It’s clear to me that there was some “advanced” civilization prior to whatever catastrophe happened 12,500 years ago, which was probably a hybrid of Neanderthal, Denisovan and Sapiens. If the Sapiens did not come out of Africa (and this seems plausible), then where did they originate from? The Denisovans were in the Altai Mt. region and east, and the Neanderthal were in Europe to the west, with the blacks bottled up in Africa.

It’s also important to remember that the Sahara goes from desert to lush wetlands on a 20,000 year period, so it is not always an effective barrier. Perhaps during the green Sahara periods other groups lived there and also blocked movement? It isn’t green for long enough times for a race or species to form there.

Nonetheless, there was once much more genetic diversity than there is now, but there is still much more than we were all told. Race is much more than a social construct. I never wanted to look at the actual differences between blacks and whites, as I’ve been much more concerned with the actions of the jews who want global supremacy, but the blacks were dumb enough to let themselves be used as tools. Now that I’ve had to look at it I want no more to do with living with them, and call myself a white separatist.

There is no true geographic separation, it is primarily urban vs. rural. Civil wars that start without defined geographic separation and with entwined populations must go through a very nasty initial stage of creating those defined regions. Look at the Balkans or Iraq. Even in California there are large conservative areas yet.

It’s not clear if the liberals hold enough territory to form a viable region at all, although they have population. That means they’d have to take some first, which they will have difficulty doing without the power of police or military force. So the issue devolves to one of what will the US military will do, as other authors have discussed. The top brass are largely deep state tools – will the lower level officers rebel?

What an incredibly stupid idea: Leave all the military training and equipment in the hands of your enemies and become defenseless. Do you even think about this crap you post at all?

Lower level officers and more capable enlisted men (mostly white) are about the only thing they fear.

Idiocy. Any history of North America that starts in the 19th century comes hundreds of years after the indigenous population was essentially wiped out by plagues. It’s no more representative of what native society was once like than a few hundred years after any civilizational collapse would be. Will the North America societies of 2350 represent the heyday of American culture? Will they know anything about it really? The east coast of NA was once extensively populated with towns and villages, not roving bands of warring tribes.

This woke nonsense of erasing our history can’t be fought by more nonsense of erasing someone else’s. It happened, it was – try to learn about it rather than trying to change it now. Spouting gibberish about history just feeds into the the agendas of (((those))) who want to erase it for their own purposes.

Games like scrabble have a limited range of fixed rules. There are no opportunities or benefits for invention or creativity. Any game that can be played by a computer requires no real intelligence at all.

IQ tests measure (maybe) one’s likelihood of success in a western society. Maybe useful in some circumstances, but meaningless for others.

If you want to see the characteristics of the various races, look to history and see what they’ve accomplished in the fullness of time. Blacks built, invented and created little compared to white and Asian societies, which is not a judgement of value so much as an observation. The races are simply different, and that difference is why blacks as a group have consistently failed in western society, and will continue to do so regardless of their ability to play scrabble. And why their presence is not a net benefit for the west.

Excellent analysis refuting the false binary choice and illustrating the alternative that is so obvious thanks to its continual omission, but…….

Why assume it is an AMERICAN bioweapon? There are of course other possibilities that are also obvious by their omission.

Merely look at what happened a few weeks ago when the huge push began to get everyone vaccinated and to vilify the unvaxed – just as Bill Gates was thrown under the bus. It was like someone turned on a switch, and a lot of people noticed it. It’s clear there is panic among the elites, as well as extreme time pressure.

Why?

The most likely answer is that the fall/winter season approaches with the typical increase in illness, and they cannot have such a big “control group” of unvaccinated people. It will be too obvious who is getting sick and who is not, even with all the lies to try and cover it up.

Exponential functions work in reverse too, all that is required is to have death rates exceed birth rates for a time.

COVID was probably supposed to be more deadly, but the globalist elites always believe they are smarter and have more control than they do. They are always caught off guard when the universe is more complex than they anticipate and does not cooperate.

The vaccine may have a bigger impact though, but it’s still too early to tell. It won’t be a mass casualty event with people dropping in the streets, rather by a remaining lifetime of illnesses, greater and smaller, leading to earlier deaths. They did manage to get billions to go along, so the effect could be huge in the long run.

Probably the coming economic collapse will have a bigger impact overall. Peak oil was real, and we no longer have the excess energy to support the population we have, therefore that population will drop – somehow. The globalists great evil is to believe they get to choose who makes it, but they will fail in that as they always do.

As for space, humans cannot survive anywhere but earth. Also it costs way too much energy to dispose of excess humans that way, so simpler methods will be used. It’s a manifestation of the delusions of the globalists, although it would be wonderful if they’d all launch themselves off to mars.

Utter nonsense. Even if abiotic oil is real, it doesn’t happen at a rate fast enough to have any relevance. The energy in fossil fuel is stored ancient sunlight that fell to earth over millennia, was used by life forms (plankton) to form their bodies, and became trapped in the carbon bonds therein.

Also the net energy return is what matters – the cost in energy it takes to get the fossil fuel energy you want. Drilling at ridiculous depths or extracting from shale formations does not yield enough net energy to make any sense, expect that it is needed to keep our industrial society going, and therefore it is necessary for the leaders of our society to maintain power. Thus we perpetuate massive financial frauds to pretend things like shale oil work, the banks make loans that everyone knows will never be repaid, and the debts get dumped on the masses.

In reality we’ve used up most of the positive net energy stored solar energy, and will go back to the real-time flows of solar energy that was once all humans had access to. Our population densities will need to return to the levels those real time flows can support too. The globalist think they’ll get to decide who survives, but they are not in control.

You keep believing energy is unlimited, it makes you a useful tool.

The absolute stupidity of implementing a technology like fission without ever having developed a way to deal with the waste is staggering. This nation alone has over 85,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel, which will remain incredibly toxic to human life for 10’s of thousands of years after we’re forgotten. It sits in pools and casks, most of it on site at the NPP where it was created – a look at a map will show those are located all throughout the regions that were the most productive farmland in the US (prior to fossil fuel fertilized factory farming – now failing). During our nation’s most prosperous times we never found the resources to deal with it – now it will sit on those sites until the banal forces of weathering release it, to poison all those lands.

What a great plan.

On top of it all we can’t afford those too-cheap-to-meter sources, and you can keep your thorium and fusion pipe dreams. You’re just hand waving that crap which will never be economically viable.

Unfortunately your comment here condenses down to “it hasn’t been a problem yet, and they’ll think of something”. Hope is not a plan. The toxicity and the time scales involved may be outside of what you are considering.

Some exciting catastrophe at a npp that releases the stuff locally is not required. On the time scale for which this waste will remain dangerous, simple weathering, erosion and decay will have exactly the same effect – maybe it won’t happen to you or me, but to our great grandchildren, but that is equivalent. Moving the stuff somewhere would have been the best choice – some place will get wasted by it, but not the places most people need to live. Still, the costs are outrageous, and we’re not going to be able to do it now since we’re collapsing. “Proper technological solutions” are not being implemented, nor are there any real programs to do so. There are zero signs that they ever will be.

As for the new reactor designs – how’s it going getting funding for that? Economic viability matters.

I’m also an engineer, with decades of design experience, and I’m well aware that “green” energy (i.e. real time flows of solar energy) cannot power our industrial society. It is your assumption that there must be an alternative to (no longer viable) fossil fuels that you need to examine. There is another possibility: that our industrial society will not be viable without fossil fuels.

The universe is under no obligations to fulfill our needs for energy. The world we have built was built on the stored solar energy of fossil fuels – stating with peat, moving to coal, oil and then gas. You may believe it can be continued with other energy sources, but that has not been proven – it’s an assumption you’re making based on faith and wishful thinking. Once the true costs of fission and these other plans are included, they are not viable. Those costs in the case of fission include cleaning up the waste, which we have no idea how to do, let alone any chance of affording it.

People are far more afraid of chaos, of the idea that no one is in control, than anything else. Therefore they would far more readily believe that their worst enemy is in full control than accept that in fact no one is.