RSSThis explanation for the higher cognitive abilities of White and East Asian people never seemed to be logical to me. I do agree that living in the cold, harsh climate of the north would cause some increase in cognitive ability...but the cognitive ability of current White and East Asian people are far beyond what is necessary to survive in harsh climates. The discovery of our solar system and the tools to study it...the discovery of the universe...the advancements in all science and discoveries go so far beyond learning to survive in cold harsh climates...that to me, it is a totally inadequate explanation.Replies: @Dimitrie, @kicktheroos, @Dule, @Sarah, @Anon, @James Scott, @Jerry Hubbard
In the North, something else happened: humans first experienced winter. That is, cold weather, ice, and snow. As black Africans, we had no evolutionary experience with such things; but now, these intrepid northerners needed to adapt: to stay warm, to cook and preserve food, and to build suitable shelters. The intellectual and cognitive burden increased, and undoubtedly this new evolutionary pressure pushed us to think more, to think in more sophisticated ways, and thus to have more-evolved brain functions. It also increased the need to cooperate, to trust one’s neighbors, and to create reliable and durable social networks. In short, the northerners became more sociable, and they became smarter.[1]
If adapting to survive in climates that feature harsh winters was sufficient to make Nordics exceptionally intelligent and able people, what went wrong when Eskimos were exposed to the same stimulus?
I have to admit, you have a point. I recently joined a local gym that is frequented by college students after the one I used to attend closed. Every time I go in there, I am stunned anew by the fact that many of them cannot go five minutes without gazing into their phones. The sequence of their workouts is 1) do a set of exercise, 2) scroll through God knows what on the phone 3) do another set, scroll again, etc. And, they’re not even slightly embarrassed to tie up a piece of equipment for an indefinite period of time because the majority of their sojourn on it is spent using the phone.
Well, she does share a bed with Cass Sunstein. They probably have to keep her away from knives to prevent her from slicing off her own skin and burning it.
Just about everything in this post was covered in Final Judgment, by Michael Collins Piper. Kennedy was forced to accept Johnson as his running mate in exchange for Jewish support to win the election. He also had to promise to do their bidding after the election was over. Johnson was their backup plan – if Kennedy didn’t follow through with the expected support of all things Zionist, he would be assassinated, and their lapdog would move into his vacated office. The assassination was a joint operation of the mob (led by Lansky), the CIA (especially Angleton) and the Mossad.
Massive shipments of arms to Israel started within two weeks of Johnson’s assumption of office, and the Israeli acquisition of Lebensraum started in 1967. The Israelis acquired a portfolio of nuclear weapons without a word of protest from the US.
Johnson was so deep in their pockets that he recalled fighters that were launched to aid US servicemen when the USS Liberty was under attack by the Israelis during the Six Day War. Think about that – he opted to let US servicemen die rather than “embarrass our friends” (his words).
The details are abundant in Piper’s book.
The religion is a manifestation of the race, so, same difference. The atheists behave just as the followers of the Talmud do.
PJB? Please expand the acronym for me. Thanks.
I recognize that my point-of-view may be unpopular, but I find the whole racial IQ debate to be a bit of a red herring. What I care about is being around people who contribute to the construction and enhancement of the kind of society I want to live in. If you have an IQ of 130, but have a corrosive effect by your actions, I want nothing to do with you. If you have an IQ of 90, and are rock solid as a human being, we’re good.
When I see Blacks of any IQ level build a society from scratch that I want to emigrate to, I’ll be impressed.
In my experience, the “strong atavistic tribal instinct to force out the aliens amongst them as they intuit that aliens are a threat to their survival” you refer to is nonsense.
Blacks would be more than happy to have the aliens (Whites) around them indefinitely, so long as the Blacks are able to prey on them. It is the aliens who seek separation to avoid the predation.
For as long as I’ve been alive, Blacks have constantly moved away from their own kind and into areas that are predominantly populated by aliens in hope of living better lives. It is true that once they achieve critical mass in their new locale, they reproduce the conditions (principally, and abundance of predatory behavior and a lack of any activity requiring ability to work in the present to benefit in the future) they recently escaped.
The author is a man of some talent when it comes to writing prose, obviously.
However, it is really hard to take his extended narrative describing the British as only too happy to mind their own business in the years prior to the onset of WWI and again prior to WWII. He claims that Britons of all classes were motivated to take up arms against a menacing Germany out of a very British sense of fair play and decency that German action had violated.
If one has read “Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War” and/or “Hitler’s Revolution” to name just two, it is obvious that the British nation was maneuvered into war very deliberately by a relatively small, elite clique that was in control of most media and most political offices regardless of which party was in power (not altogether unlike “the swamp” in the US today). Bloody conflict was actively and assiduously sought by this clique for decades, and the common British folk had little to no say in the process.
Further, he seems completely oblivious to the fact that military operations executed to create and sustain the British for centuries prior to the outbreak of WWI and WWI were far less excusable from the perspective of Christian morality than anything the German establishment had done.
Kurt, I liked ya better when you stuck to commanding your KoenigsTiger.
I would argue that the great migration which resulted in the eventual destruction of the northern cities occurred not only around the time of WWI, but even more so around WWII. Both events resulted in the mobilization of huge numbers of (mostly white) men. This resulted in a tremendous draw of labor into the jobs they vacated. Rosie the Riveter took some, but a lot were filled by Blacks drawn from the South. So, although we are constantly told that the US was the victor in those conflicts, a process was set in motion that has reduced many of our metropolitan areas to third-world status.
Now, think of which group within the US was all-in for our participation in both conflicts.
It is very telling that, to a person, every mainstream conservative broadcaster and “thought leader” professes unstinting fealty to all things Jewish/Zionist/Israeli. In Prager’s case, at least it comes naturally. How the gentile bootlickers engaged in the same obsequious brown-nosing can live with themselves, I have no idea.
That “extension of their owner’s personalities” line does not bear scrutiny. I have two large dogs – one is a Cane Corso I rescued, the other is a mutt. They are as different as night and day, even though I treat them equally in all respects. The Corso was abused before I adopted him, and he is a great dog, but he bears the scars of poor socialization. He’s fine as long as I remain mindful that he will never be friendly to other people and handle him accordingly. The mutt is very high energy with a cartoonishly strong prey drive, but he would not bite a human if his life depended on it.