RSSI am not surprised at this blackout in the media (aside from the Jewish press, whose audience is already predetermined to agree with its smears).
Even mentioning you while trying to frame it as “this guy is crazy” might lead some people to your website, where they will learn some things that they are not supposed to know, and the system can’t have that.
Ben
(can’t remember my handle, so it is making me post as “Anon”)
I heard Putin was going to unleash the Chechens on Prigozhin. If that is true, I don’t blame him for aborting the mission and dipping out. Those guys are like the fucking Dothraki from Game of Thrones; they would’ve been wearing his men’s bones as necklaces within the hour.
Ben
This has a cinematic quality every bit as good as "unleash the Kraken!" from Clash of the Titans.
unleash the Chechens
Your comments are always thought-provoking, Dr. Morgan.
I’ve recently written an essay on technology that you might enjoy:
https://notes-from-the-abyss.com/thoughts-on-the-coming-technological-dystopia/
Ben
Replies: @Ben G.
96. As for our constitutional rights, consider for example that of freedom of the press. We certainly don't mean to knock that right: it is very important tool for limiting concentration of political power and for keeping those who do have political power in line by publicly exposing any misbehavior on their part. But freedom of the press is of very little use to the average citizen as an individual. The mass media are mostly under the control of large organizations that are integrated into the system. Anyone who has a little money can have something printed, or can distribute it on the Internet or in some such way, but what he has to say will be swamped by the vast volume of material put out by the media, hence it will have no practical effect. To make an impression on society with words is therefore almost impossible for most individuals and small groups. Take us (FC) for example. If we had never done anything violent and had submitted the present writings to a publisher, they probably would not have been accepted. If they had been accepted and published, they probably would not have attracted many readers, because it's more fun to watch the entertainment put out by the media than to read a sober essay. Even if these writings had had many readers, most of these readers would soon have forgotten what they had read as their minds were flooded by the mass of material to which the media expose them. In order to get our message before the public with some chance of making a lasting impression, we've had to kill people.
I suppose this is your way of saying that my essay will be useless, in the grand scheme of things?
I wouldn’t disagree with that. As I say in the article, I think we are essentially doomed.
Of course there is the Uncle Ted solution, but I don’t know if I could get on board with that personally, because that would effect billions of people, and there would be no guarantee that the outcome would be favorable anyway. It would be hard for me to convince myself that that is my decision to make.
If others want to go that route, then that is on them, and I wish them the best of luck.
It was mainly written for entertainment purposes, because I like to write, and these happen to be my thoughts and views.