The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 PodcastsJared Taylor Archive
What Finally Happened in Our Suit Against Twitter
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

As you may know, in 2018 I and American Renaissance sued Twitter after it banned our accounts. After some initial successes, we lost on a couple of crucial rulings and decided not to appeal. Here is the story.

In 2011, I started a Twitter account and American Renaissance set up a corporate account. In 2017, Twitter gave me its blue-check “verification badge,” and by December, I and AmRen had more than 70,000 combined followers. On the 18th of that month, Twitter permanently banned both accounts without explanation or warning. We immediately appealed the bans and were told by email that we were “violating Twitter’s Terms of Service, specifically the Twitter Rules against being affiliated with a violent extremist group.” This was, of course, nonsense, but we were never able to learn from Twitter what “violent extremist group” it had in mind or what our “affiliation” was. We decided to sue Twitter for censorship.

We filed a complaint, which went before Judge Harold Kahn in the Superior Court of California on March 14, 2018. We had three grounds to believe Twitter’s action in banning us was illegal, and they are laid out in the complaint below.

After initial briefs and a hearing, Twitter succeeded in persuading Judge Kahn to dismiss two of our grounds for the suit, but on June 18, 2018, he upheld our claim under California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL). Judge Kahn called our complaint “very eloquent,” adding that it was “hard to imagine a clearer public interest lawsuit,” and that “it goes to the heart of free speech principles that long precede our constitution.”

Our claim was that Twitter could be, in effect, guilty of false advertising by boasting about its support for free speech and then banning ideas it didn’t like. At the time we opened our accounts, Twitter’s terms of service reflected its claim to be “the free-speech wing of the free-speech movement.” It promised to allow everything except: (1) threats of violence (2) promoting illegal activity (3) copyright or trademark violation (4) impersonating people (5) publicizing the personal information of others. Needless to say, neither I nor AmRen ever violated those rules. Judge Kahn noted that after we had opened our accounts, Twitter changed its rules and decided it could ban any user for any reason. He agreed that this was potentially an “unconscionable” violation of the law.

At oral argument, Judge Kahn asked opposing counsel this question: “Twitter can discriminate on the basis of religion, or gender, or sexual preference, or physical disability, or mental disability?” Twitter’s lawyers admitted that it claimed that right. Judge Kahn disagreed and ordered our suit to move forward. No suit against a social-media ban had ever reached that stage, and we prepared for battle. We looked forward to taking the testimony of Twitter executives — we would put Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey under oath and make him try to justify censorship.

Jack Dorsey, Twitter founder. (Credit Image: Mark Warner / Wikimedia)
Jack Dorsey, Twitter founder. (Credit Image: Mark Warner / Wikimedia)

What then happened baffled both our legal team and Judge Kahn. Ordinarily, when a judge orders a case to move forward the defendant — in this case, Twitter — has no choice but to fight it out. If it loses, it can appeal. Instead, Twitter petitioned the California Court of Appeal for a writ of mandate and immediate review, something so unusual it left even our appellate practice lawyers scratching their heads. Twitter claimed that win or lose, merely to have to face a suit of this kind would cause it irreparable damage. Twitter persuaded Facebook, Google, Reddit, Snap (Snapchat), TripAdvisor, Yelp, and others to file a joint brief, agreeing with Twitter that letting our suit go forward would “open a Pandora’s box of litigation burdens and claims of liability against providers.”

The California Court of Appeal didn’t even give our lawyers a chance to reply. It issued a ruling “commanding” Judge Kahn to reverse his original finding that we had a valid case against Twitter based on California’s Unfair Competition Law. When a superior court orders a trial judge to reverse himself, he doesn’t have much choice, and Judge Kahn did as he was told. Our lawyers asked him to reconsider, but on March 8, 2019, he issued his final ruling, in which he threw out our UCL grounds for suing Twitter.

It was clearly painful for Judge Kahn to submit to this completely unexpected order from a higher authority. His conclusion, which is worth quoting at some length, referred to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. This section has widely been interpreted — mistakenly, in the view of our lawyers — as giving social media companies the right to censor content and ban users for any reason. We had argued that our unfair-practices claim against Twitter didn’t even fall within the scope of Section 230, no matter how it is interpreted. In his conclusion, Judge Kahn also referred to some of the legal cases (their names are in italics) that he had considered in initially ruling in our favor:

In arguing that their UCL claim fell outside the scope of Section 230, plaintiffs [that’s us] relied not only on Demetriades, but also the Ninth Circuit decisions in Barnes (cited in the Alternative Writ Order) and Doe v. Internet Brands and several other published and unpublished federal decisions. Barnes, Internet Brands, and a few other federal decisions contain helpful language for plaintiffs, if not outright holdings in their favor. [emphasis added] But those cases are only of persuasive value and must give way to the binding authority of the California court decisions. This is true even though Barnes and some of the other federal decisions supportive of plaintiffs’ position have been cited and discussed by California courts. Barnes, Internet Brands and the other federal cases (as well as Demetriades) relied on by plaintiffs show that plaintiffs’ argument that their UCL claim survives the defense of section 230 finds support in the text of that section, is far from frivolous, and might some day even be adopted by the United States Supreme Court. [emphasis added] In the absence of a United States Supreme Court authoritative decision, my job is to apply the California courts’ interpretation of section 230 . . . .

Judge Kahn was all but saying that he was right and the California Court of Appeal was wrong. He hinted that the US Supreme Court might eventually agree with him and pave the way for litigation like ours. So far, no anti-censorship case has made it that far, so the justices have not ruled.

Image Credit: Wikimedia
Image Credit: Wikimedia

How did we react to Judge Kahn’s coerced reversal of his initial position? We could have appealed — but we would have been filing our briefs with the very same bench that had overruled Judge Kahn. It’s true that the judges had not heard our side of the argument, and an appeal would have forced them to consider it.

Litigators love to fight; it’s what they are trained to do, but our lawyers said it was time to stop. They reasoned that the chances of the California Court of Appeal changing its mind were close to zero. But there was an even more important reason. The court’s “command” to Judge Kahn to reverse himself was, for technical reasons, not a ruling that set a legal precedent. A formal rejection of our appeal would have set a precedent, making it much harder for any other plaintiff to sue social media companies in that jurisdiction — and the San Francisco Bay area, where so many of those companies are headquartered, is the ideal place to sue.

Finally, no matter how airtight our case was against Twitter, a plaintiff that anyone has ever called a “white supremacist” is fighting a strong headwind. By the time Judge Kahn reversed himself, Twitter was banning conservatives for increasingly frivolous reasons. I decided that if, in the current hysterical climate over “racism,” the identity of the plaintiff can be as important as the legal arguments, it would be better to withdraw so that plaintiffs who had a better chance of winning carry on the fight.

And so, I decided not to appeal. A victory by anyone against social-media censorship will benefit everyone, and I didn’t want to be the cause of an appeals court ruling that could jeopardize anyone’s chances. It would have been nice to have been the victor in Taylor v Twitter, but broader considerations made it wiser to withdraw. So far, no other plaintiff has made it to the point we did — of a trial judge ordering the case to proceed — but I still think we made the right decision.

We are fighting many battles on many fronts. We must choose them carefully and concentrate our forces where we have the greatest chance of success.

I am sorry that I cannot report a great triumph for freedom of speech, but I am deeply grateful to everyone who sent money to help us pay for the suit. As you know, every setback only redoubles our determination. We will never give up.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
Hide 110 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. My grim and ghastly prediction:
    This sort-of litigation will eventually appear before the Supreme Court. In a 5-4 ruling, censorship will remain the Law of the Land – how? Thanks to conservative Justices!

  2. If Jewish Power treats you like a Palestinian, maybe it’s time to side with Palestinians.

    Say NO to White Nakba, a sentiment banned on American Renaissance, btw.

  3. Gapeseed says:

    My grim and ghastly prediction:
    This sort-of litigation will eventually appear before the Supreme Court. In a 5-4 ruling, censorship will remain the Law of the Land – how? Thanks to conservative Justices!

    Nah. The Borg Liberals and Chief Justice Turncoat will glory in another close-but-no-cigar defeat for conservatives.

    • Replies: @Realist
  4. Anon[364] • Disclaimer says:

    But after the higher court struck you down, you could appeal to the Supreme Court. I suppose it is a resources issue.

    • Replies: @The Alarmist
  5. This is a grim story, well told. And a fight well fought, Thanks.

  6. I appreciate Jared Taylor. But is he finally understanding that people on the other side aren’t simply “mistaken”? They have ill intent. They are genocidal (in terms of policy) and deeply anti-White.

    They will lie, cheat and steal to push anti-Whitism.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @SC Rebel
    , @jsigur
  7. zimriel says:

    All you have to do, then, is find some Twitter employee on a Discord server, pay him two grand for the admin tool, and repost your comments under Barack Obama’s account.

  8. Had this been BLM, Antifa, or thousands of other anti American, anti white, anti Christian entities, they would have been given protected free speech status by the hate America mobs now censoring what is free and what is not.
    They hate Trump and white Americans more than they love freedom.
    We have infiltrated their administrative source code domain.
    Game on Lil techy, your demise is at end.

  9. Thank you for considering the big legal picture. It would be a largely thankless decision for anybody, and coming from such an embattled position makes it all the more worthy of respect. I don’t suppose your ideological opponents would ever realize or admit that your success in this particular struggle would benefit everyone.

  10. Dumbo says:

    So, basically, social media and Internet giants have the right to determine what is “free speech” and what isn’t. For reasons that they don’t need to explain. And at the same time they can pose as champions of “free speech”.

    UR is fast becoming one of the last bastions of actual “free speech” in America.

  11. If it goes to SCOTUS, Roberts will once again impress his judge buddies/golf partners with his “objectivity” and “nuance.”

    • Replies: @Achmed E. Newman
  12. Some Guy says:

    Sounds like a smart decision not to appeal, the normiecons are better situated to take this fight.

  13. The biggest deficiency in perception of US government, is that people still think the judicial system is somewhat legitimate – as if it functions as seen in Hollywood movies and tv shows

    So huge resources are wasted, lining lawyers’ pockets via legal forays that in the end go nowhere, as the lawyers knew right at the start

    Big tech in general OWNS the US judges, and participates heavily in US judge bribery – internet tech being the judges’ best friends, helping hide judicial misconduct … which has long been encouraged by DOJ officials, because after a judge is bribed, he is ‘owned’ by DOJ and the establishment

    The US Department of Justice file that shut down the Robert Mueller impeachment foray against President Trump, and led Mueller to start posing as semi-senile after his corruption was exposed –

    Discussed the role of Google in US federal judge bribery and how Mueller had Google join in a cover-up of his own role as a corrupt, for-sale FBI director who later collected his bribe in the form of law firm salary & bonuses after leaving office

    Donors to Bushes and Clintons and their family ‘non-profit charities’… then benefit from nearly all fed judges haveing been appointed during a Bush- or Clinton-involved administration

    ‘Report on evidence of felonies violating Civil Rights, and bribery by foreign agents, implicating United States Special Counsel Robert S Mueller III as a criminally-tainted agent of foreign & racketeering interests’

  14. @zimriel

    Nice try, but that’s not how the Twitter hack went down. Attributing this to some doofus being willing to sell out his employer, is clearly Twitter’s damage-control pilpul.

    This wasn’t about soceng, or about bribing a Twitter employee: it was about Twitter having a fundamentally insecure back-end that resulted from corner-cutting and hiring third-rate developers (just two aspects of a shoddy dev pipeline).

    Twitter has a history of this sort of amateurish shit – for example they were writing new credentials to a web-facing ‘777’ plaintext file for 18 months after launch. It was ostensibly the output of a module that was in place for testing their hash functions, and by oversight it was not disabled when the code went to production. If Twitter’s story is to be believed, nobody in charge of the filesystem noticed a file growing (eventually to ~200MB), so there’s that.

    Everyone ought to brace themselves for the next little while: shit’s about to get real for Big Tech.

  15. Dr. X says:

    Finally, no matter how airtight our case was against Twitter, a plaintiff that anyone has ever called a “white supremacist” is fighting a strong headwind.

    Money quote, right here.

    Anybody who thinks that courts are fair and neutral arbiters of the law is bound to be disappointed when he actually goes to court. Courts are part of the government power structure, and they are staffed by black-robed politicians and ideologues.

    The purpose of courts is to bamboozle the goyim into thinking that they might get justice, so the process is dragged out for months or years, costs a lot of money, and is a series of hurdles around arcane legal principles. If a case goes against “the Establishment,” then they literally invent something out of thin air to get the result they want — like Roberts telling Trump that he could not issue an executive order to rescind Obama’s executive order creating DACA.

    It’s all a sham. Every institution in the U.S. is completely corrupt. Court will not save us.

  16. @Vergissmeinnicht

    I mashed my [Agree] button perhaps too quickly. I assumed a set of quotes around “conservative” as if they were conservative when appointed. Most of them go native. That’s the problem.

  17. @Gleimhart Mantooso

    That’s how it seems to go. Lots of elected officials, too, are actually conservative when they start out, but they go native after spending a few years in Washington, FS. While there may be blackmail and bribery, Peak Stupidity also describes its cocktail party theory of political stupidity.

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  18. Biff says:

    The government is simply out-sourcing censorship to the tech monopolies – they are in bed together, and you’re invisible. Like years ago when print monopolies could get you disappeared from their pages, and call themselves “the free press dedicated to the first amendment”. It’s all the same bullshit.

    • Agree: R.C., Voltara
  19. Truth3 says:

    … which went before Judge Harold (((Kahn)))

    That’s all you need to know.

  20. Has Jared Taylor ever once mentioned the jews as the problem?

    • Replies: @jbwilson24
    , @Anon
    , @KenH
  21. Realist says:

    It appears you agree with Vergissmeinnicht…you need to reread his comment.

  22. Why fight for crumbs from the table of those who want to starve us anyway? Why not create OUR OWN Twitter, FaceBook, YouTube, PayPal etc.?

    • Replies: @Goddard
    , @Neuday
  23. Goddard says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Why not create OUR OWN Twitter, FaceBook, YouTube, PayPal etc.?

    Seems is already fulfilling some of those functions.

  24. First they came for Andrew Anglin…..

    • Agree: Katrinka
    • Replies: @Solo
  25. @Truth3

    In this case he appeared fairly honest. Not all Jews are the same.

  26. Saggy says: • Website

    The biggest deficiency in perception of US government, is that people still think the judicial system is somewhat legitimate – as if it functions as seen in Hollywood movies and tv shows

    I think it’s worse than that, the biggest deficiency in perception is that academia is somewhat legitimate, like in Hollywood. Instead the non-technical academics are paid stooges …. my dear alma-mater, UCB, is part of the openly acknowledge Jewish censorship of the web ….

  27. @Pure Coincidence

    “Has Jared Taylor ever once mentioned the jews as the problem?”

    Nope, he’ll ban people from his website for pointing out that the tiny hat people hate whites, dominate the major institutions of power, or push degeneracy.

    He’s a perfect example of Taleb’s “Educated yet Idiot”

  28. SC Rebel says:

    I think he knows that. Jared is trying to be gentlemanly, which I highly appreciate. That’s a trait of our people that I want us to hold on to.

    But you are correct. Our enemy does not share those noble traits and we need people in our movement to be the gentlemen and we need those that can “roll around in the mud” too.

    • Replies: @RichardTaylor
  29. Law is such complete utter bullsh-t these days. It is run by mentally deficient Social Justice Warriors. Free Speech. That is easy. That is over when run by ideologues who are in the judiciary and basically rule on their own emotional framework that is beyond logic, rationality, consistency and argue backward to try to justify it.
    This county is not worth saving as Reed says. It is circling the toilet. It is said that IQs are dropping dramatically. This is evident in all the institutions and population of this polyglot boarding house of a dumpster fire that is on the precipice of complete collapse.
    I don’t even think the elites have a bloody clue as to what they are creating… sure dump nationalism for your own gain, but you have created forces of utter destruction… a non cohesive identity political system, debt, educational institutions that focus on social justice warrior issues rather than competence and as mentioned a judiciary that is so full of crap that it floats…
    I am happy to be old so I don’t have to live through the horrors of the US in this century.

  30. Anonymous[369] • Disclaimer says:

    Big tech in general OWNS the US judges, and participates heavily in US judge bribery – internet tech being the judges’ best friends, helping hide judicial misconduct … which has long been encouraged by DOJ officials, because after a judge is bribed, he is ‘owned’ by DOJ and the establishment

    E. Michael Jones has been saying this for the longest time, that the Supreme Court’s paid function is to come up with legal mumbo jumbo to ratify the social engineering schemes of the elite and make it a fait accompli. And the role of the federal courts is to enforce these schemes of the ruling elites. It’s a totally rigged system and the federal judiciary exists simply to impose the rule of the minority on the majority, or more accurately, the tyranny of the (((minority))).

  31. SC Rebel says:
    @Dr. X

    Dr. William Pierce touched on that when he was a guest of the Hal Turner show. He was asked by a caller what he would say to Congress if he could address them. His response was he wouldn’t do so because it would be a waste of time since everyone in DC is already corrupt and cannot be persuaded to abandon their golden egg.

    How true that is. The focus needs to be on those folks out there that know what we are saying is right, but are afraid to say anything.

  32. HZ says:

    >OUR OWN Twitter, FaceBook, YouTube


    > PayPal

    This is where it usually fails apart. It’s just hard to do that. You need to cooporate with banks to pull that off. And those banks will just deny you. Sure we have bitcoin and other crypto but its a uncomfortable interface.

    An additional problem with “OUR” Twitter, Facebook is that it will be inherently political. 95% of the YT videos I like to consume are not political! The free speech on those remake platforms will be also abused by vandals to make sure that the front page is swastica’d up.

  33. Anon[422] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pure Coincidence

    Has Jared Taylor ever once mentioned the jews as the problem?


    Lol, I’ve heard him criticize Japanese people and culture (nb: the racialist round-eye spent his early life in Nippon) but never (((them))).

  34. @Priss Factor

    Without the White Christian race, the Jew would be lost in the sea of the coloreds!

    • Replies: @annamaria
  35. @Stonewall Jackson

    “It is said that IQs are dropping dramatically. This is evident in all the institutions and population of this polyglot boarding house of a dumpster fire that is on the precipice of complete collapse.”

    Import millions of Mexicans and Guatemalans and waddaya get? Mexico and Guatemala.

    Shoehorn African-Americans into positions of cultural and political authority and waddaya get? Africa.

    Here in L.A., America’s canary in the coal mine, our mail service has become unreliable. Some sorta power outage, even just for a second (enough to reboot all the computers), every month. An acquaintance said she tried to renew her driver’s license but left because of unmanageable lines. 911 puts you on hold (no joke, it happened to me). I’ve witnessed three dead bodies along the curb of my middle-class block over the past ten years, and who knows how many I missed since they never make the news. Homeless encampments spring up at every crack in our community. They’re everywhere.

    I moved to L.A. in 1983. It was no longer Paradise, but it was still Paradise-adjacent. I’m moving someplace white ASAP, and leaving behind this Ukrainian-level corruption and profligacy.

    • Replies: @Stonewall Jackson
  36. @Anonymous

    I agree completely.

    The process of turning the Old Testament into the Talmud, ie. completely bastardizing and reversing the moral tenets therein, is the same process that is being used to reverse the U.S. Constitution.

    How else can one explain certain barbarities?
    Hate Speech legislation.
    Alan ‘constitutional law expert’ Dershowitz interpreting the Bill of Rights to mean the government has the right to seize the individual and inject them with a vaccine against their wishes.
    The existence of the Federal Reserve and the IRS, despite the clear indication that Congress control the issuance of currency.
    Pornography: how is a picture of a man sodomizing a horse a form of speech that needs to be protected? Clearly the intention is to destroy moral standards and degrade a culture.

    The list of aberrations and abominations is as endless as the line up of ‘grandfathered’ Jews entering Ivy League Institutions with the aim of entering law to continue to feast off the carcass (10% of all U.S. economic activity is skimmed by what are, in essence, legal ‘transaction fees’), screw the goyim and protect the Tribe.
    It was obvious long ago these people have no shame. I’m hoping it becomes glaringly obvious to the mainstream that these people have absolutely no morality.

    • Replies: @Saggy
  37. @Nancy Pelosi's Latina Maid

    Godspeed in leaving my good person. I am afraid there weren’t be anywhere to go soon, unfortunately. My state of Virginia is quickly approaching California as you can see by today’s headlines, although many of the peaceful protesters were bused into Richmond to create mayhem… but we had plenty of homegrown millenials and BLM membership on hand to assist. However the state is now completely run by virtue signaling corrupt Democrat machine politicians of the lowest sort of scum… McCauliffe, a Clinton scumbag and his ilk are still very much in power here.
    God Save us both.

    • Replies: @Longstreet
  38. Neuday says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Why fight for crumbs from the table of those who want to starve us anyway? Why not create OUR OWN Twitter, FaceBook, YouTube, PayPal etc.?

    What do you mean by “Our Own”? Free speech? American Nationalist? National Association for the Advancement of White People? What wealthy venture capitalist wants to risk multiple millions on that start-up? Say you found a few people; they and their families would be relentlessly targeted in ways that tend to wear people down.

    But primarily because the civil rights laws prevent you from hiring people who agree with your political stance. All it takes is a couple SJW’s to say the words “hostile workplace environment” to a lawyer and your org. is hobbled. And even if you were successful, some wealthy group of (((media moguls))) would buy it out and kill it.

    This is why you never let a certain tribe of people into your nation. You don’t think Hart-Cellar law that flooded our country with foreigners and the Civil Rights laws that killed the 4th amendment guaranteeing freedom of association where honest mistakes, do you? We’re defenseless because we were made defenseless. They saw Christians as suckers, and they were right.

  39. First thing you have to understand… This is not American anymore. Never forget that (((Jews))) did all of this starting with the (((Jewish Immigration Act of 1965))) AKA the Hart – Celler Act of 1965.

  40. R.C. says:

    No. It seems to me that despite having a Jewish last name, that judge did far, far better than most until the system took him down.
    Wanna bet that he rises no higher by judicial appointment in the future of his judicial career?

  41. ruralguy says:

    I have been in three expensive and time-consuming civil lawsuits. They each lasted 1-3 years each. It takes up all of your time and leaves you exhausted. With attorney fees at \$300-\$600 per hour, the costs are just staggering. Even when you win, you feel you’ve lost. On a theoretical level, I’m impressed with the field of law, but the system is horribly broken.

  42. Trinity says:
    @Priss Factor

    It is hard to believe that a man as smart as Mr. Taylor is CLUELESS or WILLFULLY IGNORANT about the JQ. I guess this shows you what ignoring the 800lb gorilla in the room does for you. smdh and lolol.

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  43. KenH says:
    @Pure Coincidence

    Has Jared Taylor ever once mentioned the jews as the problem?

    Don’t make me laugh. Taylor’s steadfast refusal to connect the dots and self censor himself regarding Jewish power and influence as it regards the plight of the white race hasn’t won he and other pro-white anti-anti-semites the mainstream acceptance like they hoped and Jared has now been banned from not only Twitter but Jewtube as well. Not only that but no private venue will host American Renaissance conferences and he’s forced to hold them at a government state park in Tennessee.

    The Jews will not allow pro-whites to insinuate themselves into mainstream politics or infiltrate the institutions like they did. They have eagle eyes and are constantly on guard for any white person who deviates from self hatred and racial masochism.

    So called white nationalism 1.0 and previous leaders like the late William Pierce take a lot of heat from the enlightened pro-white crowd of today, but WN 1.0 has been proven correct time and again when they said that the post WWII U.S. system is a Jewish construct that is fundamentally corrupt and not possible to be reformed from within or changed via the ballot box as we see time and again.

    Trump was supposed to be different but he’s not. “This time” it’s supposed to be different but it never is.

  44. Solo says:
    @Johnny Smoggins

    I wonder if Unz would be able to bring Anglin on board? The guy is a very funny writer.

    • Agree: Katrinka
  45. @Stonewall Jackson

    Do whatever you must to keep your kids from going to public school!

  46. jsigur says:

    You talking about those white Jews Jarod fights the good fight with?

    • LOL: Trinity
  47. Thim says:

    Roy Cohn used to say something like, ” don’t talk to me about what the law says, I just want to know who the judges are.”

    Yet this Taylor goy goes on and on and on and on about what the law says. In a Talmudic court system, there is no law. There is only what is “good for the Jews” and what isn’t.

    American Renaissance is useless.

    • Agree: Trinity, Voltara
  48. Trinity says:

    I looked up “shabbos goy” and “controlled opposition” in the old dictionary and I found a picture of this Taylor cuckold.

    • LOL: Ann Nonny Mouse
  49. @Priss Factor

    Great Analogy! Taylor has never figured that out. He always thought he could dance around the JQ. He also doesn’t understand who runs everything including the courts. And there is a reason for this: Taylor has been connected to many Jews over the years that have connections to the CIA and many Neocons ( example:CIA-connected Trotskyite “neo-conservative” Norman Podhoretz). Taylor’s wife Evelyn Rich is considered to be a Jewish operative (numerous associations with ADL and other Jewish Organizations).

    As others have pointed out Taylor went to Yale a CIA recruiting ground. I think Taylor is nothing more than a set up. I watched him a couple of times on TV and he didn’t seem too smart to me. Many of these so called White Leaders are frauds and are paid quite well by the Intel Groups. If you read Amren you’ll see just a few articles which are very mild compared to other sites and other speakers with a mass of internet articles from other areas that are benign.

    Perhaps the Jews and his handlers decided that it’s time for a sacrifice. Taylor and friends may have outlived their usefulness for the Jews and is now expendable.

    • Replies: @Usura
  50. When a superior court orders a trial judge to reverse himself, he doesn’t have much choice….

    Unless you are appearing before Judge Emmet Sullivan. Then again, you lean to the right, so he probably would have jailed you for criminal contempt.

  51. Sir Charles Pipkins=Sir George Floyd=Jeffrey Epstein

    Too Tall=MSM=Ghilane Maxwell

  52. @Anon

    SCOTUS would never grant cert, though it might be germane that §230 is adjudicated by the FCC under its regulatory powers over common carriers. Maybe the next step is to file a complaint with the FCC. Your clever legal eagles should be able to connect the dots from §230 to §204.

  53. G J T says:

    … which went before Judge Harold (((Kahn)))

    That’s all you need to know.

    But Taylor will never say as much, which is why he’s useless.

  54. usNthem says:

    This is a perfect example of why, when the revolution comes, lawyers will be among the first shall we say, to be dealt with.

  55. Usura says:

    Can you detail these “numerous associations”? The only one I can find is where Rich wrote a letter to the SPLC providing substantial evidence (birth certificate, family records, etc.) that she is not Jewish. Apparently her family was threatened on these grounds and she snapped.

    All of this comes down one question: Am I a Jew?

    The answer is no, I am not a Jew. I am not a Jew by religion, ethnicity, race or any other criteria or definition. My accusers, and they are accusers, give the following reasons for thinking as they do. Here they are and here are my replies:

    • I look Jewish. – If I look Jewish to you, then I look Jewish to you. That was an was an easy one!

    • My surname is allegedly Jewish. – I am not American, and no one in my family is American. Plenty of people have told me that in the USA Rich is a version of the German surname “Reich”. Nobody in my family has ever set foot in Germany. (Okay, I once changed planes in Munich). It is nonsense to assume that the German surname Reich has any connection to the ancient and venerable ENGLISH name of Rich. There have been English people named Rich as long as there have been English people. In addition to the Earls of Warwick, possibly the most famous branch of the Rich family, we also boast an Archbishop of Canterbury, Edmund Rich (1175–1240). I do not know of any English people named Reich, let alone any English people who changed their names from Reich to Rich. If Americans do this weird stuff, that’s their business.

    • I am a Jewish agent or “Honeypot” whose houri-like fascinations have forced Jared into a philosemitic trance and caused him to refuse to attack Jews. What utter rot! If anyone knows how to make Jared do or not do anything, please let me know. I’ve failed for 25 years! This is such a load of codswallop I refuse to believe any rational person could even consider it! (The rational and interested might like to know I married a German-American, surname of Klumpp. Maybe I could have saved myself a lot of trouble by calling myself Klumpp?)

    You can read the letter here:

  56. Exile says:

    Anyone looking to file this sort of suit should first look to establish diversity jurisdiction in a federal or state court outside the Ninth Circuit – and if necessary defeat any venue-selection clause in the company’s ToS on grounds of a contract of adhesion, consumer fraud or otherwise.

    The Ninth is in Silicon Valley’s pocket, plain and simple, along with being thoroughly Jewed. These companies make their censorship decisions based on advice from the ADL and the SPLC.

    It is very rare for writ relief to be granted. This is clearly a corrupt and politicized decision by the Ninth Circuit.

    Given the present Supreme Court, it’s almost certain that Jared’s appeal would have been crushed by SCOTUS even had he managed by some miracle to prevail in the Ninth.

    The way to beat this corrupt Jewish oligarchy & its hired judges is not by one flagship case brought by a high-profile defendant. It is by Cloward-Piven strategies which overwhelm the system with hundreds of smaller cases with hundreds of smaller defendants.

    Make them issue lawless corrupt rulings like this on a blanket basis that flaunts their illegitimacy rather than treating one case as some kind of exception or technical flaw. Eat up the companies’ time and money in defending many lawsuits, not putting all of their high-powered lawyers on one case and letting them call in their favors with individual judges.

    • Agree: Kali
  57. KenH says:

    The jewed courts will never let white advocates/pro-whites win. Ever. The game is rigged. If by some miracle a federal district court judge rules in your favor it will be quickly overturned on appeal.

    The civil lawsuit against Richard Spencer and others who took part in UtR should have been tossed out of court on first amendment grounds but it was allowed to proceed because whites who don’t hate themselves need to be harassed with lawfare so they get the hint that their 1A rights are theoretical only. Try suing BLM on the same grounds (i.e., that BLM speech leads to iconoclasm, riots and violence) and you’ll get an entirely different outcome.

    In order for white people to live and finally be free then (((America))) has to die. Pure and simple.

    • Agree: Johnny Smoggins
  58. @Usura

    “… I look Jewish. – If I look Jewish to you, then I look Jewish to you. That was an easy one..!”

    Black beady eyes + hook nose + arrogant expression on face = ….? You decide:

  59. Saggy says: • Website

    The process of turning the Old Testament into the Talmu

    The OT is much worse than the Talmud, it is openly and explicitly genocidal, and it serves as a blueprint for Israel today …..


    Deuteronomy 7:
    1 When the LORD your God brings you into the land that you are aboutto enter and occupy, and he clears away many nations before you — the Hittites, the Girgashites, the Amorites, the Canaanites, the Perizzites, the Hivites, and the Jebusites, seven nations mightier and more numerous than you — 2 and when the LORD your God gives them over to you and you defeat them, then you must utterly destroy them. Make no covenant with them and show them no mercy. 3 Do not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons or taking their daughters for your sons, 4 for that would turn away your children from following me, to serve other gods. Then the anger of the LORD would be kindled against you, and he would destroy you quickly. 5 But this is how you must deal with them: break down their altars, smash their pillars, hew down their sacred poles, and burn their idols with fire. 6 For you are a people holy to the LORD your God; the LORD your God has chosen you out of all the peoples on earth to be his people, his treasured possession.

    14 You shall be the most blessed of peoples, with neither sterility nor barrenness among you or your livestock. 15 The LORD will turn away from you every illness; all the dread diseases of Egypt that you experienced, he will not inflict on you, but he will lay them on all who hate you. 16 You shall devour all the peoples that the LORD your God is giving over to you, showing them no pity; you shall not serve their gods, for that would be a snare to you.

    Deuteronomy 13:
    15 You shall put the inhabitants of that town to the sword, utterly destroying it and everything in it — even putting its livestock to the sword.

    Joshua 6:

    16 And at the seventh time, when the priests had blown the trumpets, Joshua said to the people,”Shout! For the LORD has given you the city. 17 The city and all that is in it shall be devoted to the LORD for destruction. Only Rahab the prostitute and all who are with her in her house shall live because she hid the messengers we sent. 18 As for you, keep away from the things devoted to destruction, so as not to covet and take any of the devoted things and make the camp of Israel an object for destruction, bringing trouble upon it. 19 But all silver and gold, and vessels of bronze and iron, are sacred to the LORD; they shall go into the treasury of the LORD.” 20 So the people shouted, and the trumpets were blown. As soon as the people heard the sound of the trumpets, they raised a great shout, and the wall fell down flat; so the people charged straight ahead into the city and captured it. 21 Then they devoted to destruction by the edge of the sword all in the city, both men and women, young and old, oxen, sheep, and donkeys.

  60. MarkinLA says:
    @Stonewall Jackson

    It is said that IQs are dropping dramatically.

    Maybe that will save us. It has never been truer than that saying by Orwell:

    Orwell wrote in the essay “Notes on Nationalism” (1945):

    “One has to belong to the intelligentsia to believe things like that: no ordinary man could be such a fool.”

  61. Lot says:
    @Priss Factor

    The lower court Judge Harold Kahn who sided with Mr. Taylor and who is praised in his article is Jewish.

    The appeal judge who wrote the decision that overturned Kahn is named Jim Humes, not very Jewish sounding to me.

    • Replies: @Priss Factor
  62. annamaria says:
    @Really No Shit

    What role would you assign to Dick Cheney, Bushes, Obamas, and the likes in the decline of the USA?

  63. @Stonewall Jackson

    It is said that IQs are dropping dramatically.

    I read a reference the other day to the percentage of NYC students that met standards of competency in math and English. Less than 50% met what is most certainly a rather degraded set of standards. NYC has the largest school district in the country. And, up until the later part of the last century, it had a most excellent reputation.

    So much around us, systems, products, they just don’t seem to work very well. It’s depressing when you begin to notice it.

  64. @Priss Factor

    If Jewish Power treats you like a Palestinian, maybe it’s time to side with Palestinians.

    Only the Christians. If they bow to a box in the sand, they are mooning us. They are our enemies.

    • Replies: @Trinity
    , @MrVoid
  65. @CelestiaQuesta

    CQ?!? Six correct comments, as usual, except for one phrase where you got carried away but now is not the time for such details. Where you been? Boris B. has been worried about you. He has some donuts and espresso just for you. As you may have noticed since we last communicated, things have gotten worse in our former Republic. Boris predicts: this will not end well.

    • Replies: @CelestiaQuesta
  66. Trinity says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    (((troll))). Psst, how is the weather in Tel Aviv, breh?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  67. The Trinity is the core of Christianity. Those who deny it, in backwards, Satanic writing, no less, are not our friends, are they?

    • Replies: @Ann Nonny Mouse
  68. Get on #gab.

    It’s the unz of twitter-type sites.

  69. @Trinity

    (((troll))). Psst, how is the weather in Tel Aviv, breh?

    I couldn’t live in Tel Aviv. God gave us pork to enjoy with our wine and forward script. Jesus said so.

    You’re not with the ADL and their war on common sense (which they term “Islamophobia”), are you?

  70. @annamaria

    What role would you assign to Dick Cheney, Bushes, Obamas, and the likes in the decline of the USA?

    They are the result, not the cause. Obama, as bad as he was, was the least-damaging Democrat since Cleveland, if not Buchanan.

  71. @SC Rebel

    I just want him to realize those on the other side are not gentleman.

  72. MrVoid says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Only the Christians. If they bow to a box in the sand, they are mooning us. They are our enemies.

    They believe what they believe. You believe what you believe. You won’t change them. They won’t change you. That doesn’t mean they can’t be useful to us. Why do you care so much about what other people believe anyway? I don’t believe in Abrahamic theology and I am friendly with Muslims in general. I don’t care what they believe so long as it doesn’t get forced on me. I shouldn’t have to care about what you believe, but you (and others in your ideological camp) are undermining us by projecting some silly black-and-white religious model onto the real world and expecting other conservative Whites to agree to it.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  73. @CelestiaQuesta

    CQ, it is like a Cremma present for Master Boris and I to see you again. And to think we thought things were bad before . . .

    • Replies: @CelestiaQuesta
  74. @Usura

    Re: Jared Taylor’s Wife, Evelyn Rich

    This video of Jared Taylor’s “wife,” Evelyn Rich, recently surfaced after the self-styled White Nationalist, John DeNugent issued a \$150 reward to anyone who could provide him with a copy of the 1992 PBS Frontline program, “Who Is David Duke?” which contained the Rich interview.

    In a recent SPLC article on this video, HateWatch asked Jared Taylor, via email, about his wife’s alleged jewishness. With his signature disingenuous and evasive fashion, Taylor denied that she was a practicing jew (rather than a racial jew, which is the real issue, and he knows it). Quote:

    “Evelyn Rich is not Jewish. She never has been and never will be. She has no plans to convert, so far as I know.” … 0%99s-wife

    With the same evasiveness, Jared Taylor, when once asked if jews were “White,” replied that they are “White enough.” That said, an article in the March 3, 2006 issue of the jewish Forward seems to confirm that Evelyn Rich is, in fact, jewish. Quote:

    “In its dossier on Taylor, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Intelligence Review speculates that his conspicuous lack of antisemitism ‘may be related to his wife, who some in the movement have said is Jewish.’ The Atlanta-based organization, which monitors hate groups, has described Taylor as ‘the race hater.’” … z3Lq7DTD3A

    Jared Taylor’s kosher certification has been an open secret in White Nationalist circles for the last 25 years. His widely publicized and profitable AmRen Conferences are known to always be swarming with what are derisively called “Jared’s Jews”. Taylor’s book Paved With Good Intentions was favorably reviewed in the February 1993 issue of Commentary, edited by the CIA/Mossad Trotskyite, Norman Podhoretz.

    Taylor also enjoys a close working relationship with Gordon Baum, the jewish CEO of the Council of Conservative Citizens, a kosher front organization that Taylor infiltrated years ago. Taylor’s friendly relationship with Don Black of Stormfront, an ADL cut-out, is another open secret.

    In his book on traitors within the White Nationalist circles, The Judas Goats, Michael Collins Piper exposed both Jared Taylor, Evelyn Rich and their behind-the-scenes cozy relationship with the ADL. Some takeaways from that book (pp. 320-23):

    -Their close friendship with Rabbi Meyer Schiller, an ADL asset
    -Taylor admitted that one of AmRen’s goals is to “de-nazify” the WN movement
    -Taylor and Rich had a personal friendship with Irwin Suall, former ADL Director
    -A graduate of Yale, a well-known CIA/Mossad recruiting ground
    -Spent time in the early 1970s in Ghana, a hotbed of Mossad operations in Africa
    -Taylor’s “anti-Black” but “pro-jewish” stance is textbook FBI-sanctioned anti-White COINTELPRO

    Jared Taylor is clearly just another “useful idiot” for jewish interests, and his so-called White Separatist Movement merely serves to legitimate the separatist goals of the jews in their quest for world domination and the destruction of the White race.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
    , @Usura
    , @tac
  75. @MrVoid

    I don’t care what they believe so long as it doesn’t get forced on me.

    Tell that to the Damascenes, Alexandrians, Constantinopolitans…

    How did the Christian Middle East become predominantly Muslim?

    Go ahead, pay your jizya. I won’t.

    • Replies: @MrVoid
  76. @niteranger

    Jared Taylor is clearly just another “useful idiot” for jewish interests…

    As were Clarence Darrow, John Scopes, and Susan Epperson? Why shouldn’t they have been fined? They were breaking the law. Who other than Jews found it unjust?

    Genesis was a far firmer barrier against miscegenation than Darwinism has shown to be. If you care about the future of the race, you’re pretty much forced to reject the latter.

  77. @Reg Cæsar

    It’s in the Apostles’ Creed and the Nicean Creed but they are post-Biblical. The Unitarians worship God as described to us by the Christ of the New Testament, and are faithful to the values Christ enjoined upon us. That is the core of Christianity. Calling them Satanic is Satanic.

    The logic of the Trinity, three Gods who are one God, is tricky. Artificial, perhaps.

    And the doctrine of the Trinity has been immensely damaging to Christianity. It gave us Islam, determined monotheism. So, … hmm, … Satanic?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  78. @annamaria

    Obama was a tool of the 1%, whereas the Bushes are part of the 1%. Cheney on the other hand is a man who was willing to let down his own people to get ahead in life … financially speaking that is!

  79. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Poor Jared Taylor. He fellates the Zionists no end, and still takes it up the arse from the Bolsheviks. It never pays to be a soulless cult sucker, but base minds or base libidos just can’t help themselves. If only you had steel trap legs AND a steel trap mind… having one or the other but not both still makes you a whore. But you come from a generation of whores, so it’s hardly surprising.

  80. @Ann Nonny Mouse

    When the Apostles were sent to Greece and Rome, that was our cue to start writing left-to-right.

    Right-to-left was understandable in the stone-carving era (easier for the righthanded majority), but by the first century AD, never mind the seventh, the precursors of paper were firmly established, and the New Testament was composed left-to-right. Right-to-left is as obsolete as animal sacrifice.

  81. MrVoid says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    How did the Christian Middle East become predominantly Muslim?

    We could consider that a vindication of Islam if we wanted to. It proved to be the stronger force at the time.

    Right now, huge portions of middle-eastern civilisation are under threat from the Zionists. Iraq and Lybia have been destroyed. Iran is continually being attacked and is the target of economic warfare. Syria is in an even worse situation. Palestine faces complete annexation. The natives of Palestine (Muslim and Christian alike) will probably be driven out, although the Zionists will do everything they can to conceal whatever it is they do.

    For us to not make common cause with these people is insane. Instead what is happening is that Conservative Inc. in America is siding with the Zionists, so of course Arbabs (Muslims and Christian alike) aren’t going to like us very much.

    BTW it’s easy to be supercilious about other people’s religions. You mock the Muslim pilgrimage to the Kaaba. Muslims could equally well mock the Christian god-eating ritual. I refuse to mock either. I think that sort of snarky talking about what other people hold dear is disgusting. However they both serve as rituals uniting the believers so in way, so why not just show some respect?

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  82. @MrVoid

    BTW it’s easy to be supercilious about other people’s religions.

    When they steal a part of Christendom the size of Canada, yes. When they tax us for being Christian– yet refuse to pay the church tax when living in Germany– yes.

    Right now, huge portions of middle-eastern civilisation are under threat from the Zionists.

    Zionists are the reason evolution and not Genesis is taught in our schools. Are you ready to reverse the Epperson decision? They claimed fining and firing Mrs Epperson was unjust. Was it?

    You worry about “Abrabs” not being permitted to govern themselves. Where is your concern for Arkansans and Tennesseans who can’t set their states’ education policy?

    However they both serve as rituals uniting the believers so in way, so why not just show some respect?

    I fully support imposing a counterjizya on Mohammedans living in the West. Start with those oversexed “Syrian” deadbeats in Cologne. That gorgeous cathedral needs pricey upkeep!

    I’ll consider respecting them when they allow us kaffirs to visit Mecca and Medina. Talk about “apartheid”…

    • Replies: @MrVoid
  83. @Trinity

    Of course JT knows. Word has it that there’s a generous Jewish benefactor to AR in the background.

  84. MrVoid says:
    @Reg Cæsar

    Zionists are the reason evolution and not Genesis is taught in our schools.

    I don’t find anything to object to about not teaching religious texts in science classes. They can keep studying Genesis in their Yeshivas for all I care but it shouldn’t be flogged on anyone else.

    • Replies: @Reg Cæsar
  85. Loup-Bouc says:

    Mr. Taylor:

    I dislike your politics, Mr. Taylor — though I agree that America’s rapidly advancing anti-conservative and anti-“White” discrimination threatens, and has, already near-achieved, a sociopolitical/economic condition worse than imagined in George Orwell’s “1984,” and Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World.

    Still, I applaud your extraordinary, exemplary, selfless decision “not to appeal” because you “didn’t want to be the cause of an appeals court ruling that could jeopardize anyone’s chances” of achieving a victory “against [illegitimate] social-media censorship.”


    The Court of Appeals’s mandamus issuance amazes me because it was ex parte. But, since I have prosecuted or consulted in prosecutions of California state court litigations rather seldom (though I have obtained California appellate court mandamus orders twice, each time not ex parte), perhaps my amazement obtains merely from my having relatively spare California state-court litigation experience.

    I reviewed the first amended complaint your attorneys drafted. It is competent, but not sterling.

    Have you considered a “federal question jurisdiction” federal court action? I expect the California Court of Appeals mandamus order would carry just very spare res judicata effect — because (a) I expect its putative premise(s) must have rested solely on California law (even if it adverted to putatively analogous federal precedent) and (b) I expect the order did not bear evidenced fact-determinations (if any truly factual -determinations), especially not federal-law-dependent determinations of fact.

    One potential res judicata problem might obtain from a certain aspect of your first amendment complaint. While arguing California state law and California judicial precedent, your first amended used several U.S. Supreme Court precedents and at least one federal Court of Appeals precedent and referenced the federal constitution’s 1st amendment.

  86. @MrVoid

    I don’t find anything to object to about not teaching religious texts in science classes. They can keep studying Genesis in their Yeshivas for all I care but it shouldn’t be flogged on anyone else.

    Then you agree with the Zionists at the ACLU, not with William Jennings Bryan? Whose side are you on?

    Those weren’t “yeshivas”, they were the public schools of Tennessee and Arkansas. Why does the ACLU, rather than the elected legislatures, control them?

  87. Usura says:

    What video? The Renegade Tribune article you linked does not contain the PBS documentary. I looked it up on the PBS archives, and it is “not available for streaming”. Interesting! Perhaps this is a reason why the man you mentioned needed to pay \$150 for a copy? Regardless, the article addresses Ms. Rich in these two paragraphs only:

    Noting Taylor’s conduct, critics have pointed out that the woman who became Taylor’s wife, Evelyn Rich, actively worked to sabotage David Duke’s 1990 campaign for the U.S. Senate. Miss Rich released an audio tape to the national media that she had secretly recorded of Duke’s private conversation with a supporter. The tape (taken entirely out of context) was used to “prove” that Duke was a “Nazi.”

    In fact, evidence demonstrates that Taylor does seem to have some sort of friendly behind-the-scenes entente cordiale with the ADL. According to one American revisionist, whose name is well known to revisionists worldwide, Taylor’s wife-to-be, Miss Rich, received a phone call at the home she shared with Taylor from no less than Irwin Suall, the now-deceased longtime chief of the ADL’s “fact finding division.” According to the source (who was visiting Taylor’s home at the time), Taylor answered the phone, then handed it to Miss Rich saying, “It’s Irwin Suall,” after which Miss Rich conversed with the ADL spymaster.

    Exactly none of this is proof Ms. Rich is Jewish. At best it is hearsay that she is friendly with Jews, and doesn’t like David Duke.

    “Evelyn Rich is not Jewish. She never has been and never will be. She has no plans to convert, so far as I know.” [Aside: the link you provided for this statement doesn’t bring me to that letter, just to the most recent “hAtEwAtCh” headlines.]

    You claim that’s an evasive statement, but I don’t think so. The ending bit implies non-ethnic Jews can convert to Judaism, sure, but that would be impossible to square with the first two sentences if she was ethnically Jewish (and presumably Taylor acknowledges at least some ethnic dimension to Judaism?). Of course Mr. Taylor could be lying, and if you suspect as much, I would welcome your scrutiny of the family records Ms. Rich has provided which I have linked above, which would be much more convincing than your impression of her partner’s words on one occasion.

    The rest of your post concerns Taylor, not Ms. Rich, and so is irrelevant to the point I was making.

    To be clear, I think Mr. Taylor’s position on Jews is misguided, but to suggest that it is so due to his wife’s alleged Jewish ethnicity is, again, a claim for which I have yet to see any convincing evidence. You’re welcome to try again.

    There is a tendency in White Nationalist circles to believe that the only thing which could blind an adherent to the status of Jews as their ethnic enemies is some great, overwhelming irrational force, like romance. But this isn’t true: some Whites, like Jared, view Jews positively as a result of their own beliefs, as have many millions of philosemitic Calvinists, Puritans, Southern Evangelicals, and greedy goyim before them. The constant attempt to characterize any racially conscious European or European American sympathetic to Jews as necessarily Jewish themselves, on the basis of thin evidence and doltish amateur physiognomic analysis (per Franklin Rickety Cart’s idiotic comment above), as if no other explanation is possible, is misguided, and misunderstands both Jews and gatekeeper good-goys like Jared and his English dame.

    • Replies: @niteranger
  88. @teachem2think

    Is this Master Boris? If so, it’s great to hear from you again. I am deeply indebted to you for your encouragement, mentoring and friendship. So much has happened since we last communicated. It’s a small world isn’t it? It’s all so unpredictable now. I may have been weakened by our ChiCom friends, (SARS early 2019, ICU 3 days ago) but I’m still hanging in there. Wishing you many books, broads, booze, health and blessings. Later my friend.

    • Replies: @teachem2think
  89. @Usura

    I don’t care if she is Jewish or not. She is associated and works with Jews against Western Civilization. Whether you are a Jew, Pseudo Jew or whatever if you are in bed with them it’s the same thing. It’s like Bolton who Trump just fired. He would bomb the whole world if Israel wanted him to. He is a Neocon Pseudo Jew and everyone knows it.

  90. @WhereAreTheVikings

    Thanks to Boris and folks like yourself, I wouldn’t be here without your wise words and mentoring support. I’m blessed to learn from the best. Cheers Viking.

  91. Ex aequo says:

    Long story short, you lost?

  92. Twitter claimed that win or lose, merely to have to face a suit of this kind would cause it irreparable damage.

    This is rubbish. If Twitter wants to avoid all such future lawsuits, it only needs to allow free speech for all. Then, there would be no grounds for people to sue. But then, Jewish finance and media would give Dorsey a hard time. It’s the Jews.

    Why didn’t Taylor argue that (1) Twitter has monopoly position and (2) it gained that position ONLY BECAUSE it promised free speech for all sides.
    If Twitter has stated from the outset that it would especially conservatives and Palestinians, many would have opted for another platform. Twitter pulled a hustle.

    As for financial companies that deny service to Taylor, why not sue and argue that since ALL AMERICANS must pay taxes and those taxes go to bail out banks, financial companies cannot deny service to anyone.

    It’s a Jewish-led war. And why would conservatism inc do anything when it serves Jews and supports banning BDS? But then, Taylor also bans pro-Palestinian voices critical of Jewish Supremacist Power on his site. Indeed, the term ‘Jewish Supremacism’ isn’t allowed on Amren.

    And this Judge Kahn sounds like a Kahn-man. He could have done more but didn’t because, as a Jewish supremacist, he personally loathes Taylor.

  93. MrVoid says:

    Then you agree with the Zionists at the ACLU, not with William Jennings Bryan? Whose side are you on?

    I consider that science should have pre-eminence over religion. If that means that I occasionally find myself on the side of otherwise unsavory actors, then so be it. I have no love for William Jenning Bryan.

    Those weren’t “yeshivas”, they were the public schools of Tennessee and Arkansas. Why does the ACLU, rather than the elected legislatures, control them?

    You may have something of a point there. I agree that the taxpayers should have control of whatever they fund, but the fact they’re forced to fund something indicates that they will never be able to control it. I’ve been in favor abolition of public eduction for a long time.

  94. @Lot

    The lower court Judge Harold Kahn who sided with Mr. Taylor and who is praised in his article is Jewish.

    I don’t trust him. Also, he could have made a fuss about it and didn’t.
    If Twitter banned Zionists as ‘Jewish Supremacists’, the Kahn would have done more.

    The appeal judge who wrote the decision that overturned Kahn is named Jim Humes, not very Jewish sounding to me.

    Jack the dork Dorsey and Jeff the bozo Bezos are not Jewish but do the bidding of Jewish Power.
    Judges are appointed by connections or elected with backing of money. Judges are owned by interest groups.

    It was (((Barzini))) all along.

  95. @CelestiaQuesta

    It is indeed. Boris is a firm believer in American Bourbon: it is an internal antiseptic; and it provides micronutrients to our cells and inspiration to our soul. We are extremely pleased to see that you have survived the pestilential infections of California as well as the Licensed Quacks whose priorities are to serve Insurance Carriers, hospital systems, and eventually their patients. More recipes to follow! Cheers!

  96. Thank you B. I shall start immediately your medical recommendation of American Bourbon as of this evening. As if by divine intervention, you appeared again at a time much appreciated.
    Cheers mysterious guardian of eternal light.

  97. This is very saddening but I can’t disagree with any of it. You had no chance going forward and as you say, setting a precedent in the Supreme court would have been a step backward. This is why when we had local guy Brendan O’Connel who was first charged here with breach of some very new anti-hate speech laws which were designed to protect Jews from criticism. I rocked up to his first appearance to offer the guy full financial support through the legalities, including the best barrister in Perth. I had actually been visited on the same day as they arrested him by the same cops who arrested him. They told me as they left they were going to arrest a guy who had definitely crossed the line. It was a frivolous complaint against myself and I sent them away with tails between their legs. Later I learned about O’Connel. He was more openly anti-semitic and public but could easily have beaten the case with a good barrister and I had just the gu. I was sure it must be a case that was won to set a precedent thus virtually eliminating the new law in its first test because if he lost it would set a precedent against free speech with a very low bar.

    To my great consternation, he refused and asserted he would defend himself. I was not happy about that and knew he’d be up against the best the local Jewish community had and that includes some of the better barristers in the city too who are Jewish. Sad to say as soon as I saw him ‘defending himself’ it was much worse than I feared. He was grandstanding and pontificating and making a case that was not the least bit relevant and he seemed to think he was on history’s stage. HE WAS JUST AT HIS FIRST APPEARANCE, with nothing but bureaucratic details to be sorted. bail, which was refused due to his combative stance in court already and first hearing date etc. His whole big dance was pointless and only ensured he was not given bail. Of course, he lost eventually and big time. he used it all to be a big name in the “resistance” but I was never able to avoid concluding that he was always a deliberate agent on their behalf and more has occurred since to make me sure. His PRECEDENT has been applied and here now free speech has been curtailed more than ever. he could have served to break their wicked law but instead, he MADE IT into what they wanted. A total jackass or a lousy traitor for them is how I see him. I explained very clearly why he had to win this, for everyone which was why I was prepared to pay anything it took. he only cared about his own image on the surface but in truth, I believe he was doing this for them. His example publicly is a show and I am not surprised Iran rejected his application to go there. Many idolise the bastard but I’d like to kick him in the nuts, not only for the way he stabbed me in the back later on with helping out the ADL crew on there directly to target me on Youtube. He colluded with a particularly vile Rabbi (Dovid Cohen) with the ADL who ran back then and maybe still does, a whole army of the swarming Jewish trolls, not hasbara capable even, who go berserk defacing any comments page and build up a case against anyone they do not like via multiple complaints albeit usually fake or fabricated. Youtube hasn’t gotten better over the years either.

    Precedents really matter big time. So you did the right thing. However, truthfully I do not believe the judge is correct in your case, there will not be any change in the supreme court’s position and free speech won’t improve only worsen. That is definitely the direction of things and I do not see that changing without a probably very bloody revolution at this point. Conservatism in so much as defending and living traditional values, free speech, even free thoughts are now definitely on the threatened species list.

    For what it’s worth congratulations on getting as far as you did. I sincerely believe that will be the high water mark going forward. Not even a black, Jewish, transgender with a few \$ million to hand and letters of recommendations from leaders of a few well regarded (in the West) nations will be able to shift this giant pile of shit that is building up against the best of the human race. The time of the scoundrels and wastes of oxygen, moral relativists, and outright anti-social and criminal class is upon us.

    Those with independence, self-respect, respect for others, regard for traditions that work and just living our own lives without the need or desire to go along to get along, leaving opinions and morals to some unseen arbiter who force-feeds ‘society’ with the beliefs and causes of the day are evidently no longer welcome on this planet. You either grovel among the swine in a pig pen existence gleefully lynching whoever the Nazi of the day is declared to be or you get ready to be the new Nazi when your turn comes.

  98. @zimriel

    Obviously Jared can’t shouldn’t and won’t, but someone else can.

  99. @KenH

    Jared actually discussed it once, way back when. He said, IOW, that he could not fight every battle at once, and that this was not the hill upon which he chose to die.

    Of course, they came after him anyway..

  100. Loup-Bouc says:

    Thank you for referencing “Report on evidence of felonies violating Civil Rights, and bribery by foreign agents, implicating United States Special Counsel Robert S Mueller III as a criminally-tainted agent of foreign & racketeering interests.”

    In the federal judicial sphere, bribery-corruption is not quite bad as you suggest. Still, corrupt spirit and psychopathy have mounted “gains.”

    If you are intimate with the post-1996 history of post-conviction relief cases (habeas corpus and other such relief), you have witnessed judiciary’s near-complete suspension of the writ of habeas corpus. Thank Billy Boy Clinton and near-all of the nine Supremes (of then and now) for that gift.

    Post-concviction-relief petitioning has become a parallel of the personal-life-sustaining efforts of gladiators of Rome’s last 50 years BCE through Rome’s first 200 years CE.

    An epitome is Chief Justice Roberts, whose blood-and-brain chemistry consists of hydrogen-corrupticon.

    I remain convinced that Billy Boy Clinton ordered the Arkansas state police murder of a New Youk journalist who was about to prove that Whitewater was reality.

    How many Glorious Leaders (executive and Congressional) must have learned at the feet of J. Edgar Hoover?

  101. Loup-Bouc says:

    This comment supplements my comment of July 20, 2020 at 10:09 pm GMT (comment # 101). In that earlier one of my comments, I wrote:

    If you are intimate with the post-1996 history of post-conviction-relief cases (habeas corpus and other such relief), you have witnessed judiciary’s near-complete suspension of the writ of habeas corpus.

    This supplement supplies some support found in Supreme Court opinions — one (Stickland v. Washington) issued before enactment of the “Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (Billy Boy Clinton’s gift) and the rest published after that statute’s enactment.


    Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984),
    WITH, e.g.,
    (1) Harrington v. Richter, 562 U.S. 86 (2011),,+562+U.S.+86+(2011)&hl=en&as_sdt=6,38&as_vis=1
    (2) Cullen v. Pinholster, 563 U.S. 170 (2011),,++563+U.S.+170+(2011)&hl=en&as_sdt=6,38&as_vis=1
    (3) Lance v. Sellers, 139 S. Ct. 511 (2019),,+139+S.+Ct.+511+(2019)&hl=en&as_sdt=6,38&as_vis=1

    That comparison will expose the Supremes’ inexorably grinding its precedents toward suspension of the Great Writ — habeas corpus. It will show you also that since 1996, the only honorable Supremes were Justice O’Connor (a Republican moderate), Justice Stevens (a rational, pre-neoliberal/pre-neocon Democrat), and (albeit his stern constraint of habeas relief) Justice Scalia (an originalist conservative, smarter even than Stevens and O’Connor, who were, themselves brilliant).

    Sometimes, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg [hereinafter “RBG”], Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor present honorable positions respecting habeas relief — in Ginsburg’s case, only when she suffers a likely-endogenously-caused convulsive break from her “normal” crazy-liberal blathering or her incompetent forays into the realm of judicial restraint.

    (The other “liberal” Justice, Stephen Breyer, is a pompous slime-bag who pretends to favoring the masses — with specks of noblesse oblige — and was near-single-handedly guilty of destroying antitrust law — to benefit psychopathic greed.)

    RBG was one of my law school teachers. She was my worst professor since my 9th year highschool algebra teacher, a shriveled hag who reveled in inelegant rituals.

    I recall a class in which I asked RBG a question — any sound, relevant answer of which would have shattered one of her stock assertions. She answered some question long-lodged in her mechanical brain — NOT the query I put. I voiced my question again — with slightly varied nuance. Again, she answered HER question, not mine. After class, I approached her with the same question AND explained why her answers were irrelevant. With determined oblivion, she repeated her earlier impertinent reply.

    RBG’s legal “analyses” paralleled a rudimentary-arithmetic-operation, or a fortune-telling bought by inserting a nickel in slot of a carnival machine: She lacked the rigorous critical, deconstructive thought that is the sine qua non of competent lawyering. Whatever could be the shallowest perspective of a court-decision, statute, or legal rule, RBG would pluck it to her yellowed menu of stock conclusions.

    RBG’s mentation was stony, like pea gravel. She — her character, or her persona — was a statue — though she was not statuesque.

    Every school day, RBG appeared wearing a repulsively prim costume costing at least \$2,000 (back in the 1960s, before Nixon deprived the dollar of its “gold standard,” when an average annual wage was about \$4,300, an average beer 6-pack cost under a buck, and 30¢ bought a gallon of gas).

    Throughout the bulk of every class, RBG stood, stiff, behind a lectern, arms folded just beneath her spare breasts (which her forearms seemed to amplify, slightly, by raising them a quarter of an inch). Most-time her sight trained on a book, or her notes — save for occasional glances peeped at her audience. Sometimes, when she fancied she’d bestow a “revelation,” she freed an arm from its sub-breast station — to point a finger to something only she perceived.

    RBG is NOT — and has never been — corrupt. But deficient competence — like Bill of Rights “penumbras” and court-birthed junk-science — can hatch results quite evil as corruption can obtain. And, mostly RBG’s Supreme Court opinions have not risen higher than the quality of her law school classes.

  102. tac says:

    Here are some references pro and con:


    (con –notice the obsession with the KKK … now what kind of a huuWhyte (((person))) would be interested in that matter–after immigrating supposedly from UK only to delve into such a topic???? That is the REAL question…and having found a substantial answer to this all too but apparent excuse, one is left with the ONLY answer that matters!!!)

    From Frontline PBS interview wit h Evelyn Rich:

  103. Just my opinion, but my view is all fake news/misinformation sites should be banned on social media if they have accounts, furthermore the sites should be delisted from search-engines. I consider VDARE, Unz Review, American Renaissance, Daily Stormer etc all fake news sites that promote misinformation and pseudoscience, especially about race. Do I though support taking them offline? No, but accounts promoting them on other sites should be banned to prevent traffic as these sites contain harmful misinformation.

    • Replies: @mikemikev
  104. @mikemikev

    They blamed me for your fake accounts since you’ve been impersonating me across the internet for years and have created this confusion. VDARE then link to stuff on your fake accounts of me I’ve never written nor reflects my views. It’s like almost every week there’s fake accounts in my name:

    15:41, 30 July 2020 Cosmikdebris (talk | contribs) renamed user 𝗢𝗟𝗜𝗩𝗘𝗥 𝗗. 𝗦𝗠𝗜𝗧𝗛
    4:18, 7 July 2020 Cosmikdebris (talk | contribs) renamed user 𝓞𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓮𝓻 𝓓. 𝓢𝓶𝓲𝓽𝓱
    7 July 2020 Cosmikdebris (talk | contribs) renamed user 𝙊𝙡𝙞𝙫𝙚𝙧 𝘿. 𝙎𝙢𝙞𝙩𝙝

    And these fake accounts go back to at least 2016:
    ” (mikemikev, no reason to allow this account to edit ever again)”

    So they clicked on your fake accounts with SJW/Antifa edits in my name to incorrectly conclude I’m a far-leftist.

    • Replies: @mikemikev
  105. @mikemikev

    No one who goes over the evidence believes a word you say Mike. You’re the compulsive liar.

    “Michael Coombs (online pseudonyms: Mikemikev,[note 1] Vekimekim, Antifungal16, Varg88, R2D279247959 and JohnnyR84030075) is a hate-filled neo-Nazi, white supremacist internet troll and conspiracy theorist from the UK who spends his time online posting anti-Semitism, Holocaust denial, racism, Islamophobia and the white genocide conspiracy theory; recently, he’s also become Sinophobic. He is perhaps most infamous for online identity theft and creating fake accounts of his enemies, usually impersonating them, resulting in many bans on social media and other websites.”

    On the above account you then began pretending to be a female, and then an Indian man.

    Seems all you do is create hundreds of fake profiles across the internet.

  106. SRP says:

    I am keenly disappointed with Mr. Taylor after discovering his incredibly foolish attempts to get free publicity from CNN and Stern, and now this futile Twitter lawsuit.

    Broadcast Media, Print Media, Public Media and Social media are OWNED by the Left. Media is now the private property of the Left.

    The truth that Mr. Taylor speaks has been locked out of mainstream media. Waddaya know?

    Yet Mr. Taylor keeps wishing to please, please pitch his soapbox on their front lawn, and sues them when they kick him off their front lawn. A waste of time and money, Mr. Taylor.

    No longer will any effective voice on the Right, including Mr. Taylor’s, get any positive airtime. Period. Forget about it.

    It is difficult to understand why Mr. Taylor, an otherwise intelligent man who surely knows the lying treachery of MSM, would allow himself to be smacked-down by these thugs not once but multiple times.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS
The “war hero” candidate buried information about POWs left behind in Vietnam.
How America was neoconned into World War IV
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Our Reigning Political Puppets, Dancing to Invisible Strings
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement