The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Science Professor Joel Hirschhorn: Is Fauci Responsible for the Majority of US COVID Deaths?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Dr. Joel Hirschhorn, a leading pro-9/11-truth scientist, discusses his recent articles “Can you trust Dr. Anthony Fauci?“, “The Indictment of Dr. Anthony Fauci for his Big Lie,” and “Follow the money: Why hydroxychloroquine may have been denied to COVID-stricken Trump.”

In 2007 Dr. Hirschhorn looked into the controlled demolition of the World Trade Center at my instigation, and concluded that I (and the Architects and Engineers) were right. He is the author of “The 9/11 Truth Manifesto.”

Dr. Joel Hirschhorn is:

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Anthony Fauci, Conspiracy Theories, Coronavirus 
Hide 15 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anon[203] • Disclaimer says:

    Arrest Fauci, Birx, Gates, Sanjay Gupta, the John Hopkins/Bloomberg brain trust now!

  2. anon[672] • Disclaimer says:

    author of nonfiction books:Introduction to Powder Metallurgy
    Prosperity Without Pollution

    So he’s an alchemist? Can you ask him if he’s looking into a way to create gold from wood, so the US can return to the gold standard and dethrone the banking mafia?

    • Replies: @Ragno
  3. Ragno says:
    @anon

    Those are actually two separate, unrelated titles.

  4. Fauci is like a top middle manager. He follows orders. Was Eichman responsible for the holocaust?

    • Agree: JasonT
  5. Bert says:

    Professor Hirschhorn focuses on Fauci’s malfeasance regarding HCQ. Fauci’s central claims are that Random Controlled Trials are the “gold standard” for accepting a particular therapy and that HCQ has not been tested via RCTs. Ignoring the fact that Fauci could have and should have begun RCTs of HCQ in April but did not, RCTs have never been the sole or even the principal method of vetting therapies; this point is made by Dr. Didier Raoult in the linked paper, which is worth reading.
    https://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(20)30643-1/pdf

    Beyond HCQ, there are several other therapies and prophylactics that could and should have been subjected to RCTs last spring: Ivermectin, Vitamin D, zinc, selenium, EGCG, bromhexine, famotidine, folic acid, melatonin, iota-carrageenan, providone iodine (Betadine), nicotine, artemisinin and statins.

    Most of these are available to anyone wishing to implement prophylaxis or prepare for self-directed treatment outside a hospital. There is also a behavioral therapy for self-directed treatment: stay outdoors as much as possible so that one is not reinnoculating oneself from one’s own exhaled and re-inhaled virions.

    That such information must be ferreted out on the internet is a testament to the dysfunction of government on all levels and to the incompetence and cowardice of most physicians. That RCTs on these potential therapies were not initiated in April by Fauci is a crime for which he should stand trial.

    • Agree: mike99588
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  6. I pegged Fauci for what he is the first time he appeared alongside Trump on TV. He’s a typical federal govt employee – a lifelong bureaucrat. Bureaucrats are driven by fear. As a result bureaucrats avoid risk. They seek safety and security. That’s why they work for the govt. It’s also why they don’t understand business – Too risky. Fauci is a frightened little wimp.

    Fauci uses his newfound fame to preach the gospel of fear. This gives him power and makes him feel important. He’s eating that up while he spreads more fear. The media have made him into a little dictator. He and his disciples will destroy the world to save it. I call him Dr Doom.

  7. Anon[131] • Disclaimer says:

    As the head of NIAID, Fauci approved of giving U.S. taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan lab in 2015 to do “gain of function” research on coronaviruses — make them more infectious and deadly to humans — after such research was banned in the United States.

    He has sat on the Leadership Council of Bill Gates’s Decade of Vaccines Collaboration I to create a Global Vaccine Action Plan. Bill Gates wants to vaccinate the whole world. His great passion is population reduction.

    Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., has said that the CDC is a vaccine company more than it is a legitimate agency of the U.S. government. This would be true of all the relevant agencies – NIH, NIAID, CDC, FDA. They are controlled — and receive money from — Bill Gates and Big Pharma.

    The involvement of Bill Gates combined with Fauci giving money to our adversary China to develop a bioweapon that may have been released in the U.S. and around the world on purpose introduces a sinister twist to what would normally be considered business as usual.

    Enter the World Economic Forum and its “Great Reset,” which is using Covid and Climate Change to pave the way to a one-world government run by corporations and their politician lackeys throughout the world.

    The WEF is advocating a technocracy that would eliminate most private ownership, take control of all resources – food, water, energy, etc. – and ration them to the public. An austerity regime would be imposed on wealthy countries with wealth transferred to poorer nations.

    People would have no freedom or rights except insofar as they were given to them by the technocratic elite. People would be chipped, monitored and controlled and would be denied food, water, shelter, medicine, and the right to buy and the right to sell if their “social credit score” fell below a certain level.

    They would be forced out of single family homes and out of the countryside into “smart cities” (human beehives). They would be controlled by 5G, AI, robots, the Internet of Things, nanotechnology and Big Data.

    There would be no more cash, only digital currency. Through vaccines, GMOs, chemicals, etc., they would be slowly sterilized and killed off until there are only about 500 million people in the world serving as slaves for an elite group of, say, one million people.

    The philosophy of Bill Gates and these technocrats and environmentalists is that most people are useless eaters and polluters and need to be gotten rid of.

    • Agree: journey80
    • Replies: @Nancy
  8. Nancy says:
    @Anon

    Ditto ‘Anon’ (131) except you forgot to clarify that the correctly identified end result is the often-reiterated goal of the Talmudists…. total Talmudist control of the goyim (each Talmudist will have 2800 goy ‘slaves’… they truly believe this.)

  9. Bert says:

    Blacks and Hispanics are suffering a great deal of mortality because the health-care establishment will not use HCQ, zinc and Zpack for early treatment to prevent hospitalization and death. Obese, diabetic and elderly people need to be treated as soon as symptoms appear. If you cared about such people in the black community, rather than being a worthless poser, you would have investigated what is available for early treatment. Start with this https://twitter.com/zev_dr and then https://twitter.com/covid19crusher?lang=en. Or you can stay on the liberal plantation and let MawMaw take her chances without even suggesting that she raise her Vitamin D titer.

  10. Bert says:
    @Corvinus

    Find out what a meta-analysis is before you click on the link.

    https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.01.20223958v1

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  11. Corvinus says:
    @Bert

    I am familiar with meta-analysis. But if the research studies they cite has significant methodological flaws, then the conclusions drawn from them would be other than valid.

    For example, one of the studies cited from your link was from Arshad S., Kilgore P., Chaudhry Z.S., Jacobsen G., Wang D.D., Huitsing K. Treatment with hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, and combination in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;97:396–403.

    Here is an analysis of that study.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7409789/

    “We read, with great interest, the results published by Arshad and colleagues concerning the potential association between treatment with hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin and in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 (Arshad et al., 2020). The reported treatment benefit contradicts that reported elsewhere, including a recent study at US Veterans Affairs Hospitals that showed an almost perfectly inverse risk of mortality (HR = 2.61; 95% CI, 1.10–6.10) (Magagnoli et al., 2020). Although Lee et al. provided an excellent commentary on the potential for immortal time bias and selection bias in this work (Lee et al., 2020), the following design and analysis flaws further threaten the validity of the reported findings.”

  12. Bert says:

    Once a hospitalized patient is having a cytokine storm, viral reproduction is no longer the problem and HCQ, as an anti-viral, has no role. HCQ’s benefit is in prophylaxis and early treatment, that is, in dealing with the virus.

    Prophylaxis:
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924857920304350

    Meta-analysis:
    And it is disingenuous of you to say that you understand meta-analysis and then cite a single flawed study to refute the conclusion from meta-analysis that HCQ is beneficial for early treatment. The whole rationale of meta-analysis is to draw a conclusion from many studies to come to a conclusion of what they say in aggregate. The link below shows that it is statistically impossible that HCQ does not have a benefit early on in the infection, given the net results of 134 separate studies worldwide.

    https://hcqmeta.com/

    From the link above:
    •HCQ is effective for COVID-19. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 134 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 2 billion (p = 0.00000000052).
    •Early treatment is most successful, with 100% of studies reporting a positive effect and an estimated reduction of 63% in the effect measured (death, hospitalization, etc.) using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.37 [0.29-0.46].
    •100% of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) for early, PrEP, or PEP treatment report positive effects, the probability of this happening for an ineffective treatment is 0.002.
    •There is evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 88% of prospective studies report positive effects, and only 72% of retrospective studies do.
    Significantly more studies in North America report negative results compared to the rest of the world, p = 0.003.

    The Left in the USA so as to hurt Trump quashed the use of HCQ for early treatment, and so did Big Pharma for financial reasons.

    Listen to Dr. Harvey Risch discuss the evidence:

    I find it odd that you as someone of African descent would ally yourself against a treatment which would help your racial group that is on average more Vitamin D-deficient, more obese, and more often diabetic, and therefore more at risk of death from Covid-19.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  13. Corvinus says:
    @Bert

    “The whole rationale of meta-analysis is to draw a conclusion from many studies to come to a conclusion of what they say in aggregate.”

    Again, if the individual studies contain methodological flaws, and the meta analysis neglects to account for those flaws, then its conclusions rest upon patently unsound data.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS