Chutzpah-of-the-week award goes to:

But it was in 1996 that Mr Wurmser first shot to notoriety when he was one of the authors of a document entitled “Clean Break” produced for Benjamin Netanyahu, then Israel’s prime minister.

In fact, he insists, “the very spirit of the document is the inverse” in that it urges Israel to act in the interests of the West.

Link

This reminds me:

"Symbol of Unhealed Congo: Male Rape Victims"

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/05/world/africa/05congo.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=the%20congo&st=cse

Ron, have you considered open sourcing this content system you’ve designed? The comment system especially is the best I’ve ever used on any site. Great job regardless.

Not to insult you or Nod but I feel that there’s something very unhealthy about someon *genuinely* preferring the company of another race to their own.

You are just trying to rationalize why normal white people (especially white women) want nothing to do with dregs like you.

Rosie is the perfect proof that radical feminism is really the puppetmaster behind White Nationalism.

Keep it simple.

Limit people to 3 comments per day. No rollover of unused capacity.

Charging for comments is a terrible idea.

And likewise it doesn’t explain the impressive technological level (functional nuclear program) of North Korea, which has achieved it despite

er…. NK was GIVEN nukes by China. Just like Pakistan was given nukes by China.

Get a clue..

The imposition of the Arab barbarian invaders’ religion upon the Persian people was one of history’s great tragedies.

er….they could change back if they wanted.

How will Ron Unz bury this to sustain his narrative about low Hispanic crime?

So you actually believe his narrative?

So anything less than 50% income tax is ‘Libertarianism’?

You socialists are the most gluttonous moochers around.

Thomm himself is a Hindu subcon pretending to be white. So it is quite natural for him to believe everyone else is up to the same sort of dishonesty that he himself engages in.

It is pretty obvious that Thomm is not an Indian. Have you even read his comments history? He is a regular white guy.

As far as the validity of Intelligent Dasein’s and Thomm’s thesis, there seems to be a lot of evidence to support it.

Of course Trump will win. AE is like a cuckservative, in that he wants to insist that Republicans will lose, and doesn’t seem happy that Trump is doing well.

More likely explanation :

YouGov polls in general are pure garbage.

Actually, women of below average height are preferred. No one wants genes from a 5’7″ woman.

That is not true at all. Female fashion models are selected for height.

In contrast, 71% of Koreans in America are Christians while 89% of Filipinos in America are Christians. Among Vietanmese here, that number is 36%. Even the Chinese in America are 30% Christian.

The Christianity of East Asians is the most superficial, cosmetic attempt to fit in. It is just as bad as their tendency to give themselves Western first names (often poorly-considered ones at that).

The typical Chinese-American Christian couldn’t tell you the first thing about the Bible. Andrew Yang is not a Christian, just found a pastor to vouch for him the day before he started running for Prez.

That is actually the best news story I have seen all week.

White SJW harridans are probably the biggest net ‘takers’ in our entire society, with huge inheritances on top of cushy lefty no-show jobs. That someone (even if they are SJW women of color) has figured out how to sucker them out of big bucks is splendid.

Almost as good as when a middle aged white woman who took her husband to the cleaners via divorce court then loses it all to a Nigerian romance scam.

Market forces win.

Note the lack of intermarriage relative to Hispanics or East Asians.

I think someone once put forth data about intermarriage, and how 2nd-gen Indians had an outmarraige rate of 30% (vs. 40% for Chinese). So it was not very different, and both were high.

Why such a difference between AF Pak and India you think?

Afg and Pak are rife with Saudi madrassas preaching Wahabbiism. That could be it. This is also why Iran and Turkey are low despite being Islamic.

I am sure that a lot of guys here realized what you are saying but, for some reason, don’t want to spell it out.

For a full explanation, see here :

https://www.unz.com/anepigone/there-be-reelection/#comment-3339592

I have actually been pointing this out for over two years.

That was one of the big moments in the transformation of America, and it is often forgotten. The 1965 immigration law in and of itself was not enough to transform America, although it played a huge role.

Other events that played a huge role between 1965 and 1991:

Bringing in a lot of Indochinese refugees after the Vietnam war ended. In many cases, there was a strong case to be made for this. As in, there were people risking their lives to be on our side, so perhaps we owed them something. However, there were many fraudulent cases, such as babies born > 1 year after we left with the mother claiming the father was an American GI.

The 1986 amnesty for illegal aliens (Simpson-Mizzolli act).

Also in 1986 — Reagan’s new tax laws eliminated all tax breaks for American graduate students, but kept the tax breaks for foreign students. When I was in grad school, suddenly Americans were paying 25% of our stipends in taxes, while the Chinese students paid ZERO.

After the Tienanmen Square Massacre in 1989, Bush I let all the Chinese students in the US stay permanently.

To show what effect these, plus the 1991 doubling of immigration, plus the increase of H1-B visas had on American science:

In the mid early-mid 1990s I looked at a lab in a grad school in a large American city. There were two phone lists on the wall — one current, one from 10 years earlier.

The one from the early-mid 1980s had 100 students:

90 American (including Asian Americans,)
5 PRC
5 Rest of World

The one from the early-mid 1990s had 100 students:
5 American
90 PRC
5 Rest of World.

I tried to make a living with a PhD in the hard sciences for a few years in the mid-late 1990s. I couldn’t. I lived off of WIC and EIC and some money I inherited. All the good jobs went to Chinese, while we Americans fought over third-rate teaching positions that paid in the 30s. Most of the time I tried to make a living as an adjunct.

I later went to computer programming, and made a lot more money, until H1-Bs took that over. Back around 2000 I could walk into almost any dot-com in NYC and see almost all Americans working there. Those were the days.

“That was one of the big moments in the transformation of America, and it is often forgotten. ”

I can do you one better–the “invasion” began when we allowed in scoundrels and derelicts from Eastern and Southern Europe. Heritage America has been paying the price ever since…at least that is what the nativists led us to believe.

https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-anti-immigration-cartoon-entitled-unrestricted-immigration-and-its-32393339.html

This will be Trump’s greatest legacy. History will remember our post-9/11 military campaigns as what they were – a colossal national and human disgrace. If it was Bin Laden’s plan to lure the US into an un-winnable quagmire in Afghanistan on 9/11, he succeeded.

I don’t know that this was his plan, but his followers today are certainly happy how everything turned out.

That would be funny if Bloomberg were actually a Boomer, but he is not. Born 1942.

Actually, I was not convinced before, but Truth and Thomm really have gotten a lot of these White Nationalist types to admit that they are homosexuals.

GeneralRipper, would you rather be in a romantic relationship with a white man or a black woman who is a supermodel?

This is a question where no answer IS an answer.

This type of graphic fantasy, along with your difficulty in answering a question that a normal heterosexual would have no difficulty with, says more about Trinity and GeneralRipper than anyone else. Straight men just don’t talk the way you two do.

I never would have believed the theory Truth and Thomm presented before, but their opponents continue to prove that thesis to be true.

I’m gonna agree with troof here. A White nationalist picking a man or even hesitating is just plain weird. Kind of a funny troll by troof but also very odd that someone actually responded with a man.

Seconded. My opinion on this topic changed, given the proof we have seen.

I have to agree, unfortunately. There is no other explanation for their answers.

That’s wonderful, but NOT ONCE in a decade or so has that been the question.

A decade? Where?

If true, that is a lot of evidence!

This is a very apt article from Fred Reed, which explains the state of White Nationalism.

For one thing, in the United States, whites are 62% of the population, but 95% of all LGBTQ people. How could this be? It is because ‘White Nationalism’ fought hard to create this situation.

As we can see above, various WNs, when faced with the simple question of whether they thought it would be worse for them to have sex with a white man or the prettiest quatroon/mulatto (such as a 1970s Pam Grier or a 1990s Halle Berry), many either said they would choose the man, or refused to answer the question even after it was posed a second, third, or fourth time to them. This is a situation where no answer clearly IS an answer.

Remember that a regular heterosexual man (white or otherwise) would have no hesitation in making it super clear that he prefers a 1990s Halle Berry (or equivalent famously pretty mulatto/quatroon) over a man (of any race) as a sexual partner.

Their rationale is that race loyalty has to trump sexual orientation, and that producing no baby is better than producing a quatroon or octoroon baby. At least they are able to spell out their logic.

The full list of commenters here who either outright said they prefer the man, or would not say that they prefer the prettiest quatroon woman in the world over a man, is as follows :

JohnnySmoggins
GeneralRimmer
utu
AndrewR
Svigor
Mike Tre (aka MikeatMikedotMike)
Hangnail Hans
Twodees Partain
BenKenobi
neutral
iffen
William Badwhite
Porktastic
Polistra
Pericles
Lurker
Cowtown Rebel
ATBOTL
Trinity
JMcG
kihowi

Remember that any of these individuals can get removed from this list at any time if they simply say that having sex with a 1990s Halle Berry (or equivalent very pretty quatroon/mulatto) is much better than having sex with a white man. The central premise of ‘White Nationalism’ really is homosexuality and transgenderism.

Truth, Rosie, Mrs. Alden, Audacious Epigone, and Anatoly Karlin will all vouch for having seen members of this list behaving as described above.

I’m gonna agree with troof here. A White nationalist picking a man or even hesitating is just plain weird. Kind of a funny troll by troof but also very odd that someone actually responded with a man.

A friend of mine had sex with a Black woman and he didn’t have much choice in the matter. She pretty much dragged him off to her dungeon. My friends and I laughed our asses off.

But I’m not a White nationalist. Just a honest racial realist and populist. I’d hang out with troof over Anglin any day.

I agree. I looked through GeneralRipper’s posting history, and he routinely either avoids answering Truth’s question outright, or responds very differently than a normal man would. This goes back years.

LMFAO!

In 10 years you can’t figure out the answer to the question “would you rather stick your dong into some puzzy or a dude’s rear end, and you’ve made a few posts about “the masculine beauty of James Dean and Marlon Brando”, but I’m a queer.

No, a straight dude with just use his hand ✋. That’s what I don’t understand about all your gay ass nigra brothers in the can, why would a straight dude rape another man or receive a hummer from another man. A straight dude wouldn’t even be able to achieve an erection. Okay, I have a choice between Orca Pigfrey sans makeup or even with makeup or my hand ✋? I swear before God that I am jerking off. Now which would you choose, a prime Ann Margret or Halle Berry? I rest my case. Even what you and Thomm call prime pussy barely ranks a 6 and that is being generous when you look at your “queens” without the war paint on.

A man that cannot say, unequivocally that he’d rather be with a woman than a man is most likely a closet fag.

Again Bro, it’s not complicated.

Ugly woman >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Man.

and here’s the important part; EVEN IF DON’T BELIEVE IT YOU JUST FUCKING SAY IT TO OTHER DUDES!

For the life of me Bro, I cannot imagine why I have to explain this to you 14x.

Even what you and Thomm call prime pussy barely ranks a 6 and that is being generous when you look at your “queens”

So you are not sure if you would rather fuck a DUDE or a WOMAN YOU RATE A 6?!?

Trynn, that says everything I need to know.

Here is the Wayback machine link for how the Alt-Right is a network of homosexuals (with recordings as proof) :

https://web.archive.org/web/20240725182727/https://skandinaviskfrihet.se/network-of-homosexuals-exposed-in-the-alt-right-with-recordings/

But Fred Reed is 100% correct in his assessment of White Nationalism.

Here is where Truth outright got Trinity to admit his homosexuality, in the links below :

https://www.unz.com/article/ok-boomer-are-boomers-solely-to-blame-for-our-national-decline/?showcomments#comment-5937293
https://www.unz.com/article/ok-boomer-are-boomers-solely-to-blame-for-our-national-decline/?showcomments#comment-5939407

Trinity’s projection is total, since Truth got him to admit that Trinity would rather have sex with a white man than even the prettiest mulatta/quatroon woman in the world.

Moving on, here is where Tallest Skil refused to say that he would prefer the prettiest Chinese woman in the world over a white man, as a sexual partner :

https://www.unz.com/aanglin/retarded-faggot-republican-threatens-to-invade-china-as-anal-empire-keeps-slipping/?showcomments#comment-5910250

Think about it. He prefers a man over the prettiest Chinese woman in the world.

This pattern regarding White Trashionalists repeats itself again and again. They are homosexuals, and are responsible for that fact that in the United States, whites are 62% of the population, but almost 100% of all LGBTQ people. The destruction they have caused to white youth is total.

Everything makes sense when you consider the following :

i) Nature created homosexuality to divert the most defective genes out of the gene pool.
ii) White Trashionalists tend to be almost 100% male and absolute bottom of the barrel ne’er do wells. Yet the fat, bluehaired feminists are entirely white and equal in number to the White Trashionalists.
iii) There is an unusually high variance in white quality. Much more than in other races.
iv) Most White Trashionalists say that they would rather have sex with a white man ahead of a famously pretty mulatto/quatroon woman like 1970s Pam Grier or 1990s Halle Berry.

Ergo, the white race has a unique quarantine and filtration mechanism for unwanted genetic waste matter. The upper 90% of white people have no flaws, while all the flaws neatly concentrate into the bottom 10% for continuous, efficient removal from the gene pool. This is why the white race keeps improving, we have a special feature where the wastematter gets eliminated from the gene pool via a defective subrace that comprises the bottom 10% of whites.

The males of this defective subrace become the White Trashionalists, while the women become the fat bluehaired feminists. This is why there are no women in White Trashionalism, but fat bluehaired feminists are both equal in number and defective IQ/appearance to the male White Trashionalists.

This explanation is both robust and elegant, and really does explain everything.