A true “scumbag” if ever there was one! The man is relentlessly evil! I don’t know how else to say it. And there are many more of his ilk: Abrams,Wolfowitz, Adelson, Goldstein, retc., etc., etc

Replies: @Anonymous

Well, it's not plausible when one looks at the sources, is it?

This is a very common Jewish mistake. They're not very bright but believe that the goyim are much dumber so they end up spewing transparent, almost childish, lies. In this particular case, a goy can simply look at the source and find out that the toad is a bold-faced liar.

It's hard to believe that someone like this can be considered a "legal scholar" but then again we live in the Western Clown World in which (((sub-mediocrities))) like this are calling the shots.

Luckily, this situation can't, and won't, last and this time we'll have to expel them much, much farther than usual. I'll chip in for the fuel.

https://www.businessinsider.in/photo/51744707/spacex-is-about-to-launch-a-rocket-carrying-an-expandable-habitat-into-space-heres-how-to-watch-live.jpg

Replies: @ariadna

Good analysis of Dershowitz’s methods. He relies on people not looking up sources and giving himself plausible deniability.
 

I seriously think he's refreshing in his ferocity. It's about time a male came back at these addled harpies. I don't like hiding behind Jewisshness, but much of what he says about things is correct and should be said by every man accused by people like this.

The article doesn’t take a position on these matters – it merely points out that Alan Dershowitz lied about and smeared Farmer and that he has a demonstrable history of accusing people who simply disagree with him (Jewish and non-Jewish) of anti-Semitism.
 

Replies: @Hubert, @Stochastic Determinist

1. I agree with you about quotations and showing scant regard. However, context is also important. I dealt with "journalists" during my work life, and was an interim spokesperson several times. While individual journalists contacted me before publication or broadcast to apologize for what was coming, it is the ownership that drives the bus, and the ownership literally owns the editors. My point is that what Dershowitz has done is accepted as normal, except when it runs contrary to the media narrative.

2. Deliberately misleading is lying. So is placing stories or quotes out of context. Farmer claims that Dersh "met" Epstein previously. What does "met" mean? I have "met" hundreds of people that I wouldn't recognize and had nothing to do with, post "meeting". The latter includes several politicians, and famous entertainers, who probably would not remember "meeting" me. This goes to the entire bullshit method of "ties". Am I "tied" to someone I met through a friend but have never seen again?

3. My point about Farmer is that she is telling a story that may, or may not be true. While Whitney Webb has done some excellent work, there is a whole lot of, as yet, uncorroborated statements made by a lot of people, including Farmer that she accepts as fact. There is no evidence of the author of this article scrutinizing Farmer's narrative (or Webb's) in the way he scrutinized Dersh O'Shits.

No one here, including Alden, actually "knows" anything. Statements and depositions, until proven, are nothing but accusations.

Replies: @Hubert, @Art, @anon, @Alden

I think you meant "event" rather than "effect" in you sentence. The phrase is attributed to some Israeli agents saying that "we were only there to document the event." The incident with these Israelis clearly shows that there was some level of pre-knowledge about 911. But the deductions which 911truthers make are unwarranted thus far.

Whenever this point comes up the issue of "controlled demolition" and such always hangs in the background. If one is convinced that the collapses occurred because of pre-planted demolition charges then the fact that Larry Silverstein was reported to be good buddies with Benjamin Netanyahu means the most logical scenario to consider is one where Israeli agents plant the bombs in the building. In that case it likewise makes sense to believe that these Israelis who "were there to document the event" were likewise somehow tied with implementing the operation of 911, possibly playing a role in the planting of demolition charges. But this deduction only holds under the assumption that the demolition charges themselves have been established as fact, when they have definitely not been.

If one backs away from the "controlled demolition" scenario for a moment and tries to evaluate this story of these Israeli agents "there to document the event" then the implications can potentially shift quite drastically. The obvious issue which comes up under such a scenario is "did the Israeli government under Sharon. Netanyahu et al make any serious effort to pass intelligence of this type onto the US government?" They very well may have. It's been documented that the Bush II administration ignored warning signs which it got from the FBI, CIA and a bunch of others. So maybe Bush II also ignored warnings from the Mossad? That is certainly possible. But if true this would drastically change the meaning of the "dancing Israelis" story.

It can't be ruled out that the reason these Israelis were so quickly shunted off back home was because the Bush II administration knew that it had ignored warnings from the Israeli government about 911 and bringing this to light would have been embarrassing. Most 911truthers who talk about "dancing Israelis" tend to have in mind one of 2 scenarios:

a) The Towers were blown up with demolitions and these Israelis were part of it.

b) The Towers came down because Arab hijackers flew planes into them and the Israeli government knew this was going to happen but deliberately did not pass its information on to the US government.

These 2 scenarios leave out at least a third possibility which is:

c) The Israeli government did have some meaningful information about what was going to happen and did pass that information on to Bush II, but the latter ignored all of the warnings.

I don't actually know what the true scenario is that did in fact occur, but it's obvious that most of the internet discussions about the "dancing Israelis" are strongly influenced by secondary assumptions which are not actually confirmed by evidence anywhere.

Replies: @Rufus Clyde