The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewC.J. Hopkins Archive
The Putin-Nazi-Terrorist-O-Matic
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

I suppose it was always just a matter of time until the global capitalist ruling classes and their mouthpieces in the corporate media combined their two main official narratives into a Ronco-type 2-in-1 kind of deal. That’s right, folks, your days of switching between the War on Terror official narrative and the Putin-Nazi official narrative are over, because now, for just $19.99, the Putin-Nazi-Terrorist-O-Matic® takes care of all your official narrative needs with just the press of one button!

Here’s how it works. First, you take your classic mentally-disturbed individual, someone like, say, John Hinkley, Jr., Mark David Chapman, or Travis Bickle, or a total wack job like Cesar Sayoc, and you paint whichever clearly psychotic crimes he’s committed as acts of “terrorism.” Don’t worry about the definition of “terrorism” or how it has become a virtually meaningless label the capitalist ruling classes and corporate media can slap onto anyone. Just keep saying “terrorist,” “terrorism,” and any other lexical derivatives of “terror,” over and over, like some kind of mantra … you know, like the Hare Krishnas do.

Next, you take whatever obsession your disturbed individual is maniacally obsessed with, and you paint that obsession as an “ideology,” or some kind of organized political movement, as if your wack job was actually a rational person and not just a totally paranoid geek who decided to attempt to assassinate Reagan because he couldn’t get a date with Jodie Foster, or to murder John Lennon because God had ordered him to do so in a J. D. Salinger novel.

Now, this works much better if your disturbed individual is actually obsessed with something political, like, say, if he’s a Donald Trump fanatic who has plastered the windows of the van he’s living in with all sorts of blatantly psychotic artwork deifying Donald Trump and demonizing Donald Trump’s political opponents, but you’ll have to work with what your lunatic gives you. In any event, whatever his pathology, you will need to de-pathologize your psycho, so you can misrepresent him as a “domestic terrorist,” and then associate whatever “ideology” you’ve just painted onto him with “terrorism.”

If that sounds a little complicated, don’t worry, folks, it’s really not! The ruling classes and the corporate media just provided us with a demonstration of the Putin-Nazi-Terrorist-O-Matic in action, which proves how easy-to-use it is. In the span of just a single week, they whipped up so much mass paranoia that, by the weekend, millions of hysterical liberals were calling for a Deep State coup, and the arrest and internment of all registered Republicans, because a right-wing loon had sent a bunch of non-exploding bomblike devices to prominent members of the neoliberal “Resistance,” or rather, to their respective mail-screening services.

These Putin-Nazi Terrorist “bomb-like devices” were “intercepted” throughout last week. Their targets were a roll call of Resistance heroes, Soros, Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, the offices of CNN, Eric Holder, Maxine Waters, Joe Biden, and, yes, even Robert De Niro! Putin-Nazi panic paralyzed the nation! The neoliberal corporate media (who, remember, are serious, respected professionals, not conspiracist nuts like Alex Jones) began pouring out pieces informing the world that Donald Trump was behind these attacks, or had encouraged, “emboldened,” or “inspired” whoever was with his violent, neo-Hitlerian rhetoric.

The Washington Post went full Shakespearean with Dana Milbank’s What Hath Trump Wrought? The New York Times explained how Trump was employing a strategy called “stochastic terrorism,” i.e., inspiring random acts of violence that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable! “Trump’s words have consequences,” The Guardian lectured. “Words matter,” CNN concurred. John Brennan, who courageously continued to appear on television, despite the ongoing terrorist threat, affirmed that Trump’s “un-American” rhetoric had “emboldened individuals to take matters into their own hands.” Even “alternative” Resistance outlets like Truthout joined the chorus of voices reporting that “Trump’s Rhetoric Emboldens Violence!”

By Thursday morning, #MAGAbomber, #MAGATerrorist, and other such hashtags were circulating widely on Twitter. Which meant it was only a matter of time until the Resistance linked these stochastically-terrorist MAGA bomber attacks to Russia. On Thursday evening, MSNBC’s Chuck Todd did exactly that, speculating that “this could be a Russian operation!” (Washington Post propagandist Craig Timberg, author of the infamous McCarthyite smear piece on “peddlers of Russian propaganda” that got the whole “fake news” hysteria going back in December 2016, would soon follow up with this ridiculous attempt to connect the “MAGA Terrorist” to Russia … but I’m getting a little ahead of myself.)

By Friday, after anti-Terrorism specialists (or the kids that work in the mail screening room) “intercepted” more “bomb-like devices” addressed to Senator Cory Booker and ex-National Intelligence Director James Clapper, the neoliberal punditocracy were soiling themselves on national television. This was it! The long-awaited Putin-Nazi Apocalypse had finally begun! And just as Paul Krugman had prophesied it would … or, OK, not exactly like that, but still, Trump was, once again, about to suspend the Constitution, declare martial law, and appoint himself dictator! Clearly, Putin had ordered Trump to launch the destruction of Western democracy by deploying the dreaded Totally Incompetent Domestic Terrorist Mail Bomber Strategy … and just in time for the midterm elections!

And then, just like that, they caught him … Cesar “the Jackal” Sayoc, Jr., the terrorist mastermind that had nearly perpetrated another 9-11-type event, and who was sleeping in his van behind an auto parts store! As is standard procedure for terrorist sleeper agents, Sayoc, until he was “activated,” had been maintaining a totally low-profile cover as juiced-up, body-building, racist male stripper with an extensive criminal record and an obsession with Trump. Like the “Skripal assassins” and other Putin-Nazi operatives, he had made a point of getting himself photographed and noticed by witnesses in various public places, and otherwise drawing attention to himself, which is one of the first things they teach you at the Kremlin. Sayoc hasn’t yet divulged the names and ranks of his handlers in the GRU, but, presumably, Eliot Higgins and Bellingcat are hard at work googling that right this minute.

In the meantime, the liberal corporate media have been working the Putin-Nazi-Terrorist-O-Matic on a more or less 24/7 basis. It is crucial at a time like this, when mass hysteria is reaching peak levels, that the public not be allowed to believe that this “MAGA Terrorist” is merely one more pathetic, attention-seeking geek who decided to vent his impotent rage on those he perceived as his mortal enemies. Same goes for the Pittsburgh synagogue attacker, who struck as I was writing this piece. Never mind that this homicidal idiot did not like Trump, who he condemned as a “Jew-lover.” In order to maintain the official narrative, the ruling classes need us to believe that he was not just another anti-Semite with a gun collection and a account, but, rather, an official “domestic terrorist,” who was probably “radicalized” by Donald Trump’s rhetoric!

Look, I’m no fan of Donald Trump, or racism, or anti-Semitism, or any other type of bigotry (despite what my smear-happy former editors at CounterPunch would like you to believe). What I am is a student of the production of ideology. I lived through the deployment of the official “War on Terror” narrative after 9-11, and then watched in frustration as millions of Americans mindlessly supported a war of aggression, the abrogation of many of their civil liberties, torture, and various other atrocities, based on nothing but propaganda and media-generated mass hysteria.

We are experiencing a similarly historic ideological readjustment at the moment, which I’ve been trying to capture (satirically and more seriously) since it began in the summer of 2016. The official “War on Terror” narrative (and people’s understanding of what “terrorism” is) is being gradually redefined and expanded to encompass any and all forms of “extremism” (i.e., whatever the ruling classes decide is “extremism”). Mass murder, battery, racist graffiti, opposing the spread of global capitalism, saying nasty things about Soros, tattooing your forehead with a giant Swastika, using the words “globalism,” “sovereignty,” and so on … the distinctions are rapidly disappearing. The media-generated mass hysteria over Islamic terrorism during the War on Terror is being replaced with media-generated mass hysteria over Nazis and Russians (unless you’re a die-hard Trump supporter, in which case, you’ve got your immigration hysteria, but my focus is on ruling class ideology, which, despite the existence of Donald Trump, remains neoliberal, supranational, and, yes, God help me, globalist in nature). Any and all forms of opposition to global capitalist ideology, regardless of whether they come from the Left or the Right, are being stigmatized as “extremism,” and thus inextricably linked to “terrorism.” I described this, back in January, as a global capitalist “War on Dissent,” and I think events over the last ten months have largely confirmed my diagnosis.

I’d love to go on, but this essay is already way too long for people’s phones, and the midterm elections are fast approaching, so this is no time for critical thinking … and plus, news is just coming in from Guardian columnist Christina Patterson that Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party are also responsible for the Pittsburgh attack, and for “emboldening” all these “extremists” and “terrorists,” and for “normalizing” anti-Semitism and fascism, and mass murder, and who knows what other atrocities, and I don’t want to miss a chance to catch the Putin-Nazi-Terrorist-O-Matic in action!

C. J. Hopkins is an award-winning American playwright, novelist and satirist based in Berlin. His plays are published by Bloomsbury Publishing (UK) and Broadway Play Publishing (USA). His debut novel, ZONE 23, is published by Snoggsworthy, Swaine & Cormorant. He can reached at or

• Category: Ideology • Tags: American Media, Anti-Semitism, Vladimir Putin 
Hide 96 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Jonathan Pie’s “Oppression Obsession” hits the nail on the head.

    • Replies: @anonymous
  2. Rational says:


    Great article, Sir.

    Cesar is being painted as a white mail Republican terrorist.

    He is neither white, nor mail, nor male, nor a Republican.
    A real male does not strip in public.
    He is a democrat as per:

    Democrat did a good job of mailing plumbing supplies to his own friends.

    How much did Soros pay him?

  3. So far I haven’t heard exactly what the chemical make-up of these “pipe bombs” is…none of which detonated or even initiated a detonation sequence. No doubt the authorities will get around to this trifling little fact in their own good time (ie when it has best propaganda affect)

    • Agree: Moi
    • Replies: @Realist
  4. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    Yes. Too bad he uses needless, foul language.

    Why do so many people, even those verbally gifted and with apparent sense, do that?

    • Replies: @Kratoklastes
    , @Anon
  5. After the US invaded Panama to “arrest” former-friend Manuel Noriega, someone reportedly dragged a portrait of Hitler out of his house. After we invaded Iraq and toppled former-friend Saddam Hussein, someone hauled a portrait of Hitler out of one of his palaces. I haven’t reviewed all of the “police actions” of the past 30 years, but I’ve reached two conclusions:

    1) There’s a booming market in Hitler portraits;
    2) Our lords & masters aren’t very creative, but they know how to tug at the heart-strings of the average Joe and Jane.

    However, we’re reaching a Yogi Bera moment where what seems to have worked in the past is going to keep on being used with fury and intensity until it stops working.

    When Trump leaves the White House, you can bet someone is going to find a portrait of Hitler. I bet that Corbyn guy has one too.

    • Agree: Den Lille Abe
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Den Lille Abe
    , @paschn
  6. @anonymous

    I would prefer to listen to a constant stream of shouted passionate expletives, than to have charlatans lying in sombre tones and choosing their words with precision.

    People who never resort to ‘foul’ language are either dead inside, or are scheming scumbags trying to get one over on the crowd.

    Contrary to popular tropes with which beta-and-below people are indoctrinated, ‘crude’ language is not a sign of lack of education, intelligence or sophistication.

    As always, I am hesitant to direct you to the psych literature, because almost all psych research is poorly-performed horse-shit… but to the extent that “studies show” any link, it’s positive – smarter people swear more[1].

    In the same way: I am immediately suspicious about anyone whose ‘authority’ includes a costume – judges, pigs, TSA etc; likewise, anyone who relies on ‘gravitas’ or presentation (politicians, senior bureaucrats, diplomats, marketing shitheads).

    If every one of those people were put to the sword by people screaming “FUCK YOU” at the top of their lungs, humanity would be better off.

    If the average person had the cognitive chops to discriminate on the basis of content, then most of the vast range of shitbags who play dressups in order to gain undeserved authority, would be out of a job.

    If judges and politicians had to make their pronouncements wearing jeans and CostCo t-shirts, their bullshit would be shorn of its fake authority and would be evaluated on its merits.

    Call figs figs.

    Fortunately, there has been some progress (a judge recently called someone a cunt in open court: a woman judge, what’s more).

    One of the funniest things ever, is that people who object to the word ‘cunt’ seldom object to anyone being called a ‘berk‘… which is Cockney rhyming slang (“Berkshire Hunt” – even though Berkshire is properly pronounced “Bark-shuh”).

    [1] e.g., Jay & Jay, “Taboo word fluency and knowledge of slurs and general pejoratives: deconstructing the poverty-of-vocabulary myth“, Language Sciences, Vol 52 (November 2015) pp 251-259

    • Agree: Stan d Mute
  7. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:

    Because, in a time where everyone who matters or is trying to matter wants to be liked by Everyone, and Everyone has access to communication media for their own expression, triviality and vulgarity could never not be all the rage.

  8. Anon[277] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Alarmist

    Nice bet 🙂

    I mean good bet.

  9. anonymous[340] • Disclaimer says:

    Hey, I disagree with none of what you’ve said.

    But listen again to the man’s (very good) rant. The “bulls**t” and “c**t” are effective. But the dozens of gratuitous uses of “fu**ing” are witless, even tic-like.

    Your own comments here are well considered and expressed, far better and more effective.

  10. @Kratoklastes

    “Get one over on the crowd”

    The problem with the angriest whites who want change is that they don’t have any [email protected] money.

    Even if the Left did not have the money to suppress the Alt-Right like Gavin, they have the money for better production values. More people will watch Oprah than the Alt-Right. They can get more air time. Hollywood will spend more money. They always have more…

    Our White Nationalist leaders are not billionaires. Tommy Morrison is not a self-made millionaire. Richard Spencer the same.

    These are average whites you meet in the street.

    Tech billionaires, media moguls and globalists are all much more wealthy. They are not white proles with few contacts in the business or media world who are out with the other squirming proles on the street.

  11. anon[707] • Disclaimer says:

    A student of the production of ideology.. (Hopkins does it again, great job)

    We, the governed masses, are weak and easily manipulated because we have been intentionally divided by the elite. Our collective strengths would over whelm the decision making powers of the few who control us, if the elite could not keep us ideologically divided they would be for the same things we in the masses are. To implement that divide strategy the elite produce ideologies that are controversial [abortion] or that have no in-fact substance [terrorism]. Topics can be produced; capable to split any like minded group into two or more sides ready to argue on any number of ideologies.
    Maybe these ideologies should be classed as weapons of mass(WMDs) destruction; because when packaged as propaganda, and applied to governed populations through media, especially elite owned media, the ideologies weaken and destroy the political, social and economic power of the group. Group unity disappears, members are encouraged to take opposite sides on the weaponized ideologies; so many issues, so many groups, its difficult to match two people to the same mind set. Hence populations split into groups and splinter into multiple subgroups (ideological camps), each begin to take sides against, or team up with others, to oppose those in the other camp. Elections rarely exceed 40/60% of the vote outcomes because everyone is so divided.

    The victim groups (governed masses) have not recognized “controversy” as the explosive weapon that it is. Because victim groups [governed masses] rarely discover that, it is not natural controversy, but weaponized controversy, that weakens their social, economic and political powers. As a result no effective means to defend the unity of groups from weaponized controversy has been developed. D&C group-splintering warfare is an effective tool used by the elite to maintain control of the masses they manage. Without an effective and capable defense, the masses will always remain victim to the few and the few will always be able to use the government to their advantage.
    I suggest message, invention, presentation and propagation MIPP are elements essential to D&C manufactured controversy mind-fare; but I am at a lost to list the elements that would constitute an effective anti-dividing, anti-splintering of group power by strategically planted ideological propositions.

    • Replies: @obwandiyag
  12. Anonymous [AKA "A C Cordeiro"] says:

    What’s behind the liberals? Who owns them? Who owns the media outlets that spread their propaganda? Why are they so concerned in demonizing russians, chineses and comunists nations? What are their fears? What are their goals, globally talking, and why they suddenlly discover that it’s almost impossible to achieve them in this century? What can they do to deal with the fact that their imperial dreams of global domination turned down on a nightmare? How they can deal with the fact that their businesses, their enterprises, can’t reach the emergent markets of Asia and Central Asia, the Eurasian Corridor to Europe and, even, Europe markets itself, without facing a devastating concurrence of the russians, chinheses and koreans that is wiping them out everywhere and imposing hard losses to their companies?

    • Replies: @obwandiyag
  13. Good piece, though I miss the historical dimension. The described mechanism seems to me to have been taken right out of the Goebbels manual, or if you like the Comintern manual. Which were in turn inspired by the instructions of people like Edward Bernays.

    What strikes me is that the US empire and its faithful servants are resorting to old-fashioned and imported (stolen, “un-American”) techniques to try and maintain their hold on public opinion. I guess, here the economic benefits of the systematic dismantling of the educational system all over the “West” are paying off! Which just proves the advantages of stubbornly concentrating publc spending on armaments instead of education: it has a side effect of making people so stupid they believe just anything.

    Still, I wonder how it will be possible to keep repeating the old fairytale of why it was necessary to fight the evil Nazis. If outright Nazism is what the US empire is all about, why did they bother about fighting Hitler?

    Probably because he was not “American.” Or was it because the original Nazis spent quite a bit on education?

  14. Realist says:

    Agreed. I have heard that sulfur was involved. Sulfur by it’s self is not explosive, but when properly mixed with carbon and potassium nitrate, it becomes gun powder. If that was the case the why not use the term gun powder? I am very skeptical about this incident.

  15. mcohen says:

    Itzik says sayoc and bowers were on the same team.both survived to tell there tale.sayoc laid the ground work for bowers.

    Sentence of the week from bowers…”screw your optics,i am going in”……

    Sayoc van had stickers with crosshairs in red over public figures

    Both unmarried no

  16. Nice Satire from C.J.

    I suspect Cesar Sayoc is a straight up patsy. As Mr Hopkins points out, none of the bombs(sic) had an earthly chance of exploding. Mr Sayoc was discovered due to DNA evidence no doubt left on the beer cans he made the bombs out of. Its straight out of the Anthrax post 9/11 playbook but fortunately without deadly consequences. How the dumb American Sheeple (apart from most readers of course) can’t see it is beyond me.

    In terms of lone nut being the harbinger of domestic terrorism we had this in the UK with the Jo Cox case in 2016, where the mentally ill individual ( who I strongly suspect was controlled by the Deep State) was hustled off to the Old Bailey accused of being a white supremacist Brexit supporting terrorist and convicted in 3 days flat. No explanation of where he actually acquired his gun, why for such a racist he didnt harm Cox’s Asian assistant even when she hit him with a handbag etc etc

    Robert D Bowers is of course a homicidal maniac, Trump hater and gift horse to the ADL who have their first real anti- semitism case in decades. Makes a change from blacks or policemen shouting ‘oy vey’ or some other gross obscenity at Brooklyn Jews

    • Replies: @RobinG
  17. @Hans Vogel

    Absolutely agree the dumbing down of education especially the absence of any critical thinking despite the presence of so called civics or citizenship on the curriculum is crucial to the success of the propaganda effort

  18. No society can manage all of its fringe lunatics all of the time. So when one occasionally goes off rails (“postal” as they used to say) the ideologues who manage the propaganda outlets know that pointing to the obvious reality of the event doesn’t advance the agenda. And, luckily for them there is always a handy abstraction, a scary “ism” or “obia” to hang on the event and smear a whole bunch of folks whose manners they disapprove of.

  19. n230099 says:

    “…Taking it up to the elbow…”


  20. Jake says:

    Neoliberal Multicultural Globalist Capitalism is the new Marxism. Its true believers have learned from the failures of Marxists to rule the world forever, forcing the deplorable white trash to accept being cogs for ideological good, how to get the job done.

  21. mcohen says:

    Whats more concerning is something stormy daniels said about trump…..that he is out of his depth.she might have ulterior motives but it somehow rings true.Combine that with sayoc and bowers types and one has to wonder how many more are there out there just waiting to make america great again

    • Replies: @anon
  22. ” news is just coming in from Guardian columnist Christina Patterson that Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party are also responsible for the Pittsburgh attack, ”
    I wonder if it is known that Soros owns the Guardian, so that, I fear, to the list CNN, Washpost and NYT, Guardian can be added.
    As I wrote here just a few hours ago, I wondered why there was no political follow up on the Pittsburgh massacre.
    But possibly this is it.
    Cynics like me, who understand Pearl Harbour, Liberty, possibly Kennedy and Diana, certainly Sept 11, now wonder ‘who did it ?’, and ‘why were just ten jews killed ?’.
    Automatic weapons are freely available in the USA, what a few Muslims can do in Paris should be quite easy in the USA.
    It is common practice with political murders to kill the murderer, such as Lee Harvey Oswald, dead men cannot talk.
    But after the murder of Anna Lyndh it seems possible that better ways have been found to hide political murders.

  23. @Hans Vogel

    If Hitler was the problem, why was not Germany beaten in 1938, when both the Chech and the Polish armies still existed ?
    Attacked by Poland, Chechoslovakia, Britain and France, possibly the USSR too, Hitler Germany would have been beaten in a few weeks, historians agree on this.
    Historians debating this question agree on the only possible solution: that Roosevelt wanted a long war, in which the USA would be the victor.
    Dividing up Germany somehow between the mentioned four or five countries would bring the USA nothing.

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
    , @Carroll Price
  24. It’s all really quite simple, welcome to Orwell’s 1984.

  25. Anon[424] • Disclaimer says:
    @Hans Vogel

    Education is feminized in the west , lacks androgens .

  26. These false flags are a part of the deep states efforts to keep the American people in a state of terror and hysteria to accept more and more government control over our lives and as long as the people accept these acts at face value without doing any checking on the facts , the deep state will have succeeded.

  27. @jilles dykstra

    FDR wanted a long war and so did the English, perfidious Albion indeed. I recommend Guido Giacomo Preparata. You might also want to wait a bit, since I am writing a book on the period.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  28. aandrews says:

    “…as if your wack job was actually a rational person and not just a totally paranoid geek who decided to attempt to assassinate Reagan because he couldn’t get a date with Jodie Foster….”


    well…when you put it like that….

  29. anon[271] • Disclaimer says:

    Whats more concerning is something stormy daniels said about trump…..that he is out of his depth.she might have ulterior motives but it somehow rings true.

    its true, he’s probably nowhere as intelligent as obozo but somehow he gets by

    stormy sounds like an expert, maybe she can judge a man’s IQ by the taste of his sperm

  30. Agent76 says:

    May 4, 2017 False Flag Exposed Caught Red Handed and Prevented

    In this video, we give you the latest news of a false flag that has been prevented in Germany, the historical context of false flags, and importance in current politics.

    May 07, 2014 The Oldest Trick In the Book: Empire Pretends It Has to Launch Wars to “Defend” Itself

    Empires – almost by definition – fight imperial wars to gain land and resources. But if they admitted to their citizens what they were up to, people wouldn’t be that excited in sacrificing their families’ blood and treasure to fight a series of wars.

  31. wayfarer says:

    False Flag Theories (Part 1.)

    “False Flag? Al Qaeda, Jews, and Synagogues”

    “MAGA Bomber and Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting False Flags”

    “Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooter, is an Actor!”

    • Replies: @Agent76
    , @tac
  32. crimson2 says:

    This website is filled with white nationalist terrorists. Learn to accept your losses with dignity, gents.

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  33. Patsy.
    Cesar’s good friend was an ex-Cia operative who he praised in Facebook post.
    Who sends timed bombs in the mail?
    No detonators?


  34. wayfarer says:

    False Flag Theories (Part 2.)

    “Game of Patsies!”

    “Censorship has Won, the Banning of Gab Proves It”

  35. @jilles dykstra

    World War 2 may have continued indefinitely had not Russia been preparing to invade Japan, thus forcing the United States into dropping the bombs.

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
    , @Wally
  36. Anyone assuming the Jewish-controlled Deep State would have any qualms about killing a few Jewish senior citizens to assure the revolution continues, are badly mistaken.

    • Replies: @Wally
  37. @crimson2


    They’re born to lose and it is largely out of their hands. Part of it is Affirmative Action, part of it PC.

    But some of it is being born in Podunk towns or exurbs of no importance.

    Poor parents. Going to lousy public schools. Early parenthood. Broken marriages. Drugs. Petty problems with the police.

    • Replies: @Wally
  38. @Carroll Price

    FORCED to drop nuclear bombs? There is always a choice, even for a rogue state like the US. (Rather, a state, inhabited by many decent, trusting people, but run by ruthless criminals such as FDR, the Bushes, Obomba and the like). Besides, in early 1945 FDR received a detailed report by one of his generals to the effect that Japan was ready to surrender. Yet FDR, may he burn in hell, decided to ignore this and continue bombing Japanese cities: in March of 1945, Tokyo was bombed, and over 100.000 Japanese civilians were murdered. The Soviet Union had promised to join in the final assault on Japan, doing FDR a favor because he did not want to go it alone.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  39. @Kratoklastes

    People who never resort to ‘foul’ language are either dead inside, or are scheming scumbags trying to get one over on the crowd.

    No one is in a position to determine whether “People…never resort…”

    In the early 80s, I was at a social function where foul language use was part of the general conversation. A woman in her mid to late 40s who was sitting at the table rebuked us gently by stating that our profanities were a poor excuse for a bad vocabulary. There is a time and place for profanity, spouting off profanely at a political opponent in a public place does nothing for credibility.

    As for calling a fig a fig, I seldom use the word cunt for the simple reason that a cunt has a use , while those who are often called cunts, don’t.

  40. Steve Sailer had vaunted about the Filipino becoming the new “Italian-american” in America… Cesar Sayoc is both!

  41. ” . . . jew lover . . .”

    Nothing gave the game up as much as the attack on a synagogue. No president has had a more open love affair with Israel than Pres Trump.

    It would take some astounding gymnastics to make a case this act was inspired by this executive.

  42. Agent76 says:

    Glad to view others keeping up with the fake dramas.

    This October 29, 2018 FBI Drill Before Synagogue Shooting, Israel Bombs Hospital, Border Militarized & Bayer Stock Crashes

    Welcome to The Daily Wrap Up, a concise show dedicated to bringing you the most relevant independent news, as we see it, from the last 24 hours.

    • Replies: @wayfarer
  43. wayfarer says:

    “We Have the Best Government that Money Can Buy”
    – Mark Twain

    “Arizona Senate Candidate Sinema “I can’t be talking about” Gun Bans”

    “James O’Keefe Responds to Kyrsten Sinema’s Absurd Comments”

  44. Rurik says:

    I am immediately suspicious about anyone whose ‘authority’ includes a costume – judges, pigs, TSA etc; likewise, anyone who relies on ‘gravitas’ or presentation (politicians, senior bureaucrats, diplomats, marketing shitheads).

    If every one of those people were put to the sword by people screaming “FUCK YOU” at the top of their lungs, humanity would be better off.

    I enjoyed your comment.

    and agree wholeheartedly

    (except for including ‘pigs’ with your litany of scoundrels. It’s not fair to the inoffensive four-legged kind ; )

  45. @anon

    Nice try. But, first of all, learn to write simply. Like the man said, all those words don’t fit on a phone.

    Secondly, you are absolutely right. ID politics is what our owners want. They want us to fight over who is oppressing whom. So it don’t matter if you are pro-white or anti-white, pro-racism or anti, you are doing our master’s bidding.

    The only answer is blacks and whites and homosexuals and heterosexuals and women and men etc etc, all together, all as one, screaming, “Mo money mo money mo money mo money.” But that won’t happen because they find it easier to shame each other over meaningless nonsense like race and sex and other ridiculous identities.

    • Replies: @anon
  46. @Anonymous

    Like as if the exact same owners aren’t funding the conservatives as well.

    Confused loser.

  47. To be a dissident in the 1960’s meant that one objected to the standard narrative of White-European greatness and blamelessness for conquering much of the world. Today it means just the opposite. The roles have reversed. Not only are Europeans not viewed as great but they are blamed for everything that is wrong anywhere, anytime. To be a dissident is to insist that Europeans aren’t quite so bad as they are currently portrayed.

    I never thought I’d say this but if Nixon were alive today he would appear as the very soul of rationality and a bastion of sanity compared to the current crop of rat-faced, unprincipled traitors who dominate the news. At least Nixon had the integrity to not sell out his country to an alien tribe of sleazy money changers, usurers and unpatriotic off-shore operators.

    At one point in his life, Hunter Thompson thought things couldn’t get any worse than Tricky Dick. Little did he suspect. It’s likely that Thompson, at some point before he pulled the trigger, came to the belated realization that, compared to the debased venality of our present leaders, Nixon was an honorable man, a lover of his country and a loyal patriot. Watergate was a misdemeanor B & E compared to the rape and genocide of whites that is taking place today.

  48. @Hans Vogel

    ‘The English’ in WII did not exist.
    Many sympathized with Hitler
    Ian Kershaw, ´Hitlers Freunde in England, Lord Londonderry und der Weg in den Krieg’, (Making Friends with Hitler. Lord Londonderry and Britain’s Road to War, 2004, London), München 2005
    The Marquess of Londonderry, ´England blickt auf Deutschland, Um die deutsch-englische Verständigung, Essen 1938 (Ourselves and Germany, 1938)
    Churchill loved war, he refused all Hitler’s attempts at peace.
    There seems to be a book Churchill’s Toy Shop, did not read it, Churchill’s personal weapons gadget development facility.
    In this he was supported by his scientific advisor Lindemann
    C.P.Snow, ´Science and government’, 1961, Cambridge, Massachusetts
    Lynn Picknett, Clive Prince and Stephen Prior, ‘Double standards, The Rudolf Hess cover-up’, London 2002
    Günther W.Gellermann, ‘Geheime Wege zum Frieden mit England…, Ausgewählte Initiativen zur Beëndigung des Krieges 1940/1942’, Bonn 1995
    Stürmer, Teichmann, Treue ‘Striking the Balance Sal. Oppenheim jr. & Cie. A family and a Bank’, London 1994
    Thomas E. Mahl, ‘Desperate deception, British covert operations in the United States 1939-44’, Dulles, Virginia, 1998
    However, in Casablanca Churchill found out he was at the mercy of FDR
    Francois Kersaudy, ´De Gaulle et Roosevelt, Le duel au sommet’, Paris, 2004
    If Churchill ever realised that LendLease was the end of the British empire, I wonder
    R.F. Harrod, ‘THE PROF, A personal memoir of Lord Cherwell’, London, 1959
    John Charmley,’Churchill’s Grand Alliance, A provocative reassessment of the “Special relationship” between England and the U.S. from 1940 to 1957’, 1995, London
    John Charmley, ‘Der Untergang des Britischen Empires, Roosevelt – Churchill und Amerikas Weg zur Weltmacht’, Graz 2005
    But the two essential books explaining why Chamberlain steered towards war, without wanting war:
    Lawrence R. Pratt, ‘East of Malta, West of Suez’, London, 1975
    Simon Newman, ´March 1939, The British guarantee to Poland, A study in the continuity of British Foreign Policy’, 1976, Oxford
    The genocidal folly of bombing German women, children and old men:
    Solly Zuckermann, ‘From Apes to Warlords, an autobiography, 1904- 46’, London 1988
    Even the official post WWII British report on the bombing of Germany concluded that the damage to GB was equal to German damage, British damage defined as building and maintaining bombers, producing bombs, and, last but not in the least least, losing a whole generation of Britain’s promising young men
    Peter H. Nicoll, ´Englands Krieg gegen Deutschland, Ursachen, Methoden und Folgen des Zweiten Weltkriegs’, 1963, 2001, Tübingen ( Britain’s Blunder, 1953)
    This last book also contains a calculation of how WWII impoverished the USA.

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  49. Wally says:
    @Hans Vogel

    “The described mechanism seems to me to have been taken right out of the Goebbels manual … ”

    Oh really? What “manual” was that? Your indoctrination is showing.

    Pie drops the ball when he talks about ‘the Nazis’ & the Battle of Britain, which was a result of British initiation of bombing purely civilian targets.

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  50. Wally says:
    @Carroll Price

    The bombs did nothing to shorten the war.

    • Replies: @Carroll Price
  51. Wally says:
    @Jeff Stryker

    And what shithole shtetl did your family come from?

    • Replies: @Jeff Stryker
  52. Wally says:
    @Carroll Price

    Indeed, they killed quite a few on 9/11.

  53. The New York Times explained how Trump was employing a strategy called “stochastic terrorism,” i.e., inspiring random acts of violence that are statistically predictable but individually unpredictable!

    Wow. Quasi-treasonous scumbaggery from the dominant press outlets has become so common, it rarely registers on me anymore. But this is an unusually detestable example.

  54. anon[271] • Disclaimer says:

    But that won’t happen because they find it easier to shame each other over meaningless nonsense like race and sex and other ridiculous identities.

    if this was true there would be no problem allowing hundreds of millions of africans into Europe, the U.S. etc but sub-saharan africans have IQs as low as 70 and have never built anything of substance in their existence

    they have nothing to contribute except violence and crime

  55. @Wally

    Are you familiar with the concept “figure of speech?”

    What indoctrination are you referring to?

    • Replies: @Wally
  56. @jilles dykstra

    Thanks for your bibliographical suggestions!

    As for the English, I prefer this to the awkward term “British.” (see also AJP Taylor’s introduction to his English History, 1914-1945). As long as the English and English speakers usually refer to the Netherlands as “Holland,” and US people call their country “America” and themselves “Americans,” why should we not say English instead of British?” The English better get used to foreign usage, as have the Greeks (“Hellenes”) and Hungarians (“Magyars”).

    Btw, the translator of Nicoll’s book on your list agrees with me: he calls Britain “England!”

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  57. tyrone says:

    Oops , you forgot one very important terrorist nest…..straight white male Trump supporters.

    • Replies: @anon
  58. wayfarer says:

    “Anything is better than lies and deceit!” ― Leo Tolstoy

  59. Wally says:
    @Hans Vogel

    A “figure of speech” which is based upon false premises indicates that the user of that figure of speech is in fact indoctrinated, big time. Simple stuff really.

    I’m referring to your obviously indoctrinated / conditioned views of Goebbels.

    • Agree: Carroll Price
    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  60. anon[184] • Disclaimer says:

    they’re almost as bad as Chicagoans, tyrone

  61. tac says:

    Here is a video that Ron Unz should feature of a truly honest and great young American Jewish activist: Jeremy Rothe-Kushel and Greg McCarren of The Anecdote speak about this Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooting:

    • Replies: @anon
  62. anon[259] • Disclaimer says:

    i listened to that podcast a few weeks ago and one of those, i think its McCarron, had such wacky left-wing views that i had to stop

    • Replies: @tac
  63. tac says:

    This podcast was uploaded today October 31st, so it cannot be one that you’ve listened to a few weeks back. Having said that, Greg McCarren (who you’re probably referring to on a podcast with Tony Hall, or some other co-speaker) is one that I have many disagreements with. Nonetheless, this podcast is worth listening to for the perspective of Jeremy Rothe-Kushel–who tends to more-often-than-not be right on the Israeli target. Listen again and let me know….

    • Replies: @anon
  64. @Wally

    Boy, you still have a lot to learn.

    • Replies: @Wally
  65. @Hans Vogel

    United Kingdom, UK, is the best expression, England, Wales and Scotland, at present with the N part of Ireland, Ulster.
    As to who live in UK, British seems the best to me.
    Though I must add that right now I do not know where the word Briton comes from.
    The Netherlands Holland confusion, it will never go away, I suppose.
    Few people realise that Holland was the area with natural borders, where the Romans hardly penetrated.
    The great rivers were a natural border in the S, marshes were the border in the east.
    The provinces of Brabant and Limburg were even until, say 1960, not seen as real Netherlands.
    They were, are, catholic.
    Holland became Netherlands through discrimination of catholics.
    Do not know if you can read Dutch, but see
    A.Th. van Deursen, ‘Een dorp in de polder, Graft in de 17e eeuw’, Amsterdam, 1998
    Gerda H. Kurtz, ‘Kenu Symonsdochter van Haerlem’, Assen, 1956
    As to the mentioned translator, UK was ruled by English, Lloyd George was something of an aberration in British history.
    WWII sources, do not miss
    Colonel Roderick Macleod, D.S.O., M.C., and Dennis Kelly, ‘TIME UNGUARDED The Ironside Diaries 1937- 1940’, New York, 1963
    Very few people know about this book, yet it is one of the most revealing, Ironside was present at cabinet meetings, and was not sparingly in his criticisms, not in the least on Churchill.
    Stupidity all around.
    The introduction states that it took a lot of convincing to get Ironside’s permission, on his deathbed, to publish parts, by a friend.

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  66. @Hans Vogel

    Until reading
    Robert J.C. Butow, ‘JAPAN’S Decision to Surrender’, Stanford, 1954
    I also was convinced dropping atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki wa nonsense.
    I now am of the opinion that the bombs saved some 21 million lives, 20 million Japanese, one million USA.
    In early 1945 Japan was not at all ready to surrender, though even Bohlen writes this
    Charles E. Bohlen, ’Witness to History 1929 – 1969’, New York 1973
    According to Bohlen indeed in januari 1945 Japan’s ambassador spoke to Stalin about Japan’s willingness to surrender.
    There were more Japanese peace initiatives, even two in Switzerland.
    However, the problem was that the fanatical Japanese army leaders, the real power, were not at all ready, the Emperor, with danger to his own life, ended the war by a radio speech.
    Butow’s description is very interesting, from day to day, often from hour to hour, sometimes from minute to minute the process is described that saved, an estimate, the menntioned numbers of life.
    If Truman understood all this when he gave his permission is quite another matter.
    Same about Oppenheimer, in the sixties he stated before a Senate committee that some scientists wanted to bombs to be used in a real situation.
    In fact, the bombs did not make much of an impression in Japan, it was the bombs with the annihilation of the Kwantung army that did the trick.
    Of course, when the bombs fell Japan was already beaten, but an all out guerilla war on the mainland was estimated to have cost 20 million Japanese lives.

  67. @Wally

    The bombs were dropped to intimidate Russia, which at that time was the only potential enemy available to justify what would become a permanent state of war to prevent the United States from re-entering an economic depression far worse than the Great Depression that had ended only 5 years earlier as a result of the US entering World War 2. Russia has never been a legitimate enemy of the United States – then or now. Most scholars and historians choose not to recognize it as such, but the Cold War was a totally contrived war similar to the War on Terror contrived that replaced it. Take note that due to Russia, in only 4 short years virtually eliminating terror as an excuse for war, they themselves became, once again, the necessary enemy for permanent war.

    • Replies: @Wally
  68. I know the argument that killing a couple of hundred “Japs” ultimately spared the lives of millions. Yet this line of arguing belongs to the realm of Counterfactual History, i.e. the “what if” kind. Since this never happened and history is not chemistry where you do experiments and redo them to check your hypothesis, this is actually not an argument at all, no matter how decently and responsibly Butow may have done his research.

    The tenacity of the Butow nuclear bomb argument, repeated ad nauseam by official academic and government authorities, might also be taken as proof that it is just a cynical lie. Especially in the light of the treatment given to fine historians such as Harry Elmer Barnes and his revisionist colleagues, who were censored, silenced, ostracized and socially and academically killed.

    The chief problem in ending the wars against Germany and Japan was FDR’s criminal insistence on unconditional surrender, officially adopted by the allies at their Casablanca conference of 1943.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  69. @jilles dykstra

    Once again thanks for your bibliographical suggestions.

    I shall continue to refer to the outsized US aircraft carrier, permanently moored just off the coast of Europe, as “England.” Whether the pale, white-legged, ill-nourished, double-crossing, phlegmatic, rainsoaked inhabitants of that island like it or not, frankly I don’t give a hoot.

    Briton btw is translated from the French “breton,” an inhabitant of Bretagne (Brittanny). “Grande Bretagne” (Great Britain) was the island lying beyond Bretagne, which was bigger than the original Brittanny. The great in Great Britain therefore does not mean “great,” but rather “big,” although many Englishmen are conceited enough to believe it actually means “great.” In order to avoid confusion with “big Britons” such as big fat Winnie Churchill, or Boris Johnson, obviously the rather confusing adjective was selected to refer to the big island.

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  70. anon[831] • Disclaimer says:

    yes, i should have been clearer – i didn’t listen to that particular episode but a previous episode of that podcast and McCarron was too much to tolerate.

    i cant listen to that wackjob Barrett who converted to islam either

  71. Wally says:
    @Hans Vogel

    Yawn. That’s it, that’s your response?

    IOW, you cannot refute my points and resort to projection.

    I notice that you do not say what it is that I supposedly ‘have to learn’.

    All classic examples of your indoctrination & conditioning.

    There’s a Sucker Born Every Minute
    – P.T. Barnum

  72. Wally says:
    @Carroll Price

    1. I agree, but irrelevant your point.*

    2. I agree, but irrelevant to your point.*

    * you said:

    “World War 2 may have continued indefinitely had not Russia been preparing to invade Japan, thus forcing the United States into dropping the bombs.”

    1 & 2 do not address your claim that the US was ‘forced’ to drop two bombs on Japan, nor do you support your claim of “indefinitely”, nor do you prove your claims that it was the bombs that shortened the war.

  73. Judging from your comments, you are probably someone who does not read thoroughly, cites out of context, does not understand figures of speech, has limited knowledge and insight and therefore resorts to insults (“indoctrination,” “conditioning”). Perhaps it is just laziness or insecurity such as one tends to encounter in people with superficial knowledge.

    Big words about Goebbels. I bet you cannot even read and understand German or any other language apart from English. Monolingualism in itself tends to give one a distorted understanding of a complicated matter such as history, especially European history. I am sure your Dr. Goebbels would have understood my earlier comment, don’t you think so? After all, he did have a great sense of humor.

    • Replies: @Wally
  74. @Hans Vogel

    Here is a misunderstanding, the argument is not Butow’s, but mine, Butow just describes what happened.
    Of course, I did know the argument existed, but I did not become convinced until I read Butow.
    You of course are right that is is of the ‘what if’ kind.
    However, in judging afterwards, how does one escape the ‘what if’ kind of reasoning ?
    FDR’s unconditional surrender, for someone like me, who sees in FDR the man who, as a puppet of Bernard Baruch, engineered WII, is an irrelevant detail of one of the most criminal acts in human history.

    Interesting is that this unconditional surrender just succeeded with Germany, not with Italy, not with Japan.
    The funny thing about Japan’s surrender is that Japan was able to dictate surrender conditions even after the supposed surrender.
    For this, see also Butow.

    About Italy’s ‘unconditional surrender’, see
    Mario Toscano, ‘Designs in Diplomacy, Pages from European Diplomatic History in the Twentieth Century’, 1970 Baltimore
    As Henry Ford sr said ‘in the end most jewish projects end through overconfidence’.
    In 1946 Baruch in vain pleaded for a world government.

    As to FDR being Baruch’s puppet, as with all puppets, Saddam the latest example, at some point in time they no longer obey the puppet master.
    It seems not impossibly to me me that the puppet master killed the supposed puppet.
    FDR died at Warm Springs, where Baruch’s father was the doctor in charge.
    Sherwood, one of FDR’speech writers, states that FDR in his last speech to congress did not read the prepared text.
    Not in the prepared text was ‘that ten minutes with Saud had learned him more about zionism than hundreds of letters of USA rabbi’s’, and ‘that he had promised Saud to limit the number of jewish migrants to Palestine’.
    USA correspondents wrote to me that these words are not in the official record of the speech, what I accept as true, but my conclusion from this is far fetched.
    However, Sherwood mentions some ‘funny’ stories circulating just after FDR died, and the fact that the USA people never knew that FDR had been cremated in Warm Springs.
    Stalin did not understand why FDR did not lie in state.
    Robert E. Sherwood, ‘Roosevelt und Hopkins’, 1950, Hamburg (Roosevelt and Hopkins, New York, 1948)

    One more thing, ‘the allies’ accepted nothing in Casablanca, Churchill discovered there that he had run into FDR’s trap:
    Francois Kersaudy, ´De Gaulle et Roosevelt, Le duel au sommet’, Paris, 2004
    Churchill there was just FDR’s errand boy.
    Not so De Gaulle.

    There never was any special relationship
    John Charmley,’Churchill’s Grand Alliance, A provocative reassessment of the “Special relationship” between England and the U.S. from 1940 to 1957’, 1995, London

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
  75. @Hans Vogel

    Thanks, I now remember the Bretagne connection.
    As to the translator of Britain’s Blunder, in Germany UK nearly always is and was England.
    Göbbels humor, never saw him described as someone with humor.
    Though the movie still is forbidden, in a tv report about the trial just after WWII against the director of the antisemitic movie made on orders from Göbbels, based on Jud Süss, I saw parts of this movie.
    There was nothing humoristic.
    BTW, Jud Süss is seen as an antisemitic book, in my view it is more anti petty German princes.
    It in fact shows jewish social stupidities, as also Katz describes, and you find in the book about Bleichröder
    ‘From prejudice to destruction’, Jacob Katz, 1980, Cambridge MA
    Fritz Stern, ‘Gold and Iron, Bismarck, Bleichröder, and the Building of the German Empire’, New York, 1977.

  76. @The Alarmist

    It is true. Even when Napoleon was killed at Sct Helena, they dragged a hitler portrait out of his mansion. They been doing this for a long time, it works!

  77. @jilles dykstra

    Thanks for the clarification.

    Indeed the problem with history is that it relies on sources. Actually, it is only accepted to make affirmative statements on the basis of sources that one has seen, read, understood and interpreted oneself. Most of the time, this is impossible, if only because it is awfully time consuming. Another problem is that of the existence and availability of sources. How is one to tell one has seen all the relevant sources? What about sources that have been intentionally hidden from the public, or even destroyed? That is where reliable colleagues come in. But since they are human, they also make mistakes and one should therefore try to find a balance between reliable authors whose point of view one shares and those one disagrees with.

    History really is an ongoing debate, as Huizinga put it, or rather it should be an ongoing endless debate. However, political expediency and academic interest and reputations stand in the way of such a debate.

    The history of the First and Second World Wars and the interwar period is a case in point: whoever strays from the strictly prescribed allowed margins is branded a “revisionist,” “fascist,” “anti-semite,” “holocaust denier,” “conspiracy theorist” etc. We are actually back in the Middle Ages, as some authors on this site have accurately pointed out.

    Concerning your take on FDR, I have also heard there is something fishy about his death and it would not surprise me in the least if he were assassinated. Stalin’s death is also surrounded with riddles. I have read somewhere he was killed by MI6. As for Hitler, it seems he certainly did not commit suicide and got out with English and or US consent after a deal had been made.

    Regarding FDR being the main person responsible for the outbreak of WW II, I share your view. Yet according to newly available Finnish sources, Churchill and Stalin made a secret pact on October 15, 1939, for a simultaneous attack on Germany in the spring of 1940. At least according to Erkki Hautamäki, whose book, published in 2004, was never (!) translated into English and is only available in Finnish and Swedish. (To me this seems only to increase its plausibility, given that the “Good War” is so fashionable and that its exaggerated and romanticized narrative remains one of the foundations of the US imperial system).

    It would seem that FDR was a war criminal and so were Churchill and Stalin. About the culpability of Hitler and his Nazis, despite their brutal and uncouth ways, one might be not so sure.

  78. RobinG says:
    @Malaysian Truther

    Robert D Bowers is of course a homicidal maniac, Trump hater and gift horse to the ADL who have their first real anti- semitism case in decades.

    Yup. There’s their proof that they need a Jewish state.

  79. RobinG says:

    Like the “Skripal assassins” and other Putin-Nazi operatives, he had made a point of getting himself photographed and noticed by witnesses in various public places, and otherwise drawing attention to himself, which is one of the first things they teach you at the Kremlin.

    It must be, since Maria Butina did much the same, joining NRA and consorting openly at national conferences. There’s no real case against her, but she languishes in solitary.
    Two Stories from the Propaganda War
    by Philip M. Giraldi
    “When someone is found guilty by the media there is no way to right the wrong when the story shifts and starts to break down.”

  80. @Hans Vogel

    Thanks for the long answer, little time now, more later.
    I’m not a historian, I just am a curious person, I have the idea, maybe wrong, that alle my questions about the 20th century now have been answered.
    It took some 20 years, I of course did it on my own, with the help of nearly 600 books, many of them quite unknown.
    The great thing about truth is that it is consistent.
    One cannot censor anything.
    So it is asserted that Hess never met the Scottish count he flew to in 1941, but he did, it is asserted that the Germans created the horror in Bergen Belsen.
    Yet in the first mentioned book one reads that Hess breakfasted with the count in 1936, Berlin, Olympic Games.
    Gould, jew, RAF scientific advisor casually mentions that the Bergen Belsen horror was caused by the allies, fighter bombers shot to pieces anything that moved, so no food, no Zyklon B or delousing.
    Robert Rhodes James, ‘CHIPS, The Diaries of Sir Henry Channon’, London 1967
    Wim Kayzer, ‘Een Schitterend Ongeluk, Wim Kayzer ontmoet Oliver Sacks, Stephen Jay Gould, Stephen Toulmin, Daniel C. Dennett, Rupert Sheldrake en Freeman Dyson’, 1993 Amsterdam
    Simon Dunstan and Gerrard Williams, ‘Grey Wolf, The Escape of Adolf Hitler, The case presented’, New York 2011
    No mention of a deal with the allies.

  81. @Hans Vogel

    ” It would seem that FDR was a war criminal and so were Churchill and Stalin. About the culpability of Hitler and his Nazis, despite their brutal and uncouth ways, one might be not so sure. ”
    Striking in all the books I read about FDR that I never found one word of regret or contemplation about the death and destruction of WWII.
    But, nobody, not even his own children knew anything about what he really thought.
    In how far his ignorance about history and world affairs played a role, guessing.
    China is a good example
    Barbara W. Tuchman, ‘Stilwell and the American Experience in China, 1911- 45’, New York, 1970, 1985
    Stilwell was flabbergasted about FDR’s China ignorance.
    Forgot where FDR’s ignorance about Germany was exposed.

    Stalin, a brutal psychopath, not just letting Russian blood flow asit pleased him, his biggest fun seems to have been to let someone understand that he was next to be killed, play with him for some time, then have him killed.
    Already as a teenager he was brutal, breaking all legs of a calf when walking with friends.
    Chrustjew seems to have been on his hit list at the time Stalin wanted to provoke war with the west by expelling all jews, the story is, Chrustjew with jews killed him.
    But of course, hearsay.
    Edward Radinsky, ‘Stalin’, 1996, London, Amsterdam

    Churchill, the man loved war, read his first book, not a word of compassion for the victims of a British punitive expedition in what now is N Afghanistan
    Winston Churchill, ‘The Story of the Malakand Field Force’, 1898, 2004, New York
    WWII was for him the opportunity to get political power again, in my opinion.
    He sacrificed the British empire for his political ambitions, again, my idea.
    The mass murder of German civilians, nowhere ever a word of regret, in his memoirs, despite that these were written after the official British report was publicised that damage to Germany equalled damage to England, in the last case: the cost of building and maintaining bombers, producing bombs, and, last but not least, losing a whole generation of England’s most promising young men.
    See also
    Solly Zuckermann, ‘From Apes to Warlords, an autobiography, 1904- 46’, London 1988
    Martin Middlebrook, ‘The Berlin raids, R.A.F. Bomber Command Winter 1943-44’, Londen 1988 1990

    Of course, there were the concentration camps that began in 1933 for socialists and communists, there was the night of the long knives, , jews were thrown out of all kinds of jobs, jews were deported.
    About the early camps, these ended the state of civil war that had waged in Germany since the allies deposed the kaiser, the long knives, Röhm had planned a coup
    Drastically reducing jewish power in Germany, I do hope that something similar will not occur in the present USA.
    Deportation of jews, in a 1939 speech Hitler threatened jewry with ‘ausrotten’ if they again caused a world war.
    What ausrotten meant at the time, there has been , and is, much discussion, but it is consistent with the Madagascar plan, deporting all jews after the war to Madagascar.
    Hans Jansen, ‘Der Madagaskar Plan, Die beabsichtigte Deportation der europäischen Juden nach Madagaskar’, München 1997
    About the gas chambers for humans, considerable doubt.
    Then there is
    Traudl Junge, with Melissa Müller, ‘Until the final hour’, London, 2004
    the book written by Hitler’s youngest secretary, where he is portrayed as a friendly fatherly old gentleman.
    For this reason, I suppose, the long introduction by Melissa Müller : let us not think that Hitler was not a beast.
    Let me add that party officials succeeded in making themselves quite unpopular, especially in the USSR, after the population had welcomed the Wehrmacht as liberators.
    Alexander Dallin, ´Deutsche Herrschaft in Russland 1941 – 1945, Eine Studie über Besatzungspolitik’, Düsseldorf 1958 ( German Rule in Russia 1941 – 1945, A Study of Occupation Politics, New York, 1957)
    Though of course giving the view of the victors, not complete nonsense, in my opinion, there are enough complaints by Wehrmacht generals about occupation stupidities.
    One final remark, when making a country rise from the ashes, Versailles, and Stalin’s attempts at communist revolution in Germany, some blood at the hands, difficult to prevent, again; my view.

  82. Wally says:
    @Hans Vogel

    I read German just fine. So what?

    You obviously know nothing about Goebbels other than the mandated Zionist propaganda, which you obey religiously.

    Again, you cannot refute my points and resort to projection, the last resort of the desperate.

    I notice that you do not say what it is that I supposedly ‘have to learn’.
    And do tell us what I have “cited out of context”.

    You are quite good at marching in lockstep to the required narrative.

    • Replies: @Hans Vogel
    , @paschn
  83. The problem is that the key actors of the Second World War were assigned roles by propaganda (which was highly sophisticated in all the major participating nations) and that since Germany was defeated, the allied propaganda has prevailed. By now, after 75 years of uninterrupted propaganda from one side only, the narrative of the Second World War has become a tragicomic caricature of a battle between absolute good and absolute evil. Besides, certain details of this romantic fairy tale have become protected by law and in about two dozen countries (most in Europe) you will be thrown in jail if you publicly question these. Since 1949, in Germany alone, at least half a million people have been thrown in a state dungeon for violating this rule.

    In contrast, there is the anecdote about German comedian Karl Valentin, who during the war entered the stage with a big portrait of the German Leader. Without speaking a word, Vallentin would hang it on the wall, step back, look at it, return, take it off the wall and put it on the foor, resting against the wall, step back and contemplate. All in strict silence, and repeat this sequence a couple of times. Then he’d say: “Der Führer hat mir ein Porträt geschenkt. Jetzt weiss ich nicht, soll ich ihn aufhängen oder an die Wand stellen?”

    Vallentin survived the war unharmed. Whereas in present-day “democratic” France, Dieudonné is being censored and narrowly escaped being thrown in jail for “hate speech”

    • Replies: @jilles dykstra
  84. @Wally

    Also mein lieber Kerl, schön Sie verstehen Deutsch. Dann hören Sie mal zu: ich finde Ihre Hartnäckigkeit, Ihr beharren auf Vorurteile, Beschimpfungen und Ihre unerklärliche Querulanz total unangebracht und unanständig, eigentlich nur blöd. Ich werde deswegen nicht mehr auf solche Kommentare reagieren, tut mir wirklich Leid. Falls Sie sich unbedingt streiten wollen, dann suchen Sie sich doch bitte eine Bar aus.

    • Replies: @Andrew E. Mathis
    , @Wally
  85. @Hans Vogel

    ” Then he’d say: “Der Führer hat mir ein Porträt geschenkt. Jetzt weiss ich nicht, soll ich ihn aufhängen oder an die Wand stellen?” ”
    Great, but on this site in english, how many understand the joke ?
    Hope you’re not offended by me trying to explain:
    Der Führer hat mir ein Porträt geschenkt: the führer gave me a portrait
    aufhängen, hang on the wall, AND ‘die by hanging’.
    An die Wand stellen, put against the wall, AND ‘ stand before a wall, and get executed’.

    Let me add one more thing, in German media, on German discussion sites, those who understand German can see the sorry mental state of most of the Germans.
    Guilt for two world wars and six million jews in gas chambers is uttered in the German parliament without anyone protesting, or explaining that other countries did not behave impeccably, or worse.
    I for one see Germans as victims, with Japanese, and Muslims.

    This continuing German brain washing prevents any rational discussion in Germany on present day politics.
    This is best seen by discussion about migration and the Palestinians.

    As Merkel said about immigration ‘es war einmal anders’, in the past it was different, she alludes to the expulsion of jews, thus playing on guilt feelings.
    Palestinians, many in Germany see the horrible Israeli behaviour towards Palestinians, but holocaust guilt feelings prevent any serious criticism of Israel.

    Anyone in present Germany who tries to bring any doubt in the guilt story is immediately branded as neonazi, and, as the AfD, put under Verfassungsschutz.
    Verfassungsschutz, literally ‘protection of the constitution’, in reality, a modern Gestapo, trying to find anyone who has other ideas than those politisch korrekt.

  86. Thanks for translating! Yet I honestly believe that no one in the “West” and certainly in Western Europe can truly be considered an educated person if he cannot read German and French. After all, this has been the case since the Middle Ages. Even so, knowledge of Latin was also a requirement until the mid-19th century. It is only since the Anglo-American conquest and subsequent occupation of Europe in 1945 that Europeans have been forcefed on a monotonous diet of English.

    As for your comment on the Germans, I agree wholeheartedly. By and large they are a sorry lot, although in private and when you know them better, they may surprise you as regards their inner thoughts and beliefs. Victims indeed, and talked into having a giant guilt complex.

    For true information, more and more Germans are relying on outside sources these days. A good example is, run from Hungary and hosted in Russia. Unattainable for the modern-day Gestapo.

  87. paschn says:
    @The Alarmist

    Actually? No. If The Jew decides “Drumpf” has paid his debt and they allow him to leave, we’ll find a Rogue’s Gallery consisting of;

    Schiff, (Russia’s “favorite”)
    Sheriff Israel
    etc. etc.

    The pompous ass was PLACED on the “throne” to give the (engineered) idiot Goim the ILLUSION of conflict and hope. Much like a perverse cat toying with “dinner”.

    When the Jew decides to start the “revolution” and they begin to exercise H.R. 104 and dust off all those portable guillotines, (Think Jacob Schiff’s Russian “regime change” on STEROIDS), lip-prints on AIPAC’s ass/speaking Yiddish/obediently helping light that Menorah each year ain’t gonna help those shabbos goi one bit. A goim is a goim regardless. Just ask that well maintained statue of Lenin… Resting clean and comfortable… Out of harm’s way and the idiots’ minds, in Washington State… Sixty plus million Russian Christian/Muslim corpses tortured/murdered, (finally) and hidden, fertilizing Russia’s soil will explain it all to you. I’m certain those millions starved/tortured/murdered in the Ukrainian Holodomor will be more than happy to corroborate, if need be.

    Millennia of slyness, treachery, hatred and evil over a Man who tried one last time to convince the (self) chosen to abandon their “oral traditions of men”, the Torah SheBeal Peh, (a.k.a Babylonian Talmud) and return to the truth.

    It’ll all be carried out by the kosher U.N. and our very own Military/law enforcement, (sigh – AGAIN) – with the Pharisee’s cheering from the stands, frothing over the rivulets of blood while the screams of tortured goim fill the ears of those NEXT in line.

    What a goddamn shame.

    Quote from “You Gentiles” by Maurice Samuel;


    “We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. (Pg 155)

    “It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not ~ they will be killed.” ~ Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg

    “We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America
    (The Jew, December, 1925, Zinobit)

    “No Rothschild is English… No Baruch, Morgenthau, Cohen, Lehman, Warburg, Kuhn, Kahn, Schiff, Sieff or Solomon was ever born Anglo-Saxon. And it is for this filth that you fight. It is for this filth that you murdered your Empire. It is this filth that elects, selects, your politicians.”
    Ezra Pound, March 15, 1942 radio broadcast

    Revelation 3:9
    Look! I will make those from the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews yet are not, but are lying—look! I will make them come and bow before your feet and make them know that I have loved you.

    John 8:44
    You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a murderer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of the lie.

    Terrifying but exciting days we live in, no? We’ll be privy to end of empire and whole-sale slaughter to rival the Romanov’s final moments.

  88. paschn says:

    Good call.

    Shills, sycophants and marranos work tirelessly to “muddy the waters”. Sadly, this sty is RIFE with them if you include the delusional NEO-Judas class of Christian/Zionists.

    Bottom line?
    Hitler’s “sins” were loving his nation/people, believing ALL people should cherish their homeland/people WHILE NOT hating other races, (so POLAR opposite the Synagogue’s religious dogma).

    Hitler was guilty of removing the kosher central bank, (spread GLOBALLY by every City of London “colony”, led by the dual world power Britain/U.S.).
    Guilty of removing those who knifed Germany in the back via their Balfour agreement, (dual citizens are what they’re called now), and attempting to DESTROY the Jews’ useful idiots, the Free Masons.


    The Jew had NO choice other than using the sewer known as the west, U.S. specifically, in CRUSHING Germany before the world’s Christian/Muslim population realized how WELL they could live their lives w/o the Jews’ primary cash cow, the global central banks and Free Masons.

    “Masonic Lodges are established all over the world to help us achieve our independence. Those pigs, the non-Jewish Masons, will never understand the final objects of Masonry.”
    Theodor Herzl
    1897 Switzerland

    “Thanks to the terrible power of our international banks, we have forced the Christians into wars without number. Wars have a special value for Jews, Since Christians massacre each other and make more room for us Jews. Wars are the Jews’ Harvest, The Jew banks grow fat on Christian wars. Over 100 million Christians have been swept off the face of the earth by wars and the end is not yet.”

    Rabbi Reichorn 1869

    The world revolution which we will experience will be exclusively our affair and will rest in our hands. This revolution will tighten the Jewish domination over all other people. Le Peuple Juif, February 8, 1919

    There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists. The ideals of Bolshevism are consonant with many of the highest ideals of Judaism. Jewish Chronicle London, April 4, 1919

    The Bolshevist officials of Russia are Jews. The Russian Revolution with all its ghastly horrors was a Jewish movement. The Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 22, 1922

    And when you have succeeded you will discover that you can now effect your own legislation at will and you can, by careful organization, by constant campaigns about the terrors of society, by pretence as to your effectiveness, make the capitalist himself, by his own appropriation, finance a large portion of the quiet Communist conquest of that nation. Address of the Jew Laventria Beria, The Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics, p. 8

    The above, in my opinion, is the CORE DIRECTIVE of all dual citizens appointed/selected/elected to sensitive positions in government.

    With the help of the kosher U.N., we are being led to a horror that will dwarf the Bolshevik terror in Russia and Europe.

  89. Wally says:
    @Hans Vogel

    Yep, you still have not refuted my points about Goebbels. LOL

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All C.J. Hopkins Comments via RSS
The sources of America’s immigration problems—and a possible solution
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings