The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
"The Evolution of Beauty" with Eric Walberg and Josh Mitteldorf
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Should Darwin’s thesis be rewritten as “the survival of the most gorgeous”? That’s the takeaway from Richard Prum’s The evolution of beauty: How Darwin’s forgotten theory of mate choice shapes the animal world—and us (2017), at least according to Eric Walberg‘s new review. Joining Eric to discuss Prum’s book is anti-aging scientist and evolutionary theorist Josh Mitteldorf.

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Science • Tags: Darwinism, Evolution 
Hide One CommentLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. roonaldo says:

    Please excuse me for commenting without listening to the podcast, since it is time consuming compared to reading a transcript.

    I did a quick internet search on the book and found a critique on which noted the book us beautifully written and a lively read. They faulted the author for using sexual autonomy of female birds to support feminist policies and his “demonizing” of the idea that the creatures use fitness cues when mate-selecting because that evokes eugenics and nazism. They object to him using examples from the animal world to support human social policies. They note various creatures that mate by force, cannabilistic behavior, etc..

    The overall view of creatures evolving into creatures of higher order seems powerfully supported by their physiognomy such as overall appearance and homologous structures, arguing for common descent.

    However, it takes the analytical chemistry of microbiology to properly test the transformative powers, or lack thereof, of natural selection by way of mutation. Now we can finally see and appreciate the mind-bogglingly complex chemical machinery of the cell and understand the immense difficulty of natural selection through mutation to produce the “irreducible complexity” we observe.

    It is normal for scientists to fight tooth and nail against advances that threaten their theories, prestige, funding, and power. Darwinism and neoDarwinism are used to declare the preeminence of everything from capitalism to communism and have spawned innumerable fields of study dedicated to application of these concepts.

    Molecular biology has put neoDarwinism into crisis. Why not interview the immensely qualified Michael Behe? Up-to-date information and analyses may be found at

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS