The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
Blue Dogs Will Roll Over on Cramdown Bill; Will GOP Stand United Against It?
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

GOP leader John Boehner wonders if the Blue Dog Democrats, who’ve been making fledgling noises about reckless spending in Washington, will yield on the unscrupulous borrower Chris Dodd-backed bill to empower bankruptcy judges to meddle in private loan contracts (noted here yesterday).

Of course they will:

“Taxpayer tea parties” have been occurring across America in recent weeks – a phenomenon that reflects the fact that a growing number of Americans are simply fed up with policies in Washington that reward irresponsible behavior and spend tax dollars on bigger, more costly government programs. Later today, the House will vote on legislation that is a textbook example of why responsible taxpayers – and more specifically, homeowners – have had enough.

Disingenuously called the “Helping Families Save their Homes Act,” the measure forces those who have acted responsibly to subsidize scam artists, speculators, and those who knowingly made bad decisions. And it repeals a century-old rule that prohibits what is commonly called “cramdown.” Cramdown allows bankruptcy judges to rewrite the mortgage terms on an individual’s primary residence, and lifting the prohibition is expected to add even more uncertainty to a housing market already in turmoil and will increase mortgage costs at a time when homeowners can afford it least.

It didn’t have to be this way. Last week, Democratic leaders tried to force a vote on the bill, but “Blue Dog” Democrats balked, refusing to support the bill because of the cramdown provisions. However, as is often the case, Democratic leaders made a few cosmetic changes to bill, and the Blue Dogs heeled, proving once again that they are all bark and no bite.

…We’ve seen this all too often from the Blue Dogs. From “pay-as-you-go” budget rules to votes on the alternative minimum tax (AMT), the Blue Dogs have made a habit of momentarily opposing their leadership, only to back down after they secured purely cosmetic changes or promises that “things will be different” the next time the House faces a similar vote.

Only this time, the stakes seem higher than they have been previously. With the economy in recession and Americans’ anxiety rising, taxpayers are tired of subsidizing more Washington spending that we know we cannot afford – and tired of bailing out those who have acted irresponsibly. That’s just what the legislation on the House floor today would do. Are Blue Dogs prepared to face their constituents – including those participating in “taxpayer tea parties” – and explain their change of heart on this bill?

On the flip side, where will all the House Republicans stand? Will they unite and unanimously reject this mortgage entitlement program, as they did with the porkulus bill? Will they show, down to the last man, that the party is willing to stand against the housing-as-a-civil-right agenda?

Ask: 202-224-3121.

(Republished from by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Subprime crisis, Tea Party