RSS
The flag on the right is the gay rights/intersex flag, intended to include people even weirder. Intersex includes not only the delusional, but genuine medical intersex cases like Caster Semenya.
On the eve of the 239th anniversary of its Declaration of Independence, the Historic American Nation faces “state conquest”—the replacement of one set of heroes, symbols, narratives, and values by another, lauding what VDARE.com has called “Anti-America”, controlled by a Minority Occupation Government [‘State Conquest in South Africa Today; America Tomorrow by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, August 5, 2019]. Hence our Ruling Class’s outrage at the desecration of a statue of St. George Floyd, in stunning contrast to their complaisance towards and complicity in the recent utter destruction of scores of monuments to honorable, and patriotic, Americans. (See also South Carolina lawyer gets suspension after Facebook post about George Floyd , by Jackie Salo, NY Post, June 28, 2021 ) Increasingly, maintaining a universal “American” identity seems like the new “Lost Cause,” given that even the American flag no longer unites alleged citizens [Endorsing a Call for the New American Flag, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, June 22, 2021]. My conclusion: white Americans needs to secede culturally, and reclaim their symbols, including Old Glory—and Independence Day.
Paul Gottfried famously described the modern post-Western world as moving towards a “secular theocracy.” Thus current battles are battles over blasphemy. Black Lives Matter is clearly something akin to a religion. Indeed, it may actually be a religion, complete with claims of miracles, life-transforming Damascus moments, and a litany of saints and martyrs.
Not a few traditionalist-minded Christians (and at least one pagan) have compared what’s going on to the iconoclasm that ended Greco-Roman paganism in the Roman Empire, when Christians literally ripped down the gods that had once defined classical civilization. I think Michael Brendan Dougherty [Tweet him]misses the moral importance of what’s happening when he claims that “Progressivism Isn’t a New Religion,” [National Review, July 31, 2020]. Edward Dutton is closer to the mark [The Next Great Awakening, Radix, June 27, 2020].
Besides, who can deny that to many nominally Christian clergy, St. George Floyd is more worthy of righteous indignation than blasphemy against Jesus Christ? Topple a statue of Jesus or Junipero Serra and there is no call for a new crusade, just pious mumbling. But St. George Floyd rouses the Church Militant. Mainline churches compete with corporate America when it comes to flying the rainbow flag, the true imperial banner of what Revolver.news’ Darren J. Beattie calls the Global American Empire.
Consider Father James Martin, editor-at-large of the Jesuit magazine America. In an act of almost incomparable blasphemy. Martin directly compared Floyd to Christ [The Holy Spirit is moving us to act against racism, by James Martin, S.J., June 1, 2020]. He’s recently received the support of Pope Francis, who praised him for his “L.G.B.T ministry” [Pope Francis encourages Jesuit Father James Martin in his L.G.B.T. ministry, by Gerard O’Connell, America, June 27, 2021].
In practice, this just means adherence to a new faith—a faith preached not just from the pulpits but from CEOs on Wall Street, the White House, entertainment, and professional sports.
Some might dismiss the new “Woke” religion as simply consumerism with vague moralistic trappings. However, as the blistering reaction against the desecration of the Floyd statue shows, there’s real fervor behind this. Traditional religious institutions have either surrendered to it, or, more commonly, enlisted in the charge.
General Robert E. Lee and General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson were once honored by Americans as model Christian leaders, regardless of their Civil War difference. Today, the Southern Baptist Convention, once the redoubt of Southern Christian conservatism, is trembling before Critical Race Theory.
The desecration of Christian morality and symbols is so common it barely attracts notice. In contrast, putting skidmarks on a rainbow flag on a road can lead to felony charges [Florida truck driver charged with felony after leaving skid marks on rainbow Pride crosswalk, by James Anthony, The Post Millennial, June 20, 2021].
Let’s not kid ourselves that blasphemy charges are only to be found in the Muslim world, or that we don’t have a state religion of our own [Mural depicting Breonna Taylor, George Floyd, others defaced, Associated Press, June 30, 2021]. Even National Cuckview is catching on [In the West, “Incorrect” Speech Is Increasingly Treated as Blasphemy, by Lois McLatchie, June 27, 2021].
The issue is not whether one thinks about homosexuality, Christianity, or correct doctrine. The issue is that certain groups and symbols have sacred significance in the eyes of the Ruling Class and many churches. And others do not.
In the rather bizarre way that progressive dogma operates in practice, even members of “marginalized” groups cease to be part of the Victim Class if they have the “wrong” political beliefs. Peter Thiel is homosexual, but isn’t spared from libelous attacks by Progressive media, the true clerics of the new regime. Andy Ngo is both homosexual and Asian, but fashionable concerns about “anti-Asian” violence mysteriously vanish when he is attacked in the street by (white) antifa.
In my book Conservatism Inc., I recall that the very first act of Leftist violence I personally experienced the night Donald Trump was elected was against a black Trump supporter, who was savagely set upon by a mostly white mob. I found myself (and others, rather more heroically) defending him from being beaten by Antifa.
Thus, the rainbow flag, or the more convoluted version that includes new sexual identities as well as “blacks” and “browns,” doesn’t truly represent groups as such. It represents a political ideology, one that claims to speak in the name of favored groups [It’s Time Black and Brown People Be Included in the Pride Flag, by Nico Lang, Them, June 1, 2020]
There are always newer versions of the flag, the symbolism I haven’t yet decoded. I don’t need to. It just means no whites and no “pride” in actual Western history, as opposed to cults of grievances by people who shouldn’t be here to begin with.
Obviously, not all non-whites or non-heterosexuals think this weird flag represents them. However, many, probably most, members of those groups do identify with this ideology. And many straight whites also have adopted it as a kind of token of faith.
Thus well-meaning attempts to oppose Critical Race Theory in the name of saving blacks, Hispanics, or Asians from “Marxists” are doomed to failure. Members of these groups have powerful social, political, and financial incentives to along with the State Cult. If you subsidize something, you get more of it—as conservatives understand in economics but apparently not in culture. If opponents of Critical Race Theory don’t oppose it forthrightly on the grounds that it is anti-white and attacks whites as a group, they will fail [Critical Race Theory Is Just Anti-White Racism, by Scott Greer, American Greatness, June 27, 2021].
We are faced with an aggressive and intolerant cult, with the power of the Permanent Government behind it. How should actual Americans, those who aren’t represented by the Global American Empire’s banner, respond?
Back to my conclusion: we reclaim the Stars and Stripes, not just as a symbol of ethnic identity but even as a symbol of religious identity. It arouses the same feelings of spiritual belonging that the “Pride” flag does for its adherents. It encompasses who we are as a people. Attacks on it are attacks on whites as such. They enable and create an atmosphere for anti-white violence, which, despite media gaslighting, is far more prominent than white-on-black crime [Stochastic Terrorism, by Gregory Hood, American Renaissance, December 18, 2018].
Cut the nonsense about at-risk “black bodies.” Blacks mostly face threats from other blacks. In contrast, whites are at risk every day from a campaign of hatred cheered on by Journofa. Given their power, I lay the blood of every crime against whites by nonwhites at the door of the Main Stream Media.
It’s time for righteous indignation of our own.
It’s also time to hold Conservativism Inc to its word. For longer than I’ve been alive, the GOP has advanced proposals to ban flag burning. President Donald J. Trump even mentioned it late in his administration, advancing a constitutional amendment [Trump throws support behind “no brainer” measure to ban burning of American flag, by Tal Axelrod, The Hill, June 15, 2019].
Below, a Tweet he issued in 2015:
Needless to say, nothing came of it—just as so little came from so many grand pronouncements and pledges of action.
Yet there is a way forward besides a constitutional amendment. We already have seen that the destruction of certain symbols, flags, and even marks on the road are considered “hate crimes.” Why not the American flag? Why not statues of American heroes?
Indeed, why not the Confederate Battle Flag, which is simply the flag of the white South? Surely this population deserves to have its identity protected just like any non-white minority group or American Indian tribe.
And surely whites throughout American territory, who see the U.S. flag as uniquely the flag of the nation, not just the government, deserve to have their identity protected.
Burning the American flag may be constitutionally protected “speech.” But burning a rainbow flag should be constitutionally protected “speech” too. Yet, somehow, it’s not.
Let’s be fair. If someone walks into a black community and burns the black nationalist flag in front of them, he is deliberately insulting them and inciting confrontation. Perhaps it shouldn’t be illegal, but it de facto is.
But is it not true that when blacks do the same to the American flag, they are equally picking a fight?
White Americans must demand that their symbols be protected. We are under threat—and it is deliberate. The American flag is our flag.
Some prominent BLM activists admit as much, which is why they want it redesigned. Give them their wish. If this requires that we need some new “official” government flag designed by some Affirmative Action celebrity, so be it [It was used as a weapon at the insurrection: Macy Gray on her quest to re-design the American flag and her vision for a country where everyone is ‘cool’ with each other, Insider, June 29, 2021].
It will mean nothing to anyone. However, the real American flag will mean something to Historic American Nation.
Is there not one Republican in Congress who will stand up for Old Glory? I don’t have any particular legislation in mind, but it would raise the question of why certain flags and symbols can be destroyed with impunity while others cannot. It would raise the question of why the so-called “marginalized” groups are in fact those who now receive racial socialist legally-mandated privileges and set-asides from the federal regime. Finally, it will raise the true National Question once and for all—who is American, and who is not.
If we are to be an empire of squabbling tribes, I want the symbols and interests of my tribe protected. If no politicians are willing to do that, despite countless years of chest beating about patriotism, I suggest they’ve lost the consent of the governed.
If that’s the case, perhaps new political approaches are necessary—including creating new institutions that more legitimately reflect the interests of the Historic American Nation. After all, American conservatives should remember that the oldest tradition of our people is revolution.
In the Anglo-American tradition, revolution is launched not to destroy the social order or property, but to preserve the liberties and hierarchy that are inseparable from our collective existence as a people and the individual blessings that make our lives worth living.
Old Glory represents that. If the GOP can’t even defend that most elemental of symbols, then we shouldn’t count on them to defend our borders, our freedoms, or anything else of consequence.
And perhaps we should raise a new standard to which the wise and honest can repair, from a new redoubt that will rally all patriots of good will.
James Kirkpatrick [Email him |Tweet him @VDAREJamesK] is a Beltway veteran and a refugee from Conservatism Inc. His latest book is Conservatism Inc.: The Battle for the American Right. Read VDARE.com Editor Peter Brimelow‘s Preface here.
English
Arabic
Chinese (Simplified)
Dutch
French
German
Hebrew
Hindi
Italian
Japanese
Korean
Persian
Polish
Portuguese
Russian
Spanish
Swedish
Turkish
Vietnamese
A very good article,that raises more than a few very good questions.Freedom?
One query I have is that of the religions contradicting their own scriptures.Peace?
I see hypocrisy is a major tenant of most faiths, but this inverted reality knows
no bounds and has been torturing humanity for as long as I can remember.Love?
Separating church and state into a myriad of warring occult “beliefs” isn’t working.
By now,how many people on planet earth have learned to despise our flag?Billions?
What does it really represent?Independence and unity,or divine dominance?
“In practice, this just means adherence to a new faith—a faith preached not just from the pulpits but from CEOs on Wall Street, the White House, entertainment, and professional sports.”
I don’t think it’s a “new faith” at all. Black Lives Matter would never have gotten off the ground if it wasn’t first put ON the ground by the ruling elites, then stroked and caressed by lackeys in the media and the corporate world.
The ruling elites paid for and supplied ISIS in the Middle East in order to achieve their goals. They’ve done the same thing with Black Lives Matter and Antifa in the Middle West. These outfits are nothing more than useful battering rams.
If anything, this is the ruling elite desperately clinging to their “old faith” of globalization and plans for a one-world government.
Whitey doesn’t want to play ball, they want their country back, so the elites have rolled out the rainbow paint and knocked over statues.
“…certain groups and symbols have sacred significance in the eyes of the Ruling Class and many churches. And others do not.”
All this “progressive” nonsense is just smoke and mirrors. Sacred significance? Ha! The elites could care less about any of this. What they DO care about is maintaining their power and wealth, the status quo, and they’re using this nonsense as a weapon.
Democrat and Republican elites are on the same page. There is no real dissent. These people don’t care about their country or its people. They care about themselves. Self-centered, narcissistic, greedy, unpatriotic, cowardly scoundrels who’ve wrapped themselves in barbed wire fencing.
Good article, though. I agree with your sentence: “It’s time for righteous indignation of our own.” But it should be directed at the Ruling Class.
Yesterday the government wanted your photo.
Today the government wants your fingerprints.
Tomorrow the government will want your DNA.
Next week the government will want you to register your guns
Next month the government will confiscate your guns.
Next year the government will send you to the concentration camps.
How much are you going to take?
Americans should go hardcore about resisting oppression now.
The police state doesn’t keep you safe. Tyranny actually increases danger because it gives people a false sense of security and leads to more terrorism. The government takes away your right protect yourself, but the state won’t protect you.
The main point of the police state is to crush resistance to the 1%
If there is TSA groping and NSA wiretapping then why is there still terrorism?
Americans should start wearing wigs, disguises, bandages, beards, hats, sunglasses, head scarves, and surgical masks.
Americans should report everyone to the police as terrorists to keep the police busy and to make a mockery of the police state while waking people up about the danger of tyranny.
Americans should get fake IDs and sell, trade, or give away like candy copies of their birth certificates, Social Security cards, passports, and driver licenses.
Americans should smuggle to avoid taxes and tariffs and make victimless gun possession, prostitution, drugs, licensing, and gambling laws unenforceable.
No one rules if no obeys.
The government and illegal immigrants don’t obey the law, so why should Americans obey the law and pay taxes that they didn’t vote for?
The USA is no longer a constitutional representative republic. Everything is illegal and everyone is a criminal. Obeying the law is difficult when the laws constantly change, the laws are contradictory, and our overlords don’t even tell us what the laws are.
Many Americans feel powerless to do anything about the expanding police state, but they can still fight back.
What if Americans just dropped out and stopped supporting US wars, debt, and tyranny?
What if everyone became stateless?
https://www.tucsonweekly.com/tucson/stateless-fear-an-asylum-story/Content?oid=7271045
What if everyone stopped using their name?
What if everyone stopped using banks and started buying gold, bartering, and hiding cash?
What if everyone bought farms using anonymous private shell corporations?
https://boldanddetermined.com/how-own-your-house-car-anonymously/
What if everyone stopped driving cars and getting driver licenses?
What if everyone stopped using phones and the Internet?
What if everyone stopped flying?
What if everyone stopped paying taxes?
What if everyone stopped joining the military?
What if everyone stopped voting?
What if everyone avoided being photographed?
What if everyone took responsibility for themselves and refused to sign up for Obamacare instead of relying on the government?
Maybe the elites want everyone to give up, but at least we won’t be paying them.
Think.
Pass the word.
You are correct and have excellent ideas. Unfortunately you forgot that your target audience, white people living in America, are abject pussies. TPTB won’t have too much trouble rounding up the people targeted for relocation camps. There will be plenty of “goodwhites” who’ll sign up to drive the trains, not understanding that they too will one day get off the train permanently.
Let us not forget that Jews own the media and the politicians. It is Jews who are the big trouble-makers.
Unfortunately, you are correct.
Most whites ARE “sheeple” and will gladly get on the trains to the FEMA camps when the great American experiment in civilization falls apart.
However, there will be “pockets of (passive) resistance–Americans who ARE aware, self-reliant, having established informal and formal networks, purposely avoiding government and law enforcement infiltration, and will be able to live a somewhat normal life, under the radar.
The “key” is to avoid being noticed, appearing to “go along” while doing what one can to “monkey-wrench” the system.
Best regards,
((Jewry)) is making a mockery of Western enlightenment values by making Americans choke on them, and getting rich doing it. The useful idiots they’re using — various left-wing activist groups, ethnic groups, LGBTQ groups, Globalist US corporations and right-wing institutional groups like the U.S. Military and Christian Zionists — are playing right into their hands, but simply can’t help themselves. Their pathologies are too deep.
There is one thing and one thing only that will save this Union: an “anti-Semitic” mass movement that wipes away the Judeofascists and their stooges from left to right, and sends them scurrying to Israel or wherever. But it most likely will never happen.
Again, the Jewish-cultivated pathologies are too deep. They’re masters at divide and rule and using goyim pathologies against them.
But there are ((Jewish)) pathologies as well that will be exploited in short order, in this war of all-against-all that the Judeofascists are stirring, as they stirred WW1 and WW2.
Ignoring the Judeofascists isn’t an option unless you want WW3. Targeting them is the ONLY option if you don’t.
‘The “key” is to avoid being noticed, appearing to “go along” while doing what one can to “monkey-wrench” the system.’
Which is why the NSA, Military and FBI all are told (and are happy to go along with) that white people who care about their future are America’s biggest problem. These institutions have the ability and resources to track and prosecute/arrest/detain/remove any of us who meet the definition of “domestic terrorist”. It’s hard to stay under the radar when a surveillance state has a target on your back and is willing to prosecute the most minor of transgressions.
I partially agree with you that the federal “alphabet agencies” have the ultimate power to go after those who meet the definition of “domestic terrorists” (white heterosexual males) but ((they)) cannot catch all of us.
The amount of information that ((they)) have to sift through and digest make discovery and infiltration much more difficult.
You are correct in your statement that ((they)) would prosecute whites for minor transgressions–not even under “color of law” as the “law” is what ((they)) say it is.
However, guerrilla tactics have been used by small groups throughout history to defeat numerically and technologically superior forces. Small unit operations do have their advantages.
Simple expedients and ingredients can be used to defeat occupying forces. The largest and most destructive aspect is infiltration, which must be resisted at all costs.
Regards,
Without labeling something correctly, such as labeling Critical Race Theory nothing other than anti-white racism, every attempt to protest and hope for change by calling it something else will fail. If doing so is left completely to the Republican party leadership, goodnight, it will NEVER BE DONE. The Republican party RINO leadership, beginning with Mitch McConnell, would rather spend 10 years in jail, than name CRT for what it actually is, anti-white racism.
Thank you. The Democratic and Republican parties have thrown history out of the window and proclaimed their own supremacy, in its stead.
Very interesting observation and a great article. Thanks, I really appreciate your writing.
Well, what do you expect when whites ceded power to hostile Jews long ago?
If a church hands over the keys to a bunch of drug-addled homo degenerates, don’t be surprised if homos throw a big ‘gay’ party.
Btw, it’s about time we had Two Americas. Let the trad America keep the Old Flag, and let the Fad America use the new globo-homo flag. Why pretend US is still one nation.
But the Trad America must be free of evil Jewish nuttery. Patriotic Jews should play a part, but all the nut Jews must go with Fad America.
James Kirkpatrick: “I think Michael Brendan Dougherty [Tweet him]misses the moral importance of what’s happening when he claims that “Progressivism Isn’t a New Religion,” [National Review, July 31, 2020]. Edward Dutton is closer to the mark [The Next Great Awakening, Radix, June 27, 2020]. Besides, who can deny that to many nominally Christian clergy, St. George Floyd is more worthy of righteous indignation than blasphemy against Jesus Christ?”
Despite Kirkpatrick’s somewhat murky phrasing, it’s good to see that both Dougherty and Dutton agree on the Christian origins of this movement, the former saying rightly that it isn’t a NEW religion (it’s a variant of the old one, Christianity), and the latter drawing the connection between this incarnation and previous Christian revival movements of prior centuries called “Great Awakenings”, and even calling it a Christian heresy. It’s also good to see Kirkpatrick admitting that Wokeism has also been endorsed by all the Christian mainstream churches. I’ve been saying both of these things for years, but mostly I’ve been ignored. “Traditional” Christians, a distinct minority among self-identified Christians, enjoy framing the issue as one of a rival religion that has inexplicably sprung up out of nowhere. This has two immediate benefits: It allows them to call for a revival of “real” Christianity, by which they mean of course their own version of the religion, and also to feel persecuted, which is very important to Christians of all types, recalling as it does Jesus’ own supposed persecution, and thereby implying they are Christ-like and virtuous. Wokeism too shares in this. Its entire premise is that all of their constituent minorities are persecuted by the evil majority, especially heterosexual white men, who are their devil figure.
Dutton’s overall position though strikes me as particularly wrongheaded. Although he acknowledges the Christian origins of Wokeism, he ascribes its rise to genetic changes in the population rather than the fact that it’s simply the logical working out of what’s implied in the Christian creed itself. Given the substantial role that the Great Awakenings of the previous centuries played in freeing the negro and giving him equal citizenship to whites, it’s clear that genetic changes favoring Dutton’s “spiteful mutants”, if they took place at all, can’t be the whole story. Dutton thinks these changes didn’t start until the twentieth century. He might want to crack a history book sometime and check into a little affair in America called the Civil War, aka the war to free the slaves. Woke American Christian whites of the nineteenth century were even more insane than the current ones, willing to kill any number of their fellow whites to achieve their lunatic ambition of freeing the negro and making of him a voter and citizen with full equality. In this they of course succeeded, and they’ve never recanted. No move has ever been made by them to repeal this mistake, and today’s Wokeism is only more progress in the same direction.
It is indeed a Christian heresy IMCO. Of course, heresies are heresies precisely because they are NOT the genuine article.
Wokeism is a variant of the old Judaizing Pelagian heresy (salvation by obedience, discipline, and, above all, self-purification.
Rosie: “[Wokeism] is indeed a Christian heresy IMCO. Of course, heresies are heresies precisely because they are NOT the genuine article.”
This kind of objection leads to the absurd conclusion that most self-identified Christians, who are members of mainstream churches which endorse anti-racism and substantially agree with the Woke agenda, aren’t “real” Christians at all. It also treacherously implies that there exists some kind of “genuine article”; that there’s only one correct way to understand and practice Christianity, when in reality all we have are variant interpretations of one rather ambiguous set of doctrines based on still more ambiguous statements by its probably fictional founder.
Wars between Christians have usually been quite vicious. If Christians excel in anything, it’s in hating one another, usually for what, to outsiders, appear to be the most trivial reasons. I can but echo the sentiment expressed by that great Christian monk Arnaud Amalric who, when it was pointed out to him that “real” Christians sharing his point of view were mixed in with the heretics, replied “Kill them all and let God sort them out.”
American whites who don’t hate themselves are being conquered by a revolutionary Jewish led government and Jew controlled media apparatus. It’s now reached the point where Trump is considered Saddam Hussein and his supporters are equally guilty and we are being treated just like the conquered Iraqi Sunnis were in 2003.
I hope this isn’t lost among the patriotard types who whooped and cheered when we invaded Iraq and did the wave when we rounded up Saddam Hussein supporters and put them in Abu Ghraib prison. The January 6th protesters are being held in Abu Ghraib like conditions in the D.C. prisons.
Thanks for demonstrating your lack of credibility with the stupid statement that Jesus Christ is “probably fictional.” Even if you refuse to accept Christian sources, Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, and Suetonius – all non-Christians writing within a few decades of Jesus’s death – record that he was a real historical person.
No serious contemporary historian, regardless of their personal religiosity, believes that Jesus Christ was not a real historical figure.
Admiral Asshat: “Thanks for demonstrating your lack of credibility with the stupid statement that Jesus Christ is “probably fictional.” Even if you refuse to accept Christian sources, Josephus, Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, and Suetonius – all non-Christians writing within a few decades of Jesus’s death – record that he was a real historical person.”
None of these people you mention claimed to have met Jesus or even personally seen him. There are no eyewitness accounts of his existence at all. There’s only hearsay of dubious value, some or all of which are Christian interpolations (i.e., forgeries).
Admiral Asshat: “No serious contemporary historian, regardless of their personal religiosity, believes that Jesus Christ was not a real historical figure.”
You’re obviously not familiar with the work of Dr. Richard Carrier.
Video Link
The treasonous politicians will only act when their jooish handlers tell them to.
The day of the rope cant get here soon enough. Purge of jooish influence and race traitors.
You are correct. All of these joos and traitors can be gotten to. The recent HX has proven that no one can be protected. Not judges, jurors or even Tucker or Supreme Court Justices.
The jooish antifa has proven that. Especially against YT. YT is the most dangerous predator on earth when he wants to be. Or has to be.
Joos have constructed a house of cards obviously based on lies (holohoax, equality, white privilege). Truth will emerge like it has for the joo 109 X before. This time will be fatal. (((They))) will be cleansed from white countries.
Watch how fast they scapegoat blacks when it starts happening.
Both Protestantism and post-Vatican II Roman Catholicism have been co-opted by jews.
Protestantism has always had a “soft spot” for jews whereas Roman Catholicism was “infected” in the 1960s with the imposition of the false judaic doctrines of the “Vatican II Ecumenical Council”.
There used to be a time when jews were recognized as being “Christ killers” by both Protestants and Catholics, but no longer.
Add to that, the false religion of “holocaustianity” has been added to the mix, further poisoning Christianity…
‘Let his blood be on us and our children… give us the thief Barabas.’ And when treated as anti-Christians, they write a Talmud that specifically teaches Jews a Dual Morality… one morality for us chosen folks, and a different morality for our treatment of Christians… i.e., any action is ‘moral’ if it benefits Jews, in any way. As E. Michael Jones relays the pre-Vatican II position – ‘no one may harm the Jews, but they cannot be allowed to subvert Christian culture.’