"And when it's legalized and congress or state legislatures tax the hell out of it, are these poor users, who likely can't keep a job to afford their habit, going to just quit because it's too expensive? There will still be an illegal market for drugs, just as cigarette smuggling rings exist nowadays for a legal product.

Cocaine, heroin, and meth addicts are a sad bunch of people who effectively cannot function in society. Much worse than virtually any drunk you'll ever know."

^ Just commenting on this being said. First of all, I've seen many drunks much worse than I've seen a lot of drug addicts. Alcohol is a dangerous drug that kills many people and ruins just as many, if not more, families than drug abuse does. Also, the issue of costs will be the same as alcohol when it was legalized; the government has taxed it but it's not that hard for the poor to get their hands on a $6 bottle of 5 'o clock vodka. Legalization will be similar to this, but without people sitting in prison for marijuana possession and violent gangs.

From my perspective, a young 23 year old, attractive married girl, it is about love, the feeling of being close, sexual fulfillment, and relationship. I don’t want my husband and my girlfriend to have sexual relations with each other because I will get very jealous from both sides. My first sexual experiences were with a girl. I have always been sexually attracted to both girls and guys. I married my husband because he is the best man in the world and I want him to be mine. He is the best lover, provider, companion, and housekeeper. I love my girlfriend because she is the best female lover, female companion, she understands me like a man can’t, and she is my best friend.

Herr Unz:

This is your quote when you reference your reasons for refusing to feature Kaminski as a contributing author:

“He reminds me a little of my sometime contributor Larry Romanoff. A couple of times I pointed out that Romanoff’s material generally seemed about one-third correct, one-third incorrect, and one-third difficult for me to determine.”

Since Romanoff is, in summation, a half-wit, then why do you DISCREDIT YOURSELF by publishing ALL of what amounts to Romanoff’s chicanery?