The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Fraser Archive
Who Are We? Towards an Anglo-Protestant Political Theology
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks
The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, lies on the ground at the Jallianwala Bagh memorial. Photograph: Narinder Nanu/AFP/Getty Images
The archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, lies on the ground at the Jallianwala Bagh memorial. Photograph: Narinder Nanu/AFP/Getty Images

The recent move by the Canadian government to criminalize “condoning, denying, or downplaying” the Holocaust is not just an infringement of civil liberties supposedly guaranteed by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. More importantly, it endows a distinctively Jewish political theology with legal protections denied to core Christian beliefs. The fact that this development has not been opposed either by mainline Protestant or Catholic churches is highly significant. Still, once upon a time, the Catholic Church did possess a distinctive political theology of its own, one identifying the Jewish people as an actual or, at best, a potential foe. The Second Vatican Council put an end to that “antisemitic” article of faith. But in principle, at least, Catholics could return their historic political theology on the Jewish Question. Things are very different among the Anglo-Protestant people of Canada, in particular, and of the Anglosphere, generally.

Anglo-Protestantism has long since been captured by cosmopolitan humanism, a liberal world-view denying the existential distinction made by realist political theology between friend and foe. Accordingly, Anglo-Protestants shy away from the traditional Christian belief that the Old Covenant with Israel according to the flesh was superseded by a New Covenant between God and the Church. Having rejected supersessionism, Anglo-Protestants generally recognize the Jews as elder brothers in the faith whose Covenant with God remains in force. The Holocaust Mythos, therefore, is widely accepted as the story of a monstrous crime committed against a people of God representative of humanity-at-large. Mainline Anglo-Protestant churches inhabit a moral universe in which a loving God confronts the “perpetrators” of genocides against innocent “victims” who may or may not receive aid, comfort, or justice from “bystanders”.

The Jewish people, on the other hand, have not been slow to recognize that their world is characterized by a sharp division between their “philosemitic” friends and their “antisemitic” enemies. During the twentieth century and continuing today, Anglo-Protestants have recognized the Jews as their “friends” and have, accordingly, been willing to combat “enemies” of the Jews whenever and however their governments have commanded. The Second and Third Reichs in Germany were foremost among those designated by our governments as collective “enemies,” not just of the British peoples, but of humanity itself.

Now that the Palestinian President (while sharing a platform with the German Chancellor) has charged Israel with inflicting “50 Holocausts” upon his people, one might wonder whether the Germans copped a bum rap over the Holocaust 1.0. To reach any firm conclusion, we should reflect upon the historical development of Anglo-Protestantism and the theological presuppositions that have prevented the church from developing an ethno-religious theology capable of reliably distinguishing “friend” from “foe”.

How Anglicans Escaped “Anglo-Saxon Captivity

The Church of England created the original model of Anglo-Protestantism during the sixteenth-century Reformation which separated the Anglican church from Roman Catholicism. The word “Anglican” is grounded etymologically in the old Anglo-Saxon term “Angelcynn” which meant literally “kin of the Angles.” This poses the obvious question as to whether Anglican political theology retains the capacity to draw any distinction between “friend” and “enemy” now that the Anglican “brand” has been drained of its ancestral, biblically-based, ethno-religious meaning. In what follows, I will use Angelcynn to denote the broad, but long disunited, body of Anglo-Protestants who could, and in my view, should re-unite in a broad church acting as a medium for the expression of their particular ethno-religious needs and interests.

Nations are rooted in historical myths, symbols, and ethno-religious traditions which, in the case of England, developed over many centuries during the Middle Ages. Leading authorities in support of that thesis are: Anthony D. Smith on The Ethnic Origins of Nations and Martin Lichtmesz on Ethnopluralismus. The concept of ethnopluralism must be distinguished from modern secular policies of multiculturalism as defended, for example, by James Tully. Official multiculturalism in the Anglosphere refuses to recognize the political character of Anglo-Protestant ethno-religious identity. But the Israeli historian, Azar Gat, in his book on Nations: The Long History and Deep Roots of Political Ethnicity and Nationalism provides support for the proposition that Anglo-Protestant Christians desperately need to recover a political theology anchored in their own distinctive ethno-religious identity. As things stand, all Protestant denominations, Anglican and dissenting churches alike, have united with the state to deny the legitimacy, indeed even the reality, of any such need.

Carl Schmitt is generally credited with the invention of the term “political theology”. What did Schmitt mean by political theology? German scholar Heinrich Meier suggests that Schmitt was looking for the legitimate foundations of political action. In European civilization, he found a conflict between political philosophy, ostensibly based in the universal principles of rational discourse, and revelation anchored in particularistic ethno-religions. To speak of revelation, of course, takes us into the realm of biblical theology. What is the relationship between biblical revelation and political theology? Did the historical Jesus preach a political theology? Did Jesus the Christ and his followers, before and after the Cross, have friends and enemies? While the historical Jesus seems to have focused on the destiny of his own people, the global Jesus, as worshipped by contemporary Anglo-Protestants, came to save the whole of humanity.

For the ancestors of today’s Anglo-Protestants, political theology, avant la lettre, was a fact of life. In fact, the theology of the Angelcynn was politicized from the very beginning of their historical ethnogenesis. The story of the emergence of the English nation, no less than the biblical narrative of ancient Israel, was and remains a process moved by “the lure of God”. Ethno-religious divisions long defined friends and enemies, thereby shaping the demographic development of the English nation. Neither the English nor, later, the British state created the English nation. Instead, the Old English Church nurtured the ethnogenesis of the English people. An embryonic English ethnos, working in and through the early Angelcynn church and their king, became the prototype of an English “state,” well before the Norman Conquest.

Over the centuries, the identity of those deemed to be enemies of the English changed. During the reign of Alfred the Great, the Vikings were perceived as the greatest threat. When William the Conqueror invaded England, the Norman enemy was victorious. The Norman Conquest in combination with the Papal Revolution transformed the ethno-religious culture of England. One sign of the transformation was the replacement of the Old English used in Angelcynn monasteries by the Latin language employed in the universal Church governed from Rome. The ecclesiastical regime based on the absolutist papal monarchy survived in England for several centuries.

Following the upheavals of the Reformation and Civil War, the division between Protestants and Catholics largely defined the distinction between friend and enemy for Britons, both domestically and internationally.

With the expansion of England, a Greater Britain emerged in the settler colonies around the world. From the eighteenth century onwards, the British Empire competed for power and resources with continental rivals such as France and Germany. Religious differences were no longer central to such conflicts. Indeed, since then, the process of secularization advanced to the point where historians have pronounced the death of Christian Britain.

In the Empire at large, one might even ask whether Australia, for example, was ever a Christian community on its road to nationhood. Ever since the Second World War, the declining Anglican confession throughout the Anglosphere has celebrated its escape from “Anglo-Saxon captivity,” to the point where it has been absorbed into a form of global Christianity hostile to any suggestion that the Anglican church should be of, by, and for the white British peoples of the Anglosphere. “White racism” is now the proclaimed enemy of mainstream Anglican political theology.

Indeed, contemporary Anglican political theology, in the person of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, manifests itself as the kinder, gentler face of post-Christian globalist bioleninism. In other words, it is difficult to distinguish between the public face of Anglican political theology and the Woke political ideology governing “Our Democracies”.

In the realm of academic theology, however, Oliver O’Donovan’s The Desire of the Nations offers a much more sophisticated model of Anglican political theology, but one no less opposed to an ethno-religious understanding of the Anglican tradition. O’Donovan contends that the point and purpose of every nation’s existence has been determined once and for all in the “Christ event”. “Membership in Christ,” he declares, “replaced all other political identities by which communities knew themselves”. Because the church is “catholic” it “leaps over all existing communal boundaries and forbids any part of the human race…to think of the Kingdom of God as confined within its own limits and to lose interest in what lies beyond them”. Strictly speaking, according to O’Donovan the church is an “eschatological” rather than a political society: it can be “entered only by leaving other, existing societies”.


For O’Donovan, in the modern world, not even those other, “political” societies constituted by governments are based on shared blood, language, and religion. Instead, the only form of “nationalism” open to modern “nation-states” such as Australia, Canada, or the United Kingdom is a “civic nationalism’’ defined by a common political will. Nationalism, therefore, is sometimes said to be in trouble. But, O’Donovan maintains, this is nothing new. “The truth is,” he remarks, “it has been in trouble ever since Christ rose from the dead”. In the eschatological society of the church, “no people’s identity as a people can be assumed; community identity is no longer self-evident. It is called into question by the existence of a new people, drawn from every nation, which by its catholic identity casts doubt on every other”.

In stark contrast, to that “catholic” vision of Christian identity, my thesis will defend the proposition that the Volksgeist of the English nation (and other British-descended peoples) was once, and could be again, an important medium through which God works in this world. Accordingly, this project rests on a set of presuppositions that differ in certain fundamental respects from those underlying O’Donovan’s approach to political theology.

Any theological schema of civic action requires one or more orienting concepts if it is to achieve its objectives. Historically potent examples of such orienting concepts, can be found in the lives and works of men such as Martin Luther, John Calvin, and John Wesley. Calvin’s theology was oriented around the concept of the “majesty or sovereignty of God.” Luther oriented his theological theory and practice around “justification by faith” while Wesley’s work revolved around the notion of “responsible grace.” Each of these concepts oriented new approaches to practical theology, each sparking its own theological revolution. Unfortunately, those revolutions oriented as they were, each in its own way, to personal salvation has run its course. Evangelical Protestantism is dying on the vine.

An Angelcynn Reformation seeking the collective redemption of British-descended peoples requires a more comprehensive strategy; it must be oriented around not just one but four concepts. This multi-pronged approach can be grounded in several existing but, as yet, separate streams of white Anglo-Saxon Protestant theology. The four key theological concepts are: (1) process theism; (2) preterism; (3) kinism; and (4) royalism. If and when these already intellectually compelling challenges to theological orthodoxy merge into a single popular current of ethno-religious experience, the next Great Awakening in British religious history will be in the offing.

Process Theism

Process theism builds on the historical theology of the nineteenth-century Anglican broad-church movement in rejecting traditional Christian theism. The early creeds of the Church established an image of God, outside time and space, the omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent source of being itself, who created the world out of nothing.

The doctrine of creatio ex nihilo cannot be found in either the Old or the New Testament. It appeared suddenly in the latter half of the second century B.C. Its appearance “can best be explained as a defence of the most controversial part of the Christian kerygma, the resurrection of the dead”. Only a God who created the world out of nothing could accomplish the bodily resurrection of the dead. Oliver O’Donovan’s vision of the universal church as an eschatological society preserves that creedal linkage between God’s created order and the bodily resurrection of believers in the new creation.

By contrast, process theism denies that the doctrine of creatio ex nihilo can be grounded in Genesis One. Instead, creation is conceived as an ongoing process within which God remains actively involved with all forms of conscious life. Biologist Bruce G. Charlton suggests that process theism can provide his discipline with the metaphysical framework it desperately needs to solve fundamental problems such as group selection. Natural selection is comparatively easy to explain at the level of individual organisms. But “true group selection…entails a purposive mechanism that can predict, can ‘look ahead’ several generations, and infer what is likely to be good for the survival and reproduction of the species.” The theory of natural selection “lacks teleology—a goal, direction or purpose.”

If the idea of purpose demands an organizing entity or deity then “evolution across history is best explained as a directional process of development” at both the individual (ontogeny) and group (phylogeny) level. The comparative evolutionary success of ethnic groups is probably affected, therefore, by the nature and intensity of their religious connection to the theistic organizing entity.

God is not omnipotent, however. Hence the evils of the world cannot be charged exclusively to his account; moreover, he is affected by his interactions with us and the wrongs we do unto others and ourselves. Robert Gnuse demonstrates that the Old Testament provides a revealing account of the processes of communication between the Israelites and the divine. Perhaps white Anglo-Saxon Protestants, too, could and should create a national bible recording our own communication—or lack thereof—with the divine.

Indeed, process theism provides grounds for doubting that the “Christ-event” (i.e., the Incarnation, Passion, and Resurrection of Jesus) happened, once and for all, in the history of only one nation in the ancient Near East on planet Earth. Jesus the Christ made a unique appearance in Israel according to the flesh but who knows whether or not other singular incarnations for other unique nations or even other worlds are excluded. There is only one historical Jesus, but there may be other Christ-events in some other “holy nation.”

Statue of Alfred the Great, Winchester, England
Statue of Alfred the Great, Winchester, England

Preterism, or, Covenant Eschatology

Preterism (from the Latin, præter or “past”) is a biblical hermeneutic or interpretive method consistent with process theism. A preterist biblical theology denies that the Bible sets out the story of humanity from the creation of planet earth when God breathed life into the first human until the end of the world at the Second Coming (the Parousia) of Jesus Christ. Rather, the biblical narrative has to do with the rise and fall of Old Covenant Israel. On a preterist reading, the bible story will not support a futurist eschatology which still awaits the return of Christ at the end of the world. Preterists hold that the clear text of Scripture shows that all of the biblical prophesies of a new heaven and a new earth, not just those in Revelation, were fulfilled in AD 70.

In that year, Christ returned to oversee the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, the physical center of the old heaven and old earth occupied by God’s first people. In the Book of Revelation, we see the Old Covenant world of Israel sinking into lakes of fire, while the New Covenant world enters into history. The Jerusalem Temple makes its exit in a spectacular cataclysm; a new creation becomes incarnate in the church, the ecclesiastical Body of Christ. There the bible story ends.

The preterist hermeneutic is also known as “covenant eschatology”. That is to say, the biblical narrative is consummated by the fulfillment of the covenant promises to carnal Israel. This was the end of the old age; it was then, that “the first heaven and first earth” long-symbolized by the Jerusalem Temple, “passed away.” It was with the end of the Old Covenant that the promised resurrection of the saints was fulfilled. This consummation was a process of spiritual renewal, begun by the resurrection of Jesus the Christ as “the firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep” (1 Cor. 15:20). As the “Holy City, the new Jerusalem” came down from God, “a new heaven and a new earth” came into being (Rev. 21:1-2) thus inaugurating the church age.

This preterist vision of the resurrection at “the end of the age” is quite different from O’Donovan’s mainstream futurist eschatology. On his reading, “it is given to nobody but the risen Christ to raise the dead, the church’s authority does not rest in exercising that power by delegation, but in pointing to its future exercise in an act of testimony.” O’Donovan, like another well-known Anglican theologian, N.T. Wright, looks forward to the parousia of a “global Jesus” at some point in our own future. Wright portrays Paul as the one who prophesies the still-future transfiguration of the entire cosmos, the moment when all those who belong to the Messiah “are themselves raised bodily from the dead.” Wright very explicitly ties the victory over death promised by Paul and Jesus to a physical resurrection of the dead. If death is to be defeated, he declares, then “anything other than some kind of bodily resurrection, therefore, is simply unthinkable.” In stark contrast, preterists contend that “the covenantal eschatology of national Israel offers a much more persuasive hermeneutical framework within which to interpret Paul’s understanding of the resurrection body.”

Samuel G. Dawson, for example, points out that Paul publicly declared that he “was saying none other things but those which the prophets and Moses did say would come” (Acts 26:22). Dawson contends that “Paul’s concept of the resurrection wasn’t that fleshly (or even transfigured) bodies would come out of holes in ground at all, because that’s not what Moses and the prophets taught.” Instead, Moses taught “the resurrection of Old Covenant Israel from the death of its fellowship from God”.

Dawson breaks even more dramatically from Wright when he observes that Paul never speaks of resurrected “bodies.” Instead, Paul refers only to “the resurrection of one body, the Old Covenant faithful who were being transformed into the body of Christ.” The hermeneutic problem here, Dawson concludes, “comes down to whether the resurrection Paul spoke of was one body in his present time or billions of bodies more than two thousand years in the future.”

If Dawson is right, then the early church effectively replaced Israel as the people of God. The God of history ordained that old national Israel fulfill its telos through one final, fiery sacrifice on the Temple Mount. A new age dawned in which the historical process of interaction between God and national Israel, as recounted in the biblical narrative, expanded to incorporate both the Greek and Latin civilizations of the Mediterranean basin. In effect, Old Covenant Israel was superseded by the development of European Christendom.

O’Donovan explicitly rejects any such supersessionist interpretation. National Israel, he asserts, can never be replaced. The Old Covenant remains in force for the Jews. Because Jesus the Christ represents God the “Kingdom’s representative must suffer the resistance of Israel on God’s behalf; but representing Israel’s cause, too, he must suffer God’s resistance on Israel’s behalf”. In the end, however, O’Donovan returns to the utterly ahistorical claim that the representation of Israel “opens out to the representation of the human race”. In this new creation, however, O’Donovan insists that “the continuing Israel…is not to be dismissed as an irrelevant survival from the past”. The Gentiles have been grafted onto Israel’s root; we only await the moment when carnal Israel comes to see “the possession of the law fulfilled in Christ”.

O’Donovan maintains that “until the last reconciliation the two communities must coexist”. Gentile Christians “cannot ignore the community into which they have by faith been grafted”. In effect, therefore, when carnal Israel speaks, Christians must listen. One might expect, therefore, that even if O’Donovan’s political theology does not require the criminalization of acts which “deny” or “downplay” the Holocaust, he would never condone such blasphemy.

Indeed, O’Donovan explicitly joins with Christian Zionists to accord carnal Israel a theopolitical status unknown to other nations comprising the eschatological society of the human race. Whether other families, tribes, and nations have an eternal destiny may be open to debate; but there is no doubt in his mind that “Israel has one—is that not enough?” A positive response to that rhetorical question, turns on the truth or falsity of the futurist eschatology upon which O’Donovan’s political theology rests. My own view is that Old Covenant Israel is not the only nation through which God has worked in this world. The English, too, once saw themselves as a “holy nation”. With the grace of God, other British-descended peoples can and should strive to emulate that godly objective.


Process theism, when combined with the historical theology inherent in preterism, leads inexorably to Kinism, or, as some would have it, “the Christian doctrine of nations”. The Old Covenant bound the holy nation of Israel to God; the New Covenant offered the grace of God to every nation (ethnos) of the known world (oikumene). The leaves of the tree of life in the New Jerusalem were to serve for “the healing of nations.” Old Israel was no more. On Judgement Day, Christ sentenced the stiff-necked synagogue of Satan to spiritual death. Only a righteous remnant was left to carry the holy seed of Israel unto the nations. For almost two thousand years, every Christian nation adjured Jews within the realm to recognize their Redeemer, thus ending their age-old rebellion against God. In sharp contrast to the Jews, Anglo-Saxons eagerly entered into the new covenant world.

Attuned to racial and ethnic differences, kinists understand the powerful biocultural affinity between the early Christian church and the pagan tribes of Anglo-Saxon England as well as the prominent place occupied by covenants in tribal social structures. Conversely, once their churches downplayed the importance of blood covenants to the spiritual life of both family and nation, the ancestral attachment of Anglo-Saxon Protestants to the Body of Christ was bound to fade away. The creedal religion of the modern Anglican church denies that either faith or political allegiance is passed on through the blood of the large, partly-inbred extended family that constitutes the Anglo-Saxon ethny. No modernist “proposition nation” grounded in the universalist ideology of secular humanism, least of all the one abjuring its ethno-religious roots in the sacred blood and faith of the Old English people, can ever again be a holy nation in the eyes of God.

For kinists, the Christian nation rests upon a covenant, under God, between the dead, the living, and the unborn. The living members of the nation, according to R.J. Rushdoony, “see themselves as the trustees of the family blood, rights, property, name, and position for their lifetime. They have an inheritance from the past to be developed and preserved for the future.”


Royalty plays a central role in the bible story. Jesus the Christ traced his descent to King David. As the very model of an English David, Alfred the Great established a Christian kingdom in England. The hereditary monarch of the British dominions once served as trustee-in-chief for his realm. The ecclesiastical significance of the monarchy was given formal recognition when Henry VIII, his heirs, and successors were declared to be Supreme Governors of the Church of England. The Royal Supremacy played a significant role in the rise of the broad-church movement in Victorian England. It has since become little more than a mere manifestation of the shapeshifting Crown manipulated for its own ends by the (imperial cum globalist) government of the United Kingdom.

Anglican royalists should create an Angelcynn Network of ethno-religious activists to liberate the captive Crown in right of the Royal Supremacy. The Crown has become little more than a rubber stamp for corrupt politicians with no discernible interest in the spiritual welfare of Anglo-Saxons “at home” or in the diaspora. Once the Royal Supremacy over the Church of England has been insulated from political control, it should be extended to every reformed Angelcynn Church, not just in the United Kingdom, but throughout the British dominions as well. In time, it may become possible for the Crown to charter Angelcynn churches even among the Anglo-American remnant population in the failed American republic.

In the eighteenth century, Henry St. John, Viscount Bolingbroke hoped that a Patriot King would re-awaken the English nation from its spiritual slumbers. The appearance of such a patriot prince would have been a miracle indeed. In our own time, it is doubly hard to imagine a British prince daring to stand against a government determined to maintain its control over the royal prerogative in ecclesiastical affairs. But, as Bolingbroke wrote, those who pray for such a deliverance must not neglect such means as are in their power “to keep the cause of reason, of virtue, and of liberty alive.” The blessing of a patriot prince might indeed “be withheld from us” but to “deserve at least that it be granted to us, let us prepare to receive it, to improve it, and to co-operate with it.”

Bolingbroke knew that were a patriot prince to campaign in defence of the monarchy, he would be subject to a raging torrent of criticism and abuse. Yet when a good prince is seen “to suffer with the people, and in some measure for them…many advantages would accrue to him.” For one thing, the cause of the British peoples generally “and his own cause would be made the same by their common enemies.”

What is the nature of that cause? In short, a patriot prince will call forth a spirit of resistance to both managerial statism and the abstract universalism of globalist plutocracy. He will do everything in his power to civilize those wild and immoral forces. But the appearance of a Patriot King is not inevitable. Indeed, only a people whose lost liberties are restored to memory will recognize his coming as an opportunity to reshape their allegedly preordained future.

The Idea of a Patriot King as Messianic Mythos

A postmodern neo-Angelcynn political theology could resurrect the hope of a nation re-born through the appearance of a genuinely godly Patriot King. A diasporic network of Angelcynn evangelists should work to ignite the mythos of a patriotic British monarch acting as Supreme Governor of their ancestral church throughout the Anglosphere.

Of course, as a matter of legal formality, the Queen already plays this role in England. Constitutional reality is quite otherwise; her role as head of the church has been usurped in practice by the Prime Minister. The Crown has been reduced to a rubber stamp. Pending the constitutional reformation of the ecclesiastical body politic, the Anglecynn Network must develop a political theology which conceives the existentially political friend-enemy distinction as constitutive of the relationships between Angelcynn peoples and other peoples or states (including “our own” states which now employ their power over us, in part, by admitting alien peoples, in huge numbers, to citizenship on equal terms with British-descended host populations).

In other words, an authentic, autochthonous, neo-Angelcynn political theology would understand the church as an ethno-religious institution safeguarding the ethnic interests, spiritual welfare and godly character of the British-descended peoples. The theological justification for such a church polity is essentially biblical. That is to say, that the Bible tells the story of a historical process of interaction between the divine, God, or Yahweh, (whichever name you prefer) and a particular people or nation; namely, the Israelites. That nation developed into a medium through which God manifested his real presence in the world.

Significantly, the Angelcynn people in the time of Alfred the Great modelled themselves on ancient Israel. During the Golden Age of the early church—the Age of Incarnation—the Angelcynn church was seen as the spiritual avatar of the emergent English nation, working in partnership with the king. That ethno-religious symbiosis of nation, church, and kingship was disrupted radically during the eleventh-century by the Norman Conquest and, shortly thereafter, by the Papal Revolution which created a church-state claiming jurisdiction over the whole of Christendom.

The old symbiosis was not, however, restored by the substitution of a state church for the Papal church-state during the Reformation. By that time, the Age of Disincarnation driven by the scholastic rationalism and legalistic absolutism of the papal church-state had all but eliminated the explicitly ethno-religious character of the English church. Anglican Protestantism became just another creedal religion, inevitably spawning countless doctrinal schisms down to the present day.

A genuinel y neo-Angelcynn political theology would aim to restore the spirit, if not the letter, of the original symbiosis between British-descended peoples, the church, and a British monarchy. Such a church might become capable of regenerating a Volksgeist serving as the seed-bed for the advent of an actual Patriot King of the sort envisioned by Viscount Bolingbroke in the eighteenth-century.


Under present circumstances, every once-proudly Anglo-Saxon country throughout the Anglosphere, is now subject to states which have reduced the WASP founding stock to a de facto stateless people. Both the globalist state and cosmopolitan Anglican churches embrace the multiculturalist program, according no special status or formal recognition to the British-descended peoples. The informal alliance between British states and Anglican churches has, in effect, transformed WASPs into an invisible race. That process was well underway by the early twentieth-century.

In retrospect, had an ethno-religious Angelcynn political theology existed as an autonomous force (i.e., one not bound hand and foot to the imperial state) during the first half of the twentieth century, church leaders might have recognized that the British and Dominion governments were acting in opposition to the best interests of the British peoples by twice declaring war on Germany.

Prior to 1914 or 1939, Germany did not conceive itself as an enemy of the British people. Both the Kaiser and Hitler declared themselves ready, willing, and able to recognize, defend, and co-operate with the governments and peoples of the British Empire. Indeed, in the late nineteenth century, many leading figures in both Britain and the United States (e.g., Cecil Rhodes, W.T. Stead, H.G. Wells, and Andrew Carnegie) not only promoted greater unity between the Anglo-Saxon nations but also believed that they should ally with their racial cousins in Germany. Accordingly, Rhodes included students from Germany as well as those from America and the Commonwealth in his famous scholarship program. Unfortunately, other, more powerful interests within the British state were determined (e.g., Winston Churchill, in both wars) to treat Germany as an enemy that must be destroyed (ideally by re-creating the fragmented statelets that existed prior to 1870).

Clearly, the idea of a Greater Britain withered away during and as a result of the world wars of the twentieth century. For a time, during the century-and-a-half following the American revolution, the Anglo-Saxon world developed a unique geopolitical personality. The Anglo-Saxon peoples anchored their collective identity in constitutional exoskeletons, creating a commonwealth of states sharing a common “British” civic identity. In all of those nations, civic identity has been progressively drained of ethno-religious meaning.

In the nineteenth century, the Church of England and its colonial, dissenting, and American offshoots endorsed a secularized “political theology of cosmopolitan nationalism”. Anglo-Catholics, evangelical Protestants, and Christian Zionists jointly hailed the ecumenical lordship of global Jesus while awaiting his return in power and glory at the end of history. What they didn’t expect was the First World War.

With the foundation of the Kaiserreich, however, the German Question reared its ugly head; it was not at all clear how the mercantile, thalassocratic ideal of cosmopolitan nationalism could be reconciled with telluric power of a militarized German Empire. Unfortunately, the Anglican political theology of cosmopolitan nationalism did not preclude the defeat and destruction of that Empire. Indeed, it eventually spawned the global hegemony of a godless, increasingly demonic, transnational corporate plutocracy.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
Hide 112 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Anglos have a dog mentality. Individualism was only for some adventurous and innovative types.

    At any rate, Anglo individualism worked only because a few led and most followed with discipline.

    Well, Anglo elites are now totally obeisant to Jews. That means most Anglo masses, in dog-like imitation of their elites, are also submissive to Jews.

    Jews lead, Anglo elites obey Jews, and Anglo masses follow Anglo elites.

    Thus, Anglos are doomed to fade away, culturally and racially. It’s over for them. Indeed, Anglos in US, UK, and Canada seem to invite being replaced.

    When race-ism is rejected, a nation is doomed. A people who don’t believe in their own race have no justification and motivation to defend the land they stand on. If they have no value as a race, who are they to claim any piece of territory as their own?

    Anglos have chosen to fade from history, and it’s now unstoppable. We shouldn’t even try.
    Just try to save the Eastern Slavs, the only whites with any chance of survival, not because they are race-ist(as they must become) but because they are, as yet, not into racial self-loathing.

  2. How many different ways and times do you have to be told, “No”?

    And stop diddling children into sociopathy.

  3. MarkU says:

    Christianity = A slave religion advocating submission, invented by Jews for gentiles.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
    • Disagree: Rich
  4. end of the world at the Second Coming (the Parousia) of Jesus Christ. Rather, the biblical narrative has to do with the rise and fall of Old Covenant Israel.

    Jesus already came back for the second time. According to MML&J he “rose from the dead” after the crucifixion. That constitutes the second coming.

    Christians are just waiting around for the third coming. As far as the rest goes, the “old testament” is mostly early Hebrew Along with the sufferings of Yahweh’s Chosen. Mostly because they were incredibly disobedient.

  5. Jimmy1969 says:

    Wasps are finished …we lost and are now almost extinct. Who are you trying to kid?

    • Replies: @James Scott
    , @Anonymous
  6. Thomasina says:
    @Priss Factor

    “Anglos have a dog mentality. Individualism was only for some adventurous and innovative types.”

    But don’t Jews have a dog mentality too? Haven’t they swallowed whole what their masters have told them: that they’re the chosen ones, that they’re smarter than all others? Haven’t they also swallowed that they’re the world’s biggest victims, that through no fault of their own they’ve been unjustly persecuted? Haven’t they been carefully taught to cast blame elsewhere, but never on themselves? They are dogs too, just a different breed of dog. Some might say narcissistic dogs.

    Jew dogs hunt in packs. They group together and attack by stealth, by cunning, manipulation, bribery, blackmail, smearing your reputation, and threatening your life. They blame, shame, scapegoat their victims (in this case “Whites”). When the victim fights back, they’re called “racist”. After beating their victims down, they further demoralize them by saying, “It’s all over, just give it up. You’re too weak to do anything about this.”

    Well, as the Jews have seen over and over throughout history, it’s never over. Things have a way of changing quickly once they get too far out of balance.

    Now, I don’t know if this is solely a “Jewish” thing or whether it’s because Jews, having manipulated and cheated their way into wealth (along with the Anglo traitors), are just trying to maintain their position by using divide and conquer tactics on the peasants who are beginning to wake up. Get the peasants looking everywhere but at the elites who have been robbing them blind for decades now; flood their countries with foreigners in order to dilute their anger. Anything to protect their man-made Ponzi schemes.

    So which dog is it? Is it a pack of Jewish dogs ruining the West, or is it a pack of worldwide elites (Anglos, Jews, Chinese, Saudi Arabian, Russian, Greek, etc.) who are just using the Jews as front men (just as they used BLM and Antifa as front men against Whites) to maintain their wealth, power and control?

    Knowing your enemy does make a difference. Which dog is it?

  7. MarkU says:

    So which dog is it? Is it a pack of Jewish dogs ruining the West, or is it a pack of worldwide elites (Anglos, Jews, Chinese, Saudi Arabian, Russian, Greek, etc.) who are just using the Jews as front men (just as they used BLM and Antifa as front men against Whites) to maintain their wealth, power and control?

    Its a small substantially Jewish banking elite playing divide and conquer. Currently they are trying to boost their numbers and influence by allowing suitably compliant and corrupt members of the political class to marry into the tribe.

  8. anarchyst says:

    We also have to get away from the “judeo-Christian” mindset, as well…
    Using the “Old Testament” for “laws” is wrong. Yes, the Ten Commandments may be a good guide which proscribes certain behaviors, but the rest of mosaic law relies on a vindictive, vengeful “god” to exact “punishment” on “his people”.
    That my work fine for jews, as they have always “misbehaved” and still have their supremacist “Talmud” to rely on, but “for the rest of us”, it won’t wash.
    Judaism is an insular belief system that shuns outsiders, prohibits proselytization, and promotes a form of supremacy, relegating all gentiles (non-jews) to the status of livestock-subhumans with souls, only to be used for the advancement and benefit of jews.
    In fact, slavery (of goyim) is still condoned and encouraged in the jewish Talmud. In addition, the Talmud condones pedophilia, allowing lecherous old jews to rape children as long as they are “three years and a day” of age.
    The barbaric practice of circumcision (male genital mutilation) is also suspect, the mohel fellating the infant after the “deed is done” passing on (who knows what) STDs to the infant. Sick…
    In fact, every jewish “holiday” (holy day) is based on the celebration of genocide and destruction of gentiles.
    Our present troubles are a result of a jewish cabal taking over political decisions in our nominally “multicultural” country.
    Tying Judaism to Christianity was a clever trick used by the jews to “cement” their claim to the “land of Israel” and of the covenant, to which I reply, “God is not a real estate agent”.
    Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with (their) God was then “null and void”.
    It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s, a “coup” by jews and Protestants.
    Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II Ecumenical Council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder.
    As is the case, even today, the jews got others, the Romans to do their dirty work for them, the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
    How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way).
    It makes absolutely no sense at all.
    Jews have no respect for Christianity, for Jesus Christ or Mary, his mother, who are both honored as Prophets in Islam, but instead, Jews spit on hearing their names and do the same while passing a Christian of any kind or a Christian Church in Israel. They have no respect for Christians or any other religion.
    It is time the Jewish lobbies and the American Government leaders as well as the evangelical Christian leaders who mislead the poor American young into joining the military and believing that they are doing something for God and Christianity by fighting Israel’s wars were named, shamed and arrested and tried for treason.
    In a perverse sort of way, israel’s favorite “war song” is “Onward Christian Soldiers”
    There…I’ve said it…

    • Agree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
    , @GenFranco
  9. anarchyst says:

    Christianity went off the rails when it did not divorce the Old Testament from the “new covenant” in the New Testament. The “judeo-Christian” link that is commonly accepted today is a problem as it subordinates Christianity to judaism.
    Even Martin Luther spoke out on the jews as being Christianity’s mortal enemy who would do anything to suborn Christianity.
    “Sola Scriptura” is a flawed concept claiming that the Bible is the “inspired word of God” despite being written by MEN with their own political and social agendas. A good example is the “rights of kings and nobles” in which Christians are commanded to follow the dictates of their leaders. Ever hear of “prima noctus”? Under the King James Version of the Bible, Christians would be commanded to follow such a vile practice.
    It is Roman Catholicism that established the world’s modern-day universities, hospitals, and human care organizations, NOT Protestants.
    You see, Protestants differ from Catholics as they do not believe that temporal “good works” have any bearing on salvation–a major fault. Even if “good works” do not have spiritual necessity, they can’t hurt and can make the world a better place.
    Since “good works” are not necessary for salvation, a Protestant can be a ne-er-do-well person who has grievously sinned and abused others all of his life, and then on his deathbed profess his belief in Jesus Christ and will automatically be “saved”. I have a problem with that…
    Let’s move on to usury. Banned by the Catholic Church, Protestants cheerfully accepted usury as it was a vehicle for commerce which enabled the success of the jews as well.
    In the days of the “robber barons”, the united States of America was largely successful due to the Protestant (lack of) ethics, most builders of industry raking in millions in profits while ignoring the basic needs of those who made their success possible by their hard work. It was common to see these Protestant “captains of industry” do their damnedest to pay their employees as little as possible while raking in massive profits benefiting only themselves.
    Protestants still consider anyone who cannot be successful in business as suffering from a moral failing of their own doing, not due to outside circumstances. This is a jewish influence in its own right.
    Catholic doctrine requires business owners to pay their workers fairly–not below subsistence wages. It is a sin not to do so. There is no comparable demand in Protestantism.
    These Protestant “captains of industry” attempted to redeem themselves by establishing “foundations” (which guarded their wealth, making it tax exempt) and indirectly countering their own Protestant belief that “good works” were not necessary for salvation.
    They always pleaded poverty to their employees while living grand lives themselves.
    This contributed to the rise of labor unions, which at first, were brutally suppressed.
    There were exceptions, such as Henry Ford, who almost single-handedly created the middle class by paying his employees well above “market wages” of the day. His \$5.00 per day wage was not entirely altruistic as it was also instituted to stem “turnover” as assembly line work was monotonous, but his writings have stated that one of his objectives was to make it possible for workers to “enjoy the fruits of their labor”.
    The Protestant Reformation resulted in the legalization of usury, the establishment of the debt based financial system and central banks which has enabled the usurers to accumulate so much wealth and power that they can impose their NWO.
    The Reformation resulted in cartel capitalism, communism, socialism, fascism, two world wars which resulted in the decimation of the European peoples by the jews and WASPS acting as muscle for the bankers, and various genocides and the dystopian difficulties that are a part of modern civilization.
    That being said, Catholics are not “off the hook” either. The sale of indulgences (a supposed “fast track” to salvation) was an egregious disgusting abuse of power. A sad fact is that “indulgences” in the Catholic Church still exist today. As divorce is prohibited by the Catholic Church, indulgences are used by Catholic clergy to declare annulment, that “a valid marriage never existed” between a Catholic couple, even if those who seek annulment have been married for decades. The larger the financial “contribution”, the faster the decision on annulment.
    The “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” was a power grab by jews and Protestants which was largely successful in crippling the Catholic Church. Fortunately, there are Catholic sects that subscribe to pre-Vatican II principles, despite attempts by the “Novus Ordo” Church to wipe them out.
    Protestants are good people who have brought much good to civilization. However, Protestant acceptance of and deference to jewish control has done much to damage our civilization.
    I welcome intelligent discourse on this subject.

    • Replies: @Alden
  10. I welcome intelligent discourse on this subject.

    I too would welcome it, but with the tone being set here by the look-at-me comments of Priss Factor (aka Jung-Freud) and, over at TOO, the Buddhism-on-a-budget ramblings and bathroom sneers of P. Marx, yours looks like a hope that is, alas, best abandoned.

    Professor Fraser did surprise me when he spoke of Oliver O’Donovan’s crudely Jewish-truckling ideas as somehow new or different. Similar disavowals of supersessionism, which is as fundamental to any genuinely Christian understanding of the Incarnation as flour and water are to the making of bread, were all the rage as long ago as the seventies among bootlicking Christian theologians. You won’t, I think, be surprised to learn that most of them didn’t believe that Christ was God.

    Apropos which, I was also surprised to see Professor Fraser raise the issue of divorcing God from creation ex nihilo. Does Fraser truly fail to see that if God is not the source of literally everything else that exists—that is to say, if He did not absolutely precede all of creation—then He he isn’t truly God at all?

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  11. unwoke says:

    “A genuinely neo-Angelcynn political theology would aim to restore the spirit, if not the letter, of the original symbiosis between British-descended peoples, the church, and a British monarchy. Such a church might become capable of regenerating a Volksgeist serving as the seed-bed for the advent of an actual Patriot King of the sort envisioned by Viscount Bolingbroke in the eighteenth century.”

    Uh, huh. Maybe Prince Harry will come riding to the rescue on a great, White charger snorting fire from its nostrils. With Viscount Bolingbroke inscribed on his shield & a gold tipped sword raised over his diamond-studded crown. With a choir of angels urging him on with hymns of rejoicing. Unless the Second (or Third) Coming arrives ahead of him & makes it all moot.

    • LOL: MarkU
  12. For Islam to call Jesus a prophet is nothing but a demotion. An insult.

    • Replies: @Twin Ruler
    , @anonymous
  13. @kerdasi amaq

    Islam is merely a more militant and fanatical variant of Judaism.

    • Replies: @anonyms
  14. IreneAthena says: • Website

    I wouldn’t be surprised if China becomes the home base of most Christian missionaries to the Muslim and Jewish world, and beyond. Read about the “Back to Jerusalem” movement. Chinese Christians, especially the ones with a history of remaining faithful during severe persecution, are pretty serious about Jesus’ mission…

    “…red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight….”

    • Agree: InnerCynic
    • Replies: @anonyms
    , @anon
  15. Anonymous[208] • Disclaimer says:

    Think of what the sadistic SOB would do to you and your children if he allowed his own son Jesus to die on the cross. Jesus’ revolt was not against the money changers and defiling of the Temple. He revolted against God himself who abandoned not only his own son, but also his creation – all people on Earth. Hence his reply to Pontius Pilate’s question: “I AM the Truth!”, meaning ” Seek no further, there is no higher authority than me. God is dead.”

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  16. @anarchyst

    “How can Christians have the same values as the Jews; the very people who denounced and betrayed the founder of Christianity, Jesus Christ, and call for his execution (by others, of course, that is the Jewish way)” – True, and yet Jesus made it very clear in Matthew 5-7 that His “values” were not the same as Jews and as the rabbis had taught the people. Time and time again, Jesus contrasts His teachings and “values” from that which was commonly held by Jewish religionists. If Christians have the same “values” as their Master (which they should), then it really cannot be that Christians should share the “values” of Jews – unless, of course, those same Christians are in apostasy and unfaithfulness to their Lord!

    This is what caused so much consternation from the rabbis, including their plot to murder Jesus. His “values” were not only different, but His entire worldview stood in stark contrast to theirs. Also, what Jesus claimed about Himself as the great “I AM” (John 8:58) proved unbearable for the Jewish religious establishment.

    When Christians morph into the Zionists we see today, they are revealing how badly they have been duped and propagandized by Jews. Moreover, it reveals these same Christian Zionists have failed to understand the Book of Hebrews which shows that the entire temple, sacrificial system, the Mosaic Law, the Sabbath, and even the land promises given to Israel were simply shadows and types of Christ and what was to come in the New Covenant era (see Hebrews 8-9; 10:1).

    For Christian Zionists to long for a dry and barren land in Palestine stands in direct contradiction to the words of Hebrews 11: 13-16 in which believers “desire a better country, that is a heavenly one” (see also Hebrews 13:14).

    Christians should not be committed to supporting Jews who are in total rebellion to the very Messiah that has been revealed to them, nor should Christians support the sort of tyranny that Israelis commit against Palestinians. So much of this on the part of Christian Zionists is due to a gross misreading of the Book of Hebrews, a failure to comprehend the newness of the New Covenant, including the flow redemptive history from the Old Covenant to the New.

    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  17. @MarkU

    You are a Mohammedan. Don’t be ashamed of yourself. It is no wonder that you, just like Hitler, hate Christianity, the religion of peace and love.

    • Replies: @anonyms
    , @anonyms
    , @anon
  18. Ed Case says:

    The First World War exposed the Church Of England for the wishy-washy institution it still is.

    Read this excerpt from

    These reservations about some of the commonly held attitudes to the war did not affect the church’s full support for the war
    effort. Diocesan and parish papers were filled with patriotic articles; the clergy in sermons called for a greater spirit of selfsacrifice in the national effort; and some church leaders played a prominent part in recruiting drives. In fact Archbishop
    Donaldson specifically called upon his clergy to help in the recruiting campaign,
    and with Canon D.J. Garland and
    Canon P.A. Micklem, set the example himself shortly afterwards.
    The archbishop went further: he made it known that
    he would refuse to accept men as ordination candidates if they were eligible for enlistment in the services.
    When the
    conscription issue came to the fore later in the war the Church of England lent its official support to the affirmative case in
    the conscription referendum. “

    The end of that War was the end of the CofE in Qld., the men who had rallied to the call of Canon Garland to join the carnage in Europe mostly wrote the Church off after that, if they were lucky enough to be repatriated to Australia.

  19. anonymous[268] • Disclaimer says:
    @kerdasi amaq

    For Islam to call Jesus a prophet is nothing but a demotion. An insult.

    You pagan godless mangods-worshipping vermin are projecting.

    On whose authority are you claiming that Jesus PBUH is a God? On the deceitful writings of pedophiles? These books, and their word of mouth, are the basis of this heresy, aren’t they? Do you have firsthand proof of this human god-hood? Aren’t you ashamed of your intelligence, or what passes for it in your faeces-for-brains?

    Which is more logical, men as polytheist Gods, or a man simply as a man, even if in this case a most blessed one?

    You pagan bastards conjure up some illogical shit and then claim simple logic is an “insult”?

    No, calling God, a man, is the real insult, and an infinitely egregious one… an unpardonable one. Try to understand that, you pagan cockroaches.

    Ultimately, you pagan scum have no ammunition against the True Monotheism of Islam. You will all wallow and drown in your pagan sewerages, taking feeble potshots at Islam, such as your pathetic attempt here.

    Where will that get you though? Will it somehow magically convert the batshitness of the Trinity (based on the equally batshit dot-dindoo Trimurti) into the “winning truth” against the simple logicality of the true monotheist, Tawheed? That would be impossible.

    Now, heel pagan lowlife, before your spiritual conquerors.

    • Replies: @InnerCynic
  20. Aaron or Melchisedek—–latter superseded tehe former. Secondly – who crucified Christ and who was spared??

  21. anonymous[200] • Disclaimer says:

    Promoting Jewish-founded, Jewish-story religiosity to ‘save’ white ethnicity is not gonna cut it, when just about every Christian ‘leader’ up to Pope Francis goes along with Soros-type agendas

    In early ‘glory days’ of ‘Anglo-Protestantism’ under the radical rule of Bible-man Oliver Cromwell, Cromwell made his fateful 1656 decision to let Jews, ‘the Old Testament Bible people’, back into Britain

    Leading only 212 years later to a Jewish Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, heading British government, and a few decades later, Britain sponsoring Zionism and birthing the Israeli state in territory Britain controlled … and now Britain has a no-white-man-near-the-top government, with many leading Truss gov’t figures being Jews, married to or dating Jews, even some of the India-heritage ones having Indian-Jewish ties

    After Cromwell allowed legal Jewish re-entry into Britain after several centuries of absence, Jews in Britain quickly began to inter-marry into the British aristocracy, a key part of the triumph of Jewish influence there. A 1950s book, ‘Tales of the British Aristocracy’ by an editor of Burke’s Peerage, Leslie Gilbert Pine (1907-87), devotes Chapter 14 to ‘The Anglo-Jewish Peerage’, this quote from p. 219 in the original:

    Jews … have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual. So closely linked are the Jews and the Lords, that a blow against the Jews in this country, would not be possible without injuring the aristocracy also.

    Similar to how multiple USA Presidential etc families have children inter-married with Jews – Bidens, Trumps, Bushes, Clintons – plus Kamala Harris’ Jewish husband etc

    There is some logic in that phrase used by Andrei ‘Saker’ Raevsky and others, ‘Anglo-Zionism’

  22. Karl1906 says:

    Get rid of the church and the corrupting connections to state and politics and christian religion will be fine (again). It’s the disconnect from the believers and what they want that has caused all of these issues in the first place. These days the church only seems to serve as a political medium (think propaganda) in line with state political ideologies. And corruption. Well, this actually isn’t new at all, but it’s certainly never been as bad as now. The “recipe” to cure this cancer has also been around for some time.

    Catholics started “walking out” of it by simply ignoring the pope. Much of the political bullshit that’s coming from the church must be ignored the same way. If you pay for this with your own taxes (or you’re even forced to pay “church taxes” which is very the often the case in Europe) simply leave the church.

    The church must “learn” this lesson (once again) the hard way. Join “free” christian communities instead. The 1850s concept of the “Old Catholic Church” (from German “Altkatholizismus”) works very well to this very day and may serve as an inspiration. Let the christian communities select and train their own church personal and keep the state and church out of your faith.

    Before it became entangled in politics and was turned into a “state religion” christianity was a “grass movement” of the followers of Jesus and it can return to that and be ONLY for the believers once again. It didn’t need an “organisation” to be run as a religion as it was already organised by being a clearly defined set of beliefs. And you don’t even need a preacher if you can read by yourself.

    • Replies: @G. Poulin
  23. zard says:

    The white gentiles are so stupid they don’t even know they’re being targeted for extermination via the ‘vaccine’ & nonwhite immigration/miscegenation…but hey, even if they did know they wouldn’t do you get a race (conditioned by Jewish Christianity for centuries) of egalitarian morons addicted to drugs, simians sports & internet porno to care about their own demise?

  24. G. Poulin says:

    The WASPS have been hell-bent on suicide for over a hundred years now. I for one am not going to try to talk them out of it.

  25. anonyms says:
    @Twin Ruler

    Blah, blah…

    Except, when it comes to psychopathic bloodlust and actual genocidal actions, there is no humanimal worse than the western albinonigger, and I make no distinction between the whitevil chrizzie or juden scum of the earth. Both of them(you), cursed pagan “in his image” mangods-worshiping lowlifes.

    These pathetic attempts at conflating the true monotheism of Islam, and the accursed Judenism will get you nowhere. They only share superficial similarities because of common Prophets of God. The Juden have been cursed ever since they took a calf as their deity.

    Islam absolutely rejects the Juden “in his image” ideology of mangods. Which other pagan scum place their faith in such vile batshit vomit? Christians, Dot-Dindoos, Buddhists… you are all brothers and sisters destined for Hell, all together, a big wailing family in eternal torment.

    So, before you shoot off your fucking accursed pagan mouth, try and consider the deep reality of each faith. Cheap propaganda brownie points will get you nowhere. You will remain a pagan piece of shit no matter what.

  26. Dumbo says:

    More evidence, if any was needed, that the Reformation was a total disaster. Sure, the Catholic Church was (is) corrupt, but the Protestant churches are even worse. And some branches are more “woke” and more Israel-first than the synagogues.

    • Replies: @Angharad
    , @profnasty
  27. Alden says:

    Great post absolutely correct.

  28. The Anglo political theology is and has been for at least fifty years straight Satanism.

  29. anonymous[176] • Disclaimer says:

    Who are we ? Watch the video to know who YOU are.

  30. Anonymous[372] • Disclaimer says:

    Jews started Christianity and Islam to enslave both, whites as well as non-whites, therefore, each to the devil his own way.

    • Replies: @anonyms
  31. Ciaobella says:

    The moment people start to listen what Rome said, instead off learning what Bible , I.e. the God’s message to us, said….. that moment took people away from God and closer to the confuser and the dragon himself. People forgot, that “ we just passing through “ on our way home.
    And it is huge difference between Church that teaches The Word of God, and the church that teaches the climate change. Open your eyes, people.

  32. Angharad says:
    @Priss Factor

    I’m a CELT. An AMERICAN CELT. MY people are worth saving. How about purging JEW RULE?

  33. Angharad says:

    No. Kristardinsanity is the DISASTER. The Death Cult created for slaves is the poison in the well.

  34. profnasty says:

    Holy wordsoup Batman!
    [BTW, happy 911 Day.]
    It takes very high intelligence to navigate the waters of philosophy.
    Profnasty is more mechanically minded.
    Modern Christianity came out of Deutschland. Gutenberg gave us the Holy Bible.
    Hold on for dear life.

  35. profnasty says:

    The Tru Church is Gospel based. That is, anti-Pharisee (ZOG).
    All the rest is commentary.

  36. profnasty says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    Agreed. The absolute denial of our culture and Race is a serpent around our neck.

  37. anonyms says:

    “Christian missionaries” are deathly scared of operating in Muslim societies. In the fanatical parts they will get their heads lobbed off (can’t condone that. I am all for you pagan scum digging ever deeper pits to Hell, without any action from us), while in more moderate true monotheist Muslim societies, where Jesus PBUH is revered/respected/LOVED as a blessed prophet of God, those pagan scum “missionaries” will get their godless asses laughed off back to their accursed temples (a totally appropriate reaction). Lol!

    China becomes the home base of most Christian missionaries

    The pagan godless chinks, worshippers of mammon, will convert true monotheists? You are a joker. Rofl!!

    • Troll: InnerCynic
    • Replies: @InnerCynic
    , @IreneAthena
  38. @Thomasina

    “So which dog is it? Is it a pack of Jewish dogs ruining the West, or is it a pack of worldwide elites (Anglos, Jews, Chinese, Saudi Arabian, Russian, Greek, etc.) who are just using the Jews as front men (just as they used BLM and Antifa as front men against Whites) to maintain their wealth, power and control?”

    Oh c’mon.

    You know very well that it’s the jews that use goys as window dressing… often that we even have a term for it.

    And the obvious tell as to who is running things is to educate yourself on what the jews want….and you will find that 90% of the time politics goes the way the jews want while whites always get fucked in the ass.

  39. Anonymous[180] • Disclaimer says:

    You’re insane.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  40. anonyms says:
    @Charles Martel France

    Lol! The more appropriate truth is that the entire whitevil albinonigger race is an accurate reflection of the evil loser called Hitler, your brother in unspeakable evil. Your accursed race’s actions ever since that scum booked his one-way ticket to Hell proves that. Millions dead and billions suffering because of the loathsome anglonigger race.

    You pagan godless mofers can’t wash off that shit stain ever. You will all carry it into the worst pits of Hell.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  41. Anonymous[396] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    . . . most of them didn’t believe that Christ was God.

    That belief is considered vulgar. I haven’t read any of the Protestants cited, but I am somewhat familiar with the writings of Teilhard de Chardin from Wolfgang Smith’s Teilhardism and the New Religion. I’d guess these Protestants are also concerned with replacing the historical, divine Christ with an abstract Christ as cover for their apostasy and their imposition of a generally Marxist, Hegelian Second Reality on what is. This new teleology isn’t a universal truth revealed by God to man, but comes into being through an evolutionary process in which superior minds replace what they see as fossilized biblical revelation because it’s been disproved by science.

    They’re not so much interpreting Christianity as replacing it with a new religion whose dogmas are fairly indistinguishable from the woke leftist agenda. If there’s no Creator and Christ isn’t an historical person and the Son of God, as they claim, the image of Christ is nonetheless still useful to them as an iconic brand name dishonestly encapsulating His replacement with their cosmic abstraction about woke ethics and a pantheistic worldview about what is. What were formerly sexual sins become as morally neutral and as necessary as virtue in the give and play toward the spiritualization of matter.

    They generally believe that matter is really all there is, although it undergoes an evolutionary transformation turning it into a super sort of matter that can be thought of as having a higher, spiritual side to it. In this naturalistic trajectory, sin becomes a good in evolution’s natural selection toward the blasphemous imposition of woke ethics onto an abstract Christ. There will be no more wars as we understand them because evolution under their direction will create a new man-kind incapable of opposing the WEF agenda. We’ll eat bugs, own nothing, and be happy thanks to DNA-altering vaccines and psychotropic drugs in our water. The scientistic pseudo-ethics of Teilhard de Chardin went so far as to justify mandatory surgery. Today that’s playing out as if the demonic sexual mutilation of troubled children is the movement of spirit in matter.

    But, their apostasy didn’t arise in some upper-bandwidth understanding of science that contradicts dogma, but in hubris. What could be more clear than that they lack the humility to believe? How about that embarrassing buffoon Welby in the photo above, probably stepping off a private jet, fortified with caviar and champagne, for a stunt that amounts to parodying Christian humility to advance a leftist agenda? On the other side of the fence, the current pope appears ahead of these Protestant apostates in replacing historical Christianity with a new religion, infusing the former with an extreme synchretism that appears to deny the Catholic faith by relativizing the Truth.

    Let’s not forget that these imposters in clerical garb are paid Christians. What are apostates supposed to do? Get a job at the grocery store? They need to retain the trappings of Christianity to keep up the posh lifestyle while advancing their politics as a new religion that turns out be re-serving old cabbage as process theology, etc. Theirs isn’t a mature Christianity, it’s the dead chorus of disbelief that dies the same death in every age. These academics lack the vitality to believe that Christ’s divinity and resurrection is the one truth against which all is measured.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @John Pepple
  42. Anglo-Protestants generally recognize the Jews as elder brothers in the faith whose Covenant with God remains in force.

    No, we don’t. We absolutely don’t. The jews are damned for all time. It’s the foundation of Christianity. Their own texts admit it. “The covenant will end and a new covenant will happen.” That’s Jesus. The jews rejected Him. They broke the covenant. Jesus held it fulfilled, cast them aside for rejecting Him, and created a new covenant. It’s literally what Christianity is. Supersessionism.

    The heresy of dispensationalism has nothing to do with Christendom. They can call themselves “christian” all they like; they’re as much a Christian as a man who removed his penis is a “woman.”

  43. @Tallest Skil

    The fact is, you still believe that God made a covenant with one specific race of people and not others. That’s disgusting. To make it worse — to make you a typical Christian pussy and slave — you believe that God favored a race that’s not even yours!

    ‘That’s okay, though, because we “solve” the absurd and unjust concept of an eternal, all-knowing, all-good, all-powerful, all-just being favoring one race of one species on one planet in an infinite universe over all others ….. by saying that those favored people broke the absurd non-existent “covenant.” But that’s okay too, because now we’ll worship a human being, one of that group of formerly favored people, who said that the other formerly favored people were sinful and greedy and ungrateful.

    And by the way, the fancy-sounding meaningless terms — supersessionism, dispensationalism, lol — don’t cover up the illogic and unmanliness of the whole approach.

    Anyone claiming that God favors or favored his group because of its color, race, whatever, is a lying or deluded arrogant sick ass. And this from a guy who’s proud of my heritage and doesn’t take crap for being a white european. But I’ve never been mentally ill or obnoxious enough to think that God made any special covenant with people of my race or color. That takes an unusual degree of irrationality and self-worship, which too much of that group seems to have in spades — and “christian” cucks like you accept the premise.

    • Agree: shadowy_figure
    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @Anonymous
  44. @Anonymous

    Great comment.

    I think that the demise and corruption of true Christianity was caused by the jewish revolutionary spirit that E. Michael Jones talks about…..and organized jewry, having the power of the purse, has been able to wreck all of Christendom.

  45. anonyms says:
    @Charles Martel France

    Lol! The juden are evil, the muslims are evil, the chinks are evil, the niggers/wogs are evil… but the whitevil mofing race is so humane and saintly. You make that point by using a white supremacist murderous lowlife as a role model? The gall… Rofl!

    You understand that we are on to the game of the albinonigger. A devious (but simple) game of obfuscation, misdirection and projection. Accuse others of what you are most assuredly guilty of, and whistle a tune while rolling your eyes, with a mischievous twinkle in them. Your bastard race has perfected the art. 😀

    This game will not work on the Day of Judgment, I promise you. Heck, I pray you vermin pay for this game right here on earth, God willing.

    A natural culling of this accursed race is the need of the hour. You impotent faggots should be responsible for your own culling.

    • Replies: @GenFranco
  46. anonyms says:

    The True Monotheism of Islam does not enslave man to other man, but except as a true slave of the One and only Lord of all existence… a most desired and blessed submission to the Almighty One who created us.

    Pagan/godless scum of the earth will not understand what this submission truly means.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  47. I’m certainly not a Holocaust denier. I know the wrath of Almighty God when I see it. Especially repeatedly against anti-Christ Judaism.

    Jews were banned in England for about 400 years (1250/1290 – 1650) except for the very very wealthy who could loan money to the crown.

    Prior to WWII Jewish immigration was banned/prohibited to Canada, Cuba and the United States (ref. HMS St. Louis/Voyage of the Damned).

    WWI was a bankers war against the interests of rising German industrialization and the economic effects against British empire commerce. Mr. Wilson… would you please bailout Mr. Morgan of his loans to the British?

    You can still hear the echos of prayers of the British empire crying out… “Oh Lord God… kill off my neighbor’s cow that I may be the only enterprise in the valley to sell dairy products!”

    Remember this little heresy insanity from the British… when they declared themselves the ‘Lost tribe of Israel’? Therefore there are no German Christians and it is your patriotic duty to go kill them.

    As for the history of the ‘British Israelism’ heresy you can always go visit the grave of Herbert W. Armstrong. In the United States as ‘British American Israelism’… Armstrong went totally kook heretic insane and when he died his son obliterated the theology and it has since been buried and forgotten in the United States today… scrubbed.

    Of course it was a down range part of emergent anti-Christ political Zionism. Stephen Sizer has made an excellent very heavily documented review of the history and founding of anti-Christ political Zionism and its British origins from the 1820-1830 period by way of John Nelson Darby.

    The entire New Testament was written (later compiled) of composed letters and such all before 70AD (See Kenneth Gentry on Before Jerusalem Fell) including Revelation. There is no historical mention whatsoever of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD in the New Testament but the destruction of anti-Christ Judaism was clearly foretold in the Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen (Luke). Interesting to note that Revelation is actually something of a ‘bill of divorcement’ with the declaration of the ‘synagogue of Satan’ mentioned twice in 2: 9 and 3:9.

    Anti-Christ Judaism, anti-Christ political Zionism, anti-Christ Israelism and anti-Christ anything is ultimately spiritual, moral and physical suicide. This gives a vast basic spiritual and moral explanation of what has happened to the United States.

    Today… Zelensky is another latest prop in anti-Christ image politician shittyworld foisted upon the media consuming public in the Anglosphere. What do you expect 21st century Judas to look like?

    Extra points if you can name Zelensky’s drug dealer that was busted a few weeks back.

  48. GenFranco says:

    anarchyst wrote:

    “Jews rejected the covenant when they murdered Jesus Christ. Their covenant with (their) God was then “null and void”. It is the flawed Schofield translation of the Bible that elevated jews to the status of Christianity’s “elder brothers”, which was then reinforced by the Catholic (flawed) “Vatican II Ecumenical Council” in the 1960s, a “coup” by jews and Protestants.
    Sad to say, even the present-day (post-Vatican II Ecumenical Council) Catholic church has bought into absolving the jews for Jesus Christ’s murder.”

    There are things I disagree with in your comments on the article, but what you wrote above is SPOT ON. Any fruitful discussion of this subject has to begin with acknowledging these truths about Christianity. Otherwise we find ourselves in a historical and theological wonderland, with the Cheshire Cat telling us that up is down and black is white.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  49. We have had two major Protestant wars: the American Revolution and the American Civil War.

    American Protestantism is not Anglican Protestantism. That is the major reason the American Revolution took place. American Protestants still are not enamored by Anglican Protestantism which for most is still too Catholic.

    And American Protestantism had a distinct Deist component, and the Deists, who were concerned with reason and science more than faith, were the founding fathers of America. Deists were most of our Presidents, drafters of the Constitution, Judges and Congressmen in the early days of America. They were the ones who created the great American Universities.

    And for the most part, the Deist wing of the Protestant church has been wiped out. We lost our great universities because of it, we lost our Protestant intellectuals, we lost a sense of what the Constitution is about, and what the founders envisioned. We no longer provide for the Common Defense, instead our foreign policy is regime change and regime stabilization. We no longer provide for the general welfare of our citizens and instead provide for the general welfare of our Corporations. Our founding fathers hated corporations. It was the east India Tea Company’s tea that went into the Boston harbor.

    Without the return of a genuine belief in reason and science and a willingness to support it financially and with some kind of network, Protestantism will continue to become more and more irrelevant.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  50. GenFranco says:

    I’d like to once again express my heartfelt gratitude to Ron Unz for giving this site the feature which allows us to mute certain commenters.

  51. @anonyms

    “…The True Monotheism of Islam does not enslave man to other man…”

    Except that Muhammad himself made slaves of defeated enemies and traded in slaves. Muslims have a long history of slavery in Africa and even raided the coasts of Europe to capture slaves.

    About Muslim enslavement of Blacks, see:

    Spare me your “true monotheism” with its agressive (and enslaving) imperialism.
    Better a peaceloving “worshipper of men” than an aggressive “true monotheist”.

    Dante placed Muhammad in the “eighth circle of hell”. Perhaps he was right.

    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
  52. Angharad says:

    Why would anyone want to promote and maintain the Death Cult of Kristardinsanity, a control system created for slaves to keep slaves AS slaves?

    Every element of The Kristard Cult was filched from authentic Pagan faiths.

    Come HOME to your AUTHENTIC beliefs, White Men and Women! You’ll be amazed at how easy it is.

    • Replies: @RockaBoatus
  53. Zionism is racism. It is a scourge upon the earth.

  54. The eternal Anglo has been weighed in the balances and found wanting.

  55. @Angharad

    “Every element of The Kristard Cult was filched from authentic Pagan faiths” – No, the theory of pagan derivation in connection with Christianity was refuted many decades ago by such scholars James G. Machen (‘The Virgin Birth of Christ’), Ronald Nash (‘Christianity and the Hellenistic World’; see also his more recent treatise on Christianity and the Greeks gods), Craig Blomberg (‘The Historical Reliability of the New Testament’), and a host of others.

    The notion that Christianity borrowed its beliefs from the pagan mystery religions falls on its face the minute a carefully investigated and close comparison is made between the two. The theory of pagan derivation is almost always made by those who engage only in a superficial comparison, and often with little real knowledge of historic Christian doctrine and theology. Their entire approach is wrong, and they often see only what seems to support their theory. They also miss the many discrepancies and dissimilarities between Christian doctrine and pagan beliefs systems.

    Moreover, it misses the more obvious point that the early Christians were devout Jews would have had nothing to do with pagan religions, let alone incorporate such pagan beliefs into their religious doctrines.

    “Come HOME to your AUTHENTIC beliefs, White Men and Women!” – Oh sure, come on home to some polytheistic convoluted mystery religion. Start worshiping the many moon and astral gods or even Zeus! Yeah, that’s really going help you. What better way to show your disdain for Christianity than by bowing down to idols and worshiping the creation rather than the Creator!

    If you think Christianity is false and wrong, why point others to what are clearly old pagan fairy tales and things that have no basis whatsoever in reality? If you reject Christianity, fine. But I would advise against offering something in its place that’s even more false and non-historical.

  56. @Anonymous

    Let’s not forget that these imposters in clerical garb are paid Christians. What are apostates supposed to do? Get a job at the grocery store?

    Yes. Or learning to code. It simply isn’t honorable to be paid for being something (in this case, a Christian) when you aren’t.

  57. God is not omnipotent, however. Hence the evils of the world cannot be charged exclusively to his account; moreover, he is affected by his interactions with us and the wrongs we do unto others and ourselves. Robert Gnuse demonstrates that the Old Testament provides a revealing account of the processes of communication between the Israelites and the divine. Perhaps white Anglo-Saxon Protestants, too, could and should create a national bible recording our own communication—or lack thereof—with the divine.

    Indeed, process theism provides grounds for doubting that the “Christ-event” (i.e., the Incarnation, Passion, and Resurrection of Jesus) happened, once and for all, in the history of only one nation in the ancient Near East on planet Earth. Jesus the Christ made a unique appearance in Israel according to the flesh but who knows whether or not other singular incarnations for other unique nations or even other worlds are excluded. There is only one historical Jesus, but there may be other Christ-events in some other “holy nation.”

    What is with the angloids and heresy, blasphemy and outright Satanism? These Sub-Human island monkeys are a caricature upon themselves.

    At this point why LARP as Christians and risk immediate punishment for absolute blasphemy? Go back to wicca tree-hugging. It is less insulting that way.

    It is funny that the angloids have completely given up on any kind of truth. God really does send out the spirit of confusion and harden the heart of his enemies. There is truly not a single race worse than the negro-saxon. This kike-loving race has done unimaginable damage to Europe and the world for centuries, and now they are telling each other to rewrite the Bible for the Huwhite Angloid race. Hilarious.

    Oh Lord, strike them down! Stop them! Deliver us from these golems!

  58. MotGOD says:

    The problem is you let Jews into your country (and they let the non-white hordes in), and worse: You let the Jews into your blood, and almost incredibly, into your aristocracies blood.

    You need to face the fact the Christianity has objectively failed (and often willfully so / as directed to by Jews), in the one real requirement of a religion: To preserve the folk.

    Then you need to either remake Xtianity into some kind of unalterably, unapologetically, and un-re-pervertable, natural law following and militantly pro-white force of nature…

    Or, you could just junk it in favor of something un-corruptibly simplex and true, like William Luther Pierces Cosmotheism, and get on with the job of securing the existence of the white race and a future for white children.

    The sand in the glass is running low — you have to go hard directly at the real problems (Jews and White Genocide), or just go home and wait for the non-white hordes to cannibalize you (or if you are really lucky for victorious white warriors to rescue you even if you are not worthy).

    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  59. Agent76 says:

    May 24, 2016 Pope has a DREAM – NWO is coming!!!!!

    Pope Francis received the Charlemagne prize 2 weeks ago. What does that mean? What did he say in his acceptance speech? What are some of the implications of his DREAM?

    August 13, 2019 THE POPE’S NEW WORLD ORDER Careful what you wish for, Holy Father.

    Globalism is, in short, a governing system whereby individual nations cede, or hand over, some of their national sovereignty to a kind of collective government.

  60. @Tallest Skil

    PS Nobody is “damned for all time”, nor should they be, just because of his genetics or place of birth or the religion his parents inculcate. That’s how your god operates? Says more about you than about Jews. And look at my comment history to see my view of Jewish tribalism and supremacism and disproportionate control and manipulation of our society and economy.

    The God that we believe in, respect, and fear gives people free will and a fair chance. Our understanding is that he’d punish or “damn” someone because of that person’s own actions, not for any other arbitrary ground.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  61. Anonymous[208] • Disclaimer says:

    If this is all you have to say, you are stupid.

  62. @anonymous

    Jesus claimed to BE God. So for Islam to simply say he’s only a prophet is to deny what he said. Now either he is what he says he is or he’s a mad man and a liar so therefor Islam has elevated a mad man and a liar to that of a prophet. You can’t have it both ways. Since I don’t subscribe to any iron age sky fantasies this struck me as one of those contradictions that religionists constantly juggle in their noggin.

    • Replies: @anon
  63. @GenFranco

    I see the damage and evil that many Jews do, disproportionate to their numbers, but why should some random Jewish guy today be responsible for what other people did before he was born? That’s the definition of unfair and irrational.

    Tens of millions of people, including unarmed women, children and elderly, have been murdered, tortured, terrorized, displaced by people claiming to be Christians over the past 2,000 years. Should YOU be responsible for all of that evil because you belong to the same religion?

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
    , @HeebHunter
  64. @anonyms

    Seriously… fuck off you evil POS.

    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  65. Know thyself instead of believing (some fucking priests & politicians; no matter what coleur).
    All Moses religions are bad. Religion is the enemy of religiousness.

  66. The old covenant has been superseded because of the Death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. Israel rejected their Messiah, and so rejected their national salvation and were temporarily set aside in favor of the Church. Paul dealt with the issue in Romans chapters 9-11. Specifically, God is not through with Israel and they still have the last 7 years promised to them in the Book of Daniel.

    It will not be a pleasant 7 years. Two thirds of all Jews will be killed that time around, and Israel with be completely sifted by God. They will cry out to God for the Messiah, and this time he will come in Glory, with his Saints, and will be seen by the entire world before setting down on the Mount of Olives where he left the earth last time.

    Preterism has been repeatedly debunked. It is tenable only if you spiritualize and allegorize a lot of scripture in way that it could mean anything. Preterism is utterly untenable scripturally.

  67. Sarita says:
    @Robert Dolan

    I thought there is a rape every 68 seconds in the US, the oh so glorious land of plenty,freedom and democracy.
    “They are jealous of our way of life.” Geoge w. Bush.

    Jealous of what? We are the worse!👇

    “Every 68 seconds another American is sexually assaulted.1
    1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime (14.8% completed, 2.8% attempted).4
    About 3% of American men—or 1 in 33—have experienced an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime.4
    From 2009-2013, Child Protective Services agencies substantiated, or found strong evidence to indicate that, 63,000 children a year were victims of sexual abuse.”

    • Replies: @Nancy
    , @Anne Lid
  68. Sarita says:

    Yes, mister Richaert (the jewish rabbi with a wasp name) but the wasp and their criminal associates killed 60 million blacks during slavery.
    No one beats that.
    If Muhammad is in the eighth circle then your kind are falling off the cliff into the opposite of Valhalla.
    Boy, you never tire of attacking the wrong people while strangely giving the jews a break.
    Oh wait .
    You’re one.

  69. @RadicalCenter

    “Tens of millions of people, including unarmed women, children and elderly, have been murdered, tortured, terrorized, displaced by people claiming to be Christians over the past 2,000 years. Should YOU be responsible for all of that evil because you belong to the same religion?”

    A most excellent question……perhaps you should ask organized jewry……since they do blame white Christian people for every ill under the sun.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  70. Bobzilla says:

    Those who are against Christ, are for the Jews; they just haven’t figured it out yet. It’s that simple, it really is.

  71. @Priss Factor

    We keep on hearing on this site proclamations by a bunch of angry old men who seem to foam at the mouth when they themselves or hear someone proclaim, that anglo’s are doomed or are dying out. If Marcus Welby (or whatever the name of the current head homosexual of the anglican church is called) is what they are referring to when they say “anglo”, then I will agree, that they are dead. Those that represent the old decaying institutions of the anglo world like Welby, Prince/King Charles etc. are dead or dying, but the Celtic/Germanic overall race of which the English are just part will survive, despite going through some rough parts right now. We’ve been through the Roman conquests, The Hundred Years War, Black Death, WW1, and WW2 and we suffered and survived each time. The next few years are going to see the collapse of the United States, Western Europe and the rise of “hard right” nationalist governments who are going to sweep the liberal decadence into the sewers and develop a new path for the Celtic/Germanic race. The angry old men that inhabit this site and live on doom and gloom are going to go to their graves very disappointed.

    • Thanks: Nancy
    • Replies: @Kurt Knispel
  72. @Joe Paluka

    Your word in Good’s ear (despite me as an angry old man)!

  73. @MotGOD

    The problem is you coming violently on behalf of the Jews into our lands.

    • Replies: @Sarita
  74. Nancy says:

    I’d like to see a little more detail on these reports……..I’m dubious. I suspect that ‘feminism’ has infected the CPS and the general ‘number calculators’…. but I could be wrong. So where is the detail? how is sexual assault defined? etc.

    • Replies: @Sarita
  75. Sarita says:

    I dunno hon,
    Its all in the net.
    There is also a crisis in the US army.
    The soldiers rape the female left and right.
    Don’t side with those who rape women just because they are white when you are a woman yourself.
    Muhammad never raped women.
    Hindus rape women. Catholic Priests and their evangelist counterpart rape kids.
    There is a crisis in the west, the church has gone crazy and all you can do is point your fingers at a man who died 15 hundred years ago?. What a joke.

    • Replies: @vox4non
  76. Cris M. says:
    @Emil Nikola Richard

    The photo garbage reminds of several things, one is discover of electricity –then them making corporate utility monopolies is been turned into one of their weapons. First we don’t need them to ‘sell’ us electric. Can’t find the youtube now but there was one with about twenty million views showing how electric works. There isn’t a ‘channel’ of energy coming into our house, only a bit of energy used to jostle electrons back and forth in the wire and that’s what ‘makes’ the electricity. We could actually ‘make’ our own with little energy and they know it. In any case beside monopolizing, they use it to fuel their schemes, beside monopolize and overcharge, hand discounts to their corporations, and, mental angling, use it for false images – use blasts of ‘lighting’ at faces of their schemers in govmt or media or actor cons so its false ‘showy’ images – which makes dead eyed people seem ‘bright’ or ‘light’. Same using over-color ‘digital’ everything, so people ignore nature which is being destroyed, so then schemers have everyone stuck in their ‘electric’ boxes. Point being blasts of ‘lighting’ and movies etc are false image scam. Dead void.

    btw if anyone happens to have that elec ytube pls reply.

  77. @Jimmy1969

    You are delusional. Whites are only now realizing we have been under attack. Once we start to fight back they lose.

  78. anon[355] • Disclaimer says:
    @Charles Martel France

    You would have been busy writing how devilish were Roosevelt,Churchill, Truman ,Eishenware were had Hitler won the game .
    Matoo Francoo Charloo.Am I right ? That would,have been your handle name .

    By the way,the artice is pure drivel. Author better try his luck in a diffferent kind of future.

  79. Sarita says:
    @Kurt Knispel

    The problem is your nazi, raping, slaughtering, bombing regimes bombing those people’s countries to the stone age forcing them to emigrate.
    The jews got nothing to do with it.
    “the jews this the jews did that”.. “a jew told me to jump off the sixth floor, so I’m gonna jump”.
    No, it’s you the wasp, you whites even killed Jesus cause italians are whites. Go to Brooklyn and they will tell you.
    Today you whites (Nazis all of you) do the same the crusaders did a thousand years ago .
    Go, go buy flowers for your genocidal maniac queen,
    And greet the gay king.🤣🤣

    • Replies: @Anne Lid
  80. @Thomasina

    Are elite Jews just the front men/fall guys of gentile elites?

    If that were the case, why would it be anathema to criticize Jews, while at the same time criticism of gentile elites is not only acceptable but encouraged?

    The whole point of setting up front men and fall guys is that you get the heat off of you and onto a false target.

    What kind of strategy involves setting up Jews as fall guys and then deflecting criticism away from them and onto yourself?

    “I’m gonna set up Jews to take the blame and then insist that I am always to blame” is pretty schizoid if you ask me.

    Maybe the answer is pretty simple – gentile elites are the fall guys.

    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  81. anon[355] • Disclaimer says:

    By the way do you know tha name of the gospel writen by Jesus ? Oh I see he did not. Did James write? Did Peter ? Did Magadelene ? Did his mother?

    Hey,I have written some epistles and about to finish a gospel .You can add that to the latest version of James .
    Oh I see ,you want in in Latin Vulgate ? Or should I send it in Greek ?

    You then can add another face to the trinity . 4 looks better . Church leaders said that there had to be 4 gospels because there were 4 corners of the universe . Trinity is inconsistent . 4 faces for four sides make sense .

  82. Many years ago I dated three WASP women. All three were graduates of elite seven sisters colleges. They all came from great families and were great people. Yet none of them wanted to get married or have children. And as far as I know, they are old and childless. The WASPs were at the height of their powers yet it is almost as if they decided collectively to commit a type of suicide. Very strange.

  83. Anonymous[396] • Disclaimer says:

    You need direction beyond Viking comic books, RC. Your define yourself as a “guy.” OK, so we’ll take you at your word on that. You also don’t take crap for being a white European, either. Where? Single-handedly kicking black ass in ghetto bars?

    RC, no offense, but don’t you realize no real man would make a fool out of himself protesting his manhood, and doubly so when it wasn’t even challenged? As Kant humorously joked, empty bluster is an embarrassing admission of what one is not. Calm down and get a life now that you’re no longer responsible for controlling the future. No, seriously, you need to just grow up and show you’re really a man by bending your knee before God.

  84. Sarita says:
    @Priss Factor

    This is a great comment. As a latina, i wonder and please answer someone, why are blacks always the nice, intelligent guys in the movies and whites are the stupid ones ?
    That’s soo funny

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  85. anon[394] • Disclaimer says:

    Some moron missionaries put same faith in emperor Jehangir that he would get converted to Christianty . Sword would then take care of the rest of Indians.
    Moronic followers of the same religion hoped and tried to persuade Ghandhi to get converted to Christianity .

    China better be alert. These morons whose religion has been undergoing revisions and changes every few centuries ,might try to add some Confucian or Ming history to the Chinese version of the bible to allure the stupidest among them .Sword would then take care of the rest of the billions.

    ““…red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight….”
    Lets combine all morons into the body of pope the rat .

    • Replies: @IreneAthena
  86. @Mario Partisan

    This is obvious stuff…..the trolls come in here and try to gaslight…..but they’re wasting their time.

    At this point EVERYBODY knows jews run the show and bribe white scum to sell out their own people.

    Most of the people who post here already KNOW about the JQ.

    Well….besides the hasbara trolls you have some authentically stupid people who are unable to figure out how things work…..and many of them have jewbrain… there is no reason to engage with them in any way.

    The ones that try to give me shit have no idea what a total waste of time it is.

  87. IreneAthena says: • Website

    What is your worldview, philosophy, or religion, Anonymous?

    • Replies: @Anon
  88. @Robert Dolan

    True, but doesn’t undermine my point. Neither of you should be guilty for something you had nothing to do with.

  89. @Anonymous

    Wow, presumptuous, gratuitously rude, and didn’t address any of the points made. Thanks for your intelligent contribution, manly man.

  90. @Anonymous

    Haven’t read a comic book in decades, though I did enjoy Peter Bagge’s political cartoon compilation. Whatever are you talking about.

  91. Anon[416] • Disclaimer says:

    The world view of Nazism ,Bolshevism .and Judeo -Christianism were and are recipe for disasters . Borrowing from end -time of evangelical or Catholicism the first two tried to remake the world with secular overhead but basically were carbon copy of the templates that ransacked the entire world for 500 years .

    Take your gospels to the nearest black or Latino or S Korean communities and see how many more retards still not saved . Sale your philosophy at a discount .

  92. IreneAthena says: • Website

    So much of this on the part of Christian Zionists is due to a gross misreading of the Book of Hebrews, a failure to comprehend the newness of the New Covenant, including the flow redemptive history from the Old Covenant to the New.–RockABoatus

    You speak truth here, R’Boatie,

    Certainly people can be led astray –to a certain extent — by (intentionally or just sloppily) bad translations of the Scriptures. However, everyone who truthfully claims to be “born again of the Spirit” is promised the comfort and companionship of the Spirit of Truth, who will lead him into all the truth he needs, and that’s whether that believer has access to only “bad” translations or even if he is flat-out illiterate.

    Throughout history manipulative and power-hungry leaders have used religion (including religions like atheism and its sub-sect Communism) to seduce many a soul away from sitting quietly and following the leading of his own God-given conscience.

    “Haven’t read that Holy Book all the way through yet? Too exhausted at night for a few moments of self-reflection, when you “commune with your own heart upon your bed, and be still?” Right? Life just gets too busy to attend such trivia. Don’t worry! I’ve got it all figured out. Just keep hating the people you already hate, and I have the mandate of Heaven to lead you into battle against them, and to shed their blood. Ka-CHING!!!.” Dear Lord God, if their mouths must NEEDS be prevented from being stopped for a season, please stop more hearts from taking heed to what they have to say. Amen.

  93. IreneAthena says: • Website

    It is all right, InnerCynic. I learned a new word tonight, “Anonyms,” which I thought was just a misspelling before I checked my impulse to respond to Anonyms with a “[sic]” after his/her/their (?) name. Anonyms is plural, so “their” is probably the correct pronoun. When conversing with a God-fearing Muslim, at least I don’t have to worry about being berated for not considering the johnny-come-lately hizn’s herzn’s etc…

  94. IreneAthena says: • Website

    “Christian missionaries” are deathly scared of operating in Muslim societies.–Anonyms

    Oh, for a society that finds the right balance between allowing religious freedom and keeping the heretics from destroying the society that allows religious freedom…

    Funny coincidence, Anonyms. Yesterday, having just heard the testimony of a Muslim-background lady who became devoted to Jesus Christ…as Lord…after He appeared to her in a dream [a phenomenon I’ve heard about fairly often, and no surprise, given the sentiment expressed in your comment], I told my husband about her amazing story.

    “Jesus appeared to her in a dream, huh? What I wanna know is, what color was Jesus?”

    “That’s a good question! And you know, she didn’t say, but she did happen to mention He was wearing a dazzling, radiant white robe. Maybe that’s what He wears in dreams, partly so people can’t tell what color He is?”

    “Red and yellow, black and white, they are precious in His sight. Jesus loves the little children of the world.” As the Great Prophet said, in Matthew 18: 2-4.

  95. vox4non says:

    You are right in that we should condemn rape whoever the perpetrator.

    However, you are wrong in saying that Muhammad / Mohammed (Mohd) never raped women. After killing her husband the day before, Mohd claimed that Roxanna (sic) married him willingly and that he never took her by force? Or that he married Aisha when she was nine? Or what about his dictates in the Hadith that what the Muslim can keep what he takes (booty, women) by his right hand (via war)?

    Again, rape is a problem but glorifying a rapist to put others down is to insult all the victims.

  96. vox4non says:

    As a Celt, I shed no tear for the passing of the Anglo-Saxons (UK and USA) for the harm they have wrought.

  97. @RadicalCenter

    The difference is that fake Christians twisted/ignored the Scriptures to commit crimes, while the KIKES’ scriptures literally demand all Goyim to be killed or enslaved as cattle, and Jesus Christ is boiling in a vat of human shit in hell. It is their religious and racial duty.

    That is the difference, you ignoramus.

    Of course, there were Jews who finally embraced Christ and rejected Satan. Do you know where these fine people were employed? In the Holy Inquisition, because being born a kike helps you see through all the typical, elementary kike lies.

    Which YOU seem to tolerate. “Radical Center”. Heh. When the Chinese and Russians come, ain’t nobody is gonna loiter on a fence. Same as it was back then.

  98. Sarita says:

    But muhammad died 2 thousand years ago,and shit is happening as we speak in christian countries !
    Are the rapists in the US Muslim ?
    Ate the marines reading the Koran?
    Didn’t Jesus say: “And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?”
    By attacking muslims you are serving the clash of civilizations.
    Unless, well that’s your job in Tel Aviv.

    • Replies: @Franklin Ryckaert
  99. @Sarita

    The “clash of civilizations” began when the first Muslim armies galloped out of Arabia.
    Since then there has been a continuous conflict of the Muslim world, not only with Christians but also with Hindus and Buddhists.

    PS, Muhammad did not die two thousand years ago, but he died in 632 AD, that is 1390 years ago.

    • Replies: @Sarita
  100. Sarita says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    I know when Muhammad died, i was giving a hypothetical number in anger at the hipocrisy.
    What is it with you and the two others attacking mohammad every thread even when the subject is about butterflies? Are you sitting in tel aviv, or is that the hate in the hearts of the wasp, former crusaders?
    Why you wont do it? Because as soon as you get off the plane you will notice WHAT’S MISSING in your civilization: Family.
    The most confusing day in your oh so civilized country?
    because a high number, maybe 69% are bastards.
    Muhammad this, muhammad that, Jews this, Jews that.
    Its you the wasp, the worse mistake God ever made!

  101. Anonymous[232] • Disclaimer says:

    Wasps are finished …we lost and are now almost extinct. Who are you trying to kid?

    That’s standard trash talk.

    Fact is, the opposition has some serious problems, chief of which is that they are large on mouth and small on acts. The height of their cleverness has been to get the Anglo-Saxons to do things through treachery and lies.

    Well, now they’ve destroyed their ability to fool the Anglo-Saxons. Their urban centers lie in economic ruins and will not rise again. Their “replacement populations” live in the urban centers, and, while they may rise in their wrath, the magic of video cameras has shown them to be deranged, manically hostile and tactically childish, so nobody cares.

    Even worse, they have graduated from threatening to “make the wheels turn backwards” to actually doing so, and so openly that they can talk of nothing else. They are now an active threat to the non-urban part of the country, and to the people in urban centers who have blue-collar jobs and think that US urban centers can be revived.

    Strategically, they are in a very bad spot and have fallen back to reliance on force (FBI, DOJ) rather than propaganda (media) as their primary claim to governance. Operationally, they have devolved from covert projects to overt projects that the majority of the countryside thinks are illegitimate. Tactically, their contact points are all relentlessly hostile and in most cases clearly harmful or a risk to life.

    And that’s just their domestic situation. Internationally, their attempts to take down one nation after another have evoked considerable animosity. Their latest attempt to take down the Russian Federation bids fair to take down Ukraine and the European Union instead.

    Go ahead — reply to that with more trash talk. Trash talkers love to feel important in at least one part of their lives.

  102. Anonymous[232] • Disclaimer says:

    The God that we believe in, respect, and fear gives people free will and a fair chance. Our understanding is that he’d punish or “damn” someone because of that person’s own actions, not for any other arbitrary ground.

    Well, God made the universe and keeps it going, so God is responsible for the human condition.

    You can make a simple driving mistake and not only die, but kill or maim your family and somebody else’s family. Or somebody else can make the mistake. You can do nothing wrong and die of cancer.

    Your assertion contradicts experience.

    Most human conceptions of God say that God is arbitrary, often as arbitrary as are humans, sometimes more so. Christianity is unique in that it depicts a God who cares about humanity and Who keeps His word. In the Greek pantheon, only Prometheus cared about people enough to give people fire, and Prometheus (“foresight”) was eternally punished.

    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
  103. @Anonymous

    Christianity is unique in that it depicts a God who cares about humanity and Who keeps His word.

    I thought he had an eternal pact with the Jews. What happened to that? Christians say he abrogated it and made a new pact with them, but if God can break a pact with the Jews, why can’t he do it to the Christians too? Maybe that’s sort of what’s happening now that Christians have become pro-Zionist. Another hypothesis is that Judaism is evil and Christianity is stupid. That’s what I think anyway. Judaism isn’t stupid because it tends to deliver on its promises, but it is evil because it creates misery for non-Jewish life (both human and animal).

  104. Anne Lid says:

    Hate has made you blind and foolish. The soldiers who nailed Christ to the cross were indeed white goyim, but who ordered his death? They operate the same now. The Cabal cannot do all the evil themselves, they direct others to do it for them.

  105. Anne Lid says:

    Nobody in his right mind thinks that the US is a democracy. The overwhelming majority of those rapes are committed by non whites. In the UK ditto, blacks, Muslims, Eastern European gypsies.

    The Catholic priests are less inclined to pedophilia than the general population. Of course the liberal policies are not helping the Church. Homosexuals used to be removed from the seminaries, now they have their own cliques. Eventually things will reach the bottom of the pit and from then on the Church will be renewed.

    The Arian heresy lasted for more than a 100 years and they outnumbered the faithful. Where are the Arians now?

  106. G. Poulin says:

    Rastafarianism is a grass movement.

  107. Anonymous[429] • Disclaimer says:

    “Anyone claiming that God favors or favored his group because of its color, race, whatever, is a lying or deluded arrogant sick ass. And this from a guy who’s proud of my heritage and doesn’t take crap for being a white european. But I’ve never been mentally ill or obnoxious enough to think that God made any special covenant with people of my race or color. That takes an unusual degree of irrationality and self-worship, which too much of that group seems to have in spades — and “christian” cucks like you accept the premise.”

    And this ladies and gentlemen, is the reason why whites are going extinct, because of their lack of group identity and tribalism. Maybe if you white cucks had some self respect like the Jews you wouldn’t be in this predicament.

    And yes, God is very real (He is Nature and Truth itself), the Jews are the chosen people because of their high IQ and high group identity, those two factors made them stand the test of time and now they control the world. God hates the weak and helps those who want to overcome hard situations, God is the hidden hand of nature (Evolution, survival of the fittest,etc), and clearly He gave the Jews their high intellect.

  108. @Priss Factor

    In fairness, some Anglos (for better or worse) are still racist towards Italians and Greeks. In neocon white circles, calling Italians fickle surrender monkeys (or words to that effect) for flipping in WWII and being reticent to criticise Russia is okay, but criticising races from other continents for say, looting city centres, or blaming whites for everything under the sun, is completely verboten.

  109. TGD says:

    While the inter Christian theological debates rage, in Israel the notes and prayers stuffed into the “wailing wall” by observant Jews (and others) are being removed. This happens every year just before the Jewish new year. One must assume that the notes and prayers have already been read by “El,” the Hebraic god.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Fraser Comments via RSS
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV