The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Patrick McDermott Archive
Voices of a White Awakening
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Notes from Chris Robert:

Every Saturday, American Renaissance publishes a brief essay by one of our readers about how he or she came to discover the reality — and importance — of race. In the essay below, Patrick McDermott examines what these stories have in common, and what they say about the future of white racial consciousness in America. I invite readers of The Unz Review to share their “red pill” stories as well. If you have one, please email it to me: [email protected]

What will it take for most white people to wake up to the growing threat of dispossession in our homelands? It is a central question facing our movement.

Some answers to that question can be found in a series of first-person accounts written for American Renaissance (organized here by perspective and available here in book form). In a video inviting readers to submit their own personal stories, Jared Taylor asked, “How did you find the truth? How did you see the light?”

Dozens have responded to this call. Individually, each of these stories is deeply personal and valuable in its own way. Together, they reflect the sort of hard-won, collective wisdom that we need to help us understand how to wake up more whites to the threats we face.

Direct contact

Most of these authors wrote about how their initial views about race were optimistic, reflecting what they had been told by their parents or by institutions such as the media, schools, or their church. Over a decade ago, Mike Rienzi (a pseudonym, as are most of the authors mentioned here) told academic Robert S. Griffin about the stark difference between what we are told and the harsh realities we face:

People who think of themselves as enlightened and on the moral high ground in matters of race write off people like me as ignorant racists. Unlike them, so it goes, we pre-judge people. If only we were exposed to racial and ethnic diversity we would learn to value different kinds of people — et cetera, et cetera, you’ve heard the line.

You’ll notice that most of these people doing the pontificating and finger pointing about racial equality and harmony and the virtues of integration and multi-racialism do it from the far distance of the leafy suburbs or a university campus somewhere. The fact of the matter is that, unlike practically all of them, I have lived close up with the reality of race in America. And regardless of what they might like to think, I am not stupid or unenlightened or their moral inferior.

The people who look down their noses at people like me should come live for a year or two or three where my family and millions of other white families live. Let their children grow up and go to school in this pigsty and be threatened and attacked and robbed and raped. Then they can talk.

This view is still true today. “I don’t think I would ever have developed a racial consciousness if I had come of age in a ‘whiteopia’ — no matter how much Nietzsche I read in college — because my consciousness was born of direct experience,” wrote Hubert Collins.

Most of these personal accounts cite direct experience as playing the decisive role in their own awakening, sometimes in frightening terms. This is especially true among people whose jobs bring them face to face with non-whites every day: Police officers, teachers, and social workers.

A man gives the finger to police who were standing guard during a protest over the police shooting of Jacob Blake on Aug 24, 2020 in Kenosha, WI. (Credit Image: © Chris JuhnZUMA Wire)
A man gives the finger to police who were standing guard during a protest over the police shooting of Jacob Blake on Aug 24, 2020 in Kenosha, WI. (Credit Image: © Chris JuhnZUMA Wire)

“If you are an officer, you will quickly be ‘red-pilled’ on the reality of race, whether you like it or not,” wrote Officer Tom Andrews. “Race is part of practically everything an officer does, and the reality of racial differences becomes clearer the longer he does the job,” wrote retired Officer Ambrose Kane.

“Most whites simply do not know what black people are like in large numbers, and the first encounter can be a shock,” wrote Christopher Jackson, a teacher at a predominantly black high school in a Southeastern state. “Black-majority schools are much more violent than black-minority schools. Blacks, far more than any other race, are the most likely to attack both one another and school employees,” wrote Don Brandy, a special ed teacher who has taught all over the country.

Few whites take such jobs, but they are not the only victims. “The small number of whites who attend my school have it the worst,” wrote Jane Moss, a 20-year veteran teacher. “They get attacked, robbed, and verbally berated on a regular basis by their ‘peers.’ Many white students suffer from anxiety and self-esteem issues, leading to problems with drugs and self-harm.”

Several whites who attended majority non-white schools give similar, first-hand accounts. “I spent a total of four years in black schools, and during that time, I had a knife to my throat, witnessed a white student get his teeth knocked out, and was threatened almost every day,” wrote Eric Gustafson. Their neighborhoods are often no different. “My immediate family and I have been the victims of crime five times in my lifetime. Each time the perpetrators were black,” wrote Fiona Baker.

Women and girls are often special targets for abuse. “White girls have it worse than boys,” wrote A.J. Clinton about his school experience. “Every day, from the first bell to the last, they were bombarded by a never-ending wave of black boys groping, grabbing at, and catcalling them.” Sadly, the statistics on interracial rape suggest that things can get much worse.

“On the streets of Harlem, my blonde hair, blue eyes, and white skin made me an irresistible target,” wrote Tracy Abel, a social worker in New York. “The mothers called me ‘cracka ass’ and ‘white bitch’ while I labored on their behalf.”

Motherhood can provide its own awakening. Jane Moss noticed how having a white son changed her perspective. “It was only after he was born that I began to fully notice the relentless propaganda of the mainstream media, and how it promotes miscegenation and presents men like my son as bumbling, weak fools,” she wrote. “It was a realization that fully awoke the protective mothering instincts inside me.”

Most of the worst personal experiences involve blacks, but Hispanics are little better. “The worst thing about life in the barrio is the partying. Blacks hold base-thumping, rap-blaring, drug-fueled ragers. Hispanics squeeze 100 people onto one tiny property along with a mariachi band and a bouncy-house. Both types of party last all night long,” wrote Helen Doe, remembering her time living in Los Angeles.

“We were immediately struck by how dirty it was. My husband and I walked the neighborhood every evening for months picking up all the trash lining the streets. Right when we’d get a block looking decent, the trash would start to re-accumulate. We’d pick it up again — hoping to shame our ‘neighbors’ into better behavior — but that never happened.” This is unsurprising. Research has found that even in mixed-race neighborhoods, the interactions among neighbors of different races are infrequent and shallow.

Teaching in a majority Hispanic school was similarly discouraging for Eric Beck. “The students are generally lazy, abusive, and disrespectful,” he wrote. “Rather than do the work assigned, most of them spend their time texting, listening to music on their iPods, playing with cell phone cameras and handheld games, talking about sex and gangs and fighting, and eating junk food.”

Daniel Vinyard, a white cop who had policed such neighborhoods, wrote about what happens when these kids grow up. “Hispanics would prey upon any race of people for robberies, burglaries, thefts or other crimes for material gain — usually to buy drugs. As for violence, they mostly attacked other Hispanics, since shootings and stabbings were usually either gang or — strange as it may seem — family related.”

Atlanta, GA, — A police officer walks through a Hispanic gang hangout in an abandoned carpet dye plant. The gangs use the building as a drug marketplace. (Credit Image: Robin Rayne / ZUMAPRESS.com)
Atlanta, GA, — A police officer walks through a Hispanic gang hangout in an abandoned carpet dye plant. The gangs use the building as a drug marketplace. (Credit Image: Robin Rayne / ZUMAPRESS.com)

The Asian population is increasing faster than any other race in America. Experiences with the Asians are uncommon among these personal stories, probably because they are still relatively few in number and are not prone to violent crime. Still, this has not stopped white flight from neighborhoods transformed by Asian immigrants.

In one first-person account, an engineer who lived in California wrote about what it was like to compete with Asians for jobs after Silicon Valley began bringing them in to replace their white employees. “One of the interviewers was almost incomprehensible with his thick accent and poor English. I was thinking, ‘Why do I have to put up with this in my own country? Why is he the one with the power over me?’”

Time after time, these stories end the same way. Relief came only when the author moved. Steven Grant’s feelings are typical: “I want a white environment. When I go to a white area it is like a cloud lifts,” he wrote.

White flight has been well-covered in AR’s Great Replacement series, which has documented demographic change in cities such as New York, Chicago, and Baltimore. But white flight is not a permanent solution and it has its own adverse consequences.

“It saddens me to think that I can no longer live in the place where my mother lives and where I grew up,” wrote Denis Ruiz. “A neighborhood is where your friends are and where your kid goes to school and where you work — that’s what makes a neighborhood,” he said. “There is no neighborhood here at all for me now.”

Distant threats

Such experiences have awakened many whites, but if direct contact with other races is the only way whites will wake up, then we may face a tough road ahead. It is still easy for most whites to avoid these jobs, these neighborhoods, and these schools.

“It’s a safe bet that for many whites, exposure to blacks and Hispanics comes in controlled doses,” wrote John Ingram. “Their positive attitudes toward ‘diversity’ are shaped by isolated experiences with small handfuls of non-whites, often in majority-white settings.”

“My awakening did not come from one or even a few incidents, but from the accumulation of thousands upon thousands of small interactions,” wrote Donald Williamson. Is that what it takes?

Comments like these speak to a defining dilemma for whites, one that pits two strong hereditary impulses against each other. One impulse is the desire to be moral. Research has shown that this desire is heavily rooted in biology and evolution. Several thinkers on the Dissident Right, such as Kevin MacDonald, have suggested that this morality has evolved differently for whites — acting as a source of evolutionary strength in earlier times (producing high-trust societies that were more cooperative), but becoming an easily-exploited weakness today.

The opposing impulse is ethnocentrism — the natural desire among all peoples to affiliate with and protect their immediate family and extended kin. Such desires are fundamentally instinctual, found in both animals and humans, including babies. Scholars frequently cite genetics as the explanation for reciprocal altruism among closely-related kin and aversion and distrust toward outsiders.

For whites without much natural ethnocentrism, what can still make them racially aware is the presence of a threat. The importance of “threat” is apparent in the many personal accounts shared with American Renaissance. Again and again, these men and women write about how they started out idealistic. They adopted values taught to them by their parents and by society, including egalitarian notions of treating everyone the same regardless of race. Their views changed only after they experienced the reality of race up close. Faced with threats to their basic safety and well-being — not just to themselves, but also their families and especially their children — these whites changed. Survival instinct took over. They awakened.

But most whites have not suffered these experiences. Most live a safe distance away — in the suburbs, in gated communities, in high-rise apartments, or in one of the many communities or states where whites are still a majority. As I outlined in an earlier article, “How White Liberals Will Wake Up“:

Most white liberals will not be convinced by rational arguments, no matter how strong or well-supported those arguments may be. They will only be convinced by threats to their basic safety. This, in turn, points to the real barrier. Most white liberals do not feel threatened.

It seems that just enough social distance, combined with a deceptive media that covers up racial conflict when whites are the victims, has managed to keep most whites in the dark. At least one writer for American Renaissance thinks that under these conditions white people are good at just ignoring the problem. “People refuse even to think about it,” he said.

But that might be changing.

Future historians will probably look back at the present era and focus on one centrally important development that changed the trajectory of our history: the Great Awokening. The Great Awokening was the product of a several events that occurred from 2013–2014: the founding of Black Lives Matter, the decades-long development and dissemination of Critical Race Theory in academia which seemed to reach a tipping point at about the same time as the unrest in Ferguson, a media populated by left-wing journalists who had been trained in these schools and were fanning the flames of racial unrest, and an audience of college-educated white liberals that seemed primed for a leftist quasi-religious awakening.

The results were explosive. Today the effects of this ideology can be seen in the news media, Hollywood, television programs, commercials, sports, video games, and even comic books. Woke platitudes crossed the lips of numerous presidential candidates in the 2020 Democrat primaries. BLM helped spawn hundreds of riots and protests involving millions of people in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death. Unlike the effects of diversity, which can be sidestepped by retreating to the relative safety of a white suburb, the Great Awokening is unavoidable.

June 3, 2020, Orlando, FL: A protester chants slogans outside the Orlando Police Headquarters. (Credit Image: © Paul Hennessy / SOPA Images via ZUMA Wire)
June 3, 2020, Orlando, FL: A protester chants slogans outside the Orlando Police Headquarters. (Credit Image: © Paul Hennessy / SOPA Images via ZUMA Wire)

BLM and the Great Awokening appear in several first-person accounts. “Black Lives Matter does a more effective recruitment job for race-realism than American Renaissance,” wrote Ambrose Kane, a police veteran. “Liberal whites are alarmed when their ‘pets’ turn on them. Many whites imagine that blacks are color-blind, whereas blacks see everything in terms of race.” “Almost every white advocate I’ve met who joined after 2014 says it was the Trayvon Martin or Michael Brown case that ‘woke him up,’” commented AR staff writer Gregory Hood.

But the effects have gone well beyond the protests. Academia, where much of this originated, has played an important role in waking up many young whites who can see through its indoctrination. “I had been brainwashed in college to think that everybody is basically equal,” said Carolyn Davies. “Your parents mortgage the farm to send you off to college to learn from these people, and so you assume the professors know what they are talking about and that they are telling you the truth, which I eventually found out they weren’t.” “It took years in academia to push me over the edge,” wrote Sinclair Jenkins:

I saw impressionable white girls constantly crying about imperialism and ‘white privilege.’ I felt my guts churn as a series of Southern women moved above the Mason-Dixon Line and immediately began telling all of their Northern and Midwestern professors how racist, sexist, and evil their home states are. Many of these women made fun of their parents for being realistic about the races.

This same indoctrination is becoming increasingly common in K-12 schools. In one personal account, a high school student wrote about the severe consequences of pushing back against a teacher who told him to acknowledge his white privilege. “One day during recess one of my peers physically attacked me while screaming ‘Nazi! Nazi!’ Another kid tripped me, and then my first assailant started kicking me while I was down. The school nurse didn’t do much, and my mother ended up taking me to the hospital later on.”

Workplace diversity trainings have subjected adults to this same indoctrination for years, but this too seems to be getting worse. “The setup reminded me of military boot camp, in which a drill instructor parades back and forth before the recruits to indoctrinate them in the ways of the military,” wrote Clement Astor. “At the end of the first day of this treatment I was angry. The class was not a dialogue, but a diatribe.”

Even some churches are going woke. “The clergy in my 85 percent white church bully the congregation with cries of racism, replacing the theology of original sin with Leftist guilt mongering,” wrote Ed Gee. “So as not to be disruptive with my unfashionable opinions, I avoid the ‘shame and blame’ events they have called, ‘Facing Racism.’”

These are not unusual reactions. Studies have shown that forcing whites to ponder their white privilege usually backfires, causing them to express more racial resentment rather than less. A Harvard Business Review overview of corporate diversity programs found that whites “often respond to compulsory courses with anger and resistance — and many participants actually report more animosity toward other groups afterward.” Other studies have found that when whites are reminded of their pending minority status, they respond by becoming more conservative, closer to other whites, and resentful of racial minorities.

Taken together, all of these trends — both localized and national — have subjected white Americans to a demographic, cultural, and ideological onslaught. And it has not gone unnoticed. Proof can be found in the many studies confirming that the two major political parties are now in the midst of a major realignment, with the primary dividing line centered squarely on race and racial views.

Under such circumstances politics becomes polarized and tribal: us versus them. “Scholars consistently find that incivility spreads rapidly, generates anger and defensive reactions, demobilizes moderates and activates the strongest partisans, corrodes faith in government, trust in institutions and respect for our fellow citizens,” wrote one academic observer in The Guardian.

“The more sorted we become, the more emotionally we react to normal political events,” wrote the University of Maryland’s Lilliana Mason. “The angrier the electorate, the less capable we are of finding common ground on policies, or even of treating our opponents like human beings.” Such language is not hyperbole. Research has shown that such extreme polarization is common before the outbreak of civil war.

With a new Democrat administration preparing to occupy the White House, the nation’s social fabric may be stretched to its limit. Joe Biden has proposed an immigration plan that could bring an estimated 52 million foreigners to the United States. A possible bipartisan amnesty deal is in the works. Forced integration efforts in some form will almost certainly be part of the mix. Mr. Biden is also expected to reinstate Critical Race Theory trainings in the government and crack down on “hate speech“ and “white supremacists.” For many whites, these policies will bring new meaning and clarity to the word “threat.”

White advocacy

Awakening is a process — and that process is well underway. It is not easy to determine how much of this is because of websites such as American Renaissance, but in their first-person accounts many readers said their initial awakening led them to seek out new information, which eventually led them here:

As is often the case, I started digging for the truth online, figuring that I couldn’t possibly be the only one that felt so frustrated, angry, and confused about the anti-white trends I was seeing everywhere. It wasn’t long before I found Red Ice TV, and then American Renaissance, Way of the World, Going Postal, Red Elephants, No White Guilt, The Iconoclast, Laura Towler, and others. At last, I had found the truth — and from there, there’s no turning back.

More people are coming every day. Despite censorship and deplatforming, traffic to the American Renaissance website has been steadily growing. Few will come without some external event or crisis first driving them to it. But once they do, they find they are not alone.

Such awakenings are an important first step, but they are not enough. We must turn this awareness into action. “There is a word for formulating ideas and creating institutions necessary for the pursuit of political power,” writes Greg Johnson at Counter-Currents. “We call it ‘metapolitics.’”

Chris Roberts, director of special projects at American Renaissance, has similar thoughts.

Activists should think about the successes of interest groups. Organizations focused on one thing and that lobby for what they want, give legal help to constituents, and raise money for politicians who support them (or sometimes against politicians that oppose them) have much more influence than any third party or single Senator. The best examples are the National Rifle Association, the Home School Legal Defense Association, and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. NumbersUSA is a single-issue group that focuses on immigration, and its efforts are credited — more than anything else — with derailing President George W. Bush’s pushes for amnesty. A similar group that concentrated on “affirmative action” (or any number of other issues) could prove just as powerful.

All of these efforts are just preparation — laying the groundwork for what’s to come. It is impossible to know what that future will look like, but one thing seems clear:

The White Awakening is here.

 
Hide 388 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Franz says:

    I’ll believe the “white awakening” is here when we can create a Euro-American version of the ADL and using it effectivly against anti-white hate speech.

    But small steps in that direction are appreciated, absolutely.

  2. conatus says:

    The problem is making a living. In 1820 ninety percent of Americans were farmers, yeoman farmers on their hundred acres, thinking independently and not wanting to see the smoke from their neighbor’s chimney.They could say what they wanted without regard to recriminations, firings and dead end careers.
    Now eighty percent of Americans work in bureaucracies with Human Resources Departments manned by angry Diversicrats . Watchout what you say or what you think and what you post online. Internalize that Crimethink Censor if you want your family to eat. Otherwise the Commissars of Diversity will escort you out of the bureaucracy to a state of permanent unemployment. Or worse, soon it will be more severe than mere unemployment…”By the NKVD’s own count, 681,692 people were shot during 1937–38 alone” the Great Terror

  3. I’ve lived all over this country and can attest that 99 percent of my personal experiences with petty crime was with blacks. Treatment from recent immigrants isn’t much better though, as they are receiving the same racist indoctrination. The time for Whites to prepare is NOW, if not sooner because events are ramping up toward an inevitable crisis. Survival preppers have provided voluminous amounts of information on the subject so there’s no need for me to repeat it here. There is one demographic that needs to be studied very carefully though, and that is anyone who is claiming dual citizenship.

    • Agree: Lurker
    • Replies: @Anon
  4. To my contrarian mind, Biden/Harris may help the Euro American cause more than did Trump’s Administration. Trump’s contrived rhetoric gave us false hope, but he never came through when push came to shove. The incoming racist Biden/Harris Admin. gives us no hope for the future.

    White flight can only go so far until we run out of room. Very soon Euro Americans will be faced with a stark choice. No matter how many votes were stolen, no matter the evidence of mass election fraud, no one with any ability to change the outcome is listening. With neither monopoly party siding with us, changing things for the better at the ballot box in a fair election is impossible.

    Given the scale of last summer’s violence by BLM/Antifa, those in power are scared to death that those anarchists will be coming for them next. Thus they appeased them, as they always do. And Trump did nothing to stop it when he could have and should have overridden the power-mad blue state governors by calling in the military to restore order. Thus, they believe they have nothing to fear from Trump’s MAGA fanatics. Until they are as afraid of Euro American men as they are of African American men nothing will change for the better.

  5. I don’t think one has to live in a white majority community to ‘wake up,’ since I live in Hispanic majority far west Texas…the rural part, not El Paso (where I did wake up to Hispanic racism of sorts being a teacher at a “Drive-by High” (all black and white students were of parents living around Fort Bliss). My awakening came upon exiting a store while a black man entered, when he nearly hit me with the door coming in and called me “racist” for questioning why he did that. That did it…my “bending over backwards for blacks” ended at that moment. This was in a town, black majority, but not exactly Baltimore if you know what I mean, on Long Island. Mostly blacks on welfare. There was also a middle-class black community near a lake in the middle of Nassau County; I had a good college friend from this area, and her house was even nicer than mine, smart black lady a bit older than me with two girls. Her black friends were okay as well, and one of them was glad I wasn’t Jewish! Bwahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahha! But yes, white flight is a good thing. And now with remote online working, white can even live in rural mostly white areas just because…even if the internet is a little too slow at times.

    • Replies: @Anon
  6. Writers for Amren (such as Paul Kersey) routinely demonstrate essences of fealty and allegiance to cops through their articles, cops that they don’t know nor have ever met, much like a devout catholic exhibiting reverence to a priest. This is a criticalmistake conservatives make; belief that the sacred and sanctified cop is a friend to the Everyman. Another continually fatal mistake is the blind eye conservatives turn to the enormous damage cops cause all communities in varying degrees through corruption, cronyism and abuse of power. A first great start to rectifying the problem; All cop unions should be obliterated, countrywide. All prior soldiers would be dis-allowed from carrying a badge. All cops who have taken Israeli repression training would be let go.

    The persons seeking the law enforcement (emphasis; force) life choose their line of work for a reason. Don’t confuse law with morals or ethics. There are over 2 million laws on the books in the USA, ever growing. A cop will follow and enforce every single one of them if it means he feeds his family and yours must go hungry, no matter how un-imaginable the law. A cop is an officer of the court, sworn to uphold the publics’interest, not yours. During arrest, anything you say or do can and will be used against you, not to help you. Sound friendly? The average american is guilty, unknowingly, of 3 felonies a day thanks to these heavily proliferated laws on the books. That cop doesn’t care if you are a nice guy or if you hadn’t known you were breaking anything at all. He has a salary, pension and a performance review to tend to. That takes precedent. You go to jail, or are charged. He’ll drag you into the psychopathic legal system whose objective is to find you guilty no matter if innocent. No skin off his nose. His union will make sure of that.

    Anti-fa is filth, as are their BLM cohorts. Marxism has no place existing anywhere. Ever wonder what life would be like now if someone could have traveled back in time to the origins of the “Institut für Sozialforschung” and nipped matters in the bud. Nevertheless, Americans everywhere should make all efforts to completely wipe all forms of active communism in their land, without conscience. But Anti-fa does have a considerable point, even if contrived or misplaced; their beef with cops. The way cops are currently allowed to freely operate (and I say “operate” as they do with impunity in the coercive and reckless sense) in society must change.

  7. anarchyst says:
    @USA Invades Israel

    There are three things that could be done to reign in questionable behavior by police and other public officials.
    1. Eliminate “qualified immunity” for ALL public officials. If public officials (yes, this includes police officers and their administrators, firefighters, prosecutors, court officials and all other “public servants”). If they knew that they could be sued personally (and possibly lose everything they own), they would tend to behave themselves.
    2. Require all public officials (yes, this includes police) to purchase a “bond” from an insurance company. You can bet that insurance companies would be more diligent in getting rid of the “bad apples” than our present system of municipal payouts. The municipality would pay the basic cost of the “bond” with any surcharges to be paid by the individual “public servant. Inability to obtain a “bond would preclude the individual from working as a “public servant”. No bond=no job…
    3. Establish and enforce an “video audit trail” whenever there is interaction by any public official with the public. In the case of police and firefighters, no “video audit trail” would mean the inadmissibility of “evidence” as well as censure and possible dismissal of public officials’ failure to assure that this “video audit trail” is present. A “video audit trail” would do much to eliminate the possibility of frivolous lawsuits by the public against public officials as well as assure that public officials “behave themselves”. This is especially true in police interrogation rooms where police-coerced “false confessions” occur with alarming frequency.
    These three changes would put the public on an equal footing with our “leaders” (who are actually supposed to be subordinate to us citizens).
    There have been many cases where people who have been legally recording police (mis)behavior have been harassed by police, their equipment damaged or destroyed, and charges brought against them. Severe punishment should be meted out to those public officials who interfere with lawful recording by citizens.

  8. Norteno says: • Website

    I think that a lot of people have great need for history lessons relative to race and ethnicity.The true Hispanics arrived in North America before there was an America. They arrived from mostly Spain but also the Spanish were accompanied by Greeks , Italians and other people from other parts of Europe. They comported themselves as Europeans and assimilated into American culture readily. This is very obvious in the southwest where the majority of “ Native” Hispanics still reside. There is a great deal of intermarriage between “Anglo American “ and “Hispanic Americans” to where a lot of families have relatives that are “ mixed”. Being Caucasian you can’t tell who’s what by appearance, it’s mostly how they identify themselves. The “Hispanics “ that are mentioned in the previous blogs are the recently arrived type that not only have no concept of Americanism but have no clue about the constitution or liberty. They are not assimilated and have no interest in doing so. Most coming illegally today are just Spanish speaking Indians with no link to Europe or America. They come for the freebies then bite-the hand that feeds them.

  9. Anonymous[157] • Disclaimer says:

    Great ideas. Nothings gonna change but thanks for the warnings.

    • Agree: Niebelheim
    • Replies: @Nisbe
  10. I attended a majority negro high school in Hampton, Virginia. It was a living hell. Basically a prison environment for 7 hours a day.

    Anyone who buys into the theory that negroes in general are fit for a civilized society is a fool. (Yes there are exceptions, but my guess is 5% maximum.)

  11. Nisbe says:
    @Anonymous

    “Nothing is going to change.”

    I doubt that. If the current trend of state approved and sponsored anti-White racism and ethnic displacement of Whites (which falls under the definition of genocide) is not terminated, eventually there will be a conflict fought along racial lines in the West, and it will either end with Whites extinct, most minorities extint (on Western territories), or the balkanization of Western territories along racial lines.

    No idea how it will end, but if the MSM, academia, NGOs, lobbyists, and other anti-White agitators aren’t stopped, war is unavoidable. In fact, war is already occurring, it’s just that Whites aren’t allowed to fight back due to all the anti-White traitors and infiltrators in Western governments and institutions.

    Related documentary “White Genocide is Real… In Their Own Words”:

    https://archive.org/details/whitegenocideisreal…intheirownwords-fulldocumentary

  12. Dr. Doom says:

    You have to be proactive and smart.

    Sabotage, subvert and smile.

    Undermine the system that is Anti-White.

    Do not assist or subsidize. Do not give to “charities” that support your enemies.

    Leave the fake churches of “universalism”. Undermine them too.

    Stick to your own kind and do not help otherkins.

    Otherkins can be helped to leave by sabotage and subversion.

    Do not trust the badges. They are an Anti-White gang.

    Do not assist. Resist. Sabotage, subvert and smile.

    • Agree: Angharad, ruralguy
    • Thanks: RadicalCenter
    • Troll: Corvinus
  13. @Norteno

    The term “Hispanic” can be confusing because any race can really be a Hispanic if their culture originated in Spain.

    You have Mexican Indians who are totally un-mixed with Whites who are considered “Hispanic” because they are Catholic, Spanish speakers. Then you have pure -blooded Spaniards who can be as White as anyone and they are also called “Hispanic”. Then you have everything in between.

    A more accurate classification for recent Mexican immigrants would be “Mestizo”, “Mixed-Race”, Spanish mixed with the local Indian.

    Hispanics in the U.S. Southwest used to be called
    “Spanish”, not “Mexican”. That goes back to the times when your class was determined by the amount of unmixed Spanish blood you could claim. During colonial times the upper class were all Spanish born. If you were born in the colonies and not Spain, then that was called a “Creole”.

    The Hispanic culture has a whole diffrenent race consciousness and history that most “White” Americans are totally clueless about.

    • Replies: @anon
    , @Dave Bowman
  14. There are good and bad sides to being European, African or Asian. Therefore it is not always okay to be white . The Holocaust alone should teach us to be humble.

  15. Polistra says:
    @Franz

    After a while, it became clear to me that all of my smug, lecturing SJW-type white friends were careful to live far, far away from black people. A couple took university jobs in ‘vibrant’ cities and both left their jobs–and those cities–within two years. Each then moved clear across the country–that’s how severe the shock was.

    But every single one emerged with his/her media-supplied prejudices intact. Cognitive dissonance! I learned that even direct experience is ignored by ‘goodwhites’ who assume that those experiences must surely be unusual. And how could it be otherwise, since they’re prohibited from talking about them, and the mass media is always at work, telling them never to believe their lying eyes.

    “Under such circumstances politics becomes polarized and tribal: us versus them.”

    The Ruling Class in the USA today couldn’t be happier: all the rest of the population, split into small tribes, constantly at one another’s throats. Dīvide et Imperā. You can pretty much forget “The White Awakening.” The Ruling Class will happily permit the USA to be completely destroyed before they’ll allow white people ever to enjoy basic rights again. So, that destruction is what it may take. And even then, there’s no guarantee regarding what may follow.

    • Replies: @WJ
    , @Nancy
    , @FLgeezer
  16. Oracle says:

    It actually isn’t that ok to be white.

  17. GMC says:

    One N Y Jewish lobbied Plan resulted in most of this Social Destruction – – 1965 Open, Unlimited Immigration Laws – Period.

    • Agree: the grand wazoo
    • Replies: @Nisbe
    , @Sin City Milla
  18. @Norteno

    They come for the freebies then bite-the hand that feeds them.

    You sure you are talking about those dominating wetbacks and not your kike loving JewSA and both entries into the World War at the orders of the kikes? Did those wetbacks set up your policies pre 1945 too?
    And then talking about it is ok to be some rootless huwhite mutt with no heritage more concrete than the Caucasus, which is also the land of tracksuit muslims.

    Muttmerica itself is a joke concept.

  19. I’m not optimistic. Negrophilia has become the essence of the American national creed. What’s more, it’s getting worse all the time. This country and everyone in it are now supposed to exist for the benefit of blacks. Every issue must now be framed in terms of how it helps or hurts blacks—for instance, tens of trillions of dollars have been transferred from Whites to black through the welfare state, but “conservatives” are concerned about how welfare dependency saps black potential, not about the fact Whites have been impoverished for the sake of blacks. “Affirmative action” has become ubiquitous and is applied to everything, from school admission to every form of employment to COVID vaccination to national park attendance, and yet we are told we must atone for our privilege.

    Despite all that, I don’t believe the situation is hopeless for the Whites of North America. However, a White revival seems extremely unlikely to happen in the context of the continued existence of the US. We need a new country, one not founded on the pernicious idea of “equality”. No two men are created equal, let alone all men of all races. A country based on such a contemptible lie does not deserve to exist, but while it does exist it is inevitable that it will produce an infinite parade of grotesqueries: sodomite marriage, transgenderism, BLM, AFFH, etc. It will not end until this monstrous leviathan dies.

    • Agree: RoatanBill, TKK
  20. Davidoff says:

    So basically this racist and racialist article complains of the racism of blacks, asians, latinos, etc against the poor whites
    Just remember that you fairytale country was built upon the blood of the true natives and TRUE AMERICANS, the massacred truly native indian Americans who were racistly annihilated in their own land by immigrants from another continent. These same immigrants when finished the killing and exploitation of that massive foreign land, decided it was not enough. They brought “inferior” “subhumans” slaves from yet another continent to build a country that has been racistly bullying, looting and making unjustified wars to other countries ever since because they think they have the god given racist right and are deluded into thinking they are, as your black (or should I say mulato?) peace nobled prized but very warmongering ex-president said “the indispensable nation ” meaning all other nations are racistly dispensable… The list of atrocities commited around the world by this “indispensable” MONSTER is endless. Imagine what the rest of the planet think of you lot.

    What comes around goes around.

  21. @anarchyst

    I wish it could be so simple. Who would you have
    dispensing “YOUR” fix? Would we need more cameras,more
    snitches,lawyers/judges,undercover thought police,
    insurance agents and prisons? More churches,charities,
    marketers and capitalists setting the bar according to old
    Hebrew texts might not be such a “good”thing.

    But, maybe you’re right?
    I”m glad there’s only those 3 things though…

    • Agree: Curmudgeon
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  22. Scotist says:

    I’m not sure what to think of any of this personally. Here in Slovenia, it’s still possible to take a 15-minute walk throughout any town and not see a single non-white person.

    • Replies: @Fred777
    , @Irish Savant
  23. Moi says:
    @Franz

    Don’t make we laugh. Whitey is too stupid to realize he’ll soon become a minority in the country he built.

    ADL? Yup, follow the Jew organization. LOL.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Franz
  24. Mike Tre says:

    “This is especially true among people whose jobs bring them face to face with non-whites every day: Police officers, teachers, and social workers.”

    These are government employees. (My wife is a social worker.) The people you forget are tradesmen who deal specifically with urban infrastructure: lineman, pavers, finishers, teamsters, etc., who must drive into cities from their suburban homes everyday and deal with the locals while they try to do their job. I live outside Chicago but find myself in the city more often than I’d like to be performing my job. The west side may as well be Lagos.

    One of a few glaring differences are that the quoted examples enjoy government benefits and protections that far exceed the tradesmen I mentioned.

    • Agree: HammerJack
    • Replies: @Trickster
    , @RadicalCenter
  25. @USA Invades Israel

    That’s correct. The police are agents of state power, not members of the working class, and do not require union representation, or the outrageous benefits we taxpayers are forced to fund, or the immunity from prosecution for crimes against persons.

    Incidentally, Marxism has only one tenet: that for there to be a fair distribution of wealth, working people must own the places where they earn their wages. This was how society functioned before the industrial revolution, when farmers and artisans and tradesmen owned the land and the tools and the shops that created their livelihood.

    Those who make their unearned income by skimming off the lion’s share of what our labor and purchasing power create need to convince us that society cannot function without their parasitic presence. Our unhappy country is just about to begin its feudal period, thanks to their insatiable greed, which will awaken our descendants to the reality of finally resolving the “class struggle.”

    • Thanks: Nancy
    • Replies: @Rooster10
  26. J West says:
    @Dr. Doom

    Yours is the comment with the most important and pertinent information. White people live in a fantasy world where they think that kissing black butt will bring peace and harmony.

    We all need to stop being nice to and/or helping black people. Also newly arrived Hispanics. Hispanics seem to want to integrate into white society and many have. But large numbers remain feral and dangerous.

    I do agree that no matter what, we should stick to our own. Support our own, help our own.

    Let all others help themselves.

    • Agree: anarchyst
    • Replies: @Druid
  27. Rooster10 says:
    @follyofwar

    I believe Trump did the right thing. Look at how many eyes have been opened by seeing the truth of what our country has become. Yes buildings were destroyed, yes people were killed, but ultimately this is the best glimpse into reality that many people will ever have of their “neighbors” and “fellow Americans” who we’re “all in this together” with… that’s a scary thought!

    At the end of the day people need to realize that no politician, police officer, or soldier is coming to save you; you’re on your own. If Trump had stepped in and ended it quickly, not only would the media have used that to further crucify him, but many “normies” eyes would have never been opened. America is becoming Balkanized as we speak, it’s better that as many White people wake up to this fact now rather than later. Don’t perish clinging to the corpse of old America, adapt, prepare, and ready yourself for the fight ahead.

    • Agree: Wally
    • Replies: @AKINDLE
  28. @Oracle

    What a profound insight!

    And the long explanation as to how you arrived at that conclusion is also much appreciated.

    • Replies: @Oracle
  29. Nisbe says:
    @Charles Martel France

    “The holocaust”

    According to the investigations of our kind host Mr. Unz (who is a racial Jew), the official version of the holocaust bears very little credibility, as you can verify for yourself here:

    https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-holocaust-denial/

    In case you wish to read more on this subject, I suggest these articles related to 2 people who faced legal charges of holocaust denial an won in the court of law of their respective Countries:

    https://archive.vn/xsJPG – “INTERVIEW WITH A GREEK HOLOCAUST DENIER”

    https://russia-insider.com/en/history/holohoax-denial-not-illegal-russia-contrary-many-news-reports/ri27711

    Also related:

    News in 2016:
    https://time.com/4392413/elie-wiesel-holocaust-survivors-remaining/

    https://archive.vn/kLGrm
    “There Are Just 100,000 Holocaust Survivors Alive Today”

    News in 2020:
    https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/There-are-192000-Holocaust-survivors-living-in-Israel-614407

    https://archive.vn/9f7of
    “There are 192,000 Holocaust survivors living in Israel”

    • Thanks: Badger Down
    • Troll: Corvinus
  30. Nisbe says:
    @Oracle

    Move to Africa, Asia or the Middle East then if you think so.

  31. anarchyst says:
    @goldgettin

    1. Eliminating “immunity” for public officials should not be too hard to accomplish. This “doctrine” of “immunity has only been in place since 1982 as a result of flawed supreme court rulings. In lieu of abolishing “immunity”, police departments could be privatized, in which official “immunity” does not apply.
    2. Private “bonding” is a part of many occupations and professions. For example, medical doctors already carry malpractice insurance to help shield them from lawsuits. the same could be applied to police and other public officials.
    3. Dash and body cams are a no-brainer. In order to assure proper conduct with the public, cameras worn by public officials would be required. The output from these cameras would be uploaded to the “cloud” where anyone would be able to access them. Public officials do not deserve privacy when dealing with their “employers”–the public.

  32. Miro23 says:

    Research has shown that such extreme polarization is common before the outbreak of civil war.

    No surprise there. Eventually things go over the edge:

    Forced integration efforts in some form will almost certainly be part of the mix. Mr. Biden is also expected to reinstate Critical Race Theory trainings in the government and crack down on “hate speech“ and “white supremacists.” For many whites, these policies will bring new meaning and clarity to the word “threat.”

    IMO the key phrase is “It’s OK to be White”.

    If someone (of any race) is comfortable with this – then they’re a normal person. If they aren’t – then they’re dangerous members of the Woke cult. And it’s not just Whites – it’s also OK to be Black/Chinese/Asian/Arab/Jewish/Latino and everything else, each with their own homeland, or as respectful guests in someone else’s.

    • Replies: @HMichaelH
  33. Fred777 says:
    @Scotist

    “I’m not sure what to think of any of this personally.”

    Think of it as a warning.

    • Agree: Badger Down
  34. Nisbe says:
    @Davidoff

    “They brought “inferior” “subhumans” slaves from yet another continent to build a country”

    In case you don’t know, it was Jews who kick started and dominated the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, and that has been proven and verified using Jewish literature.

    Dr. Tony Martin (a Black man) did a lot of scholarly work on that subject and was relentlessly attacked and harassed by Jewish collective power for “daring” to speak and prove the facts regarding the relationship between Jews and slavery.

    Learn more here:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20201225071400/http://www.africaspeaks.com/reasoning/index.php?topic=7914.0

    • Agree: Katrinka, Druid, Pat Kittle
    • Replies: @Davidoff
    , @Corvinus
  35. Trickster says:
    @Davidoff

    The world is one of conquest. The piece of land you are standing on right now probably “belonged” to many races going back to the dinosaurs. Who exactly ARE the original owners ?

    There are no TRUE Americans. Each tribe on the North and South American continent raided robbed murdered and took slaves. Tribes were pushed out of areas they long inhabited and in some cases made extinct. The Plains indians for example, and I am going to use your words, acquired their territory with the blood of other natives. The Comanches were particularly feared and did not play King of the Hill for fun !.

    The white man did what all the others have done on this continent and everywhere else on the planet. He took by force !. This is human nature pure and simple. Always was and forever will be.

    The strong steamroll the weak !

  36. @Ray Caruso

    Negrophilia is a strange thing. The whites who buy into it are doing so due extreme prejudice against the white working class. Most woke believers hail from pre GI Bill working class backgrounds themselves. Also almost all are female. It seems like these gals want to erase their mining, farming, factory working great-grandpas even more then the current generation of blue collar whites. Bowing to the black because of their “privilege” somehow in their warp little minds makes them Rhett and Scarlett Butler’s descendants. It really is a mental disease, and no awakening with them is possible. Feminism has been the key to all things progressive. To make any white movement, you just have to let the liberal women behind. I genuinely wonder if white men even could do that.

  37. @anarchyst

    Agree. However, be careful what you wish for. Most of the Sheeple view the “Thin Blue Line” as the last bastion of public safety against the: “Forces of Darkness.” In Fullerton, CA some years ago, the cops beat to death a mentally-ill homeless man who was unarmed and causing a disturbance, as most nuts tend to do. Based on body-cam evidence and even the statement of one of the badged Orcs: “…we’re going to fuck you up.” They were found NG in spite of the damning evidence against them. It was a prima facie case of Second Degree Murder under the California Penal Code. Incredible!
    John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute has documented many such cases such as this over the last few years. The truth is out there, but the Lee Greenwood listeners, flag-wavers, Romans 13 robots, and the idiots who watch hours of mendacious TV shows which glorify the likes of CSI, NCIS, the Famous But Incompetent, Chicago PD, and Dick Wolfe’s many leftist-propaganda police shows; still believe in the Amerikan fairy tale. Go on (((Facebook))) and see all of the “Blue Lives Matter” propaganda and flags.
    There was a time when we had Peace Officers in this country. Read Richard Mabury’s book: WHATEVER HAPPENED TO JUSTICE? He gives a most succinct definition of one. Like other institutions in this corrupt, syphilitic country, real Peace Officers are going the way of the Dodo. There will be no real Balkanization for white liberty-lovers. Our own race-traitors will lead the way in destroying us. The “American Education System”-public and private, has been doing it for years. Bleib ubrig.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @turtle
  38. WJ says:
    @Polistra

    I work with one of those older liberal types. Lives in an all white neighborhood. He has sent his precious children to private schools and now his granddaughter is going to a private school in our town. This private school is having in person classes while the public schools are still doing distance learning.

    As with that type of person elsewhere, he is terrified of Covid. We get along well but dont discuss politics. He got emotional a few months ago when I pointed out the absurdity of the Bubba Wallace hate hoax.

  39. Davidoff says:
    @Nisbe

    Thank you for your comment.

    Truth is most of the “Founding Fathers” owned vast plantations enslaving people. Others were “land speculators” i.e. : directly or indirectly massacring native indian americans and stealing their lands. Many others speculated in securities on a large scale… trade slave being involved one way or another… What a lovely bunch of people….

    Learn more about the hidden links between slavery and wall street here:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-49476247

    Early history of Wall street here, ” December 13, 1711, that the New York City Common Council made Wall Street the city’s first official slave market for the sale and rental of enslaved Africans and Indians.” :

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wall_Street#Early_years

    Finances of the “glorious fathers” of the “indispensable nation “:Wikipedia:

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States#Finances

    I let you work out the rest… Follow the money!

    • Replies: @Nisbe
    , @geokat62
    , @Eric Novak
  40. “The White Awakening is here.”

    Yeah, if you live in the la-la land.

    • Agree: Jimmy le Blanc
    • Replies: @Jimmy le Blanc
  41. Trickster says:
    @Mike Tre

    Correct. Any white contractor who undertakes work for a coloured man runs into a torrent of problems with contractual violations, payment and continual complaints. Frequently, family and friends who have nothing to do with the work or payment show up to offer their opinions, change orders and critiques. Often the Police have to be called as discussions abandon civility and violence looms.

    Upper class blacks who want to give the brothers a chance also encounter the same hassles added to shoddy work and no shows for days on end.

    Solution: If you are white hang white. Give your business to a white man even if you have to pay a little more. It will be less costly in the end than dealing with a black man.

    • Agree: anarchyst, Druid
    • Replies: @martin_2
    , @Alfa158
  42. Wally says:
    @Moi

    And the average IQ of blacks is?

    Naive is the word you’re looking for.

  43. anon[127] • Disclaimer says:
    @notoneofthem

    the term ”mestizo” is stupid and maybe 10-20% of mexicans actually fall into that category. 65-70% of them are either indians or the term cholos. stop trying to ”whiten” them. pure blooded spaniard also makes no sense, since the ones who came to the americas are partially or mostly berber, arab, or sephardic jewish. do you think the people who spain sent to colonize the americas were visigoths?

  44. Trinity says:

    Jared Taylor can’t even utter the J-word. People like Jared Taylor talking about finding the truth is LAUGHABLE. All our current race problems start becoming solved by calling out the Jew.

  45. Wally says:
    @Oracle

    So then, here’s your / their big chance:

    Ghana has a message for African Americans: Come home / video”
    https://edition.cnn.com/videos/world/2020/06/17/ghana-beyond-the-return-african-americans-george-floyd-busari-pkg-intl-ldn-vpx.cnn

    Ghana Invites African Americans to ‘Come Home’ in Wake of U.S. Protests: https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2020/06/09/ghana-invites-african-americans-home/

    • Agree: TKK
  46. anon[127] • Disclaimer says:
    @Trickster

    great logic, so I guess considering how many europeans slaughtered each other in ww1 and ww2, everyone on earth has a right to conquer europe ”because europeans killed and raped each other”

    • Replies: @Trickster
  47. Anonymous[237] • Disclaimer says: • Website

    Support pro white content creators on every platform https://youtu.be/epv_KUmFUBs

  48. Trickster says:
    @Ray Caruso

    You see, as a person with a little experience in business, funding blacks is not cost effective. The population of the US is what ? around 320M and blacks are 13% or so ? That makes the black population about 4M approximately, men, women and children.

    How about giving each black $1M and sending them back to Africa. That means a family 6 for example would get $6M. A one time payment !. They can use some of these funds to buy citizenship in Dongo Bongo land. US citizenship is revoked and they are banned from re-entering the US.

    Their dream of returning to their roots will be realized, and with a generous bank account, they will never need to work which is no different to their idleness now so we wont be violating their human rights. And our dream will be realized, we will be rid of them for good !

    This would be a lot cheaper than the endless gazillions we throw at them now (and in the future) none of which does any good.

    In that sense I am all for reparations. Pay them for “past wrongs” and boot them out.

  49. Ragno says:

    Fifty years ago, such accounts would trouble leftists who would try to defuse or explain away the worst details.

    Twenty years ago, Phase 2 began, in which accounts such as these would simply be suppressed and/or completely ignored.

    Now, however, as we march inexorably towards Endgame, there is a paradoxical two-pronged response to these sorts of testimonies – they’re immediately dismissed as white suprema-ciss lies while, simultaneously, the orcs openly glory in the truth of every word as they celebrate the degradation of whites. (If all else fails, you can rely upon some newspaper editorialist citing the use of pseudonyms as automatic claim-debunkers.)

    In a way, it’s a shame that the summer’s Mau-Mau marches through white suburbia tailed off as sharply as they did…..nothing awakens the racial consciousness of affluent whites quite like the reality of rage-besotted orcs tramping on their lawns and approaching their unguarded bay windows, close enough to smell the malt liquor and Hennessy perspiring through their pores.

    • Agree: Jimmy le Blanc
  50. @Marshall Lentini

    Pembroke High School. It was the negro school before integration (with a different name). It no longer exists.

  51. gotmituns says:
    @Mis(ter)anthrope

    Sir, I agree with what you said but I’ll add this. They don’t belong in a “civilized” environment. It’s not their fault they are what they are. The Lord made them that way. It is the Jews who defy the Lord’s creation by using blacks as their pawns to destroy all civilizations/cultures.

    • Agree: Tony Hall
  52. Trinity says:
    @anon

    Place the average Mexican next to a REAL American Indian and you can see a big difference. I remember this Mexican told me he was somewhere looking to catch a bus and he stopped an Indian girl and he started talking Spanish to her to ask about when the next bus would arrive, etc. I guess he thought the Indian was Mexican. haha. He said she started cussing his ass out.

  53. Corvinus says:
    @Nisbe

    “In case you don’t know, it was Jews who kick started and dominated the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, and that has been proven and verified using Jewish literature.”

    I see you have been bamboozled and hoodwinked.

    “Martin, in one of his endorsements, made a startling assertion concerning slave ownership by Jews: “Using the research of Jewish historians, the book suggests that based on the 1830 census, Jews actually had a higher per capita slave ownership than for the white population as a whole.”

    The Secret Relationship does in fact approach making that suggestion, and since the claim would appear to be a pivotal one, it is worth examining.

    In order to assess such a claim, one must resort to details. Martin’s purported actuality is wrong on its face if applied to the “white population” of the United States “as a whole,” because in 1830 only a handful of white northerners still owned slaves. Jews were concentrated in the North, and they constituted a very small minority there. Even if the statement is taken as applying only to the states in the American South that had not adopted gradual emancipation laws, it remains badly flawed. A careful and honest footnote in The Secret Relationship reveals that “Jewish scholars” had concluded that Jews in the South lived mostly in towns and cities. Neither this book nor Martin’s explains the significance of this fact.

    In actuality, slave ownership was much more common in southern urban areas than in the southern countryside. The relatively high proportion of Jewish slaveholding was a function of the concentration of Jews in cities and towns, not of their descent or religion. It is also the case that urban slaveholders of whatever background owned fewer slaves on average than rural slaveholders, including those on large plantations. Thus the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis. In this instance, as in so many others, the statistical data do not stand up and cry out their own true significance.

    Historian Winthrop D. Jordan

    In order to assess such a claim, one must resort to details. Martin’s purported actuality [the 75% statistic] is wrong on its face if applied to the “white population” of the United States “as a whole,” because in 1830 only a handful of white northerners still owned slaves. Jews were concentrated in the North, and they constituted a very small minority there. Even if the statement is taken as applying only to the states in the American South that had not adopted gradual emancipation laws, it remains badly flawed. A careful and honest footnote in The Secret Relationship reveals that “Jewish scholars” had concluded that Jews in the South lived mostly in towns and cities. Neither this book nor Martin’s explains the significance of this fact. In actuality, slave ownership was much more common in southern urban areas than in the southern countryside. The relatively high proportion of Jewish slaveholding was a function of the concentration of Jews in cities and towns, not of their descent or religion. It is also the case that urban slaveholders of whatever background owned fewer slaves on average than rural slaveholders, including those on large plantations. Thus the proportion of slaveholders has never been an accurate measure of the social or economic importance of slaveholding, unless it is assessed on a broadly regional or state-by-state basis. In this instance, as in so many others, the statistical data do not stand up and cry out their own true significance.

    Moreover, Professor Martin made this accusation –> Rhode Island Jewish merchants controlled between 60 and 90 percent of the American trade in African slaves.

    Indeed, from 1709-1807, there are 934 recorded voyages in which Rhode Island merchants were responsible for procuring 106,000 slaves. Now, Jews arrived in Newport as early as 1658. On the eve of the Revolution, they were estimated to be around thirty families. According to historical records used (e.g. naval office shipping lists, censuses, tax records) that identified merchants and planters as Jewish, there were 347 slave ships sent to Africa by Rhode Island slave traders from 1761-1774, with 21 being funded by Aaron Lopez, a Portuguese Jew. That means 326 voyages were underwritten by non-Jews during this time frame. Of course, Jews played a role in the peddling of human flesh. The extent in this particular case is nominal compared to other ethnic groups.

    Now, according to Bertram W. Korn’s research (Jews and Negro Slavery in the Old South, 1789-1865)

    census records and slave purchasing documents show that southern Jews “who owned slaves were concentrated in cities, not in the plantation districts containing ninety percent of the enslaved population. For example, there were only four Jews – less than one-tenth of one percent – among the 11,000 Southerners who in 1830 owned fifty or more slaves.”

    According to David Brion Davis, Professor of History Emeritus at Yale University

    To keep matters in perspective, we should note that in the American South, in 1830, there were only 120 Jews among the 45,000 slaveholders owning twenty or more slaves and only twenty Jews among the 12,000 slaveholders owning fifty or more slaves. Even if each member of this Jewish slaveholding elite had owned 714 slaves—a ridiculously high figure in the American South—the total number would only equal the 100,000 slaves owned by black and colored planters in St. Domingue in 1789, on the eve of the Haitian Revolution…Of course, some Jews were involved in the slave trade. Every European Western nation was. There were also some regions in which the slave trade was more accessible to Jews—Rhode Island, Newport, Holland, to name a few striking examples. The Dutch Jews weren’t persecuted, so there were quite a few who were involved.

  54. Davidoff says:
    @Trickster

    True to a certain extent. But the US are the only ones to continue to enslave other nations into submission on such an evil and unprecedented large scale by war, blackmail and all sorts of forms of aggression.

    Thanfully the uncle Shamuel empire begins to be a thing of the past… the US kleptokrats will have to answer to theis masters i.e. Big Big Money and all things considered Big Big Money aka Deep State has no real Homeland. they want to rule the whole world.

    Slavery is taking a new digital form that plans to enslave us all no matter the colour or the nation. Have a glimpse of the future reading the abstract of the sinister and truly satanic 2020 patent number 060606 ( yes, you read it right, that’s the number!) from Microsoft/ friend of the humanity Billy ninth gate of Hell :
    “Abstract
    (EN)
    Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server. A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system, and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.”

    https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO2020060606

    To have access to money (crytocurency, the money of the future..) they plan to enslave humanity to obey and perform like monkeys in order to subsist…

    It’s time to wake up and react!

  55. Trickster says:
    @anon

    What logic ? Tell me how often in the lives of individuals is logic USED ?

    Emotion rules the world my friend. Believe me, if you wear a Stetson, ride a white horse and smoke you will look like the Pall Mall man. If you are black, wear one glove and have a curl hanging down your forehead you will be Michael Jackson. If you throw out yesterdays clothes and wear stovepipe pants, no socks and sneakers you will be super cool especially if your hairstyle is “A la Samurai”

    The Mandarins of Madison avenue KNOW this and exploit it.

    Tell me where is the logic ? There is none and I dont pretend there is. Read your history books man for heavens sake. Since prehistoric man debouched from his cave and realized he could bludgeon his neighbour for his riches and bitches that has been the state of mankind.

    Like it or lump it, that is the way we ARE !

    • Agree: noname27
  56. @Trickster

    For gods sake! Arithmetic is definitely not part of your education. You have no idea where you should place the decimal point.

    • Replies: @Trickster
  57. @conatus

    “Anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the CHEKA ,( the forernner of the NKVD) stood a very good chance of fiindng himself confronted with , and very possibly shot by a Jewish investigator”
    –Jewish Nationality & Soviet Politics : The Jewish Sections of the CPSU 1917-1933 ( DS135R92G57 Zvi Y. Gitelman pg. 117.

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
    • Replies: @noname27
  58. @Trinity

    Jared Taylor can’t even utter the J-word. People like Jared Taylor talking about finding the truth is LAUGHABLE. All our current race problems start becoming solved by calling out the Jew.

    Cut the man some slack, he has done great work when it comes to raising White racial consciousness. Professor Kevin MacDonald fills in the gaps anyway. Jared Taylor’s purpose has been to inform people that there is a race problem to begin with, only then can people start posing the question in their mind of how we got here and who was behind the wheel in the meantime, at which point they can move on to Culture of Critique.

    You cannot start talking about the Jews from the get go, you will sound crazy, as people will not even understand what problem you are talking about. Jared Taylor has done great work in my opinion, but I do agree with you that his ‘optics cucking’ is not conducive for finding the Truth.

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  59. Good grief. Jared Taylor is such a schmuck. He will not identify the (((root))) of the problem. In fact, I’ve heard him say on one of his videos something to the effect that (((they))) should be considered White. Open discussion of the (((problem))) on the amren website is immediately snuffed out

    Until we face the truth about the (((cause))), we’re going to get nowhere. Nowhere.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  60. Nancy says:
    @Polistra

    I think the ‘ruling tribe’ is fomenting this division, as anything that diverts attention from their obscene theft, works to their increasing enrichment and $=even morepower/control. Seems obvious to me. If members of the underclass cooperated for their common enrichment, they might be a power to be reckoned with – as I think James West pointed out. United we stand, divided we fall. I like the Grange motto: ‘In essentials, unity; in non-essentials, liberty; in all things, charity.’

    BTW, I first reacted to BLM when they initially attacked Bernie Sanders… it told me volumes!

  61. Trickster says:
    @Zarathustra

    It should 40M or thereabouts. That has nothing to do with arithmetic not being part of my education. In the haste of writing the comment errors are sometimes made. That is why back in the day E &OE were noted in all documents.

    I could go through comments in UR and drama all the inconsistencies in grammar, sentence construction etc…..as you do !

    It was a typo so dont be a nitpicking cunt !

  62. @Temporary Insanity

    No kidding. Most Whites are spellbound by the Jew garbage on streaming services, all the while stuffing their gobs with crappy food. Meanwhile, the women whore around while working at a “career,” and the birth rate goes down even further. Any mention of the problem and Whites cover their ears and sing “la-la-la.” It’s pathetic what Whites have been reduced to. While we know the (((cause))), no one forced Whites to succumb to their own destruction.

    When Whites go down we’ll deserve it. Let the brown and black filth live in the coming Dark Age.

    • Agree: Druid
    • Replies: @Temporary Insanity
  63. Nisbe says:
    @Davidoff

    You’re very welcome.

    Regarding Wall Street, it seems pertinent to mention that Jewish domination of it is also a verifiable fact, even being able to do it using purely Jewish literature. The following link is one of the many chapters from a book called “When Victims Rule: An Examination of Jewish Pre-eminence in America And Its Historical Origins”, the whole book featuring over 10,000 citations from about 4,000 (scholarly and mainstream media) exclusively Jewish bibliographic sources:

    https://whenvictimsrule.blogspot.com/search/label/22__Wall_Street

    • Thanks: annamaria
  64. Nancy says:
    @anarchyst

    Excellent policy, IMO. And would be fought by unions, etc…. possibly most aggressively by the penal industry.

  65. anarchyst says:
    @Dweezil the Weasel

    I couldn’t have said it better myself. Thank you for your concise remarks.
    There are a number of reasons why police officers get away with abuse and yes, even murder.
    Problem #1 is their official “immunity” which absolves them of personal responsibility for their actions. THAT has to change.
    Prosecutors consider themselves a part of the same “team” as police officers and do their damnedest NOT to prosecute rogue police officers. Quite often, they will offer a lukewarm ineffective prosecution in order to avoid doing their job and taking “the thin blue line” to task. Many times, prosecutors are forced to prosecute rogue police officers, especially if video or audio evidence is present.
    If by chance a rogue police officer “catches a case”, the “thin blue line” makes sure that there are a number of “on the clock” uniformed police officers in the spectator’s gallery. This is done to intimidate the jurors to “encourage” them to acquit, regardless of the proof offered by the prosecution.
    Police departments and officers have unlimited time, can and do obtain names and addresses of jurors, and can easily “tamper” with jurors without consequences by conducting traffic stops of jurors or just parking in front of jurors’ residences.
    Since “qualified immunity” is the “law of the land”, privatization of police forces would be one way to solve the police abuse problem.
    I have police officers as relatives and would not trust them to watch my house in my absence.

    • Replies: @Peripatetic Itch
  66. @Trickster

    Many American Cherokee aver that they are descendants of Phoenicians from Carthage and Turkey. Genetic studies tend to bear that out. The Cherokee were of course inhabitants of the east coast of North America before they were forcibly relocated in the 1830s. And Phoenicians were a seafaring people.

    So did they too cross the Atlantic, but in Roman times?

    • Thanks: TKK
  67. BADmejr says:

    I would like to believe that whites as a group are finally waking up, but it seems that is only the case on an individual level, meaning a lot of individuals are finding some truth regarding race, but the group as a whole still blindly and almost religiously does not. Most of the stories of people finding truth on race involve actual experience in the real world, yet there are those who will have tons of such experience and persist on preferring the destruction of whites. An example would be the single white female activist supporting refugees flooding her native European country who is gang raped by her pets, and her biggest fear is that her story will be used as negative propaganda against her rapey pets.

    There is also the fact that places, such as South Africa, exist. Whites retained power into the 1990’s and relinquished it to the black majority, ensuring the nation they built from nothing for hundreds of years would turn on them and be destroyed. True, the internet has opened a means to information not available back then, but it is becoming so censored as to virtually perform the opposite to gaining truth. Social media selectively censors certain views and promotes other ones, whether they are popular or not. So many whites care so much about having the “right” views, morals, and opinions and fitting in with the mob. These days people are so glued to digital devices that, in effect, they live in the “Matrix” in which reality is merely electrical impulses interpreted by their brains, and the digital world is what they experience FAR more than the real world.

    On top of that, this COVID response BS has ensured even less experience with the real world, giving the digital “masters of the universe” such extreme powers over the mob’s views as to render the real world virtually nonexistent. Social distancing, lock downs, wearing masks in public- ALL of these things help ensure that the very things needed to wake people up to reality are experienced less and less.

    I fear the only way whites will wake up will be total collapse of society, nations, etc. At this point it may be too late for anything resembling the “white race” from emerging after. It is even more doubtful that the various white sub-races (ethnicities), such as English, German, French, etc. will survive this.

    Our main adversary is quite Jewish in nature, and in order to ever win (save our people), whites need to know much more than the reality of race. They need to understand the “why” behind our current reality. Otherwise, it makes little sense to people and further clouds the reality of race differences. After all, why would “we” decide to destroy ourselves by making up a bunch of nonsense that completely distorts reality, destroys our history and replaces it with “diversity, and causes us to hate ourselves to the point of believing the end of our people is a good thing.

    These things are far too complex to express to the average person, even a white one. Plus, saying, “It’s the Jews!!!” sounds idiotic to most people, and it is obviously a generalization that is largely true but does not tell the whole story. It is easier to understand if one knows how homogeneous societies throughout the world used to be, while the one common “minority” in most western countries that had any influence were Jews. Their interests are completely opposed to ours given their seeming innate desire to pervert and destroy our culture and bleed us dry by monopolizing industries essential for our existence all while working together across the world, even in ancient times. It is in the Jewish interest to become even more invisible by creating the existence of more “minorities.” While flooding our nations with foreigners has been a huge success at dividing whites to the point of being unable to protect their own white interests, Jews also helped this process by creating minorities out of thin air. First, it was turning women against our men and dividing us by class, but today they have created minorities that we never could have imagined. Creating these “aggrieved” groups was quite a feat! Now our youth are guided to choose whatever identity they like, so long as it is against the majority. A thousand genders, etc.

  68. Art says:

    It’s OK to be white – it’s better to be Christian!

    Christian idealistic philosophy is the best way to live a good life.

  69. @Nisbe

    Link says article can not be found.

    • Replies: @Nisbe
  70. Thim says:

    American Renaissance is run by worthless cowards. Yes cowards. Worthless.

    Who did this to us? If you speak the truth to Jared Taylor, he will ban you. He not only aids the enemy this way, he IS the enemy.

    Solzhenitsyn spoke the truth. After 200 years together, only this is known. We cannot live together.

    • Agree: Jimmy le Blanc
    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
  71. Corvinus says:
    @Jimmy le Blanc

    “Until we face the truth about the (((cause))), we’re going to get nowhere. Nowhere.”

    LOL, the ALLEGED cause. Listen, you are of the mindset that the Jews are at fault for almost everything. I mean, we can’t have nice things because of them. We are WAY PAST knowing and telling people. The shire has been overrun by the Orcs. Telling people that they are being invaded is fine, but that only gets you so far. What are YOU prepared to do about this situation other than spreading information and forming like-minded groups?

  72. @Trickster

    It was a typo so dont be a nitpicking cunt !

    I’m going to side with @Zarathustra on this one. There are too many commenters on this site writing in haste and letting all those “inconsistencies in grammar, sentence construction etc” slide. The reader is then the one who has to take an extra moment or two figuring out what you were trying to say. Every reader, I mean.

    That’s a lot of reader minutes when you could have fixed it yourself with a couple of minutes proofreading.

    • Agree: Etruscan Film Star
  73. Corvinus says:
    @BADmejr

    “but the group as a whole still blindly and almost religiously does not”.

    More like whites are consciously making their own decisions about race and culture that you personally disagree with.

    “Most of the stories of people finding truth on race involve actual experience in the real world, yet there are those who will have tons of such experience and persist on preferring the destruction of whites.”

    More likely that whites have generally positive experiences with non-whites, especially our youth, in ways you cannot comprehend or willingly ignore.

    “There is also the fact that places, such as South Africa, exist. Whites retained power into the 1990’s and relinquished it to the black majority, ensuring the nation they built from nothing for hundreds of years would turn on them and be destroyed.”

    How did whites get that power there in the first place?

    “On top of that, this COVID response BS has ensured even less experience with the real world, giving the digital “masters of the universe” such extreme powers over the mob’s views as to render the real world virtually nonexistent.”

    Perhaps you are creating this reality that does not exist, and become frustrated when other people tell you it is manufactured?

    “I fear the only way whites will wake up will be total collapse of society, nations, etc.”

    OK, so how are you trying to stop this tragedy from happening other than information providing?

    “and causes us to hate ourselves to the point of believing the end of our people is a good thing.”

    More than probable, white people individually and collectively love themselves, just not in the manner you subscribe to.

    “Plus, saying, “It’s the Jews!!!” sounds idiotic to most people, and it is obviously a generalization that is largely true but does not tell the whole story.”

    COULD be true, and it tells a distorted story.

    “It is easier to understand if one knows how homogeneous societies throughout the world used to be”

    You mean like the creation of the English from Frisian, Celtic, Angles, Saxon, Roman, and Jute stock?

    “While flooding our nations with foreigners has been a huge success at dividing whites to the point of being unable to protect their own white interests…”

    You mean like how filthy, swarthy, vile Southern and Eastern Europeans in the late 1800’s/early 1900’s inundated America and overran WASPS, aka Heritage Americans?

    • Replies: @geokat62
    , @BADmejr
    , @Poco
  74. @anarchyst

    privatization of police forces would be one way to solve the police abuse problem.

    I don’t think so. Private companies are not required to respect your civil rights. Nor are they subject to the same transparency requirements, so they won’t have to turn over that body-cam footage or the police reports.

    Private companies are often in charge of the prison system. How is that working out?

    • Agree: Just another serf
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  75. @conatus

    That’s an excellent point, Conatus, one that I have made myself, if I do say so. See Peak Stupidity with More on Living Paycheck-to-Paycheck, for the way I put it. This one was about that guy who got fired from Google for un-PC simple truthful statements. Excerpt:

    Let me now get to the point of why this way of living also results in a big increase in the control-freak, Orwellian police state society. Let me go back to that “living paycheck-to-paycheck” phrase. Here’s what’s the problem with that, aside from the normal worries about the monthly struggle to pay down all the STUFF: One loses much control of his direction in life when he is tied in to the incoming salary on a very short time-line. Let me put this better as an example. I’ve been reading about the fired Google-guy who wrote a simple, in-my-opinion still PC, memo about the whole male/female differences thing. (This post is not about the particulars, and, as to be expected, Steve Sailer is all over it here, here, here, here, and here.). This guy may come out of this with a job soon, just because this situation has gotten lots of attention. That doesn’t happen to the average employee, however, and it can’t. The closer you are bound to your job via your tight month-to-month budget, the less likely you will quit, speak-out, or even push-back a slight bit, when you are harassed with all the mass stupidity. You are not a free agent if you live like this – you are much more beholden to your employer and must be more of a suck-up, a kiss-ass, whatever it entails, to the dieversity and PC-crap than if you had a year or two’s salary put away to find a new job or even a new career and leave the stupidity behind! [Links are only in the original post.]

    Thanks, Conatus.

  76. “It is for us to refuse loyalty when injustice holds sway. It is not for us to decide whether our sacrifice ‘is of any use’.” Henry T. Laurency, The Philosopher’s Stone

  77. No, the sign should not read, “It’s okay to be while.” It should read, “I’m proud to be white.”

    • Replies: @Etruscan Film Star
  78. @Oracle

    Is at least OK to put up the sign, oh Oracle?

  79. Neuday says:
    @Charles Martel France

    The Holocaust alone should teach us to be humble.

    That’s hilarious! Oh yeah, when I think of “The Holocaust” the first thing I think of is humility. Assuming the holocaust narrative is accurate, if the Germans rounded up 6 million Christians and killed them, Christians would likely, for generations, wonder what those Christians did to deserve such a fate. Jews, not so much. At all. Quite the opposite, virulently and vehemently so, as they migrated to a different prosperous White nation and proceeded to pull exactly the same shenanigans that roused animus in Germany, but this time fomenting Bolshevism and Shekel-worship via racial rather than class divisions. Humility! Ha!

    • Agree: Robert Dolan, FLgeezer
    • Replies: @HT
  80. @follyofwar

    Those in power do not fear antifa, a group of mindless thugs that can be easily neutralised by turning off the Soros money spigot and getting law enforcement to do its job. The war on Whites is driven by enemies who are far more strategic in their thinking, Demoralise and marginalise Whites through AA, silence them through hate speech laws, untether them from their roots by rewriting their history, preclude them from organising as Whites, keep chipping away at their 2A rights.

    Their future is grim.

    • Agree: noname27, fatmanscoop
  81. HT says:

    Where is this white awakening? It must be the best kept secret in the world.

    • Agree: fatmanscoop
  82. HT says:
    @Neuday

    You can take the Jew out of Germany but you can’t take the communist out of the Jew.

    • Agree: noname27
  83. @Trickster

    You are not alone. Tendency to exaggerate is the standard practice of commentators on this site to try to make a point.
    ………………………………..
    BTW
    I am generally very pleased with your comments.

  84. @USA Invades Israel

    People like you seem to forget that cops are employees, first and foremost. Their employers are the ones that make the policies and procedures that they are required to follow, or be subject to discipline. They are in no different position, as an employee, than the woman flipping burgers at a McDonalds, or the guy washing the floor at the floor at an office building. They all do what they are told to feed their families.
    It is clear that you and your ilk, haven’t a fucking clue as to what unions do and can’t do. Unions are there to negotiate terms and conditions of employment, and defend their members against management actions contrary to the terms of the collective agreement – period. Any disciplinary action taken by management, in any organization, has to have an investigation. The union is there to ensure the member’s rights under the collective agreement are followed and that the investigation is conducted properly. They are legally obligated to do so. If those rights are not followed, then grievances will be filed. Most grievances involving dismissals are based in the process used to dismiss. Unions are not there to defend members who have been charged with committing crimes. Being dismissed in a non-union workplace does not prevent people suing for wrongful dismissal. The difference is that a court cannot re-instate employment, they can and do award money, and lots of it if the employer’s conduct in dismissing was not above board.
    I went to school with people who became cops, and have known dozens in my lifetime. The overwhelming majority were people who wanted to help the community, and by and large, easy going. That doesn’t mean some weren’t assholes, there were. There are as many, if not more, crooked and/or incompetent lawyers, accountants, and builders. The main difference is that they aren’t under the same scrutiny as cops.
    You are looking through the wrong end of the telescope. Cops don’t hire themselves. They don’t write their own policies and procedures. They don’t hire Israelis to train them. They don’t direct the workforce and they sure as hell don’t write the laws they are charged with enforcing.
    There’s an old saying – the fish rots from the head. Another is the old plumbers’ motto – shit runs down hill. It’s the same in any organization, and the conduct of employees is a reflection of the corporate personality.

    • Agree: Charles
    • Disagree: Biff
  85. nickels says:

    If you identify as ‘White’, you are not awake.
    Its not an identity.

    • Disagree: RadicalCenter, Leander Starr
    • Replies: @Rurik
  86. geokat62 says:
    @Davidoff

    Learn more about the hidden links between slavery and wall street here:

    Learn more about the hidden links between slavery and Jewish supremacists here:

    https://noirg.org/articles/amazon-bans-the-secret-relationship-between-blacks-jews/

    • Replies: @Davidoff
  87. Nisbe says:
    @Complex Pseudonymic Handle

    Thanks.

    It was working some hours ago.
    The censorship goons must have got to it.

    Here is a back-up:


  88. There is no such cohesive political entity as the “white race.” It cannot wake up because it does not exist; it cannot act in its own interests because it does not have any.

    All this racial game-playing is going to end within the next few decades anyway, but not because whites will have woken up. It will end because all the great social crusades—all the welfare and affirmative action and civil rights movements—the true children of the Enlightenment but especially of 19th century social philosophizing, will have faded out from men’s minds.

    Our great-grandchildren will find it literally incomprehensible that people ever devoted their attention to such things. They will no longer possess the social-utilitarian, materialistic, democratic outlook that made such visions even possible. They will live in a world of private histories and private destinies, no longer sensible of what we nowadays call “the big picture.” This is the inevitable decrescendo of intellectual program-politics that sets in with the end of the republic and the dawn of the imperial age.

    That a civilization such as ours would devote such enormous wealth and energy to such an unworthy and chimerical object—the creation of an artificial, unstable, and brutally enforced cosmopolitanism—is one of the tragedies of world history that men of a far future age may puzzle over and lament; but for us it remains not to be seen by 99 out every 100 men, who are simply part of the drama and stand not far enough apart from it to see it playing out to its pitiable end.

    For my part, I am very much done with it. I care not for preserving the white race nor Western civilization, which at this point is the disease rather than the cure. I care about being faithful to God in Christ, about truth and the life to come. Civilizations end when good men simply cease to identify with them and hold aloof from their machinations. In the West, we have reached that point.

    • Replies: @Katrinka
  89. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    More like whites are consciously making their own decisions about race and culture that you personally disagree with.

    Lol! The cultural Marxists won the battle (the other side didn’t even put up much of a fight) for cultural hegemony and have since marched through the institutions. “Making their own decisions” in this context is like saying a brainwashed person who is consciously doing things that are objectively not conducive to their self interest are making good choices and should continue to do so and no one should try red-pilling them.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Mr. Anon
  90. @Scotist

    Didn’t you elect an African as Mayor of the beautiful town of Kopar? How could you?

  91. noname27 says: • Website
    @Oracle

    You’re right, it should be: “It’s OK to be a White Supremacist”

  92. anarchyst says:
    @Peripatetic Itch

    I beg to differ.

    Private employees do not have the statutory “protections” (immunity) that public police officers have.

    Under current civil-rights laws, private employees ARE bound by civil-rights laws, unlike police officers.

    The only way an individual police officer can be personally sued is for the aggrieved to PROVE that the officer intentionally violated his civil rights and to prove the “state of mind” of the officer, a very high bar, indeed, thanks to the united States Supreme Court.

    Such a “high bar” to obtain recourse would not be required for private security individuals.

  93. anarchyst says:
    @Thim

    I agree. I have been banned from commenting on American Renaissance for more than a decade for posing the jewish question. Attempts to get reinstated were promised, but never fulfilled.
    I have noticed that presently American Renaissance is allowing comments that DO raise the jewish question.

    • Replies: @Flubber
  94. @anarchyst

    Private “bonding” is a part of many occupations and professions. For example, medical doctors already carry malpractice insurance to help shield them from lawsuits. the same could be applied to police and other public officials.

    Corporations purchased liability insurance decades before 1982. It covers employees because it is easier for a corporation to separate itself from a covered employee, if they dismiss the employee where a criminal act is involved. A criminal act voids any liability insurance. Professional liability insurance only covers those who can demonstrate they have followed what their licensing bodies have determined as proper conduct. Fiduciaries are required to demonstrate they have followed the “prudent person” rule.

    In lieu of abolishing “immunity”, police departments could be privatized, in which official “immunity” does not apply.

    Great idea! Erik Prince in charge of policing the US. That will work out well. You and the rest of the privatize everything crowd have no clue where that would go. Do you thing the private contractors have a standby police force waiting to be put in place? What makes you think the same cops won’t be back doing the same job? Public services contracted out end up being more expensive in the long run. Once the infrastructure is dismantled, they’ve got you by the short and curlies and costs go through the roof.

    • Replies: @turtle
  95. @The Spirit of Enoch Powell

    Absolutely. It annoys me that JT avoids the elephant in the room so blatantly but horses for courses. He has awakened huge numbers of Whites to the war being waged against them. Once they press on from that said elephant emerges from the mists.

  96. @Charles Martel France

    The Holocaust alone should teach us to be humble.

    I think you mean the Holocaust alone should teach us how gullible some people are.

    • Troll: Corvinus
  97. martin_2 says:
    @Trickster

    I agree it is best to avoid black trades people, such as there are, and most people know this, at least subconsciously.

    I used to know a tradesman who called himself “The Flying Scotsman”. He was Scottish, of course, but he explained the real reason he used that business name was so that customers would know he was not black. A rather ingenious ruse, I think.

    I also once knew a black mechanic named Delroy, who called himself Peter, and he explained it was so that people would not know he was black.

  98. @Trickster

    Of course paying them to go back to Africa would be the bargain of all bargains, but there is zero chance of that happening under the current regime. We’re all required to think having blacks around is not only a wonderful thing but the most wonderful thing possible, while wanting them to go away would be the most “racist” thing imaginable. What will happen barring a major disruption in the near future is that they will be paid big bucks but get to stay right right here, and not only get to stay but stay while enjoying more perks than ever, including free housing in currently desirable neighborhoods and de facto immunity for their ubiquitous criminal acts.

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @TKK
  99. anarchyst says:
    @Curmudgeon

    You are leaving out a very important aspect of public-sector labor unions that deserves scrutiny. Today’s public-sector labor unions are political entities rather than true honest labor organizations. Labor laws have pretty much eviscerated abuses of labor that used to be the norm. From OSHA and other regulatory bodies, most abuses of employees have been legislated out of existence.
    I have been on both sides of the management / union “bargaining table” and know first-hand the shenanigans that both management and unions play.
    For one, public-sector labor unions should be abolished. Public officials (yes this includes police officers) work for the taxpayers, and as such are not deserving of labor unions. Today’s public-sector unions are actually fundraising arms of the DemocRAT party, nothing more.
    As public officials do not have to account for the funds that they pay their minions, they have agreed to pay for gold-plated pension and health care plans–not available for most of us in the private sector. These perks and benefits come directly from the taxpayers…
    Public-sector police unions are some of the most effective labor unions, quite often representing members who have no business being in “law enforcement”. Again and again, there are many instances of “bad” cops receiving a pass because of strong union actions.
    As far as I am concerned, unions protect the mediocre, slackers, and criminals among us.
    Regards,

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  100. turtle says:
    @Dweezil the Weasel

    In Fullerton, CA some years ago, the cops beat to death a mentally-ill homeless man who was unarmed and causing a disturbance, as most nuts tend to do.

    I remember this case very well. It is worth noting that the unfortunate young man’s father is a retired police officer.

    It was a prima facie case of Second Degree Murder of the son of a retired police officer.

  101. For a look inside of the politics of race as it pertains to white flight from their ethnic urban neighborhoods to the suburbs. I recommend “The Slaughter of Cities: Ethnic Cleansing as Urban Renewal by E.Michael Jones

  102. Corvinus says:
    @geokat62

    You assume that these white people have been brainwashed. So, what you are implying is tens of millions of white people have been duped and manipulated and lack any sort of agency or free will despite their high IQ and high time preference. That would be insane. The fact of the matter is white people individually and collectively are aware of their surroundings and make decisions based on their background and experiences, and their decisions run counter to your preferences.

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @geokat62
  103. @Charles Martel France

    There’s more evidence that in the Persian destruction of Jerusalem in 614 AD, jews slaughtered 90,000 Christians, of all ages and sex, than there is that 6 million jews died in the misnamed, socalled holocaust. Don’t believe me? Read: Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence by Elliot Horowitz

  104. AKINDLE says:
    @Rooster10

    “I believe Trump did the right thing.” That’s laughable. Do not look at what he said at his ego driven rallies before whites, every bill he signed supported non-Whites. Him and his staff did not do anything about the rioting of BLM or tearing down of statues because he thought the criminal blacks would vote for him. Trump let all those black felon criminals out of prison, and kept bragging about it. Four years of Trump and his staff promoting blacks, hispanics, illegals (DACA) ad nauseum. I’m not sure if his incompetence is due to the fact he was a silver spooned kid that never learned how to do anything or that perhaps he has no principles. Your “Dump” turned out to be a rich, loser, flake. There was nothing pro-White Nationalist about him. Maybe he can console himself on the shoulders of the black rappers he did publicity stunts with. Here’s the little violin playing.

    • Agree: Katrinka
    • Replies: @Rooster10
  105. BADmejr says:
    @USA Invades Israel

    What others have said in reply to this post is true, but I think one cannot overlook the EXTREME change in quality of people that make up police forces these days. Much of this has been due to a lowering of standards of qualifications, especially entrance exams, meant to weed out incompetent or immoral actors. In the Nassau County police qualification exam, the Justice Department colluded with a testing agency to try to create a test that was BOTH accurate in weeding out incompetent candidates AND did not create disparate impact on minorities. Such a thing is only considered possible if one believes the nonsense that these groups (races) are inherently equal in all human traits, such as intelligence, which obviously is false. Therefore, they denuded the test of virtually all mental complexity, keeping only the reading portion as an aspect of such measurement, but then they made it count only like 1-2% towards a passing score, AND one only had to read at the bottom level of incumbent officers.

    An EXCELLENT case study on this Justice Department meddling, which took place during the Clinton administration (imagine how much worse it is now!), was done by Professor Linda Gottfredson at the University of Delaware. Here is a link to anyone interested.

    https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1996gerrymandering.pdf

  106. @Nisbe

    ‘Item cannot be found’.

    Shame, it sounded like an interesting documentary.

    • Replies: @Nisbe
  107. Charles says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Most people, apparently, do not realize a policeman is a representative of the political administration in which the officer works. My small Kentucky town of the 70s and ’80s had a police department that protected and was sympathetic to normal people, precisely b/c the political administration wanted it that way. In today’s Baltimore (as an example; hundreds of other cities could be cited instead), the politicians WANT the criminal, destructive class to be protected and even encouraged. It is no more complicated than that.

  108. HMichaelH says:
    @Miro23

    The quote speaks of “Integration.” It is my impression from the past couple of years the blacks are no longer interested in integration. They want power and separation to do what THEY want to do, criminal, and anti-social as it may be. I hear very few blacks pushing for equality of integration with other races.

  109. @Old and Grumpy

    There are plenty of males of pallor who are negrophiliacs, whom you see at every BLM protest. There may be twice as many females, but I would estimate the ratio is not quite that skewed. In any case, yes, negrophiliacs of either gender have to be essentially disowned. They should not be thought of as kinsmen but turncoats for whom there is no possible pardon. The ideal punishment would be to strip them of citizenship and ship them to Africa along with the objects of their adoration.

    • Agree: RadicalCenter
  110. @follyofwar

    “Until they are as afraid of Euro American men as they are of African American men nothing will change for the better.”

    This is the essence of the matter. Like it or not, we are still only highly evolved primitives, and we respond, consciously or not, to physical strength and the threat of force.

  111. Rurik says:
    @nickels

    If you identify as ‘White’, you are not awake.
    Its not an identity.

    Americans have an endemic historical relationship with Amerindians and blacks. The first were here when the white settlers arrived, and the second were brought over in chains.

    In both cases, whites understood their respective identity vis-a-vis the racial realities of the time.

    A Scot, a Brit or a German would and all could expect to go to the same saloon or hotel, and be treated the same. Not so an ‘Indian’ or Negro.

    So ‘white identity’ has always been a part of America’s tapestry. Even as the French and British made devil’s alliances with the ‘Indians’ to slaughter the Brits or French, respectively. Everyone involved all knew who the whites were, and who they weren’t.

    Today, as we’re all cajoled to think in non-racial terms, it’s still quite impossible for a white man not to know he’s being singled out because he’s white. And if he doesn’t identify as such, then his non-white coworkers will certainly be more than happy to point that out- for his second-class citizenship treatment, and as personae non gratae for his myriad, historical and ongoing crimes against POC.

    If you don’t understand that you’re white, then when they tell you in the HR department that you don’t qualify for any promotions, because of your gender and skin color, then you’d have to be pretty stupid not to understand that you are a white person, with all that this means today, in the land of woke.

    There may be yet a few suicidally catatonic whites who don’t identify as such,

    but you can be sure that non-whites will consider these ‘ass-in-the-air’ whites as quite an opportunity, to be taken full advantage of until they bleed their guilt out in buckets from every orifice.

    If you as a white person do not identify as white, then you’re only denying your white, racist privilege!

    You see how that works?

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  112. turtle says:
    @Curmudgeon

    A criminal act voids any liability insurance.

    Yes. But in the case of (alleged) police misconduct, there is also the possibility of a wrongful death, or wrongful injury, lawsuit, which AFAIK is a civil proceeding, and typically gets filed when the criminal case fails. My understanding, and someone please correct me if I am wrong, is that a public agency is generally on the hook for the full amount of a judgment for misconduct by any of its employees (not just law enforcement).

    Perhaps you can expound, for the benefit of anyone who is listening, on the distinction between liability insurance and various types of bonds. One thing I do know is that bonds are good only for the amount of the bond, and insurance companies will pay only to the extent of policy limits.

    Public services contracted out end up being more expensive in the long run.

    Those who argue for privatizing the police should take a hard look at private prisons in the U.S. and elsewhere.

    Private police forces, of a sort, already exist. Think “private (generally gated) community.”
    Also, university campus police, in the case of private, as opposed to public, universities.

    Erik Prince in charge of policing the US. That will work out well.

    LOL. No shit. We could start with his four “star alumni” who got pardoned this past week. Stalwarts all.

    • Replies: @Liberty Mike
  113. BADmejr says:
    @Corvinus

    Your response brings up another issue. It takes far more words to explain exactly why your several dissents against my statements are wrong than it does to make those statements. I will respond to one of these given this is the case.

    You first restated my words and then gave your short reply:

    Mine:
    “It is easier to understand if one knows how homogeneous societies throughout the world used to be”

    Yours:
    You mean like the creation of the English from Frisian, Celtic, Angles, Saxon, Roman, and Jute stock?

    When speaking of homogeneity, it certainly matters what era in human history one speaks of. When it comes to race, there are many ways to categorize, and such differences in categorization have led to some that prefer “lumping” versus splitting. As late as the WWII era, it was normal to speak of the English race versus the Italian race versus the German race. Obviously, each group came from several other groups due to various tribal wars and conquests, but these different groups were FAR more alike than Nordic Europeans versus, say, Bantu Africans.

    Looking over the past thousand or so years, homogeneity meant that a nation (which means a people) was comprised largely of people who shared common ancestry, blood, culture, religion, etc. Yes, I will acknowledge that the English as a people derived from several similar tribes, but they amalgamated into one in a relatively short period of time. An example of quick amalgamation would be the Southern Europeans you mentioned who came to US. For several generations, the Italians created a huge amount of problems, such as with Mafia and things of that nature. There were issues of Catholics versus Protestants too. The Irish, likewise, created a lot of problems creating political machines in certain large cities that disrupted the flow of the mostly English population before. Additionally, some East European groups came too. That was a disaster given this group included large amount of Jews, and the damage has been done today. These Jews coined the term “the melting pot” through their plays (prior to movies), but this was meant as a “melting of the races of Europe.” At least there is some possibility here. Over a few generations, most Italian, German, Swedish, Irish, etc. races from Europe were able to amalgamate into a single “mutt” European American race, if one wants to call it that. However, guess who has been here even longer and has not come even close to melding with the European Americans? African Americans, and they are actually about 20-25% on average European by DNA.

    Please try to understand that if you take my word of “homogeneous” and try to talk about ancient white tribes forming the “English,” you are being disingenuous and building straw men that you can easily tear apart. Not much in this world is absolute. It’s much like those of a certain tribe arguing there is no such thing as race given there is more genetic difference WITHIN races than there are BETWEEN races. This is a nonsensical argument unless one is intentionally trying to muddy the waters. If this is true, then there is no such thing as height differences between men and women (I say men are taller than women, on average, but I must be a sexist!). After all, there is more variation in height WITHIN the group that is women than there is BETWEEN the group that is woman versus the group that is man. Like I said, this is a bad faith argument meant to obfuscate rather than enlighten, much as your arguments against me were, at least the ones that contained a shred of the appearance of an argument rather than mere nonsense meant as ad hominem.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
    , @Corvinus
  114. So what you’re saying is that as the white American ability to maintain segregation breaks down, they’ll show their true nature?

    Hopefully putting the POC back in their place and continuing to believe in this color blind America where whites dominate every institution.

    https://libjournal.uncg.edu/ijcp/article/viewFile/249/116

    • Replies: @IS
  115. @Old and Grumpy

    I wonder if you, as a proud Old and Grumpy white man, would ever have the balls to sign yourself with your real name? It seems like the vast majority of the white American males here are unwilling to do that (a few are). I think that’s the first thing that needs to happen for a true “white awakening” to manifest.
    Without that, you’re all giving yourselves a message not only of your powerlessness but that it’s not okay to be white or to believe/think what you do. Exactly the type of coward that likes to blame women.

    • Agree: Katrinka, HeebHunter
    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @IS
  116. Anonymous[287] • Disclaimer says:

    Once I met a LIBERAL non jew WHITE college friend. He had grown up in the suburbs, BUT He was encourage to integrate in HSchool, and sought out to interact with non whites,. After graduation he wento on to volunteer with the Peace Corps in Guatemala. He came back enthusiastic preching white guilt and integration. Once he was arrested for a DUI…he ended up in a County Jail with a large non whites inmates..He was raped, beaten, kicked etc. for being WHITE…He discovered his RACE matters he couldn’t scape being white..PD I was born in Central America and can tell you I never faced racism form whites BUT Mexican Supremacists are truly racists…

  117. @Curmudgeon

    The Nuremburg defense is never attractive, particularly when invoked by those who carry a badge and a gun and feed off of the productivity of the non-crony private sector.

    • Agree: Kratoklastes
  118. @turtle

    In many jurisdictions, the municipality, county, or state is shielded by sovereign immunity and where such immunity has been “abrogated” by legislation, the public entity’s liability exposure is quite limited.

    For example, in Massachusetts, pursuant to M.G.L. c. 258 s. 4, recovery is capped at $100,000.00.

    • Thanks: turtle
  119. Katrinka says:
    @Intelligent Dasein

    We didn’t get there on own own. We had help. Lots and lots of help.

  120. @Oracle

    It actually isn’t that ok to be white.

    This is total nonsense. The color of one’s skin and all the associated IQ and behavioral traits that define race are what the NAACP calls immutable characteristics and are given as the prime reason that racism is bad. After all, negroes cannot help being negroes and if it makes no sense to discriminate against them for things they cannot control, then it okay to be negro and it is also okay, by the same principle, to be asian, arab, or even white.

    The reason why it is okay to be white and also discriminate against negroes is that immutable characteristics of negroes are lower IQ, poor impulse control, lack of future time orientation, lack of a sense of shame, lack of the ability to reflect on behavior or to understand that behavior has consequences, and an unfortunate tendency to commit mayhem and murder at the slightest perceived provocation.

    It is okay to seek safety, shelter and the best environment for one’s self and family, and that is why it is okay to be white and to exclude and discriminate against (i.e. make sound judgements regarding) negroes.

  121. Rurik says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    Exactly the type of coward that likes to blame women.

    You’re right about using your own name requiring a certain kind of courage, Carolyn, and it’s no secret that many, many women, (including white women) are courageous and intelligent advocates for their people. I think I’ve even been able to count perhaps seventeen of them.

    Compared to how many (white) women who continue to advocate for Affirmative Action, that fucks over their own sons and husbands and brothers and fathers, so that they, and their fellow white women can get unearned advantages over their white, male counterparts?

    I certainly don’t begrudge the (very few) white women who make common-cause with their white people and excoriate all AA as a moral abomination, but just look at how few they actually are, compared to the white women who gladly toss their sons and brothers under the racial, gender spoils bus, so that they can get in front of white men for promotions and other such pandering.

    Would the Western world be in the shape it is today if white men had never have granted women the vote?

    I ask that as an honest question, because I fully understand the motivations (simple fairness) behind women’s suffrage, but wonder if it hasn’t been a disaster.

    Look at how Sweden is female ruled, and is opening up ancient Sweden to Muslim and African invasion and the inevitable strife and dissolution that comes with it.

    Is that just a fluke, or is there perhaps something amiss with giving women the power to determine the fate of our collective destiny, if their motivating principle is always (or at least in nearly every case) one of compassion above all else?

    There comes a time when our society, indeed our very civilization and culture and existence as a distinct people, is threatened to the very core by women’s eternal demand to ‘ease their suffering, and be kind and selfless and compassionate ‘to those who long for a better life’, blah, blah..

    If our nations were like the lifeboats scenario, they’d all be sunk, because a woman’s nature is to fill the lifeboat until they’re all are succored, or until the boat sinks.

  122. IS says:
    @Jatt Aryaa

    “Hopefully putting the POC back in their place…”

    So far, your own people (I judge by your name, I apologize, if I got it wrong) are discriminated by the PC/AA “educators” (much to the chagrin of my Indian friends)…

    “America where whites dominate every institution”

    Oh, pleeease! The management in large corporations (at least in Tech) is now heavily anything but. Don’t ask me how I know 🙂

  123. IS says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    “I wonder if you, as a proud Old and Grumpy white man, would ever have the balls to sign yourself with your real name?”

    In the current situation of a veritable witch hunt, this would be rather unwise for many.

    Personally, I can now afford this (no HR watching over me, the way the First Departments did back in the USSR), but I won’t either, purely in solidarity with those who can’t.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  124. Dr. Doom says:

    White people are now under attack for just being White.

    They will LEARN cohesion and quickly.

    After that, The New Order.

    Someone will RULE. Better it be Whites and Western Civilization.

    The failed races of peons will run back to their shitholes when their subsidies run out.

    The browns are not in it for the zionist global delusions.

    They just wanted the freebies. When they run out, they will run away.

    • Replies: @IS
    , @RadicalCenter
  125. Franz says:
    @Moi

    ADL? Yup, follow the Jew organization. LOL.

    But is the ADL not merely a version of Plato’s Guardians for Jews in America?

    And it’s LOL for whites to do the same?

    There’s a type of cynicism that’s only defeatism in drag.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  126. Mr. Anon says:
    @geokat62

    A more succinct reply to Corvinus is to simply call him out for what he is: a piece of human garbage.

    • Agree: Genrick Yagoda
  127. IS says:
    @Dr. Doom

    “The browns are not in it for the zionist global delusions.”

    Go ahead, pal. Push away all your allies 🙂

    • Disagree: Robert Dolan
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  128. @anarchyst

    You somehow forgot to answer my question.
    Restating your opinion isn’t much of an argument.
    Oh well,that’s the way it is,mostly.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  129. Davidoff says:
    @geokat62

    Well…. the English, the French, the Spanish, the founding papas of the “indispensable nation” and a very long list of white ethnics…. they were all at it….

  130. geokat62 says:
    @Corvinus

    I think I’ll take Mr. Anon’s advice (see #129) and respond with “a more succinct reply.”

  131. Catdog says:
    @Rurik

    WW are scarcely worse than WM. A majority of WW voted Trump. And if there are few WW into radical politics than men, that’s not a moral failing.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @Rosie
    , @Rurik
  132. geokat62 says:
    @Davidoff

    they were all at it….

    Yes, indeed. But can you tell us the name of the owner of the largest number of slave ships?

  133. I fear there is no political solution, especially in light of the fact that the left now has the ability to alter election results in their favor. Since they have gotten away with such a huge steal it’s hard to see why they would not continue to cheat as there are no consequences when leftists break the laws.

    No….we are past the time when politics could have saved the country.

    You can’t vote your way out of communism.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
  134. anarchyst says:
    @goldgettin

    I answered your question.

    Insurance companies would do a better job of getting rid of bad police officers as there would be payouts for their misconduct.

    Police have no culpability for their actions. Private security have total culpability for their actions.

  135. @IS

    Browns are not allies by any stretch of the imagination.

    They vote hard left 70 to 80% of the time.

    AOC is the typical brown jew-brained leftist lunatic and I have had to deal with many of them over the years.

    Hispanics (and all non-whites) are taught to hate white people starting in the first grade and the hate training continues all the way through grad school.

    Allies? Since when do “allies” invade your nation to steal your resources?

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  136. @Robert Dolan

    Don’t worry, at this rate, the huwhites of muttmerica won’t even have an organization, much less nice perks like friends and alliance that come along.

  137. @Thim

    Jared and Chris are great people, brilliant and courageous.

    Jared has surely redpilled thousands of whites and brought them to our side.

    We need all the help we can get. Jared and Colin Flaherty educate white people regarding black crime, which is in itself a redpill.

    It takes all kinds to make a movement.

    I’d have to credit Alex Jones for being a gatekeeper that got me pointed in the right direction….even though he deliberately lies about the JQ.

    And I do not believe that Jared is a coward….I think that he avoids the JQ as a strategy….he tries to bring small hats to our side.

    Of course, it has not helped Jared personally to avoid the JQ as he is just as persecuted as David Duke….so it’s totally unfair to call him a coward…..he’s faced many years of painful social ostracism fighting on our behalf.

    If people keep digging they eventually find the truth. We can’t have everybody screeching, “IT’S THE JEWS!” Most people have been conditioned by the Jewish media to recoil in horror when exposed to anything remotely critical of the small hats.

    • Agree: Polistra
    • Replies: @KenH
    , @Jimmy le Blanc
  138. KenH says:

    The best way for a white person to disabuse themselves of all the “can’t we all just get along” and race equality crap is to be in an environment with lots of blacks and latinos. After a while you will start to notice behavior patterns that set them apart but anti-white racial sentiment will surface pretty quickly which most whites initially gloss over because of the anti-white brainwashing they’ve received.

    That isn’t the case when blacks and browns are a small minority among 80% or more of whites. In that case there’s usually strict racial segregation owing to the sheer number of whites. The non-whites tend to be deferential and better behaved and this is why whites get fooled into thinking we’re basically equal and that multiracialism can work. But the racial dynamic quickly changes when the ratio of whites greatly decreases.

    Most whites I know who are racially conscious or “racist” aren’t that way because they read an article or two by David Duke or watched Jared Taylor videos. It’s due to direct contact with blacks and browns.

    This is why I think it was so easy for Derek Black to betray his racialist beliefs. I think he only had limited experience with Jews and non-whites before college and then he met some “nice” Jews and non-whites and reasoned that his pro-white beliefs were wrong and unfounded. But it apparently hasn’t dawned on Derek that he’s being cynically used for propaganda purposes and to discredit pro-white beliefs among younger whites.

    • Replies: @KenH
  139. KenH says:
    @Robert Dolan

    We can’t have everybody screeching, “IT’S THE JEWS!”

    I don’t see why not. Jews in the media and Jew led groups on the left screech “IT’S THE WHITES” 24/7/365.

    • Agree: MrVoid
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  140. @GMC

    Quite true. A woman with a baby is ten times as deadly as an invading soldier. Soldiers go home. Mothers bring colonization, crime, n permanent social division.

  141. @Robert Dolan

    Why not? Imagine if tens of millions of Whites started screaming “IT’S THE JEWS!” Things would change very quickly. The big noses would know the jig is up.

  142. @Rurik

    Excellent comment, Rurik!

    Amendment XIX was one of many fuck-ups in the history of Constitutional Amendments. (There weren’t many bright spots – Peak Stupidity has covered up through XXIII with our Morning Constitutional topic key.)

  143. @KenH

    I’ve been at this for quite a while now.

    I’ve had trouble teaching lifelong friends about the JQ, let alone someone I’ve just met.

    As soon as the term “Jew” leaves your lips people get very quiet and you know exactly what they are thinking……that you are a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews……because this is what the Jews have taught them to believe. Years upon years of propaganda takes its’ toll.

    Yes, the Jew media demonizes white people 24/7….you are 100% right. But we don’t own and run the media. The small hats control the narrative so we have been disarmed.

    I am all for leading people to the truth but it’s a very delicate process.

    I tried to talk to a young man at a recent Christmas party….tried to get him to understand that we are facing a communist takeover…..and he focused on what happened to the American Indians…..kept pushing the white man bad narrative……I finally had to give up. The kid had a bad case of jewbrain from college and a half hour conversation at a party isn’t going to change his mind. I hope that I planted a few seeds…..but if I had started on the Jews this kid would have ran away immediately. I used the term “Bolsheviks” over and over. I planted seeds.

    I have long time friends that still don’t get it. They dutifully read the NYT and are happy to think whatever the Jews want them to think.

    This is a hard nut to crack.

    No easy answers.

    • Replies: @KenH
  144. @Davidoff

    You are an imbecile and your comment is easily the stupidest comment in this entire thread.

    First of all, you raging dipshit, the “native americans” are anything but…..their DNA is asian.

    Second….the tribes fought against one another and often wiped out entire enemy tribes….did genocide……they were low IQ savages, like yourself.

    Whites brought Christian civilization to this continent, a high trust/low crime culture.

    Move to Nigeria, douche.

  145. Hey, I’m white. I learned during my youth, in college and from liberals, that I’m O.K, you’re O.K., like the title of the book written by a liberal says. What happened? Now I’m not O.K. because I am white, but if you are not white, you are O.K.? I wish these communists on the left would make their minds up. Since then, I’ve made up my mind about them. They are not O.K. They are rotten to the core.

  146. @Trinity

    I almost always agree with you but not this time.

    Jared has admitted that Jewish influence has been detrimental to whites. He HAS been telling the truth. He simply does not choose to focus on the JQ.

    I’m not sure that you have any idea how hard it was for a Yalie to become an advocate for white people. Jared’s normie reputation took a nosedive the day he started sticking up for whites. Jared is a big brain high class character and he presents exceedingly well…..that’s why they took him out.

    It’s absurd to hear people saying that his work has been in vain because he is not comfortable to screech, “It’s the Jews” all day long.

    Jared is a national treasure. Truth be known they are afraid of him because he’s sane and decent and smart.

    TBH, I admire all of the people in the movement, all of the people who have gone public with their beliefs.

  147. Corvinus says:
    @BADmejr

    “As late as the WWII era, it was normal to speak of the English race versus the Italian race versus the German race.”

    I would say assuredly a number of Europeans spoke of different ethnic groups as being composed of a “race” akin to other classifying terms such as “sort”, “type”, or “kind”. But clearly, each group of people are separate in their belonging to a social group that has a common national or cultural tradition.

    “Obviously, each group came from several other groups due to various tribal wars and conquests, but these different groups were FAR more alike than Nordic Europeans versus, say, Bantu Africans.”

    The notion of “whites” or “European-whites” being bound together came about as a result of Social Darwinism and imperialism in the late 1800’s–the distinction that separated “us” from “them”. In this manner, the “lowest-rung” whites were deemed superior in social standing than their darkie counterparts, while at the same time knew full well their “pecking order” within the European hierarchy.

    Looking over the past thousand or so years, homogeneity meant that a nation (which means a people) was comprised largely of people who shared common ancestry, blood, culture, religion, etc.

    “Yes, I will acknowledge that the English as a people derived from several similar tribes, but they amalgamated into one in a relatively short period of time.”

    Distinct tribes which took two or three hundred years to become combined culturally and linguistically.

    An example of quick amalgamation would be the Southern Europeans you mentioned who came to US. For several generations, the Italians created a huge amount of problems, such as with Mafia and things of that nature. There were issues of Catholics versus Protestants too. The Irish, likewise, created a lot of problems creating political machines in certain large cities that disrupted the flow of the mostly English population before.

    “Additionally, some East European groups came too. That was a disaster given this group included large amount of Jews, and the damage has been done today.”

    It’s not as big of a disaster, nor is this damage permanent, as you think it is.

    “These Jews coined the term “the melting pot” through their plays (prior to movies), but this was meant as a “melting of the races of Europe.” At least there is some possibility here.”

    Certainly that term was promoted by a Jew (Israel Zangwill). But the concept has a myriad of contributors prior to his stage play, including J. Hector St. John de Crèvecoeur, who wrote “individuals of all nations are melted into a new race” and two articles in The New York Times (1889) referring to the “American melting pot” as a “mysterious force which blends all foreign elements in one homogeneous mass”.

    “Over a few generations, most Italian, German, Swedish, Irish, etc. races from Europe were able to amalgamate into a single “mutt” European American race, if one wants to call it that.”

    Not “European American race”, but rather an ethnic group called Americans.

    As I have been informed in the past on this and other blogs, apparently the historical record demonstrates that these groups of people were ill-equipped to become properly immersed into the American body politic and fabric of society. How did that eventually transpire–magic dirt?

    From Alt Right leader Vox Day, who champions the WASP cause–Europeans, most notably the **Germans, the Irish, the Italians, and the Polish**, lack the ability to comprehend and put into practice Anglo-Saxon ideals. Yet, those same people, in particular Alt Right leaders, whose ancestors had been deemed “unfit” for American inclusion by nativists in the 1850’s and 1890’s, today claim to possess the inherent qualities required to perpetuate Western Civilization. Nativists held those groups** in contempt for “alien ways of life”, yet by the power of magic dirt, they** transformed themselves into one of the natives.

    Of course, it needs to be mentioned here, from the WASP lens, that Eastern and Southern Europeans did not think like them. The mind of those groups individually and collectively is numbingly simplistic in brain structure. They lack the distinct ability to understand individual
    justice, or even have a conscience for that matter. Again, we were told by nativists long
    ago, for example, the Italians especially are notorious for having a completely different neurological reality, different even in matters of soul. But what did WASPs know, right?

    The Know Nothings of the 1850’s in particular believed a “Romanist” conspiracy was afoot to subvert civil and religious liberty in the United States and sought to politically organize native-born Protestants in what they described as a defense of their traditional religious and political values. The nativists did not care that the Irish, Italians, Slavs, and Poles were European; they were concerned that they would forever change their nation’s character for the worse.

    Again, how did these seemingly foreign intruders become “assimilated”–magic dirt?

  148. Corvinus says:
    @BADmejr

    “It’s much like those of a certain tribe arguing there is no such thing as race given there is more genetic difference WITHIN races than there are BETWEEN races.”

    Here is my take.

    Race is linked to biology; ethnicity is linked to culture. Race is a biological and social construct. Ethnicity is a social construct. Ethnicity is the term for the culture of people in a given geographic region, including their language, heritage, religion and customs. To be a member of an ethnic group is to conform to some or all of those practices. Certainly, race and ethnicity overlap, but they are distinct. For example, a Japanese-American would probably consider himself a member of the Asian race, but, if he does not engage in any of the practices or customs of his ancestors, he might not necessarily identify with the ethnicity, but rather consider himself to be American.

    Of course, American is not a “race”, it is a conglomeration of distinct ethnic groups all rolled into one, with a common cultural bond. Scandanavians, which are from the white race, are descendants from several distinct (North) Germanic tribes. Through intermarriage, they developed a unique set of customs that incorporated Old Norse traditions. So, in a nutshell, race refers to a group of people who possess similar and distinct physical characteristics, while ethnicity refers to a a category of people who regard themselves to be different from other groups based on common ancestral, cultural, national, and social experience.

    Natural science consists of mental constructs, created with the objective of explaining sensory experience of our world. Human beings affix labels to make sense of our environment. For example, the California spotted owl is an animal, i.e. biological construct. The name of the creature is a human designation—strix occidentalis, i.e. human construct. That is, binomial nomenclature refers to a formal system, developed by people, to name species. The California owl was not a “California owl” until someone actually and specifically labeled it. Race, biology, ethnicity–all are concepts created by man as an organizational tool to offer a consistency about the natural world in which they observe.

  149. @Rurik

    As a rather coarse in character old friend of mine would say, “Just in the right position for a good a– kicking. Being a little more cultured than he is, I’ll just quote a line from a certain Hollywood movie I saw around 25 years ago, “STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES.”

  150. My Lord, do I feel for that cop in the above picture. I pray for him. He’s doing the job that people like George Bush and the rest of the elitist clowns in our country won’t do. The Hillary’s, Obama’s, etc.

  151. Richard B says:
    @Franz

    I’ll believe the “white awakening” is here when we can create a Euro-American version of the ADL and using it effectivly against anti-white hate speech.

    Absoloutely! But it won’t happen.

    I’ll explain why by answering a question from the article.

    ‘Why do I have to put up with this in my own country? Why is he the one with the power over me?’”

    Because whites don’t care about each other.

  152. TKK says:
    @Ray Caruso

    Blacks are slowly infiltrating the Judiciary.

    This causes what I have coined– SLIPPAGE

    It is the slow slide into substandard minds making important decisions that will change our day to day lives for the worse.

    Several black, “sassy” women were appointed and elected into our Circuit Courts – think felony, civil lawsuit, family law.

    These women mimic legal words and judge speak, but have no idea what they are actually saying. It is the absolute triumph of form over content. A black woman judge…who has no more legal acumen or insight than an average middle school pupil.

    To fight back and preserve their jaw dropping incompetence, a good friend of mine has taken to putting EVERYTHING on the Record:

    “Let the Record reflect Judge Sha- Qanda is sucking her teeth and rolling her eyes. Let the Record reflect JS has instructed the jury on the facts on the case….is misquoting witness testimony….is testifying… has given the wrong jury instructions.”

    So far, he has avoided contempt and jail. It will not last much longer. White judges want to keep their cushy jobs and checks and will wade into any frays. We are hoping the Appellate Courts will catch on, where there are fewer blacks. Will my friend be pegged as racist? Yes.

    The more they are mainstreamed and shoe horned into important jobs, we continue to slide into the abyss. Complete separation is the only solution.

    • Agree: Ray Caruso
    • Thanks: Nisbe
    • Replies: @Richard B
  153. Richard B says:
    @Franz

    There’s a type of cynicism that’s only defeatism in drag.

    It’s neither cynicism or defeatism. It’s reality.

    Change of any kind is enormously difficult. Much more when that change involoves millions of people. You were right to mention “small steps” in your previous comment. Because that’s what it would take. Very well then. Let’s say whites do that.

    Obviously the smalls steps at first would be from small groups. Small groups with no real resources. Certainly nothing compared to the hostile elite, who might very well have dispatched one of their own in that first small group. But even if not, the small group, no matter how solid would still be up against the elite and their legions of useful idiots and proxies in municipal, state, and federal law enforcement, media and politics.

    But there’s another problem. The elite, et al. are prepared to lie about us. But, owing to their hate speech laws, most whites are not prepared to tell the truth about the elite. And the elite and their proxies know this and don’t hesitate to use it against whites.

    Finally, there’s another important point. Whites would need to unify around an organizing princpile that is simple, direct, grounded in reality, and inspiring. From that perspective self-preservation does not do the trick. It’s certainly grounded in reality. But it’s not inspiring.

    However, they might be inspired if they were convinced that each of them genuinely cared about the well-being of all involved. That’d be a start. But it wouldn’t be a small step. That would be a big one. Simply because whites are in the position they’re in now exactly because it’s obvious they just don’t care about each other.

    I’ll believe the white awakening is here when whites can do that.

    • Replies: @Miro23
    , @Franz
  154. Avery says:
    @Trickster

    {The piece of land you are standing on right now probably “belonged” to many races going back to the dinosaurs. Who exactly ARE the original owners ?}

    Total nonsense.

    There were no humans when dinosaurs roamed the Earth.
    Dinosaurs became extinct about 65 million years ago (as of current estimate).
    Humanoids appeared about 7 million years ago.

    But putting that aside, your assertion that somebody necessarily took somebody else’s land by force is patently absurd and false.
    For the simple reason that there were no 7 billion humans inhabiting earth a million years ago, or 100,000 years ago, or 10,000 years ago.
    2,000 BC the estimated population of earth was about 30 million or so.

    The earth was mostly empty lands*. Tribes of people simply migrated from one place to another – empty – place. Most of the earth belonged to no one – or to the herds of 100s and 100s of millions of bison, deer, wildebeest etc.

    Later as people became more sedentary, built settlements, towns, cities….. where they have lived for generations, then it belonged to them. And oftentimes others came and took it away from them by force.

    __________________________________________
    * Even today, if your drive from one coast of US to the other (or take a train trip), you’ll see that between the coasts US is mostly empty lands.

    • Replies: @john speke
  155. Rosie says:
    @Rurik

    Compared to how many (white) women who continue to advocate for Affirmative Action, that fucks over their own sons and husbands and brothers and fathers, so that they, and their fellow white women can get unearned advantages over their white, male counterparts?

    I certainly don’t begrudge the (very few) white women who make common-cause with their white people and excoriate all AA as a moral abomination, but just look at how few they actually are, compared to the white women who gladly toss their sons and brothers under the racial, gender spoils bus, so that they can get in front of white men for promotions and other such pandering.

    White women oppose affirmative action as much as White men.

    https://www.vox.com/2016/5/25/11682950/fisher-supreme-court-white-women-affirmative-action

    Organized feminism does not represent White women. The whole point of “intersectionality” is precisely to marginalize White women and turn feminism into a tool of the (((multicultural elites))).

    Would the Western world be in the shape it is today if white men had never have granted women the vote?

    This is laughable. Nobody cares what the voters think.

    Anyway, the answer is yes, it would. It is White men who have an insatiable greed for cheap labor that has ruined the West. Black slaves were imported and enfranchised here before women ever got the right to vote.

    White male billionaires do not fund White advocacy. They use their money to lobby for more immigration.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/powerpost/paloma/daily-202/2019/04/03/daily-202-charles-koch-wants-a-more-open-border-immigration-is-one-reason-he-s-backed-away-from-the-gop/5ca38a9b1b326b0f7f38f2eb/

    Look at how Sweden is female ruled, and is opening up ancient Sweden to Muslim and African invasion and the inevitable strife and dissolution that comes with it.

    Sweden is not “female-ruled,” not that it matters. Immigrants are overrunning the whole of Western Europe, not just Sweden.

    There comes a time when our society, indeed our very civilization and culture and existence as a distinct people, is threatened to the very core by women’s eternal demand to ‘ease their suffering, and be kind and selfless and compassionate ‘to those who long for a better life’, blah, blah..

    More nonsense from the manosphere chorus. Women are no more enthusiastic about immigration than men, significantly less so, in fact.

    That White women did not abandon the Republicans en masse with Trump’s nativist rhetoric should have put a stop to this nonsense about women voters being to blame for immigration, but it didn’t, because it’s never been about the facts.

    • Thanks: Carolyn Yeager
    • Replies: @Rurik
  156. Rosie says:
    @Catdog

    WW are scarcely worse than WM. A majority of WW voted Trump. And if there are few WW into radical politics than men, that’s not a moral failing.

    The woman-haters bitch and moan no matter what we do. If we try to get involved, we’re unfeminine or intruding on “male spaces” or something. If we don’t, we don’t care about our people. One must give the devil his due. The manosphere creeps are adept at creating these “no-win” situations for women. They have watched and learned from the masters of propaganda.

    • Agree: Carolyn Yeager
  157. @Norteno

    The decent Americanized and often mixed heavily-white Hispanics you‘re describing are outnumbered massively, more every year, by the disloyal, non-assimilating, freebie-seeking, forever-speaking-Spanish type whom you describe.

    • Agree: Achmed E. Newman
    • Disagree: Corvinus
  158. Miro23 says:
    @Richard B

    Simply because whites are in the position they’re in now exactly because it’s obvious they just don’t care about each other.

    More like they’re afraid. When they’re no longer afraid then they’ll regain power.

    • Agree: bruce county
    • Replies: @Richard B
  159. Miro23 says:
    @Trickster

    The piece of land you are standing on right now probably “belonged” to many races going back to the dinosaurs. Who exactly ARE the original owners ?

    A rough way to work this out is could be to look for physical adaptions. Different lands have different climates, so if a people have physical adaptions to a climate then they’ve been there a long time (it’s theirs).

    Blacks are physically adapted to the hot humid climate of sub-Saharan Africa, Arabs to the hot desert climate of North Africa/Middle East, Southern Europeans to a less extreme but often semi-desert Mediterranean climate, and Northern Europeans (pale skin and fair hair) to a cloudy, cold Northern climate with little sun. The palest skinned Europeans (Scandinavians) live the farthest North of all. These look like their homelands.

  160. @anon

    “Cholo” [according to wikipedia] originally meant someone who was 1/4 Spaniard, 3/4 Indian, “Mestizo” meant half Spaniard, half Indian, terms used in the “Castas” or “caste” system of Colonial Spain. They had all kinds of terms to describe someones racial background, they even had Blacks, “Negros” and all the various mixtures of that, wich is where the infamous “N”-word originated from.
    Some, an extremely small amount actually ,are “pure White”, if you look at the monarchy of Spain and the upper classes, they were always considered White and they inter-married with the monarchies of England and other White European nations. Now obviously we don’t have the Spanish aristocracy crossing the border here, for sure they are very mixed and definately not very White at all
    even though they are sometimes called “White” by the government in order to manipulate the statistics on things such as crime etc.
    I live in California so I definately have first hand experience with Hispanics, as they like to be called now, we have a lot of them!
    “White Non-Hispanic” has gone from around 90% down to 36% of the California population during my lifetime, I have seen it happen with my own eyes. WE are a minority now, and yes we are a despised minority that gets no special treatment or hand-outs for being a minority.

  161. @Corvinus

    There was a demand for something and so they supplied the demand.

    The middle man is who makes the cash. I think they will flip anything that can be flipped.

  162. Druid says:
    @J West

    And stand up to them, and never turn your back on them!

  163. Druid says:
    @Corvinus

    Bs. The jews owned the cotton plantations here and in Honduras/Caribbean, and wanted free slave labor. They were the biggest slave-traders in history!

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  164. @anon

    The first 40 years of Spanish colonization was almost entirely a Extremaduran cartel. Effectively white trash military caste of the Spanish Empire. The Jews came later, when the silver starting flowing in from Potosi.

  165. @Trickster

    How about giving each black $1M and sending them back to Africa.

    That’s certainly one approach, but a costly one at ~4.6 trillion dollars.
    ( 13% of 320M is 41.6M, and a $1M payment to 41.6M would be $41.6T and cost each of the ~278.4M non-blacks in the population ~$149,425. )

    That’s a lot to ask from a people, the vast majority of whom had nothing to do with the creation of black slavery in the US.

    Undoubtably there are many plans. Mefobills, I believe, has described one.

    But, seems the sine qua non of any plan should be that its costs are borne by those responsible for the creation of black slavery in the US in the first place.

  166. Richard B says:
    @TKK

    One of the best comments I’ve read here in a while. And that’s saying plenty.

    Before responding to your comment it’s worth taking a moment to point out the value of TUR’s comment culture. Though it’s important to make a distinction between being ingratiating and being grateful, it’s important to be grateful. And one is certainly that when they come to TUR after watching videos like this and then reading the comment section. The comments are breathtakingly stupid and cringe-corny in their sentimentality (the two, stupid and sentimental, go together). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIZL4BIsv5A

    In a way, of course, this touches on your comment. So, to that, I’ll now turn.

    There are a number of things worth responding to. But, to keep this as short as possible, the thing I like best about your comment is that it directs attention to sometimg I’ve mentioned many times here, ie; the impact of the hostile elite’s control on our social institutions. In a word it’s devastating. The hostile elite might be good at acquiring social control. But they’re no good at social management. As is seen in their decision to appoint incompetent judges.

    And this is devastating not just to whites. But to everyone, including the hostile elite. This is why what we’re really witnessing is nothing less than The Pyrrhic Victory of The Hostile Elite. And the reason is not hard to find.

    Their effort to create and impose a social order that is free of any control and sustained by force only increases the uncontrolled exercise of naked power.

    And it’s exactly that force, constatnly applied, that destablizes the social institutions of the culture their power controls! Though there are many other reasons, that one would be the one I’d put at the top of the list for why

    Complete separation is the only solution.

    You said it brother!

    • Thanks: Nisbe
  167. Richard B says:
    @Miro23

    More like they’re afraid. When they’re no longer afraid then they’ll regain power.

    There’s certainly some truth in your comment. And I would love to believe it. But, unfortunately, it’s also true that far too many are too far gone as a result of multigenerational brainwashing and a general culture of conformity.

    Old habits die hard. And it’s true as Swift said, in so many words, you can’t reason someone out of something they were never reasoned in to.

    On the other hand, it’s a myth whites need everyone on board. They just need a critical mass. And there’s no question that one does seem to be forming. But will it be enough?

    Who knows? One thing’s for sure. We’re going to find out sooner than later.

  168. C Zhou says:

    I’ll just leave this here in the hope that oblivious whites may wake up and finally realize who the people are that hate you and want you destroyed, your daughter and wives raped, and your son to mutilate his genitals and they will continue their work collectively and tirelessly 24/7 365 days a year to subvert and fool whites into accepting their own destruction. That is what’s best for them as a people. No individuals when it comes to this group, and it’s not the Chinese..

    [MORE]

    I don’t believe the Weimar Republic had an operation of spewing hate and slander directly towards whites openly and weponizing all others in their obsession to destroy everything related to whites but it seems to have gained plenty of traction recently in the West.

    Plenty or the below was openly practiced and promoted in Weimar and it may be just a coincidence but I believe the very same people now head, bankroll and establish the very same movements today.. I believe the tranny/drag kids push is number 1 priority at this stage in our never ending slide down slippery slope

    : Homosexuality (you cannot go 5 minutes without seeing it promoted somewhere)
    https://worldtruthvideos.org/watch/sodomite-social-engineering-daniel-walker_5GE9wG3vm3I1CUm.html

    : Pornography (overwhelmingly Jewish owned and controlled industry who fought tirelessly to make it legal and thus in 2020 we now see its creators artistically saturate it with young blond girls being destroyed by blacks for maximum demoralization purposes and no doubt that’s why Putin put a ban on it as he knows its dangers, not to mention the young girls of his region are now being targeted by the industry as performers)
    https://www.returnofkings.com/115977/the-hidden-agenda-behind-interracial-pornography

    : Tran sexuality/transgender ism/trans kids/sexualizing children
    Organizations, non-profits, foundations etc have always been useful weapons and are always established masquerading as understanding and caring gives them free rein to spread their brainwashing everywhere

    View post on imgur.com


    https://national-justice.com/new-book-exposes-power-behind-transgender-lobby

    : Miscegenation (constantly promoted in unrealistic proportions in advertising, movies, television and always aimed at manipulating women (black male white female)


    : Feminism = has evolved just to pure hatred of white men. Goal = convincing white women to be self destructive by adopting the same beliefs (Feminist leaders past and present NEVER dare mention pornography because the feminists and pornographers are allies with the same enemy)


    : Women’s liberation = convincing/fooling young white females that getting married, having children and raising a family is repressive, but getting a shitty job (they use career) with shitty wages to blow on the weekend clubbing and riding the cock carousel until you’re worn out, unwanted with no offspring is a far better direction to take your life in.

    Convincing young females they should be promiscuous and unashamed to be a whores thus we are witnessing the explosion of websites like ‘only fans’ where your young daughter can now get paid to star in porn by exposing herself and getting fucked on camera in her own bedroom while others watch on the net convinced in the belief she is normal and there is nothing morally wrong with what she is doing.

    There’s no conspiracy though, I guess all of these movements and industries established by the very same tribe that to me, seem like very unhealthy causes to promote aimed at destroying people is all just a coincidence.

    If you were to include their political groups and orgs you would be here all day, EG

    ADL etc, etc, established to fight for Jews and every other race and sexuality and with the specific agenda to spearhead hate for whites, their history and beliefs while receiving government handouts and invitations to sit on important advisory committees.

    Open borders
    Refugee advocates
    TO WHITE COUNTRIES ONLY


  169. KenH says:
    @Robert Dolan

    This is a hard nut to crack.

    No easy answers.

    I’m with you and I know how frustrating it is to broach the Jewish question with people. Most white people have been so brainwashed with holocaustianity that they have a visceral reaction to any discussion of the subject, but that shouldn’t stop us from speaking the truth.

    You have to consider that Jews are driven insane by us calling them Jews and having open discussions about their inordinate power and influence.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  170. Nisbe says:
    @Nisbe

    In an amazing turn of events, it turns out I am NOT retarded (much to my relief), seems like the problem with the archive dot org link for the documentary is that because the link contains “…” among the characters of the link, when I click it from here, or use the copy link address option on the mobile device, the browser replaces the “…” characters present on the correct link to “%E2%80%A6”, and so the link 404s on the user.

    See the difference, this is the messed up link:

    https:// archive.org/ details /whitegenocideisreal%E2%80%A6intheirownwords-fulldocumentary

    This is the correct link:

    https:// archive.org/ details /whitegenocideisreal…intheirownwords-fulldocumentary

    Just something to keep in mind for future reference, might help someone else.

  171. KenH says:
    @KenH

    Most whites I know who are racially conscious or “racist” aren’t that way because they read an article or two by David Duke or watched Jared Taylor videos. It’s due to direct contact with blacks and browns.

    That’s not to diminish the great work of either men which helps racially conscious whites better understand and make sense of the racial problems they’ve experienced. It’s just that the Jewish media thinks that whites would be woke leftards and Jew tools if not for white advocacy on the internet. Hence, their demand for deplatforming pro-white voices.

  172. @Jimmy le Blanc

    “When Whites go down we’ll deserve it. Let the brown and black filth live in the coming Dark Age.”

    My guess is at that point, Jews will reign supreme with yellow race in supporting role over the browns and blacks. It won’t too long now.

  173. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–

    That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —

    That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

    Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.

    But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

    Declaration of Independence

    “And Now You Know The Rest of The Story”

  174. @C Zhou

    The real obscenity to all of this is that our “elected representatives” have sold their souls to the most evil a-holes on the planet, and we keep voting for them.

    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
  175. Corvinus says:
    @Druid

    Rather than have a digital temper tantrum, please offer sources that refute the explanations in my links.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  176. Rurik says:
    @Rosie

    White women oppose affirmative action as much as White men.

    idiocy

    If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action. They don’t like it when they’re the victims of it, as in racial AA, but when it’s gender AA, they fully approve, and so we get the whole AA shebang, because women demand to be Marines and firemen.

    It’s not fair or equitable that they can’t carry the ladders, so we need to legislate that they can carry the ladders just as well, if not better than men can.

    That White women did not abandon the Republicans en masse with Trump’s nativist rhetoric

    you just blew your whole point

    “Trump’s nativist rhetoric” was the last gasps of a dying civilization

    I love women. I wouldn’t want to live in a world bereft of their ineffable charms.

    But giving them the vote, has resulted in a Western world that lacks the nads to make tough decisions vis-a-vis immigration, for instance, or affirmative action, or homoism and many other cultural poisons that men would soundly reject.

    • Agree: Jimmy le Blanc
  177. Corvinus says:
    @KenH

    “That’s not to diminish the great work of either men which helps racially conscious whites better understand…”

    I would argue that today’s white Americans are indeed racially conscious, just not in the manner you prefer or prescribe to. Must ALL whites be in lockstep of YOUR definition of what it is to be “pro-white”?

    “You have to consider that Jews are driven insane by us calling them Jews and having open discussions about their inordinate power and influence.”

    OK, so what to you is a “fair amount of power and influence” for each racial and/or ethnic group in a given nation?

  178. Corvinus says:
    @C Zhou

    Hello, Whiskey’s sock puppet!

  179. Maybe Navalny if would gain the power he would shoot the oligarchs. It looks that he would.

  180. @IS

    I can only honestly say, and I apologize in advance for the rudeness, that you are “full of sh–.” Everything you’ve said here comes under this category, and I think you are a troll. “Current situation,” hell.

  181. Angharad says:
    @Davidoff

    “What comes around goes around.”

    Remember your own words Hymie. Because it’s gonna come around for the 110th time.

  182. @Dr. Doom

    YES. Peaceful and legal and effective: simply withdraw your money from our enemies.

    Cancel all „service“ from Establishment television broadcasters (whether cable, satellite, or internet TV),

    Withdraw your money from sports leagues that support elevation of Africans over everyone else (white people like me and Asian people like my wife), including the NFL, NBA, MLB, and even NHL. Attend minor-league games if you need to attend a professional game; there‘s much less money in that for the parent major leagues.

    Stop helping to pay for your children to attend universities that teach them to hate us and normal families;

    If you still subscribe to newspapers such as the Wall Street Journal, LA Times, Chicago Tribune, etc. — mostly an older demographic that does that, but still enough people — cancel today. Boohoo, we won‘t have the color sports coverage or the Sunday-paper coupons.

    And if your church will not defy the mask and anti-social distancing and capacity „orders“, leave the church, stop donating, and tell them why. Of course, to be fair, you need to be willing to donate a meaningful amount of money to help the church and pastor hire a law firm to fight in the courts, possibly for years including appeals. We have.

    If your county or state doesn‘t „allow“ indoor church service, indoor dining, little league sports, or whatever is part of your family‘s lifestyle and routine, see if you can move to a county or state that is at least less restrictive — or where public opinion is such that you have a real chance to defeat and hopefully prosecute dictator mayors and governors.

    Alternately, if you have children, you can send them to live with relatives in a somewhat less-unfree state or county — especially if their schooling is required or allowed to be all online, as is the case with our kids in the LAUSD. Our kids probably won‘t return to Los Angeles much throughout 2021 if we still have the option to keep their „public“ schooling all online. Now that Dictator Newsom has extended his stay-home „order“ and many LA-area hospitals are turning away ambulances due to an alleged covid-19 surge, I‘m not sure I‘m willing to return to CA much in 2021 either.

    Use cash whenever possible, not credit cards.

    Stop borrowing money for anything except buying a home; even then, borrow from a smaller local bank, not a big national or multi-national bank.

    If you can‘t afford something without debt, then do without.

    Anyone unwilling to do these things, is part of the problem and deserves what they get.

    Withdraw your money and support in every little way possible, today. It‘s peaceful, legal, and hits our avowed enemies where it hurts, in the pocketbook. We either get serious or this gets worse and never ends.

    • Replies: @Nisbe
  183. Oemiktlob says:
    @Rurik

    Agreed. Well said, Rurik. Spoken like a man.

    • Thanks: Rurik
  184. Corvinus says:
    @Nisbe

    “If the current trend of state approved and sponsored anti-White racism and ethnic displacement of Whites…”

    Which is NOT reality.

    “(which falls under the definition of genocide) is not terminated”

    This term does NOT apply here.

    “eventually there will be a conflict fought along racial lines in the West…”

    Blah, blah, blah. I’ve been hearing this trope for 50 years. Whites are becoming extinct. Race war is not on the radar of most whites. The time for talk has LONG past. You certainly can fight back, but you choose not to. Rather, it’s always “wait until the time is right”, but the time is never right.

    • Disagree: Nisbe
    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Nisbe
  185. Whitewolf says:
    @follyofwar

    Given the scale of last summer’s violence by BLM/Antifa, those in power are scared to death that those anarchists will be coming for them next

    .

    Those in power funded and organised blm and antifa. BLM alone received over 1 billion in funding from those in power even as they were conducting fiery but peaceful protests across the country.

    • Replies: @Nisbe
  186. @Davidoff

    Boy I‘m relieved to learn that the saintly „native Americans“ weren‘t raping, raiding, torturing, and killing each other on a continuous basis before we arrived. Thanks, man.

  187. @Mike Tre

    Seems like non-Africans should simply refuse to do any work in or for the heavily African cities in particular. Let‘s see how our „superiors“ manage without whites, hispanics, and asians to run their power plants, water plants, fix their roads and bridges, provide medical care, deliver food, deliver water, or maintain some semblance of safety or order.

    At the other end of the economic spectrum, do the same for ultra-high-income neighborhoods and towns full of people who mock us, hate us, and brainwash and pervert our children through their media and „schools‘: e.g., Hollywood, Beverly Hills, downtown Los Angeles, Washington DC, Manhattan, San Francisco, and the like. Let them fend for themselves too.

    Serve, maintain, and protect the suburbs, the country, the smaller and less-savage cities only. Let the others wither and die.

    Simple withdrawal of our talents and services from our avowed enemies is peaceful, legal, and devastatingly effective.

    • Agree: Katrinka
  188. Anon[258] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ray Caruso

    If you find blacks disagreeable as social companions, consider moving to California. I know it’s fashionable right now for conservatives to kick dirt on her and crow about an exodus from the state; but it appears there is a trend of marginalization of blacks in CA that is likely to continue. Some facts to consider:

    Blacks are 5% of the state population and falling.

    The black population has especially been falling from the plum coastal locations such as East Palo Alto, Hunter’s Point (S.F.), Oakland, and L.A.

    Proposition 16, the affirmative action proposition, recently failed – to the shock and dismay of the ruling elite. Ref: David Cole’s excellent analysis of these events over at Takimag

    The appointment of a Latino senator to replace Kamala Harris signaled to CA blacks that they’re not in the driver’s seat of the Democratic party there.

    It appears that Latinos will control CA politics for the foreseeable future. But this will likely produce policies that favor working class families. So if you’re working class white, you’ll be reasonably well situated. Learn some Spanish; and enjoy the SoCal Mexican food, which is outstanding.

    • Replies: @Ray Caruso
  189. Alfa158 says:
    @Trickster

    I live in the heart of Mexifornia but still give all my contracting work to White men ( you can still find some in business, even here). I don’t pay pay more, in fact, when I have gotten competitive bids, the White contractors were actually lower, and the quality excellent. The Latin American contractors see a White customer as a sucker they can milk. (Black contractors aren’t a factor, they simply don’t exist in SoCal)

  190. @anarchyst

    An anarchist preaches order to us …Got it. Like the buzzard who preaches internal medicine.

    FACTS:

    1. No one is entitled to “Qualified Immunity.” It is earned by going before a judge upon facts and law of the specific incident, and is a real f*cking struggle to obtain on behalf of police for many reasons known to their own counsels. When a police officer violates rights which are clearly held by a person, that cop is cooked.

    For example, a police office cannot detain a pedestrian in the absence of reasonable suspicion and demand identification. “Reasonable Suspicion” requires articulable reasons clearly established under law. Okay, so the cop nevertheless says, woah, come here and show me some ID, the guy says no and walks away, and the cop detains him and accuses him of failure to identify. The simple act of detaining that person, by and of itself, has then ripened into a full-blown arrest, and that cop is now cooked by the clearly established rights held by that person to be free of such demands.

    Though being clearly established as a matter of federal law for the last forty-one years, the above facts originated in San Antonio and went up to the Supreme Court who handed down this opinion which told every frickin cop in all fifty states “No” in unambigous terms.

    There is an immense body of clearly established law acting to destroy any hope of earning “qualified immunity”, and the above is but a very very small example of its instructive value to us, as opposed to the vomit our anarchist buzzard here would spew on you in lieu of truth.

    2. All public officials IN FACT are required to obtain and hold bonds. And every public official understands the meaning of “getting sued on his bonds.” And when it happens, guess who ELSE comes into that awareness…Correct, every single insurance company out there. State government and some local governments are self-insured due to clear evidence of the money on the books, so to speak. Thus, our buzzard here don’t need be selling no “Buzzard Bonds.”

    “Public Official” is a term generally associated with any elected official. Hence the confusion when a police “officer” is alleged as being an “official.” All police officers nevertheless are girded financially by those same sources of money, and no, they have either learned consequences, or they will.

    3. The Buzzard-Cam Was Not Invented By the Buzzard, And It Works Just Fine. Your buzzard anarchist savior here simply refers to body cams used by all governmental jurisdictions for purposes of defending against the spew of legal buzzards who constantly review the day to day evidence which is generated by those buzzard cams and retained by those jurisdictions for a minimum of 90 days under most law.

    Possibly our anarchist buzzard should purchase one for himself. Or maybe not, given his reputation in truth.

    4. Conclusion: Because your anachyst buzzard hates order, he simply has more value in spewing vomit and calling it honey to see if you’ll swallow.

    • Troll: anarchyst
    • Replies: @anarchyst
  191. @Rurik

    I love women. I wouldn’t want to live in a world bereft of their ineffable charms.

    But giving them the vote, has resulted in a Western world that lacks the nads to make tough decisions vis-a-vis immigration, for instance, or affirmative action, or homoism and many other cultural poisons that men would soundly reject.

    This remark shows you as totally clueless about the women you claim to love. Do you really think the average women thinks her life is fulfilled by spreading her “ineffable charms” to any man while male mismanagement is killing her children and making all their lives miserable? Consider the grit of the millions of women of the “Mothers Movement” prior to WWII: https://carolynyeager.net/mothers-movement-agitating-against-american-involvement-world-war-ii. They were right, and were defending their nation and sons from harm in a totally white-man-made war that the Jewish Roosevelt ‘communist’ administration wanted to join. Some were tried for sedition.

    So first I want to say that I’m replying to both your reply to me (#124) and this one to “Rosie.” In both you are noticeably selective in what you choose to respond to and the way you phrase it. Obviously you underestimate women’s intelligence by a long shot.

    To argue that women having the vote in the “Western world” (I’m not sure that is your world) is responsible for it’s inability to make tough decisions about immigration, affirmative action, or homoism (!!!) , that men would soundly reject, lacks any evidential foundation for its validity. Homosexuality was rampant in ancient Greece when women had very few rights at all; it was a choice that men made because they wanted women to have less (or no) power.

    Probably, men have always recognized the power women had, given to them by Nature; that is, the childbearing function. If you want to talk about “penis-envy” in women (which I see no evidence of), you should certainly include male fear of women and the subsequent efforts to keep women down and in an assigned role that suits men. But evolution goes on in everything, and to say that white men ‘gave women the vote’ does not fit the historical picture. It was actually the result of evolving technology – the availability of modern, labor-saving devices that freed women from the 24-hour day cycle of housework, laundry, cooking and child-care. It’s called Progress. It happned for both men and women. Once anyone has more time on their hands, and especially the more intelligent ones, they start to think about things!! No telling where thinking leads.

    For me, the National Socialist German Third Reich had the right idea, but even they had to make further concessions for women–and especially because the women of Germany were some of their biggest supporters. I don’t think it was actually American women who insisted on participating in the military, the police and firemen, and I think those occupations should be off limits for females.
    I think those policies were promoted by the One-World Changers at the top (all men, btw), and promoted to women through their usual channels – Media. How many white fathers were cajoled into telling their daughters, “You can do anything you want to do. The sky is the limit.” Even if fathers and mothers didn’t say that, it was implicit and explicit everywhere you looked.

    So for white men to blame their own women for the trouble they’re in is to me shameful beyond measure. To refuse to take responsibility for your plight, and to gather on forums like this under assumed “screen names” and talk about secession or creating your own nation, is laughable. You’ve all convinced yourselves that it’s so dangerous to be “outed” but for the great majority of Americans, it’s just easier this way.

    I’m not saying this to rag on men (I love men!) but because I think its obvious that if you can’t take the heat of being a proud white man with a name and identity, you are not serious about saving your race or nation. Because if you don’t, pretty soon we’ll be in the same prison as the Europeans.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Mefobills
  192. Why do we let 13% of the population that commit 52% of the crime in this nation control 100% of the country?

  193. anarchyst says:
    @The Soft Parade

    You must be a copsucker.

    I don’t know what planet you are on but it certainly isn’t the 21st century united States.
    Cop routinely violate citizens’ rights just because they can. Their immunity sees to that.
    Cops are held to a much lower standard that the rest of us. Behavior that would get an ordinary person locked up is routinely “excused” by police department along with their unions. Add to that, the bad cop usually gets a “paid vacation” (administrative leave) while his behavior is whitewashed.

    I have cops who are relatives who I would not trust to caretake my house.

    How many cops have you fellated??? Betcha its quite a few.

  194. Diversity is a TERRIBLE idea. We need to MAWA but it’s probably too late. 40% of the county is now non-white and most are on welfare and usually have large families.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  195. Rurik says:
    @Catdog

    A majority of WW voted Trump.

    I checked

    not true

    https://cawp.rutgers.edu/presidential-poll-tracking-2020#NPGR

    white women’s votes were split evenly between Trump and Biden, at least according to the data.

    If white women would have voted like their white male counterparts, then Trump’s victory would have been an even bigger rout. So massive that even with their mega-fraud, they’d not have been able to thwart it.

    And if there are few WW into radical politics than men, that’s not a moral failing.

    I like Tulsi. Some would call her anti-war rhetoric and criticism of Big Tech as extremist, but when your nation is being run by fiends and corrupt scumfucks, then it probably just sounds extremist to tell the simple and obvious truth. Because for me (and I suspect Tulsi) destroying nations right and left, while mass-murdering and maiming millions of innocents the world over, all based on obvious lies, while concurrently doing all you can to destroy the American middle class, and plunge our society into a dystopian, diversified hell on earth, is a rather extremely fucked up thing for our government to be doing.

    There are some really incredibly brave and courageous women out there. Many who’d make an excellent president, especially considering the caliber of male presidents we’ve suffered over the decades.

    Indeed, I remember watching a video of this Irish gal (with more balls, guts and integrity than the combined assemblage of Irish male cucks and losers), showing us all what a real leader acts and sounds like.

    I’d trade every one of our 535 corrupt arse clowns in our congress for just one woman like her.

    • Thanks: Nisbe
    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
    , @Rosie
  196. Nisbe says:
    @Corvinus

    You’re either willingly blind, or ignorant.




    And study European history to see what happens when Western people have had enough of foreign infiltration and bullshit. It ain’t gonna be pretty baby.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  197. Nisbe says:
    @RadicalCenter

    And boycott Israel (barcode starts with 729, just leave it behind), because of this:

    https://bitchute.com/video/0IzBpK6zd7T4

    “Zionist Jews Admit That Mass Immigration Is #1 On Their Agenda”


    “Israel Directly Helping Muslims And Africans Invade Europe”

    http://archive.vn/C1BzD – “US Jews Demand Israel to Stick to Plan to Deport Africans to White Countries”

    • Replies: @Dr. Charles Fhandrich
  198. Nisbe says:
    @Whitewolf

    Some info on antifa:

    [MORE]

  199. Poco says:
    @Corvinus

    Black, White, Mexican, Leftist, Rightist, whatever.

    They will all eventually cheer as you are put against the wall.

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  200. Rurik says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    This remark shows you as totally clueless about the women you claim to love. Do you really think the average women thinks her life is fulfilled by spreading her “ineffable charms” to any man while male mismanagement is killing her children and making all their lives miserable?

    Have you ever heard of Hillary Clinton?

    Tens of millions of white women voted for the war hag to be president, even after we all knew she was a blood-stained, murderous bitch.

    And yes, I believe the average women is most fulfilled when she’s in a loving relationship with a man, and raising a family. Not all women, obviously, but yes, for the average women (and the average man) being in love with a member of the opposite sex, while contributing to a happy home life, is the most fulfilling life they can aspire to. IMHO

    Consider the grit of the millions of women of the “Mothers Movement” prior to WWII

    If giving women the vote, would have stopped or prevented the kind of horrors that were the World Wars, then I’d be all for it!

    But they’ve had the vote now for over a hundred years, and we’re still embroiled in serial wars all over the globe. Only now we have wokeness to go along with it all.

    Obviously you underestimate women’s intelligence by a long shot.

    I hope not. I’ve never questioned women’s intelligence. Hardly. Only their motivations vis-a-vis support for things like AA and immigration and homo-rights and other things that men (on average) are far less likely to support.

    that men would soundly reject, lacks any evidential foundation for its validity

    does it?

    are (white) women, on average, just as opposed to homoism (and immigration and affirmative actions) as white men are?

    I doubt that. I suspect that white women are decidedly more inclined to favor homo-“rights” and immigration and affirmative action than their white male counterparts.

    I think there is even a lot of research that proves my suspicions are correct, if we really wanted to delve into all of that.

    …in ancient Greece when women had very few rights at all; it was a choice that men made because they wanted women to have less (or no) power.

    from what I’ve glimmered, the Greeks had great respect and admiration for women. Their Goddesses Athena and Aphrodite (among many others) attests to the Greek’s high esteem for their women, no?

    But they sure didn’t expect them to fight their wars for them.

    Which I suppose makes them misogynistic, according to so many American women. If a man considers his womenfolk, (wives and daughters, etc..) as a reason why he fights and kills and dies in wars, he somehow hates women, because he loves them so much that he’d kill or die to protect them. This ‘reactionary, good-ol-boy’ thinking is what we’re all hectored to repudiate these days. Now a man should want to send his womenfolk into harms way, to protect him and his possessions from enemies.

    If you want to talk about “penis-envy” in women

    huh?!

    where’d that come from?

    you should certainly include male fear of women and the subsequent efforts to keep women down and in an assigned role that suits men.

    I don’t want to keep anyone ‘down’. But sure, I’d prefer to have my partner in life, being at home, nourishing and raising our children, and being contented doing so. If a women would prefer to be a ball-busting corporate lawyer, then hell yea, go for it an take no prisoners. But for myself personally, I wouldn’t prefer that type of Alpha woman as my particular partner in life. Is that wrong of me? A smart women, of course! But one that loves children and wants to raise some of her own, in an equal partnership based on love and mutual respect. Why not?

    I don’t think it was actually American women who insisted on participating in the military, the police and firemen, and I think those occupations should be off limits for females.

    Feminism wasn’t an American women’s construct, it was a Jewish construct. Gloria Steinem, Betty Fridan Bella Abzug, et al. And you’d find yourself on the wrong side of the vast majority of American women’s opinions vis-à-vis women and girls serving in the military in combat.

    So in that context, you and I are on the wrong side of the prevailing attitudes among most American women, (and sadly, men too).

    I think those policies were promoted by the One-World Changers at the top (all men, btw), and promoted to women through their usual channels – Media.

    and the late Ruth Ginsburg?

    what about ‘her’ (at least putatively a female)


    What about every Jewish woman that I’ve ever heard of speak on the issue? Don’t any of them count?

    How many white fathers were cajoled into telling their daughters, “You can do anything you want to do. The sky is the limit.” Even if fathers and mothers didn’t say that, it was implicit and explicit everywhere you looked.

    Honestly, I don’t see anything so terribly wrong with saying that to a daughter.

    Why not tell them to go for it? Not all girls will be happy as a wife and homemaker. Most, sure, but not all. Let them all (boys and girls) figure out who they are, and simply give them the encouragement to follow their own destiny. If that means being a wife and mother, then great! If it means being an entrepreneur then I wouldn’t try to discourage them. Some girls don’t fit the mold, but that doesn’t mean they should be discouraged from a traditional lifestyle either. At least in my admittedly humble and male opinion.

    So for white men to blame their own women for the trouble they’re in is to me shameful beyond measure.

    I’m not blaming white women, except insofar as their voting habits tend perhaps towards the liberal, progressive, compassionate and ‘kind’ way of thinking. Collectively, I just wonder if that hasn’t lead to the kind of politicians that are in power in the West today. It’s not a condemnation, only a question. Are women more compassionate than men are? If you showed the photo of the drowned Syrian boy to American women and American men, who would be more likely to demand we allow them all as refugees, so that no more little boys die in that way?

    It’s simply an observation on human nature, and how we got to were we are. And it’s not some kind of blanket criticism of women-kind. Heavens no! Not at all. It is women’s better angels that makes them more compassionate, (if indeed they are) and I wouldn’t want them any other way. But perhaps it’s that very same compassion, that is leading our civilization to open borders, and subsequent destruction. Yes? No?

    To refuse to take responsibility for your plight, and to gather on forums like this under assumed “screen names” and talk about secession or creating your own nation, is laughable. You’ve all convinced yourselves that it’s so dangerous to be “outed”

    Well, I have a business, and if I used my real name, that could likely cause some complications. Also, if I used my real name, I’d probably have to be a bit more circumspect with the kind of language I occasionally like to use. And what fun would that be?

    I think its obvious that if you can’t take the heat of being a proud white man with a name and identity, you are not serious about saving your race or nation.

    Point taken. But I’ve not being doing this so much to save my race or nation, but more to try to open some eyes, so that our very civilization doesn’t founder under the weight of massive immigration, and their cultural and spiritual sewage. All of which comes to us from the usual suspects, (with sadly, a lot of collaboration from legions of corrupt or ignorant white men and women).

    My agenda is to point out that their control of our money, has given them almost unlimited power over our governments and institutions, and if we are to have any shred of hope to save our progeny from the kind of horrors they will absolutely visit upon them, as soon as they’re able, then we have to kill the Fed. One way or another. Spreading the truth is for me, the only way I see any hope of that happening, and in the mean time, perhaps a few individuals will be less likely to join their military or otherwise contribute to their depraved scheme for Jewish supremacy to engulf the planet in a ghastly nightmare of unimaginable suffering and misery. It is written.

    • Thanks: Nisbe
    • Replies: @FLgeezer
    , @Carolyn Yeager
  201. @Curmudgeon

    Cops don’t hire themselves.

    Perhaps not, but only a certain psychotype wants that job.

    So a rational analysis would expect the talent pool to contain vastly more dimwitted half-thought-through authoritarians, than the GenPop. (Also more alcoholics, wife-beaters, and so forth).

    Likewise, the talent pool for the local sty will contain vastly more individuals who actively seek power and authority, but are too stupid to obtain it meritocratically (by becoming economically productive in the private sector – which is a trivial task for anyone with an IQ above 115).

    The average piggie is stupid enough to be a soldier, but not brave enough.

    That’s why the entire profession has histrionics about the 5o-odd piggies who git kilt on “The Job” every year: a mortality risk equivalent to that faced by white girls aged 10-15.

    Ask a few ex-wives and ex-girlfriends of piggies, what piggies are like when they’re not repeating piggie bromides about their deep personal dedication to protecting society from itself.

    Ask yourself why a 5’8″ tattooed fuckwit with the thick waist indicative of steroid use, would want to be a cop. They can’t look down on ‘civilians’ without the costume and the gun.

    *

    Disclosure: my 20-yo nephew is about to become a piggie; another nephew is a Fed piggie; my Dad was a piggie in the 1960s (he quit because corruption he observed and reported, was not acted upon by management). So in the same way that my family is ‘military adjacent’ (4 people – including me – with combined service of over 50 years), it is also a ‘blue line’ family but would never ever refer to itself as such. (Best exemplified by the fact that none of us would ever call the police in response to any situation. We have enough talent in our ranks to sort matters out ourselves).

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
    , @Tony Massey
  202. @notoneofthem

    Then you have pure -blooded Spaniards who can be as White as anyone and they are also called “Hispanic”

    Except that, to a person who believes in logic, rationality and facts, no “pure-bred” Spanish person – ie, a person bred in Spain of Spanish parents who has no interbreeding outside Spain with others, and therefore most certainly White – should ever in any country be called “Hispanic”. That is simply grammatically invalid and incorrect. Their correct national classification is simply “Spanish”. All else is a guide for unnecessary confusion.

    • Replies: @F. Galton
    , @notoneofthem
  203. FLgeezer says:
    @Rurik

    Bravo Rurik. Well stated and your post refuted each
    of Madam’s points. You coulda been a lawyer but I’m
    guessing you chose a respectable profession instead. You are closing out 2020 in grand style. Most of we
    Unz’ers look forward to your contributions.

  204. @Kratoklastes

    My brother has 33 years in LEO. He’s one of the most intelligent people I’ve ever known.
    He’s worked 113 homicides as the lead investigator and closed 111 with a conviction. Not always satisfying tho.
    He knows who did it in the other 2. Can’t prove it tho.
    That’s unheard of. He’s solved cold cases that were decades old.
    Society couldn’t function without guys like him.
    Most cops die early.
    Way way way more than 50 die a year in the line of duty. Way way way more. Check the numbers.
    He Can’t wait to get out. He’s hated. His department is more than 20% understaffed. All he does is work.
    People are retiring early and just leaving for better prospects.
    He has lived to serve his community and i know all his friends and they are no different.
    He’s tuned some guys up. Told me himself. They deserved it.
    I look just like him. Numerous times in Nashville people came up to me and said… do you know x?
    I thought i had a ass whipping coming. I always said, why, yes, i do.
    They were usually career criminals. Not a single one ever spoke less than praise about him and they didn’t like cops.
    Strangely enough? I met one far away out of state that my brother put away for a good bit of time.
    He thought he was treated very fairly and said he wished every cop was like him. Not that he ever gave a sucker a break. He doesn’t give me one either dude.
    Most…95+%are the best friend you never had.
    Society is fixing to take a hit guy. That generation of cops is gone forever.
    If a black person decided he doesn’t want to comply with lawful orders today…unlike the rest of us…the city burns.
    Hope your loved ones murder is solved when theirs nobody to care enough.

  205. Corvinus says:
    @Nisbe

    “And study European history to see what happens when Western people have had enough of foreign infiltration and bullshit. It ain’t gonna be pretty baby.”

    LOL, this “foreign infiltration” has been happening (allegedly) for DECADES. The shire has been completely overrun, and yet you timidly and meekly state it’s a matter of when, not if, whites will rise up like the Hulk and round up and throw Jews and their mystery meat pets from helicopters Pinochet style. This is why your words ring hollow, because this information has already been disseminated. It other than surprises me that the timing is somehow “not right” or “off”, and that sometime in the near future–which is always put off to a later date–that the “angry Saxon” will rise up again.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Nisbe
  206. @Davidoff

    the English, the French, the Spanish, the founding papas of the “indispensable nation” and a very long list of white ethnics…. they were all at it….

    Yes, of course. Everybody under the sun, if you say so.

    But… not the Jews, right..?

    Please do not reply. Your crass stupidity and ignorance is lowering the average IQ of this forum.

  207. Corvinus says:
    @Poco

    “They will all eventually cheer as you are put against the wall.”

    So, exactly when is this going to happen? Give me a ballpark figure–one year from now, five years, ten years, twenty-five years? Moreover, if you are convinced that whites are being genocided, or are about to be genocided, what are you actually doing about it from a physical standpoint?

    • Replies: @Poco
    , @Tony Massey
  208. @Rurik

    Thank you, for yet another perfectly-judged, fully-truthful and deeply valuable, important comment – as usual.

    You are so absolutely right about both Tulsi Gabbard AND the gorgeous and deeply brave Clare Daly !!

    And though I’m not an American, I feel your pain – and I foresee eventually many ropes in Congress. All 535 of them.

    It’ll be 650 in the Palace of Westminster.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  209. Mefobills says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    For me, the National Socialist German Third Reich had the right idea, but even they had to make further concessions for women–and especially because the women of Germany were some of their biggest supporters.

    Goebbels wanted women to return to the home. Universal suffrage voting is a disaster. ON AVERAGE, women’s voting pattern is very predictable.

    They vote their security. If they are secure in a marriage to a man who can provide, wives will vote the same as their husbands.

    If they divorce, they vote for their daddy government.

    They also vote for immigration.

    https://russia-insider.com/en/goebbels-brilliant-1933-speech-masculine-women-feminine-men-low-birth-rates-it-could-have-been

    But it must also be said that those things that belong to the man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her talents and abilities.

    That includes politics and the military.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  210. @Kratoklastes

    How high in the talent poly pool did you rise with such a hi q?
    My brother served 12 months in central America during the contra-years supporting both sides at a remote cia listening post.
    He’d have arrested them all.
    What are you gonna do?
    You’re gonna take the law into your own hands?
    When you get out of prison pleas come to UR and let me know if that was worth it.
    True, 30% of all murders go unsolved(that may change, cold case solves are exploding) so perhaps you have enough talent to fool these idiots.
    Truly, you haven’t been paying attention.
    Guys like my brother are common. If you have one of those guys on your ass You’re only hope is a Soros funded da.
    Good luck.

  211. @Rurik

    Okay “Rurik,” you are a very questionable personage. You have written over 8000 comments here since 2015, and they are typically unusually long ones (without any necessity to be as long as they are), so it seems you do little but read on U.R. and look for things you think you can comment on. You say you own a business? Hmm. Doesn’t seem like a real business owner of a real business would have so much time to spare. Or a married man with family either. But maybe you’re just long retired, an old guy, and this is your hobby.

    This comment I’m replying to is dishonest in that it doesn’t address much of anything I said, even though it goes on and on. For example, you bring up Hillary Clinton to me as some sort of proof that white women are responsible for just as much killing as white men. That is really lame. Then you spend some time on Jewish women feminists and supreme court justices. Are Jews white? No, but you may think so, since you’re clearly a libertarian. (Do you know how Jewish libertarian-ism is?)

    You stoop so low as to quote a partial sentence from me: “If you want to talk about ‘penis-envy’ in women” … and then ask: “huh?! where’d that come from?” It came from the previous sentence I wrote, dummy, which you ignore, but you think you can play cheap games like that with me. In answer to women’s status in ancient Greece, you ignorantly say, “From what I’ve glimmered, the Greeks had great respect and admiration for women. Their Goddesses Athena and Aphrodite (among many others) attests to the Greek’s high esteem for their women, no?” No. But it’s a waste of time to try to explain anything to you because you think you know everything already and are only here to “spread the truth” Your agenda is to “point out that [Jewish] control of our money has given them almost unlimited power over our governments and institutions,” which no doubt was made possible by giving white women the vote.

    Finally you backtrack and say, “I’m not blaming women …” when clearly you were. As I said, you’ve given zero evidence for your views, while Rosie did (she’s smarter than you). All you have are opinions and you admit it. I will not be answering any more comments from you – it was you who addressed me to begin with – so don’t bother to write any.

    All the best to you, nevertheless.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  212. On the streets of Harlem, my blonde hair, blue eyes, and white skin made me an irresistible target,” wrote Tracy Abel, a social worker in New York. “The mothers called me ‘cracka ass’ and ‘white bitch’ while I labored on their behalf.”

    LOL…Dumb cunt.

    White people will begin to regain their strength when they rediscover their ability to hate.

    The Liberal/Leftist/Jew filth will shriek that “hate” is “Un-Christian”.

    Of course, these same people who pretend to recoil in horror at the great conquests of Christians and Christian nations, will, in the very next breath laugh and mock “modern Christians” as being weak and impotent.

    When Christian nations and men were willing to hate and kill, they were at their greatest strength.

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
    , @John Johnson
  213. @Mefobills

    You are so friggin’ ignorant. And so damn prejudiced against Germans. It was not “Goebbels” who wanted women to return to the home. It was the entire National Socialist program that was intended to reverse the downward spiral that a democratic, parliamentary, internationalist Weimar government had brought Germany to. I won’t bother to go through all the details. This was decided on as a measure to stop and hopefully turn around the falling birth rate in Germany, and to halt and reverse male unemployment. It wasn’t because they feared and disliked their women, as men like you do.

    I totally agree, and have said so, that women be restricted from the military, police and firefighting occupations, except in auxiliary roles. When it comes to politics, I think women today can do a good job as mayors, running town and city governments. I’m undecided about governors and senator, but I definitely do not want a woman president. I think women’s nature is unsuited to top executive roles, and, in order to carry it out well, a woman would have to turn herself into a man. I’m not for that.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @Oemiktlob
  214. @FLgeezer

    Wow, is this forum filled with male imbeciles or what? Refuted my points? Could have been a lawyer? Absolutely not, as I noted in comment #217. Being a geezer, I guess you old guys have lost a lot of your sharpness and therefore appreciate each other. Glad you have something to do.

  215. @Franz

    How about more free speech, not less?

  216. @Nisbe

    Wait a minute. If one side doesn’t fight back because they’re “not allowed” to fight back, then by definition the war is NOT on. When the other side is powerful enough to disallow kinetic resistance, there is no war. It’s called surrender if the will to fight becomes manifest but later broken. If it never grows strong enough erupt into actual fighting in the first place, it’s resentiment. The actual fighting has been disallowed since Appomattox. There’s been talk, cheap talk, of restarting it ever since.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
    , @Nisbe
  217. @Niebelheim

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossbarry_ambush

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilmichael_Ambush

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrenpoint_ambush

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Squad_(Irish_Republican_Army_unit)

    Can you imagine a war waged in this manner in a place as large as the US?

    An interesting side note is that prior to the Kilmichael Ambush, the local parish priest came down and heard all the participant’s confessions.

    Nowadays, most of the Catholic clergy would likely turn them in. They’d rather give Communion to the likes of Pelosi and Biden.

    Wh0 are “eating and drinking of their own damnnation”, btw.

  218. Rosie says:
    @Rurik

    idiocy

    If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action.

    I always find it tremendously gratifying to blow the cover off a disingenuous creep like you who feigns the dispassionate scholar but then denies the facts, saying “It can’t be” because reasons.

    Your claim that White women are omnipotent is particularly risible given that it is now a matter of public record that , in conflicts between voters and donors, donors win. This is inconvenient for you, of course, because the donors are overwhelmingly male, so you refuse to acknowledge reality like the petulant child you are.

    https://www.vox.com/2014/4/18/5624310/martin-gilens-testing-theories-of-american-politics-explained

    because women demand to be Marines and firemen

    Meanwhile, here on planet Earth, White women are doing precisely those things they have always done: teaching children, tending the sick, waiting on people in restaurants, etc.

    A little math to show how stupid and irrational your hatred of women is:

    The current active duty military population is 1.3 million. Fourteen percent (I’ll just round it up to 15%) are women. That makes ~200,000 women on active duty in the military.

    There are 3.8 million nurses in the country. Ninety percent are women. That makes ~3,400,000 women nurses alone, 17x the number of women in the service.

    Your kind should be ruthlessly kicked out of White nationalism for alienating half the White race because you are annoyed by a tiny fraction of a fraction.

    But giving them the vote, has resulted

    Since you’re an idiot, this will probably go over your head, but…

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Rurik
  219. Rosie says:
    @Rurik

    I checked

    not true

    https://cawp.rutgers.edu/presidential-poll-tracking-2020#NPGR

    white women’s votes were split evenly between Trump and Biden, at least according to the data.

    If white women would have voted like their white male counterparts, then Trump’s victory would have been an even bigger rout. So massive that even with their mega-fraud, they’d not have been able to thwart it.

    What exactly have White men gotten in return for their loyalty to the Republican party?

    A few extra bucks in your pockets? Sometimes it seems that’s all you care about.

  220. @GeneralRipper

    You might get demoted.
    UR has… granulated my hate.
    It’s gonna take the Mexicans and the Asians and, well, whomever wants to throw their lot in to defeat the blacks.
    I think these groups will do it without us jokers.
    The blacks have to be defeated.
    Enemy number one.
    The blacks will be defeated.
    That’s easy. They can’t fight. They can’t survive without white people. Once all their white defenders are dominated…check mate.
    Personally, I’ve lived among Hispanics for many years. Many times i was called, ” hue”. I was told it was derogatory.
    However, some of the best people i ever knew were Mexican.
    I lived in the dessert southwest and Mexico for 3 years. I have to say i was treated pretty well.
    One of the best men i ever knew in my life was first gen American. Henry would’ve killed any man woman or child for me. I would’ve done the same for him.
    I loved his wife. And his Dolly. Great food.
    No, i actually think we need the Hispanics.
    You’re gonna have to chew on your collar general.
    For now…and just now…we gotta reign ìt in…but, yeh, Amnesty for these people.
    I’d rather be shoulder to shoulder with one of them in a firefight than most of these so called soldiers we have today.
    I served with them. They were Damn fine soldiers.
    Hispanic women are hot.

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  221. Mefobills says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    You are so friggin’ ignorant. And so damn prejudiced against Germans. It was not “Goebbels” who wanted women to return to the home. It was the entire National Socialist program that was intended to reverse the downward spiral that a democratic, parliamentary, internationalist Weimar government had brought Germany to.

    You don’ t think I know that?

    This is why women should not be in politics.

    It was Goebbels speech, so I attributed it to him.

    The exceptional woman makes a good mayor, or running a town or city government. But, on average they are not well suited for management roles. Evolution did not equip women (on average) for that role.

    AND… according to Goebbels and NSDAP, women should not be running a town or city government, or even commenting on politics.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  222. An interesting and well written article but couldn’t these types of anecdotes be found in just any decade?

    Dr Albert Schweitzer wrote extensively about how egalitarians are lying about race and he was completely ignored. What else do people need? The guy was at one time a revered egalitarian himself.

    For every White female teacher that runs from the ghetto there is another fresh college grad willing to take her place.

    What needs to be said is that while some Whites do indeed move on after facing the reality of race we still have the problem of Whites that choose to lie.

    There is a real problem with Whites that leave the colleges believing they are going to fix the racial problem. When they later find out their professors were lying they choose to side with the lie instead of the truth. It’s too much for them to accept that their professors were wrong and their brutish cousin was correct. They would rather join the lie. In their minds the Nazis were right if we admit any of this to be true.

    In every single multi-racial school there are White teachers that are fully aware of race and side against Whites out of bitterness. If White students are raped or beaten that if of little consequence to them.

    Learning about the reality of race actually makes some egalitarians worse. They stop believing that Blacks can be held to equal standards and adopt the cynical view of Brazil 2.0. Basically water down Whites through miscegenation and let China rule the world. They really prefer this outcome over to admitting the truth and moving on. You have to meet some to these leftists in education. They are really sick people that fully support turning the country into the third world. Nietzsche was right in that equality is often just a mask for bitterness over lacking power.

    • Replies: @Zarathustra
    , @anarchyst
  223. @GeneralRipper

    On the streets of Harlem, my blonde hair, blue eyes, and white skin made me an irresistible target,” wrote Tracy Abel, a social worker in New York. “The mothers called me ‘cracka ass’ and ‘white bitch’ while I labored on their behalf.”

    LOL…Dumb cunt.

    Someone a while back made a video of a woman walking through NYC to show how they are constantly cat called.

    A bunch of leftists complained that it re-enforced stereotypes about Black and Hispanic men.

    HOW DARE YOU SHOW REALITY

    Of course no one pointed out the irony of leftists getting mad about exposing what is supposed to be a feminist issue.

    Leftists don’t care if White women are cat called by non-Whites. If they get raped it isn’t a story to them either.

    As for social workers I have heard they contain more racial realists than any other profession with police being second.

    But they know which side butters their bread so they don’t share that reality with the public.

  224. @Tony Massey

    Lol, Mr.Unz probably shares the same sentiment, considering his articles about the mestizos.
    And I find it hard to argue against in the case of america. Look at modern huwhites vs the Mexicans, similar to Muslims vs modern liberal “Europeans” (same meaningless broad stroke like “white race”). Sure, these brownies won’t fly to space in a thousand years, but most animals never flew to space either (according to recorded history), and they lasted for quite a bit longer than we are realistically projected to survive as Völker and our respective nation states.
    What is so special about these supposed “HIQ” people who wouldn’t survive a month in the wild, when they can’t even figure out who they are? Even dogs have packs.

    But worry not, Asians will go to space instead. The last surviving huwhites and Europeans can buy the spaceship tickets.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @Tony Massey
  225. Rooster10 says:
    @AKINDLE

    I was replying to a post about Trump’s stance on on the riots. Where did I mention anything relating to his view on race or any of his other political positions or actions/non-actions? It’s obvious you missed your TDS pills today, I pray our dear leader Kamala shows mercy on your wretched soul.

    • Replies: @AKINDLE
  226. F. Galton says:
    @Dave Bowman

    I agree with your Spanish/Hispanic naming convention. But for the college admissions deans and company/agency HR directors out there who are under pressure to recruit more Hispanics/Latinos, Spaniards will get a pass if they claim to be Hispanic/Latino (and why wouldn’t they?).

    California has a large Portuguese-American population, and it’s the same situation. For college and job applications they’re suddenly not white anymore. Steve Sailer’s “flight from white” trend strikes again.

  227. @HeebHunter

    Ya lost me. No clue.
    Happy New Year’s Eve…Eve.
    I started early.
    Fixing to goto a smoke fest.
    You’re English is pretty good but sometimes i. needthe enigma to decipher it.
    Stick to the glory days.
    Come to America.
    E TN is great.
    Have a great new Year. Hope it’s good for you and yours.
    Have you ever heard of low infiltration?
    Peace
    Tony

    • Replies: @HeebHunter
  228. @Hang All Text Drivers

    Many non-whites in the usa, especially asians, do not have large families. Mexicans and other Latinos have unexceptional family size and fertility not far above replacement once they have been here a generation or two (thank God).

    It is not even close to true that “most” nonwhites in the usa are on welfare rather than working. As for Africans, well there you have a better case.

  229. @Tony Massey

    My miserable experience with cops is not consistent with that happy generalization.

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
  230. @Nisbe

    The new link doesn’t seem to work, either.

  231. @The Ghost of Paul Harvey

    “… and we keep voting for them.”

    I think that should read “… and Dominion keeps reporting that we keep voting for them.”

  232. @Davidoff

    Davidoff is clearly an idiotic Scottish nationalist, whose worldview is based on the fantasy that Scots are innocent and morally faultless under the tenets of the PC-globo religion, whereas the English and Anglo-Saxons are uniquely guilty. A total joke, ignore.

  233. @Rosie

    Meanwhile, here on planet Earth, White women are doing precisely those things they have always done: teaching children, tending the sick, waiting on people in restaurants, etc.

    Don’t forget lying to children about race and pushing White guilt in public schools.

    Visit any elementary school during MLK month and tell me I’m wrong.

    I also only see crowds of White women fighting for abortion while the country burns.

    Well except maybe the one liberal guy trying to get laid.

    Before you get upset I don’t blame women anymore than I blame men. There are no benevolent or innocent groups at this time.

    • Agree: MrVoid
    • Replies: @Rosie
  234. @Tony Massey

    Don’t spend too much time on the anti-police types here.

    They talk about the position as if anyone can do it and yet politicians continue to pressure police departments to lower their standards for the sake of diversity.

    I honestly think half of them had a mom that dialed a cop late at night and not because of a burglar. It would explain why some of them are obsessed with trying to denigrate the police.

    They might even be related to a cop without knowing it.

  235. @Tony Massey

    Way way way more than 50 die a year in the line of duty. Way way way more. Check the numbers.

    Check ’em yourself: you have no idea what you’re talking about.

    Typical Laura Norder ignoramus, braying with absolute certainty when he hasn’t bothered to check data that takes literally 15 seconds to find.

    I have little doubt that your brother’s “one of the most intelligent people I’ve ever known“… it’s just that you move in a narrow, stupid circle. If you’re too stupid or lazy [or both, but not neither] to check the data, but you still think you know the right answer… well, you’re unfit to judge anything.

    The data are produced every year, and I look at them every year to ensure that being a piggie is still outside the top 20 most dangerous jobs.

    The FBI is mandated to produce annual ‘LEOKA’ (Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted) statistics – for LEO’s feloniously killed the 2019 version is at this link.

    As you will see in the Summary:

    In 2019, 48 law enforcement officers died from injuries incurred in the line of duty during felonious incidents.

    Line-of-duty deaths occurred in 19 states and Puerto Rico.

    By region, 27 officers were feloniously killed in the South, 9 officers in the Midwest, 9 officers in the West, 1 officer in the Northeast, and 2 officers in Puerto Rico.

    Of the officers feloniously killed, 25 were employed by city police departments, including 7 who were members of law enforcement agencies in cities with between 100,000 and 249,999 inhabitants.

    So in fact it’s LESS THAN – let’s make that clear… LESS THAN – 50. FORTY-EIGHT.

    That’s less than 50, sport. You can tell because there are only two numbers and the one on the left is a 4, which is less than a 5. If it was a 2-digit number and it was ‘way way way more than 50’, then the first number (on the left) would be a 6 or bigger.

    It’s definitely not ‘way way way more’, even if you went to a US government school for 12 years.

    Now FORTY-EIGHT – the number of piggies feloniously killed in 2019 – is not ‘way way way less than’ 50 either. Of course, I didn’t claim it was less than 50 – let alone ‘way way way less than’.

    I just said that it was ’50-odd’ (in 2018 it was 51).

    But along you come – a badge-licking ignoramus – claiming it was ‘way way way more than 50‘ – indicating that you had never bothered to look at the fucking data.

    That ‘Thin Blue Line’ horse-shit might work in a Badge Bar, but it’s not going to work on the internet.

    Do you know how numbers work?

    It’s not even one LEO per state per year. Only 18 were killed in cities larger than 250k inhabitants, and 25 in cities > 100k pop.

    There are about 80 cities with more than 250k inhabitants in the US, and a tad under 320 with populations over 100k.

    (FWIW: There are about the same number of piggies killed in vehicle accidents where there was no felonious element – otherwise put, police vehicular incompetence. That’s got nothing to do with the job: it’s just a Darwinian filter. It’s to be hoped that they don’t hurt any bystanders when they die as a result of being unable to control a vehicle properly. Single-vehicle fatalities are the ultimate in cognitive eugenics).

    *

    Oh… and as for my ‘loved ones murder’ [sic]: you’re going to need more lube for your BlueLine masturbatory fantasies (wherein murder victims are the next-of-kin of “LEO awesomeness-deniers”) or you risk getting callouses on your undercarriage.

    Reality is, about 80% of murder victims are completely non-random (organised and otherwise).

    The random ones are rarely solved by brute-force investigative effort, but are sometimes resolved when a lifelong fuckup gets swabbed after yet another bout of incompetent criminality.

  236. Rosie says:

    I checked

    not true

    https://cawp.rutgers.edu/presidential-poll-tracking-2020#NPGR

    white women’s votes were split evenly between Trump and Biden, at least according to the data.

    Lol good grief. A manosphere creep telling whoppers again. Quelle surprise. Those are polls from before the election, which have been notoriously unreliable with regard to Trump.

    Exit polls tell us how selected demographics actually voted, without the under sampling of conservatives common in presidential polling.

    White women went for Trump 55% to 44%, an 11 point landslide. 63% of White women without college degrees voted for Trump. So much for “women’s nature” lol. In fact, White women are nationalists by inclination, just like everyone else on the planet. It takes K-PhD indoctrination to condition them out of it.

    Ririk will continue lying about this, though. His feelings don’t care about my facts.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  237. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    Don’t forget lying to children about race and pushing White guilt in public schools.

    Visit any elementary school during MLK month and tell me I’m wrong.

    I notice you defend the police, but attack teachers. That is the usual approach. Men who go along with the anti-White system in order to keep their jobs get a pass, but not women. Let’s call it the pr!ck pass, lol.

  238. Nisbe says:
    @Corvinus

    Not decades, centuries.

    And you should work on your demoralization tactics and strawman arguments, very low effort, made me cringe.

    See you on the other side : )

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  239. Nisbe says:
    @Niebelheim

    Thing is, as the anti-White governments and institutions keep Whites from fighting back and keep crushing them with more and more nonsense and subversion (forced diversity quotas, using their tax money to send billions to foreign powers, etc), there will come the point when poverty and misery is widespread enough that people stop caring about the risks of going against said governments and institutions.

    Do you think the comped govs and institutions are increasing their efforts to dispossesse and crush their White populations, or reducing them? Do you think they will ever reduce them before the cracking point ever comes?

    I don’t see them ever letting up until the cracking point comes. It’s always the same situation thru out history, we are not special snowflakes removed from the ebb and flow of the human condition. Unless this tragectory is changed by a truly benign and powerful enough power (perhaps the 2nd mandante of the Trump admin?), IMHO war and balkanization along racial (and religious one, due to the Islamization efforts of the anti-Christian anti-White subverters and infiltrators) lines are what awaits every Western territory in the next 5-15 years.

    • Replies: @Rooster10
  240. Rosie says:

    Goebbels wanted women to return to the home. Universal suffrage voting is a disaster. ON AVERAGE, women’s voting pattern is very predictable.

    They vote their security. If they are secure in a marriage to a man who can provide, wives will vote the same as their husbands.

    A half-truth at best. Politics is downstream of culture, your blather about “women’s nature” notwithstanding. In 2016, no less than 70% of all White women voted for Trump, including college-educated ones.

    https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls/georgia/president

    In Oregon, only 35% did.

    https://www.cnn.com/election/2016/results/exit-polls/oregon/president

    That is an enormous gap that cannot be explained away by different marriage statistics.

    In any event, Oregonians are slightly more likely to be married than Georgians. See here:

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/03/07/marriage-us-states-highest-percentage-married-people/39043233/

    Is women’s nature in Georgia different from women’s nature in Oregon? Maybe there’s something in the water.

  241. @Tony Massey

    Don’t worry, Tony. It is just another rant how whatever that is coming to our countries are fully deserved.

    I wish you a happy new year also, and all the luck needed for your desired closures.

    I don’t know about low infiltration more than what google tells me, unfortunately.

  242. @RadicalCenter

    I’ve had bad experiences with P.O. it was out of whack for a time but for God sakes my bro has said many times… before Rodney kind and after Rodney king.
    He’s tinted the shades of a few after Rodney.
    Allot of cops have

    Hey, Rodney was high on pcp driving at over 100mph on non-interstate freeways.

    He should’ve been subdued with less force. He did resist. True, the magic rule was if you ran an they caught you you took it to the gear.
    It was over board.
    A jury of their peers found them not guilty.
    Did that mean anything? No of course not.
    Did they riot?
    The Koreans made a name for themselves in shucks o geez black vs white America. They took it hard. They fought back.
    Reginald Denny got a brick to the fucking head and went on Oprah and forgave Damien williams who danced over his bloodied body. The other 2 were never charged.
    I forget their names. Damian football Williams wasn’t even the main instigator.
    Oprah gave him a car.
    Reginald Denny lost a pe piece of his memory. He publicly forgave him. Forgave them all. Oprah gave him a car too.
    You want a brick to your head for a new car?
    Do you want Togo on national tv and forgive your attackers?
    The Koreans never apologized for killing approx 25-30 of them.
    Those guys were heroes.
    To this day that area is not burned out but without any business.
    I saw it fur myself 15 years ago right after magic Johnson” revived” it. It was a husk.
    Magic was a magical negro for saving that area.
    Go look at it today.

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
    , @Tony Massey
  243. @Tony Massey

    Does it turn your stomach that some people only respond to force and your reaction is to question the force?
    Would you not comply?
    Almost all this shit would be completely negligible if everyone followed lawful orders to comply.
    Now…if a black person doesn’t want to be arrested…your city burns.
    The whole nation has to undergo lesson that doesn’t exist.
    It’s all over.
    The present generation of Leo is running for the exists

    My bro spends at least 12 hours of the month at the Academy teaching young people how to be cops.
    He can’t teach them anymore.
    Nobody wants to be a cop. Which means nobodywants to be a homicide investigator.
    You have to work your way up

    Now? All they are allowed to teach is deescalation.
    None of them understand that.
    How the fuck do you de escalate a guy?
    It’s with force. Overwhelming force. You have to put forth more force than they do.
    My best bet is to protect my people. Send 25 people vs 1. Maybe that will overwhelm them.
    Not joggers.
    They just fight harder.
    So i should send 1?

    How do you meet force and if you’re response is you never have what should someone do that has called the ems system, which nearly all did, deal with non-compliance and exhibiting violent behavior.

    Would you…

  244. @Tony Massey

    And have a very happy new year, rad.
    I lost my train of thought. That’s just me.
    It’s impossible anyone, including yourself, could ever be attacked.
    I can understand why you would not care.
    If anyone does ever attack you i hope you get a new car/truck minus the permanent loss of memory.
    In fact, i think you deserve a new vehicle.
    I just want peace. With peopl like you it’s just around the corner.
    Happy New Year
    Peace
    Hope no one brains you or your loved one tonight
    So long as we maintain the piece tho…i think it’ll all work out
    Cheers

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  245. @Nisbe

    Literally has a demonic feel to it.

  246. Oemiktlob says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    “a woman would have to turn herself into a man.”

    Carolyn, I appreciate reading your input on TUR, whether I agree with it or not, so thank you for showing up.

    For me, as a man, the section of your quote that I’ve posted above encapsulates the issue I have with women venturing into areas that have traditionally been the domain of males. I simply don’t want to see women become like men. Men do evil and that is bad enough but what does it say about a society, any society, when the women want to “get in on the action”, so to speak? Whether a woman’s motive is “pure” is moot in my mind. She will “become like a man” and that can only lead to the destruction of a healthy society. This is a lose-lose proposition. The effects may not show up immediately but I believe eventually they will. I believe we are seeing much of it manifest now.

  247. @Rosie

    I notice you defend the police, but attack teachers. That is the usual approach. Men who go along with the anti-White system in order to keep their jobs get a pass, but not women. Let’s call it the pr!ck pass, lol.

    I don’t give passes to adults that knowingly lie to children and most of them are indeed White women.

    But yes there is also a problem with police that know the truth and do nothing.

    You could say that frontline workers in general are living a giant lie and just hoping it somehow goes away. It won’t.

    • Replies: @Rosie
  248. Rurik says:
    @FLgeezer

    Thank you FLgeezer,

    always nice to get encouragement, especially from you.

    Happy New Year to you!

    • Agree: TheTrumanShow
    • Replies: @TheTrumanShow
  249. Rurik says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    You have written over 8000 comments here since 2015, and they are typically unusually long ones (without any necessity to be as long as they are)

    ‘too many notes’?

    For example, you bring up Hillary Clinton to me as some sort of proof that white women are responsible for just as much killing as white men. That is really lame.

    your point was that white women aren’t capable of affection for white men because of white men’s support for the killing machine- doing so much harm to their children, and that is why I pointed out white women’s votes for the war bitch.

    Our entire conversation is a couple of clicks away, so why would you try to dishonestly mischaracterize it?

    And I’ll tell you what is really lame, is that anyone, male of female, would have voted for that cackling monster. Even sadder that a member of the fairer sex would do so.

    Jewish women feminists and supreme court justices. Are Jews white?

    I’m not sure if Jews are white, but I am certain that Jewish females are female. And that was the point, as a reproof of your foolish suggestion that the feminist poisons inflicted on our society were done so by men, and only men.

    since you’re clearly a libertarian.

    no I’m not

    I believe in borders and I’d use anti-trust laws and law suits to crush Google and Facebook and others..

    You stoop so low as to quote a partial sentence from me: “If you want to talk about ‘penis-envy’ in women” … and then ask: “huh?! where’d that come from?” It came from the previous sentence I wrote, dummy, which you ignore, but you think you can play cheap games like that with me.

    Good Lord

    Your every point us utterly dishonest.

    I didn’t quote the part about Greek homoism because it wasn’t relevant to anything. And what did that have to do with ‘penis envy’?

    In answer to women’s status in ancient Greece, you ignorantly say, “From what I’ve glimmered,

    I said ‘from what I’ve glimmered as a open admission of my layman’s view. I’m not purporting to be a scholar, just a simple man who’s here in good faith to learn.

    [Jewish] control of our money has given them almost unlimited power over our governments and institutions,” which no doubt was made possible by giving white women the vote.

    there you go again…

    dishonestly mischaracterizing my words. In fact it seems like that’s your main method of conversing. Simply attribute something stupid to someone and then pretend that they said it, as proof of how wrong they are and how ‘smart’ you are, huh?

    For the record, white women had nothing to do with the treason of the Fed. That was all Woodrow. But I sure wish there were more women (white and otherwise) lamenting the treason of the Fed and fighting to see it ended. I’d welcome that for sure!

    so don’t bother to write any.

    it doesn’t work that way.

    Since you decided to write a grotesquely dishonest mischaracterization of everything I’ve said, you don’t get to leave it at that.

    Own up to it when you’re wrong, and you’ll be better off for it. It’s a liberating thing to admit when you’re in error. It doesn’t mean you’re a bad person, just somewhat misguided, and that’s where Unz comes in handy.

    Cheers. (and you’re welcome ; )

    • Thanks: FLgeezer
    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
  250. Oracle says:
    @RoatanBill

    I know you are being sarcastic, but I meant my comment to be from our perspective. I would say it used to be ok to be white, but now that we are being dispossessed and attacked verbally and physically throughout the world, it’s not that ok anymore.

  251. Rurik says:
    @Rosie

    Your claim that White women are omnipotent is particularly risible

    another one!

    don’t you idiots realize that every word I wrote is right here on this thread?

    saying white women are omnipotent would be the height of idiocy, and so that’s why you (also) dishonestly mischaracterize what I said.

    Look, if you have a point, then just make it. You don’t need to come off like a harridan with a battle axe, in order to show us all how ‘smart’ white women can be.

    like the petulant child you are.

    ‘creep, petulant child’.

    Thank God you’re not representative of women, (white or otherwise), as the human species would flatline in a generation.

    because women demand to be Marines and firemen

    Meanwhile, here on planet Earth,

    are you suggesting that a majority of white women don’t think women should be in combat?

    or, are you just continuing with your tiresome ogress impression?

    A little math to show how stupid and irrational your hatred of women is:

    ahh, I was too kind in referring to you as an ogress. That’s unfair to ogresses everywhere.

    Rather, you’re a putrid skank and a lying POS.

    For the record, (and I’m not talking to the skank here) I simply wondered out loud whether or not giving women the vote has resulted in a more liberal trajectory for the Western world.

    It’s not a slight against women, (ugly slags like Rosie notwithstanding ; ), because women are generally beautiful souls.

    I just think they’re more naturally compassionate than men, and that was my only point.

    then somehow Rosie comes along to call me creepy

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Rosie
  252. Rurik says:
    @Rosie

    Ririk will continue lying about this, though

    did white women vote for Trump at the same rate as white men?

    are white women as nationalistic as white men?

    fuck off slag

    • Replies: @Rosie
  253. Here is what I don’t get: Why are so many White people incapable of using the internet to fact check liberal and Con Inc BS? A good example is the Smollett fraud where even paid analysts were unable to read about how known facts of the case didn’t add up.

    All you have to do is spend an evening with Google to at least confirm that they are not telling us everything about race.

    Even Bill Gates seemed incapable of doing this as seen by his race-denial based education programs. Those programs failed and we racial realists again were not given an apology for being ignored in favor of what our establishment elites would like to exist rather than what does. So ironically someone that embraces the mass utilization of information was incapable of studying the basics in regard to race.

    The only progress I see is that liberals and Con Inc hucksters are mostly sticking to their own corners of the internet.

    When liberals come here to troll they normally use distraction tactics. That tells me they have at least learned that their arguments are weak and have to resort to trying to spoil the debate. On some level I do miss debating Anthro and various social science majors that would try to argue that race is just something that naughty White people invented. But it is minimal progress and I’ll take it.

    As for Con Inc they have no chance at defeating liberalism so I don’t spend that much time engaging them. A bunch of losers (mostly boomers) trying to cling to a fantasy where all Blacks would be like the Huxtables if not for Godless socialism.

  254. AKINDLE says:
    @Rooster10

    TDS? Far from it. That’s the criticism you get if you dared criticize “Dump” at all over the past four years. It’s getting old. You think letting black felons out of jail was some kind of “Law and Order” Candidate? He is part of the problem. He contributed to the riots. I said he was a liar. Did I say Biden/Harris were any better? NO. Now go back home and worship your little donnie statue and pray at the altar of some 6D Chess BS. BTW, I do not need some of these wretches in government to save my soul, and neither do you.

    • Replies: @Rooster10
  255. Corvinus says:
    @Nisbe

    “And you should work on your demoralization tactics and strawman arguments, very low effort, made me cringe.”

    More like you are avoiding conversation when I refute your assertion, such as “In case you don’t know, it was Jews who kick started and dominated the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, and that has been proven and verified using Jewish literature.”

    “IMHO war and balkanization along racial (and religious one, due to the Islamization efforts of the anti-Christian anti-White subverters and infiltrators) lines are what awaits every Western territory in the next 5-15 years.”

    The timeline is always pushed back in your world when the Saxon will rise up.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  256. @Rurik

    For the record, (and I’m not talking to the skank here) I simply wondered out loud whether or not giving women the vote has resulted in a more liberal trajectory for the Western world.

    Giving non-land owners the right to vote probably made a much bigger difference.

    The founders never wanted a town vagrant to have the same number of votes as a noble. Letting the women of land owning husbands vote wouldn’t have changed much.

    The real trajectory change happened with the French Revolution.

    That is when egalitarian Whites went off the rails and decided that blank slate must exist and that equality must be “the science” even if they can’t explain it.

    This tradition continues today in the colleges. If equality still doesn’t exist then let’s just make “the science” say what we want, even if we can’t explain ourselves. The French Revolution started the lie that equality exists on a biological level and that traditional Western society powers suppress it.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  257. Rurik says:
    @Dave Bowman

    You are so absolutely right about both Tulsi Gabbard AND the gorgeous and deeply brave Clare Daly !!

    thank you Dave!

    Lots and lots of really courageous, intelligent, and beautiful (inside and out) women out there.

    As for the ropes, I’m not holding my breath. The dumbing down process has been remarkably effective, at least here in the good ol’ ZUS of A.

    Here’s to hoping that this new year brings with it some relief from the madness.

    And if not, we can always mock the fools here at Mr. Unz wonderful site, and chuckle at their imbecility.

    Cheers

  258. @Mefobills

    You don’ t think I know that?

    LOL, feeling defensive? Regardless of whether you know it or not, you still want to dishonestly project that Goebbels was the evil genius of a “Nazi anti-women outlook” in order to keep the false myths about the man flourishing among the brainwashed. If you’re going to use the National Socialists to make your points, at least be accurate. Joseph Goebbels was very friendly with women, and no woman in Germany thought he was bad for her.

    The exceptional woman makes a good mayor, or running a town or city government. But, on average they are not well suited for management roles.

    You don’t think I know that? All you’ve done here is repeat what I said. Since you had nothing new or different to add, why bother with your comment? In fact, you didn’t have anything helpful to say in the first one.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  259. Rurik says:
    @John Johnson

    Letting the women of land owning husbands vote wouldn’t have changed much.

    much?

    sometimes it doesn’t take much, to alter the trajectory much.

    There is a distinct ‘gender gap’ in political and cultural preferences.

    https://scholars.org/contribution/gender-differences-american-political-behavior

    And as the link shows, often women are wiser when it comes to things like wars.

    Only not so much in Hillary’s case, as a lot of women were voting for her because she was a woman, (sort of, in any case), blood-stained or not.

    I’m not as down on the French Revolution as you are. Yes, it set in motion some terrible things, but I suspect that it was the aloof arrogance of the aristocratic class that brought it about.

    They were taxing the poor to lavish luxuries on the rich. Exactly like they do today in the ZUS.

    They tax janitors and secretaries at higher rates than Wall Street banksters, who get bailouts when their swindles go bad.

    I’d like to see the guillotine brought back.

    If a politician tells lies to get Americans into wars or takes bribes from donors to betray the nation, then that politician’s head should be separated from his neck, and held high to the wild and enthusiastic cheers of the American people.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  260. FLgeezer says:
    @Polistra

    >The ruling class will happily permit the USA to be completely destroyed before they’ll
    allow white people ever to enjoy basic rights again.

    And speaking of the Ruling Class:
    ————————-
    Convicted US spy Pollard gets warm welcome in Israel
    Jonathan Pollard, left, an American jailed in the U.S. for spying for Israel, and his wife, Esther, on a private jet provided by American casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. ISRAEL HAYOM
    By Josef Federman Associated Press

    JERUSALEM — Jonathan Pollard, who spent 30 years in U.S. prison for spying for Israel, arrived in Israel early Wednesday with his wife, triumphantly kissing the ground as he disembarked from the aircraft in the culmination of a decadeslong affair that had long strained relations between the allies.
    “We are ecstatic to be home at last after 35 years,” Pollard said as he was greeted at Israel’s international airport by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The Israeli leader presented Pollard and his wife, Esther, with Israeli ID cards, granting them citizenship.
    “You’re home,” Netanyahu said, reciting a Hebrew blessing of thanks.
    Pollard arrived on a private plane provided by American casino magnate Sheldon Adelson, a billionaire supporter of both Netanyahu and President Donald Trump.
    Pollard, 66, and his wife walked slowly down the steps as they exited from the aircraft. Pollard got on his knees and kissed the ground as his wife put her hand on his back with Netanyahu standing by in the darkness. Esther Pollard, who is battling cancer, then kissed the ground and was helped up by her husband.
    Pollard thanked Netanyahu and the Jewish people for supporting him.
    “We hope to become productive citizens as soon and as quickly as possible and to get on with our lives here,” he said.
    Pollard, a civilian intelligence analyst for the U.S. Navy, sold military secrets to Israel while working at the Pentagon in the 1980s. He was arrested in 1985 after trying unsuccessfully to gain asylum at the Israeli Embassy in Washington and pleaded guilty. The espionage affair embarrassed Israel and tarnished its relations with the United States for years.
    Despite the damage he caused to relations with the U.S. over the years, Pollard was warmly embraced by Israel’s nationalist politicians. Israeli President Reuven Rivlin welcomed him in a tweet, and lawmakers from Netanyahu’s Likud party and its allies tweeted congratulations and greetings to the Pollards, who left from the airport for an undisclosed location.
    “”There is no Israeli who didn’t feel excited this morning to see Pollard’s landing in Israel and the moment he kissed the country’s earth, which he had dreamed of for 35 years,” Israeli Transportation Minister Miri Regev, a close ally of Netanyahu, wrote on Twitter.
    Pollard was given a life sentence, and U.S. defense and intelligence officials consistently argued against his release. But after serving 30 years in federal prison, he was released in 2015, and placed on a five-year parole period that ended in November. That cleared the way for him to leave the U.S.
    Pollard’s arrival was first reported by Israel Hayom, a newspaper owned by Adelson. The newspaper published photos of Pollard and his wife, both wearing masks, on what it said was a private plane that arrived early Wednesday from Newark, New Jersey.
    It said the private flight was necessary due to the medical needs of Esther Pollard.
    The Ynet website said the couple was in quarantine, which is mandatory for all returning Israelis to guard against the spread of the coronavirus.
    ———————–

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
    , @Garliv
  261. Flubber says:
    @anarchyst

    Ignoring the JQ has made AmRem almost a total irrelevance.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  262. @Dave Bowman

    In the old days they were actually called “Spanish”, as opposed to “Hispanic”, the two terms being really synonymous. It is all just more politically correct speech used to confuse people. It is like the term,”Person of Color” what is that supposed to mean really? You can call someone a person of “Color”, but you can’t call them a “Colored Person” even though those are synonyms?
    In my area of California there are some very old Mexican restuaraunts where the sign says “Spanish Food” because in the old days they preferred to be called “Spanish” as opposed to “Mexican”. There is a “Hispanic” history in California that pre-dates the Mexican Revolution.

  263. @Rurik

    There is a distinct ‘gender gap’ in political and cultural preferences.

    There is but it is heavily skewed by single women. But more importantly egalitarian madness started well before women were allowed to vote. Lincoln and Wilson did far more damage than any group of women. Both were public egalitarians but privately believed that nature was unequal.

    I’m not as down on the French Revolution as you are. Yes, it set in motion some terrible things, but I suspect that it was the aloof arrogance of the aristocratic class that brought it about.

    They were taxing the poor to lavish luxuries on the rich.

    Yes the greed and arrogance of the ruling class at the time was outrageous and they were asking for a revolution.

    Completely agree there but the revolution went much further than wealth redistribution. They introduced the idea that inequality must be the result of oppression. It provided a bedrock for Marxism whereby anyone can switch professions with anyone else with the right circumstances.

    A lot of the nastier side of the French Revolution isn’t discussed in schools since the era is idealized by liberals.

    They tax janitors and secretaries at higher rates than Wall Street banksters, who get bailouts when their swindles go bad.

    I’d like to see the guillotine brought back.

    I get the sentiment but if the revolution was led by modern egalitarians they would stick us in after the banksters.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  264. @Rurik

    Wow, you are even more dishonest than I thought! You’re a downright liar. What’s sad is that, as Rosie said, the mano-sphere that exists here will not call you up on it. I’ll just pick out a couple of the more blatant examples bc I don’t want to encourage more lies from you.

    ‘too many notes’?

    This is your full answer to my questioning how as a business owner you can write 8000 long comments here since 2015, entailing consuming many articles on a regular basis, when nearly all regular contributors come in under 2000, with a greater number being under 1000. Failing to respond to that is a glaring avoidance on your part. Avoidance is the tactic you use to basically deny you’ve said what you’ve said. With your two replies to me, you avoided 100% of my arguments, while pretending to answer them.

    I’m not sure if Jews are white, but I am certain that Jewish females are female. And that was the point, as a reproof of your foolish suggestion that the feminist poisons inflicted on our society were done so by men, and only men.

    Two whoppers here. You’re not sure if Jews are white??? But the first whopper is that you avoided the whole issue of your original claim that white women are feminists yet used only Jewish women as examples. It’s irrational, and if you can’t see that, you are truly deficient. Everything you originally brought up was to do with “white women”; if you then substitute Jewesses for white women’s behavior bc you can’t find any white women to prove your point, that is a deceptive tactic and invalid.
    2nd whopper: To use the word “suggested” so you can use your own words for what I said rather than my words is also trick or tactic similar to a strawman argument. It’s noticeable that you didn’t quote anything from me so I really have no idea what you’re referring to. In essence, you’re accusing me of something that you won’t produce. I am right to say that men like you are cowards.

    I could go on but, as I said, I don’t want to encourage more lies from you bc that’s all that’s going to come. When I said I wouldn’t reply to you again, my meaning was for new comments in the future. Certainly you’re welcome answer anything I send to you — too bad there won’t be any more.

    • Troll: FLgeezer
    • Replies: @Tony Massey
    , @Rurik
  265. Mefobills says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    I’m saying you should shut up.

    National Socialism doesn’t care about your politics. It does care about how you raise your family. Focus on that.

    You are in cognitive dissonance about your role.

    And you hair-split just like a jew. It is pretty obvious if you read the Goebbel’s link that I provided that he was representing NSDAP thought.

    You just want to argue, like a harridan.

    Women don’t belong in men’s spaces.

  266. @Carolyn Yeager

    She does make a strong point about your choice to not name yourself.
    I didn’t name myself until Linh Dinh shamed me(well, not me but…) And i had to agree.
    I think you picked the wrong fight.
    Carolyn seems to have scored more points in this exchange.
    You would be better off apologizing.
    Happy New Year Carolyn.
    You ended the year on a score on the UR.
    Good for you.
    Personally, i try never to fuck with a woman. Can’t see winning(which is unlikely) as being ever worth it.
    Good strong comments tho. I think you made your point. Nice job.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @Rurik
  267. @Mefobills

    That’s just completely off. You throwed yourself under the bus with that one.
    It’s not that hard to be bigger than that.
    I fail too.
    And what with it being new years Eve and all… say something nice.
    I sorta think Carolyn holds her own fairly well.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  268. anarchyst says:
    @John Johnson

    It was just as bad in the 1960s. In fact, Detroit’s Northeastern High School and just about every other Detroit public school had a “black students union” that was successful in getting the American flag removed from the front of the schools and replacing it with a “black nationalist” flag.

    The ordeal that us white students had to go through was harrowing, to say the least. White students did not use the restrooms, as a “beatdown” by multiple blacks was usually the result.

    Blacks never fought one-on-one, the “pack mentality” was evident then as is today.

    Any attempts by whites to defend themselves was met with indifference, and even outright hostility from school officials. You see, even then, blacks were not “responsible” for their behavior.

    Blacks did not want to learn, the same situation that still exists today. Even then, blacks were disruptive. Most of the teachers just shrugged their shoulders, let the disruptions go on until the next class period.

    Teachers were deferential to blacks, although there were a few good teachers who tried to carefully shield their white and asian students from predatory blacks, giving them additional attention and coursework, knowing that they could excel in spite of the, violent, raucous atmosphere.

    Anywhere blacks go, they destroy…

  269. @Tony Massey

    Not sure what you are saying here, but thanks for bringing up assault.

    I was randomly blind-sided and attacked by a black guy calling me a white bitch , in daylight in downtown LA — well before any Saint George protests — and permanently injured last year. LAPD officer right nearby made no attempt to get the guy, who did not run off and could have been apprehended. Rather, the officer lectured me to calm down and be more careful and that is all his lazy overpaid ass did. Literally added insult to injury, as the old saying goes.

    Of course not all cops are like that, and I do not want to abolish all government police. But to the extent that you are being sarcastic, it is uncalled for.

  270. Rurik says:
    @John Johnson

    I get the sentiment but if the revolution was led by modern egalitarians they would stick us in after the banksters.

    sad to say, they’d stick us in instead of the banksters

    now that wokenes is (apparently) headed to the White House, I think we can all be pretty certain that we’re going to get more wars, and more QE bankster bailouts, and of course more leftist lunacy.

    As they crush the middle and working class under their juggernaut of spite.

    It looks more and more to me like the Russian Revolution redux, than the French.

  271. @Mefobills

    Well, there you go.
    The only other thing I’ll say is this is not a men’s space. You wish it would be, and you should seek one out.

    • Agree: Tony Massey
  272. Mefobills says:
    @Tony Massey

    Carolyn needs to decide if she is a good NSDAP woman or not.

    Go back and read the comment thread. Her brain has been infected by liberalism. She even advocates for women to be in leadership roles.

    I will admit that there are exceptional women. That only means that I will listen to them to a degree.

    However, it was NSDAP policy that women did not get to vote, and they were to return to the home life. They were allowed to exit from men’s workspace. They were not allowed into politics, and their opinion on politics was only politely considered.

    There was a man’s world, and woman’s world.

    Carolyn is arguing politics with a man, and she is hair splitting. If she were to go back into time to NSDAP Germany, and behaved as she does, other women would be putting sharp elbows into her ribs.

  273. @Tony Massey

    Thank you, I really appreciate your speaking up. I’m sure there are a substantial number of other men here who agree with you but are not willing to say so. Happy New Year to you too. I’ll drink a glass of wine to you tonight, Tony.

    • Thanks: Tony Massey
    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  274. Rurik says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    You’re a downright liar.

    because I didn’t respond in depth to your stupid question about being a business owner, and yet able to write prolifically at this site?

    That’s your criteria for calling someone a liar?

    By you calling me a liar, because I didn’t expound on my particular business, destroys every shred of credibility you might once have had.

    Here’s a clue: If you’re going to call someone a liar, at least try to find the tiniest shred of a lie. Saying I didn’t satisfy your query about owning a business (that could be a lemonade stand for all you know), makes you look like a malicious, mendacious bitch, without a shred of decency.

    This is your full answer to my questioning how as a business owner you can write 8000 long comments here since 2015

    dumb shit..

    if I had a nine to five job, then writing as much as I do, would be a challenge. It’s because I own my own business that I have the freedom to use my time as I please. Are you really that stupid?

    Avoidance is the tactic you use to basically deny you’ve said what you’ve said.

    more dishonesty from the tiresome liar. I never denied I said what I said. I stand by every two plus million words I’ve ever written on this site.

    Every

    One.

    Two whoppers here. You’re not sure if Jews are white???

    That’s right.

    Are Afghans white? Are Sicilians? Is Goldie Hawn white, or is she non-white?

    It’s a complicated question with nuanced blending at the seams. So as I said, I’m not sure in every case.

    And that is the truth, just as with everything I’ve ever written here. I have no reason to lie, I stand by every word. Every word.

    But then you have the vitriolic indecency to call my honesty – lies. With zero evidence, and with a short exchange between us where I’ve demonstrated over and over your relentless dishonesty and underhanded attempts at mischaracterizing what I’ve said.

    But it’s all there, for anyone to pour over, if they’re masochistic enough to suffer though your diatribes.

    your original claim that white women are feminists yet used only Jewish women as examples.

    kindly show us all the quote where I claimed that “white women are feminists”.

    Or, admit that you made that one up too! Just as you’ve made up every quote that you’ve (dishonestly and in bad faith) attributed to me during this preposterous exchange.

    I’m beginning to think you do so just to be obnoxious, without any regard whatsoever for the truth.

    you then substitute Jewesses for white women’s behavior bc you can’t find any white women to prove your point, that is a deceptive tactic and invalid.

    I didn’t substitute Jewesses for white women, I said it was Jewesses that invented feminism, (not men as you implied). But if you want examples of white feminists, they are legion, starting with the gorgon hag herself, Ms. Clinton. And then just about every white women that’s ever graduated from a modern university. Are you really that daft?!

    In essence, you’re accusing me of something that you won’t produce. I am right to say that men like you are cowards.

    All I’ve been doing is producing blatant evidence of your rancid dishonesty. You’re just too dishonest to admit it.

    I could go on but, as I said, I don’t want to encourage more lies from you bc that’s all that’s going to come

    eat shit, Carolyn.

    I haven’t written one dishonest word. Not one. Whereas you and your harridan buddy have done nothing but lie and mischaracterize and otherwise act like revolting Jewesses yourselves.

    You and Rosie and Fran should all get a room.

    • Replies: @RadicalCenter
  275. @Mefobills

    If she were Togo back into time i wouldn’t be here. That was a long time ago guy.
    Their is no going back. It’s just…a constant ball breaking today.
    Tomorrow’s tomorrow will prolly not be any better than yesterday.
    I definitely don’t want to go back to eating millet everyday 358 days a Year just so we can put the man that offers the woman whose doomed to signify his own fall from grace a place in his bed if she toils away for his domain.
    She prolly dies in the 7th pregnancy and then you gotta go get another one.

    I wonder what this Carolyn Yeager is like in bed? Maybe I’d eat millet for a year to find out.

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
    , @Rurik
  276. Rurik says:
    @Tony Massey

    Carolyn seems to have scored more points in this exchange.

    name one

    You would be better off apologizing.

    you’ve lost you mind, along with your balls

    Personally, i try never to fuck with a woman. Can’t see winning(which is unlikely) as being ever worth it.
    Good strong comments tho. I think you made your point. Nice job.

    it might be sound policy to avoid debating with some women, because you’re afraid of earning their wrath, but that’s no reason to grovel like a castrati in order to get on their good side.

  277. @Mefobills

    I really doubt if she’s the only one that gets to decide if she’s a good person or not.
    Maybe you should ask the people that know her.
    I shudder to think what the responses would b of you did the same by me.
    Let’s get this social credit system going.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  278. @Tony Massey

    I meant to say…back at the head of the house.whatever that means.I’m eating pizza. Got behind

  279. @FLgeezer

    Very much so, and your comments as well, geezer.

    Be well and may God bless and keep you all in the new year!
    (You too, Corvinus :0)

    Especially kind wishes to anyone to whom i have “spoken” needlessly harshly this year. Please forgive me.
    2021 here we come/

    • Replies: @FLgeezer
  280. @Carolyn Yeager

    Very nice. In the holy-day spirit, I’ll drink a glass of wine for EACH of you tonight 😉

    And one for the incomparable Anatoly Karlin, the AK-47 of intelligent and sometimes acrimonious debate here at Unz.

    Were I younger, there might be a shot of horilka in honor of our very own Rurik too.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  281. @Rurik

    Oh baby. I saw that movie once.

  282. Rurik says:
    @Tony Massey

    is like in bed? Maybe I’d eat millet for a year to find out.

    • LOL: Tony Massey
  283. Garliv says:
    @FLgeezer

    I saw this. Extremely insulting. Pollard convicted criminal in US but gets hero’s welcome from Netanyahu himself. And yes, Israel is America GREATEST OF GREATEST ALLY. Worse, members of the Senate and Congress never fail to remind about US “Special relationship” with Israel
    Biden is a self declared Zionist. Is US in Israel or is it that Israel IS US?

  284. @Trickster

    Stop it Trickster !

    You know how proof of delusions here triggers the myth-free Church of all knowing ones.

    better still–here …I’ll hold your beer, man

  285. FLgeezer says:
    @RadicalCenter

    Thank you RadCenter. You kindly started “Be well and may God keep you all in the New Year!” We
    elderly white goy will need God’s intervention when Cameltoe Harris becomes POTUS.

    And here is a news item you may have missed:

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/congress-questions-sale-us-residence-israel-adelson-72915033

    https://israelb.org/2020/09/israels-most-expensive-real-estate-deal-adelson-buys-us-ambassadors-residence/

    And consider that Adelson acquired his billions by preying on human weaknesses; gambling, booze, and prostitution. (((They))) assuredly have brought our once great, admired republic to its knees. It is very likely too that Adelson will make the former embassy the palace fit for his hero
    Jonathan Pollard. Sad, very sad.

    • Agree: Rurik
  286. Rurik says:
    @RadicalCenter

    And I to you, RadicalCenter!

    Thank you for your kind words, Sir.

    Cheers and Happy New Year!

  287. Rosie says:
    @John Johnson

    But yes there is also a problem with police that know the truth and do nothing.

    They’re not doing nothing. They are actively repressing White freedom of speech.

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/how-free-speech-lost-in-charlottesville-1512519529

  288. Rosie says:
    @Rurik

    did white women vote for Trump at the same rate as white men?

    No. He didn’t give them any reason to. If the White man hadn’t been the GOP’s bitch for several decades, maybe they would have had to actually do something for you.

    are white women as nationalistic as white men?

    No. We’re more nationalist than you.

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2018/08/19/new-survey-what-exactly-does-a-white-nationalist-look-like/comment-page-1/

    fuck off slag

    Caught in a lie, the misogynist screeches. Mr. McDermott, why are you bothering to moderate these comments if you’re going to allow this? Just open up the thread and let us go at it.

    • Agree: Tony Massey
    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Tony Massey
  289. Rosie says:
    @Rurik

    saying white women are omnipotent would be the height of idiocy, and so that’s why you (also) dishonestly mischaracterize what I said.

    When I said that White women are as opposed to affirmative action as White men, you said:

    If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action.

    In other words, White women get what we want.

    are you suggesting that a majority of white women don’t think women should be in combat?

    A huge majority of men and women (73% and 76%, respectively) support women in combat roles, if they so desire. But therein lies the problem with your argument. Hardly any actually want these jobs, even among those who are already in the military!

    This is a big fat nothing burger. There have always been exceptional women who engage in gender-atypical activities. With so few volunteering, it’s safe to assume that these are indeed exceptional women. Whether fitness standards should be changed to accommodate women is another question.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/25/us-army-women-combat-jobs-survey
    https://news.gallup.com/poll/160124/americans-favor-allowing-women-combat.aspx

    I simply wondered out loud

    Lol my achin’ sides! The dispassionate scholar routine, again.

    I just think they’re more naturally compassionate than men, and that was my only point.

    Indeed, and that’s precisely why depriving women of the franchise would be a terrible idea. We need safe, humane prisons, provision for the elderly, wage and hour protections, child labor laws, etc.

    Of course, there is certainly such a thing as too much of a good thing, and you’d definitely have too much compassion with an all-female electorate, but noone is suggesting that men be disenfranchised. The beauty of complementarity is that we balance each other out. As the ideal home includes both a mother and a father, so the ideal electorate includes both men and women.

    • Replies: @Rurik
    , @Tony Massey
  290. Rurik says:
    @Rosie

    Caught in a lie,

    what lie?

    according to your survey there, it suggests white women are more racially conscious and ethnically nationalist than white men.

    But that is contrary to everything I’ve ever glimmered, living on this rock for nearly six decades.

    Are white women more inclined to support white racialist politics- than white men?

    Do they vote for (how did you put it?) ‘nativist’ politicians and policies more than white men do?

    Or, is the truth completely different than what you and the survey are trying to suggest?

    And more to the point, if I’m convinced that white women do not vote for or support white ethno-nationalistic policies more than men do, then how is saying that (obvious) truth~ a lie?

    And if I’m simply stating what I consider to be the (obvious) truth, then by what kind of vicious and malicious motivation would you have for calling me a liar? (other than to be deliberately obnoxious)?

    You know, I don’t mind when people disagree with me. Many do, and good on them for doing so, so long as they’re participating in good faith.

    That’s my criteria for determining when someone deserves to be treated with the kind of decorum and respect that we should all aspire to here on Mr. Unz website.

    But when someone dishonestly, and relentlessly calls me a liar, when I’m obviously telling the truth, then that sort of breaks the code, so to speak, and they lose all the respect that otherwise honest and decent people are entitled to, regardless of their opinions.

    If I’m mistaken about something, (which is certainly possible) then I’m mistaken, (even tho in this case I’m not ; ), but it doesn’t mean I’m lying.

    Do you understand the (very significant) difference?

    And if you don’t, you have no business participating here on this forum, if you’re that dumb.

    But sadly, I don’t think you’re that dumb. Rather I think you feel entitled to smear, lie, mischaracterize and otherwise conduct yourself like a pernicious slag, because what I said, or how I said it, made you angry, and wrathful, and so in your state of mind, you considered your feelings all the justification you needed to dishonestly call me a liar, when you (and everybody else) knows damn well I’ve been doing nothing but telling the truth.

    • Thanks: FLgeezer
    • Replies: @Mike Tre
  291. Rurik says:
    @Rosie

    When I said that White women are as opposed to affirmative action as White men, you said:

    If that were true, there’d be no affirmative action.

    In other words, White women get what we want.

    not quite

    they get gender affirmative action, because they made a devil’s bargain with Jewish supremacy, to go along with racial affirmative action- so long as they too can get their unearned benefits from the bargain too.

    But that is hardly calling white women “omnipotent’, which is ridiculous. So why would you (dishonestly) suggest that I said something so patently ridiculous, unless it was intended as a smear?

    If blacks get what they want vis-a-vis affirmative action, does that make them ‘omnipotent”?

    Only a fool would suggest such a thing. And only a dishonest person would put those words in someone’s mouth, in order to discredit them.

    There is a certain de rigueur here, where misquoting is considered a most unseemly gaucherie. I’d advise against the practice.

    But therein lies the problem with your argument. Hardly any actually want these jobs, even among those who are already in the military!

    but my argument is against the rationality of the policy, not the actual number of women serving.

    Even if none were serving, my argument would be the same, vs. ‘theirs’; that women and girls should not be put in harms way by a sane society. A nation or tribe fights to protect their women folk. Only the worst cowardly cretins on the planet would send their women to fight and die (or worse) so that they could stay safe and cozy, as their womenfolk and girls absorbed the bullets.

    This is a big fat nothing burger.

    It goes to the heart of the sanity and moral health of a nation/civilization.

    There have always been exceptional women who engage in gender-atypical activities

    Indeed. And if they can muster the wherewithal, then I’d have no problem with letting women play in the NFL, or anywhere else they can prove they’re up to the standards. Even as firefighters, or what have you. If they are up to the standards. But I wouldn’t send women to fight men with guns, as a matter of principle.

    [women are] more naturally compassionate than men

    Indeed, and that’s precisely why depriving women of the franchise would be a terrible idea. We need safe, humane prisons, provision for the elderly, wage and hour protections, child labor laws, etc.

    Of course, there is certainly such a thing as too much of a good thing, and you’d definitely have too much compassion with an all-female electorate, but noone is suggesting that men be disenfranchised. The beauty of complementarity is that we balance each other out. As the ideal home includes both a mother and a father, so the ideal electorate includes both men and women.

    wow

    Thoughtful, tempered, well-considered, and on point.

    I’m at a loss over here.

    To your point, perhaps so.

    I really don’t know the answer, I was just more or less asking out loud what others thought.

    And really, it’s all completely academic. Women are not going to lose the vote in the West, unless or until Islam or some such less ‘enlightened’ people become ascendant, which seems inevitable at this point.

    And in the spirit of your last paragraphs, I’ll now wish you and Carolyn a very Happy New Year.

    • Agree: Mike Tre
    • Thanks: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  292. Rooster10 says:
    @AKINDLE

    It sounds like our views are not all that different really. Now is not the time for infighting, I wish you a Happy New Year.

  293. Poco says:
    @Corvinus

    I expect it will be some “minority” who will be lining you up dullard.

  294. @Rosie

    Touche.
    Raise the rooftops sister.
    That should pretty much shut up the holdouts.
    Still got a few clinging around here.
    We’ll see later on, Rosie.
    Not in a position to make much of a move for the next 6-8 years. Maybe never?
    I prefer the long game anyway.
    Happy. New Year i hope you an yours has a better 21.
    Cheers

    • Thanks: Rosie
  295. @Corvinus

    Happy New Year, corvinus.
    I hope 21 is productive and more satisfactory than 20.
    Always good to survive another one.
    A whole new start this Jan.
    Should be interesting.
    Cheers

  296. @Rosie

    I’m just saying, Rosie, i really believe in the effectiveness of women in a combat environment.
    I served with a number of women. I had 3 in the command at one time along the way.
    I really think women should stay out of actual trigger pulling duty.
    Notaltogether mind is. Sure, gals, pull that trigger.
    But, no, you have to stay out of actual combat arms.

    Maybe I’m wrong. I’m not ever gonna agree to a woman commanding in the field under fire.
    In all due respect.
    But, right, sure, i completely agree with ya.

  297. Anon[824] • Disclaimer says:
    @Franz

    “Until they are as afraid of Euro American men as they are of African American men nothing will change for the better.”

    All, well the bulk of, those “Euro American men”:
    Still believe there is hope for America through the judicial and legislative process and rule of law
    Have jobs
    Have homes and families to support
    Are either Christian or posses a strong moral compass
    Will not threaten and intimidate others in a mob
    Are not ready to harm others with out provocation
    Are not ready to destroy property and call it a peaceful protest
    Are not ready to challenge the police
    Are not ready to participate in “Star Chamber Justice”
    Basically, just want to be left the HELL ALONE!

    In other words, they have a lot to loose when they come off the porch.

    When this changes, and they do come off the porch, to use that great line from “The Outlaw Jose Wales”, a damn good movie which perfectly illustrates the point,
    “Hell Will Be Coming For Breakfast”

    Do you recall in “The Patriot”, when Captain Benjamin Martin “came off the porch”?
    that last man he killed, and then vented all of his anger on…..
    Do you recall what he told his son in the swamp about Fort Wilderness?
    Do you recall what happened to a lot of the prisoners taken at Kings Mountain?

    Let me assure you, it is respect for the law, for the present, that is holding those “Euro American men” on the porch.

    Brutus

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
    , @Anon
  298. Rosie says:

    what lie?

    You said as many White women voted for Biden as Trump. That is false. You have to understand, I have been going rounds with misogynists in these parts for years, and I have learned from bitter experience that they are some of the most exasperating and dishonest sophists I have ever encountered. They will continue to make the same arguments over and over and over again, even after being confronted with clear evidence that they are wrong.

    If I have unfairly tarred you with that brush, my apologies.

    But that is contrary to everything I’ve ever glimmered, living on this rock for nearly six decades.

    Are white women more inclined to support white racialist politics- than white men?

    Do they vote for (how did you put it?) ‘nativist’ politicians and policies more than white men do?

    I don’t know why you would be surprised by this. Women are more group-oriented than men. Racial solidarity and patriotism are feelings. They are emotions that are not always rational. Contra the tendency in the dissident right to claim that nationalism is rational and globalism is emotional, the truth is that a sentimental attachment to people, place, and culture is the beating heart of nationalism. Unsentimental, bottom-line thinking is every bit as corrosive to the nation-state as pathological altruism. Consider:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-military-china/u-s-military-comes-to-grips-with-over-reliance-on-chinese-imports-idUSKCN1MC275

    How does something that catastrophically stupid happen to a superpower? Bottom-line thinking.

    As for your last two questions, there again the facts are complicated. According to polls, women are as likely to support White racialist policies as men, but they are not as likely to vote for nationalist politicians and parties.

    The reason appears to be that women are particularly sensitive to feeling that they are out of the mainstream, and will reject parties that they believe to be fringe. Of course, the media manipulate this to their advantage, rather like they manipulate men in various ways I won’t go into unless you ask.

    The bottom line is that women’s votes tend to express their patriotic nature best when they feel they are within the mainstream. Hence, the willingness of many White women to support Orange Hitler in spite of the media’s relentless demonization of him. They knew they weren’t alone, that many other decent people share their reservations about globalism but are intimidated into silence.

    https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/09/160914085815.htm

    The exact same thing happened with the Brexit vote. To give women a yes/no choice is to implicitly give them moral permission to say no to globalism. Of course, younger women, recently graduated from university, were much less likely to vote for Brexit, but that isn’t because they’re not nationalist by nature, but rather because of the intense moral shaming they experienced in higher ed. That brainwashing wears off over time, but it doesn’t happen overnight. There was no gender gap in the 35+ age groups.

    https://ukandeu.ac.uk/brexit-gender-gaps-and-the-2019-general-election/

    I can tell you that it was very difficult for me to accept the truth about race, and harder still, the JQ. The pangs of guilt and shame were real and very painful. Gut women are not the problem. Hostile elite control of higher education is the problem.

    not quite

    they get gender affirmative action, because they made a devil’s bargain with Jewish supremacy, to go along with racial affirmative action- so long as they too can get their unearned benefits from the bargain too.

    OK, but do you have any evidence that White women have made such a bargain? Do White women actually support gender-based AA more than race-based AA? The fact that they are more likely to vote for Democrats certainly doesn’t prove that. With only two parties to choose from, people have to compromise. Even plenty of men (my own father!) vote Democrat because they are concerned about SS and Medicare. He’s certainly not in favor of discrimination against himself!

    For what it’s worth, I happen to think that gender-based AA is more justifiable than race-based AA. Suppose a woman takes time off to have kids. She’s not going to have as much experience as a man who didn’t. Should that be held against her? Does the process of raising children not entail growth in it’s own right? If an employer chooses to ignore that gap, is that “affirmative action”? I don’t know the answer to that, but I think reasonable people can disagree on the question.

    In any event, I’m sorry about the wordiness of this reply, and I likewise wish you a Happy New Year.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  299. @Rurik

    Ooops. Sorry, Rurik. I meant to say that I agree with FLgeezer.

    • Thanks: Rurik
  300. anon[406] • Disclaimer says:

    Sorry, off topic here.
    What is annoying me today is how hard it is to find good info on the net. Because of advertising. You ever go out there and try to find good info on perhaps technical stuff about a particular computer for example and find that the info might be there but you can’t find it due to all the advertising quacks who have envisioned everything you are asking for and arranged their SEO so it comes first and you will have to wade through thousands of bullshit sites to find the simple info you want? It is very frustrating and will waste hours (or days) of your time. Just sayin’.

    • Replies: @anon
  301. anon[406] • Disclaimer says:
    @anon

    Further to the above you go to one of the sites which have the software ‘for free’ to solve your problem and install it and go through all the ‘steps’, but when it actually comes to the point of getting it done you get a message saying, ‘Sorry, to do that you need the professional version of this software. Only 39.95!’
    At which point you might ask yourself, ‘How much crapware/spyware do I want intalled on my limited resources for tolerance?’
    Internet is not what it used to be.

  302. Franz says:
    @Richard B

    Richard B —

    You’re mostly right, and sorry for not seeing your post earlier.

    Including the small steps, one thing I have been noticing, from people I’ve talked to, is there is always The Event — something big or small that wakes people up.

    This year it’s been white workers reacting to BLM. The one thing they most resent is the forced diversity sessions they have to attend.

    For several I’ve talked to in person, that’s been The Event. And I don’t think it’s just a local thing.

    Give it some thought anyway. For every white stooge taking the knee my guess is ten more, at least, are full of disgust.

    Radicalization might proceed from that. It may well pile up real fast.

    2021 might be the crucial year. We are now certain that it’s up to us. No salvation from politics sank into a lot of skulls in 2020.

    Maybe bad was good after all.

  303. Mefobills says:
    @Tony Massey

    Why are you white-knighting for a woman?

    You are also introducing straw-man arguments, just so you can knock them down.

    Good person on not was never part of the discussion, that is you making things up.

    I can speculate based on your replies. Every time a woman shit-tests you, you roll over. Don’t roll over, and don’t white-knight. Get up off your knees.

    National Socialism was a patriarchy. God/Man/Woman/Children.

    There is a natural hierarchy in life: Men are over women. Liberalism has infected your brain-space too.

  304. @Mefobills

    I have to reply to this because it’s so full of error, to the level of delusional.

    Carolyn needs to decide if she is a good NSDAP woman or not.

    I don’t have to do anything, you jerk. Being a genuine authoritarian personality, you imagine the National Socialists were likewise, but they were not. They were merely disciplined and accepted the Leadership Principle (fuehrerprincip).

    read the comment thread. Her brain has been infected by liberalism. She even advocates for women to be in leadership roles.

    Ha! How do you define liberalism? And, like Rurik, you fail to give an example of what you’re referring to. What leadership roles? Of course women can hold some leadership roles and NS Germany did not prevent that. However, I am not trying to be a NS woman from 80 years ago either. If you’re talking about women in politics, the views I gave are not “liberal” views.

    it was NSDAP policy that women did not get to vote, and they were to return to the home life.

    Wrong! There was never any such policy about women not voting and for you to say there was puts you in the role of ignoramus. Be careful … you’ll lose your credibility. Women were not forced to do anything, ever. They were offered incentives to leave their jobs and marry, and many many of them did so voluntarily out of patriotism and their support of Adolf Hitler and the men of the NSDAP. Another factor: the memory of the Great War and the attempted communist takeover was very real at that time and Germans were largely united in their desire to save their country (Blood and Soil). Women did not want to compete with their own men, and men did not hold grudges against their women.

    There was a man’s world, and woman’s world.

    Well, when has their not been? But there was no animosity in it. When it came to Hitler at his military headquarters during all the war years, the female secretaries and other women employees had all their meals with the full staff, even listening to Hitler’s monologues. They were free to speak and ask questions if they wanted to. Otherwise, there were get-togethers of all kinds, plus just everyday mingling and talking. There was no separation when living in the bunkers – although they didn’t sleep together. The thing is, exclusive “men’s areas” were prevalent everywhere at the time. It wasn’t restricted to NS Germany. So your point is fallacious.

    You really know nothing about NS Germany, do you? A faker who’s trying to put something over on people.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  305. @Anon

    Thanks for the suggestion, but California is no country for White men. For that matter, neither is the rest of the US. As noxious as the presence of blacks is, the problem with this country goes far beyond that. It goes beyond even the pernicious fact of Jewish domination. The essence of the problem lies in this country’s embrace of the lie of egalitarianism. All the ills that plague the US are really aspects of that one problem. Even by the standards of the contemporary US, California is an exceptionally corrupt and clownish place, as demonstrated by the way they have dealt with the cold virus going around. I’m planning to leave Florida, which is a far better-run and fiscally responsible state, for the easternmost country in Europe.

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
  306. @Thim

    AmRen, like its sibling VDare, is a griping forum, endlessly presenting evidence of anti-white abuse in the government and media. That’s as far as it will ever go. Jared Taylor seems like a decent guy who cannot be dislodged from his comfort zone wherein he calls out, “Look! How awful!” without offering insight into the forces behind white genocide, or proposing action to defeat them. AmRen is no longer relevant.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  307. @gleongelpi

    No, the sign should not read, “It’s okay to be while.” It should read, “I’m proud to be white.”

    Right. The line “it’s okay to be white” is “wet,” asking to pretty please be considered okay. Too goddamn apologetic. “I’m proud to be white” or “it’s good to be white” says what is needed.

    • Thanks: FLgeezer
  308. @Davidoff

    Indians enslaved those who surrendered in war as well. So what’s the problem with white Europeans doing it, Tonto?

  309. @Trickster

    The strong steamroll the weak !

    That may be so but it still doesn’t make might right. It isn’t just the might of arms but mendaciousness, guile, cunning, and gaslighting also come in the package. By the same token of disregarding any moral standards in relations between peoples you should also accept your own replacement by those who make use of any means at their disposal to effect it.

  310. @Anon

    Basically, just want to be left the HELL ALONE!

    Excellent post, and I agree with every word. But the powers that be are not going to leave ANYONE, most especially white men, the Hell alone.

    So it would seem the most logical course of action is to start planning to take a much more “radical” tack.

    • Thanks: FLgeezer
  311. @Rurik

    I have noticed that on forums as well as IRL, the ladies tend to take criticism of their own gender from men, much more “personally” and “to the heart” than vice versa. I don’t attribute it to some malicious innate flaw, probably just has to do with the way they’re wired.

    We certainly could have never reached this point without gross failings on the part of both men and women, just as we’ll never be able to work our way out of this mess without both working together.

    And before, Rosie, Carolyn or Alden pounce, I’ll simply say that indeed more fault can probably be laid at the feet of men, since it is the role of the male to lead, more often than not.

    Anyway, having men and women divided is a key part of the strategy in the destroying our Civilization, as is the tranny/gender-blending/identify as you wish nonsense.

    I always enjoy reading your posts, Rurik.

    Have a Happy New Year.

    • Thanks: Rurik
  312. Mefobills says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    I’m in agreement with most of your points regarding National Socialism because you are right when you illustrate obvious facts.

    I’m also not an authoritarian personality, I am for a proper hierarchy. In that hierarchy women are in their “role” and that role is not to be in position of authority over men.

    The very things you describe, the women are NOT over the men. Yet, you also suggest earlier on that women could be in government, which of course is a leadership role. You are a hypocrite on this subject.

    With regards to universal suffrage voting, you are right. Women in Germany got the vote in 1919. So, I’m wrong on this and I’m man enough to admit it.

    Women voting is always a mistake, because women selfishly vote for their issues, and hence they slowly destroy the hierarchy. There is no going back? There is no going forward, beyond the carve-out that NS gave women, otherwise your civilization becomes unbalanced.

    The hierarchy was a patriarchy, where there was a reasonable and balanced carve-out for women to live, but with limits.

    I’m fairly up to date on NS economy, much more than you and most people alive – however, on the social aspects I am further down on the scale relative to you. I knew about women mingling and talking with Hitler, and that he treated the women well.

    Any leader that loves animals and women and children has empathy, and is not an authoritarian personality.

    The logos is always about finding balance.

    With regards to defining liberalism, Richard Tedore, in “Hitler’s revolution” has a chapter on the rise of Liberalism and how National Socialism was a reaction to it.

  313. Corvinus says:
    @Etruscan Film Star

    “Look! How awful!” without offering insight into the forces behind white genocide, or proposing action to defeat them“

    To the contrary, there have been a plethora of articles offering insight and courses of action. The problem is that people like yourself talk about making those things come to fruition, rather than actually doing something about it. Perhaps in 2021 you will document exactly the ways you will implement those plans. The time for talk has been over for quite some time.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  314. Anon[290] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    Great post. I would add that for many of the more established white men, what is keeping them on the porch, in addition to respect for law & order, is a seven-figure 401k and a paid off house.

    The system is changing in disconcerting ways, but many of us are still heavily invested in the system. Will there be a tipping point that gets the more invested whites off the porch? I dunno, but I’ll continue to monitor events.

    My thanks to TUR for providing info not available elsewhere.

  315. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    Romantic nationalism, devout religious beliefs, and anti-Semitism in rural Germany, along with acute financial difficulties, made the peasant-farmer class the perfect targets for Nazi propaganda. Playing upon an existing proclivity toward völkisch nationalism, the Nazis emphasized that this group was the “true nobility” considering they were the racial backbone of the nation as the purest form of the Volk. The Nazis claimed that Marxists and Jews controlled the government and were threatening the peasant-farmers’ economic vitality. The Nazis advocated for agrarian reforms, the elimination of indebtedness, and tax relief. In towns and hamlets, the Nazis demonstrated they were traditional German “rightists”, addressing middle-class issues by exploiting their fears and prejudices as propagandists saturated the towns with posters and leaflets. The drive to attract middle-class individuals was in part due to Hitler’s desire to staff the party organization with intelligent bureaucrats. The ultimate purpose? Preserve tradition.

    The Nationalist Socialists were conservative–they opposed race mixing, they adhered to patriarchy, they loathed popular culture, they opposed immigration, and they sought to preserve their culture.

    It was a party was born out of a conservative reaction to the Weimar Era, with its policies focusing on the primary goal of restoring Germany to its traditional values. Anti-Semitism existed prior to this political group: it was a prejudice they amplified by appealing to the traditional factions of German society in their nationalistic desire to MGGA (Make Germany Great Again). Healthcare, education, and worker employment measures were developed to unify the German identity, just like the traditional policies used to facilitate economic efficiency.

    The National Socialists, through the lens of social conservatism, proclaimed the power of the people first before subjugating them as cogs in a military machine, i.e. blood and soil. Moreover, the National Socialists awarded women the Mother’s Cross in accordance to the number of children each German female produced. We know that the Catholic Church in its opposition to contraception and abortion encourages its adherents to have large families. Hence, the Nationalist Socialists drew from religious tradition as another important part of their conservative agenda.

    Take the 1932 elections as a guide. The majority of Germans opposed the continuation of the Weimar Republic. Right-wingers of all persuasions felt it was necessary to support and strengthen (“conserve”) things like the family, the Army, and the Church, which they saw as the foundations of the country, and to be under threat. Most believed violent political change (“revolution”) would be necessary to stop and reverse the process of disintegration they saw taking place. The Nazis were prepared to work with the military, at least in the short term, and they largely left the Church as an institution alone. They strongly supported the family because of the need to breed lots of soldiers. Conserving German strength, unity and racial purity required revolutionary means. It also demanded the end of divisive party politics; a new political system with a visionary leader would overcome differences of left and right by creating an organic national community.

    Again, the Nationalist Socialists were conservative revolutionaries.

    • Agree: Mefobills
  316. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “I am for a proper hierarchy. In that hierarchy women are in their “role” and that role is not to be in position of authority over men.”

    How quaint of a notion. Alas, we progress as a race and as a society. We’re not going back to the “glorious days”, nor should we.

    “Women voting is always a mistake, because women selfishly vote for their issues, and hence they slowly destroy the hierarchy.”

    More like men AND women vote for what issues they believe are in their best self-interest.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  317. Mike Tre says:
    @Rurik

    Rosie is very good at producing statistics that support her notion of white women are the real race loyalists, the more healthy sex, the more intelligent sex, etc. However, statistics have to run at least somewhat congruent with the reality we see everyday with our own eyes, at least to some extent, doesn’t it? Also, it seems statistics should at least somewhat support the natural aspects of the human condition.

    For example, most people who don’t live in a cloud see the negro for what it is, a lesser intelligent being prone to poor decision making, emotional overreaction (often leading to violence) and laziness. Statistics mostly back that up.

    So when Rosie comes in with her obscure references that contradict pretty much everything we see and hear not just from media, but from the dozens/scores/hundreds of females we interact with at some degree throughout the course of our daily lives, and everything we’ve learned from studying the history of mankind, then of course our BS detector starts going off.

    Now Rosie is intelligent. She often has insightful things to say about many topics. Her problem is she engages in the same type of tribal virtue signaling that she herself sees minoritarians engagiing in for the benefit of their own groups. She applies blank slatism to the sexes. She does not like it when men point of some very obvious truths, that in general (yes there are exceptions, but not enough to justify feminizing every possible institution) men are better suited to build, manage, maintain, and defend our society and its infrastructure. On the other hand, women, by nature have been given the most important responsibility of all: Raising capable boys to continue building, managing, maintaining, and defending our way of life, and capable girls to continue raising more capable boys and girls.

    I and many other men here have conceded the point about the most important role woman have been given by nature. Sadly, it isn’t enough for those women who feel they are entitled to more.

    FTR: voting rights should be limited to 1 vote per property owning married (that would be a man and a woman; not homosexuals) couple with at least two non-retarded biological children.

    • Thanks: Rurik
    • Replies: @I'm Tyrone
  318. anarchyst says:

    Since we are on the topic of women, here goes…

    The problem is, women want it both ways.

    Women want the right to say no, even after enticing a man to be sexually active with them, even days, weeks, months, and years after the event.

    Her word is to be considered sacrosanct, and must be taken as truth without question, ruining many (innocent) men’s careers and even lives, as a result.

    Men are not permitted to have a defense against such accusations.

    [MORE]

    Don’t get me wrong, I have absolutely no use for rapists or serial abusers such as Harvey Weinstein and other Hollywood, political and celebrity types; they deserve ostracization and severe punishment for their actions, BUT if women want true equality they must take responsibility for their own actions. They cannot have it both ways.

    All one has to do is look at the way Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was treated by the mainstream media, who gave his accuser Anita Hill a pass, even though she followed him from job to job, without any mention of harassment.

    Women want the same pay for equal work–not a problem in most cases, but if a woman cannot do the job, she then asks for special treatment because she is a woman, instead of realizing that she is not cut out for such work and should seek more suitable employment.

    Men die sooner than women as they do the most hazardous work.

    If women want to be treated as equals they have to step up to the plate and TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY for their own actions

    Multiculturalism, diversity and especially feminism are flawed concepts that equate to the serpent in the Garden of Eden. Of course it took a female of the species to coax the male into eating of the forbidden fruit.

    Another parallel example is that of the Tower of Babel in which separate cultures and languages developed.

    At the risk of offending the female of the species, there were reasons why women did not achieve suffrage (the right to vote) among other things. I realize that there are many intelligent women who do not subscribe to externalized altruism, but there are far too many who do . . .

    Women have a altruistic streak, which is necessary in the formation and care of their families. However, this altruism has been externalized, helped along by our enemies, caring for outsiders (who don’t give a damn about them) while neglecting the good within the family structure in–internalized altruism.

    This externalized altruism has become deadly and has been put into the hands of feminists. This externalized altruism made the communistic, so-called civil-rights movement a (hollow) success (Actually, the so-called civil-rights movement is falling apart), along with the country).

    A favorite example of mine is how blacks use race to put “guilt trips” especially on white women who they want to use and abuse. Blacks favorite line is: “You won’t date me because I’m black”. A proper response would be: “That’s right, I don’t date outside my race”.
    Instead white women respond to the guilt trip imposed on them by blacks by “dating” them, setting themselves up for a lifetime of abuse and half-breed children sired by an absent black “father”. This is why blacks use the description “baby-momma” instead of spouse or wife. Feminism and destructive so-called “civil-rights” norms are used to reinforce such behavior.

    • Agree: FLgeezer
    • Replies: @JSM
  319. @Ray Caruso

    Good for you for leading the way by leaving.
    Truth is, things in East Tennessee, and Tennessee in general, are fairly good.
    Stay out of Memphis.
    North Nashville not so good either.
    There’s no telling how many people had their life saved in 20 due to covid.
    I’m not leaving. I’m not smart enough to learn a new language.
    I wouldn’t mind visiting Suriname. Strangely,I’ve read alot of books and took in alot of media.
    They seem to have been inflicted with a far greater prob than covid this past year.
    I’ve been following that crowd for 20 years.
    I wish Mr Unz would write about the Suriname problem. It ain’t Jews.
    I only want to visit tho. I don’t actually want to live among “those people”.
    I really appreciate their leaders brazen thefts. Who doesn’t love that. Geez they’re even more currupt than we are.
    I really wish Mr Unz would look into their recent attempts to govern.

    • Replies: @Ray Caruso
  320. Mefobills says:
    @Corvinus

    “Women voting is always a mistake, because women selfishly vote for their issues, and hence they slowly destroy the hierarchy.”

    More like men AND women vote for what issues they believe are in their best self-interest.

    Yes, the concept of in-groups voting for their self-interest is something most people don’t grasp.

    The next question:

    Has there ever been any sort of matriarchal society that survives in history?

    Also, consider that cultural marxism is a form of liberalism, and it promotes women as agents of destruction. To do that, it opposes family formation and tells women they are the same as men.

    How is that voting pattern for western women working out? I suggest it is a major reason we live in clown world now.

    • Agree: FLgeezer
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  321. @Mike Tre

    Rosie is very good at producing statistics that support her notion of white women are the real race loyalists,

    This shouldn’t surprise anybody. Rosie herself provides us with a clue why

    Organized feminism does not represent White women. The whole point of “intersectionality” is precisely to marginalize White women

    White women aren’t abandoning feminism out of a newly awakened morality or even repentance (women repent? Perish the thought). They are abandoning it because now they must share the spoils of feminism with women of color. Now they are subjected to the same haranguing that they subjected white men to for the past 6 decades. Now that the gravy train is ending, they’ve decided to weasel their way into the nationalist camp.

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
  322. Simple law of the Universe –

    When resources are abundant, women rebel (Remember the flappers of the 1920s? Fuck you men!)
    When resources are scarce, women want us all to get along (Where did the flappers go when the depression hit?)

    Scarce resources = Chimpanzees = Patriarchal authority
    Abundant resources = Bonobos = Matriarchy (feminism)

    A little evolutionary psychology goes a long way in explaining the collective behavior of women since the human female is basically just a chimp with an iphone.

  323. JSM says:
    @anarchyst

    Of course it took a female of the species to coax the male into eating of the forbidden fruit?

    This drives me nuts. Adam had no agency? What did Eve do, hold him down, shove that apple down his throat? Eve was deceived by the snake, who lied to her and said she’d not die but gain wisdom, so at least Eve was trying to gain wisdom.

    But Adam, who was standing there the whole time and surely witnessed Eve’s exchange with the snake, didn’t even try to refuse to eat the apple when Eve handed it to him. But, then, when God showed up, Adam was all, “It’s all HER fault! I’m not responsible!” like any ten-year-old dodging responsibility so as not to get in trouble with the parent.

    So why does Eve, who at least was trying to better herself albeit based on really bad advice, end up getting all the blame and placed under the rule of the fella who hadn’t even enough strength of character to refuse his bite, but like a ten year old trying to avoid responsibility for his naughtiness and not get in trouble with the parent, points to the other person for “making him do it”? He dodges responsibility for his own actions, but he gets to be overlord?

    • Replies: @anarchyst
    , @JSM
  324. @I'm Tyrone

    They won.
    Get used to it.
    You’re wrong accros the boards.
    Women are running most things. They’re usually in charge.
    It’s prolly true 56%here.
    Women, especially white women, have never had it so good.
    I don’t mind the women i encounter. I think they prolly do a much better job.
    I’m talking about day to day life.
    The Women are in charge.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  325. anarchyst says:
    @JSM

    A “woman’s charm” is very powerful stuff…

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  326. @Tony Massey

    You’ve got some screws loose, boss.

    Women are not running things. And they never will. Many of them may be under the illusion that they are running things, but they are essentially clueless puppets.

    White working class men keep this country running. We keep the lights on and things humming.

    America, and indeed all humanity is entering a crossroad. There’s no going back.

    I, for one, welcome it.

    I’ve been praying for it.

    Bring it.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  327. @anarchyst

    Female power is nothing new. Women have been doing their best to wield it since they were created.

    “Feminism” is.

    That is hatred of, or competition with the male. Which is somewhat laughable.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
  328. A little evolutionary psychology goes a long way in explaining the collective behavior of women since the human female is basically just a chimp with an iphone.

    Well “evolution” is mostly bullshit, as is “psychology”. On the other hand, women are, and always have been an essential, and truly great part of Christian Civilization.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
    , @I'm Tyrone
  329. @Mefobills

    I’m also not an authoritarian personality

    Yes you are bc you want a hierarchy that is a patriarchy.

    The hierarchy was a patriarchy, where there was a reasonable and balanced carve-out for women to live, but with limits.

    Oh, a carve-out for women to live. Sounds authoritarian to me. German women were allowed to live in the 3rd Reich only as long as they followed the men’s rules with no input from themselves, is that what you think? Remember we’re not talking about just any women and men, but German women and men who were part of the ‘blood and soil.’ This is something you fail to understand. In the Roman hierarchical system, and it was a patriarchy, the father was the unquestioned head of the family, to the extent he had the power to even slay his wife and children if they didn’t obey his wishes. Hierarchy=Patriarchy=total Authority.
    Fortunately, the Third Reich was not a Patriarchy. You’re wrong about this as you are wrong on so many things.

    I’m wrong on this and I’m man enough to admit it.

    If someone is wrong and learns they’re wrong, the only thing to do is to admit it. It doesn’t take a “man” and you shouldn’t pat yourself on the back for doing so. What else could you do? You strike me as a basically insecure man.

    I’m fairly up to date on NS economy, much more than you and most people alive –

    Most people alive? Where’s your book then?

    Richard Tedore, in “Hitler’s revolution” has a chapter on the rise of Liberalism and how National Socialism was a reaction to it.

    I just finished reading the book. https://carolynyeager.net/comment/16299#comment-16299
    But I didn’t get from it what you’re saying to me about Hitler’s NS Reich.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  330. anarchyst says:
    @GeneralRipper

    I agree with your premise that women are not running things. However, feminism IS a problem.
    Allone has to do is look at the woman governors who are imposing “lockdowns” on their citizens.
    There is an old saying “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned”. A prime example of this is Michigan governor Whitmer’s tantrums thrown after she was overruled by the courts.
    Michigan governor Whitmer’s repeated extensions” of the “stay at home” and business shutdown orders has nothing to do with health and has everything to do with her own vengeance.
    There was “pushback” agsinst her illegal executive orders…
    I’ll bet that Whitmer was thinking “I’ll show them” by extending the executive orders to well within January 2021.
    Whitmer gives women who are in politics a bad name. By throwing a tantrum, she is acting like a 5-year-old who did not get what she wants.
    The Michigan legislature needs to take her to the wood shed…

    • Agree: GeneralRipper
    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  331. @anarchyst

    I agree with your premise that women are not running things. However, feminism IS a problem.

    So then we agree.

    “Democracy” as currently defined, is the problem.

    • Replies: @GeneralRipper
  332. JSM says:
    @JSM

    Pffffft. Just makes my point, all the more.

    Eve was beguiled by the snake. Adam was beguiled by Eve. Eve gets the blame for her weakness in allowing herself to be beguiled by the snake and, so, gets the punishment of being sentenced to be ruled by an overlord, but Adam, who in his weakness allowed himself to beguiled by Eve’s womanly charms, gets to BE the overlord? Huh?

  333. @Tony Massey

    Are you using “Suriname” as code for something? The place is really a just sweaty little armpit populated by disparate groups of non-Whites who could start butchering one another at any moment. The fact Big Oil has struck it rich there makes that more likely, not less.

    As for Tennessee, regardless of how good or bad it is now, it’s bound to get worse. The same thing that happened first to Virginia and now to Georgia is bound to happen there, which is to say, liberals from northern states, Third Worlders, and native blacks will eventually overwhelm the native Whites electorally. Once they do, a low-tax, pro–Second Amendment state quickly becomes another Democrat-run cesspool. The ideology of “all men are created equal” is a cancer. It’s going to devour this entire country.

  334. FLgeezer says:

    Business as usual:

    https://mfi-miami.com/2020/07/florida-attorney-1/

    Wasserman? I wonder if he is related to our (((congresswoman)))?

  335. @GeneralRipper

    I certainly agree with you that feminism is a problem. I’m just interested in how we got to this point. I tend to think there are larger forces at work.

    Of course people make willful bad decisions, including women, but how did we go from relative order to this mess in such a short time?

  336. @anarchyst

    Years ago, the Associate Dean at a university business school observed that unions take on the character of the employer. Public service unions became politically active when assholes like Reagan started attacking the public service.
    People unionize because they believe they are treated badly, not because of any political concept or loyalty to trade unionism.
    Your reference to pension and dental plans shows you are completely out of touch with how the real world works. All businesses work on the basis of total compensation. Health plans and pensions are part of that compensation. The International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans is an educational entity. It has surveyed employers for decades about employment trends. Their surveys have consistently shown that employers themselves understand that offering pensions and other benefits attract more quality candidates.

    Again and again, there are many instances of “bad” cops receiving a pass because of strong union actions.

    Again and again, you demonstrate your lack of understanding. In over 33 years, I never saw, or heard of, the dismissal of an employee being overturned where the management had done its job properly in conducting an investigation, or had overreacted by imposing dismissal, where it was excessive.
    The problem with the Anglo-American business model is that it is feudalistic. They fail to understand why the unions are there in the first place. Nothing is the company’s fault. The US auto industry turning out unreliable pieces of poorly designed junk was all the workers fault. It had nothing to do with lousy management or the Japanese producing a better product with the co-operation of their unionized work force. In the mid 90s, General Motors had more cash on hand than any corporation in the world. A decade later it was on the verge of bankruptcy. The useless turd in charge gets a real gold plated pension, but for people like you, that’s not a problem, because he’s not unionized.

  337. @Dr. Doom

    @Doom, I’d add: change racialist culture to spread a war mentality, a mentality of war, and a mentality of the warrior archetype.

    Destroy the suicidal yet widespread yet understandable taboo among Aryan racialists wherein self.defense (“fedposting”) is denounced/delegitimized/condemned. The generally embraced mentality of “keep it kosher/legal bro’s” needs to die and be replaced by a warrior mentality. White Aryan racialists must embrace National Socialism and revolution. Values must be transvalued wherein anything that helps the Aryan race survive (& thrive) is “good” and anything that stands in the way is “bad.” Loyalty to comrades – rather than throwing he/they under the bus the moment they might draw heat upon “the movement” – must become the standard among racialists rather than the rare exception.

    For God’s sake, do be vigilant & cautious especially under the present status quo – it would suck to get entrapped by the Stasi- but curse our ancestors, because we are being annihilated & how much respect for “the law” do our enemies have? NONE! It’s a catch 22, a very gay self-fulfilling prophecy/taboo that is widely enforced & repeated whenever by a miracle a Roof comes down upon a black state senator sheboon Roof (who, whatever you think, gave up his life heroically & selflessly for a dying people being destroyed) is *automatically* denounced at best as a “retard who harmed ‘the movement’” & who supposedly helped the system indispensably justify escalating it’s repression/persecution/war of annihilation against Aryans (cuz they can’t do false flags, they totally respect & follow their own “laws,” & if only racialists keep “keeping it kosher” then they’ll call off their genocide against Aryans).

    What would you think if you were in a Walking Dead scenario & you were starving & you felt you must raid some rival group’s territory and despite the fact they outnumber & outclass you in almost every meaningful way, they bow down before you & tell you you can walk all over them & take whatever you want and praise themselves for refusing to use their immense potential power to defend themselves, which they explicitly tell you repeatedly overtly (while expecting you to let them keep all their stuff)? Are you going to apologize & back off & let your kids starve to death? Are you going to take such people seriously and not return to plunder their territory/resources the next time you & your kids are hungry?

    [MORE]

    Despite the threat posed by the feds – if “white nationalists” just dispensed with the pacifist gayness (“keep it kosher/legal bro’s”) & at very least stopped rushing to go on record to condemn pranksters every single time a prank happens & condemn/disavow/delegitimize the very notion of pranking entirely, the tranny-feminist forces would be in serious serious trouble. Why do you think there are so few pranksters even as we are openly mocked relentlessly in steadily escalating overt ways? Is the average American who got red-pilled seriously going to want to sacrifice his freedom/life for a “movement/cause” who rushes to denounce him as a “Mossad agent” (or at best denounced as the “retard who harmed the movement”) for his self-sacrifice? A movement mostly dominated by masochistic people who do that, and go the extra (feminized) mile to try to pretend that their turning the other cheek “keeping it kosher/legal” ideology/behaviors is actually in fact “courage”? And who praise themselves for such “courage.”

    Imagine if there was a Roof every single day. Think blacks would be burning down our cities? The problem is that there aren’t nearly enough Roof’s. If you disagree, you can just keep your mouth shut & thus show your “courage” by not endorsing such (winning) mentalities. You don’t have to endorse such methods, but for God’s sake stop counter-signaling them! No one is ever going to take racialists seriously when they do not fear us. And why should they fear us if we’re going to continue this decades long approach? How did the one man/movement to actually openly have defeated our enemies culturally/politically start out? Ever hear of the Beer Hall Putsch? Ever hear of the S.A.? Do you think the National Socialists rushed to condemn the S.A. members who engaged in duels to the death against the same people destroying us so long as the S.A. members were perceived to be acting in good faith/loyally? Did the N.S. throw their own damn comrades who were sacrificing their “freedom” & their very lives under the bus? (hint: NO!).

    It’s only because so many who have influence among racialists do rush to condemn/disavow/delegitimize the few men braver than any of us have been that there are so few Aryan men counter-striking our enemies. And it’s so damn demoralizing. Most “white nationalists” praise themselves for explicitly forbidding themselves from individual or collective self-defense – for tying both their hands behind their backs while demanding all of us do the same against the most ruthless & formidable tribe/power that has ever existed who are willing to do ANY-THING to destroy us! Marcus Eli Ravage said it almost 100 years ago, behind closed doors Jews laugh at “anti-semites” so long as such anti-Jews are not violent.

    In other words, the only anti-Jews Jews & their collaborators actually take seriously are those willing to fight and die on their feet rather than watch their own kids be tortured (to death) by a thousand cuts while being laughed at (by the torturers) while awaiting their turn to be slaughtered methodically by a thousand cuts. Who gets off being a damn martyr?

    Why bother with any of this if you’re going to feed this insanely suicidal taboo against self-defense? Do you want to survive? I’m not telling you to go do a prank, but I won’t tell you not to either (I’d urge you to think carefully & keep it effective, probably be wary of lowering your guard around people especially so long as this taboo remains dominant – basically I urge you to do do vetting & make people earn your trust, put them to the test, do tune into & trust your guts including with me, with everyone, it’s probably a wise idea to run for your life if you meet someone from the internet who wants to take you to a warehouse where there are various items that can be used to incriminate you), we have every damn right to implement ruthless self-defensive measures. It’s so long past time for that. What chance do we have otherwise?

    Ever read about successful/victorious revolutionary movements? Ever hear about (((Nelson Mandela))) and how he actually won? Ever hear of “necklacing”? Think he had tons of followers who rushed to demand that the black communist revolutionary movement keep it legal? At first, when his revolution was getting started, most blacks didn’t want to participate. Things were good. South African Afrikaners/Boer’s bragged all the time about how they had the “happiest blacks” anywhere in Africa…and it was true. Then Mandela comes along (backed by the (((“chosenites”))). The mixture of comfort & fear of the still Aryan dominated government led most blacks to tell him they wanted to chill, don’t rock the boat. What happened next? Mandela’s followers started beating the shit out of black normies who refused to join them and gave them one last chance. If they still refused to take up arms against the Aryan led government, they suffered a terrifying & shameful spectacle of a death by torture.

    Within a short period of time, normie blacks began to change their mentalities. Soon enough, despite the fact they were denounced all day every day in the newspapers/on television as “criminal terrorists” (imagine that…) treated similar to how “white nationalists” are treated today, whenever “terrorist” attacks took place, blacks started rushing to claim responsibility for the attack/s as something they were proud of. Do you think the blacks rushed to condemn a black who was loyal to their “cause” to overthrow the Aryan government when a black got arrested & put more heat from the government upon their “movement”? Do you think Mandela rushed to make a statement when a black got caught by police/military as all sort of media attacks were unleashed demonizing them & their movement so long as the arrested black was perceived to be loyal to their goals? NO!!!!

    Instead, Mandela said in an interview that “anything that helps destroy Apartheid is good.” He dgaf about being denounced as a “terrorist.” The blacks were more afraid of their fellow blacks than they were of Aryans. You think that traitors like McCain’s butt buddies are more or less likely to passionately collaborate if he/they know in the back of their minds that there are over a million Aryans who might take their asses out any moment? You think these traitors are going to refuse to destroy us when commanded to do so because they admire/respect racialists so much for keeping it kosher/legal?

    Are “normie” Aryans really even “asleep”? If they’re asleep & clueless as to the racial war against them, why then is white flight a huge phenomenon that is intensifying? You think white flight would even be a thing if Aryan’s did as we used to over a century ago when a black male tried sexually seducing one of our daughters or dared to harm one of them? Did blacks mock us like they do today?

    If there were a racialist Aryan army, do you think that even a 51% majority of Aryan “normies” would side with our enemies who openly despise them too? Why do the powers that be – the Jews & their collaborators – continuously spew nonstop propaganda if they can so easily deracinate us? Even at the damn (((SPLC))), they apparently have to have special intervention to get their own employees to mix with each other because otherwise, they self-segregate based upon their individual race. The (((SPLC))) has to repeatedly remind their own employees to luv “die-versity” and sing kumbai ahhhh, otherwise they all split up along the lines of their races & segregate.

    Curse our ancestors who decided to give in into the coercion and literally just gave up our cities to build dystopian suburbs & now exburbs (or whatever they suburbs of suburbs are called), not heroes like Roof or Tarrant or Anders. If the taboo to “keep it kosher/legal” remains dominant among racialists in America (like it has for over half a century), we are going to go extinct. If you’re going to feed that taboo & re-validate it, you might as well never have children and just give up. You would ironically be doing more of a service to truly defend your people if you would just keep your mouth shut and give up.

    Who wants to join a “movement/cause” that always suffers devastating blow after devastating blow by it’s enemies but never delivers blows other than losers who just want to make racialism a hobby – an alter ego escapist video game club wherein he can log in & bitch & whine & talk tough while going out of his way to reinforce the “courage” of turning the other cheek & luving thy enemy (thy enemy who hates you with every fiber of their being & who fantasizes daily – & who actively plans – to skin your kids alive in front of you, cackling like hyenas as you beg & plead for mercy)? That’s a huge part of why Aryan normies don’t openly embrace pro-Aryan racialism much less do they fight back.

    That’s why they kneel in memory of George Floyd & that’s why a ton of Aryan women are openly publicly screwing Tyrone (I now see it literally every single day…I’m only in my 30’s & I remember just 10 years ago I NEVER EVER saw mudsharks brazen enough to publicly mudthot, EVER! And I’ve witnessed the transformation of all my youth’s stomping grounds that were white Aryan only areas become overrun by the brown tide…Zio Don ain’t lying, there is a thriving black middle class by everything I now see. Blacks, who were still mostly porch monkey’s who didn’t even own a vehicle now are driving approximately 80% of top of the line luxury vehicles – I only rarely see a young Aryan man driving a really nice car – and all the nicest hotels are now infested mostly by blacks in my area. The luxury car ownership & the hotels thing are very new transformations that happened under Zio Don. Mudsharkery started under the last years of retard traitor George W. Bush’s puppetry & rapidly worsened under Obama. It seemingly came out of nowhere. And it just keeps getting worse by the day. It’s sad that most “white nationalist’s” I’ve encountered are so weak & cowardly that they pathetically refuse to even accept that this is happening despite overwhelming evidence that it is…what chance do Aryan racialists – the best of the best Aryan males left – have if we delve into delusional fantasy land to spare ourselves a tiny bit more of pain and outright refuse to believe our eyes? How can you hope to solve a problem you refuse to even acknowledge is a problem? We can WIN! And we can survive! And we can THRIVE, for God’s sake! That’s the worst part about everything. Aryan’s are a sleeping giant that could – if only we had the Will, if only we decided to do so – crush our enemies. Stop denouncing comrades who are braver than you or me, unless there’s compelling evidence that actually adds up & makes perfect sense. It is so damn demoralizing to watch everyone panic whenever there is a prank – as though it will save us, it won’t – and run for the hills & denounce a rare Aryan man who acted selflessly & heroically. You’ll know Aryans are no longer on track for extinction when Adolf Hitler is praised as one of the greatest men to have ever lived. You’ll know your kids – or the kids you wish you could have, kids you indeed could have – are safe when America & most of it’s myths are mocked as terrible experiments. When our grandparents are used as an example of tragic buffoonery, as a cautionary tale).

  338. @GeneralRipper

    women are, and always have been an essential, and truly great part of Christian Civilization.

    Yet in merely 2 generations they destroyed what Christian Civilization built over 2 millennia. They destroyed the nuclear family with no fault divorce, child custody laws, alimony etc. They destroyed their children’s future via single motherhood (contrary to myth, the majority of men were kicked out and didn’t walk out). They gutted every institution to enable them to optimize their hypergamy, ie sleep with all the chads they want while forcing the male taxpayer to pay for their indiscretions. I’ve lived in China, the Middle East, and India, and I can tell you that single mothers are often begging on the streets. But white women like this new equality where they are free to run amok while leaving others to clean up their mess.

    I agree with you that there are larger forces at work behind feminism, but lets not forget that women went along with the project wholeheartedly without pausing to think of the consequences. But most importantly, feminism appeals not to some idealism or higher morality, but to women’s most base nature.

  339. @GeneralRipper

    “Feminism” is.

    That is hatred of, or competition with the male. Which is somewhat laughable.

    Feminism is mostly a facet for bitter women that have limited access to men.

    It’s not a coincidence that so many of them are unattractive and butch looking.

    It’s all based in sexual resentment. These are the women that had the pretty friend in high school that got all the guys. They get little attention from men and when they do it can be cruel.

    There are a lot of women that call themselves feminist but the dedicated activists behind the scenes are really just bitter wenches. A lot of lesbians also fall into this category. I have been around lesbians and I don’t buy that even 30% are born that way. Most seem miserable and get upset if a man gets too close to their woman. Yea real confident in your sexuality there.

    • Replies: @Tony Massey
  340. @I'm Tyrone

    Yet in merely 2 generations they destroyed what Christian Civilization built over 2 millennia.

    But most importantly, feminism appeals not to some idealism or higher morality, but to women’s most base nature.

    Christianity is part of the problem. Left unchecked is far too vulnerable to secular egalitarian trends.

    Christians today are in total denial of the base female nature you speak of. They have adopted the liberal view that women are entirely good while only men can be bad by nature. They seem to think that men must constantly repress themselves while women can simply exist. Well a major problem is that if you completely suppress male nature they become less appealing to women.

    I honestly think Christianity needs to take a back seat for awhile. They were wrong about creationism so I don’t see why they get so much influence when it comes to subjects like race or gender. If anything they support certain aspects of liberalism like race and gender not existing because THAT WOULD BE BAD.

    Just about all of the far-left private colleges were originally Christian. They all switched over to the religion of liberalism. Why are we certain that Christianity can help preserve Western society?

    The abolitionism movement was started by Quakers and not Jews as many here think. It was Christians that decided that race must only be a skin color and hair texture. They have been dragging their feet on racial differences for hundreds of years. I don’t see why race incompatible with Christianity as God of the Old Testament at least clearly didn’t believe in group equality. But I’m open to alternative explanations.

    • Replies: @I'm Tyrone
  341. Corvinus says:
    @Mefobills

    “Yes, the concept of in-groups voting for their self-interest is something most people don’t grasp.”

    To the contrary, most people understand it completely, as evident by current events (e.g. the Election of 2020, “Back The Badge” vs. Black Lives Matters).

    “Has there ever been any sort of matriarchal society that survives in history?”

    Depends upon what one defines as matriarchal.

    https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/g28565280/matriarchal-societies-list/

    https://youth-time.eu/where-men-fight-for-equality-matriarchal-societies-in-the-world/

    “Also, consider that cultural marxism is a form of liberalism, and it promotes women as agents of destruction.”

    Cultural marxism, the “post factual dog whistle”.

    https://theconversation.com/is-cultural-marxism-really-taking-over-universities-i-crunched-some-numbers-to-find-out-139654

    “To do that, it opposes family formation and tells women they are the same as men.”

    Traditional family formation. Family formation exists and continues today.

    “How is that voting pattern for western women working out? I suggest it is a major reason we live in clown world”

    Assuming we live in a clown world, and assuming that women voters are in large part for this development.

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  342. @John Johnson

    Not sure I agree. Latin America is Christian, as are many other regions of the world. I don’t see them having these problems. I don’t think it’s Christianity that’s the problem but rather the egalitarian obsessed culture of the anglosphere. It’s a shame really because I’m not actually against egalitarianism, but the left has ruined it for everyone.

    • Replies: @John Johnson
    , @Sunshine
  343. Mefobills says:
    @Carolyn Yeager

    You have issues. Pride commeth before a fall.

    • Replies: @Carolyn Yeager
    , @annamaria
  344. @Curmudgeon

    ” Just following Orders™ “?

    Cops will never willingly give up an opportunity to increase their power, pay, privelege or pension despite their considerable sway with political votes. Politicians covet cop union support as sure as a U.S. presidents’ necktie dangles between the legs of the israel lobby.

    Perhaps one day you may come around, as this mensch finally has (see link above);

    ” I’m sorry. This video is the tipping point for me. For 48 years I have been pro-police, almost fanatically so. I cannot say that anymore. I know there are still good cops out there. Some are my friends. But as the violent enforcers of the lockdown I no longer support them.
    10:47 AM · Jan 2, 2021 ”

  345. @Mefobills

    I have issues? LOL. You shame yourself.

  346. Rooster10 says:
    @Observator

    That’s a very elementary view of Marxism. If what you stated is true, sign me up! However, that’s the sort of tripe that has entrapped many simple folk of years past. The one thing you’re missing from your utopian viewpoints is: HUMAN NATURE. No doubt the farmers of the former USSR thought the same thing, only to be disposed of by the Red Army after ushering in the new regime. “Equality and Fairness” are man-made fairytales for the masses…

  347. Rooster10 says:
    @Nisbe

    Someone that gets it! They will keep pushing until we’re extinct. At some point there needs to be major resistance, otherwise our descent will be gradually worse until complete obliteration.

  348. @Trickster

    Even your correction is wrong. You meant to type 40T, not 40M

  349. @Avery

    people moved to empty lands to get away from others who would kill them or rape their women. How do you think human migration worked? How do you think people got from africa down to Australia and over to Asia, across the bering land bridge and way down to Tierra Del Fuego. They were fleeing other humans who had probably snuck into their camps in the middle of the night and slaughtered members of their tribe. They didnt just move to these empty lands because they loved walking.
    yes, home erectus did find totally empty lands (no other humanoids) but then they evolved into other species (denisovans and neanderthals) who slaughtered one another and forced them to keep moving farther away to avoid being killed or raped. Home sapiens did in fact find occupied lands when they got to Europe and Asia and killed off the descendents of Homo erectus. None of these Proto-humans could rightly be called “caucasians”, yet they committed atrocities for hundreds of thousands of years. Again, none of this is known or taught anymore to our youth.

  350. annamaria says:
    @Mefobills

    Hate to enter the discussion, but do you know how many women are intellectually superior to you? Unless you are positioned at the very top of IQ bell for men.
    It has no sense to attack women for their mistakes when the world is ruled by the moneyed puppeteers of the obliging Cheneys, Clintons, and the likes. What is the IQ difference between Bush the lesser and Condi Rice? Does this difference matter? They both are traitors to the US. Sometimes it looks as if some men suffer mommy issues.

    What group was in charge of the last election? Why does the citizenry allow the election farce to proceed?
    Dmitri Orlov provides some numbers (in a very merciful form) to alleviate, a little bit, the educational problem in America: https://cluborlov.blogspot.com/2020/12/world-satanic-society-2020-year-end.html

    74 million votes for Trump plus 81 million votes for Biden gives us 155 million votes total. But there were only 153 million registered voters just two years ago, so that’s 101% voter turn-out. And then 160 million are said to have voted, so that’s 104.5% turn-out! Compare that to 55.7% turn-out in the 2016 election. …

    Since 2016 the US population grew by just under 8 million. Optimistically assuming half of them became eligible to vote; that would add 4 million to the rolls. Optimistically assuming all of them actually registered to vote, that would only make 157 million. Accept the reported stunning voter turn-out number for 2020 of 66.7%. That’s just under 105 million votes total—nowhere near then 160 million number that has been reported. If Trump got 74 million votes, as reported, then just 31 million votes would be the theoretical maximum for Biden—less then half as many as for Trump. …

    So how could Biden and Harris have won? Easy! The same way it was possible to knock down three New York skyscrapers using two airplanes on 9/11. If the people haven’t been taught to count, you can get them to believe just about anything!

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @annamaria
  351. @I'm Tyrone

    Yet in merely 2 generations they destroyed what Christian Civilization built over 2 millennia. They destroyed the nuclear family with no fault divorce, child custody laws, alimony etc. They destroyed their children’s future via single motherhood (contrary to myth, the majority of men were kicked out and didn’t walk out). They gutted every institution to enable them to optimize their hypergamy, ie sleep with all the chads they want while forcing the male taxpayer to pay for their indiscretions. I’ve lived in China, the Middle East, and India, and I can tell you that single mothers are often begging on the streets. But white women like this new equality where they are free to run amok while leaving others to clean up their mess.

    Once again, I agree that the things you mention are indeed problems, but I’m afraid women did not accomplish any of them on their own. They had lots of help from men. That’s a bitter pill to swallow, but it’s the truth.

  352. Mefobills says:
    @annamaria

    I use the terms ON AVERAGE, to indicate statistical distributions.

    The statistical distribution for women voters is a function of averages, not high IQ outliers.

    The voting pattern statistics are very clear and well established.

    Women (on average) vote for other women. They vote their issues. Their issues change depending on their security status.

    If secure in a marriage, where husband is the breadwinner, wife votes similar to her husband.

    If divorced, the woman attaches herself to government, where government is her proxy husband.

    Good effort trying to impugn my IQ. Let the readers read the comment thread and let them decide who has the stronger argument based on observable reality.

    Even high IQ women don’t want to admit their “free-dumb” is part of the problem. When a man like me comes along and says, you have to be restricted to your natural role, it is not well received.

    • Replies: @annamaria
  353. annamaria says:
    @Mefobills

    I am the first to cheerlead for the natural roles of women and men: Women provide care and education to their children (hence women must be well educated), and men provide support for their wives and the education for their children (hence men must be well educated).
    Various studies show gender effect, including the studies in general intelligence, visuospatial reasoning, and emotional processing. The ancient legends about two halves looking for unity are not bad.

    Meanwhile, instead of wasting precious resources on such secondary issues as militant feminism, why don’t men (and women) look for the real problem of our times? Namely, the traitorous, opportunistic, shameless, and cowardly persons of both sexes who are allowed (by the real power of Banksters and security services) to occupy the government to represent and fight for the power’s interests, even if these interests have been pushing this civilization to decline…

    • Replies: @Mefobills
  354. annamaria says:
    @annamaria

    An informed comment by Colonel Lang. The future does not look good.
    I apologize for the long quote: https://turcopolier.typepad.com/sic_semper_tyrannis/

    [MORE]

    1. The roll out of the Republican insurgent operation for objection to the Electoral College vote on the 6th is indicative of where the party is going.

    Mitch McConnell and the party apparatchiks in congress may think that they will be able to do business with Biden/Harris and their handlers but the the 74 million citizens who voted against the Democrats do not agree.

    In this context the 5 January runoffs in Georgia are largely irrelevant. The Republicans and those who vote with them will be in Opposition no matter who runs the US Senate.

    The objecting members of congress know that they cannot succeed in obtaining supporting majorities in both houses of congress in support of their objections. When pressed they said this on the Sunday morning TeeVee newsies today. No. What they are doing is establishing a baseline of political opposition to the results of the 2020 election. Along this baseline they will insist that Biden/Harris are not legitimately elected and are in fact usurpers against whom any means of resistance is justified. This closely mirrors Democrat propaganda and tactics throughout the Trump presidency.

    People who think that resistance by the Smellies (Deplorables) to Democrat/Marxist rule will disappear as a result of Trump’s defeat are deceiving themselves. It will not. In this move we see consolidation of Smelly resistance.

    2. When the 6 January rebellion in the congress fails, Trump will be faced by a personal need to maintain himself as party (and Smelly) leader. One possible course of action would be to start a war against a country so demonized by the media and his own administration that the most recent verbal threats by that country can be said to be a causus belli. The most obvious target would be Iran, closely followed in order of probability by Syria.

    The president/CinC has broad and legal effective powers to wage war against an imminent national threat on a short term basis as opposed to limitations on those powers under the War Powers Act. He/she has the ability to wage war for 30 days before congress can effectively stop a war.

    Under the Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986, the military chain of command runs from POTUS to SECDEF to the Combatant Commanders. Under the same law, the JCS (including the Chairman) and the whole Joint Staff in the Pentagon are merely advisers and planners operating in support of POTUS and SECDEF. Trump now has the SECDEF he wants and nothing stands between him and the ability to legally launch an air and naval war in the ME. The small US forces in Iraq and Syria would be greatly endangered by such a move, but … In the context of possible action against Iran, the withdrawal of the Nimitz battle group from the Gulf should not be seen as necessarily being a signal of declining US-Iranian tensions. Perhaps the withdrawal has been long scheduled but elbow room in the Arabian Sea would be needed in a shooting war.

    Biden/Harris would be left to deal with the situation. Trump might face civil or criminal action in the aftermath, but a long, drawn out legal battle with all the opportunity this would present for publicity might suit him well.

    Would the Combatant Commanders refuse legal orders to attack? I doubt that would happen. pl

  355. Mefobills says:
    @annamaria

    We are in agreement. I expose the money mechanics on a intermittent basis here at UNZ.

    I have no issue with women becoming fully actualized. What full actualization for a woman means, Carolyn and I disagree.

  356. Dr. Doom says:

    White men must view the Anti-White System as the ENEMY.

    That’s the FIRST STEP. Do not support it in any meaningful way.

    Next, sabotage the System whenever you get the chance.
    Plant seeds of disunion and disharmony into the minds you come across.
    Point out Jewish perfidy to everyone but the Tribe itself.

    Subvert the system whenever you get the opportunity.
    Tell the AA hires about how the Jews see them as PERFECT SLAVES or CATTLE.
    Turn the slave narrative to the “Jewish Slave Trade”.
    Tell everyone that White men created Freedom, and that no one else would.

    Smile. Do everything in a positive frame of mind.
    Let the Hate simmer and power your strategy.
    Recognize the Hate the otherkins have for you.
    Use it, but in a positive frame of mind.

    The Jews almost always lose. They go too far.
    They have no real supporters for their mad dreams of globalism.
    They have no real brave soldiers who will fight for their Jewish Domination.

    We are LEGION. We outnumber them by an order of 10:1.
    Take heart that when push comes to shove, we only need a couple hundred thousand.
    250,000 is the sweet spot. The ABSOLUTE CERTAIN VICTORY.

    This is not “democracy” anymore. This is WAR.
    In WAR, you do not NEED the majority, just a determined army.
    250,000 White Men could BURN THIS SYSTEM DOWN.

    Remember. Sabotage, subvert and smile.
    The System is DOOMED. It cannot survive. YOU CAN SURVIVE.
    White Western Civilization is the ONLY PROGRESS in the History of Mankind.

  357. @I'm Tyrone

    Not sure I agree. Latin America is Christian, as are many other regions of the world. I don’t see them having these problems. I don’t think it’s Christianity that’s the problem but rather the egalitarian obsessed culture of the anglosphere. It’s a shame really because I’m not actually against egalitarianism, but the left has ruined it for everyone.

    A good point but the international left really doesn’t care about what happens in Latin America.

    Ever since WW2 they have viewed Anglo Whites countries as problem #1. Taking down Germanic Whites has been more important to the left than helping workers.

    Latin American men are actually encouraged to be masculine by leftists.

    This is because the left idealizes masculinity in non-Whites. If an African or South American strongman takes over a country they will rally around him if they feel that Anglo Whites will not benefit. This has happened numerous times.

    You can argue that Western Christianity has been corrupted by the left but the corollary is that they were not strong enough to resist it. I think only a unified state sponsored religion with a strong backing like the Orthodox Church in Russia can withstand constant attack.

  358. White people will probably just break bad at some point.

    Egalitarians and leftists have proven they will do anything to maintain a fictional world. In fact they want to expand their fictional world to not only the future but also the past. They see 1984 style government censorship as the only way to keep the bad Whites from talking about unwanted facts.

    I’d rather see a populist resolution where people accept race but don’t obsess over it. I would like to see the left return to serving workers.

    But egalitarians and leftists really want to recreate the world to match their ideals even if it means turning White countries and the sources of progress into crass third world markets. Sadly even most labor-leaning leftists would prefer this to acknowledging racial differences. I’ve even had liberals admit this just means that China will dominate a giant Brazil that spans the Americas while Europe becomes Arabia North. And they will take that over admitting that race exists.

    Modern egalitarians are sick, sick people and White people will probably have to take the gloves off at some point to finish the fight.

    • Replies: @Bookish1
  359. @Franz

    I’ll believe the “white awakening” is here when we can create a Euro-American version of the ADL and using it effectively against anti-white hate speech.

    Playing the same game as the left will never work.

    They’ll just change the rules because they make them up anyways.

    We have already seen them decide that Whites can’t work together even if they are a minority.

    They just make up new excuses for why Whites can’t act collectively. They have already done this in South Africa. In Zimbabwe the left didn’t think that Whites even deserved to live.

    Leftism is really just an anti-White movement. At one point it was about workers but now it is about doing whatever it takes to take down Whitey. In their minds the workers (non-White) can only progress once the White devil problem is solved.

    The left needs to be smashed to bits and playing games like trying to start a White ADL will go nowhere.

  360. Bookish1 says:
    @John Johnson

    You make some good points but who are the leftist egalitarians. In order to be able to fight them we have to know who they are. Beside big names we have to know who they are.

  361. It’s interesting to look at the last twenty five years and to find that the most clairvoyant were the “conspiracy theorists” and race realists. I’ll admit that I was late to the party, on account of my youth and inexperience.

  362. @Trickster

    Would we even be discussing this if, as nature intended, women were not allowed to vote?

  363. Sunshine says:
    @I'm Tyrone

    They are having these problems too. Argentina just legalized abortion. Uruguay is uber liberal. There’s lots of SJW nonsense going on all over Latin America, with varying degrees of success. Mexico is trying to (or already has?) legalized gay marriage. Their traditional culture is being replaced, both here in the west and in their countries. The people who immigrated to the West return home with their nonsensical western beliefs and try and push it on their home countries. NGOs do the same, and tie aid money to globo-homo agenda pushing. Make no mistake about it, they want the entire world in lockstep with the degeneracy.

    • Agree: FLgeezer
  364. Dr. Doom says:

    You can feed a wild animal and it will come to eat.
    But when the food runs out, it will either leave or eat you.
    A similar situation here.

    The Zion pigs CANNOT WIN. They are deluded and stupid.
    Satan has LIED TO THEM. They are too dumb to see it.
    Perhaps you will understand.

    [MORE]

    Satan hates all mankind. His plan is TOTAL ERADICATION.
    Those 2800 “slaves” are just idiots that cannot feed themselves.
    The Zion pigs will be Kosher Bacon if they actually succeed.

    You White Men can win and prosper. The Zion pigs are dead either way.
    You kill them, they kill themselves, or they are killed by their would be slaves.
    Just bring them and their “slaves” together and get out of the way.

    The “diversity” hates each other and will turn on each other.
    They do not subscribe to “globalism” or Zionism.
    Once you cut them off from food and power they will fight over the scraps.

    Many will simply flee back to their origin countries.
    The others will simply wait too long for an impotent government to survive.
    Sabotage, subvert and smile.

    Remove all support for this Anti-White System.
    RESIST, do not assist. Do not comply.
    Barter, avoid taxes you can avoid, and push the System into a hole to die.

  365. Wright says:
    @Mis(ter)anthrope

    You can say the same thing about white people

    • Troll: GeneralRipper
  366. @John Johnson

    Gee John the worst I’ve known, by far the worst, were pretty damn good looking gals and they didn’t seem to care about nor have any need for feminism.
    I grew up with several that fucked their way to the top. I don’t recall them ever saying anything about women’s rights. They just did what ever the Hell they wanted and some man paid for it.
    I’ve lost count of all the one’s I’ve known that spent more than their husbands earned(one turned to crime to keep her flush with cash) all the while screwing around without consequence.
    It’s pretty uncomfortable knowing what the ol lady is doing and pater familias had no clue. Or at least didn’t want to know.
    When my ex wife went from a sub to a Dom she got her shit packed and promptly divorced. She had little clue what feminism is and, like (nearly) all her cohort she was just out for herself. And all were succeeding very well.
    She was engaged the day our divorce was final. She was married a month later. She knew what to do.
    She didn’t have any ugly girl friends. I think pretty women hate ugly women. Yeh, they weren’t all 10s but they were all doing the same thing. And getting their way. It’s not like men were telling them what to do. They wouldn’t have done it.
    Maybe it’s just me but it seems like the ones that are keeping things humming and clicking along aren’t really in charge.
    Nearly all my engagements with the outside world, yep, sure enough, I’m dealing with a chic.
    What?I’m gonna win vs them? Not hardly.
    When shit stops running and nothing gets fixed, well, men will prolly be in charge again.
    At the place i live i had to sign a 3 page contract basically stating i would never disrespect a woman and numerous examples were listed and several didn’t seem worthy of an offense. Did men come up with that idea?
    Maybe it’s not fait accompli. Yet.

  367. @Mefobills

    I expose the money mechanics on a intermittent basis here at UNZ.

    Classic understatement, understatement being a classic trait of gentlemen with true class.

    Please note this string of publications consistent with the voluminous education you’ve given us beyond the advanced degree:

    https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/how-austrian-and-british-malthusian-brainwashed-generation-americans

    published yesterday citing as authority with approval this:

    https://ellenbrown.com/2020/12/18/tackling-the-infrastructure-and-unemployment-crises-the-american-system-solution/

    the former being an extremely sophisticated example of how those whom you call our “(((friends)))” are to quote the Stones “practiced at the art of deception…(can) tell by (t)he(i)r blood-stained hands” doing controlled opposition and bringing diversionary controversies on the flank to distract from real issues and the truth.

    The latter appears to be a fountainhead of the expansive spring of truth you’ve been espousing here for years.

    Very eager to know if Ellen Brown

    https://ellenbrown.com/

    is a source familiar to you and most importantly your take on all of this.

    She sure looks like a courageous champion for truth at first impression.

    But (((they)))’ve made me leery of the potential of anything being controlled opposition going back to the 1994 book on that most hideous of Jew evil “No-Fault” Divorce Legislation entitled “The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce” by the Jewess Judith Wallerstein who lies beginning with the title. They knew divorce would devastate our children and thereby our society, they know they lobbied to get it enacted state-by-state and to mainstream it via their lawyers and judges, so she titled her report on the devastation “Unexpected” to deceive us from recognizing their evil intent.

    • Replies: @Mefobills
    , @Mefobills
  368. @Rosie

    The takeover of PC/Cultural Marxism does coincide with the feminization of western societies. It’s complex, but women seeking power certainly plays a role in our malaise.

  369. Mefobills says:
    @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    Both Matthew and Ellen are doing good work.

    I have challenged both of them, and Ellen even corrected me once in an email, and she was right.

    If you read Matthew Ehret, just remember that he gets most of his information from LaRouche Pac., and that group is curiously silent about the Jew, and machinations before Bank of England formation in 1694.

    For example, Ehret thinks that the Bank of Amsterdam was a Venetian conspiracy. But, it was not a bank of issue (it only intermediated existing money), and instead came into being as a response to predatory Jewish stock market capital, and money changers in the stock exchange.

    Ellen is fairly accurate, and Hudson has said this, to paraphrase, “She is for state banking because it is the most likely public option that can be passed, and she is probably right.”

    In other words, state banks are not the ideal solution to the money power problem, but Ellen’s approach is the practical one. Sovereign money, and releasing debts annually is the most advanced money system. The closest approximation to that was King Edward’s Talley stick system in the upper middle ages. Funny how both Hudson and LaRouche people ignore this example in history.

    They are not controlled opposition. History is something that is agreed upon by observing the facts.

    Some people have real problems when you challenge what they think they know, because the challenge will un-moor them.

    Hudson ignores Bolsheviks, because it is too close to home (his Dad was a Trotskyite), and Hudson inherited Trotsky’s manuscripts. Ellen pushes state banks, as they are low hanging fruit, even if non ideal.

    Ehret fails also: The concept that the American System of Economy’s ultimate expression is fascism, is something that LaRouche head would explode over. Yet, there is no question about it, that the advanced fascist economies were using American System methods, that had since been refined.

    It would be easy if you could have one source where the truth was honed down to a diamond by unrestrained debate, but we don’t have that.

    I get it that you worry about hidden agendas, because that is operative today.

    If you overlay the debt cycle onto the American economy, the debt cycle exactly corresponds to women entering the workforce as new debtors. New debts pay off old debts.

    The “malthusians” are really usurers, who work out scams in order to be paid, society be damned.

    So, Ehret is not wrong on the big picture, but he does get confused about details, and he will never name the Jew, who in turn is an agent for usury.

    Nowhere does the economy of Ellen Brown, Matthew Ehret, or even Hudson think about society as an integrated hierarchy and organism. OK, Hudson does think that way. He gets a pass. The last time that occurred in history was NSDAP in Germany.

    Economics is really political economy, and male/female and formation of family are part of economy. The family unit is the cornerstone of any civilization, and if you are an economist, and ignore this, you are remiss in your duty.

  370. Mefobills says:
    @Farrakhan.DDuke.AliceWalker.AllAgree

    Ehret, Brown and Hudson also fail on gap theory.

    We really need a trivium style college of economics, where history can be debated and re-written.

    All of the pieces actually fit together into a coherent whole, but if you read any one of the writers above, you can miss important pieces.

    That doesn’t mean they are controlled opposition… it just means they are not complete.

    For example, Major Clifford Hughes Douglas gets little mention.

    Gap theory is advanced economics, and Douglas proved it beyond question. Yet? Where is Hudson on gap theory? Brown? Ehret?

    Nowhere.

    Gap theory was used accidentally by NSDAP economist Fritz Reinhardt. Douglas was actually sending letters to Hitler, explaining how Hitler can save the world. Reinhardt may actually have learned to inject debt free money into families as required by Douglas gap theory.

    (It is good economics to support family formation, while simultaneously dealing with the gap problem. NSDAP Germany got it right.)

    Once again, we find the ultimate expression of advanced economics in NSDAP Germany, and all of the above writers are silent on the subject.

    I’m going to go with the “Third Rail” theory, where the Jew cannot be named, and to do so, is a career or possible death sentence.

    Douglas named the Jew, and he has been wiped from history, although I would rank him among the greatest economists who ever lived. Reinhardt, another great one – wiped from history.

  371. Rurik says:
    @Rosie

    unfairly tarred you with that brush

    Thanks, accepted.

    How does something that catastrophically stupid happen to a superpower? Bottom-line thinking.

    That’s definitely part of it.

    Hence, the willingness of many White women to support Orange Hitler in spite of the media’s relentless demonization of him.

    ‘Orange Hitler’?

    Did he seem like a ‘Hitler’ to you?

    I can tell you that it was very difficult for me to accept the truth about race, and harder still, the JQ. The pangs of guilt and shame were real and very painful.

    that sounded sincere and heartfelt. If you’ve had the courage to undo your ((programming)), then that is more than most men can muster.

    For what it’s worth, I happen to think that gender-based AA is more justifiable than race-based AA.

    “More” ? !

    Suppose a woman takes time off to have kids. She’s not going to have as much experience as a man who didn’t. Should that be held against her? Does the process of raising children not entail growth in it’s own right? If an employer chooses to ignore that gap, is that “affirmative action”? I don’t know the answer to that, but I think reasonable people can disagree on the question.

    In a sane society, women shouldn’t have to work. A man should provide for her and their offspring, with a safety net provided by the state. Provided she’s raising children who represent the heritage of the nation.

    No one should be taxed to fund raising children who will one day be enemies of the nation. Witness what’s going on today in the ZUSA. Our demographic shift has resulted in a government that is overtly hostile to the founding stock of this dying ((murdered)) nation.

    There was some talk of National Socialism on this thread, and some of its more virtuous tenets. I liked their policy of Lebensborn, So I’d be the ultimate supporter for that kind of Affirmative Action.

    But again, this is all academic, because now it’s ‘all she wrote’, and the ZUS is going down hard.

    I hope you and the rest of the good people here all have a plan, because it looks like ‘wokeness’ ((anti-White hatred on acid)) is here with a vengeance.

    God bless

  372. Anon[187] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Frank Frivilous

    Dear Mr. Frivilous,

    I’d love for you to write about your experiences with petty crime at the hands of blacks and immigrants. American Renaissance is interested in published exactly that kind of story. Please email me at: [email protected] Thanks – Chris

  373. Anon[187] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @omegabooks

    Hi Omegabooks,

    This is Chris Roberts with American Renaissance. I’d love for your to write about your awakening out in West Texas. AmRen regularly publishes stories like that, and your sounds interesting. Please email me: [email protected] Thanks! – Chris

  374. Anon[187] • Disclaimer says: • Website
    @Mis(ter)anthrope

    You should absolutely write about your experiences at that school. American Renaissance regularly publishes stories from whites who attended or taught at majority-minority schools. If you’re interested in, please email me: [email protected]

  375. @Mefobills

    You have educated us here and convinced overwhelmingly that “Industrial Capitalism” which originated as “the American System” founded on the previously proven sound concept of sovereign money is the optimal financial/economic system for the benefit of society, the people, the nation, while “Finance Capitalism” is exploitive of society, the people, the nation because it is the system of predat0ry Jew usury.

    These are key insights you express on that while discussing contemporary authors:

    Sovereign money, and releasing debts annually is the most advanced money system. The closest approximation to that was King Edward’s Talley stick system in the upper middle ages.

    …the American System of Economy’s ultimate expression is fascism, … there is no question about it, that the advanced fascist economies were using American System methods, that had since been refined.

    If you overlay the debt cycle onto the American economy, the debt cycle exactly corresponds to women entering the workforce as new debtors. New debts pay off old debts.

    The “malthusians” are really usurers, who work out scams in order to be paid, society be damned.

    …name the Jew, who in turn is an agent for usury.

    …think about society as an integrated hierarchy and organism…. The last time that occurred in history was NSDAP in Germany.

    Economics is really political economy, and male/female and formation of family are part of economy. The family unit is the cornerstone of any civilization, and if you are an economist, and ignore this, you are remiss in your duty.

  376. @Mefobills

    “Gap Theory” is a whole new level of finance/economics insight you exclusively are delivering because the John 8:44 children of the devil in their relentless deception have obscured this beneficial knowledge from us.

    We really need a trivium style college of economics, where history can be debated and re-written.

    Here you begin that process of bringing sophisticated and thus intentionally obscured truth to light:

    Major Clifford Hughes Douglas gets little mention.

    Gap theory is advanced economics, and Douglas proved it beyond question.

    Gap theory was used accidentally by NSDAP economist Fritz Reinhardt. Douglas was actually sending letters to Hitler, explaining how Hitler can save the world. Reinhardt may actually have learned to inject debt free money into families as required by Douglas gap theory.

    (It is good economics to support family formation, while simultaneously dealing with the gap problem. NSDAP Germany got it right.)

    Once again, we find the ultimate expression of advanced economics in NSDAP Germany, and all of the above writers are silent on the subject.

    I’m going to go with the “Third Rail” theory, where the Jew cannot be named, and to do so, is a career (stopper) or possible death sentence.

    Douglas named the Jew, and he has been wiped from history, although I would rank him among the greatest economists who ever lived. Reinhardt, another great one – wiped from history.

    Truly we are at the point where speaking accurately and concisely of Jew power, Jew financial predation, Jew contamination of cultural habitat is as dangerous as it was for God Incarnate Jesus and his disciples who were martyred.

    Please expound on the mechanics/specifics of Gap Theory and the “gap problem” to further edify.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Patrick McDermott Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Becker update V1.3.2
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?