The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesKevin Barrett Podcasts
David Swanson on "Leaving WW2 Behind"
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Peace activist David Swanson is the author of the new book Leaving World War II Behind. He debunks the standard misconceptions about the mythical “good war.”

WAS IT ABOUT SAVING JEWS? “In reality, the U.S. and British governments engaged for years in massive propaganda campaigns to build war support but never made any mention of saving Jews.” (p.21)

WAS IT ABOUT STOPPING HITLER’S EUGENICS? “Eugenics had British and U.S. roots and was popularized by Americans in the first two decades of the Twentieth Century…eugenics was funded by the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation, and the Harriman railroad fortune.” (chapter 4)

WAS IT ABOUT STOPPING NAZI SLAVE LABOR? “As I write this, California is using prisoners to fight forest fires, paying them $1 an hour…” (p.55)

WAS IT ABOUT STOPPING NAZI “LEBENSRAUM” EXPANSION? “In Mein Kampf, Hitler invoked the American conquest of ‘the West’ as a model for Nazi continental territorial expansion in ‘the East.’” (p.67)

WERE WE FIGHTING GOOSE-STEPPING MANIACS DRUNK ON THEIR “ONE ARMED SALUTE”? “If you do a web search for images of ‘Bellamy salute’ you find countless black-and-white photographs of U.S. children and adults with their right arms raised stiffly out in front of them in what will strike most people as a Nazi salute. From the early 1890s through 1942 the United States used the Bellamy salute…” (p.94)

DID WE STOP THE NAZIS FROM CONQUERING AND OCCUPYING THE WHOLE WORLD? “The Nazis did not have the ability to occupy even half of the Soviet Union. Some of the nations they occupied in Europe, as we will see below, effectively challenged their rule. Nonviolent resistance in Germany itself, as we will also see below, showed great potential. Nonviolent resistance to tyranny around the world, as we will see, in the past 75 years has proven itself more effective than armed struggle. The idea that Nazism could have lasted and grown to eventually include an attack on the United States is more fantasy than history.” (p.130)

WOULD PEACE HAVE BEEN WORSE? “In recorded human history, there’s no worse catastrophe than WWII. There’s nothing else that did as much immediate and lasting damage in the space of less than a decade. WWII killed 70 to 85 million human beings. In most wars prior to WWII, including WWI, the majority of deaths were of participants in the wars. With WWII and most wars that have followed it, the majority of deaths have been civilians. WWII injured, traumatized, rendered homeless, and displaced millions of people on an unmatched scale.” (p.147)

WAS THE NAZI OCCUPATION OF FRANCE A “REGIME OF TERROR”?” No, that was the US occupation of France: “In the port city of Le Havre, the mayor was bombarded with letters from angry residents complaining about drunkenness, jeep accidents, sexual assault — ‘a regime of terror,’ as one put it, imposed by bandits in uniform.” As for the US occupation of Germany, which continues at a lesser scale today: “Other estimates…go as high as 190,000 rapes, just in Germany, just by U.S. troops.” (p.157)

DID THE ATOMIC BOMBINGS OF JAPAN END THE WAR AND SAVE LIVES? “The United States Strategic Bombing Survey concluded that, ‘… certainly prior to 31 December, 1945, and in all probability prior to 1 November, 1945, Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped, even if Russia had not entered the war, and even if no invasion had been planned or contemplated.’” (p.161)

DID THE US PUBLIC SUPPORT WWII? “In May, 1940, 93% of Americans opposed declaring war on Germany.” (p.172) Only the treasonous Pearl Harbor deception could brainwash Americans into supporting the war.

WAS THE POSTWAR WORLD BETTER? “World War II created taxes.” (p.178) Now the feds and their bankster masters loot and pillage American taxpayers and the world, claiming that every anti-imperialist leader in the world is a new Hitler. Among the endless parade of “new Hitlers”: Manuel Noriega, Saddam Hussein, Slobodan Milosevic, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Muammar Gaddafi, Bashar al Assad, Vladimir Putin…who will be next?

WAS IT A WAR FOR FREEDOM? “What happens, predictably and consistently, is just the reverse of wars protecting freedoms…liberties are restricted in the name of war.” (p.233) With every war the US fights, the less free it gets. One more big war, and there may be no freedom left at all.

(Republished from Truth Jihad by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History • Tags: American Media, Nazi Germany, World War II 
Hide 34 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. anon[346] • Disclaimer says:

    The best way to get over WWII is to reform the UNSC to end P5 veto impunity. That was the USA trying to lock in its good luck as the most unscathed combatant. They knew their postwar primacy wouldn’t last so they tried to make it official for posterity.

    Specifically, we need some variant of the Small Five’s veto reform, codification of working methods, and rotating member election based on support for rights and rule of law.

    https://old.centerforunreform.org/?q=securitycouncil

  2. “World War II created taxes.” (p.178)

    This bit often gets lost in the general anti-WWII critiques in dissident forums like this, which tend to look more at imperialism and police state oppression. It’s not quite the whole truth (a lot of it started with the first war a generation earlier), but World War II definitely created the tax system as we know it today. The biography of FDR’s Treasury secretary, Henry Morgenthau Jr., goes some way into showing his cronies’ ingenuity at squeezing the middle class when they designed it.

    By pure coincidence, a lot of the leading Treasury men at the time (Nathan Silvermaster, Sol Adler, Irving Kaplan et al) were later proved to be agents of the Communist Party and the Soviet Union. The most important of the crew was Morgenthau’s number two man, Assistant Secretary Harry Dexter White. Of course, these people didn’t legislate the taxes as such, but one wonders how their political cast might have affected their implementation of the directives from Congress. Unfortunately, most historians appear reluctant to delve into this angle of the period.

    • Thanks: Haxo Angmark
    • Replies: @JimmyCrackCorn
  3. Great brief summary of points, although the Bellamy salute seems like a minor issue compared to the others.

    Reading through these reminded me of my college days discovering Howard Zinn, who made most of these same points for a large and mostly leftist readership several decades ago. For all the actual impact it made, I can only assume they stopped paying attention after he was done bashing Columbus.

  4. GeeBee says:

    Finally, someone who knows. Or at least, someone who knows and has dared to print the truth. The only quibble I have is his constant use of the epithet ‘Nazi’ to describe a system that sought to free people – not just the German volk – from the twin tyrannies of (((Finance Capitalism))) and (((Bolshevism))).

    • Agree: Daniel Rich
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @GeeBee
  5. nature says:

    disappointing

    • Replies: @Wally
  6. @GeeBee

    Did you listen to the conversation or make your assessment based on Barrett’s summary?

    In conversation, Swanson was uninformed on even basic facts and timeline; for example, Kevin corrected him on the timing of the Hitler successful economic plan for Germany and the concentration camps — Swanson said Germany’s economy boomed because NSDAP used slave labor.

    Just for starters.

    Swanson’s version of Peace is to sustain the vilification of Hitler as right and just (as opposed to giving all sides of the story a fair and objective hearing); endorsing the Howard Zinn version of American history; and insisting that “non-violent protest” is possible (whereas Benjamin Ginsberg has stated that there is no such thing as non-violent protest: what passes for non-violent protest is actually provocation, with the planned expectation that the Target will succumb to the provocation, whereupon a powerful force will step in and squash the Target).

    Keenly disappointed in Swanson: if he’s the best the Peace Movement has to offer, we’re in more trouble than I thought.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
    , @Kevin Barrett
  7. GeeBee says:

    Thanks for that. I confess I simply read Barrett’s summary. Clearly the summary is at odds with the actuality of Swanson’s take on these important matters. Thanks once again (and I shall reply to myself clarifying my error).

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  8. GeeBee says:
    @GeeBee

    I rather lazily wrote my comment based solely on having read Kevin Barrett’s summation (and not therefore having listened to the podcast).

    It would appear that I have praised Swanson’s work too hastily. Thanks to SolontoCroesus I now retract my praise.

  9. @GeeBee

    I was impressed with Barrett’s summary as well, GeeBee.
    Unz community members ought to put their heads together and write that book!

  10. @SolontoCroesus

    if he’s the best the Peace Movement has to offer, we’re in more trouble than I thought.

    I’ve always assumed that we’re in more trouble than we think.
    It became clear to me 40+ years ago, that “Western liberal democracies” were all about pizzazz not substance. The political arena is a mirror for the largest part of the masses. It is entertainment, just as the news is now entertainment. Cynics aren’t affected by the theatrics.
    It doesn’t matter to the masses whether Swanson is accurate, as long as he’s punching the right buttons.

    • Agree: Kratoklastes
  11. Myth: The war was good for the economy.

    Wages were frozen. 12 million men were enslaved via the draft, no houses or automobiles built. Taxes soared. Fuel and food were rationed. Women were forced to get jobs. 400,000 Americans were killed and millions wounded. The national debt soared. Hundreds of merchant ships were sunk, including tankers along our east and gulf coasts that dumped millions of gallons of fuel into the sea.

    Yet we are told the war years were great.

  12. It’s convenient to badmouth the war now that almost all those who lived through it are dead.

    Not that I think it was a good war. I just think it’s convenient.

  13. I actually believe that MANY Jews were brought over in a hush hush operation in Operation Paper Clip. I believe that it was enormous and not limited to Nazis, but primarily Jews. I believe that the U.S. population is probably between 8-10% Jewish, and not 2.5% Jewish, based on the fact that I just have known a very high proportion of Jews throughout my life living and working in various regions of the country.

    The census questions everything about ethnic identity except religion, and Jews have fought tooth and nail to prevent it from being asked on the census, citing the Holocaust, however, the Japanese and Native Americans were in concentration camps in America, and the census asks if people are of Japanese or Native American descent.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Patricus
  14. WW2 was essentially the 2nd Round of WW1,

    whose root purpose was

    a) bring as much of the planet as possible under Judeo-communist control, and

    b) enable a Zionist Jew-state in Palestine as a base for future globalist operations.

    both missions: accomplished. So, for the Jews (despite c. 20% KIA),

    it was a good war indeed.

  15. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:

    WW2 was a trap set to bring down the
    entire West and what’s left of Christianity.

    Though 2020/21 appearr to be the
    years, Trump stands in the way.

  16. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @No Friend Of The Devil

    Many would agree with you.

    LBJ had his own operation to
    bring his people into America.

  17. What mankind has not learned from WWII is that all wars are fought over power, manifested as interest. That is why we now stand on the precipice of WWIII.
    https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/

  18. @SolontoCroesus

    Swanson’s book is a useful addition to the growing body of WW2 revisionism, including the excellent material here at the Unz Review. Though Swanson takes a less red-pilled approach than most other revisionists, that makes his book a perfect gateway drug for left-leaning people. Buy copies and give them to your leftie peacenik friends.

    • Agree: JackOH
    • Disagree: SolontoCroesus
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
    , @JackOH
  19. @Kevin Barrett

    Not a frigging chance.

    Swanson is apparently trying to start a mini-industry around his book, offered for only $50 on its dedicated website.

    AND, for just $100 you too can enroll in a 6-week online course centered on the book.

    In the video advert for the course, a goofy looking dude with one of those annoying British-y accents that somebody seems to think is appealing to red-blooded Americans, says just 27 seconds into his spiel:

    “More people died in World War II than any other was in history, some 60- to 80-million people . . . including 27 million people from the Soviet Union. It also included some 6 million Jews who died at the hands of the Nazis during the holocaust. Genocides, massacres, massive bombings, disease and starvation were among the main causes of mass death.”

    — with this image on screen:
    Sorry, Dr. Barrett; you’re doing your part to advance alternative voices, and Swanson apparently thinks he’s advancing the cause of “peace,” and kudos to you for that.

    But when the effort to wage peace starts out by fulsomely validating one of the biggest lies in history; and when the real warmakers are not only not named but instead reaffirmed as special-status victims, you’re perpetuating war and hatred, not peace. To my way of thinking Swanson’s products are a “gateway” to the same old bastardization of history that we have been force-fed for several generations: Peace cannot emerge from falsehood — John 8:32: Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

    Rick Wiles and his team at TruNews have created a powerful explication of Truth: their four-part documentary, Sacrificing Liberty, premiered online a few weeks ago and is not available to the public
    https://www.sacrificingliberty.com

    Sacrificing Liberty is the story of Israel’s attack on the USS Liberty in the 1967 war, told by the men who survived the attack — men who, as 18-21 year olds were then tasked with recovering the body parts of their fellows from the flooded hulk of the ship.

    The men recount how they were ordered — threatened, really — to remain silent about what they had endured, and did so for over 50 years.
    The film documents Pres. Lyndon B Johnson’s key role in what appears to have been the deliberate attack on the Liberty with the intent of starting a nuclear bombing of Egypt.

  20. @SolontoCroesus

    Edit:

    Rick Wiles and his team at TruNews have created a powerful explication of Truth: their four-part documentary, Sacrificing Liberty, premiered online a few weeks ago and is not now available to the public
    https://www.sacrificingliberty.com. https://www.trunews.com/stream/sacrificing-liberty-would-israel-sink-u-s-warship-in-strait-of-hormuz-and-blame-iran

    The Sacrificing Liberty documentary can NOW be rented or purchased from TruNews at https://www.sacrificingliberty.com

  21. Patricus says:
    @No Friend Of The Devil

    8 to 10% Jews in the US is impossible. If Wikipedia can be relied upon (for this question anyway) there are 1.7% Jewish individuals in the US and 2.6% if partial Jews are included.

    Jews were an early group to stop reproducing and their population steadily declined since the early 20th century. Curiously Jews had Europe’s fastest rate of natural population increase in the 19th century.

    In my life I have met several Jews who were the last of their family line. If married parents have a single child who has no children, that’s the end. Other groups are following the population path of the Jews.

    That 8% might be accurate in New York and Rockland counties (both in NY state), nowhere else in America.

  22. Wikipedia cannot be relied on for an answer to a question that has never been surveyed at the mandatory national level. You are wrong. I have lived in several places where the Jewish population was in excess of thirty percent. They were not cities either. The Jewish urban population is even higher.

  23. From Washington Post:

    “So how does the current population compare with the American Jewish population soon after World War II? Twelve years after the end of the war, when many Jews had immigrated to the United States, the 1957 Current Population Survey (the only time the federal household count ever asked about religion) measured the U.S. Jewish population by religion at about 3.9 million people 14 and older. That’s less than the 4.2 million Jewish American adults by religion that Pew measured in 2013.” –Washington Post

    U.S. 1957 cenus said that the total U.S. population was 172 million, but we do not know how many Jews were in America that were under the age of 14 because the census did not include it in that year, which was a baby boom year, incidently. So we know with certainty that the U.S. Jewish population that year was greater than 2.2% but we do not know how much greater than 2.2% it was. We do not know the age groups of those American Jews either other than that they were older than 13 years of age. This is a deliberate conspiracy to coneal this information. Why would there be a deliberate conspiacy to conceal information by the government unless the government was tryimg to hide the fact that the Jewish population is much larger than they will admit to? Washington Post also said that because of the Holocaust thousands of Jews immigrated to America. How did they get here during the Holocaust without U.S. government assistance? Thousands could mean millions, but millions could not mean thousands. The government and media frequently understate sizes of groups in things like protests saying dozens when there were hundreds, or hundreds when there were thousands deliberately designed to understate things occuring that they wish to minimize.

    Also from Washington Post:
    “In 2016, the American Jewish Population Project at Brandeis University estimated the U.S. Jewish population at 7.2 million. The American Jewish Year Book estimated 6.9 million. And DellaPergola at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem estimated the core U.S. Jewish population at a lower 5.7 million — but when he included all the other definitions of being Jewish his count of American Jews reached 12 million.” -Washington Post

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/02/23/measuring-the-size-of-the-u-s-jewish-population-comes-down-to-identity/

    Andrea Iravani

  24. @John Regan

    The (((taxes))) & (((central banks))) are jewish which is why Hitler was evicting jews from Germany. As it stands now we live under Jewish tyranny and in some way we deserve it in spades…

  25. He left-out what I learned from Ron Unz articles and research from Marxist Jew Lenni Brenner that Zionist colluded with Nazism. Zionists also put road blocks in getting Jews transferred to USA for they wanted them transferred to Palestine. For these racist Zionists it suited their cause to see Jews suffer and USA, Britain not wanting them so that they could argue that the only solution was for Jews to go to Palestine. Also did Mr.Swanson read about how these Zionist Jews immediately follwg the war also coerced Jews in the camps to go to Palestine or else no WW II aid for them in those camps. And what about how , as Rabbi Watton said, international Jewry severely endangered German Jewry with their boycott of German goods in the late 30s. And what about a discussion as to why no one wanted the Jews. What about the work of Alexander Solzhenisyn’s work in explaining much of it from a Russian perspective from his suppressed book 200 years OF LIVING TOGETHER (Russian Jews with Russian Christians), and Israel Shahak’s work, or Lindemann’s book Esau’s tears.

  26. I wonder if David Swanson has researched into why the Jews were unwelcome is so many countries. Was it completely irrational? Was it simply just racism? Did Jewish behaviour also play a part in their sordid history? Has he seen the Dr. Meron Medzini ‘s article form the Forward Jewish publication. Even violent Imperial Japan feared the them.. He writes “On the one hand they feared the Jews because they saw how many Jews were involved in the Russian Revolution and the early days of the Soviet government. There was admiration of the Jews, but even fear.” https://forward.com/culture/359072/why-did-japan-treat-jews-differently-during-world-war-ii/ . Other works to understand the Jewish threat was Gus Russo’s two books exposing the Russian Jewish mob and its impact on America (the books THE OUTFIT and SUPERMOB,. Both wonderfully summarized in a lengthy Ron Unz article); and Bendersky’s the Jewish Threat; John Beatty’s Iron Curtain Over America; Laurent Guyenot’s FROM YAHWEH TO ZION , Michael Piper’s FINAL JUDGEMENT; books by Mossad whistleblower Victor Ostrovsky, their major involvement in major terrorism acts. The mother of them all 9/11.

  27. Wally says:
    @nature

    “Disappointing” in that we see no mention of just how fake & impossible the so called “holocaust” Big Lie really is.

    “WAS IT ABOUT SAVING JEWS? “In reality, the U.S. and British governments engaged for years in massive propaganda campaigns to build war support but never made any mention of saving Jews.” (p.21)”

    There was no “program of extermination” from which to ‘save Jews’ and there is no proof there was. Simple as that.

    Want more? Want to discuss it?

    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  28. @SolontoCroesus

    Once people learn that the heroic myth they used to believe in was a lie, they may ask themselves what else the mythmakers could be lying about.

    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  29. @JimmyCrackCorn

    Jimmy 

    The Germans get pretty pissed when someone tries to remove them from power! Seriously, throughout history the Germans as well as other Europeans, Asians, Indo Europeans, and Central and South Americans, as well as Africans have all practiced acts of domination throughout history. Apparently you have an extremely limited understanding of history. BTW, it was Nelson Aldrich and  Rockefeller that created the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve Act was passed by congress and the President, and the Morgans, Rockefellers, and Mellons were the largest beneficiaries at that time. So, it is not as if the Germans object to Tyranny, the Germans just seem to object to the fact that they are not the Tyrants. See King Charles I and King Charles V. Had to take over the Catholic church!  No wonder the Brits, Swedes, and Russians left it ! Oh, and then the Germans that controlled the Catholic church sent the Spaniards to enslave people all over the world in the Spanish Inquisition! And BTW, who is it that is controlling the EU? Germany again! Trying to prevent Brexit. The Germans have really serious control issues. Since I happen to live in the state with the highest German population, McCarthy Dahmerville,  I can state that this is true. The problem is that complete strangers and aquaintances  feel entitled to try to dictate through brute force tactics which also include illegal crimes  and property and rights violations how others live. You can thank Wisconsin for the Patriot Act, sponsored by James Sensenbrenner! And You can thank Wisconsin for the Department of Homeland Security, created by Tommy Thompson! RNC former chair, Renice Preibus, another person from Wisconsin! And you can thank Wisconsin for Eugenics, and the John Birch Society, and the Sewer Socialists with Mayor Meyer, and The American Nazi Party, with Arthur Jones! Deceased Israeli PM Golda Meier, she is from Wisconsin too! It just keeps happening! Really FUBAR cultue! The German Jews are no different from the German Nazis in many cases. They are pretty much the same, except that they hate each other! It’s the damned Germans! Religion is irrelevent! They are control freaks! 

    However, I do wish the  usury would stop, regardless of religion, race or ethnicity.

    Andrea Iravani

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @anonymous
  30. Wally says:
    @No Friend Of The Devil

    said:
    “And BTW, who is it that is controlling the EU? Germany again! Trying to prevent Brexit. The Germans have really serious control issues. ”

    IOW, you are a bigot.

    The fact is that Germany is the most productive country in the EU, they give free rides to the likes of lazy Greece, Ireland, etc. Of course they have something to say about the EU, and well they should.
    Without Germany there is no EU, like it or not.

    I hardly think your alleged information about McCarthy Dahmerville means anything. Thta’s your best shot? LOL

    And what’s with your “Germany again!” nonsense. I guess the British, French, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese Empires were not about “control”. You’re full of propaganda.
    map:
    “The Nazis Were Trying to Take Over The World”, except:
    https://forum.codoh.com/download/file.php?id=2598&mode=view

  31. anonymous[115] • Disclaimer says:
    @No Friend Of The Devil

    @ #3: https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_tribute-to-andre-vltchek-wests-sadistic-personality-disorder/#comment-4181826
    NFotD wrote:
    “I suspect that they have been attempting to get me to join them in order to shut me up. Vault 7 technology is being used on me and DEWs, and illegal surgery, and repeated breakins, theft, vandalism, spying with gas lighting, and stalking. I refuse to be a part of it. They have destroyed my life, so why in the hell would I want to associate with or work for the psychopaths that have destroyed not only my life, but much of the world? I wouldn’t!!!”

    Are you sure it is the gubmint that is “trying to shut you up”, or is it Germans? After all, Freud was German.

  32. JackOH says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Kevin, thanks. I only did a quick eye-roll of your summary of Swanson; I trust the commenters on the substance of your interview with him.

    A few obvious thoughts come to mind. There’s the commonsensical cliche derived from sales and other negotiations of all sorts: I’d rather have my client or adversary agree partly with me rather than having him not agree at all. Half a loaf is better than none. The perfect is the enemy of the good (Eugene Bardach).

    The 1914-1945 European war has been a rich source of political capital for the Left, and disturbing psychological capital for many of its constituents. It’s a pretty good thing when a man like Swanson makes some adjustment to the standard-issue WWII narrative.

  33. @Kevin Barrett

    “once people learn that the heroic myth they used to believe in was a lie . . .”

    I was going to agree, then state that Swanson fails to state that the Myth is a Lie.

    But now I get it: You and Swanson are working from the position that undermining the “Good war” and “Greatest generation” myths will inevitably lead to questioning the Big H myth.

    Trickle down economics for truth-telling.

    As well, how is that going to work when Swanson repeatedly reinforces the core myth?

    Or try this analogy: “Once you learn that your mother secretly binged on ice cream, you will eventually start to question the mysterious disappearance of your father.”

    Your mother has told you for all your life that your father beat her and drank too much (pay no attention to that blood-soaked rug in the garage), and since his mysterious disappearance she has repeatedly punched, kicked and even shot at your school mates, and also fenced in as her own property 200′ of the next door neighbor’s property.

    Your uncle as well as her very best friends tell you all the time that it’s perfectly fine for her to beat up your pals and to steal the neighbor’s property. That same uncle and those same best friends also reinforce at every opportunity the narrative that your father beat your mother — just as Swanson reinforces early and often the narrative that the Big H is slam-dunk truth.

    Your father disappeared 70 years ago, which made your life miserable; and the property your mother stole has made your neighbor’s lives worse than miserable.

    But that ice cream thing is going to make you start to question your father’s disappearance.
    Eventually.
    Sometime or other.
    And then do something about it.
    Somehow.

    Because that’s what the civilizational principle of equal justice means: that after — pick a number — 100 million? — people have been killed and entire nations destabilized or stolen outright, eventually, “people may ask themselves what else the myth makers may be lying about.”

    When TruNews premiered Sacrificing Liberty, https://www.sacrificingliberty.com six or so of the men who survived Israel’s attack on the US ship (34 American sailors were killed) were in the room. At the closing, one of them, I do not recall who, said, “How many have suffered and died to protect zionism?”

    As far as I can tell, Swanson does not even mention zionism in his book/online course.
    But Edmund Black records that “zionists returned from Versailles with a dual triumph.”
    iow, zionists won WWI.

    Zionists also won WWII.

    Zionists are ‘winning’ the GWOT.

    In my view, zionists are four-square behind the Covid scam (a Jew who had been in contact w/ an AIPACer carried the contagion to New York), and they’ve published their support for BLM.

    A few days ago Pat Lang’s blog featured an article by Haaretz correspondent Amira Hess:
    “… the Israeli Victory Is Nearly Complete.”

    “Twenty years later, the Israeli victory is nearly complete: The well-planned armed robbery of Palestinian land goes on daily unhindered. The model that Israel created in Gaza is being copied in the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) and translated into something akin to “Pales of Settlement” which, as long as they don’t show signs of fury and rebellion, are of no interest to the Jews in Israel, the supreme ruler.

    Is it too late for “people to ask what else the myth makers are lying about?”

  34. @Wally @Anonymous115,

    Wally & Anonymous115,

    I stand by my original statement in its totality without things taken out of context.

    Andrea Iravani

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kevin Barrett Comments via RSS