Hi Anatoly,

I have a question for you regarding Russia’s youth. On the one hand, they are nothing like the “woke” youth of the West and continue to think political correctness is crazy. On the other hand, I would say that a majority are tired of Putin and Putinism in general. They don’t really seem that concerned about patriotism and Russia’s place in the sun so to say. They seem more concerned about individualistic concerns, primarily with making money and having a good quality of life.

I’d say a good majority of them tend to be Yabloko sympathisers and desire to be like the West. You only ever hear about corruption from them. So my question is this. After Putin, is it very likely that Russia is going to transform into a new Western country and embrace all of the things from the West? Or is there still a conservatism there from the youth to still think about Russia and preserve it?

This is another question I wanted to ask as well but do you think in essence related to my first question that nationalism itself can be preserved in the long run? Or is the entire future likely to be individualistic with people disregarding their lands of birth and climbing into some new kind of tower of Babel?

Many thanks

Passerby,

I can see your points and it is working for Russia’s children. I know that patriotic education is quite strong there now in the schools. But what I mean is the Russian millennials. A poll recently came out that most of them would like to emigrate. Some support gay marriage and the main topics on their mind is the economy and corruption.

The smart ones seem to be aware of the West’s problems and want to find a different path for Russia. But your average IQs I think still feel the West is better then Russia and want to basically copy the West.

So it is something I think that could come to haunt Russia 20 years down the line. Although to be fairly honest I think trying to enact a Western style welfare state in Russia would be nigh on impossible, especially at this stage.

Dmitry,

That is somewhat positive to hear. Most of the major responses I was getting from Russian millennials was there desire for change and how they wanted to be like the West. So it is more heartening to know there is the possibility of a populist revival after Putin.

To be honest, the millennial generation of Russia does seem to be critical of immigration. They see the West going down the tubes and do make fun of it. But at the same time they do have this love of democracy and regularly do talk about “freedom”…

In your opinion, what is the political outlook for Russian millennials is they are not liberal?

Thanks passerby for giving me some hope for the Russian youth. I must confess it seems to be Russian Zoomers and the kids growing up now who are going to be the most patriotic which is a good thing as Russia desperately needs more patriotism if it is going to continue to succeed.

However there is going to be that continued lingering demand of dealing with corruption and providing a better quality of life for the population that is going to continue to make in roads on a political front.

The thing is about Russia is that I don’t think it could ever go full on libtard due to the nature of the country and how it has historically developed.

Also even if they did want to open the doors and flood the country with third world immigration, I doubt millions of black subsaharan Africans are going to want to settle in say Novosibirsk.

Therefore the only future Russia can realistically achieve is some future form of Putinism followed by more investments into the local economy. They need native babies to live in far off regions, they need more money to do this and they need to keep their tech geniuses from leaving. A future strong soft power cultural industry would really help the country’s economy too.

Just trying to repeat what the West has been doing never seems to work out for Russia in the long run. Like smart Russians have said to me, “we need to do this on our own terms and not on the West’s.”

You get a few blacks who really do love Russia but I am sure that you can count them on one hand. Like Dimitry said, most of them are students who usually go back home. I doubt the refugees who flood into Europe by the boat load would be quite that happy to go and live in Siberia…

Dimitry,

This is good news to hear. I was concerned by some of the reports I had been hearing of the Russian youth, particularly with the protests against the government. However it is nice to hear there is patriotism within this group and the future isn’t as libtarded as I thought it would be.

Regarding economic prospects and liberalism, I think it ultimately depends on the country. In America, major mixing and prosperity is a no brainer but in countries such as Japan or South Korea, they prefer to still marry fellow natives or at a push, marry someone of their fellow racial group.

Israel though is the best case scenario as they have been able to promote economic prosperity along with still promoting that nationalistic mindset and have still been successful in raising the birth rates.

Russia is going to have to improve its economic performance and I am sure the vast majority of people desire this very strongly. It’s just the case of being able to successfully do it with a patriotic mindset still in focus before the SJW disease starts to set in.

Now in regards to immigration, I’m not entirely sure of the situation in Russia but from my own observations of Putin, he does seem to be more concerned about keeping Russia’s more Slavic character intact compared to Western governments. He’s been making noises in that direction anyway and I don’t think, although this is just my opinion, that he desires the great replacement scenario like Western countries enthusiastically desire.

To give you an example, I remember during the days of Gordon Brown that it was revealed during Tony Blair’s time in office, the government had deliberately promoted and invited millions of third world migrants into the UK in order to, and I quote, ‘rub the rights nose in diversity.’ the government actively wanted to create a new multiracial British citizen. Social engineering to perfection, go figure.

I hope you don’t mind me asking you Dimitry but do you have any predictions for Russia? You made some good points about the country probably going more conservative as it ages but do you think it can successfully revive itself in the long run without mass immigration? And do you think that SJWism can be averted there?

I wouldn’t entirely rule out all hope for Britain as the silent majority is very furious about what is happening with the vandalisation of statues and the weak police response. I’ve seen a lot of patriotic tweets on twitter, showing people’s rage about what is happening.

However there is one caveat in all of this. the vast majority of these patriots subscribe to the civic nationalist view point. They like to drag out the odd patriotic black and fawn over how great, proud and patriotic multi-kulti Britain is.

If I am to offer an opinion, I think that the Anglo-Saxon era in Britain is over. Ethnic nationalism is pretty much dead in the UK. I think the country will eventually revive on some kind of Johnsonian patriotic civic nationalist platform but overall the diversity is there to stay. Which is a shame but what’s done is done.

When it comes to immigration in Russia, am I right in thinking it is a lot more controlled there then it is in the UK? From what I am aware, most of the Uzbeks and co usually come to make money and then leave, like one big revolving door of cheap labour. There’s no actual free welfare money for them so their not actually inclined to stay in Russia and pop out 7-10 kids from what I am aware.

Even still, it is a problem that I think will be resolved with new technological advances. Within 15-20 years, I think alot of these jobs that demands cheap labour will be automated anyway so there won’t be the demand to keep on importing people to do the work. I think Putin is sort of hinting at this as well. Big problems though for the West as when it hits them, they are going to have a useless supply of once cheap labour now with nothing to do.

Regarding Russia’s future, I think the Visegrad scenario is a very good future for the country. Do you have any thoughts to share regarding population mobility? From what I am aware, most of the Russian youth are leaving Siberia and elsewhere to go and live in Moscow and St. Petersburg. Do you think there is a chance to reverse this trend in the future? I think that could be a big challenge.

If I am to offer an opinion, I think that the Anglo-Saxon era in Britain is over. Ethnic nationalism is pretty much dead in the UK. I think the country will eventually revive on some kind of Johnsonian patriotic civic nationalist platform but overall the diversity is there to stay. Which is a shame but what’s done is done.

I find that even most “right wing” British people have no time for ethnic nationalism. I don’t think most are even particularly opposed to non-white immigration as long as the immigrants share our “values”. That basically means anyone but Muslims.

I’d say we are heading towards an American or Brazilian “melting pot” style nationalism.

Yeah I am in agreement. The UK has no time for ethnic nationalism. The society as a whole has pretty much accepted the multi-ethnic society and will fight to defend it.

If you actually look at how the UK society is now developing, it really does resemble the old Anglo-Saxon invasion. The native white Brits have become like the ancient Celts, living on the outskirts in their villages and towns where as the cities have become the hot spots of multi-kulti Britain. I always felt that it was like living on a native reservation and as soon as you left the shires, the reality sadly hit you in the face.

To be honest, though there is still some potential light on the horizon for the UK at least. I think people overall are fed up of mass immigration because of the economic impact it is having. It is simply unsustainable for the country. I think at some point the country is going to drift ever more to the right and start to restrict immigrants when there is a sufficient pressure point available (think UK and Brexit). Eventually the government will start having to cut the tap on welfare spending and will adopt probably a more anti-islamic point of view.

With this in mind, we may see sort of a voluntary repatriation, particularly amongst the muslim community. The country in effect could whiten up. I think that the UK is starting to reach its peak of being able to support a large population and more populism will start to become the order of the day there.

I can understand what you are saying and you have some interesting points. My own personal point of view is that a bit of immigration is ok and could be beneficial to society. However, on the other hand, I would not wish to see a mass stream of entirely legal immigration that ends up turning the host societies into modern day tower of Babels either as I quite enjoy the diversity of the planet and would hate to see all countries one day become one big homogeneous blob of sameness.

Also regarding ethnic identity, I do feel it is something that Europeans will have to discover and embrace for themselves at some point if they wish to survive this century. It does not have to be radical or extreme but something similar to what the Jews and the East Asian countries have. If European societies can stop being so damn individualistic and cherish what makes them unique and special, that would be a step in the right direction for these countries to actually revive themselves. Except for the Anglo countries as these lands actually have always desired foreign tastes more and that is a fact of life.

I think that you are painting this as an entirely black thing when it is not. On the contrary, most of the rioters and statue pullers have been indoctrinated white millennials. On most of the pictures I have seen, it is mainly white faces with a few black ones.

What I do like about Israeli nationalism is the concept that you are part of this tribe, this family, and you are constantly doing your best to help it and defend it no matter the cost. Perhaps this mindset would simply be too extreme for the European mind to handle but some elements of it would certainly help in reviving Europe.

I agree though that America and Europe have adopted a collectivistic zeal these days. I see no difference between what the Red Guard of China or the Taliban were doing and what is taking place right now. It is like the West’s very own cultural revolution. I think though the roots of this all boils down to how individualistic these societies were and how without meaning they had become. They needed a new religion and lo and behold, they now have one.

It is going to take decades before the present mess is going to start to get cleaned up as even the silent majority of these countries still subscribe to some thoughts of the new faith.

Yes, I too can see what your getting at and I did mention earlier some of this mindset would be considered too extreme for the European mind. However, elements of the Israeli example combined with what the Russians are doing could work out very well as a patriotic successor.

Also regarding the Israeli method, it would actually be sort of beneficial to the Russians if they did try to establish some sort of kibbutz culture and frontier patriotism as Russia has one big huge problem. Apart from Moscow and St. Petersburg, the rest of the country is dying. Siberia is rapidly losing young people as they go into the big two looking for work. I’d say that within a generation, Siberia will die. Same with some other Russian cities in the European part as well.

If Russia does want to remedy this, considering the landscape of the territory, it will have to adopt something of an Israeli mindset in order to help these areas grow again. Otherwise in the long term, Russia is probably going to lose more territory.

Sweden and Minnesota do not get as cold as Mother Russia. Black people can cope at -2c but when it gets to -10c they stay indoors. Siberia gets to -45c on average in winter time. The vast majority of blacks would not want to live in that climate.

It is like the Bible says. There is a time for war and a time for peace. The Humanists have made some positive contributions during peace time in the past just as much as the warriors who go out to fight. It all depends on the era. To be honest though, I do get the feeling the millennial generation is meant to fight but due to the advanced technology of today, there is actually no major war for them to fight in hence why they are tearing up cities. They have an anger and nothing to unleash it on.

No it is true that Russians are more concerned about the Chinese potentially taking over Siberia. Russia, if I do recall, took the Vladivostok region from China in the 19th century. The big question is though would many Chinese even want to move into Siberia? It’s not exactly the old feudal society that it once was with at least 500 million people becoming part of the middle class (a huge achievement I’d like to add). With low birthrates and expectations of a high quality of life, I cannot really see the Chinese scrambling en masse either to move into Siberia.

From what I recall reading, the Russian settlers of Siberia were mainly the descendants of the Cossacks, criminals and engineers/scientists as part of the USSR. It was sort of an Australia really and no one really wanted to go settle there. So who knows what is the fate of Siberia in the long run…

It could potentially go back to the natives but the problem is they are small in number and are very integrated into Russian society. Plus from what I’ve read about them, the native Siberians seem to be rather anti-immigrant just as much as the mainstream Russian population.

The fate of Siberia is certainly one that deserves more discussion by Karlin as it is a very interesting question.

To be honest, I don’t think blacks would want to live in Russia either since it gets to -20c in winter around the European part. It’s quite amusing to think but what will inevitably save Russia once again is General Winter.

I don’t want to sound like a leftist but this is factually incorrect. The migrants in the UK generally commit crimes like with the Rochdale scenario. But there has been no actual concentrated attempt to wipe out the native English by them. If you want to point the finger of blame, focus on the idiot white people for continually excusing bad behaviour and believing in the multi-kulti nonsense.

Also I suspect that the more migrant groups continue to grow in Europe, we are going to see a clash of civilisations take place between them throughout the continent. It’s very similar to what happened during the Fall of the Roman Empire. The invading Germanics turned quickly on each other and started to fight it out amongst themselves once Rome had fallen. I suspect a very similar situation will take place on European soil.

Well, considering the doomsday scenario you have presented, I would say that an Iran sort of scenario would emerge after the chaos has died down. The remaining whites (most in such a drastic scenario would flee east) would convert to Islam and would sort of join together with the intelligent Arabs and form a caliphate. If you look at modern day Iran, the elite on the top are usually quite pale where as the masses tend to be brown. I would expect this situation to occur.

However, if I am honest, personally I don’t think it will get to this stage. Why are Muslims and blacks in Europe en masse? Because they want money. Europe is running out of money to pay for those cozy welfare states. I suspect somewhere down the pipeline identitarian parties will take power and basically just cut off the money supply. Most will go home.

This is interesting but it does sound like the Buddhist version of the Gog and Magog prophecy in the Bible.

You know I had an interesting but scary thought the other day. Maybe the low fertility rate really is the end of nations as we know it? Even the middle East is dropping in fertility and only just replaces itself now. East Asia is screwed, Europe happily mixes itself into non-existence. My overall point is – if birth rates keep dropping, people have less partners of their own race so end up taking partners of others, leading ultimately to a huge rise in individualism and the death of traditional national structures.

Unless Europe and East Asia can develop some sort of Israeli mindset and get breeding, I do think that the mixture of the races in short a small scale of time could very well be a thing of the future…

As I’ve always said, what will reunify the Korea’s is their birth rates. Both countries heavily dislike diluting the blood line and the Greatest Korea is still near replacement level. I know in 20 years North Korea’s population I think grew by 3 million. It wouldn’t surprise me if the two eventually come to some sort of labour agreement in the next 20 years and this eventually leads to some sort of unification based on that.

It all depends on what the Russian youth want. If they decide (and I presume many are) to focus on their careers and put off having children until later, focusing on mainly individualistic aspects, then that birth rate is staying where it is. Unless there is in the next few decades a genuine cultural push to stronger family values and raising children, then birth rates won’t go up.

This is a potential good point about Russia. I did just read a prediction about Russian demography stating that the country could rise to the mythical 2.01 by 2030 – 2040. It is entirely possible with this scenario when a lot of women get into their 30s and want a baby so it could lead to a baby boom by then.

I think though there is a huge factor involved and that is the economy. Russia’s economy right now is not doing so great. The government certainly needs to do more in reviving it so people can afford to have more kids. If the economy doesn’t start to improve within the next decade or so, we could expect another baby glut.

Still, Russia is nowhere near Ukraine which itself is a dying country entirely. I honestly have no idea how this country is going to survive in the long run…

You know I have also thought about this and I tend to concur with you that increasing automation makes having children as an essential to the economy not really that important. It even will deter immigration in the future as well since there will be no economic need to import millions of people. Russia is trying to aim for this where as the US is stuck firmly in woke culture so will struggle with millions unemployed in the future. Escape from LA doesn’t look like science fiction anymore.

On the flip side, you could end up seeing more inter ethnic marriages. Fewer people means fewer mates means more outside marriages. The Faroe Islands, despite having high fertility, has had cases of men with no wives so they marry abroad. So for those who do wish to see the group live on, it maybe impossible in the long run without some kind of ethno-patriotism which I think is alien to the European mind. Might get away with it amongst the Russians but the rest of Europe I think really doesn’t care…or would look in horror at such an idea…even if it wasn’t forced…

Depends on how isolationist and nationalist the Slavs want to be though. Whether we like it or not, we do live in a globalised world. People can travel freely and amongst some Slavs, all they want is the West, patriotism be damned.

That said however, the more stupid the West gets, the more the Slavic states feel threatened and pull up the drawbridge. Amongst the youth, there is a desire to replicate the high quality of life the West has had but the idea of going down the full Globo Homo path disturbs them as well. So maybe that will be a saving grace for Eastern Europe.

Won’t happen to Russia down to one simple thing. Money. Nobody in Russia wants to pay out large amounts of welfare to refugees of any colour. You see, the refugees all go to Europe because they know Europe will give them free money. Europe lied to itself as it is the right thing to do because of the past and obviously humanitarian concerns. Russians simply do not care and want the money reserved for them and nobody else. So honestly, I strongly doubt a refugee horde is going to appear at Russia’s doors. If anything, Russia will probably close the doors and focus on taking care of themselves, as the old “Socialism in one country” mindset goes.

Yeah to be honey you have a good point here. If we actually read the history of the fall of the Roman Empire, actual Italy itself wasn’t heavily colonised by the invading Germanic hordes. Instead they mostly left and went back to their native homelands once there was no more loot to plunder. I think in regards to modern mass migration, the same effect is likely to take place. It’s all about the money at the end of the day.

Yeah I agree with this statement too. Most white people in Europe usually marry white. I did notice a trend in the UK where actual mixing was taking place between individuals that were half white and between whites. The trend was usually between mixed race girls and white boys. So that in itself means within the next generation, the children from these relationships will start to appear more white and assimilate even more into the dominant mainstream.

It’s not just the women who have more feminine features but also the men. I tend to notice a more masculine look amongst Western men and women but when it comes to the east, both genders tend to have more feminine features in their faces. This also is an interesting post because I am aware that in Russia, the women are naturally the strongest gender with the men being the weakest. There is mindset there of continually having to look after the men like they are little boys and pushing them in the right direction. It’s not traditional patriarchy but something else entirely.

It did actually. The remaining Romans eventually evolved into the Italian people and pretty much assumed much command and dominance within the Catholic Church, forming much important decision making over the various successor Germanic kingdoms. They also pretty much started the Renaissance that went ahead in reshaping European culture for centuries to come. I’d actually say in many aspects the Romans really did make a come back. Not to the same extent as the Roman Empire but they did and had a huge influence. Even to this day Italy is pretty much a hot bed of culture that has given birth to pizza, unique forms of art, culture, etc. Many things still came from Italy that lives on with us to this day.

My money is still on India. I watched a combat simulation once of what would happen in a sparring match between the two and India pretty much came out on top due to the favourable usage of their terrain. China would try to advance but would end up losing valuable equipment. In other words, a major land war between the two would be a huge logistical defeat for China.

I thought Ukraine and Belarus were some of the most developed parts of the USSR? From what I have read, Ukraine suffered the most by leaving the USSR and never was able to truly develop without the aid of Russia. Belarus though is different thanks to “Father” although even then, I’ve been told alot of Belarusian success came from selling their products to the Russian market. In other words, Russia has been keeping the Belarusian economy alive…

Not entirely. Belarus produces alot of domestic goods ranging from clothes to tractors. All of these goods are pretty much sold in the Russian economy rather then elsewhere in Europe. Not sure how much Belarus makes out of it all but as Russians have told me, “We buy Belarusian goods, we keep their economy alive.”

Out of all of the Scandinavian countries, I always tend to find Denmark is the more conservative when it comes to immigration. I’ve spoken to Danes in the past and compared to the Swedes, most of them had a negative opinion on immigration, particularly from the Islamic world. What is more surprising is that this attitude stretches back into the early 2000s, well before the Alt Right and Identitarism started to become more mainstream.

Overall, I think Denmark has the potential to survive. I think that they are heavily limiting the immigration there already. I think that if they can successfully get their native birth rates to replacement level (which is feasible as they do have high birth rates there) and with a strict integration focus, they could essentially survive as a white majority society with a small non-white minority that eventually ‘whitens up’ so to speak.

Also some interesting news. Due to the recent BLM riots, I’ve noticed on twitter alot of your average and mainstream Brits actually showing what I’d call white Identitarian signs. It’s something you’d only find say on white nationalist sites 10 years ago but these days, more seem to be sympathising with white identity politics. I think the statue pulling and the heavy crime associated with it really has started to shock the mainstream.

Now obviously it’s not going to lead into full blown WNism but you never know, it might lead to more pro-white identity politics down the line…

Yes, Denmark has done a good job in heavily regulating immigration. I think the population is still 90 percent ethnic Danish. They also keep getting more tough on immigrants due to the influence of the Danish People’s Party continually having a role in government. So all in all, I think Denmark has a chance to survive.

As for Eastern Europe, I think their leaders are really stuck between a rock and a hard place. On the one hand, they do want to reject immigration and keep their countries a native as they possibly can. On the other, due to the mass emigration of their youth to the West, they are stuck with huge labour shortages and need migrants.

It all depends on how they handle this. The Russian method of immigration actually works as it is a revolving door policy. The Central Asians go to Russia for work, they earn money and go back home as wealthier people. That immigration could work for the Visegrad group.

If they decide to go for a fully legalised multi-kulti society in the long run, then as you know we are looking at the Visegrad states going down the Western European path. If that is the case, they are about 30 years behind.

They will argue “well they are doing the jobs we won’t do and it is all legalized” but the West also accepted legalised migrants to do the dirty jobs to begin with too. Many of these once working communities soon devolved into slum areas 3 generations on. As we see with the North Africans in France, the Pakistani communities in the UK, etc, etc.

Let’s hope Visegrad continues to learn the lessons from the West and restricts the immigration to the bare essential and follows more the Russian method.

There is a huge question mark when it comes to Russia. Right now under Putin, it is following a more patriotic high water mark but it remains to be seen after Putin what direction the country is going to take on next. A big problem is that you do have a generation of Russian youth who still idolise “Democracy” and “Liberalism” and want Russia to follow the same path, naively thinking that if they do so, they will get to have the quality of life Westerners had during the late 20th century.

On the other hand, you do have more of the youth put off by the current situation and realise that the West is going down the wrong path and Russia should find another way. However on all sides there is alot of criticism now about Putin. So whether that is concerning criticism of Putin’s ideas or just the corruption I’m not too sure. But I do fear Russia could, unless something major comes along, join the Western rot if it is not too careful.

However, considering how quickly the West is deteriorating, I think this might be enough to put Russia off the West for good. But even I am resigned to the fact that Russia is at this moment in time Europe’s last great hope. If she goes, the party is over for good.

This is the easiest question to answer on why blacks did not advance compared to the other races and it is very simple. They had no reason too. You see, Africa is a very comfortable continent to live in with no major pressures (until relatively recently that is). Black people had everything they ever needed. Enough animals to provide food and clothes. A good temperature so they did not have to worry about building strong foundations to keep warm in. Large spaces of land where disease did not roam as freely and wars, whilst still available, happened at lesser frequency compared to elsewhere. From a Human evolutionary point of view, the black man was living in a garden of Eden. He just did not need to advance.

Now compare this to the Europeans. The Humans who settled Europe had to deal with it being the smallest continent in the world so essentially tribes were more cramped together meaning more war. Disease can spread more easily. The continent gets cold, very cold, so they need to develop tools to make more warmer accommodation and clothes. You have more famines due to the weather. Oh great, the guy next door wants to your stuff and is coming close so you best get more weapons and quickly to fight him off. Wait, I can make a better weapon to defend myself with, this will keep him away. But now I need money to maintain my weapons and defences. Here comes trade and economic development.

So basically what we have here is the tale of two peoples. One had everything he needed and did not develop. The other was struggling very hard and had to develop and advance in order to survive. As is history.

The big problem now is the man who did not develop now wants the other guys stuff but does not know how to properly maintain it due to he needs to go through his own evolution to attain it. The other guy is letting him have his stuff because he has reached an existential crisis where he his claiming he has no right to exist. That is basically the huge problem.

I’d argue in essence we are in the second generation. The first who started to really create this mess was the baby boomers. Gen X never really seemed too bothered and even downright critical at times. It’s the Millennials who are the true second generation and they are going full blown young pioneers. As a majority, they unfortunately cannot be persuaded. They are too collectivistic in their outlook. I would not be surprised if the establishment told them to do kamikaze strikes in the name of “diversity”, they would even hesitate.

The Zoomers are interesting however. I wouldn’t call them nationalists but they are becoming more sceptical or even critical of the system. This usually happens in the third generation, as it was in the USSR. The system usually collapses when the third generation stops believing in it.

I have no idea what this guy was moaning about at the time. From my own knowledge, race mixing in the Soviet Union was not actually a crime per say. There was no actual laws against it and I do know Russians did (and still do) intermarry say with Tartars. It’s just that Russia has always been socially conservative, even the surrounding countries and groups within Russia, that race mixing itself is more rare as people voluntarily prefer not to do it en mass. So no idea where he got the idea the Soviet Union forbid him to actually do it…

Yeah it is a nonsense story. America had a law that stated you could not marry outside of your race (obviously was repealed with the Loving case) and apartheid South Africa went a step further even, forbidding not only marriage but even having sex outside of your racial group. If you were caught even having a random non-white hook up, you went to prison.

Now comparing this to the Soviet Union, there were no such laws in place. Obviously as one poster pointed out they had issues with marriage to foreigners which was mainly for ideological reasons. However for all intents and purposes, there was no law or even punishment for actually marrying or sleeping outside of your racial group. So compared to America or apartheid South Africa, the Soviet Union was actually pretty liberal in that regard.

You know it’s funny but when I talk to Russians today and ask them how people living in the country view race mixing, it’s actually still viewed as something most people would prefer not to do as a majority. I’m not just talking about the whites but actually the various Asian groups living throughout the country. Native Siberians prefer to marry their own group, same with Tartars, same even with Uzbekis and Tajiks (unless they desperately want citizenship to which they try to marry a white girl but usually it’s rare). So despite living together for hundreds in years on the steppe, the vast majority have not actually mixed together into one homogenous mass but instead have stayed rather tribal which is interesting to view from not only a nationalistic but also demographic perspective as well.

I think this whole “let’s mix the world into one big coffee coloured race” is a uniquely American phenomenon. Out of all the people I have met, I’d say the Anglos are the biggest race mixers out there, especially amongst the men. But if you look back in Anglo history, it’s always been a phenomenon. During the British Empire, it was quite common for soldiers and officers to have sex with natives in the newly found colonies, even marrying the higher up caste such as in British India. So I think therefore if any group is going to mix itself into something else, it’ll be the Anglos.

Not a problem, you posted a very interesting question and it has been a topic that has been on my mind as well recently. Anyway, when it comes to Russia, I wouldn’t say it is a Democracy anymore then the U.S or UK. The thing is – Democracy never works anyway. It’s a lie and always has been. The only difference is who actually runs the democracy.

Now in Russia, the system is pretty much entirely run by Putin. As Russians have told me before, Putin is a strong king and Russians throughout their history have always needed a strong leader to successfully run the country. Putin is in effect no more different then say Rurik, Vladimir the Great, Peter the Great, Catherine the Great, even Stalin and Brezhnev. But getting back to Putin and his power, essentially every decision made goes through Putin. His government relies on him to make decisions, whether good or bad. As one Russian told me, “Putin knows how to be King.”

So it’s not really a true democracy in that power is shared and all parties get a credible voice. They don’t. There is alot of corruption of course. But the key thing is real power stays in the hands of the national interest.

Now in the West, the democracy is run primarily by corporations and their lackeys. They pretty much make the decisions and this is passed down to all of those politicians who make money from generous donations who stick with whatever the corporation’s want and make decisions based on that. Can you see the difference? Real power is being made on an international capitalist scale rather then on the national stage, which is the big difference with Putin and Russia.

However you right about the proportional representation system. The various parties in Russia can be elected to the Duma in stark contrast to the Anglo countries. So that is at least something Russia has right.

It was the same in Europe 500 years ago too. My point is blacks had no reason to advance because they pretty much had their basic needs secured. Food, shelter, heat, etc. If you have those in abundance pretty early, why advance anymore? There is simply no reason too.

Actually Africa did have some success stories. Mali was one of the best they had. They managed to create a very wealthy empire thanks to the gold mines they had. Obviously the conversion to Islam at the time helped with education rates in that empire but for native Africa, it did very well at the time. Then you had Ethiopia which was for quite a time a very powerful localised empire in the region.

Black Africa was also starting to experiment with developing towns with stone wall defences so they were starting to settle down in larger numbers. I think that had they had been left to their own devices, eventually they would have evolved to the feudal agricultural level and then started to industrialise. It would have been alot slower then Europe due to the lack of necessity but it slowly was starting to take shape.

The problem is, they were too slow and obviously Europe helped create huge messes which is why Africa is in so much poverty to this day. We tried to industrialise them too fast and turned them into basically a cash crop for us. This in turn has led to the population there ballooning, it’s still poor and now they are coming to Europe en masse. In a sense, sins of the fathers….

Honestly I think that after this warm summer, Russia will have a very cold winter. I don’t think anything is too unusual. Well I hope not.

Yes I am getting very concerned about Belarus. Ok on the one hand, I can understand that people do want to improve their quality of life. I don’t think we can argue against that. However, what does concern me is where this pro-democracy movement is going to lead to. The main oppositionist candidate has said he would like Belarus to be independent from both the West and Russia. Fair enough but as we know, money is going to start pouring in from somewhere and I fear the pro-democracy people might just shift to the West heavily, thinking that it’ll give them a great quality of life.

You know, a Russian once told me something quite pessimistic once. The person said that Russia, Belarus and Ukraine would accept mass immigration and becoming a minority if it gave them a really good quality of life. In other words, they’d be happy to sell out. This did make me feel lost for words but it does make you wonder…

This is what I am fearing the most about the Slavic world in general. I did have an honest chat with Dimitry several days ago and he was quite positive these people would not make an impact on Russian politics and that the country would take a Visegrad turn. Which is good news. The only problem is Visegrad is now trying to promote legal immigration from third world countries in order to facilitate their labour shortages…

After Putin, give it time and you might end up with these idiots influencing the mainstream, saying the country needs to open up to immigration because of the low birth rates and we need more taxes. Also wouldn’t gay marriage be a lovely thing too? People may just accept that, particularly a future government that has decided to fully embrace a capitalistic model.

I don’t know about you guys but I honestly do not feel as optimistic for Eastern Europe and Russia as I once did. I think after Putin we are going to see the country push in a huge democratic direction and that means all sorts of craziness is bound to happen.

A very wonderfully written article Andrew on the current problem in the West today. I never saw it quite like that but you have really framed it so well. It is like the flagellants of the past and it is utter madness what is happening. However, I do see some light at the end of the tunnel. Lately when I go on twitter, I see alot of people furious with BLM. What surprised me the most however was that many of these posters are just average looking people and they are posting pro-white messages that only would have been seen on a more radical website like Stormfront 10 years ago.

I think that people in the West are starting to really get fed up now. I don’t think the opposition is going to be purely white nationalist entirely but I think in the long run you could promote a healthy white Identitarian message out of this.

As for the Jews in Israel, if I’m honest, both the Jews and the Palestinians there are equal in terms of the hatred they have for each other. I wouldn’t be surprised if on the other side of the fence, you had Palestinians spectating and enjoying the view of rockets falling into Israeli territory. I never see a “right” side in this conflict.

The big question though Felix we need to ask ourselves is how committed the average Russian is to maintaining a powerful hold? I think it really all depends on the next generation. Dimitri was more optimistic thinking there would still be a power struggle but I do wonder if this power play is simply down to the current Russian elite having been brought up under the USSR. Today’s youth might be quite happy to forget about Belarus or if Belarus goes West, might even start demanding to join in the fun…

If I am to be brutally honest, the more I am seeing from Russia, the more I am starting to consider it a ticking time bomb of liberalism. I think Putinism is sort of a last hurrah if I’m honest.

It wouldn’t work this time around. Unlike the Crimeans, Belarusians are quite happy to be independent and if anything did occur on the Russian side, there would be mass riots, huge international condemnation and probably even more sanctions. If that happens, the Russian economy would probably go into a major economic crisis, leading to potential huge riots and protests there as well.

To be honest, I don’t think any major changes will come from the Putin era of leadership and the current individuals you mention will probably stick with the status quo for the foreseeable future. I’m looking further down the pipeline at the next generation of leadership, particularly Russia’s millennials. From my observation, they aren’t woke but they do remind me of Britain’s boomer generation, minus the glorious wealth. More individualistic, concerned with making money.

To be honest, the only thing saving Russia at this moment with this generation is how the West is declining. But if it wasn’t for a Western decline, I bet they’d be more than happy to jump on board the Globo Express train.

Honestly, I do not care about what happens between Israel and Palestine. It’s none of my business. If they want to blow each other up, fine. What is my concern is when this crap starts hitting Europe, which obviously with the refugee crisis, it is starting too.

What do you personally make of Navalny? To me, I’ve always viewed him as another potential Yeltsin figure who would pretty much destroy the country and sell out the family silver so to speak.

You have some good points here. It is difficult to ascertain what Russia’s political future is but from what you are describing, it seems to be that the only thing keeping Russia conservative at the moment is basically the living standards, which seems to be something most Russians are protesting about these days.

I think the larger question we have to ask ourselves is can Russia successfully improve its quality of life without going full blown libtard and GloboHomo? The only two examples I can think of is Japan and Israel. High standards of living yet conservative still in their outlook (even downright nationalistic in Israel – defence of the Jewish people)

Otherwise we can say that is essentially a ticking time bomb in the long run, if Russia’s economy actually does start to improve post-Putin. Although to be fairly honest, I think the days of the Western gravy train are pretty much over and Russia has been simply too late to get onboard so it is very sceptical if Russia can actually acquire that standard of living when the West is starting to decline in the information age…

That said, I do think Russia is protected from guilt politics compared to the West. No country can point the finger and really blame Russia because you guys can easily retort with “well we had the gulags and we lost 20 million in the war.”

I think it is simply all down to levels of comfort on both sides. For the left, they are protesting and rioting because the state supports them. There will be no consequences and ultimately they can return back to their lives as the smoke clears problem free. For the right, they too are also comfortable and do not want to lose this comfort over fighting back for what is right. Instead they’d rather ‘protest’ on the internet. It will take dwindling levels of comfort to get the right to truly start organising.

When it comes to race in America, I always get the feeling the whole multi-racial ‘united’ country is just one big Potemkin village. That is on the face of it, people ‘pretend’ to love diversity but in reality, all groups usually quite happily self-segregate into their own groups.

If I am honest, I’ve always thought America would do quite well adopting something similar to the Dutch idea of Pilliarisation, as what established between the Dutch and Belgians. That is all groups have their own majority communities, with their own majority run public services (education, police, fire, health, etc) but still remaining United and faithful to the country. That is equal opportunities for everyone, working for the country but overall living where they choose to live and in effect governing their own areas with an equal budget.

So not segregation but just a natural convenience for everybody. If you even look at demographic stats in America and where people live, it really does show a strong streak of Pilliarisation already. Might as well help provide the funding for it.

I have to confess, I once had my fears of a potential SJW putsch after Putin. I never saw it happening anytime soon but probably 20 years down the pipeline. However, I have been convinced recently of Dimitry and his thoughts.

What we have to understand about Russia is its history and where it is going on a political and economic stage compared to the West. Right now Russia has an economy mainly centred on oil and gas. The West wants to make do without this by phasing out petrol and diesel engines by 2040. This is going to hurt Russia’s economy.

In other words, Russia has the potential to have more problems and right now, the last thing on the youths mind is going full blown SJW. They just want to improve their quality of life. Yet if there are more problems around the corner, there simply will not be the time or place to worry about BLM, for example.

Plus all of these immigrants do not want to move to Russia. There is no major welfare state for them to live on and if Russia does try to enact a major welfare state over the entire country, once again, major problems. Plus I doubt Russians want to pay millions for Africans or Muslims to live for free in their country on their expense when they have their own worries.

Overall, I think for Russia, the future is more likely going to be right wing then we imagine. For example in the following steps:

1) They have to find new economic alternatives with which to grow the economy away from oil and gas. Which means more protectionism in the long run. Could lead to a nice growth in soft cultural power however.

2) Not many immigrants want to live in Russia. It’ll be too much of a cost and I doubt millions of Africans are going to want to live in -45c conditions in Siberia. Any that do make it will go to Moscow and St. Petersburg but even then, there will be stiff competition for jobs from the natives.

Therefore if Russia is to survive and since no one wants to really move there, they need to start having babies. Hence why going nationalistic is probably the only way the country can become competitive.

3) They don’t want more Chechnya’s. The West has yet to experience this but Russia remembers.

4) The West is heavily declining. Russians are shocked with BLM. They are starting to see a continent in decline. The more the West starts to decline and the crazier it becomes, the more Russians are going to pull up the draw bridge.

So overall, I think that Russia has the potential to be great but it needs to solve the economy and corruption, have more kids and basically keep looking at the West failing.

Remember back in the 1980s, the West was freedom, economic prosperity and greatness. A shining city on the hill. Now it’s starting to resemble a third world basket case. It will only intensify. I doubt for improving the quality of life, many Russians need convincing that SJWism and millions of third world people is a good idea for improving this…

This is always a problem that has been going on since the dawn of time. Basically large settlements turn into cities that become large breeding grounds for Cosmopolitanism until they eventually collapse and shrink, leading to more right wing thinking and behaviour.

I think the way to beat this is to always ensure you have strong birth rates, particularly in the countryside. If you have that factor and it is a continued generation of new babies being born, then they start to migrate back into the cities, giving them a more closely resembled ethnic look.

To be honest though, I do think the future of white people is actually going to be more conservative. The more they get pushed from the cities and back into the town’s and villages, the more right wing and conservation they will become. I think Karlin documented this a year or two ago.

I think if you want a prime example of what the white man is going through, look at the history of the Jews. When they were at their peak in ancient Israel, they went ‘liberal’ for those days before eventually downsizing, becoming more conservative and moving into Europe, where they started to become more liberal again until the 20th century…

Nowadays in Israel, they are very right wing and concerned about their survival. That I think is a similarish fate for European eventually.

It is interesting that it is mainly white men on motorcycles discussing this ‘frustrating’ fact about China. I’m not sure what it is about white people but there does seem to be something inherently liberal about them. That is everything must be open and not closed at all.

I do wonder if it goes back to the history of the Indo-Europeans traveling everywhere by horse back and this mentality has somehow stuck in the mainstream population genetics. That is the desire for travel and expansion into foreign realms…

Yeah even though I have mixed feelings by what is going on in Russia, it does make you wonder if eventually it is going to become a lost cause there. It’ll come later of course but once the wealth levels go up, the liberalism will surely follow.

Ask yourself this question though. Does anybody really want to listen to views on here? I tend to find that most people can only be pushed so far.

Right now with places like Parler, you do have many Trumpists but also the anti-islamic faction too. Yes, it’s not actually anything to do with ethnic nationalism but it’s a huge step in the right direction. At least people are turning heavily against BLM and do tend to agree with Trump and his base message of no more immigration/America first.

Honestly, I just don’t expect the view points expressed on this website is ever going to truly make it to the mainstream.

This is true. To be honest, I think that when it comes to view points on this website, the best that can be achieved is what I would term as a healthy white Identitarism. Nothing radical, just promote the idea that it is fine to be white, there is nothing wrong with it, too much immigration destroys the traditional identity, etc.

I think the Trumpists would be accepting of such a message. I have noticed a lot of them now are accepting pro-white points of view. As long as it isn’t too radical and holds any prejudice to other groups, they will get on board.

I think there are some key differences here on what could take shape. If Biden wins, the Republicans can put down the Trump saga as a regrettable mistake and go back to being the boring old Jen Bush party moaning about lowering taxes for the rich and abortion.

However if Trump wins, the Republicans will have to acknowledge that people support Trumpism and will have to start re orientating the party towards Trumpian Populism in future elections as they will realise that it is a permanent vote winner. Basically how they started to change themselves into becoming an evangelical Conservative party due to Reagan where as before, it was the Democrats who were the Conservatives.

Even if they do this though, the Republicans are still going to remain the good old American majority white party so out right winning future elections after Trump is going to be very difficult. I think this all potentially bodes for a potential secession crisis in the future.

However even if Trump wins, the Democrats may start to take notice and try to compete with the Republicans and start to moderate their policies, shifting away from Identity politics and embracing the populist waves and trying to alternate with a more centrist position. But considering all the crazy lefties in power within the party structure, this would be an incredibly difficult task, almost Herculean to achieve.

So we could still be looking at a potential secession down the road.

But we all have to admit one thing – Donald Trump, love him or loathe him, has changed ultimately the political face of politics for the better. Even though he actually has done very little, just the fact he got elected with his views really does go to show the people have had enough and want changes.

Instead of that, the vast majority are just normal people from another culture trying to live and work in a new country. In fact they are just humans…

LOL. And did the Algerians say the same of the pied-noirs after they got their independence? And now you stand to lose your independence to those you once colonised. And you’re unwilling to fight off and drive out those colonising you unlike the Algerians did to you. Maybe one day you will or maybe you won’t. I just don’t know why you didn’t stay in Algeria and keep pouring in even more European and black African colonists into it and create this globo-homo multiracial diversified melange on their own Algerian soil, and in all your other colonies, instead of in your home country. It would have made sense to carry out such a social experiment on foreign soil and see how it works before deciding if you want to continue with it in your own country or just give up on it because it’s unworkable. It seems to me that those Algerians of old that drove you out were more “human” than you are now, because they were unwilling to accept foreigners on their soil and willing to go to any lengths and make any sacrifice to get them out – and that surely is the human thing to do if you love your own people an your own country. No wonder they don’t respect you and take any advantage they can of you and yours when they land on your shore, just easy pickings for them.

But you forget that your countries are also aging at an extreme rate. As a result of this, I have noticed that the Polish and Hungarian governments have started to silently ‘import’ legal workers from outside the EU bloc, namely India and other non-white countries. They’ve just put up the wall to Islam instead.

If I’m honest, I think that the Visegrad nations are about 30 years behind Europe. As your quality of life starts to improve, your population will start to become more liberal and infused with GloboHomo ideas. The elites will then foister continued ‘legal’ immigration due to low birth rates. If it’s legal and safe, the population will continue to tolerate it.

I think that by the end of this century, Eastern Europe will be as diverse as Western Europe. Unless people develop an ethno-patriotic back bone and combine that with having a good quality of life, then Europe can survive. But since wealth and liberalism seem to correlate, I am not optimistic.

Personally I think you are missing the point here. There are two relevant facts at play. The first is karma and the second is stupid white people. Let us begin.

Karma – The Anglo-Saxon West pretty much destroyed the entire balance of the planet with its greed for profit and lust for empire building. You pointed out the destruction of the native Americans but what about the deathsnof millions of Indians due to British colonialism? Or the millions of Chinese during the Opium War and other British policies?

Unlike even the Romans, the British and other European powers actually left little behind in terms of infrastructure and economic development in their once colonies, aside from railroads left behind in India. Most of it was basically one big plantation economy.

So what do the once colonial subjects want to do? Leave their own countries and come back to the motherland. Imperialism has been a long term disaster for the West.

Stupid white people – Yes, yes, people here blame the Jews but let’s be honest here, if it was the Jews who helped contribute, who happily lapsed it up and performed the dance? The stupid white people! Had the stupid white people been more intelligent, they would have put two and two together and stopped the madness along time ago. Instead they are worshipping George Floyd.

Look, I’m no leftie liberal. I want white people to survive and prosper. But honestly, I see alot of sins and ultimately stupidity at the white man’s feet. I blame him more then anyone else.

You know, I really hope what you are saying is correct. I really do. Do you know why I am pessimistic? Because I have seen the exact same arguments and false beliefs in my own native Britain for so long now.

I’ll give you a history class. In 1947, the government told people that we needed to invite black Jamaicans and other West Indies people in order to fill a labour shortage after the war due to the loss of soldiers. It would be temporary and they would go back home. Hint: It never happened.

In the 1960s, the government invited thousands of Asian (Indian and Pakistani) migrants, particularly from Africa in order to escape Idi Amin and his regime. People complained about it, they started to march, the government told them the numbers are just about enough to fill a football pitch and nothing more. There was no way that traditional white British people would become a minority in their own homeland.

They lied. Only Thatcher in the 1980s was honest enough to prevent mass continued immigration but after her came Tony Blair who decided to hit the nuclear option and turn the UK into a diverse society to rub the rights nose in it. The flood gates opened and have been pretty much the same ever since.

Now you say ‘it’ll never happen here, we are too proud and patriotic.’ Well, so were the British people. They marched, they protested, they tried to politically do something about this madness and were told it was all exaggeration. But they did try.

I can see the same signs with Eastern Europe. You are proud, patriotic. Right now your people are matching and protesting but for how long? I see the rot of GloboHomo taking shape in the East and I am not optimistic.

In 30 years time, you could see a new generation of politician get into power who want to truly transform EE as it is backwards and not at all glorious like the “enlightened West.” They will do it slowly until eventually, you get to the point where what is another half a million blacks going to matter?

You want to know the only hope you have of preventing this? If the West collapses first and your people panic and realise that it is not the way forward. Already there are signs that EE is starting to lose faith in the West but it’s going to take more craziness from the West before the youth there fully abandon such copy cat ideas.

But never think for one minute EE is immune from this and can weather out the storm. Just look at Japan. Already they are bringing in hundreds of thousands of new Philippine and Indonesian migrant workers. Something once considered impossible. And the people? They are accepting it.

John,

Actually I agree with Beckow on this one. Compared to Western Europe, the East is very much majority white. The gypsies only really live in Romania, Hungary and Bulgaria IIRC. Even then, there has been a “whitening up” process whereby the minorities have, by and largely, interbred and become part of the majority. Russia itself is very much part of this phenomenon too as many Russians have Tartar and other non-white ancestries but look perfectly white.

If Western Europe only accepted a certain amount of non-white minorities and closed the door for good, eventually they too would “whiten up” and become indistinguishable from the natives. Problem is, the West has gone for full blown mass colonisation that Iranification is more likely then whitening up.

I disagree about Slavs not being susceptible to propaganda. ALL people are susceptible to propaganda. Are you not forgetting all of that Soviet propaganda that turned the Slavs into Stalin worshippers?

To be honest, these protestors who are opposing Lukashenko really do not care about the future of the country, their civilisation or what have you. All they want is a good quality of life. If it means joining up to the EU in order to get those juicy subsidies, then so be it.

Even Serbia wants to join the EU. Serbia, the country that was heavily bombed by NATO in the 1990s. I think when it comes to nationalism, money talks more with people these days.

Rather then try to build up their own countries, they seem willing to sell it down the drain and mass migrate to the “New Romes” (London, Paris, Berlin, etc) in order to get some share of the pie.

You know, I don’t think many of these people protesting actually care. They don’t think long term about the situation. They have been thoroughly indoctrinated into GloboHomo mass culture that to them, becoming like the West is the only way for them to prosper.

It is the same with the protests going on in Russia today. Most of them are young, they have grown up on a diet of GloboHomo propaganda and they want to live in a country that is on the TV such as “Friends”. They cannot conceive of the West’s problems or its future, just that it has a far better quality of life then back home.

I know what I am talking about because I have interacted alot with younger Russians and many of them still have this naive belief that if they just copy everything the West has done, magically things will radically improve. If you try to point out the alternatives, about what is happening in the West, etc, etc, they just cannot conceive that the West is bad and it is a lie. Like a religion almost.

I think the problem ultimately stems from Communism and the 1990s decade. When the Soviet system collapsed, people essentially lost hope with anything to do with Socialism and you had a younger generation growing up, watching Western TV, taking note of the bad situation in the former east at that time. Psychological speaking, the East has never recovered from that after shock.

To all of those here thinking the Slavic states are immune, to Karlin and his dreams of a greater Russian empire in space, I ask the question. Why are the Slavs not protesting for nationalism? Why are they protesting for Democracy and Liberalism?

Because it is the stronger “God” that they believe in.

Unless another system, a strong system, is developed that can successfully counter GloboHomo, Putin, Lukashenko and the nationalism that has been present is but a mirage of time that itself cannot ensure on a long term basis.

Now the bigger question is – could Democracy and Liberalism actually succeed in Belarus/Russia, etc? The answer is no, not for the long term. In Belarus’ case, it would just be a repeat Ukrainian horror show. The young would leave en masse to the “Glorious West” with false hopes of joining the EU.

In Russia’s case – it might succeed for a decade but quickly develop into another oligarchy. Whatever happens in that scenario I have no idea.

This is the case amongst the Soviet generation. I’d say within the 50 – 80 year age groups, Soviet nostalgia is very strong. It is this generation that regretted the breakup of the Soviet Union, still believe (even to this day) in Communism and fondly remember how great life was back then (remember the Sovok Boomer Karlin presented a while back?).

However it is the younger generation that is having none of it. The smart ones are naturally critical of the West but still see Democracy as the way forward. The masses however want to go full on West and are in love with the GloboHomo culture. As one younger Russian told me once, “amongst the youth, the minority think the West is becoming a new Sodom and Gomorrah. The majority think the West is being progressive and cool.”

Another Russian also told me to expect gay marriage in Russia within 30 – 50 years after the Putin era if the current Western pop culture still heavily stands.

So it is down to comments like this and from the protests I am reading about why I am naturally very sceptical if Belarus and Russia can avoid the same fate. Watch the Visegrad states. When they decide to start adopting gay marriage and pushing towards a more liberal culture, expect the rest of Slavdom to follow suit.

Yeah this is something I have been contemplating too. If the West was doing really well economically, everything was great and thriving and people were having a really great quality of life, I think that the Slavic world would very quickly embrace GloboHomo view points, believing that it is the road to prosperity.

However, considering that the West continues to decline with every passing year and the problems continue to grow, there is a potentially positive chance that the Slavic people will put two and two together, realising that the combination of GloboHomo views has led to the decline of the West.

I tend to concur with Dimitry that the East will for the foreseeable future attempt to go down the Visegrad route. He is right now Russia and surrounding areas have not been soaked in wealth and comfort to launch a full SJW cultural rebellion anytime soon. The protests are mainly economical in nature.

The light at the end of the tunnel might be that of Russia reaches the path of GloboHomo in 50 years time, it might be a concept long dead and buried with memories of totalitarianism that no one wants to embrace and thus might steer the country away from such stupidity. Same with Belarus. Only time will tell.

The main fear of people on this blog is that they will be reduced to the ash heap of history. They ultimately fear global liberalism as it leads to global mixing which means less and less people start to look like them. It is a basic evolutionary fact that no one likes to go extinct and usually when people can see above the herd and notice what is happening, they fear the future even more. So hence the air of sadness.

Exactly what I’ve been trying to say for a while on here now and constantly people keep denying that GloboHomo “can’t happen here.” I’ve heard many different theories on how the East cannot become like the West, ranging from women’s physical features to Slavic people being more intelligent and cynical, apparently.

Yet for all purposes, what we are seeing in Belarus is nothing short of a colour revolution and we know how this is going to play out. I was reading a Lithuanian commentator say how the EU immediately needs to back the opposition, stuff billions of Euros into the country and essentially allow freedom of movement for Belarusians.

I get it, people want a better quality of Life, we are all Human. But replacing Lukashenko with the opposition will just kill Belarus off in a very short space of time. Millions of young people will flock to the West, the nation will become impoverished with the state run industries being heavily privatised and the country will look like another East German ghost town within two decades.

There is no long term planning behind this, just “Democracy, Freedom, Money.” In the end, nothing good can come from this.

When it comes to the EU and UK youth, it is actually surprising but many of them did not benefit from EU membership. Very few studied abroad in EU countries as the programmes to do so were never really encouraged in the British education system. I would even go as far as to say that 98 percent of young students actually went to British universities rather than EU ones…

I know this because I tried to enquire back in the day of going to an EU university so I could study for free. The options were simply just not available and all of the directions kept pointing me towards UK education. Makes sense though the UK authorities would do this as they want to keep as many debt slaves as possible…

Now in regards to the youth and working abroad in EU countries, once again this is a sham. I could count on my hand the amount of young people that actually did this. Once again, that 98 percent figure I quoted earlier stayed in the UK, working in local jobs rather then going abroad.

The only thing the youth of Britain actually profited from as a majority was cheap sunny holidays to Spain and Portugal. Oh and buying larger amounts of cheaper tobacco and booze to bring back home (which I successfully did when in the Czech Republic – was great!).

In my own perception, the Brexit situation came in several waves

1) Older people with nostalgia for the glory days who voted to leave.

2) Skilled labour who were economically pressured by EU migration

3) Alt Righters who wanted to see Europe burn

4) Apathetic majority youth who didn’t really understand the EU and did not bother to turn up to the polls

5) A strong youth minority who were absolutely supportive of EU membership

6) Middle income people who didn’t want to push the boat and voted to stay in

7) Welfare class who wanted to just punish the government and voted to leave

So many factors in what actually happened.

As Hyperborean has pointed out, the victory could be short lived. Unfortunately the Johnson cabinet is filled with committed globalists who still want to keep the global steam train running by inviting millions of non-EU migrants in to fill the void caused by the EU migrants leaving.

Unlike Trump who is a true Populist, Johnson is nothing of the sort. Yet I am starting to see the signs of people in the UK truly getting fed up with the status quo of mass immigration and it’s not just the whites but also the third generation non-white population.

I think that after Brexit, if nothing changes within the foreseeable future, the UK is going to continue down the path of more Populism until whoever takes the reigns of power truly takes a hard national economic stance which benefits the local population.

Actually Lukashenko has already beat you to it and has invited Russian troops in to help what he perceives as a “foreign attempt” to create instability in Belarus. From what I read, Putin is still weighing up the options.

We have to remember though that Putin also has problems with his own domestic liberal youth to contend with. Should he outright try to annex Belarus and it leads to more sanctions, I think there could be major protests throughout Russia. Putin realises this which is why he is weighing the options very carefully.

Yes this is my concern too Dmitry. It is always about the bloody EU. To be honest, I do wonder if the youth really do care about their country anymore or if they really do care about themselves….I mean, the EU continues to fill up with more Islamic migrants each year and the idiots in this video want to join it!? I guess it really is a huge case of selfish “me, me me” individualism over what is the right direction for the country.

You know, if it wasn’t for the EU lovers, I’d actually be sympathetic to the protesters if they promised to genuinely build a patriotic state that remained neutral to both sides. But this huge desire to join with the West is a step too far. But once again, they care about money and the false dreams the EU will give them….