The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Nomi Prins Archive
The Donald’s Finances and the Art of Ignoring Conflicts and Contradictions
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

The 2016 election campaign is certainly a billionaire’s playground when it comes to “establishment candidates” like Hillary Clinton and Jeb Bush who cater to mega-donors and use their money to try to rally party bases. The only genuine exception to the rule this time around has been Bernie Sanders, who has built a solid grassroots following and funding machine, while shunning what he calls “the billionaire class” that fuels the super PACs.

Donald Trump, like Ross Perot back in the 1992 and 1996 elections, has played quite a different trick on the money-saturated American political system. He has removed the billionaire as middleman between citizen plebeians and political elites, and created a true .00001% candidate, because he’s… well, a financial elite unto himself, however conveniently posed as the country’s straight-talking “everyman.”

Despite his I-can-buy-but-can’t-be-bought swagger, Trump’s persona has been carefully constructed to deflect even the most obvious questions of conflict of interest that his wealth and deal-making history should bring up. He claims that he would govern (or dictate) as he is, no apologies or bullshit. But would he?

The billionaire-as-president is a new prospect for America. The only faintly comparable situation in our history came before the Crash of 1929, when President Calvin Coolidge, who famously declared that “the business of America is business,” reappointed mogul Andrew Mellon as his treasury secretary, just as President Warren Harding had done before him. A walking conflict of interest, Mellon left Washington during Herbert Hoover’s administration to avoid Congressional scrutiny of his personal business endeavors. He was later investigated by the Department of Justice for falsifying tax information in his own business empire.

Trump is, by his own admission, a dealmaker who has, since the 1970s, utilized self-promotion and his own growing celebrity to make money. Nonetheless, he denies the importance of money itself. His quasi-autobiography, The Art of the Deal, opens with this now-familiar tall tale: “I don’t do it for the money. I’ve got enough, much more than I’ll ever need. I do it to do it. Deals are my art form.”

Today, he asserts that he is worth a cool \$10 billion, having long been cagey about just how much he has. That figure, too, may be more scam than reality. Forbes pegs Trump’s fortune at \$4 billion in its 2015 top billionaires list, where he places 405th in the world and 133rd in the U.S. In his 92-page Federal Election Committee financial filing, which doesn’t require the disclosure of his total wealth, the value of his global enterprises, assets, debts, and income sources are listed in ranges, rather than exact figures. More than 20 items are characterized as worth “over \$50 million.”

He has at least \$1.4 billion in assets and \$285 million in debt, if we use just \$50 million as a guesstimate on those items; \$2.8 billion in assets and \$570 million in debt, if we pick the figure of \$100 million instead. In other words, we still don’t know what he’s worth. As with so much else, we just have to take his word for it.

Consider the presidency as Donald Trump’s ultimate deal. And don’t think for a second that if he entered the Oval Office his money and deal-making lust and every conflict of interest that went with them wouldn’t follow him there.

He claims to be an open book — “the definition of the American success story,” as his campaign website puts it. He wants people to believe (as his acolytes do) that he’s just like us — except for the hair — only richer, more successful, and (not to mince words) better. That narrative has, of course, been carefully constructed for our consumption, which means, if he succeeds, we are part of his chosen art form, his deal.

Though you might not know it from the incessant media coverage of his candidacy or his P.T. Barnum-ish self-glorification, there are plenty of pieces missing from his financial story that call into question both his skill as a dealmaker and his business acumen. Though there’s been much discussion of how money from the Koch Brothers and other billionaire donors might influence 2016’s candidates, there’s been little discussion of how Trump might be influenced by the billionaire backing him: himself.

Celebrity Apprentice

The Trump phenomenon has delivered ratings to networks and, arguably, the apolitical to their TV sets. It’s probably sold a lot of cars, judging from the commercials that went with the recent Republican debates. A record 24 million people watched the first one on Fox News. That event was, in fact, such an obvious triumph for Fox that CNN upped the ante, expanding the second debate to a full (some would say endless) three hours. As Trump noted, “I guess it was to sell commercials.” CNN similarly shattered its prior election debate records, averaging 23 million viewers.

All of this has been a boon for The Donald, who clearly has a remarkable ability to glue cameras to him and use the media to his advantage, a skill he honed starting with his first Manhattan deal in 1973. When Trump went on ABC’s This Week with George Stephanopoulos on August 23rd, he dispatched Jeb Bush this way: “We need a person with a lot of smarts, a lot of cunning, and a lot of energy. And Jeb doesn’t have that,” while dissing Scott Walker as a governor whose “state is really in trouble.” Walker just left the race. Jeb continues to falter. Call it Trump magic.

The Donald has long perfected two proven strategies for winning: attack and deflect. On both counts, he is a TV veteran. Appearing on NBC’s Late Night with David Letterman in 1987 to promote The Art of the Deal, his skill in deflecting attention from aspects of his life that might otherwise diminish his aura was already on full display. When Letterman probed the particulars of Trump’s personal wealth multiple times, he dodged effectively, insisting, “You’ll never get it out of me.” He also deflected his host’s question about the degree to which his father’s money contributed to his success. “He was a solid guy and a bright guy, I learned a lot” was about all Letterman could dig out of him on Fred Trump.

And here’s an irony: for all his edginess, Trump’s savvy in avoiding what might embarrass or confine him makes him much more of a politician that he’d like us to believe. His father, however, provided Trump with far more guidance and help than that “self-made man” would care for us to realize. So let’s start with a little tour of his celebrity apprenticeship.

Fred Trump was born in Queens, New York, in 1905. His own father had emigrated to the United States from Sweden in 1885. He would convert a business in low-income housing into a \$300 million fortune.

A year after leaving high school, Fred built his first home in Woodhaven, Queens. “It cost a little less than \$5,000 and he sold it for \$7,500,” his son proudly wrote years later.

By 1929, Fred was building larger homes. When the Depression hit, he bought a bankruptcy mortgage-service company, which he sold for a profit a year later. In 1934, he returned to building lower-priced homes in the depressed Flatbush area of Brooklyn. During the next dozen years, he would build 2,500 of them in Brooklyn and Queens.

Trump and his father had an “a relationship that was almost businesslike,” The Donald would later write and from Fred he would, he’s testified, learn toughness, though “I also realized that if I ever wanted to be known as more than Fred Trump’s son, I was eventually going to have to go out and make my own mark.”

Think, for instance, of George W. Bush’s urge to surpass his father’s record of political power — and war making. But don’t imagine for a moment that Trump struck out on his own any more than the young Bush did. Trump recounts his first major deal as Swifton Village, a foreclosed apartment complex in Cincinnati that he said he bought with his father in 1969, while still in college. (Cincinnati Magazine claims the purchase was Fred’s exclusively.) The price was \$6 million and in 1972, they resold it for \$12 million, according to Trump (and a far more modest \$6.75 million according to other estimates).

But Cincinnati was never The Donald’s dream. He wanted Manhattan from the beginning. His first deal there started in 1973 with a desire to purchase the old Penn Central rail yards at 34th Street on the West side of the island.

At that time, New York was a complete financial mess. That summer, Trump came across a newspaper story about the Penn Central Railroad bankruptcy filing. Penn Central trustees had hired a small LA-based investment management company led by Victor Palmieri to sell its assets, including its long abandoned yards in the West thirties and sixties. Ever the con artist, Trump recalled, “I couldn’t sell him on my experience or my accomplishments, so instead I sold him on my energy and my enthusiasm.”

Trump initially proposed building middle-income housing on the site with government financing. When the city became mired in financial problems and money for public housing dried up, he switched to Plan B and “began promoting the site as ideal for a convention center.”

Trump still did nothing without his father’s involvement. As their development firm had no official name, they decided to call it the Trump Organization, which covered them both and, they hoped, had a certain gravitas. Over the next several years, Trump solicited support from New York Mayor Abe Beame, who belonged to the same club as his father and to whom his father and he gave money, as he later wrote, “like all developers.” Palmieri would give Trump his virgin credibility with the press as his choice for developer, swearing to Barron’s that “he’s larger than life.”

On July 29, 1974, the New York Times featured a front-page story on how the Trump Organization secured options to buy the two waterfront sites from Penn Central for \$62 million. However, it was Mayor Ed Koch who, in 1978, gave Trump’s pet project for a future convention center at West 34th Street his official stamp of approval by agreeing to buy the site. That site would eventually become the Javits Convention Center.

It was the symbolic, if not financial break The Donald had been waiting for. As for the West 60th street site, due to numerous problems, he let the option expire in 1979. In a sense, Donald Trump would never look back, but he would have to look down often enough.

Trump’s Bankruptcies

As Carly Fiorina made crystal clear to almost 23 million Americans in the second Republican debate (the topic had been broached in the first one), Trump’s companies have officially gone bankrupt four times since 1991, or as Trump spun it, “I used the law four times and made a tremendous thing. I’m in business. I did a very good job.”

While that’s a small number of bankruptcies relative to the hundreds of companies that comprise his empire, they represented a fair amount of debt. There was the Trump Taj Mahal (with \$1 billion in debt) in Atlantic City in 1991 and the Trump Plaza Hotel in Atlantic City in 1992 (with \$550 million in debt). Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts, the company created from the post-bankruptcy ashes of the Taj Mahal, the Trump Plaza, and also Trump Marina in Atlantic City filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (with \$1.8 billion of debt) in 2004. Bankruptcy number four, Trump Entertainment Resorts (the post-bankruptcy company created to take over the remains of Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts) filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (with \$1.74 billion of debt) in February 2009.

While Trump owned 28% of its stock, as he told Bloomberg News upon resigning from the board four days before the \$53 million bond payment that forced it into bankruptcy was due, “I have nothing to do with it. I’m not in it. I’m not on the board.”

He continues to argue that the Atlantic City bankruptcies weren’t his fault, but attributable to the casino environment of that moment. Though there is some truth to that, he glosses over his method of creating new companies to purchase the bankrupt ones, after shedding their debts, and his convenient exit timing from management posts to shed blame.

While four of his companies officially went down for the count, he had many companies that didn’t and, as he has repeatedly said, he himself never declared personal bankruptcy (so his credit score likely remains in fine shape). Keep in mind, though, that, hard as it is to find consistent basic information about Trump’s various disasters, the count of his unofficial bankruptcies would undoubtedly run significantly higher. After all, a number of his companies effectively went bankrupt by closing down or being bought out at bargain basement prices.

In 1989, for instance, Trump purchased the Eastern Air Shuttle, connecting New York, Boston, and Washington, D.C. with hourly flights, for roughly \$365 million. But the Trump name didn’t carry the day and passengers didn’t pony up for the line’s fancier seats and gold lavatory fixtures. Instead, in 1990 Trump defaulted on the loans he had taken out to finance the company, and its ownership reverted to its creditors, led by Citibank. The Trump Shuttle was then merged into a new corporation, Shuttle Inc., and in April 1992, its routes were assumed by USAir Shuttle, which is one way the rich make problems disappear.

In April 2006, at a Trump Tower gala, Trump’s son Donald, Jr. promised that Trump Mortgage would become the nation’s number one home-loan lender. In a CNBC interview shortly afterwards, Trump said, “Who knows about financing better than I do?” Eight months later, the company closed down amid the crashing housing market and negative publicity over an unfortunate hiring choice. Trump’s CEO, E.J. Ridings, had lied on his résumé. His previously advertised “top” spot at one of Wall Street’s “most prestigious banks” turned out to have been as a lowly broker — for one week. As Trump continually reminds us, he only has the best people work for him.

Then there was “Trump University,” active from 2005 to 2010, where, for \$25,000-\$35,000, students could assumedly learn how to become real-estate gods like Trump. According to related lawsuits, they were then enticed to take out credit cards under phony business names to help pay for the privilege, and to inflate their income by projecting profits from non-existing businesses.

Earlier this month, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman told the New York Daily News that approximately 600 former students have filed suit against the “university” in Manhattan Supreme Court. Similar suits are pending in California. Schneiderman claimed Trump banked \$5 million personally from the scam. Trump had also ignored 2005 warnings not to use the word “university” in the name.

Of course, if ordinary Americans declare bankruptcy due to unforeseen or difficult circumstances, they are regularly stigmatized as lazy deadbeats. The Trumps of our world, however, being rich enough to launch corporate bankruptcy protection filings, are seen as savvy dealers. In this sense, Trump couldn’t have been savvier, since he’s survived one potential financial catastrophe after another. Unfortunately, his experiences have absolutely no applicability to ordinary Americans, even though, as David Dayen wrote at the Intercept, “Everyone would have benefited from relieving primary mortgage debt, the absence of which led to at least six million foreclosures.“

Trump International

It’s evident from Trump’s recent comments that his foreign policy ideas haven’t evolved much since he last seriously thought about running for president in 2011 when he wrote the first version of a campaign book, Time to Get Tough (updated for his 2016 bid).

Then, too, he talked about “getting China to stop playing currency charades,” while declaring his “great respect for the people of China” and blaming “our leaders and representatives” for making terrible deals with their leaders that have cost American jobs. What Trump didn’t discuss then, and doesn’t discuss now, is how U.S. companies, his own included, produce and sell in China because they make more money doing that. Though he regularly complains that we don’t manufacture anything here anymore, neither does he bother to explain his own patriotism shortfall, since he and his daughter, Ivanka, have clothing lines made in China (and Mexico, that land of “rapists,” and Bangladesh, a country continuously in violation of human rights for garment workers).

Absent any sense of irony, he has blamed Chinese currency manipulation for making him set up shop in China and claims China is “killing us.” This, though the Chinese stock markets have recently been hammered, the Yuan is weakening, and the country’s growth is slowing, hardly signs of an imminent threat. It’s a great Trumpian combo, though: anti-China anger plays well with the xenophobic crowd, while a weaker Yuan keeps costs down on Trump’s clothing business. A deal, after all, is a deal.

According to the Trump Organization website and his Federal Election Commission financial disclosures, he has operations practically worldwide, but notably not in Russia. Yet Trump has had his eye on doing business there for a long time. As far back as 1987, when it was still the Soviet Union, he wanted to erect a Trump Tower in Moscow’s Red Square. In 2013, he was still talking about the possibility in Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Perhaps because of his ongoing business interests (or their mutual maverick styles), Trump, unlike his Republican presidential opponents for whom the Russian president is little short of the devil incarnate, regularly claims that he will have a “great relationship” with Putin.

As for Trump’s Mexican border wall and the fantasy of getting the Mexican government to pay for it, Trump has made hay with the immigration issue. You wouldn’t know, listening to him, that the number of illegal immigrants has dropped significantly since the financial crisis. On the Late Showrecently, Trump doubled down on his wall, comparing it to the Great Wall of China and suggesting that “we can have a great and beautiful wall, we’ll have our border, and guess what, nobody comes in unless they have their papers.” This from the man who has a borderless record of outsourcing jobs and tax revenues to Mexico and elsewhere.

All of this adds up to a vast set of potential conflicts of interest and downright deception should Donald Trump ever set foot in the White House, a subject that is at the heart of what might be called Trumpocrisy in the present campaign, but seldom part of the debate by or about The Donald himself.

The Polls

For now, Trump remains the clear GOP frontrunner in terms of composite polling results. His polling success has been predicated since announcing his candidacy on a cocktail of bravado, media exposure, tactical hits on opponents as if they were competitors for one of his casino deals, and the wholesale avoidance of any serious discussion of the financial baggage he brings with him into the election season. Can there be any question that, for the man who wanted to leave his father’s helping hand behind, bagging the Oval Office would be the ultimate step in outshining Fred Trump’s legacy? It’s less clear what the rest of us get out of it.

Trump assures us that he wouldn’t let his business dealings interfere with his politics, but is he really prepared to step away from all Trump Organization matters globally? Does anyone believe that his deal-making instincts will die in the Oval Office? Or would building Trump Tower in Moscow be the touchstone for any future conversation with Putin about Ukraine and Syria? Would his acts be indicative of what happens — consider Bill Clinton netting high speaking fees from countries in which then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was conducting foreign policy — when you fuse public office and private power? In historical terms, it would be as if a Morgan or a Rockefeller were running the country and his private business affairs at the same time, creating the quintessential conflict of public and private interest.

Unfortunately, we are used to politicians saying whatever they think they need to say to be elected president, and falling way short of their campaign promises on the job. Even scarier would be the notion of selling America to the craftiest bidder. The election may be more than a year away, but isn’t it time to dig beneath the carefully crafted persona that is Trump and unearth the person and the full spectrum of his business dealings? To see the real Donald Trump is to plunge into all the conflicts of interest he denies, the financial tricks he dispenses, the crucial details he deflects obfuscates, and the flimflam he offers up day in, day out.

Nomi Prins, a TomDispatch regular, is the author of six books, a speaker, and a distinguished senior fellow at the non-partisan public policy institute Demos. Her most recent book is All the Presidents’ Bankers: The Hidden Alliances That Drive American Power (Nation Books). She is a former Wall Street executive.

(Republished from TomDispatch by permission of author or representative)
• Category: Economics, Ideology • Tags: 2016 Election, Donald Trump 
Hide 40 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. fnn says:

    The GOP Establishment hates him. Until that changes, that’s reason enough to support him.

    • Replies: @Art
    , @Kiza
  2. “Can there be any question that, for the man who wanted to leave his father’s helping hand behind, bagging the Oval Office would be the ultimate step in outshining Fred Trump’s legacy? It’s less clear what the rest of us get out of it.”

    If the rest of us get a big and beautiful border wall, I don’t think many will care if it’s got Trump branding all over it. Ditto the deportation buses.

    Likewise, who cares if it takes a Trump Tower in Moscow to bury the hatchet with Russia?

    The comparison to Coolidge and Harding isn’t damning. Consider the full context of Coolidge’s famous/infamous line:

    “There does not seem to be cause for alarm in the dual relationship of the press to the public, whereby it is on one side a purveyor of information and opinion and on the other side a purely business enterprise. Rather, it is probable that a press which maintains an intimate touch with the business currents of the nation, is likely to be more reliable than it would be if it were a stranger to these influences. After all, the chief business of the American people is business. They are profoundly concerned with producing, buying, selling, investing and prospering in the world. I am strongly of the opinion that the great majority of people will always find these the moving impulses of our life.”

    Americans are intimate the coarse self-interest and flamboyance of men like Trump. He is the guy selling us used cars and real estate, putting his name on baseball hats of the little league teams and plastering his face all over billboards. That he’s a purely business enterprise brings him closer to the Average Joe. And as a local businessman, he’s treating the average voter as a potential loyal customer.

    He’s his own creature, capable of interfacing directly with the voter in a raw, off-the-cuff, almost interactive basis, bypassing not just the billionaire donors but the entire media establishment that has been treating GOP candidates like show dogs since Reagan. Trump’s supporters are tired of the Best in Show – they just want a dog who thinks they’re the greatest and bark at their enemies and keep intruders out.

    This is not the result of a carefully crafted persona. It’s raw, often awkward salesmanship, with some of the most transparent bluster and bluffing we’ve ever seen. But Trump the businessman has correctly identified what a big portion of America wants but no other politician wants to give: an Americans-first platform on immigration, trade and war.

  3. I judge people by what they do. Not what they say. And on that basis, everything Trump says about getting the illegals out of the country and restoring America’s borders is opportunistic flim-flam. Moreover, Trump is thick as thieves with the Judeo-globalist Wall St./Las Vegas/Hollywood billionaires who – via their stooge politicians – took down our borders in the first place, and intend to drown the White population in a rising tide of illegal (and “legal”) color. Trump is a shabbatz goy…and the latest act in the 30-year-long Republican neo-con dog-and-pony show whose only real purpose is to keep Whites participating in the System…while the System destroys them. This said, the net result of Trump’s antics may be the utter destruction of the Republican Party which, after 3 decades of ethnic cheap labor insourcing, has painted itself into a demographic corner. And that’ll be fine: leaving non-selfliquidating Whites and HardRights no place to go…but farther to the Right

  4. Yevardian says:

    Finally some some sober analysis and information about Trump. I still won’t stop enjoy him rampaging within the Republican party like a bull in a china shop though.

  5. Past, present, and future state of mankind:

    “These stupid peasants, who, throughout the world, hold potentates on their thrones, make statesmen illustrious, provide generals with lasting victories, all with ignorance, indifference, or half-witted hatred, moving the world with the strength of their arms, and getting their heads knocked together in the name of God, the king, or the stock exchange—immortal, dreaming, hopeless asses, who surrender their reason to the care of a shining puppet, and persuade some toy to carry their lives in his purse.”

    —Stephen Crane, quoted by Jack London in People of the Abyss

    • Replies: @Kiza
  6. rod1963 says:

    As long as the GOP, Fox News, Chambers of Commerce, K Street and the all the so-called Conservative “think tanks” are against him. I’ll support him because he’s making the oligarch class nuts.

    It’s better than the phoney alternatives, that openly support the destruction of the U.S. in the name of globalism and progress.

    Maybe he won’t work out, maybe he will. Just have to wait and see.

  7. Greg Bacon says: • Website

    Just another ‘dog and pony’ show to keep the bumpkins occupied with delusions of grandeur until November 2016, when HRM Hillary takes control.

    • Replies: @Realist
  8. Realist says:
    @Greg Bacon

    She won’t take control until January 2017.

    • Replies: @whorefinder
  9. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Was this copied and pasted out of the Huffington Post or written by a sperg libertardian? I don’t care about anything as long as Trump builds a wall and deports the beaners. This guy is really upset that Trump ripped the Jews off by having his company declare bankruptcy. The writer needs to focus on what is good for the American (white) people and take his autism medication…

    • Replies: @D. K.
  10. woodNfish says:

    Yawn, another hit piece on Trump. At least Trump is telling the truth. So far, I like the positions he has published on his website. And the fact that he hasn’t been bought and paid for is a boon. Deporting all the illegals and their brats will do a lot to alleviate unemployment. Our government should serve its citizens first, not illegal, criminal invaders.

  11. Nomi Prins is a former official at both Goldman-Sachs and Lehman, a poster girl for the kind of people likely to find themselves in Federal prison should The Donald win election. If he doesn’t, they are more likely to be torn limb from limb by an enraged mob at some time in the foreseeable future. While she appears to be marginally more honest that the scum she worked with, it makes no difference. A person like Prins is so far removed from the core American population that she simply can’t understand that all the baloney she throws at Trump will be ignored by most Americans. Why? Simple. People are not stupid. They know Trump did not make his pile selling lemonade from a sidewalk stand and they know he had to play the game. But they also know that he loves this country and, whatever his past sins, intends to chase the money changers out of the temple. If I were Prins I would buy a ticket to the Fiji Islands, fast.

    • Agree: Junior
    • Replies: @Realist
  12. So who is your candidate Nomi? Kind of hard to respond not knowing.

  13. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    As a purchaser of her book, which I highly recommend , I disagree completely here. Of course if I am wrong about Trump and if he turns out if elected, to do the exact opposite of his top ten promises made during his campaign, exactly as both Bushes, Clinton, and Obama had (Do you grasp the enormity of that? All three of the last successful US Pres. candidates did the EXACT opposite of what they promised during their campaigns) I will get down on my hands and knees and ask God’s forgiveness. However my gut tells me, based on watching many hours of youtube videos of Trump being interviewed by extremely hostile lie-stream media liars, that he is GENUINE: in fact that is the same determination made by scores of millions of voters who are determined to elect him the next president of this country, as a first step in stopping a hidden power behind the scenes that has been running this country and its citizenry into the ground for the last 40 or 50 years.

  14. joe webb says:

    if you are a businessman, you live in the real world of competition, grifters, and so on. So Trump survived it and prospered.

    If there is a can of worms in Trump’s closet, by now the Trump haters would have found it.

    Trump is not perfect as none of us are.

    If he has the right politics, that is all that matters. If it takes a billionaire to lead a populist revolt, so be it. Probably the main reason the Trump haters hate him is that he is a big blonde German.

    Never mind the Jewish angle. Who came up with the Polish jokes by the way? How many Jews does it take to overplay their hand?

    Joe Webb

  15. Art says:

    “The GOP Establishment hates him. Until that changes, that’s reason enough to support him.”

    Charles Krauthammer and all the Jew neocons hate Trump — that is good reason to support him.

  16. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I can’t believe how stupid people are when it comes to Trump.

    He does the same thing over and over again.

    Ha talks big and promises people a lot. He doesn’t come through and bankrupts whatever company he was in charge of, then he leaves with a profit without having had to put any skin in the game.

    Americans are like an Atlantic city Casino. Trump will just smooth talk his way into office by pushing a lot of the right buttons, bankrupt the country, blame it on Mexicans and the Chinese and leave office after giving himself and his banker friends lots of tax breaks.

    Trump is promising a lot of flashy things like a border wall, and promising that Mexicans will pay for it. Yeah right!

    Meanwhile he is proposing a repatriation tax break for over seas funds and eliminating the estate tax. Two things that will benefit himself tremendously.

    • Replies: @schmenz
  17. Yes so far I am supporting Trump because the GOP RINO establishment simply hates him.
    I agree that we need a border fence. Also bring back the troops from Korea and other places and defend the real border.

  18. whorefinder says: • Website

    According to her boss Obama, just being elected in November 2016 immediately grants her a never-before-heard-of office:

    Office of the President-Elect.

    • Replies: @Realist
  19. schmenz says:

    “Meanwhile he is proposing a repatriation tax break for over seas funds and eliminating the estate tax. Two things that will benefit himself tremendously”

    I would think eliminating the estate tax would benefit everybody.

    • Replies: @Realist
    , @Anonymous
  20. Priss Factor [AKA "The Priss Factory"] says:

    Trump is fun, but I can’t take him seriously.

    I can’t take anyone who says he is ‘conservative’ and for ‘gay marriage’ seriously.

    Trump is better than the others on immigration/invasion, surely.

    Check out this news report:


    I wonder… if it’s okay for cities to ignore and override federal laws—of course federal government encourages illegal immigration—, why can’t there be sanctuary places for decent and moral folks who don’t wanna participate in ‘gay marriage’?
    If even illegal criminals are protected from deportation, why can’t decent moral folks be protected from persecution from vile homos and the their Jewish allies/enablers?

  21. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    I expect that Trump hasn’t spent much of his own money yet. He shows up, buzzes a stadium with his jet, calls a press conference and pushes the envelope a little, and he gets wall-to-wall media blitz for his trouble.

    I’m with the skinny blonde on this: I don’t care if he performs abortions in the Oval Office, as long as he shuts the border.

    Besides, who you gonna vote for, Bush?

    • Replies: @tbraton
  22. Realist says:
    @Southern Sage

    Goldman-Sachs is a corrupt, lying, cheating financial institution. They are a big reason this country is in deep crap.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  23. Realist says:

    “I would think eliminating the estate tax would benefit everybody.”

    Yeah if you have an estate.

  24. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    “I would think eliminating the estate tax would benefit everybody.”

    Really? Everybody has rich family members who will pass on millions tax free when they die? The estate tax is already very generous and doesn’t tax >99% of the population. Only rich oligarchs would benefit.

    • Replies: @wrd9
  25. Kiza says:

    Naomi misses the point of Trump big time.

    Trump is not a candidate for a good and successful US president. Trump is the least bad candidate for a US president. Fair enough Naomi, Trump is a disaster, but then what does this say about all other candidates on both sides. He himself is a member of the privileged 0.001% but the establishment hates him, especially GOP.

    Perhaps, we are really talking about a list of potential captains for a sinking Titanic, not a job that a truly smart and capable person would volunteer for. But, Trump is still a good bet for not making the ship sink even faster, unlike under Hillary or Fiorina.

  26. Kiza says:

    Loved your quote of Jack London. The peasant voter is a guaranteed loser no matter which way he/she votes. Politics is the elite’s playground and voter is there only to be shorn (like sheep), of blood, treasure and anything else the elite can use.

  27. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:

    This was a wonderful hit piece! Too bad your not fooling anybody with this trash.

    Trump gets things done that the government CLAIMS can’t be done and has been doing so for a LONG time.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  28. @D. K.

    And a hard leftist one at that, per her mild support for Sanders and her recent book being published by (the) Nation Books.

  29. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    An ice rink? Really?

    • Replies: @Junior
  30. Junior [AKA "Jr."] says:

    That’s right and the wall is next. Followed by fixing the trade deals and then fixing our horrible military entanglements. One step at a time. That’s how you make America great again. And Trump WILL do it if given the chance.

    Trump 2016. Screw the Establishment.

  31. tbraton says:

    I heard somewhere this week–probably in Bret Baier’s introduction to his interview with Trump on Tuesday, 10/6/15—that Trump was leading in the polls despite having spent only \$2 million thus far. He has been able to do that because he has been masterful in securing free air time from networks glad to be able to boost their ratings. The first Republican debate on FOX got 24 million viewers—smashing the old record—and the second Republican debate (which CNN extended to three hours) drew 23 million viewers. Without Trump, I doubt those ratings would have been nearly as high. It will be most interesting to see how many viewers tune in to watch the first Democratic debate next week. I’m guessing the audience will be about 1/3 of the first two Republican debates.

  32. wrd9 says:

    For the 99%, the issue isn’t with the federal estate tax but with state estate taxes. Many working class seniors have made a lot of money via house appreciation values and frugality. To have some of their assets confiscated at death is outrageous. What these laws encourage is evasion of those taxes.

  33. map says:

    What is there not to understand?

    All the GOP has to do to counter Trump is adopt his policy proposals. Hell, if everyone is lying, then why can’t the GOP candidates lie as well? What’s to lose by taking a nationalist stance on immigration, trade and war if the intent is not to follow through anyway?

    Yet, they are not even smart enough to do that.

    More to the point, what to bankruptcies have to do with anything? Sophisticated creditors lent money to a guy who is more sophisticated than them…and he beat them. This is lending to a dry-waller with a liar loan.

    Want to know the best way to interpret Trump? He is an oligarch who wants to beat the other oligarchs with a popular uprising…sort of like a certain popular general marching an army across the Rubicon.

  34. Come on, Nomi. My Klaus Nomi comment was the funniest.

  35. Sam J. says:

    So Trump is not perfect. Notice little talk about how the banking system flim flammed us into fronting them \$16 Trillion during the banking crisis, that I assume they set up to happen in the first place. The \$16 Trillion is roughly enough to give every American family of four a \$250,000 house loan at zero interest. What if they had done that? Instant end to deflation. \$16 Trillion is just what Ron Paul could get them to fess up too others have calculated it could be as much as \$28 Trillion.

    Even if Trump is a failure at these prices he’d be a bargain. Even if he completely screws us it will be no worse than all the other candidates.

  36. ChrisD says:

    The author of this hatchet job is obviously touched. They write: “Does anyone believe that his deal-making instincts will die in the Oval Office?” Well guess what? Everyone is voting for the Donald for EXACTLY this reason. They want a President who can make cut-throat, hard-line, and tough deals that benefit the United States and beat China, Japan, Korea etc at trade and finance. The author has obviously missed the entire point of Trump’s appeal and should probably go back to their Republocrat campaign office.

  37. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Goldman-Sachs is a corrupt, lying, cheating financial institution. They are a big reason this country is in deep crap.

    Yep, money changers. Money shifters. People who make money on money– other people’s money. I first read Trump’s Art of the Deal in the 80’s. I still recall his line, “Wall Street is the world’s largest casino.” What gets me is after these money shifters have hollowed out the middle class, they siphoned off the peoples’ money, then siphoned off the future generations’ money, it is not enough. QE 00!

    Don’t forget, Kasich made his \$10 million fortune on public pension funds of Ohio for Lehman. But people in Ohio would still vote for him??

  38. Realist says:

    “I still recall his line, “Wall Street is the world’s largest casino.” ”

    There is nothing wrong with the simple concept of investing in a company that one thinks is being managed well. But the stock market has been bastardised and corrupted to the point that it isn’t even a casino. It is a sure thing for the corrupt power elite.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Nomi Prins Comments via RSS
Becker update V1.3.2
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement