RSSWhat about John Mohamed and Lee Malvo – the Washington DC snipers?
What I don’t get why Trump is treating Sessions this way. Anyway, it’s an eye-opening episode for me. For one, it reveals the extent to which some would go to defend anything Trump does, no matter how counter-productive. I’m sure I will be getting replies about how how Sessions had it coming or what Trump did was no big deal.
Sessions has been a disappointment. Instead of being Trump's legal attack dog he's been a scared rabbit begging the Dem's to eat him last. Politically Session's is on the right side but he has no stomach for battle. Courtly Southern Gentlemanliness is not the right demeanor for battling berserkers bent on destroying what's left of traditional America.
I don’t get why Trump is treating Sessions this way
Maybe the nuttiest part of our already nutty refugee systen is that the specific Somalis we take in are from a supposedly oppressed minority group there known as the “Bantu Somalis”.
This is not true – I have worked with a refugee agency in East Africa, particularly in Kenya where a large number of them are processed for resettlement into other countries. While there are some “Bantu Somalis” among the refugees, most of them are non-Bantu. This is the same for refugees that got resettled in Europe as well.
He is still attacking Sessions…
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/889790429398528000
Reading the comments here so far, I bet if he starts attacking Bannon publicly, some would find a way to justify it. Trump can never be wrong…
“JewishnessWho is a Jew?
Competing answers to an increasingly pressing question”
1) For Orthodox Jews like Rabbi Tubul, the solution is simple and ancient: you are a Jew if your mother is Jewish, or if your conversion to Judaism accorded with the Halacha, Jewish religious law.
2) The biggest problem comes from the clashing consequences of two great ruptures in 20th-century history: the Holocaust and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Under Israel’s Law of Return, anyone who has, or whose spouse has, at least one Jewish grandparent can claim citizenship—a standard expressly modelled on the criteria for persecution under the Nazis’ Nuremberg laws of 1935. The Law of Return also recognises conversions that the rabbinate rejects.
3) Rabbi Andy Bachman of Congregation Beth Elohim, a lively and ecumenical synagogue in Brooklyn, New York, argues that “an exclusive definition of Jews as a faith is a goyishe [gentile] construct”—an effort to fit the Jewish people into a recognisable gentile category. Attachment to Jewish history and culture also suffice, he thinks. In this dispensation, gentile spouses and converts are welcomed. The biblical story of Ruth, a gentile who took on her Israelite in-laws’ religion, is a favourite parable.
Continuation:
Hence, it is not true at all that according to The Saker Jews aren’t a separate group that has some kind of unique, different quality.
In practice, Jews themeselves have proudly set themeselves apart from goys but goys must accept to lose their own uniqueness ( French people, German people, British people, Italian people, Spanish people and so on ) by accepting a multitude of immigrants from different continents and ironically some of the strongest supporters of the new multiethnic Europe are intellectual Jews ( writers, journalists, artists, politicians ) who still live in European countries but love Israel much more.
In short, something’s not right to say the least!
Best regards.
Fabrice, greetings from Italy.
The dirty little secret is that zionists played a major role in writing those "Nazi" Nuremberg laws as part of the zionist campaign to get all (German) Jews out of Germany and into Palestine, where their money and skills were desperately needed; or into the USA, which zionist Jewish leaders perceived would be the primary source for the tremendous amount of money needed to fund the zionist project in Palestine.
Under Israel’s Law of Return, anyone who has, or whose spouse has, at least one Jewish grandparent can claim citizenship—a standard expressly modelled on the criteria for persecution under the Nazis’ Nuremberg laws of 1935.
The secession of French elites is just a consequence, not the real problem!
Her is a good economic explanation in French language.
Comment l’euro a conduit la France dans l’impasse
FIGAROVOX/ANALYSE – La monnaie unique a vingt ans cette année. Pour l’économiste David Cayla, cette monnaie ne s’est pas avérée être l’outil promis au service des économies européennes, mais plutôt un cadre normatif auquel les peuples européens sont condamnés à s’adapter, en dépit de leurs différences économiques structurelles.
Par David Cayla
Publié le 29/04/2019
https://www.lefigaro.fr/vox/economie/comment-l-euro-a-conduit-la-france-dans-l-impasse-20190429
I had read the Italian version and I can say that it’s a sort of “Lectio Magistralis” from any kind of view!
Enjoy the reading!
Best regards.
Fabrice, greetings from Italy