RSSI am a mechanical and aerospace engineer.
There were no planes, it was CGI.
I am a particle physicist.
I am a mechanical and aerospace engineer.
There were no planes, it was CGI.
I am a mechanical engineer who has worked in aerospace, the towers were a new (at the time) tube construction, the traditional girders were internal for the stairs and elevators only. The tube was comprised of vertical 14” x 14” box section 26” apart of varying thickness from 2” at the base to 1/4” at the top, 1/2” where the planes hit. The idea that an aluminum tube 2 to 3mm thick penetrated this is preposterous. The planes were CGI.
Wiki has the details of the construction.
Yes I googled it too sometime ago and was no wiser. Maybe the 5 is an S and it is an acronym for Stupid Dumb Signature. Any other suggestions?
Re the Samson option
I have seen in various places people claim that nuclear weapons do not exist, I considered these deranged comments but when I looked further into this it was clear the original tests were faked and that Hiroshima and Nagasaki looked no different to Tokyo after the fire bombing.
It does seem a bit of a stretch to have so many countries in on this but suppose you are say Pakistan and declare you have nuclear weapons, what is the US/UK/Russia going to say? “Nonsense, they do not exist.”
I recall our host is a physicist, maybe he could use his considerable intellect to write an article on this.
Dawson’s Numec/JFK documentary is quite good. It also has more endnotes than almost any other documentary I know (maybe 5 minutes of endnotes), so it’s strange Ron claims he provides no references. I can’t judge his 9/11 work. Owens is different but also very good, especially since she has left Daily Wire. I don’t think such petty personal attacks against other media figures are helpful.
The case against Brigitte Macron is quite strong actually and certainly hasn’t been debunked. If it was incorrect it could be debunked very easily, but it hasn’t been debunked. For instance this Veronique woman could simply come forward and say I’m not Brigitte, or somebody who knows her could do so, but nobody has come forward. Or Brigitte’s alleged brother could simply come forward and give an interview, but he hasn’t done so. Or of course they could provide photos of Brigitte as a young lady, but again they haven’t done this. So at this point it’s fair to state she is in fact a man.
I was saddened to hear that, because I like Candice, and hearing about that doozy, made me think of Mr. Unz' theories about how some people who delve into conspiracies, (and who're generally more well-informed than those who don't), often do themselves and their causes more harm than good, when they go too far. I watched the first few minutes of this video, and for me, Candace makes a lot more sense than Joe. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lD29jqH078Joe mentions that most "scientists" agree with Climate Justice, and Candace says who cares what these "scientists" say. And I agree with Candace. I also watched a video where she states that she's 'not a flat earther, but then goes on to say neither is she a 'round earther'. I suspect that what might be going on with her, is akin to what happened to me, when I discovered at a young age that everything I'd been told about the world and history and 'truth', were agenda-driven lies. As you attempt to come to terms with that, there is this terrible cynicism, and you risk running to the opposite position, out of a desperate need to purge all the lies from your mind. It isn't enough to declare and accept that Hitler wasn't the most evil human that has ever lived on Earth, you entertained that perhaps he was the best, because you wanted, needed to purge the lies. And to do so, you felt a kind of retroactive spiritual cleansing had to be done, by reversing everything you'd been told, in order to off-set the lies. If that makes any sense.I suspect that's where Satanism comes from. Young people become so disillusioned with being hectored their whole lives, that their mortal bodies are sinful, and all earthly pleasures are a terrible sin, and to eschew pleasure for sacrifice to others, because it's self-effacing sacrifice to the church, and duty to the church, that is the purpose of human life, blah, blah.. And then they see all the hypocrisy, and realize all the pious sanctimony is intended to control them, and then in anger and outrage they run in the opposite direction. I suspect that were it not for all the lies were all told about history and global events and religion and so forth, that many of these people would never be inclined to so strongly need to repudiate all those lies, and often do so in weird and extremist ways. Candace, like all of us, has been told so many lies about how it is Americans, (and to a lesser extent, Europeans) use of 'fossil' fuels, that is burning the planet to a crisp, while China's and Africa's use of those same fuels, is actually offsetting the terrible damage done by racist's use of those fuels. And you realize it's all a crock of 'woke' shite, and so you want to buy the biggest diesel 4x4 you can afford. Even if you don't really have any use for one, other than to put it in the face, (and the diesel fumes up the noses) of the agenda-driven lying scum. Perhaps Bill Nye has done more for the flat earther crowd than anyone else, when all those young people come to realize Nye is a greedy, lying POS, shilling whatever horse shite the PTB tell him to. They start to wonder, is there anything they've told us http://hinghamfinemotor.weebly.com/uploads/6/0/6/2/60627935/child-and-adult-talking_orig.jpg
I discovered that Owens had raised her bizarre theory to even greater heights of absurdity by strongly suggesting that Brigitte was actually Macron’s own biological father
Climate change back around 1980 a cover of Time magazine had a picture of Manhattan With a giant glacier looming over it. Caption was The Coming Ice Age. I wish I’d bought a dozen copies.
A thousand years ago the earth was so warm the Vikings had European style agriculture in Greenland Wheat was grown in Germany and oranges in N France And wild grapes grew in Eastern Canada .
By 1300s earth got colder . There was a little ice age until about 1850.
Ssssshhhh...
By 1300s earth got colder . There was a little ice age until about 1850.
For the 1,000,000th time you ignorant jackass: You don't know what a jet airliner crashing into a skyscraper looks like! The only time in history that has happened was on 9/11. That is the only reference we have to go off of.Someone who says "this doesn't look like what a jet airliner crashing into a skyscraper should look like" is an automatic tell that you are dealing with an idiot. You have no idea how a plane travelling 500-600 mph should or should not "melt" into a building. The only pictures you've ever seen of a jet crashing into a skyscraper were from 9/11. You have no other reference to compare that to in order to say, "this looks discrepant." You are talking out of your fundament.Replies: @ABR, @Sparkon
The images of the 2nd plane defy logic, like melting into a steel frame building like butter and having it’s wings go behind near by buildings
As a certain Mr Lear said, “A commercial airplane cannot do 500mph at 1000ft and one can calculate the velocity from the videos as around 150mph.
I've never ONCE heard Dr Kevin Barrett advocate for the 'Holographic projections' of aircraft used on 9/11 theory - and I have listened to/watched countless 100's of hours of Barrett's False Flag Weekly News and No Lies Radio audio broadcasts over many years (not to mention his output on RT/Press TV Iran and numerous other venues).
People like Barrett, who support any kind of crap on that .... Kevin Barett is somehow here as a major commentator, he solidly supports the ‘no passenger aircraft’ bullshit.
At times, even the ‘holographic projections’ bullshit.
As for Dr Kevin Barrett's grasp of the events of 9/11, in my estimation it is excellent - and I've seen a TON of his output.
Summary: Mr Guava, I've never seen you (that I recall) participating in the UR 9/11 threads absorbing the evidence presented (most of which is in the comments section), explaining what did and didn't happen on 9/11.
Yet you offer some silly explanations of your own with a degree of conviction.
The fact is that you know much less about this False Flag than you think you do.
I have come to appreciate your Calcified, Knee Jerk, Dog Whistle spittle of your Military Drone Theory. Without fail, you immediately fire it off in every 9/11 Plane discussion.
I however suggest the perpetrators designed their False Flag incorporating the Least Amount of Risk of Failure and Discovery. For if discovered…all of Israel is destroyed. The masters of False Flags would not take that risk. They would not risk using Real Airplanes….Military Drones or Commercial.
Your Drone theory is chalk full of unnecessary Risks. A much simpler, foolproof plan is to simply sell the False Flag using controlled Media and Fake CGI Aircraft.
I suggest to everyone to watch Simon Shack’s 2007 Documentary, “SEPTEMBER CLUES” . The 9/11 Planes Impacting the WTCs was not sold to the American public by thousands of eye-witnesses…it was sold by our Mainstream MEDIA masquerading as LIVE NEWS—ALL READING THEIR SCRIPTS.
Same to you Fredo. Happy Easter.
Enjoy your day sir.
There were no planes. Images we saw on television were computer generated.
I’m always amazed people can sit through the overwhelming majority of these movies.
Of the ones listed that I’ve seen, you couldn’t pay me to rewatch 95% of them. And these are billed as the greatest films of all time. Probably just a personal idiosyncrasy.
The best film of all time was Kubrick’s Moon Landing 1969.