The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Reed Sainsbury: Ye Is Right, and Then Some
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Reed Sainsbury, author of Exposing the Lies of History: Deprogramming 101 takes up where Ye leaves off. If the ADL ever reviews Sainsbury’s book they’ll probably call it “an exhaustive, profusely-illustrated compendium of anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.” What they won’t tell you is that some of them are true, others partly true, still others possibly true—and that the best way to sort out what’s true and what isn’t is to have a free and open discussion.

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: ADL, Anti-Semitism, Jews, Kanye West 
Hide 33 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. G anzi says:

    Two Words Kevin
    Red China

  2. JWalters says:

    Thanks for the thoughtful discussion. Which let to some spin-off thoughts:

    Suppose your doctor said, “There’s a 30% probability you have a parasitic infection that could seriously damage your central nervous system and immune system. I recommend we run some additional tests and examine this situation thoroughly.” Would you not agree a more detailed examination would be a sound course to take?

    Now suppose there were substantial credible evidence that America had been taken over by a stealth enemy,
    (1) who controlled our banking system and money supply, and had the capacity to cause financial crises and profit from them,
    (2) who controlled our mainstream media, and had the capacity to block important information from reaching the public, and the capacity to insert false information (“disinformation”) into the mainstream news, thus presenting the public with a fictitious view of reality,
    (3) who controlled our mainstream politicians of both parties, and had the capacity to pass all sorts of laws and initiate military conflicts for their benefit.

    Would it not be common sense then to launch a serious investigation into that evidence and that possibility?

    The evidence is substantial that America has been taken over by a banking mafia. The evidence is also substantial that this mafia operates according to principles from the Jewish Talmud, in particular, (1) the principle that God intends for Jews to rule the world from Jerusalem, and (2) that non-Jews are merely disposable animals.

    Such a mafia combined with these two principles would account for many odd aspects of our current world.
    (1) The Israeli treatment of Palestinians as disposable animals.
    (2) The absence of reporting on Israel’s ethnic cleansing crimes by the mainstream media.
    (3) The slavish pandering for Israeli money by American politicians.
    (4) The relentless efforts to rule the world by “American” politicians, regardless of cost.
    (5) The “American” treatment of Ukrainians like Palestinians, as disposable animals.
    (6) The evidentiary links between such a mafia and the JFK and RFK assassinations, and the 9/11 attack.

    And much, much more.

    Such an investigation would reveal, at the very least, where many of our problems are coming from. And if it finds there is such a mafia, then it will also reveal what must be done to eliminate that parasite and substantially heal our society.

  3. Y claims X controls Hollywood, the media, government, corporations, and the banks.

    X proceeds to destroy Y’s career as an entertainer. X enlists the media, politicians, and business executives in a campaign to discredit Y for hate speech. X pressures Y’s bank to stop doing business with Y.

    No one ever breathes a word of X’s disproportionate influence again.

    See? I told you everything Y spouted was just a pack of anti-X canards.

    • Agree: Iris
    • Replies: @JWalters
  4. The Israeli MOSSAD was behind the attacks of September 11th. And, what makes it all the more lacking in chivalry, is the motive: to distract attention from Israel’s role in the global sex traffic. Jewish gangsters are smuggling women to Israel to be used as sex slaves there!

  5. @JWalters

    Thank you JW. The cold-blooded savagery of JFK’s assassination is the clear warning signal for anyone who crosses the Talmudic mafia. Peter Dale Scott wrote an article for Global Research: which connects many of the dots you mention but sadly without the much needed investigation of the Jewish mafia.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
    • Replies: @JWalters
  6. • Thanks: JWalters
    • Replies: @profnasty
    , @Wokechoke
  7. profnasty says:
    @Priss Factor

    ‘Israeli journalists’ is redundant.
    All journalists are Israeli journalists.
    (At least here in the good ol US&A.)

  8. profnasty says:

    Kevin. To define terms as per the propaganda of the criminal is not wise. I’m referring to your use of the definition of communism as told by Marx in his Manifesto.
    Why not use real unfettered language to describe? For all intents and purposes Communism is a Jew Dictatorship. Capitalism is also a Jew Dictatorship.
    (In our times.)
    This is perhaps an over simplification, which isn’t in your DNA, but it’s true.
    I’m a socialist because the real answer is always somewhere in between.

    • Replies: @Chris in Cackalacky
  9. @profnasty

    Kevin is extremely naive. Marxist theory has been the bible for academic snobs and Kevin has fallen for it. He cannot conceive that the entirety of Communism is a racket for Jewish banker control. He actually believes communism is a peasant and proletarian revolt against the factory owning class. He cannot recognize communism as a Jewish strategy to use the grievances of the working people to destroy their national leadership class and impose an international Jewish ruling class.

  10. JWalters says:
    @Beautiful Evidence

    Thanks for the link to the Peter Dale Scott article. The opening quote from Senator Frank Church is ominous. (It’s probably no coincidence that Frank Church was knocked out of the Senate in his next race.)

    It seems to me we’ve had a lengthy phase in which many people have assembled a lot of information and made solid cases against the Jewish mafia on numerous fronts. The emphasis has been on building unassailable legal cases, and that monumental work has been invaluable and essential.

    But now we can switch to a new phase, illustrated by the parallel with the parasitic infection. We only need to show there is sufficient evidence of a significant danger in order to justify a thorough investigation. In this framework, with this criteria, we no longer need a conclusive, courtroom-style case to justify serious public attention to the topic. (The minimal evidence used to justify severe COVID policies demonstrates this.)

    The very solid cases that have been assembled provide more than enough evidence to justify a serious examination of this potentially extremely serious danger.

    For new Unz Review readers, quite a bit of research on the Jewish mafia has been gathered into a fairly compact form (with a lot of links) at War Profiteer Story

  11. JWalters says:

    Logic 101, Alice in Wonderland version.

  12. I must say… I don’t follow Sainsbury’s father’s logic. He served in the Korean War and witnessed all the carnage and grew a conscience. So, he became a Nazi sympathizer even though Nazis did horrible things in WWII?

    • Replies: @Petermx
  13. America’s so-called “leaders” desires to continue sucking air have led to their remaining silent on what they must know to be the obvious disgusting truth about the events of September 11, 2001 (controlled demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7, the missile which hit the Pentagon while arguably the most expensive sophisticated surveillance system on Earth experienced TOTAL malfunction, NIST’s non-investigation into explosives, etc.).

    These “leaders” include George W. Bush, Barack Obama. Donald Trump and Joseph Biden, along with pre-9/11 presidents Carter and Clinton..The presidents are well aware of what comes to those who threaten the so-called “status quo”: Such people are brutally murdered via assassination as was the case with President John F. Kennedy, spiritual leader Martin Luther King jr., Robert F. Kennedy, Malcolm X and many others across time around the Earth whose stances represented hurdles/roadblocks for the power elite..

    The 3-years long and ongoing COVID-19 crime spree falls into the same precise obvious disgusting truth category as 9/11, where the compiled evidence of mass murder mRNA injection crimes has grown to the size of a Mount Everest. Might America’s “leaders” discover the spiritual power within themselves to overcome their paralyzing fear of death and manifest true justice on Earth respective of 9/11 and COVID-19?

    Future generations on Earth will live with the consequences (hugely negative or hugely positive) of how that question becomes answered via continued inaction – or righteous actions.

  14. I enjoyed the discussion up to the point where you mention Ron Unz quoting Zellicoe about the Rothschilds and a peace plan in the same sentence. Seriously?

  15. @JWalters

    I’m being facetious in that concluding sentence.

  16. @Chris in Cackalacky

    I don’t think either communism or capitalism are just “Jewish rackets for bankster control.” Rather, the “big Jews” (like anybody else seeking wealth and power) use whatever is there and try to turn it to their advantage.

    • Replies: @Chris in Cackalacky
  17. @JWalters

    “My favourite character in Wilson’s The Insect Societies is Monomorium santschii. This species, over evolutionary time, has lost its worker caste altogether. The host workers do everything for their parasites, even the most terrible task of all. At the behest of the invading parasite queen, they actually perform the deed of murdering their own mother. The usurper doesn’t need to use her jaws. She uses mind-control. How she does it is a mystery; she probably employs a chemical, for ant nervous systems-are generally highly attuned to them. If her weapon is indeed chemical, then it is as insidious a drug as any known to science. For think what it accomplishes. It floods the brain of the worker ant, grabs the reins of her muscles, woos her from deeply ingrained duties and turns her against her own mother. For ants, matricide is an act of special genetic madness and formidable indeed must be the drug that drives them to it. In the world of the extended phenotype, ask not how an animal’s behaviour benefits its genes; ask instead whose genes it is benefiting.”

    Selfish Gene, p. 252 (Dawkins is here referring to the founder of sociobiology, Edward Wilson. I’m referring to something else!):

  18. anon[307] • Disclaimer says:

    obviously the idea of the incarnation is ridiculous and retarded. the muslims are right about that. the jews too.


    anything less is IDOLATRY / SHIRK.


    kevin is a scholar. i won’t try to out-scholar him, but…

    protestants have ruined everything.

    • Replies: @Anpn
  19. @Kevin Barrett

    Your theory is based on intentional misdirection baked into the Marxist cake. Communism is Judaism in disguise. When you have a billion dollars and all the toys you ever wanted, what is your next acquisition as a Jewish magnate? Making the rabbis happy. And the rabbis want world power in Jewish hands. That is where communism comes in. When a nation is under communist yoke, its citizens are entirely dependent on the state which Jews control. . Kevin, you were one of the first to speak out on 9-11 Truth. Didn’t you learn anything? Do you think the world conspiracy begins and ends with 9-11? I call you naive because I regularly hear you accepting mainstream lies as truth? You need to understand everything you have been taught about history and economic theory are lies.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  20. anon[411] • Disclaimer says:

    thinking some more…

    1. the sufis are simply superior to the christian mystics…except for eckhart…and (post-christian) heidegger.

    2. my understanding is sufism is just ersatz vedanta. (so you’d be super impressed if you didn’t know vedanta.)

    did ibn arabi go beyond …

    i don’t think so.

    so i can STILL say:

    all the major religions are like the blind men and the elephant (including jainism and its doctrine of anekantavada) …

    … true but not the whole truth ….

    but they can all be reduced to TWO.



  21. Anpn says:

    Kevin Barrett a scholar??


    “Kevin Barrett” is a synonym for Cognitive dissonance.

  22. Petermx says:
    @Priss Factor

    Maybe it’s not Sainsbury’s father who has the problem, but you. You sound like you have “Nazis on the brain” disease.

  23. @Chris in Cackalacky

    What are the best-documented and most important historical examples of Jewish magnates “making the rabbis happy”? I’m trying to think of some and coming up blank.

    • Replies: @Chris in Cackalacky
  24. @Kevin Barrett

    One example is Jacob Schiff of Kuhn Loeb bringing Leon Trotsky to NYC, training him in principles of Freemasonry and sending him back to Russia with money to win the revolution. And there are numerous quotations from rabbis claiming both communism and Freemasonry are Jewish.

  25. @Chris in Cackalacky

    What’s the evidence that Schiff bankrolled Trotsky to make any specific rabbis happy? Schiff and Trotsky were atheists whose ethnic revenge against the czar and Christian Russia had nothing to do with pleasing rabbis, any more than Theodore Herzl’s atheistic Zionism did.

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  26. profnasty says:

    Dr.Barrett, nah.
    According to Buchanan Deutschland was surprised to find Stalin was prepared to roll on Europe.
    Lebensraum was the answer to London’s starvation blockade after War I.
    Or so they say.

  27. Thought projects its own opposite. That is, it has a mechanical and electro-chemical properties. Since the 1960s, we’ve seen the anti-Jewish animus of the masses, so commonplace during the ‘1920s, -30s, -40s & -50s, evolve into strongly pro-Jewish and, by extension, pro-Israel attitudes. But now it seems a critical mass has been reached with all of the endless knee falls in the direction of ubiquitous Jewish power & influence. There’s a reaction building, the law of physics is asserting itself. Philo-Semitism, it appears, is dredging up its long-suppressed opposite. My sense is when that dam breaks, it’ll be hard, if not impossible, to return to the old pretend civility, to restore the former status quo.

  28. @Chris in Cackalacky

    Kevin MacDonald is a retired teacher from Long Beach State. He discovered the gimmick of anti-semitism to get the school to pay him for not working. Now, he sucks on the teat of the taxpayer as a retiree.

    This character also makes easy money writing for anti-semites. A depraved and viciously greedy fake. Followers of this intellectual charlatan are as pathetic as fans of the Jonas Brothers.

  29. @Chris in Cackalacky

    > Jacob Schiff of Kuhn Loeb bringing Leon Trotsky to NYC, training him in principles of Freemasonry

    That’s silly. Trotsky was never a Freemason. His position on Freemasonry is as stated:

    Freemasonry is an unofficial but extremely important component part of the bourgeois regime. Outwardly non-political, like the Church, it is substantially as counter-revolutionary as the Church. To the acute forms of class antagonisms it opposes mystical, sentimental and moral symbols, which it clothes in a masquerade of ritualism after the manner of the Church. In its origin an inefficient petit bourgeois antidote to the class struggle which rends mankind, Freemasonry has become in its turn, like all movements and organizations of that character, a valuable weapon of the class struggle in the hands of the ruling class against the dispossessed.

    Trotsky’s presence in New York was all about antiwar activism. He spent his few months there telling audiences that the First World War was an inter-imperialist war of reaction and that US workers should not wish to join.

    Basing itself upon the Russian émigré journals produced in New York, this article reports the full range of Trotsky’s journalism of January to March 1917. It shows, for example, how Trotsky … attempted to encourage others to keep America out of the war.

    Although there exists absolutely no direct evidence of Jacob Schiff having ever had any contacts with Trotsky, one can at least make a plausible speculation that Schiff may have sponsored Trotsky as an antiwar speaker. Until the March revolution Schiff had been opposed to US entry into World War I. So, it is plausible that Schiff may have funded Trotsky’s stay in New York. Or maybe there was someone else opposed to US interventionism who did so.

    > sending him back to Russia with money to win the revolution.

    That is utterly ridiculous. At the time Trotsky was going back to Russia in 1917, he was known as a vitriolic opponent of Lenin’s. The later involvement of Trotsky in the revolution of November only came after he and Lenin had decided in July to mend their fences and form an alliance. Nobody in spring 1917 would have had any way of knowing that this was going to come about. It was the Russian foreign minister, Pavel Milyukov, who requested that the British allow Trotsky to pass through Canada:

    Amherst’s most difficult prisoner was fast becoming an international incident, and after only one month in Nova Scotia, the British ordered Trotsky freed after receiving an official request from Pavel Milyukov, the foreign minister of Russia’s democratically minded Provisional Government.

    Milyukov would have made this request at a time when there was no reason to view Trotsky and Lenin as anything other than bitter political rivals. If Schiff had ever had any connection with sponsoring Trotsky as an antiwar speaker for 3 months in New York, then he would have viewed Trotsky the same way. Not as an ally of Lenin who was about to lead the Bolsheviks, but as free-floating maverick who had argued for his own brand of Marxism but had no major organizational connections.

  30. @Kevin Barrett

    More to the point is that once the Czar was overthrown, Schiff supported the Provisional Government of Kerensky. To the extent that Schiff may hypothetically have “bankrolled” Trotsky for a limited time it would have been when Trotsky acted as an antiwar speaker in New York from January to March 1917. Schiff never bankrolled any opponents of Kerensky’s government, though he did attempt to bankroll the Right-wing Whites in the Russian Civil War. The Whites never had enough popular support among Russians to be able to win the kind of political outcome which they sought.

    Schiff welcomed the overthrow of the Tsarist government and subscribed to Russian war loans in 1917. He and his partners were less enthused when a radical Bolshevik government took power in Russia at the end of that year, and refused to provide any further financing. He supported Allied intervention in Russia, and was closely associated with anti-Bolshevik Russian elements in the United States.

  31. Kevin- Interesting conversation, thanks for that.

    If I may I would like to ask about your point of Hitlers (paraphrasing)”nasty anti slavic attitude and racist stealing /exploitation of Lebensraum in the East” as alleged quotes in “MeinKampf” and acted out later.

    1. Which quotes are you exactly refering to in that book ?

    2. Would you agree that firstly,
    when taking agreater overview, it is somewhat strange that – as seems surprisingly often the case in WW2 Germany-topics- we are talking here about what one country`s leader SAID/WROTE which is combed through and interpreted in exorbiant detail and while that of course could be regarded as important,
    a) how comes surprisingly none of all the other contries leaders writings is usually studied equally critically and
    b) judicially seen in a fair court noone would ever be judged guilty because of words spoken, especially if not giving any chance to defend himself. Which seems unfortunately the case, since interestingly I so far have ever only heard you mention/quote what the indicting parties said, not one quote what the accused actually replied, explained ?

    3. Would you agree that it can appear as somewhat perplexing to hear condemnation as to the immorality and barbarism of the idea/intent of gaining/governing more “Lebensraum” coming from people from America given that they launch this accusation while actually sitting exactly on a chair in/on a certain land and whole continent that their ancestors stole by the precise politics they so condemn another countries leader for now?
    And not only that of course, even after having conquered/established the US f.ex. during the same era as Hitler lived even expanded that very same condemnable “Lebensraum”-exploitation more imperialistically further to invasions of Cuba, The Phillipines, Puerto Rico, Hawai etc….

    (Same of course applying to England, France and the Soviet Union, did not all those powers before, during and after the war employ that exact same imperialistic “living space” policy, the former 2 being anyways the worlds greatest colonial powers at the time, plus Englands Ireland and Scotland policies and France actually at the very time of “Mein Kampf”s publishing having just occupied “Lebensraum” in Germanys Alsace and the Rhineland, as the Soviet Union gobbled up Mongolia, Bulgaria, Rumania, Latvia, Estonia and of course whole eastern Europe after the war…..)

    You dont see this as double standard maybe ?

    3. It is certainly true that there are primary documents showing that some pretty nasty and condemnable words/remarks were written and said by people in the german military/ leadership during that belligerent period.
    But again dont you think judging that harshly would be fair only when also taking into consideration what the other sides actually said and if one may ask, if so, why again you surprisingly mention none of those equally?
    Which german quotes would you cite that are nastier than f.ex these by:

    Ilya Ehrenburg : (Vonya 1942/43)”The Germans are not human beings. Henceforth the word German means to us the most terrible curse. From now on the word German will trigger your rifle. We shall not speak any more. We shall not get excited. We shall kill. If you have not killed at least one German a day, you have wasted that day…there is nothing more amusing to us than a heap of german corpses.”

    “We must turn Russia into a desert populated by white negroes upon whom we shall impose a tyranny such as the most terrible. we shall shed such floods of blood as will make all the human losses suffered in the capitalist wars pale by comparison.(..) By means of terror and bloodbaths, we shall reduce the Russian intelligentsia to a state of complete stupefaction and idiocy and to an animal existence.”

    Or Man Of The Century Curchill:
    “I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place.(1942)”
    Or short form: “The Aryan stock is bound to triumph.(Michigan University speech, 1902)”

    5. Finally and to sum it all up, still all these are words and since it is really only the actions/facts that count:

    Fact 1. The so often cited “Untermenschen” (subhuman) quote as refering to russians/slavic people seems infact to really be a bad faith mistranslation of the context of the sentence it appears in. In the original text it actually refers to the mistreatment of those Russians under the Bolshevik tyranny, which treats them as subhuman.

    (If interested f.ex.

    Or horse mouth -quote Ostfront Wehrmacht General Otto Ernst Remer:
    “Your question, whether we called the Russians “subhumans,” is nonsense. We had a first-class relationship with the Russian people. The only exception, which was a problem we dealt with, was with the Soviet Commissars, who were all Jews. These people stood behind the lines with machine guns, pushing the Russian soldiers into battle. And anyway, we made quick work of them. That was according to order. This was during a war for basic existence, an ideological war, when such a policy is simply taken for granted.
    There was sometimes talk about the so-called Asian hordes, and ordinary soldiers sometimes spoke about subhumans, but such language was never officially used.”

    Fact 2:
    -Hitlers allies actually included several slavic countries (Croatia, Bulgaria, Ukraine) the military and SS slavic (also whole russian army-under General Vlasov-) divisions and even highest ranking officials in Hitlers innermost circle (f.ex. SS Gestapo and Interpol chief Arthur Zajtich, SS Chief of Special Forces Otto Skorzeny; SS police chief Odilo Globocnik and Wehrmacht general, Lothar von Rendulic) were infact all of slavic origin.
    -He offered alliance to Poland and recognition of their territory annexed from Germany post WW1 without claiming it back in 1938/39 and refused offered annexation of Ukraine later in the war.
    -The only german “Lebensraum/Generalplan Ost”settlements on expanded eastern territory actually ever established were in/around already existing german towns in former (pre WW1) german territory.

    Regarding all this and not to push blame around or whitewash what the Germans did, dont you think that there is more to the whole picture than the simplistic “Hitlers nasty slav-hate and horrible Lebensraum” -narrative?

    • Replies: @Patrick McNally
  32. @Lorian Effervis

    > Trotsky: “We must turn Russia into a desert

    A ridiculous fake quote. Trotsky never uttered such garbage.

    In contrast, the Hunger Plan, constructed by Herbert Backe, was a real documented fact which asserted on May 2, 1945, that:

    1.) The war can only be continued if the entire Wehrmacht is fed from Russia in the third year of the war.
    2.) If we take what we need out of the country, there can be no doubt that tens of millions of people will die of starvation.

    Further updates made 3 weeks later on May 23 asserted that:

    Many tens of millions of people in this country will become superfluous and will die or must emigrate to Siberia. Attempts to rescue the population there from death through starvation by obtaining surpluses from the black earth zone can only be at the expense of the provisioning of Europe. They prevent the possibility of Germany holding out till the end of the war, they prevent Germany and Europe from resisting the blockade.
    — Alex Kay, Exploitation, Resettlement, Mass Murder: Political and Economic Planning for German Occupation Policy in the Soviet Union, 1940-1941, p. 134.

    It certainly is true that colonial expansion across North America provided an inspiration for Hitler. But even there it should be noted that the mass dying off of American Indian populations seems to have been largely unplanned as European diseases infected the native population. In contrast, the idea of people like Backe and Hitler was that a mass dying out of several tens of millions of east European Slavs was an essential part of the program for gaining Aryan living space.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS