The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
Dr. Syed Haider on “Transgender Ideologies Are Child Abuse”
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Dr Syed Haider sent me a press release that begins:

“Transsexual and homosexual curriculum in today’s modern school system has become a concern for parents across the nation. It’s easy for anyone to view TikTok videos of teachers who openly admit to promoting their “queer agenda” on underage students.

The UCLA Williams Institute released a study based on data from the CDC which conducted 2 surveys from 2017 to 2020. The study found that nearly half of those who identify as transgender were between the ages of 13 and 24.

What’s even more alarming, the researchers found that the number of transgender youths nearly doubled since the first survey was taken in 2017, while the number of US adults who identified as transgender remained steady over that same time.

Dr. Haider offers a hard stance on this issue, based on the old adage, “Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil.” Dr. Haider advises parents that “It is our job to keep our children’s minds pure.” He adds “Public Schools are no longer safe for children. They have stopped teaching reading, writing and math. Instead, they are being presented with bizarre abstract thoughts about gender and their bodies.”

Why is there such a push in today’s public schools to teach children about transgenderism and homosexuality? The argument from trans advocates is that trans people are at risk from bullying and suicide and by normalizing gender dysphoria, transsexuals will feel more accepted.

Dr. Haider asserts the opposite is true and that by encouraging children to take on transgender lifestyles we are now exposing them to these harms. “It’s like the teachers are planting an evil seed inside a child’s brain and then giving it all the right circumstances to grow into a poisonous plant.”

He reveals that normalizing gender dysphoria will only expose them to the depression and suicide that run abnormally high in the transexual community. Subjecting children to physical surgeries and hormone therapies can have detrimental and irreversible consequences while often increasing risks of suicide and depression. …”

Dr. Syed Haider has over 10 years of experience as an internal medicine trained hospital doctor. Since December 2020, he has treated thousands of COVID-19 patients around the country by providing easy online access to off-label prescriptions. After realizing that our country has offshored almost all prescription drug manufacturing to unfriendly nations like China, he launched his latest initiative at, providing “prepper antibiotics” and chronic med refills to store in case of emergencies like anthrax or plague bioterror attacks, natural disasters, supply chain breakdowns or just to have on hand for off-grid living and travel.

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Transgenderism 
Hide 15 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. ‘Transgender’ child slicing would not be as acceptable if it were not for the fact that the middle eastern religions had already established a ‘well worn’ precedent in carving up their own children’s genitals; little boys and little girls.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @eternal anglophile
  2. Athena says:

    He adds “Public Schools are no longer safe for children. They have stopped teaching reading, writing and math. Instead, they are being presented with bizarre abstract thoughts about gender and their bodies.”

    Subjecting children to physical surgeries and hormone therapies can have detrimental and irreversible consequences while often increasing risks of suicide and depression. …”

    Absolutely DISGUSTING. Why do taxpayers accept to pay for schools that will virtually destroy their children, without saying anything? WHY?

    Why are websites offering drugs to modify the levels oestrogene, testosterone, or progesterone allowed to sell to teens or even children? Why does the UK allow this?

  3. I have maintained, since the Renee Richards days, that there is no such thing as “transgender”. There are mentally ill people who seek mutilative surgery to fulfill their delusion. Any parent or teacher who aids, endorses, or enables these delusions in children is committing child abuse.
    Do you tell alcoholics and drug addicts that their addiction is ok and they should continue? Do we pretend these addictions aren’t medical conditions? We have entered the death spiral of our civilization.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @American Citizen
  4. @Curmudgeon

    The media has turned the “normal” people into enablers for this behavior through relentless propaganda.

  5. Dr. Syed Haider is a sane man in our utterly insane America!

    I thank Dr. Kevin Barrett for this podcast.

    Studies Confirm Homosexuality’s Dangers —
    In an article titled “Health Risks: Fisting and other Homosexual Practices,” Michelle A. Cretella, MD and Philip M. Sutton, PhD, LMFT, LP


    CAUTION — These texts may cause feelings of extreme revulsion.

    “Medically, men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately at risk for sexually transmitted infections (STI) and HIV (Diggs, 2002). The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention estimates that gay and bisexual men (men who have sex with men or MSM) in the United States are 50 times more likely to contract HIV than are heterosexual men (Lansky, 2009). This is largely due to having multiple sexual partners and engaging in risky sexual practices, including a high incidence of anal intercourse within this opulation (Diggs, 2002). For example, the estimated HIV risk with a single sexual exposure through receptive anal intercourse (2%) is 20 times greater than for receptive vaginal intercourse (0.1%), (Pinkerton, Martin, Roland, Katz, Coates, & Kahn, 2004).

    “Semen has immune-suppressant activity that increases the chance of sperm fertilizing a woman’s egg during vaginal intercourse. If released in the rectum, however, semen makes this already vulnerable tissue more prone to both infection and the development of cancer — rectal carcinoma in MSM results from infection with a highly carcinogenic strain of HPV (Diggs, 2002). Of greater concern is that despite knowing the high risk of contracting HIV, many MSM repeatedly indulge in unsafe sex practices such as “bare-backing,” i.e., deliberate, ‘unprotected’ anal intercourse (Parsons & Bimbi, 2007; Parsons, Kelly, Bimbi, Muench, & Morgenstern, 2007; van Kesteren, Hospers, & Kok, 2007.) Homosexual women are also at higher risk for STI and other health problems than are heterosexual women (Evans, Scally, Wellard, & Wilson, 2007.)

    “The negative consequences of homosexual behaviors are not limited to the physical harms noted above. Compared to their heterosexual peers, homosexual high school students and young adults (fourteen to twenty-one years old) in New Zealand, which has a culture highly tolerant of homosexuality, had significantly higher rates of major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, conduct disorder, nicotine dependence, other substance abuse and/or dependence, multiple disorders, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts (Fergusson, Horwood, & Beautrais, 1999).

    “In general, compared to heterosexually behaving adolescents and adults, having same-sex sexual partners is associated with substantially greater risk for mood disorders, anxiety disorders, psychological distress, substance use disorders, for suicidal thoughts and suicidal plans, suicide attempts, unstable relationships and lower levels of quality of life (Andersson, Noack, Seierstad, & Weedon-Fekjaer, 2006; Balsam, Beauchaine, Rothblum, & Solomon, 2008; Cochran, Keenan, Schober, & Mays, 2000; Cochran, Sullivan, & Mays, 2003; Cochran, Ackerman, Mays, & Ross, 2004; de Graaf, Sandfort, & ten Have, 2006; Drabble & Trocki, 2005; Gilman, Cochran, Mays, Hughes, Ostrow, & Kessler, 2001; Herrell, Goldberg, True, Ramakrishnan, Lyons, Eisen, & Tsuang, 1999; Jorm, Korten, Rodgers, Jacomb, & Christensen, 2002; King, Semlyen, Tai, Killaspy, Osborn, Popelyuk, & Nazareth, 2008; Mathy, Cochran, Olsen, & Mays, 2009; Russell & Joyner, 2001; Sandfort, de Graff, Bijl, & Schnabel, 2001; Sandfort, de Graaf, & Bijl, 2003; Sandfort, T. G. M., Bakker, Schelievis, & Vanwesenbeeck, 2006). The findings are consistent both for countries like Denmark, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Sweden where homosexuality is more socially accepted, and for the U.S. where it is less accepted.

    “While the seriousness of such health risks may not be minimized, neither may the vulnerability of teenagers and young adults to being taught ways of behaving that put them at significant risk. NIMH scientist Dr. Jay Giedd, M.D. has reported that as humans develop, their brains’ “frontal cortex area” which governs judgment, decision-making and impulse control “doesn’t fully mature until around age 25” (Voit, 2005). In other words, “the frontal lobes, the very area that helps make teenagers do the right thing, are one of the last areas of the brain to reach a stable grown-up state” (Strauch, 2003, p.16.) As a result, while physically, “the teen years and early 20s represent an incredibly healthy time of life … the top 10 bad things that happen to teens involve emotion and behavior” Because “the brain is pretty adept at learning by example, something that parents can and do to influence their children’s brain development is ‘modeling.’ The teenage brain is pretty adept at learning by example, so parents — and the other adults involved in the lives of teenagers — teach healthy ways of behaving by showing and giving good examples of how to live” (Voit, 2005), and unhealthy behaviors by showing or giving poor examples.


    “An adolescent’s desire to prevent or cease experiencing serious medical, psychological, and relational health risks is sufficient reason for him or her to seek and receive competent psychological care to minimize or resolve the desires, behaviors and lifestyles associated with such increased risks. The concerns of parents, family members and friends of persons whose sexual behaviors and/or attractions leave them at risk for such harms are understandable and scientifically and clinically justified. Regardless of venue, the health and well-being of young persons is best served by sex-education that is consistent with established clinical experience and scientific research.”

    • Thanks: Kevin Barrett
  6. It is all part of the plan! This is really a sneaky way to bring back Eugenic sterilization. After all, teens who have sex change surgery can never reproduce, later in life. That could be the entire secret agenda.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  7. @Twin Ruler

    Anything to lower the white birthrate, cause confusion, and demoralize poor white people.

    The nose works feverishly to subvert and disrupt in every way possible.

  8. anarchyst says:

    In the push for “rights”, we were told that all homosexuals wanted was “to be tolerated” and shown “respect”. However, that attitude has turned out to have negative ramifications and that nothing could be further from the truth…
    Sad to say, “tolerance” has morphed into demands for not only “acceptance”, but deference, to the whims of homosexuals, without regards for the rights of heterosexuals with differing beliefs.
    When homosexuals purposely target a Christian-run bakery or other business, making demands for not only “acceptance”, but using the “civil-rights” laws, forcing the owner to go against his principles, THAT, my friends is tyranny, under guise of “civil-rights”.
    Using the “civil-rights” laws to force business owners into actions that go against their basic beliefs is tyranny of the highest order, and has no place in American society. It is interesting to note that, in these cases where homosexuals wanted to “prove a point”, they bypassed many bakeries who would accede to their wishes and give them what they desire.
    As an aside, muslim bakers who refused to bake homosexual-themed cakes were NOT targeted for “civil-rights” violations—double standard, indeed.
    This kind of behavior garners no favors with most decent people and furthers resolve against militant homosexuals who want not only toleration, but total “in your face” acceptance of their “lifestyle”–something that some people find that does not “square” with their beliefs.
    It appears that the success of “equal rights” for homosexuals has renewed a push to “normalize” other behaviors, such as “transsexuality”, “cross-dressing”, and other “gender fluidity” behaviors.
    There is even a push by pedophiles and their advocates to redefine (decriminalize and normalize) their behavior, renaming it “minor-attracted adults” rather than the perversion that it is presently defined as. The “slippery slope” started with the normalization of homosexuality, and has degenerated into the demands for acceptance of every form of human dysfunction.
    Let’s not forget homosexual and transgender “grooming” which is now a part of many government schools curricula.
    “Live and let live” used to be a staple of American society, but was eviscerated with every “protected group” using the so-called “civil-rights” laws to force others to not only tolerate them, but accept them. Not good…

  9. Cris M. says:

    Important subject, under estimated situation to ignore, very. When children are targeted and people say nothing, it’s not long before no one has choice. Anarchyst comment above notes false words, would add also the word ‘grooming’ is dumb down from the real word – predators. Have to use real words. They edge and edge and people step down, then down again, until you’re in a hole.

    Appreciate the article, and other’s posts.

  10. anarchyst says:

    Woman Raised By Lesbians Has Some Shocking Things To Say About Needing A Dad

    Experience is supposed to be top card over any and all facts. But what happens when experience blows holes in the activist narrative?

    It doesn’t matter who you click with. That was what the airline put in their ads.

    Homosexuals should be able to raise children. We’ve been told this for as long as same-sex relationships have been socially acceptable.

    But did anybody ask what the CHILDREN thought about it?

    One has finally spoken up. The keepers of the narrative will not like it.

    We can probably expect her to be given the same rough treatment that other heretics against the cause, like Milo, are given.

    So, while she still has a voice, let’s let hers be heard:

    It’s her own personal story, after all. By the rules of the game as the Left has been playing it, who can judge her for her own story?

    [Heather]Barwick, who is 31 now, married, and has four children, said that same-sex marriage and parenting withholds either a mother or father from a child while telling him or her that it doesn’t matter. That it’s all the same. But it’s not.

    “A lot of us, a lot of your kids, are hurting,” wrote Barwick in her essay for The Federalist website. “My father’s absence created a huge hole in me, and I ached every day for a dad. I loved my mom’s partner, but another mom could never have replaced the father I lost.”

    “I grew up surrounded by women who said they didn’t need or want a man,” said Barwick. “Yet, as a little girl, I so desperately wanted a daddy. It is a strange and confusing thing to walk around with this deep-down unquenchable ache for a father, for a man, in a community that says that men are unnecessary.”

    She used to be an advocate of same-sex marriage. So she isn’t motivated by disdain for same-sex relationships. She’s backing a different cause now.

    “Gay marriage doesn’t just redefine marriage, but also parenting,” she says. “It promotes and normalizes a family structure that necessarily denies us something precious and foundational. It denies us something we need and long for, while at the same time tells us that we don’t need what we naturally crave. That we will be okay. But we’re not. We’re hurting.”

    “It’s not just me,” said Barwick. “There are so many of us. Many of us are too scared to speak up and tell you about our hurt and pain, because for whatever reason it feels like you’re not listening. That you don’t want to hear.”

    “If we say we are hurting because we were raised by same-sex parents, we are either ignored or labeled a hater,” she wrote.
    Source: Daily Mail

    Now she’s an advocate of Children’s rights. She’s also married and a mother of four.

    Buckle up, Heather. It looks like you’ll be in for a rough ride.

  11. anonymous[208] • Disclaimer says:

    How is transgender ideology “child abuse” different from the right of any wacko to shoot children in McDonalds on the grounds of too much mayo in his sandwich?

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  12. @Psychotic Break

    Yes indeed. But I’d add the caveat that all countries where FGM/MGM (GM) is commonplace are Islamic yet not all Islamic countries are big on GM. I suspect it says more about ethnoracial differences by way of culture than religious ones, but I’m not sure where the causal links are and in which direction they flow. As usual, search engines are superlatively unhelpful on a matter of controversy and immense cultural relativism. Someone who could offer a quick history lesson on GM or provide sources to a good treatment of it would be helpful in this discussion.

    • Replies: @eternal anglophile
  13. When you live in Britain where, since the 1950s or even earlier[1], in excess of a million of your native schoolgirls have been raped and tortured by Muslim men, largely from the Indian subcontinent, you tend not to think of them as natural allies. Sure, they’re useful, to a degree, in the culture war: e.g. protesting against LGBT ideology outside schools, since they’re the only ones who can get away with it. But the idea of them as allies to Christian whites or non-Christian whites is the kind of nonsense that could only come from an American who’s never had to live in close proximity to large Pakistani diaspora communities.

    As soon as they can take advantage of whitey, the do exactly like the other minorities when in Rome — in my experience, even more often and with greater intensity. I have tales that would chill your blood – or send it boiling out of your body – of the exploits of Muslims in my bifurcated town, which is half native Anglo and half comprised of an assortment of subcontinental Muslims and atheistic Western “Muslims”. More than a couple of my friends and acquaintances have had their skulls caved in, in the most cowardly of fashions, by large groups of these people — they’re notorious here for their cowardice, fighting only when the numbers make it impossible for them to lose.

    One of those cases I found out about secondhand was of a young white father who made the mistake of politely asking a group of Pakistani “youths” to quieten down while loitering around his cul-de-sac at 2am so that his infant daughter could get some sleep. Their response was to kick him into a coma — and, IIRC, braindeath. Naturally, like the rapists, they escaped justice. But, yes, please, tell me more about how I should view them as my natural allies. Maybe you can do it while I play a sound collage of Muslim youths yelling into microphones about how “Britain is [theirs]”, perhaps against the backdrop of some of the most beautiful churches in Europe falling to their arson attacks.

    [1] Of course, that’s essentially as soon as they arrived in any numbers worth counting. Note that cases from the ’50s were described in Call The Midwife in what’s likely the first mainstream description of the problem in any form. It should’ve attracted more attention than it did — then maybe we could’ve averted the worst of the crisis.

  14. @eternal anglophile

    Addendum: I forgot to add that I haven’t analysed the matter in a great deal of detail, so it could be religious but factional (e.g. Sunni, Shi’ite, Wahabi, or any of the innumerable denominations and affiliations). But I’ve been repeatedly told – admittedly, mostly by the agitprop media – that “FGM has nothing to do with Islam”. Those people somehow didn’t see that they were ironically condemning the cultural and ethnic character of the nations where GM is prevalent while attempting to defend their religions (since, after all, the only remaining conclusion post-removal of Islam as a confounding factor is that GM is some intersection of cultural practice and ethnic proclivities — and as we believe that culture is downstream of race and ethnicity, it’s an incredibly damning indictment of, say, Somalians et al.).

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS