The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 BlogviewMichelle Malkin Archive
Whitewashing Chuckaquiddick
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Well, well, well. The NYTimes has finally, finally seen fit to print a story on the Democrats’ credit report fraud scandal. The story appears on p. 20 in the print edition and online here. Here’s the fair and balanced lead:

National Republicans, who face an uphill battle in their efforts to capture the open United States Senate seat in heavily Democratic Maryland next year, are trying to exploit potential legal problems that Democrats are now suddenly facing in that race.

The article fails to mention former DSCC research director Katie Barge’s previous employment by the left-wing opposition research outfit, Media Matters.

The article fails to mention exactly how Barge and underling Lauren Weiner obtained Lt. Gov. Michael Steele’s credit report–by abusing his Social Security number in order to obtain the report under false premises.

The article fails to mention that Barge and Weiner’s employer, Sen. Charles Schumer, has ironically fashioned himself a champion of privacy and defender against identity theft. See this Newsday article for the angle the Times refused to print.

And the article fails to mention who’s picking up the tab for Barge and Weiner’s legal bills.

The Times. Always more informative for what it leaves out than for what it puts in.

***

Matthew Hoy weighs in:

the article is really a case study on spin — how to provide all the facts, but mislead and obsfucate in order to protect their ideological friends. The story is written as a horse race piece and not a hard news crime/scandal piece. You don’t find out that there is a criminal investigation until the seventh graf. Talk about burying the lede. Frankly, if a first year journalism student turned this into me they’d probably get a D.

Read the whole dissection.

Clay Waters at Newsbusters has a similar verdict: “The piece is at best dutiful, with little juice, from the dull and uninformative headline (“Democrats Are on Defensive In Maryland Senate Race”) on down.”

***

Related: Jay Rosen on the fall of the Times.

***

Previous:

Chuckaquiddick: Look who’s paying the tab

NY Times “looks into” Chuckaquiddick

Chuckaquiddick: Where’s the MSM?

The NYTimes ombudsman is totally worthless

Democrat dumpster diving

A despicable Democrat dirty trick

(Republished from MichelleMalkin.com by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology 
PastClassics
Which superpower is more threatened by its “extractive elites”?
Becker update V1.3.2
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
How America was neoconned into World War IV