First half hour: Richard Gage, AIA, and civil engineer Roland Angle discuss the newly-issued University of Alaska report showing that the only possible explanation for the observed collapse of WTC-7 on 9/11 is the simultaneous failure of every column in the building—in other words, a controlled demolition. Just like your lying eyes already told you, and your government strenuously and guiltily denied.
Please take five minutes and email this announcement to your members of Congress and to share it widely via email and social media.
- The full announcement for you to read and share is here.
- Information for your U.S. Representative is here.
- Information for your U.S. Senators is here.
- Please copy [email protected] so that we can tally numbers.
Second half hour: Wayne Coste, another 9/11-savvy engineer, has just published “Why Were the WTC Twin Towers Destroyed That Way:
Explaining the Mechanism of Their Destruction on 9/11.” He writes: “For much of the buildings’ destruction, the observations show a highly energetic propelling force that was activated floor-by-floor with the origin of this force centered at the buildings’ core / elevator shafts and radiating outward in the north-south-east and west directions. This observed propelling force is hypothesized to be based on a nano-thermite material that was ‘tuned’ to be more like a rocket fuel than either an explosive or an incendiary. This type of material would be more explosive than a propellant and not as explosive as ‘molecular’ or high explosives.” According to Coste’s hypothesis, panels made of propellant (what might be called a “low explosive”) would have been installed in the elevator shafts and detonated in a precisely timed sequence to give us the observed “top-down” demolition.