The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Richard Cook on Neocons & Ukraine; Francis Boyle on Resisting Medical Tyranny
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Richard Cook, the Challenger disaster whistleblower, asks: “Who are the Neocons and what are they trying to do with respect to the Ukraine war? Why are they trying to use the US, UK, and NATO/EU to destroy Russia? How are Biden, Johnson, Scholz, van der Leyen etc. their instruments? Is Zionism part of it? These questions are not being addressed by most commentators. Btw, your essay on Leo Strauss, I thought, was spot-on. The hybrid war against Russia, and against both Christianity and Islam, was right out of that playbook.”

Next 30 minutes: International Law professor Francis Boyle discusses his new book Resisting Medical Tyranny: Why the COVID-19 Mandates Are Criminal. Boyle: “This book proves that the COVID vaccines and their related mandates violate the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation that the United States government used to prosecute, convict, and execute Nazi doctors at Nuremberg. The COVID vaccines and their related mandates are a Nuremberg Crime against Humanity under international criminal law.”

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 9 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anon[236] • Disclaimer says:

    I’ve got Boyle to thank as the guy who first warned me of the clot shots. Right off the bat he pointed out the UNC frankengerm origins and the smoking guns of banned bio weapons. That made it clear that the other shoe would drop: vaccine profiteering. It was AMERITHRAX/Biothrax all over again. A quick look and you find the nutty professors of Emergent, glowies you wouldn’t trust to sell you fill dirt, and swarms of spooks from the Ebola, H1N1, and AIDS catastrophes.

    Boyle is an eminent man. Maybe I owe him my life.

  2. peterAUS says:

    From Amazon review:

    …He provides key principles that can be used by individuals around the world, armed with good lawyers, in fighting back….

    Designed to fail.

    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  3. IreneAthena says: • Website
    @peterAUS

    I’m curious why you think so. Are you dismissing the possibility that any legal action against the C19 criminals is designed (by whom? prosecuting attorneys?) to fail?

    I just finished writing a comment (on a more recent Kevin Barrett article, the “Jan6/elephant in the room” one) about two more groups of lawyers who are pursing legal action (whether independent of each other and Boyle, I don’t know.)

    I know, I know, and agree: the conglomeration of the c19 criminals and the financial criminals with the globalists and their planned social-credit-system-managed-digitized-economy, it all seems too big for mere mortals to be able to oppose…

    …BUT, united legal action could be another significant stepping stone towards resistance. I also think about what Vernon Cole says, about the part of the resistance being other than “merely mortal.”

  4. peterAUS says:

    I’m curious why you think so. Are you dismissing the possibility that any legal action against the C19 criminals is designed (by whom? prosecuting attorneys?) to fail?

    Of course not.
    A very rich person, with an access to a very competent team of lawyers could take a successful legal action against the C19 criminals. Say…he/she can get an exemption from wearing a mask. Or similar.
    Using legal/law approach to challenge the Scamdemic in general will fail.

    I just finished writing a comment (on a more recent Kevin Barrett article, the “Jan6/elephant in the room” one) about two more groups of lawyers who are pursing legal action (whether independent of each other and Boyle, I don’t know.)

    O.K.

    I know, I know, and agree: the conglomeration of the c19 criminals and the financial criminals with the globalists and their planned social-credit-system-managed-digitized-economy, it all seems too big for mere mortals to be able to oppose…

    Correct.
    For now.

    …BUT, united legal action could be another significant stepping stone towards resistance. I also think about what Vernon Cole says, about the part of the resistance being other than “merely mortal.”

    Define “united”. THAT is the problem.
    IF you can get, say, where I live, 1 000 000 uniting behind such an action, yes, I am sure that the local administrators will buckle.
    Or a billionaire, on Musk level, to support those small groups you mentioned.

    What people like you appear not to be understanding is that difference between good ideas and having them implemented on the ground. How the power, in practice, really works.

    Or…you appear to have misplaced faith in a common person.

    Example from here: before elections it appeared that third of the populace had really enough with all that Clovid nonsense. The ONLY party which championed that attitude got zero…I repeat..ZERO seats in the parliament. What does it tell you?

    I did point to you that material some time ago; I really suggest at least skimming through it. Could clarify some delusions and, consequently, suggest a better approach to the problem.

    At this stage all we can do is to try to minimize a damage on a personal/family/close circle of people we care for level. Nothing more.
    If…IF…something happens in the future then we could try to do more. That “something”, again, is rather well explained by Sam Francis in his writings about Middle American Radicals. It applies to anywhere within the West, IMHO.

    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  5. JWalters says:

    Very glad of Mr. Cook’s focus on the neocons. They have been the drivers of disastrous American policies, and aimed to benefit a foreign country. Reporters and analysts are reluctant to talk honestly about Jews or even Israelis, but feel somewhat safer talking about neocons. So by all means, let’s get that discussion rolling by focusing on neocons.

    Also highly relevant here is Laurent Guyenot’s analysis of the Biblical roots, the fundamental character of the neocons’ goals and deceptive techniques. In this incisive interview he discusses key points from his book From Yahwe to Zion.
    The Cult of Yahweh Know More News LIVE feat Laurent Guyenot

    The interview makes clear that the US and Europe must throw off these certifiably evil gangsters, who so readily sacrifice the people of America and Europe.

    The book itself (translated into English by Kevin Barrett) is available here.
    From Yahweh to Zion
    https://archive.org/details/from-yahweh-to-zion-laurent-guyenot

    And my thanks also to Dr. Boyle for his work on justice for the Covid & vaccine criminals. Another mass crime by the same gang.

  6. IreneAthena says: • Website
    @peterAUS

    Define “united”. THAT is the problem.

    Sure is!

    “United” as defined by the odious World-EF/HO-etc.org’s means “uniform.” Everybody gives/gets/does/BECOMES what the PTP decides and ordains they will give/get/do/become. Whatever needs to be done to achieve a uniform population (of “Untermensch”) will be done, that all will go according to the plans of the Enlightened Ubermensch in Central Planning, who know what’s best for the rest of humanity.

    The PROBLEM (or one of them, hoo boy, we have many, many problems) is, various people trying to create a “united” resistance to TPTB are using the same definition of “united” which TPTB use: “uniform.” Everybody must believe/perceive/prioritize & address problems the way this thinker (or this one, or that one) believes/perceives/prioritizes & addresses problems. Results are: wasted energy/frustration/potential allies alienated.

    This raises the question: so how can the “uniform” definition of “united” work so well for TPTB? Answer: They have no compunctions about ruthlessly eliminating opposition in the ranks. This raises another question: Is this really the model we want to emulate? Which touches on an element of resistance strategy (I think) you’ve mentioned: wait for a large enough fault line to develop within the TPTB, then take advantage of the fissure. But in what kind of formation, with what kind organization, using which definition of “united?”

    I march to the beat of a different drum. Yet I have faith (no, not total faith in a single human leader!) that others marching to the beat of yet another different drum can…are… working toward a humanity that is “united” along the lines of one model, a model in polar opposition to that of TPTB’s: “ …. the whole body being fitted and held together by what EVERY JOINT supplies, according to the proper working of each INDIVIDUAL PART, which makes the body grow, building itself up in love.”

    So yes, at the moment, job-one is looking after the people we care about. Birds of a feather will flock together. I as a sparrow neither belong with the eagles nor do I have any business telling them how or where to fly or feed their young.

    But when the eagles and the sparrows see an opportunity to free themselves from a common enemy: It’s “Alfred Hitchcock” time.

    You’re probably tired of reading, and I’m tired of writing.

    • Replies: @peterAUS
  7. peterAUS says:
    @IreneAthena

    …This raises another question: Is this really the model we want to emulate?..

    Yes.

    …what kind of formation, with what kind organization, using which definition of “united?”…

    Sinn Fein would be a good example.

    …others marching to the beat of yet another different drum can…are… working toward a humanity …

    Free will. Good luck.

    …at the moment, job-one is looking after the people we care about…

    Yep.

    ..You’re probably tired of reading…

    Not really. We fundamentally disagree, but, at least we try to be civil and put some practical, coherent, ideas online. Sorely lacking in this online pub, and getting worse.

  8. Rush says:

    The podcast provides some nuggets of information from Mr Cook and Mr Barrett, such as Zelensky’s speech to the US Congress being authored by Washington lobbyists. However I don’t know why they add extraneous material to buttress the points made which are at best superfluous but which require further proof if not to undermine the case. Keep the premises as simple as possible. So for example bringing in Mossad as behind JFK and 9/11 as an Israeli false flag operation detracts from the credibility of the points made concerning neocon meddling in Ukraine.

  9. Good show. Just wondering though:

    Astonishing how many time the NAZI /Nuremberg terms were flung around in this interview…and the obligatory “Lebensraum”- spiel here and there…indeed an evergreen and never gets old it seems…?

    Sometimes i really wonder if people constantly throwing them around ever take a look at themselves while/ why they do it or is it maybe the ultimate meme infact always to employ when one exactly does not want to do that, but enjoy a nice little finger-pointing /”splinter in the eye of the other”-session..?

    Boyle:
    “This book proves that the COVID vaccines and their related mandates violate the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation that the United States government used to prosecute, convict, and execute Nazi doctors at Nuremberg.”

    A) The glorious Nuremberg codes, written, established while :

    1.British/Americans were/and -as recent history shown -have continued ever since- systematically torturing (here german) pows and civilians-
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223831/How-Britain-tortured-Nazi-PoWs-The-horrifying-interrogation-methods-belie-proud-boast-fought-clean-war.html

    2: The US had done -and was freely continuing of course-the same experiments
    https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/ugly-past-u-s-human-experiments-uncovered-flna1c9465329

    B) The condemnable idea of gaining/annexing “Lebensraum”-
    Isnt it rather amusing/paradoxical that when looking at the greater picture this accusation is coming mostly from:

    1.-America whose entire country/history is the planets largest incarnation/embodiment of exactly that “barbaric “Eroberung von Lebensraum (here in the West)” principal .
    And after just years before in addition to that having annexed/invaded Cuba, Panama, Hawaii, Nicaragua, Phillipines, Puerto Rico….and well, imperialistic policies ever since ww2 it seems?

    2. England, the world greatest colonial power, whichs british empire had annexed close to a quarter of the whole globe, responsible for “Eroberung” of “Lebensraum”-territories of NZ, AUS, US, CA…….

    3. Russia that had during/before WW2 just annexed (half, later whole of)Polen, invaded Bessarabia,Belarus, Ukraine, Romania, Lettland, Estonia, Lithuania and partly Finland and in the East Mongolia, Georgia….and -at least according to the Suvorov-hypothesis- was preparing an offensive to overrun the war-weakened west when Barbarossa started (first) and took over whole eastern europe later.

    4. Well, lets just say there is a certain small country in the Middle East that seems to have employd exactly that ghastly (when others do/epress to do it) policy and -as the Us- whichs state is solely founded on it..?

    Is this not an infact awe-inspiring show of hypocrisy?

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS