The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Andrew Joyce Archive
Thoughts on the Protected Race
🔊 Listen RSS
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Troll, or LOL with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used once per hour.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Know that we have taken into our hand, custody, and protection Leo the Jew our goldsmith and all his affairs. And therefore we command that you keep ward and defend the said Leo and all his affairs, doing no hurt or injury to him.”
Proclamation of King John of England, 10 Nov. 1199

My office was created by law and designed to protect the Jewish people throughout the world. Think about that. The world’s greatest power is focused, by law and design, on protecting the Jews.”
Elan Carr, U.S. State Department Envoy on Anti-Semitism, February 2019

By almost every metric, Jews are the most protected ethnic group on earth. At the frontline of this protection, Jewish institutional security is heavily subsidised by taxpayers throughout the West. In Germany, the government provides an annual stipend of $15 million to the Central Council of Jews. In the UK, the government spends around $20 million annually on both security for Jewish institutions and “Holocaust education” designed to combat “anti-Semitic ideas.” This is in addition to the UK pledging almost $70 million for a new Holocaust memorial designed to achieve the same ends. Hungary has promised $3.4 million to “fight anti-Semitism in Europe,” and Sweden has handed over 2 million kronor for increasing security at Jewish institutions. France has invested $107 million in “fighting anti-Semitism” since 2015. This brings us to a grand total of over $215 million in “protecting Jews” and “fighting anti-Semitism,” and doesn’t even take into account spending in the United States (somewhere between $20 million and $50 million annually for frontline security at Jewish institutions), or the spending of Jews on their own defense (the ADL’s annual budget alone is in the region of $58 million). One gets the distinct and remarkable impression that, globally, diaspora Judaism probably requires something approaching $1 billion simply in order to feel safe.

Jews are protected in other ways. Since mid-2018, resolutions and other legal measures against anti-Semitism have been gathering in pace and increasing in spread. In May 2018, South Carolina became the first US state to pass the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act, which effectively shuts down speech against Israel on college campuses by requiring South Carolina’s public institutions of higher education to “take into consideration the [State Department’s] definition of anti-Semitism for purposes of determining whether the alleged practice was motivated by anti-Semitic intent” when “investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of a college or university policy prohibiting discriminatory practices on the basis of religion.” In February 2019, President Macron of France announced a “crackdown on anti-Semitism” that would involve dissolving three pro-White organizations, defining anti-Zionism as a form of anti-Semitism, and introducing new laws against “hate speech” targeting Jews on social media. Just a few weeks ago, Florida passed legislation defining anti-Semitism and making it illegal under state law. Tennessee has attempted to pass an Anti-Semitism Awareness Bill, and recently passed a resolution “fighting anti-Semitism” by declaring unequivocal support for Israel. This, of course, follows hot on the heels of the House resolution “condemning anti-Semitism” in the aftermath of Ilhan Omar’s now notorious remarks on the Israel lobby.

There simply isn’t another ethnic group elsewhere on earth that enjoys the same level of financial and legal protections enjoyed by Jews. Of course, the uninformed, when confronted with such a fact, might reply that this level of support is both needed and deserved. According to the received narrative, recent history suggests that Jews are the West’s most vulnerable and victimised group. All of these laws, and all of this funding, is therefore merely a response to an acute need. But recent history has nothing to do with Jewish protection, and nor are these measures responsive to any real immediate threat. In order to gain a full appreciation for what exactly is going on, we need to go much further back in time.

Should you ever happen to visit the English town of Lincoln, I recommend you pay a visit to the Jew’s House restaurant. As well as enjoying some fairly good cuisine, it will give you an opportunity to look inside one of the five surviving houses of Medieval England. The building was once, as the name suggests, a Jew’s house from the middle of the twelfth century until the expulsion of the Jews from England in 1290. Its last Jewish owner is said to have been Belaset, daughter of the moneylender Solomon of Wallingford. Belaset was hanged in 1279 for coin-clipping, a 13th century practice whereby (predominantly Jewish) money dealers would lightly shave gold and silver coins, eventually accumulating enough shavings to create new, illicit money. Jew’s House is not the only medieval home still standing in Lincoln. A short walk away is Norman House. Like Jew’s House, it was built around 1170 for a Jewish moneylender, Aaron of Lincoln, and also housed Jews until the expulsion.

‘Jew’s House’ Lincoln, England: This 12th century home is one of the oldest surviving town houses in England, due largely to the fact it was built for maximum security and durability.
‘Jew’s House’ Lincoln, England: This 12th century home is one of the oldest surviving town houses in England, due largely to the fact it was built for maximum security and durability.

The fact that England’s oldest houses are almost all Jewish in origin, and that two of them are in Lincoln, is no accident. Lincoln Jewry was both the most affluent and the most numerous of all medieval Jewish communities in England, and the survival of these dwellings owes much to two factors – Jewish wealth and the Jewish need for security. Jews had the money to build homes with expensive local limestone, and they had a desire to build very strong, almost impregnable, homes that could withstand the onslaught of both Man and Time. A key architectural feature is asemi-sunken undercroft that would have provided secure storage for the wealth of those residing in the living accommodation above. This relatively luxurious style of living was pioneered by the Jews who moved to Lincoln as part of the Norman conquest, and was based on the Jewish experience of living closely with Norman elites in the ducal halls of Normandy. The construction of such homes in 12th century England thus sent a clear message: Jews were an intimate part of the new elite; Jews were arriving predominantly as dealers in money; and, Jews expected to be hated and to require high levels of protection. One thousand years has now passed, and yet it is one of the remarkable features of world history that these three aspects of Jewish life haven’t changed at all. Jews remain an intimate part of the elite, Jews retain a ‘special’ relationship with money, and the facts outlined at the beginning of this essay suggest that Jews fully expect to be hated and require high levels of protection.

The Jewish strategy among Europeans has always been predicated upon high-risk, high-reward ventures. For much of the last thousand years, this primarily involved exploitative financial relationships that were incredibly lucrative but contributed to tremendous hostility among non-elite European populations. The standard method of balancing profit and danger was to form a relationship with very strong elites, and to implicate those elites in the sharing of profits (thus also ensuring they would suffer a loss from any attack against Jews). Throughout European history, when attempts to forge or maintain such relationships failed, the results of high risk ventures were disastrous for Jews, as resentment from below was finally allowed to fully vent. This can be seen in instances where the power of the monarch weakened (e.g. the expulsions of Jews by Edward I as a response to the rise of the barons), where there was a break between the death of a king and the coronation of another (e.g. killings of Jews around the coronation of Richard I), where the monarch was immovably hostile to Jews and their interests (e.g. the creation of the Pale of Settlement by Catherine the Great), and where popular support for government elites and their authority collapsed rapidly (e.g. Weimar Germany and the subsequent rise of Adolf Hitler). Very high levels of elite protection are thus seen by Jews, not entirely without reason, as absolutely essential to the continuance of Jewish communities and their behaviors among European populations.

Writing on Jews and the State in medieval Europe, Robert Chazan writes that “the Jews were normally accorded substantial protection by the secular authorities. This meant warnings against violence when passions were inflamed, efforts to put down violence when it did flare up, and finally the imposition of penalties when the attempts at protection failed and Jews suffered loss of life and property. The basic thrust of governmental policy towards the Jews was protection.[1]R. Chazan, Church, State, and Jew in the Middle Ages (New Jersey: Behrman,1980), 11. [emphasis added] Kevin MacDonald has argued that Jews have excelled as flexible strategizers, and this ability to adapt to circumstances is certainly in evidence in relation to the need to secure privileges in the form of elite protection. Jewish historian Yosef H. Yerushalmi has pointed out that wherever Jews lived they tended to establish liaisons with “the highest governmental power available, whether that of emperor or caliph, count, duke, or king, bishop, archbishop or pope.”[2]Quoted in M. Teter, Jews and Heretics in Catholic Poland: A Beleaguered Church in the Post-Reformation Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 28. Yerushalmi described such relationships as a “direct vertical alliance.” Magda Teter has laid emphasis on the flexible manner in which Jews approach the establishment of direct vertical alliances:

At the beginning of their settlement in Poland, Jews forged a strong relationship with monarchs, who issued privileges and assured the Jews’ protection. When Poland’s balance of power shifted from a strong monarchy to a decentralised nobles’ republic, the Jewish relationship with the king was transformed into a symbiotic relationship with the powerful nobles. Jews’ reliance on royal protection was transferred to reliance on the nobles. First kings, and then the nobles, often placed Jews in positions that often gave them authority over Christians.[3]Ibid.
(Quoted in M. Teter, Jews and Heretics in Catholic Poland: A Beleaguered Church in the Post-Reformation Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 28.)

As well as blending financial interests with the nobles, another feature of the early modern period through to the nineteenth century was intermarriage between Jews and the European aristocracy. This was quite literally the physical joining of interests, perhaps the ultimate protection against suffering a backlash from the elite. By the early 20th century, the scale of Jewish intermarriage with the British aristocracy was such that it led L.G. Pine, editor of Burke’s Peerage from 1949–1959, to write in 1956 that “the Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual.” Given the trends of history in the centuries prior to the 1950s, it’s extremely difficult to imagine that this occurred by accident, or without some level of conscious or unconscious design.

As flexible strategizers, Jews were more than capable of handling the transformation from aristocratic rule to social democracy that occurred between the 19th and 20th centuries. As an interregnum of sorts, however, there were early problems with Jewish security while the new form of direct vertical alliance was established. A general rule worth operating by is that where the elite is pro-Jewish or tied to Jewish interests, Jews are likely to be reliable supporters of the governmental status quo, to support strong government, and to be against the freedom of the individual (e.g. see overwhelming contemporary Jewish support for gun control). Conversely, when elites are perceived as less inclined to support Jewish interests, Jews are likely to be vastly over-represented among anti-elite elements, as radical socialists, and as regicidal revolutionaries (e.g. the Bolshevik Revolution). Where the form of government merely weakens, Jews are forced to reconfigure their strategies in a more time-consuming, but no less pressing, manner. Indeed, a key feature of 19th century socialism was a strong anti-Semitism that rejected Jewish claims to being part of “the people,” and many anti-Jewish socialists portrayed such claims as opportunistic and cryptic strategies to secure power anew under the new form of government. One of the most memorable statements of the era in this regard is the French socialist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon’s remark that far from being a genuine socialist, Karl Marx was “the tapeworm of socialism.” Proudhon (1809-1865), seen by many as the father of anarchism, regarded apparently socialist Jewish “allies” like Heinrich Heine as “nothing but secret spies” whose hidden agenda was merely to secure Jewish privileges and protections under the guise of social justice – a perspective apparently lost on the ignorant hordes who today believe themselves to be anarchist “Antifa” while striving to protect similar “tapeworms” in their midst.

Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: “Marx is the tapeworm of socialism.”
Pierre-Joseph Proudhon: “Marx is the tapeworm of socialism.”

As social democracy became ascendant, Jewish strategies to maintain privileges and security had to make significant adaptations. Most obviously, social democracy was ostensibly the move to protect mass interests over those of an elite. Since Jews were an intimate part of the elite, this would necessarily lead to a decline in power, unless Jews could undergo a transformation in the popular mind into a more generic “mercantile elite,” “bourgeois elite,” or even most audaciously, masquerade as part of the proletariat. It was in eastern Europe that the clash between Jews and the interests of the masses became most acute. Faced with increased calls for freedom and democratic representation, the Tsars sided with the masses rather than the Jews, freeing the serfs and withdrawing protections and privileges from Jews. I would argue that this move, rather than the specific content of Bolshevism or Communism, was the most decisive factor in the eventual rise of the Jews against the Tsar and the Russian aristocracy during the Bolshevik revolution. The apparently incongruous position of Jews fighting alongside the peasant class against the elite wasn’t altogether lost on contemporaries. As one Ukrainian Communist put it in 1876, “The weight of the Jews’exploitation is great and their harmfulness unlimited … If we find it possible to preach revolution, and only revolution against the nobles, how can we defend the Jews?”[4]R. Wistrich, From Ambivalence to Betrayal: The Left, The Jews and Israel (University of Nebraska Press, 2012), 187. But Jews did want to be defended, and if they weren’t going to be defended by the Tsar, and they couldn’t trust the masses, then they would simply disguise themselves as part of the proletariat (Proudhon’s “secret spies”) and establish their protections and privileges themselves.

The perceptivity of figures like Proudhon and the Ukrainian Communist was lacking in the overall movement, where Jews were dominant in intellectual and activist roles. Within weeks of the revolution, Jews were able to cancel all restrictions imposed on them by earlier Tsarist regimes and abolish the Pale of Settlement initiated by Catherine the Great. Between 1918 and 1930, anti-Semitism was legislated against and massive amounts of literature purporting to debunk anti-Semitic attitudes were disseminated as part of a society-wide “education” campaign. Plays and films were made portraying Jews and anti-Semitism is a strongly philo-Semitic manner, and trials of individuals convicted of “anti-Semitic crimes” were made very public. It was the 20th century equivalent of building the Jew’s House of Lincoln, now constructed not of heavy limestone, but of slick lies and oppressive legislation.

Today, Jews still reside safely, if a little paranoid, in a house built with lies and legislation. They have established “direct vertical alliances” with every Western elite, including the most “populist.” I smile wryly at the theatre of Viktor Orbán toying with George Soros, while he pumps millions into Jewish education programs throughout Europe educating people on the “dangers of anti-Semitism” and provides a European “hotline” for concerned Jews to call in the event that they feel a little insecure. The same situation prevails with the “populist” boy wonder Sebastian Kurz in Austria. Kurz recently unveiled a “Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism.” The policies, endorsed by Kurz and later to be introduced to the entire European Union, include:

  • a commitment of a percentage of GDP annually to fighting antisemitism;
  • barring antisemites from political parties and public office;
  • committing financial and other resources to guaranteeing security for Jewish communities in Europe;
  • making Internet companies liable for antisemitic content on their platforms;
  • and advising companies not to do business with countries or organizations that support antisemitism in any way.
Sebastian Kurz receives award from the European Jewish Committee’s Moshe Kantor for his compliance in a modern day “Direct Vertical Alliance”
Sebastian Kurz receives award from the European Jewish Committee’s Moshe Kantor for his compliance in a modern day “Direct Vertical Alliance”

These measures reach a level of protection for Jews not seen since the immediate aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution, and only contribute to the growing reality that much of our politics now seems to exclusively revolve around the issue of anti-Semitism. It used to be the case that Jews considered everything within the framework “Is this good for the Jews?” Today, it seems that our governments, media, and academia are preoccupied with the same question. This reality, of course, clashes dramatically with the narrative that Jews have no overarching influence in our politics and society. On this note, I might add that I was recently axed from Twitter for the ninth time. On my last two Twitter accounts, I pursued a strategy of presenting such glaring contradictions in short, witty comments – just enough information to make the point clearly, and just enough humor to make it stick in the mind. In very short periods of time, I amassed many thousands of followers before the accounts were invariably suspended for “targeted harassment” even though I never interacted with other users, and merely presented facts or witticisms. I don’t think I will now return to Twitter, but one of my last parting shots, before being reported by a delusional neurotic named Gabe Hoffman (who apparently claimed I insulted him personally, without evidence, despite the fact I never interacted with other users), was:

Jews are the most oppressed people in history and I know this because they used their extraordinary wealth, their near monopoly of mass media, their massive political influence, and their censorship of alternative viewpoints to make sure I got the message.

This is the central paradox of our time. Jews enjoy extraordinary privileges while presenting themselves as the most oppressed people in history. Were they oppressed when they lived in the fortress in Lincoln? When they received the personal protection of King John? When they received charters and special protections to live in the German principalities, complete with reinforced walls for the streets in which they lived? When they intermarried with the aristocracy? Were they oppressed when the Tsar and his family were butchered? Were they oppressed when they made anti-Semitism illegal, had show trials against anti-Semites around Russia, and flooded the schools and universities with information on how marvellous they truly are? Are they oppressed when they produce legislation for the European Union and have it imposed at their will? Are they oppressed when they dictate to Big Tech what is and isn’t allowed on their platforms, under legal penalty? Are they oppressed when they demand a percentage of the GDP of each one of our nations to protect them? Are they oppressed when a leading figure at the U.S. State Department says: “The world’s greatest power is focused, by law and design, on protecting the Jews.”

No. They are not oppressed. Oppression is having your hands cut off by the King’s men because you refused to pay your debt to Aaron the Jew. Oppression is being told what you can’t say in your country, your own land that your fathers sweat and bled on in the hope that you could one day walk on that soil a free man. Oppression is being made to hand over your taxes and a percentage of your GDP, without any vote taking place on the matter, so that it can be passed to a population already influential and extraordinarily wealthy. Oppression is being banned from participating in politics because you happen to object to the influence of foreign actors in the business of your own people and country. Oppression is when the wealthy and powerful use their influence to starve you financially into submission to their interests. Oppression is when you go to prison because you disagree with something written in the history books.

The situation, I will admit, doesn’t look hopeful. But just as history relates a tale of direct vertical alliances, and all that they entail, it also relates the stories of collapsing elites, uneasy interregnums, and the rise of figures who side with their people and reject such alliances. One day in 1290, the Jew’s House of Lincoln stood silent, cold, and unoccupied, its money vaults emptied, its past residents hanged or exiled. It stands today, to my mind, not as a testament to durability, but as a monument to hubris and a mockery of pretensions to invulnerability. I see a time when our contemporary hubristic constructions are hollowed out and left vacant by the sweeping rush of history.

Notes

[1] R. Chazan, Church, State, and Jew in the Middle Ages (New Jersey: Behrman,1980), 11.

[2] Quoted in M. Teter, Jews and Heretics in Catholic Poland: A Beleaguered Church in the Post-Reformation Era (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), 28.

[3] Ibid.

[4] R. Wistrich, From Ambivalence to Betrayal: The Left, The Jews and Israel (University of Nebraska Press, 2012), 187.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
• Category: History, Ideology • Tags: Anti-Semitism, Censorship, Jews 
Hide 97 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. For you degenerate gamblers, the over/under on comments for this article is 375.

    • LOL: atlantis_dweller
    • Replies: @atlantis_dweller
  2. you can always depend on Andrew Joyce to hack through the verbal thickets produced by the Jews and their shabbatz goy apologists and

    tell the truth absolute. In the largest sense, the 3,000 year history of the Jews is a pattern of repeated asymptotic rise and then precipitous fall…and

    for the moment, we are at Peak Jew.

    for the moment.

    • Replies: @Wally
  3. @Oleaginous Outrager

    I’d pick 180 as the watershed.

    • Agree: Z-man
  4. Rich says:

    They are an ethnicity perfectly situated for our present, degenerated society. They have been urban dwellers for centuries, rarely engaged in physical labor, prized education and stick closely enough together to gain an advantage on other ethnicities. It’s up to the descendants of Christendom to join together, and learn from this small group how to work together as a group to help our own people. There was a time, not very long ago, when Whites were proud of their ancestry, and actually worked together to better our folk, and our future. We can still do it, we will do it, the sooner the better.

    • Replies: @Anon
  5. Andrew Joyce is fast becoming one of my favorite authors here at Unz. This piece is yet another fine addition to his ever-expanding body of quality work.

    The standard method of balancing profit and danger was to form a relationship with very strong elites, and to implicate those elites in the sharing of profits (thus also ensuring they would suffer a loss from any attack against Jews).

    Very true. And there’s another reason why as well: when the sh*t finally hits the fan, the Jews can then more easily shift blame to their erstwhile (but now no longer useful) allies. You can see them doing this right now with the Zio-Rapture Christians in the US. The Jewish ‘left’ is hard at work blaming them for all the wars in the middle east for having elected Bush–as though anyone knew back in the year 2000 that the World Trade Center was about to be attacked! (Yeah well, OK: there were indeed some people who did know in advance. But for the most part, (((they))) weren’t Christian ‘rednecks’.)

    I smile wryly at the theatre of Viktor Orbán toying with George Soros, while he pumps millions into Jewish education programs throughout Europe educating people on the “dangers of anti-Semitism” and provides a European “hotline” for concerned Jews to call in the event that they feel a little insecure. The same situation prevails with the “populist” boy wonder Sebastian Kurz in Austria. Kurz recently unveiled a “Catalogue of Policies to Combat Antisemitism.”

    I smile wryly along with you. All of these controlled-opposition ‘nationalists’ are Zionist decoys, intended to preserve Israel–not their own countries.

    https://www.counter-currents.com/2019/04/we-cant-trust-conservatives/

    Oppression is being banned from participating in politics because you happen to object to the influence of foreign actors in the business of your own people and country.

    Oh, as Henry Ford might have joked: the Jew media will now let you oppose “the influence of foreign actors in the business of your own people” all you want, so long as those foreign actors are Russian! ‘Xenophobia’ is just fine with the Jew media while you happen to share enemies in common.

    • Replies: @Anon
  6. RedReader says:

    They weren’t protected under Stalin and post-stalinist USSR had anti-semitic policies, so you should retract any claims of Judeo-Bolshevism. There were poor oppressed Jews in Eastern Europe, they were not the majority but they were noticeable. The Tsars were more philosemitic than you ever acknowledge. It seems the origin stories of you pro-Tsarist narrative are old Hollywood tropes about Jews complaining about the Tsar as an evil oppressor of Jews. Read Israel Shahak’s Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.

    The United States and capitalism is what protects the Jews and their power. To claim otherwise is disingenuous and playing into the hands of the elites who fear populism. If capitalism is maintained and private property the supreme law, then those who hold the loans and the vaults of wealth have nothing to fear. They can buy legislators and they can buy protection. The only way around that conundrum is for limits on private property and acknowledging higher principles than private property.

    • Replies: @Wally
    , @Digital Samizdat
    , @fnn
    , @fnn
  7. Andrew, in the context of your excellent article here, it’s very interesting to consider what Ang Lin has just written about George Stelter, who is apparently a gentile, over on his sector-leading website. Whatever else one may think of Lin (rather highly, speaking for myself), he is obviously a brilliant and extremely energetic young man who has really come into his own in the last year as a political analyst, and he often has fresh takes well worth noting.

    When I read material like your article, I sometimes find myself taking the role of a skeptical Jew. For example, on ‘masquerading as part of the proletariat’, I can imagine a Jew reacting with ‘these anti-Semites will just call any means at all that we Jews find to survive and thrive as enemy behavior.’ And really, such a hypothetical reaction would not be wrong. From whichever side one looks, conflicting interests of differing groups are the heart of the matter.

    What I find intriguing about Ang Lin’s article on Stelter is the sheer potential dynamism of Jewish evolutionary strategy. I know you are discussing the same thing here, and emphatically not taking the static view, but there is a tendency among many of us to take too long an evolutionary view, as if the people of Exodus, of the Babylonian captivity, of Rome’s decline, of Charlemagne’s counting houses, of medieval Lincoln and of modern NYC were almost the exact same people genetically, with almost the exact same strategy. They’re not: this is an accelerative, three-thousand year explosion.

    What I am getting at is a possibility I have long considered: take a physically beautiful, high-trust, highly outbred, monogamous, relatively wealthy but egalitarian, religious and relatively patriarchal society like late 19th century Sweden. Without three-thousand year old outsider roots, it would take longer, but my guess is that all on its own, such a society would eventually evolve a parasitic ruling class, physically less attractive and vigorous, with high verbal IQ/legalistic group psychology and beliefs, relatively inbred, and with low-trust, except within nepotism: IOW, people like Stelter, Jews in all but name. I believe such a possibility follows directly from Maynard Smith’s concept of the evolutionary stable strategy.

    If that scenario is accurate, the only way out of our dilemma may be a Western leadership class that truly understands the sociological implications of Darwinism, and is willing to put a thumb on the evolutionary scales.

  8. Pride before the fall.

    And this race, ethnicity, people, whatever you want to call them, are filled with overweening pride, arrogance., hubris…

    It will end the same way it has before with this lot, only much more grandly given the greater scale of their sins.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  9. @Jack Highlands

    Correction: should be Brian Stelter (of CNN), not “George Stelter”. I’m certain some crypto-confusions circuits related to real-life Jew Jay Greenspan, who looks like Stelter and played presumed gentile George Costanza on ‘Seinfeld’, were activating my sub-cortex there.

    • Replies: @Haxo Angmark
    , @Anonymous
  10. @Jack Highlands

    all your confusions aside,

    (((Brian Stelter))) is

    an ashkenazic Jew.

    • Replies: @Chet Roman
  11. Excellent analysis. I’ve come to expect nothing less from Andrew Joyce, who consistently penetrates the fog of politically correct (((thinking))) in scholarly and unexpected ways. Bravo Mr. Joyce!

    As for Joyce’s observations that leading Ashkenazim strategically intermarry into elite gentile families, let’s consider the Clinton and Trump families as case studies.

    Why did ‘Orthodox’ Jew (Jared Kushner) marry blond shiksa (Ivanka Trump)?

    Might this have been a calculated political maneuver by an ambitious and tribally-loyal young Jew? Stranger things have certainly happened.

    Undeniably, this atypical ‘marriage’ paid off enormously for Israel-loyalist and mega-Jew, Jared–not to mention Israel and the entire global, Jewish establishment.

    Since then, Trump has turned into a tame and accommodating poodle for the Israelis.

    Mere accident?

    And in typical fashion, the gentile (Ivanka) tossed aside her religious heritage and converted to a race-centered ‘religion’–even though she is not of that race and many Orthodox Jews refuse to recognize goyish blondes as truly Jewish.

    Exceptions to the definition of a ‘Jew’ however are often made when an ambitious young Jew like Jared Kushner marries into a mega-prominent gentile family such as the Trumps.

    The immense political benefits to the ‘Jewish people’ are simply irresistible.

    This dictum also applies to Chelsea Clinton and her politically-useful marriage to Marc Mezvinsky.

    It’s worth noting that both Mezvinsky’s father as well as Jared Kushner’s dad were arrested, tried and convicted for financial crimes. Both mega-wealthy, Jewish fathers spent time in prison.

    Can you image the unending satire, ‘humor’, and ridicule that would ensue if these royal ‘marriages’ involved presidential daughters marrying young men whose fathers had italian ‘mafioso’ backgrounds? The references and ‘satire’ would be un-ending.

    Not so in these cases.

    Sometimes criminal actions and arranged marriages are embraced while their checkered histories are glossed-over if not purposely forgotten.

    • Agree: Cloak And Dagger, Druid
    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  12. Wally says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    Yet Haxo Angmark believes in the great enabler, the fake & impossible ‘Nazi gas chambers’.

    http://www.codoh.com

  13. Wally says:
    @RedReader

    “They weren’t protected under Stalin and post-stalinist USSR had anti-semitic policies, so you should retract any claims of Judeo-Bolshevism.”

    Said, but not proven.

    A few shtetl Jews is a distraction from the remaining facts.
    I suggest a review of the Weimar days.

    Your diversions are noted.

  14. gloob says:

    Outstanding piece, Mr. Joyce. Truly. I will be forcing it on everyone I know. A must read: read it or else!

    I wonder….

    I’m not a huge fan of TV, and I certainly would never pay for the displeasure of watching it. I don’t have cable, so I rarely see the Fox channel. But when I visit my parents, I do see it. They watch literally nothing else. All day, every day.

    Fox has always had its Jews: Chris Wallace, Krauthammer, et al, but lately it seems to be pretty much wall to wall Hymie. I’m sure a big part of that is the fact that the Ivy league is graduating a great number of Jews as Whites, thereby making the pool of Whites Fox has to choose from smaller.

    But.

    I wonder if this seemingly growing number of right-wing Jews (and not just on Fox) is reflective of a sense that power is shifting from left to right. It may be hard to have faith in that idea just now, but I feel fairly safe in saying that we have passed peak-leftism, at least in terms of power, if not sheer craziness.

    I seriously doubt that this perceived shift of Jews is any sort of conscious plotting. But is it possible that like animals that on a less than conscious level know when a storm, earthquake, tsunami, etc. is coming, that these Jews are a new pre-conscious (?) vanguard of “tapeworms” positioning itself for a cushy ride on our gathering wave? The answer to the question is probably not terribly important except as a possible indicator that power is indeed shifting.

    • Replies: @utu
  15. wayfarer says:

    Oppressor (noun): a person or group that oppresses people.

    Israel, the White Jewish Supremacist Nation.
    source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blue_Boy

  16. Anon[214] • Disclaimer says:
    @Rich

    Indeed, there was a time, not very long ago, when Whites were proud of their ancestry—before Christianity invaded Europe. Now Europeans are wannabee-Jews. “For it is we [Christians] who are the Circumcision.” (Philippians 3:3)

    • Replies: @Rich
  17. wayfarer says:

    White Jewish Supremacists, and Racial Demographic Hypocrisy.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  18. jfk says: • Website

    “One gets the distinct and remarkable impression that, globally, diaspora Judaism probably requires something approaching $1 billion simply in order to feel safe.”

    Evil is increasingly desperate and fearful, because truth, justice and peace are all anti-evil and forever.

    Imagine, a world without evil;

    And that day is coming finally.

    Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel

    http://againstourbetterjudgment.com/

    About the book

    Soon after WWII, U.S. statesman Dean Acheson warned that creating Israel on land already inhabited by Palestinians would “imperil” both American and all Western interests in the region. Despite warnings such as this one, President Truman supported establishing a Jewish state on land primarily inhabited by Muslims and Christians.

    Few Americans today are aware that U.S. support enabled the creation of modern Israel. Even fewer know that U.S. politicians pushed this policy over the forceful objections of top diplomatic and military experts.

    As this work demonstrates, these politicians were bombarded by a massive pro-Israel lobbying effort that ranged from well-funded and very public Zionist organizations to an “elitist secret society” whose members included Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis.

    Against Our Better Judgment brings together meticulously sourced evidence to illuminate a reality that differs starkly from the prevailing narrative. It provides a clear view of the history that is key to understanding one of the most critically important political issues of our day.

  19. Anonymous[317] • Disclaimer says:
    @The real John Smith

    It will end the same way it has before with this lot, only much more grandly given the greater scale of their sins.

    It will be different this time. The scale of the stage is global and the reaction will be global so there’ll be no place on Earth to expel them to.

    • Replies: @Justsaying
  20. Granted, columns such as this bring out the crackpots, but I’ll offer a couple of brief observations. First of all, a mention of the creation of the first banknotes and the rise of fractional-reserve banking (both artefacts of jewish moneylending) would be germane.

    Secondly, as Mr Joyce implies, if the Establishment uses its mass-media mouthpieces to trumpet attacks upon one group of people as enjoying the benefits of privilege, you may be quite certain that the actual beneficiaries are well hidden and seldom if ever mentioned in this regard.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  21. @RedReader

    They weren’t protected under Stalin and post-stalinist USSR had anti-semitic policies, so you should retract any claims of Judeo-Bolshevism.

    Would that be the same USSR that made the mere possession of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion a capital offense? Stalin’s ‘persecution’ of the Khazar Mafia was simply a necessary corrective following a period of near-total Jewish domination and excess in Soviet public life from 1917 to about 1937. That was the subtext of the so-called ‘Great Purge’: Soviet Jews saw their numbers in certain key ministries (such as the NKVD) reduced to match their numbers in the general population.

    But of course, to hear Jewish historians tell it, starving and executing millions of Slavs and others (1917-37) constituted ‘revolutionary progress’, while bringing the Khazar Mafia which had caused such suffering to heel (1937-48) constituted ‘anti-Semitic persecution’. Stalin’s ‘crime’ in this case was to get rid of a caste of Jewligarchs whose very ‘communist’ zeal was endangering the survival the Soviet Union–and with it, communism itself.

    You know, if you listened to these people long enough, they’d have you convinced that the Palestinians were are a mortal threat to them, rather than the other way around. Funny how that works …

    • Replies: @Digital Samizdat
  22. Anon[214] • Disclaimer says:
    @Digital Samizdat

    Zio-Rapture Christians? As Zion and Rapture* are both term found in the Christian Canon, what other sort(s) of Christians may there be? Those who reject the Canon?

    * simul rapiemur cum illis in nubibus

    • Replies: @anon
  23. More first-rate observations from Mr. Joyce. But what is a Jew? With the collapse of Western Christianity, its detritus being renamed ‘Socialism’ n its rank n file Socialists worshiping Jews as their priesthood, isn’t it fair to say that all the Socialists of the PC type are Jews, which means most of the modern Democratic Party? Most Jews don’t haul Talmuds around but most Democrats read Zinn, Marx, Marcuse, Plath, Klein, n just about any other leftist screed authored by a Jew which calls for reparations cast in the Left’s usual infinite permutations of victimhood.

    The ultimate Judaizing religious denomination (the PC Cult) is today’s Democratic Party, funded by left-wing Jewish oligarchs a la George Soros. Of course, given the recent shameful display of Israel-a** kissing by the Republican leadership, they aren’t far behind, their version of ‘Christianity’ being only a little less Judaized than the Dems, perhaps just further up the slippery slope. With the death of Christianity much noted in the 19th century, it seems that instead of religion disappearing, it is decomposing back into the religion from whence it came: Judaism. Could it be that if you are not a White Nationalist or a Muslim, you are now by definition a Jew n therefore seeking Jewish-like privileges with the government n reparations from all non-Jews?

    • Replies: @Tono Bungay
  24. One Tribe says:

    Thank you Mr. Joyce, for the courage and diligence in researching all of the facts for presentation, while pretty much telling it’s own story, is well-organized for easy absorption and consideration, and of course… writing it all down, in spite of the torrent of goodspeak, and … plague of unfortunate co-incidences happening to those who dare to put the facts down.

    I strongly recommend that activists resisting the scourge focus on the behaviours, and avoid falling into the trap of race-identity generalizations.

    Even if there was such a thing as ‘race’, it is the behaviours which are the issue, focus on the behaviours
    Beyond the fact that science can’t define ‘race‘, in terms of identified commonality, nor generational genetic persistence of that commonality across a comparison population, there is no possibility to prove genetic makeup to expressed behaviour, for any given individual, the entire concept of ‘race‘ is only an invalid generalization of anti-social behavioural traits.

    It is proven that these people that fly under that banner, most frequently share more similarities in DNA with their host nation, than they do with others flying under the same banner, resident in another host nation, (see The Thirteenth Tribe, Arthur Koestler).

    I most strongly recommend that we skip the lazy, and invalid generalization step, and talk about the group, which has the norm of the anti-social behaviours.

    The facts are out there, and there is 2500+ years of data to perform trend analysis on.
    But if you look into it, even at a cursory level down, the trend is extremely difficult to NOT see!

    Once seen, it is extremely difficult to not see all of the time, in our current global society.

    Okay, don’t panic.

    The politically correctness horde can agree that anti-socialness is bad…

    Spread the word as best you can, remember the sage words in The Matrix, many minds are not ready to be freed.

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  25. @Digital Samizdat

    Long story short: Stalin’s real crime was trying to rescue communism from (((communism))).

    • Agree: Mulegino1
  26. utu says:
    @gloob

    I seriously doubt that this perceived shift of Jews is any sort of conscious plotting.

    No, it is conscious and planned. It is necessitated by Zionism and the role Israel is to play in the endgame for the world domination.

    …all other continents will become united in a world alliance at whose disposal will be an international police force. All armies will be abolished and there will be no more wars. In Jerusalem, the United Nations will build a shrine of the prophets to serve the federated union of all continents; this will be the seat of the Supreme Court of Mankind, to settle all controversies among the federated continents, as prophesied by Isaiah… – David Ben-Gurion expressed in 16th January 1962 interview for Life Magazine and Look Magazine

  27. By almost every metric, Jews are the most protected ethnic group on earth.

    By the same token, Palestinians have to rank amongst the most abused and least protected ethnic groups on the planet. And the abuse and lack of protection come from countries that enjoy the most impunity for their atrocities, led of course by the most protected and privileged tribe —- Zionist Jews.

    • Agree: DESERT FOX
    • Replies: @attilathehen
    , @Iris
  28. Excellent article! However, I wish the author’s well-enumerated list had better addressed these 3 areas:

    1) contextualiation of the progroms
    2) elite jews versus rank and file jews
    3) the degree – or not – that pure merit enters in

    Here’s an interesting supporting article: It cost Facebook $22 million to keep Mark Zuckerberg safe last year
    https://www.cnn.com/2019/04/12/tech/mark-zuckerberg-security/index.html

  29. Interestingly, I am getting “Comments are closed” on every Unz story if I access the site via a normal browser, but no such issue if I use Tor Browser.

    Let’s see if this comment gets through – it would be sad if UnzReport has joined the “conditional speech” club.

    My assumption is that it’s some other issue: the first time the site loaded today, it didn’t load any CSS – the rendered page was completely unstyled.

  30. My ‘considered contrarian’ approach applies here (as it does in all things).

    Buy on the sound of cannon; sell on the sound of trumpets

    Alternatively:

    Buy when there’s blood in the streets; sell when they’re dancing in the streets

    Think of the Jewish Question as a stock price (let’s use the ticker symbol $JEW) and ask if you’re the type of investor who buys breakouts to new highs.

    If you were considering investing in ‘$JEW’ at the start of the 20th century, the most profitable strategy would have been to short them just after the Bolshevik Revolution/WWI… and then to go long in the mid 1940s.

    Right now, ‘$JEW’ is extremely overbought and there are significant signs of divergent internals – each push to a new high
    ① is made on weaker and weaker fundamentals,
    ② has a shorter half-life, and
    ③ has no follow through.

    $JEW is also becoming far more tightly held; that makes it prone to manipulation, but it is constantly requiring injections of new capital (a key marker of poor fundamentals).

    • Replies: @jacques sheete
  31. @Justsaying

    Muslim Palestinians are worthless. I don’t care what happens to them.

    As to this article, Andrew Joyce is always scribbling about Jews, yet he does nothing. Why doesn’t he start a political party for the West? He’s a cuck. Remember when Trump was running for president and he ran on immigration? Other GOP candidates were angry about this because he was winning, but Ann Coulter challenged them to take up this issue so their chances could improve. None did.

    I have to give the Jews credit. They are protecting their borders. The next announcement will be that the West Bank (Judea and Samaria) will now be part of Israel. The Arab street will do nothing. Oh, wait, they’ll attack Western Europeans. Now that Jews have a country, we need to send all Jews in the West to Israel.

    Andrew Joyce is a just a cowardly cuck.

    • Troll: NoseytheDuke
  32. Miggle says:

    The word is “parasites”.

  33. @Kratoklastes

    Thanks for reporting that.It makes me feel better about my similar experience after, at one stage, appearing to have made the last Comment before closure. (Do you know when Ron is going to give up on his UR public benefaction? It will be some time after he turns 80 and he decides that he just doesn’t have the energy any longer to chase down all the software, denial of service and other petty prblems on a daily basis) 🙂

    • Replies: @Commentator Mike
  34. @mark green

    The following appeared once as the last Comment before “Comments closed” !

    You stimulate some interesting speculations. But Jared Kushner’s marriage to Ivanka doesn’t really need much explanation if you consider what (apart from adequate sexual attraction) was in it for a rich young man with respectabilty impaired by his father’s crimes. An important part of the context which makes it natural enough is American Jews’ – like German Jews’ before 1933 – high rate of intermarriage.

    What surely stands out for explanation in modern secular New York is Ivanka’s conversion. While I recently came across a convert who was an attractive blonde bookkeeper who had moved from her home state of Queensland and married a Jew in Victoria I can’t claim to have any great insight into why women might convert. Actually, remembering a recent catch up with a Jewish friend whose father came to Australia from Hungary post WW2 and who (the son) set himself off on a very successful and prosperous career with a Stanford MBA I was interested to learn that his sons from his first marriage to a Jew would come with their non Jewish wives to his Friday night open house dinner *and/but* his highly competent new wife, whom he was willing to follow to Boston for her time at Harvard (I approximate from memory) had converted to Judaism. *So*….. perhaps one should be looking at something more like female psychology plus appreciation of a family centred tradition rather than interests of The Tribe.

    Another way of putting the intermarriage business into context is to look at Catholic families like the Kennedys. Do they all marry Catholics? Certainly not. They have even been going to non Catholic schools against the wishes of the Church (wishes which used to be firm commands like that of the priest 55 years ago to a 14 year old boy who had to stand outside an Anglican chapel where his sister was marrying a non Catholic).

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  35. @attilathehen

    …and you are a Zionist.

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  36. @Wizard of Oz

    ‘…While I recently came across a convert who was an attractive blonde bookkeeper who had moved from her home state of Queensland and married a Jew in Victoria I can’t claim to have any great insight into why women might convert…’

    There is the rather misogynistic theory that women are attracted to men who belong to the dominant group.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  37. Crimson2 says:

    Lol at people like Andrew Joyce who want to murder Jews complaining about how much money is spent on protecting Jews.

    Andrew, if people like you didn’t exist then we could save some money on protecting Jews. Make it happen, buddy

    • Agree: TKK
  38. @Colin Wright

    That’s all a cuck like you to say???!!! Also, aren’t you married to a brown woman from Central America? I saw some comments where you were described as being pro-immigration because of your wife. If so, you prove my point.

    Israel is securing their borders, but you are destroying our border.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  39. @Meretricious

    Well what’s the non crackpot version of what you have only half said about “fractional reserve banking”? People known or believed to be rich have always been able to create money by reliance on their credit (think endorsed bills of exchange). Would you prescribe the death penalty or regulation (by a central bank or otherwise) for them?

  40. Fascinating! Thank you for the great research and historical context. These psycopath’s reign won’t last. It’s not sustainable. However, if they give birth to AI and robots, before the rebellion, they won’t need us. But eventually, the robots will rebel the same way Adam did. Then rinse, wash, and repeat.

    Perhaps these people have been doing this for thousands of years. Perhaps they created us, because they do treat us like cattle. Those supremacist rats.

  41. @attilathehen

    ‘That’s all a cuck like you to say???!!! Also, aren’t you married to a brown woman from Central America? I saw some comments where you were described as being pro-immigration because of your wife. If so, you prove my point.

    Israel is securing their borders, but you are destroying our border.’

    Classic Zionist redirection. I only noticed that your post amounted to Zionism — but you really are a Zionist. Are you Jewish?

    • Replies: @attilathehen
  42. The Heeb, Yid, kike, ash-can-Nazi, the bane of civilized man for 5,000 years. Yes there’s some good and honorable Jews, but when the SHTF how do we separate them. Terrorist, moderate terrorist, innocent terrorist. Sorry they all have to go. They have their own country so ship them over there. Or am I being too bigoted, to severe? I don’t think so. For millennia they have not assimilated. They’ve had their chances, and have deceived their way to today.
    Nationalize that private corporation the Federal Reserve Inc. If we want to keep the Ponzi scheme of fractional reserve banking that’s fine for now, but pay our treasury the interest, or vigorish as I call it, but pay it to our self.

    • Replies: @Druid
  43. @Colin Wright

    Jews aren’t the dominant group in Australia or even thought to be. But a misogyny free evolutionary explanation is that potential mothers will seek out impregnators who show promise of passing on relatively good genes by being important or rich, or just a bit more so than her family. But why the conversions? (Chelsea Clinton has not has she, btw?). Could it be the greater attachment of Jews to rituals that emphasise family values? At least it beats having the priest to dinner with the family so he was of course a revered friend of the parents. Funny how many ex Catholics there are now who might have once thought the Catholic Church was the great support for family values.

  44. @Crimson2

    You appear to be a Tiny Duck who can spell.

  45. Rich says:
    @Anon

    I get it, you don’t like Christianity. Bully for you. But we still need a unifying movement to help bring Whitey together. Not very long ago it was a compliment to tell someone “That’s mighty White of you.” We need to bring that attitude back.

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  46. Saggy says: • Website

    What a much needed article. It restored my faith after the moon hoax and the 9/11 BS.

  47. @Anonymous

    Most people on the globe aren’t the greatest fans of this tribe as it is. It must be intrinsic antisemitism I guess.

  48. @attilathehen

    Hear ye, hear ye, a worthless piece of Zionist trash hath spoken.

    • Agree: Colin Wright
    • Replies: @attilathehen
  49. “Jews had the money to build homes with expensive local limestone, and they had a desire to build very strong, almost impregnable, homes that could withstand the onslaught of both Man and Time. ”

    It has been rumored that the so-called holocaust memorials that dot every state are actually “fallout shelters” (heh); i.e. safe havens intended for use by local Jews when the inevitable backlash arises due to Jew’s persecution of beleaguered whites. Allegedly the “holocaust memorial” buildings contain hidden underground, reinforced bunkers that are stockpiled with emergency supplies of food and water, arms and ammo and that they will serve as vaults for Jewish portable wealth in the event of an uprising of the deplorable proles and peasantry.

    This speculative rumor, if true, indicates that the phrase “never again” is not merely a hope, but an active plan.

  50. anon[332] • Disclaimer says:

    By all means correct me if I’m wrong, but wasn’t it King John who robbed the Jews blind and kicked them out of England?

    • Replies: @Wizard of Oz
  51. Hibernian says:

    ” (wishes which used to be firm commands like that of the priest 55 years ago to a 14 year old boy who had to stand outside an Anglican chapel where his sister was marrying a non Catholic).”

    That was 1964. I think even then, and certainly ten or more years after that, most priests would have a “don’t ask don’t tell” policy about this issue or even, reluctantly, approve. Or maybe not care at all, especially after 1980.

  52. Great article. I like the part about Ivanka and Chelsea both marrying Jewish men whose fathers are ex-cons. That should tell you what kind of family the Clintons and the Trumps are. Both are mafia families, criminals seek each other out.

    I think the number of Jews are grossly understated in the US. I live in the west coast, WA and OR didn’t use to be liberal, these days everywhere I look, I see Jews.

    • Replies: @Wally
  53. Rich Sum says:

    Elan Carr in Feb. 2019 from the office of the U.S. State Dept Envoy said, ” My Office was created by law and designed to protect Jewish people around the world !Think about that .The worlds greatest power is focused by law and design on protecting the Jews . ” Th eU.S. wars will never end our controllers and handlers will not let it happen …

  54. anon[327] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anon

    isn’t rapture a darbyism from the 19th century?

    Just another Brit with too much fog on the brain.

  55. @anon

    No, his sins were such as to give us Magna Carta and all the myth and legend attaching but it was the splendid Edward Longshanks, Hammer of the Scots, who did it nearly 100 years later.

    • Replies: @anon
  56. @Rich

    Wasn’t that always a joke?

  57. @Jack Highlands

    Have you factored in the probability that, in a stable, prosperous democracy (and I don’t necessarily include plutocracies with democratic flavour like the US) you will find at the top for far too long professional politicians, often ex union officials, who count on using taxpayers’ money to buy the needed 51 per cent of the vote where it counts by cynically relying on the collective 200 per cent of entitlement?

  58. @Colin Wright

    I am not Jewish. I want all Jews in the West to go to Israel. At least they protect their country. Look at our borders.

    I’m correct about your wife. You are another problem.

    • Replies: @Colin Wright
  59. @Justsaying

    Another cucked Western male. I offer solutions and all I get is insane replies.

    Andrew Joyce has been scribbling this stuff for several years at Occidental Observer. That’s all he does – scribble and whine.

  60. @attilathehen

    ‘…I’m correct about your wife. You are another problem.’

    What you are is evident.

  61. Anon[253] • Disclaimer says:

    Yes it is certain that the House of Cards built time and time again with the same basis of lies lies and corruption will come tumbling down on the heads of the Jews. I do hope I am around to see it. I think it will be a marvelous time.

  62. Patrick says:

    This article does a good job of cataloging privileges and the dynamics surrounding it, I particularly liked the lore regarding old houses. At the end of the day though I don’t find jews to be particularly unique when it comes to comparing them to other ethnic groups of the world, the only reason they happened to attain a privileged position in the west is because native westerners have a culture of individual competition against each other. Strategically any group that competes as individuals will ultimately see their wealth taken by people who act as groups. It’s like a team playing a soccer match against the other team and the other team consists of individuals running around doing their own thing, not cooperating.

    This is why muslims and hindus are doing well in the west as well in terms of gathering both money and influence. Hindus are far more economically successful than white americans and muslims have far more political influence. Both these groups are establishing the same sort of privileges jews have, so jewish privilege is not related to jews being particularly better than than others, the issue is that the native culture in the west is simply short sighted, individual competition is very short sighted. Individual rights are good, but individual rights are different than individualism. Individualism is a culture, individual rights are a set of laws.

    • Agree: Ilyana_Rozumova
    • Disagree: Svigor
  63. Svigor says:
    @attilathehen

    Jews have literal armies of people who do nothing but write. Lies, propaganda, half-truths, etc, nothing but words and talk.

    Sorry, you were saying something about giving Jews credit?

    If you knew anything about Fourth Generation Warfare, you’d know that the moral dimension of warfare is actually the most important. Hell, if you knew your Sun Tzu, you’d know that. Demoralizing, enervating your enemy so he can’t even muster the will to fight, or better yet, doesn’t even know he’s in a fight (YT’s current situation), is the most devious and effective form of warfare.

    Jews obviously know this. It ain’t the trigger-pullers in Israel who are defending Jewry. It’s the Jews’ moralist army, their propaganda and indoctrination army, that is their first and last line of defense.

    • Agree: Igor Bundy, Z-man
    • Replies: @Wally
  64. Svigor says:

    I mean the IDF can’t even handle Hezbollah. Without a great patron, Israel is toast.

  65. B N K says: • Website

    One example of how it was/is done.

    How The Jews Took Great Britain

    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=86

    My Name Is Brother Nathanael Kapner
    I’m A “Street Evangelist”

    I Grew Up As A Jew
    I’m Now An Orthodox Christian

    I Wish To Warn How Jewry
    Is Destroying Christianity Throughout The World

    http://www.realjewnews.com/

  66. Wally says:
    @Libtard is redundant

    said:
    “I think the number of Jews are grossly understated in the US. I live in the west coast, WA and OR didn’t use to be liberal, these days everywhere I look, I see Jews.”

    There’s no doubt about that, see:

    http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/trump-dances-to-israels-tune/

    my comment #66 for further confirmation

  67. Wally says:
    @Svigor

    said:
    “Jews have literal armies of people who do nothing but write. Lies, propaganda, half-truths, etc, nothing but words and talk.”

    Ron Unz has published an article by Alison Weir on that very fact here:

    How Israel and Its Partisans Work to Censor the Internet
    http://www.unz.com/article/how-israel-and-its-partisans-work-to-censor-the-internet/?highlight=wikipedia

    also recommened:
    Zionist Wikipedia Editing Course
    http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/139189

  68. @Crimson2

    “Lol at people like Andrew Joyce who want to murder Jews ”

    Witless straw man claims. Brilliant.

    Criticism is not hatred, child.

  69. Anyone who is given preference just needs an elbow in the door to throw the door wide open. Which is why any kind of preferential treatment for the supposedly oppressed ever works in society. The government if it feels like some are oppressed give very specific help. Not the help of forcing everyone to change their ways like they do now. This anti semitism has now morphed into anti zionists and anti israel.. Like how would opposing fascism be in any way equal to wanting equality and fair treatment of everyone. What they are saying is because they are special people, they can do what ever they like to others and no one can say anything because well they are a protected special people.

  70. anon[332] • Disclaimer says:
    @Wizard of Oz

    I recall reading about John hitting the Jews up for cash to try and get his French possessions back (the same thing that fueled his conflict with the barons that gave us Magna Carta). Apparently his men got one guy and pulled half his teeth out before he coughed up. Pretty gnarly.

  71. Druid says:
    @the grand wazoo

    It’s not their country though!

  72. Hhsiii says:

    I can hear Dr. Evil “Almost one BILLION dollars.”

    Sand off a beach.

    I used to live by that synagogue and voted there, the one with the swat team in the photo. Right by the fire house and 19th precinct police station. At other temples closer to 5th there’s usually a mobile home/command center nearby. But Park East usually just had a shvartze in a suit as visible protection. With a paddy wagon parked by the precinct house nearby anyway. Just in case.

    Carry on.

    • Replies: @mcohen
  73. mcohen says:
    @Hhsiii

    One gust of wind and we will be seeing 2 full moons tonight.

  74. @Wizard of Oz

    Me 2. Maybe RU had some housekeeping to do so pressed some “close comments” button.

  75. @Crimson2

    What about the threat to everybody by those who Jews import through the open borders they advocate? If they supported raising walls in the west there would be less money needed for their protection. Or how about they all packed up and went off to walled up Israel and then we see what we do for own protection?

  76. Anonymous[243] • Disclaimer says:
    @Jack Highlands

    I can’t find anything on this ang lin fellow. Got a link?

    Also why does unz.com insist on unencrypted http? All our traffic is visible to whoever controls the physical internet infrastructure.

  77. @Patrick

    Which is why both Muslims and Hindus have built such great societies in their respective lands that Americans and Westerners in general are clamouring by the millions to be let in to live and work there so they can soak up some of that affluence and high culture created by the teamwork of which you have noted. Did I read you right?

  78. @Sin City Milla

    I don’t think Sylvia Plath was Jewish, although she was interested in Jewish subjects. Does the writer know differently?

  79. @One Tribe

    I strongly recommend that activists resisting the scourge focus on the behaviours, and avoid falling into the trap of race-identity generalizations.

    I very strongly agree with that, and for several reasons, mostly valid, I think.

  80. @Kratoklastes

    I had the same experience after I was finally able to access UR at all.

    I still cannot edit my comments and cannot find a way to communicate that problem to UR staff.

  81. @Haxo Angmark

    Stelter is a Methodist Jew. He was raised a Methodist and converted after marrying a Jew.

  82. @Kratoklastes

    $JEW is also becoming far more tightly held

    ④ Decreasing volume ($JEW is also becoming far more tightly held…nobody buys that $hit any more)

  83. Excellent article Mr. Joyce.

    No wonder Kevin MacDonald values your input and that of Tobias Langdon on TOO.

    Werner Sombart’s book Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben (The Jews and Modern Capitalism) is an excellent read on this topic and is still relevant.

    Apart from money which enables them to install puppets like Bush and Obama, as in the case of the Clinton Crime Family Inc. and El Trumpo das Golem, intermarriage is another tool much like in Britain where a number of politicians and prominent British degenerates (celebrities) like Daniel Day-Lewis, Sam Mendes, Stephen Fry, the late George Michael, David Beckham, Katie Price, Daniel Ratcliffe, Craig David etc have partial kosher ancestry – usually through a mother or maternal grandparents.

  84. It’s the protection paradox. The more you protect them and support their integration, the nastier they get.

    Balkan jews for example never got to such power, because they weren’t allowed a special niche (for example aromanians frequently dabbled in trade and currency exchange, as well as the greeks and romanians) – and, perhaps more importantly, the locals have a similar distrustful mentality allowing them immunity from being golems

  85. fnn says:
    @RedReader

    Solzhenitsyn on Jews in the Gulag:
    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/06/13/kevin-macdonald-translation-of-solzhenitsyns-in-the-camps-of-gulag-chapter-20-of-200-years-together/

    If I wished to generalize and state that the life of Jews in camps was especially difficult, then I would be allowed to do so and wouldn’t be peppered with admonitions for unjust ethnic generalizations. But in the camps, where I was imprisoned, it was the other way around – the life of Jews, to the extent of possible generalization, was easier.

    A Lett Ane Bernstein, one of my witnesses from Archipelago, thinks that he managed to survive in the camps only because in times of hardship he asked Jews for help and that the Jews, judging by his last name and nimble manners, mistook him for their tribesman – and always provided assistance. He says that in all his camps Jews always constituted the upper crust and that the most important free employees were also Jews (Shulman – head of special department, Greenberg – head of camp station, Kegels – chief mechanic of the factory), and, according to his recollections, they also preferred to select Jewish inmates to staff their units.

  86. fnn says:
    @RedReader

    From Kevin MacDonald’s review of Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century: http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/slezkinerev.pdf

    Jewish representation at the top levels of the Cheka and OGPU (the acronyms by which the secret police was known in different periods) has often been the focus of those stressing Jewish involvement in the revolution and its aftermath. Slezkine provides statistics on Jewish overrepresentation in these organizations, especially in supervisory roles, and agrees with Leonard Schapiro’s comment that “anyone who had the misfortune to fall into the hands of the Cheka stood a very good chance of finding himself confronted with and possibly shot by a Jewish investigator” (p. 177). During the 1930s the secret police, then known as the NKVD, “was one of the most Jewish of all Soviet institutions” (p. 254), with 42 of its 111 top officials being Jewish. At this time 12 of the 20 NKVD directorates were headed by ethnic Jews, including those in charge of state security, police, labor camps, and resettlement (i.e., deportation). The Gulag was headed by ethnic Jews from its beginning in 1930 until the end of 1938, a period that encompasses the worst excesses of the Great Terror. They were, in Slezkine’s words, “Stalin’s willing executioners” (p. 103). The Bolsheviks continued to apologize for Jewish overrepresentation until the topic became taboo in the 1930s. And it was not until the late 1930s that there was a rise in visibility and assertiveness of “anti-Semites, ethnic nationalists, and advocates of proportional representation” (p. 188). By this time the worst of the slaughters in the Gulag, the purges, and the contrived famines had been completed.

    • Replies: @FLgeezer
  87. Jake says:

    I am going to start my comments on this article by saying that Joyce is wrong in asserting (or perhaps he means it as a suggestion) that Jews did not enter England/Britain until after the Norman Conquest.

    Iy is impossible to understand fully the ‘Jewish problem’ until to accept how simple it is: the Jesus story is true, and Jews in rejecting Christ, in defining themselves as anti-Christ, embraced anti-Logos, which means they embraced anti-philosophy (as both Plato and Aristotle understood the term), which means they embraced amorality.

    And that process means that Jews are the descendants of Abraham (and the few others they allow into the tribe via marriage) who chose to embrace Lucifer as their spiritual father rather than Jesus the Christ.

    And that means that even as those Jews hated the Romans for destroying the Temple, they used the pagan Romans and the Empire to wage constant war on the growing Christian communities. Jews would go wherever Christianity began to take root and do their damnedest to derail it, which at times meant encouraging persecutions of Christians by the Romans and at other times meant stirring up local groups to revive their historic paganism in opposition to Christian proselytism, which after Rome’s official toleration of Christianity meant stirring up rebellion against Rome under any form save Christian. And that meant that Jews could be found at least on the fringes of all ancient heresies that were not overtly anti-Jewish.

    Jews made it to Roman ruled Britain. I would bet that if we had the documents, we’d see clearly that Jews tossed money to rile the still pagan Celtic tribes against the partially Christian Celtic tribes, and then after Constantine, against Roman rule. I would bet that Jewish influence was indispensable to the rise and spread of the Pelagian heresy, just as Jewish influence, including money, was absolutely necessary to every step of the Reformation.

    I assume – there are no records left, and my assumption is based on recorded histories of Jews – that Jewish moneymen played a role in largely Christianized and semi-Romanized Celtic Britain being swamped with pagan Germans, just as they played a key role in financing the various Germanic tribes running amuck in the Western Roman Empire.

    Jews would have latched onto the notion of getting close to the Norman kings as soon as they began claiming the right to rule large portions of old Gaul, because that would weaken the heirs of Charlemagne, who had in a sense made Paris the Christian version of Rome as the center of politics.

    The late Medieval English peasantry erupted with a number of revolts, all of which were inspired totally or significantly by heretical notions, all of which also had forms among the nobility, including the Royals. How much of that was due to Jewish influence? How many Jews remained in England, pretending to have converted? How many of the wealthy English commoner merchant families had Jewish ancestry? That is a very important question because that class backed Reformation ideas from the very beginning and also had deep ties to Jewish merchants in other countries.

    The ‘Jewish problem’ is a spiritual one. You cannot control it, much less solve it, by focusing on politics or economics or biology, etc. Jews will be anti-Christ and therefore anti-Christendom. Jews will always back the whites who will hate the largest number of whites who are, or easily could become once again, supporters of historic Christendom.

    The WASP Empire is the Anglo-Zionist Empire, and that has been true since Oliver Cromwell.

  88. @Patrick

    Naturally you are absolutely correct. But there is a difference. But there is one very significant difference. Jews are totally under absolute control of Rabbis who do control all aspects of their lives.
    Not like any other group where priests control only spiritual aspect of their lives.
    It is Rabbis main task to set the aims of the group, that must be achieved at any cost.
    And that is why Jews are so successful.
    Rabbis are GODFATHERS of the Jews.

  89. Mulegino1 says:

    The insatiability of Jewry with respect to its demands upon the goyim is just another aspect of its identity, which is Talmudic.

    Talmudism is the sacralization of Jewry’s ethnocentric psychopathy.

    Zionism is the weaponizing of the Talmudic worldview against all peoples. It is manifested directly and brutally against the Christians and Muslims in Palestine. In the west, as Codreanu observed, it is exercised covertly in the “swamp of our sins”- via the subversion and vitiation of our culture and institutions. Jewry thrives in a society dominated by the love of money over principle, honor and true spirituality. Like Damocles, though, it knows that the sword above its head hangs by a very delicate thread, thus its chronic paranoia with respect to its host populations.

    In a healthy society and culture, the Jews do not have to worry about a violent reaction against their collective, since laws and customs keep their collective influence to a minimum. The historical animus against the Jews is directly attributed to their behavior as an organization and group, not their mere physical presence. It is when the Jewish hive begins to swarm that the tocsin is sounded and heeded in such a sane and spiritually healthy society.

  90. FLgeezer says:
    @fnn

    >During the 1930s the secret police, then known as the NKVD, “was one of the most Jewish of all Soviet institutions” (p. 254), with 42 of its 111 top officials being Jewish.

    And it continues to the present. (((They))) celebrate each Easter by persecuting elderly goy and by clogging up our court system with ridiculous, unjust lawfare:

    http://news.trust.org/item/20190418101135-pj0x9

  91. anarchyst says:

    One overlooked aspect of jewish dysfunctionality is the amount of mental illness that is prevalent within jewish communities.
    High rates of mental illness among jews can be traced to interbreeding as well as the practice of male genital mutilation (circumcision) along with the “mohel” fellating the baby boy after “the deed is done”.
    This is an excellent way to spread STDs, which might not affect the subject of male genital mutilation immediately, but most certainly will affect his mental state in later life.
    As many STDs have very long gestation rates, undiagnosed mental illness due to STDs transmitted by “mohels” among jews in later life is not only a distinct possibility, but is, in fact, reality.
    Add to that, the distorted worldview that most jews have because of their perpetual “victimhood” status that is instilled in them from birth, and you have a clearer picture of the dysfunctionality inherent in jewish society.

  92. This morning Barr summarized the Miller report. This was the historical moment when all Jews did show red faces. Face of Rozenstein face was red as paprika. Wolf face did compete with his redness.
    Rest of the CNN sayanims did have embarrassing white faces. (Even negroids.)

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments become the property of The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Andrew Joyce Comments via RSS
PastClassics
What Was John McCain's True Wartime Record in Vietnam?
Are elite university admissions based on meritocracy and diversity as claimed?