Dr. Roberts, thank you for this cautionary note. Based on my reading of Dr. Wathelet’s concerns regarding the potential for herd immunity, I chose to reduce my enthusiasm and encouragements for an aggressive undoing of the shutdown, despite the questioning perspectives that I provided to you through your website. DISCLAIMER: I am not an epidemiologist, immunologist, virologist, pulmonologist nor a physician. I am a physiologist and I worked in public health for nearly nine years, but not involving airborne diseases (save Legionella which was of little consequence in my tenure). I am speaking here mostly as a layman.

FIRST: COVID-19 IS REAL, NOT A HOAX. it is clear that there is a separate disease process at work besides influenza and provisionally we assume this to be the result of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. I would hope that post-mortem samples are being conducted on deaths reported as due to COVID-19 and parallel cases that are not (control). These samples should correlate case data (including PCR and serological results relevant for diagnosing COVID-19) plus routine histological as well as electron microscopical images from critical tissues, particularly the lung. Considering locations in an equatorial Caribbean where there is no “winter flu,” we can see the rise and fall COVID-19 without the confounding effects of influenza or flu+pneumonia. (Dengue is a vector-borne disease, not an airborne disease, and peaks in the months from August to December. Symptomologically, it is easily distinguished from COVID-19 and influenzas.)

Here, is a revealing statement by Dr. Hudson:

Michael Hudson: ” I think Bernie added that it should be given to self-employed, to retirees, and to aliens living here. You have also to give it to everybody, or else they are going to be out in the street. It has to be general.”

I suppose that Dr. Hudson would advocate that these illegal and legal aliens vote in our elections as well.

Thank you, Mefobills. That was extremely informative. I was unaware of those interesting details. I am a bit unclear about how one actually passive-aggressively effects the self-deportations. A plane or bus ticket to the land of origin is understandable. Besides the expense of returning, I do not see a practical means of increasing the likelihood that the ejected aliens will remain in their homeland. We already have a bilge pump that is overworked by the holes in our sovereign ship od state. I understand that the porous border is not the specific responsibility of the mefobills system. But the two sub-systems of border control and this mefobill sub-system must be coordinated to act in concert if the total system is to make sense regarding this particular aspect the government enticing desired, restorative outcomes.. Other than the transportation home, the rest of the directed payment system (your example being “tampons”) are generally fungible and I am not sure that we would not be simply paying for a trip home to visit family before the aliens’ quick return—with families in tow. Most likely, I am simply not imaginative enough in the arts of economic and bureaucratic enforcement techniues for tasks such as making the alien’s homeland sufficiently “sticky.” Well, I suppose if we can use this system to fund tampons for migrants, perhaps we can stimulate our construction and enforcement industries to provide some border and internal migratory tamponade. But you cite my concern exactly, with parasitically unreliable forces at the top channeling these, in-principle, excellent tools, we could witness an even sorrier condition evolve.

Agreed on all points. Do we have an IQ barrier as they want us to believe? I do not think so. there is sufficient right-end tail. But, I would hazard a guess that potential leaders, intellects and critics are neutralized and decapitated. This decapitation will become keener as the surveillance state continues its rapid consolidation. We have a serious problem that our population–unlike the oligarchs–do not recognize nor respond to the importance and practical value of the intellect—their own intellects for that matter. They do not understand or deeply respect the intellect of the current oligarchs. Contrarily, they do obediently respect the ‘power’ of the oligarchs. The oligarchs achieved power first, then used the power of advertising, entertainment, journalism, academia and the law to create their own celebrity status–again, after the conquest. Furthermore, we have a tremendous problem with accumulating capital. (I need to catch up on the other comments to see if some of this has been answered by you or others.) Lastly, though submissive to the overlords, our population is fiercely independent, competitive and unhelpfully distrustful of each other. Thus, they are unable to distinguish cooperativity (appropriately integrated with self-initiative) from their indoctrinated notion of collectivism.

I would second the comments above that with the torso in the prone position and the head turned to the right, as was in the case with Mr. Floyd at the time of his loss of consciousness and possibly his actual time of death, a knee on essentially the right and rear of the neck would not constrict the victim’s airway. Further, the victim spoke while in this situation, as has been pointed out. Further, the claim by some that his carotid arteries were occluded is impossible for both vessels and most likely for either. Furthermore, there are two arteries (the vertebral arteries) protected within bony processes of the spine in the neck. The autopsy report does not indicate any damage to these processes protecting these arteries, thus no occlusion of blood via these vessels should have occurred due to the maneuver employed by the policeman. All four arteries (that is, carotid and vertebral aa.) meet in a structure called the Circle of Willis that redistributes their contributory arterial flows as a failsafe for supplying blood to the brain. Mr. Floyd appears to have likely caused his own death with, principally, Fentanyl. His behavior subsequent to his own choice to use this drug (I assume for now that this will be established in evidence) must be seriously entertained as culpably causal to the events involving his restraint and his death. Frankly, the more that I reflect upon this police maneuver, the more that I believe that it is appropriate, though I am no friend of police abuse and bullying. I missed the report about former Officer Chauvin’s being accused by the tax authorities of tax evasion. I do not have sufficient information or competence to discuss this matter. However, as per Sydney Powell’s assertion that America is suffering from a spate of prosecutorial misconduct, if it can be judged that the government’s tax attorneys are conducting an uneven persecution of Mr. Chauvin, I would hope that an excellent attorney would come forward to represent Mr. Chauvin and seek damages and that the government tax and DOJ attorneys would be investigated should credible cause exist. What is more, I hope that there are both the legal instruments and adequate legal counsel to seek damages for false and hasty accusations by significant, public figures. I also affirm the comments above, by Pierre de Craon, regarding the chaplain’s ill-conceived and misdirected remarks. The supposed “sin of racism” is nonexistent. If ever there is true mistreatment of individuals, there are precise categories of sin and vice to describe those wrongdoings. This make-believe sin, one popular with, and promulgated by, then, Pope John Paul II, is in ways parallel with the fake notion of “hate crime.” Mere erroneous misconceptions, mis-categorizations or failures of logic that a person contemplates prior to a willful act of wrongdoing and sin towards an individual cannot be described as ‘sins’ or ‘crimes’. (I have a modest amount of experience teaching cadaver anatomy, experience assisting in experimental surgeries involving cannulation of the vertebral arteries and many occasions performing CPR in the emergency room. I am Catholic.)

¶ 1/2. Sorry, bloke, I got as far as “When you were…” and dozed off. B.t.w., tell @Hibernian not to laugh at just everything—but Leprechauns do LOL at almost anything.

¶2/2. Seriously, thanks for the chiding. I will see if I cannot check my White verbosity, just as I have had to check my White privilege.

Dr. KB, I did not appreciate your perpetrating this media-promoted canard/red herring of the “white supremacist.” I call “Foul!” on that one. Mr. Perloff, I am surprised and disappointed that you did not catch and counter that one from your host—snuck in (or added due to a lack of being properly informed) at the very end. Otherwise, both of you, this was a fine discussion.

First, I listened to the interview with Craig Nelson that you linked. Here, here to the matter discussed in, roughly, the first half of the interview. Items in the second half were problematic, but this is off-topic here (sort of). Second, and to my main point, I must utterly reject your statement: “…historically the US does have a white supremacism problem.” I have taught in different parts of the U.S. About half of those were predominantly non-White situations. Further, I lived outside of the U.S. I know experientially that resistance to other races is characteristic of every non-White group, including members of the Black, Hispanic and Asian groups with whom I have interacted. White people are only unique, perhaps, in their rare openness to other races. This statement that causes me concern is an example of biased spotlighting grossly lacking in statistical context. Next, I avoid using the term ‘supremacism’. It is an emotionally-laden term that is difficult to define whether from the perspective of those who want to promote it, or from that of those who want to detect it and condemn it. As a concept, it does not lend itself to high-level analysis. My own research involved the measurement of behavior, albeit much simpler behavior than that that psychologists of personality and psychometricians attempt to measure. Because a term like ‘supremacy’ invokes values, ends, and intractable statistical universes, it is very difficult–if not impossible–to quantify. Value-free concepts of ecological and evolutionary dominance and competition within niches might be useful, but those terms, and the results forthcoming, are likely to be hard and clinical. I do not think that employment of these concepts would assuage the anger of non-White advocates if they cannot tolerate biological realities such as measurements of intelligence.. I found the article by Joseph Kay at ‘American Renaissance’, “Blacks and Whites: We Need a Divorce,” September 4, 2020 and “Race: A Very, Very Dismal Reality,” by Fred Reed–here–at the ‘Unz Review’, September 7, 2020, to adequately match or supersede possible attempts by me. The Kay article, whatever the practicalities required, was refreshing in its advocacy for what I want to call a “no-fault” divorce between Whites and Blacks and some other groups. The Reed article further drove home the point as to why the separation is now likely to be inevitable. It is a relief that we do not need to assign blame in this separation, because there is no blame in the fact that the cultures are different. In growing numbers, individuals in all groups seem, in explicit as well as incrementally implicit terms, to be calling for a separation. Moreover, culture is not a property of a people that can be simply, whimsically or justly modified in a day. History is filled with examples of well-meaning Whites attempting to be helicopter parents to other groups. The intentions of some may not have been completely pure. These were regrettable cases. What went wrong? What went wrong was a poor understanding of intelligence and evolutionary biology. Genetics strongly influences neurobiology. The structural and functional aspects of neurobiology strongly influence the emergent properties of intelligence and other traits of personality and subsequently-expressed behaviors. The cognitive aspects expressed through the motor systems of humans constitute the social and physical environment, that is, the culture in which the individual is immersed. Races, and even ethnicities to a lesser degree, differ in their cognitive makeup. Cultures need to be co-natural with the individuals who create them and who must thrive in them. Admixing cultures, especially by force and at invasive levels, is extremely harmful and unjust to the individuals of all races involved. Sovereign borders are necessary for maintaining peace and justice. Borders are the principal tools that enhance communication and conversation between different people in different ethno-national states. There must be a preservation of differences fitting for the biologically-influenced preferences of different people. Differences are essential as a vital, driving force for communication, conversation, exchange and trade just as the cells of the body require electrical, chemical and molecular gradients and identities vis-à-vis their surroundings and other cells. We love diversity, correct? Sovereign states reflect the need that races and ethnicities have for their cultural extensions to be protected in geographic proximity. Space and proximity matter for people to interact with their co-ethnics if assortative mating and business relations are to proceed efficiently. Racial differences are not merely skin–or worse–skin-color deep. Racial differences are biologically profound—deep into every fiber of an human organism. But racial differences also extend outward, into the environment, creating and also interacting with the culture. Overstated perhaps, we might playfully consider culture as almost a projecting “organ” of the minds that our brains produce and facilitate. Political states must be concerned with the preservation of the full range of traits of their peoples. This is where every people’s greatest opportunities can be found. Countering the lie and patent injustice of the oxymoronic, homogenizing multiculturalism by re-instituting international respect for sovereign, ethno-national states, as best as can be achieved, will create situations that best enable various peoples to develop their future generations. Rather than exploiting other ethno-national states by corporate conquest or bombing the daylights out of them to fulfill the ends of globalist misanthropes, we could better assist the talented individuals of other nations lead their societies in the order that they prefer and toward their notion of flourishing. But these societies must accept the results of their choices. Also, aid must be at primarily at the level of the intellect, not the wallet. Kleptocracy in third-world nations can be resisted if the sophisticated, financial kleptocrats of first-world nations have been booed out of positions of power and self-aggrandizement. It is most certainly apology time. White Americans, and European people around the world, need deep and profound apologies for what they have suffered over many decades, even centuries, at the hands of other races. During this time, the best intentions of Whites have been repaid with the most vile, post-modernist, arational defamations; violent assaults occurring in exceedingly disproportionate numbers; and irreparably large material losses and financial burdens. Whites cannot take it any longer. Europe, the United States, and all of the other countries where Europeans have established themselves, need to reassert in clear and effective terms that our states are White-European, Christian, scientifically and technologically advanced states and that Whites are the protected and dominant class within their own countries just as other races must be understood to be the protected members of their sovereign nations and the societies within. This is what is desirable and just for any people group around the world.

Dr. Barrett, I am sorry for the delay in replying. I think your use of the word, “remedial” was impolite and presumptuous. I endured, as an academic, decades of accusations and insinuations against my people regarding what you–lacking proper contextualization–poisonously call “White supremacy.” This is reckless of you.

I simply walk into Mass and into Walmart. I do not wait to let ushers at church shoot temperature-detecting devices at me. I do not wear masks. The priest kindly administers Communion to me on the tongue after Mass. That is a compromise I can tolerate temporarily.

Dr. Ted Noel is a retired physician who does an excellent demonstration by exhaling Vape smoke through various masks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BslFT9cKZwc

Video Link

Tobacco smoke size: is 10 nanometers (nm) to 1,000 nm in size while the SARS-CoV-2 virus particle is 60 nm to a maximum diameter of 140 nm. In the video by Dr. Noel, one can see that the smoke–much of which is comparable in size or larger to the COVID virus–easily exiting all types of masks.

https://www.coloradoci.com/bin-pdf/5270/ParticleSize.pdf

I know of a woman that was in an ICU Unit four weeks ago due to renal failure. She was forced to wear a mask. She needed an oxygen cannula for comfort, not a mask. The family, also masked, was unable to communicate well with her through the mask. She suffered a fatal cardiac arrest by early afternoon. This is infuriating.

Just resist. Patrick Wood, Technocracy Today, provides plasticized card on a lanyard that can provide HIPAA and 1st Amendment language that people can wear when in public.

Be courageous. Push the envelope. Do not simply cave and crumble up into a ball.

First of all, regardless of the true biological existence, nature or origin of the putative SARS-CoV-2 agent, it is clear that the so-called COVID “crisis” has been artificially amplified and manufactured. PCR amplification of genetic material reverse engineered from fragments of RNA supposedly from the SARS-CoV-2 virion and dubiously used in conjuction with a presence/absence “confirmation or adjudication” (Moderna’s words, not mine—notice that ‘diagnosis’ was not the term selected) has a dial-up/dial-down adjustment feature—especially when the number of amplification cycles is not specified. The potential for deceptive manipulation of “case” numbers is enormous and virtually certain. Second, the hysterical tone of newscasters and politicians along with the repressive censorship by social media are telling indications that the “pandemic” is quite possibly, or rather almost certainly, a fraud. Third, these nucleic acid-based pharmaceutical instruments are not vaccines, but rather tools of genetic modification. We could call them ‘pseudovaccines’. Fourth, the developmental testing is grossly inadequate to the level of malfeasance if not criminality. Fifth, no competent scientist would envision, much less recommend, conducting an experiment–let alone an initial trial–on a whole population. Sixth, the potential for adverse consequences are real, severe and–especially in the case of DNA-based pseudovaccines–irreversible. The likelihood of neurological sequelae are particularly troubling and, given that roughly 95% of translational products are found uniquely in the nervous system. Seventh, permanent alteration and risks exist for populations and ethnic groups. Eighth, there is every reason to be concerned about malevolence in the execution of ethnic warfare and genocide emerging from this program of genetic modification masquerading as a vaccine. Most assuredly this concerns grows with future pressures and programs of mass inoculation . Ninth, many followers of religious traditions, such as Catholicism, object to receiving injections and participating in an industrial activity with this level of complicity with the harvesting of materials from human abortions. Tenth, a rarely mentioned point is that to receive or administer RNA- or DNA-basd pseudovasccines is to commit acts of the most profound form of bodily mutilation. Mutilation, even self-mutilation, for non-therapeutic reasons is impermissible (see ‘Catechism of the Catholic Church’, Part 3, Paragraph 2297). See interview, Dave Schmitt by Brian McCall on ‘Catholic Family News for a conversation of the topic.

https://catholicfamilynews.com/blog/2020/12/30/more-ethical-dilemmas-for-the-covid-vaccines-interview-with-dr-david-schmitt/

Altering the genome, or potentially doing so, in the manner of nucleic acid-based pseudovaccines, especially considering that these vaccines are not administered to those suffering the disease, but rather to those not suffering the disease, not only does not constitute a therapeutic action, it is contrary to a therapeutic action as defined as an action to restore health.

In a couple of my podcasts I mention I discuss the Cedntral Dogma of Biology and draw a parallel to what I believe shoudl be recognized as the Cantral Dogma of Civilization. The parallel is of supreme importance in the larger picture of the COVID-Lockdown-Pseudovaccination Scam.

See if you please: http://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/deschmitt

Posting under my real name, I will provide a response to the reply by “That Would Be Telling (TWBT).” I appreciate TWBT’s having followed my post with enumerations. TWBT skipped my items 1 and 2. As did Drs. Yeadon and Wodarg in their petition to the European Medicines Agency on December 1, 2020 to stay Phase III trials of the BIONTECH product (viz., the mRNA “vaccine”), I pointed out that there is no evidence of a pandemic and that the PCR “test” is an inadequate instrument for defining COVID infection, or the tellingly suspicious use of the term “cases” in histrionic reports by legacy Media. Given this situation, there is no basis for properly assessing the existence of an epidemic (or pandemic), thus it impossible to properly asses the risks of giving a putative vaccine (such as it is) to any given recipient.

[Henceforth use paragraphs if you want your comments published.]

Dear CanSpeecy, you are quite correct that there are feedbacks in the flow of information as it pertains to both the Central Dogma of Biology (CDB) as well as the Central Dogma of Civilization (CDC—ooooh, that unfortunate), if we can begin to use the latter term usefully.

Hi CanSpeccy. Well, actually I am rather small brained. I barely am able to find my cowboy hats in the adult section of the western-wear stores. Maybe I have deeper convolutions on the surface of my brain, but smart people that I respect tell me that I merely have more convoluted thinking—not the same.

As for the use of paragraphs, there were comment sections that I used in the past that simply deleted my paragraph separations and rammed everything together. Thus, I internalized the rebuke and have followed the practice automatically.

There does seem to be a diminution of our ability (me too) to consider extended thoughts. In my roughly decade-long tenure in public service, I found a managerial class that is less and less capable of dealing with reasonable volumes of data. Field personnel and their supervisors would prefer multiple trips accomplishing goals haphazardly, if not in error, to the practice of precise communication. Any attempt to correct this is met with punish of—guess who? I suspect that having sloppy systems and promoting frontline incompetence allows for the camouflaging of malfeasance and the erasure of trails of decision-making and competency. I was working in a public health sector. I saw a decade ahead of time things which only later and, especially only after the year 2020, made fuller sense. Government and the private sectors were being set up not to act in a manner that subverted evidence-based regulation and replaced it with Roritarian, pragmatist, post-modern, totalitarian machine for propagating absolute falsities. It is mind-control all over again—or should I say, “still?”

In my travels a few days ago, I was awaiting flight check-in. Two young ladies, apparently business travelers, were chatting. They were engaged in mutual agreement about how they really enjoyed working at home because of policies enacted as a result of COVID (such as it is. I could not take it any longer. I politely interjected myself into the conversation and challenged thier assumptions on a number of points such as PCR (I have dome PCR), and the lack of good immunolabeling-specific electron-micrographic imaging of the virus in tissues from autopsy (I have done EM as well). One wpman retorted that her mother is a respiratory therapist and she really believes in masks. (Really, my august reverence is beyond description.) The other woman asserted that she is happy to wear a mask, it is not that much trouble and she is eager to do whatever the government wants. Need I comment? Is this perhaps the ill effect of having elevated the influence of females in society? I cannot answer this question, but I will let you entertain the question on your own.

I noticed a man paying interewst to our question. I noticed him again, later, as we are checking him. He was chided by the check-in clerk that the gator-cloth “masks” such as he was wearing was considered insufficient by the airlines (as if any mask in a crowded plane could possibly come close to being effective). This customer promptly lowered the gator mask and positioned into place a paper mask underneath, stating: “Actually, I work for the CDC.” Well, isn’t that comforting? As we boarded the plane he was fiddling with his baggage in his seat as is common before hoisting it into the overhead compartment. (He was seated in first class, don’t you know.) I bent over and behind him and whispered: “This unscientific childishness must end.” His lack of response told me that my message just may have hit home.

There may be a SARS-CoV-2 virus, a virus of suspicious origin—and I am not talking about the nation of origin, though that is not irrelevant in the complexity of the story. The relevance of the nation of origin of the virus is not understood, I suspect, in a manner that is superficially interpretable. But it is quite clear now to most examiners of the totality and specifics of the events of year 2020 and before, that the “COVID pandemic,” as well as are the pseudo-vaccines, are utter, criminal fakeries in support of an even larger, historical and global crime of tyranny, murder, theft, pan-optacon surveillance and fraud.

The juridical and due punishment perpetrators should be proportional, thus the purpose of the oligarchs having their own crooks in the offices of prosecutors, courts, presidents, bureaucrats, newsrooms and–above all–the banks.

I am convinced that “That Would be Telling” is disinformation Troll.