RSSRe: “If America wishes to determine the truth, it can do so.”
Just who the fuck is “America”?
Is there a more disgusting, rotten, perfidious, predatory, and psychopathic country on earth than the US?
College psych 101 rears its ugly head.
Replies: @Brant
According to the report, released by Gallup earlier this week, 4.6 percent of African Americans responded “yes” when asked if they identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender, along with four percent of Hispanics, 4.3 percent of Asians and 3.2 percent of Caucasians.
The margin of error are huge, there is no good data indicating “people of colour” are more likely to be LGBT. It’s all in the female category too.
Gay germ makes no sense to me because it’s only to apply to men, yet female homosexuality is equally discordant in twins. It implies that it’s something stochastic in brain development very early on (in uterine environment or shortly after) which creates an opposite sex brain structure. The germ thing also makes no sense because men don’t suddenly become gay, nor do little boys suddenly ‘turn feminine’ which would be a sure indicator of a germ. Mothers would be horrified if that were true. In reality, they notice their boys act more like girls as soon as they start expressing themselves. The germ theory needs to go in the bin. Cochran was foolish on that front.
Some pathogens learn to exploit immune weakness in fetal development: the "crossover" between depending on mom's immunity and building their own immune system.
It implies that it’s something stochastic in brain development very early on (in uterine environment or shortly after) which creates an opposite sex brain structure.
Both of the homosexuals from the neighborhood where I grew up did not display any of this behavior.
In reality, they notice their boys act more like girls as soon as they start expressing themselves.
Some pathogens learn to exploit immune weakness in fetal development: the "crossover" between depending on mom's immunity and building their own immune system.
It implies that it’s something stochastic in brain development very early on (in uterine environment or shortly after) which creates an opposite sex brain structure.
Sure, but it’s not supposed to apply to women because the whole concept is that the pathogen destroys male typical structure reverting the male to a female typical attraction circuit. How would female homosexual twin discordance come about? Oh, hormones in utero? So now the hormonal theory of homosexuality is plausible again. I just think the pathogen idea is dumb AF because gay face seems to be real and gays are so fem/neurotic that it’s a lot more cognitive overhaul than just some tiny region for attraction.
Both of the homosexuals from the neighborhood where I grew up did not display any of this behavior.
In reality, they notice their boys act more like girls as soon as they start expressing themselves.
It doesn’t have to be extreme gender nonconformity, just elevated. Two of the gay males from my school were ‘different’ from the beginning at age 5. None of the boys treated them weirdly, and they occasionally hung out with us. None of us “caught” the gay off them. The fact that people on UNZ trot out Cochran’s pseudoscience is laughable.
Maybe you're not part of the hypothetical population with a particular HLA type.
None of us “caught” the gay off them. The fact that people on UNZ trot out Cochran’s pseudoscience is laughable.
My model – not the only possible model based on a pathogen, but reasonable – leans on a couple of natural examples. One is narcolepsy. We now know that narcolepsy happens when a particular kind of neuron, concentrated in a little region in the hypothalamus, somehow gets zapped. 99% of narcolepsy cases happen in the 25% of the population that has a particular HLA type – which suggests that something, probably a virus, triggers an overenthusiastic immune response that zaps a neuron subpopulation that produce a particular neurotransmitter (called hypocretin or orexin) that regulates appetite and sleep patterns. And it doesn’t do anything else: narcoleptics aren’t stupid. You can compare narcolepsy to type I diabetes or Parkinson’s disease. Suppose there’s a neuron subpopulation that performs a key function in male sexual desire: wipe out that subpopulation, and Bob’s your uncle.
Judging by what you’ve said, it appears you know of Cochran and his hypothesis, but haven’t actually read what he says about the pathogen and when it likely strikes
Cochran says it strikes sometime in childhood. Of course thats absurd – you’d notice your son suddenly turning feminine. The largest review showed that 90% of gay men were more feminine than the average heterosexual man. And again, why is twin discordance used as “evidence” for the gay germ, yet women are equally discordant and their homosexuality is not meant to be caused by a germ. That’s a blatant hole in the hypothesis because it implies that twins can undergo different developmental processes in events.
Perhaps such a germ expresses as transgenderism if one is infected later in life? Maybe not gay, but it sure looks like it
Have you read “The Man Who Would Be Queen” by J. Michael Bailey? He himself is on good terms with Cochran, and believes the germ theory has “evolutionary plausibility” but has big holes in it. Bailey writes about how transsexual men were often aroused by cross dressing from as young as 3. There was a case in Ken Zuckers office where a boy was pointing out womens underwear he wanted and had an erection. These straight men don’t suddenly “turn trans”, they actually just don’t talk openly about their fetish for cross dressing as a woman… yet in every documented case there is a long hidden history of doing so. Attributing all atypical sexual interest to germs is getting ridiculous – from an evolutionary perspective transsexualism is no problem since 80% of them are still attracted to women and reproduce. It’s easily explained by a mutation which is often passed from father to son.
I do buy into – among possibly other triggers – the infection hypothesis but from the autoimmune response. This is PANS you can read up on it. No literature states that there are sexual affects but I have seen this in play with children afflicted. Its been confirmed from talking w a couple researchers and practitioners they too have noticed but sadly won’t wade into politically charged waters.
The rise in gender issues also correlates to the rise in autoimmune issues. There are clearly major environmental issues plaguing our world.
It’s plausible. A more realistic version of Cochran’s hypothesis would be something like a pathogen causing an allergic reaction. Allergic reactions in pregnancy have been found to effect sex differentiation in the offspring of rat. Female offspring were more masculine, male offspring more feminine.
See here: https://neurosciencenews.com/allergic-reaction-sexual-development-10947/