RSSWe can literally throw this comment back at you:
I am neither Arab nor Palestinian, but the picture of poor, suffering Israelis is a joke.
More than 13 million expelled Germans after 1944/45, who originated the entire culture (Boehme, Kant, Schopenhauer, Koch, …) are worth more than the entire Jewish culture in past 6000 years.
For virtually the entire previous period of human history, Jews produced absolutely nothing except pure superstition (the Talmud) that rivals anything in the Koran. Cheating, genital mutilation, you name it. There’s no creativity, no culture, no intelligence, no nothing. They don’t get to wipe Immanuel Kant’s boots. (Muslims at least had an indirect contribution of preserving the text of Greek and Roman culture, to be transmitted to Europe.)
Jews can only produce positive cultural content when they are heavily mixed (both culturally and racially) with Europeans, and inside of European countries. But in that case, ‘positive’ does not mean ‘original’, since everything was derivative of Germanic culture. Say, Israel is entirely dependent upon the United States for its cultural content. Further, the Jewish contributions tend to be ‘Talmudic’ and have little to do with any basic physical technology. They make contributions to unoriginal sub-fields (violinists, not composers), and unoriginal time periods (all Jewish physics Nobels put together are not worth Newton or Clerk Maxwell).
Since Germany was so culturally superior to Jews, Germany should have exterminated them during the 1940s.. right? Then there would have been peace now.
Simply put- Jews are now in one of those great creative periods some peoples experience in some areas (Italians from, say, 1300 to 1600, Germans from 1750 to 1930, English from 1600 to 1880,..). Their creativity will be exhausted, as is always the case- but for now, it still exists.Replies: @Taxi, @Jihadijew, @Jihadijew, @ProudGermanic
Hilbert lived to see the Nazis purge many of the prominent faculty members at University of Göttingen in 1933. Those forced out included Hermann Weyl (who had taken Hilbert's chair when he retired in 1930), Emmy Noether and Edmund Landau. One who had to leave Germany, Paul Bernays, had collaborated with Hilbert in mathematical logic, and co-authored with him the important book Grundlagen der Mathematik (which eventually appeared in two volumes, in 1934 and 1939). This was a sequel to the Hilbert–Ackermann book Principles of Mathematical Logic from 1928. Hermann Weyl's successor was Helmut Hasse.About a year later, Hilbert attended a banquet and was seated next to the new Minister of Education, Bernhard Rust. Rust asked whether "the Mathematical Institute really suffered so much because of the departure of the Jews". Hilbert replied, "Suffered? It doesn't exist any longer, does it!"
Simply put- Jews are now in one of those great creative periods some peoples experience in some areas (Italians from, say, 1300 to 1600, Germans from 1750 to 1930, English from 1600 to 1880,..). Their creativity will be exhausted, as is always the case- but for now, it still exists.Replies: @Taxi, @Jihadijew, @Jihadijew, @ProudGermanic
Hilbert lived to see the Nazis purge many of the prominent faculty members at University of Göttingen in 1933. Those forced out included Hermann Weyl (who had taken Hilbert's chair when he retired in 1930), Emmy Noether and Edmund Landau. One who had to leave Germany, Paul Bernays, had collaborated with Hilbert in mathematical logic, and co-authored with him the important book Grundlagen der Mathematik (which eventually appeared in two volumes, in 1934 and 1939). This was a sequel to the Hilbert–Ackermann book Principles of Mathematical Logic from 1928. Hermann Weyl's successor was Helmut Hasse.About a year later, Hilbert attended a banquet and was seated next to the new Minister of Education, Bernhard Rust. Rust asked whether "the Mathematical Institute really suffered so much because of the departure of the Jews". Hilbert replied, "Suffered? It doesn't exist any longer, does it!"
I don’t believe you are addressing the main part of my post, which is that there is a false inference from ‘superiority’ to ‘right to exterminate’. If Jews > Arabs *implies* that Jews can exterminate Arabs, then Germans > Jews would imply that Germans can exterminate Jews ‘because’ they are superior, which is absolutely ridiculous. I am not calling into question the cultural contributions of Jews at an absolute level, but the issue was about relative levels, and your premise that ‘because’ they are superior to some other race, they can exterminate that other race.
You are really conceding my main point, which is that although Jews (like Arabs) have made important contributions during their Golden Period, they are not at the same level of *magnitude* as Germans. Say, even Newton (hence Einstein and others) was not as historically important as Kepler (what Newton did could have been done by Huygens or any number of others, albeit more slowly; Kepler was indispensable). Von Neumann himself acknowledged Germans Hilbert and Weyl as his superiors (whose work is more used in actual physics, not ‘mathematical’ physics that simply proves theorems). All Jewish violinists are not worth Beethoven, J.S. Bach, etc. Your comment about the ‘decline’ of German culture applies also to the modern decline of Jewish culture (mirrored by the decline of physics itself, which was only ‘revolutionary’ in the early 20th century). Further, Arabs may be inferior in individual achievement, but in terms of single important ‘deeds’ they are actually *necessary* for subsequent Western thought (scholasticism depended on the Arabian development of Hellenism, e.g. Averroes).
(Although we are getting sidetracked, one negative feature of Jewish thinkers is that they are *either* technically powerful or original, but not both at the same time. There is no Jewish equivalent of Newton, Poincare or Gauss; von Neumann was powerful but not original (he used the techniques produced by others, like the Koopman operator technique, Haar measure, Weyl’s idea of defects in an unbounded operator, McCulloch-Pitts cycles for automata theory), while Einstein was original but not technically powerful.)
And yet despite being Germanic myself, I don’t believe for a moment that Jews should be exterminated ‘just because’ of some (possibly temporary) inferiority. I believe that culturally, Jews, Germans, Arabs, are all ‘good enough’ — clearly have demonstrated potential — and that the huge distinction is in their political practices, not in cultural content.
A short list of those 'deeds': methodologies of empirical science, abolition of eminent domain and primogeniture, pharmacy, constitutional federalism of ethnic nationalisms, astral navigation, individual property rights, spherical trigonometry, inoculation, logarithms, pluralistic justice, chemistry, and religious liberty.
Further, Arabs may be inferior in individual achievement, but in terms of single important ‘deeds’ they are actually *necessary* for subsequent Western thought (scholasticism depended on the Arabian development of Hellenism, e.g. Averroes).
I dispute the assumption on this site (and by Escobar and others) that Israel is on the ‘American’ side, and China as representing some distinct ‘side’. In fact Israel and China are structurally entangled (in some ways dependent):
1. The primary reason for China’s rise since the 2000s is Israel dragging the U.S. into the Middle East. If this did not occur from 9/11 to 2021, the United States would have pivoted to Asia much sooner. As it so happens, the U.S. is stuck in the Middle East indefinitely. Also, China and Israel had a de facto historical cooperation with each other from the Soviet days (weapons trade).
Caveat: against this, you can argue that neoconservatives wanted an attack on the Middle East to be a ‘long term prelude’ to some attack on Russia and China. But this can be seen as another way that a ‘bad thing becomes a good thing’.
2. Any negative comments China makes about Israeli policies about Palestinians is irrelevant, since the point is that they *benefit* from perceived violations from Israel, and seek to use and exploit this as much as possible. Their message is simply that Israeli actions in Palestine are a bit more extreme than their own (less visible, and less visibly proved) policies against Muslims. Every similarity between Israeli policies and Chinese policies weakens U.S. propaganda against China.
The explanation for this is: neocons and Israelis are not on one ‘side’ against China, but China is succeeding in dividing Israelis and using one portion of them against the ‘mainstream West’ collectively. (Just like: the Arabs are not some monolithic entity, but Israel succeeds in dividing them.)
3. Other parallels between the two countries are striking. Both were founded within a year of each other (1948, 1949), both were initially socialist and ‘became capitalist’ afterwards, both are structured in the same way (where oligarchs are controlled by the state and not vice versa), both are good at economic leverage.
Ironically, I agree with your broader point that ‘Jews always win’ regardless of whether others win or lose. But the question is what they are winning, and this notion of victory is culturally conditioned.
What I am now absolutely convinced of is, that at the deepest level of reality, ‘Jews always win’ in the material world. We are living in an entire reality that is itself completely dominated by merchant-type civilizations, like Jews or Carthage, rather than Rome. Regardless of what the Palestinians do, they are still puppets. The very existence of anti-Semitism is just another machination of the Jewish power centers, since they manipulate it for their own benefit — they turn anything negative into a positive. Anti-Semitism is simply a device to produce more Jewish unity; if the Palestinians vanished, Israel would be in danger of dissolution from internal conflict (orthodox vs. non-orthodox). But even then, they will find out some way out of it. Even if they get nuked, they have enough nukes to take the rest of the world down with them.
I am not convinced that this is a ‘good’ thing, but it seems to be a fact. Throughout human history, the side with the higher levels of individual culture and heroism was always weaker, and has always lost. (See Hannibal vs. Scipio Africanus, Napoleon vs. Wellington.) ‘Higher culture’ is the greatest sign of weakness, since the stronger side are the professionals: those who devote themselves entirely to the ‘real world’ of compromises, not the imaginary world of higher action, faith, and invention. Jews specialize in the real world (itself deeply horrible), while Arabs, Germanics and others essentially hate this world.
This is one of the great ironies, that Jews after the Great Revolt of 66 AD would be the cultural antipodes of their previous selves. The Hebrews of the Bible were, behaviorally and otherwise, the ‘Palestinians’ of their time. They did *not* compromise or try to manipulate world ‘systems’ (like the economy, media), but fought to the death.
The West itself, which dominates the high-end of culture, was essentially extremely weak. If it did not luck out in discovering the New World, it would not have undergone any of the revolutions (economics, industrial) and would be entirely colonized by say the Ottoman Empire. No other culture was so dependent upon geographical vectors of expansion. The West is dying since it was deceived by its past achievements, and never understood how weak it was at the center.
I pray every day these kikes launch the first nuke. Please, dear God Almighty, make that happen. It is all we need to send these demons to a real Holocaust.Replies: @anarchyst, @Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist
Even if they get nuked, they have enough nukes to take the rest of the world down with them.