RSSWhy not add the ending 50% citizenship (dual citizenship) to birthright citizenship and E-verify?
In the early 1980s my wife and I were taking an afternoon stroll on a clear and cloudless day on a public footpath outside of Stuttgart, Germany when a silver colored, cigar shaped object flew into our line of sight and hovered long enough for us to discuss what it might be. Since the object was in the proximity of the Stuttgart Airport landing pattern we assumed it was some experimental aircraft. It had no markings or windows or wings. Suddenly it accelerated toward the heavens until it vanished as a dot in the sky. It made no noise and there was no vapor trail. We checked the local news upon returning home and there was no mention of it. So much for being picked up by radar.
Naturally, like pilots with similar sightings, we did not rush to dine out on the experience and shared the story with very few over the years.
Your guess is as good as mine as to what it was, what it was up to, and why. What it definitely was not was a jointly shared hallucination.
Thanks for a very informative article! I am generally positive with regard to China, but I do see one major deficiency which is not generally mentioned. Maybe it is not mentioned because it is assumed to be obvious but I think it is important to mention and that it colors many things about China. That thing is that China has a one party government. This means that information and facts coming from the Chinese are likely to be unreliable. More importantly, China is actually held back, in economics and development and education, by a one party rule. That president Xi wants a legacy as important as Mao’s legacy is a bad sign because a one party system will allow him much lee way for his approach. A leader wanting a big legacy is CORRUPTION, not of money, but of spirit. I hope that the Chinese government will see that any leader building a legacy is a major corruption issue, and will cost the people money and resources.
I posted my view of the one party system and of Xi wanting a huge legacy. Yet, I am generally positive about China. I find the loose talk of China stealing this and that technology not convincing. The official US government accusations may be even more exaggerated! Here is a short paper that explored this area,
MASS DISINFORMATION IN THE TRADE WAR LEADS TO A GUILTY WITHOUT EVIDENCE TREND by Manuel Lee
Summary: Most people in this country (the United States) believe that China “stole us blind” for decades. Is there a lot of truth to this belief or is there just a little bit of truth? This short paper researches this topic, lays out the US government accusations, and displays the facts and evidences related to the accusations…………………….
As the title of this article indicates, the subject is not limited to China, but is related to the whole world and to the direction of justice in the world. Many people who read this article will be shocked by the vast discrepancy between the actual facts and the purported facts given out by the US government.
The link to this succinct paper can be found here,
Is this a joke, or a sad example of lifelong brainwashing?
I am libertarian more than anything else. As such, I am negative on one party rule, or two party rule. But one party rule oppresses the individual the most. If one party rule worked in China, ok, but for long term stability, I believe that China needs to allow for more breathing room. I am sure that you, or anyone else, had at one time, wanted to look up a certain topic on the internet, in order to make an informed decision. In China one does not have the luxury of looking up Google Scholar, for example. A loss for Chinese researchers.
every bookstore I visited had a little altar devoted to Xi with his recent publications … hard to take such country seriously.
I feel the same, almost the same. You have to be careful. I think most Chinese are smarter than that, and just put up with with Xi’s books and picture sitting around, just to run the business smoothly without trouble from the authorities.
4) the science and technology that has prospered China has primarily been STOLEN from American/Canadian companies and universities
You are just regurgitating another American myth. Check out this link,
MASS DISINFORMATION IN THE TRADE WAR LEADS TO A GUILTY WITHOUT EVIDENCE TREND by Manuel Lee
8) Confuscism is no way equivalent to the revealed Word of God…salvations is ONLY acheived through accepting Christ as personal lord and saviour…
I respect your belief system. I have studied Eastern philosophy and , to a smaller extend, studied Western religions including Christianity. I can state with near certainty that the Bible, both the Old Testament and the New Testament, are written 99% by MEN, I repeat, by MEN. Years, decades and even centuries pass, and scribes and writers recount the tales from the sages, the rabbis, and the Apostles. Perhaps a few of the writers were inspired by God, but the vast majority were common men like you and me. The writers of the New Testament supposedly never ever met the Apostles. The early Church Fathers held councils to determine the official creed. Needless to say, the Church placed themselves as the connection to God, and the average person will then need the Church for salvation. In reality, the Church promoted themselves to this position, knowing that the scribes were common men, like themselves. Those people who do not contribute money to the Church or who don’t submit to the power of the Church were punished severely.
On the other hand Eastern Philosophy is more or less based on observations on nature, on observations on human nature, and on philosophy. It is more evidence based and more humanistic and more tolerant. In general, a better recipe for life than Western Religions. Eastern Philosophy does not define God, that God is impossible to define, but still allow one to live in the world respecting all living things. In the Western Religion God is some great all knowing being in the sky that must be obeyed by following the rules of the Church. You may buy that but I prefer a more philosophical approach to life.
Libertarian is the facade of the ‘god-fearing’ morally defunct evil ‘Puritan’ cult
You are projecting what I said! I said that I come closer to libertarian than other beliefs. I am far from a cultist. Read my reply to Col Dolma on religion. I mostly subscribe to Eastern Philosophy. Does that sound like I am some cultist??? FYI, I am libertarian in that I don’t like government control over people’s lives.
Chinese can access Western information
I don’t believe that people in China can just access Facebook, Google, etc on demand. They normally have to use a VPN and they can get in trouble for doing that!
unlike the West which blocks their people’s view about China and the rest of the world with thick-weaved anti-China propaganda and national security fake news
But that is not the point!!!!! People in the West, such as Ron Unz, have to wade through lots of propaganda to get at the truth. Yes, it takes effort, but I still like that better than in China where most Western websites are off limits.
I have been to China and the West/USA many times.I would say it is far easier for Chinese to get a VPN and access western sites. Than it is for a Westerner to penetrate the endless smoke screens to get a fair view of China.The proof of the pudding is in the eating.There is no point taking anyone's word for it. I could be a "CCP Shlll" for all you know.So I urge you to go to visit China to experience if for yourself. Have a chat with a few folks over a beer, and see if they know more about the West than the average Westerner knows about China.
People in the West, such as Ron Unz, have to wade through lots of propaganda to get at the truth. Yes, it takes effort, but I still like that better than in China where most Western websites are off limits.
The general transfer of technology from the West to China is not a myth
No one is saying that. The link is saying that technology transfer was more or less transferred from American company to Chinese company willingly. The link refutes the charge that the majority of tech transfer was from theft or from hacking.
Many people dislike China for taking over the world by cheap goods. They get back at China by claiming that China stole their technology from the West and from America in particular. This link refutes these charges:
MASS DISINFORMATION IN THE TRADE WAR LEADS TO A GUILTY WITHOUT EVIDENCE TREND by Manuel Lee
Yet, I can understand people’s frustration. It is like Amazon, its operation, though legal, destroyed hundreds of thousands of brick and mortar stores across the country. But the more the US fights back unfairly, the more it hurts the US.
This link refutes your charges:
MASS DISINFORMATION IN THE TRADE WAR LEADS TO A GUILTY WITHOUT EVIDENCE TREND by Manuel Lee
That's a deeper question than you might think. The Industrial Revolution is currently a subject of discussion rather than general agreement. Nobody seems to know why it happened. See Gregory Clarke's A Farewell to Alms for a survey of the field of study. Clarke reviews several proposed enabling events and maintains that work by other economic historians has shown that the "trigger" was not the trigger. Clarke then states his own theory, which has not been disproven but is subject to wide criticism as it seems to violate US Civil Rights jurisprudence by maintaining that population mean IQ can change with time and place.However, some things can be said. First, the Industrial Revolution did not occur in "the West" in general. It occurred in the United Kingdom, and stayed there for several generations. During this time interval, England was the only place on Earth with factories in today's sense. The factory system was a major element in the UK victory over the Napoleonic Empire in that England could produce goods so cheaply that some French Army buyers bought their uniforms from England, and English trade supported England as a "force in being" that required Napoleon to maintain a huge army. Napoleon's Russian invasion was an attempt to conquer one of England's largest trading partners and drive England to bankruptcy.And nobody knows what triggered factory system development in England. There are many explanations, all disproved or disputed.However, in some cases the industrial revolution was impossible. Consider the archaic Inuit of Arctic Canada, who went extinct because their gene pool got too small. Or consider the Polynesians, who lived on small islands. Neither had any chance of an industrial revolution, and the physical reasons for that are obvious. So in some cases, physical reasons can preclude industrialization. Since nobody understands why the Industrial Revolution occurred, it is difficult to set a lower limit on factors that would preclude industrialization. Such factors may not even be physical.OK, so it's a difficult problem, and industrialization looks to me like an emergent (and possibly ephemeral) resultant of a self organizing system. That means it might vanish tomorrow ( See: https://www.zerohedge.com/political/climate-jeezus-taketh-away ). People in general don't even understand the abelian sand pile, which is about as simple as self organizing systems get, and certainly don't understand what is needed to keep industrialization going. Industrialization might be as fragile as the development of an egg into a chicken, and as subject to old age as a 5 year old chicken. Nobody knows. That said, here are a several possible reasons why China might have skipped industrialization:1. Physical cause: Unavailability of power sources during Grand Canal era: Western Europe had long used water power and wind power (see The Medieval Machine). The Industrial Revolution occurred after the invention and application of the atmospheric steam engine and its later refinements. The Grand Canal was of necessity through the Yellow River's alluvial plain, center of Chinese population. The level topography of the alluvial plain made water power impractical. Apparently windmills were not widely used, but I know little about that. Animal and human power was economically dominant. The Chinese pattern of intensive cultivation on small plots ensured that human power would be in oversupply and thus cheaper than complex and expensive machines. Without a long history of substituting mechanical power for human labor, the foundation of industrialization was lacking.
Can your observations be extrapolated to explain why unlike Europe, China did not have an Industrial Revolution?
Can your observations be extrapolated to explain why unlike Europe, China did not have an Industrial Revolution?
Liked your explanation to Littlereddot. However, here is a more general view. I have studied Eastern Philosophy as well as Western Religions. I admire Eastern Philosophy but I found that Western religion is more or less a dishonest way to hook people on reliance on the Church. The vast number of the writers of the Bible (both The OT, and The NT) were simply MEN. Maybe a few were inspired by God, but not the vast majority. The early Church leaders were also MEN, like you and me. . Needless to say, the Church placed themselves as the connection to God, and the average person will then need the Church for salvation. That’s how the Church got so powerful. People feared Eternal Damnation if they dared to question the Church.
On the other hand Eastern Philosophy is more or less base on observations on nature, observations on human nature, and on philosophy. It is more evidence based and more humanistic and more tolerant. In general, a better recipe for life than Western Religions. Eastern Philosophy does not define God, that God is impossible to define, but still allow one to live in the world respecting all living things.
The general principle is that a system based on lies and deception will eventual fail, even if it takes a thousand years, it will fail. Eastern Philosophy is not based on lies and will survive the centuries. Seemingly China and India abandon their heritage for Western materialism, but only temporary and they will get back on track!
So, Greece was the bridge to spread ancient Egyptian wisdom to Rome, and the Arabs were the bridge to spread Greek, Middle Eastern, and Far Eastern wisdom to Europe. In a similar way, the West is the bridge to bring modern technology to the East, especially China. Many Westerners resent the transfer of technology to China. But due to the dishonest religions of the West and the more sincere ideas of Eastern Philosophy, the transfer of knowledge was already written in the stars.
You touch on extremely important points. If I may, I would like to add a layer to your distinction between East and West.To me, it is clear that we are not created equal. I am not speaking of between races. But even within a race, there are some able to understand more than others. There are some who are able to understand at a higher level of abstraction and moral principle, and there others that can understand only on a transactional level.I know I will oversimplify, but for ease of discussion, I would like to distinguish the two broad levels as a Higher Spirtuality and Base Organised Religion.Westerners are no doubt familiar with the distinction between the two levels, as it is expressed in a Christian context:Higher Sprituality examples:
I admire Eastern Philosophy but I found that Western religion is more or less a dishonest way to hook people on reliance on the Church.
The Abrahamic religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, are prima facie preposterous hoaxes that can’t be taken seriously for even a minute by a rational person.
Could not agree more! Here is my take on the debate on why science and technology developed in the West:
Here is a more general view. The societies of the Middle East, India, and the Far East have generally been more urbanized than Europe from the remote past to around 1500. These urban dwellers fight and back stab each other for millennia and caused a lot of karma. The Europeans had somewhat less karma, and armed with knowledge brought by the Arabs, were able to advance through developments in science and technology.
I have studied Eastern Philosophy as well as Western Religions. I admire Eastern Philosophy but I found that Western religion is more or less a dishonest way to hook people on reliance on the Church. The vast number of the writers of the Bible (both The OT, and The NT) were simply MEN. Maybe a few were inspired by God, but not the vast majority. The early Church fathers were also MEN, like you and me. . Needless to say, the Church placed themselves as the connection to God, and the average person will then need the Church for salvation. That’s how the Church got so powerful. People feared Eternal Damnation if they dared to question the Church.
On the other hand Eastern Philosophy is more or less base on observations on nature, observations on human nature, and on philosophy. It is more evidence based and more humanistic and more tolerant. In general, a better recipe for life than Western Religions. Eastern Philosophy does not define God, that God is impossible to define, but still allow one to live in the world respecting all living things.
The general principle is that a system based on lies and deception will eventual fail, even if it takes a thousand years, it will fail. Eastern Philosophy is not based on lies and will survive the centuries. Seemingly China and India abandon their heritage for Western materialism, but only temporary and they will get back on track!
So, Greece was the bridge to spread ancient Egyptian wisdom to Rome, and the Arabs were the bridge to spread Greek, Middle Eastern, and Far Eastern wisdom to Europe. In a similar way, the West is the bridge to bring modern technology to the East, especially China. Many Westerners resent the transfer of technology to China. But due to the dishonest religions of the West and the more sincere ideas of Eastern Philosophy, the transfer of knowledge was already written in the stars.
You know very well that it is blocked but then say the opposite because you can use tricks to get around the block. Try being honest!
Google Scholar is a great resource for academic research, but it is blocked in China by the Great Firewall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eS_ffyaWRE
Our government has its reasons for labeling certain websites as illegal. The websites of those cults, those that spread anti-China and hate.
Is Goggle Scholar blocked because it spreads anti-China hate?????
When you mentioned cults, you probably mean FLG. Yes, I know the history. The FLG was a qi gong, meditation, and exercise group, and a patriotic group back in 1990!!!!! It got TOO BIG AND THE CPC FEARED IT. That was it. It was not spreading anti-China hate in any way. So can you explain? Of course, since China banned the FLG, it has become an enemy and is spreading anti-China propaganda. All China’s fault, totally. Agreed?
To get a better feel of what FLG is, one needs to actually meet their members.I have met them before. They have a small office in my city. I pass by it every time I go into the center of town.They are SUPER INTENSE, and there is something really off about them. Let me just say that I would not let my daughter date one them.I have friends who are devout Buddhists. Some do group meditations and I have participated in such from time to time. These are normal folks.FLG are a different kettle of fish altogether. Beware of them.Replies: @jaybird
When you mentioned cults, you probably mean FLG. Yes, I know the history. The FLG was a qi gong, meditation, and exercise group, and a patriotic group back in 1990!!!!!
You touch on extremely important points. If I may, I would like to add a layer to your distinction between East and West.To me, it is clear that we are not created equal. I am not speaking of between races. But even within a race, there are some able to understand more than others. There are some who are able to understand at a higher level of abstraction and moral principle, and there others that can understand only on a transactional level.I know I will oversimplify, but for ease of discussion, I would like to distinguish the two broad levels as a Higher Spirtuality and Base Organised Religion.Westerners are no doubt familiar with the distinction between the two levels, as it is expressed in a Christian context:Higher Sprituality examples:
I admire Eastern Philosophy but I found that Western religion is more or less a dishonest way to hook people on reliance on the Church.
Thanks for the interesting video on Taoist magic. There is huge gulf between Eastern Philosophy and Western religion. It is the difference between civilization survival and civilization suicide! Western religion, is not based on sincerity but based on materialism. One goes to church, gives out money, and the church will give the one salvation. The early church fathers designed this system of giving out “salvation” in exchange for money and power, a totally corrupt system.
Confucianism and Buddhism are quite genuine, but Taoism is materialistic (praying, paying or working for some material benefit). Yet, Taoism is voluntary and is not forced on people. On the other hand, Christianity (and Islam and Judaism) is forced on the whole society and a person is punished for disobeying the church.
I am describing philosophy and religion as different points on a linear continuum. The more thoughtful and evolved folks gravitating towards philosophy, and the less thoughtful folks towards religion.IMHO, as an intellectually leaning Westerner, you have naturally come into contact with the high philosophy of the East. But if you lived here, you would have also experienced the superstitious mumbo jumbo too.So the difference between the East and West that you have observed, appears that way because you are comparing the high philosophy of the East with the low end of Western Religion-Philosophy continuum.The Western Religio Philosophical traditions also have their admirable aspects, many of which tie in with Eastern traditionsFor example the Golden Rule:
There is huge gulf between Eastern Philosophy and Western religion
Oh, they have their own base levels of nonsense. Not everyone who follows these traditions are able to understand/practise them at the higher levels.For example:
Confucianism and Buddhism
Bullshit. FLG was recruited by the CIA long ago, and its guru lives in luxury in New York City.
When did the CIA recruit FLG????? That was years AFTER China banned the sect! No one knows the exact date of recruitment, but when the guru moved to a big mansion, it was presumed that he was funded by the CIA.
So you will not touch on my original premise that it was all China’s fault and China’s paranoia that started the bad blood with the FLG. The FLG was one of many qi gong sects in China, but it was the biggest, close to the size of the Communist Party. That was its sin, for being too big. China could have handled the issue much better but it used paranoid methods.
Yes.
Google Scholar is a great resource for academic research, but it is blocked in China by the Great Firewall.
One goes to church, gives out money, and the church will give the one salvation.
Once upon a time, long, long time ago, that was the case. Christianity was a stabilizing organization in an unrewarding and dangerous world, but a sort of world where Christians believed that every person's faith and ethical treatment of all people was tested. If the faith passed the test, the person would be saved for an immortal life. Once the Roman Imperial government made Christianity as legal, it became a sort of buffer between the Empire's population and the Imperial government. When Europe fell to the barbarians during the troubles of the second Century (the AD 300s), the Christian Church was able to establish itself as a buffer between the conquering barbarian warriors (who found their previous tribal laws not applicable to their new status as military nobles) and the former Imperial population. The Christian church in Europe and the Byzantine Empire was society, in the sense that the formal rulers could not rule without Church support. The Christian Church was, of course, usually avoided obstructing the government of any particular area, as this would usually have meant conquest by the area's neighbors. Departure from Christianity during this time interval was a threat to physical survival of the base population, which relied on the noble/peasant intermediary function of the Church. The above system gradually failed during the 1500s (after the Western breakout from Europe). The Church became so much more political that the Pope in the Papal States acted as though he were just another ruler in Italy, different only in that he could raise revenue by looting Church funds. "When the coin in the coffer rings, a soul from Purgatory springs!" is the slogan of this change. By 1700, the Church had lost its formerly essential role as intermediary. It still existed, but much of its personnel was now appointed by the government of the newly powerful kings. By AD 1800 France had repudiated the Catholic Church and was forcing a similar repudiation on all Europe (Napoleonic Wars). This brings us to the US. Pre-1800, church meant either a Protestant denomination of the Episcopalian Church, related to state church of England. Church communities were very influential politically, sort of a very early political machine. Immigrants typically imported their own churches, and Catholic and Orthodox church membership became more frequent in the cities. By the time of the New Deal, the churches had in effect been replaced by the urban political machines, which "spiritualized" churches by removing their political influence. By Eisenhower's time, the churches were starting to dissolve, justified in part by church opposition to Southern "desegregation". Churches were registered as tax exempt organizations rather than as churches, and public threats were made by government that any political statements in a church would revoke the church's tax free status. This was lawfare, and marked the start of "churchianity", within which churches became a combination social club and political indoctrination center. So- your assertion that the Christian churches are compulsory is about eight Centuries out of date. It is a rerun of the "Do you want a theocracy or good Democratic rule?" propaganda. Note that the exile of churches from politics has not produced freedom. It has, instead, introduced all-of-society censorship, the COVID violations of freedom to assemble for presentation of grievances, and the indifference to base population's welfare. The indifference includes homeless, the Black welfare slums in which marriage is effectively forbidden, and the recent widespread incineration of Los Angeles. Do you really think that is an improvement?Christian churches may reappear in a sort of covert and non-declared form over the next several decades, but if they do they will not, being covert, have the sort of enforcement capability that you impute to them today. A ruling class that attempts to control everything will in practice control nothing. Consequently some organization will appear that provides the framework which makes division of labor and mediation of conflict possible.Replies: @jaybird
On the other hand, Christianity (and Islam and Judaism) is forced on the whole society and a person is punished for disobeying the church.
Once upon a time, long, long time ago, that was the case. Christianity was a stabilizing organization in an unrewarding and dangerous world
Good history lesson, but my point is much deeper!!! Comparing Eastern Philosophy to Western religion is comparing a sincere idea to some human creation. Eastern Philosophy says that God cannot be known with our common senses. God cannot be even named (thus Lao Tzu’s saying, “The Tao that can be named is not the Tao”). Yet, in a very materialist fashion, the Church Fathers say, “give your donations, and you will be saved”. God is named “God”, Jesus is names “Jesus” and the system is a business transaction of money in exchange for opening the gate to a named heaven. In the long run, any faked system will fail. The Church Fathers are MEN but they made themselves out to be the right hand of God.
a. littlereddot's comments about high and low Taoism imply that the low form of Taoism does much the same. Legalism and Confucianism, of course, aren't concerned with the supernatural in any form, and make no assertions concerning "life after death".
Yet, in a very materialist fashion, the Church Fathers say, “give your donations, and you will be saved”.
The Church Fathers are MEN but they made themselves out to be the right hand of God.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Fathers
The Church Fathers, Early Church Fathers, Christian Fathers, or Fathers of the Church were ancient and influential Christian theologians and writers who established the intellectual and doctrinal foundations of Christianity.
We use the campus network is able to log in to most academic related external network.
Ok you now admit that you use a special network to get around the government block, just as I thought. But why do you mock people who are just telling the truth, that Google Scholar is blocked in China??? Is this part of your public education, or is it part of our family training???
But the far, far, far more important topic relates to the FLG. The Chinese government attack on the FLG represents the China equivalent of WMD (Weapons of Mass Destruction) of the USA. The USA was exposed for its hypocrisy and lies with regard to WMDs. Similarly, China is exposed for its authoritarian nature by its ruthless persecution of the FLG.
I will state that I have no connection to the FLG and find its anti-China propaganda distasteful and probably funded by the CIA. That said, the FLG was a peaceful qi gong sect in China. It got very popular and soon its membership reached numbers like that of the Communist party. The government noticed its popularity and fearful of such a large organization. President Jiang Zemin ordered a sudden crack down in July 1999 in which tens of thousands of FLG leaders were arrested. The charges were ridiculous, including that it is an unregistered organization, that it is a superstition, that it is disturbing peace, that it is illegal and must be smashed, etc.
Millions of people resisted because either they were qi gong practitioners or FLG practitioners. Because of these resisters, China mobilized the whole country to arrest and persecute a peaceful qi gong sect!!! There are few instances in history that the resources of a huge country were directed at suppressing a peaceful sect that has never been political!!! The hapless citizens and police of China want no part in persecuting a peaceful sect, but because of the nature of the system, had to do the dirty job!!! China’s system need reform desperately!!! Perhaps Ron Unz can look into this aspect of China which shows that China is not all roses.
For the extreme China supporters, this topic is China’s equivalent of WMDs for the USA. Can you keep up pretenses with a straight face? Do you not agree that China needs reform desperately???
Qi Gong is just one of the rituals like many rituals the ‘god-fearing’ morally defunct evil ‘Puritan’ cult practised in churches, schools etc. to brainwash and indoctrinate people into sheeple and zombies to be enslaved and abused.
Before the persecution of the FLG, qi gong was viewed favorably in China because the qi gong energy does work and supplement the national health care system. After the persecution, China had to say some qi gong is superstition in order to maintain a bit of face.
FLG is minuscule compared to Christians and Muslims in China.
The number of FLG practitioners was around 90 million, about the same number as the Communist Party. After persecution, the numbers, of course, dwindled enormously.
FLG was banned because of its Mafia-style organized criminal activities, harvesting organs from its followers and violence on the street getting out of hand
RIDICULOUS!!!!!! FLG is/was a peaceful qi gong sect.
The USA sends anyone suspected of national security threats to Guantanamo Bay to be investigated via torture without proof,
True, and China does the same to FLG practitioners. Face it, China showed its dirty face and needs drastic reform to curb the blood thirst of its government!!!
It does not matter when the CIA recruited Li, but he’s a traitor
Ridiculous! You are inverting the whole situation! China channeled all its vast resources to persecute a peaceful qi gong sect!!! Once it made that fateful decision, there is no going back for either side. In China FLG dies, in the US China dies. ALL CHINA’S fault, due to its extreme paranoia and a system that cannot temper the paranoia and jealousy of its leader.
To get a better feel of what FLG is, one needs to actually meet their members.I have met them before. They have a small office in my city. I pass by it every time I go into the center of town.They are SUPER INTENSE, and there is something really off about them. Let me just say that I would not let my daughter date one them.I have friends who are devout Buddhists. Some do group meditations and I have participated in such from time to time. These are normal folks.FLG are a different kettle of fish altogether. Beware of them.Replies: @jaybird
When you mentioned cults, you probably mean FLG. Yes, I know the history. The FLG was a qi gong, meditation, and exercise group, and a patriotic group back in 1990!!!!!
I have friends who are devout Buddhists. Some do group meditations and I have participated in such from time to time. These are normal folks.
FLG are a different kettle of fish altogether. Beware of them.
Fine, don’t get near them. If a group has weir people, that is no reason to persecute them, including the supposedly organ harvesting. The FLG saga totally exposed China as a backward country and a with backward political system.
You are obviously a decent, sensible guy.I hope that statement doesn't mean that you take the FLG's word for it? Don't you want to test it out for yourself, to your own satisfaction?It seems to me that you are confronted with 2 versions of reality that are incompatible with each other.1. China is backward country with a backward political system, people are repressed.
The FLG saga totally exposed China as a backward country and a with backward political system.
I am describing philosophy and religion as different points on a linear continuum. The more thoughtful and evolved folks gravitating towards philosophy, and the less thoughtful folks towards religion.IMHO, as an intellectually leaning Westerner, you have naturally come into contact with the high philosophy of the East. But if you lived here, you would have also experienced the superstitious mumbo jumbo too.So the difference between the East and West that you have observed, appears that way because you are comparing the high philosophy of the East with the low end of Western Religion-Philosophy continuum.The Western Religio Philosophical traditions also have their admirable aspects, many of which tie in with Eastern traditionsFor example the Golden Rule:
There is huge gulf between Eastern Philosophy and Western religion
Oh, they have their own base levels of nonsense. Not everyone who follows these traditions are able to understand/practise them at the higher levels.For example:
Confucianism and Buddhism
So the difference between the East and West that you have observed, appears that way because you are comparing the high philosophy of the East with the low end of Western Religion-Philosophy continuum.
I agree somewhat. A bit of Eastern Philosophy permeates the whole society in Asia, which is good. In the West, Christianity and Judaism permeate the whole society. The latter 2 are like business transactions where I go to church, donate, and I get the possibility of entering heaven. In the West it is more like a business than in the East.
Maybe what I am saying is that Eastern Philosophy is really trying to get into the basic questions of life. In the West, even in high level philosophy, it is some striving to understand “God”. Just that question of understanding “God” is already wrong. Lao Tzu said, “The Tao that can be named is not the Tao”. So the Western philosophers ask the wrong questions, can’t get answers, and defers to the mass low level religion. In this way, the East even with fluff and nonsense, is better able to handle life than in the West.
I was brought up as a Christian, but like you, I sensed something was amiss. Like you, the religion seemed so transactional. Even when I approached church pastors, they would just brush aside my questions with irritation.It wasn't till many decades later that I discovered that Christianity had its own set of high spirituality. And no, I am not referring to Catholic mystics like St Theresa of Avila or St John of the Cross. I am referring to a much earlier time, a time during and just after the life of Jesus.This was a time when there were many beliefs circulating that would seem strange to us today. There were many competing schools of thought. Sadly they were banned as heretical and their beliefs purged from "Christianity".I am not sure if you are familiar with the conditions that led to the Councils of Nicaea in the 300s AD, and how the gathered bishops formulated the "accepted Christianity" of today? At this council some books/gospels were deemed heretical and banned, others were accepted into the Canon(s) and still used today. The basic question that the bishops had to decide was:Was Jesus THE Son of God, (ie. Jesus was special)
In the West, even in high level philosophy, it is some striving to understand “God”.
You are obviously a decent, sensible guy.I hope that statement doesn't mean that you take the FLG's word for it? Don't you want to test it out for yourself, to your own satisfaction?It seems to me that you are confronted with 2 versions of reality that are incompatible with each other.1. China is backward country with a backward political system, people are repressed.
The FLG saga totally exposed China as a backward country and a with backward political system.
1. China is backward country with a backward political system, people are repressed.
OR
2. China ain’t so bad. The people are happy, and 90% support their government.The real question to me, is how are you going to find out which one is true?
But your answer is in the question. The system is backward and repressive, but when things are going ok, the people are happy. You have to understand that the average person is concerned with his savings account and getting 3 meals a day. He will not lose his savings or go hungry to protest government repression on FLG or government hypocrisy on free speech. People will only protest when their land is taken away to give to developers. Basically people are not high minded.
China is backward in that free speech is guaranteed in its Constitution but you cannot criticize the government without getting locked up. China is backwards in that Jiang Zemin can simply order the FLG sect be destroyed and it was done. Imagine in the USA, if the president orders that the Mormon sect be destroyed, he will be impeached out of office. This is an elementary observation, yet people think that China is so advanced. This inability to follow the Constitution colors everything and allows the Chinese government to do what it wants. Any system that has unchecked powers will make big mistakes, sooner or later. When President Xi ordered that everyone be locked up during Covid, it was a big mistake. The order cost the economy dearly and closed millions of businesses. Yet, the complains of the people were not heard. When people are herded into confinement in big centers with strangers, they feel isolated and their immune system goes south! It was much better for people to isolate in their own rooms, despite the possibility of contaminating other member of the family. Yet, the system in China will not allow the voice of the people be heard. The simple demand of following its Constitution will do wonders for China, or any other repressive government.
I was brought up as a Christian, but like you, I sensed something was amiss. Like you, the religion seemed so transactional. Even when I approached church pastors, they would just brush aside my questions with irritation.It wasn't till many decades later that I discovered that Christianity had its own set of high spirituality. And no, I am not referring to Catholic mystics like St Theresa of Avila or St John of the Cross. I am referring to a much earlier time, a time during and just after the life of Jesus.This was a time when there were many beliefs circulating that would seem strange to us today. There were many competing schools of thought. Sadly they were banned as heretical and their beliefs purged from "Christianity".I am not sure if you are familiar with the conditions that led to the Councils of Nicaea in the 300s AD, and how the gathered bishops formulated the "accepted Christianity" of today? At this council some books/gospels were deemed heretical and banned, others were accepted into the Canon(s) and still used today. The basic question that the bishops had to decide was:Was Jesus THE Son of God, (ie. Jesus was special)
In the West, even in high level philosophy, it is some striving to understand “God”.
The basic question that the bishops had to decide was:
Was Jesus THE Son of God, (ie. Jesus was special)
OR
Was Jesus A son of God. (ie. Jesus was just like the rest of us)
Yes, the early Church Fathers were genuinely concerned with this important theological question. It turned out that they decided that Jesus is THE Son of God. We should also understand that the bishops were philosophers, and that the question already included that God is the all knowing and all powerful Creator of the Universe. So if Jesus is THE Son of God how is Jesus related to the finite world and why did He lived a life with aging and death?
Buddha, Lao Tzu, zen, all say that everything is ultimately connected. But this connection cannot be seen or describe in language. To believe a God such as the early Church Fathers believed is to make certain assumptions that are not philosophical, for example, to assume an infinite God in a finite world. Not being philosophers, the early Church Fathers have to make the best decision for the benefit of the Church! Once the decision was made that Jesus is THE Son of God, it made Christianity a particularly special religion and eventually so popular that the whole Western world was conquered. Knowing this history and the philosophical implications will help people understand the deep issues involved aside from the more popular question,”if I accept Christ will I be saved?”
Why bother to speculate, when you could just visit China and see the answer for yourself?
I have been to China several times. But I did not spent time with students talking about freedom. It was more visiting culture spots and scenic areas. However, I also know students from China here in the US. They say that the general public cannot access, for example, Google, Facebook or Youtube. Yes, you can go around them if you have the technical skill to use a VPN. However, if you persist in looking in using VPN, you WILL GET A WARNING ON YOUR PHONE! If you persist in looking up forbidden topic (which they don’t dare do), you may get into trouble.
This is nothing very unusual. Websites deemed undersirable in many countries in Asia will be blocked. When that happens you will get a notice on your phone saying that said website is blocked.In countries where the censorship is crude, governments block undesirable websites. Citizens know they don't have full access to information so deliberate find ways to seek it out.In countries where the censorship is savvy, governments use other tricks like shadow banning. That way citizens think they are having "freedom of information"...but they are far from it. This latest Tictok Refugee - Red Note phenomenon is proof of it.I would say that the latter form of censorship is FAR more effective than the former.
you WILL GET A WARNING ON YOUR PHONE!
On the State Department disinfo payroll, are you, racist? Public opinion is extensively tracked in China by the Government and by local and foreign polling groups, and ALL record very high satisfaction with life in China.
I am not anti-China, but get all these paranoia responses. They track public opinion, and will try to accomodate. But when it is really important, then people have no say. For example, they can be locked up in detention centers for Covid when they just want to isolate in their own rooms. They have no say. People used to hold up blank sheets of paper to protest, but they are afraid to even do that now! If only the government allow people to freely express themselves then China will beat the US hands down.
And was produced by the same cultists I saw on the street when I went to university. I’m not sure if they have received any NED money but they are effectively an anti-China propaganda outlet and I could easily see US intelligence working with them.
The FLG in the US runs the Epoch Times and they seem to have a lot of funds for a free newspaper. So I don’t doubt that they get funding from US covert sources.
Yet, IT IS STILL CHINA’S FAULT FOR ATTACKING A SECT (OR CULT) THAT WAS A PEACEFUL QIGONG SECT!!! Some people suspect that Jiang Zemin was jealous of Li Hongzhi, who was getting more and more popular in China. Li traveled throughout China and gave lectures, often to thousands of attendees. A country that allows some old dude’s jealousy ruin a country’s good name has a need for serious reform !!! Yes, you all say that FLG is a cult. But it is a cult only because Jiang Zemin say so. Let us say it is a cult. SO WHAT???????????????????? Are you saying that I cannot join a cult?????? Two thousand years ago Christianity was also called a cult. Now, it is the world’s biggest religion. People’s responses to the FLG ban show that many people in China really DON’T BELIEVE IN FREEDOM OF SPEECH!
Why don’t you ever reply to my posting but always spew out insults??? There is zero racism in my post, racism exists only in your paranoia.
So why did China allow Li Hongzhi to lecture all over China and become very popular, if FLG was really an evil cult?????????????? FLG became very popular and grew large. Jiang Zemin got jealous of Li Hongzhi and was also concerned that FLG was as large as the communist party. Then Jiang wanted to destroy FLG, mostly out of jealousy. To do that he said that FLG is an evil cult and used the resources of the whole of China to destroy FLG. Jiang was a paranoid person. The system in China allowed an old jealous person to be able to destroy competition and ruin the reputation of China. A real shame. The system definitely needs reform. Note that there is no racism at all.