The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Ken Meyercord INSISTS on Talking About the Holocaust
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Ken Meyercord—like fellow Truth Jihad Radio regular Randy Short—seems to be running for the office of “most dangerous man in DC.” Ken’s cable access TV show (check out the Holocaust episode) has focused on the same kinds of topics we cover here. And when he isn’t butchering sacred cows on Washington DC-area cable TV, Ken may be found at think tank seminars, speeches, book-signings and similar events raising the hard questions and making the denizens of our nation’s capital uncomfortable.

I recently invited Ken back on the radio to discuss his views on the likely US military origin of COVID-19. Ken responded tardily: “Sorry for the delay. I’ve been out of town and incommunicado. You may recall that I made it a prerequisite for my being on your show that we first do an episode on the Holocaust. As that requirement has not been met, I wouldn’t have accepted your offer, even had I received it in time.”

OK, Ken, let’s talk about the Holocaust! Here is Ken’s brochure on the subject, which he encourages folks to print and distribute: DID THE HOLOCAUST REALLY HAPPEN – pdf

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History • Tags: Conspiracy Theories, Holocaust, World War II 
Hide 30 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Petermx says:

    The lies and distortions by the holocaust propagandists should be discussed, also the fact that many so called “democratic” countries in Europe censor people and throw them in jail for so called holocaust denial. Other reasons it should be exposed as atrocity propaganda is that it is used to keep Germany down and now to persecute White people in general, calling Whites racists, anti-Semites, having “White privilege” and other epithets, and all this is done so Whites can be stripped of their rights while the Jews doing this everywhere increase their own power and can be assured White countries will always support Israel when they kill Arabs and steal their land. Blacks and Hispanics do not have the media ownership, money, lobbying groups and organizations to perpetrate this hoax and the persecution of Whites – organized Jewry does.

    Also worthy of discussion would be how WW II become so bloody and nasty and what was organized Jewry’s role in making the war so bloody? The evidence shows that no group played a bigger role than Jews in making WW II happen. Finally, Germany was not the only country that wanted Jews to leave their land, Ukraine, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and others all disliked Jews for various reasons, including Jewish-Bolshevism.

    A discussion of the extermination of tens of thousands of German civilians (in one case over 100,000) night after night by firebombing their cities is also worth discussion. When the war started, Germany obeyed the treaties signed against such bombing and Great Britain deliberately escalated the war by attacking civilians. So, who was the war criminal, Churchill who began murdering civilians, or Hitler, whose planes avoided civilian targets until he finally retaliated?

  2. anarchyst says:

    From an engineering and logistical standpoint, NONE of the claims made by holocaust™ “survivors” and promoters is possible.
    –Killing jews with “bug spray” (Zyklon B) is not only impossible, but is laughable on its face.
    –Transporting jews to “camps”, utilizing scarce energy sources, transportation and logistical difficulties only to kill them is not only problematic but impossible as well.
    –Tattooing camp inmates only to kill them is also problematic.
    –If the “camps” were truly “death camps” why would medical facilities, recreational facilities, brothels, movie theaters, and other amenities be needed?
    –“Gas chambers” with non-sealed wooden doors and the lack of ventilation systems for such facilities, once again, disproves the claims made by holocaust™ promoters. Doors that “swing the wrong way” would make retrieval of the bodies impossible. Ordinary light fixtures, rather than explosion proof lighting fixtures are claimed to have been the norm.
    –Claims by holocaust™ promoters that gassed bodies were blue or green (rather than bright red) from poisoning are totally false.
    –Claims that the inmates could tell when jews were being cremated by the color of smoke emitted from the crematoria chimneys are patently foolish and false.
    –Let’s not forget “lampshades, wallets, soap and shrunken heads” made from jews is also laughable,
    –Crematoria running 24 hours a day, without “downtime” for maintenance on the muffles and flames “visible out of the crematoria stacks” are also impossibilities. Crematoria are designed to burn “clean” with no visible smoke and definitely no flames outside the stacks would be possible. Not only that, the claims that thousands of bodies were cremated daily are a statistical impossibility as it takes approximately 1.5 hours to cremate a human body. If cremation were used on “6 million” jews, the cremation process would have been operating into the 1950s.
    –The lack of depositories for bodies and ashes is more proof that the “camps” were not “death camps” but rather “work camps” for the German war effort.
    –Anne Frank’s “diary” partially written with a ball-point pen which was not invented till the 1950s. Time travel, anyone? lol
    Germans were (and still are) excellent engineers and could not have engineered the grievous errors that are claimed by holocaust promoters.
    Follow the shekels…

    • Agree: Irish Savant
    • Replies: @Alfred Muscaria
    , @dimples
  3. It’s absolutely essential to have the truth on the Holocau$t™ emerge as the current narrative provides Jews with a force field to repel all criticism, a position that enables them continue their destruction of our societies largely unimpeded. The Holocau$t™ narrative has also been deftly deployed to demonise Germans and by extension all Whites for whom Germans act as de facto surrogates. Thus those of us who try to defend our people are branded Nazis-who-want-to-kill-six-million-Jews.

  4. Wally says:

    More from Ken Meyercord here:

    Holocaust Howlers: https://inconvenienthistory.com/8/4/4173

    Censorship with a Capital “C”: https://inconvenienthistory.com/10/1/5367

    The ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    see the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here:
    http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here:
    http://forum.codoh.com

    To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

  5. Hans says:

    EXCELLENT idea from Ken! The Holohoax is the linchpin of the (((Globalists’))) ancient wet dream to rule the world. Hoping that hosts, guests, and callers will make it a point to routinely hammer the lies and grill the defenders.

    Dr. Mengele is getting clubbed like a baby seal at the moment with the partially awakened likening the Covid poison shot to his work.

    People need to read and spread the truth about him – The Tall Tales of Dr. Mengele’s Assistant Analyzed http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=37

    Pretty soon the Holobollocks will be on its last legs (the pickle barrel and the wolf mother). LOL

  6. Petermx says:

    Thank you to both Kevin Barrett and Ken Meyercord for having the courage and willingness to discuss this subject and expose yourselves to the hatred and lies of the filth that slanders anybody that does not support the belief in the hoax. This filth, and I believe that is a good description of them, would have Mr. Barrett and Mr. Meyercord thrown in jail immediately if they could.

  7. dimples says:

    I don’t want to be seen as confirming or denying the criminal extermination of large numbers of Jew filth by the glorious Nazi regime, but the brochure by Ken Meyercord is clearly superficial and unscholarly, and therefore worthless except as propaganda.

    One thing I would note is that when the SS abandoned Auschwitz-Birkenau ahead of the Russian troops, the only buildings destroyed were the (alleged) gas chambers (roofs blown in) , the crematoria above them and the records office. The rest of the camp was left in original condition, including the sauna, outbuildings, prisoner huts etc.

    Looks like a serious bit of guilt there, but who knows. The claims re lack of prussian blue staining in the walls of the alleged gas chambers are obviously crucial. But of course, the Jew filth and their German lackeys won’t allow a thorough impartial scientific investigation into their great money and oppression narrative spinner to provide any certainty.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @anarchyst
    , @saggy
  8. @Petermx

    Deliberate targeting of civilian populations, on a scale unprecedented in the history of warfare, became official policy in Britain’s Lindemann plan. German-Jewish émigré Professor Frederick Lindemann, Churchill’s friend and scientific advisor, submitted a plan urging that German working-class houses be targeted in preference to military objectives. The war cabinet approved the plan and it first went into action on March 28, 1942, when 234 aircraft attacked the old port city of Lubeck. It had no military or industrial importance but was chosen because, as Air Marshall “Bomber” Harris remarked, the city was “built more like a firelighter than a human habitation.” Its old medieval houses and cathedral were obliterated, by what Harris termed “a first class success” of the RAF. Two months later a thousand aircraft dropped high explosive and incendiaries on the medieval town of Cologne, burning it from end to end.

    This is the truly horrific -but always unspoken- legacy of “the good war.” The incineration of hundreds of thousands of German and Japanese civilians in their homes would justify the 700,000 tons of incendiaries, nerve gas, napalm, cluster bombs and high explosives the US dropped a few years later on tiny North Korea, and the inhuman savagery unleashed on Vietnam, where year in and year out the USAF dropped on average eight tons of high explosives, incendiaries, and toxins every hour of every day for almost ten years.

    “War crime” is an empty pejorative term, generally employed in nationalist propaganda to demonize the conduct of an economic rival. War itself is the crime. The use of violence to settle disputes is forbidden to individuals – hence the hysterical overreaction to the so-called “terrorists” who defiantly usurp this state prerogative for their own purposes – but there is no effective means to compel nations to cease waging war – except by waging war on them.

    • Thanks: SolontoCroesus, Petermx
  9. Anonymous[310] • Disclaimer says:
    @dimples

    I actually agree with you that this brochure is superficial and presents a weak case for revisionism. However your own comment is rather weak. The Germans destroyed the crematoria at Auschwitz because the Soviets had already propagandized the (admittedly unpleasant) crematoria at Majdanek when they captured the area the previous summer. As the brochure does note, no serious person believes the ridiculous claims the Soviets made about Majdanek (that 1.4M Jews were killed there). The Germans simply were preventing an opportunity for black propaganda at Auschwitz. As you note, they left intact the actual delousing chambers which, unlike the rest of the camp, was awash with Prussian blue staining. (They also left behind thousands of potential witnesses when they evacuated, along with many Jews who preferred to not be “liberated” by the Red Army.) All rather strange for an alleged “death camp.”

    • Replies: @dimples
  10. Isn’t Elie Wiesel a notorious fraud? Taking his testimony as a basis for argument may not be productive. Or do the orthodox believers now call him a fraud because he omitted the gas chambers the first time ?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  11. Anonymous[963] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierce fan

    Wiesel is a known liar and shouldn’t be trusted on any claim. It is interesting, though, that for whatever reason, he claimed to have chosen to evacuate Auschwitz with the Germans, along with his father who was in the infirmary at the time. This account is consistent with the experience of the famous chemist Primo Levi and Anne Frank, both of whom were unable to work and given medical treatment instead of being killed outright as the official story claims was the fate of such Jews. (Frank was actually transported back west to Bergen-Belsen after contracting typhus at Auschwitz.) All of these accounts seriously conflict with the official historiography.

  12. dimples says:
    @Anonymous

    Well surely according to this logic the SS should have left the records office intact to prove that nothing untoward had happened there.

    As for witnesses left behind, the issue is that there were supposedly no witnesses left in relation to the (alleged) gassings, since they had all been gassed. The gassings stories all came from a few sondercommando who survived, and who claimed to have been witnesses, whether they were or not. Since they were Jews with an interest in beating up the alleged events perhaps one should take their stories with a grain of salt.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  13. anarchyst says:
    @dimples

    Actually American execution expert Fred Leuchter did a forensic study of the so-called “gas chambers” and proved that executions by gas could not have taken place.
    He was rewarded for his efforts by losing all of his state and federal contracts for the design and implementation of execution equipment. The state of Massachusetts charged him with “practicing engineering without a license”–a charge that has never been levied on anyone else in that state’s history. He was also target by mossad types, recognized them and wisely exposed their cover, forcing them to back off.
    The only thing needed to destroy the holocaust™ story is to utilize basic engineering principles which totally exposes the whole holocaust™ story as a hoax.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  14. Anonymous[219] • Disclaimer says:
    @anarchyst

    Also, the Jan Sehn forensic institute in Krakow “explained” the fact that the presence of Prussian blue staining in the crematoria was little different from the rest of the camp while the actual delousing chambers were lousy with it (see what I did there) by…declaring the delousing chambers to be “outliers” to be ignored instead of a piece of evidence to be explained. Viola, the crematoria were actually homicidal gas chambers! Completely specious “investigation”.

  15. Anonymous[219] • Disclaimer says:
    @dimples

    I don’t see anything inherently suspicious in the Germans not wanting any documents to fall into Soviet hands (who could and did falsify things anyway).

    Either way, the Germans sure did leave around a lot of witnesses to the “crime”.

    • Replies: @dimples
  16. saggy says:
    @dimples

    The Nazi’s didn’t destroy the ‘gas chambers’, they (or someone) bombed the crematoria furnace rooms. The crematoria were L shaped buildings … with a main building and two long mostly underground storage rooms, as shown ….The hoax ‘gas chambers’ were supposedly in the underground storage rooms. These rooms were not bombed, the main building housing the furnace rooms were bombed. The roofs of the storage rooms collapsed for the most part, but there were still places where a persons could stand up in the hoax gas chambers, takes samples from the walls, etc.,

    • Replies: @dimples
  17. @anarchyst

    –Tattooing camp inmates only to kill them is also problematic.

    The lack of uniform sizes and fonts for the tats suggest they were done after the war in an attempt to cash in. Like many lies there might be an element of truth in that repeat Bolshevik agitators likely had been tattooed to identify them in the future. It could be Nobel Laureate Eli Wiesel did not address his lack of a tattoo so as not to blow the lucrative myth. It could also be he never set foot in a camp and everything he wrote was a lie. Which is it?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @dimples
  18. anarchyst says:
    @Alfred Muscaria

    You make an excellent point on the lack of uniformity when it comes to jew “tattoos”. Eli Weisel is a fraud, along with the rest of the holohoax crowd. It would not surprise me to find out that jews tattooed themselves in order to get on the “money train”…
    It is interesting to note that “holocaust™ survivors” who never left New York City or were never in a “war zone” are collecting “holocaust™ reparations” as we speak. A new jewish scam has come to light–“holocaust™ transference syndrome” in which the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren are affected by the “holocaust™ and should also receive “holocaust™ reparations”. It appears that the holocaust™ scam will never end.
    Best regards,

    • Replies: @Right_On
  19. dimples says:
    @Anonymous

    Well if you read the literature it is clear that there were very few people claiming to be witnesses to gassings. This is one of the basics of holocaust revisionism.

  20. dimples says:
    @saggy

    Clearly the roofs (or rooves, a strange word) of the underground alleged gas chambers, being made of reinforced concrete were blown in, otherwise they wouldn’t have collapsed. Yes I am aware that samples were taken of the walls still standing surreptitiously by various investigators. Yes I am aware that these samples showed very small amounts of prussian blue, although since the walls were made of fresh concrete they should have absorbed large amounts of it due to the alleged almost continuous daily gassings.

    I am merely pointing out that it is the Jew filth that prevent an authoritative investigation of the matter in case it might detract from the lucrative holocaust business and the Jewish victimhood legend. A proper investigation would also include setting up a similar concrete test room and pumping cyanide gas into it on a daily basis according to calculations of the correct amount over the period in question to determine how much prussian blue would be expected to remain in the concrete. Perhaps in fact not much prussian blue would in fact remain in the walls I don’t know. The gas was pumped out again very quickly after each alleged gassing so perhaps this has an effect I don’t know.

    However as the Polish investigation showed, it is probably impossible for such an objective investigation to take place in any case.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @saggy
  21. dimples says:
    @anarchyst

    “–Tattooing camp inmates only to kill them is also problematic.
    –If the “camps” were truly “death camps” why would medical facilities, recreational facilities, brothels, movie theaters, and other amenities be needed?”

    This is really stupid.

    Auschwitz-Birkenau in particular was a large work camp plus alleged extermination facilities. Incoming victims, it is said, were separated into persons suitable for work and persons such as women, children and old people sent directly to the alleged gas chambers. I presume they were not tattooed. Since the camp was also a work camp, facilities were provided for the slave workers.

    Try reading up on some basics, instead of just repeating revisionist propaganda.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  22. Right_On says:
    @anarchyst

    As I am of Saxon heritage, can I cash-in on being a 32nd-generation Norman Conquest survivor and claim reparations from . . . the French, maybe?

  23. dimples says:
    @Alfred Muscaria

    “The lack of uniform sizes and fonts for the tats suggest they were done after the war in an attempt to cash in. ”

    This is an absurd argument. The tattoos were done on the spot by unskilled SS troops and would be expected to have lack of uniformity.

    In an earlier life a client showed me his concentration camp tattoo. He was quite proud of it and enjoyed freaking people out (including myself) by showing it off. He was of Eastern European descent. Another client was an Austrian born during the war who had been named Adolph by his mother. This was of course a great source of humor amongst his family and friends.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  24. Anonymous[334] • Disclaimer says:

    Let’s not forget one of the more laughable assertions, namely Hilberg’s claim that the Germans used telepathy (in essence) to coordinate the entire operation.

  25. anarchyst says:
    @dimples

    Ha ha…your jewish “holocaust™” fable is collapsing before your very eyes. The jewish “holocaust™” itself is propaganda and is falling apart because of the engineering and logistical impossibilities that its promoters still espouse. Follow the shekels…

  26. anarchyst says:
    @dimples

    In order for Zyklon B to work at delousing it must be heated. In the supposed “gas chambers” there are no heaters or means to ventilate the “gas chambers” after the supposed “executions” took place.
    Zyklon B would have been a very poor execution agent.

    • Replies: @dimples
  27. anarchyst says:
    @dimples

    That was your “client’s” lucky lottery number…lol

  28. saggy says: • Website
    @dimples

    I am merely pointing out that it is the Jew filth that prevent an authoritative investigation

    The holohoax is a preposterous hoax for which there is not a shred of physical or documentary evidence, thus, there is no need for another ‘authoritative investigation’, there have been plenty of these already. What needs to happen is for the hoax machinery, the endless propaganda being generated today, needs to be stopped. For a review of the facts visit holohoax101.org

    • Replies: @dimples
  29. dimples says:
    @saggy

    That’s rather extreme. I was only referring to an investigation of the remains of the walls of the underground gas chambers at Auschwitz. Obviously ‘authoritative’ investigations of the whole extermination allegatiosn are about as complete as is possible by this point. In my personal opinion both sides have some good arguments, both sides have some weak arguments, but my personal opinion is of no consequence of course.

  30. dimples says:
    @anarchyst

    Zyklon B was hydrogen cyanide liquid absorbed into gypsum pellets, then sealed into cans. When opened the hydrogen cyanide gassed off at 25 degrees C. I don’t know what temperatures applied in gas chambers, particularly in winter, but a room full of bodies would warm up to some extent. Perhaps you could personally experiment with this.

    I’m only familiar with the story of the two alleged underground gas chambers at Auschwitz since these were largely not messed with after the war. These had powerful ventilation systems since they were originally designed to store bodies dead from typhus etc before cremation. Other alleged gas chambers did not have ventilation and I agree that getting the Zyklon B out completely must have been difficult.

    The delousing huts had no ventilation so windows were opened and the gas allowed to percolate out before entry. If this method worked for the delousing huts, I assume something similar would work for alleged gas chambers with windows.

    I totally agree that there are many problems with the alleged Zyklon B gassings and cremation stories, but in my opinion there is insufficient knowledge to make any one view more certain than another. That’s why I put ‘alleged’ in front of it.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS