Thinking about how something like this could be prevented from happening again, could the system be modified so members of the jury cannot know the race of the accused, via maybe having a separate room from where the accused can watch his her trial and also assigning them numbers instead of names etc.

I guess what I am asking is, is there any fundamental legal reason where the judge and jury have to see the accused and know his her name?

This could potentially eliminate most biases and accusations of systemic racism? Surely there is a good reason why this suggestion is impossible to implement though. Asking for a friend.

Where to start with the originating posts by Hanania and Unz and the tweet you kindly shared with the readership? Hanania and Unz are de facto imbeciles on this subject, which is certainly puzzling because they are no dummies.

Oh, the complexity of human intelligence perhaps?

To Hanania:

First, what kind of moron does not understand that advocating for high migration, say from Muslim countries (the guy literally suggested that in his Amy Wax interview) to counter woke Americans is simply a bad idea?

I’ve seen some Australians commenting here, just ask them how introducing cane toads worked to control a beetle pest in Australia. Well turned out cane toads brought their own set of problems too and also became a pest.

Second, about immigrants making cities safer nonsense, well dear retard, depends on the immigrants and the city. Did immigrants make Paris, London, Barcelona and Amsterdam safer? well many people born in those cities, having seen the changes derived from mass immigration will disagree.

In the Netherlands for instance they are currently battling a very serious organised crime problem in general and with the Mokro (Moroccan) mafia in particular. In Germany substitute Moroccan with Arab Lebanese clans.

For first time in Dutch history they had a very popular journalist killed in broad daylight in the center of Amsterdam (Peter DeVries) They had to close TV studios in the city center, from where this journalist came out right before he was shot dead, for safety reasons and threats.

The attorney (!) of the principal protected witness against the alleged boss of this Moroccan mafia was also shot in broad daylight in front of his house in the morning. And so was the witness’ brother inside of his legitimate business.

Hit squads are shooting each other with AK47s in the streets of Dutch cities from time to time. No it is not a war zone mr Unz, but is a clear worsening of the situation.

And another example, a guy was shot dead with an AK47 for parking his car where a “target” of a hit also used to park his and was living in the same building, in the center of Amsterdam.

And so were an innocent man and his wife and baby mistaken by a resident of his building by another hit squad with ak47s. Man died, wife wss severely injured but survived. Baby miraculously survived without injury.

The dutch Prime Minister stopped going by bike to work because of threats of kidnapping and killing. The dutch Princess was forced to stay home not unlike Assange and forbidden from residing in Amsterdam, attending college there (UVA) and living a normal life like another dutch citizen. Yes, this was possible before, not anymore. The reason? threats of kidnapping and possibly killing.

Law enforcement in the Netherlands openly said they cannot protect everyone. The implications of this anyone with half a brain and *the willingness to use it* to think about it can get easily. The police cannot protect everyone, careful of what you say ie snitches get stitches. Welcome to a beginning to fail State.

The former top dog of law enforcement said the Netherlands is becoming a narco state.

There is a wave of bombings of private homes and businesses, possibly victims of extorsion by organised crime groups. The majors can close businesses and homes, and evict victims for safety reasons. What are the implications of that? your brain will possibly help you out with that.

There are more examples, but hopefully the reader gets the idea.

To Unz:

After reading the above, how do you quantify that, ie the slow, unquestionable infiltration of organised crime and corruption in a country’s society and institutions?

The numbers of murders are very small. The murder totals are even less than in the 90’s. Still any non retard would agree the situation has clearly worsened in terms of safety for citizens in Dutch cities compared to the 70s.

Now tell me with a straight face mass immigration of a de facto sub caste had nothing to do with it.

And here is the kicker: you will find Hananias and Unzes in the Netherlands who will tell you everything is alright in the Netherlands. The above is true but no biggie, the Netherlands is very safe. And this is quite true yes.

And also you will find Unzes and Hananias in Mexico, Colombia etc. saying the same. Which is less true, but still it is true up to a point.

This is in my view why Unz and Hanania are makig fools of themselves in this regard. But what else can one expect from childish, spergy libertarians? Possibly they will answer the problem is not enough immigration or too much government or some other moronic, autistic remark.

For interested I have links to local press sources confirming all the above is true.