The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Laurent Guyénot Archive
Will the Denazification Ever End?
Not until the “Vernichtung” of the Whites
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments

Auschwitz is the new Sinai. Jewishness is not anymore about being the people most loved by God, but about being the people most hated by men.[1]Jews are “the people chosen for universal hatred,” had proclaimed in 1882 Zionist pioneer Leo Pinsker in Auto-Emancipation. This new version of chosenness requires that Jewish suffering be “uniquely unique,” unparalleled in all human history. This in turn requires that Nazi cruelty against Jews be supreme, absolute — the unprecedented manifestation of pure metaphysical evil. In this new Holocaust religion, miracles do happen. Professor Simon Baron-Cohen suffered no ridicule for telling in his book The Science of Evil (2011) how, as “one of the many ‘experiments’ they had conducted,” “Nazi scientists had severed Mrs. Goldblatt’s hands, switched them around, and sewn them on again so that if she put her hands out palms down, her thumbs were on the outside and her little fingers were on the inside.”[2]Simon Baron-Cohen, The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty, Basic Books, 2011, kindle edition, as can also be read in the online edition at archive.org. This passage is reproduced, in a slightly altered form, in the New York Times.

Jewish sanctification is not the sole purpose behind the endless demonization of Hitler and Nazism. Another purpose is to make the anthropological bases of National Socialism unspeakable and unthinkable. Some fundamental ideas that once could be recognized as true, and even self-evident by a majority of people, are now banned from public discourse under the pretext that they are reminiscent of Nazism.

The “naziest” of these ideas is, of course, the greatness of the White race. Hitler spoke of the Aryan race, by which he meant all Germanic peoples, including the Dutch, Swedes, Norwegians, Finns, Swiss, as well as the English, whose leading ethnos is primarily of Anglo-Saxon and Norman descent.

“All human culture, art, science, and invention which surround us are almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan race. This very fact justifies the deduction that the Aryan alone was the founder of a superior type of human life and is the prototype of what we mean by the word ‘man’ today. He is the Prometheus of humanity from whose brilliant mind the divine spark of genius has always sprung, ever rekindling the fire which, in the form of knowledge, has illuminated the night of unspeakable mysteries, and thus sent man up the road to lordship over the other creatures of this earth. Take him away, and perhaps within a few thousand years, profound darkness will descend again upon earth, human civilization will vanish, and the world will become a desert.” (Mein Kampf 255).[3]All citations of Hilter’s Mein Kampf (MK) are from the Wewelsburg Archives edition, 2018, online at archive.org. All other citations of Hitler are from Adolf Hitler, Collection of Speeches, 1922-1945, online at archive.org.

Vienna State Opera, painted by Adolf Hitler, 1912
Vienna State Opera, painted by Adolf Hitler, 1912

Toward the end of his life, Frederick Lindemann (1886-1957), Churchill’s Jewish wartime advisor,[4]The son of an Alsacian engineer and of the widow of a banker named Davidson, Lindemann is listed among Oxford Jewish Personalities by the Oxford Chabad Society. According to Ronald Hilton (“Men Behind Roosevelt and Churchill”), he was a member of a group of Oxford Jewish intellectuals around Isaiah Berlin. and the inspiration for the British “strategic” bombing of German cities, “made a remark on more than one occasion with such an air of seriousness that he seemed to regard it as his testament of wisdom: […] ‘Do you know what the future historians will regard as the most important event of this age? […] It will be the abdication of the White man.”[5]As reported by Roy Harrod in The Prof: A Personal Memoir of Lord Cherwell, Macmillan, 1959, pp. 261-262, quoted from Mike King, “The Evil Professor Frederick Lindemann.” In other words, the Nazis’ defeat will mark the beginning of the end of White civilization. What the Nazis did, Whites will pay for, until they are destroyed morally, psychologically, demographically, genetically. The insane 1944 “Morgenthau Plan” against Germany, which US Secretary of War Henry Stimson condemned as “Semitism gone wild for vengeance,”[6]Quoted in David Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle, Focal Point, 1996, p. 20. was not fully implemented, but Jewish vengeance grew into a more far-reaching plan against the White race. The current cancellation of the White race is the final phase of the denazification project. This is why anti-Nazism (or anti-Fascism) is, still today, the banner of the conspiracy against Whites and their traditional values.

Studying Hitler

The excellent Andrew Joyce recently wrote: “There really is no question about the fact that White identity politics is post-modernity’s only radical political evil, and Adolf Hitler is its Great Satan, looming over a horde of contemporary minor demons.” Joyce suggests that, since White nationalism is identified as unredeemably evil in mainstream discourse, it cannot fight from that position with rational arguments. What is needed is a “fight fire with fire” strategy, that is, exposing the evilness of those who, under the guise of moral principles, are simply engaging in a slow genocide of their own race. “Aren’t they riddled with the most malevolent of intentions? Don’t they bleat endlessly about eugenic policies of yesteryear while paving the way for ‘after-birth abortion.’ They’re not wrong, my friends, they’re evil.”

I agree, but I want to suggest a complementary approach. Since the elaborate mythology of Nazi perversity is the weaponry of the post-modern assault on White civilization, there is no winning this cultural war without neutralizing it, breaking the spell of the Reductio ad Hitlerum. Before White nationalists or “race realists” can hope to emerge from their trenches and launch a successful offensive, they will have to first keep pounding at what Brenton Bradberry calls the “Myth of German Villainy”. What mainstream culture calls “Nazism” is a bogeyman. We need to deconstruct this fantasy, by studying the real thing. It starts by calling it by its proper name, National Socialism.

I am reminded of the story — can’t remember where I heard it — of a European man who once got a haircut in India. Unpleased with the result, he complained, “I look like Hitler!” The barber, flattered, answered with a big smile: “Yes, yes, very nice!” Let’s learn from the Indians. Next time someone tells you that you sound like Hitler, say, “Thank you!”

More seriously, de-demonizing Hitler and National Socialism is not the same as idealizing or promoting them. There is much to be criticized in Hitler’s philosophical, anthropological and political views (his anti-Slavism, for instance). They have to be contextualized, anyway. Ian Kershaw wrote in his introduction to his biography: “the answer to the riddle of his impact has to be found less in Hitler’s personality than in the changed circumstances of a German society traumatized by a lost war, revolutionary upheaval, political instability, economic misery and cultural crisis.” In truth, Hitler’s personality was shaped by Germany’s circumstances. History is the mother of psychology. At the end of World War I, Germany had been stabbed in the back, betrayed, humiliated, dismembered, ransacked, starved, and Hitler felt like Germany.

Whatever we think about Hitler’s personality, there is no justification for the ban on balanced or even positive appraisals of his thought. Should favorable studies of Hitlerism be banned because of the Third Reich’s alleged crimes against humanity? Let’s compare, then. The political theory of Karl Marx inspired the most bloody regimes on earth, responsible for the death of up to one hundred million people by torture, mass execution, deportation, forced labor or planned starvation, according to the authors of The Black Book of Communism (1997).[7]Stéphane Courtois, ed., The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard UP, 1999. And yet Communists are still allowed to claim that Marx’s theory is true, and that ideal Communism should not be confused with — and not even blamed for — the horrors committed in its name. By contrast, the bloodless National Socialist revolution of 1933 is universally condemned as an evil conspiracy against humanity, although it performed a social and economic miracle from 1933 to 1939. After visiting Germany in 1936, former British Prime Minister David Lloyd George wrote (Daily Express, September 17, 1936):

“I have now seen the famous German leader and also something of the great change he has effected. Whatever one may think of his methods — and they are certainly not those of a parliamentary country —, there can be no doubt that he has achieved a marvelous transformation in the spirit of the people, in their attitude towards each other, and in their social and economic outlook. He rightly claimed at Nuremberg that in four years his movement had made a new Germany. It is not the Germany of the first decade that followed the war — broken, dejected and bowed down with a sense of apprehension and impotence. It is now full of hope and confidence, and of a renewed sense of determination to lead its own life without interference from any influence outside its own frontiers. There is for the first time since the war a general sense of security. The people are more cheerful. There is a greater sense of general gaiety of spirit throughout the land. It is a happier Germany. I saw it everywhere, and Englishmen I met during my trip and who knew Germany well were very impressed with the change. One man has accomplished this miracle. He is a born leader of men. A magnetic and dynamic personality with a single-minded purpose, a resolute will and a dauntless heart. […] As to his popularity, especially among the youth of Germany, there can be no manner of doubt. The old trust him; the young idolize him. It is not the admiration accorded to a popular leader. It is the worship of a national hero who has saved his country from utter despondency and degradation.”[8]Published in the Daily Express, September 17, 1936, online here.

The merits of Hitler’s political theory should be judged by what it achieved in peacetime, as it was intended. “If Providence preserves my life,” Hitler declared in January 30, 1942, “my pride will be the great works of peace which I still intend to create.”[9]All citations of Hitler other than from Mein Kampf are from his Collection of Speeches, 1922-1945, online at archive.org What happened during the war is a different matter. So here is my modest contribution to a dispassionate study of Hitler’s political philosophy. It will shed light on Lindemann’s prophecy.

February 26, 1936: Hitler approves of the Volkswagen model, which he helped design
February 26, 1936: Hitler approves of the Volkswagen model, which he helped design

Germany and the organic political theory

First, some historical and theoretical perspective. Hitler’s political philosophy was rooted in a German tradition that included Fichte, Nietzsche, Kant, Hegel, and Schopenhauer (whose work Hitler said he carried “throughout the whole of the First World War”).[10]Yvonne Sherratt, Hitler’s Philosophers, Yale UP, 2013, p. 23. Yvonne Sherratt, in her book Hitler’s Philosophers (Yale UP, 2013), claims that Hitler misinterpreted them all. And of course, we cannot know how those great thinkers would have judged Hitler. But we know at least that Martin Heidegger, the greatest philosopher of his generation, joined the NSDAP in 1933, and there are enough other examples to dismiss the silly notion that Hitler’s popularity was only due to his mastery of propaganda — which was indisputable.

All of “Hitler’s philosophers” were critical of Jews. Fichte, for instance, wrote in 1793: “Within almost every country in Europe lies a powerful state, animated by hostile sentiments, which is continually at war with all the others, and which, in some of them, terribly oppresses the citizens; I mean the Jews.” Fichte recommended treating Jews with the compassion due to all human beings, but added:

“But as for giving them civil rights, for my part, I see no other way than to cut off the head of each one of them one fine night and replace it with another devoid of any Jewish idea. Otherwise I don’t know how to defend ourselves against them, if not to conquer their promised land for them and send them all there.”[11]This text has not been translated in English. The German version is online here. I have translated from the French version: Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Considérations destinés à rectifier les jugements du public sur la Révolution française (1793), Paris, 1859 (online here), pp. 183-185.

Fichte’s Addresses to the German Nation (1808) had a major influence on German nationalism. In his eighth address, he seeks to answer the question “What is a people?” as a prerequisite for answering the question “What is love of fatherland?” In the process, he defines a nation as a collective being whose existence depends on those who love it more than themselves. His premise is that man finds meaning in his life by contributing to “the unending progress in the perfection of his race.” Blood is what connects nature and culture.

“What man of noble mind is there who does not earnestly wish to relive his own life in a new and better way in his children and his children’s children, and to continue to live on this earth, ennobled and perfected in their lives, long after he is dead? […] In order to save his nation he must be ready even to die that it may live, and that he may live in it the only life for which he has ever wished. […] He who regards his invisible life as eternal, but not his visible life as similarly eternal, may perhaps have a heaven and therein a fatherland, but here below he has no fatherland […]. But he to whom a fatherland has been handed down, and in whose soul heaven and earth, visible and invisible meet and mingle, and thus, and only thus, create a true and enduring heaven — such a man fights to the last drop of his blood to hand on the precious possession unimpaired to his posterity.”

Fichte’s political theory belongs to what T. D. Weldon calls the “organic theory of the State,” as opposed to the “mechanical theory” (States and Morals, 1947).[12]T. D. Weldon, States and Morals: A Study in Political Conflicts, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1947, online at archive.org. “In any organism,” Weldon explains, “the parts are subordinate to and dominated by the whole. They therefore necessarily lose their essential character when they are separated from it.” By contrast, “a machine is made up out of a number or separate bits each of which exists before it is put into the machine and each of which can be taken out and used in a different machine without any loss of reality or, except by accident, of importance.”

ORDER IT NOW

By the “mechanical” category is mostly meant “social contract” theories, initiated by Thomas Hobbes (1588-1679). For Hobbes, men are social by necessity alone; by nature, “men have no pleasure (but on the contrary a great deal of grief) in keeping company.” They enter into social contracts out of fear of violent death. Hobbes was a monarchist, but with Locke and Rousseau, the contractualist model became attached to liberalism and democracy. It triumphed in the French Revolution and remains to this day dominant in French political rhetoric; it is arguably the basic paradigm of cosmopolitanist ideologues, who want to replace ethnonational patriotism by a “rationally based loyalty” to constitutional law (Jürgen Habermas).[13]Clare Ellis, The Blackening of Europe: Volume I. Ideologies & International Developments, Arktos, 2020, p. 119.

Organic theories define the nation primarily by common ancestry, and regard the family, rather than the individual, as the basic cell of the social organism. They developed in reaction to democracy and the dissolving effect of its underlying individualistic worldview. “If democracy demands equality of political status for all human beings,” writes Weldon, “then no organic theory of society can be brought into harmony with it. For the whole idea of an organism is that the elements in it have different functions to perform and that these functions are not equally important for the maintenance of the whole.” In reaction to the French Enlightenment, then to French imperialism, German nationalism crystallized around an organic and racial definition of the Volk. Before Fichte came Herder’s ethnic theory of nationalities (Ideas on the Philosophy of the History of Mankind, 1784-91). Herder rejected the French individualistic anthropology, which postulated an invariable human nature. Nations are collective beings having each a particular “genius” (an immortal soul), and nationality is not an accidental attribute of the individual, but the most essential part of his or her being. Hitler was the heir of this tradition.

Hobbes’ anthropological premise that “man is a wolf for man” makes the inherent limit of the contractualist model evident. It is disproved by modern anthropology, which confirms Aristotle’s insight that man — like the wolf, for that matter — is a social animal, and shows that all traditional human societies are held together organically. Ludwig Gumplowicz has formulated in 1883, in Der Rassenkampf (“The Struggle of the Races”), the natural law of “syngenism”, referring to the natural sense of kinship between members of the same race. At the origin of the formation of the syngenic feeling, there is above all consanguinity, although education, language, religion, custom, law, and way of life play their part.[14]Ludwig Gumplowicz, Der Rassenkampf (“The Struggle of the Races”), 1883, quoted from the French translation, La Lutte des races. Recherches sociologiques, Guillaumin, 1893 (online at archive.org), pp. 242-261. More recently Philippe Rushton’s research has shown that empathy tends to be naturally correlated to genetic similarity.[15]MacDonald, Cultural Insurrections, p. 32-33 Human sociability is not primarily rational. It is emotional and rooted in biology.

That is not to say that there are no contractual processes in the formation of the polis. Laws, of course, are largely contractual. The point is simply that the culture of sociability is rooted in human nature, and that natural sociability is conditioned by kinship or genetic similarity . If we assume that most nations are held together by a certain equilibrium of organic (syngenic) and contractual principles, National Socialism is a radical organic political theory. This is best illustrated in the writing of its legal theorist Werner Best: “The National Socialist political principle of totality, which corresponds to our organic and indivisible vision of the unity of the German people, does not suffer the formation of any political will apart from our own political will.”[16]Johann Chapoutot, La Loi du sang. Penser et agir en Nazi, Gallimard, 2014, 2020, p. 271. It worked for Germans at the time: it pulled their country together, socially, morally and economically. This is the reason why Germans loved Hitler.

Hitler drew much inspiration from Benito Mussolini, who gave the clearest expression to the organic, anti-democratic ideal in The Doctrine of Fascism (1932):

“Fascism sees in the world not only those superficial, material aspects in which man appears as an individual, standing by himself, self-centered, subject to natural law, which instinctively urges him toward a life of selfish momentary pleasure; it sees not only the individual but the nation and the country; individuals and generations bound together by a moral law, with common traditions and a mission which […] builds up a higher life, founded on duty, a life free from the limitations of time and space, in which the individual, by self-sacrifice, the renunciation of self-interest, by death itself, can achieve that purely spiritual existence in which his value as a man consists.”

It must be stressed that for Mussolini, as for Hitler, the organic unity of the nation does not come naturally: it is a superior reality created by the State. “Anti-individualistic, the Fascist conception of life stresses the importance of the State and accepts the individual only in so far as his interests coincide with those of the State, which stands for the conscience and the universal will of man as a historic entity.”

Both the Duce and the Fuhrer despised Parliamentary democracy because it is not conducive to the emergence of true leadership, which is the fusional and energizing encounter between a man’s inner calling to lead, and a people’s inner longing to be led. From the organic or holistic viewpoint, men have a natural need for hierarchy and authority, which drives them to collectively subordinate their own will to the stronger will of a leader, for the sake of the whole.

Benito Mussolini
Benito Mussolini

Hitler’s “race-based nationalist state”

Hitler’s goal, as he explained in Mein Kampf (MK), was to create a “race-based nationalist state.” He believed that a nation’s most precious God-given treasure is its collective genetic heritage, and that the most sacred duty of men and women is to protect and transmit it, in order to make their people eternal.

Like Italian Fascism, National Socialism is holistic, heroic and sacrificial. “If we ask ourselves what forces preserve a state, we can lump them all in one category: the ability and willingness of an individual to sacrifice himself for the whole. These virtues have nothing at all to do with economics. We can see this from the simple fact that man never sacrifices himself for economics” (MK 129).

“This will to sacrifice, to devote personal labor and, if necessary, life itself to others, is most highly developed in the Aryan. The Aryan’s greatest power is not in his mental qualities necessarily, but in the extent of his readiness to devote all his abilities to the service of the community. In him, the instinct of self-preservation can reach its noblest form because he willingly subordinates his own ego for the prosperity of the community and is even willing to sacrifice his own life for it, if necessary. […] This spirit of placing the community’s prosperity before the self-interests of one’s own ego, is the first essential element for every truly human culture. This spirit alone has brought about all the great works of humanity. It brings only a small reward to the originator, but rich blessings to future generations. This alone makes it possible to understand how so many people can bear a shabby but honest life filled with nothing but poverty and insignificance; they know they are laying the foundation for the existence of the community. Every workman, every peasant, every inventor, and every civil servant who labors without ever attaining happiness and prosperity is a pillar of this high ideal, even though the deeper meaning of his actions are forever hidden from him.” (MK 263)

For Hitler, there can be no healthy nation without social justice: that is the meaning of “National Socialism”. It aimed at creating a classless society, not by the violent destruction of the bourgeois class, but by reducing class conflict through cooperation in the higher national interest. “We can only prevail if we have social peace, i.e. if not everyone can do what he wants to […], each is called upon to show mutual consideration to the others!” (October 4, 1936). On May 1st, 1933, Hitler announced a period of compulsory labor service for everyone, in order to bring the German Volk “to the realization that manual labor does not discredit, does not degrade, but rather, just as any other activity, does honor to him who performs it faithfully and honestly.” Hitler took pride in having overcome class hostility and created a genuine Volksgemeinschaft (people’s community):

“It was the gentle as well as dogged conversion of the former state of classes into a new socialist organism, a Volksstaat, which alone made it possible for the German Reich to become immune to all attempts at Bolshevik infection. […] History will one day record it as one of our greatest accomplishments that we succeeded in beginning and carrying out the National Socialist revolution in this great state, without destroying national wealth, and without restricting the creative powers of the old classes, and, in so doing, obtained a complete equality of rights for all.” (January 30, 1944)

The National Socialist state claimed to bring a revolution in Law, by restoring the primacy of natural law. In its hubris, the liberal judicial tradition has “denied that the natural world was the foundation of values,” explains lawyer Hans-Helmut Dietze in Naturrecht in der Gegenwart (“Natural law in the present,” 1936). In reaction, “the new natural law wants to translate into legal terms the order that exists in nature.” The racial laws of 1935 are “an allegiance to the laws of nature,”[17]Johann Chapoutot, La Loi du sang. Penser et agir en Nazi, Gallimard, 2014, 2020, pp. 201-202. because preference of one’s own kins over aliens is a natural right of all men, and the preservation of genetic homogeneity a public duty.

ORDER IT NOW

Another National Socialist lawyer, Werner Best, opposes two “conceptions of life”: the “individualist-humanist” (or individualist-universalist) conception posits that “the singular individual is the highest value,” and “individuals are of equal worth.” No human phenomenon is superior to the individual, apart from “the arithmetic sum of all individuals, which we call humanity.” In this view, the end of the state is to protect the individuals. In contrast, in the “racial conception”, the Volk is seen as “an entity which transcends individuals and passes through time, an entity defined by a unity of blood and spirit.” The people is the supreme value. “All lower vital values, including individuals, must be subordinated to the preservation of this supreme vital value. If necessary, they must be sacrificed for its sake.”[18]Ibid. pp. 263-264.
(Johann Chapoutot, La Loi du sang. Penser et agir en Nazi, Gallimard, 2014, 2020, pp. 201-202.)

The emphasis on natural law as the foundation of moral values means that there is no place for such things as feminism or homosexualism, not to mention trends still unimaginable in Hitler’s time: “The German woman will never need to emancipate herself in an age supportive of German life. She possessed what Nature gave her automatically as an asset to maintain and preserve; just as the man, in such an age, never had to fear that he would be ousted from his position in respect to woman” (Hitler, September 7, 1934).

Hitler and the Jews

Hitler believed that Germans were the bearers of the purest Aryan creative spirit, and were the natural leaders in the hierarchy of continental European nations. He recognized, however, that England was the rightful master of the seas, and envisioned a partnership with her for the peaceful government of Europe.

Hitler’s conception of the superiority of the Aryan race was not much different from the Anglo-Saxonism that had flourished in Victorian England. It was even more sober than the “American Destiny” propaganda that flourished during the Mexican War, holding that “Anglo-Saxons were a superior race destined to rule over other races or to ensure their extinction.”[19]Reginald Horsman, Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism, Cambridge UP, 1981. And Madison Grant’s The Passing of the Great Race, shockingly racist, was published less than ten years before Mein Kampf.

Compared to Grant’s, Hitler’s eugenic views were also rather moderate. Since eugenics is one key element of the dark legend of Nazism, it must be reminded that “eugenics” was invented by the British Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s cousin, to correct the perverse effect of civilization which “diminishes the rigour of the application of the law of natural selection and preserves weakly lives that would have perished in barbarous lands” (Galton, Hereditary Genius, 1869). Darwin’s son Leonard was the first president of the British Eugenics Society founded in 1911. Winston Churchill happened to be a strong advocate of eugenics, and acted as honorary vice president of the First International Congress of Eugenics in 1912. “The improvement of the British breed is my aim in life,” he wrote to his cousin Ivor Guest on 19 January 1899. In December 1910, as Home Secretary, Churchill wrote a letter to Herbert Henry Asquith, stating that “The unnatural and increasingly rapid growth of the Feeble-Minded and Insane classes, coupled as it is with a steady restriction among all the thrifty, energetic and superior stocks, constitutes a national and race danger which it is impossible to exaggerate” (see here).

So, if Hitler’s German supremacism and eugenic views were far from radical by British or American standards, what made Hitler so unacceptable to the British and American elites? The answer is simple: it was his strong hostility to Jews. Hitler came from a German Judeophobic tradition, and felt strongly about the corrosive force of Jews. He saw the Jews as not only responsible for the Bolshevik uprisings that had almost overcome his country, but also as the source of the moral corruption of the Weimar Republic. If the German people were to form a healthy organism again, Jews had to be exposed and neutralized as an alien and parasitic nation.

“The Jew’s life as a parasite within the body of other nations and states […] drives the Jew to lie and to lie regularly and methodically in an orderly, businesslike way which comes as naturally to them as warm clothes to those who live in cold climates. His life within a nation can only continue if he convinces the people that Jews are not a separate people, but merely a ‘religious community,’ although an unusual one. But this itself is the first great lie.” (MK 270)

When he wrote that “The Mosaic Law religion is nothing but a doctrine for the preservation of the Jewish race” (MK 128), Hitler was echoing what many Jews, and especially Zionists, were saying. Lucien Wolf, journalist, historian and editor of the Jewish World, had written in 1884 that, “in Judaism the religion and the race are almost interchangeable terms.”[20]Lucien Wolf, “What Is Judaism? A Question of Today,” The Fortnightly Review XXXVI, (1884), pp. 237-256, online here. And in an Essay on the Jewish Soul, written four years after Mein Kampf, Isaac Kadmi-Cohen described Judaism as “the spiritualization that deifies the race, jus sanguinis”; “Thus divinity in Judaism is contained in the exaltation of the entity represented by the race.”[21]Isaac Kadmi-Cohen, Nomades: Essai sur l’âme juive, Felix Alcan, 1929 (archive.org), pp. 115, 98, 143, 27–28. No wonder some Jews like Harry Waton considered, erroneously, that “Nazism is an imitation of Judaism.”[22]Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites: A Program for Humanity, 1939 (archive.org), p. 54.

In contrast to Hitler’s Judeophobia, the British elites’ Anglo-Saxon racial pride had combined with a strong Judeophilia from the time of Oliver Cromwell. This was most manifest in what is known as Anglo-Israelism, the theory that the English are the direct descendants of Jews (the lost tribes of Israel). That this weird theory had remained influential throughout the Victorian era,[23]With such publications as John Wilson, Lectures on Ancient Israel and the Israelitish Origin of the Modern Nations of Europe (1840) or Edward Hine, The English Nation Identified with the Lost Israel (1870), mentioned in André Pichot, Aux origines des théories raciales, de la Bible à Darwin, Flammarion, 2008, pp. 124-143, 319. testifies to the cultural ascendency of Jews over the British aristocracy. There was actually some truth in the latter’s sense of their Jewishness, for during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, many mariages had united rich Jewish families with the old destitute landed aristocracy, to the extent that, according to Hilaire Belloc, “with the opening of the twentieth century those of the great territorial English families in which there was no Jewish blood were the exception.”[24]Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, Constable & Co., 1922 (archive.org), p. 223.

ORDER IT NOW

Churchill held the Jews in the highest esteem, and his thoughts, he once said, were “99 per cent identical” with those of Zionist lobbyist Chaim Weizmann.[25]Martin Gilbert, Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship, Henry Holt & Company, 2007. He wrote in 1920 an article for the Illustrated Sunday Herald titled “Zionism versus Bolshevism: A struggle for the soul of the Jewish people” which began by these words:

“Some people like Jews and some do not; but no thoughtful man can doubt the fact that they are beyond all question the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has ever appeared in the world. / Disraeli, the Jew Prime Minister of England, and Leader of the Conservative Party, who was always true to this race and proud of his origin, said on a well-known occasion: ‘The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.’”

This is highly revealing of Churchill’s ultimate motives and, indeed, of his personality. Replace “the nations” by “the individuals” in the last sentence and you have the explanation for Churchill’s pro-Jewish policies. His hatred of Hitler was strongly motivated by Hitler’s hostility to Jews.

Benjamin Disraeli
Benjamin Disraeli

Hitler himself refered more than once to Benjamin Disraeli, saying for example in April 26, 1942: “The British Jew, Lord Disraeli, once said that the racial question is the key to world history. We National Socialists have been raised in this belief.”[26]Hitler had made the same remark in November 8, 1941. Hannah Arendt wrote that Disraeli was a “race fanatic” who had “evolved a plan for a Jewish Empire in which Jews would rule as a strictly separated class.”[27]Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, vol. 1: Antisemitism, Meridian Books, 1958, pp. 309–310. Disraeli expressed his deeper thoughts through Sidonia, a character appearing in three of his novels, who was really a cross between Disraeli and his close friend Lionel de Rothschild, according to Robert Blake.[28]Robert Blake, Disraeli (1966), Faber Finds, 2010, p. 202. “All is race—there is no other truth,” claims Sidonia in Tancred. And in Coningsby:

“The fact is, you cannot destroy a pure race of the Caucasian organisation. It is a physiological fact; a simple law of nature, which has baffled Egyptian and Assyrian Kings, Roman Emperors, and Christian Inquisitors. No penal laws, no physical tortures, can effect that a superior race should be absorbed in an inferior, or be destroyed by it. The mixed persecuting races disappear; the pure persecuted race remains.” (Book IV, chap. 15)

By “a pure race of the Caucasian organization,” Disraeli/Sidonia means here the Jews, and the implicit idea is that the Jews will finally prevail, provided they remain a pure race and their enemies do not. Hitler’s views actually seem to mirror Disraeli’s, when he writes that the Jew

“wants to destroy the hated white race through bastardization. He continues to bring negroes in as a flood and force the mixing of races. This corruption puts an end to white culture and political distinction and raises the Jew up to be its masters. A racially pure people, which is conscious of its blood, can never be defeated by the Jew. In this world, the Jew can only be the master of bastards. This is why he continually tries to lower the racial quality by poisoning the blood of individuals among the targeted peoples.” (MK 290)

Hitler had only contempt for the American “melting pot”, which he saw as a Jewish idea for the Goyim (the expression was coined by Israel Zangwill, who happened to be a leading figure of Zionism). “It is incredible,” Hitler declared on January 18, 1927, “that the Jew who has been in our midst for thousands of years and yet remained a Jew, has managed to persuade millions of us that race is completely unimportant, and yet for him race is all-important.” Benzion Netanyahu (father of Benjamin) can write that marrying a non-Jew is, “even from a biological point of view, an act of suicide,”[29]Benzion Netanyahu, The Founding Fathers of Zionism (1938), Balfour Books, 2012. but will call you a Nazi if you, a non-Jew, entertain such thought.

From the following statement by Anti-Defamation League activist Earl Raab in the Jewish Bulletin in 1993 (quoted from Kevin MacDonald’s The Culture of Critique), we can better understand why, still today, the very possibility of a pure Aryan race has to be permanently destroyed:

“The Census Bureau has just reported that about half of the American population will soon be non-white or non-European. And they will all be American citizens. We have tipped beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in this country. We [Jews] have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it irreversible — and makes our constitutional constraints against bigotry more practical than ever.”[30]Quoted in Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Praeger, 1998, kindle 2013, k. 246–7.

The same agenda has prevailed in Europe. Clare Ellis shows in The Blackening of Europe (read Andrew Joyce’s review here) that the European Union has turned into “a politically engineered cosmopolitan project” by which

“indigenous Europeans and their political and cultural institutions and identities are undergoing processes of erasure — stigmatisation, marginalisation, deprivation, and replacement — by mandated immigration ism, multicultural ism, and other methods of forced diversification, while resistance to their political and cultural marginalisation and demographic dispossession is criminalised.”[31]Clare Ellis, The Blackening of Europe: Volume I. Ideologies & International Developments, Arktos, 2020, p. 6.

Conclusion: Is there hope?

Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, volume 2: “If current events are allowed to develop unhindered, the final result will be the realization of the Pan-Jewish prophecy, and the Jew would devour the peoples of the earth and become their master” (MK 413). Hermann Goering shared Hitler’s vision: “This war is not a Second World War. This is a great racial war. In the final analysis it is about whether the German and Aryan prevails here, or whether the Jew rules the world, and that is what we are fighting for out there.”[32]Quoted in Michael Burleigh, The Third Reich: A New History, 2000, p. 591. Germans lost the war, and here is the result today, as described by Benton Bradberry in the concluding paragraph of his book, The Myth of German Villainy:

“At the beginning of the twentieth century, the white race dominated the world. The First World War dealt Western Civilization a deadly blow, though Europe might have recovered from that. But today, some six and a half decades after the devastating Second World War, a war which could easily have been avoided, the white European race faces the danger of eventual extinction. Its birth rate now hovers below the population maintenance level, while hoards of non-white, non-Christian immigrants swarm in from all sides — both in Europe and the United States — polluting, diluting, factionalizing and Balkanizing our once homogeneous populations, to the point that the process now seems irreversible. If ‘Demographics is destiny’, then the destiny of the West is in inexorable decline, while the fortunes of International Jewry are in the ascendency.”[33]Benton L. Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 288 in the archive.org edition.

Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi, founder of the Pan European Union in 1946 (supported by Churchill and financed by the Warburg bankers), had prophesized in 1925 both the disappearance of the White race into a mixed “Eurasian-Negroid race of the future,” and the supremacy of the Jews, the only remaining pure race: “Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. […] Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit.”[34]Count Richard Nikolaus Eijiro von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Praktischer Idealismus: Adel – Technik – Pazifismus, PanEuropa Verlag, 1925 , online at archive.org, pp. 22-23 and 27-28. This quote appeared in Coudenhove-Kalergi’s Wikipedia page, was screenshot by Adam Green (here at 19:30), and deleted from Wikipedia soon after. For a detailed presentation of the “Kalergi Plan” and its influence, read Clare Ellis, The Blackening of Europe: Volume I. Ideologies & International Developments, Arktos, 2020, pp. 10-29. Should we accept the inevitable (whether by Providence or Darwinian law), let the Jews rule the world, and get over it? I sometimes contemplate this idea. But I always come back to the same point: Jewish power is the rule of the Lie (read my previous article “The Devil’s Trick”).

“Truth is God.” I haven’t read much of Gandhi’s words, but this aphorism strikes me as the most profound and the most practical wisdom. Not “God is Truth”, but “Truth is God,” which means that truth-seekers are God-lovers, no matter what they think about the concept of “God”. The Egyptian word for Truth is Ma’at, which also translates as Justice or Wisdom — the Sophia of the Greeks. Ancient Egyptians expected their soul to be weighed against the feather of Ma’at after they die. I hope it still works that way, because I intend to follow Gerard Menuhin’s advice: “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil.”[35]Gerard Menuhin, Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, The Barnes Review, 2015, on archive.org.

Adolf Hitler, Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ, 1913 (Wikipedia)
Adolf Hitler, Mother Mary with the Holy Child Jesus Christ, 1913 (Wikipedia)

Laurent Guyénot has collected his earlier Unz Review articles in “Our God is Your God Too, But He Has Chosen Us”: Essays on Jewish Power. He is also the author of From Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land … Clash of Civilizations, 2018, and JFK-9/11: 50 years of Deep State, Progressive Press, 2014 (now banned from Amazon).

Notes

[1] Jews are “the people chosen for universal hatred,” had proclaimed in 1882 Zionist pioneer Leo Pinsker in Auto-Emancipation.

[2] Simon Baron-Cohen, The Science of Evil: On Empathy and the Origins of Cruelty, Basic Books, 2011, kindle edition, as can also be read in the online edition at archive.org. This passage is reproduced, in a slightly altered form, in the New York Times.

[3] All citations of Hilter’s Mein Kampf (MK) are from the Wewelsburg Archives edition, 2018, online at archive.org. All other citations of Hitler are from Adolf Hitler, Collection of Speeches, 1922-1945, online at archive.org.

[4] The son of an Alsacian engineer and of the widow of a banker named Davidson, Lindemann is listed among Oxford Jewish Personalities by the Oxford Chabad Society. According to Ronald Hilton (“Men Behind Roosevelt and Churchill”), he was a member of a group of Oxford Jewish intellectuals around Isaiah Berlin.

[5] As reported by Roy Harrod in The Prof: A Personal Memoir of Lord Cherwell, Macmillan, 1959, pp. 261-262, quoted from Mike King, “The Evil Professor Frederick Lindemann.”

[6] Quoted in David Irving, Nuremberg: The Last Battle, Focal Point, 1996, p. 20.

[7] Stéphane Courtois, ed., The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard UP, 1999.

[8] Published in the Daily Express, September 17, 1936, online here.

[9] All citations of Hitler other than from Mein Kampf are from his Collection of Speeches, 1922-1945, online at archive.org

[10] Yvonne Sherratt, Hitler’s Philosophers, Yale UP, 2013, p. 23.

[11] This text has not been translated in English. The German version is online here. I have translated from the French version: Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Considérations destinés à rectifier les jugements du public sur la Révolution française (1793), Paris, 1859 (online here), pp. 183-185.

[12] T. D. Weldon, States and Morals: A Study in Political Conflicts, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1947, online at archive.org.

[13] Clare Ellis, The Blackening of Europe: Volume I. Ideologies & International Developments, Arktos, 2020, p. 119.

[14] Ludwig Gumplowicz, Der Rassenkampf (“The Struggle of the Races”), 1883, quoted from the French translation, La Lutte des races. Recherches sociologiques, Guillaumin, 1893 (online at archive.org), pp. 242-261.

[15] MacDonald, Cultural Insurrections, p. 32-33

[16] Johann Chapoutot, La Loi du sang. Penser et agir en Nazi, Gallimard, 2014, 2020, p. 271.

[17] Johann Chapoutot, La Loi du sang. Penser et agir en Nazi, Gallimard, 2014, 2020, pp. 201-202.

[18] Ibid. pp. 263-264.

[19] Reginald Horsman, Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism, Cambridge UP, 1981.

[20] Lucien Wolf, “What Is Judaism? A Question of Today,” The Fortnightly Review XXXVI, (1884), pp. 237-256, online here.

[21] Isaac Kadmi-Cohen, Nomades: Essai sur l’âme juive, Felix Alcan, 1929 (archive.org), pp. 115, 98, 143, 27–28.

[22] Harry Waton, A Program for the Jews and an Answer to All Anti-Semites: A Program for Humanity, 1939 (archive.org), p. 54.

ORDER IT NOW

[23] With such publications as John Wilson, Lectures on Ancient Israel and the Israelitish Origin of the Modern Nations of Europe (1840) or Edward Hine, The English Nation Identified with the Lost Israel (1870), mentioned in André Pichot, Aux origines des théories raciales, de la Bible à Darwin, Flammarion, 2008, pp. 124-143, 319.

[24] Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, Constable & Co., 1922 (archive.org), p. 223.

[25] Martin Gilbert, Churchill and the Jews: A Lifelong Friendship, Henry Holt & Company, 2007.

[26] Hitler had made the same remark in November 8, 1941.

[27] Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, vol. 1: Antisemitism, Meridian Books, 1958, pp. 309–310.

[28] Robert Blake, Disraeli (1966), Faber Finds, 2010, p. 202.

[29] Benzion Netanyahu, The Founding Fathers of Zionism (1938), Balfour Books, 2012.

[30] Quoted in Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique: Toward an Evolutionary Theory of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Praeger, 1998, kindle 2013, k. 246–7.

[31] Clare Ellis, The Blackening of Europe: Volume I. Ideologies & International Developments, Arktos, 2020, p. 6.

[32] Quoted in Michael Burleigh, The Third Reich: A New History, 2000, p. 591.

[33] Benton L. Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, AuthorHouse, 2012, p. 288 in the archive.org edition.

[34] Count Richard Nikolaus Eijiro von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Praktischer Idealismus: Adel – Technik – Pazifismus, PanEuropa Verlag, 1925 , online at archive.org, pp. 22-23 and 27-28. This quote appeared in Coudenhove-Kalergi’s Wikipedia page, was screenshot by Adam Green (here at 19:30), and deleted from Wikipedia soon after. For a detailed presentation of the “Kalergi Plan” and its influence, read Clare Ellis, The Blackening of Europe: Volume I. Ideologies & International Developments, Arktos, 2020, pp. 10-29.

[35] Gerard Menuhin, Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil, The Barnes Review, 2015, on archive.org.

 
Hide 598 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Chris Moore says: • Website

    The Judeofascists have always projected their own worst traits onto their enemies. This is why you can say to a certainty what monsters they are.

    Think of all the monstrosities they have accused their enemies of: Deplorables, Nazis, Czarists, Whites, Christians, Muslims, Palestinians, Iranians, Persians, Amalekites, etc. Then understand that everything all these people are alleged to have done to the Jews, top Jews actually did to them, tried to do to them, or wanted to do to them.

    But the problem isn’t just top Jews, it’s also the people who pretend to believe Zionist lies like the Holocaust, and then take seriously the initiatives necessary to “prevent another Holocaust,” like the creation and maintenance of Israel and all of the” liberalism” (code for acceptance and embrace of Jewishness and its political programs) that have gone along with it.

    So its not just Zionists who are the lethal enemy of humanity, it’s all those grasping, depraved and soulless monsters who have collaborated with them by acquiescing to or embracing Zionist propaganda, Zionist wars, and Zionist lies.

    At the top, these aren’t just “mistaken” people, these are evil people.

    • Thanks: GMC
    • Troll: Corvinus
  2. If you were a twenty year old member of the german nazi party in 1940 you are now 100 years old! Any day now every single one of them who ever was will be no more.

    • Replies: @Petermx
  3. As the defeated German people looked eastward they saw the newly formed Soviet Union ruled by Bolsheviks the leadership of which was at that time largely Jewish. They could not help but see the mass executions carried out by the Bolsheviks and at the same time see Germany’s almost total vulnerability. Lenin sent an army west which was fortunately stopped by the Poles (which the government of the Soviet Union never forgave) and Germany realized what a close call that had been. Fear is a great motivator and many of the inhuman excesses that followed surely were underlain by fear of the Soviets.

  4. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says:

    No where but in the U.S. and possibly England, does this fanatical undercurrent of hatred against Germans persist, despite the fact that Germans have been in and contributed immensely to the whole formation of the U.S. almost right from its beginning. Why is this so??

  5. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anita Patel

    Well put. In fact, the European as well as American secret service agents of the time, knew exactly what the Soviet Union was like and the genocides it had already committed. It was the New York Times reporter Duranty, who misled more than anyone else, the American government about the true nature of the Soviet Union.

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
  6. In many ways, the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, a kangaroo court in all regards, did not merely prosecute the German leadership, but was prosecuting the White race itself. It is now known that many confessions were elicited through torture, notably of blunt trauma towards the prisoners’ testicles in the form a kicks and punches, one can only imagine the glee the Jewish interrogators and their brainwashed Gentile accomplices must have had in torturing the German Goyim for their insolence and arrogance in wanting a nation that they could truly call their own, a privilege that the Jewish supremacists regard as something only they can have, due to their Talmudic culture. All this so they could use the false confessions as a way to push through a pre-judgement that would be used to shame Europeans for time eternal and when combined with the dominant role of Jewish individuals in Western media apparatus, used to put up a psychological barrier between Europeans and the desire to organise along ethno-racial lines.

    Nobody says to the Muslims “You must not form ethnic lobbying groups, because if you do you risk another Armenian Genocide”, nobody says to the blacks “you must not form racial movements to advance your own groups interests, because if you do you risk another Rwandan Genocide”, but the Holocaust legend is always brought up when Europeans wish to do the same when they are alarmed by the demographic flooding of the countries their ancestors built for them.

    The alleged crimes of the National Socialists are used to discourage European ethnic nationalism, for what is the meaning of “racist” if not a synonym for “Nazi” which itself has genocidal connotations?

    When discussing these matters, it is good to bring up the views of the allied soldiers who were mostly ethnic nationalists as well. The British soldiers are Normandy and Arnhem were not fighting so that London could be occupied by foreigners and have a Pakistani mayor after all.

    Here is an interesting study conducted by the US War Department on the attitudes of US enlisted men on racial segregation, an overwhelming majority of White enlisted men (who formed the bulk of the American fighting force) favoured racial segregation

    https://www.scribd.com/document/34612500/Final-Race-Wonk-Room

    From Troubling the Waters: Black-Jewish Relations in the American Century by Cheryl Lynn Greenberg

    Part of Jewish hesitations to take on questions of black civil rights directly came from fear that Jews’ already tenuous position in America might be further jeopardized by any perceived alliance with an even morthe e reviled group. As the ADL’s Philip Frankel put it in 1943, “The difficulties facing Jews, as a minority group, are sad enough without thing ourselves up with another minority group of less influence, and by so doing probably taking on some of their troubles – a group whose difficulties, in my estimation, are even more deplorable than our own.” Such suspicions were probably accurate. While a 1944 poll suggested than 12 percent of non-Jews “appear to be definitely anti-Semitic” and 42 percent “susceptible” to anti-Semitic propaganda, a 1943 poll revealed that “90 percent of the American people stated that they would rather loose [sic] the war than give full equality to the American Negroes”.

    https://tinyurl.com/blackEquality

    Something to keep in mind next time you hear someone claim that the allied soldiers who were tricked into fighting a war they had no interest in fighting, were fighting for anti-racism and anti-nationalism. The mythos surrounding WW2 must be tackled head on or else it will have grave consequences for the European peoples.

    The strength of the Jewish people has always been in their reference for history, even if it is warped by their ethnic egos, while your kids learn transexual nonsense at state schools, the Jewish children will learn of their long and illustrious history as a völk, instilling in them a racial consciousness and a will to survive, something that is lacking in many Europeans.

  7. It is interesting to think why all those Third Worlders admire Hitler and the Nazis. It’s probably just the case of “the enemy of my enemy”. They could do well to try to emulate some of the positive aspects of those they admire, like order, tidiness, cleanliness, efficiency, organisation, punctuality but I guess it’s the hatred and violence that appeals to them more.

    • Replies: @Agathoklis
    , @anon
  8. Hitler ice-cream cones! That’s awesome. And here I thought the old kraut only made lampshades and soap. Knew the lampshades were bogus (Jews being way too thin-skinned to make a decent lampshade) but they have real HITLER!!!! ice-cream cones in India. It would be entertaining for some Indians who owned a restaurant to import these ice-cream cones into Germany just to see the reaction or Merkel and her fellow Stasi lickspittles. Maybe if Trump would order some in for the white house, he could be a better literal Hitler. Anything would help since he’s an even worse literal Hitler than the one in Mel Brooks’ fake musical Springtime for Hitler.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  9. In the 1930s King Edward VIII of England favored an alliance with Germany.

    Toward the end of his life, Frederick Lindemann (1886-1957), Churchill’s Jewish wartime advisor,[4] and the inspiration for the British “strategic” bombing of German cities,

    The US Army Air Force joined this genocide campaign where the goal was to kill civilians.

    • Thanks: turtle
    • Replies: @turtle
  10. Hysteria about nazi virus is like hysteria about covid virus.

  11. My children were playing in the front room a few days ago, creating a world with toy cars, blocks, and stuffed animals.

    After that, they placed a few ugly dinosaur toys off to the side of the game and stated, “Here are the jews.”

    I was so proud of my kids! I smiled and gave each of them warm hug, then praised them for their awareness.

    • Replies: @Tsigantes
  12. Anonymous[265] • Disclaimer says:
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    “völk”??? Seriously dude, learn to spell at grade school level. “Volk”. Jeez! It’s not a metal band.

    • Replies: @Chesterton
  13. Hitler was a great man. He really did make his best effort to liberate the white golem from its Jewish master. It can be said that he succeeded, if only for a little while, at least until the other limbs of the golem cut off the hand and plucked out the eye that had caused it to sin.

    If you are waiting for another Hitler to appear, it is impossible. The white, already rootless, souless, will end up like the Blackman of the Western Hemisphere. He will be self-hating, without original language or culture, totally destroyed as a human reality (if indeed, we can even remember him independently existing as one). In short, he will forget how to bathe himself, revert to eating raw food, cannibalism, and will live in the woods in a wattle and daub hut that he made for himself.

    Subconsciously, he knows that this is his destiny, and has made every effort to prepare accordingly:

    • LOL: HeebHunter
    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @al gore rhythms
  14. @Commentator Mike

    “order, tidiness, cleanliness, efficiency, organisation, punctuality”

    You think that these attributes were characteristic of Hitler and Nazi Germany? Absolutely hilarious. The Nazi bureaucracy was a shambles – it could take months for laws to be passed because they required the approval of the Fuhrer who would spend months avoiding concentrating on simple administrative detail. In addition, even his most ardent admirers within the regime would admit he was anything but punctual.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
    , @Colin Wright
  15. @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    Nobody says to the Muslims “You must not form ethnic lobbying groups, because if you do you risk another Armenian Genocide”

    Armenians were Christians genocided by Muslims.

    When discussing these matters, it is good to bring up the views of the allied soldiers who were mostly ethnic nationalists as well. The British soldiers are Normandy and Arnhem were not fighting so that London could be occupied by foreigners and have a Pakistani mayor after all.

    Agree. Since most whites fought against Nazism why this identifying of everything pro-white with Nazism? Aren’t some of these right wing defenders of whites equally guilty of this?

    • Replies: @anon
    , @sarz
    , @Hiya Doody
  16. GMC says:

    What I got out of reading parts of My Camp, was a book that held a lot of – who Hitler and Germany were, and what they observed to be factual. But the truth is poison today. The propaganda and War crimes against Germany during those war years , have overridden the truth about that Peaceful era and their start of a more prosperous one, after they clearly saw the problems. And their problems, are now – everybody’s Problem. I wonder where his books, or Notes, from after the War – are ?

    • Replies: @Johnny Rico
  17. The Nazis lost the war, but they didn’t necessarily lose the argument. BTW, the Nazis’ model of a wholesome white society comes through even in recent anti-Nazi propaganda, like the high school scene in the The Man in the High Castle:

    • Agree: Mefobills
    • Replies: @Hun
    , @Kevin Barrett
  18. In other news (old already) Israel has signed a landmark agreement with UEA as it looks to further normalise relations with all its former Arab enemies:

    https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/13/israel-uae-normalization-west-bank-annexation/

    May I invite the UNZ commentariat to extend their congratulations and best wishes to these two peoples of the Book on this unprecedented cooperation and to wish them further success in bringing peace, progress and prosperity to the region and to encourage them to take their fellow Jews and Muslims back from Europe, Americas, and elsewhere so that they may also share in this new found peace, progress and prosperity, and so that the third people of the Book, the Christians, may also live in peace and prosperity after these troublemakers are taken back to the Middle East. (half sarc)

    Some comment that this agreement, and further ones to come in the future, is because the Arabs and the world are fed up with the Palestinians – funny that they’re not fed up with the Jews.

  19. Cutler says:
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    Excellent comment, Thanks for the links.

  20. He continues to bring negroes in as a flood and force the mixing of races.

    By God, he wrote this in 1924! What would he call what is going on now? There are no words to describe it.

  21. Goyboy says:

    I suppose there was a time when all of Europe could have been united against the common enemy even if Hitler had not included the Mediterranean lands and even the East. I’m sure even in these lands the Volk would prefer their borders to be closed to third world immigrants

    This was a very good read.

  22. Patric says:

    Quote from the article “But I always come back to the same point: Jewish power is the rule of the Lie (read my previous article “The Devil’s Trick”).”

    Isn’t the present corona hoax a good example of the ‘rule of the Lie’? It’s the sort of thing that is possible with almost total Jewish control of the financial systems and the media. What we have imo is a massive and contrived hoax (Lie) for the attainment of all kinds of undeclared and nefarious social ends. The ‘story’ itself is a total falsehood, only in a Jewish dominated world could it ever get so far. But that’s where we are now drowning if a world of Jewish rackets. This is the latest one and it is big.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Thanks: Ugetit, FLgeezer
  23. Franz says:
    @Anon

    No where but in the U.S. and possibly England, does this fanatical undercurrent of hatred against Germans persist… Why is this so??

    Can’t speak for England.

    But Michael Collins Piper (RIP) wrote a small but vivid book called The Judas Goats: the Enemy Within which lays out the level of subversion in the USA as of 2007. Collins himself died in 2014 at 54.

    There’s still, amazingly, a YouTube post of Piper in an interview with Texx Marrs about the book itself. Touches on how bad it was in the late Bush years. They had no clue President Kushner was coming about a decade later. Under “Cyrus” Trump I guess the USA is a full colony now.

    • Replies: @Paul C.
  24. Denazification will end when whites push for De-Zionazification.

    Whites must push back and dig into all the dirty laundry of the Jews and their history.

  25. Biff says:

    a European man who once got a haircut in India. Unpleased with the result, he complained, “I look like Hitler!” The barber, flattered, answered with a big smile: “Yes, yes, very nice!”

    In Thailand where I have family, I was told that the school curriculum teach’s the children that Hitler was a contemporary among his peers(no better or no worse), and also that he achieved great success in developing Germany into a modern nation.
    How I first heard of this is some woke westerners were seething mad that they were not indoctrinating the poor children with bullshit propaganda – “Hitler must be evil for everyone!”

    Thus the joke makes perfect sense, and I “get it”.

  26. gotmituns says:

    As a man of Germanic background, I only got interested in my roots because of the denazification process. I asked myself, why is all this propaganda still going on so long after WWII? So I started looking into the subject. I couldn’t believe what I started uncovering. Then I got into Germanic history. It was the Germans who understood the Jews completely once thy left their barbarian origins behind and surpassed all of Europe intellectually. Even before Martin Luther and John Calvin, they knew the Jews were no good. And on their part, the Jews understood they had to being the Germans down the best they could to enslave Europe. But in the end, I think it will be the Jews who lose this battle/war even though it seems they’ve got everything going their way right now.

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  27. Kapyong says:

    The Mussolini photo is a faked composite – like so many from that period.

  28. @Anon

    Does the Bernays gang control the minds of USUK?

  29. “I tried to varn you. You should have listened.” –Funny Mustache Man

  30. There is much to be criticized in Hitler’s philosophical, anthropological and political views (his anti-Slavism, for instance)

    I’m sure Wally would deny that – the anti-Slavism I mean. Uh, maybe he had nothing personal against them, it’s just that they were in the way of his living space.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Fox
    , @Wally
  31. Thomasina says:

    Like a child who is constantly praised for being good, fair, empathetic, open, and accepting, pretty soon the child lives up to its reputation. No matter the insult or injustice, the child goes along, doesn’t object because he doesn’t want to be knocked off his “good” pedestal.

    Diabolical, really. Invent the Holocaust and the evil German story, prevent the truth from surfacing, magnify the lie, stifle speech, garner sympathy through the media/books/Hollywood, and then guilt and shame people in order to get your way. After all, good Christians would never want to be seen as “bad” or unfair.

    Highly manipulative. When pushed or confronted with an issue you don’t like, these guys are ready for you. They already know precisely what you’re going to think (before you’ve even thought it) and how you’re likely to react, so they get out ahead of your reaction and start accusing and shaming you before you’ve even said anything.

    This surprises and paralyzes you. They’ve shamed you for even thinking a certain way, which they know will cause you to feel guilt and shame. Once they have triggered this “guilt” position, they also know how you’re going to respond: you’re going to do the opposite. You’re going to keep your mouth shut, and you do.

    Narcissism 101. (Actually more like the Dark Triad, but we’ll leave it here).

    Narcissists do not like being exposed. Expose them.

    Narcissists don’t want you speaking up. Speak up, but don’t get angry. That’s what they’re looking for, for you to say or do something stupid.

    Narcissists accuse and shame. Let them. Call their bluff. When they try to shame you, let it roll off your back.

    Narcissists will try to get you to defend yourself. Don’t do it.

    Narcissists live in fear, and fear comes from hate.

    Know thy enemy.

    It’s time to let go of the “good” label and embrace your aggressive side. They certainly have.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  32. karel says:

    I am slightly amused by your repetition of the mantra that ”At the end of World War I, Germany had been stabbed in the back, betrayed, humiliated, dismembered, ransacked, starved,” as you are just repeating here the most important part of a recent German mythology. The problem is that there is a rather fuzzy definition of what the stab in the back actually was. Perhaps you can tell us more about this famous event. In any case, what should have the Germans expected after loosing the war and destroying the lives of millions?

  33. Rabbi Michael Lerner, the leader of a “progressive” Jewish group in California that offers its views in a magazine called ‘Tikkun,” has made it clear that he and his followers want to replace the US Constitution with a Marxist brand socialism. Lerner has called for the destruction of American monuments of most of the founders of the US, including Washington, Jefferson, et al. No one can doubt the Jewish propaganda of the New York Times, most of the tv channels, Harvard University (which now has a Jewish president), and many other outlets. I myself am a Harvard graduate, class of 1959.

    • Replies: @Ugetit
  34. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    Excellent article. For the Jews all Whites are Nazis so the persecution against Whites–legally, culturally, politically, biologically–will never cease. I don’t see any political solutions.

  35. Ugetit says:
    @gotmituns

    I asked myself, why is all this propaganda still going on so long after WWII?

    Unbelievable, isn’t it?

    It’s even more shocking when one realizes that the vast majority of Americans of the time knew much more of the truth than the almost complete majority of them do today, and wanted no part of “European,” (really, One Worlder) wars.

  36. JackOH says:

    Laurent, thanks. A few weeks ago I offered up a pet theory of how the Left continues to use the ahistorical Hitler, the blackened and demoniacal cartoon-strip figure, to leverage their goals. Here it is below:

    What I believe the Left saw after 1945 was millions of returning American servicemen plopping themselves in their easy chairs within segregated neighborhoods, segregated school districts, banging on occasionally about kikes, niggers, fags, commies, while telling the little lady to fetch him dinner and a brew.

    They’d defeated Hitler, and regarded themselves as immune from charges that they were, well, a little like him. They weren’t immune. Although the Left rarely used “just like Hitler” to slam its opponents, America’s traditionalist-conservative folks really couldn’t muster successful arguments to oppose the Left.

    I think the key to that is understanding that traditionalist-conservatives felt that they indeed were defending ideas that were uncomfortably “Hitlerite”. Hitler, of course, is the most demoniacal, blackest evil.

    I suppose my point is one of those deals where you either see it or you don’t. I’ll note that a Princeton prof quietly published a book not long ago noting that German lawyers studied America’s racial laws prior to drafting those mid-1930s Nuremburg laws against Jews, and the Germans concluded that some aspects of America’s racial laws were stricter than what they were looking for.

    I suppose the only thing I can think of to modulate the Left’s extraordinary advantage in leveraging Hitler is the rehabilitation of Hitler in some way. This will put many American traditionalist-conservative noses out of joint, but it will somehow have to be explained to them that their acquiescence to the Left’s Hitler as the world’s worst evil is exactly what makes them, the traditionalist-conservatives, so damned vulnerable.

    • Agree: mark green
    • Replies: @JackOH
    , @Wielgus
    , @Sollipsist
  37. Biff says:

    English man out in the Baltic Sea calls the German coast guard:
    “Help! I’m sinking!”

    German coast guard:
    “Vat are you sinking about?”

    • LOL: Johnny Rico
  38. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Commentator Mike

    The leaders, planners, movers of the 5-6 million
    Armenian, other Christians genocide were Donmeh Yid.

    The foot soldiers were Turks in the
    process of being de Islamized.

    Certainly, many Yid got in on the slaughter.

  39. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    It’s obvious now that the US fought on the wrong side during WWII. We should of joined with Germany to defeat the Commie thugs who were actually the ones who wanted to conquer the world, not Hitler. But most people don’t know that, since they only get their uh, news from FAKEBOOK or Joogle or Boobtube.

    Those who have read real history books, like those by the historian David Irving, would know that it was the Commies bent on world domination, not Germany.

    Ask yourself this: If we had joined Germany and beat back the Commie hordes, do you really think all the nuttiness we have now, like men getting their sexual organs chopped off and a huge gash cut between their thighs because they think they were born female into a men’s body, or all this insane schooling, like the idiotic Common Core math, which rags like “The Atlantic” were bragging back in 2012 would turn our kids into “little mathematicians.” Instead its made an entire generation of kids so dumb in math that they have trouble counting out the correct change.
    The main Dr. Frankenstein is one David Coleman who admits that he created that mind boggling POS to end WHITE Privilege.

    Then there’s the never-ending porn that now is available to kids 24/7, even free. The degenerate movies coming out of Hollywood which are more about messaging than entertaining.

    I could go on much longer, but this isn’t my blog. Add up all the insanity’s attacking us and ask yourself if we fought on the wrong side in WWII.

    P.S. Sorry Mr Unz if this creates problems from you from the usual suspects. Now that they’ve shut down Ann Coulter, we have to speak where we can.

  40. Ugetit says:
    @phillip sawicki

    …has made it clear that he and his followers want to replace the US Constitution with a Marxist brand socialism.

    The constitution was itself a coup d’ etat, and it was replaced with a mild, though nearly complete, version of Marxist totalitarianism under FDR building on the groundwork provided by the establishment of the FED, and Wilson’s war policies.

  41. JackOH says:
    @JackOH

    Italics ought to run para 2-5.

  42. Phibbs says:

    Jews own the mainstream media in the United States. These Jews condone the BLM rioting as do their politicians in the Congress. Jews are pro-multiculturalism as it helps to mask their blatant disloyalty to America. Jews destroyed Russia in 1917 and they are trying to destroy America, The parasitic Jews have all but used up their Gentile-American host.

  43. Saggy says:

    Damn! Another incredible article from Guyenot. I’m reading ‘From Yahweh to Zion’ for the 2nd time … an incredible book that is essential to understanding anything.

    So, I’m a big fan of Guyenot. But, I have a question for him –

    Why in hell are you (Guyenot) promoting the holocaust hoax?*

    As he points out in the beginning of this article everything Jewish today is based on the hoax. Yet, the hoax is totally preposterous and very easily exposed. So, why not do it?

    If in doubt about the hoax start here ….


    Video Link
    See also http://www.holohoax101.org

    *Referring to it as if it happened.

    • Thanks: Robjil
  44. Durruti says:

    Guyénot:

    The political theory of Karl Marx inspired the most bloody regimes on earth, responsible for the death of up to one hundred million people by torture, mass execution, deportation, forced labor or planned starvation, according to the authors of The Black Book of Communism (1997).

    I previously commented on the claims that Stalin’s government murdered (a magical) 60 million Russians. Looks like I will have to do so again!

    In 1917, Russia numbered 120 million. If Stalin’s ‘Bolsheviks’ murdered 60 million, or anywhere near that number, (are you sure Guyénot that it was not the magic 6 million/Holocaust?) – then there remain 60 million in 1940 (perhaps a few children add up to 70 million Russians??). In other words, when the German Regime launched Operation Barbarossa in 1941, Germany, alone (80+ million souls -https://www.answers.com/Q/Population_Germany_1940 ), outnumbered the Russians. Germany invaded the Soviet Union with the help of allies – Rumania (2 million soldiers), Hungary (1 million), Italy 400,000, and Finland (200,000), and a half division from Belgium, and a full division from España, and more from Slovakia.

    If one reads the Memoirs of German Generals who led their Armies against Russia, they have one Common Complaint, It was the “endless” numbers of Russian Army Soldiers – Russian Divisions that they had to fight. Alan Clark’s popular History “Barbarossa” chronicles many of these complaints. To their shock, the Germans invaded a healthy, prosperous, and populous Russia. Those Russians marched all the way to Berlin, and even had enough energy to attack the Japanese in Manchuria – at the end of the war – 1945.

    The numbers advanced by the Russian Haters – do not add up! The numbers of the fantasy Holohoax Zionist Land Thieves – do not add up. These 2 fictional totals are advertised by the same World Brainwashing Zionist Empire, from book publishers, to movie moguls in Hollywood, and Europe.

    The Truth is:

    Russians, and Americans and Germans, (and my Dad’s Belgians), are not intrinsically evil. There is only 1 Race, and the IQ pseudo science is another Zionist invention. It is possible, as French humorist Dieudonné recently suggested – to refashion a more balanced appraisal of Adolf Hitler, without descending to the depths of fantasy and actually strengthening the Zionist Tribal version of History.

    I prefer a Rebirth of our American Republic, with its Separation of Powers. Our Republic was assassinated on November 22, 1963, by the same Zionist Oligarchs we are subjected to in 2020, and we need to Restore it, with our Constitution, and Honest elections (political process). That is my Dream. Dictators might make the trains run on time, but they get most of the rest wrong, & they attempt to give me orders (wear a face mask, walk in a direction, forget math). LIBERTY has high standards, and Honesty is the Key to our future.

    The fantasies of the Zionist Holohoax, and the fantasy MOSSAD/CIA numbers of the Marxist Russian/Holohoax, do not add up.

    Durruti – who sometimes signs his work with his alias, Dr. Peter J. Antonsen

    • Agree: glib, gay troll, Tsigantes
    • Thanks: GMC
  45. @anon

    The foot soldiers were Turks in the process of being de Islamized.

    And Kurds too, apparently. Or most, or many, of those “Turks” were Kurds.

  46. @Anon

    Germans have done more to destroy the United States than any “contribution” they have made. The widespread trouble we have today is directly related to the Germans and their contributions. The US would have been better off had every ship bringing this plague to our shores had been sank in the middle of the Atlantic.

    I am proud that a direct ancestor crossed a frozen river on Christmas to stab Germans in their sleep.

    The only race more vile and degenerate than the Germans are the Jews. Would that the last German died of a heart attack after strangling the last Jew.

  47. RVBlake says:
    @Anon

    Hollywood propaganda is a leading contributor.

  48. Anonymous[314] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomasina

    I agree. In any such disputation, not understanding you’re facing an implacable, inimical foe looking to vanquish you in debate, or absurdly assuming out of intellectual and moral laziness that it’s merely a cordial discussion of a topical issue, is your first big mistake with a Jew. The points you make, Thomasina, are a good start, especially immediately understanding from that telltale, shit-eating grin that this is an enemy your talking to who’s looking to use deceit to destroy you in front of others.

    In his Art of Controversy, which is short, to the point, and available free on the Internet, Schopenhauer, after making it crystal clear the Aristotelian framework in which you as a disputant must operate, goes on to illuminate 38 tricks that will be used against you, yet, if you keep your head about you, they can be as easily turned against a dishonest foe whose Achilles heel is being too clever by half and, generally, not half as smart as he thinks he is. As Thomasina points out, make not losing your cool over provocations, such as ad personam and ad hominem attacks your best response, as if to say, “That’s all you’ve got”? Once bested, of course, the phony jocularity of, “You’re too smart for me” with a wink toward the audience will be followed by his disappearing up his own asshole like the Cheshire cat.

    There’s also Wellman’s Art of Cross-Examination, which alto it’s badly dated, does make important points, starting with the notion that if he asks you a question, you’d better realize he’s an expert at the subject and you’re being set up, not at that moment, but down the line, cumulatively.

    I can anticipate the retort that I’m being paranoid, but the truth is that nobody but nobody could care less if someone’s a Jew but for the Jews’ shoving it in our faces. As to the canard that any criticism of Israel or the jews acting collectively is ipso facto a hate crime of anti-Semitism, this is a conclusion that can only be drawn from the unspoken or unwritten premise that Jews acting collectively and the state of Israel have never and can never do anything wrong and therefore any criticism is always a moral wrong. If Israel and Jews acting collectively are not morally perfect, than reasoned and fact-based criticism is long overdue.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  49. @Anon

    Geopolitics stemming from Halford Mackinder’s nonsense of controlling the world via controlling the heartland. Back in the day most Russian royalty stemmed from German bloodlines. The Brits and American puppies feared Germany and Russia would eventually ally and thus ruin their control of the heartland via the oceans. Kinda stupid when you considered Brit monarchy comes from the same German blood, and that both continental nations wanted to be allies with England. It must be the Jewish DNA in English aristocracy that make the England, and subsequently the US, supremely greedy and somewhat moronic.

    • Replies: @Anon
  50. anaccount says:

    It looks like even Serbia is bowing down to the globo-homo antichrist, formerly based in Tel Aviv. How utterly disapointing to see Russia do nothing, again.

    How do I know the Russian government isn’t in on this? They never seemed to like the White-preservationists in Russia. Just like my government in the formerly free United States.

    At the very least the answer doesn’t seem obvious. Is it good to eventually have NATO in Serbia and Belarus? Is it good to lose? We could ask Putin.

    The West was lost decades ago but I had some hope for Russia and Eastern Europe until recently. You folks are on a different timeline but Im predicting a Moscow drag queen story hour within 20 years.

    God help us.

    • Replies: @AriusArmenian
  51. Sparkon says:
    @karel

    According to Benjamin Freedman in his 1961 speech at the Willard Hotel, it was the presentation of the Balfour Declaration by the Jews at the Paris Peace Conference that clarified to the Germans the real reason the United States had come into the war against them.

    Bringing the United States into the war so the Jews could have Palestine was the stab in the back.

    The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain’s promise to pay the Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. And I don’t think I could make it more emphatic than that.

    Now, that is where all the trouble started. The United States went in the war. The United States crushed Germany. We went in there, and it’s history. You know what happened.

    Now, when the war was ended, and the Germans went to Paris, to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919, there were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. Now what happened?

    The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations that claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, the Jews said, “How about Palestine for us?” And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration.

    So the Germans, for the first time realized, “Oh, that was the game! That’s why the United States came into the war.” And the Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered this terrific reparation that was slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and they were determined to get it at any cost.

    https://highlander.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Benjamin-H-Freedman-Speech-at-the-Willard-Hotel-1961.pdf

    • Replies: @karel
  52. Agent76 says:

    Jul 29, 2013 The Origins of the American Public Education System Horace Mann & the Prussian Model of Obedience

    [MORE]

    In the 1830’s, American Lawmaker Horace Mann visited Prussia and researched its education methodology. He was infatuated with the emperor’s method of eliminating free thought from his subjects and designed an education system for Massachusetts directly based on these concepts. The movement then quickly spread nationally.

    Feb 17, 2012 The American Way? Our Connection To Nazi Germany

    Don’t let the title fool you. This video is actually about how government-run schooling contributed to the rise of socialism, imperialism and eventually fascism in Germany between the 1890s and 1940s.

  53. @karel

    Germany did not lose WWI. At the end of the war, Germany held territory, and no German territory was held.

    There is a reason the Germans almost universally proclaimed they were stabbed in the back. The initial story told to them was that things would go back to the way they were before the war, not that they would be forced to pay for more than a century from their treasury.

    German reparations from WWI (that’s WW One) only ended a few years ago.

    • Thanks: Joe Levantine
    • Replies: @turtle
    , @karel
  54. Good article and fairly well written exposed me to ideas I hadn’t encountered in this sort of detail. However, there is no actual reality to “race” as a legitimate category except in a relatively minor way. Jews, for example, are not one race at all but one culture. Aryans themselves are more mixed with many ethnic categories and races. History shows that far more intercourse occurred between nordic countries and what we now call the middle east and North Africa.

    Culture is the main determinant of qualities in individuals. Living in a part of the South where race was once a big deal you see a lot more race mixing (I live around the Piedmont) particularly in the mountains where “white” and Indians mixed quite a lot yet, culturally, these people are distinctly as Southern as anyone else in terms of beliefs, religion, diet and values.

    While you give a good examination of cultural/intellectual attitudes in Germany, Britain and the Jewish community they have little bearing on today’s situation. Western civilization is in jeopardy not because of “race-mixing” but because of cultural depravity brought on by the hedonism of consumer culture which is most particularly not the result of Jewish thought but the tendency of humans to acquire status and in capitalist cultures that means money–more money = more status so people pursue that and the pleasures that money can buy. Of course pleasure as such can be acquired (if we can use that term) without money just as easily. Our problem is that prosperity eroded values and spirituality and engendered alienation. Hitler and other German thinkers did not understand the inherent problem of capitalism as an acid on cultural values. Whatever is to happen in human society will have nothing to do with race but the creation of some new set of cultural values that go beyond materialism–if not Western civilization will dissolve into some version of mass suicide resulting from despair.

    • Disagree: Insouciant
    • Thanks: Tommy Thompson
  55. As long as we define Jews are a totally different race, we will lose. Given Hebrew is identical to the ancient Phoenician script, Jews are likely as Aryan as Germans. Maybe that dot connection is a bit off, but defining the Jews as modern Aryan supremacists will be believable to their weaponized minority tools. It also gives the perception of a power tribe rather than a victimized one. Victimization is necessary for the modern Jews to unite as one.

    Unfortunately for us the European gentile and kosher power tools like the Hitler fan boys, corrupt political leaders, and the Amen crowd will screech foul. None of you are helping in what very likely is a fight for survival. Sabotage within is our biggest problem in the current PR war. Also stop referring to yourselves as white. You’re playing the ultimate Jew game.

    • Agree: gay troll
    • Replies: @bluefire
  56. @karel

    If you are really interested in the ‘stab in the back’ theory, I would recommend you read Mein Kampf.

    If you are loath to take Hitler’s word for it, just research what was proposed to Germany just before the armistice and what the Treaty of Versailles imposed on the Germans.

    Had the allies stuck to reconciliation, Hitler most probably would have pursued his artistic endeavours or some other career than politics for his chances of success as a leader of a political party would have been almost nonexistent.

  57. I noticed in the Hitler Volkswagen model pic, there is a black officer standing behind him.

    We have recently come to learn that the German Army of the Nazi regime had African, Arab, German Jewish, Slaves and other nationalities, races and religions. Jews commanded many U-boats as the story goes.

    Maybe Hitler’s racism was more limited and practical than we were led to believe. Obviously Germany was not open to mass immigration then.

  58. @Commentator Mike

    This is the line I disagreed with in Laurent’s otherwise pretty good (and welcome) article. Current events and the reaction to Trumpism in the US is forcing a reevaluation of Adolf Hitler. Hitler’s so-called “anti-Slavism” is fiction; certain Slavs had been practicing anti-Germanism for some time and Hitler was simply defending German interests.

    A few denigrating comments in private about Russians and Poles (when at war with them) does not equal policy. We have examples of that from all leaders. Much of the so-called Eastern policy found on Wikipedia is fabricated lies. Did he desire expansion into Ukraine because of its enormous amount of rich soil, as a way to solve Germany’s food problems? Yes. That was not because he disliked or wished to enslave Slavs but because he wanted to feed Germans. Remember the Starvation Blockade by the British Navy in both wars? Did Hitler think Germanics under National Socialist discipline were the only ones qualified to lead Europe to keep it safe from Bolshevism and other enemies? Yes. And as this article points out, he has been proven to be 100% correct. The weak Slav nations got pulled into the Bolshevist circle; it was not Hitler’s fault or his doing. He tried to protect all Europe.

    Hitler’s attitude toward Slavs continues to be misrepresented by “White Nationalists.” Read about Pan-Slavisim, please, for a more balanced view. And listen to my podcasts devoted to the subject: https://carolynyeager.net/hitler-and-slavs

  59. @Chris Moore

    You can thank the Judeo-Puritans of the Anglo-Saxon world for our predicament. To this day, these fools have willfully turned away from the coming racial storm. They put all their trust in their Bible and completely turn their backs on history. If they study history at all, it is usually with an eye toward harmonizing their religious beliefs with historic events. Even as we tumble into the arms of deracinated, leftist tyranny, these civic nationalist fools continue to rationalize the danger by demanding a return to constitutional principles…as if this alone will assure our survival. These Judeo-Puritans are beneath contempt at this point. There is no reason to debate them, as they are blindly going over the cliff. Let them. The rest of us must begin to think of a way to salvage what we can without their help.

    • Replies: @Majority of One
    , @Corvinus
  60. sonofman says:

    Hitler stated his disdain for communism, the upper class bourgeoisie, and the international finance system presumably controlled by Jewish expertise. Throughout history and up until now, Jewish wealth is in employment to the political, corporate and financial elite.

    One of the main focuses of the National Socialist ideology was to create capital through intellectual and manual labor and to end all forms of income gained without productivity. But the assertion that Hitler had a hatred of Jewish people is an exaggeration. He developed a logical skepticism based upon an awareness of how international finance operates, and the circumstances of the Weimar Republic, issues that were in the consciousness of the collective. Hitler came to power mainly because the warnings he expressed about the dangers of international finance came to pass with the Great Depression in 1929 (NSDAP 1928- 2,6%. NSDAP 1930-18,3%). WW2 was enabled to suppress the German industry and to prevent independence from international finance.

    Every European country is a nationalist state founded upon a collective genetic and cultural heritage. America is different in that it is a collective of individuals with different genetic and cultural backgrounds that came together to create a new culture.

    How do you explain the European history of everybody kicking each other’s butt, because British, French, German, Russian, Spanish, Italien, Danish, Swedish, Polish, Portugese, etc. are not races?

    All discussions about the concept of “racism” are being used with the goal to stigmatize nationalism and inhibit ideas of independence from nonnative control.

    War, is not an option anymore. Now it’s about controlling the narrative, but because of the Internet, control now includes censoring, Ad hominem attacks on a person’s character using invectives such as “anti-semite”, “white supremacist” or “conspiracy theorist”, and even creating laws that make dissenting opinions and even the presentation of forensic evidence punishable, therefore cancelling basic human rights.

    Once again, the usual suspects have gone too far. Brexit happened (God bless Queen Elisabeth for allowing her subjects to decide their own destiny) because the nationalist state is a natural and favored right of people. That is also why Donald Trump is POTUS now. It also explains the resurgence of right-wing political parties.

    President Clinton said it best: “It’s the economy, stupid”. Today, nation states are corporate entities whose main battle is trying to diminish the power of authoritarian rentier capatalists who are draining the wealth of nations. Interpretations about events that happened eighty years ago and purporting that it is still relevant and that we, as a collective, did not learn from it, only proves that a false indoctrination attempt is in progress, especially since contradictory discourse is forbidden.

    • Agree: Majority of One
  61. @Tommy Thompson

    “…I noticed in the Hitler Volkswagen model pic, there is a black officer standing behind him…”

    That only seems so due to light and shadow effects. Here is the full picture :

  62. Saggy says:

    Come to think of it, the whole article is preposterous, the idea of ‘rehabilitating’ Hitler while accepting the holohoax as real is a total non-starter. Discussing modern and ancient philosophies of race while accepting the Nazi gas chambers as real is totally irrelevant not to mentions completely senseless. The first and foremost project of anyone who wants to stop the Jews should be to expose the hololhoax.

  63. @Durruti

    And then after 20 million were killed in WWII, there would have been only 40 million Russians in 1945.

    • Replies: @Durruti
  64. Trinity says:

    With each passing day, month, year, decade, people with a half a brain cell can look back and see that what we were told about Hitler, Germany, WWII, Churchill, Eisenhower etc., were all the total inverse of the truth. Hell, we can see how (((they))) invert the truth in the modern day world with current events for further proof how (((these people who have totally controlled the narrative for at least a century now))) lie to the gullible goyim. However, the cat is out of the bag and (((they))) have called in damage control, seeking to have the same control over social media that they have enjoyed in print and television.

    With each passing day, month, year, decade, I think more and more people are waking up to the truth about WWII, Hitler, the so-called, “evil Nazis” and war crimes committed by the “good guys” like Eisenhower and Churchill. We have learned the truth about Pearl Harbor, the questionable “official narratives” of 9-11, the JFK assassination, the USS Liberty, the Jewish control of our financial institutions, academia, media, publishing companies, pornography, domestic and foreign policies in America and Europe, etc. Anyone in the year 2020 who thinks that America fought on the right side in WWII has to be a complete moron or a shabbos goy on steroids. IF Hitler would have had his way, America would have never been involved in WWII. Hitler did indeed have contempt for America and with good reason, even then, I guess Hitler could see where America was heading. Even so, Hitler never wanted to go to war with the Brits or Americans. We have lionized scum like Churchill, Eisenhower and FDR, while the never ending lies and demonizing of Hitler continues nonstop 24/7/365 for the last 75 years. Check out your television programming today, chances are something is being shown on some channel about Hitler, the “evil Nazis” or “the holocaust” sometime today, especially on (((The HistoryChannel.))) Imagine the number of books, articles, documentaries, movies, made on WWII? That is just a small period of time in world history and the amount of overkill tells you that something is not right here, there is an agenda behind this nonstop programming of something that happened so long ago.

    • Agree: Druid, mark green
  65. Surma says:

    Need we remind you of the Asiatic hordes that raped and pillaged Europe. World has been ruled by the great Asiatic races since millienilium. White man only rule for few hundred years. The western civilization is already decaying. Your men are women and soon your women will be raped by the hordes. Good riddance.

  66. @karel

    Another primary element to the backstabbing was the fact that Kaiser Wilhelm’s government was constrained and in some ways controlled by the Sanhedrin’s financial barons–essentially the Rothschilds and the Warburgs–closely inter-related clans who essentially owned the German central banking establishment. So what else is new?

    Fact, central bankster Max WARburg demanded of the Kaiser’s regime that he be placed into control over Germany’s intelligence services. A fatal mistake. It was Warburg who connived and arranged for Lenin’s infamous “sealed railroad coach” to travel from his lair in Switzerland through German territories and hence across the Gulf of Finland and into that then Russian province, from which he debouched into St. Petersburg by way of Finland Station.

    Meanwhile, Max Warburg’s brother Paul, who had been dispatched by the Sanhedrin elders to the U\$ to help Jacob Schiff (the Rothschild crime clan’s prime minion in the U\$) in setting up the financial end of the Bolshevik counter-revolution by financing Lev Bronstein (aka Leon Trotsky) and a couple hundred lower East Side Bolshevik Jews and sending them right through the British blockade (where they were given freedom of passage) along much the same route as Lenin had taken into St Petersburg where, with millions in Wall \$treet dollars, they were able to spearhead the Bolshevik counter-revolution in November of 1917. Successful revolutions by minorities require immense levels of financing. Revolutions are not made on the cheap by “downtrodden masses”.

    The whole affair was a matter of Talmudic dialectics, calculated to bring down the three principals of Bismark’s unfortunately dissolved “Drei Kaisers Bund”–The German, Austro-Hungarian and Russian Empires. The new dialectic became Soviet Russia and the attempted Bolshevik takeover of Germany and Hungary during the post WWI era. The underlying agenda was destruction of the Germanic and Russian ethnic nations–entities which the Sanhedrin considered hostile stumbling blocks to their agenda dating back to the establishment of the original Babylonian Blood Brotherhood.

    • Replies: @karel
    , @Thomasina
  67. @Carolyn Yeager

    “…Did he desire expansion into Ukraine because of its enormous amount of rich soil, as a way to solve Germany’s food problems? Yes…”

    There is an honest way to solve certain economic needs. It’s called buying. Germany could solve its food problem by buying food from the Ukraine in exchange for its own industrial products. That would be an honest, non-criminal deal.

    But food was not the only reason for annexing the Slavic East. Racial expansion, euphemistically called “Lebensraum”, was the main motive. That appears clearly from Hitler’s own remarks, both in his Mein Kampf and in various places of his Table Talk, which cannot be explained away as “a few denigrating comments in private about Russians and Poles”, as you try.

    All three Axis powers were supremacist imperialists. Japan with its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, Italy with its Spazio Vitale, and Germany with its Lebensraum.

    Sorry, but Uncle Adolf was no innocent saint.

  68. I, Edward Manfredonia, thought that I should include this section of an article by Michael Witzel for all who are concerned with the effects of immigration:

    THE HOME OF THE ARYANS

    Michael Witzel writes page 8:

    [MORE]

    MALLORY’S model is, in effect, a rephrasing of what EHRET had described in 1988 in more general terms (derived from Africa): an immigrating civilization joins the local one, transforms it by taking on many of its aspects and then sets in move a recurrent, billiard-like spread of this innovative culture. In the end no one at the start of the process may be genetically linked to anyone at the end of the process. (This is precisely what seems to have happened in the case of Aryanization of S. Asia).

    Michael Witzel
    Harvard University

  69. Wally says:
    @Chris Moore

    Knowledge of the fraudulence of the impossible “holocaust” is spreading worldwide.

    [MORE]

    Sites like http://www.codoh.com and https://www.unz.com are at the forefront of this endeavor.
    The horse has left the barn and there can be no turning back.
    Antifa, ‘BLM’, etc. are nothing compared to growing “holocaust” Revisionism. Rejection of The Big Lie changes everything.

    Only lies require censorship.

    recent:
    video / Fat Jews Skinny Jews in Camps (5:25 Min) : https://codoh.com/library/document/fat-jews-skinny-jews-camps/en/
    video / Bishop Williamson Says No Gas Chambers (5:16 Min): https://codoh.com/library/document/bishop-williamson-says-no-gas-chambers/en/

  70. TGD says:

    75 years after the end of WW2, Germans have built up from the ashes of the war the greatest industrial engine in Europe if not the world. This feat has given rise to the new German supremacism and the gradual rehabilitation of Hitler of which the recent officially sanctioned publication of Mein Kampf is a prime example.

    I blame the rise of German supremacism on the USA, which instead of punishing Nazi war criminals, let them back into West German society to serve as a bulwark against Communism and perhaps deliberately to infect generations of young Germans. Contrast that with post war US policy vis-à-vis Japan. The US Army tried and hanged 5500 Jap war criminals including Hideki Tojo, the ringleader of Imperial Japan. Hardly any German war criminals were hanged by the western Allies.

    One notorious example was SS Obersturmbannführer Joachim Peifer. He gave the order to shoot about 120 US prisoners of war at Malmedy Belgium. Originally sentenced to hang, he was eventually released after 12 years in prison. It took the remnants of the French Resistance to finally kill that viper. Peifer should have been sent to the Soviet Union where he was responsible for mass atrocities against civilians. They would have hanged him for sure.

    • Disagree: Katrinka
    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Wally
    , @Gulnare
  71. @Anonymous

    perhaps you should reappraise your use of the English language before criticising others.
    seriously dude jeez.
    moron.

  72. turtle says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockade_of_Germany

    In March 1919 Winston Churchill told the House of Commons: “We are holding all our means of coercion in full operation or in immediate readiness for use. We are enforcing the blockade with vigor. We have strong armies ready to advance at the shortest notice. Germany is very near starvation. The evidence I have received from the officers sent by the War Office all over Germany shows first of all, the great privations which the German people are suffering, and secondly, the great danger of a collapse of the entire structure of German social and national life under the pressure of hunger and malnutrition. Now is therefore the moment to settle

    German official statistics estimated 763,000 civilian malnutrition and disease deaths were caused by the blockade of Germany.[4] That figure was disputed by a subsequent academic study, which put the death toll at 424,000.

    Dr. Max Rubner in an April 1919 article claimed that 100,000 German civilians had died due to the continuation blockade of Germany after the armistice. In the UK a Labour Party anti-war activist Robert Smillie issued a statement in June 1919 condemning continuation of the blockade, and claiming that 100,000 German civilians had died.[38][39]

    The restrictions on food imports were finally lifted on 12 July 1919 after Germany signed the Treaty of Versailles

  73. Wielgus says:
    @JackOH

    As if fascists never used the “Bolshevik menace” to leverage their goals.

    • Replies: @JackOH
  74. @Saggy

    If white people want to live, the HolyCo\$t must die. Without the HolyCo\$t, they never would have been able to force “diversity” on white nations, nor the current indoctrination of school children toward Hating Whitey.

    • Agree: Greg Bacon, Saggy
    • Replies: @Druid
  75. @Saggy

    Holocaust revisionism is an interesting topic in its own right, but as far as White advocacy is concerned, it is better to tackle the mythos of the Holocaust legend rather than its veracity (which I agree is preposterous, the 6 million figure comes from demographic records if I remember correctly, how many of these Jews just died in the war like the millions of other civilians? How many were absorbed into the Soviet Union and worked to death in the GUlags?)

    As a thought experiment, if everything that is said about the nature of the so-called Holocaust was indeed true, would that really be enough to stop you for advocating for your own groups interest? Isn’t claiming that European racial consciousness will inevitably lead to gas chambers and death squads, as ludicrous as claiming socialism in the form of universal healthcare, free public transport etc etc, will inevitably lead to de-kulakisation, mass deportation and work camps?

    It is the false association that must be tackled head on, as I said in comment #6, most of the Allied soldiers themselves were pro-White and had traditionalist views on a variety of social issues like feminism, miscegenation, immigration and homosexuality.

    If someone accuses you of being a “Nazi”, do not go on the defensive, ask them if the soldiers were fighting so that their kind could become minorities in the countries they founded, ask them if they were fighting for White guilt and reparations and so on.

    • Replies: @Saggy
  76. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Are you sure Whitey hasn’t been taking credit for the black man’s achievements again? We see this time and time again with the Ancient Egyptians, Romans and people like Beethoven. Hitler’s real origins and phenotype are worth investigating, especially in the atmosphere of pro-black historical revisionism we find ourselves living in. We have the 1619 Project, I propose a 1933 Project.

    • LOL: Trinity
    • Replies: @Exalted Cyclops
  77. turtle says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Many readers here are probably already aware of this:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Village_(Dugway_Proving_Ground)

    The purpose of the replicas of German homes, which were repeatedly rebuilt after being intentionally burned down, was to perfect tactics in the fire bombing of German residential areas during World War II.

    The U.S. government, in other words, conducted scientific research to find the most effective way of incinerating German, as well as Japanese, civilians.

    • Replies: @Insouciant
  78. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:

    Disraeli looks like Old Scratch.

  79. Mother Earth is how life forms get to be living in the atmosphere of Father Sky. Words are simply a way for the human brain to communicate. The species homosapiens are not paying attention to the tragic destruction of life in earth. Too much cognitive dissonance (bees buzzing in the brain) is a serious problem. Fine Art, Music, Gardening, T’ai Chi, Yoga, Meditation/s, humans best begin to bond in nature before time explodes.

  80. Saggy says:
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    If someone accuses you of being a “Nazi”

    If someone accuses you of being a Nazi they are hanging the anvil of the holohoax around your neck. If you don’t address that first all this blather about race and nation is neither here nor there, or at best incidental. If you accept the reality of the holohoax you have accepted that Nazis are evil incarnate.

    And, from reading this article, Guyenot does accept the reality of the holohoax. He referred to it as the Holocaust without a disclaimer.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  81. @anon

    I will not elaborate further on this here but to say that all Armenian historians reject the Turk Donmeh narrative on the Armenian genocide.

    • Disagree: Tommy Thompson
    • Replies: @Tommy Thompson
  82. Durruti says:
    @Commentator Mike

    And then after 20 million were killed in WWII, there would have been only 40 million Russians in 1945.

    That!

    Made my day!

  83. Anon[406] • Disclaimer says:
    @TimeTraveller

    And Thats what you want

    to all europeans around the world never trust a middle eastener / north africans it doent matter if they are as smart as a jew or as stupid as a moroocan they are snakes in human form .

    Trust me i know a lot of them they are a dumber version of jews

    • Replies: @TimeTraveller
  84. Ugetit says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    All three Axis powers were supremacist imperialists. Japan with its Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, Italy with its Spazio Vitale, and Germany with its Lebensraum.

    Just copying the “Big Three,” Britain, America, and the USSR of St. Marx’s “Worldwide rev” fame and other lesser imperialist powers, and a bit late in the game I might add. As for the charge of “supremacist, you may want to grab a copy of the Talmud, read Cecil Rhodes’ “Confession of Faith” and Beveridges’ “March of the Flag to name only three examples among many of supremacism.

    Had to laugh at the “buying” part as well. Ever hear of South Africa? The usual suspects also try to convince us goyim that the Zionist mafia bought the bulk of “eretz Israel” from the Arabs too and anyone who believes that needs to see me about buying a seaside condo in the Rockies, cheap. It’s a steal!

    Uncle Adolph was pretty near being a saint and even worked miracles. Winnie, Woodie, Frankie, Vlad, and Joey and their moneyed backers were obviously fallen angels in case anyone’s forgotten. If you had been in Hitler’s position, what would you have done?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  85. @turtle

    Agree.

    FDR acquired land in the Utah desert in mid-1938 (before Kristallnacht, the alleged ‘opening shot’ of holocaust). His stated purpose for the land was to develop chemical – biological weapons to use against Germany.

    Construction of German Village began in 1942.

    The same Jewish architect who, in the late 1930s built homes in Rehovath, Palestine, for Chaim Weizmann and the Schocken family (owners of major German department stores) designed German Village. His name is Erich Mendelsohn. He subsequently designed numerous Jewish synagogues & community centers. He is celebrated today in the Jewish community.

  86. @anaccount

    It looks like even Serbia is bowing down to the globo-homo antichrist, formerly based in Tel Aviv. How utterly disapointing to see Russia do nothing, again.

    Russia’s attitude is if Serbia is led by idiots and its people allow it to continue then why should Russia rush in to save Serbia from itself? The Russian people have learned well from their history with communism and neoliberal predatory capitalism.

    • Replies: @Vojkan
  87. @Saggy

    He referred to it as the Holocaust without a disclaimer.

    Well there are the legal ramifications to consider when publishing as a public persona under one’s own name.

  88. Hun says:
    @advancedatheist

    In real life, that school, located in Vancouver’s Kerrisdale, has maybe 10% white children. Down from 90% white only 15 years ago.

  89. I note that the French version of JFK/9-11 has been re-edited at kontrekulture.com.

    I’ve ordered a copy and started reading it. The JFK affair is so full of glaring dirty tricks. How can US citizens still trust their governments? I mean these 2 events have raised passions and people just leave it at that, with gaping holes in the official narrative.

    That’s probably what audiovisual exposure is doing to our attention span …

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  90. I understand that people need to expose this plot by the parasitElites of Jewish and Non-Jewish background.

    But the articles and books are all over the place. At some point you have to realize that just TALKING & WRITING about it is not enough.

    We have a Technocracy emerging in full view, where the leaders are not even hiding their plans for a future Technocracy & Scientific based world-wide dictatorship. See the German, Klaus Schwab, and his World Economic Forum (WEF). I am unable to get much info on Schwab, except he founded the WEF in early 70s and is very liked by Zionists.

    But his sites provides enormous information on what these people are doing and everyone should read up; One page shows the many organizations, individuals, foundations, and corporations that are members (clearly showing where all the corporate culture is coming from). He is speaking of REVOLUTION in a Technocracy fashion as in “The 4th Industrial Revolution” and the “Great Reset”. Look them up.

    The point is we are ALL outdated now. We just keep getting articles BUT NO LEADERS, While they (both Jews and Non-Jewish white parsitElites) openly plan our demise and enslavement with Modern-day Technocratic/Scientific Dictatorship.

    Anyone unfamiliar with what is really going on would literally think that people like Andrew Anglin and Richard Spencer are the new leadership types for Whites. I would guess that both of them are Operatives.

    Nobody with a rational mind will go along with people who like Nazi stuff and who Adulate Adolf Hitler. Even if Hitler had some intentions that were normal and good, rational people cannot and will not invoke Hitler in their every day life. Won’t happen.

    People like Anglin & Spencer do more harm than good to White people. They only stir up rage, because ultimately neither one is a Leader. They enrage people who are frustrated with too much knowledge and not enough action: it’s the kind of stuff that an inspires someone like the idiot who shot up the Synagogue, taking out some people who were in their 90s.

    Where is the REAL leadership? And Don’t give me Trump. He’s a CYRUS and we all know it.

    • Replies: @Archange
  91. Fox says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Ah, here is the beloved “living space trope” to be followed soon by “we showed them/ him real good”. Naturally, the fact that 5 million Red Army troops armed to the teeth, ready to strike, standing at Europe’s eastern perimeter had nothing to do with any apprehensions Hitler might have had towards the Slavic Bolshevik Empire.
    Compare that reasoned apprehension with the sheer madness with which anti-Germanism was expressed before, during and after the First World War, as well a before, during and after the Second World War, as well as it will be at the present and the unforeseeable future if nothing meaningful will happen, that is. However, now that the ideas of Wilson, Churchill and Roosevelt about the evil Germany and her people constitute and the blessings bestowed upon mankind (minus Germans, of course) by the elimination of both land and being of the Germans, are coming to fruition, the reality they have created might necessitate by dint of an all-or-nothing situation to rethink all of it.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  92. Mefobills says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Your comment is exactly what LAURENT GUYÉNOT is cautioning against.

    Adolf Hitler is its Great Satan, looming over a horde of contemporary minor demons.” Joyce suggests that, since White nationalism is identified as unredeemably evil in mainstream discourse, it cannot fight from that position with rational arguments.

    Sorry, but Uncle Adolf was no innocent saint.

    Yours is an all or nothing position, where to pass muster, the avatar must be perfect and unimpeachable. He has to be a saint.

    The avatar of Hitler was not perfection personified, nobody is. Looking back with 20/20 vision, it is obvious he should not have turned east. It is even more obvious that the Slavs were natural allies. Mistakes were made.

    Also, NSDAP thought came out of many hundreds of years of German tradition, and did not hatch fully formed in Hitler’s mind.

    We have to find some way to illustrate good things that NSDAP did, and there were a lot of good things. I would say that NSDAP thought is such an important subject that it should be required study in school. Their economics were especially relevant to today.

    It is too easy to derail people with the “Hitler did this” demonization argument.

    How to stop the Hitler demonization and holocaustianity BS?

    • Replies: @Peripatetic Itch
    , @Druid
  93. JackOH says:
    @Wielgus

    Wielgus, well, of course, Fascists and their National Socialist kin both leveraged fear of Bolshevism to achieve their goals. But, Fascism and National Socialism are dead letters, and any American candidate who voiced a politics of national solidarity would draw the ire of America’s corporations. America’s Left, although co-opted by America’s corporations for money reasons, is still energetic and enjoys a significant base in the Democratic Party.

  94. @JackOH

    Good luck. We can’t even rehabilitate Nixon, whose presidency achieved more positive goals than any president (of either party) has managed since. Between the cold reality of Watergate and the endless cartoonish villain depictions since then, Nixon takes second place only to Hitler (or maybe third after Trump) as the reflexive embodiment of the Devil Himself in modern U.S. mythology.

    • Agree: JackOH
  95. Thomasina says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    “There is an honest way to solve certain economic needs. It’s called buying. Germany could solve its food problem by buying food from the Ukraine in exchange for its own industrial products. That would be an honest, non-criminal deal.”

    With what currency? German Marks? Was Ukraine prepared to accept German Marks in exchange for grain?

    Gold? How much gold did Germany have?

    U.S. dollars? British pounds? How much of this did Germany have just lying around?

    Weren’t there food blockades? Was Ukraine a part of these food blockades?

    Do you mean to tell us that Hitler could have just picked up the phone and ordered the food? During wartime?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  96. @TimeTraveller

    “and will live in the woods in a wattle and daub hut that he made for himself. ”

    Probably the hut will have been made by someone in China.

    • LOL: TimeTraveller
    • Replies: @Druid
  97. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Sorry, but Uncle Adolf was no innocent saint.

    True, but there were no saints anywhere in the 20th century.
    In context, part of the NSDAP “Volk” philosophy included the Dual Monarchy of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. This map shows the Pre-WWI extent of that territory.

    and this one shows the territorial changes

    Note that Galicia, the fertile farmland of what is now Ukraine, was part of the Empire. Not only was it part of the Empire, there were a significant number of “Germans” farming in the region, who had been there for 200+ years. These were Mennonites, a pacifist religious group related to the Amish. Post 1917, there was a mass exodus of these farmers fleeing the Bolsheviks. Of those leaving Europe, large numbers went to Canada in the 1920s, primarily as farmers. Some sub-sects of the Mennonites still live in/on colonies. The Lebensraum would likely have been regaining that part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
    On another note, Poland’s territorial gains recognized at Versailles, were almost all by invasion post 1918 Armistice and disarmament of Germany and Austro-Hungary.

    • Replies: @Buzz Mohawk
  98. @Chris Moore

    Your point is well made. The “Collaborators” are just as bad if not worse than the Jewish Zionist Mob.” The “Collaborators” are everyone from the Hollywood Whoredom to the Sports Whoredom. The Jews can control most of the world with one thing…MONEY. Our entire Congress is bought and paid for by Jewish Money. Add the myths of antisemitism and the gang banging by the Jewish owned media and you have what we have today.

    You don’t get expelled from over 100 nations, countries and places in the world because you do the right thing. The Jews will destroy any country or nation. They are never patriots. They invited the Muslim Hordes into parts of Europe. The Jews have done the same thing over and over again and when they are caught scream antisemitism. The entire BLM and Antifa is nothing more than their latest game plan against mankind.

    • Agree: Druid
  99. FLgeezer says:

    **BEGIN CLIP**

    Holocaust survivors socialize virtually

    [MORE]

    Zoom & Schmooze allows folks to connect
    The COVID-19 pandemic has enabled Palm Beach County Holocaust survivors isolated in their homes to embrace technology and connect with each other virtually.
    Before the crisis, Alpert Jewish Family Service in West Palm Beach provided monthly in-person Eat & Schmooze socialization events for clients of its Holocaust Survivors Assistance Program.
    As the survivors have had to quarantine in their homes, the events’ format changed into a virtual one, and are now known as Zoom & Schmooze. So far, there have been five of these online events since they began in June, including one hosted by Mind and Melody, an interactive music program.
    George Bodrogi, a survivor living in Boynton Beach who has participated in Zoom & Schmooze events, describes them as fantastic.
    “We’re all locked up in our homes,” he continued. “The only time we go out of our homes is when we have to buy groceries or go to a doctor’s office, so Zoom & Schmooze gives us an opportunity to interface with other Holocaust survivors, people that we used to sit with side-by-side in an auditorium, a temple or reception hall.” Bodrogi continued, “While it’s not the same as before when we would be with each other in person, we at least get to see each other, and it gives us a sense of solidarity and a sense that we are still together as survivors.”
    Jennifer Escobar, Alpert JFS’ director of long term care, praises the agency’s Holocaust team for working together and finding ways to engage the survivors during the pandemic. She noted there have been more than 50 participants in the events.
    “We were so surprised by the survivors’ technological abilities and how quickly they adapted to the new Zoom world,” Escobar continued. “It took some time and some patience with the team working with their clients individually and then in smaller groups, but this came together very nicely.”
    Sara Zenlea, a care manager in the agency’s Holocaust program, also said there has been a team effort in providing the virtual events for the survivors.
    “Everybody brings their own skills and talents to it, and the survivors bring their own skills and talents to it as well,” Zenlea said.
    “On the survivors’ part, I think there’s been an amazing amount of resilience, which is just awe-inspiring. For the team’s part, everyone has their own sense of creativity and their own sense of thought.” Zenlea continued, “It’s a matter of just getting together, thinking out of the box and thinking of ways that we could manage this.”
    The next Zoom & Schmooze event takes place on Sept. 15” ‘
    **END CLIP**

    But not to worry. When/if the last of these pass away, we will have Eternal Holocaust in DC.
    ‘60 Minutes’ on CBS Sunday assured us of that. Find out starting at about 15:30 at the link
    below. What you won’t find out is how much this scam is costing the American taxpayer.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/video/60minutes-2020-08-30/

  100. @Hun

    My high school in east Tulsa went from probably 95% white to majority Hispanic. The neighborhood I grew up in during the 1970’s has turned into a barrio.

  101. Anonymous[213] • Disclaimer says:

    Can Aryan WHITE anglo saxons -as well as other non jews races- can they truly be free as long as their MINDS and SPIRITS remain enslaved to CHRISTIANITY which is another form of JUDAISM…Can CHRISTIANITY ever break its insane christian zionism…Can Christianity survive without whites??? for whites and other non jews biblical myths like chosen people, promised lands…had been thesource of mind, spiritual, body enslavement to the jews..the killers of Christ and yet Christian wordshipped them???

    • Troll: ploni almoni
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  102. @Chris Cosmos

    Hitler and other German thinkers did not understand the inherent problem of capitalism as an acid on cultural values.

    I think you misunderstand and underestimate.
    The issue isn’t capitalism, it is finance capitalism. The Mom and Pop store on the corner is capitalism, the Big Box stores and Supermarket chains are finance capitalism.

    As for the effect on cultural values, Leon Degrelle would disagree with you.
    https://counter-currents.com/2015/06/for-our-part-we-dreamed-of-something-great/



    Video Link

  103. Petermx says:
    @Morton's toes

    A meaningful statement to me. But another thought worth considering is that an adult German in 1945 thought differently than that same German in 1980. I think I came to this realization recently regarding my parents. The same can probably said of most people, not just Germans, but perhaps especially Germans.

    I think I came to this realization after considering something historian David Irving wrote. In a conversation with his German (possibly also Jewish) publisher, the publisher said everyone in Germany heard about the stories of gas chambers and similar things during the war. Irving countered that that is not true and that the publisher believes it to be true only because the story is now known by everyone and talked about all the time and people think they heard it many years ago already.

    I think David Irving is correct. There were many atrocity stories in allied propaganda during the war so some people heard things, just as Americans were told for the last few years that President Trump was working for Russia. But how many Americans (even Democrats) actually believe that? I don’t think very many. If a German heard such a thing during the war (gas chambers) he probably discarded it as propaganda. Germany also dispensed propaganda. As Irving says, it’s a part of war. But German propaganda was not as effective. I do believe it was quite effective in one aspect, convincing many that Germany would be victorious (even when that was no longer possible) so as to convince people to keep fighting.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  104. Bookish1 says:
    @Agathoklis

    Pure bullshit. Germany was highly organized as Germans usually are.

  105. Swastika sporting (in homes, on invitations, on temple walls etc) Hindoos may love Hitler but converts to the Arab inspired Islam hate him with passion … in the 1st image, behind a dark Indian stands goat(ee) wearing Muslim leery of his nemesis’s plan for the “final solution” of the Subcontinent’s Muslims!

    • Replies: @Petermx
  106. Greg Bacon says: • Website
    @Tommy Thompson

    Maybe Hitler’s racism was more limited and practical than we were led to believe.

    The shape-shifters that are so adept at telling lies, some lies have been told 6 gorillion times have been lying about Jesse Owens & Hitler.

    One of the bigger lies by these shifty people is that Hitler snubbed sprinter Jesse Owens at the 1936 Olympics.
    That is a LIE, but don’t check snopes for facts or truths.

    “Hitler had a certain time to come to the stadium and a certain time to leave and it so happened that he had to leave before the victory ceremony after the 100 meters,” Owens told The Pittsburgh Press on 24 August 1936.
    But before he left I was on my way to a broadcast and passed near his box.

    “He waved at me and I waved back.

    “I think it was bad taste to criticise the ‘man of the hour’ in another country.”

    https://www.marca.com/en/olympic-games/2016/08/07/57a76934468aeb676a8b4567.html

    But one president did snub Owens, FDR. It was an election year and he didn’t want to appear soft on the negro issue.

    In this election year, a certain group of race supremacists are wanting to erase the great black leader, Malcolm X from history, but you won’t see Rachel Madcow talking bout that.

    Malcolm X Must Fall: Hundreds of Streets, Schools Named After Black Ally of the KKK

    “Between the Klu Klux Klan and the NAACP group, give me the Klan,” [Marcus] Garvey had once said.

    https://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/daniel-greenfield/malcolm-x-must-fall-hundreds-of-streets-schools-named-after-black-ally-of-the-kkk/2020/06/24/

    So who are the real racists?

  107. “Professor Simon Baron-Cohen suffered no ridicule for telling in his book The Science of Evil (2011) ”

    Professor Simon Baron-Cohen a psychologist is better known for his endorsement and enthusiasm for the “neurodiversity” movement. Basically a trojan horse for peadophillia, that claims there is no right way for your brain to be wired.

  108. @Hun

    There are still white kids in Vancouver? Not that I’ve seen.

  109. Petermx says:
    @Really No Shit

    Not all Hindus “love” Hitler either. I met an otherwise very intelligent Indian who, like most Americans (and Europeans too), is an expert on WW II, the holocaust, lebensborn and all the other propaganda dispensed since the 1930’s and he believes all of it. It’s interesting how many of the most otherwise intelligent people are borderline idiots when discussing the most important event since at least the Napoleonic Wars.

    • Replies: @Really No Shit
  110. @Durruti

    I have long questioned the numbers of people lost in various conflicts of the last century whether by communism or in wars.
    The 65 million killed is number that appears to be from Solzhenitsyn. He didn’t say 65 million were killed during the revolution, rather the total number since the revolution. In fact, he used the term Gulag victims, so it is unclear whether the 65 million means 65 million dead, or 65 million victims in Gulags, including those who died. While your math would be wrong, I believe the number is much too high. I say that, because unlike the mystical six kagillion gassed in a two car garage, which has remained constant, the Holomodor in Ukraine keeps growing. The first time I heard about it was more than 50 years ago, when it was 4 million starved. During the Zundel trials in the 1980s it became 6 million to “see” the Hollow-co\$t bid. A few years back I heard it was almost 10 million. Irrespective of the number. it would be part of the 65 million.
    Of course, none of this means there weren’t massacres and/or starvation campaigns, just that it is unlikely the numbers were so high. I would include the 20 million dead in the USSR during WWII in that as well. The Allied numbers have been routinely inflated, and the Axis numbers deflated. For example, the “official” number of deaths at Dresden are 25-35,000. Yet Kurt Vonnegut, Jr and Victor Gregg, who were POWs in Dresden at the time and involved with locating bodies claim the number was many times more than that.
    As for there being only one race, homo sapiens, I’m afraid I have to disagree. There more than 3 dozen types of finches, all of them different species. No one would ever suggest they are the same species https://www.beautyofbirds.com/finchspecies.htm
    That doesn’t make one species of finch any better than another, just different, and they don’t mate outside their species. The same for IQ. There are differences, but so what? I have often asked the question that if you were lost in the Arctic in winter, who would you rather be with, a “low IQ” Inuit or a White PhD climatologist? I’ll take the “low IQ” Inuit every time.
    Genetics has proven we are different, why deny it.

  111. Anon[203] • Disclaimer says:
    @TGD

    How you can look at the shitshow that is the world today and think “this is all because the USA didn’t hang enough nazis during their show trials!” is beyond me.

  112. Saggy says:

    The whole point of the article was rehabilitating the Nazis, and attempting to do that without addressing the holohoax is absurd. Thus, the whole article was pointless and absurd … like 2+2 = 5 …. and that’s not a good thing.

  113. Cyrano says:

    Hitler’s racism was directed towards Jews and Slavs, the favorite untermensch of the day (for the Nazis).

    Today’s racism is directed towards the deplorables – I guess they are the favorite untermensch of present times. Today’s racism is much more advanced – because it’s not based on race, or even on nationality (it’s within the same race, and within same nations so it’s OK), so it actually doesn’t count as racism, but it’s the highest form of humanism there is.

    Both of these 2 types of racism – the Nazi era, and today’s are designed by the same type of degenerates – western elites, whose primary objective is to save that darling of human achievement – capitalism.

    It turns out Nazism wasn’t needed as a savior of capitalism, that beast is resilient. Today western degeneracies racism towards their own people is probably over the top effort too, the monster will survive again (capitalism), but it will wreck countries, nations and maybe even the western civilization.

    It doesn’t matter, as long as the technique used for saving the beast is regarded as the highest form of humanism. Deplorables of the world unite! (in the west).

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  114. Laurent Guyénot, thank you!

  115. Wally says:
    @TGD

    Yet you ignore the very real US war crimes of Hiroshima & Nagasaki.

    you said:
    ” the USA, which instead of punishing Nazi war criminals, let them back into West German society to serve as a bulwark against Communism and perhaps deliberately to infect generations of young Germans.”

    Laughable BS from the indoctrinated.
    What “war criminals”? Present us proof of their alleged crimes.

    – The fact is that Germans were already falsely punished under the Show Trials, aka: Nuremberg. see:
    Nuremberg Show Trials:
    https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=11053

    – “Joachim Peifer / Malmedy”? More nonsense.

    That too is debunked here:
    The Malmedy Trial: Denial of the Obvious, By John Wear : https://codoh.com/library/document/the-malmedy-trial-denial-of-the-obvious/en/
    Malmedy ‘Massacre’: https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=97
    plus:
    American Atrocities in Germany, By Edward L. Van Roden :https://codoh.com/library/document/american-atrocities-in-germany/en/

  116. Ragno says:

    Just a sidebar note: the inclusion of the two canvases by Hitler inadvertently point out a tactic common to Shitlibbus Americanae: if the target makes a living, or merely displays an aptitude, for the arts, always go out of your way to denigrate the work as derivative, amateurish and hopelessly substandard – that not only gives the Oy Polloy the all-clear to pile on, but legitimizes the cruelly stupid equating of artistic vision and ability with one’s political orientation. By now, Hitler’s early years in Vienna have been characterized (to death!) as the laughable failure of a boob who was clearly in way over his head, because after all how could a mediocrity, with vile opinions and given to tantrums, ever be capable of great or even competent painting/literature/sculpture/composing/architecture/etc? Ordinarily I’d add and then rapidly change the subject before someone half-conversant with art history rattles off the first 15 or 20 examples of Great Artists You Wouldn’t Live Next Door To For Any Sum that come to mind……except in this case, the cultural conditioning is so widespread, and so rigidly enforced with Maolike severity that you may not need to: the first audience member to raise his hand in dissent is likely to be physically attacked and possibly gang-stomped for doing so…..and knows it.

    So for the record, this brownshirt or boob (take your pick – or combine the two!) is officially declaring that were all provenance removed from the two paintings shown in the article, and the images grouped with other early 20th-century European paintings, well…..lets just say they’d be significantly more highly-regarded than they are now. Or perhaps it will just seem that way in the absence of the usual dismissive contempt that otherwise accompanies their appearance 100% of the time. Imagine that – without clear identifiers, such as shockingly mediocre technique or rendering….and without an even clearer signal from certain of the onlookers, you’d never know which paintings on display were Fucking Evil Incarnate, and which – all of them being early 20th-century European, after all – were merely deeply problematic.

    • Agree: Fox
    • Replies: @anon
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  117. Zumbuddi says:
    @Cyrano

    GIGO comment.

    You’ve drunk Hollywood produced Koolaid, that NSDAP was all about Jews or Hitler’s racism.

    There were profound domestic and international economic geopolitical issues at stake in the era of the Zionist wars.

    Hitler & racism are red herrings to distract from the real issues since they heavily implicate Jewish treachery.

    Both are the output of Jewish narcissists.

    Someone needs to invent a word — closest I can come is Incest — for the pathology of Jewish self-love.

  118. Larry says:

    The author has provided many reasons to continue to detest Hitler (as well as any other socialist genocidal maniac).

    The author has also provided many reason to continue to detest white supremacists for worthless, unproductive, parasitic losers they are.

    Nothing new.

    • Troll: Andy Horton
  119. @AriusArmenian

    #82

    My brief understanding of Ottoman history was that the Young Turks ( Masonic Donmeh) took control of the government from the Sultan in a 1905 revolution the same year a failed Communist putsch in Russian against the Czar took place.

    The Young Turks from then on controlled and ran the Ottoman government leaving the Ottoman Sultan only as a titular ruler (figure head) until Turkey’s defeat, where he was reinstated by the Western power to sign surrender terms. As he failed to defend against Greece’s post war invasion to finish off Turkey, the Young Turk, Kemal Attaturk came to the rescue according to most historians and thrust himself to power and the formally ended Sultanate rule..

    The Turkish admitted that the the Prime Minister of Turkey at the time, a Young Turk was behind the Armenian and other massacres carried out.

    I will not elaborate further on this here but to say that all Armenian historians reject the Turk Donmeh narrative on the Armenian genocide

    So this statement that absolves the Donmeh as being behind the Armenian pograms and genocide as defined today, is incredulous. If not the Salonika Masonic Donmeh (crypto Jews) then who was behind it?

    Many Armenians that I know just paint a wide brush in condemning all Muslims for the massacres as if it was ordered by Islamic clergy. This is despite hundreds of thousands fleeing persecution being welcomed and even protected by Syrians at great risk to themselves or Iranians. the Armenian communities already residing in neighboring Arab and Persian towns remained unmolested from their Arab or Persian neighbors.

    I remain open to learn more on this subject from someone better informed and does not carry a big log on their shoulder.

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
  120. @Fox

    Ah, here is the beloved “living space trope”

    Actually the term is “Lebensraum”. That should give you some idea with whom the term, and policy, originated. And let’s not go into Suvorov’s “Icebreaker” yet again – it’s been debated here countless times.

    • Replies: @Fox
  121. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ragno

    First time I’ve seen Adolph’s art.
    No hesitation to have them on my main room wall.

    Stuff by Rothko, Chagall, Picasso are in the barn.

    W by himself in the bathroom.

  122. Thanks, Laurent. Great article.

    That an amazingly powerful, invincible, homosexual lobby suddenly sprang up out of nowhere post-sixties tells us something.

    As powerful as the Jewish lobby, a high proportion of them Jews.

    The Jews do everything possible to subvert society. I don’t think revolutionary Marxism was a Jewish idea, but anything like that, the Jews dive into it.

    Anything possible, any scheme imaginable, to subvert society in the host nation.

    BUT BUT BUT

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  123. karel says:
    @Sparkon

    Many thanks but I am not so certain. How could supposedly giving Jews Palestine destroy the German war machine or whatever came later?

    This was something Hitler wanted all along but that was many, many years later

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  124. @Curmudgeon

    During wartime it is normal to inflate the enemy’s losses and deflate your own – for the sake of morale. How come afterwards this is reversed so as to make the winner seem the victim and less murderous than the loser I don’t know. Hard to get to the truth in this numbers game.

  125. Trinity says:

    Hmm, so not only Germans but Whites need to be punished or made to feel guilty because Jews were prisoners of war in German prison camps during WWII?? Hmm, so Germany and Germans were supposed to allow Jews to keep oppressing Germans in Germany or maybe even have a Jewish Revolution in Germany like they orchestrated in the Soviet Union?? What makes Jewish victims of war more special than any other people that have had to endure the same harsh treatment at the hands of their captors?? The German people suffered far more than the Jewish people in World War II, so did Russians, Ukrainians, Chinese, Japanese, etc. It is common knowledge that the holocaust has been greatly exaggerated by even those who believe a great deal of the so-called, “official narrative.”

    Are Jews made to feel shame over the treatment of Palestinians, or what happened to Germans in WWII or the Holodomor? Jews are not the only people who have suffered, and they sure are not blameless victims every single time something happens to them throughout history. Did not Germany welcome fleeing Jews from Russia with open arms and did not the Jewry stab Germany in the back during WWI?

    We see in the year 2020 that Whites are made to feel like it is racist to even defend themselves. Look at the couple in St. Louis who were defending themselves from a mob of Antifa/BLM rejects. Do you think the mob would have possibly attacked the couple had they not been armed? Would the mob of goons attacked an unarmed, intimidated couple? Given the mentality of these cowardly goons, my guess is that they smell fear a mile away and they have demonstrated that they will attack the helpless, the outnumbered and even the elderly and not feel guilty at all for their actions. When someone is so mentally ill that they feel guilty for merely standing up for their God given rights or their survival, then they have been mind fucked beyond help.

    Off your knees, Germany and off your knees, White people.

    • Agree: freedom-cat
  126. Durruti says:
    @Curmudgeon

    As for there being only one race, homo sapiens, I’m afraid I have to disagree. There more than 3 dozen types of finches, all of them different species.

    Genetics has proven we are different, why deny it.

    Thanks for your intelligent thoughts/response to my comment.

    I believe we are Genetically, the same species. Am not always sure about “homo sapiens” (knowledgeable, wise clever ‘intelligent’ MEN/humans). I always thought our “Genetics” display overwhelming connections between we-humans.

    [Finches are beautiful birds. I do not believe I have ever seen an ugly Finch.]

    I teach my students that the Apes descend from Humans, and that Darwin got it in reverse.

  127. Thomasina says:
    @Anonymous

    I’ll check out “Art of Controversy” and the “Art of Cross-Examination”. I once read an essay on “The Art of Seeing”. Fascinating. Anything done well IS art.

    “Nobody could care less if someone’s a Jew.” Exactly, the ordinary guy, who cares. But when as a group they use deceit, lies, manipulation, bribes, threats, blackmail, when they feel entitled to shut down speech and change laws to benefit themselves, that is when people get mad.

    One thing I have found with the very few narcissists I have known is that they are never satisfied until things are exactly the way they want them. There’s no compromise. They just keep chipping away until they get what they want. They wear you down. Unrelenting.

    Not only do the Jewish elite have massive amounts of wealth to throw around, but they also own the financial system, the media, big Tech, Hollywood, academia, publishing, the politicians, the administration, the judiciary, etc.

    They run the country, and this fact needs to be exposed. Once it is exposed, we need to opt out of their system as much as we can. Let them twist.

    Thanks, Anonymous[314]

  128. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    BUT the Jews are NOT a race. That is their top lie, but anyone can see that they themselves are of visibly different races.

    They are the result of aggressive Pharisaic proselytizing all over the Hellenistic world that was the legacy of Alexander the Great but included the Roman Empire, plus of course the result of the Khazars converting to the religion of their rulers.

    • Thanks: Tommy Thompson
    • Replies: @anon
  129. karel says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    Yes Germans lose no wars. That is the reason why they always want to start new ones even though we may wait a bit for a another one. Germany lost Alsace Lorraine, unless you have not noticed, and Saarland was also occupied but not permanently lost. One of the many reasons, I do not claim here a monocausality of the events ,was a starvation in Berlin in 1918 and a great fear of a communist uprising , which seemed a more terrible option to the ruling class than agreeing to the terms of the an armistice.

    Try to tell the French that ”Germany did not lose WWI.” and they would laugh at you or some of the cocky ones would kick you in the ass. Czechs would just laugh, feeling pity for you.

    • Replies: @Genrick Yagoda
  130. Fox says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I just wrote “living space” for your benefit. One never knows whether the experts on Germany and the history of the Second War do in fact speak or comprehend German. It is usually a good assumption that especially those with opinions in sync with the official edicts do not.
    As of Suvorov, he merely gave an overview from the Soviet side. That the Red Army had amassed a gigantic troop contingent along the western boundary of the Soviet sphere of influence has been discussed and shown in considerable detail by numerous authors in the last 75 years.

  131. Excellent article, comme toujours, Laurent Guyénot! Vous êtes un phare dans la nuit. You’re a beacon in the night.

    In his “Concept of the Political” (Begriff des Politischen, 1927) and “Theory of the Partisan” (Theorie des Partisanen, 1963), the jurist and political theorist Carl Schmitt (1888-1985) defined politics as the “capacity to designate the enemy”. This is what the White Race is no longer allowed to do.

    So who is the enemy? Let’s start with the one and only genuine government of the white nations of the world: the Mainstream Media and those who own and control it. All of our institutions cravenly bow down and cater to the MSM’s most trifling whim without exception: the government, business, labor, the churches, the schools and universities, the law, the medical profession, non-governmental organizations, you name it.

    But the Number One enemy of the White Race is not Jews and non-whites. No, the Number One enemy of the White Race as a whole is by far and away the little pawns and lackeys who make up our third rate white ruling class. The fake whites who eagerly submit and enthusiastically execute whatever command, whim, and fancy the Jews, non-whites, and their media come up with. People like Morris Dees, the founder of the rabidly anti-white and utterly corrupt Southern Opulence Crime Center (SOCC, although I believe it calls itself the Southern Poverty Law Center).

    Those people are only white on the outside, and are anything BUT white on the inside. They’re Fake Whites. Like shape-shifting skin-walkers, they are as foreign to the White Race as any Chabad-Lubavitch Jew or semi-cannibal from Papua-New Guinea.

    They all reflexively and eagerly dance to whatever tune the MSM is playing. More than that, they cravenly beg for more slavery and more chains, which they fervently call “freedom and democracy”. The beleaguered and endangered White Race has NO ONE AND NOWHERE to turn to, except ITSELF.

    Hitler’s only “crime” is to have lost the war. They began by demonizing Hitler and the Nazis: the Great Satan and his demonic worshippers. Through them they demonized all Germans, and through the Germans they demonized the entire White Race. A very simple tactic. And as lethal as murder when you control 100% of the media.

    Make no mistake about it: 1945 marked the triumph of Extremism. Unless the white race fully regains control of its media and the TRUTH is finally told about Hitler and National-Socialism, about the Confederacy and the Ku-Klux-Klan, and about Race as a whole – among many other things – we, the Aryans, will die.

    When were voters anywhere ever asked their opinion with regards to the dictates of the Jewish-negro-Latino-homo lobbies on immigration, homosexuality, lesbianism, “hate laws”, and all the rest of the Politically Correct commandments arbitrarily imposed upon us?

    We all know the answer: we were NEVER asked. Anywhere. Ever. First, they said “we only want equality”. When that didn’t work, politicians passed laws legalizing reversed discrimination against the White Race. When that didn’t work either, our media masters opted for open genocide through population replacement.

    Then they unleashed homosexuality, lesbianism, “transgender”, and the eradication of all differences between the sexes. No more he or she. Just “it”, as in Sweden. The complete inversion of values: hedonism , “gay pride” and lesbianism against heterosexuality and family values. The masculinizing of women and the feminization of men.

    In many (most?) white countries you can lose your job for merely voicing your support of Donald Trump, and you can be jailed for expressing any kind of criticism against non-whites or Jews. So……is there a way out for the endangered and on-its-way-to-extinction White Race? Yes, there is: REVOLUTION. It is the ONLY way out for the White Race. Nothing else will stop the genocide.

    Senator Roy Blunt from Missouri was chairman of the Inauguration Committee and he gave the first speech at Trump’s inauguration. Here’s the relevant part:

    “…..36 years ago at his first inauguration… President Ronald Reagan said that what we do here is both commonplace and miraculous. Commonplace [because] every four years since 1789 when President George Washington took this exact same oath, [and] miraculous because we’ve done it every four years since 1789 and……it sets [an example] for democracies everywhere.

    Washington believed the inauguration of the second president would be more important than the inauguration of the first. Many people had taken control of a government up until then but few people had ever turned that control willingly over to anyone else. And as important as the first transfer of power was, many historians believe that the next election was even more important when in 1801 one group of people arguably for the first time ever, in history, willingly, if not enthusiastically, gave control of the government to people they believed had a dramatically different view of what the government would, should and could do.” (source: http://www.pressreader.com/)

    Except there WAS no “transfer of power”. Power remains more firmly than ever in the same Jewish hands that have held it since days of the Franklin Roosevelt Administration (1933-45). And when the White Race finally does seize power from the Jews, you can bet your life that the ensuing revolution will be every bit as bloody and murderous as the French and Russian revolutions ever were. Or more so.

    When will this Revolution finally take place? The trigger will almost surely be a major catastrophic event or series of events, man-made, natural, or both. Like a major war, i.e. World War Three – started by the JeW Axis (Jerusalem-Washington) – followed by a complete collapse of the New World Order.

    In a span of 31 years (1914-1945) there were two World Wars (1914-18, 1939-45), a revolution (Russia: 1917-22), a worldwide depression (1930-39), and a civil war (Spain: 1936-39). When the Wheel of History starts moving it can move very fast indeed, and those who are at the top end up being crushed at the bottom of that wheel. Get ready.

    ————————————————————

    Happy slaves are the bitterest enemies of freedom.
    Marie von Ebner Eschenbach (1830-1916), Austrian writer

    A people of sheep eventually begets a government of wolves.
    Bertrand de Jouvenel (1903-1987)

    When justice is crushed, when evil is triumphant, then I come back. For the protection of the good, for the destruction of evildoers, for the establishment of the Reign of Righteousness, I am born again and again, age after age.
    The Bhagavad-Gita IV, Verses 7 and 8

    The further a society drifts from truth, the more it will hate those who speak it.
    George Orwell (1903-1950)

    All that is gold does not glitter,
    Not all those who wander are lost;
    The old that is strong does not wither,
    Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

    A slumbering people is easier to control than a people that is oppressed.
    Anonymous

    When exposing a crime is treated as committing a crime, you are being ruled by criminals.
    Edward Snowden (1983 – )

    • Thanks: Trinity, Ann Nonny Mouse
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  132. @Curmudgeon

    In fact, he used the term Gulag victims, so it is unclear whether the 65 million means 65 million dead, or 65 million victims in Gulags, including those who died.

    Do you think the entire population of all of Siberia ever numbered that many (current population of Siberia is 33,765,005 )? I know it was used for exile in the past, and those exiled would have at some point died, of old age or whatever, whether while in exile or upon release or return, but that many? And I doubt the gulags could have accommodated that many even on some conveyor belt principle. I wonder where Solzhenitsyn pulled that number from.

    • Replies: @Durruti
  133. vot tak says:

    The israelo-facsists aligned themselves with nazis and fascists during the 1930s/1940s, they are still doing this. The difference, these things are in total power now in “the west”. It’s not half nazi-zionazi control anymore, it is zionazi. The subversion to israeli dominance is total. The header article author knows this has no problem with it.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  134. @Mefobills

    Looking back with 20/20 vision, it is obvious [Hitler] should not have turned east.

    Victor Suvorov has laid out a compelling case that Hitler merely preempted a major invasion of Germany by Stalin, who was amassing a major invasion force on Germany’s border, but who had not prepared for having to fight a defensive operation. He had weaponry like amphibious and motorway-capable tanks (useless for defense in a countryside without motorways), paratroopers and gliders for dropping forces behind enemy lines and even millions of German-Russian phrasebooks. His forces were massed in a straight line along the border when a defensive formation would have seen them spread out well back from the border.

    Suvorov, a former Soviet Intelligence officer, argues that Stalin’s forces would soon have been large and powerful enough to sweep across Europe to the Atlantic and be in a position to invade England. Controversial but well worth consideration.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @Wade
  135. karel says:
    @Majority of One

    Yours is at least a coherent explanation. It makes some sense what you write, but I do not believe in a monocausality. Your proposal is the most intelligent one of the responses I have got here but as you see, there is no consensus. Many thanks for your comment.

  136. @Petermx

    Of course, unlike the White Christian German for whom aryanhood is a race construct, whereas, for the brown Hindoo Indian, the aryanhood is all about the religion …

  137. Dutch Boy says:

    The British people are just that – most of their genetic heritage is from the pre-Anglo-Saxon Celtic population (the Britons of Roman times). Their gene pool closely resembles that of their Irish neighbors, also descended from a pre-Anglo-Saxon population. The Celts are, of course, a different offshoot of the great Indo-European (or Aryan) invasion that conquered almost all of Europe in the second millenium, B.C.. Anglo-Saxonism is a cultural movement based on a pre-scientific belief in the origin of the British people (that they are mostly descended from Germanic invaders) that recent genetic research has disproven.

  138. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    BUT the Jews are NOT a race. That is their top lie

    I dunno.
    Maybe liars are a race.

    So,
    Yid could be right.

    Hmm,
    Yid could be many races:
    Liar, Thief, Scoundrel, Traitor.

    Well,
    these shape shifters can be one or many.

  139. @Petermx

    David Irving IS correct. Germans knew nothing of “death camps” or “gas chambers” until the Americans came along and made films about them. Those who lived near a camp were forced by the Allies to tour them and view piles of dead corpses – and even to handle them! Germans were treated to something like traumatic shock syndrome. They had no defense, and no one on their side. Still, many did not believe it.
    It was mostly only some party and government officials who heard rumors that such things were happening, and when they inquired of their superiors were told it was war propaganda, which it was.

    One of the confusing aspects of “the holocaust” narrative is that it is put out by different groups, or at different times, both that it was successfully kept a big secret from the German people AND that most Germans knew about it because “everyone knew.”

    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Petermx
  140. @karel

    Yeah, Duuhhh, Germany lost Alsace Lorraine…. AFTER WWI! Why do you think so many Germans felt they were stabbed in the back, as I just finished explaining to you?

    If you hear laughter, you might want to consider that it is directed at you, and not me.

    • Replies: @karel
    , @Genrick Yagoda
  141. @Thomasina

    You can trade without paying with money but by simple barter, like with tractors for grain.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  142. karel says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    Hm but who stabbed them in the back? You explained nothing because you have no idea what you are talking about.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Seraphim
  143. anon[771] • Disclaimer says:

    Hitler spoke of the Aryan race, by which he meant all Germanic peoples, including the Dutch, Swedes, Norwegians, Finns, Swiss, as well as the English, whose leading ethnos is primarily of Anglo-Saxon and Norman descent.

    No love for the Celts and Mediterraneans, huh? Good riddance to this White race.

  144. walrom says:
    @Anita Patel

    You should read the story, but not the fictional one. Poland and the German sex became socialist and the half-destroyed Union was still helping them to rebuild their economy.

  145. @Ugetit

    Whether the Allies were themselves (supremacist) imperialists does not absolve the Axis nations of same, and does not “prove” that Hitler had no territorial ambitions in the Slavic East but invaded Russia “only to defend Germany”. Hitler could have promised freedom to the Baltic states, Belo-Russia and the Ukraine and could have won those peoples as allies. Perhaps he could even have won over large sections of the people of Russia proper, opposed to the communist genocidal policies. In that case the Germans would have been welcomed as liberators. But Hitler would have none of it. He wanted “Lebensraum”.

    • Replies: @Fox
    , @Ugetit
  146. Sparkon says:
    @karel

    How could supposedly giving Jews Palestine destroy the German war machine or whatever came later?

    Did you miss the part where the world’s most powerful nation, the United States of America, by devious means, came into WWI on the side of the Allies because of the Balfour Declaration?

    The arrival of 2 million U.S. troops in Europe turned the tide of the war against Germany, although all that number did not see action. When the Germans learned why the U.S. had entered the war against them, of course they felt like they’d been stabbed in the back.

    And the Balfour Declaration was not the only grievance Germans had, as you have read in the other comments.

  147. @Chris Cosmos

    Chris: Your assessment on culture segues in nicely with some of the author’s insights. The prime culprit was capitalism PLUS industrialization and its concomitant, urbanization. Cultures are built upon the building blocks of the nuclear family and the extended family.

    The literal home of localized, organic culture is the rural farming village, the ideal situation in which to raise and enculturate children. One of the developments which quickly doomed the basis for Western culture and particularly in America was the mass migration to urban areas during and after the two World Wars.

    After the initial conflict, much of the infrastructure of the extended clan was shattered and following the second the clan was almost totally demolished. With the television era and then the advent of the birth control pill along with the perceived need for two income households, the nuclear family itself began to break up.

  148. Thomasina says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    “Everybody, stop the war. We need grain, so we need to turn our attention to building tractors for Ukraine for a few weeks.”

    Something like that?

    Seriously, Germany got totally screwed over at Versailles. Bad things happen when you screw people over. And I see it happening again.

    • Replies: @ivan
  149. incitatus says:

    “Both the Duce and the Fuhrer despised Parliamentary democracy because it is not conducive to the emergence of true leadership”

    “Leadership” meaning unrestrained power free of legislative checks-and-balances or consent of the people, free to wage wars on a whim. And both did. And both ruined their nations.

    “[Leadership] is the fusional and energizing encounter between a man’s inner calling to lead, and a people’s inner longing to be led. From the organic or holistic viewpoint, men have a natural need for hierarchy and authority, which drives them to collectively subordinate their own will to the stronger will of a leader, for the sake of the whole.”

    Bovine philosophy worthy of leadership-cults. Serfdom “for the sake of the whole” and wholesale murder of the opposition. Guess who determines “the whole”? The leader. Just ask Pol Pot, Kim Jong-un or Jim Jones. Word to the wise – don’t drink the Kool-Aid.

    Many might say ‘Leadership’ is acting with the informed consent of constituents to promote a sustainable future, evaluated (nit-picked, second-guessed, messy) all along the way. It falls within the Hellene ‘Primum non nocere’ (“first, do no harm”) school of medicine, but equally applies to self-governance. Thus ‘checks-and-balances’. Designed to void unrestrained “leadership” in successors of George III, let alone popular demagogues like Mussolini and Hitler.

    “Hitler’s goal, as he explained in Mein Kampf (MK), was to create a “race-based nationalist state.””

    You’re too modest. Austrian vagabond/gefreiter/Reichswehr spy Hitler – self-styled choice of ‘Providence’ – wanted a great contest pitting races against each other in a grand Darwinian struggle. A struggle that put lemming Germans on the spit:

    “If the German people are no longer strong enough and ready to sacrifice their own blood for their existence, then they should perish and be wiped out by another, stronger power. They are no longer worthy of the place they have won for themselves.”
    -Adolf Hitler to the Danish Foreign Minister 27 Nov 1941 [Stargardt, The German War p.227]

    “[The Führer said] if the German People turned out to be weak, they would deserve nothing else than to be extinguished by a stronger people; then one could have no sympathy for them.”
    – Adolf Hitler to Joseph Göbbels, Tagebücher 8 Feb 1943 [part II vol. 7 p.296; Beevor ‘The Second World War’ p.544]

    “Leadership” or madness?

    Treatment of those who dared tell the truth? Generaloberst Erich Hoepner (commanding 4th Panzer Group, Army Group Center, Russia) writes 21 Dec 1941:

    “The miscalculation in the German plans can in no way be explained by the conditions of the winter campaign. Winter is not to blame here, but an organic mistake in the work of the OKW during the planning of the war.” [Stahel ‘Retreat from Moscow’ p.186];

    Reason? 1693 supply trains reached the eastern front December 1941 [9300 the minimum requirement]. No winter uniforms, transport or weapons suited to conditions.

    Hitler dismisses Hoepner 8 Jan 1942 after the latter strategically withdraws to strengthen his defensive line and save his men. Hitler orders Hoepner be deprived of his pension and the right to wear his uniform and medals (illegal under contemporary Reich law). Hoepner (age 56) files a lawsuit and wins his pension.

    Hoepner is later accused of participating in the 20 Jul 1944 Plot, arrested, tortured by the Gestapo, refuses to commit suicide and demands trial. It’s conducted by ‘People’s Jurist’ Roland Freisler. Hoepner is hung 8 Aug 1944 with piano wire from meat-hooks (perhaps filmed, like other executions, for the Führer’s snuff-film collection).

    Of course, Sippenhaft (NSDAP collective punishment) kicks in:

    “Hoepner’s wife, daughter, son (a major in the army), brother and sister were arrested. The women were sent to Ravensbrück concentration camp. His sister was soon released but Frau Hoepner and her daughter were placed in the notorious Strafblock for four weeks’ additional punishment. Hoepner’s son was first held at a specially created camp at Küstrin (now Kostrzyn nad Odrą) and then sent to Buchenwald concentration camp.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erich_Hoepner

    This is the régime the author seeks to redeem? Good luck.

  150. @Epaminondas

    Those people believe that the Old Testicles happens to be the gist and essence of history. Essentially, they are both naive and ignorant. Except for grade-school texts, many of them have read only one book in their entire lives. That segues closely with the deliberate dumbing down process that began with our edjumication policies in the early part of the 20th Century.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  151. Paul C. says:
    @Franz

    That was a good listen. 2 excellent researchers and seekers of the truth. RIP.

  152. Fox says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    There it is again, the beloved “Lebensraum”.
    Sometimes it seems that arguments -or opinions- are quite generally resting on a a very small number of slogans.

  153. Petermx says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Yes, I know Carolyn. I had many conversations with my mother who turned 18 the same month the war ended and she saw and heard nothing like that. The picture I got from my mother was that for her life was pretty normal until late 1944, 1945. She did not live in a big city so she didn’t experience the bombing.

  154. Corvinus says:

    “The “naziest” of these ideas is, of course, the greatness of the White race. Hitler spoke of the Aryan race, by which he meant all Germanic peoples, including the Dutch, Swedes, Norwegians, Finns, Swiss, as well as the English, whose leading ethnos is primarily of Anglo-Saxon and Norman descent.”

    Everyone has heard of Celts, Anglo-Saxons, and Vikings. And most of us are familiar with the idea that the English are descended from Anglo-Saxons, who invaded eastern England after the Romans left, while most of the people in the rest of the British Isles derive from indigenous Celtic ancestors with a sprinkling of Viking blood around the fringes. Yet there is no agreement among historians or archaeologists on the meaning of the words “Celtic” or “Anglo-Saxon”. What is more, new evidence from genetic analysis indicates that the Anglo-Saxons and Celts, to the extent that they can be defined genetically, were both small immigrant minorities. Neither group had much more impact on the British Isles gene pool than the Vikings, the Normans or, indeed, immigrants of the past 50 years. Essentially, the English are Mutts.

    The notion of “whites” or “European-whites” being bound together came about as a result of Social Darwinism and imperialism in the late 1800’s–the distinction that separated “us” from “them”. In this manner, the “lowest-rung” whites were deemed superior in social standing than their darkie counterparts, while at the same time knew full well their “pecking order” within the European hierarchy. The following source offers extensive evidence to prove this point.

    http://science.jrank.org/pages/10962/Race-Racism-in-Europe-French-Revolution-Nation.html

    Georges Vacher de Lapouge, in his study of European skulls in 1888, saw three European races and ordered their quality and value: European Man, Alpine Man, and Homo Contractus. He argued that none of these races directly correlated with a specific nation, but his descriptions of their behaviors and religious ideas were clearly meant to correspond to Germany, Southern Europe, and the population of European Jews. The naturalized German citizen Houston Stewart Chamberlain wrote in 1899 that the German race struggled to maintain its purity because of the Darwinian form of natural selection that caused Germans to feel a revulsion toward intermixing with lesser races. Overall, this putative science of race uncoupled nationalism from its liberal roots, implying that those who lived within a national community did not necessarily belong. One could act, speak, or feel German or French but never be German or French.

    In newly unified Italy, northern Italians in Lombardy saw the threat of southern peoples, the Sicilians or Neapolitans, as racially enervating. They were thought to be different because of their hot-blooded, less rational characters—elements believed to emanate from their hotter climate and their proximity to Africa. Similar ideas existed in Spain toward those from the south, in particular Andalu sia. In northern Spain, notions of racial purity became important adjuncts of the Basque nationalist movement that sprang up in the late nineteenth century. The presence of foreign guest workers, or maketos, from other parts of Spain, was perceived as a threat to Basque purity. Sabino Arana, an early founder of Basque nationalism, proposed miscegenation laws in 1901 to prohibit the marriage of Basques to Spaniards.

    Of course, the hierarchy of race begs the question: If other, non-white races are inferior to “whites”’, then is there a hierarchy within the “white” race? Would not certain “white” groups be considered superior to others that seem “less white” or “not quite white”?

    Are all Finns superior to all Iberians, who tend to be of a darker skin tone? Is a low-education Swede automatically “better” than a highly-educated Greek? Did not the Romans, a “darker” Latin group, conquer and “civilize” less-developed barbarian tribes such as Britons? Was not Great Britain the product of made up of mixed peoples from different levels of that hierarchy? How would one “ethnically handicap” Romans, Angles, Saxons, Normans, Danes, Gaelic Celts, Jutes, and Frisians?

    “[Hitler] recognized, however, that England was the rightful master of the seas, and envisioned a partnership with her for the peaceful government of Europe”.

    No. The Anglo-German Naval Agreement, (June 18, 1935) was a bilateral concord between Britain and Germany countenancing a German navy, but limiting it to 35 percent of the size of the British navy. Part of the process of appeasement before World War II, the agreement enabled Germany to violate restrictions imposed by the Treaty of Versailles, prompting international criticism and driving a wedge between the British and Germans. The fact of the matter is that Great Britain’ naval prowess was seen as a direct threat to German imperial ambitions on the European continent, as well as German colonial possessions in Africa.

    “Since eugenics is one key element of the dark legend of Nazism, it must be reminded that “eugenics” was invented by the British Francis Galton, Charles Darwin’s cousin, to correct the perverse effect of civilization which “diminishes the rigour of the application of the law of natural selection and preserves weakly lives that would have perished in barbarous lands”.

    The early German eugenics movement was led by Wilhelm Schallmayer and Alfred Ploetz. Unlike the American movement, one publication and one society, the German Society for Racial Hygiene, represented all eugenicists, and was in large part responsible for formulating Nazi eugenics policies, which clearly is an affront to Christianity.

    “He believed that a nation’s most precious God-given treasure is its collective genetic heritage, and that the most sacred duty of men and women is to protect and transmit it, in order to make their people eternal.”

    Suffice to say, men and women have their own designs as to what constitutes “sacred duties”, and need not be virtue signaled to death for refusing to promote, at best, or outright dismissing, at worst, this notion of a “pure people”.

    “Should we accept the inevitable (whether by Providence or Darwinian law), let the Jews rule the world, and get over it?”

    Assuming that this premise is true.

    “But I always come back to the same point: Jewish power is the rule of the Lie (read my previous article “The Devil’s Trick”).”

    More like your perverted version of White Nationalism is a lie. Ironic that you cite this “Devil’s Trick”. Projection on your part?

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @AndrewR
  155. Corvinus says:
    @Epaminondas

    “You can thank the Judeo-Puritans of the Anglo-Saxon world for our predicament”.

    Son, you need to realize that:

    All people are made in the image of God (Gen. 1:26-28). This is what gives all humans dignity and value. God’s creation of humanity in his image means that there is one and only one human race, and that all people of all ethnicities have the same inherent dignity as God’s image-bearers.

    All people are sinful, having fallen in Adam (Rom. 5:12-21). This means that all people by nature are subject to the judgment of God (Eph. 2:1-3). It also means that racism has its ultimate roots not in circumstance or social conditioning, but in our sinful nature.

    Salvation in Christ is offered freely to all who believe, regardless of ethnicity (Acts 17:30; Rom. 3:22b-23).

    In Christ, Christians have a spiritual and covenantal unity that transcends ethnic differences (Gal. 3:28). The unity Christians have as members of the body of Christ is also a unity that genuine brings together people who have nothing in common outside of Christ, creating a glorious picture of God’s radical grace.

    Local churches should be characterized by unity-in-diversity (1 Cor. 12:12-26). Ethnic diversity brings glory to God (Rev. 7:9-10). This means that ethnic differences are not merely boundaries to be overcome. Rather, we should celebrate them as expressions of God’s multifaceted glory. This means that we shouldn’t seek cultural uniformity in our churches, but unity-in-diversity.

    “To this day, these fools have willfully turned away from the coming racial storm…”

    So, what are YOU going to do about it other than lament on a blog? Will go the route of Kyle, or remain mealy mouthed on the sidelines?

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Epaminondas
  156. @Ragno

    Your comment hit the bull’s eye–and and was also highly entertaining. Thank you!

  157. Corvinus says:
    @Tool Book and Rifle

    “Unless the white race fully regains control of its media and the TRUTH is finally told about Hitler and National-Socialism, about the Confederacy and the Ku-Klux-Klan, and about Race as a whole – among many other things – we, the Aryans, will die.”

    OK, so how are YOU going to make this happen? What efforts you willing to make to ensure that these alleged lies will be exposed other than commenting in this post? Your “tribe” is allegedly dying before your eyes, right? I mean, you had proposed “retaking our lands through ethnic cleansing”. So, is this just more Internet Tough Guy Talk, or is there truly a plan of action that YOU will put into motion?

  158. anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    German’s are the largest ethnic group in the US, so is America’s never-ending hatred of Germany a form of self-hatred? There’s not a dime’s worth of genetic difference between the Germans and the English so they are engaging in a form of self-hatred also. I’m of Norwegian and Scottish background and have always admired Germany and the Germans for their culture and accomplishments and also because they are close brothers to my genetic background. I have never understood this constant hatred of Germany that our society is supposed to have. Hitler was just a footnote in German history and love him or hate him was probably responsible for less deaths than Napoleon or the many wars that England was responsible for. Take an Englishman like Oliver Cromwell, he was a religious fanatic and was responsible for the deaths of thousands of people. He was however a friend of the Jews so we never hear anything negative about Cromwell.

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
    • Replies: @Anon
  159. Sparkon says:
    @Majority of One

    Your assessment on culture segues in nicely with some of the author’s insights.

    That segues closely with the deliberate dumbing down process

    A segue is a smooth transition from one thing to another with no breaks or interruptions, as a noun, or as a verb, to make a smooth transition from one thing to another.

    Psst. Some far out DJs and groovy bands segue between songs by mixing the beginning of one song with the end of another, so there is no silence or break between the songs.

    But don’t feel bad; even Thomas Pynchon misspelled it in Gravity’s Rainbow.

    • Replies: @Badger Down
  160. @karel

    THE JEWS STABBED THEM IN THE BACK. Have you got it now? Who is it that has no idea …

    • Replies: @incitatus
    , @karel
  161. @Anon

    …said the angry Jew about the Byzantine that pissed in his soup…

  162. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Uncle Adolf was no innocent saint.

    and neither are you, so I suppose you lack the moral standing to criticize Hitler. For that matter, I’m hardly a Saint either, so I suppose I lack the moral standing to criticize you. Let us all repent, and spend the remainder of our lives carrying night soil for the poor and oppressed, who must be Saints because we are carrying their night soil, and doing it silently, too, so as not to be critical. Or, maybe, let’s not do that.

    In any event, Hitler did not so much invade the USSR as launch a spoiling attack against an overwhelming attack being mounted by the USSR. See Viktor Suvorov’s books, and see: https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-when-stalin-almost-conquered-europe/?highlight=viktor+suvorov
    Whatever Hitler’s non-Saintly attributes, he wasn’t dumb enough to start a two front war.

    • Replies: @Ugetit
    , @Sparkon
  163. Thank you Laurent for all of your writing. I have read and reread and reread your JKF – 9/11 book. Thank you for connecting so many dots.

    Thank you Trinity for your comments as well. You perfectly summarize the what the truth is.

  164. @Genrick Yagoda

    You need to improve your reading comprehension. I told you in my first post that the German people were lied to, and told that they would agree to an Armistice based on Roosevelt’s 14 Points that were widely publicized. In other words, fair treatment upon the succession of hostilities, not the country being carved up and reparations paid for a century.

    Given your continued addled responses, please don’t think I am communicating with you. Other people read exchanges in the comment section, and it is for their benefit I write.

  165. @Jean-Marie L

    I knew there was something wrong with their “official narrative” by the 3rd day. First clue was the official narrative was already posted all over mainstream media by the end of the first day (the first time was on BBC interview of Ehud Barak around noon or so that day – interview is still on youtube i think, an Israeli Defense department guy, who pinned it all on Bin Laden and pretty much laid the basic foundation of the official narrative).

    If a crime that big did happen by outside forces, they would not have the culprits already named by the end of that day on 9/11.

    From there, a logical mind can figure it out.

    It’s been almost 20 years and the only group that continues to actually try to do something is Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

    Richard Gage doesn’t give up, but it doesn’t seem like anyone cares anymore. Really sad.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
  166. incitatus says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Jews?

    Tell us, Hungarian Housfrau, why Ludendorff, widely despised with revolution breaking out, slips out of Germany 26 Oct 1918 disguised in spectacles and false beard to find refuge with a Swedish admirer and write his memoirs.

    Hint: Ludendorff didn’t fear the Allies or Jews. He feared German troops enraged by his meat-grinder incompetence.

    The Swedish government asked him to depart February 1919.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Petermx
  167. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:

    And the strangest thing about Laurent Guyénot’s article is that, after living through the years after 2016 and watching almost every cultural institution in the West (esp. the USA) discredit itself by dint of hard work and persistence — the strangest thing about this article is that it does not seem strange at all. Expulsion of the Jews from the Western ecumene would be a minor event among the likely events consequent to the years since 2016. Everything and everybody not needed for bare existence is in process of being jettisoned, as we suddenly find that we are poor, that we are the future generations that have to pay back the borrowing since the 1960’s revolution and that the riches we thought we have, well, we haven’t. And the world we thought we stabilized, well, we don’t. Not anymore.

  168. anon[206] • Disclaimer says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Hitler wasn’t an enemy of the people of the third world, there were troops from India fighting for the Germans in Europe in WW2.

    https://medium.com/lessons-from-history/hitlers-indian-army-in-world-war-ii-161434bbadc9

    The admiration of Hitler and Germany in many places in the non-western world is simply because people wherever you go admire a man of action and not the swishy wimps we have as leaders today. German troops were patriotic, cultured, brave and honorable. Germany manufactured technologically advanced, quality goods and of course, they were white but weren’t British or American, who were seen as the exploiter.

    To this day in many places in the world, if they see a white face they will either be rude or indifferent thinking that you are American and to a lesser extent British, if they hear a German accent, they’re all of a sudden friendly with you. Germany is seen a good white country.

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  169. Ugetit says:
    @Anonymous

    Mr. Ryckaert is wrong about Mr. Hitler’s status as a saint. I have evidence that he should be considered one.

    ”Adolf Hitler was a Jeanne d’Arc, a saint. He was a martyr.”

    -Ezra Pound, Interview in Philadelphia Record and Chicago Sun, May 9, 1945

  170. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Germany could solve its food problem by buying food from the Ukraine in exchange for its own industrial products.”

    You are under a delusion here. Germany ‘could’ if the Ukraine (a part of the Soviet Union at the time) had it to sell and was willing to sell to Germany. That is doubtful on both counts. Ukraine was something of a shambles. Germany needed a stable source of food. Nothing in the East was stable, because of the nature of the SU. Even in the West, Germany had been buying dairy products from Denmark, from which it obtained much of its dietary fat in the form of butter. All was well until England cut off that trade with Denmark, and Germans, having no other source, died from lack of dietary fat. Including infants and the unborn. Successful world trade depends on peaceful, friendly, fair conditions.

    The US today is dealing with serious trade problems with China. Trump’s ‘America First’ is becoming more popular because of fear of being held hostage to China for basic needs. Trade is no substitute for self-sufficiency in basic goods.

  171. Ugetit says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    In that case the Germans would have been welcomed as liberators.

    They were often welcomed as such. If you have evidence that “Hitler would have none of it,” please post it otherwise your claims are the opposite of reality.

    Just because he saw a need for “lebensraum” doesn’t mean he was not prepared to offer a fair deal for it nor does it mean he meant to obtain it aggressively as propaganda would have us believe.

    He put forth superhuman efforts to maintain peace but was thwarted time and again at every turn by Winnie the drunken boob warmonger, Frankie the Commie appeaser, and Joey the Red, who was the best of the three because he did what he could to foil the One World conspirators and snuffed a bunch of old Bolshies, while the other two went along with the program without evident protest.

  172. @incitatus

    I’m putting you on ‘Ignore’.

    • Replies: @incitatus
  173. Seraphim says:
    @Corvinus

    “If the German people were to form a healthy organism again, Jews had to be exposed and neutralized as an alien and parasitic nation”.
    It sounds a bit ironic that the Nazis thought to do that by copying the Jews and imitating their ‘values’, anti-Christianism in the first place.

    “The British Jew, Lord Disraeli, once said that the racial question is the key to world history. We National Socialists have been raised in this belief.”

    • Disagree: Badger Down
  174. Vojkan says:
    @AriusArmenian

    My opinion exactly and I’m Serb. Before you endeavour to save people, inquire if they indeed want to be saved. I had the infortune to be constrained by family reasons to move back from France to Serbia four years ago and I am certain that Serbs neither want nor deserve to be saved.

  175. Ron Unz says:

    A few days ago someone pointed me to this very funny video about America’s victorious involvement in WWII. Since I expect it will be purged from YouTube, there’s fortunately a BitChute backup:

    https://youtu.be/cFuHilRYEWk

  176. Sparkon says:
    @Anonymous

    Whatever Hitler’s non-Saintly attributes, he wasn’t dumb enough to start a two front war.

    But that’s exactly what he did. Whatever good Hitler did for Germany, he was a disaster for Deutschland as warlord.

    Adolf Hitler might have avoided a two front war if he’d knocked Great Britain out of the war by smashing the BEF when it was trapped at Dunkirk in the spring of 1940, and by applying the entire force of the Luftwaffe against the RAF’s Fighter Command in August and September 1940, rather than being suckered into a city bombing campaign.

    Halder has said he began drawing up plans for Barbarossa in August 1940.

    The Red Army in early 1941 was not capable of mounting a successful large scale offensive operation against the entire Wehrmacht, which at that stage was at full strength, and standing on its home ground.

    Recall that Stalin had liquidated virtually the entire top command of the Red Army down to the regimental level in 1937-39. Thereafter, new NKVD chief and murderous thug Lavrenty Beria began new purges in 1940 and 1941 against air force commanders and industrial commissars, which continued even after the Germans invaded.

    If Stalin really was planning on attacking westward, I think he would have waited until he had a large force of his new tanks, the T-34 and the KV, rather than relying on the thin-skinned T-26, but it is true the Red Army tended to overestimate its own striking power, and underestimate the defensive strength of the enemy. Still, both the Japanese and the Finns had shot up the Red Army’s T-26s, which were its most numerous tanks by a wide margin at the outset of Barbarossa.

    What could have, would have, or might have happened is interesting fodder for speculation, but the historical record shows that it was the Germans who attacked the Soviets on June 22, 1941.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @ploni almoni
  177. Seraphim says:
    @karel

    Indeed Germans have not been stabbed in the back, they shot themselves in the foot when they started the war, pushed from the back by the Jews to go and ‘liberate the Russian Jews’!

    • Disagree: Badger Down
    • Replies: @karel
  178. Petermx says:
    @incitatus

    I think you watch too much The History Channel (nicknamed “The Hitler Channel”). Germany had the best soldiers and the best generals in both wars. Ludendorff and Hindenburg defeated the Russian army quickly in the east enabling them to then concentrate in the west and then almost won there but might not have had enough resources to fight 3 major powers simultaneously. I say “might”.

    Yes. The Jews did stab Germany in he back. Rosa Luxemburg, Karl Liebknecht and others were organizing riots and spreading defeatism at home while one of my grandfathers was fighting in the east (and receiving an Iron Cross) and the other fighting in the west (also receiving an Iron Cross). Those traitors made things worse for everyone, including the loyal Jews who had to pay for what other Jews did.

    This is a speech by a famous American who was at the Versailles Conference. He knew many of the most influential people in the USA, including Jews. He was there and saw what went on. He was Jewish himself. He was so disgusted by what the Jews did that he converted to Christianity. His name was Benjamin Freedman and this is his famous 1961 speech explaining partially (there is much more) why Jews were considered disloyal and earned Germany’s ire.

    • Thanks: SolontoCroesus
    • Replies: @Petermx
  179. Thomasina says:
    @Majority of One

    “Revolutions are not made on the cheap by ‘downtrodden masses’.”

    I thought the “downtrodden masses” brought about the French Revolution. Were they assisted?

    Helping my daughter with her homework, I came across one line in her textbook that read something like this: “The merchant class incited the peasants to bring about the French Revolution. After the killing ended, the merchant class took over.”

    This surprised me when I read it. I’d be interested to know if this is true and, if so, who belonged to this merchant class.

  180. Richard B says:
    @Chris Moore

    At the top, these aren’t just “mistaken” people, these are evil people.

    That’s right. And what is evil? It’s that which denies the value of others. Which is exactly what those who call themselves The Chosen People do from the get go. The act of calling themselves the chosen denies others the value of choice. Because our decisions can not go against theirs. A beter example of moral insanity would be hard to find.

    But, more than simply destigmatizing historical figures demonized by Jewish Supremacy Inc., we could also come to understand our own cultural history, and from a non-ideological perspective.

    Certainly one thing a study of our cultural history reveals is that the best thing that can be said of Whites, or European man (and his geographical extensions), the one thing that sets us apart from every other group, is our drive toward reality. And the drive toward reality is the escape from charisma. We don’t need anymore charismatic personalities. We need powers of example.

    The list of powers of example among us is longer than we might think. It includes everyone who refuses to give up. What’s the drive toward reality if not another name for the fighting spirit?

    In short, what we need are heroes of a culture crisis. Those who can face both our cultural crisis and their own personal crisis within the larger culture and emerge heroic, perhaps battered, but unbroken and ready for more.

    In terms of powers of example, from a perspective both contemporary and historical, our culture, offers infinite and incalculable riches.
    By not turning our back on reality we earn our victory.

  181. Petermx says:
    @Petermx

    It was not just in Germany where Jews were considered disloyal. It was hard to find a country where they were trusted,

    From Thomas Dalton’s The Jewish Hand in the World Wars, Part 2

    The ultimate goal, though, was his overthrow, and thus we can imagine the joy of the global Jewish community at his fall in March 1917. As we recall, the Czar and his family were then murdered by Jewish Bolsheviks in July of the following year.

    It was a somewhat similar story with the German ruler Wilhelm II, who acceded to the throne in 1888. There, however, Jews were prosperous and enjoyed a relatively high degree of freedom—despite the Kaiser’s evident personal dislike of them.4 Previously I cited some impressive statistics by Sarah Gordon regarding their numbers in law, media, business, and academia, all prior to World War I. In the banking sector, they utterly flourished; prominent German-Jewish banking families included the well-known Rothschilds and Warburgs, but also the Mendelssohns, Bleichroeders, Speyers, Oppenheims, Bambergers, Gutmanns, Goldschmidts, and Wassermanns. But despite their wealth and success, Jews had no access to political power, owing to the hereditary monarchy. This, for them, was unacceptable. Thus they had to introduce “democracy”—with all due high-minded values, of course. Only through a democratic system could they exert direct influence on political leadership.

    Consequently, as soon as the Czar fell in Russia, calls came out to repeat the success in Germany. On 19 March 1917, four days after the Czar’s ouster, the New York Times
    reported on Louis Marshall lauding the event, and adding that “the revolt against autocracy might be expected to spread to Germany.” Two days later, Jewish speakers at Madison Square Garden “predict[ed] an uprising in Germany.” As the article explains, “[some] predicted that the revolution of the working classes of Russia was the forerunner of similar revolutions the world over. That the next revolution would be in Germany was predicted by a number of the speakers” (March 21). On March 24, Jacob Schiff took credit for helping to finance the Russian revolution. At the same time, Rabbi Stephen Wise put the blame for the pending American entry into World War I on “German militarism,” adding “I would to God it were possible for us to fight side by side with the German people for the overthrow of Hohenzollernism [i.e., Kaiser Wilhelm].

    ”Strangely enough, Wise got his wish. Within two weeks, America was in the war. And about 18 months later, Wilhelm would succumb to uprisings in the ranks of his forces and be compelled to abdicate.

    The Paris Peace Conference

    Having won the war, Wilson’s Jewish team was anxious to dictate the peace. “As it turned out,” remarks Robert Shogan (2010: 25), “the war would bring benefits to the Zionist cause, in part because of Brandeis’ role as a trusted advisor [to Wilson].” The victorious nations convened in Paris in January 1919, and the American Jewish Congress was there as its own delegation. Shogan adds that “[Stephen] Wise was in Paris, on assignment from President Wilson to head the Zionist delegation to the peace talks.” (One might reasonably ask: Why do Zionists get their own delegation at all?) Louis Marshall was also prominent there among the American Jews.

    The Jewish aim was neither a just implementation of peace, nor fair treatment of Germany, but rather to maximize benefit to the various Jewish communities of Europe and the US. “At the beginning of 1919,” says Ben-Sasson (1976: 940), “diplomatic activity in Paris became the main focus of the various attempts to fulfill Jewish aspirations.” Fink (1998: 259) concurs: “In March 1919, pro-Zionist and nationalist Jewish delegations arrived in Paris.” Nearly every victorious nation, it seems, had its own Jewish representatives. Some sought formal and explicit Jewish rights in their own nations, and others worked for recognition of a Jewish national state. Polish Jews were notable beneficiaries; they succeeded in achieving explicit mention in the Polish Treaty for Minority Rights.

    https://codoh.com/library/document/the-jewish-hand-in-the-world-wars-part-2/en/

    • Thanks: RVBlake, geokat62
  182. bluefire says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    I’d be willing to a truce in a hypothetical much less unfortunate world timeline. Occurred to me last night that if this hostility between Aryan and Jew didn’t exist both would be exploring space. Something like a Star Trek would be real.

  183. @Corvinus

    Make it illegal to pay for advertising. Let any media that wish to do so advertise, but at no cost to the entity selling the goods.

    Then the media would no longer rule us.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  184. Druid says:
    @Genrick Yagoda

    Killing the HolyCost will not be enough. The scum will find something else! Get rid of the source or their power permanently

  185. utu says:
    @Ron Unz

    Are you in favor of separate water fountains, Ron?

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  186. Druid says:
    @Mefobills

    You say Slavs were natural allies. Maybe that’s true, however, the poles were constantly poking Germany and abusing Germans on their land. What do u think?

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  187. Druid says:
    @al gore rhythms

    And supplied by a Jewish middleman!

  188. @anon

    That’s because they hadn’t been colonised by the Germans. If they had, it would be a different story. Just go ask the Namibians.

  189. Tsigantes says:
    @Anon

    The European peoples knew very well what was going on in Russia, since it was not hidden. They didn’t need “secret service agents” to inform them.

    If it was hidden where you live you need to ask why and pursue that, not make inaccurate sweeping statements.

  190. Tsigantes says:
    @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    The strength of the Jewish people has always been in their reference for history, even if it is warped by their ethnic egos, while your kids learn transexual nonsense at state schools, the Jewish children will learn of their long and illustrious history as a völk, instilling in them a racial consciousness and a will to survive, something that is lacking in many Europeans.

    I’m not a frequent enough commenter to designate this as a troll, but the illogic and misstatements throughout this comment certainly look like a troll masquerading as a dreaded Supremacist.

    Long and illustrious history”

    ? Please show some evidence of this.

    Europeans lacking a will to survive? Again, evidence please…sounds like wishful thinking to me.

    “The strength of the Jewish people has always been in their reference [sic] for history”

    ….I would suggest quite the opposite, that the weakness of the jews is their inability to confront, comprehend, and draw conclusions from their own history. This failure to do so is what makes their history a never ending repetition of self induced disasters.

  191. Half Back says:

    Well the push for war with China is being lead by Jew, Yael Halon, a usual suspect, driving for war by re- chanting Chinese… kill Americans. You might get it. One has to wonder if a war with US/China is a jewish construct, due to lack of power over the CCP. Better watch out it could very hot quickly.
    https://www.foxnews.com/world/gordon-chang-warns-china-configuring-its-military-to-kill-americans
    Fox Reporter Yael Halon.

  192. JackOH says:
    @Ron Unz

    Ron, you’re slaying me, dude. LOL! The Clutch Cargo-style anim–. . . well, you get it.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  193. @Exalted Cyclops

    I hope those Hitler cones don’t go the way of Darkie toothpaste, though maybe a cat logo and “Kitler” wouldn’t be too bad.

  194. @Thomasina

    OMG, they’re teaching Nasty propaganda to your daughter. Everybody knows “merchant class” is code for AshkeNazis from Venice.

  195. @Sparkon

    I thought segue rhymed with league, but not for long.

  196. sarz says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Armenians were Christians genocided by Muslims.

    No. The Armenian genocide was a Jewish project. Ataturk and the Young Turks were Donmeh, crypto-Jews, and the genocide was a Judaic project.
    Go over to Brother Nathanael Kapner’s Real Jew News and put in a search for Armenian genocide.

  197. @incitatus

    Hitler’s political thought was mediocre and silly. As was Mussolini’s.

    Fascism managed to be worse than communism. Both were miserable failures.

    I’m an American who is glad our forces helped defeat totalitarianism.

    There’s plenty wrong the U.S. right now. But resurrecting Hitler in response is about as stupid as it gets.

    • Replies: @incitatus
  198. @Ron Unz

    For anyone interested, this sketch comes to you from Murdoch Murdoch, whose video archive can be found here in their entirety. Think of it as a South Park (badly drawn characters) with alt-right themes

    https://www.murdochmurdoch.net

    • Thanks: Dan Hayes
  199. Ugetit says:
    @Ron Unz

    I don’t see the humor in it. Who can say that America also has not been stabbed in the back and thrown under the bus while the bankers yuck it up?

    At the 6th hour, of the 6th day, of the 6th month of 1944, Allied armies … launch ‘D-Day’ (Devil’s Day?) … Moments before the attack is launched, exactly at 6 AM, Eisenhower broadcasts an unbelievably cruel radio message to the civilian population of the northern French towns that were about to be leveled and invaded …

    Later that day, Eisenhower issues another statement to the “people of Western Europe,” via the BBC. Ike’s use of the terms, “united nations” and “our great Russian allies” again give us a clue as to who he really was… [and what the fight was all about]…

    -M.S. King, “The Bad War.”

  200. Ugetit says:
    @Thomasina

    It should read “banking mafia” instead of “merchant,” I suspect. I’d like to know who funded the thing as well.

  201. @Franklin Ryckaert

    But surely, you agree that compared to Franklin Delano Roosevelt or to Winston Churchill, Hitler is by far the more positive and moral person?

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  202. Adrian says:

    Hitler’s political philosophy was rooted in a German tradition that included Fichte, Nietzsche, Kant, Hegel, and Schopenhauer (whose work Hitler said he carried “throughout the whole of the First World War”).[10]

    I just cannot imagine what Hitler learned from, for example, Schopenhauer’s works “he said “he carried “throughout the whole of the First World War” “.

    Schopenhauer was not only a non-nationalist – he was the anti-nationalist. His German background was, apart from the language, just incidental to him.

    To begin with his father was Dutch by descent and still spoke the language fluently. That father wanted to make a cosmopolitan merchant of the later philosopher and took him and his mother on an eighteen months journey through Europe. Apart from that Schopenhauer claimed to have lived the two happiest years of his life during his youth in France. He then almost forgot his mothertongue. During the time of the “liberation wars” against Napoleon’s France, when German youth flocked to the anti-French banners, he made himself scarce because he had no desire to be killed for a cause for which he had no sympathy,

    He despised English religious bigotry but nevertheless judged the English to be the most intelligent people of Europe. He kept abreast of international affairs by reading the London Times every day.

    He certainly did not think that whites had a monopoly of wisdom. It was during his youth that eastern manuscripts were first made accessible to Western readers. Schopenhauer found a happy confirmation of his own views in the Upanishads and in Buddhism. In fact he came to call himself a Buddhist.

    I can’t for the life of me imagine what Hitler made of Schopenhauer’s view of morality which is based on the idea that all creation is an expression of the same (irrational) life urge. So compassion is the highest virtue.

    In sum Adolf would have been better served by lugging around an extra few rations in his knapsack rather than the works of a philosopher who had views totally alien to him.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  203. @ploni almoni

    Towards west Europe yes, towards east Europe no.

  204. Mefobills says:
    @Peripatetic Itch

    Hitler was army and land power. He didn’t understand Naval power. His theory was that Germany and England were natural allies, with England taking care of “Oceania.” Hitler was using wishful thinking despite all the evidence the England was the real enemy.

    London was the seat of finance capitalism. It was FC that declared war on Germany, and it was FC that was pulling strings in the background to have Stalin as part of an Allied resistance to National Socialism/Industrial Capitalism.

    Germany had Stuka’s to attack trains and tanks, and could easily have used Slav’s as irregular army combatants. When the Russians extended themselves with long supply chains and power projection, they would be exposed.

    The same strategy the Soviets used to beat Germany, could have been used against the Soviets.

    20/20 rear vision says to attack England and use about 700 U boats. Strangle the Island – nothing gets in or out.

    If Russia attacked in the meantime, it would have to be some sort of Blitzkrieg, and that would not have worked despite “rubber wheels” on tanks as Suvarov proposed. The supply chains would be way to long for Russia to support with men and material. Germany, Poland and others would have interdicted the exposed supply chains, and also cut off bridgeheads, etc. the same tactics Russia used.

    It was a mistake to turn east. Hitler screwed up. The lesson is that you need a King, and some sort of King school, where qualified students are trained. They debate with each other and work as a group, so you don’t have one “leader” leading your country off a cliff. Hitler saw much, but he didn’t see everything.

  205. Mefobills says:
    @Druid

    Hitler and Józef Piłsudski were working things out. After Pilsudski’s death in 1935 things turned sideways. There were “loans” from France to Poland for armaments. Foreign Minister Józef Beck resisted growing pressure on Poland from the West to cooperate with the Soviet Union in order to contain Germany.

    So, once again, it was Western Finance Capital that was directing and maneuvering from behind the scenes. This “capital” was funding and agitating the crowds by seeding it with paid for anarchists. It is easy to whip up a population with propaganda and money… we see it happening constantly today with color revolutions.

    My opinion: Pilsudski was smart, but Beck was weak and stupid. It is tragic that Pilsudski died.

    A fish rots at the head, if you have bad leadership in your ruling hierarchy, bad things happen.

  206. In order to do my “part” of preserving the European race, I take my kids to church every Sunday. I’ll do you one better. I take them to Mass (gasp). To all you Atheists on here who rag on Jews and then proclaim that the Christians are just as bad: you have a lower IQ than you think. Probably something of a Negroid. Religion is the foundation of culture. Jews know it.

    Don’t get me wrong, most Evangelicals and Conservative Catholics are Zionists. But at least they hold to some tradition. Most white Atheists are a plague on European race. You should be ashamed and humble yourself before the Lord. To young white males: Go get a job and have kids. Then, take them to church.

  207. @Corvinus

    Thank you for making my point for me.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  208. “In order to do my “part” of preserving the European race, I take my kids to church every Sunday. I’ll do you one better.”

    You know it takes a while to comprehend the world in which these comments exist. There’s nothing western about faith in Christ. Nothing.

    Thou Shalt not kill

    I am the bread of bread of life, no man comes to the father except by me.

    in the context of Christ is the same for those in Christ regardless of what geopolitical landscape one lives. He doesn’t say whites are best. He doesn’t care about tall buildings. He is not the least concerned about a better toilet by comparison to a walk or life in him. In fact one of the worst things that could have happened was for western tradition to break scripture out into chapters and verses.

    That is especially true for the NT, which has a strong oral tradition then into texts as recorded record and as set by the apostles — as letters distributed among the churches as letters . . .

    Chapter and verse is great for organizational purposes, but it also had the unintended and tricky outcome of making the scriptures of the NT as a kind of law book —- wholly gutting its intention from a wholistic spiritual encouragement and guide and historical record into a system of rules based edicts. That the west exported as their own. But anyone with the slightest knowledge of European history will remind that the western tradition was molded first by the Romans disparate European populations, who practices a variety of religious practices that make have no relation of similarity to Christ.

    Really, the Vikings?

    I hate to break it to you, but refinement came from the East and don’t tell anyone, but the evidence is pretty strong that it also came from the south . . . but western faith is forged from Eastern spiritual understanding — embodied in the New Testament.

    The New Testament in form and context is not western if one wants to assign social regional placement.

    Now I want to be careful here because there are indications that some civilizations of refinement existed in Europe, but in a large portion those enclaves were bull dozed by the nomadic raiders of Germany, Scandinavia, etc.

  209. Trinity says:
    @Ron Unz

    And during the 6th hour on the 6th day of the 6th month, “Our Greatest Generation Ever” launched operation freedom, freeing the world from those “evil Nazi” bastards. LMWAO.

    IF I were king for the day, every American, French, and British WWII veteran still alive ( can’t be many left) would have to watch this video nonstop 24/7 at least once a day until they passed on.

    Thank you, “Greatest Generation Ever.”

  210. “So, once again, it was Western Finance Capital that was directing and maneuvering from behind the scenes. This “capital” was funding and agitating the crowds by seeding it with paid for anarchists. It is easy to whip up a population with propaganda and money… we see it happening constantly today with color revolutions.”

    You do realize that what you describe is the rise of the Nazi party, not some new modus of people of color.

    Furthermore, Nazi Germany as “socialist”

    On what planet? They were fascists who used the term socialist, but the authoritarian control of the country slaps any notion of a socialist agenda out the window.

    The author needs to review the definition of what socialism looks like.

    In a socialist system, one does not round up entire populations as did the Nazis. The premise is entirely false.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  211. @Franklin Ryckaert

    This shows just how half-baked your entire ‘case’ against Adolf Hitler is. It was Roosevelt and Churchill (and Eisenhower) who handed east Europe over to the Soviet Union who put it behind the “Iron Curtain” for 45 years. Hitler fought for all European territory (up to the Urals) and would not give up an inch willingly. And he did not intend to enslave any Europeans, despite the enemy propaganda.

    Your blind rejection of Hitler is based on something other than love for the white race and Europeanism. Your father was a member of the Dutch Jewish Resistance that existed to “save the Jews” and you want to do the same. You say it’s because all human beings must be treated with decency and fairness, even Jews. You refuse to acknowledge that as long as we stick to that standard, we’ll never be free of Jews … since they don’t play by that rule.

    You remind me of Joe Biden. He says he’s against riots and looting but is also against arresting and convicting rioters and looters. He’s not anti-police but is against police using any kind of force. Figure that out.

  212. @Mefobills

    It was a mistake to turn east. Hitler screwed up.

    Besides speaking from an 80-year hindsight advantage, you are also just a talker, not a do-er. It’s easy to mouth off what should have been done (without any solid proof or evidence that that would have worked any better!), but what have you ever done in the real world? Adolf Hitler was a brave man who took action and accomplished great things for his grateful people. That he overestimated the German toughness and loyalty and underestimated the traitorous ruthlessness of his European, Anglo-American enemy due to his own idealism, is all that he can be faulted with.

    That he didn’t “screw up” is shown by the fact we’re still talking about him today and debating his importance and lasting influence. He said himself that time would prove him right and it seems to be doing so.

    Your odd idea for “Kings” who are trained to work as a group (an oxymoron) instead of “one leader,” is a half-baked way of avoiding admitting you have nothing better than the same old failed parliamentary democracy. Again, it’s easy to spin “ideas” from your armchair as an anonymous commenter.

    • Agree: Fox
    • Disagree: TheTrumanShow
    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
  213. “Ancient Egyptians expected their soul to be weighed against the feather of Ma’at after they die. I hope it still works that way, because I intend to follow Gerard Menuhin’s advice: “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”.

    It came to mind today a declaration a person had to make at judgement in ancient Egyptian texts: “I have not shut my ears to the words of truth” and how much more heinous a sin it is to actively suppress the truth and actively lie as happens today through the Jewish elite who even introduce laws through a prostituted political establishment to enforce such evil. Their “god” is the father of lies.

    One unintended side effect of this rampant corruption is that we now have a clearer understanding of what it was like to live in Germany in the 1920’s and why Adolf Hitler came to be idolised by the vast majority of Germans. I was very late in realising that the history of the 20th century is largely a lie and that the WW2 was in effect a battle for the soul of the West v the children of the devil as the NT describes them.

    Lord Beaverbrook told the young Robert Kennedy at the end of WW2 that the USA was a subjugated nation run by Jews but I wonder if he could have forseen the brazen way its rulers now administer their colony today.

    • Thanks: TheTrumanShow
  214. TGD says:

    For those who fall for the line, “Hitler’s biggest mistake was starting a 2 front war,” I must disagree. His biggest mistake was declaring war on the USA as a test of German superiority. The best agricultural land in the Soviet Union after 1941 was either occupied or left fallow for lack of farm labor or failure to allocate labor and resources.

    “An army runs on its stomach” is a popular expression. Without massive food aid from the USA (and lesser quantities from Canada and Brazil) in the form of “Tushonka,” the Soviet counter offensive and thrust across Europe would not have been possible. Roosevelt ordered strict rationing of meats, fats and other products in order to provide this high quality food to the Soviets.

  215. Durruti says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Do you think the entire population of all of Siberia ever numbered that many (current population of Siberia is 33,765,005 )? I know it was used for exile in the past, and those exiled would have at some point died, of old age or whatever, whether while in exile or upon release or return, but that many? And I doubt the gulags could have accommodated that many even on some conveyor belt principle.

    I wonder where Solzhenitsyn pulled that number from.

    Solzhenitsyn pulled that number from his ass.

    Solzhenitsyn was a fine writer, and Russian Patriot. His forté was fiction, not carefully researched History. He suffered 10 years in the Gulag (prison). His motives are easy to understand.

    His book, August 1914, is my favorite. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/216512.August_1914

    Solzhenitsyn, as you have discerned, did little research to support his figures. He relied too much on hearsay.

    • Thanks: Commentator Mike
    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  216. Adolf Hitler’s antipathy towards Bolshevism was righteous. He blamed the Jews for the misery they had visited on Russia and who planned to inflict it on the rest of the world. When Bertrand Russell went to visit the new promised land in 1920 he quickly realised his assumptions were unfounded and that this had been visited on the Russian people by the Bolshevic leaders who were “Americanised Jews”.

    I do not buy the argument that the avarice of Ashkenazi Jews is the product of Darwinian evolution brought about by a hostile environment and had nothing to do with traditional ME Jewry. The NT clearly had Jesus warning the non Ashkenazi about love of money. The very character of Judas is directly associated with mammon so there seems no way this tendency can be pinned on a convert people like the Ashkenazi whilst claiming ME Jews are blameless. This seems more like a spiritual rather than a genetic phenomena (just as the NT claims).

  217. @advancedatheist

    “The Nazis lost the war, but they didn’t necessarily lose the argument.” Actually, in terms of public perceptions—in other words, “history” as it influences human action, what Zelikow calls “public myth”—losing the war IS losing the argument. That’s why Laurent’s call to de-demonize Hitler by emphasizing his peacetime achievements is so…quixotic. Famous leaders who won or lost wars will always be remembered for their wars. Rehabbing Hitler as a peacetime visionary and economic-ideological success story may convince a small minority, but it will be a very tough sell in the larger clash of ideas.

    The Hitler myth discredits all who raise Darwinian biology to the status of false god, and make a theology of their eugenics project. So to disrupt the Jewish elite’s eugenics project and prevent it from achieving world domination, identify it with (demonized) Hitlerism. Just as the colonized world won its independence circa 1960 by exposing the hypocrisy of the colonizers’ “liberal at home, authoritarian abroad” behavior, so too the goyim can win their struggle against the New World Order plan to rule the world from Jerusalem by emphasizing the contradiction between liberal Jewish rhetoric and the tribal eugenics machine that culminates in Israel’s genocide of the Palestinians.

  218. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Sparkon

    Recall that Stalin had liquidated virtually the entire top command of the Red Army down to the regimental level in 1937-39. Thereafter, new NKVD chief and murderous thug Lavrenty Beria began new purges in 1940 and 1941 against air force commanders and industrial commissars, which continued even after the Germans invaded.

    Suvorov claims that the top command had been appointed to run a peacetime or possibly defensive war Army, and that Stalin simply replaced the administrative soldiers with fighting soldiers suitable for an offensive. As I recall, the US Navy did something very similar, as did the US Army, before the US entered WW II, so Suvorov’s thesis is at least plausible, and, frankly, only good sense.

    If Stalin really was planning on attacking westward, I think he would have waited until he had a large force of his new tanks, the T-34 and the KV, rather than relying on the thin-skinned T-26, but it is true the Red Army tended to overestimate its own striking power, and underestimate the defensive strength of the enemy. Still, both the Japanese and the Finns had shot up the Red Army’s T-26s, which were its most numerous tanks by a wide margin at the outset of Barbarossa.

    According to Suvorov, Lenin and then Stalin both planned to attack the West during a moment of Western weakness — after the West was exhausted by an anticipated military stalemate like that of WW I. The Soviet Army, like the German Army during the 1939 invasion of France. did not depend on superior materiel so much as it did on speed. Armor (like air power) is just a way to move firepower quickly to some objective vital to the enemy. Neither the Germans nor the Russians had heavy tanks in significant numbers in 1939, yet the Germans defeated the French (whose individual tanks outclassed the individual German tanks) largely by outmaneuvering them.

    Getting to the German invasion: the USSR thought it saw a strategic vulnerability. Thesis: Hitler wouldn’t start a war to his East after what he had seem in WW II. Conclusion: so the Russian force could mass at the German/Polish border without considering the a German spoiling attack. Russian forces could then attack Germany itself while the bulk of the German Army was still in France, presumably threatening England.
    Hitler did not act as anticipated. He massed a German invasion force almost within sight of the Russian’s force. Apparently Stalin decided to gamble on the Russians being first to get organized and jump off. It was a reasonable gamble, sort of, because the Russians had started preparations first. However, Stalin lost his gamble. Hitler’s forces jumped off a couple of weeks before the Russian forces were going to jump off. As Stalin had planned, the offensive force ate up the defensive force. Only the depth of the Russian manpower pool, the location of the USSR’s war industries behind the Urals and out of range of German air power, and the Allies’ “unconditional surrender” demands, enabled Stalin to end up with half of Europe.

    That’s according to Suvorov. I tend to thing that the preponderance of evidence supports Suvorov.

    What could have, would have, or might have happened is interesting fodder for speculation, but the historical record shows that it was the Germans who attacked the Soviets on June 22, 1941.

    Not really. As I point out above, Germany and the USSR were playing a game of Russian Roulette, and the Russians lost. Had the USSR forces jumped off three weeks earlier, W. Europe would have been SSRs all the way to the Atlantic Coast, conquered or neutralized just as Finland was in its Winter War.

    Seriously, take a look at Suvorov’s actual books, not at what the media and Western scholarship has told you. The assertionthat the Germans “all went crazy” and “followed a madman” who was “evil” was never very plausible, and it’s getting less plausible as time passes.

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
  219. geokat62 says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    … so too the goyim can win their struggle against the New World Order

    My utmost desire is that more and more contributors follow your lead and use this term on a regular basis.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  220. Zumbuddi says:
    @Kevin Barrett

    Could not Disagree more.

    “Public perception” is not history, any more than 2 + 2 = 5.

  221. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Thomasina

    This surprised me when I read it. I’d be interested to know if this is true and, if so, who belonged to this merchant class.

    Generally speaking, the French Revolution is attributed to the new “middle class” of semi-independent professionals — lawyers, writers, engineers, shopkeepers, commercial farmers, etc. For the first time since Late Antiquity there existed a group of people outside the established government that could govern. Peasant’s rebellions had always failed because they invariably failed at government — splitting into factions and destroying the basic economy (rather as the 2020 lockdowns have destroyed the West’s basic economy).

    The independent new middle class was much more technically competent than the existing French Royal government, which was an ossified patronage system that had lost its most recent major war (7 years war). A sophisticated propaganda campaign (in which Rousseau played an important part) delegitimized the Royal government (the propaganda reads like crude deception now, and included the first idea of the “noble savage” as actually existing in the Indian tribes of North America).
    And, as the doggerel goes, “The Revolution came and went, and unrest was replaced by discontent” until Napoleon took on the whole of Europe and Russia as well.

    As for the merchant class, well, don’t know who said that. Never seen it before, and it has the flavor of Marxism. “Bourgeoisie” means “townies”, people who lived in towns and were not farmers/country nobility.

    The term bourgeois originated in medieval France, where it denoted an inhabitant of a walled town. Its overtones became important in the 18th century, when the middle class of professionals, manufacturers, and their literary and political allies began to demand an influence in politics consistent with their economic status. Marx was one of many thinkers who treated the French Revolution as a revolution of the bourgeois.

    https://www.britannica.com/topic/bourgeoisie

    Marxists are notorious for killing off anybody with ability — worst example being perhaps Pol Pot, but the Bolsheviks were perhaps a close second. It makes sense that they would advocate (and implement) killing off the leading citizens of the towns.

    The generally accepted theory of the French Revolution was, in about 1960, that the French liked bureaucratic government, but not the King. One could say that they killed the king, got Napoleon then lost him, and have had a government of do-nothing self seeking bureaucrats ever since. That’s a far cry from being taken over by merchants.

    • Replies: @Georges G.
  222. Zumbuddi says:
    @geokat62

    Unfortunate comment.

    U r so enamored of your goyim hobby horse that a label distracts you from the distortion in the substance of Barrett’s statement.

    “Goyim” is not going to vanquish the evil of 100 years of lies.

    Neither will capitulating to the lies as Barrett suggests, return a people to a life of truth & integrity.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  223. Archange says:
    @freedom-cat

    @freedom-cat

    The website of the world economic forum seems standard politically correct business talk. Nothing sets it apart from the usual business press. What makes you think it is worth reading it ?

    • Replies: @freedom-cat
  224. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Your post on Germans, their character, history, etc. is one of the most balanced I have ever had the pleasure of reading. The main take-a-way would be that German history and Germans, comprise more than a mere 12 year period of history, something that unfortunately many people can’t fathom. lol It’s almost to the point of being absurdly comical, how Germans are viewed in the U.S. It’s getting better as more Americans are becoming more educated on these matters. It is remarkable in the extreme, how little to this day most Americans know about the history of NASA, the MOON Landings and how Germans and German technology were behind them. But even more than that, a German, Wehrner von Braun, convinced President J.F. K. that the U.S. could land on the moon. Many, many American scientists of the time, considered this impossible. von Brauns motto was, “late to bed, early to rise, work like hell and advertise. So despite being a technical genius, the man was a superb salesman to boot. The result was that on July 20, 1969 a rocket that was more than 30 stories high, the Saturn V sent men to the moon and thus put the United States of America on the pinnacle of fame among the worlds nations. A fantastic feat of Anglo-Germanic achievement, still unrivaled today.

  225. karel says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Ha,ha,ha, the Foxhunter again. Have you risen from the graves of the missing Germans? Well in any case it was not me stabbing them as I am a certified Aryan, something you can never aspire to. My grandfather, also an Aryan, was a deserter from the Austrian army and later a legionary fighting against the beastly Germans on the Russian front. There were not many Jews in the Czechoslovak legions then. Try to stab yourself in the back so that you can commiserate with the Germans of 1918.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  226. karel says:
    @Seraphim

    At least an intelligent comment. Germans themselves cannot really cannot agree on who stabbed them in the back i.e. the famous ”Dolchstoss”. The more educated contributors to this discussions can read
    https://www.zeitklicks.de/weimarer-republik/zeitklicks/zeit/politik/die-novemberrevolution/was-ist-die-dolchstosslegende/
    The less-educated majority can just look at the picture.

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @HeebHunter
  227. Bookish1 says:
    @karel

    He was a traitor. Nothing worse than a traitor.

    • Agree: Genrick Yagoda
    • Replies: @karel
  228. Bookish1 says:
    @Adrian

    You sound like an a true amateur when it comes to Schopenhauer. An entire world view is to be had by understanding and digesting Schopenhauer.

    • Replies: @Adrian
  229. @Anon

    Americans hate all “Europoors.” It’s a direct result of American Judeo-crackerism. The cracker hates whomever his Jewish Gods tell him to hate.

    It’s as simple as that.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  230. Bookish1 says:
    @Ron Unz

    I wish someone could put what they are saying in writing because I cant hear the words.

    • Replies: @Petermx
    , @geokat62
  231. Anonymous[367] • Disclaimer says:
    @Chris Mallory

    Would you mind enlarging on your assertion of why Germans have done so much to destroy the U.S.? You’ve said nothing about it actually, or are we just supposed to know it as fact.

    • Replies: @Kilo 4/11
  232. @Mefobills

    20/20 rear vision says to attack England and use about 700 U boats. Strangle the Island – nothing gets in or out.

    Fair comment, but as you say hindsight is 20/20. You are basically suggesting a siege of not one but two country-size islands with a huge moat around them and with the best navy in the world. That takes a long time (measured in years probably) a lot of resources and effort and no guarantee of success. You are going to lose a lot of your U-boats and have to replace them with scarce steel-making resources, some of the more crucial (iron ore and chromium for instance) of which are being supplied by courtesy of Stalin himself. Meanwhile your backside, your supply of oil from Romania for instance, is at risk of being cut off by a sudden attack from the east. Without oil your U-boats are dead in the water. Nor can U-boats be brought to the Eastern front.

    If you believe Suvorov, Hitler had used Stalin to supply Germany with critical war materiel, while Stalin was expecting Germany and the Western allies to wear themselves down in battle before moving in himself to beat up on the winner. Churchill conversely hoped the Soviets and the Germans would beat each other up before launching his major ground offensive. This probably accounts for the prolonged phony war.

    Hitler had reason to feel betrayed by Stalin, who had presumably agreed to invade Poland at the same time as Germany did, but pleaded lack of preparation at the last moment and made Hitler the fall guy for the start of the war. Stalin then moved into Poland provoking no world outrage, took over several Eastern European countries and then made demands on Romania that Hitler could hardly ignore.

    Hitler knew of course that the Russian Revolution was dominated by Jewish bolsheviks, that those same bolsheviks had attempted a takeover of Germany as early as 1917, that they had undermined the German war effort in WWI with strikes, mutinies and probably sabotage, that Zionist Jews had brought the U.S. into that war with the Balfour Declaration and that Zionists had declared war on Germany in 1933. He also knew of the bolshevik reputation for savagery. He was thus at least reasonably justified in thinking he would rather have Germany lose to the West than to the Soviets.

    The Soviet forces were deployed in the highly vulnerable, from a defensive standpoint, Lvov and Bialystok salients (as opposed to say Brest, half way between them) Their airplanes were parked wingtip to wingtip. They had an enormous advantage in air power, which would have protected their supply lines, mostly railroads I am led to believe.

    Hitler made mistakes for sure. One of the most important was not figuring out that the Brits had broken his Enigma code. Another (maybe not his) was that Germany had the Treaty of Versailles millstone around its neck.

  233. @Corvinus

    “Internet Tough Guy Talk” is all the White Race can do at the moment, although I very much deplore the fact. There are no movements or leaders of any consequence anywhere in the White nations of the world at the present time.

    We need to avoid the kind of loud mouth who will pick up a newspaper headline and say: “AND WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO ABOUT THIS?”. The simple fact of the matter is that, as things stand, we cannot win. Bottom line.

    What we need is a trigger and that trigger has not yet taken place. But it will, and in this decade, I am convinced of that. It will more than likely be a war that the U.S. will lose. Just like World War One was marked the true beginning of the 20th century.

    Without that WW I, no Communism, no Fascism, no National Socialism, and Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, Churchill, De Gaulle, Mao, and many others would have remained completely unknown.

    What we need is a Mohammed of the White Race. A leader who will be at once a political, a military, and – above all – a religious leader. The founder of a new religion based on Aryan paganism and, in part, on Christianity (2,000 years of Christianity cannot be written off overnight, nor should it).

    Will such a man come about? Time will tell. In the meantime, keep in mind this saying: when the disciple is ready, the master will appear.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @ploni almoni
  234. @incitatus

    Incitatus does not mind working for people who are much worse.

    • Replies: @incitatus
  235. Petermx says:
    @Bookish1

    Make sure to start the video at the beginning. It plays twice, the second time without sound.

  236. Wally says:
    @Commentator Mike

    Good to see that I’m so deep in your head. I own you.

    So, “deny” what?

    What is “anti-Slavism” anyway?

    Yawn, the desperate “living space” nonsense.

    If Hitler had wanted to ‘exterminate’ Slavs he could have, he had years to do it, but clearly did not.

    As for the baseless ‘Slav sub-human’ canard, well I’ve demolished it and you can’t do anything about it.

    recommended:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=slavs&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally
    and:
    https://www.unz.com/?s=sub-human&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  237. @Anonymous

    “until Napoleon took on the whole of Europe and Russia as well”: Napoleon never took Russia, French invasion of Russia was a disaster that unfolded in less than 6 months. As for the common legend of the bourgeois revolution prepared by a few dreamy intellectuals like Rousseau, it does not hold water. Overthrowing a regime requires a robust secret organization, foreign support and substantial financial backing. This was true in France in 1789 and in Russia in 1917. For the Bolshevik revolution, we know who provided the planning, foreign support and financial means. Even if the true initiators of the French revolution are unknown, we ought to keep in mind that the same causes produce the same effects.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  238. geokat62 says:
    @Zumbuddi

    U r so enamored of your goyim hobby horse that a label distracts you from the distortion in the substance of Barrett’s statement.

    True enough.

    “Goyim” is not going to vanquish the evil of 100 years of lies.

    Even so, it helps put things into sharper relief. We need to have a better understanding of who is standing on either side of the battle line.

  239. Wally says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    The laughable Zionist, Franklin Ryckaert, continues to religiously believe in the utterly debunked Hitler’s Table Talk.

    That’s the same anti-science Ryckaert who claims millions upon millions were ‘exterminated’ and according to his “Holocau\$t Industry”, the alleged resultant human remains are said to exist in precisely known locations. No such remains exist … but Ryckaert still faithfully believes. LOL

    I have shredded Ryckaert and others on the Table Talk fakery here:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-understanding-world-war-ii/?showcomments#comment-3464653
    and:
    https://www.unz.com/article/why-germany-invaded-poland/?showcomments#comment-3425545

  240. @vot tak

    You don’t have a problem with that, why should we?

  241. 2 questions:

    [MORE]
    )

    1) “…which is the fusional and energizing encounter between a man’s inner calling to lead, and a people’s inner longing to be led. ”

    How does this theory work on lone wolves?

    2) Is Benjamin Disraeli Bob Dylan’s dad?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  242. Corvinus says:
    @Ann Nonny Mouse

    “Then the media would no longer rule us”.

    YOU rule yourself. The media does not dictate how you live your own life.

  243. @utu

    humor is not for the politically correct. They belong in prison.

  244. Corvinus says:
    @Tool Book and Rifle

    “Internet Tough Guy Talk” is all the White Race can do at the moment…”

    Absolutely not. Action is mandated. Take charge.

    “There are no movements or leaders of any consequence anywhere in the White nations of the world at the present time.”

    Why not YOU?

    “The simple fact of the matter is that, as things stand, we cannot win. Bottom line.”

    How defeatist and cuckish.

    “What we need is a trigger and that trigger has not yet taken place”.

    Right, wait for something to hopefully happen (rolling of eyes).

    “What we need is a Mohammed of the White Race”.

    Again, why not YOU?

  245. @Sparkon

    The historical record also shows that Oswald shot John F. Kennedy, that Osama bin Laden was behind 9/11 and that Obama had Osama bin Laden assassinated. Only fools would doubt that.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  246. Fox says:

    Yet another laughable facet of “de-nazification” is that when you want to consult a German patent from about 1935 (when the old, Weimar Republic format was changed) to the 8th of May, 1945, for example through the European Patent Office (epo.org), you’ll find that the Hooked Cross has been blotted out from the laurel wreath the German Eagle is holding as the header of the document. It’s either crudely covered with ink or a small sliver of paper has been glued over it to conceal it.
    The Anti-Nazis are afraid of symbols and even make a bureaucratic rule out of it. If that doesn’t qualify as being retarded, then I can’t even imagine how low the standards for admittance into that circle of institutionalized dullness, leaden spirituality and arrested development are.

  247. Sparkon says:
    @ploni almoni

    Nevertheless, we can be absolutely certain it was Germany that attacked the Soviet Union, and Japan that attacked the United States, both in 1941.

    Neither JFK’s assassination, nor 9/11 have anything to do with WWII, and of course, many people don’t believe either of those official myths to begin with, so I don’t know what you’re trying to prove with your hot air.

    To avoid getting yourself confused, don’t mix myth — official or not — with established history.

    Of course you’re entirely welcome to try to prove that Germany didn’t really invade the USSR in 1941.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
    , @Vojkan
  248. geokat62 says:
    @Daniel Rich

    2) Is Benjamin Disraeli Bob Dylan’s dad?

    The exact same question crossed my mind, DR.

    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  249. incitatus says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    “I’m putting you on ‘Ignore’.”

    Don’t blame you. It’s a lot easier than answering simple questions.

  250. @Corvinus

    Why not YOU, Corvinus? Just like in “Underworld” or Hungary in the 15th century. Don’t let the real world get in the way, just DO it!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  251. Wally says:
    @Chris Mallory

    said:
    “Germans have done more to destroy the United States than any “contribution” they have made.”

    Got proof?

    Nope. Just irrational ranting.

  252. karel says:
    @Bookish1

    ha, ha, ha the ”Dolchstoss Legende” again. Why should anyone risk own life for the survival of the degenerate Habsburgs? Would you?

  253. @Franklin Ryckaert

    Wherever the Germans went in the Soviet Union they were very well received except by die hard Communists. Soviet propaganda had to deny that fact and now Russian propaganda has to deny that as well which is why they extoll Stalin. You wouldn’t be a Stalinist, would you?

    • Replies: @ivan
    , @incitatus
  254. Anon[367] • Disclaimer says:

    Can’t we just call the title of this article, ” Will the targeted hatred of Germans ever end in the U.S.?

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  255. Adrian says:
    @Bookish1

    You sound like an a true amateur when it comes to Schopenhauer. An entire world view is to be had by understanding and digesting Schopenhauer.

    “Entire world view”? I was talking specifically about his attitude towards nationalism. But now we are at it you might give us the benefit of your professional insight into his “entire world view”.

  256. incitatus says:
    @New Dealer

    “Hitler’s political thought was mediocre and silly. As was Mussolini’s.”

    They were brilliant enough to hoodwink their nations, that’s what mattered. Convincing citizens “to collectively subordinate their own will to the stronger will of a leader, for the sake of the whole”, as the author seems to endorse. They willfully expended German and Italian lives in their contest, a festival of killing, gambling all that they would win.

    The author is much too modest in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ quotes about Jews. He forgot these zingers:

    “I am convinced that I am acting as the agent of our Creator. By fighting off the Jews, I am doing the Lord’s work.”

    “Was there any excrement, any shamelessness in any form, above all in cultural life, in which at least one Jew would not have been involved? As soon as one even carefully cut into such an abscess, one found, like maggots in a decaying body, often blinded by the sudden light, a kike.”
    -Adolf Hitler ‘Mein Kampf’ 1925 Volume 1 Chapter 2

    “The black-haired Jewish youth lies in wait for hours on end, satanically glaring at and spying on the unsuspicious girl whom he plans to seduce, adulterating her blood and removing her from the bosom of her own people. The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a subjugated people. In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women he strives to break down the last barriers of discrimination between him and other peoples.”
    -Adolf Hitler ‘Mein Kampf’ 1925 Volume 1 Chapter 11

    Thoughts of a messianic ex-vagabond/gefreiter/Reichswehr spy/demagogue/failed revolutionary/jailbird. There’s little evidence for Hitler’s Anti-Semitism prior to 1919. But he knew good marketing, the value of scapegoats and incendiary rhetoric.

    His first targets were, of course, Versailles (the world is against us) and arch-enemy France (no apologies for destroying Northern France and Belgium 1914-18: it was their fault).

    Jews (like Communists) were an afterthought, the domestic enemy, meant to explain WW1 failures and keep eyes askew from totally incompetent Wilhelmine leadership (Wilhelm II, Bethmann-Hollweg, Moltke, Falkenhayn, Hindenberg, Ludendorff).

    No surprise they sponsored Hitler (thinking they could control him). They were wrong.

    “Both [Fascism and Communism] were miserable failures.”

    Agree

    “I’m an American who is glad our forces helped defeat totalitarianism.”

    Same here. Salut!

    “There’s plenty wrong the U.S. right now. But resurrecting Hitler in response is about as stupid as it gets.”

    Amen!

  257. incitatus says:
    @ploni almoni

    “Incitatus does not mind working for people who are much worse.”

    Really? Did you send me a check? Guess I missed it.

    • Replies: @ploni almoni
  258. @Thomasina

    To understand the French Revolution one can do no better than Nesta Webster’s “French Revolution.: She understood it as a combination of conspiracies, of which the leading was that of the Orleanistes, that of a rival to the throne. To this has to be added the conspiracy of the Illuminati, recently founded on May 1st 1776 and commemorated as the date on the Seal of the United States. Another faction in the conspiracies were the English who financed the French revolution as payback for the decisive French success in the American revolution. (The English general representing Cornwallis at the surrender at Yorktown started handing his sword to the French general, the Comte de Rochambeau, who waved him off and nodded towards Washington… )

    [MORE]

    Nesta Webster: “Now if we study carefully the course of the revolutionary movement we shall find that the role of the people is in the main passive; only on these great days of tumult do they play an active part. Between these outbreaks the fire of revolution smoulders, at moments almost flickers out, then suddenly for no apparent reason bursts again into flame, and it is only by long and patient search amongst contemporary documents that we can begin to understand the causes of these conflagrations.

    “The popular Revolution,” said St. Just, “was the surface of a volcano of extraneous conspiracies” and consequently the actions of the people seen from the surface only can never be understood. Thus the story of the Revolution, as it is usually told us, with its pointless crimes, its unreasoning violence, and its hideous waste of life, is simply unintelligible—” a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury and signifying nothing.”

    If, then, we would discover the truth about these great revolutionary outbreaks, we must dig down far below the surface, we must trace the connection between the mine and the explosion, between the actions of the people and the causes that provoked them… no royalty can exist without a patriciate. . . . ” There was a faction in 1790 to place the crown on the head of Orleans; there was one to maintain it on the head of the Bourbons; there was another faction to place the House of Hanover on the throne of France. These factions were over- thrown with royalty on the 10th of August; terror forced all the secret conspiracies in favour of monarchy to dissimulate more profoundly than ever. Then all these factions took the mask of the Republican party…

    In order, therefore, to persuade the people of Paris to march on the Tuileries some very powerful incentive must be provided. For some months the Girondins, Brissot, Gensonne, and above all Carra, had endeavoured to inflame the popular mind by continual declamations against the so-called “Austrian Committee,” by means of which Marie Antoinette was declared to be betraying France to the Emperor of Austria, but their efforts to prove the existence of this committee had ended in ignominious failure. To the request for a written statement of their accusations they replied : “What do you wish us to prove ? Conspiracies cannot be written down (“Les conspirations ne s’ecrivent pas”).” Later on at their trial, when they asked Fouquier Tinville for proofs of their guilt, Fouquier quoted these words to them and sent them to the guillotine…

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  259. Seraphim says:
    @karel

    Romanians, like Czechs, were groaning under the tender care of the Habsburgs. In 1918 they deserted the KuK altogether, again like the Czechs. So, we don’t buy either into the German ‘innocence’ in WW1 or WW2, or in the delusional self-aggrandizement of ‘Germanentum’.
    I recommend a book largely forgotten, which gives an accurate explanation of what the real ‘Dolchstoss’ was: “Brest Litovsk. The Forgotten Peace. March 1918”, by John Wheeler-Bennett. Written in 1938, it exposes the continuity of German expansionist policy from the time of the “Alldeutscher Verband” to the “Heim ins Reich”.
    I recommend also the much vilified “Germany’s Aims in the First World War”, by Fritz Fischer. To be completed with “Fritz Fischer’s ‘Programme for Revolution’: Implications for a Global History of Germany in the First World War”, by Jennifer Jenkins, 2013.

  260. Davorin says:

    For me, the first reaction is always, “OK, what do we do??”

    I think the first step is for the best leaders among us to start pro-natal parties in all of our white homelands. And give your life to this cause, your entire being. Because our problem is demographics, we can deal with the why and what-else later.

    The main platform for these parties is births, increasing birth rates at any expense, above all else. Right, left, we can decide this later. We need a new politics, this is birth politics.

    Go.

  261. Anonymous[243] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    Greek culture became so appealing to jews in ancient pre christian days that the jewish patriarchs o so called Macabees carried out a mass genocide of assimilated jews….Roman destroyed the jewish kingdoms-no such thing as jewish country- because ROMANS did not believe any of the jewish-christian BS theological myths…Romans were freed of christianity which theapostle Paul cleverly invented to dominate control subdue the Greco-Roman world most of them non jews…Much of WHITE ARYAN WESTERN CULTURES from greece to Eurpeans demise the main causeof its own internal destruction has been CHRISTIANITY…whch another form of covered JUDAISM….the West remains slave in mind and spirit to Biblical mythology about Jews, Christ, etc…which have no bases in facts…

    • Troll: Seraphim, ploni almoni
  262. JackOH says:

    For those excellent commenters who find the notion of rehabilitating Hitler understandably revolting, consider these points:

    (1) Thomas Sowell noted in a newspaper essay that he explicitly made the connection between America helping to defeat Hitler while hypocritically maintaining racially divisive policies of its own in the Deep South. Sowell was a young man enamored of Marxism at the time he made that connection. Certainly if Sowell made the connection, it’s reasonable to believe other leftists and left-liberals would have at least informally cast their goal as the de-Hitlerization of post-WWII America.

    (2) Imagine the following question posed to America’s political and intellectual leaders in the summer of 1945: How shall the Hitler of private memory and public consciousness best be used to further our political goals?

    My guess is the Left understood intuitively how a ” radically diabolized” Hitler could serve its goals. America’s Right, in my view, probably wouldn’t even have understood the question. For example, the Left successfully commandeered the word “liberation” to describe political movements that threatened the traditional family and workplace, and I don’t think the Right ever had the wit to understand how liberation unduly piggybacked on phrases such as the liberation of Europe a generation earlier.

    Just a few thoughts here.

    • Replies: @Fox
  263. @Sparkon

    History is an agreed upon fable. You also cannot deny that France and Great Britain attacked Germany, not the other way around. And that, in fact, first of all, the Zionists led by Samuel Untermyer attacked Germany in 1933.

    • Agree: Genrick Yagoda
  264. @geokat62

    The exact same question crossed my mind, DR.

    Will there be an answer…?

  265. Fox says:
    @JackOH

    I don’t understand why you speak of the “excellent commentators who find rehabilitating Hitler understandably revolting” while at the same time expressing your belief that he (or the image that has been cast of him) is used to further certain political goals. The “private memory and public consciousness” in which he exists and existed within the boundary of your worldview was the construct of wartime propaganda, demonization and boundless calumny. So, how seriously can one take that as representing reality, as a foundation of a serious opinion, and furthermore, as a reason to speak of Hitler, and his goals and aspirations in always moralizing and emotional derangement? Why not take a step back and get a good view of the whole?
    What does rehabilitating Hitler mean in your mind? He can’t be reelected, he is dead. He was driven into the war by people who nowadays are celebrated as heroes and are even in your face every day in some countries when one is using money. It is even disapproved of to reveal the fact that it was England and France which declared war on Germany, because saying that is calling int question the propaganda tool of Hitler, the mad world conqueror. A lo can’t be said and a lot must be believed without question in this present world, and yet something is so wrong as to sap all life force from the bodies of whole nations, and one may not enquire, what it is that is wrong and bearing death.

    That we are now on the brink of a catastrophe is the outcome of this demonization, which was used to set the events in motion which have brought us into the present position. Maybe Hitler was intelligent enough to recognize what would happen if the train towards the abyss was not stopped. That woud set him far apart from such entities as Roosevelt and Churchill and their retinue. Perhaps the ongoing de-nazification, the topic of Guyenot’s article, is the necessary mirror image of chaos the democratic mis-leaders have thrown the world in in order to obscure that fact.

    • Replies: @JackOH
    , @L.K
  266. @Tool Book and Rifle

    It is late and we are done for unless we keep the faith and preserve the good.

    • Replies: @Tool Book and Rifle
  267. @incitatus

    As you say, they are, indeed, zingers.

    • Replies: @incitatus
  268. Anon[264] • Disclaimer says:
    @Old and Grumpy

    Kinda stupid when you considered Brit monarchy comes from the same German blood, and that both continental nations wanted to be allies with England. It must be the Jewish DNA in English aristocracy that make the England, and subsequently the US, supremely greedy and somewhat moronic.

    If they weren’t Cryptos themselves they were beholden to jew finance, the ladder being even more of an incentive to follow direction.

  269. Anon[264] • Disclaimer says:

    Can Laurent or another educated person please explain to me the reasons the Soviet lines did not collapse under assault from the Wehrmacht or SS during Barbarossa?

    I’ve read many accounts that the Ukrainian forces virtually welcomed and embraced the SS Division that seized control and eradicated the communists in their cities and towns.

    It seems the Soviet troops would have dropped their arms in anticipation of the same treatment by the Germans, regardless the threat of being shot by their troops.

    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
    , @Sparkon
  270. @Carolyn Yeager

    Thanks Carolyn. From my (limited) understanding, anti-slavism was a subject that divided members of the NSDAP. Alfred Rosenberg’s radical anti-slavism was opposed by others like Ribbentrop, who made no difference between Germans and Slavs (aren’t the “Rus” who founded Kiev Scandinavians anyway? And aren’t “Prussians” literally Western “Russians”). I do not believe that Hitler took Rosenberg’s book very seriously. But Hitler appointed Rosenberg administrator of the Eastern territories, and this affected greatly the way Russian civilians and soldiers were treated. Did Hitler himself hold the Slavs to be natural slaves needing to be conquered by the superior Germans? I read some words to that effect, although I couldn’t find the quotes again: Slavs need only be taught to read and to count till ten, this kind of things. Did Hitler’s intention and instruction to colonize and exploit the Russians, rather than liberate them from Bolshevism, cause him to lose popular support and therefore contribute to his defeat in the East? This is my understanding, so far. Can you explain to me why it is wrong?

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @karel
  271. @Saggy

    What’s wrong with you Saggy? You know I’m French and living in France (I told you already). Still you challenge me to explicitly deny the Holocaust, the six millions, and the gaz chambers. And where do you see I’m legitimizing the Holohoax? Why do you think my last sentence is quoting Gerard Menuhin’s book? How much does the CRIF pay you?
    We are at war. We need to attack the enemy from several angles. You are surely right that the Holohoax is the most important front. I am not suggesting to give up this front, but to put up a fight on other sides too. This is especially necessary where holocaust denial is severely punished by law, like France, Germany and Russia. It is a matter of strategy. I have been investigated and interrogated by the police for my articles, and I am in the process of losing my teaching job. I believe what I write is being closely examined, so excuse-me for not handing the enemy the stick to beat me with. When I think of what a hero you are, and how much you suffered for all the pioneering articles you wrote on the Holohoax and signed with your real name, in a country that forbids it, I feel ashamed. I certainly deserve your contempt and anger for being such a coward.

    • Thanks: geokat62, Robjil, Thomasina
    • Replies: @Saggy
  272. @Kevin Barrett

    Winning the argument is important, but speaking the truth is more important. You should know that, Kevin, as a self-proclaimed truth-jihadist.

    • Replies: @Kevin Barrett
  273. @Carolyn Yeager

    “Again, it’s easy to spin “ideas” from your armchair as an anonymous commenter.”

    Methinks the pot doth call the kettle black, unjustly. In his comments, Mefobills is sufficiently visible to a reader. Websites and photographs seem unnecessary pedestals.

  274. @incitatus

    “The author is much too modest in Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf’ quotes about Jews. He forgot these zingers:”

    How about these zingers from the Talmud for context:

    “Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therefore he will be served by animals in human form.”
    —Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855

    “The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts.”
    —Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b

    • Replies: @incitatus
  275. @Wally

    I own you.

    LOL. I brought you out so others can have a laugh.

  276. Compare the Jewish Talmudic mindset above with that from Ancient Egypt whom they curse along with all Christians every year:

    “They [human beings] are His [god] images who came forth from His body”.
    (Instruction of Merikare, c. 2000 bc)

    Unlike the Talmudic Jews they have a functioning conscience and they will have to give an account when they leave this world:

    “As for the (divine) tribunal which judges sinners,
    You know that they are not indulgent
    On that day of judging the offender”
    (op cit)

    For “They are all thine, all those who come to thee. Great and small, they belong to thee; Those who live upon earth, they all reach thee, Thou art their master, there is none outside thee”. (Frankfort, 1961)

    Unlike Talmudic Jews all peoples are considered human beings:
    “I [Lord of All] made every man equal to his fellow, and I forbade them to do wrong”
    (Coffin Texts, c. 2000 bc)

    That this includes all human beings is made explicit in a depiction from the New Kingdom in which all the known races of mankind are shown approaching the judgment seat and “existence in the hereafter is assured to all of them” (Hornung, 1999).

  277. @Durruti

    I am not even sure of the true number of Soviets killed during WWII. I was looking up an early 60’s reference book which stated that 14 million Soviet citizens were killed during the war, including civilians (7 million military and 7 million civilians). More recently I have seen numbers like 19 and 20 million Soviets killed during the war, even 27 million according to Wikipedia!

    • Replies: @Durruti
  278. @karel

    Did you really just link a middle school text book slide and telling people about education?

    • Replies: @karel
  279. @Anon

    From some of the replies here, it never will.
    Logical though.
    Amerimutts are going to be exterminated and turmed into Atzland or whatever loco chico spic dystopia their DEMOGRAPHIC majority wants.
    Very fitting.
    Amen to the defeat of “totalitarianism” by based “white” “brothers”. Hail Marxism and nigger dicks.

  280. This is well written article, grounded in quotes from Hitler and others. It shows, however, how the Nazi ideology is irreconcilable with Christianity. According to the Bible God considers us as individuals, not as members of a tribe or nation or race. All of his commandments and all of Christ teaching is universal and focused on the relation you as a person, as an individual have with God first and other persons, as individuals, second. The criteria applied on the final judgment for eternal life in heaven are what you did as an individual to other individuals, not what you did to preserve your race or nation. If His design and His will was to make indeed race or nation the most important thing for humans in this life this would surely have been reflected in His words and Christ’s teaching. But it is not.

    If God is good and what comes from Him is good everything that is opposing God’s word must be evil. Hence, the Nazi view that the race or nation are more important than individuals is evil.

    This doesn’t mean the Jews were not working for hundreds of years now to undermine Christianity and European culture rooted in it. After all modern Judaism is not the religion of Old Testament, but a religion based on the Torah which was developed as an opposition to Christianity. It is a deeply evil, racist ideology indeed. And indeed those Jews that reject Christ and embrace that ideology are effectively helping evil even if some of them do not realize this.

  281. @EliteCommInc.

    Yes, why round up entire populations when they are already rounded up. And indeed, what does socialism really look like? Have we ever had socialism? No, we are only building socialism. That is why the pyramid under the “all seeing eye” is missing the summit. Last step, and we are finished.

  282. geokat62 says:
    @Bookish1

    I wish someone could put what they are saying in writing…

    Your wish is my command…

    [MORE]

    Captain: Alright men. Nazi-occupied Europe lies before you. Many of you will die here today, but all of you are heroes.

    Let us take this moment before we engage our enemy to remember what it is we fight for.

    Thomas, are you prepared to die today?

    Thomas: Yes. Sir.

    Captain: And what are you prepared to die for?

    Thomas: Sir, I’ll gladly give my life for the future of our country. A future where our negroes use the same water fountain as us and go to the same school as our kids.

    Captain: And you, Tyler, why do you fight?

    Tyler: Sir, I’m fighting so that in the future our daughters can abandon motherhood and join the workforce… to be like men.

    Captain: That’s right, Tyler. Our society doesn’t need mothers. It needs more worker units in a non-binary capitalistic soul crushing machine.

    James, what are your hopes for the future?

    James: Well, I just want to my granddaughter to pop out as many well fed and supported mulatto babies as possible.

    Captain: I’m sure all of us would recognize our white privilege and would agree we should offer up one of our granddaughters to the superior African born.

    Now let’s here from Nigel from the Royal Army. What are you fighting for, soldier?

    Nigel: Well, Sir, I would say my greatest hope would be to see a Muslim mayor of London, one day. But, the truth is, I aspire for something even greater. That some day no Muslim sex criminal will be punished in our kingdom, again.

    Captain: John-Pierre, why did you join us on this most holy crusade?

    John-Pierre: Well, mon capitan, I wish to see the German invaders pushed out of France so on one glorious day it could be occupied permanently by a title wave of sub-Saharan Muslim invaders.

    Captain: We should all be so lucky as to be replaced by a title wave of sub-Saharan Muslim invaders.

    Thomas: How about you captain… why do you fight?

    Captain[sighing]: I fight so that one day a black man could be president of the United States… and use his authority to force bakeries to bake cakes for homosexual weddings, for schools to allow transsexuals to use whatever bathroom they want, so that my great grandchildren will be burdened with debt at the beginning of their adult lives for a worthless degree from a Marxist educational system.

    Thomas: Well, that’s beautiful captain. What about you. Frank?

    Frank: Well, I want to help free Jewish people from the holocaust camps so that they can hang guilt over us for nigh a century, while they quietly takeover every institution of our society, from finance and education to media and government bureaucracy.

    Captain: They are truly god’s chosen people and we should submit before their superiority.

    What about you, Isaiah, aren’t you from the tribe?

    Isaiah: Well, I’m just here to support our communist allies, so they can rape Eastern Europe for a couple of generations and murder tens of millions of people in China.

    Captain: Well, communism is the way of the future, boys. Remember folks, the Nazis are the bad guys and we’re the heroes.

    Are you ready?

    Vive la France, for king and country, for the future!

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  283. Durruti says:
    @Commentator Mike

    I am not even sure of the true number of Soviets killed during WWII.

    Who is?

    We guess that the Soviet Union & China lost many millions, perhaps as many as 20 million & 30 million respectively. China was at war with an invading Japan – from the 1930s – 1945. The honest approach of historians is to admit the paucity of reliable counts.

    The Nation who lost the greatest percentage of their population in both WWs I & II, was Serbia/Yugoslavia. The 6 million Holocaust figures are no more accurate than the (surprisingly similar – with the addition of one 0), 60 million figure for Stalinist repression in Russia.

    There is still controversy over how many casualties there were at the Battle of Gettysburg.

    It is the Agents serving special masters who insist on certain casualty figures – in order to push some agenda. Indeed, the democraps insist that the Russian Government is helping Casino Trump to win his election.

    There are many unanswered questions of the WW I – WW II era. Was Trotsky a British Agent? Citations-evidence please. Why was he assassinated? WHY??? Why did Mussolini declare war on the USA, when he had lost most of his army, and was not able to conquer Greece (a nation of 8 millionish).

    What was the real reason for the Night of the Long Knives Massacre? Was that a gift for the Banker/Financiers – who helped Germany recover its economy & to rearm? Who were these Financiers? The conferences between Zionists & Nazis (mostly scrubbed from history)?

    Youth Wants to Know. Old TV Show.

  284. JackOH says:
    @Fox

    Fox, buddy, you probably lost me a bit at “boundary of your [i. e. my] worldview” which suggests you misread my comment. But, anyway, my idea of rehabilitating Hitler amounts to no more than placing him in his historical factualness, as a man among all men, with unique talents that gave him enormous successes and catastrophic failures.

    The purpose of that rehabilitation is, in my view, solely to curb the American Left’s poorly checked ability to leverage the Hitler of “private memory and public consciousness” to serve domestic American political ends. That will be distasteful to many folks whose support is important. I think they’d redden at the thought of rehabbing Hitler for the sake of Hitler fanboyism, but I think they’d be willing to accept the quiet popularization of the historically accurate Hitler to put a cork in the American Left’s blathering about “oppressions” from which people need to be “liberated”. That’s why I tread a bit gingerly in peddling my pet theory.

    • Disagree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @Fox
  285. @Laurent Guyénot

    Of course the truth is the most important thing. I was arguing against what I understood to be your claim that de-demonizing Hitler in the way you proposed would be politically effective, i.e. would “win the argument” and help defeat ZOG/NWO.

    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
  286. The “naziest” of these ideas is, of course, the greatness of the White race. Hitler spoke of the Aryan race, by which he meant all Germanic peoples, including the Dutch, Swedes, Norwegians, Finns, Swiss,

    Finns are not Germanic. Finland is not a Germanic country, it’s a Germanic colony owned mostly by Swedes and Germans and not by the actual natives of the land.

    We are not Aryan and were never considered such by even those few Nazis that actually favored Finns like Himmler. Finns were generally classified as racially Mongoloid at that time. Ethnic Swedes and ethnic Germans from Finland were of course considered Aryans and they were eagerly recruited to Nazi organizations from day 1 when ethnic Finns were banned for racial reasons. Hitler did eventually give Finns a racial upgrade but that was after Stalingrad when they were getting desperate.

    This was a pretty big deal long before the German Nazi party even existed. Finland is historically a country ruled by a Germanic aristoracry where ethnic Finns didn’t have any political rights. Sweden and ethnic Swedes in Finland were pioneers of race biology starting from the time of Linnaeus and a lot of their skull measuring work went into trying to prove that the Swedes should remain the privileged ruling caste in Finland. Swastika-waving Swedish execution squads who insisted that Swedes are the higher race and therefore have the right to kill Finns and Russians were a thing in the Finnish Civil War before the German Nazi party even existed.

    We are now a strange double cuckolded people who have to simultaneously worship a bunch of Germanic colonists who called us an inferior race as national heroes and then also self-flagellate over our supposed racist and colonial history. Finland is definitely one of the countries that will implode if this American-sponsored eternal denazification goes on for much longer.

  287. @A-Christian

    the Nazi ideology is irreconcilable with Christianity

    Yes and no. Hitler expressed on several occasions that it was a fatal strategic mistake to combat Christianity (MK 99-100). Unlike Himmler, a rather superficial thinker, he never publicly criticized Christianity, though in private he said that the NSDAP is waging “a great battle to deliver mankind from the curse of Mount Sinai.” For Ernst de Reventlow (1869-1943), a senior National Socialist ideologue, it is the aura of the Old Testament that is the cause of the failure of all previous ideological movements against Judaism and the Jewish spirit. I have made the same point in https://www.unz.com/article/the-holy-hook/ I wrote: “there will be no definitive emancipation from Zion without mental and moral emancipation from the biblical matrix.”
    Reventlow, though, like myself, believed that Christianity is an ever evolving paradigm, and can be directed toward some kind of neo-marcionism. Christianity is a hellenistic cult full of pagan roots (the cult of Mary in particular), and these can be emphacized.
    Your remark on individual salvation brings the issue of the role of christianity in the spread of individualism, which I have addressed here: https://www.unz.com/article/israel-as-one-man/ The problem of christianity is best illustrated by Paul in Galatians 3: “There can be neither Jew nor Greek, there can be neither slave nor freeman, there can be neither male nor female—for you are all one in Christ Jesus.” Such ideas brings credence to those who think that Christianity is a Jewish trick to destroy Gentile nations (Thomas Dalton here: https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/04/28/schopenhauer-and-judeo-christian-life-denial-part-2/
    But again, Christianity is not a closed system. There is certainly nothing in Jesus’s words that forbids reflecting on the syngenic aspects of the Kingdom. German idealism and romanticism, which are friendly to the concept of collective souls, are not the enemy of christianity. The sickness of christianity, though, is dogmatism, i.e. thinking inside a closed box.

    • Replies: @A-Christian
  288. @Kevin Barrett

    I think in the very long run, it will be effective, because the demonization of Hitler is simply one side of the Big Lie. We are ineluctably moving in that direction anyway. Recent books on Hitler are starting to treat him more rationally. In the end, this will also open the way to more fundamental revisionism on the holocaust. What is important is that dissidents do not self-defeatingly hinder the process by calling our enemies Nazis, and reinforce the big lie by using clichés such as “MK-Ultra came from Mengele’s experiments” (read on unz.com).

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager, Trinity
    • Replies: @SolontoCroesus
  289. @Anon

    I cannot elaborate here, but I think there are three major factors:
    1) Staline quickly reacted against Russians surrendering en masse to the Germans, by putting political commissars behind their back. Very effective, together with propaganda (Russian soldiers thought they would be tortured and killed by the Germans if their surrendered);
    2) Stalin received massive armement from the US. Without it, he was done.
    3) although Carolyn Yeager would say otherwise (her comment 59 and mine 281), German anti-Slavism led them to behave very brutally towards Russian civilians and caused, in Ukraine for example, people to turn against them after initiallly welcoming them. Rosenberg and Himmler are partly to blame.
    More research needed…

    • Replies: @TGD
  290. @A-Christian

    It was a French Catholic Cardinal who agreed that Hitler was fighting for “Fortress Europe.”

  291. @incitatus

    You can pick up your payment from the Priests of the Temple at the Secret Operative desk under your cipher.

  292. @Laurent Guyénot

    As I type this, I’m listening to a US Senate committee question Francis Collins, head of NIH, and Surgeon General Jerome Adams, MD on the development of an anti-covid vaccine; how it should be distributed; and, especially, how the American people must be convinced that the vaccine is safe and must be submitted to; that “conspiracy theories” are undermining the People’s faith in “experts” who attest to safety of vaccines, and those conspiracy theories must be debunked.

    Committee members include Lamar Alexander, Patty Murray, Bob Casey, Elizabeth Warren (might be others; I’m working-listening-typing simultaneously — not a good plan, but I want to record these impressions in-the-raw)

    Murray, Casey, Warren focus on “Trump pushing conspiracy theories; Trump concerned only with his own political situation – re-election,” etc.”

    Many if not all of the above mention condemned Trump’s endorsement of hydroxochloroquinine / zinc as “conspiracy” and “dangerous.”

    The Casey-Santorum campaign was among the first events that alerted me to the influence of zionists in US politics: a Jewish mag. in a local library reported that members of ZOA took Casey to Israel before endorsing him; upon their return, they assured their readers that “Good as Santorum has been for Jews, Casey will follow in his footsteps.” And indeed he has, as I & others in a PaxChristi group quickly learned.
    So — Casey is owned by zionists.

    Patty Murray is a co-sponsor to Holocaust Education act —
    Sen 2085 Never Again Education Act https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/2085
    https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/943/text

    Casey and Warren co-sponsored the Senate bill.


    One after another of the senators condemned that “conspiracy theories” expressing skepticism of vaccines, and urged that “public relations campaigns” be undertaken to undermine those conspiracies. Surg. Gen. Adams said, “We must engage in education campaigns with anti-vaccers . . .” When Lynn Olsen discussed Those Angry Days, her book on the conflict over convincing Americans to enter WWII, she used that same formulation: “The American people had to be educated to the threat posed by Germany . . .”


    In his comments, Dr. Collins explained the three vaccines that are in trial, including one from Israeli company Moderna.
    He explained that one of the three trials involves direct impact on RNA; if I’m not mistaken, that is the Moderna project.

    —-

    It is my considered, evidence-based conviction that zionism, especially as expressed by Likud in Israel which has a malign, overwhelming and direct influence over US lawmakers and education, communication, etc.

    As I have come to understand the history of the world wars, I and II, zionists played a major role in involving USA in those wars; that a crucial goal and outcome of zionist involvement in those wars was the destruction of not merely the German nation but of the German people, culture, soul and, indeed, the posterity — their ability to reproduce.

    Zionists are intimately involved in campaigns to continue the demonization of “white supremacists” and especially “Nazis”, a term that serves to perpetuate the demonization of Germans/Germany.

    So — I assess that US legislators are fully on board to granting to an entity that exhibited genocidal intent; that accomplished a significant level of that goal; and that remains committed to the eradication of “whites,” “Europeans,” “Germans,” “Nazis,” “Fascists” etc. the ability to distribute to the American population a vaccine that might well do finally accomplish their genocidal wish.

    That is to say, “rehabilitating Hitler,” and “holocaust denial,” and “revisionist history” is not just an absorbing but ineffective, even fatuous exercise.

    I think it’s a matter of life-and-death.

    • Agree: Genrick Yagoda
  293. Sparkon says:
    @Anon

    Can Laurent or another educated person please explain to me the reasons the Soviet lines did not collapse under assault from the Wehrmacht or SS during Barbarossa?

    Ukrainian forces virtually welcomed and embraced…

    Soviet troops would have dropped their arms…


    T
    he Red Army’s defense lines collapsed or were destroyed by the Germans on any number of occasions, especially early in the war, but the Red Army always had sufficient reserves of manpower to plug the breach and/or construct new defense lines quickly, even while falling back. In the event, the Red Army gave up ground to the Germans all the way to the suburbs of Moscow by early December, 1941.

    Nevertheless, defeats were not appreciated by Iosef Stalin, and in fact a significant number of Red Army generals were shot for their failures on the battlefield, as were many others.

    …. according to the author’s calculations, just in the first year of the war … 107 people were arrested (1 marshal, 72 generals, 6 admirals, the rest were division commanders and senior political personnel; of these, 45 were sentenced to death, including 34 generals, 10 people died in custody).

    Another study found that during the course of the war, 458 Soviet generals and admirals were killed. More than 90 of these were the result of political repressions, 48 were shot and six died under torture. These losses represented 12 percent of the total loss and cost the Red Army a large number of experienced commanders.

    In the Red Army, the punishment for failure, or falling out of favor, was as swift as it was severe: a bullet in the back of the head.

    Most Soviet citizens who welcomed the Germans sooner or later probably met the same fate, although a relatively small number managed to escape to the West. It is virtually impossible to say how many Soviet citizens were killed at the hands of the NKVD in this fashion, but we can at least recognize and acknowledge that claimed Soviet losses in WWII have continued to rise as time has gone on.

    Stalin said seven million Soviets had lost their lives. Khrushchev raised the figure to 20 million; and under Gorbachev, some boosted it to 27 million. And two years ago, at a Duma hearing, one official testified that 42 million had been killed.

    https://novayagazeta.ru/articles/2019/05/08/80449-dozhit-do-rasstrela

    [original in Russian; English version below]

    http://euromaidanpress.com/2019/05/11/soviet-soldiers-who-didnt-reach-berlin-because-they-were-shot-by-their-own-people-recalled/

    Whatever the number was, it is not unreasonable to ask, as Pavel Gutyuntov has: how many Soviets citizens and soldiers were killed by the Soviets themselves, and how many were killed by the Germans? Only the Grim Reaper himself could provide the ghastly answer, but if the Gutyunov’s 12% figure (the percentage of Red Army generals who were shot) is applied to the Soviet Union at large, the number would be in the millions.

    After all, Stalin was a murderous psychopath in very bad company with his fellow Bolsheviks, many of whom were of similar persuasion, like Kaganovich, Yagoda, Yezhov, and Beria. The average Soviet citizen probably hated these men for good reasons, but survival required keeping one’s lips buttoned except for the approved slogans, and at least going through the motions of adoring Stalin and his henchmen.

    His buddies Marshals Voroshilov and Budyonny from the cavalry clique survived the purges of the late ’30s, which were directed against the “mechanisers” promoting modernization and development of tank and air power in the Red Army, like Marshal Tukhachevsky, who was accused, tortured, and shot in 1937. Meanwhile, the mustached buffoon Budyonny, founder of the Red Army’s horse cavalry and its staunch proponent even after the war had started, nevertheless survived the war, as did short guy Voroshilov, while Marshals Blyukher, and Yegorov were shot, along with Tukhachevsky.

    The first five Marshals of the Soviet Union in November, 1935. (l-r):
    Mikhail Tukhachevsky, Semyon Budyonny, Kliment Voroshilov, Vasily Blyukher, Aleksandr Yegorov.

    Due to its built-in advantages, the Soviet war machine always outproduced its German counterpart during the war so that the Red Army always had more tanks than the Heer, and the VVS more aircraft than the Luftwaffe. The Soviets also had a much larger pool of available manpower, so Stalin had no real problem liquidating anyone who stood in his way, who failed, or who may have been too tall, too popular, or too handsome.

    Even though Stalin was short, standing only about 5’5″, handicapped with a withered hand and crippled arm, and disfigured with rather severe smallpox scars, he was a vain man who did not like being in the company of taller men, and wore lifts in his shoes or boots with high heels to appear taller.

    With Stalin, even being right about the nature of future warfare could be fatal, as Marshal Tukhachevsky was to learn.

    • Thanks: Laurent Guyénot
  294. Saggy says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    . When I think of what a hero you are,

    Well, when you put it that way ……. LOL … you got me !

    And, I think your book is the best …. revelatory ….

    And I didn’t challenge you to explicitly deny the hoax, but I think putting ‘Holocaust’ in quotes would be appropriate? Or avoid the topic. Writing about it without quotes or a disclaimer of some sort, no matter how oblique, is in effect endorsing the hoax. Yes? No?

    I think about Chomsky – I read his book ‘The Fateful Triangle’ years ago, he was the sharpest critic of Israel in the US that I am aware of. And yet when it comes to the hoax …. a vicious supporter.

    I am in the process of losing my teaching job.

    I’m sorry to hear this … if I were local I’d come to a demonstration for you to retain your job.

    But, there are no demonstrations even for Assange in the US…. it seems we’re doomed …

    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
  295. L.K says:
    @Fox

    Well said, Fox.

    I refer to your comment/reply #275.

    Take care.

    • Thanks: Fox
  296. @Saggy

    In the above article, I mentioned the Holocaust only in the phrase “the new Holocaust religion”, and I also mentioned “the Third Reich’s alleged crimes against humanity”. Even this “alleged” adjective could cause me trouble in my situation, but I had to include it. I was hoping this would be good enough for you. So your reaction sounded very unfair. Especially since you complained of the same thing in my other article “A Holocaust of Biblical Proportions” (since I cannot explicitely deny the Holocaust, I showed that, “whatever happened to the Jews, it was because the Zionists needed a holocaust”). Again, I am aware that I am not fighting on the main front, just trying to give a hand on the side. Best.

    • Thanks: mark green, RVBlake
    • Replies: @Tool Book and Rifle
  297. Saggy says:

    If we are talking about rehabilitating Hitler, I think the best avenue is Buchanan’s book – ‘Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War’, but for something quicker try this …. a short clip of a speech by Hitler in which he makes fun of Roosevelt, who had sent him a telegram listing the countries he should not attack ….. and then after watching the clip, read the video description which contains some extraordinary comments by Hitler regarding the machinations of the US and British militaries, and more ….



    Video Link
    xxx

  298. @Laurent Guyénot

    Cher Laurent,

    I also think that Saggy’s comments were unfair, since you live in France where ANY allusion to the Holycost can be twisted by the authorities and interpreted as a “crime”. If Saggy had known this he probably would not have made such a comment.

    Je vous souhaite la meilleure des chances, I wish you the very best of luck for I know just how vicious and criminal the murdering, sadistic psychopaths who rule over us can be.

    All the best,

    OLF (Outil, Livre et Fusil)

  299. @Laurent Guyénot

    Hello, and thanks for your article.

    From my (limited) understanding, anti-slavism was a subject that divided members of the NSDAP.

    There were many issues that members of the NSDAP took different sides on. Christianity was probably the biggest one, not the Slavs. Even how to handle the Jews was was not agreed upon. Alfred Rosenberg had his detractors and his strong supporters. This is something every party leader has to deal with in party politics.

    I don’t know where Ribbentrop indicated he saw no difference between Germans and Slavs. Can you cite it? And lets remember there are lots of different Slavic peoples and they differ among themselves, so “anti-Slavic” is too broad to mean much. Aren’t the Bulgarians Slavic? Hitler worked well with and spoke well of the Bulgarian leader Boris III before and during the war. And no, I wouldn’t call Prussians ‘Western Russians’. Ukrainians were/are Western Russians. Fact is, Hitler worked well with and respected all who worked with him and respected him and his reasonable goals for Germany. Can you disagree with that? If they fought him, disrespected him and Germany’s rights, and treated him as an enemy, then he had to oppose them. This describes the Polish and Czech governments at the time (1930s) and Bolshevik Russia (1917 on) … all Slavs.

    Hitler appointed Rosenberg administrator of the Eastern territories because he thought him qualified for the job. He was born and grew up in the East, and had clearly developed ideas. You say you think Rosenberg mistreated the Russian soldiers and civilians? How so? Was this mistreatment a result of Rosenberg’s policies?

    Citing individual comments from Table Talk, informal after dinner conversation between Hitler & Himmler as recorded by a third party while being listened to by many who comprised the inhabitants of the bunker, are unclear without the context. The passages about “Slavs need only be taught to read and to count till ten,” can be understood as forward thinking for pacifying the Russians and Ukrainians (not all Slavs) they were currently at war with, and preventing nationalist-type movements from forming that would destabilize the areas and put Germans at risk. Everyone does the same in similar situations.
    Your idea that the Russian peasants would turn and fight their fellow Russians (with German-supplied weapons) is naive and completely unfounded in real-life experience.

    Did Hitler’s intention and instruction to colonize and exploit the Russians, rather than liberate them from Bolshevism, cause him to lose popular support and therefore contribute to his defeat in the East? This is my understanding, so far.

    Where are the instructions to colonize and exploit the Russians? Beyond dinner table talk, that is? Using Table Talk as proof of anything except insight into Hitler’s mind is completely unwarranted. It’s done because there’s nothing else to convince people of what they want to convince them of. I guess you accept the White Nationalist idea that if all “White” people becomes a single entity standing together as equals, they will be strong enough to survive. But Europeans have never treated each other as equals, not even within the “Slavic group” or the “Germanic group” or the “Mediterranean group.” That’s because they’re not.

    Adolf Hitler believed in individual excellence, merit, he called Leadership, and that these specially talented individuals served the folk (the people) regardless of which group they came from. That’s why he got along with Polish leader Pilsudski, but not with Jozef Beck. Beck was working with Britain-France-USA against the interests of Germany. The deal with Stalin was that both countries would simultaneously invade Poland but Stalin reneged at the last moment! To Hitler and other NSists, Slavs as a group were not very reliable. To rely on them to immediately become loyal comrades would have been foolish.

    These are some of the reasons I do not think “Hitler’s intention and instruction to colonize and exploit the Russians, rather than liberate them from Bolshevism” (your words) caused him to lose popular support or contributed to his defeat in the East. I think it would have gone even worse if he had depended on them. Can you give any evidence that shows how such a policy would have worked out?
    The Heretics’ Hour: Hitler and the Slavs Part One. Answering accusations that Hitler hated Slavs and his anti-Slav policies caused Germany to lose the war. (https://carolynyeager.net/heretics-hour-hitler-and-slavs)

    • Agree: HeebHunter
  300. @Corvinus

    I might as well level with you. The true reason why I didn’t start a worldwide Pan-Aryan movement and march on Washington is because I’m a 101 years old, in a wheelchair, and I live at the North Pole, right next to Santa. He’s even older than me, so I help him get the groceries and to chop firewood for the wood stove and the fireplace.

    But last week he forgot to wear his mask at the supermarket, so the Mounties immediately rushed a swat team to surround Santa’s house, dearly hoping to wipe him out, along with Mrs. Claus, and finally put an end to Christmas, this racist feudal remnant of White OH-pression.

    But Santa, Mrs. Claus and me rushed out of the house in black face, waving BLM and Antifa signs, shouting “KRISSMUS BE RAY-SISS!!! DOWN WITH KRISSMUS!!!”, while nagila hava played in the background – alternating with ooga-booga rap music – with the flag of Israel flying on the flagpole.

    So the Mounties beat a hasty retreat and, greatly disgruntled, reported the news to Justine-l’androgyne-Trudeau, who beat them with a wet noodle. There you go, now you know why, Corvinus-the-genius.

  301. Thomasina says:
    @Georges G.

    “Overthrowing a regime requires a robust secret organization, foreign support and substantial financial backing. This was true in France in 1789 and in Russia in 1917.”

    I think you hit the nail on the head, Georges, and I agree with you. The peasants in France might have had a protest, a riot, even killed some people, but to overthrow a regime like that, no. That took some help from some people in high places.

    The more you read about history, the more you realize it’s anything, but. The lies, the omissions, the fabrications are simply mind-boggling.

    “…the same causes produce the same effects.” Yes, they do.

    Thanks, Georges.

  302. karel says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Well, read Mein Kampf my friend and you will realize how much in the nineteen twenties was Hitler still an anxious captive of his wiennese days. On page 62 of the Ford edition he stated that
    ”When the Imperial succession gave Archduke Francis Ferdinand more influence, the increase of Czech authority really began to accelerate with his support from above. This future ruler of the Dual Monarchy used every means possible to promote and encourage the removal of the German element, or at least to cover it up. Through the civil servants, purely German towns were slowly but surely pushed into the danger-zone of mixed language. In Lower Austria, this policy progressed even quicker and many Czechs already considered Vienna “their”greatest city.”
    This sounds more like an expression of anxiety about the ascendancy of Czech influence and power in Lower Austria at the expense of the supposedly ”superior’ German speakers, this becoming the dominant force in some regions. Hitler also mused about Habsburgs, whom he hated, by noting that
    ”The family of the new Hapsburg Monarchy spoke only Czech. The Archduke’s lower class wife, a former Czech countess, belonged to a group who held their fear of Germans as a tradition.”

    • Replies: @Seraphim
    , @Hibernian
  303. karel says:
    @HeebHunter

    What is wrong with school text books? Have you never used them? Is everything false what is written in them? The text was quite clear and coherent. if you have something better to offer, please do so. In any case I liked the picture. Did you?

  304. anarchyst says:

    Here is an excerpt from the vile tome “Germany Must Perish” by jew author Theodore N. Kaufman

    Germany has lost its war. She sues for peace. The imperative demands of the victor people that Germany must perish forever makes it obligatory for the leaders to select mass sterilization of the Germans as the best means of wiping them out permanently. They proceed to:

    [MORE]

    1. Immediately and completely disarm the German army and have all armaments removed from German territory.

    2. Place all German utility and heavy industrial plants under heavy guard, and replace German workers by those of Allied nationality.

    3. Segregate the German army into groups, concentrate them in severely restricted areas, and summarily sterilize them.

    4. Organize the civilian population, both male and female, within territorial sectors, and effect their sterilization.

    5. Divide the German army (after its sterilization has been completed) into labor battalions, and allocate their services toward the rebuilding of those cities which they ruined.

    6. Partition Germany and apportion its lands. The accompanying map gives some idea of possible land adjustments which might be made in connection with Germany’s extinction.

    7. Restrict all German civilian travel beyond established borders until all sterilization has been completed.

    8. Compel the German population of the apportioned territories to learn the language of its area, and within one year to cease the publication of all books, newspapers and notices in the German language, as well as to restrict German-language broadcasts and discontinue the maintenance of German-language schools.

    9. Make one exception to an otherwise severely strict enforcement of total sterilization, by exempting from such treatment only those Germans whose relatives, being citizens of various victor nations, assume financial responsibility for their emigration and maintenance and moral responsibility for their actions.

    Thus, into an oblivion which she would have visited upon the world, exits Germany.

    And then jews wonder why they were and still are hated…

    • Replies: @Robjil
  305. Seraphim says:
    @karel

    The great majority of the know- it- all about Hitler never read ‘Mein Kampf’. And they don’t have a clue about the realities of Central and South-East Europe.

    • Replies: @karel
  306. Corvinus says:
    @Tool Book and Rifle

    “Why not YOU, Corvinus?”

    YOU, not I, are complaining about how white nations are allegedly being overrun by orcs.

    “I might as well level with you…”

    So now you make a mockery of your position. Why would you purposely expose yourself as a clownish fraud is beyond me.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  307. incitatus says:
    @Jack McArthur

    “How about these zingers from the Talmud”

    No question there’s enough self-interested hate hiding in religious dogma.

    Haven’t read the Talmud. Don’t doubt it espouses all that’s right, can do no wrong (including murdering Canaanites) for the faithful. Most religions seem, one time or other, to do the same.

    Jews were a minor people (a ‘footnote’) in the Ancient World with little/no intercourse with Egyptians, Phoenicians, Hittites, Babylonians, Minoans, Dorians, Mycenaeans, Trojans, Hellenes, Persians, Etruscans, Romans, Celts – the wellspring of Western ethos. Before Constantine converted to Christianity (312 CE) did any care about Jews? The few that did (then and after) probably wanted them dead as ‘Christ killers’.

    Yet Christ was a Jew, so if you’re a Christian (as am I), you should care. Not necessarily about the history. More about his teachings. Which say one should consider each according to his acts. Like any else, there are many that merit approbation.

    Fast forward to the papally endorsed Croisade des Albigeois 1209-1229 in southern France, bloodletting and territorial conquest excused by RC dogma. Opened by the sack of Béziers 22 Jul 1209. When asked how to distinguish between Catholics and Cathars residents papal-legate Arnaud-Amalric instructed:

    “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius” [“Kill them. For the Lord knows who are His.”]. 20,000 are estimated to have been killed. Arnaud-Amalric moved on comfortably to become archbishop of Narbonne in 1212.

    • Replies: @Jack McArthur
    , @geokat62
  308. Robjil says:
    @anarchyst

    Voltaire noticed this barbaric aspect of Judaism way back in the 1700s. People of Jewish culture at the top of heap of humanity for the past hundred years have been a true nightmare for this planet. Jewish culture has no compassion for others outside its tribe. Here is quote in which Voltaire notes that Jewish culture never forgives when it is victorious. It is a culture with no sense of compassion for others outside its tribe. Kaufman’s thinking is an example of Jewish thinking at its most cruel. A culture this cruel should never be at the top levels of humanity. This cruel way of thinking is destroying our planet faster than any “climate change”.

    “If these Ismaélites (Arabs) resembled to the Jews by the enthusiasm and the thirst for plundering, they were prodigiously higher by courage, by the nobility of soul, by the magnanimity: their history, or true or fabulous, before Mahomet, is filled of examples of friendship, such as Greece invented some in the fables of Pilade and Oreste, of Thésée and Pirithous. The history of Barmécides is only one continuation of amazing generosities which raise the heart. These features characterize a nation. We do not see on the contrary, in all annals of the Hebrew people, no generous action. They do not know nor hospitality, nor liberality, nor leniency. Their sovereign happiness is to exert wear with the foreigners; and this spirit of wear, principle of any cowardice, is so natural in their hearts, that it is the continual object of the figures that they employ in the species of eloquence which is proper for them. Their glory is to put at fire and blood the small villages they can seize. They cut the throat of the old men and the children; they hold only the girls nubiles; they assassinate their Masters when they are slaves; they can never forgive when they are victorious: they are enemy of the human mankind. No courtesy, no science, no art improved in any time, in this atrocious nation. —Voltaire, Essai sur les mœurs (1756) Tome 2, page 83

  309. ivan says:
    @ploni almoni

    They were well received at first as liberators from the yoke of Communism. But soon enough the Germans mucked it up through their own special brand of eugenic racism.

  310. ivan says:
    @Thomasina

    They didn’t get badly screwed compared to others. WWI was fought outside of Germany, Germany proper was hardly touched. When the Allies were ready to deliver the punishment in 1918, the German Army sued for peace and then made up the legend of a Dochluss. The Allies did not make the same mistake again in WWII.

    • Replies: @anon
  311. incitatus says:
    @ploni almoni

    “As you say, they [‘Mein Kampf’ Jew rants] are, indeed, zingers.”

    LOL! At last we agree on something!

    Stay well ploni almoni!

  312. incitatus says:
    @ploni almoni

    “Our orders were to occupy one cottage per crew, and to throw the peasants out. When we entered “ours”, a woman and her three young children were sitting around the table by the window, obviously having just finished a meal. She was clearly frightened of us, and I could see her hands were shaking, while the kids stayed in their seats and looked at us with large, non-understanding eyes. Our Sergeant came straight to the point: “Raus [Out!]” and pointed to the door. When the mother started to remonstrate and her children to cry, he repeated “Raus!”, opened the door and waved his hand towards the outside in a manner which could not be mistaken anywhere…Outside it was bitterly cold…I watched them through the small window standing by their bundles in the snow, looking helplessly in all directions, not knowing what to do…When I looked back a little later, they were gone; I did not want to think about it anymore.”
    –Soldat Henry Metelmann, Army Group Center, Dec 1941 [Stahel ‘Retreat from Moscow’ p.89-90];

    Army Group Center recorded -29°C (-20.2°F) 7 December 1941. Denying shelter in those conditions was a death sentence, as Metelmann admits. Perhaps that had something to do with Russian disaffection with German ‘saviors’?

    • Agree: Laurent Guyénot
    • Replies: @E_Perez
  313. Hibernian says:
    @karel

    There’s maybe a wee bit of irony in Hitler referring to a countess as lower class.

    • Replies: @Fox
    , @karel
  314. Fox says:
    @Hibernian

    He did in all likelihood speak of the “niedere Adel”, i.e., nobility of lower rank, such as barrons and counts. In contrast to this is the “Hochadel” – “high nobility”, king, duke,duke elector. I don’t know what the exact difference is, where the separation is made, but there is per se nothing denigrating, dismissive, mocking or disapproving about using the term “niederer Adel:, i.e., “lower rank nobility”.
    You must not forget that when you read “lower class” that it is a translation from German with, perhaps an intention to construe a certain cast of what has been written, rather than striving for accurate translation.

  315. New book details how Russian peasants preferred German rule. How does this jibe with comments made in this thread that the “Nazis” had a hateful, racist policy toward the Russian people.

    Øystein Rygg Haanæs – University of Oslo (Norway)
    https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/research/news-and-events/news/2018/many-russians-hoped-that-hitler-would-free-them-fr.html
    … Ethnic Russians were much less loyal to the Soviet regime in their encounters with the German occupiers than historians have believed up to now. This is the story told by UiO [University of Oslo] researcher Johannes Due Enstad, who has recently published a book about the German occupation of Northwest Russia during World War 2 … According to Enstad, this German agricultural policy was the main reason why the positive attitude to the occupants lasted as long as it did … “Many sources interviewed after the war tell us that, in a material sense too, they were better off during the German occupation than during the years after the Germans were chased into retreat,” says Enstad. Another reason for the relative popularity of the occupiers was their policy on religion … Many priests openly supported the occupants and prayed for a German victory in their sermons. 

    Johannes Due Enstad – University of Oslo (Norway)
    https://warontherocks.com/2018/08/fragile-loyalties-soviet-russians-between-hitler-and-stalin/
    … My book is the first (in English) to focus on the occupation experience of a mostly rural Russian population … Many in northwest Russia despised the Bolshevik regime for reasons grounded in their own personal experience, as even Soviet authorities had to admit. Another reason many Russians were ready to support or tolerate the German occupation regime has to do with German agricultural policy … German authorities in northwest Russia allowed de-collectivization to go ahead, later institutionalizing it by decreeing a “New Agrarian Order” in spring 1942. Peasants naturally welcomed de-collectivization. In some places, tears of joy and “spontaneous cheers for the Führer” were observed … People in the countryside “began to live a life both freer and more affluent than under Soviet power.” 

  316. E_Perez says:
    @incitatus

    Outside it was bitterly cold…

    Oh, yeah, it was bittercold in Russia!

    Fortunately, when the Allies dropped their firebombs on Dresden, it was very warm inside the buildings,
    City officials recodred 80°-110° C, 14 February 1945

    Nobody was obliged go get out and no inhuman allied soldier shouted “out!” .

    Want some pages of testimonies, to make your eyes wet, Mr. incitatus?

    So I suppose you want us to believe that – during WWII – there was a war going on.

  317. @incitatus

    I was given the impression Jews were picked upon basically through being so called “Christ killers” but found out the roots of being the “Haters of Mankind” long predate Christianity and even pure monotheism.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephantine_papyri#Jewish_temple_at_Elephantine

    I agree that teachings are very important hence the passages from the Talmud which seem to in part explain Jewish behaviour and mindset. Historical context is important in the development of religion hence the quotations from Ancient Egyptian texts. To me they are far more advanced than the Jewish texts quoted even though they are very much older.

    Jesus being a Jew? Depends how Jew is defined but I see him as being a lover and not a hater of mankind like the modern Talmudic Jews but then again they only reflect their ancestral spirit and teachings. I see no good reason to doubt what Jesus taught about them. This is not blind dogmatic clinging to revealed texts but simply matching the description given with the deeds.

    If somebody truly believes that persons other than Jews are only beasts fit for being used and abused then they have judged themself.

    • Replies: @incitatus
  318. I now see that the quotations from the Talmud are claimed to be based on a book “The Talmud Unmasked” which some Jews say is unreliable with the standard “anti-Semitic” appellation.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Talmud_Unmasked

    If somebody can point me to a reliable non Jewish source which debunks the claims I would of course retract.

  319. Fox says:
    @JackOH

    To put Hitler in an historical context is an absolutely necessary step for a return of the world to a sane state. I d agree with you on that. The word which is correct for this necessary step is to “undemonize”, not “rehabilitate”. The latter implies the establishments insane stance that Hitler was evil, irrational, a criminal, a raving lunatic out for world-conquest, a raging fanatic against all but the white race, the “white supremacist” par excellance, and therefore the absolute negative, the anti-Jesus, anti-good, anti-democrat, etc.
    As long as all channels on TV, all films in the officially sanctioned range of “respectable”, all pastors and assorted high moralizers, all school books and curricula, etc. will demonize Hitler, it will be difficult to undo that baleful influence. A balanced and intellectually respectable contribution to a meaningful, i.e., non-hysterical and not panic-driven exposition in English is, e.g., the book by A.J.P.Taylor, The Second World War, and Irving’s books about Churchill and Hitler give likewise a picture of the time and the people involved that is devoid of the shrill crying of a market hawker for the wares he wants to sell. The hawker at the country fair is an apt comparison for the anti-Hitler pro-Allies literature that is pushed with a huge, shrill, steamroller-like propaganda machine, while Taylor or Irving or other people like that may easily find themselves behind bars for their findings and summaries of what they see in all the information they have gathered and combined.
    So, while in rough outlines I agree with you, the notion of rehabilitation must be replaced by the notion of undemonization.
    It would strike the sword from the hands of the people who are bent on overthrowing any normal organisation of human affairs. If the Hitler card is not a trump card anymore to generate outrage, money, suppressive laws and destructive school curricula, then the power of the subversive force – call it with whatever name you like- will be broken, because this power rests on an opposition rather tha a positive goal, destruction, rather than creation.

  320. @Anon

    Yeah, Anon why this animosity toward Germany in England and the US?

    I think it is because the German or at least the historical German knows the Jew as an alien to be treated accordingly whereas the Anglo feels the Jew to be a kind of Kin and hates anyone who collars his brother.

    We spend a lot of time asking the J Question but we should spend time also asking the A Question or why is it that Angloes are so perversely attracted to Jews? Without the Angloes, the Jews would never have taken down National Socialism and the Angloes paid for that take down with many lives and much lucre. Why? I think our semiwise author Guyenot gets at it when he talks about the British 17th century Puritan’s affinity for Jews. I think the American Puritans were similar. I think that when these people read the Bible – the Old Testament – they identified as Jews and kind of relapsed from Christianity into a sort of Hebrewism 2.0. They became spiritual allies of the Jews, were and still are very enamored of the Jews. Of course the Jews being Jews , they thought the Angloes were just useful idiots and then they eventually took over the English nation state and America’s. But I think this unrequited love of Angloes for Jews still goes on and might even explain the unwillingness of certain of our contemporary Anglo “race realists” to NAME the Jew

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  321. @Jack McArthur

    Here is web link to an article in a Jesuit journal written by a Rabbi which references problem passages in the Talmund. Note the scathing apparent rebuttals in the comment section.

    https://www.americamagazine.org/issue/657/article/jewish-views-other-faiths

    “Maimonides’ elucidation of those that the rabbis deem unfit for true worship of God: “Some of the Turks and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does.” Interestingly this racist outrage is sanitized in the Friedlander translation”.

  322. @Carolyn Yeager

    But near Novgorod in that same NW Russia :

    “…A mass grave with the remains of more than two and a half thousand civilians was earlier found in the Novgorod region. Among them there were many women and children. The women were shot, but the babies were finished off with rifle butts, even bullets were not wasted. All documents were submitted to the Investigative Committee, which opened a criminal case under the article “genocide” against 19 natives of Latvia…”

    Source : Russia to publish declassified documents on Nazi crimes, Russkiy Mir Foundation, 28.02.2020

    As for the Nazis caring about food for the Russians, ever heard about the Hunger Plan?

    “…The Hunger Plan (German: der Hungerplan; der Backe-Plan) was a plan developed by Nazi bureaucrats during World War II to seize food from the Soviet Union and give it to German soldiers and civilians. The plan entailed the death by starvation of millions of Slavs following Operation Barbarossa, the 1941 invasion of the Soviet Union (see Generalplan Ost). The premise behind the Hunger Plan was that Germany was not self-sufficient in food supplies; to sustain the war and keep up the domestic morale it needed to obtain the food from conquered lands at any cost. It was an engineered famine, planned and implemented as an act of policy. This plan was developed before the Wehrmacht (German armed forces) invasion and provided for diverting of the Ukrainian food stuffs away from central and northern Russia and redirecting them for the benefit of the invading army and the population in Germany. The plan resulted in the deaths of millions of people.[1] The plan as a means of mass murder was outlined in several documents, including one that became known as Göring’s Green Folder, which quoted a number of “20 to 30 million” expected Russian deaths from “military actions and crises of food supply”.

    Source : Wikipedia, Hunger Plan.

    Add to this Hitler’s plan to completely destroy Leningrad, Moscow and Stalingrad (with their inhabitants), one wonders why those Slavic untermenschen still don’t appreciate Hitler’s attempt at “liberating them from Bolshevism”.

    • Replies: @Fox
  323. @E_Perez

    That is a tu quoque argument (look that up).
    The crimes of the Allies don’t negate or morally cancel the crimes of the Nazis in east Europe.

  324. @Carolyn Yeager

    And then there is this :

    “…The Koriukivka massacre was a mass murder of 6,700 residents[1][2] of Koriukivka (then a village) in Ukraine on 1–2 March 1943 by the SS forces of Nazi Germany. 1,290 houses in Koriukivka were burned down and only ten brick buildings and a church survived.[3] The residents of neighboring localities were intimidated and refused to help the Koriukivka residents.[3] On 9 March, the Germans returned to Koriukivka and burned alive some elderly people who had returned to the village after escaping thinking it was safe.[4]

    According to forensic evidence, the deaths were brought on particularly by shootings from assault rifles, heavy machine guns, blows with blunt objects and burning. Some people were burned alive.[5] The mass murder was committed as a retribution for Soviet partisan activities headed by Oleksiy Fedorov.[2] Koriukivka was freed by Soviet troops on 19 March 1943. A report on the number of victims and inflicted damage was compiled in the same year. The Koriukivka massacre became the largest German punitive operation against civilians in World War II .[5]

    Source: Wikipedia, Koriukivka massacre.

    • Replies: @E_Perez
  325. karel says:
    @Seraphim

    Absolutely right what you say. People who have problems understanding simple English texts feel like experts on history of countries “about which we know little” as Neville Chamberlain famously stated. At least Chamberlain was honest, unlike the pretentious morons ventilating here their foolish opinions. Actually, not even their own opinions but rather snippets of nonsense they picked somewhere on way and internalized them to such a degree to make them believe that these are products of their own deep thoughts. Nowadays everyone is an expert on everything. An acquaintance of mine, who tried to supply me with his latest opinions on covid 19, felt deeply offended when I told him that soon we might have more experts than those infected.

  326. karel says:
    @Hibernian

    Yes, but perhaps he was not ironical at all, but considered it as a matter of fact or even expressed an admiration that Chotková made such a great advancement in life. Hitler, like Mussolini, who spent many years living like a vagabond and worked as an occasional unskilled labourer, considered himself as a low class individual. This he mentioned several times in Mein Kampf. It is clearer in the original version. Ford translation is not very precise and one cannot avoid the impression that Ford tried to make Hitler more noble than he actually was. Mussolini tells of similar experiences, who unlike the lounge lizard Lenin, had to slave on building sites in Zurich.

  327. geokat62 says:
    @incitatus

    Yet Christ was a Jew, so if you’re a Christian (as am I)

    Wait… you’ve just admitted you’re a xian and, based on previous comments, you also support the Jewish state… doesn’t that make you a xian Zionist, Incy?

    Well, that explains everything!

    • Replies: @incitatus
  328. @Agathoklis

    ‘You think that these attributes were characteristic of Hitler and Nazi Germany? Absolutely hilarious. The Nazi bureaucracy was a shambles – it could take months for laws to be passed because they required the approval of the Fuhrer who would spend months avoiding concentrating on simple administrative detail. In addition, even his most ardent admirers within the regime would admit he was anything but punctual.’

    And?

    What can one then say of its opponents, who, with literally ten times the manpower and resources, were barely able to stave off its assault and only crushed it after massive effort and sacrifice?

    It’s fashionable to denigrate National Socialism; it avoids considering the horrible possibility that it offered something the alternatives didn’t and don’t. But whatever its failings, it appears to be the case that National Socialism released a far greater proportion of national energy and enthusiasm than any of its rivals.

    Churchill once said that democracy was the worst possible system — except for all the others. Perhaps one could say the much the same for National Socialism. It was the worst possible way of mobilizing a nation for struggle — except for all the others.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @karel
  329. @Jack McArthur

    May I recommand that you read my book “Our God is your god too…” or read my earliers Unz Review articles: I think I have demonstrated that Jewish hatred for humankind is not grounded in the Talmud, but in the Hebrew Bible, something that Christians are unable to see, for their own misfortune. The spirit of the Talmud is the spirit of the Bible.

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @Robjil
  330. @Carolyn Yeager

    Thanks. I guess this is a case of looking at the glass half-full or half-empty. That one million Russians (mostly prisonners of war, though) fought under German uniforms under Vlasov (to liberate Russia from bolshevism) is certainly impressive. Could the Germans have done better at rallying popular support? It is difficult to say; Soviets commissars and partisans were also very active in retaliating against “collaborators”. Flanklin Ryckaert makes some good points.
    Regarding Hitler’s attitude to Slavs, I think he repeated several times, in MK and in speeches, that he considers that Russians cannot rule themselves. They were ruled by Germans (the Romanov), then by Jews (Bolsheviks), and they will be ruled by Germans again. But on the other end, I’m very sure he considered that German rule would be a liberation for them–and it would have been.
    Interesting debate anyway.

    • Replies: @karel
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  331. Vojkan says:
    @Sparkon

    With regards to Nazi Germany, I’d say that some people’s sickness of Jewish deceit, brazen immorality, nepotism and greed is clouding their judgment.
    With regards to Japan attacking the USA first, things aren’t as clear cut:

    https://mises.org/library/how-us-economic-warfare-provoked-japans-attack-pearl-harbor

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  332. Robjil says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Jewish rule is Not-see. One can’t see it. It is anti-Semitic to see it. Many Christians do not see it or want to see it because of the Old Testament.

    Yet, Jewish rulers want us to Over-see Jews as the greatest victims ever in history.

    Jewish rule by Over-see victim propaganda.

    The word 0versee also means to watch over slaves or workers. Over-see Jewish propaganda is all about this. Make us silent slaves or workers for our Jewish rulers.

    “Media lies matter” is how Jewish rule works. 90 percent of the world’s media is under Jewish or Zionist control. It is filtered “news”. Only things that promote the Over-see Jewish propaganda for Jewish history is “allowed” to be heard.

    A true freedom of the press would end Jewish rule in one second.

  333. E_Perez says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    That is a tu quoque argument, Mr. Ryckaert (look that up).
    The crimes of the Germans don’t negate or morally cancel the crimes of the Sowjets in east Europe.

    I understand:

    We must endure pagelong descriptions of German war crimes by highly objective sources as Wikipedia, but have to shut up when it comes to Allied warcrimes, since this woud be “tu quoque”.

    You couldn’t illustrate better the necessity of Mr. Durocher’s article.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Thanks: L.K
  334. The reason Marxism gets a pass in academia where Nazism does not is simple enough: it is very easy to find Marxists who condemn the likes of Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot for their crimes against humanity. For comparison, how often do you find a Nazi who objects to Hitler’s crimes? When you provoke a Nazi, they will find an excuse for almost every evil thing that Adolf did. The Jews made him do it, the Allies made him do it, he wasn’t strong enough to fight Stalin so he had to *help* him, someone threatened to stop giving him money… excuses. He was dictator! If he didn’t approve of the genocide, he could have given the officers responsible for organizing the extermination camps the same reward for their service that Rommel got.

    The reason Marxism gets a pass in popular culture where Nazism does not is also simple enough. The average Marxist activist is an overly verbose college-educated type who might cause narcolepsy if you listen to them too long. with a notable subset who break things when they think breaking things hurts fascism. The average Nazi activist is a violent criminal, with a notable subset who kill people when they think the we won’t let them start building ovens.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  335. karel says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    I cannot find in MK anything related to your statement that ”that Russians cannot rule themselves.” But perhaps you have a different copy of MK and will ferret the statement out. Hitler never referred to Russians as people but only as bolsheviks, implying that they were Jews. There were almost no Russians in Wien in his days making it somewhat unlikely that he knew any of them personally. One of his best friends was the music composer August Friedrich Kubizek born in Linz of Czech parents. Linz had very large Czech minority, if one can call it that way . Hence, Hitlers antipathy towards Czechs was more of his crazy leaning towards German nationalism than a problem of race whatever his thoughts on the subject were..

    In fact, Hitler rather admired Russia and was envious of it as he complained that

    ”The vast Empire kept giving the Czar new soldiers and fed the war its new victims. How long could Germany last in this race? ”

    Hitler was very sad about the low reproduction rate of Germans but was not quite certain what to do about it.

  336. geokat62 says:
    @Blue Lives Matter

    The reason Marxism gets a pass…

    Do us a favour, blm, and tell us how many innocent souls were sacrificed in the name of Marxism versus Nazism?

    • Replies: @Blue Lives Matter
  337. Wade says:
    @Durruti

    The only thing I would add to this is that National Socialism of the kind the Nazi’s were practicing probably wouldn’t have worked great in the long run. Hitler’s main achievement was in his strength to rid Germany of the bankers who were suffocating it, and as the rumors I’ve heard suggest, to make Germany independent of the international banking cartel that has taken over the world these days.

    My impression, especially after ready Larry Romanoff’s essay on this site regarding the industrial scale theft of intellectual property that the USA did after the way, is that Germany’s economic miracle during the 30’s was likely not due directly to the economic management of National Socialism per se, but in the fact that the National Socialists kicked out the old managers of the system. The Germans’ natural talent took over from there.

    Had Hitler won the war, I believe that in the long run he would’ve had to loosen the reigns over his economy and allowed markets and competition to flourish minus any German equivalent of the US Federal Reserve.

  338. Sparkon says:
    @Vojkan

    Yes, I have written on many occasions that FDR provoked Japan into its attack on Pearl Harbor. The McCollum Memo was prepared in October 1940, and in early 1941, FDR articulated that it was U.S. policy for Japan to strike the first blow.

    Stalin and Roosevelt played the same game, which was to lure the weaker foe into making a foolish attack. They were fellow travelers likely reading from the same playbook authored by Jewish hands, and that’s why both leaders resolutely ignored or dismissed all the many warnings both received from many sources about an impending attack.

    https://www.unz.com/proberts/does-western-civilization-have-a-future-or-is-it-already-in-its-grave/#comment-4141128

    Some of FDR’s actions against the Japanese may have been grounds for war, such as the formation of the famous Flying Tigers in China, and his so-called “pop-up cruises”:

    From March through July 1941, Stinnett writes, White House records show that FDR flouted international law and dispatched naval task groups into Japanese waters on three such cruises. One of the most provocative was a sortie into the Bungo Strait, southeast of Honshu, the principal access to Japan’s Inland Sea.

    No shots were fired or lives lost during the cruises. It would take all eight of McCollum’s proposals to accomplish that. After the eighth provocation, Japan responded. On November 27-28, 1941, American military commanders received the order: “The United States desires that Japan commit the first overt act.” According to Secretary Stimson, that order came directly from Roosevelt.

    https://mises.org/library/how-us-economic-warfare-provoked-japans-attack-pearl-harbor

  339. Wade says:
    @Peripatetic Itch

    Check out this document:

    https://archive.org/stream/NorbertMasurMyMeetingWithHeinrichHimmler/Norbert%20Masur%20My%20Meeting%20with%20Heinrich%20Himmler#page/n13/mode/2up

    I don’t know the full context under which the interview took place, but it is a Jewish guy interviewing Himmler.

    In it, Himmler categorically states that they never had any intention of invading Russia but that they were forced to after discovering that Stalin had 20,000 tanks on the verge of invasion.

    It turns out that Himmler wasn’t lying. He also makes several other extraordinary claims regarding how he willingly turned over the camps to the US without a fight.

    The interviewer just concludes that he’s a cold-blooded liar.

  340. TGD says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Guyenot:

    2) Stalin received massive armement (sic) from the US. Without it, he was done.

    The Soviet Union produced the majority of its armaments. The USA supplied them with a high quality food product that gave them the strength and energy to take on and defeat the Nazis. The USA also supplied the Soviets with about 200,000 Studebaker trucks for field supply and on which were mounted katyusha rockets. The Nazis relied on horse power for resupply.

    The USA also supplied the Soviets with certain metal strengtheners and electronic systems for communications and enemy detection.

    • Replies: @Fox
    , @Laurent Guyénot
  341. Wade says:
    @Ron Unz

    Speaking of funny satirical cartoons, have you every seen White Rabbit Radio’s “Anti-Racist Hitler” cartoon?



    Video Link
    I’m quite sure that didn’t survive on YouTube longer than 5 minutes.

    • Replies: @E_Perez
  342. @Laurent Guyénot

    I am disappointed that you reply to my last comment 328 rather than to the one directed specifically to you wherein I answered questions you posed and asked a few of you in return. Such as:

    I don’t know where Ribbentrop indicated he saw no difference between Germans and Slavs. Can you cite it?
    and
    You say you think Rosenberg mistreated the Russian soldiers and civilians? How so? Was this mistreatment a result of Rosenberg’s policies?
    and
    Can you give any evidence that shows how such a policy (of recruiting Russians to fight on the German side against the Red Army) would have worked out (well)?

    My point is that I think you are going too much by hearsay and are only comfortable with taking baby steps for now. I used the word naive for you, but I think it stems from not being fully in command of the information. You make the mistake above of saying Hitler’s statements that “Russians cannot rule themselves” are in MK or speeches, when it is from Table Talk. Huge difference between the two because MK was written in 1923 and the Table Talks took place in 1941-43 when Germany was in ‘total war’ in the Soviet Union. Everything quoted from AH needs to be in context, including the when and where, under what condition.

    I’d like to add that if we had informal conversations by Churchill, Roosevelt, Stalin, etc with their close associates like we have TT, we can be sure they would be more shocking than anything Hitler said. Richard Nixon’s Oval Office tape recordings from Watergate Era are a case in point.

    Flanklin Ryckaert makes some good points.

    What points? The same dishonest Jew-controlled Wikipedia pages he has trotted out upteenth times before? He can’t even make his own argument anymore, just pastes sections from Wiki that try to blacken the NS regime. There is no “debate” here, only long-held opinions expressed again and again. In “debate” one has to actually present something convincing. or you’ve lost the debate. What was convincing to you in what Ryckaert posted?

    I also question what you actually know about the “one million Russians (mostly prisonners of war, though) fought under German uniforms under Vlasov” that you call’ impressive.’ That didn’t work out so well. https://carolynyeager.net/goebbels-vlasov-irving-question-part-2

    • Agree: L.K
    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
  343. Fox says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    You really, r e a l l y love the “untermenschen” topos, along with the “lebensraum”. And forever and ever you are sitting on the fence, ready to make a decision when circumstances allow to make one.

  344. Fox says:
    @TGD

    You must be consistent and call the Reds “Commies”, as the proper counter to the “Nazis”. In this vein, “Demmies” or “Demies” or “Dummies” would be a possibility for the faction with the moniker “Democrats” to swing along in harmony with the same rhyme sound.

  345. I didn’t write a paragraph about Hitler’s anti-Slavism, not even a sentence, just a couple words, in passing, and it was actually meant as a kind of joke, since most people would expect that Hitler should be criticized primarily for being anti-Jewish. I don’t pretend to master this issue at all, and I don’t even pretend to be a specialist of WWII, Hitler, etc. I’m a relative newcomer to this field of revisionism. So you are right to “question what (I) actually know” about things I didn’t write about in my article. If I had written an article on Hitler’s attitude to Slavs, I would have spent a few months researching the topic. So yes, what I write in my commentaries, for the sake of debate and out of respect for my readers, from whom I learn a lot (sometimes), is not to be taken a informed statements. So: I may be wrong about Ribbentrop (probably confuse him with someone else on that point, Jodl perhaps). And I don’t quite get the point of your other questions, but take “I don’t know” as an answer. I am happy to have found a specialist of the question of Hitler’s attitude to Slavs, and believe you are right about me confusing my source on Hitler’s remark that Russians cannot rule themselves. Your remark on the little value of table talk is a good point. If I ever decide to master it, I will start with your link (but I wish you had a written article about it, with footnotes and references, rather than a 2 hour audio). But I did also learn a couple things from Ryckaert, e.g. the Koriukivka massacre.
    As a matter of fact, I would be more than happy to be convinced by your viewpoint, but at this stage, I am not, and it remains an open question. I believe that Hitler’s attitude to Slavs, and Russians in particular, was at the best ambiguous. It would help if you could produce one quotation by Hitler (not from talble talk, understood) to the effect that he intended to liberate the Russians from Stalin and give them back sovereignty. Or did the Germans prepare leaflets in Russians with such declarations? Apart from this point (two words in my article), is there something else that you want to contradict? Sorry again for disapointing you. I do my best. Your comment 355 is also a disapointment.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  346. @Carolyn Yeager

    I will read your article on “The Goebbels-Vlasov-Irving Question” right away.
    And by the way, I had greatly appreciated your article “Some Answers to the Mystery of the “Missing Jews”” and I am looking forward to more of this quality.

    • Replies: @karel
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  347. karel says:
    @Colin Wright

    Colin you will never stop educating us, Probably, till death do are part. Well the statement of Churchill you so slavishly quote i.e.

    ”Churchill once said that democracy was the worst possible system — except for all the others.”

    is to fool the fools as it actually means that ”democracy” is best as all other systems are worse.

    As a proper Nazi-socialist lackey you could not resist adding your own Churchillian permutation

    ”Perhaps one could say the much the same for National Socialism. It was the worst possible way of mobilizing a nation for struggle — except for all the others.”

    How very true Colin, but no so great for those who did not survive the mobilization.

  348. anarchyst says:

    Monika Schaefer, Sylvia Stolz, Ursula Haverbeck are three women who have been incarcerated for questioning aspects of the so-called jewish “holocaust”.
    You see, the jewish “holocaust” has been turned into a “religion, in which no investigation or dissension is permitted, “under penalty of law” in many countries.
    The “kangaroo courts” that prosecute those who dare to seek TRUTH about this event utilize a concept called “judicial notice”. For those who are uninformed about this practice, “judicial notice” disallows any evidence that goes against the “commonly accepted beliefs”, EVEN IF THE “COMMONLY ACCEPTED BELIEFS” CAN BE PROVEN TO BE FALSE.
    Judicial notice is a dangerous concept, as it is quite often used to make sure that the courts get a conviction. If a defendant cannot introduce evidence on his own behalf, true “justice” is impossible.
    The jewish “holocaust ™” is burning itself out, as more and more people are realizing that it is truly the biggest “hoax of the 20th century”.
    Censorship and incarceration for independent “thought” is the last grasp for the holohoax crowd. They don’t want to see their “cash cow” end.
    The holocaust promoters are at it again, claiming that memories of the “holocaust” can be transferred to children, grandchildren, and even unrelated individuals (jews only).
    They want to keep the reparations racket going. What better way than to declare that the descendants of “holocaust” victims are “holocaust” victims as well?
    It has been shown that approximately 40% of all jews suffer from some degree of schizophrenia due to rampant inbreeding and from “male genital mutilation” where the “mohel” fellates the infant, passing whatever STDs the “mohel” possesses….put such people in power, and you have the situation that we live under today.
    Criminalizing TRUTH is the last vestige of those who cling on to a dying falsehood.

  349. anon[309] • Disclaimer says:
    @ivan

    Germany proper was hardly touched.

    Wrong.
    In “Germany proper,” civilians were deliberately targeted: even Jewish sources concede that 800,000 German civilians were starved to death.

    That’s not nothing.

    • Replies: @ivan
  350. @TGD

    Are you sure? This is not what I read. I’ll have to check, but the list I found of what Roosevelt shipped to Stalin is:
    Trucks : 427,284
    Tanks and Combat Vehicles : 13,303
    Aircraft : 11,000
    Bombers : 3,000
    Anti-Aircraft Cannons : 8,000
    Motorcycles : 35,170
    Ordnance Service Vehicles : 2,328
    Radar Systems : 400
    Petroleum Products (gasoline and oil) : 2,670,371 tons
    Explosives : 300,000 tons
    Field Radios : 40,000
    Foodstuffs (canned meats, sugar, flour, salt, etc.) : 4,478,116 tons
    Locomotives & Railway cars : 13,000.
    Tommy Guns (fully automatic machine guns) : 135,000
    Metal Cutting Machine Tools : 400,000

    • Replies: @karel
    , @Sparkon
  351. TGD says:

    Monsieur Guyénot, je reconnais mon erreur.

    • Replies: @karel
  352. @Anon

    The American people do not harbor any “fanatical hatred” of Germans, (or Russians, or Japanese, or Chinese, or Mexicans etc.. for that matter)

    German people made up the largest immigrant group to the US, with the Irish being second.

    Maybe you’re mistakenly equating the garbage that flows from the diseased mind of the Jew/Hollyweird elite with that of a majority of Americans. It’s a very common problem.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @Poco
  353. Dr. Charles Fhandrich [AKA "Dr.C. Fhandrich"] says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    Very interesting reply.

  354. @Laurent Guyénot

    Fair enough. I accept your sense of unfairness. Much about the anti-Slavism has come from certain commenters here who, you may not be aware, specialize in bashing the “Nazis” for planning to enslave and genocide the Slavs, based on a few statements they repeat without context.

    But that you should be surprised that Hitler’s attitude toward Slavs, and Russians in particular, was ambiguous? Why wouldn’t it be? My God. What was the Russian attitude toward Germans, and Hitler in particular? How about “take, take, take.” The Poles and Czechs managed to grab German land (and population) from Germany’s “defeat” in the Great War, then proceeded to mistreat and even steal from these Germans under their control. The Weimar govt. complained but nothing was done by the League of Nations or any of the victor nations. Not until Hitler’s successes in Germany (1936-7) did they start to pay attention. This certainly did not create any warm feelings or trust toward any of these nations.

    Why, in heaven’s name, should it have been Hitler’s responsibility “to liberate the Russians from Stalin and give them back sovereignty.” Who was going to guarantee that sovereignty after it was achieved? The pro-Slavics want to project the idea that Slavs are a harmless, friendly people who just want to live and let live. They also project that Germans have “held down Poles and Czechs” and that they live on Slavic land, and that some famous German geniuses were actually Polish. This brings to mind the Negro’s “Wakanda” and “Kangs” and the 1619 Project in the USA. In all these ways, they have not been good neighbors. (Read Else Loeser’s paper here: https://www.cwporter.com/loeser2.htm)

    I don’t think Hitler, et al ever announced their goal was to liberate the Russians, but to destroy Bolshevism in order to protect Germany and Europe from that plague. What Hitler-Himmler were saying in Table Talk was that Slavs were unpredictable, different from Germans (a Mongol mixture), and had to prove themselves as able to fit into German society as equals. They were doing that with Poles and Czechs, some of whom were of “good blood.” If not, they would still live better, more prosperous lives under the German flag that they had under their own leaders. The NSists never supported nationalist govts. for their Eastern neighbors and that’s not what they were fighting for.

    And let me tell you, even today these independent nations are NOT friendly or fair-minded to Germany, only if they can ‘take, take, take’ and keep Germany guilty for eternity. They want the Germans under their heel, so it seems it’s a choice between one or the other, not a working together. The Poles (and Greeks) are now seriously clamoring for Trillion dollar reparations from WWII! That says it all .

    • Replies: @karel
  355. Dr. Charles Fhandrich [AKA "Dr.C. Fhandrich"] says:
    @TimeTraveller

    Sad and pathetic, if true.

  356. karel says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    A nice list but how much of it has actually arrived and reached Stalin and when the delivery materialized is another question. You do not have to be an armchair general to notice that the German armies were stopped in their advance on Moscow on Dec. 5 1941 after Zhukov received reinforcements of divisions from Siberia. After that date German armies have never recovered any past initiative on the central front. The 5th December was two days before Pearl Harbor so that it seems somewhat unlikely that Roosevelt sent anything to the uncle Joe before that date.

    I cannot find any documents praising a great success of American tanks leased to the Red army against their German counterparts and in the greatest tank battle of WWII there is only a brief mention of ”some” British Churchill tanks
    https://www.tanks.net/tank-battles/world-war-ii-battle-of-kursk.html
    I hope that you will not start arguing with me that without these ”some” Churchills, the battle would have been lost for the Red army.

    The delivery of locomotives is also a suspicious item as the track gauge of Soviet railways at 1520 mm differed from the European and US norm. The latter converted in 1886, almost all of the railroads using the 1524 gauge to 4 ft 9 in (1,448 mm). These fabulous locomotives could have been only used after the Red army reached Western Poland and by then the war was long lost to Germany. It seems to me somewhat unlikely that Americans started producing locomotives to fit the Soviet railroads but anything is possible. Germans tried to convert the Soviet railroads to the standard German gauge but apparently not with much success.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  357. @Laurent Guyénot

    Thank you.

    I’m afraid I misdirected you when i linked to Part One of The Goebbels-Vlasov-Irving Question – Part Two. And even in Part One (https://carolynyeager.net/goebbels-vlasov-irving-question%5D, there is only this small bit:

    Background: Vlasov’s army was surrounded and he was captured on July 12, 1942. A Baltic German captain convinced Vlasov to cooperate with the German Army. Vlasov was taken to Berlin under the protection of the Wehrmacht’s propaganda department. He founded the “Russian Liberation Committee” in hopes of forming a Russian Liberation Army. In Spring 1943 Vlasov wrote an anti-Bolshevik leaflet that was dropped by the millions on Soviet forces. He also wrote an open letter against Bolshevism. The propaganda department issued Russian Liberation Army patches to Russian volunteers using Vlasov’s name, but those who wore them never served under his command. Both Adolf Hitler and Heinrich Himmler were against giving Vlasov command of an army of Russians so it wasn’t until March 1945 that he was given this opportunity. His final act in early May was to allow his battalions in Prague to join the Czech Resistance and fire upon the SS troops still fighting there.

    It’s possible it was only in a podcast that I talked more fully about the troops under Vlasov in 1945 deciding to join with the communists with his blessing and shoot at German troops. Sorry about that. You might say that Vlasov was given a raw deal, but it does show what happens under stress on the battlefield. This is why Hitler and Himmler were against it from the beginning, and rightly so imo.

    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
  358. karel says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Although have mentioned that countries who loose war are not usually awarded with more territory but it is the other way around. A simple fact, you cannot understand. Should USA return the annexed lands to Mexico because the Latinos, or whatever you call them in your backward country, predominate in some border regions? I would call these regions ”Latinoland” and the demands for a land grab could be modeled on Hitlers desire to acquire the fabled ” Sudetenland”.

  359. Sparkon says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Yes, there should be no doubt the United States sent an enormous amount of material aid to the Soviet Union during WWII.

    The revisionist would question whether or not the Soviet Union really needed all that stuff we sent them, in the first place, and in the second, whether or not we should have sent them our most secret, precious stuff.

    For further insights on Lend Lease, please see From Major Jordan’s Diaries by George Racey Jordan wherein the author recounts his observations about material being shipped to the USSR through Great Falls, Montana, where he was stationed during the war.

    Mr. Nixon: On the point of the so-called shipments of uranium… the shipments went through. Is that correct?

    Mr. Appel: Two specific shipments of uranium oxide and uranium nitrate, and shipments of heavy water have been completely documented to include even the number of the plane that flew the Uranium and heavy water out of Great Falls.

    Mr. Nixon: And the final point is the matter of Mr. Hopkins having attempted to expedite the shipments. Major Jordan’s testimony on that was that his notes, written at the time, showed the initials “H.H.” on one of the consignments which he broke into. Your investigation has shown no correspondence of Mr. Hopkins in which he used the initials “H.H.” Is that correct?

    Mr. Appall: That which we reviewed.

    Mr. Nixon: I understand that…

    https://samisdat.info/books/from-major-jordans-diaries-1952/1952%20-%20From%20Major%20Jordans%20Diaries%20-%20George%20Racey%20Jordan.pdf

  360. karel says:
    @TGD

    Stop being servile and read something about the matter.

  361. @Laurent Guyénot

    Reventlow, though, like myself, believed that Christianity is an ever evolving paradigm, and can be directed toward some kind of neo-marcionism. Christianity is a hellenistic cult full of pagan roots (the cult of Mary in particular), and these can be emphacized.

    I quote this part, but the your whole reply shows that you consider Christianity purely as a human myth, a part of culture, a system that influences people. In other words you don’t consider it a fact that Christ was God incarnate nor that he was resurrected. Clearly Hitler and other NS thinkers also did not. And this is, sir, exactly why the national socialism can’t be reconciled with Christianity.

    Now, if we consider it as a myth, then Christianity makes no sense. It is actually less logical than Buddhism. Christians have been aware of this early on.

    Furthermore, if one analyzes the world from purely materialistic point of view looking for some lasting sense of purpose for his own existence then either he falls into hedonistic individualism (which we see in abundance in the world today and it is actually what is peddled as “freedom” by the system) or he deifies the only scientifically, materially transcended element of our being – passing on the DNA to his offspring. Now, it is clear that families do not function in a vacuum, but form tribes and nations. Hence ensuring continuity and superiority even of one’s own race or/and nation becomes a kind of materialistic transcendence, something more valuable than life. An “Ersatz-God” if you like.

    The problem here, however, is what is the truth. Does God exist? Was Christ indeed a form of God incarnate? Did he rise after being dead for three days?

    Now, I know for a fact that this is true. Hence, I can’t accept a surrogate God in the form of a nation or race. However, I do know that there is a Christian form of individualism that actually makes it a duty to care for my family and my nation. The key difference here is that a) I do it of my own will and b) I still know all humans have same dignity, no matter what their race is and can still choose to be saved, to be in communion with God through Christ. And, in the end, it is this communion with God that is much more important than everything else.

    Historically there is lots of evidence that ultimately Hitler and others wanted to get rid of Christianity. I think he realized that his ideas couldn’t coexist with Christianity in the same society – at least not in the long run.

  362. Petermx says:

    A new book by a Norwegian professor on how Russians felt about their German occupiers during WW II. Judeo-Bolshevism vs National Socialism.

    Many Russians hoped that Hitler would free them from “Stalin”
    https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/research/news-and-events/news/2018/many-russians-hoped-that-hitler-would-free-them-fr.html

  363. Petermx says:
    @A-Christian

    Who do you think was more Christian, the German National Socialists or the American Democrats (FDR’s party)? The National Socialists were vehemently opposed to Bolshevism, which forbade Christianity and burned down Christian churches. The Soviet Government was 80 to 85% Jewish according to Russian President Putin, and historians agree with him. The USA allied itself with Germany’s main opponent, the USSR, and helped spread communism over half the world.

    Many Christmas traditions used in celebrations around the world, including putting up a Christmas tree and singing possibly the most favored Christmas song (Silent Night, Holy Night / Stille Nacht, Heilige Nacht) originated in Germany and these celebrations continued every year in Germany during the war.

    Christmas 1942 – Germany
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=yOXLwGLaQFY&feature=emb_logo

    • Agree: Laurent Guyénot
  364. Sparkon says:
    @karel

    You do not have to be an armchair general to notice that the German armies were stopped in their advance on Moscow on Dec. 5 1941 after Zhukov received reinforcements of divisions from Siberia.

    You are just parroting disinformation.

    There was no significant movement or transfer of any Siberian or Far Eastern Red Army formations to the Western Front at any time in the second six months of 1941 after the German attack, although this fable appears in virtually every Western account of Barbarossa and The Battle of Moscow, because Stalin’s spy Sorge blah blah blah.

    Nigel Askey has analyzed the movements of Red Army formations. He concludes:

    In short, of all the divisions transferred west after August 1941, only three rifle divisions originated with Siberian personnel and only two went into the Western Front defending Moscow.

    Whichever way data is analysed, the whole Siberian transfer story is a myth in all respects: including timing, numbers, source of personnel and overall combat performance

    So the question is; who stopped the Germans in December 1941 if it couldn’t possibly have been hordes of newly arrived Siberian or East Front troops? The answer is a massive number of newly mobilised and deployed divisions and brigades. The Soviet land model shows that 182 rifle divisions, 43 militia rifle divisions, eight tank divisions, three mechanised divisions, 62 tank brigades, 50 cavalry divisions, 55 rifle brigades, 21 naval rifle brigades, 11 naval infantry brigades, 41 armies, 11 fronts and a multitude of other units were newly Mobilised and Deployed (MD) in the second half of 1941.

    [my bold]

    https://www.operationbarbarossa.net/the-siberian-divisions-and-the-battle-for-moscow-in-1941-42/

    The Siberian divisions myth is disinformation designed to conceal the speed and size of the Red Army’s mobilization. Once upon a time, a country’s mobilization capacity was top secret information. Stalin didn’t need Sorge to tell him anything about Japanese plans because the USSR and Japan had concluded a non-aggression treaty in April 1941. In any event, there was very little in Siberia that the Japanese could exploit rapidly, certainly not petroleum, which was there for the taking in the Dutch East Indies, so there was really very little question among knowledgeable military analysts about which direction Japan would strike.

    I wonder what the armchair generals would think about the headline in the Bergen Daily Record from Hackensack, NJ, dated Dec. 3, 1941?

    NAZIS DRIVEN BACK AT MOSCOW
    Reds Advance, Gain 24 Miles

    https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/490173948/

    Virtually every account gives Dec. 5, 1941 as the starting date of Zhukov’s counteroffensive. Zhukov himself said he advised against the attack, but was ordered by Stalin to attack on December 5th.

    But in New Jersey they somehow knew already on Dec. 3, 1941 that Zhukov had attacked and pushed the Germans away from Moscow.

    Psst: Maybe they had a time machine in Hackensack.

    • Replies: @karel
  365. Gems from Hitler’s Table Talk (henceforth HTT), showing his extraordinary love for Slavic people :

    [MORE]

    “…The foundation of St. Petersburg by Peter the Great was a fatal event in the history of Europe; and St. Petersburg must therefore disappear utterly from the earth’s surface. Moscow, too. Then the Russians will retire into Siberia.
    It is not by taking over the miserable Russian hovels that we
    shall establish ourselves as masters in the East. The German colonies must be organised on an altogether higher plane.
    We have never before driven forward into empty spaces.
    The German people have absorbed both northern and southern
    Austria, and the original inhabitants are still there; but they
    were Sorb-Wends, members of basic European stock, with
    nothing in common with the Slavs.
    As for the ridiculous hundred million Slavs, we will mould the best of them to the shape that suits us, and we will isolate the rest of them in their own pig-styes; and anyone who talks about cherishing the local inhabitant and civilising him, goes straight off into a concentration camp..!” (HTT p. 617)

    “…Whoever occupies St. Petersburg controls the Baltic. The presence of a second Great Power in the Baltic would be intolerable for us, too, for it would enable it to swamp the whole sea with mines. In this case we must revert to the practice of ancient days, and St. Petersburg must be razed to the ground.

    (HTT p. 621,622)

    For those who still maintain that Hitler “only wanted to defend Germany and defeat Bolshevism”, here are his grandiose plans for the Germanic colonization of Russia together with his statements of utter contempt for Slavs:

    “…The struggle for the hegemony of the world will be decided in favour of Europe by the possession of the Russian space.
    Thus Europe will be an impregnable fortress, safe from all
    threat of blockade. All this opens up economic vistas which, one may think, will incline the most liberal of the Western democrats towards the New Order. The essential thing, for the moment, is to conquer. After that everything will be simply a question of organisation.
    When one contemplates this primitive world, one is convinced that nothing will drag it out of its indolence unless one compels the people to work. The Slavs are a mass of born slaves, who feel the need of a master. As far as we are concerned, we may think that the Bolsheviks did us a great service.
    They began by distributing the land to the peasants, and weknow what a frightful famine resulted. So they were obliged,
    of course, to re-establish a sort of feudal régime, to the benefit
    of the State. But there was this difference, that, whereas the old-style landlord knew something about farming, the political commissar, on the other hand, was entirely ignorant of such matters. So the Russians were just beginning to give their commissars appropriate instruction.
    If the English were to be driven out of India, India would
    perish. Our rôle in Russia will be analogous to that of England in India.
    Even in Hungary, National Socialism could not be exported.
    In the mass, the Hungarian is as lazy as the Russian. He’s by nature a man of the steppe. From this point of view, Horthy is right in thinking that if he abandoned the system of great estates, production would rapidly decline.
    It’s the same in Spain. If the great domains disappeared
    there, famine would prevail.
    The German peasant is moved by a liking for progress. He
    thinks of his children. The Ukrainian peasant has no notion
    of duty.
    There is a peasantry comparable to ours in Holland, and
    also in Italy, where every inch of ground is zealously exploited
    —also, to a certain extent, in France.
    The Russian space is our India. Like the English, we shall rule this empire with a handful of men.
    It would be a mistake to claim to educate the native. All that we could give him would be a half-knowledge—just what’s needed to conduct a revolution!

    It’s not a mere chance that the inventor of anarchism was a
    Russian. Unless other peoples, beginning with the Vikings, had imported some rudiments of organisation into Russian humanity, the Russians would still be living like rabbits. One cannot change rabbits into bees or ants. These insects have the faculty of living in a state of society—but rabbits haven’t.
    If left to himself, the Slav would never have emerged from the narrowest of family communities.
    The Germanic race created the notion of the State. It in-
    carnated this notion in reality, by compelling the individual to
    be a part of a whole. It’s our duty continually to arouse the forces that slumber in our people’s blood.
    The Slav peoples are not destined to live a cleanly life. They know it, and we would be wrong to persuade them of the contrary. It was we who, in 1918, created the Baltic countriesand the Ukraine. But nowadays we have no interest in maintaining Baltic States, any more than in creating an independent Ukraine. We must likewise prevent them from returning to Christianity. That would be a grave fault, for it would be giving them a form of organisation.
    I am not a partisan, either, of a university at Kiev. It’s
    better not to teach them to read
    . They won’t love us for tormenting them with schools. Even to give them a locomotive to drive would be a mistake. And what stupidity it would be on our part to proceed to a distribution of land ! In spite of that, we’ll see to it that the natives live better than they’ve lived hitherto. We’ll find amongst them the human material that’s indispensable for tilling the soil.
    We’ll supply grain to all in Europe who. need it. The Crimea
    will give us its citrus fruits, cotton and rubber (100,000 acres of plantation would be enough to ensure our independence).
    The Pripet marshes will keep us supplied with reeds.
    We’ll supply the Ukranians with scarves, glass beads and everything that colonial peoples like.
    The Germans—this is essential—will have to constitute
    amongst themselves a closed society, like a fortress. The least of our stable-lads must be superior to any native.
    For German youth, this will be a magnificent field of ex-
    periment. We’ll attract to the Ukraine Danes, Dutch, Norwegians, Swedes. The army will find areas for manœuvres there, and our aviation will have the space it needs.
    Let’s avoid repeating the mistakes committed in the colonies
    before 1914. Apart from the Kolonialgesellschaft, which repre-
    sented the interests of the State, only the silver interests had any chance of raising their heads there.
    The Germans must acquire the feeling for the great, open
    spaces. We must arrange things so that every German can
    realise for himself what they mean. We’ll take them on trips to the Crimea and the Caucasus. There’s a big difference between seeing these countries on the map and actually having visited them.
    The railways will serve for the transport of goods, but the
    roads are what will open the country for us.
    To-day everybody is dreaming of a world peace conference. For my part, I prefer to wage war for another ten years rather than be cheated thus of the spoils of victory. In any case, my demands are not exorbitant. I’m only interested, when all is said, in territories where Germans have lived before.
    The German people will raise itself to the level of this empire.

    (HTT p. 32-35.)

    This says it all. To claim that Hitler’s table talk was only unimportant “small talk”, having no real influence on Germany’s policies, according to the Führer Prinzip Hitler’s wishes were Germany’s policies. Having read HTT nobody can lie anymore about Hitler’s real racist colonialist intentions.

  366. incitatus says:
    @E_Perez

    “Oh, yeah, it was bittercold in Russia! Fortunately, when the Allies dropped their firebombs on Dresden, it was very warm inside the buildings”

    You dismiss the remorseful account of a German soldier expelling Russian civilians to certain death Dec 1941 with Dresden 1945? Are you that desperate? The crime was making ordinary German soldiers genocidal perpetrators because of incompetent leadership (no winter uniforms, no supplies, failing logistics, etc.).

    Dresden was indeed criminal. Even more Operation Gemorrah. Hamburg 24 July – 3 August 1943. It created a firestorm with 240 km/hr (150 mph) winds and 800°C (1470°F) temperatures, destroyed 21 sq kms (8 sq miles) of the city; in all, 50% of the buildings are destroyed, 34-38,000 are killed; 42,600 wounded; 900,000 flee the city [Stargardt ‘The German War’ p.366-70]. It came closest to toppling the NSDAP régime.

    All war is criminal. Justice Robert H. Jackson:

    “Any resort to war – to any kind of war – is a resort to means that are inherently criminal. War inevitably is a course of killings, assaults, deprivations of liberty, and destruction of property.”

    German civilian terror bombing precedents? Guernica 26 Apr 1937. Warsaw Sep 1939. Rotterdam 1940, Belgrade 1941, Leningrad (from 8 Sep 1941 – 620,000 killed by spring 1942, ultimately 3,436,066 casualties), Stalingrad (23 Aug 1942 – 2 Feb 1943; 40,000 Russian civilians are killed in the first week of bombing – utimately there are 1,129,619 Russian casualties).

    5 Oct 1939 in Warsaw, Hitler warned press attending a victory parade amidst ruins:

    “Gentlemen, you have seen the ruins of Warsaw. Let that be a warning to those statesmen in London and Paris who still think of continuing the war.” [Beevor ‘The Second World War’ p. 35]

    Guess what? The Allies (sadly) took notice and wanted to serve same notice to Hitler.

    That pales before the Führer order (2 Sep 1942) to 6th Army:

    “The Führer commands that on entering the city the entire male population should be eliminated since Stalingrad, with its convinced Communist population of one million, is particularly dangerous”

    A death sentence from a messianic ex-vagabond/gefreiter/Reichswehr spy/demagogue/failed revolutionary/jailbird/minority leader, crime boss who orders the murder all males. And compromises his soldiers in genocide. Any tears for them?

    • Thanks: ivan
  367. karel says:
    @Sparkon

    So what, if Zhukov got only few divisions. Should I cry or what? I suppose Nigel Askey, the great analyst, was counting the Siberian divisions while standing behind Zhukov in 1941.
    If, as you insinuate that
    ”But in New Jersey they somehow knew already on Dec. 3, 1941 that Zhukov had attacked and pushed the Germans away from Moscow.” I wonder who these ”they” were.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  368. incitatus says:
    @Jack McArthur

    “the roots of being the “Haters of Mankind” long predate Christianity and even pure monotheism.”

    Interesting, especially the ‘Elephantine Papyri’ 400 BCE Jewish “polytheistic sect”. Go figure!

    Jesus being a Jew? Depends how Jew is defined but I see him as being a lover and not a hater of mankind like the modern Talmudic Jews but then again they only reflect their ancestral spirit and teachings.”

    Confess no expertise in “modern Talmudic Jews”. Don’t spend much time thinking about them. Think Jews little different from anyone else, burdened with the same extremists.

    As for hate, most religions eschew dissent/disown heretics. Insecurity defense mechanism? Romans consigned them to gladiatorial combat (win-win public entertainment). Persians cut off their noses. Jews/Romans crucified them. Byzantines blinded them. Western Christians branded or burned them-to-death. A lot of holy mutilation/snuffing. Doubtless extremist Jews in Israel will reap their quota.

    “If somebody truly believes that persons other than Jews are only beasts fit for being used and abused then they have judged themself.”

    Agree. Same with sanctimonious phony Christians like Jerry Falwell Jr. Let alone those who target non-believers and fund Zionist causes while privately believing unconverted Jews will languish in hell. Never did figure them out.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  369. incitatus says:
    @geokat62

    “Wait… you’ve just admitted you’re a xian and, based on previous comments, you also support the Jewish state… doesn’t that make you a xian Zionist, Incy?”

    I’m the most imperfect Christian any can imagine.

    That aside, kindly quote my support for Israel. Spare no effort.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Hibernian
  370. E_Perez says:
    @Wade

    excellent!
    how the video can be downloaded?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  371. alba/ says:

    Only will end when we declare ourselfs ARYANS

    • Replies: @karel
  372. @Jack McArthur

    We don’t need the Talmud to know the Jews . The Talmud is an important book because it makes the Jewish hatred of Christians very obvious as it attacks Christianity in the most vulgar ways . But anybody who can disinterestedly read the Old Testament will see the contempt Jews hold for anyone who isn’t one of them. It only remained for the Christians to come along and become the HATED instead of just the contemptible gentiles because Jesus upsided their classical Jewish Messianism. Unfortunately Christians cannot see this in the OT since they read themselves into it by seeing it as a predicate for Christianity. This interpolation of the OT has obviated the vicious semitism of which the Hebrew Bible wreaks. This Christianizing of the OT offers great cover for the Jews since the Talmud is very inaccessible unlike the OT which- if you just read it literally- shows the Jews for the supremacists they are. I think the Hebrew Bible is the most racist and imperialist tract I ever read but the Christians can’t see this as they regard an attack on the OT as somehow an attack on them. Obviously I am a skeptic but I have no beef with Christians We white people have got to get together and see the Jew for what he is. Unfortunately the Christiain reading of the OT confounds what could be a clear indictment of the Jews.
    Would that there was a form of Christianity that was pure New Testament. I might not only
    allie with it but join it myself

  373. @geokat62

    I am aware that the Great Leap Forward killed more people, and that Pol Pot managed to murder a higher percentage of his population than any other dictator.

    On the other hand, Cuba exists. We have no similar example of a non-genocidal Nazi state.

    You can make an argument that academia goes too easy on Marxism; however, if we purge every ideology whose adherents have murdered millions from the public sphere, that means we need to kick Marxism out *AND* keep Nazism out.

  374. Seraphim says:
    @A-Christian

    Mr. Guyenot is a dyed-in-the -wool ‘gnostic’, by definition an ‘anti-Christ’*, like so many products of the Masonic ‘Illumi[nat]ism’ and French Revolution. Gnostics denied the divinity of Jesus Christ like Judaism (where it stems from). They denied the Old Testament, not because Yahve was ‘un Dieu courroucé’, but because it spoke about Christ, the God-Man**. He says that Church history (and its Scriptures) are fakes and pays heed to ‘millenium revisionists’ myths***.

    *
    “Who is the liar but the one who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, the one who denies the Father and the Son” (1 John 2:22). And 2 John will insist that “the deceiver and the antichrist” is the one who does “not confess that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh” (2 John 7).
    “Whoseoever believeth that Jesus is the Christ is born of God: and every one that loveth him that begat loveth him also that is begotten of him. 2 By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep his commandments. 3 For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. 4 For whatsoever is born of God overcometh the world: and this is the victory that overcometh the world, even our faith. 5 Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?” (1 John 5:1-5).

    **
    “Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life” (John 5:39-40).
    “These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem” (Luke 24:44-47).

    ***
    “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables” (2 Timothy 4:3-4). That includes, of course, the ‘NatSoc’ or ‘NazBol’ myths (filtered through ‘Nouvelle Droite’ lenses).

  375. @A-Christian

    The problem here, however, is what is the truth. Does God exist? Was Christ indeed a form of God incarnate? Did he rise after being dead for three days? Now, I know for a fact that this is true.

    You are indeed a very typical Christian. You assume that the answers to all three questions are necessarily the same, and that anybody who doesn’t believe literally that Jesus was born of a virgin mother and rose physically from his tomb doesn’t believe in God and is an atheist and a materialist. Was Plato an atheist and a materialist? Have you ever heard of “natural religion”? I firmly believe in a Creator, always have, and I also believe in some form of life after death (the immortality of the Spirit). But yes of course, I consider the standard Christian narrative a myth, although I don’t doubt the historical existence of Jesus and the general background of the story.
    To believe the Christian narrative, you have to believe that God, the Creator of the Universe, once decided to chose, among all peoples of the earth, the Jews, and then ordered them to slaughter many nations, women and children included. Why should I believe this? Because the Jews say so in their book? You have to believe that the Jews failed to recognize Jesus as their Messiah, yet that the all-knowing God somehow had predestined Jesus to be crucified. Why should I believe such contradiction? Because “credo quia absurdum”?
    Thomas Jefferson: “Indeed I think that every Christian sect gives a great handle to Atheism by their general dogma that, without a revelation, there would not be sufficient proof of the being of a god.”

    Historically there is lots of evidence that ultimately Hitler and others wanted to get rid of Christianity.

    What evidence? On the contrary, Hitler considered the Catholic Church to be an indispensible force of stability in the world.

  376. geokat62 says:
    @incitatus

    That aside, kindly quote my support for Israel.

    Are you suggesting you prefer there were no Israel… that Palestine should be restored to the Palestinian people?

  377. geokat62 says:
    @E_Perez

    how the video can be downloaded?

    Just click on this link…



    Video Link

    • Replies: @E_Perez
  378. Robjil says:
    @incitatus

    Not many people know of Kito’s war. It was a Jewish rebellion in the Eastern Roman Empire in 115-117 AD. Christians were not in power yet, thus Jews can not blame their actions on Christians. It was a barbaric revolt. Jewish rebels massacred hundreds of thousands of non- Jewish civilians throughout a huge area of the Eastern Roman empire – Libya (Cyrenaica), Cyprus, Egypt and Mesopotamia.

    This is an example of a “Haters of mankind” in action on a grand scale. We seen these same actions in WWII with Jewish advisors who pushed for attacks on civilians to “win” WWII. The same game continues after the 9/11 with endless false flags on civilians throughout the world.
    http://dictionary.sensagent.com/Kitos%20War/en-en/

    The Kitos War (115–117) (Hebrew: מרד הגלויות‎: mered ha’galuyot or mered ha’tfutzot (מרד התפוצות), translation: Rebellion of the exile) is the name given to the second of the Jewish–Roman wars. Major revolts by diasporic Jews in Cyrene (Cyrenaica), Cyprus, Mesopotamia and Aegyptus spiraled out of control, resulting in a widespread slaughter of Roman citizens and others (200,000 in Cyrene, 240,000 in Cyprus according to Cassius Dio, but see below) by the Jewish rebels. The rebellions were finally crushed by Roman legionary forces, chiefly by the Roman general Lusius Quietus, whose nomen later gave the conflict its title, as “Kitos” is a later corruption of Quietus.

  379. E_Perez says:
    @geokat62

    no.
    downloaded as a file, not watched in browser.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  380. @Robjil

    “…Major revolts by diasporic Jews in Cyrene (Cyrenaica), Cyprus, Mesopotamia and Aegyptus spiraled out of control, resulting in a widespread slaughter of Roman citizens and others (200,000 in Cyrene, 240,000 in Cyprus according to Cassius Dio, but see below) by the Jewish rebels…”

    Those numbers must have been extremely exaggerated since the total population of Cyprus did not exeed 200,000 from the Iron Age to mid 19th century.

    According to the Atlas of World Population History by Colin McEvedy & Richard Jones:

    “…Cyprus has had a peasant population as long as anywhere in the Near East – at the very least since the 6th millennium BC. Slow growth from a few thousand at this time, to some tens of thousands in the Late Bronze Age, covers the prehistoric demography of the island.The population then enters the 100 – 200,000 band within which it remains for the whole of the period from the Iron Age to the mid 19th century…”

    The Jews constituted never more than 10% of the population of the Roman Empire (many were converts). It is impossible that a small minority on the island of Cyprus would have succeeded in exterminating the majority.

    • Agree: ivan
    • Replies: @Robjil
    , @Robjil
  381. Hibernian says:
    @incitatus

    I’m the most imperfect Christian any can imagine.

    Humble bragging at its best.

  382. @Laurent Guyénot

    I like you, Laurent. You are a real straightforward, modest truthseeker; your comments show it. I agree with you here except for two things: I do doubt the existence of a historical Jesus. No evidence. And as you say, too many contradictions. I wonder why you do accept the historical man ‘Jesus’?

    I also think that Hitler came to the conclusion that the Churches, with their universalism, would remain unaccepting of National Socialism and its goals. If the churches wouldn’t adjust, a new people’s religion would have to be found. Yes, he considered a spiritual outlook intrinsic to the Aryan soul. He abhorred Atheism as destructive Jewish materialism. However, between 1940 and 1945 everything had to wait on the conclusion of the war. From 1944 he was also looking for a successor, so the Christian issue was far from uppermost.

    Also, Hitler was not really a dictator. He never wanted to dictate the spiritual life of the German people. We must remember he loved and respected the German people, and wanted to give them freedom and happiness. He did not want to coerce them into anything except to become a unified group that loved and cared for each other, and able to defend itself against enemies. That’s really all Hitler was about. If Christianity acted in opposition to that, then Christianity came in second to the survival of the German people themselves. This is what all European peoples should be following. We should be standing up for ourselves and our own. No class warfare.

  383. @Laurent Guyénot

    For Hitler’s real opinion on Christianity you might read Hitler’s Table Talk – Nationalists.org and look in the Index under “Christianity” at among others :

    heaviest blow struck at humanity by, 7, 75
    National Socialism, no co-existence with, 145
    natural death of, 59
    rebellion against natural law, 51

    which was quite different from the stance he publicly displayed for political reasons.

    • Thanks: Laurent Guyénot
    • Replies: @ivan
  384. @Achilles Wannabe

    We white people have got to get together and see the Jew for what he is.

    What do you mean by this, actually? This is not going to happen. I think instead of focusing on the Jew, white people need to focus on themselves, celebrate themselves, love themselves, and throw out this idea that “supremacy” and “racist” (words you used against Jews) are wrong, and even evil.

    The more we study and elevate the Jews’ importance, the stronger they get. We must separate from them and then live our own lives serving our own people. Just as Adolf Hitler set out to do. We are not out to save the whole world as Christianity is. The Christian philosophy (NT) is that all are the same under God. All are brethren, and so on. Racial differences don’t count or are annulled. Since European peoples are the top of the human pyramid, this is bad for the highest and good for the lowest. Christianity celebrates “the lowest among you.”

    You have said you spent your life among Jews and didn’t see them for what they are. Not until you began reading WN literature and websites, I guess. Then you were educated, but it was hard going. Still is, for you. The true Christian cannot see the Jew as an alien because the Christian belief system prohibits it. I don’t think the New Testament is a solution.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  385. @Achilles Wannabe

    Why not just use one of the millions of NTs only that are available and chew the cud and take it from there. Nobody should force you to swallow whole immediately anything. Its good to respect the house rules and not be like those who wish to change the house rules because they are without sin, i.e. its must be the religion that needs changing – pride.

    There are people out there who cannot find a church because the ones they have tried to join have thrown in the towel e.g. homosexuality, the unborn, money worship, virtual Judaism etc and so they end up on their own or maybe they cannot find a welcoming masjid because they are not Pakistani.

    Today is the Coptic New Year which is a carry over from Ancient Egypt. Tomorrow is the day in the calender when a saviour Ancient Egyptian King liberated the first major town from the yoke and bondage of the Hyksos whom Josephus said were the Hebrews (recent archaeology now supports this but because it relates to Jews, donkey worship and human sacrifice no scholar I know is brave enough to join the dots publicly).

    There is a picture of the aftermath of 911 in which firemen are gathered round a mound on which a cross shaped girder has dropped on top. Myth is a divine story in which we play many parts. That day, my birthday, began with miracles before the first plane hit and not least because somebody had pointed out to me months before how a book had been published in the 1980s by an evangelical Christian (and unusually endorsed by a traditional Catholic theologian) that this same day was the birthday of the child destined to die so sins would be forgiven.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  386. Robjil says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Whatever numbers it was, it was a brutal attack on civilians. Papyri found in Egypt talk about the great fear among the people who lived during these attacks.
    https://historum.com/threads/the-kitos-war.35146/

    The amount of destruction caused by the Kitos War (so called from the Hebrew form of Lusius Quietus’ name) was titanic. Supposedly 220,000 Greeks and Romans were murdered in Egypt and Cyrene, and another 240,000 perished in Cyprus. Papyri found in Egypt attest to the murderous fighting between Jewish and gentile gangs in the desert, and the state of fear in which the common people of the province lived in. How many Jews were killed, Cassius Dio does not bother to record. But he does tell us that such was the bitterness of the people of Cyprus towards the Jews, that a law was passed banning any person of Jewish descent or faith from ever setting foot on Cyprus, under pain of death. This law was still in effect a century later under the Severan emperors, and was even applicable if the offender had been shipwrecked on Cyprus or had been blown to its shores by unforeseen winds.

  387. Robjil says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Here is another one that most people are not aware of – The Mamilla Pool massacre.

    Jews had the upper hand in Israel in the 614. What did they do with the power that they had? Christian Zionists should study this Mamilla Pool massacre incident. Why isn’t this massacre recalled in our history classes in our schools.

    https://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=201070

    In 614 local Palestinian Jews allied with their Babylonian co-religionists and assisted the Persians in their conquest of the Holy Land. 26,000 Jews participated in the onslaught. In the aftermath of the Persian victory, the Jews perpetrated a massive holocaust of the Gentiles of Palestine. They burned the churches and the monasteries, killed monks and priests, burned books. The beautiful basilica of Fishes and Loaves in Tabgha, the Ascension on the Mount of Olives, St Stephen opposite Damascus Gate and the Hagia Sion on Mt Zion are just at the top of the list of perished edifices. Indeed, very few churches survived the onslaught. The Great Laura of St Sabas, tucked away in the bottomless Ravine of Fire (Wadi an-Nar) was saved by its remote location and steep crags. The Church of the Nativity miraculously survived: when Jews commanded its destruction, the Persians balked. They perceived the Magi mosaic above the lintel as the portrait of Persian kings.

    The Mamilla Pool massacre of Christians by the Jewish rebels came after this destruction.

    This devastation was not the worst crime. When Jerusalem surrendered to the Persians, thousands of local Christians became prisoners of war and were herded to the Mamilla Pool area. The Israeli archaeologist Ronny Reich writes:
    They were probably sold to the highest bidder. According to some sources, the Christian captives at Mamilla Pond were bought by Jews and were then slain on the spot.

    Here is what an Oxford professor wrote about this crime.

    The Oxford Professor Henry Hart Milman’s History of the Jews describes it in stronger terms:
    It had come at length, the long-expected hour of triumph and vengeance; and the Jews did not neglect the opportunity. They washed away the profanation of the holy city in Christian blood. The Persians are said to have sold the miserable captives for money. The vengeance of the Jews was stronger than their avarice; not only did they not scruple to sacrifice their treasures in the purchase of these devoted bondsmen, they put to death all they had purchased at a lavish price. It was a rumour of the time that 90,000 perished.

    Jewish culture has problem with compassion for non- Jews when it has power. We see the same thing every today with Jewish culture in full spectrum dominance of the west.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
    • Thanks: Commentator Mike, MrVoid
    • Replies: @ivan
  388. ivan says:
    @anon

    That was the result of the “starvation blockade” by the Royal Navy. I am not claiming that it was a moral thing to do. But because of the exigencies of the Armistice terms, the Allies wanted a speedy implementation of its terms so that they could demobilize. The Germans however vacillated, frankly speaking they cheated on the terms from the word go. You have to put these starvation deaths under the ledger of the Germans who were too ashamed to admit defeat. In other words the Herrenvolk and those screaming that the German Army was not defeated in the field, who after having brought disaster to Germany, preferred to blame Jews and Communist agitators instead.

    • Replies: @anon
  389. ivan says:
    @Robjil

    They not only had the upper hand, but were not interested in rebuilding the Temple, so the Caliph built a mosque instead. At least in this respect, the Muslims were blameless. But the braindead Christian Zionists of today want to bring about a world war by pulling down the al Shariff mosque, for the Chosen.

    • Replies: @karel
  390. ivan says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    For a nominal Catholic as he had presented himself initially, Shitler was not too troubled by starting his purges among devout Catholics first.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priest_Barracks_of_Dachau_Concentration_Camp

    Shitler worshipers here should note that this was before all the BS about fighting Bolshevism and the rest. So among other things its no wonder that the Poles knew what awaited them.

    • Replies: @Fox
  391. Fox says:
    @ivan

    You are deluded about this “persecution of religious practice in Germany”. Any Catholic priest who ended up in an internement camp (such as Dachau) was engaged in political agitation. The stay in these camps was usually limited and the agitator could return to his post after doing his time. While you may object to such measures, they were practised in the Democracies as well as the Bolshevik SU. Hence, getting upset about the casheering of clergy agitators in Germany, yet giving silent assent to internment of people in England, or putting people on trial for sedition in the US, and the real assault on religion in the SU is construing a fantasy fable of reality.
    My parents were Catholics in the Germany of 1933 to 1945, as was everyone else from were they were, they went to church regularly, people got married in churches, baptized, had confirmation, went to confession during the Hitler years and no one did anything to hinder them in their habits.
    The churches as active underminers of the legitimacy of the government were of course recognized for their activity; the opposition to Ultra-Montanism, the illegitimate influence exercised from Rome in German affairs, is a thousand years old. Catholicism has played a prominent role in the separatist movement following the defeat in the First World War. In the long run, the indluence of the churches was to be curtailed, but again, is this not also done in the democracies where clergy with unwelcome opinions is quickly eliminated by the artificial storms of “spontaneous, public upset”, all orchestrated by the state agencies and their minions in the press? A priest ripped to shreds by this savagery will not be able to return to his parish, a priest who had been in an internment camp for a time, however, could.
    As soon as you and the other anti-“nazis” come to a point of general criticism of internment for religious or political reasons, then I will take your and their argument seriously, but as long as it remains moralistic cant and hypocritical finger-pointing I am merely disgusted and feel contempt.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @ivan
  392. incitatus says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    ‘Historically there is lots of evidence that ultimately Hitler and others wanted to get rid of Christianity.’
    “What evidence? On the contrary, Hitler considered the Catholic Church to be an indispensible force of stability in the world.”

    Hitler was jealous of any/all institutional/religious/fraternal influence (Masons, Jehovah Witnesses, Jews, RCs)- any that threatened his total control of ordinary Germans. Operation Hummingbird (30 Jun 1934) dispatched the following Roman Catholics, primarily because they were influential or knew too much:
    • Catholic journalist Fritz Gerlich (murdered at Dauchau);
    • Catholic politician and Papen associate Erich Klausener (shot by the SS);
    • Catholic youth leader Adalbert Probst (abducted, “shot while trying to escape”);
    • Bernhard Stempfle (Catholic priest, journalist, Hitler confidant, helped write Mein Kampf) Jun. ’34 deported to Dachau, 1 Jul ’34 found dead in the woods near Harlaching (“broken neck” or shot in the heart “while trying to escape”).

    Then, of course, there’s what Hitler said:

    “The parsons will be made to dig their own graves. They will betray their God to us. They will betray anything for the sake of their miserable little jobs and incomes.”
    – Adolf Hitler on Church elections Jul 1933 [Burleigh ‘The Third Reich’ p.258]

    “We will have to bend the Churches to our will and make them serve us. The vow of celibacy must be eradicated. Church assets must be confiscated, and no one should be allowed to study theology before the age of twenty-four. With that, we will rob them of their next generation. The monastic orders will have to be dissolved. In this way, and only in this way, will we be able to break them down. It will take decades. But then we will have them eating out of our hands.”
    -Adolf Hitler 11 May 1937 Cabinet Meeting [Göbbels Tagebücher 12 May 1937; Ulrich ‘Hitler: Ascent’ p.653]

    “The fact that I remain silent in public over Church affairs is not in the least misunderstood by the sly foxes of the Catholic Church, and I am quite sure that a man like Bishop von Galen knows full well that after the war I shall extract retribution to the last farthing. And, if he does not succeed in getting himself transferred in the meanwhile to the Collegium Germanicum in Rome, he may rest assured that in balancing of our accounts, no ‘T’ will remain uncrossed, no ‘I’ undotted!”
    – Adolf Hitler ‘Table Talk’ 4 Jul 1942 p.553

    Meanwhile, here’s what the NSDAP taught the young to sing:

    “We are the happy Hitler Youth. We need no Christian virtues for our Führer Adolf Hitler is always our guide…We do not follow Christ but Horst Wessel…I can do without the Church, the Swastika is redemption on earth”
    -Hitlerjugend Lied 1935 [Childers ‘The Third Reich’ p.303]

    “Pope and rabbi shall yield, we want to be pagans again…out with the Jews and with the pope from the German home”
    -Hitlerjugend Lied 1935 [Childers ‘The Third Reich’ p.303]

    “Their time has passed, but the priests remain to rob the people of their soul, and whether it is Rome or Luther they are peddling, it’s all Jewish thinking. The time for the cross is now over.”
    -Hitlerjugend Lied June 1935 [Sopade ‘Deutschland Berichrt’ Report from South Bavaria p.674-75; Childers ‘The Third Reich’ p.325]

    In April 1941 Bavarian Minister for Education and Gauleiter of Munich Adolf Wagner ordered removal of crucifixes and religious instruction from schools, to be replaced with Nazi songs and ideology. Public outcry/objection forced reluctant moderation.

    2,720 clerics were imprisoned at Dachau – 2,579 RCs; 109 Protestants; 22 Greek Orthodox. 1,034 died.

    Was that because “Hitler considered the Catholic Church to be an indispensible force of stability in the world?” Don’t think do.

    • Thanks: ivan
    • Replies: @Fox
    , @Laurent Guyénot
  393. anon[309] • Disclaimer says:
    @ivan

    Do. you have sources to support your contentions, ivan? If so, cite them. If not, you’re blowing smoke.

    In The Transfer Agreement Edwin Black states the number 800 000 total starvation deaths . The largest part of the starvations occurred before the war ended; that the starvation/blockade continued even after Germany agreed to an armistice cost the lives of another 40 000 to 70 000 German civilians.

    • Replies: @ivan
  394. karel says:
    @alba/

    I have done so, if you have not noticed.

  395. karel says:
    @ivan

    The Christian Zionists are confused about the location of the temple. Certainly not there, where the Fortress Antonia once stood, the remains of which are still visible today.

  396. ivan says:
    @Fox

    And what right had Hitler declare himself Fuhrer? And promote paganism? Were all these on the agenda when the Nazis stood for election? Catholics and Christians in general do not regard any entity to be above God as the Cardinals Faulhaber and Galen maintained. And you know, the priests were not simply “agitating”, they were protesting the eugenic policies of Nazis, the culling of “lives unworthy of lives”, the crippled and the war veterans among others, and the reduction of the Concordat to a mere slip of paper.

    The Catholics were of course fatally stupid to join with the Nazis to outmaneuver the Social Democrats and Communists by aligning themselves with the Nazis in the Riechstag. But do you think even those Catholics who voted for the Nazis were totally mad about Shitler?

    The other thing its very amusing to see the commentariat carry on and on about the economic miracle in Germany under the Nazis, well that is a no brainer when the government carries out public works : Keynesianism as the economists say. In the US, FDR did the same thing and he was rewarded with the Presidency for two terms even before the war.

  397. ivan says:
    @anon

    Oh is that right? Then the naval blockade had nothing to with the larger part of the deaths. Perhaps you think a war that cost France alone about two million was a picnic? The loser has to suffer in any conflict. If I were a Frenchman I would demand it.

    Ánd did not Edwin Black have a book out about ‘IBM and the Holocaust’.

    • Replies: @anon
  398. alba/ says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    form of Christianity that was pure New Testament?

    If hitler and jesus if cristianity and ” aryanism ” would have a child their holy book would be named ” the lord of the ring”

    Thats the closest to a pure new testament you will ever get .

    https://ibb.co/PxDdrtm

  399. alba/ says:

    A little story of the posible inspiration of the lord of the ring 3 master rings history

    Through acts of generosity and the costs of waging war, Saladin depleted his treasury. Caught by a sudden need for money, he thought of a wealthy Jew, Melchizedek by name, who lived in Alexandria. But Melchizedek had a reputation for miserliness, and he would never voluntarily surrender the vast sum needed by Saladin, nor was the Sultan prepared to take the money by force. At last Saladin devised a plan whereby he would embarrass the wealthy Jew, who would then redeem himself with money.

    Accordingly, Saladin summoned Melchizedek to his palace, then stated, “Men speak highly of your wisdom. What conclusion have you reached concerning the ways of God? Which of the three great religions is the truly authentic one? Judaism, Christianity, or Islam?”

    Sensing that with this question Saladin was seeking to lead him into an unwinnable quarrel and thus gain advantage over him, Melchizedek answered, “That is an excellent question, my lord. I can best explain my views on the subject with the following story:”

    I have heard that there was once a wealthy man whose most prized possession was a precious ring. He bequeathed this ring to one of his sons, and by this sign, the latter was known as the head of family. Succeeding generations followed this tradition, with the principal heir always inheriting the cherished ring from his father. But, to make a long story short, the ring finally came into the possession of a man who had three sons, each the equal of the others in obedience, virtue, and worthiness. Unwilling to favor one son over the others, the father had a master artisan make two copies of the valued ring, and he bequeathed a ring to each son.

    Following the father’s death, each son laid claim to the deceased man’s title and estate, showing the inherited ring as proof. However, a careful inspection of the three rings could not reveal which of them was the authentic one, so the three sons’ claims remain unresolved.

    The same is true with the three great religions, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. The adherents of each religion consider themselves to be the legitimate heirs of God’s truth. But as was the case with the rings, their claims too remain unresolved.

    Its not difficult to imagine islam christianity and judaism as a parable of power that even its benefitial ultimely were forged by the true rings and ultimely subservient to it.

    The Three Rings were made by Celebrimbor after Sauron, in the guise of Annatar, had left Eregion. These were free of Sauron’s influence, as he did not have a hand in their making. However, they were still forged by Celebrimbor with the arts taught to him by Sauron and thus were still bound to the One Ring. Upon perceiving Sauron’s intent, the Elves hid the Three from him. They were carried out of Middle-earth at the end of the Third Age, after the destruction of the One Ring.

    Tolkien in the end reject christianity ( poisoned since birth and ultimely subservient to the true ring, in the price would have to be payed payed ) even if he subscrive to some of its softening moral dogmas.

    • Thanks: incitatus
    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
  400. Fox says:
    @ivan

    You are not maintaining the time line of events. Just repeating the usual propaganda props in the manner of a pater noster -in your case with a few additional nasty additions- doesn’t cut it. What is your point? Are you a Pole or Czech with a need to quiet your collective bad conscience about your behavior towards your German neighbor?

    • Replies: @Ivan
  401. Fox says:
    @incitatus

    With Christians like you I understand a motivation to overcome this cult. Why should Christianity which has burst on the scene with violence not be held to a critical evaluation? If it produces people with your mindset then there is something not right with it.

  402. @Carolyn Yeager

    Certainly I agree we should be serving our own people.

    But one way to do that is to understand the Jew. This is not to “elevate” him but to recognize him as THE social-ethnic type who mediates our institutions – academic, financial, entertainment and even Christian in the form of zionism and the great supposed sin of “anti semitism”. How are we going to serve our own people if our own people don’t even know who they are? They are constantly lied to and manipulated in their identities by the Philo semetic Jew’s control of our institutions. Perhaps you have been in this WN thing long enough to no longer know philosemitism existentially but as you point out , I haven’t been around long. I still know in a resonant, way how deracinated and semophiled the white mind has become at the hands of the Jew. Know your enemy is my raison d’etre these days.

    By the way. I am fine with white racialism and supremacism providing that the latter means we keep our countries and run them according to our traditionalist standards. And while i am not a Hitler scholar like you, reading Mein Kamph convinced me that he spent some time understanding the Jew as a prelude to helping the German gentile. That is what I am talking about.

    As for Christianity, much like you I have problems with it. But given the Christian propensity in this country, and the terrible state we are in, I think I will try to cut a deal with the Christians if they will try to deal with the Jews. Yes, I will even morph if that helps. Jesus can be seen as a prophet you know – an anti-semetic one.

    As for your contention that Christians cannot cope with the Jewish problem because of universalism, check out the new book by the Christian Giles Corey(KMac reviewed it here I think) The Sword of Christ. Corey has an interesting take on the argument that Christianity has been Judaized. He thinks theologically correct Christianity is WHITE. Corey’s is a Church I might attend

  403. @Jack McArthur

    You might want to try Giles Corey’s The Sword of Christ. I am. K MacDonald introduces it
    right here recently

  404. Thomasina says:
    @ploni almoni

    Thank you for your reply. Absolutely fascinating. I don’t know how people ever say they’re bored with stuff like this to read!

    Thanks for the recommendation of Nesta Webster’s “French Revolution”. One day I’ll get around to reading all of these good books.

  405. Thomasina says:

    Laurent Guyenot – excellent article. Very well written. Thank you.

  406. @incitatus

    Interesting, thanks. That sure gives a different perspective. It seems to me that this anti-Catholicism movement comes from the pan-germanic movement, which supported Hitler but which Hitler criticises in Mein Kampf precisely for that reason :
    “The hard struggle the Pan-German movement fought against the Catholic Church can be explained by its insufficient understanding of the people’s spiritual nature….
    “the Pan-German movement would never have made this mistake if it had sufficiently understood the character of the broad masses. If its leaders had known that to succeed at all, for purely psychological reasons, they must never show two or more adversaries to the masses. If they do, then the fighting force is completely divided. If they had realized this, the Pan- German movement would have directed their full fighting force at one single adversary. Nothing is more dangerous for a political party than to let itself be led back and forth hither and yon between decisions because this means it can never accomplish anything visible.”
    Hitler expresses his opposition to the Ultramontane tendency of Catholicism, but that is a very ancient problem in Europe. Catholicism has always meant interference by a foreign power.
    In any case, it seems that the attitude de National Socialism toward Catholicism and Christianity in general is, like its attitude to Slavs, is not monolithic. Hitler was on the moderate side regarding Christianity, and he certainly never promoted any kind of paganism.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @incitatus
  407. @alba/

    Very interesting. The ring is in itself a symbol of the Covenant (in French, l’Alliance, the same word used for wedding ring). I was wondering is Sauron is somehow Yahweh. Smeagol, who is obsessed with the ring which gives him immortality, represents the Jew, quite transparently (money-hording, homeless, wandering, anti-social, deformed, despicable, betraying, rightly outcast). Tolkien’s view of Catholicism remains a mystery. Do you have any source (other than the Lord of the Rings) for his rejection of christianity?

    • Replies: @alba//
  408. @Carolyn Yeager

    I agree with you on Hitler’s view on Christianity, which, I’m not afraid to say, seem quite close to mine. Léon Degrelle, a strong Catholic who joined the Waffen SS and was really liked by Hitler, had interesting things to say on that point. Hitler’s view is quite simple and common-sense: don’t disturb the faith of people who need Christianity, it does them good. But don’t tolerate ecclesiastical anti-national activity. Christianity will die of its own death. Hitler despised atheism more than anything else, you’re right.
    On christianity in general, I think there is not “one” christianity, or at least there are many sides to it, and different potentials to them. One way to look at it is this: Jesus is the archetypal hero who stood up to Jewish Power and was the victim of Jewish Power (who pressured the Gentil power to destroy him). In that sense, Jesus is a valuable model (and we are the true christians), except that there is some kind of “learned helplessness” in having such a defeated model (resurrected, though, but then no kindgom on earth, only in heaven, etc). Christianity is a very flexible thing, and although today, we have a pope saying “Inside every christian is a Jew”, the strongly Judeo-phobic essence of christianity is still potent. It is also conceivable, as Reventlow thought, to move christianity toward some kind of neo-marcionism, meaning to get rid of the OT.
    Just some thoughts. Defending christianity is certainly not my fight anyway. I just think Hitler was right to write that it should not confronted as an enemy.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @Ivan
    , @Vaterland
  409. anon[309] • Disclaimer says:
    @ivan

    re your reply, #412:
    Asked for sources, you provided none.

    I’ll take that as your admission that you’re blowing smoke.

  410. Ivan says:
    @Fox

    I am an Indian. The timeline I. gave is in the ballpark. I get the big picture and move on. I don’t bullshit anyone. Not my style.

    • Replies: @Fox
  411. Sparkon says:
    @karel

    Any tears you shed should be for the millions of innocent victims on all sides who got sucked into this entirely unnecessary war.

    “They” in this case refers to the people who prepared and printed the Dec. 3, 1941 edition of the Bergen Daily Record, and to the people who read it.

    There is a simple rule of thumb. When stories don’t add up, it means someone is lying.

    The massive Soviet mobilization — 178 new divisions — meant there were plenty of Red Army reserves in the immediate vicinity of Moscow, and west of the Urals, where most of the USSR’s population was concentrated within a few hours train ride from the Soviet capital, which was also the rail center for the entire nation.

    The idea of transferring a few divisions over several thousand miles to help Moscow makes no sense, when Moscow sits in the most populous part of the Soviet Union, where most of the newly mobilized Red Army formations would have been concentrated..

    It would be like saying New York City survived (a mythical attack) only because it was able to bring in some troops from Taos, New Mexico.

    Neither Stalin nor Stavka would denude its Far Eastern defenses when plenty of reserves were available in close proximity to the Western front.

    • Replies: @karel
  412. @Carolyn Yeager

    A quote from Mein Kampf in support of your view: “The most horrible example of this tyranny is Russia, where the Jew has killed or starved close to thirty million people, sometimes using inhuman tortures to enforce his savage fanaticism and assure domination over a great people.”

    For those interested, I have just scanned and uploaded on archive.org Julius Epstein, Operation Keelhaul, a great and important book containing a chapter on Andrey Vlasov and his army of one million Russians fighting under German uniform to free their nation from bolshevism (all forcefully sent back by Eisenhower to the Soviet Union to be hanged).
    https://archive.org/details/epstein-keelhaul

  413. fnn says:

    Joyce Carol Oates (age 82) caught repeating inane left-wing propaganda in her senescence.

  414. S says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Vlasov and his Russians weren’t the only former Soviets to turn upon the Germans at the very end. The Queen Tamar battallion of the Georgian Legion, led by Shalva Loladze (pictured below), did as well on the island of Texel, Netherlands, in April and May, 1945. Hundreds of Germans and Georgians died in the vicious fighting which didn’t stop until May 20, 1945.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgian_uprising_on_Texel

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  415. @Achilles Wannabe

    Let me try again. What I want to get across is that white people (I prefer to say European b/c its not a color!) are not going to remove Jews unless they can be convinced that RACISM (ie race realism/racial differences that result in unequal IQ, personality development, physical-emotional traits and limitations) is a real, nature-made thing, not a bad thing.

    Understanding Jews while still living among them won’t work. Jews are too clever, having been at the game of fooling “goyim” for many thousands of years. Christians are taught that forgiveness and redemption are godly and key Christian beliefs. We have to be able to NOT forgive Jews and not forgive those who have abused us. We also have to stop believing that all that counts is Life after Death … the silly Heaven concept. I’m a reincarnationist.

    All the way back to 1919, Adolf Hitler saw the Jewish Problem clearly and spoke about it. Of course, many others saw the problem before that but they didn’t try to come up with a “final” solution for it. Because of that, he is the most demonized name in respectable society – the epitome of the evil that thinking racially will bring out in every human. I think as long as that remains the standard or default view, the Jews hold their power, despite people like Giles Corey. He’s an outlier. I don’t plan to read his book but I doubt he mentions Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich, unless in a critical way and in passing. And I don’t expect many Christians to react positively to it, either. Their church pastors will not recommend it.

    I am grateful to Laurent Guyénot for going as far as he has in declaring the importance of changing this stupid attitude to AH and to National Socialism. We need to build on this theme. I’m working with some others to put forth a stronger presence in this area. I am not calling for a carbon copy of the Third Reich to be put in place, but for the necessity of normalizing the period and the man. Instead of “Understanding Jews” we should be “Understanding Adolf Hitler.” De-criminalize him, please! Keeping him as the creator of an evil period in our history results in holding down all White Pride, White Nationalist thought and action, not the opposite as KMac and friends have believed. They focus on the Jews – well, fine, let them continue. But I want to focus on us as a Jew-free people. That means we embrace Racism as a good.

  416. @Achilles Wannabe

    P.S. I recommend you read Thomas Dalton’s “Eternal Strangers.” https://www.thomasdaltonphd.com/eternal-strangers

  417. geokat62 says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    They focus on the Jews – well, fine, let them continue… That means we embrace Racism as a good.

    It appears you’re virtually on the same page as Jared Taylor of American Renaissance.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  418. karel says:
    @Sparkon

    Ok, if you believe it, then I will not try to convince you that it was otherwise. Rest in peace.

    • Replies: @Sparkon
  419. karel says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    One million? You must be joking. They had hardly enough men to fill three divisions. The only battle ready was the first division under General Bunyachenko, which switched sides during the Prague uprising in May 1945 hoping to save their skins while trying to negotiate surrender with the Americans. The engagement of the first ROA division lasted about two days and after some initial successes against the SS troops under the commander Carl Pückler-Burghauss, they started to quarrel with the insurgents about weapons and eventually retreated to Plzeň that was already occupied by the Pattons 16th Armored Division.

  420. @geokat62

    Not at all. Maybe you should look at my website.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  421. geokat62 says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Not at all.

    Really? Like you, Jared thinks it’s a mistake to focus on the Jews and, like you, he thinks race realism is a good that should be embraced.

    What am I missing?

    I’ll visit your website, but in the meantime perhaps you could furnish a thumbnail sketch of how you think you differ from JT?

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  422. Fox says:
    @Ivan

    Calm yourself to a normal level.
    The Konkordat was perfect enough when signed between Hitler and Pacelli that it is even today, in the Antifa Republic FRG, in full recognition; it was fully followed through under the government of Adolf Hitler. War veterans were held in high esteem, and the euthanasia program was signed into law in late of 1939 to be stopped about a year later after it was found to have met widespread disapproval in the population. I have read about the “gassing of the war veterans” before, which is a made-up story in line with the other demonization props invented before, during and after the war.
    You may be Indian (dot or feather?), but as is said in German:”Alter schuetzt vor Torheit nicht”, hence: ” Being the Indian Ivan does not protect from committing a folly.”

    The current governments in the West are actively working against the Christian denominations (e.g., it is forbidden in the current Germany to display crucifixes in schools, court houses, e.g.), clergy is being censored, on occasion removed on government-sponsored press campaigns, etc. This is done without the exigencies of a war or threats against national security. In addition, books are burnt in rhe name of freedom, in the current FRG, for example, yet we only hear about the book burnings in Germany in 1933.
    Just a reminder for you that things are not as lop-sided as your world view suggests it to you.

    • Thanks: Ivan
    • Replies: @Ivan
  423. Sparkon says:
    @karel

    Ok, if you believe it, then I will not try to convince you that it was otherwise. Rest in peace.

    You did try to convince me, but you failed.

    It’s not a matter of belief, but a matter of facts. There was no need for the Red Army to transfer divisions to the Western front from Siberia, the Far East, or anywhere else, and Askey’s work confirms what common sense suggests.

    Further proof is the Soviet invasion of Iran in August 1941, when Stalin sent three entire armies to join the British in overrunning that country, so obviously, the Red Army had plenty of reserve strength at the ready for Stalin to be able to send three whole armies to Iran without imperiling the Western front at the very time the big Battle of Smolensk was raging.

    Stalin wanted it to appear as if the Soviet Union was in dire straits, so it was in his vested interest, as well as good information security, to conceal the Red Army’s true strength, which also made it easier for him to plead for material help from the USA, but of course FDR was already willing to give the Soviets almost anything they wanted, and Red agent Harry Hopkins was just the man for the job.

    As for resting in peace, I am alive, kicking, and in good health, so either your command of English is not that great, or you are just being a boor.

    • Replies: @karel
  424. karel says:
    @Sparkon

    I am not a psychiatrist. Please try to find another place for the treatment of your obsession.

    • Troll: Carolyn Yeager
  425. alba// says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    >Do you have any source (other than the Lord of the Rings) for his rejection of christianity?

    No its just speculations

    About Sauron is clearly a symbol for masonry

    https://ibb.co/Zxfbrcg

    https://ibb.co/qxHpXxw

    And masonry was just a tool of judaism ( the true ring) so yes without a doubt sauron is the representation of yahve and judaism represent the true ring

    Yahve( sauron) lost its power to manifest phisically just like jews lost is ancestral land after the war with the romans ( in the second era war of the LOTR that preceed the medieval representation of the third era in what is ambiented the book)

    Elfs are aryans or proto indo europeans , based in the a theory of an ancient pure race that spread across the word in the ancient times and whose linguistic testament is spread all across eurasia ( tolkien was a linguistic ) , it wasnt the nazis who first discovered the linguistic relation between sanscrit and europeam languages but british and was very popular to call european iranian and indians aryans in the 1900 emgland

    I think Smeagle is a deluded european farmer corrupted by the power of the ring

  426. @geokat62

    What an jerk. I don’t owe you a sketch. It takes a second to click the link and you’ll see immediately that my thinking about Jews is nothing like your friend Jared’s, nor has it been for 15 years now. Jared thinks its a mistake because he likes Jews and doesn’t see them as a problem.

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @karel
  427. geokat62 says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Jared thinks its a mistake because he likes Jews and doesn’t see them as a problem.

    Thanks for furnishing that sketch, Carolyn. Very kind of you.

  428. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    The standard view seems to be that if one criticizes the Jews enough, their teeth fall out. Not going to happen.

    HBD and genetics is the foundation of a survivable policy. The problem isn’t so much the Jews as that we listen to them. And that’s far from our only problem. Ever since WW II we’ve put our smart people into implementation rather than rule (the “captive screwball” theory of business), and we’re burning them up like a tobacco addict goes through cigarettes. We’re also burning ourselves up like overloaded bearings. Humanity could lose industrialization from our current failures.

    So, yes, racial consciousness has to become a good. This next election should accelerate a return to reality for the bulk of the US population, no matter who wins. The reality is that we’re poor and our lives are forfeit if we can’t start defending ourselves. For example, the basic laws passed in the 1960s revolution must be revoked. No 1964 Civil Rights Act, no 1965 Immigration Act, end Federalization of welfare costs, no more subsidized NGOs.

    Actually, BLM and Antifa and for that matter the Federal school curricula are doing a great job at making racism respectable. A bit of political Akido and it will be respectable and very nearly compulsory for everybody.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  429. Poco says:
    @GeneralRipper

    That diseased mind hates Americans of German and Irish descent as well.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  430. incitatus says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Thanks for your reply.

    “It seems to me that this anti-Catholicism movement comes from the pan-germanic movement, which supported Hitler but which Hitler criticises in Mein Kampf precisely for that reason : “The hard struggle the Pan-German movement fought against the Catholic Church can be explained by its insufficient understanding of the people’s spiritual nature….”

    ‘Mein Kampf’ was Austrian suicidal jailbird philosopher Hitler mouthing-off (throwing-the-dice) 1924. A convicted felon after his 4 Sep 1921 personal assault of German WW1 veteran and electrical engineer Otto Ballerstadt, head of rival Bayernbund, left in critical condition, Ballerstadt retired political life in 1925.

    Hitler was a talented demagogue, a gefreiter (PFC) useful to the Reichswehr (who wanted to excuse egregious WW1 failure), so he wasn’t deported to Austria as legally mandated 1921 or 1924. Wonder why?

    After corrupt 86-year-old Hindenburg folded 30 Jan 1933 and appointed 43-year-old Austrian felonious minority candidate Adolf Hitler Chancellor, all bets were off. What did Hindenburg get out of it? Continued tax exemption for his gifted East Prussian Neudeck estate and forgiveness for illegally passing it exempt to son Oskar (a contemporary scandal).

    Long retired engineer Otto Ballerstadt, no threat to Hitler, was arrested by the SS 30 Jun ’34, killed near or in Dauchau, body found 1 Jul ’34 in forest near Gündinger Neuhimmelreich shot in the back of the head. Former Chancellor General der Infanterie Kurt von Schleicher and wife were shot dead opening their foyer door; Generalmajor Ferdinand von Bredow was shot in the face opening his door; Herbert von Bose (von Papen’s press chief) was shot ten times in the back; and so on. All without judicial process.

    Under Hitler all parties (other than NSDAP) were illegal, all rivals arrested, murdered, imprisoned, ‘reeducated’. Left (KPT), Centrists (SPD) or rival conservatives. Made no difference. ‘Gleichschaltung” remade Germany as an NSDAP state beholden to one leader. Press included.

    Great if the leader’s right. Not so good if the leader’s wrong (1941-45). Suicide pact.

    “Hitler expresses his opposition to the Ultramontane tendency of Catholicism, but that is a very ancient problem in Europe. Catholicism has always meant interference by a foreign power.”

    It’s probably simpler than that. Hitler didn’t tolerate dissent. Wasn’t just Bishop Galen and those pesky RCs complaining about régime Aktion T4 snuffing thousands of Aryan ‘useless eaters’ after 1 Sep 1939. That was fairly late. Rewind to 1937 and former WW1 U-Boat captain and former NSDAP supporter pastor Martin Niemöller, who believed what he preached. Big threat to the Führer.

    “Pastor Niemöller finally arrested [1 Jul 1937]. Small mention of this in the press. The thing now is to break him so that he can’t believe his eyes or ears. We must never let up.”
    – Joseph Göbbels Tagebücher Teil 1, Vol 4 entry for 3 Jul 1937 p.208 [Ulrich ‘Hitler: Ascent’ p.655]

    “That [Niemöller’s release after eight months ‘investigative custody’ on winning a closed court verdict of seven months in prison and 2000 mark fine] takes the cake. I’m only going to give the press a brief announcement. The Führer will order Himmler to have this guy immediately taken to Ornienburg [Sachsenhausen KZ]. There he’ll only be able to serve God by working and looking deep within himself.
    – Joseph Göbbels Tagebücher Teil 1, Vol 5 entry for 2 Mar 1938 p.185 [Ulrich ‘Hitler: Ascent’ p.656].

    He’s [Pastor Niemöller] in the right place in a concentration camp. It will be quite some time before he gets out. That’s how it is now for all enemies of the state. Anyone who thinks kindly old Hitler is a weakling will get acquainted with the hard-nosed Hitler.”
    – Adolf Hitler 3 Mar 1938 Lunch in the Berlin Chancellery [Göbbels Tagebücher Teil 1, Vol 5 entry for 4 Mar 1938 p.187; Ulrich ‘Hitler: Ascent’ p.656]

    Niemöller, after being serving time, was arrested exiting the courtroom and interned in KZs until 1945. He was lucky. He survived. Many of his religious piers (e.g. Lutheran Dietrich Bonhoeffer hanged 9 Apr 1945 at Flossenbürg KZ) did not.

    “Hitler was on the moderate side regarding Christianity”

    Hitler cared nothing for Christianity. He cared for power derived from promoting his leadership cult. There could be no rivals, full stop. Arrest them, kill them, imprison them, silence them. Simple as that.

    “and he [Hitler] certainly never promoted any kind of paganism.”

    Reread what he taught German young:

    “Pope and rabbi shall yield, we want to be pagans again…out with the Jews and with the pope from the German home”
    -Hitlerjugend Lied 1935 [Childers ‘The Third Reich’ p.303]

    Sounds pretty pagan to me.

    Stay well, Laurent

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
    , @MarkNiet
  431. @incitatus

    Well you know what the really shitty thing about WW2 was?

    Choosing between German quasi Christian pagans or Fanatical Christian Hating Jew Bolsheviks.

    Looking at the current situation, I’d have to go with the former.

  432. incitatus says:
    @Robjil

    “Kito’s war…a Jewish rebellion in the Eastern Roman Empire in 115-117 AD”

    Interesting, thanks.

    Closest I’ve read was Sallust’s ‘The Jugurthine War’ (describing Rome’s torturous quest to capture and kill the upstart king of Numidia 112-106 BC. He drove Rome crazy. Not as bad Hannibal Barca’s embarrassing multi-year romp though Latium years earlier, but close enough. He was finally captured, paraded through Rome in Gaius Marius’ triumph (106 BC), executed by strangulation in prison two years later. Romans didn’t fool around.

    As you say vis-à-vis Kito “Christians were not in power yet, thus Jews can not blame their actions on Christians”. Solace for Jews and nascent Christians. Poor long-dead pagans take it in the cheek once again!

  433. Gulnare says:
    @TGD

    “One notorious example was SS Obersturmbannführer Joachim Peifer.”

    Pfeifer (“pepper” in English) is a very common jewish surname…

    • Troll: Carolyn Yeager
  434. Anonymous[208] • Disclaimer says:
    @A-Christian

    Why do you people LARP as Christians? Just call your anti-Christian cult something else. You have not read the bible, you ignore its constant reference to the nations, and God having created them and dealing with them AS NATIONS, because you do not care about God or His word, you care about virtue signalling to progressives.

  435. @Gulnare

    You’re making a common mistake here. There were a lot of Jewish Germans before Hitler took control. The most visible Jews to many people (especially HERE) are the German diaspora – a large number of whom have common German names.

    SS recruitment requirements included physical fitness, fanatical loyalty to Adolf Hitler, and multiple generations of pure Aryan descent. If Pfeifer was an obvious Jewish name, the SS recruiters would have noticed. So we have two options – the SS evaluated his character and concluded that he represents Nazi ideals so perfectly that they decided he was officer material in in spite of him being an ethnic Jew, or he got in on forged paperwork and his conduct was consistently in line with Nazi ideals.

    For him to give the order to murder American POWs shows conduct in line with Nazi ideals. We know this is consistent with Nazi ideals because his subordinates obeyed the order. We know this is consistent with Nazi ideals because his superiors did not execute him. They murdered plenty of Jews who did not deserve to die, but when faced with an actual mass murderer they decided that either he wasn’t really a Jew or that Jews are OK if they’re mass murderers?

  436. Ivan says:
    @Fox

    Curry (not casino) Indian.

  437. Ivan says:
    @Laurent Guyénot

    Leon deGrelle was a major league bullshitter who claimed that since Stalin purged the Red Army of Tukhachevsky and the officer caste, the Red Army was in no condition to fight. I would imagine that the Aryan looking Tukhachevsky impressed the Nazis as the only fighter they would respect. Nazis had to learn the hard way that the Slavs were not the undermen when it came to war.

    • Replies: @Fox
  438. karel says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    “I am not a psychiatrist. Please try to find another place for the treatment of your obsession.” As in the case of the tenacious “sparkon”, the above statement also applies to you Liškolovče. Why dont you try to find skeletons of the missing Germans instead? It may relieve the pressure in your head.

    • LOL: incitatus
    • Troll: Carolyn Yeager
  439. @Laurent Guyénot

    I read the chapter on Andry Vlasov in the Keelhaul book and found it to be blatantly anti-German and equally pro-Russian. Of course, Epstein was a Jew so could not write a fair book.

    He characterized Hitler and Rosenberg as closed-minded about any Russian divisions supplied and trained by Germany from the start, for the sole reason of their view that all Slavs were Untermenchen (which Epstein defined as ‘subhuman’) whom must be subjugated to the German Herrenvolk (defined as ‘master race’). This is pure lie, as neither used those words with those meanings.

    There were not “a million Russians fighting under German uniform” but far fewer, and it took them only about a day in action to “vote” to leave their position on the Eastern Front without informing the Germans and march to Prague to join the communist partizans fighting against the SS for the “liberation” of Prague! One day! Epstein saw fit to praise them for their loyalty to their homeland. They killed something like 2000 Germans and captured a bunch more to hand over to the arriving Red Army.

    Whatever fate befell these Russians in the end, I feel no sympathy – as you do, Laurent. About the only thing I learned was the fast friendship from early on between Vlasov-in-custody and Klaus von Stauffenberg and the rest of the treason group that was already forming in Army Group Center. It only proves that Hitler had the right instincts but did not or could not put together the proof or evidence for what he “felt.” His fatal flaw: He had too much respect for the German military honor code, and did not have the necessary conscienceless ruthlessness that Josef Stalin had.

    • Replies: @karel
    , @Laurent Guyénot
  440. Fox says:
    @Ivan

    We are now again at the point on the circle that is being run around seemingly endlessly:
    What did the about five million Red Army soldiers, armed to the teeth with heavy weaponry, do at the East-West demarcation line, heavily concentrated at the German-Soviet sector, on June 22nd, 1941? They were carrying maps of the areas west to the western border of the SU and Russian -German instruction books with ready-formulated speech (e.g.: “Gdye Mer” – “Во ист дер Бюргэрмейстер?” “Wo ist der Buergermeister” -“where is the mayor”, formulated in Cyrillic to imitate closely the German sound, so as to allow Russian speakers to say things in German to people of authority or give instructions) on June 22nd, 1941.
    Whether the Bolshevik Army would have attacked is a question of conjecture, although a very well-founded one, but any responsible person in a position of authority would have had to make a decision as to what a giant army ready to strike at the border means.
    It was the identical strategic situation to 1914, when Russia, France and England had made their pacts to crush Germany from East and West in a vice grip, with England as the deciding factor whether they’d dare the gamble. For Germany the only chance of thwarting this stratagem was to attack. This is an unwelcome fact for the people who are enamored with the world conquest farce, which was enlarged to the world conquest and lebensraum farce in the war of 1939-1945.

    I don’t recall Degrelle ever making the statement that the Red Army was in no condition to fight; he did, however, remark on the effect the purges and show trials must have had on the overall ability to have experienced officers lead the army, as opposed to ideologically trustworthy, but less capable officers.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @ivan
  441. MarkNiet says:
    @incitatus

    “Orthodox cross procession in Northwest Russia, 1942. That the Germans opened the churches closed by the Bolshevik was well received by a religious peasantry. Source: The Russian state archive for film and photo documentation, 3/261/5.”

    https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/research/news-and-events/news/2018/many-russians-hoped-that-hitler-would-free-them-fr.html

    • Replies: @incitatus
  442. Petermx says:

    I haven’t followed this whole thread but could this be similar to others whose attitudes changed once it was clear the allies would win? About 15 years ago I met a German who lived with his parents in Czechoslovakia during the war as a child. He told me relations were good between Germans and Czechs until the allies arrived and then the Czechs became unfriendly (he may have used a stronger word).

    I am not sure about some of the things written at the end of this book review but otherwise I think it is very revealing on how Russian peasants welcomed the Germans as liberators and the following also makes sense.

    ““Nevertheless there was no marked change in the Russians’ view of the occupiers until the autumn of 1943, when it became more and more clear that a German retreat was coming. There was then a marked increase in the passive and active opposition to the occupiers”, says Enstad.

    He is of the opinion that when people live in an area where two warring fractions are fighting for mastery, it is natural to adapt to the one that is in power at any given time – and avoid confrontation as far as is humanly possible.”

    https://www.hf.uio.no/ilos/english/research/news-and-events/news/2018/many-russians-hoped-that-hitler-would-free-them-fr.html

    Similarly, as the videos of occupied Paris and articles from historians like Robert Faurissson show, occupied France was treated very well by Germans, contrary to the many decades of lies after the war portraying the Germans as brutal occupiers. They had it so well that many “collaborated” with their German occupiers so around 1980 or 1990 they started to let it out that many, many French “collaborated” and I think the Jews began emphasizing this and demonized the “collaborators”. I think maybe the Jews felt this new twist would work in their favor too. It is fascinating to me that the allies (probably especially Jews) created a new word for what is perfectly normal behavior for people under occupation. It is normal to “collaborate” because if you you attack your occupiers you’ll be shot. How many Germans collaborated with their enemies after our surrender? Everyone.

    At around the same time I met the German that lived in Czechoslovakia I met a beautiful Czech girl that opened a shop selling Czech crystal. She had a German grandparent. After a conversation with her, talking to the other guy and other things I read, I soon realized that the supposedly horrible relations that Germans and Czechs had (prior to WW II already) was at the very least, exaggerated. That was probably done to justify taking Bohemia and Moravia from Austria WW I (without a plebiscite).

    Of course Vlasov was not a civilian. You can understand and forgive civilians who are at the mercy of their occupiers.

    • Replies: @karel
  443. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Fox

    I don’t recall Degrelle ever making the statement that the Red Army was in no condition to fight; he did, however, remark on the effect the purges and show trials must have had on the overall ability to have experienced officers lead the army, as opposed to ideologically trustworthy, but less capable officers.

    Right, about that.

    Soviet motivation was very basic, something right out of Hobbes, who thought that fear of death motivated all politics.

    “A man would have to be very brave to be a coward in the Red Army” (paraphrase)
    Joseph Stalin
    https://20thcenturytruth.wordpress.com/stalin-you-have-to-be-brave-to-be-a-coward-in-the-red-army-unarmed-human-shields-used-as-defence/

    Suvorov claimed that those officers tried were not competent combat officers. Perhaps he was right. However, “competent combat officers” in the Red Army had to be willing to accept very large casualties, and would perhaps be more noted for their obedience (or fear of execution) than their tactical acumen. Best, perhaps Stalin thought, to make a few examples early on to set the mental tone.

    Remember also that it was routine to use KGB followup units to kill any troops attempting to shirk or flee.

    So the trials would have had two purposes — (a) remove the administrators, and (b) here’s what happens if we decide you aren’t useful enough.

    Now, this is not to deny that Soviet pre-WW II formations were highly innovative, or that Red army operational techniques improved during WW II, Kursk was a resounding Soviet operational success, and more or less the end of German mass breakthrough tactics. However, Soviet line troops were noted for their heavy casualties. Tank desant, for an example of a high casualty tactic, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tank_desant) was part of Soviet tactical doctrine and general practice during WW II. To be fair, effective armored personnel carriers with overhead cover were not widely deployed by any of the WW II combatants, and the increased mobility of infantry units may have actually decreased overall casualties, but — it was a suicide job if I ever saw one. Supposedly the Soviets didn’t bother to monitor political correctness in these units, as nobody expected them to survive.

    So, in the above environment, show trials resulting in executions would not disorganize the military as they would in a Western force. IMHO, of course.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
  444. karel says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Lovec, you are a very confused troll as it is impossible to discern from your random writing style what you actually want to say or what was said by someone else. Anyway, being a habitual liar you never forget to express your loyalty to Nazism by stating that General Bunyachenko’s first ROA division marched ” to Prague to join the communist partizans fighting against the SS for the “liberation” of Prague!” Well, what the fuck you know about Prague uprising, nothing, I dare to ask. The claim that General Bunyachenko joined the communist partizans is beyond absurd. It seems that you are very sad that Prague was liberated from the SS troops. Wipe your tears.

  445. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @Poco

    Old saying:
    “This animal is very bad; when you attack it, it defends itself.”
    https://www.englishclub.com/ref/esl/Quotes/Life/This_animal_is_very_bad_when_you_attack_it_it_defends_itself._2782.php

    That’s the Americans – the real population, not the governments we’ve had. The American Dream is the Protestant Dream — to be a good steward of the land and be rewarded by God for doing so. Keep them from doing that, and there might be a reaction. That’s why the rioting in cities is blowing back on the rioters. It’s also why the Americans will abandon the cities more or less completely. Cities are no longer good stewardship if the land, nor is high population.

    OT: Take a look at the old Mack Reynolds stories.
    “Expediter”: Reynolds described, several decades before it happened, exactly what took down the USSR.
    “Among the Bad Baboons”: Reynolds describes a US in which the cities have been destroyed by large riots and US citizens live on the dividends “citizen’s basic stock issue”, since few work thanks to “ultramation”.
    “Revolution” was an attempt at describing inefficiencies in the US corporate model that Reynolds thought would lead to political changes in the US. They are somewhat like the inefficiencies that we see today — misallocation of resources on a wide scale.

    Reynolds thought the USSR would last indefinitely (as did most people back then) and got a few other things wrong also, but he did given the moderate socialist view of the world’s future, and was right a few times. If nothing else, he gives some idea of the difficulties in anticipating the future.

    If you want to spend the money, here are what look like most of his works, including the stories cited above.
    https://bearlib.com/mack-reynolds-ebooks

  446. karel says:
    @Petermx

    Indeed, it was exactly as you say that ”About 15 years ago I met a German who lived with his parents in Czechoslovakia during the war as a child. He told me relations were good between Germans and Czechs until the allies arrived and then the Czechs became unfriendly (he may have used a stronger word). ” Czechs had fantastic lives under nice German occupants who were so worried that the subdued Czechs would get too fat during the war so that reduced their food rations compared to Germans. This followed a plunder by a forced devaluation (about 30%) of the Czech crown compared to the German Mark. Daily terror by Gestapo was also a great fun. Most Czechs enjoyed it just like the internement in concentration camps and occasional executions of the trouble makers.

    Your fables sound like those of our lovely Carolyn. Did she write this contributions for you?

    • Replies: @Petermx
    , @utu
  447. incitatus says:
    @MarkNiet

    Thanks for the 1942 photo. January or December? Big difference.

    “Germans opened the churches closed by the Bolshevik was well received by a religious peasantry.”

    Doubtless true, and all were right in welcoming the return of religious rights. Germans encouraged local compliance, but was it genuine? What was the long term German goal?

    “This is a war of extermination. Commanders must be prepared to sacrifice their personal scruples.”
    – Adolf Hitler Address to 250 Senior Officers at the Reich Chancellery on USSR Invasion Plans 30 Mar 1941 [Beevor ‘The Second World War’ p. 189]

    Is that Christian?

    “We will carry out all necessary measures [in conquered Russia] – executions, expulsions etc. – and continue to do so…[the main goal is to] correctly slice the giant cake so that we can firstly rule, secondly administer, and thirdly exploit it. [The Baltic States, Crimea, German Volga settlements, the Baku oilfield region will become] territories of the German Reich…Nobody must ever be allowed to bear arms except the Germans…This gigantic expanse must of course be pacified as quickly as possible, and this can be achieved by shooting everyone who even looks at us the wrong way.
    -Adolf Hitler 16 Jul 1941 to Göring, Lammers, Keitel, Rosenberg and Bormann at Wolfsschanze [Ulrich ‘Hitler: Downfall’ p.198-99]

    Is that Christian? What about this:

    “It is the eternal law of nature of [survival of] the fittest that gives Germany the historical right to subjugate, rule over and force these racially inferior people to do productive labor.”
    -Adolf Hitler 24 Sep 1941 recorded by Werner Koeppen (Rosenberg’s liaison at Wolfsschanze) [Ulrich ‘Hitler: Downfall’ p.692, note 41]

    Is that Christian?

    Here’s what the Führer thought about the German churches:

    “In the long run National Socialism and religion will no longer be able to exist together…The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity’s illegitimate child. Both are inventions of the Jews.”
    – Adolf Hitler ‘Table Talk’ 11-12 July 1941

    “The war will be over one day. I shall then consider that my life’s final task will be to solve the religious problem. Only then will the German nation be entirely secure once and for all. I don’t interfere in matters of belief. Therefore I can’t allow churchmen to interfere with temporal affairs. The organized lie must be smashed. The State must remain the absolute master. When I was younger, I thought that it was necessary to set about matters with dynamite. I’ve since realized that there’s room for a little subtlety. The rotten branch falls of itself. The final state must be: in St-Peter’s chair, a senile officiant; facing him, a few sinister old women, as gaga and as poor in spirit as anyone could wish. The young and healthy are on our side…I dream of a state of affairs in which every man would know that he lives and dies for the preservation of the species.”
    – Adolf Hitler ‘Table Talk’ 13 Dec 1941

    “The State” Austrian Hitler refers to is his rotten leadership cult. Religious rebirth? Don’t think so, unless the measure of faith is Jim ‘Drink the Kool-Aid’ Jones.

    • Thanks: ivan
    • Replies: @Anonymous
  448. Fox says:

    Can you provide more information on the book by Ulrich you cite? There is a whole raft of people with the name Ulrich and writing anti-Hitler books, and I can’t decide which one it is you mean.

    • Replies: @incitatus
  449. Anonymous[339] • Disclaimer says:
    @incitatus

    Is that Christian?

    Hell, yes. And you’d best not forget it. All the niceness comes off sometimes, and the not so nice core comes through. “Wrathful God”, remember?

    “Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.”, translates as:
    “Kill them all, God will know his own.”
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massacre_at_B%C3%A9ziers
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caedite_eos._Novit_enim_Dominus_qui_sunt_eius.

    Push comes to shove, if Christianity could be lost, then it’s as Christian as anything gets. The US was prepared to kill the industrial world back in the 1950s, and meant it, and that was probably the only way to save the industrial world back then.

    This is a bit off topic, but Antifa and BLM are like Little Willie:
    Willie saw some dynamite
    couldn’t understand it, quite.
    His curiosity didn’t pay
    it rained “Willie”
    seven days.

    And, like back in the 1950s, it might rain everybody else too as local wars break out and some become nuclear.

  450. incitatus says:
    @Fox

    ”Can you provide more information on the book by Ulrich you cite?”

    Volker Ullrich. German historian. ‘Hitler: Ascent’ (published 2016); ‘Hitler: Downfall’ (released in English 1 Sep 2020). Well worth the trip.

    Same for German historian Peter Longerich (‘Hitler-A Biography’ 2019, ‘Goebbels-A Biography’ 2015, ‘Himmler’ 2013).

  451. Petermx says:
    @karel

    No, I relayed what someone else that was there told me. Since Youtube has now removed it, I can’t post it but until a few months ago there was a video of 200,000 Czechs in Prague in 1942 pledging loyalty to Germany and their own leader, which is also in line with what I said. I also read an article within the last few years when a Czech politician said life was not so terrible under German occupation. The Jews quickly complained but I don’t recall what happened after that, Also, I am familiar with Lidice. For decades after the war this was brought up over and over again and then I finally learned the British trained Heydrich’s assassins to kill him because they knew the Germans would take revenge, as armies always do when partisans do such things. They wanted bad relations between Czechs and Germans. At Heydrich’s funeral Czechs were present in sympathy.

    I don’t know how old you are but try reading some of David Irving’s books. The fact that a modern day politician would make such a statement (even if shouted down by the idiots), all these things say the narrative that was peddled for decades after the war has as much truth in it as the Jews claims that they were made into soap and lampshades (such idiocy), now known to be a lie.

    I have no doubt life could be difficult under occupation. My parents experienced the war too and then occupation. But I don’t know of any other country in the world (except Japan) that would have tens of thousands of civilians deliberately murdered by the enemy within a few hours while in their homes, having bombs dropped on them. But the Germans experienced this in virtually all their cities. much more than Japan.

    After spending the last 2 years in Europe I have learned that most Europeans are as stupid as Americans when it comes to WW II, and this certainly includes Germans, who almost all say “there was not much bombing here”. Most people have all been told how awful the Germans were but lie to cover up things contradicting that claim, such as Russians and Ukrainians welcoming Germans as liberators. The Ukrainians are completely ignorant too. While they took some revenge on the Jews that murdered 8 million Ukrainians before the war, now they are taught the Jews were the victims. The Jews are now in control there too but before 1990 Jews were not memorialized as victims separately in eastern Europe and I recall reading in the US how this bothered them. But the fact that they were the biggest torturers and murderers is covered up.

    • Replies: @karel
  452. Fox says:

    Thanks. Volker Ulrich is apparently one of the establishment historians; generally, I am very skeptical of their productions. You mention him with Longerich, the Believer.
    In German there is a saying:

    To the tune of him whose bread I eat I will dance.

    Hence, uncontroversial establishment creatures with a couple of awards and honorary doctorates, ready publishing contracts and a pretty portrait available, are very likely to carry the establishments opinions, and are therefore not worthwhile to consult. You see, I don’t expect much from weak characters with limp opinions and dinner invitations at residences with thoroughly good press as their hallmark.

    • Replies: @incitatus
  453. IstvanIN says:

    The Tribe has won. I see miscegenation every day and foreigners unceasingly numerous on the streets of my state. The vast majority of Whites will never see the Tribe for what they are. The vast majority of Whites will never support what would be required to take back our countries from the Third World invaders of Europe and North America. And what would be required? Extreme ‘unpleasantness’ which White people will never approve of. If our people do ever wake up it will be too late, it will be when we have been reduced to the world-wide equivalent of the Afrikaners in SA. They have won.

    The real question for history is why we fell for it?

    • Replies: @geokat62
  454. ivan says:
    @Fox

    My comment about deGrelle on Tukhachevsky was meant to show what his understanding about military and other matters amounted. If I recall he carried on with the usual bombast about the fearsome Tukhachevsky and how awesome he was. I contrast it with this hilarious takedown :

    http://www.elnitsky.com/suvorov.html

    The business between Stalin and Tookie went back to the war against Poland, where there were mutual recriminations after Pilsudski put paid to the Lenin’s idea of “revolution in many countries”, by stopping the Soviets. Incidentally as I don’t have to tell you this is the same Pilsudski whose fighting Poland was the only force between the marauding Soviets and a Germany recovering from the WWI. I think its fair to regard the later Germans under Shitler as among the most rank of ingratiates, fully deserving of death for teaming up with Stalin to divide Poland.

    I am of the school that Stalin had intended to wage war to expand Soviet areas of control right into Germany. But that was for later in 1942 or 1943, in the meantime he did his utmost not to provoke Hitler. In June 1941 in the face of multiple intelligence reports both from overseas and the frontline that the Germans were preparing for an imminent assault, the criminal Stalin ordered the Soviets to not fire even a single shot. This is too well known to continue belabouring. It accounts for the utter annihilation of the frontline Soviet forces in the initial two or three months. But Uncle Joe was building up his reserves all this time, so the Soviets could take that blow, perhaps unprecedented in all history. In the memoirs of WC Bullitt, one of FDR’s advisors he reminds that his readers the Soviets mobilisation all through the war, had ended up with them being able to string more that 250 ~270 divisions at what became the Iron Curtain.

    Hitler struck first, but he wasn’t fighting a defensive war in 1941.

    • Replies: @karel
  455. @Carolyn Yeager

    I wrote you a longish response to this post last night. But it got vaporized somehow. Too tired to try again. But I think we don’t actually disagree on much anyway. I enjoy your posts and your site

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  456. @Achilles Wannabe

    Well thank you, AW. I appreciate that you took the time to write a longish response. I’m sorry I missed the opportunity to read it. I hate that when I write something that takes a bit of time and then lose it right before I post it. Ouch! I too think we are basically in agreement and are allies. You’re a respecter of women too, which can’t be said for all commenters here and on other boards. For me, it’s a particularly Germanic trait. But not solely, of course.

  457. karel says:
    @Petermx

    Not much good, ventilating hearsay. But what really amuses me is your statement of ”there was a video of 200,000 Czechs in Prague in 1942 pledging loyalty to Germany and their own leader”. Our lovely Carolyn would tell you that Prague was actually a German city, hence they must have been logically all Germans. Well most of these 200 000 probably were but I am unaware that anyone really counted them. Some of these enthusiast were brought from the countryside, some were compelled to attend by their German employers and some were just there out of curiosity to gape at the show. You are a believer of propaganda shows.

  458. @Carolyn Yeager

    I didn’t say this book was perfect. But it does a great job at exposing one of the greatest and least known crimes of the Allies (Eisenhower), the forced repatriation of all Russian soldiers (2 millions at the least), who were destined to the gulag or hanging, regardless of whether they fought as Soviet soldiers or under German uniform, since Stalin had declared traitor any soldier surrendering to the enemy. Epstein, by the way, was the most important investigator exposing the truth about Katyn.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  459. @Laurent Guyénot

    I don’t know, I learned about this mainly British betrayal of all Axis fighters (not just Russian) quite a long time ago. I’m sure there are many details I don’t know. But Germans with their Croatian allies who managed to reach the American and British zones to surrender to them were betrayed, lied to, put into train cars which were then locked and taken into the Soviet Union where they were delivered to the Gulag where most eventually died. Some did eventually return to Germany. This was considered “reparations” for the SU.

    I only read the one chapter, but if a writer has that biased an approach as Epstein does to the National Socialist regime, then I wouldn’t call it a great book. It’s a flawed book. Epstein lionizes all the anti-Stalinist Russians, and I guess all anti-Hitler Germans. A sentence I found particularly indefensible was on the bottom of page 63: The Vlasov people wanted to fight Stalin and Stalinism—a regime certainly not better than Hitler’s Nazi regime—but were condemned by the West for one reason only: that we were allied with Stalin’s terror regime. [This is not a quote so I don’t know why he uses “we”.] To characterize Stalin’s regime in Russia as only “not better than Hitler’s” is to say Hitler was no better than Stalin — which is outrageous. There is no equivalency, in truth. I guess the idea is that he’d also say Eisenhower et al were bad, but not as bad as Hitler. This book came out in 1973. I’m not saying it is not an important contribution but it needs to be updated.

    About Katyn, I don’t find anything about his role in it on his Wikipedia page. Nothing.

    • Replies: @Laurent Guyénot
  460. @Carolyn Yeager

    Well, if we only build our understanding of WW2 on pro-Nazi books praising Hitler, we surely don’t have much to read, these days. This kind of books documenting the crimes of the allies are welcome, as far as I am concerned. By your criterion, Suvorov’s books are also a waste of time, I suppose. Epstein’s role on Katyn is told in Wolfe’s introduction. I don’t see any reason to doubt it.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  461. karel says:
    @ivan

    I am not quite certain what you are talking about by mentioning that ”the same Pilsudski whose fighting Poland was the only force between the marauding Soviets and a Germany recovering from the WWI.” You tend to forget that Poland took a large bites of Lithuania, Ukraine and Belarus after the end of the war, supposedly from the ”bolsheviks” to realize their dreams of Wielkopolska. They were, however, screwed by Tuchachewsky’s armies in 1920 and had to retreat.

    The Polish appetite for land grabs was not quite exhausted in the east as they had nothing better than to do than occupy the Těšínsko region. After the ultimatum by the Czechoslovak government from 21st January 1919, to withdraw the occupying troops, that was ignored by Poland, Czech armies attacked at 13 pm on 23rd January. This was the beginning of the seven-day war which ended once Czech troops reached Polish town of Skoczów. Then the Czech government was put under ”diplomatic” pressure by the valiant Frenchies to stop their advance. This was a real, rather than the fictitious ”Dolchstoss” by a supposed ally, that Germans are so fond of moaning about. Poles just as Germans have suffered for centuries from an invincibility complex till it was occasionally cured by their setbacks.

    • Thanks: ivan
  462. @Carolyn Yeager

    I am increasingly interested in Germanic traditions. I grew up thinking I should assimilate to anglo traditions. Then I found out, very belatedly, that the WASP had turned the country over to the Jews. I guess the Jews are running Germany too but, at least the Germans made them(or us)fight a war to do it. See you around the net Carolyn

  463. @Laurent Guyénot

    By your criterion, Suvorov’s books are also a waste of time, I suppose.

    Not at all! I read The Chief Culprit and we added a short side-essay on Suvorov’s contribution in The Artist Within the Warlord. You must misunderstand what I’m saying. Let me explain:

    Currently, still, the default and standard narrative of mid-20th Century Europe is that Adolf Hitler was the worst political actor of all – a real monster. So an unbiased or neutral book is seen as “pro-Nazi and praising Hitler” even if it’s doing no such thing. Epstein’s book was not about Hitler but he made sure to add negative, unflattering and even untrue background info. That’s what I mean by needing updating.
    Some of us are not willing to tolerate this state of affairs any longer, and I for one always speak up when I have the chance. I know that makes it sound as though I’m harping on the same thing ad nauseam , but it has to be done. Eighty years is long enough for this to go on. That’s why your article is so welcome. And for those who want to criticize Hitler and his regime, fine, but let them get their facts right and not think they can get away with saying anything. I do not agree with the attitude of those who say “some of what’s written here is good or pleasing to me, so I’ll take a pass on the part that isn’t.” And they’ll even recommend it to others. That’s what I really don’t get.

    I’ll read Wolfe’s introduction. Thanks. I do appreciate learning about this book.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  464. It’s not “nazification”, a non word. It’s AshkeNAZIfication. Or converting the world over to the way of the ashkenazi jews. Since WW-2 started as inter tribal warfare between the Sephardi jews, and the Ashkenazi jews, the jews controlling the world press needed a way to lure the rest of the world into the jew vs everyone else, conflict. So, a new- misdirecting, buzz word was invented. NAZI, which is a simple contraction of the word AshkeNAZI. Have you ever heard the media, or seen in print, the origin of the word NAZI. Didn’t think so!

  465. @Carolyn Yeager

    Oh, I just went to that Dalton site Looks very interesting – all that lit from National Socialists
    Thanks

  466. Anonymous[291] • Disclaimer says:

    Fichte, for instance, wrote in 1793: “Within almost every country in Europe lies a powerful state, animated by hostile sentiments, which is continually at war with all the others, and which, in some of them, terribly oppresses the citizens; I mean the Jews.”

    Can someone explain what specific evidence Fichte saw, in 1793, of Jewish power and Jewish hostility?

  467. Anonymous[291] • Disclaimer says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    All the way back to 1919, Adolf Hitler saw the Jewish Problem clearly and spoke about it.

    Is Hitler on record in 1919 saying anything?

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  468. utu says:
    @karel

    Did Czechs had reason to hate Germans? Did they hate Germans? Most Czechs rather hated the troublemakers like the ones who were executed once Heydrich too over. His actions turned out to be effective as the London-based Czech resistance was rolled up. And after this stick Heydrich gave Czechs a carrot:

    Labour was reorganised on the basis of the German Labour Front. Heydrich used equipment confiscated from the Czech organisation Sokol to organise events for workers. Food rations and free shoes were distributed, pensions were increased, and (for a time) free Saturdays were introduced. Unemployment insurance was established for the first time. The black market was suppressed. Those associated with it or the resistance movement were tortured or executed. Heydrich labelled them “economic criminals” and “enemies of the people”, which helped gain him support. Conditions in Prague and the rest of the Czech lands were relatively peaceful under Heydrich, and industrial output increased. (Wiki)

    To the question:

    What were some of the other major resistance acts other than the assassination of Heydrich? Were there any acts of sabotage or anything like that?

    Professor Jan Rychlík answers:

    Yes. But of course it is very difficult to evaluate this, because after the war, as often happens, every theft or misunderstanding was claimed to be an act of sabotage against the Nazis. It is like today – everybody who was prosecuted during the communist regime says that they were persecuted, when very often they were common criminals who would be arrested anyway, because no state can tolerate that kind of criminality. But at the end of the war, I think that the most important resistance activities were found in a partisan movement, which started in the Beskydy mountains on the borders of Slovakia.

    Meaning there was no resistance. Plenty of heroes after the war who stop chicken from Germans. Czechs did not resist.

    That German soldiers were sent to spend their furloughs to Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia because it was the safest place for Germans to be in the whole Europe? Because of no bombings it was safer than Germany. In places like France or Denmark it was imaginable some German soldier could be shot. But not in Bohemia unless some agent was sent form England who usually could not finish his task because he was promptly denounced to police. Czechs took mass public loyalty oath to Hitler and Germany and they adhered to it. There used to be a video on YT from this event at Wenceslas Square. Then there was video The Savage Peace showing interesting footage of Germans being mistreated after the war but it was also taken down. The hate and the lust for revenge apart from being purely politically calculated to promulgate the ethnic cleansing stemmed from their loyalty to Hitler. There was no signs of any hate during the war. Just telling jokes.

    Czechs ended up getting the best deal from all occupied countries. They did not have to provide conscripts except for the Czechs who stayed in Sudetenland and were forced to become German citizens and Silesians, mostly Poles in Teschen Silesia. It’s ironic that Poland by annexing the Teschen Silesia and liberating their Silesian Poles from the Czech rule in 1938 sealed their fate as the future Wehrmacht cannon fodder.

    • Replies: @karel
    , @karel
    , @Fox
  469. AndrewR says:
    @Corvinus

    Finns aren’t Germanic fool

  470. karel says: • Website
    @utu

    well well, ”Did Czechs had reason to hate Germans? Did they hate Germans?” What silly questions. In short, Czechs have not had many good reasons to love them but this is also a nonsensical statement as it assumes a universal answer. Do I hate Czechs because I cannot stand my next door neighbor or do I hate Germans for the same reason? I had many such unpleasant neighbors when living in several German cities but did I hate Germans because of that? The antipathy is always towards particular individuals and you should know that much.

    From what you write it may seem that Heydrich was a philantropist, as he gave away something, which had been stolen in the first place. Hermann Göring was also very kind to his workers in the stolen Czech factories. He owned quite a lot as you can find out from the German wiki i.e.

    Nach der sogenannten Zerschlagung der Rest-Tschechei 1939 wurden die Škoda-Werke mit der Sparte ASAP (Abkürzung für Aktiengesellschaft für die Automobilindustrie, heute Škoda Auto) in den Konzern eingegliedert ebenso die Československá zbrojovka Brno unter dem Namen Waffenwerke Brünn. Bereits Ende März 1939 bestanden die Reichswerke aus 84 Gesellschaften u. a. mit eigenem Transport- und Schifffahrtsunternehmen. Am 7. Juli 1939 erfolgte die Gründung der Holding Reichswerke AG „Hermann Göring“.

    Hermanns brother Albert who was the nice Göring was loved by his workers in Pilsen. He also saved many from deportation or a possible execution of the member of the resistance Jan Moravek.

    There is a lot of nonsense dripping out of your contribution and I will come to that later.

    Anyway, sun shines here in the Covid infested Prague so that I am tempted to find a consolation in visiting a garden of the local brewery rather than sitting at my computer. I hope that you will not hate me for this decision.