The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewC.J. Hopkins Archive
Manufacturing Mass Fascism Hysteria
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If the neoliberal ruling classes expect to keep the American masses worked up into a white-eyed hysteria over “fascism” until November 2020, they’re going to need to get some better Nazis. The current Nazis are just not going to cut it. They are neither scary nor Nazi enough. OK, the militia ones look kind of scary, and that “Based Spartan” guy looks kind of … uh, weird, but most of them just look like regular old rednecks. How hard would it be to get them some brown shirts, or those khaki pants like they wore in Charlottesville, or some other type of Nazi-like uniform?

And some jackboots. People love those jackboots.

Seriously, the Resistance need to get their official narrative optics in order, and they need to do it without delay. Millions of liberals are standing by to be brainwashed into a year-long frenzy of manufactured mass “fascism” hysteria, but they are going to need some halfway convincing Nazis to spastically freak out over. A few hundred bozos in MAGA hats parading around with American flags does not exactly a Sturmabteilung make.

I’m referring, of course, to the latest “fascist invasion” of Portland that took place last Saturday, which, according to the corporate media, and Antifa, and local fascism experts, was supposed to be a veritable bloodbath. Heavily-armed white supremacist terrorists were flying in from around the country to indiscriminately murder as many “Black, Asian, Latino, indigenous, immigrant, Pacific islander, disabled, houseless, and LGBTQ persons” as possible. This white supremacist terrorist kill-fest was going to be revenge for the preventively self-defensive beating of Andy Ngo, “the most dangerous fascist grifter in America,” by Antifa militants earlier this month.

Ngo (who most people had never heard of until Antifa militants beat him senseless), although he poses as a legitimate journalist by writing for outlets like The Wall Street Journal, The New York Post, Quillette, and so on, is allegedly a fascist intelligence asset in charge of compiling fascist “kill lists” consisting of the names of assorted well-known Portland anti-fascist figures (who most people had also never heard of until they claimed that Ngo had put them on his “kill list”).

Alexander Reid Ross, for example, an extremely influential “fascism expert,” outreach specialist, and geography teacher, who is hot on the trail of the Putin-Nazi plot to form a syncretic alliance of Assad-loving, Duginist, LaRouchian Nazis led by Max Blumenthal and Vanessa Beeley, or possibly Glenn Greenwald and Tucker Carlson … or something more or less along those lines (see Ross’ seminal paranoid ravings, which the SPLC was forced to retract by Blumenthal’s fascist legal counsel.) Ross reportedly remains in hiding in a safehouse in an undisclosed location somewhere in the Pacific Northwest, presumably protected by the FBI, while he continues his important work.

And then there are the notorious Proud Boys, a gang of self-described “Western chauvinists” who apparently haven’t been laid in years. According to the SPLC (which has designated them an official “hate group”):

There are three degrees of membership within the Proud Boys, and to become a first degree in the “pro-West fraternal organization” a prospective member simply has to declare “I am a western chauvinist, and I refuse to apologize for creating the modern world.” To enter the second degree, a Proud Boy has to endure a beating until they can yell out the names of five breakfast cereals (in order to demonstrate “adrenaline control”) and give up masturbation because, in theory, it will leave them more inclined to go out and meet women. Those who enter the third degree have demonstrated their commitment by getting a Proud Boys tattoo. Any man — no matter his race or sexual-orientation — can join the fraternal organization as long as they “recognize that white men are not the problem.”

Such is the caliber of the cast the Resistance are featuring in their “fascism” fantasy. As you can see, it’s not exactly the A-list. If they’re going to stick with the “fascism” hysteria from now until November 2020 (which is really the only option they have left, what with “Russiagate” having blown up in their faces), the least they can do is get some real Nazis, and some semi-respectable Nazi hunters, and cut out this pathetic Portlandia nonsense.

The Resistance owes liberals at least that much, especially after making them look like fools by leading them on for three years with their ridiculous “Russiagate” hysteria. Sure, the “fascism” hysteria is an easier sell, but that doesn’t mean they don’t have to sell it. It’s not like they can just abruptly switch from the “Russiagate” narrative to the “fascism” narrative (as if their Russiagate hoax had not just been exposed) and expect liberals to go along with it like the members of some enormous cult.

Or, I don’t know … maybe they can. The New York Times certainly appears to think so. Check out this exchange between executive editor Dean Baquet and an anonymous staffer at an emergency in-house “town hall” meeting convened after The Times changed a page one headline because it didn’t paint Trump as racist enough. (The transcript is Slate’s; emphasis is mine.)

Staffer: I’m wondering what is the overall strategy here for getting us through this administration and the way we cover it … people don’t understand. I think they get confused as to what we’re trying to do.

Baquet: OK. I mean, let me go back a little bit for one second to just repeat what I said in my in my short preamble about coverage. Chapter 1 of the story of Donald Trump, not only for our newsroom but, frankly, for our readers, was: Did Donald Trump have untoward relationships with the Russians, and was there obstruction of justice? That was a really hard story, by the way, let’s not forget that. We set ourselves up to cover that story. I’m going to say it. We won two Pulitzer Prizes covering that story. And I think we covered that story better than anybody else.

The day Bob Mueller walked off that witness stand, two things happened. Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, “Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going to do it.” And Donald Trump got a little emboldened politically, I think. Because, you know, for obvious reasons. And I think that the story changed. A lot of the stuff we’re talking about started to emerge like six or seven weeks ago. We’re a little tiny bit flat-footed. I mean, that’s what happens when a story looks a certain way for two years. Right?

I think that we’ve got to change. I mean, the vision for coverage for the next two years is what I talked about earlier: How do we cover a guy who makes these kinds of [racist] remarks? How do we cover the world’s reaction to him? How do we do that while continuing to cover his policies? How do we cover America, that’s become so divided by Donald Trump? How do we grapple with all the stuff you all are talking about? How do we write about race in a thoughtful way, something we haven’t done in a large way in a long time? That, to me, is the vision for coverage. You all are going to have to help us shape that vision. But I think that’s what we’re going to have to do for the rest of the next two years.

For anyone not entirely fluent in Pulitzer-winning Professional Journalism Speak, that translates roughly as “OK, no more Russia stuff. We’re switching to the fascism and racism stuff, and we’ll be hammering on it until Trump is history.”

Which is fine with me. I don’t like Donald Trump. And Americans are certainly racists … uh, working class Americans, that is. Sorry, white working class Americans, not Black people, or the staff of The New York Times, or the neoliberal ruling classes. Unless they’re disabled, or houseless, or Latino, or indigenous, or LGBTQ (i.e., the white working class Americans, not the ruling classes). In which case, they get a pass on the racism. But the rest of us are all white supremacists, and homophobic anti-Semites, and xenophobic racist transphobes, and … well, basically, a bunch of Nazis.

What? You don’t believe that most white Americans are Hitler-loving, Sieg-heiling Nazis who want to mass murder all the Jews and the Mexicans and re-enslave all the African Americans? How do you think Donald Trump got elected? Somebody stole the presidency from Clinton. If it wasn’t the Russians, it had to be the fascists! I mean, after all, who else is there?

C. J. Hopkins is an award-winning American playwright, novelist and political satirist based in Berlin. His plays are published by Bloomsbury Publishing (UK) and Broadway Play Publishing (USA). His debut novel, ZONE 23, is published by Snoggsworthy, Swaine & Cormorant Paperbacks. He can be reached at cjhopkins.com or consentfactory.org.

 
Hide 92 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Rational says:

    RABID LEFT WING RAG NYT RUN BY A BLACK THUG WHO STEALS WHITE WOMEN

    Thanks, Sir. You are so right.

    One of the biggest libbarbarians in this country is the black thug, Dean Baquet, the editor of the NYT, a Jewish paper. The Judiasts hired him as a sabbath goy to help them exterminate the white goyim.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Baquet

    But this black thug preyed on a white woman, Dylan Landis, and stole her from whites. He refused to marry a black girl, because, like most black men, he thinks black girls are “sh…”, and inferior but whites are superior and better. He is therefore, by his own liberal logic, a racist, neonazi.

    Shame of Dylan Landis for marrying a black thug, a man so evil, he lies and spews hate on whites like her all day.

    What a shame and disgusting life to be taken by not only a black thug, but one who is so evil, he lies all day and shows nothing but hate for his own wife and her family.

    Even dogs have more self respect than Dylan Landis.

    • Replies: @DanFromCT
  2. Richard B says:

    “The current Nazis are just not going to cut it. They are neither scary nor Nazi enough.”

    Actually, they’re going to have to get better informants.

    But they can’t do that because there’s no one to inform on because there are no Neo-Nazis or White Supremacists.

    And the only KKK that exists today is The Kvetching Kosher Khazars.

    So they’re out of luck there too.

    Fact is, The ADL/$PLC has been manufacturing these groups for years. Here’s how it works.

    Through their control of The FBI they just go to their database and look up names of those down and out Whites who are up on parole, probation, or have cases pending for drug charges (opiods usually, for obvious reasons), violent offenses (sounds glamorous, but it’s usually just domestic abuse cases), drunk and disorderly (bar fights) DUI, and even a sprinkling of pedos.

    From there it’s a cinch to get these well-funded, well-organized, highly motivated and extremely powerful organizations to get these hard luck hicks to do their bidding.

    This has been going on for years folks. Years!

    The ADL, SPLC, ie; The Kvetching Kosher Khazars, don’t fear their own Frankenstein.

    No. They fear people like Schaeffer Cox and LaVoy. Two people who didn’t hate anyone, they just loved their freedom.

    The Deep State fears men like these because they are, or were, straight shooters who could inspire people to rebel within the law.

    And that’s why they took them out. One by prison, the other by death.

    The result is that today, most people simply don’t want to be Schaeffer Cox’d or LaVoy’d.

    And now we’re back to why the powers that be need to get better Nazis.

    But no matter who they get, it won’t work. Because now, everybody knows.

    What was once designed to produce crying, tears, and outrage, now only produces yawning, eye-rolling and boredom.

  3. It can’t be much of a conspiracy if nobody could engineer a single simple atrocity on one side or the other at the Portland rally. The media must have been so disappointed. Perhaps they believe that everybody is already sufficiently distracted from whatever they don’t want us to be looking at.

  4. White nationalism in the real world attracts quality white people. Refer to this study:

    A Psychological Profile of the Alt-Right

    https://psyarxiv.com/c9uvw

    According to the graphs on p. 17 of the document, 42 percent of Americans who identify as “Alt-Right” earn $75,000+ a year, and the majority report living in long-term relationships. This functional and competent population contradicts the media’s effort to portray white nationalists as a bunch of incels and NEET’s based on some bad street theater.

    • Replies: @sally
  5. Miro23 says:

    What? You don’t believe that most white Americans are Hitler-loving, Sieg-heiling Nazis who want to mass murder all the Jews and the Mexicans and re-enslave all the African Americans? How do you think Donald Trump got elected? Somebody stole the presidency from Clinton. If it wasn’t the Russians, it had to be the fascists! I mean, after all, who else is there?

    The reality is that this junk is endless (not the article – the content).

    And, the answer has to be, to side step it rather than fight it. For example, the population of the US at the time of Independence was 2.5 million (1776), which was a little less than the population of Kansas today.

    So, if America’s founders could build a nation in 1776, why can’t the people of Kansas (and every other state) build themselves independent states today? The advantages would be saying goodbye to a whole collection of dictatorial mostly Jewish run organizations: 1) The FED debt machine 2) The Associated Press propaganda machine 3) The Congressional war machine 4) The criminalized CIA/FBI, 5) Obligatory multicultural LGBT education 6) Rip off healthcare systems etc. etc.

    Kansas people organize their own healthcare, policing, justice, schooling, news media and currency in a Confederation with other independent North American states. They would require a high level of citizen participation and rely on their own news service and media (TV publishing) and send their own independent correspondents to places like the ME, Russia and China (and get real news).

  6. Well just to throw one spanner in the works on slavery! (and the Muslim faith doesn’t disagree imo, though for them the devotion is to Allah)

    Buddhadāsa claims that even slaves or servants in the Buddha’s time had some socialist connotations. He talks about the past ideal when even slaves did not want to leave their generous seṭṭhī masters, in contrast to laborers in the present time who hate their selfish capitalist bosses. He says:

    Buddhist setthi treated slaves like their own children. All worked together for a common good. They observed the moral precepts together on Buddhist Sabbath days… Slavery in a socialist state need not be abolished because the slaves themselves would not want to leave such masters… The kind of slaves which should be abolished are the slaves under the capitalist system, who are treated like animals, beaten and whipped. These kind of slaves are always wanting to be free… [slaves] under a socialist system would not be endangered, they would be looked after with love, compassion, and care.

    https://www.suanmokkh.org/articles/20

    People are heading for extremes, the word fascist gets thrown around too easily. I got called one for making an argument against labour unions when I was in uni, even though Hitler unionised all the labour force in his time – work that one out!

    The left is a sad shell of whatever it ever was, and I’m certainly too young to remember anything but underread know it alls silence treating anyone with data or opinion that is not 100% in line with their implicit marching orders. A non-aggressive, non emphatic debate on something like facebook is an insta loss of a friend.. Unz articles are certainly a great way to start a fire when only words are wanted in this respect! 🙂

    People say the internet produced information reinforcement vortexes (or some other less obtuse term!), with individuals self selecting for the groups that fit their world view, but I don’t think this was ever not the case. If anything, the net throws all the information at you at once, and people just don’t have the willpower or even capacity to wade through the different frames of references, without attaching to some frame before enough data is in. And they certainly are not willing to change their minds on much once they are set in their beliefs.

    We are heading for a clobbering match imo, and I am resigned to the opinion that such a forest fire may be the best way to progress the people to reasonableness. Strangely!

    • Agree: Fox
  7. Vulcan says:

    …there’s no one to inform on because there are no Neo-Nazis or White Supremacists.

    Has anyone discovered if there’s any truth to the rumour that forces are even now trying to get Tucker Carlson off the television for making exactly this point?

    Admittedly my view is from a distance. But it was knowingly acknowledged that the last actual American Nazi, George Lincoln Rockwell, was killed by one of his own followers over a half-century ago.

    Like or not, that makes this an almost prehistoric concern. Civil engineers have testified that the USA is falling apart, even as China become First World, and all these sillyboys have on their minds are nazis in America?

    Madness!

    • Replies: @Richard B
  8. LGBTQ+FIFL

    FremdschamInducingFashLarpers

  9. @Miro23

    HEAR HEAR!

    Stop the hate.
    Separate.

  10. “ Racist” morph to “ Fascists” , German imagery still falls short of the “ needed conversation”:
    Untold millions experiencing black fatigue, borders/ language/ culture awakening.

  11. Trump is shite but please vote for him anyway. Do it for the memes and more footage of glorious shitlib meltdowns.

    • LOL: Liza
    • Replies: @OEMIKITLOB
  12. What kind of mind is it that initiates fascist actions against others, then screams out that it hates fascism, all the while refusing to define the concept itself? That is exactly the leftist mind.

    There is something grotesque about this distortion, this twisting of perception, and the gross misassumptions contained therein. It’s obviously a form of self-hatred, the basis of insanity. The leftist mind hates itself, by forcing itself to initiate actions that it hates.

    The leftist mind is a vicious feedback loop of self-hatred.

    • Replies: @onebornfree
  13. NYT is Pravda, keeping the nomenklatura up to date on the Party Line. WaPo is Izvestiya.

  14. When the Proud Boys and Antifa are scheduled to meet, the police should be there to hand out fully loaded pistols to the combatants along with a warning that the first shot fired is likely to trigger others to fire indiscriminately and could lead to large loss of life. Further, as the groups head for a confrontation, those in the lead should consider that their fellow travelers behind them just need to fire a shot into the air for those in the front line on both sides to fall like flies to a hail of bullets.

    For each pistol handed out, the police should get a signed waiver receipt acknowledging that the antagonists are about to embark on a dangerous mission.

    With the preliminaries out of the way and everyone armed, the show could begin. Let’s see if they have the balls they pretend to have if the stakes are raised.

    The first such encounter that leads to deaths or injuries will help eliminate future such nonsensical events and rid the planet of a few people with shit for brains.

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Parsnipitous
  15. DanFromCT says:
    @Rational

    It’s college educated white women like Dylan who give the Dems the edge every time, obeying TV’s kosher opinion shapers authoring these white women’s thoughts and actions as easily today as Bernays said it would be getting them to take up smoking yesterday. No more Miss Goody Two Shoes for today’s woman. She’s actually brimming with self respect, not for smoking these days, but for liberating herself by becoming some black man’s slave and making Oprah her favorite philosopher.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  16. …or those khaki pants like they wore in Charlottesville…

    Any update on the tall, crewcut dickweed marching at C-ville wearing brand-new khakis and carrying, like a bindle, a nazi flag that still had creases in it from being in a bag never opened until that morning?

    Betting most readers here know exactly whom I’m describing.

    Any idea which Deep State agency he was shilling for?

  17. Realist says:

    A few hundred bozos in MAGA hats parading around with American flags does not exactly a Sturmabteilung make.

    I’m not a fan of this article. It denigrate whites to feed sarcasm of the left.

    • Agree: MikeatMikedotMike
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wally
    , @Parsnipitous
  18. G says:
    @Miro23

    It will never be allowed by the establishment, because the USA today and since at least the end of WW II is a (global) empire, not a republic. And the first people colonized by an Empire are its own subjects.

    One thing you can hope for is that the distance between the official, publicized narrative and the reality people encounter in their own lifes will become as drastic as in the late-stage Soviet Union. “Russiagate, Nazigate, Epstein Suicide” it all helps to realize the emperor has no clothes. And this realization is what actually immunizes against the seduction of state-totalitarianism and it is why, for example, Poland, Hungary and East-Germany, who lived through Communism, are somewhat immune to the new (soft) totalitarianism of neo-liberalism and globalism. The people, not necessarily their elites of course.

  19. Parfois1 says:
    @Miro23

    Kansas people organize their own healthcare, policing, justice, schooling, news media and currency in a Confederation with other independent North American states.

    Keep on dreaming…

    Since a national popular rebellion is off the table, state’s rights could become a viable alternative to the present corrupt political system. All you need is one successful escapee from the federal lock-up to open the floodgates for mass evasions. Feasible too… Good luck!

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  20. Antifa , is a zionist bolshevik operation that is trying to start a bolshevik revolution in America and disarm America and it is going to get worse, as this is NATO’s OPERATION GLADIO brought to America by our zionist overlords to destroy America like they destroyed Russia in the revolution, and the same types of bolsheviks are involved.

    If they disarm we Americans , then the killing fields of the bolshevik revolution will be seen here in America!

  21. Anonymous[330] • Disclaimer says:

    Someone based in Berlin, presumably the German one, might not have to look across the pond to the USA in searching for violent fascists.
    https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2019/06/19/germ-j19.html

    There were also the NSU murders.

  22. Anonymous[204] • Disclaimer says:

    I’m not a white nationalist and have zero tendencies toward that but I was a little shocked and disturbed by the story I read yesterday about the two “Proud Boys” members being convicted in NYC and facing a possible 15 years in prison for a street fight in the UES where the Antifa participants (whom the Proud Boys fought) refused to testify or cooperate with police. Things like this make me believe the social order is quickly unraveling.

    https://nypost.com/2019/08/19/proud-boys-maxwell-hare-john-kinsman-convicted-for-ues-brawl-with-antifa/

    But I think for most people who hold radical ideas they’ve decided it makes not sense to act out or even speak out but merely wait for dollar to go to zero and the social order to completely collapse and then commence in seeking redress. But if by some miracle this doesn’t go down we are only left with these dark ideas which we can be absolved of in the confessional.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  23. Anonymous[388] • Disclaimer says:
    @DanFromCT

    It’s college educated white women like Dylan who give the Dems the edge every time, obeying TV’s kosher opinion shapers authoring these white women’s thoughts and actions as easily today as Bernays said it would be getting them to take up smoking yesterday.

    A perfect example of this is a recently published book:

    A Well-Read Woman: The Life, Loves, and Legacy of Ruth Rappaport

    [MORE]


    Growing up under fascism in Nazi Germany, Ruth Rappaport read banned titles in the corner of the Leipzig library and decided that if she couldn’t save her family and friends, or even herself, she would save books. This fascinating and distinctive figure, along with debut author Kate Stewart’s gifted storytelling, help us appreciate the complexities of women’s working lives throughout history and understand why access to books and libraries matters.

    Luckily, Ruth escaped the fate of many European Jews, and after a number of challenging adventures as a teenager, she eventually immigrated to America, where, despite some initial apprehension and missteps, she renewed her mission to protect and champion the people’s right to information.

    Employed under and alongside men, she clashed often with naysayers as she built an enormous library system across Vietnam for embittered American troops, then went on to head the Social Sciences Subject Cataloging Division at the Library of Congress.

    While there are many popular Holocaust-related memoirs and biographies, none are about someone who built a life’s work in explicit remembrance of Nazi censorship. Although Ruth had several brief affairs, she never married, or had children; in a time when women’s destinies were solidified in motherhood and homemaking, Ruth Rappaport chose a different path, and her legacy endures.


    About Kate Stewart
    Kate Stewart is a third-generation librarian, born and raised in the Midwest. She graduated from Vassar College with a BA in history and the University of Iowa with two master’s degrees in history and library science. She has worked as a librarian and archivist for ProQuest, the Library of Congress and the U.S. Senate in Washington, D.C. She is currently an archivist at the Arizona Historical Society in Tucson.

    • Replies: @Parsnipitous
  24. “Any man — no matter his race or sexual-orientation — can join the fraternal organization as long as they “recognize that white men are not the problem.”

    Ok. Despite celibacy being key to my lifestyle,

    I have never considered that self gratification would ever be considered a factor in one’s manhood. And call me old fashioned . . .

    And that last expectation — regardless of orientation — I doubt I would ever cross the threshold of ignoring that the advance of same agendas are fact a real problem. And while being white is not a problem — it would be utterly foolish to pretend that whites male and female upstaged citizenshipo making white face a pass despite ability and character far too often to merely dismiss the very real issues on the question of citizenship.

    Otherwise is treat history with rose colored spectacals.

  25. Liza says:

    According to the graphs on p. 17 of the document, 42 percent of Americans who identify as “Alt-Right” earn $75,000+ a yea

    r

    It could be I am not interpreting that colored chart correctly, but I see the $75,000+ alt-righters as being 26%. Not 42. Did I make a mistake in looking at the chart? Thx.

  26. “And some jackboots. People love those jackboots.”

    That’s because they’re always ready to march. ALWAYS.

  27. @Miro23

    Constitional convention is the legal way of shutting down the US. Add an article shutting the US down.

    Counterinsurgency

    • Replies: @Miro23
  28. @Parfois1

    All you need is one successful escapee from the federal lock-up to open the floodgates for mass evasions. Feasible too…

    Example of successful escapee: Sanctuary cities and states are already in legal rebellion against the Federal Government in that they are materially aiding and strongly abetting violation of Federal immigration laws on a massive scale with the openly expressed intent of dispossessing other States and the countryside of their control over the continental United States.

    Counterinsurgency

  29. Anon[926] • Disclaimer says:

    The MSM’s primary narrative problem is that better Nazis don’t dress up in American Flags and helmets to confront a bunch of vegan opiate addicts and high school kids in black gear that was bought off of Amazon.

    The obvious strategy and push is to couch anything that goes against open-borders as fascist. Patriot Prayer type groups originally being almost solely for the sane border control that literally has always defined any political nation. Now they’re Nazis and fascists, according to the MSM / Wikipedia / etc.

    This spin is the Left’s current most important propaganda. This spin is where the Right needs to concentrate its counter-information, only working out from there.

    Because if that point is lost then a cornerstone of sane national politics and our nation is gone. The internationalists knew this, and this is why it is their current point of primary attack.

  30. @Anonymous

    But I think for most people who hold radical ideas they’ve decided it makes not sense to act out or even speak out but merely wait for dollar to go to zero and the social order to completely collapse and then commence in seeking redress. But if by some miracle this doesn’t go down we are only left with these dark ideas which we can be absolved of in the confessional.

    The Russian October Revolution demonstrated that just ending the previous regime doesn’t necessarily get you anything good. You need something good in place already, as a shadow government of sorts, and it has to be prepared to fight off its evil competitors.
    In the US, the most likely source of change appears to be a constitutional convention held after the cities have finally been denied tax revenue (by, for example, a failure more severe than that of 2008 of the large financial concerns that provide much of their funding). The political structure after that would be provided by surviving State governments (e.g. not those state governments run entirely by megacities). Think on this.

    Counterinsurgency

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  31. Anon[926] • Disclaimer says:
    @Realist

    I’m not a fan of this article. It denigrate whites to feed sarcasm of the left.

    That’s a good point. The Right should never cede to Leftist perspectives, starting with the essential character of political participants.

    Attacks which are always an identifier of pure propaganda on the part of the Left.

    The Right has a bad habit of doing this since the post-WWII Neocon subversion of Conservatism, because this was a primary tactic of those communist subversives to ostracize the traditional nationalist Right.

    Those communists instilled the still-active and problematic habit of the New “Right” attacking the traditional Right to win approval of the Left: essentially subsuming the Right under Leftist moral narratives. Which is where we’ve been ever since.

    The only value in it was to gut the Right in favor of almost pure philo-Judaism and Zionism, those institutions then acting as the only acceptable nationalist surrogates available (the Jews are masters at providing psychological surrogates for the disenfranchised – see the Judeo-Communist Class politics that replaced the politics of culture and ethnicity), and assure the victory of the Far left everywhere else but Israel.

  32. Wally says:
    @Richard B

    Hopkins said:

    “the least they can do is get some real Nazis, and some semi-respectable Nazi hunters, and cut out this pathetic Portlandia nonsense.”

    – Q: So then, what’s a “real Nazi”?
    – A: Someone who was accused of immense crimes for which there is no proof, crimes which have been shown to be simply impossible.

    – Blinded Hopkins, cannot see beyond his childish, indoctrinated view of life.
    Unwittingly, he serves his masters well.

    [MORE]

    recommended:
    Ron Unz goes full on Revisionist, says: “Does anybody seriously believe something so totally ridiculous?”: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11985
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
    Babi Yar: The [alleged] Einsatzgruppen Killings: http://www.unz.com/article/babi-yar/
    “The Holocaust” Is a Myth That Conceals Our Shame: http://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-holocaust-is-a-myth-that-conceals-our-shame/
    Teaching Holocaust, Don’t know much about history, by Philip Giraldi: http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/teaching-holocaust/

    • Replies: @DanFromCT
  33. Anon[505] • Disclaimer says:
    @RoatanBill

    Or so-called counter-protests could be outlawed in the same space and on the same day as protests, being that counter-protests are an inherent attempt to silence free speech and are observably used to instigate violence in protests that would have otherwise been peaceful. The death at Charlottesville would not have occurred without the counter-protest.

    The ability to counter-protest during a permitted protest works against the Rights of freedom of assembly, free speech, and whatever else constitutionally supports protest Rights. It fundamentally infringes on and endangers that gamut of Rights.

    No one has the right to gather with intent to incite violence or suppress speech. If their intent is to counter-protest, there is no reason that can not be done on a differing date or in a different place. Allowing counter-protesting in the same space as a protest is an inherently oppressive and dangerous mechanism on a number of levels.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  34. Wally says: • Website
    @Realist

    No surprise there since article author Hopkins is openly neo-Marxist.

    Truth for those like him is a mere inconvenience to be ignored.

    Shysters like Hopkins always rely on The Big Lie as their weapon and shield.

    Revisionists are just the messengers, the absurd impossibility of the ‘holocaust’ storyline is the message.

  35. On one website. along with the Proudboy miscarriage of justice was a story about a 17-yr-old mestizo POS who head-butted A COP and was let go with no penalties.

    The fire rises.

  36. Anonymous[252] • Disclaimer says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    The Russian October Revolution demonstrated that just ending the previous regime doesn’t necessarily get you anything good. You need something good in place already, as a shadow government of sorts, and it has to be prepared to fight off its evil competitors.

    You are talking about a society which had a largely homogeneous population with a subsistence economy which was not artificially sustained by technology, fiat money, and goods from without.

    When the dollar evaporates there will be total disintegration of the social fabric and complete breakdown of all structures and organization. For a short time you’ll have law enforcement and military trying to maintain order. But with no commerce and no trucks bringing goods into high-population centers life there will quickly resemble a Brazilian prison sans the primitive order.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  37. DanFromCT says:
    @Wally

    The campus Nazi hunters of Hillel might be available to hunt crisis actors playing alt-right protestors, but not until they’re finished with their present Dem/msm gig as Antifas.

  38. @Anon

    The fact that you can actually use the term ‘permitted protest’ and ‘freedom of speech’ in the same sentence tells me a lot about where you’re coming from. If one needs a permit to express their speech, then how is it free? How is the concept of a permit to assemble not violating the Constitution? Where are ‘free speech zones’ mentioned in the Constitution?

    I’m of the opinion that sooner or later the factions will exchange blows as the general direction of the country is down hill and accelerating. Might as well get it over with in a fashion that demonstrates the stupidity of the participants on both sides. The very idea of a ‘left’ and a ‘right’ means the powers that shouldn’t be have won and the fanatics on the extremes are just serving their masters.

    • Replies: @Hunsdon
  39. @RoatanBill

    I like your scheme, but this is not (yet) the late Roman Empire, I’m afraid.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  40. @Realist

    C.J. is a (recovering) leftie, still hoping to be received back into the fold he was excreted from (Counterpunch-tier leftism), but he’s too independent-minded for that — what a conundrum!

    I rather like his pieces, but yes, old habits die hard, so he has to dump on “the right”, etc. Nonetheless, he’s one of the still-human leftists you can probably have a conversation with.

    I hope he reads these comments, but I doubt he’ll engage them: he’s already in trouble for publishing here.

  41. @Anonymous

    Having known some librarians, a “third-generation-librarian” scares the bejesus out of me.

  42. sally says:
    @advancedatheist

    who is ruling this country us Nazis, the 527 USA clowns, the privately owned Media, the writers and journalist that write for the privately owned media, the foreign department or the Martins?
    .
    I vote for the Martins they have pretty little women with flat round heads and fast spaceships.

  43. @Parsnipitous

    You are, of course, correct; it is not the late Roman Empire, but it is the late US Empire.

    When the US Dollar goes to its intrinsic value very soon, only then will the average person realize that they’ve been living in an unsustainable environment with ‘leaders’ as dumb as a stump or Trump.

    Once the economy crumbles and, due to the Grand Solar Minimum, food becomes an issue either in the US or abroad, then the primitive instincts will kick in all around the world. The anti weaponry leftists will discover that gov’t isn’t going to protect them because it can’t protect them because it doesn’t want to protect them and good riddance to them.

    Load up on precious metals including the most precious metal of all – lead.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
  44. Hans says:

    FBI Arrests Chinese-American ‘White Supremacist’ For Threatening Latinos On Facebook – https://christiansfortruth.com/fbi-arrest-chinese-american-white-supremacist-for-threatening-latinos-on-facebook/

  45. Miro23 says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    Constitutional convention is the legal way of shutting down the US. Add an article shutting the US down.

    The Russians already tried this

    The post February 1917 Russian Provisional Government arranged a Constituent Assembly with different factions meeting and voting to determine the future Russian government. When the Bolsheviks realized that they were on track to lose they violently broke it up:

    There were stationed in and about the hall during the session sailors and Lettish soldiers armed with rifles and grenades and machine guns. Very soon after the opening of the session, the Bolshevist delegates presented an ultimatum to the Constituent Assembly. Among other things, they demanded the adoption of this decree:

    “Supporting the Soviet rule and accepting the orders of the Council of People’s Commissaries, the Constituent Assembly acknowledges its duty to outline a form for the reorganization of society.”

    P 203. David R. Francis (US Ambassador to Russia) in his book, “Russia From the American Embassy, April 1916 – November 1918”

    If the US is going to have a Constitutional Convention it needs to be surrounded by at least a division of (loyal) US Marines.

    It would also get massive abuse from the Jewish media – so maybe it would be better to just get on with it locally.

  46. @Sick of Orcs

    “more footage of glorious shitlib meltdowns.”

    To a non-voter such as myself, the only thing that has been worthy of his Presidency thus far is the entertainment value that comes from watching their apoplectic fits. I can only imagine the response if he is re-elected

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Sick of Orcs
  47. onebornfree says: • Website
    @Monotonous Languor

    Monotonous Languor says: “The leftist mind is a vicious feedback loop of self-hatred.”

    “The Left is the most dangerous ideological phenomenon in the history of mankind. It glorifies poverty, the total state, and mass death. The Left wants to destroy Western civilization, based on Christianity, the traditional family, and the free market.

    It’s no coincidence that Communists killed more than 100 million people, not including their wars.

    By the way, young people are not taught about the evils of the Left, only its myths. They do not believe there were gigantic atrocities in the Lenin-Stalin Soviet Union, nor Mao’s China. Socialism is good! Everyone is better off under socialism. Everyone is Equal…..”:
    https://www.lewrockwell.com/2019/08/lew-rockwell/the-enemies-of-our-civilization/

    Regards, onebornfree

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
    • Replies: @bike-anarkist
    , @Republic
  48. peterAUS says:
    @Miro23

    …why can’t the people of Kansas (and every other state) build themselves independent states today?

    Because, at this stage, they do not want that. They still believe that the current system can deliver what they want. Like….hehe…”the next Most Important Election Ever”. MAGA thing etc.
    Takes much more than the current unpleasantness to motivate people enough for such a move.
    They/we will get there sooner than later I am sure.

  49. HBM says:

    Narrative preparation for when Whites begin to resist their dispossession. White ethnic interests aren’t and never will be kosher. Whites will be allowed only being overrun with brown people quietly; that’s our karmic destiny, according to the Left and their minions, whose hyperbolic howling drives public discourse. And it’s going to get a whole lot worse.

    Of course noticing this is a conspiracy theory– except when it is being celebrated.

  50. peterAUS says:
    @Miro23

    If the US is going to have a Constitutional Convention it needs to be surrounded by at least a division of (loyal) US Marines.

    You are onto something there. Rudimentary, but something.

  51. @onebornfree

    It’s no coincidence that Communists killed more than 100 million people, not including their wars.

    Actually, It’s no coincidence that Capitalists killed more than 100 million people (and still killing), not including their wars.

    It is the BEHAVIOUR of humans that have killed more than 100 million people, not the ideology.

    If it’s the ideology, then, “Guns kill people, but people don’t”!

    • Replies: @Sean McBride
    , @OEMIKITLOB
  52. @bike-anarkist

    Regarding the claim that capitalists killed more than 100 million people (during the 20th century, implied): what is the factual proof? Anything equivalent to the Black Book of Communism or the research of R.J. Rummel?

    • Replies: @redmudhooch
  53. @bike-anarkist

    Why are you conflating the states failures with peaceful people who offer a good or service to others in the market that they are free to accept or reject voluntarily?

  54. Republic says:
    @onebornfree

    Leftism is a totalitarian force.

    Wherever leftism is in a position of power it tends to invade every private corner and force every thought into a leftist mold. In part this is because of the quasi-religious character of leftism; everything contrary to leftist beliefs represents Sin. More importantly, leftism is a totalitarian force because of the leftists’ drive for power. The leftist seeks to satisfy his need for power through identification with a social movement and he tries to go through the power process by helping to pursue and attain the goals of the movement . But no matter how far the movement has gone in attaining its goals the leftist is never satisfied, because his activism is a surrogate activity . That is, the leftist’s real motive is not to attain the ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal. The leftist wants equal opportunities for minorities. When that is attained he insists on statistical equality of achievement by minorities. And as long as anyone harbors in some corner of his mind a negative attitude toward some minority, the leftist has to re-educated him. And ethnic minorities are not enough; no one can be allowed to have a negative attitude toward homosexuals, disabled people, fat people, old people, ugly people, and on and on and on. It’s not enough that the public should be informed about the hazards of smoking; a warning has to be stamped on every package of cigarettes. Then cigarette advertising has to be restricted if not banned. The activists will never be satisfied until tobacco is outlawed, and after that it will be alcohol, then junk food, etc. Activists have fought gross child abuse, which is reasonable. But now they want to stop all spanking. When they have done that they will want to ban something else they consider unwholesome, then another thing and then another. They will never be satisfied until they have complete control over all child rearing practices. And then they will move on to another cause.

    Ted Kaczynski

    • Agree: Wally, Miro23
  55. Wally says:
    @OEMIKITLOB

    He’s certainly better than the alternatives, and indeed, watching the limousine left lose it is pure schadenfreude.

    There is no doubt, Trump wins 2020. He’s playing his detractors like a fiddle.

    2016 reactions to Trump Victory:

  56. peterAUS says:
    @Republic

    …..the leftist’s real motive is not to attain the ostensible goals of leftism; in reality he is motivated by the sense of power he gets from struggling for and then reaching a social goal. Consequently the leftist is never satisfied with the goals he has already attained; his need for the power process leads him always to pursue some new goal.

    Yes.

  57. annamaria says:

    Sergey Brin and Larry Page have been rich thanks to cooperation with intelligence services: https://russia-insider.com/en/media-criticism/russia-insider-list-censored-sites-leaked-google-whistle-blower/ri27512

    a Google insider has leaked a ton of documents proving what everyone knows is true, but which Google CEO Sundar Panchai swore under oath recently before Congress is not, that Google uses algorithms to keeps many sites out of search results…

    As if that wasn’t bad enough, the Google engineer who leaked this stuff was harassed by the police!, which Google sicced on him.

    Comment section:

    Google’s true origin partly lies in the CIA and NSA research grants for mass surveillance!

    Two decades ago, the US intelligence community worked closely with Silicon Valley in an effort to track citizens in cyberspace. And Google is at the heart of that origin story. Some of the research that led to Google’s ambitious creation was funded and coordinated by a research group established by the intelligence community to find ways to track individuals and groups online.

    The story of the deliberate creation of the modern mass-surveillance state includes elements of Google’s surprising, and largely unknown, origin. It is a somewhat different creation story than the one the public has heard, and explains what Google cofounders Sergey Brin and Larry Page set out to build, and why.

  58. Realist says:

    He’s certainly better than the alternatives, and indeed, watching the limousine left lose it is pure schadenfreude.

    The limousine left s backed by millions of dumbass, shitlib proles.

  59. Agent76 says:

    April 26th, 2019 The Coming of American Fascism, 1920–1940

    Review of The Coming of the American Behemoth: The Origins of Fascism in the United States, 1920–1940 by Michael Joseph Roberto. Fascism is usually thought of as a quintessentially and almost exclusively European phenomenon, as having begun with Mussolini, culminated with Hitler, and been eradicated in World War II.

    https://dissidentvoice.org/2019/04/the-coming-of-american-fascism-1920-1940/#more-91631

    Aug 30, 2011 CORPORATE FASCISM: The Destruction of America’s Middle Class

    A new kind of fascism has taken over America: the merger of corporations and government whereby corporate power dominates. With the emergence of ever-larger multinational corporations — due to consolidation facilitated by the Federal Reserve’s endless FIAT money — the corporatocracy has been in a position to literally purchase the U.S. Congress.

  60. @Republic

    That’s why they unwittingly call themselves Progressives. Progressive ideology has no built-in limits. If not stopped at an early stage by some outside force, they always end up eating themselves.

    Leftism is also a quasi-religion, a stealth religion that insists it is not. Leftists are eager to sacrifice you, your family, your freedoms, your nation, and your entire civilization on the bloody altar of their holy moral fantasies.

    • Replies: @Republic
    , @Miro23
  61. @Miro23

    If the US is going to have a Constitutional Convention it needs to be surrounded by at least a division of (loyal) US Marines.

    Precisely [1]. The time to have a constitutional convention is when you have absolute military control of the country, that is, when the fight has been fought and _won_ beyond question. It is not a shortcut, it has to be a victory celebration.

    Counterinsurgency

    ] Edward N. Luttwak .
    _Coup d’État: A Practical Handbook, Revised Edition_.
    Harvard University Press; 2 edition, 2016/04/11.
    ISBN-13: 978-0674737266; ISBN-10: 9780674737266
    Luttwak is a very well respected strategist. [2] These are real instructions. My advice: don’t do it yourself, _don’t let anybody do it to you or your side_.

    2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Luttwak

  62. Republic says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    Paul Joseph Watson: an excellent example of this “religion”

    Greta, the new child high priestess of climatology

  63. @Anonymous

    You are talking about a society which had a largely homogeneous population with a subsistence economy which was not artificially sustained by technology, fiat money, and goods from without.

    Not quite true. France had been financing capital projects in the USSR. It had railroads (including the Trans-Siberian, but only single track) and was getting a market economy. In fact, it was the industrial workers who provided the city mobs that helped bring the Bolsheviks into power.

    When the dollar evaporates there will be total disintegration of the social fabric and complete breakdown of all structures and organization. For a short time you’ll have law enforcement and military trying to maintain order. But with no commerce and no trucks bringing goods into high-population centers life there will quickly resemble a Brazilian prison sans the primitive order.

    Some places will be hit a lot harder than others, true enough. We’re talking singularity here.

    The US _could_ physically become an autarkic state. Most manufacturing is in the countryside, the Interstates woould still be here (though you’d have to bypass the cities), the US can feed itself and extract its own energy, but whether that would persist in the face of dollar devaluation to near zero, I couldn’t say. It’s interesting how much Bitcoin has recovered, though. Some substitute currency might emerge.

    There is also the question of what the rest of the world would be doing. If they panic and start fighting, there would be nobody to stop them.

    As for the large cities, they can’t last a week without utilities, especially electricity. Logistics considerations alone make it impossible.

    Counterinsurgency

  64. Hunsdon says:
    @RoatanBill

    Perhaps when referring to a permitted protest, he meant a protest, for which a license had been issued, as opposed to a protest which would be allowed.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  65. sally says:
    @Miro23

    So, if America’s founders could build a nation in 1776, why can’t the people of Kansas (and every other state) build themselves independent states today? The advantages would be saying goodbye to a whole collection of dictatorial mostly Jewish run organizations: 1) The FED debt machine 2) The Associated Press propaganda machine 3) The Congressional war machine 4) The criminalized CIA/FBI, 5) Obligatory multicultural LGBT education 6) Rip off healthcare systems etc. etc. <=Miro23..

    Several states in 1860s decided they could do as you suggest. the argument the Group I persons put up resulted in the Northern states ( the Union) destroying the Group II persons( the southern states) in a bloody war known as the civil war in America ( read below).

    First off the President of the government that defeated the British and issued the Declaration of independence (1776) was not the USA government(founded in 1789).. It took from 1776 to 1778 to get the Articles of Confederation government organized with all of the states in agreement, but in that AOC governments the individual states were autonomous as you suggest, and they were all powerful in function and operation. John Hanson was the first of eight president's of the AOC. These presidents and the state support of it, defeated the British, not the USA presidents. the USA was formed as a result of the constitution and the constitution was a coup in that it ratification was defined in the document and then used to eliminate the AOC in favor of the USA . Hanson's title as President of the AOC, was President of the United States in Congress Assembled.

    [MORE]

    There were two groups of people in America on the not British Side.
    1) the Wealthy landed estate owners and the owners of large numbers of Africans (like George Washington. ) many of whom did not want to declare against the British cause if they did and got caught they would be punished as Traitors, the group I persons were essentially the British Aristocrats turned traitor to empower the the American colonies to defeat the British. The Group 1 persons ran colonial America for the British. and

    2) the group; persons sick and tired of British Colonial Tyranny.. Hanging people for minor offenses, corrupt courts where an ordinary American colonist could not win a case against a British Aristocrat, forced conscription to serve in the British Army or Navy.. forced to house and feed the British soldiers in the personal homes of group ii persons, and on and on.

    Group one were just as guilty as the British in many things. . when it came to recognizing the human rights of those in Group II many asked what rights. Those in group 1 were the bankers, the lawyers, the landed slave owner estate owner wealthy gentry; the ship owners, thSo, if America’s founders could build a nation in 1776, why can’t the people of Kansas (and every other state) build themselves independent states today? The advantages would be saying goodbye to a whole collection of dictatorial mostly Jewish run organizations: 1) The FED debt machine 2) The Associated Press propaganda machine 3) The Congressional war machine 4) The criminalized CIA/FBI, 5) Obligatory multicultural LGBT education 6) Rip off healthcare systems etc. etc.e slave traders, the whalers, the farmers, etc, they were generally educated in British Style but mainly they were the economic zionist of the time and their financial ties, their success and their near birthright to rule came from their status with either England or France..

    Group II one the other hand were the workers, the sailors, the whalers, farm workers, the trappers, the mappers, the keepers of the records, in short, Group II men and women did the work that keep the economy spinning.

    Group I could see that the East and West Indies companies (British owned) corporations had the cooperation of the law makers and government in England, France and the like.. You might say they were jealous. Laws were passed in England that taxed the corporations and businesses and farming produce, mainly the flow of income from Group 1 colonist to capitalist and bankers in England very differently. the same British laws that controlled the British Colonies in America, taxed the American owned colonial boats, and the American produced farm produce(unless it was put on an English vessel), and the pelts generated by trapping and hunting etc at much higher rates than the English owned British businesses were taxed. The colonist had to work twice as hard as the British to earn as much.. So it was obvious Group I persons would like to change that. Many had so much at stake in America they could not leave, and so little was left to do but support the war against England. But many group I persons did not fully commit to join the army instead they would make loans and finance the soldiers in group II.

    Group II just wanted to be free of the British Tyrannical rule.. They wanted an American government, and they wanted fair trials with Juries made up of people who knew the local score ( not some jury or judge from England) who would do what the Group I persons told them to do. Group II wanted the right to protect themselves, and they wanted a local militia to protect themselves from both government and the tyranny of powerful corporations. Group II wanted to earn their daily living (to them own guns was essential) and the Group II people did not want a government that allowed its soldiers to bust into their homes and arrest the occupants, search the place, and confiscate all of their worldly belongings, nor did Group II persons want to be forced to house these strange armed members of the .British Armies in the homes of Group II persons.

    So the Articles of Confederation existed, in partnership with the states, to find ways to make an army of the Group II persons. as the Group II persons were the hunters, dirt farmers, sailors, slaves and persons doing the manual labor and they knew how to fight in the woods they were wanted to make up most of the fighting man's army. But several British colonial Aristocrats would be needed to lead them.. (Because George Washington was rich enough to be well known, the AOC made Washington, Gen of the continental Army; the hope was that Washington's name would help to attract Group II persons willing to endure the fight.
    So, if America’s founders could build a nation in 1776, why can’t the people of Kansas (and every other state) build themselves independent states today? The advantages would be saying goodbye to a whole collection of dictatorial mostly Jewish run organizations: 1) The FED debt machine 2) The Associated Press propaganda machine 3) The Congressional war machine 4) The criminalized CIA/FBI, 5) Obligatory multicultural LGBT education 6) Rip off healthcare systems etc. etc.
    It did not take long to rout the British, by 1778 there were mostly defeated .. and the Articles government then set about making good on the promises it had made to those who helped defeat the British. That's when the conflict between Group I and Group II developed. The group II persons expected to confiscate the estates of the landed gentry because the ownership to those estates traced to Foreign kings and queens. In other words George Washington, who owned half of W. Virginia and substantially all of Virginia would forfeit his vast landed estate and the slaves he needed to keep it going, so that the Articles Government could divide, proportion and distribute everyone's land without regards to Group I and Group II status. Landed gentry, Aristocrat no more, demote the former estate owner, former slave owner and former officers and judges in the former British colonial government would be mere Americans? If you believe Group I would merge their interest to group I chaps, I have a Bridge in Brooklyn to sell.

    By 1778, when President Hanson formally took office, the officers and men of group II (Shay's rebellion) were demanding what the Group I men had pledged to tSo, if America’s founders could build a nation in 1776, why can’t the people of Kansas (and every other state) build themselves independent states today? The advantages would be saying goodbye to a whole collection of dictatorial mostly Jewish run organizations: 1) The FED debt machine 2) The Associated Press propaganda machine 3) The Congressional war machine 4) The criminalized CIA/FBI, 5) Obligatory multicultural LGBT education 6) Rip off healthcare systems etc. etc.hose who took on the British. But group I was not about to give up there landed estates and slave. .
    What had group II been promised: 40 acres of their own, freedom from the Tyranny of corporate partnered government (even African Slaves were expecting to be freed since they too fought the British) and a pension for life to include their widow.

    Now put yourself in the place of a group I person.. would you be willing to fund a revolutionary government that had successfully destroyed the hegemony of the British Empire; a government proven able to deprive the British wealth from doing business in America if such a government were going to take your estate and give it to those who helped defeat the British.? Probably not.

    So what happened, the funding for the operation of the Articles of Confederation government had to come from the several states. and the states had to get the money to fund the AOC by taxing the estates and corporate profits of group I.. So Group I just quit paying the taxes, or they lobbied the state government, not to assess or collect them; either way the states could pay their share to the AOC. Eventually the ability of the Articles of Confederation (Americans only Democratic Government) to operate came to a halt. That halt was contrived, but it allowed the Group I persons to send proxy to Philadelphia and to generate there in 1787 a brand new government, a government that would not confiscate land granted estates, a government that would take the pesky, demanding Article II person out of the decision loops, a government that could operate without consulting the pesky members of group II, a government that would one again establish a British Tyranny in an Americanized form. So once again the Group I could use the government to obtained favouritism, Group could control the courts, force group II persons to finance and support the military and allow Group I to do business and banking as usual.

    Group two were denied access to the new Republic established by Group I in 1789.. The Group II persons could not vote for the President or the VP, or members of the Senate, they could by vote, establish what mirrored the house of commons in England; but like the house of commons, the House of Representatives is big but has very limited power.

    It is important to understand the tension between group I vs group II <=this happened a long time ago..

    • Replies: @Miro23
  66. @OEMIKITLOB

    I know you said it’s not your thing, but please vote anyway, OEMIKITLOB.

    Your vote will cancel out at least one illegal or dead person voting democrap.

    • Replies: @Realist
  67. @Hunsdon

    I took his comment to mean the local gov’t issued a piece of paper to allow the protest to proceed. The alternate assumption, that the protest was allowed to occur without some piece of paper is just as bad as who, prey tell, is allowing things to happen. Either way, some agent is involved.

    It would appear that the plain meaning of the words in the Constitution and Bill Of Rights are slowly being redefined until black is white and night is day. The average person asks permission from gov’t to live. It’s supposed to be the other way around. We, the people, are to tell our employees, the gov’t, what we want and not have them preach to us using propaganda to achieve their goals.

  68. Its all a psyop. Gotta create a boogeyman for the liberals to save us from, pay no attention to the capitalists on Wall St raping and pillaging the country, look a Russian!

    No different than Trump and the GOP with their Mexican-Radical Muslim boogeyman.

    Both sides play their ignorant base. Back in the day it was communist boogeymen, seems some here never got over that one. Sad!

    • Agree: Biff
    • Replies: @Monotonous Languor
  69. Richard B says:
    @Vulcan

    “Has anyone discovered if there’s any truth to the rumour that forces are even now trying to get Tucker Carlson off the television for making exactly this point?”

    Yes. That’s true. And one of the ways they are doing that is by actually accusing Tucker himself of being a White Supremacist.

    Everything they’ve tried so far, The Russia Hoax, Mueller, Kavanaugh, etc. has failed. If this whole Racism, Racism, Racism, White Supremacy, etc. fails they’re done for.

    So I think they’re going to try to really make this stick.

    The one thing the hotile elite have working in their favor is the fact that Whites seem constitutionally incapable of understanding the seriousness of the threat they face if they don’t organize and defend themselves.

    From this perspective it doesn’t matter that there are no White Supremacists.

    They’ll simply brand you and kill you. Just like they did in Russia in the 20th century.

    USSR 1919 – USSA 2019

    • Replies: @Vulcan
  70. When the mouthpiece of Jewish Supremacism feels THIS MUCH HATRED against whites, why do whites keep sucking up to Jews?

    https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/08/21/ann-coulter-why-the-new-york-times-is-unreformable-and-must-die/

  71. Miro23 says:
    @Monotonous Languor

    That’s why they unwittingly call themselves Progressives. Progressive ideology has no built-in limits. If not stopped at an early stage by some outside force, they always end up eating themselves.

    Leftism is also a quasi-religion, a stealth religion that insists it is not. Leftists are eager to sacrifice you, your family, your freedoms, your nation, and your entire civilization on the bloody altar of their holy moral fantasies.

    The more weird and extreme it gets, the more they prove their faith. For example, virtue signaling religious “Progressives” famously created monastic orders that vowed to go barefoot, to keep absolute silence or make pilgrimages on their knees.

  72. Miro23 says:
    @sally

    That’s a useful commentary that repays careful reading.

    Eventually the ability of the Articles of Confederation (Americans only Democratic Government) to operate came to a halt. That halt was contrived, but it allowed the Group I persons to send proxy to Philadelphia and to generate there in 1787 a brand new government, a government that would not confiscate land granted estates, a government that would take the pesky, demanding Article II person out of the decision loops, a government that could operate without consulting the pesky members of group II, a government that would once again establish a British Tyranny in an Americanized form.

    It is important to understand the tension between group I vs group II

    The modern day colonial variant, is the local US Anglo elite allied with the US Jewish/Zionist elite for economic reasons. This local Anglo elite would probably support a Confederation of North American States (and abandon the Jews/Zionists) if they could see a route to retaining their Group I elite status, either directly, or more likely by once again (later in the process), gradually centralizing control over State administrations.

    The State’s political independence (especially raising and spending their own taxes) would need to be very carefully protected, but the Catch 22 is of course, that if their independence was solidly protected, they would never get essential Group I support. Group I would stick with the Zionists.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  73. @redmudhooch

    Whenever someone starts equating two sides as being morally equivalent, then they are playing a devious game with their audience. The point of the game is to convince someone that opposition to only one side is pointless.

    The game is played for one of two reasons: (1) When one side, in this case that of the leftists, knows that its position is no longer convincing, and that it’s losing what had heretofore been unwitting supporters. (2) The other reason is when those pushing for moral equivalence are cowards who refuse to fight an obvious enemy, which in this case is leftism. To justify their cowardice, they convince themselves that “a plague on both your houses” coupled with endless compromise nobly brokered by themselves, is supremely moral.

    The first case is promoted by leftist trolls; the second is promoted by leftists’ useful idiots. In both cases the audience should see through the subterfuge and dismiss with prejudice. Moral equivalence isn’t moral, it’s a pretext for dodging the truth of objective morality.

    • Disagree: Biff
  74. Realist says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    Your vote will cancel out at least one illegal or dead person voting democrap.

    This country’s problems will not be solved through elections.

    The Deep State doesn’t care about the unimportant internecine squabbles of the ‘two parties’ as long as their important issues are maintained. As a matter of fact it strengthens the false perception that there is a choice when voting.

  75. @Miro23

    This local Anglo elite would probably support a Confederation of North American States (and abandon the Jews/Zionists) if they could see a route to retaining their Group I elite status, either directly, or more likely by once again (later in the process), gradually centralizing control over State administrations.

    Excellent point. Where’s the way out?

    1929 and WW II was the way out last time. 1929 saw the assets of the Group I dwindle markedly. Both financial and physical assets declined, and the Federal government was (in practice) opposed to their ever rising again. The elites in _all_ combatant countries, save none, in WW II had their assets confiscated and largely expended in the fighting. At the end, Group I’s dominance was gone, transferred to the Executive Agencies and to some extent the formal Congressional, Executive, and Judicial branch of the Federal Government. [1]

    It could happen again. In fact, it is plausibly happening in that we see the cities failing, asset devouring warfare, very large debt, decline of physical assets, and a predicted 2008 level financial failure. Group I is being assailed by the unemployables it brought in to keep city populations up.

    If Group I loses its financial, physical, and political base, then its place is very weakly held and is up for grabs. That’s where the USSR went.

    Counterinsurgency

    1] but see:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_Liberalism
    In practice, actual control of government by its formal leadership had been lost by the end off WW II. Congress had ceded much of its power to the Executive Agencies, the Courts weren’t all-powerful until the 1950s, and the Executive himself didn’t do anything radical on their own initiative until JFK/LBJ. By that time the government bureaucracy was well on its way to the unintelligent dominance that we see today.

    • Replies: @Miro23
  76. Miro23 says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    This local Anglo elite would probably support a Confederation of North American States (and abandon the Jews/Zionists) if they could see a route to retaining their Group I elite status, either directly, or more likely by once again (later in the process), gradually centralizing control over State administrations.

    Excellent point. Where’s the way out?

    I think that there’s nothing to do with the present Jewish and Anglo Group I elites. They totally feed off Federal Special Interest Washington and will never willingly give it up.

    Direct Democracy, State by State, in an American Confederation, has nothing to offer them (which is the main point), so the US could get a whole new set of local elites – one for each state – and subject to Direct Democratic control. The Confederation of American States could still have a CAS President, but it would be more of a ceremonial role.

    Interestingly, Direct Democracy would probably produce a Latino elite in California, and a Black elite in Mississippi.

    • Replies: @Counterinsurgency
  77. Wally says: • Website
    @redmudhooch

    LOL. You canot be serious.

    [MORE]

    – There is no proof for the “holocaust” narrative mentioned in the laughable video. There necessarily cannot be since the ridiculous claims are scientifically impossible.

    – More on the fake “6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers” here:

    Ron Unz goes full on Revisionist, says: “Does anybody seriously believe something so totally ridiculous?”: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11985
    American Pravda: Holocaust Denial, by Ron Unz: http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/
    “The Holocaust” Is a Myth That Conceals Our Shame: http://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-holocaust-is-a-myth-that-conceals-our-shame/
    Teaching Holocaust, Don’t know much about history, by Philip Giraldi: http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/teaching-holocaust/
    Babi Yar: The [alleged] Einsatzgruppen ‘Killings’: http://www.unz.com/article/babi-yar/

    – See the “holocaust” scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    – No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  78. @Richard B

    Richard B. I maintain that judaism is terrorism and I openly advocate for the criminalization of judaism and the prosecution of all of its adherents.
    jews are the original fascists. Nazis are not the only ones who will not be arguing or debating anyone about the facts in the truth. Your omissions are glaring enough to blind only mice and scat.

  79. @Miro23

    I think that there’s nothing to do with the present Jewish and Anglo Group I elites. They totally feed off Federal Special Interest Washington and will never willingly give it up.

    Right, the current elites are urban, and the cities are living by taxing other parts of the US and by various means taking resources from the US influenced world. “Tax” doesn’t mean “infinite resources”.
    You remember the 2008 financial panic. The “Wall Street” firms with good lobbying efforts were re-funded; all else was allowed to sink. This was in large part because the urban areas depended upon taxes from the Wall street firms, and the firms with the most lobbyists were considered most likely to resist taxes less than those with fewer lobbyists. This makes a plausible case that the urban areas _almost_ lost vital tax base, and is a plausible illustration of future hazards. For a second illustration, consider the flight of productive citizens from the States in which the more predatory urban areas live. This also reduces tax income.
    Tax income lasts until it doesn’t.

    Direct Democracy, State by State, in an American Confederation, has nothing to offer them (which is the main point), so the US could get a whole new set of local elites – one for each state – and subject to Direct Democratic control. The Confederation of American States could still have a CAS President, but it would be more of a ceremonial role.

    That’s one way to do it, and has some precedent. Like other loose confederations, it would have to defend itself in a world of contending states, and might be changed into something better able to raise the forces needed to do that.

    Interestingly, Direct Democracy would probably produce a Latino elite in California, and a Black elite in Mississippi.

    Which would promptly find themselves in a war with other States. California needs water from the Rockies, and Mississippi would have a population largely unable to support an industrial society. Think Zimbabwe, right here in CONUS. Texas might find itself fighting Mexico again.

    Counterinsurgency

    • Replies: @Miro23
  80. This site is front run and loaded up with jew supremacists who claim they are not White Nationalists even as they commit capital crimes hiding in the shadow of gentiles.
    jew fink it won’t matter what strategy short of flight and self-destruction that you employ. You have roasted the West with hate in the eye of your hurricane lies.
    Now you must feast on your dessert. You filthy and shameless overrated punk of disaster.

  81. @CJ

    “And Americans are certainly racists … uh, working class Americans, that is. Sorry, white working class Americans,”

    Not according to the data.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2018/11/30/white-liberals-dumb-themselves-down-when-they-speak-black-people-new-study-contends/?noredirect=on

  82. Miro23 says:
    @Counterinsurgency

    Interestingly, Direct Democracy would probably produce a Latino elite in California, and a Black elite in Mississippi.

    Which would promptly find themselves in a war with other States. California needs water from the Rockies, and Mississippi would have a population largely unable to support an industrial society. Think Zimbabwe, right here in CONUS. Texas might find itself fighting Mexico again.

    A lot of this race conflict in the US is artificial, and whipped up by the Jewish media as part of their anti-Anglo race war.

    Take away the MSM, (and have states organizing their own affairs) and 1) they’re going to be too busy sorting out their healthcare, schools, taxation etc. to get into conflict with neighbouring states 2) because of differences in resources they’re going to have to cooperate and trade inter-state with a Confederation of States framework helping out.

    As for Mississippi, they could probably look after their own affairs OK at a basic level (they’re not rich). So far Blacks have just been a tool in the anti-Anglo race war, with the MSM promoting the worst aspects of their society. The MSM doesn’t appreciate regular law abiding Black “Uncle Toms”.

    Latinos are in Texas precisely because they want an opportunity for a better life and don’t want to live in Mexico. That suggest, that if they were running Texas, they would do it on the US Anglo model which they see as superior to the Mexican variant.

  83. @Miro23

    Right, that was everybody’s dream 30 years ago. It isn’t now.

    Counterinsurency

  84. Ruprecht says:

    Great little piece of commentary!

    I’m sorry it took me this long to getting around to reading it.

    Thanks.

  85. Vulcan says:
    @Richard B

    USSR 1919 – USSA 2019

    Thank you for that reply.

    I join others in apologising for not being around promptly. But Tucker’s extreme popularity even extends outside his home country, as some of us can attest. It’s as if we can say, “Well there has to be a sane alternative if this fellow draws an audience.”

    It would be tantamount to saying American freedom is a fraud to remove him. I hope they are not fool enough to do that.

    • Agree: Richard B
  86. @Miro23

    Jew, do you have a pic of your nose?
    Do you have any idea how God damn nasally dripping wet with mucal transparency your f’n half digested tripe sounds? jew, you could be dreaming of white nationalism in blackface playing sambo songs with a kazoo in your ass and be none the wiser.
    jew, I don’t just resent your expectations on my behavior; I demand that you be self recognized as an enemy combatant.

  87. TI guy says:

    I spent the last two years and a half warning people about this experiment:

    [MORE]

    https://www.everydayconcerned.net/ti-station

    https://www.targetedjustice.com/

    https://www.targetedevidence.com/

    It is a kind of technology controlled by very questionable persons and it threatens humanity in levels most people can barely understand. Nobody seems to care about this for some reason.

  88. anarchyst says:
    @Richard B

    There’s more…

    A business named “Crowds On Demand” provides “protesters” and “rioters” for any occasion.

    Hired protesters are paid approximately $15.00 per hour while their “handlers” can make much more.

    This is not a joke.

    This business is well-funded by a jewish consortium that includes the “deep state”, George Soros among others.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All C.J. Hopkins Comments via RSS