Yes, around here on UNZ and elsewhere we are unfortunately mainly 'blessed' with the neo-nazi inspired gossip crowd of 'Churchill was a drunkard', and Roosevelt 'a Jewish agent'.., it stinks.

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Truth Vigilante

Eternal Slave writes:

There is a widespread rumor that FDR was a “Jewish puppet”. This rumor persists to a large extent to this day.
 

Roosevelt was not a traitor and a “Jewish agent”, but a true American patriot ....
 

1. Bernard M. Baruch — A financier and advisor to FDR.
2. Felix Frankfurter — Supreme Court Justice; a key player in FDR’s New Deal system.
3. David E. Lilienthal — Director of Tennessee Valley Authority; advisor to FDR. The TVA changed the relationship of government-to-business in America.
4. David Niles — Presidential aide.
5. Louis Brandeis — U.S. Supreme Court Justice; confidant of FDR; “Father” of the New Deal.
6. Samuel I. Rosenman — Official speechwriter for FDR.
7. Henry Morgenthau Jr. — Secretary of the Treasury, unofficial presidential advisor. Father of the Morgenthau Plan to restructure Germany/Europe after WWII.
8. Benjamin V. Cohen — State Department official; advisor to FDR.
9. Rabbi Stephen Wise — Close friend of FDR; spokesman for the American Zionist movement, head of The American Jewish Congress.
10. Adolph J. Sabath—An avid New Dealer, Zionist and interventionist who strongly supported war against National Socialist Germany.
11. Sidney Hillman — Presidential advisor.
12. Anna Rosenberg — Longtime labor advisor to FDR; manpower advisor with the Manpower Consulting Committee of the Army and Navy Munitions Board and the War Manpower Commission.
13. Herbert H. Lehman — Governor of New York, 1933-1942, Director of U.S. Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations, Department of State, 1942-1943; Director-General of UNRRA, friend of FDR.
14. Herbert Feis — U.S. State Department official, economist, and an advisor on international economic affairs.
15. R. S. Hecht — Financial advisor to FDR.
16. Nathan Margold — Department of the Interior Solicitor, legal advisor.
17. Jesse I. Straus — Advisor to FDR.
18. H. J. Laski – Unofficial foreign advisor to FDR.
19. Emanuel A. Goldenweiser — Federal Reserve Director.
20. Charles E. Wyzanski — U.S. Labor department legal advisor.
21. Samuel Untermyer — Lawyer, unofficial public ownership advisor to FDR.
22. Jacob Viner — Tax expert at the U.S. Treasury Department, assistant to the Treasury Secretary.
23. Edward Filene — Businessman, philanthropist, unofficial presidential advisor.
24. David Dubinsky — Labor leader, president of International Ladies Garment Workers Union.
25. William C. Bullitt — Part-Jewish, ambassador to USSR.
26. Mordecai Ezekiel — Agriculture Department economist.
27. Abe Fortas — Assistant director of Securities and Exchange Commission; Department of the Interior Undersecretary.
28. Isador Lubin — Commissioner of Labor Statistics, unofficial labor economist to FDR.
29. Harry Dexter White [Weiss] — Assistant Secretary of the Treasury; a key founder of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank; advisor to FDR, close friend of Henry Morgenthau. Cowrote the Morgenthau Plan
30. Robert Moses – Held numerous New York public offices; instituted centralization in New York state government which was later used as a model for FDR’s New Deal.
31. David Weintraub — Official in the Office of Foreign Relief and Rehabilitation Operations; helped create the United Nations; headed the New Deal Works Project Administration’s National Research Project.
32. Nathan Gregory Silvermaster — Agriculture Department official and head of the Near East Division of the Board of Economic Warfare; helped create the United Nations.
33. Harold Glasser — Treasury Department director of the division of monetary research.
Treasury spokesman on the affairs of United Nations Relief and Rehabilitation Administration.
34. Irving Kaplan — U.S. Treasury Department official, friend of David Weintraub.
35. Solomon Adler — Treasury Department representative in China during World War II.
36. Benjamin Cardozo — U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
37. Leo Wolman — Chairman of the National Recovery Administration’s Labor advisory Board; labor economist.
38. Rose Schneiderman — Labor organizer; on the advisory board of the National Recovery Administration.
39. Jerome Frank — General counsel to the Agricultural Adjustment Administration; Justice, U.S. Court of Appeals, 1941-1957.
40. Gerard Swope — Key player in the creation of the N.R.A. (National Recovery Administration).
41. Herbert Bayard Swope — Brother of Gerard Swope. Served as a consultant to the U.S. Secretary of War. Pulitzer Prize winning journalist.
42. James M. Landis – Member of the Federal Trade Commission; member and later chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
43. J. David Stern — Federal Reserve Board member; appointed by FDR.
44. Nathan Straus — Housing advisor.
45. Charles Michaelson — Democratic [DNC] publicity man.
46. Lawrence Steinhardt — Ambassador to the Soviet Union and five other countries. Wrote campaign speeches for FDR.
47. Harry Guggenheim — Heir to Guggenheim fortune; advisor on aviation.
48. Arthur Garfield Hays — Advisor on civil liberties.
49. David Lasser — Head of Worker’s Alliance; labor activist.
50. Max Zaritsky — Labor advisor.
51. James Warburg — Millionaire, his father helped establish the Federal Reserve System; early supporter of the New Deal before backing out.
52. Louis Kirstein — Associate of E. Filene.
53. Charles Wyzanski, Jr. — Counsel, Dept. of Labor.
54. Charles Taussig — Early New Deal advisor.
55. Jacob Baker — Assistant administrator in the Federal Emergency Relief Administrator (FERA) and Works Progress Administration (WPA).
56. Louis H. Bean — Dept. of Agriculture official.
57. Abraham Fox — Research director, Tariff Commission.
58. Benedict Wolf — National Labor Relations Board [NLRB].
59. William Leiserson – NLRB.
60. David J. Saposs – NLRB.
61. A. H. Meyers — NLRB [New England division].
62. L. H. Seltzer — Head economist at the Treasury Dept.
63. Edward Berman — Dept. of Labor official.
64. Jacob Perlman — Dept. of Labor official.
65. Morris L. Jacobson — Chief statistician of the Government Research Project.
66. Jack Levin — Assistant general manager, Rural Electrification Authority.
67. Harold Loeb — Economic consultant, N.R.P.
68. William Seagle — Council, Petroleum Labor Policy Board.
69. Herman A. Gray — Policy committee, National Housing Conference.
70. Alexander Sachs — Rep. of Lehman Brothers, early New Deal consultant.
71. Paul Mazur — Rep. of Lehman Brothers, early consultant for New Deal.
72. Henry Alsberg — Head of the Writer’s Project under the W.P.A.
73. Lincoln Rothschild — New Deal art administrator.
74. Sol Rosenblatt – Administrator of the NRA’s division on amusement and
transportation codes.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Johan

Eternal Slave writes:

Nonsense and lies of neo-Nazi propaganda. I would recommend reading serious historical works and not historical neo-Nazi charlatans like David Irving.
 

More than that, he has had access to the diaries/private letters and personal writings of an assortment of prominent Germans (high ranking military entities and those in the German government/bureaucracy) that NO OTHER historian has had access to.
You see, after writing his masterful book on Dresden, the families of those prominent individuals in the Third Reich saw that 'this was an Englishman who spoke the truth'.
They saw that Irving would not embellish his writings to appease the Jews that controlled the major book publishing houses and the western academia.

So, the families of these prominent individuals (some of whom were hanged post war or had passed away in the interim), they handed Irving their diaries, private letters and documented correspondence belonging to said high ranking* family member.
(*And not just high ranking individuals either but those in Hitler's inner circle. ie: the likes of private secretaries, adjutants and people that were there to witness firsthand the various important discussions and historical events).

You've revealed a lot by the way you call people 'Neo-Nazis'.
ONLY Malignant Jews talk that way. Thanks Shlomo for revealing who you are.
I mean, to call someone a 'Nazi', you say it likes it's a bad thing.
In war atrocities are committed by all sides, as one side retaliates to depraved acts perpetrated against it by reciprocating in kind. But, using any metric one chooses to apply:

The Anglo-Zionist empire committed BY FAR THE WORST ATROCITIES** OF WWII.
 

Of course you know nothing about these aforementioned things since everything you've ever read consists of 'kosher' ADL approved books and authors. It's ironic that you, someone who's likely not read a single objective historical work on WWII, should be advising others do so.
The fact of the matter is that you are badly in need of an education on true WWII history.

It's safe bet also that you believe that 6 million yids also perished in the Holohoax and that most were killed in those mythical gas chambers (which no one has furnished a shred of evidence for their existence).
Is that correct Shlomo? Are you one of these Holohoax propagandists?

You go on to writes stuff like this:

So Roosevelt is a “Jewish puppet” and therefore pursued anti-Jewish policies?
These are clearly mutually exclusive.
 

So, I don't know why you even brought up that point, seeing as you've made the case for me.
Contrary to your false assertion that the 'Jews have cooled off in their support for FDR', the reality is that they idolise him. (Case in Point: A shlomo like yourself).
And, I don't know who you're trying to convince by posting a link to a Washington Post article.
WaPo is known disinformation outlet that works in cahoots with Malevolent International Jewry, so there's little likelihood you'll ever get any truth out of them.

Summary: Hitler extricated Germany from the financial orbit of the Jewish controlled western financial system and exploitation through usury. Needless to say, that is why Germany's economy grew spectacularly in the 1930's while the other western nations were mired in Depression.

This could not be allowed to stand. If Germany was allowed to flourish economically under Hitler, this would serve as a template to the other nations of the world to also extricate themselves from Talmudic usury.
THAT is the major reason why Germany was targeted for destruction (along with the fact that Jews were removed from prominent positions in academia, industry etc - which further strengthened the German economy as this parasitic entity was purged from important positions in society).
 

Oh, and I forgot to address this stupid remark of yours which confirms that you're an economic ignoramus (in addition to the fact that you're a dunce on WWII history):

Roosevelt’s economic reforms were, on the contrary, highly successful. No catastrophe.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav

And at the same time, he publicly struck back against Jewish influence in the US when he felt it was necessary or that he was strong enough to take such a step (see quotas for Jewish students at Harvard or Project M).
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Re Syria, we don't know the whys and wherefores. Re Armenia, Russia stabbed no one in the back, Armenians stabbed themselves. They snubbed Russia and cosied up to its enemies. Why on Earth should Russia then rescue Armenia?

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Colonel Dolma

Agree... Thank you

The WW2 “holocaust” is a Jewish lie. One that was repeated hundreds of times for 4 decades before WW2 by Jews around the world begging for money, sympathy and Palestine like lying wastes of skin faking cancer on go fund me websites.

British propaganda officers admitted as much. It doesn’t surprise me that FDR didn’t commit resources to stop what wasn’t happening.

How long has the global Zionist cabal controlled the United States. One third of the founders were Freemasons, the secret satanic society based on Judaism.

This holocaust in Gaza began with the founding of the US.

Here Jewish leaders brag about owning and controlling freemasonry and that it is completely satanic in nature.

THE JEWISH TRIBUNE, New York, Oct. 28, 1927, Cheshvan 2, 5688, Vol. 91, No. 18: “Masonry is based on Judaism. Eliminate the teachings of Judaism from the Masonic ritual and what is left?”

LA VERITE ISRAELITE, Jewish paper 1861, IV, page 74: “The spirit of Freemasonry is the spirit of Judaism in its most fundamental beliefs; it is its ideas, its language, it is mostly its organization, the hopes which enlighten and support Israel. It’s crowning will be that wonderful prayer house of which Jerusalem will be the triumphal centre and symbol.”

LE SYMBOLISM, July, 1928: “The most important duty of the Freemason must be to glorify the Jewish Race, which has preserved the unchanged divine standard of wisdom. You must rely upon the Jewish race to dissolve all frontiers.”

AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OF FREEMASONRY,Philadelphia, 1906: “Each Lodge is and must be a symbol of the Jewish temple; each Master in the Chair, a representative of the Jewish King; and every Mason a personification of the Jewish workman.”

MANUAL OF FREEMASONRY, by Richard Carlile: “The Grand Lodge Masonry of the present day is wholly Jewish.”

THE FREEMASON, April 2, 1930, quoting Br. Rev. S. McGowan: “Freemasonry is founded on the ancient law of Israel. Israel has given birth to the moral beauty which forms the basis of Freemasonry.”

Rabbi Br. Isaac Wise, in The Israelite of America, March 8, 1866: “Masonry is a Jewish institution whose history, degrees, charges, passwords and explanations are Jewish from beginning to end.”

Benjamin Disraeli, Jew, Prime Minister of England, in The Life of Lord George Bentick: “At the head of all those secret societies, which form provisional governments, men of the Jewish race are to be found.”

LATOMIA, a German Masonic journal, Vol. 12, July 1849, Page 237: “We cannot help but greet socialism (Marxism – Communism) as an excellent comrade of Freemasonry for ennobling mankind, for helping to further human welfare. Socialism and Freemasonry, together with Communism are sprung from the same source.”

BERNARD STILLMAN, Jew, in Hebraic influences on Masonic Symbolism, 1929, quoted The Masonic News, London: “I think I have proved sufficiently that Freemasonry, as what concurs symbolism, lays entirely on a formation which is essentially Jewish.”

O.B. Good, M.A. in The Hidden Hand of Judah, 1936: “The influence of the Jewish Sanhedrin is today more powerful than ever in Freemasonry.”

JEWISH ENCYCLOPEDIA, 1903, Vol, 5, page 503: “The technical language, symbolism and rites of Freemasonry are full of Jewish ideas and terms … In the Scottish Rite, the dates on official documents are given according to the era and months of the Jewish calendar, and use is made of the Hebraic alphabet.”

B’NAI B’RITH MAGAZINE, Vol. 13, page 8, quoting rabbi and mason Magnin: “The B’nai B’rith are but a makeshift. Everywhere that Freemasonry can admit that it is Jewish in its nature as well as in its aims, the ordinary lodges are sufficient for the task.

The ADL (Anti-Defamation League) of B’nai B’rith is a totally Jewish controlled organization with its main goal to destroy Christianity. (Also, the B’nai B’rith form a super-Masonic lodge where no “Gentiles” are admitted.)

TRANSACTIONS OF THE JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY Vol. 2, p 156: “The Coat of Arms used by the Grand Lodge of England is entirely composed of Jewish symbols. FREEMASONS WORSHIP LUCIFER!

Replies: @Anynomous

.whether FDR, was a Jewish agent or not, but he sure did everything that the Jews wanted him to do!
Get America & Britain ( along with Anglo sucker, Canada!) involved into a war with Japan ( Pearl Harbir?), and Germany! Fire bombing of Hamburg, Dresden, Calais, oil fields of Ploesti. Give Stalin control of East Europe ( Yalta, Potsdam), Operation keelhaul,Bleiburg, etc.! His whole cabinet was staffed by Jews..! Of course he was either Jewish
and he was their Shabas Goy! Don’t be silly..

Replies: @24th Alabama, @Eternal Slav

There is no Russia here. There is a Jewish Soviet Union. And it was the Soviet Union that first clung to the enemies of Armenia (Israel, Turkey, Azerbaijan, etc.). Armenia asked for help, and the Soviet Union refused help. That is treason.

The reason is clear - ZOG controls Russia. Azerbaijan is an ally of Israel. Israel also wants to conquer Syria. That is why the Putinist government betrayed both Syria and Armenia. For Israel. That is absolutely clear.

Replies: @Poupon Marx

Wrong ... Jootin had a hard on for Azeri oil and transit fees... didn't even whimper when the azeris shot down his pilot.... earlier the turks did the same, shot the pilot out of the sky and assassinated his ambassador... again barely a wimper.. but azeris are broadcasting all over the world (guess who helps them with that) over the downing of an airliner (possibly by ukrainian drones).... verdict is in... Putin is a chabad puppet dwarf...granted Pashynian is a soros horses ass... he should have launched those iskanders directly on baku oil infrastructure and brought on the war and cut the source of funds for the fake state of azerbaijan.. instead death by a thousand cuts from the azeri laudromat, zangezour corridor and other forms of bullshit..of course the Iskanders were likely disabled by chabbaddist putin

Replies: @Passing by

It is a waste of time to refute your stammering one sentence explanations of the equivalent of a newspaper headline or bumper sticker. You are obviously a dullard, of low intellect and knoledge and evidently low motivation to learn and verify. Hit the road, Zion Zero.

Replies: @Eternal Slav

What do people need?

We don’t need more idols.

People need to value and hang onto something that can’t steer them wrong.

The need to make laws that protect that thing.

Truth, reality, is that thing that will be supported by developing a plan to defeat lying.

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Besides, libertarian schools of economics are heavily dominated by Jews, and Jewish financing...

Replies: @Truth Vigilante

In fact, most economic historians disagree with the claim that the New Deal was a “disaster,” or even with the claim that the policy only prolonged the Great Depression.
 

Similarly, most economics graduates in the U.S are indoctrinated with Keynesian nonsense - when we know with certainty that this is a failed doctrine.
So, going with the consensus is a contrarian indicator - in that what the majority believes is almost always wrong*.

(*For example, most Americans were stupid enough to take the experimental mRNA gene therapy that masquerades as a Covid vaccine - and those clot shots killed something like 700,000 Americans and injured millions more according to Dr Peter McCullough - arguably the leading authority in the world on the carnage caused by the Covid 'vacines').
I assume you're also one of those fully vaxxed and boostered fools, judging by the stupidity of your comments due to the neurological impairment you've undergone as the spike proteins cause atrophy of your brain.

As for your uninformed comment that the New Deal was not a disaster, I refer you to the video I posted in comment # 191. You need only stop at the 3:20 mark and READ for yourself what FDR's Treasury Secretary (the Jew Henry Morgenthau Jr) said in 1941. He said this:

'We have never made good on our promises ... after 8 years of this administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started .... and an enormous debt to boot'.
 

BTW, as expected, you avoid responding when I ask you for you position on the Holohoax.
Yet another clue that you're a Shlomo that is afraid they'll be eviscerated in a debate.

And, in relation to your comments 193, and 194 (where you post a link to a Salon.com article and some non entity called Ray Allen Billington that no one has ever heard of), it's little wonder that you mind is so full of claptrap.
Salon is a known to be affiliated with the ZOG ruling elite and is worthless as a source for objective information. You must be quite a simpleton if you haven't worked that out already.

From what I've seen you mention to date, ALL your sources are ZOG affiliated and posting disinfo from start to finish. You really have no idea as to where you can turn for honest information, do you?

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Mr Eternal Slave, all of the things you've itemised collectively do not add up to a hill of beans.

Compare them to the following things in QUALITATIVE terms that FDR did to advance the Talmudic agenda of Malignant International Jewry:

1) The incendiary bombing of German civilians (often times PURPOSELY targeting population centres that offered no military or industrial target), resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousand of non combatants (mostly women, children and the elderly), that were making no contribution to the German war effort.

2) Egging on Poland to remain belligerent towards Germany in the lead up to WWII (the Polish government was conducting countless acts of depravity on ethnic Germans living in Poland that resulted in thousands of Germans murdered and countless more brutalised - eg: eyes gouged out etc)

3) Purposely provoking the Germans with acts of war (firing on German U-boats etc).
Absent these provocations Germany would not have declared war* on the U.S.

(*Even if Germany had not declared war on the U.S in the immediate aftermath of the Pearl harbour attack, FDR would've likely conjured up some False Flag or other pretext to get America involved in the European theatre of war).

End Result: Countless scores of thousands of U.S soldiers killed in a war that America HAD NO REASON TO BE INVOLVED IN.

 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

You stated:

1. In 1923, as a member of the Harvard’s Board of Overseers, Roosevelt began to worry that “a third of the entering class at Harvard were Jews.” He helped establish quotas that limited the number of Jews admitted to Harvard to 15 percent of each class. Roosevelt was proud of this move in later years, even boasting about it to his Jewish Treasury Secretary, Henry Morgenthau, in 1941.
 

The president replied by citing an incident in 1923, when he was a member of Harvard University’s Board of Overseers: “Some years ago a third of the entering class at Harvard were Jews and the question came up as to how it should be handled . . . I asked [a fellow-board member] whether we should discuss it with the Board of Overseers and it was decided that we should. . . . It was decided that over a period of years the number of Jews should be reduced one or two per cent a year until it was down to 15%. . . . I treat the Catholic situation just the same. . . . I appointed three men in Nebraska—all Catholics—and they wanted me to appoint another Catholic, and I said that I wouldn’t do it. . . . You can’t get a disproportionate amount of any one religion.”
 

Franklin Roosevelt had placed more Jews in major federal appointments than the total named by all the presidents before him.
 

On a personal level, Roosevelt was well-disposed toward Jews. As governor of New York state, with the largest concentration of Jews in the United States, he denounced antisemitism, became the first presidential candidate to criticize anti-Jewish prejudice and backed Palestine as a Jewish homeland.

Once he was president, he drew upon Jewish talent to pursue his agenda. During his unprecedented four terms, 15 percent of his appointees to federal government and White House positions were Jews, far exceeding the Jewish percentage of the population. And one of his key cabinet members, Henry Morgenthau Jr., secretary of the treasury, was Jewish.
 

In January 1942, according to Morgenthau’s diary, White House adviser Leo Crowley reported to him that during a recent lunch with the president, FDR commented, “Leo, you know this is a Protestant country, and the Catholics and Jews are here on sufferance. . . . It is up to both of you [Crowley and Morgenthau] to go along with anything that I want at this time.”
 

FDR remarked: “Leo, you know this is a Protestant country, and the Catholics and Jews are here under sufferance. It is up to you to go along with anything that I want.” The president may well have meant his comment as a joke...
 

"Franklin Roosevelt appointed more Catholics and Jews to his presidency than all previous presidents combined," says Andrew Preston, a Cambridge University historian.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav

When exactly was the US “great”?

Replies: @Eternal Slav

You stated:

Roosevelt was clearly opposed to the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine on principle. Because his goal was to prevent, as much as possible, the establishment of a homogeneous Jewish community. It is clear that Zionism, with its effort to build the largest homogeneous Jewish community in the Middle East, stood in direct opposition to Roosevelt’s vision in this regard.
 

That is true. But it is also true that he prevented a much larger number of Jewish immigrants from settling, precisely because of the fear of Jewish immigration. And this despite massive pressure from many Jewish organizations and groups. Here you can see that when Roosevelt decided to stand firmly for something, he was adamant. Here you can see that you greatly underestimate Roosevelt.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Eternal Slave wrote:

what can be said about such great American presidents as Abraham Lincoln or Theodore Roosevelt
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

There's nothing much to respond to you except that although you are convinced that you are the smartest kid in town and that you know better than everybody here, your reading of both history and current events is complete rubbish. Whether you're a troll or those are your true beliefs is irrelevant because arguing with you would be a waste of time either way.

Finally accept that the Nazi evil has been defeated and definitively destroyed and will never rise from the ashes.

Note: It is funny that you blame the Western Allies for supporting the Banderites, while the same brutal fascist organization was supported by the Germans. Not to mention the German support for the Ustasha and the brutal Japanese fascists.

Replies: @Anynomous

"American and british still to this day try to spread lies about german being monsters etc. The fact is that there werent “gas chambers” and german themselves couldnt even feed themselves at the end of the world."
Yes, indeed.

I however wonder if you are ignorant about the Germans being portrayed as monsters by the Slavs. Slavs have not only - with great eagerness- swallowed the established narrative on WWII, but also internalised the omnipresent tales about the Germans being barbaric monsters since centuries.

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Dont worry, american and british with their supremacy views and ideology will be completely de-nazified in the end. Right now american and british are laughing while pulling strings of our totally corrupt governments and holding guns on our heads, but times will change eventually.

If american and british would have read real history what really happened and didnt believe to their own lies, they would know that german in WW2 complied with international law to the fullest. It was american and british that did most sickening war crimes and massively supported the bolshevik communist Soviet Union.

In fact when german found out that ukrainian banderista nazis had chopped people with axes, they were horrified themselves, but atrocities of even ukrainian banderista nazis werent never a problem to american and british. They are simply lack common human traits of the human specie. Even now american and british are openly allied and co-operating with the sickest fucks in the world that you can think of, jihadist terrorists, kurdish terrorists, organized crime organizations, ukrainian banderista nazis, the northern league of uzbeks, tajiks and other pedophiles, as well as with ukrainian banderista nazis etc. Thats really their secret weapon, of lacking many traits of human specie that would normally restrict them. American and british simply do not have these features restraining them. They can lie absolutely anything right at your face and tell how they are the good and moral ones and you are the evil dictator that needs to be taken down and your people need to be liberated of their resources managed by american and british, because hey, its best if the resources are in american and british hands, right? Its like taking your wallet and telling you well, its best if Im having the wallet, because I know how to use it!

Replies: @Eternal Slav

I’m not criticizing him [Churchill] for his fight against Hitler.
That’s the last thing I would criticize him for.
 

I'm also not a fan of Churchill (who wanted to drop nuclear bombs on Russia, for example). Maybe he really had a problem with alcohol. Just like he had a problem with smoking. But the point is, I'm not criticizing him for his fight against Hitler. That's the last thing I would criticize him for.

Replies: @Truth Vigilante

Oh dear, don't tell me Johan that you're yet another apologist for the mischief making on Malignant International Jewry?
The well researched contributors here in UR that say Churchill was a drunkard, and that both FDR and Churchill were both servile ZOG sock puppets, do not say those things about these traitors because we dreamed it up.

It is WELL DOCUMENTED that these individuals were completely under the thumb of their Jewish benefactors.
It's unfortunate for you Johan, that you have been TOO LAZY to do the necessary legwork and ascertain for yourself that their traitorous activities are well documented with an avalanche of evidence to support those assertions.

There is a thread in UR where all these matters are currently being discussed. But I don't see you participating in the comments of that thread Johan. (I attach the link to it below):
https://www.unz.com/article/why-did-churchill-have-britain-fight-on-after-summer-1940-its-bad-news/#new_comments
I mean, if you're as knowledgeable as you think you are about Churchill and FDR, surely you should be able to provide evidence that proves that these two individuals were altruistic saints who genuinely cared for the welfare of their fellow countrymen?

I suggest you read the article in the link above first then scroll through the comments. eg: comments like # 3, 201, 317*, 325 and countless more posted by John Wear.

(*From comment # 317 we have this from the brilliant historian John Wear):

Franklin Roosevelt was attempting to have several countries start a war against Germany. To this end, Roosevelt wanted to arm Great Britain, Poland, and France so that these countries would be willing to enter into a war against Germany.

Washington journalists Drew Pearson and Robert S. Allen reported in their nationally syndicated column that on March 16, 1939, President Roosevelt “sent a virtual ultimatum to Chamberlain” demanding that the British government strongly oppose Germany.
Pearson and Allen reported that “the president warned that Britain could expect no more support, moral or material through the sale of airplanes, if the Munich policy continued.”
(Source: Pearson, Drew and Allen, Robert S., “Washington Daily Merry-Go-Round,” Washington Times-Herald, April 14, 1939, p. 16).

Roosevelt also attempted to arm Poland so that Poland would be more willing to go to war against Germany.
Roosevelt did everything in his power to start a war against Germany.

For example, Sir Ronald Lindsay, the British ambassador to Washington, confirmed Roosevelt’s secret policy to instigate war against Germany with the release of a confidential diplomatic report after the war. The report describes a secret meeting on Sept. 18, 1938, between Roosevelt and Ambassador Lindsay.
Roosevelt said that if Britain and France were forced into a war against Germany, the United States would ultimately join the war. Roosevelt’s idea to start a war was for Britain and France to impose a blockade against Germany without declaring war.

President Roosevelt told Ambassador Lindsay that if news of their conversation was ever made public, it could mean Roosevelt’s impeachment. What Roosevelt proposed to Lindsay was in effect a scheme to violate the U.S. Constitution by illegally starting a war.

Ambassador Lindsay in a series of final reports also indicated that Roosevelt was delighted at the prospect of a new world war. Roosevelt promised Lindsay that he would delay German ships under false pretenses in a feigned search for arms.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Besides, libertarian schools of economics are heavily dominated by Jews, and Jewish financing…
 

The list below is that of individuals (some of whom would not have attached the word 'Libertarian' to themselves - because the term had not yet been invented in the era in which they lived), but who nevertheless espoused philosophies and foreign (and economic) policy beliefs that aligned word perfect with today's Ron Paul Libertarianism.
They can thus be labelled the 'Founding Fathers of Libertarianism':

Adam Smith, John Locke, Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, Frédéric Bastiat, Lysander Spooner, Henry David Thoreau, Alexis de Tocqueville, Carl Menger, Eugen von Böhm-Bawerk, Friedrich von Wieser, Joseph Schumpeter, Friedrich Hayek, Hans-Hermann Hoppe. Lew Rockwell and countless others.

 

Replies: @Johan, @Johan, @Johan

You keep talking about how horrible german were claimed to be, when in fact they were complying with international law to the fullest. If you actually wang to talk about how horrible german were, start to represent actual evidence of something that really happened.

What is funny here is that american and british keep telling how horrible monsters german were, but then they smuggled as many german scientists, doctors, businessmen etc. to the USA, UK and Canada that they could get their hands on. Same with bolshevik communists and japanese. They werent monsters and horrible people then it seems, as they were good enough for collaboration with the oh, so moral american and british.

American and british have been continuing human experiments since WW2 to this day. They still continue them in Ukraine, Georgia, Africa and numerous other areas in the world.

American and british have also always allied with the most sick fucks in the world, as long as it has advanced their goals.

And american and british are the ones who always lecture us about what is right and wrong, what is good and evil, about "western values", "democracy" etc. It hasnt never been about any of that. It has been about power and resources. And people fall for it over and over again, when evil and criminal american and british start to lecture about "western values", "freedom", "democracy" etc. An american and a british can lie right at your face and and his face doesnt twitch even a bit. Thats why people fall for their lies and acting.

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav

The presidency of FDR is when you believe America was great eh?

Opinions are like assholes.

But, what makes you believe that to be true?

It is clear that you really do not know history.
 

It was just right that Roosevelt defeated two evil empires – Nazi Germany and fascist Japan.
 

Take Hitler's Germany for example. It was fighting to UNSHACKLE THE WORLD FROM INDENTURED SERVITUDE TO JEWISH USURY.

How the eff is that evil? The Germans of the first half of the 20th century deserve to get a lifetime recognition award (with statues erected in every nation in their honour), for their courage and self sacrifice in attempting to bring about the demise of ZOG.
 

Of course, Malignant Jew that you are, this outcome [a German triumph in either world war] would not be deemed 'Good for the Jews'.
Just as JFK/RFK/JFK Jr/Gaddafi remaining alive was also perceived as being not good for the Jews - hence the reason that the cartel of banking misfits that comprise ZOG ordering their execution.

With every foolish assertion you post you confirm to the UR readers that you're a foaming-at-the-mouth rabid member of the (((tribe))).
Mr Eternal Slave, why don't you have the guts to admit you're a Jew?

Replies: @Johan

Eternal Slave writes:

The Nazis, the “great defenders of the white race”, who massacred tens of millions of white Slavs and other white Europeans.
 

Within days after hostilities began, the Kremlin’s Central Committee issued orders to the effect that only scorched earth be left to the enemy. Everything of value was ordered to be destroyed, regardless of the needs of the civilian population left behind.

The measures taken by the Soviet Union between 1940 and 1942 aimed not only at furthering the Soviet war effort, but also at harming the German enemy even at the cost of huge losses of life among Soviet civilians.

The Soviet scorched-earth strategy included the deportation of millions of men, women and children; the resettlement and reestablishment of thousands of factories; the withdrawal of almost the entire railway rolling stock; the-annihilation of raw material depots; the removal of most of the agricultural machinery, cattle and grain stocks; the systematic destruction, burning and blowing up of the immovable infrastructure, inventories of all kinds, factory buildings, mines, residential areas, public buildings, public records, and even cultural monuments; and the intentional starvation of the civilian population which remained behind to face German occupation.

It was basically a policy which unscrupulously used the civilian population as a strategic pawn.

As early as February 1940, German intelligence had reported the systematic deportation of the Polish, Ukrainian and Jewish population from the western Ukraine.

In June 1940, up to one million Jewish refugees from German-occupied Poland along with many hundreds of thousands of Poles were deported to Siberia.
Then, a few weeks before 22 June 1941, mass deportations of the civilian populations along the entire frontier with Germany, Hungary, and Rumania took place.
 

In summary, the scorched-earth policy was extremely well geared to Soviet objectives.
Extensive investments had been made in a rather thinly populated and underdeveloped area in order to develop its transportation facilities, power stations and network, and heavy industry.

Last but not least, substitute factories had been systematically erected, ready to accept the industrial equipment from the more developed Soviet areas to the west should an unfavorable course of the war necessitate their removal to safer areas. What was lacking, however, was the social infrastructure, such as housing and hospitals, to accommodate the many millions of civilians deported there between 1940 and 1941.

As a result, 15-20 million civilians died of epidemics, hunger, overwork, lack of housing, lack of clothing and the brutal Siberian winter.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Well, I'll concede something upfront. FDR was a manipulative and savvy politician, and he was able to achieve certain things that many people disagreed with. So, in terms of maneuvering America into war, then I agree that he was very clever and resourceful.

But… he could not achieve these things alone. The men around him—Morgenthau, Stimson, Hull, General Marshall, Admiral Leahy, etc.—they all wanted to get into the war as well. He met with certain members of Congress and tried to sell them on the necessity of war. FDR also isolated or removed any individuals in his administration who he perceived to be a threat to his plans. The most obvious example of that was Joe Kennedy Sr. He also used the FBI to obtain "dirt" on political opponents that he might be able to use as bargaining chips.

But none of this really applies to FDR's alleged "anti-Jewish" activities.

You stated:

When a person is not yet president, he is more likely to express his opinions honestly. So if Roosevelt already held these views at this time, we can be sure that they are his honest views. All the more so since his views on the Jewish question were not typical for American presidents at that time.
 

Other U.S. presidents have made their share of unfriendly remarks about Jews. A diary kept by Harry Truman included statements such as “The Jews, I find, are very, very selfish.” Richard Nixon’s denunciations of Jews as “very aggressive and obnoxious” were belatedly revealed in tapes of Oval Office conversations.
 

“The Jews, I find are very, very selfish,” Truman wrote on July 21. “They care not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or Greeks get murdered or mistreated as D[isplaced] P[ersons] as long as the Jews get special treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or political neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or mistreatment to the underdog. Put an underdog on top and it makes no difference whether his name is Russian, Jewish, Negro, Management, Labor, Mormon, Baptist he goes haywire.”
 

Despite the majority support of the American public for the acceptance of Jewish immigrants (yes, the majority of the American public supported the acceptance of Jewish immigrants), Roosevelt stood his ground and refused to accept most Jewish immigrants. All this in defiance of the American public.
 

Polls in the late 1930s and early 1940s found that more than half of the U.S. public perceived Jews as greedy and dishonest; between one-third and one-half believed Jews had “too much power”; and about one-third regarded Jews as overly aggressive. About 15 percent of respondents said they would support “a widespread campaign against the Jews in this country” and an additional 20–25 percent indicated they would feel sympathy for such a movement; only about 30 percent said they would actively oppose it. Even on Capitol Hill, a small but vocal number of congressmen exhibited fierce xenophobia, occasionally crossing over into outright antisemitism. A 1941 diatribe by Rep. John Rankin (D-MS) accusing “international Jews” of trying to drag America into Europe’s war…
 

Not to mention his support for war with Japan and Germany before 1941, despite the isolationism of the majority of the American public.
 

And as for his compromises and “promises”, remember Lincoln. Lincoln made similar compromises and “promises” regarding the preservation of the Union and the issue of the abolition of slavery. No one will suspect him of not intending to abolish slavery because of this, no matter all the “promises” and compromises to the southern landowners.
 

[In 1940] Over 90 per cent of the Jews in New York County's 17th Assembly District cast ballots for F.D.R. In 1944, Jewish Democratic strength increased still further. In Boston's Jewish Ward 14, more than 95 per cent of the Jewish votes cast went to Roosevelt.

The results of national sample surveys conducted by the American Institute of Public Opinion and by the National Opinion Research Center show that more than 90 out of every 100 Jews voted Democratic in 1940 and 1944.
 

Replies: @Phil Barker, @Eternal Slav

Please, study something about the history of capitalism.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

Poland as a historical Slavic country has existed for centuries
 

Polish nationalism arose completely independently of the Jews and England and was, on the contrary, of an anti-Jewish nature
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav

'You are lying. You do not know the history of Slavic nations at all..'
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

You write: "You are lying. Most Czechs were actually against the Nazi occupation. It was a criminal German occupation of Czechoslovakia – a territory to which Germany had no historical or moral claim. Part of the German effort to conquer Europe and the entire world. As part of the fight for German world domination."

My response: Germany did not have a plan to dominate the world. This is what President Franklin Roosevelt and his administration claimed to the American public in order to bring the United States into World War II.

In an effort to convince his listeners in his Navy Day speech that Germany was a real threat to American security, Roosevelt made the following announcement: “Hitler has often protested that his plans for conquest do not extend across the Atlantic Ocean. I have in my possession a secret map, made in Germany by Hitler’s government—by the planners of the new world order. It is a map of South America and a part of Central America as Hitler proposes to organize it.” Roosevelt explained that the map showed South America, as well as “our great life line, the Panama Canal,” divided into five vassal states under German control. Roosevelt concluded: “That map, my friends, makes clear the Nazi design not only against South America but against the United States as well.”
(Source: Weber, Mark, “Roosevelt’s ‘Secret Map’ Speech,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, Spring 1985, p. 126).

The Italian government stated that if Roosevelt did not publish his map “within 24 hours, he will acquire a sky-high reputation as a forger.” A reporter at a press conference the next day asked Roosevelt for a copy of the secret map. Roosevelt refused, insisting that it came from “a source which is undoubtedly reliable.” The truth about the map emerged after the war: It was a forgery produced by the British intelligence service. William Stephenson, chief of British intelligence operations in North America, passed it on to the chief of U.S. intelligence, William Donovan, who gave it to Roosevelt. Wartime British agent Ivar Bryce claimed credit for thinking up the secret map in his memoir published in late 1984. (Source: Ibid., pp. 126-127).

Roosevelt continued: “The property of all churches will be seized by the Reich and its puppets. The cross and all other symbols of religion are to be forbidden. The clergy are to be ever liquidated…In the place of the churches of our civilization there is to be set up an international Nazi church, a church which will be served by orators sent out by the Nazi government. And in the place of the Bible, the words of Mein Kampf will be imposed and enforced as Holy Writ. And in the place of the cross of Christ will be put two symbols: the swastika and the naked sword.” (Source: Ibid., p. 126).

As with the secret map, the German government correctly denounced Roosevelt’s religious document as a preposterous fraud. Roosevelt’s Navy Day address was loaded with brazen falsehoods designed to convince the American public to enter into war against Germany.

Even full-page advertisements entitled “Stop Hitler Now” inserted in major American newspapers by Roosevelt’s supporters had failed to sway the American public. The advertisements warned the American people that a Europe dominated by Hitler was a threat to American democracy and the Western Hemisphere. The advertisements asked: “Will the Nazis considerately wait until we are ready to fight them? Anyone who argues that they will wait is either an imbecile or a traitor.” Roosevelt endorsed the advertisement, saying that it was “a great piece of work.” (Source: Johnson, Walter, The Battle against Isolation, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1944, pp. 85-87).

The truth is that Roosevelt did everything in his power to plunge the United States into war against Germany. Roosevelt eventually went so far as to order American vessels to shoot-on- sight German and Italian vessels—a flagrant act of war. However, Hitler wanted to avoid war with the United States at all costs. Hitler expressly ordered German submarines to avoid conflicts with U.S. warships, except to prevent imminent destruction. It appeared that Hitler’s efforts might be successful in keeping the United States out of the war against Germany.

However, President Roosevelt finally was able to use Japan as a back door to instigate war against Germany. Roosevelt followed an eight-step action plan designed to induce Japan to attack the United States. The complete embargo of all trade with Japan was especially crippling to Japan, as she was dependent on imports of oil and other natural resources for her existence. When the United States refused to negotiate with Japan to ease the embargo, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and other places in the Far East. Germany declared war against the United States four days after Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor. The leak of Rainbow Five, which outlined the plan of the United States to invade Germany by July 1943, had forced Germany to declare war on the United States.

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Truth Vigilante

You write about Hitler: "He only continued the world-ruling Great German plans of his predecessor Wilhelm II with the aim of conquering all of Europe and eventually the whole world. He only continued what the Germans (Great German chauvinists) failed to do in WW1."

My response: Few historians in postwar years believed Germany to be solely responsible for the outbreak of World War I. There were differences of opinion about the degree of responsibility borne by Germany, Great Britain, France, Russia, and other belligerent nations, but no responsible person could find Germany totally responsible for the war. Representative of impartial scholarship on the subject is the opinion of Dr. Sidney B. Fay of Harvard University. Fay concluded after an extensive study of the causes of World War I:

“Germany did not plot a European war, did not want one and made genuine, though too belated efforts to avert one…It was primarily Russia’s general mobilization, made when Germany was trying to bring Austria to a settlement, which precipitated the final catastrophe, causing Germany to mobilize and bring war…The verdict of the Versailles Treaty that Germany and her allies were responsible for the war, in view of the evidence now available, is historically unsound.” (Source: Fay, Sidney B., The Origins of the World War, New York: Macmillan, 1930, pp. 552, 554-555).

Other historians who established that Germany was not primarily responsible for causing World War I include professors Harry Elmer Barnes, Michael H. Cochran, Max Montgelas, and Georges Demartial. The Englishman Arthur Ponsonby also convincingly demonstrated that atrocity charges against the Germans were manufactured by Allied propagandists. (Source: Ponsonby, Arthur, Falsehood in Wartime, Costa Mesa, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1991).

Most American liberals who had originally supported American involvement in World War I eventually repudiated the thesis of unique German responsibility for the war. They logically denounced the failure to revise the Treaty of Versailles with its absurd attempt to collect astronomical reparations from Germany. (Source: Barnes, Harry Elmer, Barnes Against the Blackout, Costa Mesa, CA: The Institute for Historical Review, 1991, p. 159).

You can read my book "Germany's War" on this website at https://www.unz.com/book/author/john_wear/for an explanation of why Germany became involved in World War II.

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @The Old Philosopher

Rubbish!

Pure and unadulterated rubbish (to quote a "Canadian" politician).

See the Polish-Lithuanian Union
 

Such a Roman Dmowski (anti-Jewish himself), the father of Polish nationalism, had nothing to do with Jews and England
 

You suffer from arrogant ignorance, combined with hatred towards Slavs
 

The only time Polacks have ever been worth a shit in all of history was during communism, since the Russians civilized them.

Replies: @Eternal Slav

1) We are talking about interwar Poland. Not about the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth...
 

And just by the way, Gdańsk and Wrocław were and are historically Slavic and Polish.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

I could know more of the history in question,
 

but I’m pretty sure you’re wrong.
 

Poland would be one of the more legitimate nations of Europe — and has been for more than a thousand years now
 

Replies: @Colin Wright

FDR smashed Europe. Underhandly destroyed white dominion in Asia and Africa.

Nice Try.

Replies: @Eternal Slav

You write: "Don’t even try, neo-Nazi. Versailles clearly decided that Germany was the main and only culprit of WW1, along with Austria and Turkey."

My response: No, Versailles didn't "clearly decided that Germany was the main and only culprit of WW1, along with Austria and Turkey."

President Woodrow Wilson in an address to Congress on Jan. 8, 1918, set forth his Fourteen Points as a blueprint to peacefully end World War I. The main principles of Wilson’s Fourteen Points were a nonvindictive peace, national self-determination, government by the consent of the governed, an end of secret treaties, and an association of nations strong enough to check aggression and keep the peace in the future. Faced with ever increasing American reinforcements of troops and supplies and a starvation blockade imposed by the Allies, Germany decided to end World War I by signing an armistice on Nov. 11, 1918. The parties agreed to a pre-Armistice contract that bound the Allies to make the final peace treaty conform to Wilson’s Fourteen Points. (Source: Chamberlain, William Henry, America’s Second Crusade, Chicago: Regnery, 1950, pp. 13-15, 20-22).

The Treaty of Versailles was a deliberate violation of the pre-Armistice contract. Article 231 of the Treaty of Versailles placed upon Germany the sole responsibility “for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied and Associated Governments and their nationals have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany and her allies.” This so-called “war guilt clause” was fundamentally unfair and aroused widespread hatred among virtually all Germans. It linked up Germany’s obligation to pay reparations with a blanket self-condemnation to which almost no German could subscribe. (Source: Tansill, Charles C., “The United States and the Road to War in Europe,” in Barnes, Harry Elmer (ed.), Perpetual War for Perpetual Peace, Newport Beach, CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1993, pp. 81, 84).

The Treaty of Versailles forced Germany to cede 73,485 square kilometers of her territory, inhabited by 7,325,000 people, to neighboring states. Germany lost 75% of her annual production of zinc ore, 74.8% of iron ore, 7.7% of lead ore, 28.7% of coal, and 4% of potash. Of her annual agricultural production, Germany lost 19.7% in potatoes, 18.2% in rye, 17.2% in barley, 12.6% in wheat, and 9.6% in oats. The Saar territory and other regions to the west of the Rhine were occupied by foreign troops and were to remain occupied for 15 years until a plebiscite was held. The costs of the occupation of the Saar territory totaling 3.64 billion gold marks had to be paid by Germany. (Source: Franz-Willing, “The Origins of the Second World War,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 1986, p. 103).

The Versailles Treaty forced Germany to disarm almost completely. The treaty abolished the general draft, prohibited all artillery and tanks, allowed a volunteer army of only 100,000 troops and officers, and abolished the air force. The navy was reduced to six capital ships, six light cruisers, 12 destroyers, 12 torpedo-boats, 15,000 men and 500 officers. After the delivery of its remaining navy, Germany had to hand over its merchant ships to the Allies with only a few exceptions. All German rivers had to be internationalized and overseas cables ceded to the victors. An international military committee oversaw the process of disarmament until 1927. (Source: Ibid.).

The German delegation in Paris was formally presented with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles on May 7, 1919. At first the German delegation refused to sign the treaty. After German delegate Johann Giesberts read the long list of humiliating provisions of the treaty, he stated with vehemence: “This shameful treaty has broken me, for I believed in Wilson until today. I believed him to be an honest man, and now that scoundrel brings us such a treaty.” (Source: Luckau, Alma, The German Delegation at the Paris Peace Conference, New York: Columbia University Press, 1941, p. 124).

Germany eventually signed the Treaty of Versailles on June 28, 1919, because she faced death by starvation and invasion if she refused. With the naval blockade still in force and her merchant ships and even Baltic fishing boats sequestered, Germany could not feed her people. Germany’s request to buy 2.5 million tons of food was denied by the Allies. U.S. warships now supported the blockade. With German families starving, Bolshevik uprisings in several German cities, Trotsky’s Red Army driving into Europe, Czechs and Poles ready to strike from the east, and Allied forces prepared to march on Berlin, Germany was forced to capitulate. (Source: Buchanan, Patrick J., Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War, New York: Crown Publishers, 2008, pp. 77, 83).

Francesco Nitti, Prime Minister of Italy, said of the Versailles Treaty: “It will remain forever a terrible precedent in modern history that against all pledges, all precedents and all traditions, the representatives of Germany were never even heard; nothing was left to them but to sign a treaty at a moment when famine and exhaustion and threat of revolution made it impossible not to sign it.…” (Source: Hoover, Herbert, Memoirs, Vol. 1, Years of Adventure, New York: MacMillan, 1951-1952, p. 341).

Despite the unfairness of the Treaty of Versailles, its provisions remained in effect and were formally confirmed by the Kellogg-Briand Peace Pact of 1928. Germans regarded the provisions of the Versailles Treaty as chains of slavery that needed to be broken. One German commented in regard to the Versailles Treaty, “The will to break the chains of slavery will be implanted from childhood on.” Adolf Hitler referred to the Versailles Treaty in Mein Kampf as “…a scandal and a disgrace…the dictate signified an act of highway robbery against our people.” (Source: Hitler, Adolf, Mein Kampf, translated by James Murphy, London: Hurst and Blackett Ltd., 1942, p. 260).

Hitler was committed to breaking the chains of Versailles when he came to power in Germany in 1933.

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav

You write: "Just as the Nuremberg Tribunal decided on the guilt of Germany and its allies in the case of WW2."

My response: You are correct that the International Military Tribunal (IMT) decided on the guilt of Germany and the German defendants at the trial. However, this does mean that Germany and the German defendants received a fair trial. The IMT was a travesty of justice organized by Jews who wanted to demonize and convict Germans of genocide.

The mostly Jewish control of the IMT and later Nuremberg trials (NMT) is indicated by Nahum Goldmann in his book "The Jewish Paradox". Goldmann, president of the World Jewish Congress (WJC), admitted that the idea of the Nuremberg Tribunal and German reparations originated with WJC officials. Only after persistent efforts by WJC officials were Allied leaders persuaded to accept the idea of the Nuremberg trials. (Source: Goldmann, Nahum, The Jewish Paradox, New York: Grosset & Dunlap, 1978, pp. 122-123).

Also, the WJC made sure that Germany’s alleged extermination of European Jewry was a primary focus of the trials, and that the defendants would be punished for their involvement in Germany’s extermination process. (Source: World Jewish Congress, Unity in Dispersion, New York: 1948, pp. 141, 264-267).

Two Jewish U.S. Army officers played key roles in the Nuremberg trials. Lt. Col. Murray Bernays, a prominent New York attorney, persuaded U.S. War Secretary Henry Stimson and others to put the defeated German leaders on trial. (Source: Conot, Robert E., Justice at Nuremberg, New York: Harper & Row, 1983, pp. 10-13).

Col. David Marcus, a fervent Zionist, was head of the U.S. government’s War Crimes Branch from February 1946 until April 1947. Marcus was made head of the War Crimes Branch primarily in order “to take over the mammoth task of selecting hundreds of judges, prosecutors and lawyers” for the NMT trials. (Source: Butz, Arthur R., The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, Newport Beach, CA: Institute of Historical Review, 1993, pp. 27-28).

Numerous observers spoke of the predominance of Jews at the IMT. For example, American prosecutor Thomas Dodd wrote to his wife on September 20, 1945, about the prosecution staff at the IMT:

“You know better than anyone how I hate race or religious prejudice. You know how I have despised anti-Semitism. You know how strongly I feel toward those who preach intolerance of any kind. With that knowledge—you will understand when I tell you that this staff is about 75% Jewish. Now my point is that the Jews should stay away from this trial—for their own sake. For—mark this well—the charge ‘a war for the Jews’ is still being made and in the post-war years it will be made again and again. The too large percentage of Jewish men and women here will be cited as proof of this charge.” (Source: Dodd, Christopher J., Letters from Nuremberg: My Father’s Narrative of a Quest for Justice, New York: Crown Publishing, 2007, pp. 135-136).

Nevertheless, many defenders of the Holocaust story maintain that the 42-volume Trial of the Major War Criminals (The Blue Series) supplies a massive compilation of damning evidence against Germany’s National Socialist regime. In his book "Made in Russia: The Holocaust", Carlos Porter confronts the evidence directly by reproducing page after page from the Blue Series. Porter shows that many of the charges made at the IMT are so bizarre that most defenders of the Holocaust story have long since let them lapse. In addition to killing Jews in homicidal gas chambers, the Germans at Nuremberg were accused of:

--building special electrical appliances to zap inmates to death with mass electrical shocks;
--killing 20,000 Jews in a village near Auschwitz with an atomic bomb;
--forcing prisoners to climb trees and then killing the prisoners by cutting down the trees;
--killing 840,000 Russian prisoners at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp using a pedal-driven brain-bashing machine, and then burning the bodies in four mobile crematories;
--torturing and executing people at the Yanov camp in Russia in time to music created by a special orchestra selected from among the prisoners, and then shooting every member of the orchestra;
--grinding the bones of 200 people at one time as described in documents and photographs that have disappeared;
--making lampshades, handbags, driving gloves for SS officers, book bindings, saddles, house slippers, etc. out of human skin;
--killing prisoners and concentration camp inmates for everything from having soiled underwear to having armpit hair; and
--steaming people to death like lobsters in steam chambers at Treblinka.

After this incredible survey of Nuremberg atrocity evidence, Carlos Porter provides numerous examples of improper prosecution tactics at Nuremberg. The defendants at Nuremberg were rarely able to confront their accusers, since affidavits from witnesses who had been deposed months before sufficed. The prosecution made it difficult for the defense lawyers to have timely access to the documents introduced into evidence by the prosecution. Also, photocopies and transcripts were usually submitted into evidence instead of the original German documents, which in many cases seemed to have disappeared. Finally, the defense had access only to those documents which the prosecution considered material to the case. The defense had no right to review the tons of remaining documents that might help them defend their clients. (Source: Porter, Carlos Whitlock, Made in Russia: The Holocaust, Historical Review Press, 1988).

It is also notable that Dr. Hans Laternser, the defense counsel for the General Staff and the O.K.W., submitted no fewer than 3,186 affidavits during the IMT sworn to by key German witnesses. None of these affidavits was ever published in the IMT Blue Series. (Source: Irving, David, Nuremberg: The Last Battle, London: Focal Point Publications, 1996, p. 166).

So, the IMT and later Allied-run trials were politically motivated proceedings that falsely accused Germans of conducting a policy of genocide against European Jewry. These trials were a disgrace to the American judicial system.

You write: "Note: Harry Elmer Barnes is a convicted historical charlatan, paid by the Germans and spreading German war propaganda. And also a neo-Nazi, openly sympathetic to Hitler and a Holocaust denier."

My response: Harry Elmer Barnes was a true scholar who earned a PhD in history from Columbia University. I am not sure why you call him a "convicted historical charlatan." I also don't think there is anything wrong with Barnes disputing certain aspects of the official Holocaust narrative.

Harry Elmer Barnes wrote that powerful vested historical interests organized to frustrate and hide the truth concerning the origins of World War II. The methods followed by the various groups interested in blacking out historical truth fell into four main categories: 1) excluding revisionist historians from access to public documents which were freely available to establishment historians; 2) intimidating publishers from publishing revisionist books and articles; 3) ignoring or obscuring revisionist publications; and 4) smearing revisionist authors and their books. As a result, history became the chief intellectual casualty of World War II. (Source: Barnes, Harry Elmer, Barnes against the Blackout, Costa Mesa, CA: The Institute for Historical Review, 1991, pp. 11, 198).

Historians who questioned the official version of the origins of World War II placed in jeopardy both their professional reputation and their livelihood. In this regard, Harry Elmer Barnes wrote:

“In all essential features, the United States has moved over into the Nineteen Eight-Four pattern of intellectual life. But there is one important and depressing difference. In Nineteen Eight-Four, Orwell implies that historians have to be hired by the government and forced to falsify facts. In this country, today, and it is also true of most other nations, the professional historians gladly falsify history quite voluntarily, and with no direct cost to the government. The ultimate and direct cost may, of course, be a potent contribution to incalculable calamity….

A state of abject terror and intimidation exists among the majority of professional American historians whose views accord with the facts on the question of responsibility for the Second World War. The writer of this review has published a brief brochure on “The Struggle against the Historical Blackout,” which endeavors to set forth a few of the salient facts about the attempts to suppress the truth in this matter. Several leading publicists have written the author stating that, on the basis of their personal experience, it is an understatement of the facts. Yet, the majority of the historians to whom this has been sent and are personally known to the author to share his views have feared even to acknowledge the receipt or possession of the brochure. Only a handful have dared to express approval and encouragement. It is no exaggeration to say that the American Smearbund, operating through newspaper columnists, radio commentators, pressure-group intrigue and espionage, and academic pressures and fears, has accomplished about as much in the way of intimidating honest intellectuals in this country as Hitler, Goebbels, Himmler, the Gestapo, and the concentration camps were able to do in Nazi Germany.” (Source: Ibid., pp. 198-199).

Barnes wrote that the dogma surrounding Hitler’s sole responsibility for starting World War II is unprecedented in modern history. Barnes said: “It is unlikely that there has been any vested interest in dogma, opinion and politics since the birth, death and resurrection of Jesus Christ equal in intensity to that built up around the allegation that Hitler was solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1939.” (Source: Ibid., p. 254).

Harry Elmer Barnes, who died in 1968, did not foresee that the historical blackout would become even worse regarding the “Holocaust.” Germany eventually passed laws making it a felony to dispute any aspect of the Holocaust story. Similar laws were eventually passed in the following countries: Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Slovakia, Sweden, Switzerland, and the European Union. The obvious question is: What kind of historical truth needs criminal sanctions to protect it? The Holocaust story would not need criminal sanctions to protect it if it was historically accurate.

Replies: @Truth Vigilante

These areas were historically part of Slavic lands – Poland and even for a time Czech land.
Only through violent and genocidal German colonization and Germanization did these areas become German. Another dark page of German history. Sorry Germans, but this is also part of their history.
 

This comment alone shows your arrogant stupidity. Kropotkin is one of the greatest scientists of the world, who refuted capitalism with science.
 

You write: "Just look at the Holocaust of the Jews, which clearly happened. For example, Holocaust deniers and neo-Nazis claim that in Treblinka and other death camps of Operation Reinhard, there was no extermination of Jews, but that Jews were instead deported further to the East and that these concentration camps were just 'transport camps'."

My response: Yes, Holocaust Revisionists claim that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps rather than extermination camps.

The German policy of resettling Jews in the east is supported by the demographic studies of Eugene M. Kulischer. Kulischer, who was a member of the International Labor Office in Montreal during World War II, in 1943 published the book "The Displacement of Population in Europe." (Source: Kulischer, Eugene M., The Displacement of Population in Europe, Montreal: International Labour Office, 1943).

Kulischer devoted an entire section of his book to the expulsion and deportation of Jews during World War II. Kulischer stated:

“For the Polish ghettos are not the last stage in the forced eastward migration of the Jewish people. On 20 November 1941, the Governor General, Hans Frank, broadcast the information that the Polish Jews would ultimately be transferred further east. Since the summer of 1942 the ghettos and labor camps in the German-occupied Eastern Territories have become the destination of deportees both from Poland and from western and central Europe; in particular, a new large-scale transfer from the Warsaw ghetto has been reported. Many of the deportees have been sent to the labor camps on the Russian front; others to work in the marshes of Pinsk, or to the ghettos of the Baltic countries, Bielorussia and the Ukraine.” (Source: Ibid., pp. 110-111).

Kulischer wrote that removal of the Jews to the east was largely motivated by the wish to make use of them as forced labor. Jews were not sent to work in the Reich because this would violate Hitler’s policy of making Germany free of Jews.

Kulischer stated that “deportation to the east is for the Jews the equivalent of the recruitment for work in the Reich to which the rest of the population of German-controlled Europe is subject, and their removal further and further eastward is doubtless connected with the need for supplying the army’s requirements near the front.” (Source: Ibid., p. 110).

Kulischer concluded that the vast majority of deported Jews “went to the General Government, and further east to the German and Rumanian-occupied territories of the Soviet Union.” (Source: Ibid., p. 112). Nowhere in his book does Kulischer speak of extermination camps or of a German policy of genocide of the Jews. The demographic evidence does not support such a conclusion.

Heinrich Himmler also made orders and statements indicating that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps. For example, on July 5, 1943, Himmler personally gave the following order: “The transit camp Sobibór is to be converted into a concentration camp. In the concentration camp a plant for the repair of captured munitions is to be established.” (Source: Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Transit Camp or Extermination Camp? Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2010, pp. 258-259).

In the months that followed their transfer east, letters and post cards addressed to the relatives of the deported Jews arrived in the Warsaw Ghetto from Bialystok, Pinsk, Bobruisk, Brzesc, Smolensk, Brest-Litovsk, and Minsk. Some letters and cards were sent by mail, while some arrived through the underground. Many letters mentioned that the senders were working hard and were being properly fed. (Source: Gutman, Yisrael, The Jews of Warsaw, 1939-1943, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University, 1982, p. 219; Dawidowicz, Lucy, The War Against the Jews, New York: Seth Press, 1976, pp. 306, 333; Dawidowicz, Lucy, Holocaust Reader, New York: 1976, pp. 356, 364).

Forensic evidence also indicates that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were not extermination camps. A detailed forensic examination at the Treblinka Camp using sophisticated electronic ground radar found no evidence of mass graves. The Australian team that carried out this forensic examination at the Treblinka Camp was headed by Richard Krege, a qualified electronics engineer. Krege’s team used an $80,000 Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical signals that are visible on a computer monitor. GPR devices are routinely used around the world by geologists, archaeologists, and police. GPR detects any major disturbances in the soil to a normal effective depth of four or five meters.

For six days in October 1999 Krege’s team carefully examined the entire Treblinka site, especially the alleged “mass graves” portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. Krege’s team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil samples. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had been significantly disturbed. In addition, the team found no evidence of individual graves, or substantial amounts of bone remains, human ashes or wood ashes. Richard Krege concludes from his examination of the site that Treblinka was never an extermination camp. (Source: The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, May/June 2000, p. 20).

Defenders of the Holocaust story have sometimes used forensic archaeologist Dr. Caroline Sturdy Colls and her limited excavation work at Treblinka to prove that Treblinka was an extermination camp. An analysis of her work, however, shows that she fails to prove that Treblinka was an extermination camp. (See https://archive.ph/wnzto).

German aerial reconnaissance photographs taken in 1944 of the Treblinka Camp also cast serious doubts on the widely accepted story that Treblinka was a mass extermination center. Discovered in 1989 in the National Archives in Washington, D.C., these photographs corroborate other evidence indicating that Treblinka was a transit camp. The photographs indicate that Treblinka was an extremely small camp. The camp’s alleged burial area is too small to contain the hundreds of thousands of bodies supposedly buried there. Treblinka was also not particularly well guarded or isolated. The aerial photographs show that fields where Polish farmers planted and cultivated crops were directly adjacent to the camp perimeter and were cultivated right up to the edge of the camp. (Source: Weber, Mark and Allen, Andrew, “Treblinka,” The Journal of Historical Review, Vol. 12, No. 2, Summer 1992, p. 134).

John C. Ball, a geologist with experience interpreting aerial photographs, has reviewed the wartime aerial photos taken of Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibór. Ball concludes: “To this day there is no air photo evidence to support the alleged mass murder of the Jews at any location in Europe occupied by the Germans during World War Two. Further, air photo analysis refutes the claim that the ‘Nazis’ had intended, at whatever time, to keep events in the alleged extermination camps secret.” (Source: Ball, John Clive, “Air Photo Evidence,” in Gauss, Ernst (ed.), Dissecting the Holocaust: The Growing Critique of Truth and Memory, Capshaw, AL: Theses & Dissertations Press, 2000, p. 284).

There is more I can write on this subject. This is enough for now.

Replies: @Eternal Slav

You write: "Just look at the Holocaust of the Jews, which clearly happened. For example, Holocaust deniers and neo-Nazis claim that in Treblinka and other death camps of Operation Reinhard, there was no extermination of Jews, but that Jews were instead deported further to the East and that these concentration camps were just 'transport camps'."

My response: This is exactly what we claim.

Historians universally acknowledge that none of the Aktion Reinhardt camps had crematoria. By contrast, German concentration camps such as Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen and Dachau had crematoria even though mass killings are not alleged to have taken place at these camps. Why wouldn’t the Germans have also built crematoria at the Aktion Reinhardt camps, since such crematoria would have been far more necessary to accomplish the mass killings? (Source: Graf, Jürgen, “David Irving and the Aktion Reinhardt Camps,” Inconvenient History, Vol. 1, No. 2, 2009).

Had Treblinka, for example, been a pure extermination camp, then it would have been the sheerest insanity not to construct crematoria. Majdanek and Auschwitz-Birkenau, which supposedly functioned simultaneously as concentration and extermination camps, possessed several crematoria. The former camp had two of them with seven muffles altogether; the latter, five crematoria with a total of 52 muffles (although not all functioning in the same time period). Why did Himmler not provide for the building of even a single crematorium for an alleged pure extermination Aktion Reinhardt camp? (Source: Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Transit Camp or Extermination Camp?, Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2010, p. 143).

According to Holocaust historians, the bodies of Jews gassed at the Aktion Reinhardt camps were first buried in mass graves. The bodies were later exhumed and burned in the open air. (Source: Rudolf, Germar, Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial Issues Cross-Examined, 4th edition, Bargoed, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, January 2023, p. 269).

This story lacks all credibility. First, it would have required a tremendous amount of work to bury hundreds of thousands of dead bodies in a few months at the Aktion Reinhardt camps. It would have then required an enormous amount of work to recover these buried bodies and place them on the open-air pyres to be cremated. Finally, it would have required an enormous amount of wood to burn the dead bodies on open-air pyres. The Germans were not so stupid to have used such a labor-intensive and costly process when far better alternatives were available.

It would have been enormously difficult, if not impossible, to cremate 870,000 bodies at Treblinka through open air cremations. Germar Rudolf calculates that without wood between the corpse layers, each pyre of the fire grates would have been about nine meters high. With wood between the layers, each pyre would have been over 26 meters high. This would result in a total weight of over 700 metric tons per pyre for successful cremations. Even if the Germans had managed to build such a pile, it would be only a matter of time before the corpses fell over to one side, because fires never burn evenly. Realistically, a stable pile cannot be built that is higher than it is wide. (Source: Ibid., pp. 271-273).

Based on several cremation experiments, Carlo Mattogno determines that 160 kg of wood are needed to cremate a human body weighing 45 kg. He calculates that the burning of 870,000 bodies at Treblinka would have left 1,950 tons of human ashes, plus 11,100 tons of wood ashes. The total volume of ashes would have amounted to approximately 48,400 cubic meters. Also, 139,200 metric tons of wood would have been required for the incineration of the bodies. Since human teeth and bones cannot be completely destroyed through open air cremations, myriads of teeth and bone fragments would have been scattered at the site of the former camp. (Source: Mattogno, Carlo and Graf, Jürgen, Treblinka: Transit Camp or Extermination Camp? Washington, D.C.: The Barnes Review, 2010, pp. 150-151).

Although enormous amounts of fuel would have been needed to cremate the hundreds of thousands of alleged corpses, there is no credible documentary record or witness recollection of the great quantities of firewood that would have been required. According to Polish-Jewish historian Rachel Auerbach, fuel to burn bodies was not needed at Treblinka because the bodies of women, which had more fat, “were used to kindle, or, more accurately put, to build the fires among the piles of corpses…” Even more incredible, she wrote that “blood, too, was found to be first-class combustion material.” (Source: Auerbach, Rachel, “In the Fields of Treblinka,” edited by Donat, Alexander, The Death Camp Treblinka, New York: Holocaust Library, 1979, p. 38).

Auerbach’s explanation of how bodies were burned at Treblinka is total nonsense.

Many Jewish prisoners undoubtedly perished during or after their rail journey to the Aktion Reinhardt camps. It is also plausible that hundreds and perhaps thousands of Jews who were too weak or ill to continue the eastbound journey from the camps were killed by officials acting on their own authority. These prisoners were buried at the Aktion Reinhardt camps. However, there is no credible evidence that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were mass extermination centers in which Jews were systematically put to death.

All three of the Aktion Reinhardt camps were situated near the demarcation line between German- and Soviet-occupied Poland. This geographic fact indicates the likelihood that these camps served as transit camps for Jews to the east. The Soviets used broad-gauge railway tracks in contrast to the rest of Europe. Therefore, transports towards the east had to transfer their people at this demarcation line from trains of the European gauge to those of the Russian gauge. This explains why so many witnesses talked about hygienic measures such as delousing and showering procedures at these camps, which today are often falsely regarded as deceptive measures preceding mass murder. (Source: Rudolf, Germar, Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial Issues Cross-Examined, 4th edition, Bargoed, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, January 2023, pp. 290-291).

The Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps rather than extermination camps. The demographic studies, the statements from Heinrich Himmler, the lack of credible forensic evidence that mass exterminations occurred at these camps, the photographic and engineering evidence, the impossibility of disposing of so many bodies in such a short period of time, the relative lack of secrecy and security in the camps, and the small size of the areas where the bodies were supposedly buried all indicate that the Aktion Reinhardt camps were transit camps.

Germar Rudolf writes about the Aktion Reinhardt camps:

“Those claiming that a gigantic mass-murder operation unfolded have to deliver the kinds of evidence required in any murder case: primarily traces of the bodies, evidence of them having been murdered, and any kind of trace of the murder weapon.” (Source: Ibid., p. 279).

Official Holocaust historiography has produced no credible evidence of any of these.

You would not recognize the truth if it fell on you.

Always remember this mantra: Whatever one sees/hears/reads in the mass media, from Hollywood, court historians, or those who continuously beat the drum of "Germany baaad allies and communists goood, the EXACT opposite is much MUCH closer to the truth.

As evidence for this, simply look at the war mongering and war deaths over the last 80 years.

The foremost actors were USA, Britain, France, Soviet Union, and Israel.

You need to recall that I did say:

No OBJECTIVE historian or researcher has ever had a bad word to say about Harry Elmer Barnes.
 

Replies: @Eternal Slav

You write: "So again. Show me the name of a single Jew who was deported from Treblinka and other local concentration camps of Operation Reinhard further to the East? One single name. So where?

My response: Germar Rudolf reports a name.

Jean-Marie Boisdefeu has documented an interesting case he stumbled over while skimming Vad Vashem’s database of Holocaust victims. This case is based on a memorial book published by government authorities, in this case of Germany. It concerns the Berlin Jew Siegmund Rothstein, born in 1867, who was first deported to the Theresienstadt Ghetto for elderly Jews in August 1942. Barely a month later, however, on September 26, he was deported to Treblinka at the age of 75. But that was not his end at all, because the German authorities found life signs of him further east, as they finally determined that Rothstein died in Minsk, the capital city of Belarus, some 240 miles (286 km) east of Treblinka. I doubt 75-year-old Mr. Rothstein jumped off the train prior to arriving at Treblinka and ran all the way to German-occupied Minsk. Hence, he must have traveled there by train. I also doubt that the German authorities reserved a train just for him or put just him on a military train going to Minsk. Rather, he must have made that journey on a deportation train together with hundreds or thousands of fellow deportees from Theresienstadt.

Boisdefeu states that none of the thousands of Jews deported from Theresienstadt is listed in the German memorial book as having been killed at Treblinka, but that they all are listed with a variety of different locations where they either died or were last heard of and then went missing. This case, too, indicates that thousands of Jews seem to have been deported to “the East” with Treblinka as a transit station. As a result, Treblinka must indeed have had the logistics to temporarily house, feed and clean hundreds, if not thousands of individuals for short periods of time. Among other things, it most likely did have a very real shower facility for that very purpose. (Source: Rudolf, Germar, Lectures on the Holocaust: Controversial Issues Cross-Examined, 4th edition, Bargoed, UK: Castle Hill Publishers, January 2023, pp. 292-293).

Replies: @Eternal Slav, @Eternal Slav