The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Pedro de Alvarado Archive
Yes, Virginia Dare, the Great Replacement Triggered Venezuela’s Decline
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Earlier (2003!) by Steve Sailer: The Wind from the South—Anti-White Populism

A loyal reader recently sent me Michael M. Rosen’s piece in the Washington Examiner that tried to explain Venezuela’s economic and political collapse [How Venezuela was destroyed from within, July 14, 2022]. Rosen blamed corruption and the socialist economic policies of successive regimes. And indeed, this Conservatism Inc.’s take on the matter contains a sliver of truth. But as a Venezuelan myself, I can say with certainty that Rosen is only half right…and maybe not half. As the reader reminded me, the rise of a mixed-race elite, most notably the late president, Hugo Chávez, and the immigration of non-whites from neighboring countries, explains a lot more.

Granted, as Rosen wrote, the fiscal policies of Chávez and his successor, strongman Nicolás Maduro, have wrecked a “once-great country”:

At the height of the economic crisis in 2018, inflation surged to an astronomical 130,000%. Between 2013 and 2019, according to the International Monetary Fund, Venezuelan GDP plummeted by a staggering 65%. By 2020, more than 5 million Venezuelans, out of a total population of 30 million, had fled the country.

As a report on CNN Espanol put it, “runaway inflation has decimated Venezuela. As the value of money and wages has become worth less and less, the despair on the population has deepened” [Venezuela gives a rare look at its economy. It’s an ugly, ugly picture, by Jorge Luis Pérez Valery and Abdel Alvarado, CNN Espanol, May 29, 2019]. Venezuelan emigrants are impacting many host countries: “[E]stimates suggest that public spending related to growing migrant populations could reach around 0.6 percent of GDP in Colombia by 2023, 0.3 percent in Ecuador and Peru, and 0.1 percent in Chile” [For Venezuela’s Neighbors, Mass Migration Brings Economic Costs and Benefits, by Emilio Fernandez Corugedo & Jaime Guajardo, IMFBlog, November 21, 2019].

But punching buttons on the adding machine to reckon the financial disaster that Chávez caused doesn’t get to the bottom of the problem. As the reader’s letter said, since 1999, when Chávez (who was partly black and indigenous—BIPOC, in the terminology of Left Twitter) took over, Venezuela has been ruled by a mixed-race elite that is vastly more corrupt and incompetent than its corrupt and incompetent white elite, which had governed from the late 1950s through the 1990s.

He writes

[T]he mixed race [herders] finally took over the government. For the first time, [Venezuela] was not ruled by a corrupt and incompetent white government, but by a vastly more corrupt and incompetent mulatto government. Now most of the educated whites have left the country, and it will never return to white rule. Someday this will happen in Brazil, the only other substantial country in South America with a large population of people who are partially African.

Say what you want about the Bolsheviks, they were right to observe that politics is all about “who, whom?”

Here are Venezuela’s demographics: 68 percent of Venezuelans are mestizos (mixed race), while 21 percent are European, predominantly of German, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish origin. Venezuelans of African extraction account for 8-10 percent of the country’s population and Amerindians make up 2 percent of the population.

Curiously, Venezuela has a decent sized Arab diaspora, numbering 1.6 million. These are Syrian and Lebanese Christians. Some of the immigrants and their progeny, such as former Minister of Industries and National Production and current Minister of Petroleum Tareck El Aissami, figure prominently as elites in the current Chavista regime [How Lebanese descendants are shaking Latin America’s politics, by Richard Hall, The National, September 7, 2018].

Of course, Venezuela has been a mixed-race country from day one, and was periodically politically unstable until the 20th century when it modernized and oil was discovered. But Venezuela’s pragmatic immigration policy that attracted Europeans played the most significant role in the country’s prosperity. People are policy, not oil.

From the late-19th into the 20th centuries, large numbers of immigrants from Italy, Portugal, and Spain emigrated, quickly integrated into Venezuelan society and formed a part of the country’s burgeoning middle class:

In 1870, Antonio Guzmin Blanco became president of Venezuela and exercised power, directly or indirectly, until 1888. The country became relatively pacified and economically prosperous. Guzmin was a fervent believer in the utility of immigration. A new law was promulgated in 1874 and the government took an active role in fomenting and subsidizing immigration. Private individuals made contracts with the government to bring in groups of immigrants who were given free passage and housing until they were able to obtain work. Nearly 15,000 arrived between 1874 and 1877 and another 9,000 between 1881 and 1884. Between 1874 and 1888 a total of 26,090 immigrants arrived, of whom 20,544 were Spaniards. … The second most numerous group were 2,764 Italians.

[Italian Immigration in Venezuela: A Story Still Untold, by Susan Berglund, Central University of Venezuela, May 1, 1994]

Thanks to this European immigration, by the 1960s, Venezuela became Latin America’s most prosperous country, with a standard of living comparable to that of southern Europe. Venezuelans of European origin figured prominently in the nation’s success story.

Of course, Venezuela had problems before Chávez came into power. Under the first term of President Carlos Andres Perez (1974-1979), Venezuela turned to socialism. The government nationalized its oil industry and began to use petroleum revenue to set up a welfare state. (Perez’s father, by the way, came from Spain’s Canary Islands, another group that the country’s immigration policies favored.)

But more damning than Perez’s socialist policies was the decline in European immigration versus that from neighbors in South America. The lavish welfare state was a magnet for non-white Latin Americans, notably Colombians and Peruvians, who did the usual unskilled work that immigrants on that side of the Bell Curve usually do:

Emigration [from Colombia] has been rising in recent years, though it is not an entirely new phenomenon in Colombia. In fact, emigration on a significant scale began in the 1960s and was primarily economically motivated. In the 1970s and 1980s, Venezuela and the United States represented the main destination countries for labor migrants, and these countries still host the majority of Colombian migrants.

[Colombia: In the Crossfire, by Myriam Bérubé, Migration Policy Institute, November 1, 2005]

Peru was another significant source of immigrants to Venezuela, at least until recently [The Peruvian Diaspora: Portrait of a Migratory Process, by Jorge Durand & Mariana Ortega Breña, Latin American Perspectives, September 2010]. Now though, thanks to the collapse of the Venezuelan economy, Peru is a destination for destitute Venezuelans [Social and Economic Integration of Venezuelan Migrants,].

Many of Venezuela’s mixed-race immigrants joined the non-white underclass to propel the black, Spanish, and Amerindian Chávez to victory in the 1998 presidential elections.

Though Venezuela was headed downhill before Chávez took over, with two failed coup attempts and a nasty bout of inflation in the 1990s [A History of Venezuelan Inflation, by José Niño, Mises Institute, December 7, 2018], under his rule from 1999 through 2013, the decline accelerated. Chávez put socialism and corruption into overdrive. He pursued aggressive confiscatory policies against enemies of the regime, who were usually part of the country’s white European upper crust.

In many respects, Chavismo blended two styles of Leftism — class-based and race-based. He seized the landholdings of his political enemies, wealthy landowners, in a redistribution scheme called Mission Zamora, which even America’s Leftist National Public Radio called a failure:

President Hugo Chavez’s government has made the expropriation of farmland—taking land from big landholders and giving it to the poor—central to his so-called revolution. The idea is to spur production and end dependence on food imports.

But the results have fallen short, making the country more dependent on foreign food than ever before.

[In Venezuela, Land Redistribution Program Backfires, by Juan Forero, July 15, 2009].

Chávez established other “Bolivarian missions” programs, supposedly to help poor Venezuelans. In fact, they consolidated Chávez’s power base among impoverished, non-white Venezuelans.

Foreign Policy magazine explained in 2015

Historically, land reform has been a showcase of authoritarian regimes seeking to consolidate their power. Autocrats in countries such as China, Egypt, Mexico, Peru, and Zimbabwe have burnished their revolutionary credentials and defanged their reactionary foes by redistributing land from powerful landowners to the rural poor. Such class-based authoritarian land reforms are often broad in nature, granting swathes of land from large landowners directly to the laborers that work it.

In Venezuela, however, the government of Hugo Chávez and his successor, Nicolás Maduro, has given land reform an additional, polarizing dimension — it has used it to selectively dispense patronage to its supporters and punish its enemies. Two important tactics undergird this strategy. First, the regime has undermined private property rights, making a vast pool of land available for redistribution. Secondly, it has created an environment of deliberate legal ambiguity, enabling bureaucrats to pick and choose winners and losers for political rather than technical reasons.

This Land Was Your Land—In Venezuela, land redistribution is not just an ideological imperative — it’s how the regime rewards its friends and punishes its enemies.

By Michael Albertus, November 13, 2015

Apart from the economic policies Chávez pursued, the constituencies it served are equally if not more important. Chávez of course was partly black and indigenous, so he put the country’s black and indigenous people on a pedestal while diminishing the accomplishments of white Venezuelans.

In 2002, Chávez grabbed the brass ring of anti-European public policy. He abolished Columbus Day, which was called Día de la Raza, and created the Day of Indigenous Resistance, Día de la Resistencia Indígena, to celebrate indigenous people’s struggle against European settlers. Chávez repeatedly used the occasion to “redistribute” land [Venezuela: Land returned on Indigenous Resistance Day,]. Such was the mania for indigenous pride that protestors tore down a statue of Christopher Columbus in Caracas and hanged it:

Protestors used thick yellow climbing ropes to bring down the 100 year old statue of Columbus and dragged the remains through downtown Caracas and towards the Teresa Carreño theatre, where hundreds of indigenous people presented their cultural songs and dance to each other and other supporters commemorating October 12. The protestors intended to ask indigenous people to bring Columbus to trial after 512 years.

[Columbus Statue Toppled in Venezuela on Day of Indigenous Resistance, by Robin Nieto,, October 13, 2004]

Scrapping Columbus Day represented Venezuela’s definitive departure from its European heritage.

The funny thing is, anti-white sentiments across Latin America are relatively recent. Historically, Latin America states have been civic nationalist and never really pursued explicitly racial policies. Latin American elites knew and publicly recognized that Europeans represented the pinnacle of human achievement. If Latin America wanted to advance, most prominent leaders in the 19th century understood, then importing Europeans was the way to do it.

For example, Argentine diplomat and classical liberal theorist Juan Bautista Alberdi believed Argentina had to import Europeans en masse to become a civilized nation. His most famous expression was “to govern is to populate.” His work largely influenced the Argentine constitution of 1853. Article 25 promotes European migration:

The Federal Government shall encourage European immigration, and it may not restrict, limit, or burden with any tax whatsoever the entry into Argentine territory of foreigners whose purpose is tilling the soil, improving industries, and introducing and teaching the sciences and the arts.

Alberdi’s sentiments about Europeans were typical. Governments actively encouraged white immigration to accelerate blanqueamiento (whitening).

That is why countries like Argentina shone as a beacon of hope, although today Argentina is heading in Venezuela’s direction [Argentina: A Mirror of Your Future, by Gustavo Semeria, American Renaissance, April 14, 2017].

Venezuela is a safe topic for conservatives as long as they burble anodyne political platitudes about “corruption” and “socialism” and avoid the obvious, just as they avoid it about non-white immigration to the United States.

Fact is, non-whites favor corrupt, socialist regimes because it’s the easiest way to extract money from productive whites without robbing them in a dark alley. Non-white governments, as we know from observing Detroit, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C., are typically filled with angry anti-white activists who pursue an anti-white agenda

Latin America’s corruption won’t be fixed by just constitutional reforms. It will ultimately take a demographic overhaul to save the region, which must become whiter, especially among its ruling classes, to thrive.

That goes double for Venezuela, after 14 years of Hugo Chavez, and now, a decade under Maduro.

The lesson for Venezuela, as it is for the United States, is this: Demography is destiny.

Pedro de Alvarado [Email him] is a Hispanic dissident who is well aware of the realities of race from his experience living throughout Latin America and in the States.

As a native of lands conquered by brave Spaniards but later subverted by centuries of multiracial trickery and despotic governance, Pedro offers clear warnings to Americans about the perils of multiracialism.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
Hide 30 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. A load of rot. Venezuela has been under terrible US sanctions for years. Part of the problem?

    “Chavez put socialism and corruption into overdrive.” Synonyms, you think?”

    There’s a chapter on Venezuela in The New Confessions of An

    • Replies: @Elric
  2. It’s a fault of your site, Ron, that the first comments disappear so can’t be edited. That one got away unfinished. But America forcing privatization on weaker countries via its Hit Men, and grabbing their businesses, might, might, might be part of the problem.

    • Replies: @Mr. Grey
  3. When will Sweden become Venezuela?

    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  4. The only thing wrong with eugenics was the use of force to implement it. The idea of eugenics is sound; get rid of the low end of the gene pool where stupidity and envy reign.

  5. Notsofast says:

    typical venezuela hit piece, no mention to coups and assassination attempts against chavez and maduro. most glaring omission is the failure to mention the years of illegal u.s. sanctions designed to destroy their economy.

    • Agree: Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Elric
  6. Notsofast says:

    …..get rid of… would you suggest, that this be done?

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  7. Realist says:

    The only thing wrong with eugenics was the use of force to implement it.

    Absolutely correct. The last thing this country…this planet needs is more idiots.

    • Replies: @Rev. Spooner
  8. @Notsofast

    Getting rid of the low end is a matter of stopping the support of what isn’t self sustaining. Stop welfare to the millions on it that are abusing the system. Let the phony religious institutions tend to the indigent. That sends a message to the 3rd world that coming to the US isn’t a guarantee of a free ride as it once was.

    What you subsidize, you get more of. This is common sense. Just stop all the free stuff and the low end either shapes up or dies out. It’s the free stuff that allows the low IQ to survive so that the political parties can pander to them for votes. The low IQ vote for a living instead of working for a living.

  9. @Realist

    I hereby declare you to be an “Idiot”.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  10. An informative article, Sr De Alvarado.
    5 million Venezuelan emigrants out of 30 million is a lot of people. A large percentage would undoubtedly be white and skilled/professional workers. Estimates of GDP decline are 35% for 2019, 30% for 2020, and 10% for 2021. The long term outlook is gloomy.

    Realistically, the numbers of White Venezuelans would be expected to decline. It is likely that few will return. Yet these are the people who largely perform the technical and professional tasks necessary to make any modern economy work. There will come at ime when there just aren’t enough of them. At that point, the state will collapse and long term civil war and faction fighting will ensue. RIP Venezuela.

  11. @Rev. Spooner

    Since Realist was replying to my post, why not state your objection fully so it can be evaluated? Surely you can write up your view succinctly.

    Name calling settles nothing but does tend to make the issuer seem less than intelligent, so please refrain from everything but a substantive statement of your view and why my view is somehow wrong.

    • Replies: @Rev. Spooner
  12. Elric says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    No, the sanctions may be a bad idea but they are not the reason Venezuela is failing. It is their extreme socialist policies and also the racial factor mentioned in the article. ZOG America is definitely an international force of chaos today, but it is not responsible for every problem in the world.

    • Troll: Notsofast
  13. Elric says:

    Whatever the mischievous actions of ZOG America including their sanctions, they are not primarily responsible for Venezuela’s economic woes. It is their failed socialist policies (capitalism works with some social programs) and the racial factor this article mentioned. Venezuela is capable of ruining itself without Weimerica.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  14. Same is happening to Brazil; Brazil is getting less and less White as years pass…
    Brazil was around 65% self-declared White many, many decades ago. Now, it’s around 45% self-declared White.

    For 3 main reasons, that I can think of:
    I) Lower fertility of White Brazilians compared to the mixed-race and Black;
    II) Miscegenation of White Brazilians with Mulattoes and even Blacks;
    III) Tons of White Brazilians, if they can, immigrate to Europe or USA/Canada or even Australia/New Zealand.

    I) ‘Mixed-race’ is known as Pardo, in Brazil;
    II) 50%-30% of ‘self-declared Whites’ are not truly White;
    III) Levantines, mostly of Syrian or Lebanese ancestries, are counted as White in Brazil;
    IV) Brazil has lots of East Asians, mostly Japanese.

  15. @Priss Factor

    Latin America (Venezuela, included) has very, very few Muslims.

  16. Mr. Grey says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    Confessions of an Economic Hitman is a fantasy by a failed fiction writer.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  17. Notsofast says:

    thank you for your repetitive bullshit, constituting 2/3’s of your total comments.

    • Troll: 36 ulster, Verymuchalive
  18. @RoatanBill

    1st Step) Make a deal with various countries – maybe in Africa or Asia;
    2nd Step) Pay generously Americans of lower-than-average IQ to give up their citizenships and immigrate to said countries mentioned in the ‘1st Step’.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  19. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Looking at things just from the US perspective, the working population has been ripped off for decades to support a huge portion of human trash. Sometimes multiple generations of said trash got gov’t support for a variety of reasons, none of them legitimate from the average working guy’s perspective.

    Why should the working population pay to get rid of the human trash? If your response is that it’s better to pay them off once to get rid of them, that’s giving in to what amounts to extortion. Foisting off a problem on another population is also wrong ethically.
    The Brits worked out a deal with Kenya to dump their trash in that African nation but the deal fell through.

    There’s something else to consider. The average IQ of the US population is 98 or 99 depending on where you look. That level of IQ is pathetic in a 1st world country. It’s people above 120 that do most of the innovation and moving the society along to attempt to stay 1st world. Clearly the US has lost its edge and is in the process of serious decline but to try to ship half or more of the population somewhere is arithmetically not realistic.

    The whole world has the same problem. Lots of low IQ people barely contributing, if at all and breeding more of their kind while voting to steal as much as possible from the truly productive in the society. The people that work and support themselves regardless of IQ are productive at their level and aren’t a problem yet, but as time progresses and more and more skills are required, even those will become problematic as fewer jobs are available for them to fill. This problem is only going to get worse over time unless the current unproductive trash and their propensity to breed isn’t curtailed.

    • Replies: @Vergissmeinnicht
  20. @RoatanBill

    I) I think you’re overestimating USA’s IQ – 95 or 96 is more likely;
    II) I do not support moving the lower-than-average IQ to somewhere else against their will;
    III) I do support, moreover, paying GENEROUSLY the lower-than-average IQ¹ individuals to get sterilised (it’s up to them to accept or refuse this offer).

    1. Or, at least, for starters, the ones whose IQs are below 90.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  21. RogerL says:

    I find it curious that of all the race realism essays I’ve read on TUR, you are the first person to mention the issue of high levels of corruption in mixed-race governments.

    The evidence of that is in plain sight in the US, so anybody could see this, if they are looking for it.

    This lack of visibility is very concerning because high levels of street crime are a drain on the society and economy, but that is an order of magnitude less of an issue than high levels of crime in the government.

    Street crime makes being in that society unpleasant, but the society will continue to function. High levels of crime in the government can lead to a failed state.

    This further confirms my impression that most race reality people are more focused on ideology, and they avoid addressing the need for pragmatic solutions to the problems facing a mixed race society.

    This was also the first history of the evolution of Venezuela, which I’ve read, which focused on the cause and effect dynamics that drove that evolution.

    Most of what I’ve read about Venezuela was so politicized that it was hard to say what was really going on in Venezuela. I appreciated the lack of spin as you presented the facts.

    In particular, I’m thinking of this statement:
    Venezuela has been ruled by a mixed-race elite that is vastly more corrupt and incompetent than its corrupt and incompetent white elite, which had governed from the late 1950s through the 1990s.

    That statement explains a lot, which wasn’t clear to me, before. So the peasants did have valid complaints about the white government. However, the solution of putting mixed race people in charge of the government turned out to be a huge mistake.

    I suppose I have one question that still needs to be addressed. What was a bigger inflammatory factor on the part of the white government, racism or general corruption?

    This isn’t a simple question because I can see that at times it wouldn’t be at all clear, as to whether an abusive action, which was causing a non-white peasant to suffer, was at the root racism or corruption.

    Another factor would be predators who are simply exploiting the vulnerable, regardless of their race. However since people tend to take things personally, probably many people would interpret it as racism to people of their race. I live in the US and believe there is an intense predator/classism problem in the US, which confused people claim is racism.

    I suppose after corruption and classism have been reduced to low levels, then it would be easier to see how big of a problem racism is.

    Thanks for the education and warning.

  22. @Vergissmeinnicht

    98 and 99 IQ for the US average are not my estimates, that’s what I’ve read from several sources. I’ve never read anything lower than 98. IQ testing is unreliable at best and the number can’t be used except as a guide for discussion purposes. Pigeonholing someone by reference to an IQ number isn’t fair. What’s fair is reacting to their actions or lack of actions.

    I don’t believe in using force under any circumstances except as a reaction to force, fraud and other behavior that initiates negative outcomes. Then I believe it is proper and necessary to kill the person that initiated the violence, fraud, etc regardless of that person’s position in the society. A gov’t thug that initiates force or fraud by using the law as an excuse is still a predator and is fair game. Any action that produced a negative outcome not associated with premeditated planning should be forced to make restitution as in the case of an accidental injury or property damage, for example.

    I don’t condone extortion, bribery, or anything that pays the initiator of a problem to change his behavior, especially when it’s not necessary. The US simply has to turn off the welfare system for the physically capable dolts in the society to force them to go to work, replacing seasonal immigrant labor in the fields, digging ditches, cleaning graffiti, sweeping streets, clearing underbrush in forests, etc. As long as otherwise useless gov’t exists, it should provide these low end jobs for minimum wages and barracks housing.

    If people want to eat, they need to work and if they don’t like the low end work, they can improve themselves to find better jobs. This would also incentivise their children to learn something in school to not end up like their parents. Those that prefer a quick buck by becoming criminals should be executed on their first offense. Either way, they are no longer moochers on the rest of us and probably too tired with less free time to screw their brains out to produce more of their kind. The baby daddies the whores are famous for cavorting with should be forced to pay child support for each of their offspring. They helped create the problem and should be forced to help fix it. Once there’s a steep price to pay for 15 minutes of fun, the incidence of bastard children should decrease as a result.

    I’m in favor of abortion on demand for the first 3 months of pregnancy, abortion along with a medical reason for the next 3 months and no abortion except for medical emergency for the last 3 months. The baby factories should be encouraged to seek sterilization to improve their own living conditions.

  23. anon[137] • Disclaimer says:

    Lawyers have high IQs and yet they not only appear to be less productive than average and mildly below average IQ personages but downright counterproductive on an industrial scale. Same is true for the parasitical FIRE sector. How about the advertising and PR sectors? The woke “educators?” I betcha the neocons all have higher than average IQs. How about Freud, Bernays and Leon Trotsky? The list of such high IQ “contributors” to the well-being of humanity is endless.

    • Replies: @RoatanBill
  24. @anon

    The humanities and social sciences turn out the truly useless in the society. Every one of their “disciplines” is fraudulent having been concocted to gain an unfair advantage. Lawyers, psychologists, economists, etc just spout their useless opinions as though they were fact. These are all fraudulent “professions” that shouldn’t exist.

  25. Notsofast says:

    gotta disagree on lawyers, a good lawyer has a very specific knowledge relating to their area of expertise. i pity the poor soul that falls into the legal quagmire without proper legal advice. i think of the story you tell, of your friend that tried to take on the i.r.s. and was destroyed. i’m sure if he had consulted a competent attorney, they would have dissuaded him from his course of action. a good lawyer and c.p.a. are critical to protecting any remaining rights you may have left. the i.r.s. doesn’t want to take on competent professionals, much easier to pick on the little guy. the i.r.s. is about to hire 87,000 new agents, i wonder why?

  26. Qcic says:

    Venezuela has an interesting mixture of racial/cultural influences, more so if the East Indians in Trinidad are included.

    As widely pointed out on the UR, Communism generally has Jewish backing. Do Jewish people play a significant role in the elite power structure of Venezuela?

    I believe Communism and Socialism are terrible ideas, but I am slightly sympathetic to the Venezuelan narrative of throwing off the yoke of Colonialism which still seems to exist. Unfortunately, if the most competent and honest people are driven out in the process, why bother?

  27. @RoatanBill

    You will always come a cropper when you try eugenics. Look at China with it’s One Child Policy and India with it’s preference for male children. Japan and Europe have made it too expensive to have more than one child per couple.
    These are all different types of eugenics and are coming to bite these societies in their respective arses.
    The flood of immigrants are just our overlords importing cheap labor for their profit.

  28. I’m not advocating active eugenics as it was attempted before. Your reference to China and India is a non sequitur. The reasons white people can’t afford kids is because they are supporting the kids of the non white via gov’t mandate and arbitrary policy.

    I am advocating a softer eugenics that has no force associated with it, just prudent economic policy that denies the low end the continued and ever expanding support they rely on to live above their means and corrupt the political process by their voting for a living.

    What is so wrong with asking people to support themselves? Why is it that Phelopia and Testicleeze can get together and create a child that you and I have to then support for decades and possibly, or even probably, as a criminal since single parent households have a statistically high rate of producing ditbags once they reach adulthood?

    Part of why I left the US is because I no longer wanted to be taxed to support human trash, a scheme that is guaranteed to produce an ever increasing supply. I also saw that after 9/11 the country was headed for an all out police state and that pretty much has transpired.

    I want welfare shut off for able bodied people. Period. I’d also shut it off for the non able bodied as that’s supposed to be the role of the religions, to tend to the indigent. The bleeding hearts that want to keep shoveling money toward Phelopia can do so via their charity.

    If you want to eat, work for it. There’s no active program to go after baby daddies that the whores use to increase their children count that thereby increases their welfare payments. Admittedly, they’re too stupid to know that economically that’s a losing proposition, but it nevertheless increases the society’s cost to keep these losers alive. I’m after policy changes that are just common sense and common decency toward the working population.

  29. Von Rho says:

    About Richard Hall’s mention, Geraldo Alckmin is not Lebanese but Prussian. Americans are ignorant about ethnology.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pedro de Alvarado Comments via RSS
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV