The author’s anti-Christianity doesn’t help. White Christians have babies – white atheists and white neopagans don’t. Also, you alienate (completely) huge numbers of whites by being anti-Christian. You don’t have to be a believer yourself.

Holy crap! I can’t even finish the article before having to comment.

What is it about Leftist men that they go for really ugly, low quality and/or fat chicks?!!

The guy Sean is a decent looking guy, his girlfriend Holly is a fat, ugly low-quality girl (and you know she’s a nasty witch too!).

See this all the time. These dudes are mentally ill/defective. Seriously.

Finished the article. Soros must be paying that dude to have sex (“girlfriend”) with that pig of a woman – mystery solved!

Yeah, but the guy in the article above doesn’t look sissyboy. There’s lots of sissy boys on the far left. But some far left men aren’t sissyboys. For some reason even the masculine leftist dudes still seem to get fat, ugly women. E.g. I’ve seen handsome, masculine leftist white guys with fat black chicks. They must be crazy.

My only other guess would be the women are hyper-slutty and put out several times a day – the only possible reason why a decent looking guy would date an ugly, nasty woman.

At first glance, my reaction was the girl isn’t pretty but isn’t horribly ugly – in the lower middle maybe. But part of that is she isn’t fat – Western girls now get extra points just for not being obese.

“Looking at her, I would say she might be Jewish but that look can be seen in a lot of Italians too.”

I was thinking the same thing – a friend of mine married an Italian-American girl – looks similar – e.g. has a broad, not gracilized nose – main unattractive feature she has is her nose.

Wow – that’s not even accounting for proportion of the population for each group.

According to an IQ estimator I found (based on correlation studies – IQ correlates with SAT scores at about 0.8 if I recall) an SAT of 1400 composite (old system) suggests an IQ of about 141-142 (15 point SD). Someone should do the math to see if the proportions in the post match with what you’d expect based on currently accepted IQ estimates for the races.

Well yeah, that’s pretty much Marxism. The top and bottom vs. the middle. Classically, it was a subset of the top, isolated intelligensia that didn’t fit it.

I assume it’s relevant that Kamuela Yong’s PhD is in APPLIED math.

Several years ago, they had a women of color article at work (a very large engineering company). The black women’s achievements were in things like “engineering management” and “engineering planning”. The Asian women’s achievement’s were in hardcore engineering like electrical engineering. The article said it was “smashing stereotypes” but it confirmed my stereotypes.

“Give Rodney another chance!!!”

Video Link

RE: the suggestion that black adopted children (boys in particular) will kill the parents, harm the siblings, become like Colin Kaepernick.

So despite what Brimelow says, VDARE is a white nationalist website (which is ok).

Obviously the main objection that white nationalists are going to have to this woman adopting black children is the implication that families that are composed of two white parents and ONLY their biological children (or children that could plausibly be their biological children) are not the norm. They will see that if whites continue to do this, in the future there will be fewer (or no) white families.

Additionally, bringing non-white (and particularly black) children into the family means the family will be necessarily open to their white children marrying non-whites (blacks in ACB’s case). How can you suggest to your children they shouldn’t marry someone who looks like their brother/sister?

So, the complaints that the black boy will do bad things to the family is an exaggerated distraction.

VDARE/Welton and their readers’ main objection is going to be that ACB’s (very publicly visible) family suggests that in the future there won’t be any white families. And, I suppose, their white biological children will have less parental investment/resources than if they parents hadn’t adopted.

Sometimes you just have to state things explicitly.

Yarvin is vastly overrated – impressive, at best, by the standards of internet bloggers. He is not an academic, and I don’t just mean in the sense of having formal credentials.

“The fact that he drew so heavily on them makes him ideologically liberal: a “super-Protestant”

Is there evidence that Mendelssohn took these ideas from the small, marginalized Protestant groups? Leftism existed in the ancient world -there’s no evidence Quakers, Diggers, Moravians took their ideas from ancient leftists.

“Reform Judaism is basically Quakerism. Its only distinguishing feature is a fierce loyalty to Israel, a loyalty which is ethnic rather than religious in nature.”

This “only” distinguishing feature (and massively unprincipled exception) makes all the difference in the world and should tell you that Judaism is nothing like small groups of radical, non-conformist Protestants.

Hi John,

I think there is probably an increased risk with most adopted kids e.g. lower class white kids adopted from meth addicts. It might very well be worse with black kids (I don’t know if stats exist).
My main point is some claims in above comments seemed over the top as if the boy raping his sisters or knifing the parents to death is inevitable. Normal people will see such claims as ridiculous and patently false and won’t even listen to the person saying this. So it is a distraction from the main concern which is that it should be normal for families to consist of all white people (or all black people for that matter) and that prominent public figures who display a counterexample are harmful to the future of white people.

My position is that the Death of the West is by analogy a physician assisted suicide where the patient was ill (but not terminally) and the physican’s assistance was to advance his own interests.

I think MacDonald has said the Jews were a necessary but insufficient condition.