The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Tribute to Nitehawk (RIP); Ken Jenkins on Common Fallacies & 9/11 Truth
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Mr. Rho of Revolution.Radio, joins us to talk about Nitehawk, the founder of our network, who passed away Wednesday September 25. Then activist/filmmaker Ken Jenkins comes on to discuss logical fallacies that creep into discussions of 9/11 including: The ad-hominem fallacy, including blaming/demonizing/scapegoating; anchoring; confirmation bias; and more. (For a broader discussion of psychological issues impeding rational consideration of 9/11, see Fran Shure’s “Why Do Good People Become Silent—or Worse—About 9/11?“)

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: 9/11, Conspiracy Theories 
Hide 5 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. onebornfree says: • Website

    “This study shows the complete fraudulence of all of the various existing videos depicting the collapse of WTC7:”

    For more videos covering the 9/11 video fakery revelation see :

    “Onebornfree’s Special Scam Alerts No. 110- Sept. 9th 2019- The September 11th. 2001 “Terrorist Attacks” Scam:”

    Regards, onebornfree

  2. Good interview. The 20th anniversary of 911 in 2 years will be critical. Something has to happen in regard to proper investigation/ grand jury or what ever is best. 2020 election will be critical for this.
    Something has to give.

  3. I don’t think it’s helpful to talk about why people are unreceptive when lots of people are clearly receptive. Put your energy into making your case airtight. The motives of people who oppose you is a boring subject.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  4. @jack daniels

    This interview doesn’t focus on why people aren’t receptive to 9/11 truth, but on impediments to clear and accurate thinking that affect everyone—including 9/11 truth supporters—on all kinds of issues.

  5. Floda says:

    Here is THE CAUSE of 911:

    In 1989 the New York Port Authority (PA) engaged a group of independent Architectural Consultants to take a look at the WTC Towers and give an estimate of the cost of demolition. They were given temporary offices in the building.

    Only a few weeks passed before the Consultants advised the PA Board they had found a catastrophic error was made during the original construction of the buildings. They found the building were riddled with ‘galvanic corrosion. This is an electrochemical process in which one metal corrodes preferentially when it is in electrical contact with another, in the presence of an electrolyte.

    They advised within at most, 10 to 12 years bits would begin falling off the buildings on to the streets below and estimates of demolition costs were (in 1989) $5.6 Billion.

    A few days later the consultants arrived at their offices to find security had taken all their records and files and packed these into boxes. They were paid in full and gently but firmly escorted out of the building. Needless to say they were not to disclose this information to anyone.

    A couple of months later one of the consultants bumped into a PA Board member in a bar while waiting for their respective companions to arrive for dinner. They struck up a conversation during which the consultant asked, ‘what are you guys going to do about the issue we uncovered in the buildings?.

    He replied casually, ‘oh I dunno, maybe we’ll just wait twelve years and then blow the buildings up’

    Welcome to how the real World works. I understand not even one of the consultants remained in New York after 911, all made themselves scarce indeed.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS