The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Washington Watcher Archive
Trump’s 2020 Bet
Give Wall To Immigration Patriots, Cheap Labor To Donors; Run Against Democrat Nuttiness. Unfortunately, It Might Work.
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The collapse of the Russiagate hoax is a devastating blow to the Democrat/ Main Stream Media complex, which quite obviously was stupid enough to believe its own propaganda, and unquestionably removes an obstacle to President Donald J. Trump’s re-election. Unfortunately for immigration patriots, Trump seems to have been persuaded that he can also achieve re-election with a new immigration agenda: make efforts to build the wall while simultaneously championing an increase in legal immigration to provide cheap labor for corporations—the reverse of his promise in the 2016 campaign. Of course, in the long term this will be a disaster for America. But, short term, Trump may get away with it.

Last week brought a new round of disappointments for immigration patriots from the White House. There was the announcement the president requested an 8 percent cut to e-Verify funding in his proposed budget. The administration claimed that this didn’t matter because “technological modernization” meant there didn’t need to be as much funding for it as before. The White House also emphasized it still supported mandatory e-Verify, an idea that congressional Republicans and Trump have seemingly forgotten. [Trump seeks cuts to E-Verify, by Rebecca Rainey, Politico, March 19, 2019]

Color us skeptical that the e-Verify cut as just a cost-saving measure.

Next was the administration’s decision to bring back catch-and-release policies for illegal families caught in the Rio Grande Valley. No longer will illegals who travel with minors be detained upon arrest; they now will be merely processed by Border Patrol and sent on their merry way. The new policy will benefit hundreds of illegals who can now get into America and skip out on their court date. [Trump administration to stop detaining some migrant families at border, by Michael Burke, The Hill, March 19, 2019]

This is a reversal of an executive order Trump signed last year that was supposed to end catch-and-release policies and detain all illegals apprehended at the border. Administration officials claim the new policy is response to a lack of space for detainees at detention facilities and “safety concerns.” Homeland Security chief Kirstjen Nielsen insists this isn’t “catch-and-release,” it’s just a sign “we are out of detention space”. [DHS secretary denies reintroduction of “catch and release” at border, CBS News, March 22, 2019]

But it clearly is catch-and-release, regardless of what the Trump administration says. So it appears the detention facility bed cap in the budget deal Trump signed last month may have hindered his ability to enforce immigration law after all. Trump shills blame Congress. They seem to think the administration just can’t be expected enforce immigration law on its own. [Trump Administration Is Reverting to ‘Catch and Release.’ Congress Is to Blame., by James Carafano, The Daily Signal, March 21, 2019]

And blaming Congress doesn’t excuse the fact that there’s a complete lack of any legislative proposals from the White House or its congressional allies to fix the problem. The same goes for mandatory e-Verify.

You cannot blame Congress for these misfortunes when the Trump administration makes no effort to correct these problems— or to advance any other patriotic immigration reforms.

Even worse, on top of all this, Trump continues to argue America needs more immigrants to meet corporate demands while the situation at the border deteriorates.

The southern border is in chaos. February witnessed the highest number of border crossings in 12 years. This surge has overwhelmed Border Patrol and they’ve had to call on Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to aid with the situation. This shift in manpower has resulted in a sharp drop in immigration arrests [U.S. immigration arrests fall under Trump as resources shift to the border, by Mica Rosenberg, Reuters, March 21, 2019]

Nielsen has called the situation a “near system-wide meltdown” and urged Congress to do something about it. [Secretary Nielsen Remarks on the State of Homeland Security, March 18, 2019] It should be noted that Nielsen has not been competent at her job and has been singled out by Trump for her failures on border security. Yet the president keeps her on as DHS chief instead of finding a worthier replacement. He appears content to blame Congress and Democrats for America’s immigration woes while doing nothing to fix the crisis.

Trump has done some good things. His executive order has gained billions for the wall and he vetoed the bill that aimed to block the national emergency declaration. His administration continues to fight to uphold good immigration policy in court. It netted a victory from the Supreme Court last week over the government’s power to detain and deport criminal aliens—the high court ruled non-citizen legal residents who commit a crime and serve time can be detained by DHS agents without a bond hearing, which makes it easier to deport them. [Supreme Court Backs Trump Administration in Deportation Case, by Greg Stohr, Bloomberg, March 19, 2019]

But these actions are not enough to curb illegal immigration, let alone reform and restrict the legal immigration system. It seems that Trump just wants to slouch toward 2020 claiming that the wall is being built—and that’s it when it comes to immigration. No more talk about the elimination of chain migration, the diversity visa lottery, or ending temporary protected status for migrants from Haiti and Latin America. Immigration reduction is off the table in favor of a corporate-endorsed immigration increase. Any problems in enforcing immigration law will be blamed on Congress.

The sad thing is Trump may win this bet. His poll numbers remain incredibly strong among Republicans with no sign a significant portion of his base has abandoned him. His overall support among Americans inches toward 50 percent. [President Trump’s approval rating continues to climb, by William Cumming, USA Today, March 4, 2019] The economy is humming and is producing record growth. We are not mired in any foreign interventions that the public cares about and the president has avoided any major catastrophe on the global stage.

Meanwhile, the Democrats are spiraling toward an extremism that will alienate many Americans. They still want impeachment proceedings even after the Mueller report showed no impeachable offenses. Many Democrats have embraced the socialist label. Support for third trimester abortions is now almost party dogma. They all want to raise taxes. They all want to check “white privilege.” And they all want to rattle the saber against Russia.

On immigration, open borders and “abolish ICE” define the Democrat agenda. They don’t want a wall, they don’t want to enforce immigration law, they want to give citizenship to all illegals, and they want to dramatically increase legal immigration and refugee intake.

This Democrat stance is way outside of the mainstream. Three-fourths of Americans say they would support a candidate who said, “We have a moral duty to create an immigration system that protects the lives and jobs of our citizens” . [Harvard/Harris Poll: 3-in-4 Voters Favor ‘America First’ Immigration, Trade, War Platform from Candidates, by John Binder, Breitbart, March 1, 2019] In contrast, Democrats say we have a moral duty to create an immigration system that rewards the foreigner and ignores the citizen.

Trump’s many failures pale in comparison to the horror that is the Democratic Party’s platform. The GOP and Trump exploited the calls to abolish ICE in 2018, which helped them avoid a total wipeout. The same will likely occur again when Trump’s 2020 opponent has an agenda that goes much further than abolishing ICE.

The president’s new immigration stance is a major disappointment to immigration patriots. Trump’s 2016 campaign promised to transform the GOP into a nationalist and populist party that would commit itself to reducing nation-breaking immigration and putting Americans first. Trump’s presidency, however, has shown little difference from the agendas of the Republicans he defeated in the primaries. Tax cuts, GDP growth, fears of socialism, and unwavering support for Israel are Conservative Inc. hallmarks–and now seem likely form the backbone of Trump’s re-election pitch.

However, the call for more immigration, which Trump frames as a needed policy for businesses, makes him more appealing to the Republican donors who shrank from him in 2016. Vice President Mike Pence has made it his mission to convince these Trump-wary donors to support Trump in 2020 and reportedly has made significant progress towards his objective. [Pence woos 2016 anti-Trumpers to bankroll billion-dollar reelection, by Alex Isenstadt, Politico, March 21, 2019]

Of course, it’s true that Trump could be a lot worse on immigration. He could propose a grand Amnesty for all illegal immigrants. This may indeed be part of the grand the immigration proposal Jared Kushner is reportedly negotiating, but it appears antithetical to Trump’s instincts. Trump is still fighting for the wall and the power to aggressively enforce immigration law.

And it’s still not impossible that Trump may revert back to his 2016 self. He’s wobbled many times on immigration patriotism, but he’s always come back to it. Jared Kushner is the main driver of the president’s terrible policies and Trump could lose faith in his primary adviser—perhaps if the grassroots backlash to Kushner’s immigration proposal is as fierce as it was to repeated Bush-Obama Era Amnesty proposals. Losing faith with advisers is a very common occurrence with Trump, as seen in his many personnel departures. It hasn’t happened with his blood relatives yet, but the history of Europe’s royal families suggests that it can.

New advisers could come in and convince the president that real steps to patriotic immigration reform will better help him win again. A renewed awareness of America’s terror threat may prompt him to call for cuts. Trump could also listen to his economic advisory council, whose recent report said there are too many Americans out of work to necessitate more immigrants. [White House Economic Staffers Suggest No Need for More Immigrant Workers, by Neil Munro, Breitbart, March 19, 2019] This is particularly true if the long economic boom shows signs of coming to an end.

A lot can happen over the next year that could make Trump a national populist again.

But we can’t overlook the fact Trump could re-elected president as Business First Don. And, given his personality, it’s all too probable that he will be happy to settle for that.

Washington Watcher [email him] is an anonymous source Inside The Beltway.

(Republished from VDare by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Ideology • Tags: 2020 Election, Donald Trump, Immigration 
Hide 10 CommentsLeave a Comment
10 Comments to "Trump’s 2020 Bet"
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. Congress writes immigration law and funds the enforcement thereof. The Oligarchy funds presidential elections and the Oligarchy wants cheap labor. Trump did what he could with no help from his Party. He got his ass kicked. Now he is doing it their way.

    Trump’s foreign policy is the same old Clinton Bush Obama bull shit. So what do you want me to do? Vote blue? I’m a white man. If Jesus was a Democrat I wouldn’t vote for him.

    • Replies: @Issac
  2. Issac says:

    You would do well to not rely upon the Republican Party. If they are nationally viable in 2020, it will be the last election cycle in which that is true.

  3. “The collapse of the Russiagate hoax is a devastating blow to the Democrat/ Main Stream Media complex ….”

    Is it really? They control what the masses see, hear, and, in many cases, think.

    The GOP? Are they still around? Time to stick a fork in the USA, and pretty much the Western World for that matter. This article assumes the 2020 elections will matter; 2019 may be TEOTWAWKI, as TPTB pull out all stops to crash the system and pin it on Trump.

  4. Rosie says:

    Working class white women will swing back to the Democrats in 2020, but college-educated White women will still be just as unwilling to vote for him as ever. This will be a disaster for him. As Greg Johnson has said, when you betray your allies to curry favor with your enemies, your enemies still hate you, and now you don’t have any allies. Working-class White women were ridiculed for being naive enough to believe a filthy rich man with an R behind his name would ever do anything for them. Now these women are being forced to acknowledge that their trust was indeed misplaced. I can’t see them getting back on the Trump train, absent radical action that Trump has already shown he is unwilling to take.

  5. anonymous[378] • Disclaimer says:

    Voting for either color in this Red v Blue puppet show sustains a corrupt empire that will keep treating you with disdain.

  6. KenH says:

    Trump is turning into a swamp creature and he’ll be campaigning like Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio in 2020. Not sure if anyone else has noticed but it seems that the more be breaks his promises on immigration and sells out to neocons his approval ratings climb which is why you can’t trust the polls.

    Cuck extraordinaire Erick Erickson was one of Trump’s biggest nemeses during the campaign but has now fallen in love with him and thrown his support behind Trump. So either he’s moved towards Trump’s campaign position or Trump’s moved towards Erickson’s cuckery and the evidence says the latter.

    George H.W. Bush Sr. had a 90% approval rating in the spring and summer of 1991 yet still went down to defeat in 1992 to a young political upstart named Bill Clinton. The same polls who consistently showed Trump losing to Hillary Clinton and sometimes losing by 15 points. Pay no attention to the polls.

    Trump promised to blow up the oligarchic control of the political system and immigration policy but has failed either because he wasn’t serious to begin with or because he’s been beaten down by special interest pressure and talked out of it by princess Ivanka and prince Jared, both ultra liberal Jews.

    • Agree: Hail
  7. Priss Factor [AKA "Asagirian"] says: • Website

    Jews who complain about the Dreyfus Affair and McCarthy Era, but they combined both in the Russysteria Hoax. It was led by Jewish globalist-supremacists in media and deep state with help of goy cuck-collaborators and homo-imperialists.

    Innocent men were accused of collusion for which there was ZERO evidence. The ‘evidence’ as presented to kick-start the persecution was a total fabrication by a hack operator.

    And the paranoia and hysteria about Russia, ironically by the Tribe that has real control over America, made McCarthy and HUAC look like amateurs. Jews might as well write a book called PROTOCOLS OF ELDERS OF RUSSIA.
    At least there were really communist operators in the 40s and 50s. In contrast, this Russysteria hoax was total fantasy on the level of tooth fairy and bogeyman. They say McCarthy carried out a ‘witch-hunt’, but Russysteria is worse. It’s like witchcraft.

    Jussie Smollet is a scumbag and deserved to get indicted for his hate-hoaxing and defamation of Trump supporters.
    But who will pay the price for this much bigger monstrous miscarriage of justice? But then, why would those with control of institutions go after their own kind? They are ‘made men’, above the law, and too big to fail.

    On the other hand, Trump the scump is no better. The endless lies about Iran as the biggest sponsor of terror and Assad using chemical weapons on the eve of victory… well, what goes around comes around. In an empire of lies, they are all guilty of one thing or another.

  8. Hail says: • Website

    Trump seems to have been persuaded that he can also achieve re-election with a new immigration agenda: make efforts to build the wall while simultaneously championing an increase in legal immigration to provide cheap labor for corporations—the reverse of his promise in the 2016 campaign. Of course, in the long term this will be a disaster for America. But, short term, Trump may get away with it.

    Oh, Washington Watcher! You can be forgiven for the small little verbal gymnastics there (bold text) because you, like many of us (me included), were at one time emotionally committed to this man, and emotional loyalty is hard to cut off. Even when one knows one should cut it off.

    What I mean is, you are letting him off the hook, and making excuses. As if Trump has no ‘agency.’

    I would ask two sets of questions regarding the text I highlighted in bold:

    (1) Who ‘persuaded’ him to roll over and become a braggadocio-version of ¡Jeb! on immigration? What were their methods of persuasion? What were their objectives? Why was Trump willing to ‘be persuaded’ so easily? Something is not adding up. Which leads to the second question:

    (2) Questioning assumptions: How do we know Trump was ever serious, and not running a cynical, self-serving, political con-game all along? the weight of evidence suggests he may have been all along something like this mix: Two parts slick salesman who sees a market opening, one part quasi-nationalist dilettante, one part Twitter-troll.

    Later in the article, WW writes:

    Jared Kushner is the main driver of the president’s terrible policies

    Somehow, Jimmy Carter didn’t let his deadbeat brother set policy in a major area. Why does some mediocrity like Kushner, a relation by marriage, get the god-like power to sway the future ethnic makeup of the United States (against our favor)? Troubling.

  9. onebornfree says: • Website

    Donald Trump- Scam Artist Par Excellence

    Just as “Russiagate” was a scam [i.e. crooks “investigating” crooks], Trump is scam. He always was, he always will be. A scam artist, just like all politicians and all the political parties they represent.

    He has, to date, never called for a dramatic, immediate shrinking of the size of federal government via an immediate return to the constitution , [itself a scam, admittedly, but at least, a return to its original limitations would dramatically , if perhaps only temporarily, decrease the overall size/ power of the federal government].

    He’s never even talked about eliminating the income tax; about pulling the US military out of ALL foreign countries, about ending ALL welfare [ for individuals, corporations, or nations , e.g. Israel]; about ending the federal reserve, Social Security, the CIA, the NSA, the Pentagon, the FBI, the EPA, the FDA, the TSA, Homeland Security, and all the rest of the 1000’s of constantly growing, entirely unconstitutional, scumbag federal agencies stealing our money and freedom on a minute by minute basis.

    And “the wall” and immigration , should , at best , be a 10th amendment issue, not a federal one.

    Instead he’s given us even bigger government, more wars, more laws, bigger budgets, bigger deficits [$21 trillion anybody?}and even less freedom for individuals.

    Donald Trump- a total, fucking, scam. And voting morons love a good scam artist, as the last election proved once more, and will almost undoubtedly prove next time around.

    The “alt. right”. What a frickin’ joke!

    “The Donald Trump “Make America Great Again” Scam…..or, “Why Donald Trump Won’t Work””:

    Regards, onebornfree

  10. at the moment, this stuff looks important

    by November 2020, it’s ancient history.

    this for sure, though:

    1) if the PA dems don’t make the mistake they made in 2016 – report the Philly results early, instead of waiting to do the usual Black precinct vote-harvesting as per usual +

    2) if Wisc returns to it’s usual prog-voting +

    3) AZ or Tejas or FLA flips,

    Trump is a one-termer.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Washington Watcher Comments via RSS
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?