The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
When Jews Define Fascism
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Concluding one of America’s more infamous obscenity trials in 1964, Justice Potter Stewart absolved a controversial French motion picture with an opinion that has since passed into common parlance: “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.” The opinion was celebrated at the time as a victory for freedom of expression, and paved the way for a later deluge of Western cultural degradation. Of greater significance, however, is the fact that almost 60 years later “I know it when I see it” has become a political philosophy in its own right, adopted and pursued by a radical Left intent on curtailing that very same freedom by claiming an exclusive and unaccountable ability to define Fascism. This was the starkest message from The Burkean’s unprecedented recent Irish Antifa Project, which was designed to infiltrate and expose self-styled Antifa networks in mainstream Irish academia and politics.

In my view, the most predictable revelation from the Irish Antifa Project was the extent of historical and cultural ignorance among the profiled activists. None of the intellectually and professionally mediocre individuals exposed by The Burkean appeared capable of articulating what Fascism was, or is alleged to be today. Fascism instead seems to have been adopted by these non-entities as a vague catch-all for anything touching upon capitalism, conservatism, religion, or tradition. Equally vague are the proposed activist methodologies of these individuals, which range from the compiling of databases with the names of those deemed to be Fascists, to tentative but deniable support for violence. With the exception of a small number of fanatical Jews like Trinity College student Jacob Woolf, “anti-Fascism” has evidently been adopted by the majority of those concerned as a kind of half-hearted virtue signaling hobby or political side gig, albeit one with sinister potential.

Unfortunately, the problems posed by an uninformed, unaccountable, and unhinged “anti-Fascist” radical Left aren’t helped by the fact confusion about the nature of Fascism is endemic in society as a whole. There are essentially three traditions when it comes to explaining Fascism. One can be found within Fascism itself, and demonstrates how self-defined Fascists see themselves. This material is overwhelmingly historical. Another tradition can be found in contemporary mainstream academia and, although biased, it is at least academic in style, serious, and relatively comprehensive. The work of the late Roger Griffin is perhaps the best available in the English language in terms of this tradition, and is also largely concerned with history. The third tradition, on the other hand, is popular, highly politicised, always concerned with contemporary politics, and is abridged to the point of being a pop-Left caricature of serious studies of Fascism. It is particularly problematic because it has tremendous traction among the masses and, despite being propaganda for extremist politics of its own sort, always presents itself as objective and neutral.

The individuals profiled by The Burkean are unquestionably disciples of the latter tradition, a recent example of which is Jason Stanley’s How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them (2018). Stanley, a Jewish professor at Yale whose background is in language and epistemology and not history or politics, hasn’t published any peer-reviewed material on Fascism or anti-Fascism, but his 2018 book proved a moderate publishing sensation because it represented a thinly veiled attack on the Trump administration. The same administration provoked similar ill-conceived and unhelpful monographs on Fascism from Cass Sunstein (Can it Happen Here?), Madeleine Albright (Fascism: A Warning), and Harvard duo Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt (How Democracies Die). All of these individuals are Jews, and this is not a coincidence. In fact, since the production of Leon Trotsky’s Fascism: What it is and How to Fight It (compiled between 1922 and 1933) and the Frankfurt School’s project on the “Authoritarian Personality,” Jews have been at the forefront of paving the cultural, as well as political, path to Antifa activity. They do so by bastardising public understanding of the nature of Fascist politics, thereby shaping “anti-Fascism” as a vehicle for the undermining of the White nation. When it comes to Fascism, “Jews know it when they see it,” a pronouncement we are all encouraged to accept without question.

Jewish Definitions of Fascism

A common theme in influential books like Stanley’s, destined for a modicum of success in the paperback mass market thanks to dramatic titles and relentless marketing, is their incredibly—and deliberately—vague definition of Fascism. These Jewish activists know this, of course, but they push ahead regardless. Stanley, for example, excuses the gaps and logical leaps inherent in his dubious study by arguing that “generalization is necessary in the current moment.” But if he is defining the “current moment” as Fascist under his generalized definition, isn’t he simply using generalization to excuse the same generalization? Isn’t this tantamount to saying to his readers: “The present moment is so obviously Fascist that we really don’t need to define Fascism”? Such considerations don’t slow Stanley down for a second, and this celebrated Yale professor slips off the hook to pronounce, even more unhelpfully, “I have chosen the label “Fascism” for ultranationalism of some variety.” What variety? What’s his definition of “ultranationalism”? It doesn’t matter. What is clear in texts like Stanley’s is that you aren’t here to be encouraged to think or ask questions, but to absorb a discourse and accept a dogma. The authority behind such demands stems predominantly from emotional blackmail — Stanley cashes in his card as the son of “Holocaust survivors,” and explains that “My family background has saddled me with difficult emotional baggage. But it also, crucially, prepared me to write this book.” His lack of education and reading in the subject is therefore apparently more than compensated for in the fact he is emotionally distressed by it. Right.

Jason Stanley: Bravely struggling with his emotional baggage
Jason Stanley: Bravely struggling with his emotional baggage

Not only are Jewish definitions of Fascism deliberately inadequate and disingenuous, they’re often completely wrongheaded. Stanley in his first chapter “The Mythic Past,” for example, describes Fascist propaganda as relying on a unique blend of mythic, romanticised, and normally rural evocations of the past, and that the same propaganda offers a future return to this idyll. It goes without saying that this provides an extremely convenient way for Jewish and Leftist activists to attack almost all genuine conservatives as Fascists. But is such propaganda even inherently Fascist or even right-wing? We might consider the following quote from a well-known historical figure: “The position of the English agricultural labourer from 1770 to 1780, with regard to his food and dwelling, as well as to his self-respect, amusements etc., is an ideal never attained again since that time.” The ideologue behind this quote proposed a future in which the national community of citizens enjoyed something like a return to this pastoral idyll, filling their days with productive work, music, and leisure (“hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise [literature] in the evening”). It really is quite a vision. But the problem is that these proposals aren’t from the works of Sir Oswald Mosley, but from Karl Marx’s Capital and The German Ideology, and they were a key aspect of the early promotion of Communism. The idea that Fascism uniquely appeals to notions of making one’s country “great again” is an unsophisticated trope and, ultimately, a political weapon.

The truth of the matter is that politicised nostalgia and visions of national rebirth are common to ideologies of all stripes, and are useless as tools for examining the specific nature of genuine political and cultural manifestations of Fascism. The only possible exception is Roger Griffin’s highly nuanced theory of palingenetic ultrationationalism, which is corrupted and glossed in Jewish treatments of the subject in order to indict all expressions of White discontent in modernity. Presentations of ideal pasts and futures are quite obviously utilised by all political actors keen to exploit the public instinct to reject the status quo. Barack Obama’s campaigns based on “Hope,” “Change,” and “Progress,” and Trump’s “MAGA” are not substantially different in style or method, the only significant dissimilarity being the demonising of the latter and the feverish and irrational presentation of its ethos as an early symptom of an impending Fascist takeover. The preoccupation of Cultural Marxist anthropologists with describing putatively utopian modes of life in primitive societies can also clearly be seen as a call to “make society great again” by demolishing capitalism, the family, etc. The oldest and most profound political expression of resurrecting a glorious past rooted in the land is, of course, not even to be found in European Fascism at all, but in the quintessential palingenetic ultranationalism of Zionism, a subject strangely never covered by our Jewish authors, presumably because of other “difficult emotional baggage.”

Similar definitions of Fascism, this time refracted through a lens of Leftist pop-culture garbage, can be found in Cass Sunstein’s 2018 Can It Happen Here? Sunstein’s expertise is ostensibly law, though his most successful work is apparently The World According to Star Wars (2016). In another time and context, someone like Sunstein would cut a ridiculous figure, in much the same way that the Romans found it hilarious that the people squatting in the hovel that was 1st century Judea regarded themselves as a superior nation. Sunstein has shaped his career as a professor at the University of Chicago Law School around such efforts as inaugurating a “celebrate tax day” and ending all government recognition of marriage. But Star Wars books and outlandish schemes aside, Sunstein is a deeply sinister individual. He is particularly concerned by “conspiracy theories,” and has developed policy suggestions that governments engage in the “cognitive infiltration of extremist groups” by entering “chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.” In other words, Sunstein is a major contributor to the concept of “thought crime” and a high-profile advocate for the same kind of law enforcement online disinformation and entrapment activity that regularly snares exuberant White teenage gamers and presents them to the media as right-wing terrorists.

Cass Sunstein: “We need a cognitive infiltration of extremist groups”
Cass Sunstein: “We need a cognitive infiltration of extremist groups”

Sunstein edited, and contributed to, Can It Happen Here?, along with a motley of other Jews, including Eric Posner, Jack Balkin, Tyler Cowen, Jack Goldsmith, Tom Ginsburg, Noah Feldman, Jonathan Haidt, Bruce Ackerman, Jon Elster, Martha Minow, David Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone. In fact, of the 17 essays comprising the volume, 13 are written by Jews. One of the non-Jews is Sunstein’s Irish-American wife, the shabbos goy and ADL darling Samantha Power, and two are Muslims. Can It Happen Here?, subtitled Authoritarianism in America, is therefore little more than an exercise in Jewish paranoia and a glaring example of the way in which Jews invoke vague caricatures of Fascism in order to attack the traditional structures of White nations. Posner, for example, cites Trump’s hostility to elements of the press and the fact his initial success occurred somewhat outside the two-party structure of American politics as sufficient evidence of a Fascist threat. In other words, Jews, who dominate the press and have very significant financial interests in the trajectories of both major parties, regard anything not fully within their control as tantamount to Fascism.

The same fearmongering yet vague template is followed by Levitsky and Ziblatt in How Democracies Die (2018), which opens with the authors declaring that authoritarianism has been for them an “occupational obsession.” Levitsky and Ziblatt “feel dread … We worry.” What has them most worried is “intimidation of the press” and the fact some politicians “view their rivals as enemies.” Trump terrifies due to his “clear authoritarian tendencies.” He is said to follow in an American tradition of “extremist demagogues” that includes “Henry Ford, Huey Long, Joseph McCarthy, and George Wallace.” America “failed the test” when it elected Trump in November 2016. Like Sunstein and Posner, Levitsky and Ziblatt are especially concerned by “extreme partisan polarization,” which is another way of saying that they are very worried that the two main political parties may actually diverge in a meaningful way from one another and therefore run the risk of engaging in a genuine politics. Since the same complaint is made by Stanley and Sunstein, we might assume that Jews are most comfortable with two-party systems in which the parties and their policies are almost indistinguishable and in which there is a high level of ideological consensus. Anything outside this comfort zone is Fascism.

Levitsky and Ziblatt: “We feel dread … We worry.”
Levitsky and Ziblatt: “We feel dread … We worry.”

Equally terrified is Madeleine Albright, whose Fascism: A Warning (2018) is derived from an identical playbook to that employed by Stanley, Sunstein, Levitsky, and Ziblatt. Albright opens the 2019 edition of her book with a new preface in which she poses as a benevolent granny, writing with detachment and objectivity, she claims, at her “farm” in Virginia. Granny Albright, who once declared the Serbs to be “disgusting” and opined that starving half a million Iraqi children via UN sanctions was “worth it,” now spends her days tending to her tomatoes and pondering with great bemusement why a reporter recently branded her a “war mongering ghoul.” As she observes the serenity of the evergreens around her, it is quite the mystery why multicultural America seems to be “at each other’s throats.” We might think that Granny Albright could answer such a question by leaving rural Virginia and moving to America’s multicultural heartlands. But no, from her safe and isolated vantage point she has it all figured out. Her answer is simple, and has nothing to do with the fact multiculturalism is itself a poisonous doctrine — multiculturalism isn’t working because Donald Trump and Fascism are on the verge of a devastating takeover. But what is Fascism? This is never clear anywhere in the book. Albright vaguely explains that Fascism is a “spread of anti-democratic trends.” [Translation: “The controlled two-party system has been weakened”] Fascist “attitudes” develop when “the perception grows that everybody lies.” [Translation: “The goyim know”] Fascism is “a doctrine of anger and fear.” [Translation: “I’m worried. Shut it down.”]

Andrew Rawnsley, Guardian journalist, aware of the this glaring weakness in the book, interviewed Albright prior to writing his review : “I suggest to her that the book struggles to offer a satisfactory definition of fascism. ‘Defining fascism is difficult,’ she responds. ‘First of all, I don’t think fascism is an ideology. I think it is a method, it’s a system’.” In other words, Fascism is a label that can be applied to any kind of politics that unsettles Jews and offers authentic alternative political methodologies. By refusing to acknowledge Fascism as a specific historical political ideology with identifiable and fixed traits, Albright and the other Jewish activists mentioned here can free it up as a system of mere “methods” that can then be interpreted in general terms in order to attack those elements of White society deemed oppositional to Jewish interests. So-called Antifascism, which draws all of its cultural power from this kind of Jewish propaganda, is therefore not against Fascism at all, but against any “methods” or “trends” that aren’t conducive to Jews.

Madeleine Albright: Wrote a book about something she can’t define
Madeleine Albright: Wrote a book about something she can’t define

Stanley’s book is an excellent guide to Jewish paranoia about the “methods” hinted at by Albright. His text is divided into chapters titled “The Mythic Past,” “Propaganda,” “Anti-Intellectual,” “Unreality,” “Hierarchy,” “Victimhood,” “Law and Order,” “Sexual Anxiety,” “Sodom and Gomorrah,” and, since Jews inevitably view all dissent from their interests as leading ultimately to outlandish forms of mass murder, the final chapter is headed “Arbeit Macht Frei.” Each of these chapters deals with entirely subjective material and ideas, and there is no serious engagement with any scholarly literature on historical Fascism.

As discussed above, “the mythic past” is only a problem for Jews like Stanley when the past in question isn’t conducive to Jewish goals. Fictional multicultural pasts where ancient “Cheddar Man” Britons had dark skin, Africans lived in England before the English, and Whites demonstrated unique evil, are currently the height of intellectual and cultural fashion. These are the versions of “the mythic past” that Jews celebrate and promote. On the other hand, conceptions of the past as involving mono-ethnic cultures, celebrations of European racial glory, and acknowledgement of White group achievement are branded Fascist and beyond the pale. In the Jewish vision, the histories of Europeans are irredeemably shameful and therefore any attempt to make one’s nation “great again” is both irrational (“they were never great in the first place!”) and threatening. In this reading, all positive reflections on the European past are part of the Fascist methodology and should therefore be ruthlessly opposed. When Jews like Stanley and Albright include references to “the mythic past” in their “warnings” about Fascism they are in fact warning and shaming Whites against asserting their own interests and group pride.

The same framework is employed in discussing the alleged propaganda and “anti-intellectual” qualities of Fascism. Stanley argues that Fascists “attack and devalue education, expertise, and language.” This argument is, at best, entirely subjective and at worst complete nonsense. The idea that Fascists have been against intellectualism in general is simply ridiculous. As John Whittam writes in his Fascist Italy:

Fascism suffered not from the lack of ideas but from too many. Despite their rhetoric and pronounced hostility towards the intellectuals of the old liberal establishment, Futurists, syndicalists, ex-socialists, and even the ras professed an ideology and invariably had access to a newspaper where their views could be expressed. After the conquest of power one of the major problems was the formulation of an ideology from the bewildering array of distinctive ideologies within the Fascist movement.[1]J. Whittam, Fascist Italy, (New York: Manchester University Press, 1995), 81-2. [emphasis added]

Underlying Stanley’s accusatory statement is the simple fact that Fascists oppose liberal, left-wing, and Jewish intellectualism. Jewish activists like Stanley believe, of course, that theirs are the only legitimate and authentic intellectual activities in the public sphere. An attack on their position is therefore seen as an attack on all genuine intellectualism. The accusation that Fascists are anti-intellectual thus speaks of a profound arrogance in the accuser.

Equally revealing are Stanley’s chapters on “Sexual Anxiety” and “Sodom and Gomorrah.” These chapters are more or less an apologetic for Weimar-style sexual degeneracy, and insinuate that all attempts to prevent descent into such an abyss are pathological and Fascist. Some interesting context in this regard can be found back in 2016 when Stanley became embroiled in controversy after a Facebook exchange with fellow Jewish academic Rebecca Kukla, of Georgetown University, was widely disseminated. The pair had been discussing Richard Swinburne, an Orthodox Christian philosopher, and were incensed after Swinburne addressed the Society of Christian Philosophers and lectured on Christian ethics, including the religion’s stance on homosexuality. Swinburne made the argument that homosexuality could be understood as an illness, even a form of disability, since it acted against the otherwise natural imperative to reproduce. Stanley, in a conversation with other Jewish academics, accused Swinburne of “promoting homophobia,” paving the way for another Holocaust, and then finished his tirade with “Fuck those assholes. Seriously.” The charming Dr. Kukla, presumably equally engaged in employing vigorous intellectualism against the Fascist encroachment of Prof. Swinburne, added, “Those douche tankards can suck my giant queer cock.”

Rebecca Kukla: Stunning and brave intellectual fighting against Fascist anti-intellectuals
Rebecca Kukla: Stunning and brave intellectual fighting against Fascist anti-intellectuals

When the exchange went viral, both Stanley and Kukla scattered like cockroaches under torchlight, hiding under pity narratives and accusations of anti-Semitism. In a remarkable piece worth quoting here at length, Stanley wrote shortly afterwards:

I wanted to address the situation that has arisen from the series of articles in right-wing media outlets about me, and then me and Professor Kukla, that resulted from a private Facebook exchange being published and taken out of context … I was almost always the only Jewish person in my classes growing up. In my high schools in tenth and eleventh grade, I was the first Jewish person to attend. I am very familiar with the isolation that is involved, even when there is no overt discrimination (though I grew up being asked if I had horns and such like, this was ignorance and not malice). It is woven into the tapestry of my existence what it is like to be in a minority faith among a majority … My central concern right now is entirely about our gay colleagues in academia who have been watching this episode in horror, rightly concerned that any complaints about discrimination they may raise, even in private spaces, will result in the kind of incredibly intense retribution that Rebecca Kukla and I have been singled out and subject to over the past week. And those concerns would be legitimate. I need to end with the issue of anti-Semitism. On my public post, someone posted a disturbing comment about Swinburne’s death. I contemplated deleting it but then wanted to wait to see if anyone would ‘like’ it before addressing its horrors (no one did). It is hard to avoid the suspicion that the media discussion starting with the September 28th piece in The American Conservative, and then the Washington Times, is straightforwardly anti-Semitic. How did a non-story about the complexity of communication that results when screenshots from private conversations are made public, become a national story about two leftist Jewish professors and the dangers they pose? At first, the story was solely about me. Then, the other Jewish philosopher who posted on that thread, Rebecca Kukla, was also targeted. What ensued was a terrible anti-Semitic narrative, channeling a virulent 20th century form of anti-Semitism.

When I first read this piece, I have to confess without exaggeration that I laughed so hard I was literally gasping for air. It positively drips with a comic level of Jewish stereotype. Consider the speed with which Stanley morosely explains how he felt as “the only Jew in the class.” Observe the fake worry about the “Other,” in this case his “gay colleagues.” And reflect on the final, truly beautiful, example of the shameless Jewish recourse to the protective embrace of the anti-Semitism accusation — and not just any anti-Semitism but that infamous “virulent” kind. Every ingredient of “crying out as they strike you” is present here in perfect, distilled form. All my differences with him aside, Stanley is to be congratulated on being an excellent student of his people’s craft.

ORDER IT NOW

When we therefore read Stanley’s chapters on “Sexual Anxiety” and “Sodom and Gomorrah” we know precisely the kind of attitudes that our esteemed Yale professor brings to the table. He advances a theory that Fascists merely pretend to be upset about the rape of White women in order to reinforce the patriarchy. Take, for example, his outlandish claim that “The crime of rape is basic to fascist politics because it raises sexual anxiety and an attendant need for protection of the nation’s manhood by the fascist authority.” For Stanley, all rhetoric with the purpose of supporting stable, growing White families is Fascist, along with any attempts to challenge the “liberation” of women into sterility, promiscuity, vacuous careerism, grooming gangs, and abortion. But the deeper problem here is that there is no serious literature on any such fixation on rape within Fascism, and Stanley seems to pluck his concept of rape as “basic to fascist politics” from thin air. In reality, antifascist propaganda has been noted many times in the scholarly literature for its reliance on rape metaphors to attack the psychological appeal of Fascism (e.g. “Fascism rapes the mind of the masses”[2]See, for example, S. Chakotin, The Rape of the Masses: The Psychology of Totalitarian Political Propaganda (1940).). We can quite easily surmise that Stanley is probably aware that his argument is nonsense, and that he simply prefers to stigmatise any attempt to protect White women. The same methodology is employed when Stanley proposes that homosexuality and race-mixing are inherently good, being valiant sins “against Fascist ideology.” This is what now passes for an education at Yale.

Conclusion

Stanley, Sunstein, Levitsky, Ziblatt, and Albright have produced quite typical examples of Jewish propaganda disguised as “anti-Fascist” literature. The key features of such works are invariably a vague definition of Fascism, an attempt to relate “warnings” to some aspect of contemporary politics, melodramatic admonitions about a putative future violent catastrophe that must be avoided, and maudlin appeals to personal family history and “emotional baggage.” Underlying the surface veneer, these works are highly focussed efforts to pathologise aspects of White culture and politics deemed oppositional to Jewish interests. These efforts, and their framing, are quite obviously derived from Cultural Marxism, especially Adorno’s work with the Frankfurt School on The Authoritarian Personality, and from earlier forms of Jewish activism witnessed from the end of the 19th century and culminating in Weimar Germany (e.g. the work of Magnus Hirschfeld). The family, the acknowledgement of heterosexuality as culturally and biologically normative and preferential, the desirability of mono-ethnic cultures, and the acknowledgement of inequality among human beings are reframed in this kind of “warning literature” as inherently Fascistic.

It is very worrying that our culture has bequeathed a great deal of respect and legitimacy to Jewish intellectuals, especially in relation to the subject of Fascism. We have allowed them to assert that “they know it when they see it.” The fundamental crisis of our civilization is that they see it everywhere, and they won’t rest until this phantom of their paranoia, and us with it, are abolished.

Notes

[1] J. Whittam, Fascist Italy, (New York: Manchester University Press, 1995), 81-2.

[2] See, for example, S. Chakotin, The Rape of the Masses: The Psychology of Totalitarian Political Propaganda (1940).

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 131 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Paul says:

    Given the Zionist treatment of the indigenous Palestinian people, it is odd to hear Jews complain about fascism.

  2. Outstanding piece, Mr. Joyce..

  3. Pheasant says:

    Good piece but Andrew Joyce does not define facism either…

    • Replies: @Anon
    , @Verymuchalive
    , @Saggy
    , @FvS
  4. anon[185] • Disclaimer says:

    Rebecca Kukla: The most stunningly ugly human being of all time.

  5. The USA Department of Justice filing, that helped shut down the Mueller impeachment forays against Trump, implicates Cass Sunstein as having a role in the crime scheme in which Mueller got a payout:

    Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein, Hillary propagandist, supporting threats to kill his own Harvard classmate

    A man with apparently no ethics except his wishing to serve the Hillary Clinton wing of the powerful

    Cass Sunstein is deeply implicated in the crimes of the child-rape network threatening to murder his classmate, in that Sunstein is a leading propagandist for the child-rape network planting lies on the internet to attack common people

    Sunstein has declined to modify or amend his oily propaganda for ‘wiki world’ and ‘nudging’, as euphemisms for what Sunstein knows are child-rape criminals spreading lies to destroy and kill people, including the attacking on someone Sunstein knew as a boy

    The above on p. 24 of:
    ‘Report on evidence of felonies violating Civil Rights, and bribery by foreign agents, implicating United States Special Counsel Robert S Mueller III as a criminally-tainted agent of foreign & racketeering interests’
    https://www.docdroid.net/eVAAjIq/doj-ig-memo-mueller-bribery-extortion.pdf

    also linking to a document on Cass Sunstein’s friends and their role in the crimes, for whom Cass Sunstein spews propaganda

    EU police and prosecutor report on crimes of Wikipedia with Google,
    and the ’20 Major Techniques of Wikipedia Deception’
    http://pastebin.com/BeppgiMJ

    • Replies: @Richard B
  6. @anon

    It (honestly) was never clear to me, from the article, whether she was a he or he was a she.

    • Replies: @Thomasina
  7. gfhändel says:

    The images speak sufficient volumes, the text could be toned down.

    Incidentally that picture of MA looks 99.9% like my maternal grandmother.

  8. True fascism is about exposing and exploring the true nature of power.

    Jews are crypto-gangster-fascists who project ‘fascist’ fantasies on the other.
    A diversionary trick.

  9. Fascism’s unforgivable sin was its spot-on critique of the failure of liberal democracy, which, it argued, was the inevitable result of its corruption by capitalism. Eighteenth century liberalism broke the power of absolutism but in time it devolved into a reactionary movement, redirected specifically to defuse the popular revolutionary socialism of the nineteenth century, which Germany revived. The elephant in the liberal living room is the embarrassing reality that capitalist society is organized on the exploitation of one class by another. Fascism spoke the inconvenient truth that the ideals of the Enlightenment – equality, individuality, democracy – must collapse into institutionalized injustice under the all-pervasive directive of the primacy of the private accumulation of capital over all other concerns.

    In this way, fascism is the thinking person’s version of Marxism, stripped of the latter’s absurd mismeasures of human nature. Fascism restored the traditional fabric of society, placing the needs of the national community above the selfish whims of the individual. In so doing it gave to otherwise alienated individuals the sense of common purpose and connection to others that are so vital to mental health. And only a strong authoritarian state can claim and effectively wield the power necessary to undo the damage that capitalism does and to contend with the many domestic and foreign adversaries which a truly class-free social revolution inevitable creates.

    No wonder the mortal adversaries, western imperialism and Soviet communism, were so terrified of this existential challenge to their oppressive systems that they made temporary common cause of ruthlessly annihilating Germany in history’s most destructive war.

    • Thanks: HammerJack
    • Replies: @obvious
    , @JackOH
  10. Anon[198] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pheasant

    Fascism is defined as a state having means of production owned by business. Communism is when means of production, including workers, owned by the state.

    Communism is merely a name for modern serfdom. Some things never change

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  11. Anon[375] • Disclaimer says:

    I need an answer to this question.

    Given that Jews don’t even believe in God anymore (most of them, at least) and have no interest in keeping Jewish law, why do they insist on keeping the whole Jew thing going for forever?

    Why not just assimilate?

    I mean, it’s not easy, it takes time, but lots of time has been given.

    I’ve got a theory. Jews view themselves as being superior, they hate people like me, they have a grudge against me that they need collective action (from elite Jewish communities) to carry out, and they cannot bear the thought of becoming one of me given how much they hate me.

    I mean, I don’t choose to assimilate with black people. But then again, I don’t really like black people, do I? And I would prefer to not have authority over black people, or vice-versa. I’d prefer separation. Sorry brothas, I want my descendants to look like me.

    But Jews apparently want to live in every country around the world, and be an unassimilable elite in them all.

    If nobody can give me a decent sympathetic answer to this question, I’ll just keep on assuming that Jews are my enemy.

  12. @Anon

    But Jews apparently want to live in every country around the world, and be an unassimilable elite in them all.

    jews live high on the hog in most other countries, occupying positions of power and wealth that they have no business being in

    if they were all forced to go to israel they would take a huge hit to their standard of living because there are only so many good jobs to go around in a small country like that. In my opinion this is what scares them about nationalism – what would happen if most people around the world decided that they didn’t need or want jews in their country?

  13. This is one of the best written, most informative and useful articles ever published here. But the photograph of Madelaine Albright in particular should have been accompanied by some sort of warning. “Hideous crone” understates the horror.

    • Replies: @Moi
  14. @Anon

    Disagree. I don’t think workers being owned by the state is an objective of Communism. I think the workers being the rulers, being themselves the state, is what Communism is or aims at.

    Totally disagree that Communism is modern serfdom. Exactly the opposite.

    By the way, you need to learn the difference between Marxism and Bolshevism.

  15. @Anon

    Given that Jews don’t even believe in God anymore […] and have no interest in keeping Jewish law, […]

    Leaving for another comment your second question let me just quibble over two points here. Going on Shahak’s book, it doesn’t matter a hoot what Jews believe, whether some believe there is only one God because the male god and the female god are copulating and are thus one, or something else, doesn’t matter. What matters is that they wash their hands the same way etc. etc. So they have every interest in keeping Jewish law, meaning exactly identical performances of Jewish ritual.

    It’s peculiar why they don’t just assimilate. Some like Gilad Atzmon have wrestled with this question. It appears, to me at least, that they must hate, so they must believe they are hated. Without that belief they would assimilate, which would be a disaster for Judaism.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  16. “There are essentially three traditions when it comes to explaining Fascism.”
    Actually (!), there is the conservative/libertarian (as defined in USA terms) way, too. It states, as far as I understand, (to put in simple terms) Fascism [and Nat Soc too, subsequently] is a left-wing ideology because it does not embrace the free-market.

    I truly don’t get why some conservatives/libertarians do that (Bolsonaro from Brazil, who embraces American-style Conservatism – ‘Neo-Conservatism’ even, perhaps?) has accused Fascism of being left-wing multiple times…
    Do they *really* believe that stuff? Or is it just propaganda? A mix of the two, maybe? I.e. they believe their own propaganda? Could there be there a 3rd explanation?

    I do get that it’s easier to convince a person to vote against the Left if that person believes the fallacy: ‘Fascism is left-wing; Bernie (for example) is left-wing; therefore, Bernie is a fascist!’ (And since Fascism is evil incarnate one cannot vote for Bernie!)
    Perhaps I’m overestimating the population’s IQ, but (!) I’d think you’ll win more votes by EXPOSING that fallacy instead. And by saying (suppose you are a right-wing politician): “Yes, I’m a right-winger and so was Hitler – this means nothing at all! Hitler and I are nothing alike! I disavow Hitler!”
    .
    .
    .
    P.S.: Back to “There are essentially three traditions when it comes to explaining Fascism.” I indeed realise by ‘traditions’ the author means ‘in academic circles’; I tried to find ANY academic paper that postulates National Socialism as left-wing and couldn’t find any! It’s impressive because it has been 75 years since 1945, and for sure there are libertarian- and conservative-oriented academic journals that would publish this sort of revisionism (in fact, if the case could be construed decently, I can’t find why even a mainstream or at least ‘neutral’ academic journal wouldn’t publish it – as there isn’t baggage in saying ‘Nat Soc is left-wing’ as in other subjects, I’d guess) – and yet (!), nothing at all? It makes me conclude, then, that indeed “the case CAN’T be construed decently” is the most reasonable explanation!
    Well… perhaps there are papers that postulate ‘Nat Soc/Hitler as left-wing’ but I just am too stupid to find ’em. In fairness, I found a paper that seems to argue that Sir Oswald Mosley was a left-winger: https://academic.oup.com/tcbh/article-abstract/13/1/38/1717118

    • Replies: @jack daniels
  17. @anon

    The invasion of polite discourse by potty language is yet another of their “contributions.” I often get the feeling they see the use of dirty language as a litmus test for whether you are a Fascist.

  18. @Vergissmeinnicht

    Why they put Hitler on the left is pretty easy to see. Prominent libertarians and neocons tend to be Jews, and since putting Hitler on the right puts him in their camp (broadly speaking) they will go to lengths to put him on the left. I have even seen the KKK put on the left!

    • Replies: @obvious
  19. anon[289] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    The Jew is obsessed with assimilation. The rabbis constantly rant against it. The problem for the secular Jew, and likely the fantasies of most religious ones, is that no matter the fascination with the shiksa, as well as the adoration of the mandingo, the potent reality of Jewish degeneration and the horrid genetics that manifest a rather ugly pallet. Witness the arch Jewess Natalie Portman. Used her underaged sexuality to gain attention, selling her favors and seemingly goyish looks for roles and power in the industry. Yet, now she is becoming just as comically Jewish as a Three Stooges character. The Jew knows that he cannot be beautiful, strong or intellectual. So he much eliminate his adversaries by a variety of dirty tricks and corruptions. Indeed the goy in his desire for harmony makes it easy for this parasite to burrow into financial institutions, the media, academia and eventually politics where his tribal alligence becomes obvious.

    The problem for the Jew is that he can not have it both ways. No amount of plastic surgery of sophistry can hide his inner ugliness, and their obsession with a long and perverse life should show even the most unsophisticated goy the truth of his monetary masters. Just look at Adelson, Soros and Albright. Then imagine what kinds of necromancy it takes to keep them ‘alive’. We must understand that the horrid children stories of medieval Europe were based on actual Jewish behaviors. I submit that whatever it takes to maintain RBG is not of this world, and is anything but Pure

    • Replies: @Amerimutt Golems
    , @Z-man
  20. obvious says:
    @Paul

    Do you think Israeli Jews don’t look “indigenous” enough? They look pretty indigenous to me.

    Everybody is indigenous to somewhere, so how do you get to be “indigenous” by signing into a UN welfare camp called “Palestine”? Does that make you more “indigenous”?

  21. obvious says:
    @Observator

    You lost me at “strong authoritarian State”. Which human monkeys were those? How is the already strong authoritarian State bad but if only a new set of talking human monkeys is “recognized”, that will make everything better and different?

    Fascism is the cry of the lower middle class who do not understand how things work or where they came from. It is an urban tryharder phenomenon. Very short attention spans.

    George Orwell understood this: he was tolerant but realistic, and “conservative” in a natural way, all the time grasping the nature of Capitalism, that man needs to be set free not governed by others. Liberal Democracy is just a means to stablise government instead of civil wars.

    Personal liberty and private order are much more important and effective than grasping schemes.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  22. obvious says:
    @jack daniels

    “Hitler” is a Right appropriation of the Left. Give the NCO’s a release valve and a crack at juicy positions and prestige, all the while protecting the Big Money.

    • Replies: @Malla
  23. Malla says:
    @obvious

    “Hitler” is realizing that Vulture Capitalism and Marxist Socialism have the same elite masters and revolting against it in the interest of the people.

  24. @anon

    The Jew is obsessed with assimilation.

    Plastic surgery, changing names, joining exclusive clubs etc then pushing anti-host culture memes like censorship, white guilt and open borders isn’t assimilation. In contrast Orthodox Jews are less pretentious about contempt for gentiles.

    Plastic surgery probably wouldn’t be needed had it not been for centuries of inbreeding.

    • Agree: Pheasant
  25. @Pheasant

    True, and he makes no mention of Paul Gottfried’s Fascism: the Career of a Concept. Although Jewish, Prof Gottfried is a paleoconservative and his books are always carefully written. His work on Fascism is probably the best recent work on the subject. I don’t know why Dr Joyce didn’t mention it.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
    , @chris
  26. Interesting (and alarming) essay by Dr.. Joyce. Alarming because the sheer relentlessness and vindictiveness of these people is matched only by the vacuity, shallowness and spite of their ostensible “intellectual” product.

    A few thoughts…

    1. Actual real Fascism is of course dead as a doornail, and has been since the 1950s at the absolute latest. The word “fascist” is simply a bogeyman, used by Jews and their playthings to frighten the public, to sell books, and to denote whatever naughty thing they don’t happen to like at the moment — as Dr. Joyce shows. (So-called “Islamo-fascism” is, if possible, even funnier as a name-calling stunt, and more mistaken, than calling Trump a fascist.)

    2. In macro-historical terms, the only reason we pay any attention at all to real fascism is that it ended in a massive train-wreck, as so many things do (who fusses over the far more impact-laden bloodbaths of Timur the Lame these days?). But unluckily, since the Jews’ ox got gored as well in the general wreckage, the Owners Of All Megaphones will never ever shut up about it. That’s all this really ever is, innit.

    3. Again in macro-historical terms, what Fascism really was, in the broadest sense, was simply one among several rather crude and clumsy attempts made in the early Twentieth Century to make some sort of sense out of the confusing, and very very recent, transformation of economic, political and industrial terms brought about by the sudden onset of the Machine Age. In the same way that it was the unknown effects of the Machine Age which made the Great War such a vaster cataclysm than previous wars, the Machine Age rattled every single bar in every single cage of the European order. Fascism was only one of the rather brutish attempts to navigate the new terrain. (to be continued)

  27. 4. We no longer worry about fascism, or have to deal with it, for two reasons. One, it was decisively defeated militarily and discredited ideologically; and two (and more importantly), we no longer live in the Machine Age! We moved very quickly into the Technological/Information Age, and from there into the Immigration/Industrial Outsourcing Age. Fascism was an attempt to solve the problems of undernourished semi-literate White men with large families who lived in urban slums and who worked in giant factories full of deafening machinery. That political constituency has ceased to exist.

    5. Centuries from now, the Peruvian robot historians will tell a very different story about the Second World War, which was of course the apotheosis and endgame of fascism, than the story we tell ourselves now — or rather, allow the Jews to tell for us, when they aren’t screaming it at us and drilling it in with sleep-deprivation techniques.

    Levels of apportionment can be argued over, but it’s certainly true that the Jews bore substantial responsibility for the actions and circumstances that led to the war. It could be argued that one of its chief architects was none other than Henry Morgenthau. In any event, the robots will view the early career of Hitler as a sort of premature German version of Gandhi — Hitler kicked the Jewish Empire out of Germany, and got the Germans out from under the Jewish yoke, in the same way that Gandhi kicked the British Empire out of India. But the Jewish Empire (which did and does exist in Europe although not on maps, controlling institutions rather than territory, yet making war and peace just like other nations all the same) did not go quietly, and instead mustered its British, American and Soviet satrapies to pursue proxy revenge. The Hitler regime of course then degenerated through its own failures into madness, incompetence, stupidity and evil, but the ball was already in play.

    The point of bringing this up is the role of Jewish vindictiveness in keeping Fascism afloat as a zombie all-purpose threat to all and sundry. The “threat of fascist evil” is simply the threat of a nation or people getting the zany unacceptable notion into their heads that their country might after all be better off without Jews in charge.

    And that calamity cannot of course even be thought about or spoken of, much less implemented.

    • Replies: @Charon
  28. Defining fascism’s easy. ‘Antifa’ is out there reprising early fascism right now.

    You physically attack people who disagree with you. It’s not complicated.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  29. - says:

    “I was the only Jew in my 10th-grade class…”

    is awfully reminiscent of

    “I remember being the only (half) black at Harvard and hearing car-door locks snap shut whenever I set foot onto a public street…”

    I’m crying too hard to be able to explain why the two quotes sound so similar; can someone who’s not crying, help out?

    • LOL: Z-man
  30. @Colin Wright

    Defining fascism’s easy. ‘Antifa’ is out there reprising early fascism right now.

    As they said in the Thirties, “When fascism comes to America, it will be called ‘antifascism’”

    And in the Forties, “Fighting fascism abroad in order to impose it at home.” (Remember our first peacetime draft?)

    But few understood the essence of fascism as deeply as the late artist Tom of Finland.

    • Agree: Digital Samizdat
    • LOL: Sick of Orcs
    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
  31. @Paul

    Yeah, ironically, Israel is successful fascism. They are racialist, socially and economically supportive of their Jewish population and seeking Liebensraum for the future – Eretz Yisrael. They just want to deny fascism to everyone else so their Zionist fifth columnist countrymen can bleed denationalized states for their Jewish Deutschland über alles. Hitler would have been impressed though quite resentful. Adolph Eichmann saw it all coming and respected it. He was Zionist. Hannah Arendt, the Jewish philosopher, said that

  32. @Verymuchalive

    I heard Gottfried on Luke Ford. He buys the Hollywood fairy tales about WW2. I think he also plays down the America First’s take on Jews in the 30’s. I almost bought his book on fascism but I came away from the Ford show thinking of him as C.O.

    • Replies: @Johnnie Tumbleweed
  33. @obvious

    Personal liberty and private order are much more important and effective than grasping schemes.

    Libertarian idealistic crap. National Socialists weren’t grasping. They had a firm hold which scared the hell out of international Jewry and English and American Waspery who thought eventually NS might come peaceably to a place near them. If it had, we would’t right now be the usury pit of the West. Classical Liberal “Freedom” is just another word for nothing left to lose

  34. Sean says:

    I suppose the glorification of collective violence is an ingredient, but prior to that there must be cultural nationalism to inspire supporters to rally to the cause and die for it. Just as Fichte’s preaching activated German nationalism, Zionism only worked because there were people like Martin Buber to supply the cultural backbone. Abba Ahimeir said spiritual achievement equivalent to Fichte’s, the cultural Zionism such as advocated and epitomised by the supreme Hasidic stylist Asher Ginsberg was an essential prerequisite for Israel. Ginsberg was prescient

    [Our] school of thought differs from those who claim to be the ‘real’ Zionists in refusing to believe in the possibility of transferring all the Jews in the world to Palestine, and consequently in refusing to accept the proposition that we cannot survive in the diaspora. On the contrary, it holds that dispersion must remain a permanent feature of our life, which it is beyond our power to eliminate; and therefore it insists that our national life in the diaspora must be strengthened. But that object, it holds, can be attained only by the creation of a fixed centre for our national life in the land of its birth.

    Ahimeir’s ‘s avowedly Fascist Brit HaBirionim (motto “conquer or die”) was the first Jewish group to begin to act against the British “occupation.” However they made the fatal error of killing Arlosoroff the homosexual for wanting to compromise with the Palestinians. It was too soon. Hitler would never have got the Nazis to power if he had purged homosexuals first.

    Ahimeir has been accused by Chomsky of proposing an alliance with Hitler’s Germany Nazi’s, but Brit HaBirionim staged provocations by taking down Swastikas from the German Embassy. It was Yair who misunderstood Hitler and thought Polish antisemitism was more severe than the Third Reich’s. Ahimeir and Yair had in common seeing the British as the real enemy.

  35. Jewish definition of ‘fascism’ appears to parallel their definition of ‘anti-semitism’: anything or anyone they don’t like.

    Sadly, I strongly suspect that in just a few years truthful, critical articles like this one by Dr Joyce will quite possibly be illegal to publish. Basically all criticisms of jews or jewish actions will likely be criminally proscribed by laws so broad that saying or writing virtually anything negative could quickly land you in serious trouble with our Tribal overlords and their highly paid prosecutorial minions………

  36. @obvious

    Gamal Abdel Nasser, President of Egypt, had an interesting insight: “you (the Jews) will never be able to live here in peace, because you left here black but came back white. We cannot except you!”

    • Replies: @Z-man
    , @Moi
  37. Marcali says:

    „(T)he Fascist movement was itself disproportionately Jewish – that is, Jews made up a greater proportion of the party at all stages of its history than of the Italian population as a whole. … and by 1938 the party had 10,215 adult Jewish members.” (Out of a Jewish population in Italy of about 47,000 people.) „Mussolini had had several Jewish ollaborators, including his favorite and most influential mistress, Margherita Sarfatti. He had been officially blessed by the chief rabbi of Rome and had assisted in the early development of a Zionist navy as a maneuver against British imperialism.”

    Stanley G. Payne: A History of Fascism, 1914-1945, The University of Wisconsin Press, 1995, p.240.

    • Thanks: Z-man
    • Replies: @mark green
    , @Verymuchalive
  38. I heard Gottfried on Luke Ford. He buys the Hollywood fairy tales about WW2. I think he also plays down the America First’s take on Jews in the 30’s.

    That’s always been Gottfried’s weakness. However, as a book about what Fascism was and wasn’t, I found it useful and helpful. As with many writers, you take what’s useful from their works and disregard what’s erroneous.

  39. @Anon

    That is a hell of an interesting if question. And SO complicated

    Actually, I think Jews on average – like in a bell curve distribution and all that -cannot assimilate. It is a genetic thing. Their lack of belief in their old God is not important. That conceit of a God who chose them and gave them the material world if they were true to HIM was a reflection of their needs at a specific time. But the underlying narcissistic ethnocentricity and based materialism were what moved them to create their god and would be important in the long run after they dropped him Their trans historical nature you might say is what is important. It is what prevents them from assimilating to European or Aryan values even though they have given up their god and their specifically religious notion of chosenness

    In the largest sense there is nothing particularly Jewish about this. We are all limited by our evolutionary path of development. Can you imagine assimilating to a Jewish society? Probably not. I can’t. It is no different for Jews when asked to assimilate to a European society

    However here is the rub: in a classical liberal European society, Jews have a great coping mechanism which enables them not to assimilate and yet not pay a price. The Jew, the purported assimilatee, combines with other Jews to assert Power over the Europeans -the purported assimilators. If the Jews can get away with it, they then transform European societies to meet their genetically driven needs which are not our needs-not in keeping with our genetically driven behaviors, ideals, goals. But when our society is sufficiently Judaized for long enough, we Europeans may not even know what our genetically driven needs are. We feel those needs in some sort of strangled up way but may think we are or should be what the Jews and their surrogates -Euroes properly assimilated to Judaization – tell us we are

    You may have not done very well assimilating to our Judaized society. I know I haven’t The level of materialism in this country – a Jewish materialism – drives me nuts. It always has. I have always had primal needs for spirituality, community, sociability, honor and leisure which are mostly absent in this market driven madness which has gotten worse by the decade. The rat race is Jewish, not Aryan However, I have been taught by Jews and their surrogates that this inner me with these needs is deficient, weird, out of step. resentful and I thought they might be right because no one stands up for Aryan values in a Judaized society.

    • Agree: Commentator Mike
  40. Vojkan says:
    @anon

    Are you certain it’s human? It definitely looks alien to me.

  41. gotmituns says:

    The reason the Jews hated Hitler is he was on to their game and he took Germany on to a barter economy and by 1936-37 had Germany back on their feet economically while the rest of Europe was still enmeshed in the depression. That’s why every country in Europe had a fascist party going into WWII and why many men in the countries Germany overran signed up for the SS to fight the Communist/Jewish Soviet Union..

  42. Vojkan says:

    I must say that I admire Andrew Joyce’s effort. I don’t read books by people who make me want to puke and the authors he listed are a truly nauseating bunch.

  43. @Achilles Wannabe

    I tried to read Gottfried’s book on fascism but found it to be an elaborate evasion. Contrary to the way he is advertised – “Scholarly Scourge of The Neocons” – he is just another Neocon himself, albeit a bitter, resentful one. Apparently he is still angry because Wolfowitz wouldn’t give him a job in the Bush Junior administration, or he was passed over for an Ivy League professorship, or some such nonsense.

    I actually paid real money for his pointless book on fascism because it was heavily promoted by Tom Woods, whom I used to take seriously. Woods is always making a big production of his friendships with our Jewish friends.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  44. Truth3 says:

    The Goyim Know!

    The Goyim Know, it’s finally So

    Our Ways of Lies, and Theft, They Know

    Jews Must Rule, but in the Dark

    ‘Cause if Non-Jews Knew, it’d be no Lark

    The Goyim Know, I say it Plain

    Grab all You Can, and head for Spain

    Gold & Silver, Diamond & Gem

    Crammed up Our Ass, What We Stole from Them

    The Goyim Know, Our Cloak has Dropped

    The Markets Crashed, Our Bubbles Popped

    It Worked Before, in Days of Past

    But of Their Blood, We’ve Sucked the Last

    The Goyim Know, We Better Run

    From Pitchforks Sharp, We Took Their Gun

    If We Get Away, It Would Be Nice

    To Come Back Again, and Rob Them Twice

    The Goyim Know, We Killed Saddam

    Hung by the Neck, With No Salaam

    But Credit is Due, It Would Be Fair

    To thank Dubya Bush, and Tony Blair

    The Goyim Know, it’s all Unz’ Fault

    Our Loot Revealed, Right in the Vault

    His Site Condemns, Our Evil Ways

    But Ron Will Learn, When House Ablaze

    • Replies: @Ray P
  45. Robjil says:

    This explains why Jewish culture is OK to do bad things. Mad Albright saying 500000 Iraq children dying of US sanctions was OK was a prime example of this attitude.

    https://stopnoahidelaw.blogspot.com/2019/03/jewish-professor-all-non-jewish-nations.html

    According to Prof. Eidelberg, the US is “Almost Chosen” since it does wars and rules the world for the Chosen.

    Prof. Paul Eidelberg received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago. He is a former officer of the U.S. Air Force and is currently sought as an American-Israeli political scientist. He is the founder and president of the Israel-America Renaissance Institute (I-ARI), http://www.israpundit.org, with offices in Jerusalem and Philadelphia. He has written several books on American and on Jewish Statesmanship. His magnum opus The Judeo-Scientific Foundations of American Exceptionalism: Today’s Choice for the “Almost Chosen People” is in the process of publication, he lives in Jerusalem.

    He believes all nations and ethnic groups are “invented”. Only the Chosen are “real” people.

    Prof. Eidelberg believes that all nations and ethnic groups are “invented” and are the creations of the fallible will of men, except the “Chosen People”.

    This is “logic” for why Judaism is a Chosen wonder.

    Eidelberg’s logic is that Judaism is the only religion which was founded as both a faith and a nation (Israel); it is because of this supposedly superior brainchilld that the non-Jews of the earth “hate the Jewish people”.

    The US is the only “nation” outside of Israel that was “founded” on Jewish Noahide Laws.

    As is asserted in Public Law 102-14 (here), according to Eidelberg the only nation on earth besides Israel which might be considered “exceptional” would be America, but only because it was founded upon the Jewish Noahide Laws. If the USA enacted Public Law 102-14 and the Jewish Noahide Laws it would ban the practice of any religion not approved of by Jews, and those who resisted would be beheaded.

    Here is why this Prof. “thinks” the US was the only “nation” founded on Noahide Laws. The writings of the Puritans is his reasoning. This makes the US the “Almost Chosen”.

    What is remarkable is that America is the only nation that was founded precisely on the Noahide laws, as one may readily confirm in the writings of the Puritans and in the legislation of colonial America, especially New England. Therein is the source of American Exceptionalism.

    In the real world, this Chosen mania is the real Fascism of our world. Whatever this Stanley guy wrote about Fascism is baby Fascism compared to worldwide terror of Chosen Fascism.

  46. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:

    Excellent article!

  47. The title of the piece,

    Jews Fascism

    Two nouns with no meaning left. Now let´s start skating, preferably by a
    “Jewish”, “White”, “Also White” author. Keep amnesia going.

  48. Thomasina says:
    @ThreeCranes

    My first thought on seeing the picture was “that is a guy”.

  49. Z-man says:
    @Paul

    Do as I say not as I do.

  50. Charon says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Thanks. Good, thoughtful, comprehensive response.

  51. @Reg Cæsar

    Please forgive/ignore ‘troll’ designation, Reg.

    I was aiming for the LOL button.

    PS LOL

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @Reg Cæsar
  52. Saggy says: • Website
    @Pheasant

    Defining fascism is impossible, it is way beyond definition … so much so that wiki lists 23+ definitions …. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_fascism … take your pick …

    [MORE]

    1 By fascist thinkers and movements
    1.1 General Francisco Franco Bahamonde
    1.2 Benito Mussolini
    1.3 Sergio Panunzio
    1.4 Charles Maurras
    2 By scholars
    2.1 Umberto Eco
    2.2 Emilio Gentile
    2.3 A. James Gregor
    2.4 Roger Griffin
    2.5 F.A. Hayek
    2.6 Dimitri Kitsikis
    2.7 John Lukacs
    2.8 Ernst Nolte
    2.9 Kevin Passmore
    2.10 Robert Paxton
    2.11 Stanley G. Payne
    2.12 Zeev Sternhell
    2.13 John Weiss
    3 By Marxists
    3.1 Bertolt Brecht
    3.2 Georgi Dimitrov
    3.3 Leon Trotsky
    3.4 Clara Zetkin
    4 By other antifascists
    4.1 George Orwell
    4.2 Franklin D. Roosevelt
    5 Fascist as insult
    6 See also
    7 References

    It is used primarily to signal the virtue of the Jews, by contrast. Find something bad, call it fascist. Anyone calling anything ‘fascist’ is reminding us of the virtue, innocence and suffering of the Jew.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  53. Z-man says:
    @anon

    Just look at Adelson, Soros and Albright. Then imagine what kinds of necromancy it takes to keep them ‘alive’.

    Don’t forget the personification of a vampire squid, Ruth ‘Vader’ Ginsberg, who is kept alive with the blood of white Christian babies. (Wry grin)

  54. Z-man says:
    @Chet Roman

    There is some intermarriage between Khazar Jews and natives and also between ‘Them’ and some even darker people (Ethiopians, etc.) but I think that’s just used as a cover to try to trick the non Jew globohomo shitlib elite. But the joke is on ‘Them’. Eventually the majority of the top caste Israeli Jews will be so diluted that Israel will eventually become the new Palestine. Unfortunately it won’t be in this lifetime, only Jesus’ Second Coming can make that happen sooner.

  55. “It is very worrying that our culture has bequeathed a great deal of respect and legitimacy to Jewish intellectuals…”

    Why then does Andrew Joyce so bequeath? Our Jewish hegemons have coined a term: “self-identify”.
    It means that identity is what you will. That in turn means, serving one’s own passions. Serving one’s passions means self-subjugation and not freedom. Freedom is the reverse: self- mastery. That in turn requires strict attention to Jesus Christ and his commandments which teach in what authentic human acts consist.

    “White” identity, being a self-identity shares the Jewish ideology. The Jew can happily disappear within it or have it serve as his strawman to fight.

    Andrew Joyce and Jason Stanley are two sides of the same bad coin.

  56. Richard B says:
    @brabantian

    Speaking of child rape. It was good to hear people come forward regarding the child rapist Kirk Douglas.

    In my view Douglas deliberately targeted Natalie Wood because her familhy fought the Bolsheviks in Russia. In fact, her father died in a street fight with them.

    KD lured NW in hotel room under the pretext of an audition and brutally raped her for hours.

    She was a virgin.

    This is what they do because it’s who they are.

    An antisemite is anyone who doesn’t want to be violated by Jewish Supremacy Inc. in any way, shape, or form, and calls them out on it.

    They live in The Inverted World of a psychopath.

    Meaning, they view any hindrance to their psychotic arrogance and relentless aggression as “Evil.”

    Unfortunately, for people who don’t live this way, it’s difficult to respond adequately to the threat.

    And, of course, the psychopath knows this.

    Jewish Supremacy Inc. has targeted the West the same way a pedophile predator stalks the vulnerable.

    It’s always been the West’s Achilles Heel. But, the West has had its awakenings too.

    And, true to type, JSI calls these, “antisemitic pogroms”, instead of retaliation against their psychopathology, which is what they were.

    JSI is pulling all the stops now exactly because they know this pattern could very well play itself out -again.

  57. geokat62 says:
    @Sick of Orcs

    It’s not too late to change it by simply clicking the LOL button. Give it a try.

    • Replies: @Sick of Orcs
  58. JackOH says:
    @Observator

    Fine comment, Observator. (I’d have a quibble or two, but no matter.)

    Reality is “national solidarity” poses a massive threat to the corporate and other interests gorging themselves at Washington’s table, getting cash, favors, and your policy positions dressed as “public interest” policy positions. That’s why even the hint of national solidarity (Trump’s clumsy campaign announcement in 2016? Buchanan at the Repub convention?) needs to be countered with the usual imagery of Mussolini trussed up, and Hitler in the bunker.

    It’s a scurvy game, but I think we’re stuck with it.

    I think Corrado Gini wrote a well-regarded explication of Italian fascism. Anyone know anything more about it?

  59. Tom says:

    The most profound and sad expose I’ve ever read on Jewish Propaganda in the USA.
    This piece is a machine gun that fills all the massive lies of these Jewish Intellectuals with enough holes, that irrefutable evidence of their pathology, cunning, and Satanic intent as a group is undeniable.

  60. Rob McX says:

    Fascists could be defined as “white people who have the same racial awareness of non-whites and Jews”.

    If you want to see fascism, it’s all around you – blacks, Jews, Hispanics, Asians, etc. all fighting for their racial advancement. Whites are the odd ones out.

    • Replies: @jsigur
  61. tomo says:

    Arbeaight Macht Frei.

  62. Anon[376] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Bitter irony is, that his/her surname means “Doll” in russian [yes, (s)he is Russische Jude]

    • Replies: @geokat62
  63. Ray P says:
    @Truth3

    Woody Guthrie finally has a rival. The guitar is no doubt inscribed ‘This machine k!lls Y!ds’.

    • Replies: @Truth3
  64. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @obvious

    Yid looks indigenous to carnival side shows, caves, swamps,
    prisons, bars, brothels, lie factories, manure lakes.

    Not to Palestine.

  65. geokat62 says:
    @Anon

    Bitter irony is, that his/her surname means “Doll” in russian…

    Although it also means “Doll” in Greek, it apparently is Latin in origin:

    Etymology
    From Latin cuculla (“hood”). Doublet of κουκούλα (koukoúla).

    https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/κουκούλα

  66. Moi says:
    @john cronk

    Every country has a core culture that keeps it together as a people. For America this core culture was Christian and overwhelming white. But it’s all over now so you’re feeling blue–but it’s much too late.

    • Replies: @Sam J.
  67. Moi says:
    @Chet Roman

    Nasser was a fool who did not understand the country and culture he was born into. Same with the dwarf Arafat. Both the dwarf and Nasser adopted alien ideologies.

  68. Moi says:
    @Johnnie Tumbleweed

    I can see twisted crone reveling in a blood ritual of half-million dead Iraqi children.

  69. The use of Fascism in today’s vernacular in the US is coming closer to its basic definition, which is merely the circumstances when both government and corporations are so entwined with each other as to be indistiguishable from each other.

    In this regard, the United States has already become a Fascist state.

    However, this term is often used incorrectly to describe other political systems in history; the most glaring example, that of The Third Reich.

    The Third Reich never came close to being a Fascist state since the German government at the time maintained control over the corporations through the Board of Manufacturing. Though the National Socialists at times bent to the needs of industry, it was for the most part the controlling entity from 1933 onward…

    • Agree: Agent76
  70. Leon Uris and his schmaltzy books about heroic Sabras and other cringe-worthy Israeli characters is the Jewish attempt at romantic, mythic return to greatness.

    Uris’ books are pure jew-volk chutzpah.

  71. Agent76 says:

    May 29, 2020 Netanyahu on Trial

    Jesse Ventura and Brigida Santos discuss Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criminal corruption trial, how Covid-19 related deregulations put public health at risk, and President Trump’s latest break with the international community.

    April 5, 2016 Apartheid South Africa And Apartheid Israel: One Was Shunned, The Other, Embraced

    Congress and Reagan voted to impose sanctions against the apartheid state of South Africa, but what’s stopping our elected representatives from taking the same action against the apartheid state of Israel?

    http://www.mintpressnews.com/apartheid-south-africa-and-apartheid-israel-one-was-shunned-the-other-embraced/215352/

  72. @Sick of Orcs

    I’ve hit a couple of those buttons by mistake. That’s why I never go near them.

    Someone just asked me a question, and I answered it. And he labeled me a troll. Wouldn’t that make him an accessory to trollery?

  73. @Reg Cæsar

    Knowing you, it made him an accessory to drollery.

    Or droll-adjacent, as the realtors say.

  74. @geokat62

    Fixed! Thanks for the info, geo.

  75. anon[324] • Disclaimer says:

    Tyler Cowen isn’t Jewish. It sounds like Coen, but it is actually an old Puritan name, interestingly from “coven”.

    • Replies: @gregor
  76. anonymous[361] • Disclaimer says:
    @Z-man

    is that the Before or the After?

    • Replies: @Z-man
  77. @Marcali

    Interesting facts. Thank you.

    The ‘Fascists’ were a political party formed in Italy in the early 1920’s. It was a unique era and place. ‘The Great War’ was freshly over (at a cost of 18,000,000 dead) but not the injustices which followed. Simultaneous with the rise of ‘fascism’ was a rival and ruthless orthodoxy called communism, which was spreading rapidly through Europe and beyond.

    Unlike the communists, the Fascists did not possess a specific blueprint or ideological creed. This may explain why no one can properly define ‘Fascism’. But before WWII, many saw Fascism as an idealistic and romantic vision for cultural renewal. Unlike communism, Fascism was regionally-focused. It was not global or uni-polar the way communism was.

    ‘Fascism’ has become a catch-all phrase denoting ‘racist white people’ or simply ‘bad/evil authoritarian government’. Thus, Joyce correctly observes that , “Jews, who dominate the press and have very significant financial interests in the trajectories of both major parties, regard anything not fully within their control as tantamount to Fascism.” To countless Jews and leftists, ‘fascism’ simply means a thought or political idea that they hate and one that you must hate it, too! Very clever. Very insidious.

    Unlike the National Socialists in Germany, the Italian Fascists were not outwardly anti-Jewish, but they did seek to restore Italy’s past greatness just as Hitler sought to restore Germany’s sovereignty and pride. Both the Fascists as well as the National Socialists knew who was behind communism and who their enemies were. This ultimately united them.

    The Fascists were anti-communist and pro-business. They rejected the totalitarian nature of Jewish-lead Marxism. They surmised its fanatical nature and took action to resist it, unlike naive notables such as FDR and Churchill.

    Unlike communism, Fascism only became a ‘train wreck’ due to the superior military power of those who sought to crush the German, Italian and Japanese Axis (alliance).

    After the glorious ‘Good War’, the ‘classless and idealistic’ communists rounded up and/or starved millions. Soon a good deal of Europe was consumed by this totalitarian (and anti-Christian) orthodoxy. Communism quickly spread into Asia. Tens of millions died there or were crushed under this ‘egalitarian’ orthodoxy. Communist sympathizers even managed to penetrate both British, French, and American institutions of government, law, media, labor, and higher education. Their descendants are still with us. They manage our immigration policies and orchestrate our wars.

    Today’s defamatory fascist label (which defines ‘good think’ vs. ‘bad think’) is a form of bullying. It is used to enforce conformity via shaming and stigma. (See: political correctness.)

    Before WWII, countless intellectuals and men of conscience who revered European civilization and its people, joined the Fascist movement. The US could have achieved peace and averted WWII. Had the US not supported Great Britain before WWII, provoked Japan, and aided the Bolsheviks throughout WWII, fascist Italy, Germany and Japan might have survived and communism repelled.

    • Agree: Fox
    • Replies: @Agathoklis
    , @Adûnâi
  78. The title of the piece,

    Jews Fascism

    Two nouns with no meaning left. Now let´s start skating, preferably by a “Jewish”, “White”, “Also White” author. Keep amnesia going.

  79. When you take the time to study The Philosophy of Fascism, and there’s a book by the same name, it is clearly a love letter to the world, which of course why it is demonised by those who know not love for the whole human race. Read the book. The channel, CT, on YouTube or Cultured Thug on bitchute has just posted today, a review of this book. Check it out and remember, love always, especially the truth. Thanks, Mr. Joyce

  80. jsigur says:
    @anon

    I have to believe Rebecca is either a tranny or male acting female

  81. jsigur says:
    @Rob McX

    fascists are folks that have created a system from parts of Jewish ideology and stated no Jews allowed to subvert our effort. This is the threat to JUDAISM/ that goyim can come together and run something for the benefit of the ruled

    The World Conquerors”
    Louis Marschalko
    https://ia800306.us.archive.org/19/items/TheWorldConquerors-TheRealWarCriminals1958/MARSCHALKOLouis-The_World_Conquerors–The_Real_War_Criminals_1958–imgocr.pdf

    [MORE]
    discontent, envy and class-warfare.
    It makes little difference whether or not the Jewish question wu
    .. over-emphasised” by National Socialism. It is of no importance
    either that National Socialism actually adopted the racial theory of
    the Old Testament as one of its instrumental devices; for even had
    it forsworn these, it would still inevitably have clashed with world
    Jewry, which could not tolerate the existence of any other nationalism
    on earth. The National Socialists might have treated Jewry 1UI
    humanely as possible, but this would not have altered the fact that
    the secret power exercised by Jews over the German Reich wlUl
    being taken out of their hand, which was absolutely intolerable for
    them. Besides, they could not afford to contemplate such creative
    energy, such striving towards national unity, such influence wielded
    67
    by an elite, all of which were things bearing irreconcilable hostility
    towards the power aspirations of world Jewry. They could not bear
    the fact that by the elimination of the power of gold, not only were
    state power and the means of influencing public affairs wrencbed out
    of their bands, but tbe secret power as well. In any case, from the
    moment world Jewry realised that Germany was being ruled by a
    conscious elite, it would have promptly turned against National
    Socialism with just as much hatred as it actually did when “antiSemitism” gave an excuse for it.
    In loosing Germany, Jewry lost a territory from which it had
    exerted power. Therefore it was determined to re-conquer it.
    For a century, world Jewry, Marxism and liberal capitalism had
    been adopting mass-production methods to transform the people
    into unthinking masses, the free individual into the proletarian.
    They had realised, of course, that only unthinking herds could accept
    and endure the yoke of Judah.
    In Germany, National Socialism at least arrested this process. In
    spite of his liberalism, the Spanish author Ortega y Gasset, in his
    work Tile Uprising of the Masses. long ago drew attention to the
    danger inherent in people being reduced to herd-like masses. Lothrop
    Stoddard, professor of Harvard University, also insisted that an
    uprising of the masses must be prevented. By its accomplishments
    German National Socialism clashed most violently with Jewry’s
    plans, since the role of the mob is clearly laid down in the Protocols
    which speak of: “… that same blind slave of ours-the majority
    of the mob.” (Protocol X.) And again: “From all this you will sec
    that in securing the opinion of the mob we are only facilitating
    the working of our machinery.•..” (Protocol XIII.)
    To achieve world power auxiliary troops arc needed. And these
    consist first and foremost of the masses themselves. To secure the independence of a nation, men of outstanding quality are required. While
    destruction is the basis of Jewry’s world domination, constructive
    work is the foundation of real freedom.
    Thus, to ask whether or not the Hitlerite regime was really ‘bent on
    war is beside the question. There is no point in assuming that Hitler
    and the German leaders were madmen. We might, with more justice,
    admit that National Socialism had war declared upon it from the
    very moment of its birth. It was condemned to war because it was
    68
    a system which inevitably made enemies of Bolshevism and world
    capitalism. Le. of those forces forever looming in the background I
    Without making a single .. anti-Semitic” manifestation or the slightest
    unfriendly pronouncement. National Socialism would still have made
    enemies of Jewry on account of the successful completion of the
    .. levelling up” process.
    In this connection we will once more quote Hans Grimm, who
    states fairly and concisely in his book The Answer of a German:
    .. Between 1933 and 1939 more was done for public health. for
    the mother and child, as well as for the promotion of social welfare
    than before and, perhaps we might admit, than ever before!”
    At this time even Winston Churchill had a different opinion of
    National Socialism from that which he professed later. Churchill
    wrote of Hitler in Step by Step:
    .. If our country were defeated. I hope we should find a champion
    as indomitable to restore our courage and lead us back to our
    place among the nations.”

    • Agree: Malla
  82. Guest0206 says:

    Communism was both brought in (1917) and repelled (1991) by the same tribe.
    A good step in understanding this statement would be a banned (yes) work of a Nobel prize winner Solzhenitsyn: “Two hundred years together”.

    • Replies: @Kolya Krassotkin
    , @anon33
  83. Wally says:
    @Paul

    – And how do they get away with it all?
    – Here’s how, Joyce wrote:

    “Stanley, in a conversation with other Jewish academics, accused Swinburne of “promoting homophobia,” paving the way for another Holocaust, and then finished his tirade with “Fuck those assholes. Seriously.”
    – Everything that today’s Jews advocate uses the absurdly fake & impossible “holocaust” narrative as a weapon & shield to win the day.

    – Stomp your feet, whine & kvetch about Jews ‘defining’ whatever, etc., etc., but absolutely nothing changes until the “holocaust” Big Lie is rejected utterly. It simply does not stand up to scientific, rational examination. And that’s why Jews want & get free speech about it banned.

    – Highly recommended for those who value truth over propaganda:
    ‘Holocaust’ Handbooks, Documentaries, & Videos: http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?main_page=1

  84. @mark green

    “Unlike the communists, the Fascists did not possess a specific blueprint or ideological creed.”

    Perhaps, but there were Fascist thinkers that tried to systematise Fascist thought like Giovanni Gentile and to a lesser extent Sergio Panunzio. Closely related thinkers were Filippo Tommaso Marinetti, Charles Maurras and Georges Sorel. There is actually a whole rich intellectual tradition which leads up to the rise of the Italian Fascists.

    Arguably, Mediterranean”Fascism” of the Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, and perhaps even Greek variety, was quite different than the ideology of the Nazis. In fact, if Hitler and the Nazis never came to power, explicit Fascism would have remained a somewhat respectable ideology. Of course, Fascism did not end with WWII. It continued some ways in Spain and Portugal and more explicitly in Lebanon with the Phalangists and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party in Syria. Also, certain parties in Italy.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  85. Agent76 says:

    Aug 23, 2019 Israel is arming a neo-Nazi militia in Ukraine – deleted Azov Battalion video

    This video shows a fighter from the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion reviewing two Tavor style rifles, manufactured in Ukraine under licence from the Israeli government and Israel Weapons Industries.

    Jun 6, 2017 50 Years After Launching June 1967 War, Israel Continues World’s Longest Military Occupation

    In the final installment of our three-part special on the 50th anniversary of the June 1967 war, author and scholar Norman Finkelstein discusses why the U.S.-backed “peace process” was never meant to end the Israeli occupation, and how, despite the ongoing brutality, mass Palestinian civil resistance could still bring it to an end.

  86. Z-man says:
    @anonymous

    I think that’s the after. She probably had her cousins in the media destroy all the before pictures. (Grin)

  87. @Guest0206

    Whenever I am discussing with normie friends about who really controls much of the world I often bring up the fact that there is no commercially available English translation of THYT, by Solzhenitsyn. Most have never even heard of the work but are still, nevertheless, astounded that an English translation of any work by any author of Solzhenitsyn’s stature should be unavailable.

    But samizdat English translations of the work can be found; and copies in the original Russian and of a French translation can also be had.

  88. @Anon

    Anon, you should read the Talmud; it will more than answer your question. L

  89. And the winner of the Woody Allen look-alike competition is:

    As has been noted at the top of the comments by Paul: as long as these jewish goons turn a blind eye to all the hideous crimes committed against the indigenous Palestinians, they can go f*** themselves and their warped definition of fascism.

    They already do…?

    Oh…

    • Replies: @Truth3
  90. Ask the Bolivian people to define fascism. Go read up on Klaus Barbie and the cocaine coup, Operation Condor. Death Squads, torture, terrorism, political repression. Read up on The School of the Americas in Georgia, where the US trains fascist terrorists and death squads.

    Its all there. Fascists protect the rich, do the bidding of the CIA, and murder anyone who stands in the way of them looting your nation. Just another tool of the empire. Thats why they’re all pro-Israel, Israel is fascist, and proud of it. They all send their police to train with the Israelis, because thats the kind of country they want for themselves, a racist fascist police stat where the rich rule.

    https://consortiumnews.com/2013/06/06/hitlers-shadow-reaches-toward-today/

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  91. @redmudhooch

    Israel is Fascist but it is Zio – Fascist. In the Jewish imperialist ethnocentric tradition, Zionists destroy other people’s nation states and whatever chance they might have for fascism – NATIONAL SOCIALISM – so Israel’s fifth columnists can then bleed the hapless gentiles to support Israeli Fascism. Fascism in one country is the Zionist principle. In the Zionist scheme, national socialism – the only kind of socialism that can work because it is people taking care of their own people- – is for Israel and neo liberalism is for everybody else because that is where the money is – money for Israel, money for Jews and their collaborators.

    Come in out of the rain Red. Fascism isn’t capitalist. If it was there would have been no world war 2. International Bankster Jewry – Zionist to the core – and WASP’s took down Hitler because he threatened their Usurious economics

    • Replies: @Adûnâi
  92. Truth3 says:
    @Daniel Rich

    Oh Jesus… what a Devil.

  93. Truth3 says:
    @Ray P

    Guthrie was a Jew by inverse injection. He married a Jew named Greenblatt, his mother-in-law inculcated a Jewish mindset in him.

    Guthrie was a pig. Communist fellow traveler, cheater, and liar. His plagiarisms were ignored because he embraced so called anti-fascism and real communism.

    Nobody would ever had heard of him without the Jew Communist backing.

    Arlo Guthrie, his son by the Jew, converted out of Judaism (to Catholicism) in middle life. Obviously he had seen enough. Meir Kahane (the Jew Terrorist) had been his rabbi as a boy.

  94. Adûnâi says:
    @mark green

    > “‘Fascism’ has become a catch-all phrase denoting ‘racist white people’ or simply ‘bad/evil authoritarian government’. Thus, Joyce correctly observes that , “Jews, who dominate the press and have very significant financial interests in the trajectories of both major parties, regard anything not fully within their control as tantamount to Fascism.””

    You cannot explain the Jewish hatred of Communism. You cannot explain the Fascist hatred of Communism. Fascists are Jews because Fascists did not support the Communists of Catalonia who murdered (((Christian))) nuns in cold blood.

    > “The Fascists were anti-communist and pro-business. They rejected the totalitarian nature of Jewish-lead Marxism.”

    (((business))), (((freedom)))… meaningless buzzwords.

    The German Hitlerians were such tragic fools. They produced propaganda where they defended the fat bourgeoisie from Communism, and they believed it. But then the Anglo bourgeoisie attacked them viciously. And Communism lent them aid. Which Hitler eventually rejected, and traitorously stabbed them in the breast in 1941, and lost.

    The only remaining Communist state of today – the DPR of Korea – is an openly racist nationalist military-first society with nuclear ICBMs pointed at Washington and Jerusalem. That is a victory.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  95. Adûnâi says:
    @Achilles Wannabe

    > “Israel is Fascist but it is Zio – Fascist. In the Jewish imperialist ethnocentric tradition, Zionists destroy other people’s nation states and whatever chance they might have for fascism – NATIONAL SOCIALISM – so Israel’s fifth columnists can then bleed the hapless gentiles to support Israeli Fascism.”

    Doesn’t look like Fascism to me.

    What even is Fascism? If you mean the longing for the past, then “Jewish Israeli Fascism” will look Haredi. And the Haredim would prefer living as servants to the dominant non-Jews. The entire existence of Israel is a paradox, as for two thousand years, the Jews had been forced to survive as stateless slaves. Their nationalism is necessarily modernistic.

    > “Fascism isn’t capitalist. If it was there would have been no world war 2. International Bankster Jewry – Zionist to the core – and WASP’s took down Hitler because he threatened their Usurious economics”

    1. World War Two has nothing to do with economics. If anything, the Fascists disregarded the economics, as such a total war is unfeasible without the control of resources.

    2. World War Two has nothing to do with economics. If anything, it was a religious war waged by the Anglos of the West against Germany because Germany tried to advance her racial needs by genociding the Poles and the Russians. Was it envy by the Christian Anglos to the future they openly hated by wprshipping a dead Jew on the cross?

    3. If you want anti-capitalism, you need Communism. Communism did not play games with the bourgeoisie, Communism sent the slackers to the GULAG. The USSR was invaded by the Americans, the English, the French, the Japanese… It fell, but it fell to Christianity inherent in all Aryan peoples. The last true Communist state Jew- and Galilean-free is the DPR of Korea.

  96. @Marcali

    In 1936, the population of Italy was approximately 43 million. The number of Italian Jews was very small, then and now. 47,000 equates to approximately 1 in 1,000 Italians. Their influence, culturally, economically, socially, was very limited. In other words, before 1938 Italian Jews were a non-issue in Italian society.
    In 1938, Mussolini allowed himself to be bullied by Hitler. Rather limited measures were directed against Italian Jews. This earned Mussolini the wrath of the Papacy.
    Before 1938, Italian Jews looked on Italian Fascists very favourably and vice versa. Shortly before WWI, Italy had grabbed Libya from the Ottoman Empire. It was still establishing settlements – of Italian nationals- in Libya well into the late 1930s. Compare them to Israeli settlements in the West Bank, as some might do. Also, Italy retained Italian Somaliland. It strongly desired to hold onto both Colonies.
    Even before WWII, Arab nationalism and Muslim movements were very much in evidence. It was very much in Italy’s interests to oppose both. So obviously, it supported movements in the region which did likewise. Like the Zionists. Unsurprisingly, Italian Jews reciprocated.
    This would have happened regardless of who was in power in Italy before WWII. Both response were to political imperatives.

  97. chris says:
    @Verymuchalive

    Yeah, I thought the same thing, even though, in this review, Joyce is mainly covering this one collection, Gottfried, who also studied at Yale should have warranted a mention here.

    Though Gottfried is indeed much better, he too dances around the essence of Fascism, finding all sorts of interesting tid-bits and commonalities, and ends up treating it as some kind of inexplicable enigma, befalling all these hapless Europeans in the 1930s.

    Not once, however, does he stumble on the simplest and true explanation of the Fascist phenomenon, namely that it was a natural reaction in response to the existential fear of these societies of Communism and of its Jewish proponents and enablers.

    Ironically, the propagandist authors which Joyce is analyzing, who bring themselves to hysteria due to their fear and determination, seem rather short on commensurization with their 1930s European brethren’s concern and fear of the Communist menace.

    But the truth, most obviously, in not the point of their screed; quite the opposite actually.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  98. @Saggy

    ‘Defining fascism is impossible’

    The perfectly intelligent and lucid historian of Vichy France, Robert Paxton, wrote a whole book attempting just that: The Anatomy of Fascism.

    He failed.

    I take the attitude that the word obviously and necessarily describes the ideology of Mussolini’s Italy; outside of that, it becomes rapidly less applicable, swiftly degenerating into little more than an abusive epithet. For example, if I describe Franco’s Spain as ‘fascist,’ beyond telling you that I disapprove of the regime, the label has almost no descriptive value. Franco could have done or not done almost anything; I could still have chosen to label his state ‘fascist.’

  99. @Agathoklis

    ‘… Of course, Fascism did not end with WWII. It continued some ways in Spain and Portugal and more explicitly in Lebanon with the Phalangists and the Syrian Social Nationalist Party in Syria. Also, certain parties in Italy.’

    …and Zionism, which is quintessential Fascism — more Nazism, really. After all, the racial-ethnic component is as essential to Zionism as it was to Nazism.

    …though I suppose Zionists would reject the label.

  100. @chris

    ‘… Not once, however, does he stumble on the simplest and true explanation of the Fascist phenomenon, namely that it was a natural reaction in response to the existential fear of these societies of Communism and of its Jewish proponents and enablers…’

    Fear of Bolshevism would certainly be a component, but if you look at the original Fascists — Mussolini’s Italians — frustration with the parliamentary state and failure in World War One was at least as important.

    Ditto for Hitler and the Nazis. Read Mein Kampf. If I recall aright, he spends as much if not more time railing against the parliamentary state and its institutions as he does in inveighing against the Jews.

    • Replies: @chris
  101. The thing about capitalists is it’s difficult to find people to fight for you. After all, capitalism is about rule by rich oligarchs. While people will fight and use violence to protect their own property, most people won’t go out on a limb to defend the privilege and wealth of oligarchs and uber-bourgeoisie. You buy guns to protect your own home and family, not to defend Bill Gates or Warren Buffett.

    Now, what will people fight for other than for their own family and property? People, especially those with rightist inclinations, will fight for blood & soil, nationalism, and tribalism. People, especially those of leftist inclinations, will fight for the cult of justice or messianic ideology. Rightists prefer the sacred, leftists prefer the sanctimonious. Rightists will fight for their hole in the ground, leftist will fight for holier-than-thou. Neither rightists nor leftists want to fight, kill, and die for the sake of rich people.
    And this is why capitalists need ‘fascists’ or ‘communists’ as shock troops. It’s like the rich oligarchs and Jewish globalists needed ‘Neo-Nazis’ in Ukraine to pull off the Maidan coup. This is why the oligarchy and deep state in the US recruit Jihadis and ISIS to fight in Syria. Not because the oligarchs and religious nuts believe in the same thing but because the oligarchs know that only Jihadis have the balls/nuttery to fight to the death.

    So, there has been the history of fascism and communism but also the history of ‘fascism’ and ‘communism’ as the tools of capitalists, i.e. capitalists used those ideologies/movements as tools and weapons than as desired objectives or goals. Generally speaking, the goy conservative capitalists supported ‘fascists’ to fight radical revolution and Jewish Power to keep their privilege and maintain order. Though there were Jewish oligarchs who also supported the ‘fascists’, especially in Italy, many more Jewish capitalist oligarchs funded the ‘communists’. Not because they wanted the communists to really win and take over but to serve as shock troops against the ‘fascists’ and ‘anti-Semites’ supported by the goy conservative oligarchs.
    Now, given that fascism is far more tolerant of capitalism than communism is, one might think most Jewish capitalist oligarchs would have supported the ‘fascists’. After all, Italian Fascism and National Socialism made peace with capitalists whereas the communists who gained total power wiped them out. But Jewish oligarchs were loathe to support the ‘fascists’, especially in Germany, because fascist elements were so anti-Jewish whereas the communists, though anti-capitalist, were opposed to ‘antisemitism’ and had a large Jewish contingent. Jewish oligarchs thought, “The communists may take away our property but they won’t kill us.” Of course, they hoped that the ‘communists’ would never really take power. They figured the ‘communists’ would be too busy combating ‘fascists’ to ever get around to toppling capitalism.

    But in Israel, the Jewish oligarchs have united with the ‘fascists’ because ‘fascists’ there are Jewish. The alliance of Jewish fascists and Jewish capitalists in Israel is akin to the alliance of German fascists and German capitalists under National Socialism. The fascist-capitalist alliance is more natural/organic than the communist-capitalist one for obvious reasons as fascists seek to control capitalism whereas communism seek to eradicate it. The main reason why many Jewish capitalists supported communists(as the lesser of the two evils) against the fascists is because most fascist movements in Europe(and its crypto-types in the US) happened to be anti-Jewish. But in the case of Israel, we see a very natural alliance of Jewish capitalists and Jewish fascists.

    In the US, the most visible ‘fascist’ elements are anti-Jewish. They are opposed to capitalism to the extent that the current incarnation is ‘woke’, but they are not anti-capitalism per se. If capitalism were pro-fascist, most fascists would be okay with it. In contrast, communism is intrinsically opposed to capitalism for what it is. So, we’d expect capitalists to prefer fascists over communism.
    In a similar vein, communists in the US should be more anti-capitalist than anti-fascist. After all, communism emerged BEFORE fascism as a war against capitalism. Classic Communism even argued that fascism is just a tool of capitalism. In other words, capitalism is the ROOT of fascism: the hammer used by capitalists to beat down workers and prevent communist revolution: No capitalism, no fascism. Then, the communists should be mainly attacking the capitalists as the very source of fascism, a mere manifestation of capitalism. But Antifa and other supposedly radical leftist elements have been mostly serving the all-powerful capitalists in their hunt for mostly imaginary ‘nazis’ and KKK. If Antifa and such types are communist or radical leftist, why do they overlook the real and growing power of their core ideological enemy, the capitalists, while chasing after Nazi or KKK unicorns? And if Antifa and communists are the main ideological enemies of capitalism, why is US capitalism either supportive or at least tolerant of them against the ‘fascists’ who would welcome an alliance with capitalists as long as they aren’t ‘woke’ or anti-white?

    It’s because identity trumps ideology. Just like Hollywood capitalist Jews protected and used Hollywood Jewish communists, Jewish capitalists and Jewish handlers of Antifa see eye to eye on the main threat to Jewish Power: White Liberation and White Agency. In Israel, Jews have no need for Antifa and the like. Over the years, the Jewish Left has been losing ground in Israel because Jews there face no threat from the Goy Right. Thus, Jewish capitalists are better off promoting Jewish fascists. But ‘fascism’ in the West is dominated by goyim who tend to have hostile views toward Jews. So, Jewish capitalists must clamp down on ‘fascism’ in the West by supporting the ‘communists’. (But Jews will then support ‘fascists’ in Ukraine against Russian interests. Jewish power does indeed play it by ear.) And as Antifa has been infiltrated and guided by Jewish agents, its main agenda is always to batter down any vestige of white identity or white liberation in the name of fighting ‘nazism’ and KKK when, in fact, it’s to keep whites cucked and servile to Jewish Power.

    Now, one may ask why goy capitalists in the US, even conservative ones, are tolerant of Antifa and the ‘radical left’ while always virtue-signaling against any sign of white identity or interests as ‘Nazi’, ‘KKK’, or ‘white supremacist’? Why aren’t they like the German Conservative Oligarchs who supported the National Socialists? It’s because, since the end of WWII, Jews-Blacks-Homos have become the holy trinity of the West. Shoah-MLK-GloboHomo are so revered in the West that even goy rich go along, sincerely or cynically. Just like there was a time when one had to be Christian to gain prominent positions in European society — the main reason why certain Jews converted to Christianity — , anyone who wants to be someone in the neo-‘spiritual’ order must profess fidelity to the Holy Three of Jews, Negroes, and Homos. Also, as whiteness is the New Devil of the West, even goy conservative capitalists dare not touch it with a ten foot pole.

    • Replies: @Malla
  102. @Adûnâi

    ‘Doesn’t look like Fascism to me.’

    Sure — but don’t try that outside of Tel Aviv. In fact, I bet it would be a bad idea in a lot of neighborhoods inside of Tel Aviv.

  103. chris says:
    @Colin Wright

    Agreed, Colin. These movements were, of course, more than just a reaction out of fear.

    What I wanted to say was, not so much why the leaders developed these philosophies, but why everyone else supported them wholeheartedly.

    These societies were all fighting for their lives against fanatical, murderous, ideologues. And when the Russian Communists overran the Eastern European countries after the war, it really came to pass that many in those societies were terrorized and killed. So those fears had been well founded.

    But the authors of books like “How Fascism Works” want us all to forget Acts I, II, and III of the play, and to start with their own synopsis whose function is to completely erases the culpability of their tribe in the cycle. If you manage to do that, the ‘only’ explanation for Fascism is an ideology akin to pathology.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
  104. Jews that are in power want to erase European whites as an ethnicity. At a minimum remove them from power. It’s too obvious.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  105. gregor says:
    @anon

    Correct. Funny enough though, when Cowen interviewed Jonathan Haidt, at one point Haidt seemed to think Cowen was Jewish and asked him if he was. Cowen said no (mostly Irish).

  106. anon33 says:
    @Guest0206

    “Guest0206 says:
    June 1, 2020 at 11:14 pm GMT

    Communism was both brought in (1917) and repelled (1991) by the same tribe.
    A good step in understanding this statement would be a banned (yes) work of a Nobel prize winner Solzhenitsyn: “Two hundred years together”.”

    So a book that became an international bestseller (Russian/French editions) with over 3 million copies sold worldwide, according you to *at-least* is known as a banned book?

    Solzhenitsyn in his whole body of work never claimed such nonsense as you have stated above that the Jews were allegedly behind the USSR. Perhaps if you were to read his work and lay off the conspiracy theories you would know this about him and his works.

  107. @Adûnâi

    What do you think German fascism looked like day to day and across Germany? The Nuremberg Rally? Get over Hollywood and Netflix. Fascism doesn’t have ONE look. That is why it should be called NATIONAL Socialism. In America, we wouldn’t even wear uniforms. Not our thing. As for World War 2 having nothing to do with economics, with WASP’s and Jews, everything has to do with economics,

    • Replies: @Peter D. Bredon
  108. @Johnnie Tumbleweed

    Yeah, Gottfreid is the token Jew on the Paleo conservative right. Their all phonies because they play the America first card but refuse to talk about what the Jew and Wasps did to the real America first people in the 30’s. Buchanan is the only one I can stand because he wrote the Unnecessary War although he did manage to do it without once mentioning Jews which is like leaving the Yankees out of baseball. Not mentioning Jews in itself was an intentional “tell” though. Buchanan is Catholic and Irish/ German so he doesn’t have the Anglo or neo WASP philosemitism which underlies Vdare. I do like Pat actually

  109. Sam J. says:
    @Anon

    “…Given that Jews don’t even believe in God anymore (most of them, at least) and have no interest in keeping Jewish law, why do they insist on keeping the whole Jew thing going for forever?…”

    There’s enormous financial advantages to Jews being Jews. They can get loans with little or nothing down. An example I heard of was a Jew that got a loan to buy an existing apartment complex. She could pay the loan and have enough to live in a fairly decent manner. None of us average people could get this. A large part of Jewish wealth is access to loans at good rates that they use to buy existing businesses and then squeeze the living hell out of the employees to profit as much as possible. Look at the big leveraged take overs in the 80’s and you will see this very explicitly. Most of the outsourcing of US business is due to Jews taking over the companies and moving manufacturing overseas. They have murdered us. I expect they own everything. Just recently they were given $6 trillion and that was after the banks got somewhere up to $30 trillion or more in zero interest loans. With it they bought everything. They own it all. We should take it back.

    And there’s always the stick. Any Jew that let’s on what they are doing is destroyed. Prime example Joan Rivers when she let slip that Michelle Obama was a tranny was dead with in weeks from…a throat exam.

    The best way to think of the Jews is a large Mafia shake down group with the same in group preferences. They act very much like this and in reality most of the mafia was Jewish.

  110. Sam J. says:
    @Moi

    “…But it’s all over now so you’re feeling blue–but it’s much too late…”

    No it’s not. I hear that,”We can’t do anything about the illegal aliens here or the rapeugees or any of the immigrants that have moved here since 1965 but are public charges and are just fucking the country”, so I decided to do a little math.

    Let’s say we decided to deport all the of the above named.

    Let’s call it 100,000,000 aliens or public charges or rapeugees or whatever we want to get rid of.

    wikipedia,”…747 carries, With a typical three-class configuration, the Boeing 747-400 can hold 416 passengers. With a typical two-class configuration, it can hold 524…”

    [MORE]

    Let’s call it 500.
    1,554, 747’s built
    So we only use 1000 keeping in mind there’s a shit load of other planes we could also ship people out on.

    cargo area of a 747
    Cargo 3,900 cu ft (110 m3)
    500 passengers\3,900 cu ft = 0.1282 passengers\cu ft

    131 C-5 Galaxies
    We use 100 planes.

    I used the cargo area of a 747 to get passenger capacity if we built some sort of cheap plywood seating to cram people in the same capacity as a 747 in the C-5 cargo bay. C-5 cargo compartment was 17.2 ft (5.24 m) wide by 13.5 feet (4.11 m) high and 100 ft (30.5 m) long with front and rear access doors.
    17.2 x 13.5 x 100 = 23,220 cu ft
    23,220 cu ft x 0.1282 passengers\cu ft = 2,977 passengers

    747, 500 passengers x 1000 planes = 500,000 passengers at one time.
    C5, 2,977 passengers x 100 planes = 297,700 passengers at one time.

    747(500,000) + C5(297,700) = 797,700 alien passengers at one time.

    100,000,000 aliens/ 797,700 passengers at one time = 125 trips to get rid of aliens.

    Say we have two days per trip for each plane then in less than a year we could ship out every single alien, rapeugee or public charge. Copy this and save it somewhere and next time someone says we can’t deport these people tell them we can. Cut and paste this in the reply and see what they say. Knowing something is possible is the first step and now we know it is.

  111. Sam J. says:

    The simplest explanation for what Fascism is is to look at Japans civil, banking and corporate structure. That’s what Fascism is. China is much the same.

  112. ivan says:

    Jews get a bad rap, perhaps well deserved. But for my money, it is the Protestants, at least those of the past who are masters of deception usually by means of retailing half-truths about Catholic civilisation. Jews may sincerely believe in their own lies, but Protestants are master propagandists who can give Communists a run for the money.

  113. @anon

    race to the bottom between “her” and Masha Gessen

  114. Anonymous[521] • Disclaimer says:
    @Adûnâi

    “World War Two has nothing to do with economics. If anything, the Fascists disregarded the economics, as such a total war is unfeasible without the control of resources.”

    WRONG. It had a LOT to do with economics.

    “The fight against Germany has now been waged for months by every Jewish community, on every conference, in all labor unions and by every single Jew in the world. There are reasons for the assumption that our share in this fight is of general importance. We shall start a spiritual and material war of the whole world against Germany. Germany is striving to become once again a great nation, and to recover her lost territories as well as her colonies. But our Jewish interests call for the complete destruction of Germany…” – Jew Vladimir Jabotinsky, in Mascha Rjetsch (January, 1934)

    and

    “The war wasn’t only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets. We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn’t want to.” -Winston Churchill to Truman (Fultun, USA March 1946)

    and

    “Germany’s unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn’t profit any more.” – Winston Churchill, The Second World War (Book by Winston Churchill, Bern, 1960)

    [Crime?–Anonymous]

    and

    “Not the political doctrine of Hitler has hurled us into this war. The reason was the success of his increase in building a new economy. The roots of war were envy, greed and fear.” – Major General J.F.C.Fuller, historian, England

    and

    “We made a monster, a devil out of Hitler. Therefore we couldn’t disavow it after the war. After all, we mobilized the masses against the devil himself. So we were forced to play our part in this diabolic scenario after the war. In no way we could have pointed out to our people that the war only was an economic preventive measure.” – U.S. Secretary of State, James Baker, Der Spiegel 13/1992 (1992)

    [An economic preventive measure? How euphemistic.–Anonymous]

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  115. Anonymous[521] • Disclaimer says:
    @Adûnâi

    “The German Hitlerians were such tragic fools. They produced propaganda where they defended the fat bourgeoisie from Communism, and they believed it.”

    Your knowledge of history from that period is “tragic”, fool.

  116. Anon[422] • Disclaimer says:

    “his most successful work is apparently The World According to Star Wars (2016). In another time and context, someone like Sunstein would cut a ridiculous figure”

    40 years ago, in grad school, we were regaled with the cautionary tale of a prof who wrote, in his spare time, a book on mountain climbing; he was fired or denied tenure, on the grounds that he should have been spending his time on writing in his field. Of course, a healthy Aryan pursuit like mountain climbing suggests his real offence was not being one of the Tribe.

  117. @obvious

    They look about as “indigenous” as someone in a black frock coat and fur hat could in the Middle East.

  118. @Anonymous

    Oh THANK YOU. I just made a copy for my files. Two of international Jewry’s sustaining myths 1) the GOOD War was not fought for economic reasons 2) it was fought against aggressive capitalist fascism.

  119. @Achilles Wannabe

    That was Mosley’s mistake; the uniforms made his movement an easy target for satire, from Huxley (The Bloody British Bastards of Point Counter Point) to Wodehouse (“The Blackshorts”)

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  120. @Peter D. Bredon

    The Mosley movement was tragic. If only he could have stopped Churchill the Brits might still have a country and so might we. There is a series on Netflix butchering Mosley’s character. They can never give up on the WW2
    hoax. It is foundational

  121. Malla says:
    @Priss Factor

    Good analysis except

    After all, Italian Fascism and National Socialism made peace with capitalists whereas the communists who gained total power wiped them out.

    Communists wiped out the local capitalists but were very close to the international Capitalists who funded them. Communism is basically taking a society, educating them, giving them good healthcare to create a good type of worker slave who could be sold to Global capitalists as slave labour. Soviet Russia did the same in the early period. China did it since some decades ago and Vietnam is doing it too. Somehow the Cubans have not done it yet but they sure do sell good cigars to the World’s fatcats. How much to the workers make from the cigar manufacturing? How much profit does the Communist elites keep for themselves for the export of those cigars?
    North Korea exports labour to work as slave labour in Russia while the North Korean elites keep the profits. In other words the Communist party eats the profits of the Working classes having replaced the Capitalist fatcats.
    Ironically labour unions are not allowed in Communist China where workers were worked like slaves with many Chinese workers committing suicide. But labour Unions definitely existed in Capitalist America or Capitalist Britain. What is ironic is that Capitalist fatcats used Communist countries like China and Vietnam, using their cheap slave labour to give a big middle finger to the Workers of the West. How ironic!!! Now one understands why the Rockefellers wanted a 100% Communist China even when Stalin himself wanted a 50% Communist- 50% Capitalist China like Vietnam and Korea as USSR was economically weak to support a 100% Communist China. But the Capitalist oligarchs wanted a 100% Communist China BECAUSE they plan things decades in advance. They would eventually use Communist China to destroy the Working classes of the West as planned decades ago.

    National Socialism (which was distinct from fascism) was understanding that folk/ Race is more important than class. And that for the interest of the folk the various classes have to work together, nay forced to work together for everyone’s benefits. The Working class want a good standard of life suitable for human beings. Sure, that is what they will get. The German working class wages and quality of life was improved. Germans workers could go on paid holidays to the Mediterranean, no other working class people could do that.
    The Middle Class find the working class rough and barbaric. Do the working class have to be barbaric and uncouth? No, opera tickets for the working class. Why should Opera or high Classical music belong to only the rich? It is an expression of the folk, the people and thus all rich and poor should have the right to enjoy it.
    The Third Reich instead of sacrificing the people for either Capitalism and Communism (like what the USA and USSR did) decided to use various elements of free trade and socialism for the benefit of the people. People should not be sacrificed for ideology or economic systems, ideology and economic systems should be made servants for the benefit of the people and even animal welfare and the environment as much as possible.
    Also Capitalism and Communism were too material nothing spiritual in it. Man cannot be happy by these empty material ways of life. NS was a reaction against soul less materialism that emerged out of the industrial revolution in both Capitalism and Communism. NS was a reaction against the destruction of European traditions and culture happening in both the Capitalist and Communist world.
    Also Communism is considered by many to be the end game of Capitalism. They seem like enemies on the surface but are cousins just like how Karl Marx was a blood relative of the Rothschilds. Some people even speculate that Marx was secretly funded to destroy true Socialism. Even Mikhail Bakunin had doubts about the possible secret funding of Karl Marx leading to the monopoly of Karl Marx’s thoughts on Socialism.
    It is only that Soviet Communism thank partly to Social Realism, Stalin’s crushing of the earlier Communists etc… became Nationalist Communism after WW2, in other words in some ways it too started going in the National Socialist direction. The same with the present CCP (Chinese Communist Party) up to some extent. Some consider North Korean Jurchen as a new version of NS.

    • Replies: @Achilles Wannabe
  122. Mycale says:

    Sunstein edited, and contributed to, Can It Happen Here?, along with a motley of other Jews, including Eric Posner, Jack Balkin, Tyler Cowen, Jack Goldsmith, Tom Ginsburg, Noah Feldman, Jonathan Haidt, Bruce Ackerman, Jon Elster, Martha Minow, David Strauss, and Geoffrey R. Stone.

    It’s at this point I feel obliged to mention that Jews make up about 2% of the US population, at most. How so many of them ended up in this book talking about the evil goys who want to celebrate their peoples’ accomplishments, and how the real crime is noticing this, is a real question.

    Imagine if there was a book that talked about black pathology, where 13 of the 17 contributors were white (not fellow white), Thomas Sowell, and 3 Asians. How would that go over?

  123. Andrew Joyce. You are magnificent. Would you care to write a proper, coherent, historically- based and unbiased account of Fascism. I, for one, see it as the Third Way, between modernity’s capitalism/liberalism on the one hand, and bolshevism and internationalism on the other. It seems to me it was an attempt to allow the national unit to flourish in harmony, rather than basing politics on the principle of war, ie on antagonism. I find Ezra Pound views on Fascism and Mussolini extremely sensible. Nazi Germany’s rejection of the Jews lay on several grounds: Jewish-dominated international banking and the devastation it caused to national economies, the internationalism of Communism confronting the national state as a cultural and political unit and the continuing Jewish-spurred revolutionary movements in Germany, and not least, the declaration of war against Germany by international Jewry in 1933. Of course, the usury prevalent in Germany caused economic havoc to German society between the wars.

  124. Fascism is opposition to Bolshevism. That’s how these Jews, as Bolsheviks, define it.

    • Replies: @paranoid goy
  125. Prepped with Johnny Korbel, Maddie’s bro. It always the same: hatred and violence with appeals to ‘top down authority’ genocide is great as long as God say so.

    Problem is that it doesn’t work, never has but people coming out of our Western Tradition, believe in the same model, no matter the cost to other, no matter the blood that is spilled in its service.

  126. FvS says:
    @Pheasant

    Here’s a decent explanation.

  127. @ben tillman

    Clear, true thoughts never need many words. Thanx.

  128. It is quite extraordinary that pro-Zionist Jews could call themselves ‘anti-Fascist’. Zionism is probably the contemporary ideology closest in the world today not only to historic Fascism per se, but indeed to ‘blood-and-soil’ Nazi fascism, whereby the descendants of a specific bloodline enjoy state and social privileges and a right to the land denied less fortunate individuals.

    It is also extraordinary that the useful idiots who make up Antifa are unaware of this prime example of historically defined Fascism looking them straight in the face. So egregious is Ziofascism that there are plenty of Israelis who, until now, have unabashedly embraced the label, like the young woman who, some 10-odd years ago, was among those Israeli youth who went to a hilltop overlooking Gaza to enjoy the show as the IDF pummelled hapless unarmed Gazans. “I’m a little bit fascist,” the attractive brunette said unashamedly to the camera.

    Having lost, among other things, my maternal grandmother to the post-1943 German-occupation regime of Fascist Italy, and having dealt in the 1970s with real dyed-in-the-wool fascists in Europe, I have always been deeply anti-Fascist, and given to peaceful activism. Today’s Antifa (sporting a name that sounds like it was cooked up in a Madison Ave advertising firm, or, more likely, in a CIA office) do not seem like genuine anti-Fascists. They seem like nihilists with pronounced authoritarian fascist tendencies themselves. Not even the age-old anarchist strategy of creating mayhem “to bring out the repressive character of the state for all to see” can justify their actions, because we already know about the repressive character of the state and have been seeing it daily for at least the past 30 years.

    And by letting themselves be used, probably unwittingly by most, by one-half of the duopoly, i.e., the Democratic party, which has abused procedural law in alarmingly authoritarian fashion in Russiagate, they are effectively contributing to the repressive character of the state, not exposing it.

    The utter lack of awareness of history and humanity on all sides of this violently internecine struggle is deeply distressing. It will not end well.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The unspoken statistical reality of urban crime over the last quarter century.
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
Talk TV sensationalists and axe-grinding ideologues have fallen for a myth of immigrant lawlessness.