I want the American public to know right now, we will not be intimidated. American patriots are fed up with the corruption from the local level to the highest level of our government. We are going to take this country back. We will not be intimidated. We are going to clean this mess up right now. President Trump won by a landslide. We are going to prove it. And we are going to reclaim the United States of America for the people who voted for freedom. — Sidney Powell, Washington D.C., 19 November, 2020
Sidney Powell is emerging as a pivotal figure among those sounding the alarm that the United States is forfeiting its claim to be anything like a democratic country subject to the rule of law. Like Rudolf Giuliani, Powell has been a federal prosecutor. Unlike Giuliani, Powell has made one thing abundantly clear. She will not distinguish between members of the Republic Party and Democratic Party in her prosecutorial approach to solving the still-unresolved outcome of the 2020 US election. “My intent,” Powell assets, “has always been to expose all the fraud I could find and let the chips fall where they may—whether it be upon Republicans or Democrats.”
Powell’s non-partisan approach to getting at the truth of what actually happened in election 2020 is proving to be infectious. Increasingly individuals are turning up at public demonstrations calling attention to the fraud of this election in ways that promote the need for genuine investigations of a bi-partisan nature. Those seeking investigation more than victory want to see a genuine archaeological dig by forensic experts into the evidentiary morphology of this electoral debacle irrespective of adversarial spins favouring Republicans or Democrats.
Powell’s commitment to pursuing the high road of non-partisanship in litigating the rigged 2020 election may well have played a role in opening up a split within the personal legal team of President Donald Trump. Giuliani’s strategy points one way and Powell’s strategy points another another. As I see it, Powell will probably continue her case no matter who is residing in the White House after Inauguration Day on January 20, 2021.
As any conscientious and aware observer can easily discern, the main elements of this year’s presidential contest expose the clear outlines of a rigged election displaying a wide variety of cheating techniques. The obvious irregularities began in the early hours of November 4 after President Trump made a speech at the White House emphasizing the large extent of his reported lead especially in important swing states like Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin. The outcome of voting in Nevada and Arizona would subsequently move into the category of contested jurisdictions.
When rigged elections come to light, evidence of fraud inflicted on voters is evidence of gross abuse pointed at people and principles. The real crime of facilitating or allowing election fraud goes back to the government’s betrayal of many sacred trusts. The act of voting by enfranchised citizens is meant to be the ultimate embodiment of the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. The effort to rig elections assaults the dignity, interests and constitutional rights of faithful citizens who are cheated of their chance to perform their democratic duty.
People will remember waking up after election night to news reports stating that the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate had somehow zoomed ahead during the dead of night when the vote counting was supposed to have stopped. Starting at around 4:30 am strange occurrences began in many vote tabulation centers. The anomalous developments threw the electoral process into a condition of chaos and disarray that continues yet. In Michigan and Wisconsin, for instance, huge bundles of votes miraculously showed up, all for Joe Biden. As Sean Davis tweeted,
So while everyone was asleep and after everyone went home, Democrats in Michigan magically found a trove of 138,339 votes, and all 138,339 of those “votes” magically went to Biden. That doesn’t look suspicious at all.
What are the odds of flipping a coin 138, 339 times and having it come up tails 138,339 times in a row? A similar all-Biden “vote” dump took place around 6 am in Wisconsin. The resulting graph of the Biden vote in these and other states goes perpendicularly straight up to form so-called vote spikes. The legitimacy of these spikes especially in Georgia, Michigan and Wisconsin has become the subject of much scrutiny and sceptical interpretation.
The overall pattern of what transpired is beginning to be pieced together. It seems that the rigged computer voting machines were not sufficiently well rigged to negate the enormous surge of votes for Donald Trump that arose from normal voting on election day. When the voting system shut down it seems to have been to break the trajectory of a big win for Trump. When the process was mysterious set back in motion during the wee hours of the morning of Nov. 4, new techniques of cheating were introduced and deployed to “backfill” the Biden electoral deficit.
In some counties where big Trump leads were cancelled out in the days after the election, the stats showed numbers of votes exceeding the numbers of voters by as much as 350%. Another anomaly showed up in voter counts where candidates lost votes over time at the same rate as Biden gained votes.
Of course, there is mounting uncertainty about the legal status of various categories of mail-in ballots. This uncertainty applies especially to ballots submitted after November 3 in certain states like Pennsylvania and Wisconsin where there are strict constitutional prohibitions on changing electoral rules through executive orders or even legislative enactments.
This contention has become greater since 27 November when Patricia A. McCullough, a Judge of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, made her historic ruling. Judge McCullough’s ruling addressing the election fiasco in Pennsylvania sets out a template of legal interpretation and procedure that may very well proliferate as this election crisis continues to unfold.
Judge McCullough determined that Pennsylvania’s Governor, Secretary of State as well as the members of the Legislative Assembly failed to adhere to the Constitution of Pennsylvania in coming up with new rules involving mail-in ballots. Part of her consternation resulted from the fact the government officials in Pennsylvania failed to adhere to a court order from US Supreme Court Judge, Samuel Alito. Shortly after election day Judge Alito ordered Pennsylvania officials to separate out mail-in votes received after 8 pm on November 3.
A major emerging category of controversy in this contested election concerns the discretionary power, if any, of state official to deviate from entrenched rules and procedures in order to accommodate floods of mail-in ballots. Much evidence is coming to light of various forms of mail-in ballot fraud. In many cases evidence of the origins of these ballots is non-existent or evidence has been removed and destroyed in violation of legal regulations.
Some believe that issue of the wrongful overlay of new rules over the election laws embedded in state constitutions may emerge as a pivotal issue for the US Supreme Court. Already one of its members has intervened in the Pennsylvania proceedings suggesting Mr. Justice Alito may have identified already the basis of a possible test case.
Judge Alito’s monitoring of Pennsylvanian officials was followed by two rulings so far from Judge McCullough at the local level. This flurry of juridical activity from both the state and national ends of federalism is suggestive of where this matter may be headed.
The ruling by Judge McCullough was part of a process that included the tabling of a resolution calling for “the secretary of the commonwealth [of Pennsylvania] and the governor to withdraw or vacate the certification of presidential electors and to delay the certification of results in other statewide electoral contests voted on in the 2020 general election.” The mobilized Pennsylvania legislators went further, “urging the United States Congress to declare the selection of the presidential electors in this Commonwealth to be in dispute.”
In Pennsylvania an anomaly has emerged of 1.8 million mail-in ballots being sent out by the government and 2.5 million ballots coming back into the electoral process. What is the explanation? Given the nature of the rulings by Judges McCullough and Alito, the status of the whole bundle of 2.5 million ballots submitted after election day hangs in the balance. Similar questions arise about the status of the 700,000 supposed votes marking the difference between ballots sent out and ballots received.
As the controversies concerning the tarnished legitimacy of this rigged election keep mounting, many questions are being raised about the across-the-board misrepresentations of this still-unresolved presidential contest by media conglomerates and Internet monopolists. Once again their collective unwillingness to engage in honest and fair reporting present the media mafia presently deceiving Americans on a giant scale as key co-conspirators in election fraud.
During their monolithic misrepresentations during the election contest before Nov. 3 and in their failure to explain to the public the unfolding electoral scandals after Nov.3, most news agencies seem to assume that they will never be held accountable for their sabotage of journalist ethics. They assume that they can help along an historic instance of election tampering without being held legally accountable for the crimes in which they are deeply complicit.
In the course of 2020, the push to monopolize and control Internet content became an element of improper electoral manipulation as well as an indicator of the magnitude of the crackdown on our rights and freedoms. The crackdown now appears to extend to the denial of our right to have our votes count in honest elections. The attack on open discussion and debate began with the imposed uniformity of the formulaic fear mongering on COVID-19. The consistency of the steady flow of disinformation on many facets of this topic amounts to an unrelenting assault on science in the name of science.
This assault on the remnants of a free press and an open Internet continued with the unrelenting promotion of vaccine redemption together with the glib dismissal of the political implications of the Laptop from Hell along with related evidence. The effect has been to censor and downplay revelations on what some have referred to as the Biden Crime Family. The effect has been to shut down legitimate electoral debate about whether or not the Democratic Party and the Chinese Communist Party have conspired together improperly in the lead up to this tainted US election.
Most recently the coordinated censorship of Big Tech together with Big Media continues with the pretence entailed in amplified coverage of the invented “Office of the President Elect.” The deceits embedded in the fake news accounts of this fake office are accompanied by the failures of news reporting when it comes to the fast-emerging evidence of election fraud. The MSM’s effort to marginalize this subject as an insignificant diversion away from the big issues of the day is reflective of a radical attempt to extend the powers of unabashed disassemblers of truth and accuracy in reporting.
Voting Machines Rigged for Cheating
At the heart of Sidney Powell’s case are allegations that that many of the computerized election devices used in the 2020 election were rigged as mechanisms explicitly designed for many different varieties of cheating. Many of the election machines were provided by the Canada-based company, Dominion voting systems and its Smartmatic partner headquartered in the UK.
Initiating a case in the US District Court of Atlanta Georgia on 25 November, Sidney Powell argued “There is incontrovertible physical evidence that the standards of physical security of the voting machines and the software were breached, and machines were connected to the internet in violation of professional standards of state and federal laws.”
Included in her 104-page submission is her call for a dozen remedies
including an injunction blocking the state’s certified results showing Biden as winning by 12,000 votes from being sent to the Electoral College, an audit where signatures are matched, the impounding of election machines, and the securing of video surveillance tapes from vote-counting settings.
Sidney Powell’s legal strategy included, in her own words, a tactic for “blowing up Georgia” in a way that highlights the double-dealing of two important Republican Party quislings.
Georgia’s Governor, Brian Kemp, and the Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, are both Republicans who, with their actions, put themselves in the prosecutorial sights of Sidney Powell. Both men were instrumental in the decision to spend \$100 million in hastily bringing into Georgia Dominion voting machines with Smartmatic software.
As investigators reported in Texas in early 2020, the hardware and software of Dominion voting machines were loaded with devices and capacities that could be used in rigging elections.
Powell has been quick off the mark in situating some of the roots of Dominion and its corporate partner, Smartmatic, in an operation led by US intelligence agencies whose goals include rigging elections in foreign countries. In Powell’s estimation, this CIA-directed initiative, code named Hammer and Scorecard, was probably drawn upon in designing the Dominion system.
The Dominion/ Smartmatic corporate and US intelligence-agency-complex has been long in the making. Ever since the institution in 2002 of the Help America Vote Act, computer voting has been a significant factor in US election contests. This development has resulted in American elections being clouded by a number of serious allegations arguing that rigged computers have become instrumental in determining the outcome of elections.
As Joseph Stalin is reputed to have said, “Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes determine everything.”
The voting machine companies along with their related patents have passed from company to company along with many changes of brand names. In the early days of computer voting, Sequoia voting machines proliferated. Other companies in the voting business include Diebold, Hart Intercivic, and Election Systems and Software. Unlike its treatment of the Internet monopolists like Google and Facebook, the Department of Justice has regulated the election business by enforcing anti-trust legislation.
The DOJ regulation of voting machines, however, stops with the issue of proprietorship. The running of these machines in US elections has been pretty much a free-for-all. As Brad Friedman commented back in 2010, there is
little to ensure the accuracy or ability of citizens to oversee their own elections run on unobservable, easily manipulated, oft-failed electronic voting systems which use secret software made by private corporations to count votes in our public elections.
The failure to address this obvious shortfall in the integrity of US elections has now blown up amidst the proliferation of converging traumas imposed on people and institutions as the final days of 2020 close in on us. Sidney Powell makes much of the fact that The Dominion and Smartmatic systems have important origins as part of the electoral processes that developed during the tenure of Hugo Chavez as Venezuela’s top leader during the opening years of the twenty-first century. My understanding is that Chavez was very popular with the poor and very much resented by the rich.
One of Chavez’s mentors was Fidel Castro. While the Cuban Revolution was founded in guerrilla warfare and a military takeover of power, the governments of Chavez and then of Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela have depended, and continue to depend, on the outcomes of elections. Were these elections done honestly or were the Venezuelan elections as corrupt and dishonest as the current US election?
Sidney Powell tends to equate her antagonism with Venezuela’s communist system with her antagonism towards the Dominion and Smartmatic vote rigging systems. Both companies retain ties with their Venezuelan founders and both companies, in the view of Sidney Powell at least, are tainted by their origins in a socialist system of governance.
Powell presents a case that the US election of 2020 included purposeful interventions from communist regimes also in Cuba, and China. Powell’s undeveloped argument about the alleged interference in the US election of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is especially fraught given a core element of Trump’s political platform. One of Trump’s main political goals has been to restore US manufacturing capacity, a capacity that was largely exported to China along with millions of decent jobs.
The revelations that emerged from the Laptop from Hell together with other related sources of serious evidence suggest that Joe Biden may indeed have violated criminal laws while compromising the national security of the United States vis a vis China. Through the machinations of his son, Hunter, Joe Biden may indeed have allowed himself to become financially and politically compromised. He may have indeed thereby compromised the national security of the United States by entering into inappropriate commercial transactions with entities integral to the international operations of the Chinese Communist Party.
This perception is especially strong in an important wing of Trump’s so-called “deplorable” movement. This constituency takes many of its signals largely from the rugged media meister, Steve Bannon. Through Bannon’s relationship with Miles Guo, a rich and flamboyant and very controversial Chinese enemy of the Chinese Communist Party, Bannon has carved out a constituency of Chinese dissidents inside and outside China who seek US help in overturning the Maoist government of CCP Chairman, Xi Jinping.
The growing hostility between the US and Chinese governments is being expressed on many ways including growing military, economic and propaganda battles that touch profoundly on the contested issues at play in this fraud-infested US election. There is no doubt that the Chinese Communist Party would prefer to see a Biden victory over the populist constituency that voted in large and possibly momentous numbers for the continuation of the Donald Trump presidency. I see no reason at this stage to preclude the possibility that Chinese government did intervene to influence the US election to help bring into being a Joe Biden presidency.
No evidence has been offered by officials of the Democratic Party, including its presidential candidate, to counter evidence-backed allegations about the scandalous nature of Joe Biden’s relationship with the government of China. Could it be that the US ruling class has been so prone to sell out America by cashing in on the financial bonanza derived from exploiting masses of skilled workers in China, that Biden’s participation in the rush for spoils is made to seem normal?
The failure of federal investigation so far may have occurred because US intelligence agencies are deeply implicated in this unresolved and still-simmering national security scandal. These intelligence agencies along with their CIA-directed partners in mainstream media venues have mingled their fates as co-conspirators in the quest to keep US citizens as much in the dark as possible. The aim of this culture of deceit and cover up is to keep average Americans ill-informed about their true conditions so they will be less likely to advance their own interests when voting in elections. But what does it mean to vote in elections if the conduct of election 2020 is to become the terrible new normal?
The apparent failure of DOJ and FBI officials to investigate this possibility of collusion between the Democratic Party and the Chinese Communist Party may indeed be derived from the obvious partisanship of the US intelligence agencies in favour of the interests personified by Obama, Clinton and Biden. As the lead lawyer for General Michael Flynn, a patriotic American who was slated to become President Trump’s lead National Security Adviser, Sidney Powell possesses much insider knowledge of the ruthless attacks on the Trump administration. Powell makes it very clear that, in her understanding, the FBI conspired to “entrap” Flynn in a process rife with FBI criminality. The tactics deployed in entrapping General Flynn set the bar really low for the onslaughts to come.
The issue of foreign interference in US election integrity also calls attention to the UK-based SGO Smartmatic vote system. In London England sits Antonio Mugica, the Venezuelan founder of the Dominion/Smartmatic election rigging complex. The current Chair of SGO Smartmatic is Lord Mark Malloch-Brown. A former Vice-President of the World Bank, Malloch-Brown has been a Board member of George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and its Quantum Fund. Smartmatic’s US Chair is Peter Neffenger who is reported to be part of the supposed “transition team” of the fraudulently titled “President Elect,” Joe Biden.
Applying the Tactics of Imperial Domination to the Deplorables of the American Heartland
There are reports that the CIA had custody of a Dominion voting system server kept in a secret US location in Frankfurt Germany. This facility is apparently also connected to a Spanish voting system company known as Scytl. Shortly after the US election, a unit of the United States European Command is reported to have picked up the server with whatever information it may or may not contain about vote rigging in the 2020 election. Powell is unsure if the “good guys or bad guys” are presently in control of the server.
The Dominion voting system is headquartered in Toronto Canada. The Dominion company shares office space with a George Soros NGO called the Tides Foundation. The Soros role in this election fraud suggests at a color revolution is underway in the United States. This phenomenon is perfectly in line with the propensity of governments that impose imperial rule on foreign peoples to eventually fall prey to the repressive techniques they employ in building and maintaining empires. Again, and again the repressive tactics of imperial rule end up being applied domestically.
The term, “color revolutions,” refers to George Soros-backed episodes of US-led regime change in several of the republics that had been part of the Soviet Union before its dissolution in 1991. In his role in these transformations of government, George Soros has always kept within the scope of US government policies and strategies. This orientation orientation helped make Soros a significant collaborator and funder in the projects of Hillary Clinton’s State Department during the years of the Obama-Biden presidency.
Soros is well known for his history of sponsoring the activities of the Black Lives Matter from its inception in 2013. The activities of Black Lives Matter were featured in the summer of 2020 when urban protests put BLM in leading roles often involving riots including much burning and looting. This cycle of peaceful protests leading to violent spectacles took place especially in Democratic Party-controlled urban centers like Minneapolis, Seattle, New York and Chicago. Soros money played a major role in these episodes including through his funding of candidates for state prosecutors whose role at the height of the riots was to treat leniently those charged with committing violent crimes.
Norm Eisen, one of the main intelligence agency strategists of the George Soros-backed color revolutions, is a director of the Democratic Party’s Transition Integrity Project. The regime change experts throughout TIP are intent on forcefully taking back the White House for the Democratic Party regardless of what transpires in the judicial and/or legislative assessments of the actual outcomes of the 2020 election.
In taking a more non-partisan approach to this unprecedented crisis in US statecraft, Sidney Powell is attempting to introduce a deeper text underlying the wider implications of the current election fraud. Allegations that the US electoral process is awash in corruption are hardly new. It seems, however, that Powell is in a position to give this issue the gravitas it deserves. As she would have it, the most pernicious aspects of the informal US empire are converging in a foreign-backed internal coup aimed at subordinating the people of the United States to a new form of fascistic authoritarianism. A main emblem of this rampaging 2020 authoritarianism is the media conspiracy to repress the dissemination of information and interpretations deemed inconsistent with certain official policies and narratives.
In calling attention to the proliferation of large and small techniques for cheating in the still-unresolved electoral contest of 2020, Ms. Powell is giving detailed legal testimony on how voter fraud has long been emerging as an illustration of the growing impoverishment of US political culture. The conditions of pervasive dishonesty are becoming so marked in the United States that many elected offices are more likely to have been purchased than earned.
According to Ms. Powell, the descent of the US electoral system into orgies of cheating and misrepresentation is part of a larger process that is injecting a particularly toxic brand of lawlessness into life within the upper tiers of government. At the top of the pyramid of wealth and power, the vulgarities of unbridled politics have almost completely subsumed the viability of anything resembling a rule of law.
A regular part of Ms. Powell’s presentations on the subverted election of 2020 bemoans the fact that the US Department of Justice and the FBI are not already conducting massive criminal investigations culminating in charges against those who may have committed federal felonies. Among those most vulnerable to federal charges emanating from this rigged election are Dominion voting system officials, including, prominently, Eric Coomer. Coomer has been exposed as a friend and adviser to the Democratic Party’s Antifa protestors.
Antifa protestors took part closely with Black Lives Matter to in the rioting and statue destruction that ran rampant in US cities in recent months. As a Dominion voting system official, Coomer is on record as having bragged to his Antifa associates that he had personally put in place the means of preventing Donald Trump from winning the 2020 election.
Dominion officials have suspiciously shut down their offices in Toronto and Denver and then disappeared from sight as questions keep mounting about their seemingly criminal conduct.
The flight of Dominion officials away from scrutiny and accountability was especially remarkable in Pennsylvania. Dominion officials failed to show up as they had promised to an investigative procedure initiated by members of the Pennsylvania legislature.
COVID-19 as a Pretext for Attempting to Rig Elections Through Unconstitutional Chicanery
The evidence is accumulating that Joe Biden himself was entirely correct when he incriminated his own election team by asserting on video, “We have put together I think the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.”
Sidney Powell, Rudolf Giuliani, Jenna Ellis and L. Lin Wood are prominent among the lawyers seeking to expose what Joe Biden described in his own words as the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of US politics. Also prominent in this legal cohort is Phill Kline. A former Attorney-General of Kansas, Kline is developing a case that applies to many sites of electoral contention.
The specific theme Kline is preparing to put before the courts has to do with the unprecedented nature of the vote counting procedures employed in this particular election. The alterations to established procedures for vote collecting and vote counting were made primarily by agents of the Democratic Party in the name of being responsive to COVID considerations.
Many standard electoral rules meant to protect against election fraud were eased or erased altogether in procedures that Pennsylvania Judge Patricia McCullough has recently condemned as unconstitutional violations of law. In commenting on the ways that fears of “the mythic Coronavirus” seem to have been deployed in election 2020, Brett Redmayne-Titley has commented, “a purely political coronavirus has utilized the virus known as Covid-19 to great effect, that of anointing, not electing, Joe Biden President.”
The COVID considerations were used as justification for Mark Zuckerberg and his wife to contribute \$400,000,000 into what amounted to a partisan slush fund used to implement discriminatory election practises. This fund was used to privatize vote-collecting and vote-counting procedures of election 2020 in ways that significantly advantaged the Democratic Party vote rigging in large urban areas.
The cynical and purposeful exploitation of COVID precautions remains a significant tactic employed to help give cover to the rigged vote of 2020. In this instance and in others like it, the supposedly new coronavirus is providing a rational to advance a range of political objectives often only marginally connected to public health considerations.
Is it mere coincidence that the political party that exploited COVID-19 to engage in unprecedented forms of election fraud is the same US political party most invested in imposing mandatory masking, lockdowns, social distancing, vaccines, human chipping and immunity passports? Is it mere coincidence that the Big Media and Big Tech venues pushing the Democratic Party’s Gates-driven agenda on COVID-19 are the same venues that suppressed revelations about the Biden Crime Family? Is it mere coincidence that these same media monopolies have moved to downgrade, demean or ignore altogether the proliferating revelations about the proliferation of election fraud in the still-unresolved 2020 vote?
Is it mere coincidence that people directing the Big Media and Big Tech conglomerates are all in perfect alignment with those seeking to overturn the existing legal order of the United States? A major indicator of this alignment is the uniformity of reportage among a massive consortium of media outlets that pretend they possess the power to determine collectively the winner of this presidential election. What is to be said of the fact that Facebook’s Mark Zukberberg has acquired such prominence in pushing forward so many disparate elements of this perverse agenda?
Zuckerberg is acting as an Internet publisher censoring stories that point to the victory of Donald Trump in election 2020. Alternatively, Zukerberg has promoted stories on Facebook that put the candidacy of Joe Biden/Kamala Harris ticket in a positive light.
Moreover, Zukerberg is funding activities that violate the constitutional principle that all voters and all votes are to be treated equally, a principle well established in the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2000 in the case of Bush versus Gore. The need for this equality of treatment runs against the grain of a program used to school Democratic Party activists in a list of electoral functions like vote counters, vote monitors, vote judges and enforcers of discriminatory behaviour in vote counting areas.
A major pattern characterizing this process was the training with Zuckerberg money of scores of Democratic Party partisans who played many roles in enforcing the conditions of fraud. This privatized system of election tampering included the imposition of improper intimidation to keep Republic Party monitors from witnessing close up the all-important moment when many mail-in ballots were removed from their information-bearing envelops. This form of conniving can be described as the fraudulent treatment of mail-in ballots, a major basis of the election rigging in this still-unresolved electoral contest.
The effort in places like Philadelphia and Detroit to block Republican monitors from witnessing the removal of ballots from their envelops is one of a number of manifestations of Democratic Party cheating that permeate this historic desecration of the electoral process. As Ms. Powell acknowledges, some Republic Party candidates probably joined in the fraud, paying money to become beneficiaries of the cheating enabled in part by the Dominion voting system.
Government Of, By, and Primarily For the Extremely Rich and Well Connected
The destruction by elites of the US capacity to host reasonably fair elections is depriving average Americans of decent governance based on genuine consent of the governed. These folks have good reason to suspect they have been cheated by a sabotaged system where their vote has been misdirected to neutralize or negate their own electoral choices.
Thus the triumph of fraud over decency continues its expansionary course in what is increasingly a failed state. Average citizens are consistently abused, ripped off and lied to by agglomerations of corrupt officials in public and private sectors. This betrayal of public trust is especially rampant in media companies whose directors have made it clear that they have absolutely no commitment to telling the truth in their publications and broadcasts.
These officials together with assorted high rollers in the field of organized crime are regularly shielded from accountability for their infractions. The illegal actions of those considered to be above the law are regularly protected and helped rather than prohibited and punished by the heavily politicized leadership of most law enforcement agencies.
Will this betrayal of the rule of law prevail once again? Will the main suspects continue to be protected from federal felony charges even as the broad and unprecedented extent of the most recent cases of election fraud continue to come to light? Why should the responsibility to enforce the laws meant to protect against election fraud fall on the likes of Sidney Powell rather than on law enforcement agencies?
As Powell has announced to the world, many of the top officials of these now-publicly disgraced agencies seem to have made themselves partisan allies of big crime cartels. The organized crimes committed by these cartels operate through agencies such as the Democratic Party, the FBI, the ADL, the Open Society Foundations, BlackRock and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York?
As heavily implied in the testimony of Sidney Powell, the United States is becoming a tyranny. The levers of governing authority are of, by, and primarily for the extremely rich and well connected. Especially since 9/11, the US Constitution has essentially been pre-empted. The concept of “we the people” has become little more than a nostalgic reminder of a good idea long since left behind in the rush to massively empower multibillionaires.
The delegation of enormous powers to the likes of Bill Gates, George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg, or Jeff Bezos is proving to be disastrous. The allegiance of the mega-rich is mostly to money rather than nationality, mostly to the fruits of political patronage rather than to the pride of patriotism. Where do the so-called “deplorables”—many belonging to the denigrated and often unemployed working class– fit into this scheme of top-down repression, exploitation, disempowerment, and deception?
As promised, Powell released the much-anticipated “Kraken” at a Washington press conference on 19 November 19th, 2020. “Kraken” is a Norse term for a massive sea monster capable of overturning ships. In this case the vessel experiencing the Kraken attack is the US ship of state. As I write this essay in late November, there are still two presidential contenders. Both still claim to have won the 2020 contest for the top job in the United States.
Many see the jurist who is releasing the Kraken as a bellicose messenger of unwanted tidings. Others see Ms. Powell as an exceptionally principled legal advocate and witness whose explosive testimony demands a genuine hearing if the errant United States has any chance of redemption.
As suggested in Ms. Powell’s legal representation of General Flynn, the Texas-based lawyer is reputed to have the capacity to make legal representation in military tribunals. Such tribunals may play a role in the course of a looming constitutional crisis that might extend to adjudication of treason charges. Anticipation of such a crisis may have been a factor in the reinstatement of firing squads as a legal means for executing convicted felons.
On Nov. 19 Sidney Powell explained how the Dominion voting system used an algorithm to flip large numbers of votes from Trump to Biden. Parts of the Dominion voting machine system used in 28 US states were improperly connected to the Internet. There were various forms of backdoors and other digital openings allowing operators inside and outside of the United States to alter vote counts at their own discretion. Ms. Powell went onto explain how, in spite of this digital tampering with the results, the size of Trump’s margin of victory was so huge that it caused the Dominion system and its Smartmatic extensions to shut down automatically.
As the uncertainties about the outcome of this election continue to grow, so too does the possibility mount that Joe Biden got many less legal votes than reported and that Donald Trump got many more legal votes than reported. This understanding animates the investigative work of Bernard Kerlik, former Police Commissioner of New York City.
From his work with Rudy Giuliani, the former NYC Mayor, Kerlik predicted that it will eventually emerge that “Donald Trump won by millions of votes over what is reported.” Donald Trump won “the biggest landslide in presidential history.” Kerlik estimates that the real number of legal votes for Trump is somewhere in the neighbourhood of 80,000,000.
In September of 2018 Donald Trump issued an executive order “on Imposing Certain Sanctions in the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election.” The Order can be seen as a response to those who tried to destroy Donald Trump’s reputation and presidency by wrongfully depicting him as a violator of national security intent on doing the bidding of a meddling Russian government. The Executive Order of 2018 calls on the Director of National Intelligence to consult with his colleagues in doing an investigation of possible foreign interference. The investigation is supposed to take place within 45 days of a US election.
Among the listed criteria is a provision prohibiting “any foreign interference that targeted election infrastructure [that] materially affected the security or integrity of that infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election results.” This wording seems to fit to a tee the allegations made by Sidney Powell concerning foreign interference through the provision of computerized voting machines said to be rigged by communist operatives in Venezuela. The Order’s introduction refers also to the “unauthorized accessing of election and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and disinformation.”
In her presentations Powell adds Cuba and “possibly” China to her list of foreign and communist polities whom she suspects interfered in a US election. Her sense of indignation that such violations have occurred seems to have been strengthened by her awareness that the Democratic Party pressed similar allegations that the Russian government interfered with the US election won by Donald Trump in 2015.
The allegations by the Democratic Party and its circle of supporters inside and outside the bureaucracy of the US government continued throughout Donald Trump’s first tern of office. The scheme to defame, frame, and criminalize the Trump administration has never let up. This agenda was pushed forward with the assistance of the FBI whose leadership continue the hoax that Trump was an instrument of Vladimir Putin’s malevolent manipulation.
The unrelenting preoccupation of the Democratic Party with “Russian disinformation” continued into the election season of 2020. For instance, Adam Schiff, the Head of the House of Representatives’ Homeland Security Committee, misled the public by fraudulently claiming Hunter Biden’s Laptop from Hell had been created and planted by Russian agents.
The perspectives of both Schiff and Powell fail to acknowledge the obvious fact that the main source of foreign interference in US domestic politics, including in elections, comes from the government of Israel as well as from some influential American Jews whose primary political attachment is to their perception of Israel’s best interests.
The main agencies for the exercise of Israeli and Jewish influence on US politics, including on US elections, are abundant, well funded, well organized and many-faceted. The clout of this complex of agencies plus the people that staff and support them have been examined by Walt and Mearshimer in their much discussed book, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. Walt and Mearshimer devote much attention to explaining the deep and wide political influence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, AIPAC. They also devote considerable attention to the ADL.
Like AIPAC, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is core agency among the numerous and many-faceted organizations that together constitute the Israel Lobby. The ADL’s activities extend to close integration with law enforcement agencies at all levels, with media, and with the key movers and shakers of Silicon Valley.
In the course of 2020, Silicon Valley with its ADL bastion of Jewish power has been an important platform of operations for those intent on seizing control of the content of the Internet and especially of its main search engine, Google.
This preoccupation with controlling Internet content is a fundamental aspect of the effort to overcome and destroy the protections of the First Amendment in the US Constitution. The ADL’s participation in the tightly-coordinated attack on constitutional protections of free speech in this presidential contest can be conceived as component of Israeli interference in a US election.
The foreign influence of Israel on US politics including on elections goes far beyond the role of any other national or corporate lobby in the United States. The influence of, for instance, Venezuela, Cuba, Russia, Canada, or the UK on this US election does not come close to that of Israel. For decades the US political process has been constructed so that every US presidential election is a contest between Republican and Democratic Party advocates of close and friendly integration between the US and Israeli governments.
The lack of any genuine rivalry between Trump and Biden when it comes to the need for vigorous debate on US-Israel relations is par for the course. The foreign interference of Israel in US elections has been institutionalized to the point where it is made to seem normal. An aspect of the foreign interference puts certain important topics off limits as media cartels devote their resources to propagating Zionist propaganda rather than building up constitutionally-protected free speech including on sensitive subjects.
Both political parties share the bi-partisan principle that all candidates for top office must be vetted to disqualify any contenders whose platforms include significant criticisms of Israel. Generally speaking, any significant commitment to the principle of justice for the dispossessed and persecuted Palestinians is treated as the basis for disqualification from the even the possibility of achieving high office. The strength of this taboo against any honest discussion of Israel-Palestinian relation in presidential politics amounts to foreign interference in US elections on steroids.
These days the longstanding taboo against articulating even a hint of empathic support aimed at easing the suffering of persecuted Palestinians has been refashioned into a ruthless career-destroying fatwa. Those who refuse to self-censor when it comes to highlighting the pain and continuing persecution of the Palestinians are regularly branded as anti-Semites and creators of hate speech.
The process of attacking and shunning those advancing principled positions on human rights helps give cover to the ethnocidal policies of a foreign government, one that receives massive financial and military support from the beleaguered and now-disenfranchised US tax payers. However deplorable, these tax payers have a right to proclaim: No taxation without enfranchised representation in honest elections.
This attack on the critics of Israel could not be successfully implemented without the enthusiastic participation of an obedient media staffed by cynical and unprincipled opportunists. Media spin doctors of this ilk well understand that the route to fame and fortune runs through the promotion of the policies and actions of the likes of the ADL, AIPAC, and the Israeli government.
The process of vetting candidates for elected office extends to both houses of Congress. Carrot and stick tactics are deployed including the incentive of large campaign donations for politicians who advance the objectives of the Israel Lobby in public pronouncements and in the proceedings of the main legislative branch of the US government. While the carrot includes large cash payments to those US politicians who promote the agenda of America’s most powerful and wealthy lobby, the sticks of coercion are many and often of a covert nature.
The most notorious coercive device for exacting compliance from influential figures has come to light in a many revelations involving the activities of Jeffrey Epstein and his circle of influential associates. The most prominent acolytes of Epstein included the vaccine, depopulation and AI promoter, Bill Gates, as well as Bill and Hillary Clinton with their notorious foundation.
The Epstein/Mossad/CIA playbook is said to have been based on blackmail of influential deciders lured into situations where they were filmed having sexual interactions with children. The apparent inability of, for instance, the DOJ to deal decisively with this appalling abuse of power on many levels is an indicator of the enormous walls of official complicity protecting the most guilty among us from accountability for their crimes.
It is beyond the scope of this essay to go deeper into this subject. For those seeking to learn more about this subject, however, the essays and reports of the Council for the National Interest are germane. The main issue addressed by the Council for the National Interest is to demonstrate how the interests of the United States and Israel are not the same and in some instances are very discordant.
Dr. Philip Giraldi, the Executive Director of the organization, is a journalist, a scholar of significance as well as a former CIA agent. His equally-prolific colleague, Alison Weir, takes the lead in putting together the Council’s web sites including If Americans Only Knew and Israel-Palestine News.
Whither the Deplorables, the Democratic Party, and the Chinese Communist Party?
The effort to depict Donald Trump as a manipulated agent of Russian adventurism marks a counterpoint to the depiction of Joe Biden and other key figures in the Democratic Party as paid tools under the directing influence of the Communist Party of China. In my view, the now public evidence pointing to a compromised relationship of Joe Biden with the CCP is much more compelling than any characterization of Donald Trump as a dupe of the Russian government.
The anti-communist legacy inherited from the US role in the Cold War permeates almost every facet of this election fiasco whose stakes go far beyond any US presidential election so far. As many see it, the Democrat Party’s contemptuous disregard for the requirements of honest conduct in elections as well as in most other government functions amounts to an uncivil insurrection whose goal is nothing short of revolutionary transformation of the United States.
Justified or not, many of those who see themselves as opponents of this possible insurrection understand what is taking place to be a communist uprising whose main mascot so far is those who have identified themselves as members of the self-declared anti-fascist group, Antifa. In trying to oppose the tactics of her opponents, Sidney Powell made her revulsion towards communism graphically clear.
While Powell highlighted Venezuelan communism in her presentations, the Chinese Communist Party is the real wild card in the strange convergences of emergences that seems to be rapidly forcing society towards some very dark places. In ways that have yet to become clear, the Chinese government are probably deeply involved in many facets of the major developments unfolding in the United States.
The CCP might in the future be in a good position to help reassemble some pieces of a dismantled USA should events spin out of control. Is the plandemic part of a larger plan to break down the economy and governing system of the United States and to integrate what’s left into a Chinese-centered world order?
The Democratic Party hit squad that worked so hard to discredit Donald Trump’s presidency also exploited the negative imagery of Russia’s associations with Soviet communism throughout much of the twentieth century. The Dems’ emphasis on Russia as an enemy of the US drew on the legacy of many Red Scares including those that animated the US-led side in the Cold War. A compelling case can be made that many well-established interests in the Pentagon and intelligence agencies depend on the maintenance of hostile US-Russian relations to keep their budgets inflated and their prestige undeservedly elevated.
Will the United States be able to avert the drift into a civil by finding a way through this electoral crisis in a way that restores some of the great strengths of the American Republic?
A renowned cybersecurity expert, Navid Keshavarz-Nia, has joined the Sidney Powell team as an expert witness in her legal pursuits. As cited in an article in the American Thinker by Andrea Widburg, Dr. Keshavarz-Nia lays out the conclusions so far that the cybersecurity expert has arrived at concerning the role of electronic tampering in violating the integrity of this election. Here are the Dr. Keshavarz-Nia’s bullet points along with Dr. Widburg’s introductory remarks:
So what does the brilliant Dr. Kershavarz-Nia have to say? This:
- Hammer and Scorecard is real, not a hoax (as Democrats allege), and both are used to manipulate election outcomes.
- Dominion, ES&S, Scytl, and Smartmatic are all vulnerable to fraud and vote manipulation — and the mainstream media reported on these vulnerabilities in the past.
- Dominion has been used in other countries to “forge election results.”
- Dominion’s corporate structure is deliberately confusing to hide relationships with Venezuela, China, and Cuba.
- Dominion machines are easily hackable.
- Dominion memory cards with cryptographic key access to the systems were stolen in 2019.
Although he had no access to the machines, Dr. Kershavarz has looked at available data about the election and the vote results. Based on that information, he concluded
- The counts in the disputed states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia) show electronic manipulation.
- The simultaneous decision in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada, and Georgia to pretendto halt counting votes was unprecedented and demonstrated a coordinated effort to collude toward desired results.
- One to two percent of votes were forged in Biden’s favor.
- Optical scanners were set to accept unverified, un-validated ballots.
- The scanners failed to keep records for audits, an outcome that must have been deliberately programmed.
- The stolen cryptographic key, which applied to all voting systems, was used to alter vote counts.
- The favorable votes pouring in after hours for Biden could not be accounted for by a Democrat preference for mailed in ballots. They demonstrated manipulation. For example, in Pennsylvania, it was physically impossible to feed 400,000 ballots into the machines within 2–3 hours.
- Dominion used Chinese parts, and there’s reason to believe that China, Venezuela, Cuba interfered in the election.
- There was a Hammer and Scorecard cyber-attack that altered votes in the battleground states, and then forwarded the results to Scytl servers in Frankfurt, Germany, to avoid detection.
- The systems failed to produce any auditable results.