The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 NOI Research Group Archive
Where's the "Thanks" in Thanksgiving?
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

One of the most cherished American holidays is Thanksgiving, a day that Abraham Lincoln officially declared in 1863 in praise of “our beneficent Father who dwelleth in the Heavens.” In the early 1900s, Gimbels and Macy’s saw dollar signs and commandeered the celebration, evicted the heavenly Father altogether, added a parade with Santa Claus, and the rest, as they say, is history.

Or is it?

Every American school child learns of the harvest feast where the friendly local Indians broke bread and shared turkey with the black-hatted, big-buckled European Pilgrims in a festival of interracial harmony and mutual respect. Yet, there is almost nothing true about that idyllic scenario—not even the turkey. This comforting mythology has concealed some of the bloodiest acts of race hate in American history. Let us pull the stuffing out of this Thanksgiving myth and get down to the bones of the Thanksgiving idea, which has some harsh and disturbing truths.

First, let us look at these so-called Pilgrims. Most people don’t know that there were 102 British passengers on the 1620 voyage of the Mayflower, but those we now call Pilgrims numbered only 35—the rest were an assortment of dregs, cutthroats, and criminals. Their journey to Indian lands was financed by wealthy Englishmen, who sought profits from the exploitation of the lumber and furs found there in abundance. The quest for “religious liberty” was hardly the concern of these investors and one would be hard-pressed to find God anywhere near the venture. The “Pilgrim Fathers”—who, interestingly, called themselves Separatists, not Pilgrims—came to this new world with many more muskets than bibles; indeed, they came ready to conquer, not to pray. By the time the Mayflower arrived, the Indians, who had barely survived an earlier invasion of Europeans, shunned contact with these newcomers and retreated inland.

They were smart. As soon as the Europeans set foot upon the shore (there actually never was a “Plymouth Rock”), and before the Whites even saw their first Indian, they set about to pillage their surroundings:

  • They found an Indian food storehouse and ransacked it, stealing the corn and a trap for hunting game.
  • They desecrated the gravesite of an Indian child, stealing the valuable contents and throwing the body back.
  • They broke into two Indian homes when the families were gone and stole their belongings.

To the Indians this was frighteningly familiar. Still, they tried to make peace with these strange and violent people from across the sea. The Indian Squanto had been kidnapped in an earlier British invasion and forcibly taken to Europe. Somehow he made his way back to America, and, having learned English, he was sent out to “greet” the newcomers.

Despite the assistance of the Indian farmers the Pilgrim crop had failed miserably in 1621, but the Indians produced twenty acres of corn without which the colonists would have surely perished. They held a feast and invited the Indian leader Massasoit, and it was Massasoit—not the Pilgrims—who then invited ninety or more of his fellow Indians. No turkey, cranberry sauce, or pumpkin pie was served; no prayers were offered and the Indians were not invited back. The Pilgrims did however consume a good deal of beer. In fact, each Pilgrim drank at least a half gallon of ale a day, which they preferred even to water. It may be about the only Thanksgiving tradition that has survived intact to this day.

But there is more troubling reality behind this interracial gathering. The Europeans erected an 11-foot-high wall around their entire settlement for the purpose of keeping the Indians out. Just days before the “feast,” a gang of Pilgrims actively sought to murder a local Indian leader. They eventually killed and beheaded an Indian, brought the head to their Plymouth compound, where they impaled it on a wooden spike, and displayed it for many years.

By 1636, these Pilgrims had been joined by many more even “holier” European colonists known as Puritans, and their thirst for Indian blood could only be described as insatiable. They trapped some 700 Pequot Indian men, women, and children near the mouth of the Mystic River and attacked them with unrelenting military force. Only a handful escaped and few prisoners were taken. They wrote proudly of the massacre: “To see [the Indians] frying in the fire, and the streams of their blood quenching the same, and the stench was horrible; but the victory seemed a sweet sacrifice, and they gave praise thereof to God.” This event marked what was most likely the first actual Thanksgiving.

Soon, the European intruders were in a full-scale war with the Indians. A people who had for thousands of years been peaceable farmers were now forced into humiliating submission. They struck out in 1675 with raids on several isolated frontier towns, but the unrelenting aggression of the White man was too much to overcome. It took only a half a century for the Europeans to annihilate the Red nation—it must have been a record even for them. Historian Douglas Edward Leach describes the bitter end: “The ruthless executions, the cruel sentences … were all aimed at the same goal—unchallengeable white supremacy in southern New England.

When Captain Benjamin Church tracked down and murdered the Indian leader Metacomet, his body was cut into four parts and “left for the wolves.” His hands were cut off and sent to Boston and his head went to Plymouth, where it was set upon a pole on Thanksgiving Day, 1676! Metacomet’s nine-year-old son was destined for execution, the Puritan reasoning being that the offspring of the devil must pay for the sins of their father. He was instead shipped to the Caribbean to serve his life in slavery.

In the midst of the Holocaust against the Red Man, Massachusetts Governor Joseph Dudley declared in 1704 a “General Thanksgiving”—not to celebrate the brotherhood of man, but for “[God’s] infinite Goodness to extend His Favors … In defeating and disappointing … the Expeditions of the Enemy [Indians] against us, And the good Success given us against them, by delivering so many of them into our hands …”

Just two years later one could reap about a \$100 reward in Massachusetts for the scalp of an Indian. According to one scholar, “Hunting redskins became … a popular sport in New England, especially since prisoners were worth good money …”

If this is the first time you have heard any of this history, don’t get mad at The Nation of Islam. Ask your teachers why they didn’t tell you. Ask them what’s behind their other cherished holidays and traditions.

Enjoy your turkey.

(Much of this information with references can be found in the book The Hidden History of Massachusetts: A Guide for Black Folks.)

(Republished from Nation of Islam Research Group by permission of author or representative)
• Category: History • Tags: American Indians, Thanksgiving 
Hide One CommentLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. The Nation of Islam published The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, volumes 1, 2 & 3. The first book reads as a sober account. It quotes Jews. Are the sources genuine? Checking them would take time and effort. But the opposition do not tell us that the NOI is lying, suggesting that they have it right. The Wiki, at tells us that the NOI uses selective quotations. Where did they get that idea from?

    Harold Brackman, who knows the ground wrote in opposition – see Jew on the brain : a public refutation of the Nation of Islam’s The Secret relationship between Blacks and Jews ( ]. Unfortunately for Doctor Brackman his doctoral thesis covered the same ground, telling us that the NOI was right.
    The Hypocrisy and Fraud of Harold Brackman is an exposé – see

    The NOI will have less to say about the African tribes that captured blacks to sell as trade goods, in return for mirrors, beads, muskets etc. Are they right about the New England settlers?
    The descendants of those New England settlers are the self-righteous trouble makers who care so deeply about racism.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply -

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All NOI Research Group Comments via RSS
Becker update V1.3.2
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World