The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Ray McGinnis on New 9/11 Book “Unanswered Questions
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Ray McGinnis, author of Writing the Sacred, has just come out with a new book about 9/11. Entitled Unanswered Questions: What the September Eleventh Families Asked and the 9/11 Commission Ignored, it “explores the efforts of the Family Steering Committee and other September Eleventh family members, and first responders, to have a transparent, accountable, and independent investigation into the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.” A few days ago Ray McGinnis posted a list of resources for those wishing to learn more about the first responders’ and family members’ quest for truth and justice.

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Foreign Policy, History • Tags: 9/11, Conspiracy Theories 
Hide 6 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. If people ignore obvious questions then it is pretty likely they or their bosses were involved in the original act and they are simply trying to cover that up.

  2. Many people who were not in on the coup itself will support the cover-up out of a desire for stability, and to ward off cognitive dissonance. Two authors who helped me understand how this works are good guy Schotz https://www.amazon.com/History-Will-Not-Absolve-Orwellian/dp/0965381404 and neocon perp Luttwak https://rense.com/general68/prac.htm . Here are some gems from Luttwak’s 9/11 how-to guide Coup d’Etat: A Practical Handbook:

    “As long as the execution of the coup is rapid, and we are cloaked in anonymity, no particular political faction will have either a motive, or opportunity, to oppose us.”

    “Our far more flexible instrument will be our control over the means of mass communication…. In broadcasting over the radio and television services our purpose is not to provide information about the situation, but rather to affect its development by exploiting our monopoly of these media.”

    “We shall make use of a suitable selection of unlovely phrases.” [for example, anti-Americanism? Anti-Semitism? Conspiracy theorist?].

    “We should establish direct communications with as many of the more senior officers and officials as possible to convey one principal idea in a forceful and convincing manner: that the coup will not threaten their positions in the hierarchy and the aims of the coup do not include a reshaping of the existing military or administrative structures.” [this appears to be exactly the task of JINSA].

    etc.

    • Thanks: Iris
  3. Let’s start with WTC7.
    Then, The Dancing Israelis, their appearance on the Tel Aviv TV talk show; “We were there to document the event.”
    Then, Neil Bush’s security contract.
    Then, Lucky Larry Silverstein…in general.
    Then, the jew messaging service that warned to stay away that day.
    All the above ought to get things off to a good start.

  4. Anonymous[907] • Disclaimer says:

    There is ONLY one force on earth capable of “dustification”, that is, converting millions of tons of concrete, massive internal steel girders and the aluminum cladding to vapor, or dust in EIGHT SECONDS.
    Nukes! Back pack variety, with radiation turned down to just do the EMP blast.
    Probably two in each tower. The cause of blowing all the windows out and SETTING FIRE to #7 contents, which pre planted conventional explosives, (weeks to install), “pulled” the
    building right on cue as ordered.

    • Replies: @Iris
  5. Iris says:
    @Anonymous

    Nukes! Back pack variety, with radiation turned down to just do the EMP blast

    You are correct; only a nuclear detonation could have turned hundreds of tons of structural steel and concrete into fine dust.

    But there is no need for imagining any novel or fancy feature: in traditional underground detonations, that have been practiced for decades in the real life, radiation is by default almost entirely contained by the ground above it.

    The 9/11 story is that of Andersen’s tale of the emperor walking naked and nobody daring to say so. Anybody with basic engineering/physics training and a genuine interest in truth knows that the WTC came down by underground nuclear detonations.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS