The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
Clinton Appointee Strikes Down Hazleton Anti-Illegal Immigration Law
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Update: Send a note of encouragement to Hazelton’s mayor here. And via Redstate, the full, 200-plus-page decision is here (PDF).

hazletonmex.jpg

Downtown Hazleton, Pa.

Just in:

A federal judge on Thursday struck down the city of Hazleton’s tough anti-immigration law, ruling unconstitutional a measure that has been copied around the country.

The city’s Illegal Immigration Relief Act sought to impose fines on landlords who rent to illegal immigrants and deny business permits to companies that give them jobs. Another measure would have required tenants to register with City Hall and pay for a rental permit.

U.S. District Judge James Munley voided the law Thursday based on testimony from a nine-day trial held in March.

The city will almost certainly appeal.

FWIW, Munley is a Clinton appointee.

Hazleton’s Republican mayor pushed for the strict laws last summer after two illegal immigrants were charged in a fatal shooting. Mayor Lou Barletta argued that illegal immigrants brought drugs, crime and gangs to the city of more than 30,000, overwhelming police and schools.

Immigrant groups sued, saying the laws usurp the federal government’s exclusive power to regulate immigration, deprive residents of their constitutional rights to equal protection, and violate state and federal housing law.

In a 206-page opinion, Munley said the act was pre-empted by federal law and would violate due process rights.

“Whatever frustrations … the city of Hazleton may feel about the current state of federal immigration enforcement, the nature of the political system in the United States prohibits the city from enacting ordinances that disrupt a carefully drawn federal statutory scheme,” Munley wrote.

“Even if federal law did not conflict with Hazleton’s measures, the city could not enact an ordinance that violates rights the Constitution guarantees to every person in the United States, whether legal resident or not,” he added.

JURIST covered the trial in the spring. Background here. Hazleton’s lawyer is Kris Kobach, former DOJ official and current University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law professor of law. During trial, Kobach noted:

Mr. Kobach said Congress had done nothing to preclude cities, counties and states from approving their own laws to fight illegal immigrants, so Hazleton’s law is on safe ground. He pointed to a Virginia law that bars illegal immigrants from attending state-owned universities as proof that Hazleton should be free to try to enforce laws consistent with federal immigration policy.

Diggers’ Realm has a big Hazleton archive.

(Republished from MichelleMalkin.com by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Open Borders Lobby