The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Full ArchivesJared Taylor Podcasts
Polygamous Refugees Coming Your Way? with Jared Taylor
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks


Jared Taylor and his co-host note that 12.5 percent of Afghan women are in polygamous marriages. Which will prevail: anti-bigamy laws or shariah? The hosts also discuss the most influential people in the world, the wisdom of Jenn Jackson, and “white supremacy with a tan.”

(Republished from Renaissance Radio by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: Ideology • Tags: Immigration, Muslims, Polygamy 
Hide 11 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. The above image is of Indonesian people not Afghani for those who are too blind to see.

    Those in these types of marriage are practising Islam to a high degree and will not leave a country that is going to be governed using the Quran as a basis to a country which is becoming more atheistic bit by bit.

    The above title is BOLLOCKS as we say in the UK.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @TG
    , @Raches
  2. “If the laws of the country conflict with Islamic law, if one goes against the other, then I am going to follow (Sharia law)”

    https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2008/05/24/gtas_secret_world_of_polygamy.html

  3. nsa says:

    Settle the Afghan polygamists in Utah. Settle the old Afghan goats married to 13 year old child brides in Appalachia. Settle Afghans addicted to bacha bazi in West Hollywood. The Afghan death squad quislings should be relocated to Washington DC, Reston VA, Langley VA.

  4. Wokechoke says:
    @BDS Always

    It’s common enough of Pakistanis in the UK to have two or three wives like this. A Pathan will be similar entering into multiple marriages. Prosecution for bigamy is only enforced against men who are white and the second or first wife pursues charges.

  5. ruralguy says:

    Are they refugees?, or parasites mobbing a dying nation?

  6. TG says:
    @BDS Always

    I must disagree. The Afghanis are miserably poor and will go anywhere to avoid starving, including the ‘infidel’ west. And really, as “Wokechoke” said, third-world refugees generally aren’t prosecuted for things like this – just as they aren’t prosecuted for identity theft or violating tax laws etc., because that would slow down the influx of cheap labor. And the rich want cheap labor, and increased upwards pressure on rents (which occurs even if the immigrants are unemployed).

    So let’s get this straight: the Afghanis are highly inbred, with a mean IQ I think of about 84. They are wife-beating pederasts (or at least, widely tolerant of pederasty). They breed like rodents, with the highest fertility rate outside of Africa: their population has doubled from 20 million in 2001 to about 40 million today, and will hit 80 million in the next 20 years, and they can’t even feed half the people they already have today: gosh, where do you think these surplus tens of millions will go? (One guess). They also hate Americans, and “green on blue” killings were so common that even our ‘loyal’ Afghani allies had to be excluded from entering US bases unless they were disarmed and searched first.

    And now we hear that one in eight Afghani women are in polygamous marriages. I mean, what’s not to like.

    It would be tempting to call the Afghanis “Stone Age”, but that could be construed as being a racist insult to cavemen (mustn’t be racist).

    But on the brighter side, as the purpose of bringing all these Afghani refugees is simply to force population growth upwards, nobody is checking who is coming here, we’re handing out blank visas, so we’ll be getting a lot of random Pakistanis and Chechens etc. as well.

    What could go wrong?

  7. Raches says:
    @BDS Always

    The above image is of Indonesian people not Afghani for those who are too blind to see.

    Good eye.  From racial characteristics alone, they look much more like Southeast Asians than Afghanis.  I don’t know the minutiae of differences in that region, or Indonesian dress customs, well enough to pin it; a reverse image search suggests that this image is either Indonesian, Malaysian, or from an Indonesian or Malaysian family somewhere in Europe.  The image has been used all over the Web to represent “polygamy”, since 2009 at the latest.  I could not positively identify the original source without much more effort than I am willing to spend on it.  (By the by, the use of totally unsourced images on the Web is a huge problem.)

    Mr. Taylor should be more careful than mainstream journalists are in their use of random photos as “stock photos”.

    Those in these types of marriage are practising Islam to a high degree and will not leave a country that is going to be governed using the Quran as a basis to a country which is becoming more atheistic bit by bit.

    The above title is BOLLOCKS as we say in the UK.

    Disagreed.  That is naïf, at best:  Devout Muslims have a history of Islamic expansionism, one way or another.  Many “migrants” and “refugees” are manifestly not only devout, but fanatical.  And a poor choice of illustrative photo does not altogether invalidate the substance of Mr. Taylor’s point, which he makes in the podcast. ®

  8. Jared Taylor and his co-host note that 12.5 percent of Afghan women are in polygamous marriages.

    With a lot less than 12.5% of the men!

  9. SafeNow says:

    “third-world refugees generally aren’t prosecuted for things like this – just as they aren’t prosecuted for identity theft or violating tax laws etc…”

    California here. I will expand this good point. The “etc” in the above quote includes the everyday stuff. These are visible, and infuriating, dangerous, unpleasant, and culture-changng. Not yielding the right-of-way for an ambulance. Performing noisy construction work on a peaceful Sunday street, contrary to local law. Parking the trucks overnight on the front lawn. Or, if not actually illegal, disruptive. Like using the hospital emergency room as the family physician, or for the kid’s soccer-team physical. Not tying-down the ladder or mattress, resulting in a “ladder in lane” major traffic jam, delaying thousands for an hour. And, getting down to the culture-changing small-but-important stuff: Not accepting and reciprocating a smile.

  10. I would say that the ones who should be screaming the loudest on this are the Mormons. They have even been killed in the past for polygamy. Keep voting for the left, because you know what they will say. We have to respect these peoples IDENTITY..

  11. anonymous[164] • Disclaimer says:

    Monogamy is more natural for humankind, but polygamy should be fine too, if the concerned people are okay with it (especially the women). The people in question here are overwhelmingly monogamists, and strictly too, and not like the *wink* “monogamy” of the whorish western world.

    Since this essay takes a racist dig at polygamy…

    Polygamy (incl. monogamy) is certainly better than Polyamory, Adultery, Promiscuity and Infidelity, which are core “values” of the western evilisation.

    Polygamy establishes healthy families, while the other abominations lead to broken ones.

    Polygamy is certainly better from a moral and spiritual point of view. But, those are alien concepts to said evilisation.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS