The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 John Taylor Archive
Thomas Friedman Tells the Palestinians to Get Over It
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information


Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Something Here
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Some years ago I worked for a bank in Bahrain owned by several Arab governments. Having been on the payroll of a US bank for a number of years I found the atmosphere at my new employer quite refreshing. All memos my colleagues wrote were remarkably honest and occasionally amusing. About the Islamic Bank of Kuwait, for example, a fellow lending officer opined “neither God – nor the government of Kuwait -will permit this bank to fail,” a testament to the IBK’s creditworthiness which certainly made sense to me.

More important, living in Bahrain meant that much of the Arab world, including Oman, the Yemen, Iraq and Syria, lay just a short air journey from my new home.

Having seen Syria’s largest cities, Damascus and Aleppo, and the Crusaders castles that once dominated western Syria, my wife and I were keen to visit Palmyra, the oasis town which served for centuries as a caravan stop for travelers heading to the Euphrates and points further east. To get there we hopped the Homs to Deir az-Zor bus and asked the driver to drop us in Tudmor, “the city of dates,” Palmyra’s name in Arabic.

To visit the ruins, most of which date to Hellenistic and Roman times, we hired a motorized agricultural tricycle and seated ourselves uncomfortably in its flatbed. After completing our tour of the town’s monuments and palm groves, our driver took us up to the Qala’at ibn Maan, a 16th Century Arab castle which afforded a fine view over Palmyra and the surrounding ground.

From the castle’s ramparts I was surprised to see patches of green spotting the stony desert and the occasional black Bedouin tent. Our guide explained that for much of the year Syria’s Bedouin lived on the edges of populated areas finding what employment they could, but after the rains they would take their sheep and goats into the desert and live a nomadic existence, if only for a few months.

I haven’t thought much about our visit to Palmyra and Syria’s Bedouin in a long time. Very likely the trip would have fallen permanently down the memory hole but for Israel’s recent highly publicized intent, the Prawer Plan, which is now on hold, to displace Israel’s Bedouin inhabitants of the Negev, destroy their towns, villages and encampments and settle Jewish Israelis in their places or convert their lands to forestry preserves or artillery ranges. I also began to wonder, the death of Nelson Mandela perhaps stimulating my imagination, whether the homes for the newly dispossessed Arabs would resemble the Bantustans of Apartheid South Africa, the political objective clearly being the same in both examples of ethnic cleansing.

The most outrageous aspect of what the Israelis are planning is that the Bedouin targeted for removal are all Israeli citizens, being push aside against their will and having little legal means to resist what is clearly a gross violation of their political, civil and property rights. Being a citizen of the Middle East’s only democracy apparently doesn’t mean much if you aren’t Jewish.

But it struck me that there is nothing anomalous about what is happening to the Arabs of the Negev. Jews did not come to Palestine to share power, or anything else, with the natives. Zionism was conceived as an antidote to European anti-Semitism. The uninvited and unwanted Europeans’ objective of creating a Jewish commonwealth and eventually a Jewish state meant Zionism had to dispossess the Palestinian Arabs. Thus Zionism is an inherently racist formulation claiming the right to replace Palestine’s indigenous population, which had inhabited the land for centuries, with Europeans who may or may not be the decedents of the ancient Hebrews who inhabited part of Palestine 2000 years ago.

In any event, today Uncle Sam is Israel’s protector and shill. We obtain virtually nothing in return except the hatred of a billion Muslims. It is possible, I suppose, to find some amusement in the daily spectacle of John Kerry running around madly under the rather bizarre misapprehension that Israel’s settler dominated government has the slightest intention of allowing the establishment of a Palestinian state. Zionism from day one has sought to prevent the Palestinians from obtaining political power. As the Arabs like to say, correctly, Kerry is just “baking stones.”

Even more amusing is Thomas Friedman’s take on Israeli-Palestinian peace talks. He approvingly quotes Ari Shavits’ crazy assertion that “it is the Palestinians’ responsibility to overcome the painful past, lean forward and not become addicted to victimhood.” Has it escaped Mr. Friedman and Mr. Shavits that Israel is continuing the colonization of the West Bank, preparing to dispossess its Arab citizens in the Negev and maintaining the siege of 1.2 million Palestinians in Gaza where conditions are so bad that sewage is literally running in the streets?

It is a little difficult “to escape the painful past” when Israel acts as it always has. If there is a crisis in Zionism, it exists only in the minds of a few commentators here in the United States. There is no crisis in Tel Aviv.

Finally a word about victimhood and its uses: Am I the only observer to note that the Israelis and their friends in this country routinely employ reminiscences of Nazi genocide as a political weapon and fund raising tool? And that while “anti-Semite” used to refer to people who dislike Jews, now is employed to attack people Jews dislike?


John Taylor lived and worked in the Middle East for a number of years as an archaeologist, banker and international civil servant. He worked for a major US bank in New York, Paris, Athens and London and is a graduate of the Universities of Chicago and Cambridge.

• Category: Foreign Policy • Tags: Israel, Palestine 
Hide 7 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
  1. KA says: • Website

    Prayer plan is not an isolated anomalous expression of the Israeli behaviors. It is very much the routine expression of the Zionism’s housekeeping DNA. From the very outset Zionism set its eye on the ever lasting possibility of Eretz Israel coming to fruition from a launching pad in the heart of Arab in course of time through combination of war ,deception,unbalanced and partial negotiation,forcing of treaties and show of force . All it needed an idea , something with no overt sinister motive that would let anybody in on its actua plan. It was Jewish home ( that would not violate rights of the existing native) between Balfour and the early Zionist that changed to Jewish Commonwealth, which would change the nomenclature again to some kind of federation, actual partition of the same land where Jewish home was considered some. 30 yrs ago in 1917 . State of Israel would be the on next follow up visit through non binding illegal UN general assembly in 1947 ,through shrewd maneuvering of the poor African,Asian,and Latin American countries with bribe and threat . All along ,in the process,the. Home managed to add acreage around its perimeter. If Negev were left out,US .’s electioral issues could change it through some discreet negotiations between Weizmann and the powerful victor left standing after ww2. Even the victor has its dark corners like the vanquished that is susceptible to bribibings. Truman gets bribed by Zionist . Truman in return bribes the world not keen to agree to creation of Israel. That modes operandi has not changed much. Israel bribes and threatens the Congressmen and the Senators who in return do same to the world. All is in order to change State of Israel to Eretz Israel . To nullify any claims of the Natives ( as was enshrined even in the corrupt colonial legacy of world view of Balfour) ,Israel will have to be referred to as Jewish State. Natives could not return and could not enjoy same rights as the Zionist would in Jewish State. The natives can only trek out . To get to Jewish State , a simple move would suffice. Israeli Ambassador David Ivry , had to ask the aide to C Powell to slip the word in Powell ‘s speech without Powell noticing the dirty tricks that would shape the post Camp David one sided,partial,unbalanced dressing down also known as peace process .All Israel needed a Prawer plan,other would follow suit by war or by deception and the war would be forced through deception.

  2. Don Nash says: • Website

    ‘Final solutions’ are always so problematic. One simply can’t paint lipstick on that murderous pig and expect the world to politely ask for a dance. Friedman is a well paid shill. He is a willfully blind shill but, he is well paid and that’s probably all that matters. Well for Friedman anyway.

  3. Mr. Taylor, If you are going to appropriate lines from Joe Sobran, at least give an attribution. Re: And that while “anti-Semite” used to refer to people who dislike Jews, now is employed to attack people Jews dislike?

  4. SJ says:

    Important points. Land seizure is a crime, even under Israeli law! When will justice be served?

  5. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Selective memory is an amazing thing. Voluntary selective memory in this case…

  6. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    Americans rarely learn about the Palestinian struggles with anything close to a balanced perspective. John Taylor’s account is remarkable in that he lived in the Middle East for a number of years and is able to view the direction and changes in Israeli hard liners as more and more oppressive measures are taken by Zionists against Palestinians while the world either averts their eyes or actively support those measures.

    I am not sure where Thomas Friedman owns property but I am very sure that if it were confiscated and he was only permitted to travel by back roads and be cleared at checkpoints by armed guards he would not be willing to “just get over it.”

    Land seizure is a crime even under Israeli law as SJ notes in his comment. But perhaps Israeli law only applies to Jewish citizens and Arab Israeli citizens need to “just get over it.”

  7. Anonymous • Disclaimer says:

    That’s rich coming from the likes of Friedman who talk about Palestinian ‘victimhood’. Every time Israel is faced with any kind of criticism, however slight, it immediately brings up the Holocaust and it’s always Munich in 1938 all over again.

Current Commenter

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone

 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All John Taylor Comments via RSS
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
Becker update V1.3.2