The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Robert Morningstar on JFK Assassination and ET/Jinn Question
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


My fellow Revolution Radio host Robert Morningstar publishes UFO Digest, makes films, investigates red-pill topics…and has some very weird views of Islam. But he’s definitely barking up the right tree on the JFK assassination. In the first half of this interview he explains what really happened in Dealy Plaza, and how the Zapruder film was altered to generate a “consciously engineered hallucination, an optical illusion. It is the greatest instrument of mass mind control that the world had ever seen until this COVID plandemic.”

In the second half of the interview Robert explains how demonic forces have infiltrated our world, in part by hijacking authentic religious traditions—as happened when false messiah Sabbatai Zevi created Zionism in 1666 c.e.

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History • Tags: Conspiracy Theories, JFK Assassination 
Hide 16 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. This just keeps going from bad to worse. Thanks for proving what a waste of time and resources higher education is though!

    It’s the Wisconsin idea! Tax idea tax us!

    Andrea Iravani

  2. I am not at all sure that “hate” is absent from the scriptures mentioned in the podcast. I suppose this depends on how certain words are translated but often the context affirms i.e. “hate” is appropriate when the surrounding text describes acts which fit.

    Whatever be the case here is a passage from an Ancient Egyptian text:

    “Great is the blessing of god He makes the ignorant become the wise the hater become the lover He makes the small surpass the great, the one at the end be first… He teaches the dumb to speak and opens the ears of the deaf.”
    “Monotheism: The Egyptian roots”, James P. Allen, Biblical Archaeology Review, Jul/Aug 1999

    Those who know the gospels will perhaps be surprised by these words and who would much later echo them.

  3. Anonymous[228] • Disclaimer says:

    Wow. This should be called Dueling Douches, especially when they start talking about The Satanic Verses. The interviewer is certainly an idiot. Then again, so is the guest, but to a much lesser extent.

    When the interviewer starts spouting his own version of the fairytale commonly known as the Bible it approaches unlistenability as a limit. He sucks as an interviewer.

    Never has a podcast so failed to give me even the littlest thing or be helpful in any way.

  4. jimmy1969 says:

    JFK conspiracy theorists are all quacks, charlatans, mountebanks, snake oil salesmen and overall nut cases. The minute I hear the word JFK assassination theory I immediately thing of the 3 stooges or Laurel and Hardy. The late great Prosecutor who prosecuted the Mansion family wrote an exhaustive book on the single lone gunman theory. I think it was over 1400 pages. Vincent Bugliosi was a solid respected reliable man. He debunked every nut case out there and exposed them all as frauds.

    • Replies: @TGD
    , @flashlight joe
    , @dimples
  5. sinewave says:

    A “sabot”, as an assassin might use, is a covering that carries the projectile through the barrel of the gun with out leaving identifying marks on the projectile.The sabot is meant to separate from the projectile after leaving the muzzle. Has nothing to do with the material the projectile is made of.

  6. TGD says:
    @jimmy1969

    If the so-called conspiracy theories are just bunko, why does the deep state refuse to release the secret files from the Warren Commission?

    • Replies: @Alfa158
  7. bayviking says:

    Morningstar offers an explanation of five shots striking JFK. We could easily verify this theory by examining the remains of JFK’s body, which is not an unusual practice in murder cases. In this case we are told it would not be polite to do this to the Kennedy family. It would be important to also see the “undoctored” Zapruder film, But instead Morningstar launches into a personal version of the Bible and Koran and wacky personal testimony which strongly suggests he lives in an imaginary world of his own creation. No reason to take Morningstar seriously when clear thinking people like Richard Dawkins and Bertrand Russell are readily available.

    We still don’t know the full story of the JFK assassination. Instead, while pretending we live in a transparent Democracy, where people weigh facts and make rational decisions, everything is classified.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  8. Alfa158 says:
    @TGD

    Because it’s logically impossible. If they did release the secret files, everyone would insist those aren’t the real secret files.
    That’s how non-falsifiable theories work. Any files released would simply lead to conspiracy theories that the files are fake and the real secret files are still being held back.

    • Replies: @anon
  9. @jimmy1969

    The supposed assassin was assassinated, up close and personal, while in police custody, by a Jew with ties to the Mafia. His name was Jack Rubenstein, aka Jack Ruby.

    What part of mob hit don’t you understand?

    Dead men tell no tales.

    • Thanks: FLgeezer
  10. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alfa158

    That said…

    release ’em. Let’s see.

  11. @bayviking

    If you really think we can easily verify the number of shots by examining JFK’s body, you need to read Best Evidence by David Lifton.

    • Replies: @bayviking
  12. dimples says:
    @jimmy1969

    I’ve always felt the Zapruder film had been altered because of the discrepancy between the head shot as shown in the film and what the doctors in the hospital saw. The film shows the entire right side of JFK’s head split open, while more than a dozen IIRC doctors testified that the only damage to JFK’s head was at the right rear. I assume that a tangential shot from the grassy knoll hit Kennedy behind the right ear. There was no entry wound from the front.

    The HSCA in 1977 moved the autopsy entry wound from the lower right rear to the top of the head with the exit being a wound similar to the Zapruder film. This harmonized the official wounds consistent with being caused by shots from the TSBD with the Zapruder film.

    Follow this URL or not for more stuff on the Zapruder film alteration.

    http://www.johncostella.com/jfk/

    • Replies: @Sparkon
    , @Jimmy1969
  13. Sparkon says:
    @dimples

    There was no entry wound from the front.

    Wrong. The shot that pierced the windshield of his limousine and hit Pres. Kennedy in the throat was obviously fired from the front and could not have been fired from any other location.

    In the press conference held at Parkland one hour after Pres. Kennedy was declared dead, attending ER physician Dr. Malcom Perry unambiguously described the throat wound as a wound of entry.

    The Zapruder film has had frames removed, most likely to obscure, cover-up, and remove all signs of a hit from the front. Unfortunately for the plotters, they were unable to remove all the frames where Pres. Kennedy clutches at his throat after being shot there.

    Reconstruction of the ballistics of the throat shot by lining it up with the hole in the windshield indicates the throat shot was probably fired from the terminal annex parking lot above and beyond the south grassy knoll area, or directly opposite and across the streets from the more famous north grassy knoll, where another team of assassins behind the stockade fence was sighted by witnesses.

    The autopsy performed by Dr. Humes at Bethesda was witnessed by two FBI agents who wrote in their report that Dr. Humes discovered the back wound was shallow, and did not have an exit. He could feel the end of the wound with his fingertip and described it as having no exit. No bullet was found in that back wound. Indeed, the FBI report notes that the autopsy doctors were perplexed in that a full-body X-ray of the deceased JFK showed no intact bullets anywhere in his body.

    The bullets were probably removed from JFK’s corpse either during the flight from Dallas to Andrews AFB, or more likely, after its arrival at Andrews AFB and before the official autopsy began at 8 pm.

  14. bayviking says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    You will not see any misses. But the direction of every hit could be easily determined. Meanwhile I’ll look into your reading recommendation. “Unspeakable” and “Legacy of Secrecy” were good reds.

  15. Jimmy1969 says:
    @dimples

    Read the Bugliosi book big guy.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS