The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Kacey Gunther Archive
The Zionist Shadows of Woodrow Wilson During World War I and Its Aftermath in Paris
Dissecting the Treaty of Versailles’s "Big Four"
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

In a Daily News Bulletin issued February 4, 1924, by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, Jewish leaders across the nation publicly mourned the passing of former war-time president Woodrow Wilson, the self-described “staunch friend of the Jews.” The telegram goes on to commemorate Wilson’s “intense interest in Jewish questions” by reviewing his political deeds as president, appointing Louis D. Brandeis to the Supreme Court Bench despite vigorous opposition from the Court itself and urging the approval of the British Mandate over Palestine following the Balfour Declaration.[1]Jewish Telegraphic Agency, INC., “Leaders Pay Tribute To The Passing Of A Great Statesman,” Daily News Bulletin, last modified February 4, 1924, https://pdfs.jta.org/1924/02-04_025.pdf.

Nearly a century later, this adulation of America’s twenty-eighth president continues to be echoed by prominent Jewish leaders and intellectuals. In Pulitzer Prize-winning biographer A. Scott Berg’s book, “Wilson,” this formidable Head of State has influenced the decision-making of each succeeding American president up to former President Donald Trump. Furthermore, Berg argues that Wilson is the most pro-Jewish president in US history.[2]Galia Licht, “Who Was the Most Pro-Jewish U.S. President? Woodrow Wilson, Obviously, ” Haaretz.com, September 25, 2013, https://www.haaretz.com/life/books/premium-which-pre...40052. This is attributed to Wilson’s breakaway from American isolationism, which guided the nation’s political function on the world stage for a hundred and twenty-five years.

Six months after winning a second consecutive term as president on the Democratic ticket (the first time since Andrew Jackson’s second term), Wilson asked the legislature to declare war on Germany in an imperative speech to Congress on April 2, 1917. His justification was to answer the question of the role the United States would play in the world – it was America’s duty to ensure that “the world must be safe for democracy.” This rhetoric has been repeated repeatedly by American politicians at all levels in subsequent generations, followed by military action.

As Wilson plunged the nation into Europe’s devastating four-year war which wrought 17 million deaths and 25 million wounded, he often portrayed himself as the beacon of progressive ideals, a missionary of self-determination, democracy, and multilateralism to the world and, by involuntary extension after the First World War, its conquered colonies from the ashes of the defeated German and Ottoman Empires. The question is on whose behalf and if foreign elements were acting abroad, at home, or both.

For example, it is entirely plausible today to assert that the invasion of Iraq was contrived almost entirely by high-ranking Jewish Zionists in the Bush administration for the long-anticipated purpose of removing Israel’s arch-nemesis at the time—Saddam Hussein—in another mission to destroy the Jewish State’s Arab neighbors and assert dominion over the region.[3]Casey Titus, “History’s Deceptive Buildup Against Saddam Hussein,” The Duran, accessed March 22, 2021, https://theduran.com/history/deceptive-buildup-again...usseinThe catch was that Israel would not be fronting the 2 trillion dollar bill and sacrificing 190,000 lives; that was left to the Americans.[5]Paulina Cachero, “According to reports, US taxpayers have paid an average of \$8,000 per person and more than \$2 trillion in total for the Iraq War alone.”Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/us-taxpayers-spent-8...020-2, last modified February 6, 2020.

Eighty years prior, before the founding of modern Israel, this similarly established Zionist paradigm in America’s political institutions persuaded the Wilson administration to do the same. Instead of winning the hearts and minds of the public through unbridled war propaganda and an unprecedented national tragedy for the specific purpose of creating a homeland for Jews, a cooperative network of Zionists in Britain, Russia, and the United States worked towards this goal through the imperial hand of the idealistic Wilson.

Jews long held Woodrow Wilson in high regard for his liberal politics and inclination to address their requests. When the former governor of New Jersey first ran for president in 1912, Boston’s Jewish Advocate published a political ad, pressing readers to join with “practically all the great Jewish leaders throughout the country” in endorsing him.[6]Jonathan D. Sarna, “Woodrow Wilson: A Jewish Hero.”What Should We Do with His Racism? ” The Forward, November 15, 2016, https://forward.com/opinion/450092/woodrow-wilson-wa...cism/?These leaders included financier Jacob H. Schiff, philanthropist Nathan Straus, and Ambassador Henry Morgenthau. At the time, beginning in 1906, the United States was faced with the difficult task of admitting roughly ten million immigrants, mainly from Eastern and Southern Europe.

This sudden influx overwhelmed several facets of the native populace, whereby the “restrictionists” emerged with literary test campaigns as a method by which to curtail subsequent waves of immigration. The American Jewish Committee was the most active and significant anti-restricionist lobby group in each of these battles through delay and outright blockage of the legislative passage. During his tenure as president, Wilson assisted by vetoing three restrictive measures he believed were aimed principally at Jews before being overridden by Congress. The AJC’s particular fixation on the plight of Russian-Jewish immigrants caused an extensive lobbying endeavor in America’s foreign policy.[7]Joseph Rappaport, “The American Yiddish Press and the European Conflict in 1914.” 113–28 in Jewish Social Studies 19, no. 3/4 (1957).http://www.jstor.org/stable/4465551.

This emerging conflict of interest was sidestepped upon the outbreak of the First World War. The intense pogroms and anti-Jewish sentiment of Czar Nicholas II caused the American Jewish community to side more with Germany than with Allied forces. Immigrant Jews even prayed that the “more civilized” Germans would liberate their suppressed brethren in Eastern Europe from Russian harassment. In the Yiddish press, the enemy was portrayed vividly as: “The Jews support Germany because Russia bathes in Jewish blood.” Who will dare say that it is a crime for Jews to hate their torturers, their oppressors and murderers?”[8]Rappaport, page 116. The German Foreign Office took advantage of this position in order to maintain its favor in the Jewish community; in September, 1914, Dr. Isaac Straus was even sent to the United States to manage propaganda work among Jews for the German Information Bureau located in New York.

The German Information Bureau, despite official American neutrality, could not be more pleased following its meeting with the Jewish press. This came at a time when most Americans would rather side with French and British allies out of strong ancestral ties: “So far as our relations with the very influential Jewish press are concerned, they are in good shape, and will be carefully nourished. It is critical in this regard that all news pertaining to them elevate Jewish self-esteem; for example, the appointment of Jewish officers, the installation of Jewish professors, and honors bestowed upon Jewish professors should all be sent here.”

While war efforts were being bolstered in the Jewish press, American Zionist leaders adopted a policy of neutrality for the time being, stemming from Theodor Herzl’s stance on non-partisanship in a neutral country as war raged. During this time, it was Britain’s Grand Fleet that managed the naval blockade of supplies into Germany, starving 400,000 German civilians to death. For the first two years of the First World War, German war efforts nevertheless proved supreme thanks to their unexpected arsenal of submarines against the wealthier, more weaponized Allied Powers. Imperial German forces nearly captured Paris, expelled Russia from the war, and drove the French Army into mutiny, all before a Western Front victory was barely in their grasp by 1918. On three separate occasions throughout 1916, Germany pursued avenues to negotiate for peace, but both British and French resolve maintained that peace would only come about upon Germany’s defeat.[9]Jon Guttman, “Did the Germans Try to Make Peace in 1916?,” HistoryNet, https://www.historynet.com/did-the-germans-try-to-ma...6.htm, last modified December 18, 2014.

Zionist leaders eventually came to the realization that Allied victory meant Russia’s influence would be amplified in the Near East. In early 1915, a conditional Entente agreement even allocated Constantinople to Russia. This posed an issue as Constantinople rested in the possession of the Ottoman Empire, an ally of Germany and Austro-Hungary. High-profile Zionists had their eyes eastbound on Palestine as a suitable place to lay the groundwork for a Jewish homeland. In 1896, the father of Zionism, Theodor Herzl, approached Sultan Abdul Hamid II and offered to pay off the Ottoman debt in exchange for a charter that permitted Zionists access to Palestine.[10]Elis Gjevori, “How Theodor Herzl Failed to Convince the Ottomans to Sell Palestine,” https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/how-theodor-herzl-...46991, last modified May 25, 2021. The Sultan outright refused.

The prospect of a promised land for Jews never escaped one highly influential man’s attention — Justice Louis D. Brandeis. Through Brandeis, Zionist leadership “passed into American hands by default.” He was considered one of the men of “light and lead” on whom Wilson relied.[11]Adler, Selig. “The Palestine Question in the Wilson Era.” Jewish Social Studies 10, no. 4 (1948): 303–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615334. Born in 1856 to secular Jewish immigrant parents from the present-day Czech Republic, he graduated from Harvard Law School at the age of 20 and settled in Boston to open a law firm focused on progressive social causes. In his early career, he was distinguished for his public advocacy against powerful corporations, mass consumerism, monopolies, and public corruption while advising methods to restrict the influence of big banks and money trusts in his collection of essays, Other People’s Money and How the Bankers Use It.[12]Jewish Virtual Library, “Louis D. Brandeis,” last modified January 2016, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/louis-d-brandeis.

These progressive positions would later be taken up by Democratic candidate Woodrow Wilson on the larger question of the role of the national government and the future of the American economic system. By that time, Louis Brandeis was head of both the Federation of American Zionists and the American Zionist Movement after meeting the English-born Zionist leader and close associate of the late Herzl, Jacob de Haas. The prominent Jewish lawyer was converted into a staunch Zionist under the mentorship of leading Zionists during that time, such as Aaron Aaronsohn, Horace Kallen, Shmarya Levin, Bernard Rosenblatt, and Nahum Sokolow.[13]Jonathan D. Sarna, “Louis D. Brandeis: Zionist Leader,” Brandeis University, last updated in 1992, https://www.brandeis.edu/hornstein/sarna/americanjew...holar. From August 31, 1914, to October 1, 1916, Brandeis was also chairman of the Provisional Executive Committee for general Zionist affairs.

The Brandeis-Wilson coalition was the start of a political partnership with far-reaching consequences on the international scene until Wilson’s death. The opportunity for career advancement presented itself so visibly that Brandeis switched parties and carried his advocacies, including Zionism, into American political institutions as a high-ranking political figure with direct access to the newly elected U.S. president.

Upon Wilson’s presidential win in November, he noted to Brandeis, “You were yourself a great part of the victory.” During Wilson’s first year as president, Brandeis was instrumental in the behind-the-scenes creation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913. The ambitious president attempted to make Brandeis his Attorney General and later Secretary of Commerce, but intense resistance from corporate executives forced Wilson to rescind his plan to make the renowned radical part of his cabinet. Instead, he nominated him to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1916, and he was sworn in amid a public outcry.

At a time when correspondence between Zionist leaders and the American president was steadily rising, as the Great War intensified in its first year, Brandeis approached Wilson about Zionist plans, to which Wilson seemed receptive. By 1916, Brandeis established regular contact with the State Department on the future fate of the declining Turkish Empire following the war, with Hungarian-born leading Zionist and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise in communication with Wilson’s chief adviser on European politics and diplomacy during the First World War, Edward Mandell “Colonel” House, on Zionist objectives. Specifically, Wise functioned as an intermediary between Wilson and House from 1916 to 1919. Wise began his Zionist career in the late 1890’s by assisting the movement’s ideological development and organization of its membership. Another acquaintance of Herzl’s, he served as American secretary of the World Zionist Movement and was instrumental in producing the aforementioned Provisional Executive Committee for General Zionist Affairs.[14]American Jewish Archives, “A Finding Aid to the Stephen S. Wise Collection, 1893-1969,” The Jacob Rader Marcus Center of the American Jewish Archives, accessed December 31, 2021, https://collections.americanjewisharchives.org/ms/ms...49.htm

Opposition to American entry into the First World War cut across political, racial, and economic lines. Various factions of society, including socialists, anarchists, syndicalists, pacifists, civil libertarians, Marxists, rural southerners, Canadian and Irish nationalists, and women’s groups, were just some of the small but vocal minorities opposing American militarism. International socialist groups, for example, were keenly aware of the capitalist mobilization the war promised to big business rivals. The working class fought, while the ruling class profited.[15]Catherine Gilchrist, “Socialist Opposition to World War I,” Dictionary of Sydney, last modified in 2014, https://dictionaryofsydney.org/entry/socialist_oppos..._war_i This was America’s first debut as a global military power and pitted citizen against citizen until eventually the government itself grossly violated civil liberties under the Espionage and Sedition Acts.

In 1916, Wilson reignited his bid for re-election through his continued commitment to progressive change by calling for legislation regulating work hours and a minimum wage. Democrats campaigned on the slogan, “He Kept Us Out of War,” insisting to voters that a Republican victory would mean war with Germany. Just four months after his second inauguration, Wilson reneged on his campaign promise of neutrality and officially declared war. By this time, public resistance to this betrayal was minute. The preceding years of preparedness campaigns, patriotic zeal, and heavily propagandized press cycles swayed the consensus into viewing the war as just and necessary. Thousands more dissenters continued to be jailed, silenced, and deported under newly solidified justification.

Shortly after the U.S. entered into the war, the British Foreign Minister, Arthur J. Balfour, arrived in Washington. In a cable, James Rothschild urged Brandeis to discuss Zionism with Balfour on the viability of an English Zionist program to recognize Palestine as the Jewish national homeland. “Unanimous opinion is the only satisfactory solution for Jewish Palestine under British protectorate,” Rothschild explained in a telegram. Russian Zionists fully approve. Public opinion and competent authorities here are favorable… It would greatly help if American Jews would suggest this scheme to their government.[16]Rothschild and Chaim Weizmann to Brandeis (cable), April 21, 1917 (received April 25), Zionist Archives, New York City, Jacob de Haas Archives.The charitable activity of the Zionist movement was over. Now an era of wielding political power has commenced to shift the tide of international conflict under the London-Moscow-New York axis.

Only one month after American entry into the war, Brandeis followed through with Rothschild’s request. Appealing to Wilson’s progressive vision for the globe, Brandeis explained that a Jewish Palestine would fulfill the conditions of the peace settlement Wilson desired; Turkish despotism would be swept aside for a democratic government where economic and cultural development would be undertaken by a historically suppressed people.[17]Lebow, Richard Ned. “Woodrow Wilson and the Balfour Declaration.” The Journal of Modern History, 40, no. 4 (1968): 507 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1878450.In reaction to the Balfour Declaration, Wilson said, “The allied nations, with the fullest concurrence of our government and people, agree that in Palestine shall be laid the foundations of a Jewish Commonwealth.”[18]Jewish Virtual Library, “U.S. Presidential Quotes About Jewish Homeland & Israel,” Jewish Virtual Library, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/u-s-presidentia...brary, accessed December 31, 2021.

Partnered with Brandeis in courting Wilson was the Austrian-born Jewish lawyer and professor, Felix Frankfurter, a lifelong committed Zionist and member of the Zionist Organization of America. Frankfurter became acquainted with Brandeis in the Parushim, a secret Zionist society, reform movement, and arguably the first modern militant Zionist organization in America. Found by their former mentor, Horace M. Kallento, Zionist purpose was “a group much like the Peace Corps, young men and women who saw the Utopian opportunity that existed for the Jewish people in Palestine and who were willing to devote themselves to an ideal.”[19]Schmidt, Sarah. “The ‘Parushim’: A Secret Episode in American Zionist History.” American Jewish Historical Quarterly 65, no. 2 (1975): 122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23880453

The ideological motivations for endorsing Zionism were personal for Wilson as well: “To think that I, the son of the manse, should be able to help restore the Holy Land to its people.” With Wilson formally persuaded, Brandeis passed along the good news via urgent cables to Rothschild in London. Two weeks later, Jacob de Haas, now advisor to Brandeis, cabled Russian born-Zionist leader and future president of the World Zionist Organization, Chaim Weizmann, not only outlining the plan for Palestine but to communicate “an accurate statement of the prevailing sentiment in the United States to be presented to the Allied Governments.”[20]De Haas Archives, Brandeis to Rothschild (cable), May 9, 1917.

President Wilson was later asked directly by the British government about the likelihood of issuing a declaration of sympathy for the Zionist movement. Wilson responded that the time was not ripe. A month later, Wilson placed his full backing behind the affirmation as pressure mounted against Germany’s Turkish ally to make dispensations to the Zionists. The topic of the Balfour Declaration was on the table between the two world powers. Colonel House complained to Wilson in a note: “The Jews from every tribe have descended in force, and they seem determined to break in with a jimmy if they are not let in.”[21]Adle, Selig. “The Palestine Question in the Wilson Era.” Jewish Social Studies 10, no. 4 (1948): 306. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615334.

Brandeis’ influence over Wilson in regards to Zionist ambition could not be understated. Wilson once remarked that it was Brandeis to whom he owed his career. According to Frank Edward Manuel, Wilson’s interest in Zionism and including it as part of his foreign policy was “being slowly nurtured by Louis Brandeis, one of the men who stood closest to him in the early years of the administration and who became the key figure in future American intervention in Palestine.”[22]Ahmed, Hisham H. “From the Balfour Declaration to World War II: The U.S. Stand on Palestinian Self-Determination.” Arab Studies Quarterly 12, no. 1/2 (1990): 9–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41858937.

A roadblock in the way of the highly anticipated declaration was the Counselor to the State Department, Robert Lansing. Lansing was completely bypassed in House and Wilson’s correspondence on the Balfour Declaration. In response, Lansing argued in a letter to Wilson why America must decline Balfour’s promise, noting that, among several reasons, “many Christian sects and individuals would undoubtedly resent turning the Holy Land over to the absolute control of the race credited with the death of Christ,” a flagrant secession from the protracted Christian support for the prophetic restoration of Israel.

Lansing ordered Ambassador Walter Hines Page to investigate and report prudently the British reasons for the Balfour Declaration. In spite of political opposition within the State Department, the declaration was officially signed by Lord Balfour after a two-year process of edits by British and American Zionists and officials. Despite its official status as a British document, it was Brandeis who spearheaded its drafting and application through Wilson.

News rapidly spread worldwide upon the issuance of the Balfour Declaration, with heaps of telegrams addressed to Wilson expressing their gratitude for his contributions. Leaflets were dropped over German and Austrian territory announcing, “The hour of Jewish redemption has arrived…” The Allies are giving the land of Israel to the people of Israel… Will you join them and help to build a Jewish homeland in Palestine? Stop fighting the allies who are fighting for you, for all the Jews… An Allied victory means the Jewish people’s return to Zion.”[23]Brendan Devenney, “Chapter One—Zionism: The Beginning,” Medium, last modified November 2, 2021, https://medium.com/@dubhelloco/chapter-one-b8d8b77b38b8.

By the summer of 1918, Turkish resistance was waning and President Wilson took this time to formally announce his public endorsement of the Balfour Declaration in August. Three months later, Germany was the last of the Central Powers to sign an armistice agreement with the Allies. The war was over. The next battle would be held in Paris.

The ambitions of Wilson’s liberal internationalist foreign policy were outlined in the Fourteen Points and used as the basis of terms for Germany’s surrender at the Paris Peace Conference. The Peace Conference produced five treaties, one of which was the notorious Treaty of Versailles. There were a number of high-profile Jews present, not just in diplomatic positions but in many senior and important functions within the Allied delegations.[24]Levene, Mark. “Nationalism and Its Alternatives in the International Arena: The Jewish Question in Paris, 1919.” Journal of Contemporary History 28, no. 3 (1993): 522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/260644. This included Baron Sonnino for Italy, Edwin Montagu for Britain, Louis Klotz for France, and Paul Mantoux as the interpreter for the “Big Three”—United States, Britain, and France.

Wilson also endorsed Rabbi Wise to promote the Jewish program for Palestine in Paris. Another Zionist delegate was Frankfurter, who was among the nearly one hundred intellectuals that signed a statement of principles for the formation of the League of Free Nations Associations. This formally enacted Wilson’s mission to dispel isolationism in favor of increasing American participation in international affairs.[25]Gunther, Learned Hand: The Man and the Judge, 261.

In the midst of empirical savagery slicing up Germany and parceling out Europe’s colonial holdings, the case for a Jewish homeland in Palestine was presented by a delegation of the Zionist Organization led by Weizmann. The terms of the newly established British Mandate involved promoting Jewish immigration and settlement, suggesting boundaries, self-government, and the assurance of religious liberty.

At the request of President Wilson, Jewish statesman and Wall Street financier Bernard Baruch attended the Paris Peace Conference as an advisor to negotiate a deal with the victorious Allied powers on the destiny of Germany.[26]“BERNARD BARUCH: A PUBLIC MAN’S PRIVATE LIFE,”https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/, n.d.https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/bernardbaruch/world-war-i/. He served as a member of the American Delegation to the Preliminary Peace Conference and on the Committee on Form of Payments of Reparations. Baruch is credited with managing America’s economic mobilization in the First World War while chairman of the War Industries Board. While Baruch opposed the strenuous financial tenets of punishing Germany, he nonetheless attempted to assist the Senate in passing the Treaty of Versailles.

Baruch also played a significant role in securing France’s vote in favor of the Palestine Partition Plan. He swayed their vote by visiting France’s UN delegate and heavily suggesting that failure to support the resolution could result in America withholding desperately needed monetary support as the war devastated France’s financial market.[27]Saul J. Singer, “Bernard Baruch: ‘America First’,” The Jewish Press-Breaking News, Opinions, Analysis and More on Israel and the Jewish World | Last modified March 29, 2017, https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/featur...3/29/.

The renowned English economist, John Maynard Keynes, was also in attendance at the Peace Conference as a delegate of the British Treasury. Disgusted by the ravenous nature of the treaties, particularly the Versailles Treaty, Keynes publicized a negative portrayal of the treaties in his book, The Economic Consequences of the Peace. In response, Baruch paid John Foster Dulles \$10,000 to ghostwrite his own book, The Making of the Reparation and Economic Sections of the Treaty, to counter Keynes by exalting the treaties.[28]Gates Brown, “Baruch, Bernard Mannes | International Encyclopedia of the First World War (WW1),” 1914-1918-Online. WW1 International Encyclopedia, last modified March 16, 2015, https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/ba...annes.

The most significant of American Jewish attendees, however, was Justice Brandeis himself, whose task at the world’s peace tables was to assist Colonel House “in collecting peace data for President Wilson.” The task was clear: “Colonel House will devote his attention to problems concerning the war in the west, while Justice Brandeis will study the near eastern question.” Their work will form the basis for the country’s contention.”[29]Butler Citizen, “Zionist Louis Brandeis Takes Control of the 1919 Paris Peace Conference,” Newspapers.com, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/35334878/zionists-lo...trol/, last modified October 2, 1917.

For a liberal president known for endorsing and exporting democratic ideals even through coercion, its inconsistent implementation was noted during the peace talks and formally addressed on August 28, 1919, through the presentation of the King-Crane Commission. The commission argued that the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine would inevitably lead to an immediate violation of the right of the indigenous Palestinian people to self-determination and deemed the Zionist program incompatible.

The report also stated that meetings with Jewish representatives led them to conclude that “the Zionists looked forward to a practically complete dispossession of the present non-Jewish inhabitants of Palestine through armed forces” and begged the Peace Conference to reject Zionist proposals. The findings of this report were suppressed for three years by Brandeis until after the Peace Accords were passed. Working diligently to ensure the stipulations of the Balfour Declaration were incorporated into the final arrangement was Frankfurter, who found the findings of the commission to “cheat Jewry of Palestine.”[30]Ahmed, 23,

As the dissolution of the former Ottoman Empire began via the Treaty of Sevres, the vehicle for colonizing Palestine as spelled out by the Balfour Declaration was put into effect under the Brandeis-guided Wilson. The Council of the League of Nations and the United States both approved the Mandate for Palestine in July of 1922. It was clear from the beginning that the flagrant denial of self-government for the Palestinian population would continue until the Jews were strong enough to take the reins of government in the region.

For four days in April 1922, Congress debated resolutions brought forth to reaffirm the colonial implications of the Balfour Declaration as urged by Zionists. One of the vocal participants of its opposition was Professor Edward Bliss Reed, who testified in a prophetic hearing before Congress about the outcome of what American support entailed: “If you indorse the Balfour declaration, you are caught absolutely in the mandate…” What I want to warn you against is getting caught up in the mandate in what I consider an impasse. It will devastate this country, Palestine. I want to prevent my country from doing something that will bring it untold trouble.”[31]United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs, Hearings Before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Sixty-seventh Congress, Second Session, on H. Con. Res. 52, Expressing Satisfaction with the Re-creation of Palestine as the National Home of the Jewish Race April 18, 19, 20, and 21, 1922 (Kessinger Publishing, 1922), 23–24.

Nevertheless, Congress was subjected to endless Zionist pressure and passed the Lodge-Fish Resolution endorsing the British Mandate for Palestine as laid out by the Balfour Declaration, which was signed by Wilson’s presidential successor, Warren G. Harding, on September 21, 1922.

When Wilson died two years later, the President of the Zionist Organization of America, Louis Lipsky, stated publicly, “Mr. Wilson followed with interest the progress of the Zionist movement even after he retired to private life.” In 1921, when informed that the Mandate for Palestine had been finally ratified, he telegraphed to the Zionist Organization of America: “I am proud that it should be thought that I have been of service to the Jewish people.”[32]Jewish Telegraphic Agency, “Jews Mourn the Death of Woodrow Wilson,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, https://www.jta.org/archive/jews-mourn-death-of-wood...ilson, last modified in 1921.

The First World War was proclaimed to represent “the war to end all wars”, bringing about a golden future on the promise of self-determination, democracy, mutual security, and peace. The cost would only be the blood and ashes of young, idealistic men committed to the service of their nation. What resulted was the pervasive indifference and lack of cohesive understanding of the memory of the war in spite of its devastating cost. As Steven Trout tried to explain the lack of American consciousness toward the war, “What exactly should the nation recall about the war? Is neutrality failing? The bravery of the combat soldier? The futility of trench warfare? The racial discrimination that permeated the ranks? Are there domestic attacks on German Americans? The botched peace processes? ”

Not to mention the American public that had opposed entry into Europe’s war was forced to grapple with the casualties of 120,000 soldiers and the reintegration of 200,000 wounded men, crippled of mind and body. For Wilson, it was his lifelong and close political partnerships with notable Jewish Zionists fully entrenched in American institutions that prompted his breakaway from isolationism—to which the United States has never returned. More consequential was Wilson’s setting the pattern for amplifying and servicing the dominance of a foreign state as the costs continue to rise.

Footnotes

[1] Jewish Telegraphic Agency, INC., “Leaders Pay Tribute To The Passing Of A Great Statesman,” Daily News Bulletin, last modified February 4, 1924, https://pdfs.jta.org/1924/02-04_025.pdf.

[2] Galia Licht, “Who Was the Most Pro-Jewish U.S. President? Woodrow Wilson, Obviously, ” Haaretz.com, September 25, 2013, https://www.haaretz.com/life/books/premium-which-prez-was-most-pro-Jewish-1.5340052.

[3] Casey Titus, “History’s Deceptive Buildup Against Saddam Hussein,” The Duran, accessed March 22, 2021, https://theduran.com/history/deceptive-buildup-against-Saddam-Hussein

[4] Nathan Guttman, “Top White House posts go to Jews,” The Jerusalem Post, https://www.jpost.com/jewish-world/jewish-features/top-white-house-posts-go-to-jews, last modified April 25, 2006.

[5] Paulina Cachero, “According to reports, US taxpayers have paid an average of \$8,000 per person and more than \$2 trillion in total for the Iraq War alone.”Business Insider, https://www.businessinsider.com/us-taxpayers-spent-8000-each-2-trillion-iraq-war-study-2020-2, last modified February 6, 2020.

[6] Jonathan D. Sarna, “Woodrow Wilson: A Jewish Hero.”What Should We Do with His Racism? ” The Forward, November 15, 2016, https://forward.com/opinion/450092/woodrow-wilson-was-a-hero-to-jews-what-should-we-do-about-his-racism/?

[7] Joseph Rappaport, “The American Yiddish Press and the European Conflict in 1914.” 113–28 in Jewish Social Studies 19, no. 3/4 (1957).http://www.jstor.org/stable/4465551.

[8] Rappaport, page 116.

[9] Jon Guttman, “Did the Germans Try to Make Peace in 1916?,” HistoryNet, https://www.historynet.com/did-the-germans-try-to-make-peace-in-1916.htm, last modified December 18, 2014.

[10] Elis Gjevori, “How Theodor Herzl Failed to Convince the Ottomans to Sell Palestine,” https://www.trtworld.com/magazine/how-theodor-herzl-failed-to-convince-the-ottomans-to-sell-palestine-46991, last modified May 25, 2021.

[11] Adler, Selig. “The Palestine Question in the Wilson Era.” Jewish Social Studies 10, no. 4 (1948): 303–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615334.

[12] Jewish Virtual Library, “Louis D. Brandeis,” last modified January 2016, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/louis-d-brandeis.

[13] Jonathan D. Sarna, “Louis D. Brandeis: Zionist Leader,” Brandeis University, last updated in 1992, https://www.brandeis.edu/hornstein/sarna/americanjewishcultureandscholar.

[14] American Jewish Archives, “A Finding Aid to the Stephen S. Wise Collection, 1893-1969,” The Jacob Rader Marcus Center of the American Jewish Archives, accessed December 31, 2021, https://collections.americanjewisharchives.org/ms/ms0049/ms0049.htm

[15] Catherine Gilchrist, “Socialist Opposition to World War I,” Dictionary of Sydney, last modified in 2014, https://dictionaryofsydney.org/entry/socialist_opposition_to_world_war_i

[16] Rothschild and Chaim Weizmann to Brandeis (cable), April 21, 1917 (received April 25), Zionist Archives, New York City, Jacob de Haas Archives.

[17] Lebow, Richard Ned. “Woodrow Wilson and the Balfour Declaration.” The Journal of Modern History, 40, no. 4 (1968): 507 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1878450.

[18] Jewish Virtual Library, “U.S. Presidential Quotes About Jewish Homeland & Israel,” Jewish Virtual Library, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/u-s-presidential-quotes-about-jewish-homeland-and-israel-jewish-virtual-library, accessed December 31, 2021.

[19] Schmidt, Sarah. “The ‘Parushim’: A Secret Episode in American Zionist History.” American Jewish Historical Quarterly 65, no. 2 (1975): 122. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23880453

[20] De Haas Archives, Brandeis to Rothschild (cable), May 9, 1917.

[21] Adle, Selig. “The Palestine Question in the Wilson Era.” Jewish Social Studies 10, no. 4 (1948): 306. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4615334.

[22] Ahmed, Hisham H. “From the Balfour Declaration to World War II: The U.S. Stand on Palestinian Self-Determination.” Arab Studies Quarterly 12, no. 1/2 (1990): 9–41. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41858937.

[23] Brendan Devenney, “Chapter One—Zionism: The Beginning,” Medium, last modified November 2, 2021, https://medium.com/@dubhelloco/chapter-one-b8d8b77b38b8.

[24] Levene, Mark. “Nationalism and Its Alternatives in the International Arena: The Jewish Question in Paris, 1919.” Journal of Contemporary History 28, no. 3 (1993): 522. http://www.jstor.org/stable/260644.

[25] Gunther, Learned Hand: The Man and the Judge, 261.

[26] “BERNARD BARUCH: A PUBLIC MAN’S PRIVATE LIFE,”https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/, n.d.https://blogs.baruch.cuny.edu/bernardbaruch/world-war-i/.

[27] Saul J. Singer, “Bernard Baruch: ‘America First’,” The Jewish Press-Breaking News, Opinions, Analysis and More on Israel and the Jewish World | Last modified March 29, 2017, https://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-Jewish-world/bernard-Baruch-America-first/2017/03/29/.

[28] Gates Brown, “Baruch, Bernard Mannes | International Encyclopedia of the First World War (WW1),” 1914-1918-Online. WW1 International Encyclopedia, last modified March 16, 2015, https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/baruch_bernard_mannes.

[29] Butler Citizen, “Zionist Louis Brandeis Takes Control of the 1919 Paris Peace Conference,” Newspapers.com, https://www.newspapers.com/clip/35334878/zionists-louis-brandeis-takes-control/, last modified October 2, 1917.

[30] Ahmed, 23,

[31] United States. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs, Hearings Before the Committee on Foreign Affairs, House of Representatives, Sixty-seventh Congress, Second Session, on H. Con. Res. 52, Expressing Satisfaction with the Re-creation of Palestine as the National Home of the Jewish Race April 18, 19, 20, and 21, 1922 (Kessinger Publishing, 1922), 23–24.

[32] Jewish Telegraphic Agency, “Jews Mourn the Death of Woodrow Wilson,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, https://www.jta.org/archive/jews-mourn-death-of-woodrow-wilson, last modified in 1921.

 
Of Related Interest
The Weekly Standard's Fractured History and the Reality
The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel, by Alison Weir
Hide 201 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. An armistice is not a surrender, and therefore not a “win” for any side. There were no battles on or invasions of German territory. Germany lived up to the armistice and disarmed, while the UK, US and France kept their armies at the ready. Germany’s “defeat” was the peace treaty in which they had no part constructing, and threatened with invasion if they did not sign.

    The same scam played out under Rosenfeld when “Judea” declared war on Germany six weeks after Hitler was appointed Chancellor in 1933. It’s been rinse and repeat for over a century.

  2. Socialists in the US were against the war. So I guess that makes the war good.

    This is an example of how simple-minded you people are.

    • Thanks: simple mind
    • Troll: El Dato, RedpilledAF
  3. Chris Moore says: • Website

    Eighty years prior, before the founding of modern Israel, this similarly established Zionist paradigm in America’s political institutions persuaded the Wilson administration to do the same. Instead of winning the hearts and minds of the public through unbridled war propaganda and an unprecedented national tragedy for the specific purpose of creating a homeland for Jews, a cooperative network of Zionists in Britain, Russia, and the United States worked towards this goal through the imperial hand of the idealistic Wilson.

    So the ((Jews)) working with liberlas orchestrated what Zionists call the “Holocaust.” Just like ((Jews)), Deep State and neocons orchestrated 9/11 to facilitate the “War on Terror” and the war on “Islamofascism.”
    https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israel_did_it

    Jews long held Woodrow Wilson in high regard for his liberal politics and inclination to address their requests. When the former governor of New Jersey first ran for president in 1912, Boston’s Jewish Advocate published a political ad, pressing readers to join with “practically all the great Jewish leaders throughout the country” in endorsing him.[6]These leaders included financier Jacob H. Schiff, philanthropist Nathan Straus, and Ambassador Henry Morgenthau. At the time, beginning in 1906, the United States was faced with the difficult task of admitting roughly ten million immigrants, mainly from Eastern and Southern Europe.

    Judeofascists and their stooges pose as “liberals” outside of Israel, but show their true kosher-fascist face in the Levant. Most liberals are phonies and frauds, masking their hatred and greed as “idealism” and “pluralism,” which really means they’re on the take from the Judeofascists rackets, who are in the business of mass murder and treachery.

    Neocons are just more honest liberals, who no longer bother going overboard posing as idealists.

    “Liberals” like Wilson, Roosevelt and ((LBJ)) are responsible for every major American war of the 20th Century. They’re just like their ((Jewish)) puppeteers — poseurs, hypocrites, moral frauds… and scum.

    Woodrow Wilson Pawn of the Jews
    https://www.google.com/search?q=woodrow+wilson&sitesearch=realjewnews.com

    • Agree: Joe Levantine
  4. Wilson, Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Johnson, (his mama’s) Bush and Obama. What a crop! America truly is exceptional

  5. “Kacey Gunther” doesn’t appear to have ever written anything else, so I assume the name is a pseudonym. The Author’s sympathies seem to be firmly with the Germans here.

    During this time, it was Britain’s Grand Fleet that managed the naval blockade of supplies into Germany, starving 400,000 German civilians to death.

    The German U-Boat campaign was trying to starve British civilians to death. The Brits won this “starving out” contest. Fortunes of war.

    On three separate occasions throughout 1916, Germany pursued avenues to negotiate for peace, but both British and French resolve maintained that peace would only come about upon Germany’s defeat

    I don’t think so. Half a million German soldiers were already dead or wounded, and the Powers That Be in Germany still figured they had the upper hand.

    Disgusted by the ravenous nature of the treaties, particularly the Versailles Treaty, Keynes publicized a negative portrayal of the treaties in his book, The Economic Consequences of the Peace.

    Ravenous? Has this author ever seen what the Germans forced on Russia with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?

    As for the rest of the essay, it hangs together. This could possibly be on account of my general ignorance of the WW1 era. Woodrow Wilson can’t be kicked around enough. IMO he was an elegant and cultured version of Donald Trump. I’m pleased to see that in Presidential Rankings Wilson is dropping steadily.

    https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2021/?page=overall

    Based on what I know, I’ll give this essay a B+, for it surely is a history lesson regarding Zionist maneuvering.

  6. Few Americans realize that World War I was America’s worst foreign policy blunder. Bankers had loaned Great Britain and France more money than they could ever repay. However, if Germany lost, they could demand the Germans pay massive reparations to help pay back these loans. These bankers manipulated American politicians and media to approve American intervention that prolonged the war.

    • Thanks: Sarah, emerging majority
    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  7. Emslander says:

    The hope of the world, a peaceful, prosperous and undefeatable land in America was sacrificed by a sick eastern liberal college professor for a secular internationalist beachhead in the Christian West. Sad times.

    My German ancestors in the heartland, who had worked for three generations to help create this vast prosperous and pastoral country were destroyed. Some were sent to kill their brothers in eastern France or to die. In the meantime, the internationalists were destroying Christian Russia.

    Is it any wonder that Our Lady of Fatima chose 1917 to bring her warning about the “errors” in Russia to the modern world?

  8. Zumbuddi says:
    @Emslander

    Thank you.

    Heartfelt and uncomfortably true.

  9. Zumbuddi says:
    @Carlton Meyer

    Much of your work is admirable, but in this recap of WWI you commit the same sin of omission as most historians of the European wars of 20th century: you fail to inform of the major role played by Zionists and zionism.

    Zionists were (behind the scenes, for sure) primary factors in starting these wars, and Zionists were the biggest victors of both wars.

    That USA seemed to come out on top in post-war period was an illusion, fueled to support the intended use of USA as host to several generations of Ashkenazi/Frankist/Khazarians and their unwitting or witless hangers-on who used this land, its people and treasure as an arsenal not for democracy but for destruction.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  10. Sepp says:

    “The intense pogroms and anti-Jewish sentiment of Czar Nicholas II”

    It was an interesting article, but very superficial, in effect a judeo-wiki whitewash of Hebrew malfeasance.

    As one small example, France and England had promised Russia Constantinople and control of the Bosphorus in return for her mobilization invasion of East Prussia. This was already agreed upon long before 1915. Of course Perfidious Albion never intended to carry through with this pledge, because the Sabbatean Zionists ruling England and the Sabbatean Zionists running the US already were in agreement that the Romanovs would be destroyed and the Ottoman empire shattered.

    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
  11. The default position on the Right seems to be “Jews invented liberalism to destroy the West, therefore liberalism is bad and hurrah for… um, I guess oppression?”

    Try this out: Jews saw that liberalism was the wave of the future and would inevitably triumph. (People would enjoy not being slaves, not having to surrender their daughters to the local prince, etc. Who knew?) Thus, they infiltrated and subverted it, using it to further their own oppressive goals.

    You can clearly see the process in 1840s Europe: Jew Marx tasked with subverting socialism, turning it into Communism. (Even today, American “conservatives” hate what they call “socialism”, while real conservatives are socialists, from Bismarck to Spengler to Thatcher).

    Another example, the Jewish infiltration and subversion of Freemasonry.

    • Replies: @whodat
  12. El Dato says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Ravenous? Has this author ever seen what the Germans forced on Russia with the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?

    I was in good spirit. You take some, you get some. The German Kaiser and Russian Czar were cousins, it was all one family playing the Grand Game.

    Plus the Czar could have stayed out of the European clusterfuck, instead of honoring secret treaties. Then they attack and still get their asses kicked at Tannenberg.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tannenberg

    But the German/Prussina forces were indeed a bit racist against the Slavs.

  13. Alison Weir says: • Website

    Very interesting article. I’m surprised, however, that the writer left out some significant information.

    For example, as I write in my book, Samuel Landman, secretary of the World Zionist Organization, wrote in a 1936 article in World Jewry that a secret “gentleman’s agreement” had been made in 1916 between the British government and Zionist leaders:

    “After an understanding had been arrived at between Sir Mark Sykes and [Zionists] Weizmann and Sokolow, it was resolved to send a secret message to Justice Brandeis that the British Cabinet would help the Jews to gain Palestine in return for active Jewish sympathy and for support in the USA for the Allied cause, so as to bringabout a radical pro-Ally tendency in the United States.”

    Landman wrote that once the British had agreed to help the Zionists, this information was communicated to the press, which he reported rapidly began to favor the U.S. joining the war on the side of Britain.

    Landman claimed that Zionists had fulfilled their side of the contract and that it was “Jewish help that brought U.S.A. into the war on the side of the Allies,” thus causing the defeat of Germany XE “Germany” . He went on to state that this had “rankled” in Germany ever since and “contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi programme.”

    More on this, on the Parushim, and additional related information is in my book “Against Our Better Judgment: The hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel,” available on Amazon.

    Additional information on how Israel and its partisans pushed the US into invading Iraq is in “Israel loyalists embedded in U.S. government pushed U.S. into Iraq War” at https://israelpalestinenews.org/israel-loyalists-embedded-in-u-s-government-pushed-us-into-iraq-war/

  14. one might also note that, post WWI, the Brits effectively Jew’d the Jews by grabbing Palestine for themselves and (temporarily) stiffing the entire Zionist project.

    which by the late 1920’s was going nowhere: in 1929, Jewish emigration from Palestine exceeded Jewish immigration to Palestine and overall Jew population was decreasing. And that’s why

    the Zionists looked elsewhere: to the Hitler movement in Germany. Which (((they))) bankrolled and made the trade and immigration deals with that eventually (see also: WWII/”holocaust”) put Israel-in-Palestine on the map.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @Sepp
  15. On three separate occasions throughout 1916, Germany pursued avenues to negotiate for peace, but both British and French resolve maintained that peace would only come about upon Germany’s defeat.

    No, this is incorrect.

    The allies’ position was always that they would immediately end the war if Germany and Austria agreed to return their armies to their pre-war borders.

    Germany only proposed peace when she felt strong enough to impose a settlement on the allies that was favourable to her. Whenever the allies or Wilson offered to negotiate a peace treaty that obviously wouldn’t favour Germany, the Germans hedged and stalled. Right up until August 1918, the Germans thought they could win the war, and so they refused to withdraw their armies from the territory they had conquered, and to negotiate for peace.

    The Kaiser and his regime were criminals and war-mongers. The world is well rid of them.

    • Troll: Sepp, Rurik, RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @Fox
    , @Ukraine Tiger
  16. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Haxo Angmark

    one might also note that, post WWI, the Brits effectively Jew’d the Jews by grabbing Palestine for themselves and (temporarily) stiffing the entire Zionist project… the Zionists looked elsewhere: to the Hitler movement in Germany. Which (((they))) bankrolled and made the trade and immigration deals with that eventually (see also: WWII/”holocaust”) put Israel-in-Palestine on the map.

    Makes sense. The ((Jews)) would have been well aware how much the Germans despised them in light of what Weir wrote above:

    Landman claimed that Zionists had fulfilled their side of the contract and that it was “Jewish help that brought U.S.A. into the war on the side of the Allies,” thus causing the defeat of Germany XE “Germany” . He went on to state that this had “rankled” in Germany ever since and “contributed in no small measure to the prominence which anti-Semitism occupies in the Nazi programme.”

    So the Zionists partnered with the Nazis on deals like the Transfer Agreement, because they knew how much the Germans wanted the damn ((Jews)) out of their nation.

    It was only years after Germany was defeated in WW2 that the Zionists contrived the “Holocaust” myth, in conjunction with Anglosphere Machiavellians.

    The ((Jews)) took casualties in WW2, but nothing out of proportion to their numbers. In fact, I would gander that the ((Jews)) took proportionately fewer casualties than the Europeans (being dodgy shysters, they always manage to avoid the consequences of their treachery). Yet the Anglo-Zionists have mythologized the “Holocaust” to portray the ((Jews)) as the major “victims” of WW2 (which goes along with the ((Jewish)) Chosen/Persecuted shtick).

    The only way the ((Jews)) have been able to get away with all of this is because the White elites from Russia (under Marxism) to post-war Europe to N. America were so damned depraved and corrupt, just like their warped and psychotic ((Jewish)) partners in crime.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  17. lloyd says: • Website

    I was a little surprised to not read in the article nor comments any reference to Benjamin Freedman’s 1961 claims. Freedman had been in the inner circle of Zionists but had converted to Catholicism. So I will say something I don’t really know much about. According to Freedman, President Wilson was blackmailed by intimate letters he had written to a lady. The blackmail money was paid by a Jewish attorney in return for Wilson appointing a Zionist Brandeis to the Supreme Court. Brandeis exercised extraordinary influence on Wilson in the lead up to World War One and Treaty of Versailles. There doesn’t appear to be any other evidence for this. But Freedman as a converted Catholic was not found out for lying. These are the Zionist honey trap tactics. In the morality of the time, exposure of Wilson’s transgression would have been akin to membership of Epstein’s pedo club.

    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  18. Fox says:
    @Zachary Smith

    The German U-boat war was a response to the blockade Britain set up. In the course of doing this, Britain was also blockading neutrals’s trade, had forced inspections of any vessel it pleased, seized freight, sailed under false flags, had armed merchant vessels under false flag. Since Wilson’s sympathies were lodged with the Entente, he saw nothing wrong with Britain’s disregard of the Laws of the Seas.
    Germany had announced that it was going to resort to U-boat warfare as a counter measure to Britain’s starvation blockade. That was a fair warning to step back from the abyss, but without effect. Germany also refrained from it for a time in the hope that Britain would alter its course of action with regard to shipping. Since this didn’t happen, it was resumed. Germany also made the suggestion to end the war in December of 1916 with returning to the state before the war. The Entente powers chose to continue, at that time already with the certainty that Wilson would join them shortly.

    That the war ended with England, France and America choosing dishonor by disregarding the terms under which Germany agreed to lay down her arms makes it an all-time low in human history. At this time, abject hate propaganda had turned the population in the Entente countries into raving maniacs. It has permanently poisoned the atmosphere of human affairs.

    • Thanks: Emslander
    • Replies: @turtle
  19. fausto says:

    This fucker sic the central bank on us. This fucker is rotting in hell; unfortunately there is no hell. His descendants should be sought out and made to endure shame as long as they live.

  20. @lloyd

    According to Freedman, President Wilson was blackmailed by intimate letters he had written to a lady.

    I’d forgotten about those letters, and maybe the Author did too. Or perhaps he didn’t consider the story to be reliable enough to include it here. One version at an unreliable site:

    https://www.veteranstoday.com/2021/12/11/the-khazarian-mafia-blackmailed-woodrow-wilson-into-world-war-i/

    All that was a very long time ago, and there is no obvious way to determine the truth more than a hundred years later. As I’ve already indicated, my opinion of Woodrow Wilson is so low that it’s difficult for me to reject out of hand any tales about the man.

    • Replies: @lloyd
  21. Sepp says:
    @Haxo Angmark

    “the Brits effectively Jew’d the Jews by grabbing Palestine for themselves and (temporarily) stiffing the entire Zionist project.”

    This double cross ultimately cost them their empire. The big question is whether this is also the reason the British Isles were so completely miscegenated and kalergyized.

    The US empire supplanted the English empire as Judea’s favorite pet shabbos nation . One could consider WWI as a war between the goyim over which nation would become the Hebrew’s favorite. The Kaiser and the Sultan had refused to help the Sabbatean Rothschild family from sinking its fangs into Jerusalem. Tsar Nicholas was horny for Constantinople and the Bosphorus, and if he had credibly promised the Rothschilds Jerusalem he likely would have been on the winning side in WWI. The English Empire came through in the end, but that reneged on its promise, and suffered eternal Jewish vengeance.

  22. Fox says:
    @Stebbing Heuer

    Germany did propose just that, return to the prewar situation in December of 1916, and the Entente powers disregarded it. On the other hand, I don’t know of any peace offers by the Entente. Their war aim was unconditional victory. Since this was their objective since they formed their alliance with the secret ‘informal General Staff conversations’, drawing Belgium into it soon after, then the alliance between Russia and France, and their obvious maneuvering in July of 1914 to make the war brake out, it’s not strange that they didn’t make any ‘peace offers’ other than through total victory.
    What losers.
    The result is now a terminal decline of Europe. Only the Germans foresaw this to be the outcome of a senseless war. Yet in London, Paris and St.Petersburg it was believed to be worthwhile to eliminate a trade rival who was very successful, or to get even for the loss of the German provinces of Elsass and Lothringen (because these are these provinces’ names) in a war that was intended in Paris to smash again into Germany in 1870, or to extend the reach of Russia yet further into Europe.

  23. Woodrow Wilson was a messianic, self-righteous sonofabitch. He was also under Zionist influence.

    Piss on him.

    The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand and his wife ignited the fuse that led to the titled, inbred European rulers declaring war on one another. They started their friggin’ war–let them duke it out.

    • Replies: @Emslander
    , @4 Dog Night
  24. Whether for the bankers who created the Fed or for the quite open Zionists or for the nascent Military Industrial Complex who got the war production contracts and new markets in Europe, the responsibility for the destruction the American Dream, of balance of powers, constitution based government, the basic concept of ‘Democracy Must Limit Power, economic and political’, ‘isolationism’ i.e. USA military is there to defend ONLY the USA, yes that was the American political dream, already weakened by the stupidity of the Civil War, and imperial ‘adventures’ in Cuba and the Philipines, the BASIC RESPONSIBILITY is with the American People who allowed themselves to be led into the USA imperial century by getting bought off with money and imperial nationalistic dreams. WWI signaled the death of the republic and the dream of small government, small business, the family farm, limits on big business, limits on financial capital.

    The USA citizens of 1790 who DEMANDED the Bill of Rights in exchange for accepting the secretly negotiated written by elites, Constitution ROLLED IN THEIR GRAVES as the 20th century got underway. They understood the importance of LIMITING ALL FORMS OF POWER, religious, economic and governmental and their descendants FORGOT this basic, pragmatic, understanding.

    • Thanks: Sarah, emerging majority
    • Replies: @Emslander
  25. Frankie P says:
    @Alison Weir

    Thank you, Alison Weir, for everything you do.

    You stand for truth in the face of a massive wall of deception.

    I admire your judgement.

    Perhaps if more Americans knew, we could recover our better judgement.

    Frankie

  26. If Wilson and the US had not entered First World War, it’s almost certain France, Germany and UK would have reached truce and then patched together some sort of compromise peace. Germany would not have been humiliated, it would not have had to pay debilitating reparations, Hitler would not have come to power, there would have been no Second World War, and no Holocaust. Wilson made an error responsible that resulted in deaths of tens of millions world-wide. Many in US no longer regard him as worthy of respect. Even Princeton University made decision to rename its Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.

  27. gotmituns says:

    Wilson’s greater sin was creating the FED. God Damn him for that even more than getting us in WW!.

    • Agree: Rurik
  28. Miro23 says:

    Frankfurter became acquainted with Brandeis in the Parushim, a secret Zionist society, reform movement, and arguably the first modern militant Zionist organization in America.

    The Parushim, with the initiate required to swear an oath:

    “Before this council, in the name of all that I hold dear and holy, I hereby vow myself, my life, my fortune, and my honor to the restoration of the Jewish nation, -to its restoration as a free and autonomous state, by its laws perfect in justice, by its life enriching and preserving the historic speech, the culture, and the ideals of the Jewish people.

    To this end I dedicate myself in behalf of the Jews, my people, and in behalf of all mankind.

    To this end I enroll myself in the fellowship of the Parushim. I pledge myself utterly to guard and to obey and to keep secret the laws and the labor of the fellowship, its existence and its aims. Amen.”

    Ref. https://ifamericaknew.org/history/parushim.html

    These were US Supreme Court Justices, the highest US authorities supposedly defending the US Constitution and the wellbeing of the American people.

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  29. Rogue says:
    @Chris Moore

    The ((Jews)) took casualties in WW2, but nothing out of proportion to their numbers

    I’m near the end of Hitler’s War by David Irving (courtesy of this very site). His so-called “revisionism” makes plain that many Jews were transported from various places in Europe by the Nazis, and that unquestionably many were killed.

    Irving doesn’t supply numbers (the 6 million figure is almost certainly false), but what you allege above I’m not so sure about.

  30. Rogue says:

    This article doesn’t mention about the Zimmerman telegram that was sent to Mexico in early 1917, about proposing war by Mexico with the USA, in the event that the US declared war on Germany.

    The British intercepted the message and decoded it – and then passed it on to the US government.

    Apparently, and understandably, this enraged American public opinion and made it a lot easier for the US Congress to declare war on Germany.

  31. @Zachary Smith

    Maybe you don’t think so but it is a fact that Germany tried to end the conflict in 1916 even when they had the upperhand.

    This esay is very close to fact throughout and you have yourself forwarded your lack of knowledge on the subject.

    “Based on what I know” after admitting that you know very little does not give a smug and arrogant prick such as yourself the right to grade but you do have the right to persue the knowledge that you lack. There are any number of truthful publications out there. I suggest Gerard Menuhin’s “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil” which is quite the read so that publication maybe a bit beyond you.

  32. @Stebbing Heuer

    Your talking through your arse buddy. The Allies never had any intention of stopping the war until Germany was destroyed. Remember that the main reason for the conflict was that Germany was becoming an economic powerhouse and a threat to the Bristish Empire.

    When the Germans had control of the conflict 1916 they offered to stop the war and return to the pre-war position but the Zionists offered to bring the USA into the war on the side of the allies in return for the signing of the Balfour Declaration.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  33. @Matt Lazarus

    Oh I think the Zionists would have found another way to start a conflict to get the Balfour Declaration through. You are correct though in suggesting that there would be no fake narrative on a fake holocaust. I wonder where they would have utilised the 6,000,000 figure.

    • Replies: @usNthem
    , @SolontoCroesus
  34. Emslander says:
    @Orville H. Larson

    Like every liberal prior to him and after, Wilson just couldn’t let a good crisis go to waste.

  35. Poco says:
    @Matt Lazarus

    But Princeton did that because Wilson once said the word nigger. They couldn’t care less about the rest of his stupidity.

  36. Emslander says:
    @WingsofADove

    One of the young men in the Watergate coup was asked in the Congressional hearings whether he would have any advice to other young people coming to D.C. for careers in “making a difference” and he said that he would tell them to stay home and have a good life.

    I’d go a step further. If a child begins to take an interest in social justice, international affairs or elective politics, jail them for twenty years.

    • Agree: anarchyst
  37. usNthem says:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    A good trade-off for helping to establish a zionist homeland might have been for every jew living in Europe and America at the time to have to settle there permanently.

  38. turtle says:
    @Emslander

    the [internationalists]* were destroying Christian Russia.

    *Jewish Bolsheviks
    FIFY

    And American citizens of German heritage, approximately 20% of the population, were the target of an organized campaign of hatred, prosecuted by the U.S. government against its own citizens. Some, including some of my ancestors, changed their names to something which sounded more “English,” out of fear.

    Lynchings, tar and feather parties, book burning, closing of hundreds of German language publications, renaming of streets and entire towns, prohibiting the teaching or even speaking the German language. All these things happened in the wonderful U.S.A., whilst Wood’nhead Wilson was busy “making the world safe for democracy,” whatever that means.

    • Replies: @Emslander
    , @Joe Levantine
    , @TGD
  39. @Ukraine Tiger

    Chaim Weizmann played a major role in getting the Balfour declaration as well as in prolonging the war –and incidentally, in knowingly contributing to enabling the starvation of 800,000 (not “40,000”) German civilians.

    (Note: Two “Henry Morgenthaus” operated in this period, Sr. and Jr. Jr. was FDR’s Sec’y of Treasury & author of plan to destroy Germany’s industrial and cultural strengths.)

    Morgenthau Sr. had been ambassador to Turkey. In 1916 or 1917 Wilson sent him on a “secret mission” to negotiate peace with Turkey.
    Brandeis learned of the commission, alerted Weizmann and sent Frankfurter into the fray to dissuade Morgenthau from the mission, at which they were successful — Morgenthau Sr abandoned the visit to Turkey. They were afraid that a separate peace with Turkey would jeopardize the Jewish claim on Palestine.

    Weizmann wrote of the affair in his autobiography. He thought it was quite humorous that US Senators thought him “dishonorable” and that he had “prolonged the war by two years.” Hah hah hah.

    https://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/why-not-question-the-holocaust-in-schools/?showcomments#comment-4989737

    • Thanks: Rurik
    • Replies: @thotmonger
  40. whodat says:
    @James J O'Meara

    Some years ago, early 1990’s I think, I decided to go to some Opus Dei meetings in Chicago. Being a Pat Buchanan supporter, I was already very suspicious of Jewish motives etc, and was
    surprised that several prominent Opus Dei meeting people were Jewish, and militant Zionists at that. I was totally under the Pius XII Catholic spell, and when it came up that Catholics were supposed to lay off secret Baptisms and Proselytizing of the Jews,
    seemed to be a violation of the mission so save as many souls as possible on earth but this “deal” was promoted and advocated and praised as obvious by the Jews in Opus Dei meeting, and I began to wonder if the institutional Catholic Church was more about deal making and advancing strategic objectives by making alliances with any devil who was a willing accomplice. I never ever entertained that though before then.
    I was a truly naive Catholic foot soldier, who never questioned his officers before.

  41. Alex70 says:
    @Alison Weir

    The article also makes no mention of Colonel House

    • Replies: @Rurik
  42. turtle says:
    @Fox

    the war ended with England, France and America choosing dishonor

    The British Navy made Germany an offer it couldn’t refuse: sign the Treaty of Versailles and be impoverished and degraded, or we will starve you to death.

    In the U.S., the 1920s were known as the “Roaring Twenties.” In Germany, not so much.
    So, when the stock market crash of 1929 plunged the entire world into the so-called Great Depression, it wasn’t exactly “news” to the German people. More like a “rerun.”

  43. profnasty says:

    Synopsis: It’s the Jews fault, stupid.
    Brandeis, Baruch, House.
    Tomato-Tomahto.
    They should have expanded the mandate through Trans(sic) Jordan and across Sinai. Twood have given the Muslims and the Jews more wiggle room.
    Oh well, what the hell.
    The turning worm began with Rosenvelt’s assassination of McKinley (Through Goldman) [Through Czoglocz. ]
    The Bull Moose Party installed Schmilson.
    ***Now, moving on. What was the sum total affect of the JFK assassination, hhmmmm?
    Ed. Note: How many British Prime Ministers, modern Era, have been assassinated? My count is none. Do tell.

  44. Rurik says:

    the [internationalists]* were destroying Christian Russia.

    *Jewish Bolsheviks

    how about *genocidal Jewish supremacist fiends?

    They’re not always Bolsheviks, that was just thier manifestation at the time. But they are always genocidal, and supremacist, no?

    from the Boer war, to 9/11, these rancid cretins have unleashed their inhumanity upon mankind by always finding some pliant goyim to be their stooge. And from Wilson to (now Sir) Tony Bliar, they always use the vanity of these weak and treasonous scum to their eternal advantage.

    “To think that I, the son of the manse, should be able to help restore the Holy Land to its people.”

    Well Woody, your execrable little life was of consequence, because it led to untold millions of Christians being slaughtered, butchered and burned alive, generations of commie slavery and genocide, and will, by all current indications, lead to the depraved death of Western Civilization itself!

    Wow. And all because some clever and manipulative Jews massaged your pathetic ego.

    The Fourteen Points were a ruse to trick Germany into disarming, so that Perfidious, (perhaps the most treacherous rats to ever stain that once great island), and a gaggle of worms from France and Belgium, et al, could hand over the the people (and especially children) of Germany to the tender mercies of the world’s most notorious supremacist pedophiles. (no, I don’t mean the British aristocracy, although they certainly are a close second to that dubious title).

    Woodrow Wilson has perhaps, (even more than Churchill) proved to be the biggest betrayer of all that is noble and honorable and decent in this world.

    He has doomed Christendom to slow and depraved genocide.

    He brought on communism and Zionism and is directly responsible for Nazism, and the horrors of not just both world wars, but all the horrors and tyranny that the Western world is descending into following ((9/11)), and the culmination of Jewish supremacist power that is manifesting right before our eyes, with the ((Big Tech)) and ((Big Pharma)) take over of the Western world and beyond. And all carefully orchestrated by the supremacists at the Fed/ECB.

    So yea, he certainly was a man of consequence !

    I was sorting hoping that this good but incomplete article would flesh out Wilson’s personal interventions on behalf of Trotsky- when that ((commie murderer)) was arrested in Canada with suitcases full of NYC Jewish banker lucre, intended to be used to enslave Russia and beyond to ((their)) genocidal (isn’t it always!) schemes.

    So Wilson didn’t just betray Germany into the fiend’s tender mercies, but Russia too! And that means all the millions (like the Kulaks) in all the lands beyond Russia that also suffered these people infinite capacity for genocidal hatred and murder.

    • Thanks: Trinity, Joe Levantine
    • Replies: @Trinity
  45. Trinity says:

    So Jews support Germans and Germany when it is good for the Jews and they seek to genocide the German people when it is good for the Jews. Those Jews are truly the apple of God’s eye.rotflmmfwao.

  46. HdC says:
    @Rogue

    If what you wrote is true, then the “logic” of that statement is a circular argument:

    Mexico to declare war on the USA if the USA declares war on Germany. Consequently the USA declares war on Germany.

    Maybe it sufficed for propaganda purposes; obviously it did. But to use that as an excuse to declare a war?

    • Replies: @Rogue
  47. HdC says:
    @Matt Lazarus

    Well, there was no holocaust, not of the Jews anyway.
    The holocaust was propagandized as an allied defence against their truly bestial behaviour during the war.

    • Disagree: Paul Greenwood
  48. Rurik says:
    @Ukraine Tiger

    When the Germans had control of the conflict 1916 they offered to stop the war and return to the pre-war position but the Zionists offered to bring the USA into the war on the side of the allies in return for the signing of the Balfour Declaration.

    the speech that opened my eyes and changed my life

    my ‘red pill’

    https://highlanderjuan.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Benjamin-H-Freedman-Speech-at-the-Willard-Hotel-1961.pdf

    • Thanks: Mike Tre, Thomasina
    • Replies: @Montmorency
  49. Rurik says:
    @Alex70

    no mention of Colonel House

    leading Zionist and Rabbi Stephen S. Wise in communication with Wilson’s chief adviser on European politics and diplomacy during the First World War, Edward Mandell “Colonel” House, on Zionist objectives. Specifically, Wise functioned as an intermediary between Wilson and House from 1916 to 1919.

  50. @turtle

    It was the German reparations that caused the Great Depression –
    one of the few things Keynes got right; forced to export at any cost to
    themselves (to earn “hard” currency) they laid waste to the economies of
    the victors (from the German perspective the “next” war was inevitable by 1928,
    Adolf or no Adolf).
    Nowadays the reserve dollar works in a similar direction, except that China
    isn´t starving.

    • Replies: @Paul Greenwood
  51. Emslander says:
    @turtle

    And American citizens of German heritage, approximately 20% of the population, were the target of an organized campaign of hatred, prosecuted by the U.S. government against its own citizens. Some, including some of my ancestors, changed their names to something which sounded more “English,” out of fear.

    Yes. They also took away the farms that my great grandfathers had turned into models of Kulak independence. They did it offering easy loans to “modernize” with better dairy equipment, required by government regulations. The milk prices they used in 1925 to support the loan payments were highly inflated by the difficulty European producers had in the war. My stupid ancestors went along and the farm economy collapsed when European farms recovered. I’m sure the “bankers” knew this would happen.

    I’ve learned about the language and cultural persecutions very slowly, because the old Germans just didn’t talk about such embarrassing matters as the betrayal by the great US of A government. German Catholics were still teaching children in German schools until 1916. They acquiesced to the Eastern hatred quickly.

    I use “internationalists” because I hesitate to put it all on the Hebrews. New Englanders came out to the Midwest in the 1860’s and established newspapers, colleges and other forms of cultural hegemony and most of them weren’t Jews.

    Then, to be fair, they did the same thing to the Japanese in WWII. The Japanese American citizens had the additional disadvantage of looking like the enemy.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  52. Wilson is the only US President that lies in the Washington National Cathedral.
    Why?
    Balfour.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  53. @Emslander

    A funny thing happened on the way to Versailles. In 1915 (emphasis added):

    [Colonel] House to [Woodrow] Wilson, June 3, 1915, from London : ‘In the event of war with Germany, I would suggest an address to Congress laying the blame of this fearful conflict upon the Kaiser and his military entourage, and I would exonerate the great body of German citizenship, stating that we were fighting for their deliverance as well as the deliverance of Europe. This should have a fine effect upon German-Americans. [The Intimate Papers of Colonel House Vol. 2 (1926 Houghton Mifflin Company, Cambridge, Mass.), p.466 (footnote 1)].

    But the authors of the Treaty of Versailles intentionally set out to viciously and purely punish “the great body of German citizenship” notwithstanding the overwhelming evidence that they had been systematically deceived into supporting the war.

    It was regardless among the most fateful of reversals ever.

    What did the great body of German citizenship do, between 1916 and 1919, that caused their previous status as at least a metaphoric hostage in need of rescue, to become that of the principal perpetrators who needed to be severely punished and made to pay for it all?

  54. Balfour was not created an Earl until 1922 and so it was plain Arthur Balfour that promoted the Declaration which had first been approved by Washington before Paris and London were able to sign off on matters.

    Britain was dependent on its Purchasing Agent in USA – J. P. Morgan Bank – for procuring munitions and had no desire to antagonise Wilson or the Jewish lobby which they had courted to entice US into the war.

    Balfour was very pro-Jewish State but that was not widely-shared – so much of the policy like Sykes-Picot was secret and only came to light once Bolsheviks published Tsarist Foreign Ministry documents.

    It is clear Balfour pursued that politicians proclivity to solve today’s pressing issue by creating tomorrow’s nightmare for the next generation – like having Samuel as the Governor of the Mandate who put Yasir Arafat’s uncle as Grand Mufti only for him to thank the Jewish Governor by allying with Adolf Hitler

    • Replies: @anon
    , @barnabus
  55. @Zachary Smith

    “ The German U-Boat campaign was trying to starve British civilians to death. The Brits won this “starving out” contest. Fortunes of war.”

    When studying the history of WWI at an English boarding school, our History teacher made the same claim to which I promptly pointed out that ‘starving the enemy‘ was a policy where the British shed first blood. The Germans response was the U Boat warfare which turned the tide against Britain. The History teacher’s response was a sly smile with a traditional British ‘ no comment’. Only after class the teacher approached me to ask for my reference which I presented to him from a history book from my former studies at a Catholic school in the Levant.

    “ just remember when doing your duty to the fatherland to be the gentlemen you have always been”

    Kaiser Wilhelm addressing the German navy’s officers at the beginning of the war. Source: a television documentary about WWI.

  56. This is all interesting, but for Americans living in 1918, some of the biggest bastards making their lives a living hell were Gentiles–Wilson, Postmaster Burleson (who opened everyone’s mail), propaganda chief Creel and AG Gregory who sicced Antifa-style thugs onto suspected “slackers.” Any one of these traitors could have resigned in protest over Wilson’s domestic fascist program but nope, they were enthusiastic participants. The bottom line is that Jewish power is always enabled by a gang of Gentiles who will murder their own for 30 pieces of silver. In other words, we’re screwed!

    • Agree: Emslander
  57. @nokangaroos

    Germany did not pay the Reparations. Prussia had imposed huge Reparations on France after 1870 payable in Gold. It was these extractions that financed German industrialisation.

    Germany was running budget deficits because a weak and incompetent Weimar Republic was profligate and living on short-term fund inflows from USA which reversed once US margin calls from Wall Street slides necessitated liquidity.

    It was Benjamin Strong who had held interest rates low (Greenspan ??) that engendered the speculative boom then increasing rates 1928 before his untimely death, caused the bubble to burst.

    Germany was secretly re-arming after 1919 with Soviet Russia……..Weimar had funds to build Junkers factories in Russia and test poison gas and let Guderian develop Panzer tactics. – it was Hitler that stopped all these joint-ventures.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  58. Funny no mention of Benjamin Freedman’s speeches and warnings he gave to alert real Americans of what the zionists had done and had/have planned. Without Mr Freedman much of what had been done might still be unknown as so much is still kept hidden that if it all ever came out 90% of the people would not believe any of it. The Masters of Deceit.
    According to Freedman, Woodrow Wilson was a real scumbag who only first got elected thru Jewish trickery. They got Teddy Roosevelt to run again for Pres as a 3rd party candidate which divided up the vote and enabled Wilson to win. The rest is history, a very sad history.

  59. @turtle

    Germany had destroyed much of Europe and sent Lenin to St Petersburg as their agent to destroy Russia. Germany had imposed Treaty of Brest-Litovsk so should not get too sensitive about Treaty of Versailles which was far less ruthless.

    France was the key driver of Versailles – that was why it was in Versailles – that was where the Prussian King was crowned Emperor of German Reich 1871 after defeat of France.

    Germany did not pay UK Reparations after either War.

    Take a look at Hungary rather than Germany if you want to see poverty.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  60. @Sepp

    With respect to the pogroms in Russia, E. Michael Jones’ book “ The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit” goes in depth about the history of Jewish Russian relations in a very meticulous and documented way.

    The verdict, lo and behold, Khazarian trouble making does not change over time. The more the Romanovs tried to integrate the Jews into Russian society, the more revolutionary activity they had to face.

  61. Emslander says:
    @whodat

    I was introduced to Opus Dei in 1985. I noticed very unusual changes in that conceptually good organization in the early 1990’s and was forced out by 1998. That was my personal experience, but I’ve always been a sinner, so what do I know?

    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  62. @Emslander

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but at one time the American Congress voted voted for English vs German language for the USA and English won by a thread. I read this some 40 years ago.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  63. @whodat

    You are addressing an important issue with respect to the Catholic Church. If you are interested in deeper analysis, I strongly suggest you read Michael Hoffman’s ‘ The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome”. It will open your eyes to a new reality about the transformation of the Catholic Church from the time she started dabbling with usury all the way to Vatican II.

  64. Emslander says:
    @Paul Greenwood

    It took TWO WW’s to destroy the German people.

    Six million, they say?

    Ten million Germans died when they were driven from Czechoslovakia, their actual homeland, after the Allies gave the Slavs a free hand after WWII. I spoke to an older German gentleman a few years ago and his opinion of the Slavs as the most vicious of the genocidal maniacs was unaltered by the passage of years.

  65. Emslander says:
    @Rev. Spooner

    I’d heard similar stories, but my quick lookup just now reveals that it is not true. It was suggested in Congress in 1796 to print all official records in both German and English, but it went nowhere. German speakers were only 9% of the population at the time.

    All my ancestors were very good at farming and left politics to the Irish. LOL

  66. @Rogue

    https://archive.org/details/germanysaimsinfi0000fisc_y0c7/page/295/mode/1up

    For my first post I dug out my own copy for reference, but simply forgot to check for internet availability. At the bottom of page 295 begins a section titled “The Peace Offer of the Central Powers (December 10, 1916)”

    This next 15 pages speak of Zimmerman in the course of describing the incredible arrogance and stupidity of the German government in provoking the US. (The author appears to assume Wilson was a rational statesman, which I think is a mistake.)

    Author Fischer does describe all the German “peace proposals” in excruciating detail and declares them to be more ‘strategies’ than anything else.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  67. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Rogue

    Irving doesn’t supply numbers (the 6 million figure is almost certainly false), but what you allege above I’m not so sure about.

    I would say, especially when you take in the “entitled,” and fake “victim” quotient (the ((Jewish)) nation’s Chosen/Persecuted shtick) and its self-conception as a profiteering provocateur and revolutionary historical actor, for sure they didn’t get any more casualties than they had coming, and probably far fewer.

    Similarly to the ((Jewish)) provocateur-engineered “War on Terror.”
    https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it

    How many Muslims were murdered thanks to the Zionists and their works? A million? How many ((Jewish)) casualties? A handfull.

    Yet, to hear the Zionists tell the story, they’re eternal victims of Islamic “anti-Semitism” and the Muslims owe them billions in reparations.

    A wonder if the House of Saud scum that got into bed with the ((Jews)) on the project knew how many Muslims they were going to get killed.

    I wonder if the Whites who got in bed with the ((Jews)) on instigating the World Wars knew how many Christians they were going to get killed.

    My guess is they knew, and they didn’t care — same as the scum that is in bed with the ((Jews)) today.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  68. Trinity says:
    @Rurik

    Perhaps Woody and Cuckhill are enjoying barbecue right aboutnow.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  69. IronForge says:

    We just need several Referential Sites Fact-Checked and Vetted without Bias regarding Tribal and other Ethno/Religious/Political/Ideological Entities’ Activities throughout the (Past Several) Centuries across the Globe.

    Obviously the Results won’t impress the Objective and Ethical 3rd Person Observers; but Objectivity is Paramount in making Cases before BodyPolitics of Nation-States.

    IMHO, the Tribals, ZioMasons, and Catholics have gone too far in Influence-Peddling and Racketeering. Perhaps Tribals may be setting themselves up to be despised beyond reconciliation outside the ZioMasonic Core of USA/GBR+Commonwealth/FRA/NDL/BEL/ISR/UKR.

    Tall Fences make for Good Neighbors, Tall Borders make for Good Nation-States…

  70. @turtle

    It is amazing how the brightest White race goes into fratricidal mode at the behest of Jewish manipulation. Even the current peace in Europe is by and large dominated by Zionist interests with the European natives relegated to voting for handpicked candidates whose only qualification is behaving obsequiously to Zionist interests and their lackeys in the banking, media, armament and pharmaceutical industries.

    Now the same deadly game of which Germany was the victim in two World Wars is being played against the Russians with Western Europeans dutifully playing their part. If the attempt at subverting Christian Russia is not aborted first and foremost by the Germans, then anyone equating Europeans with tribal Arabs and Africans should be excused.

    • Agree: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @HdC
  71. @Curmudgeon

    An armistice with reparations is as good as a surrender.

    • Replies: @Curmudgeon
  72. TGD says:
    @turtle

    And American citizens of German heritage, approximately 20% of the population, were the target of an organized campaign of hatred, prosecuted by the U.S. government against its own citizens.

    I can’t find any confirmation that the US government organized “a campaign of hatred” against German Americans. These anti German actions were spontaneous local events. The Germans were resistant to assimilation into the broader US culture and steadfastly maintained their ethnic identity. This was a cause of friction between ordinary citizens and Germans.

    British propaganda concerning “the rape of Belgium” served to infuriate the general US populace against their German neighbors. Belgium, which was steadfastly neutral, was invaded by the German army on August 4, 1914. When the Belgians resisted, a campaign of brutality unlike anything that had occurred since Genghis Khan was instituted. Though the Germans may not have bayoneted babies and raped and hanged nuns, the civilian atrocities that the German army committed are a fact of history.

    To wit:

    ” The total Belgian deaths during the war amount to some 100,000 — 40,000 military deaths and 60,000 civilian deaths.

    Of those civilians who died as a direct result of the war, some 6,000 were executed. More on this below.

    Nearly 1.5 million Belgians were displaced by the German occupation of their land, with impoverished refugees fleeing in every direction. Some 200,000 ended up in Britain, and another 300,000 in France. The most, by far — nearly a million — fled to the Netherlands, but did not always have an easy time in doing so. The German army constructed a 200km-long electrified fence, called the Dodendraad by the Dutch, that claimed the lives of around 3,000 attempted escapees during the course of the war.

    Some 120,000 Belgian civilians (of both sexes) were used as forced labour during the war, with roughly half being deported to Germany to toil in prison factories and camps, and half being sent to work just behind the front lines. Anguished Belgian letters and diaries from the period tell of being forced to work for the Zivilarbeiter-Bataillone, repairing damaged infrastructure, laying railway tracks, even manufacturing weapons and other war materiel for their enemies. Some were even forced to work in the support lines at the Front itself, digging secondary and tertiary trenches as Allied artillery fire exploded around them.”

    • Replies: @Fox
    , @emerging majority
  73. Rurik says:
    @Chris Moore

    My guess is they knew, and they didn’t care — same as the scum that is in bed with the ((Jews)) today.

    the worst are the ‘intellectuals’

    George Will

    Rick Wilson

    Fredo Reed

    Rod Dreher

    and so forth..

    they’re the whores who shill the lies pretending to be one of us, while they service America’s and Europe’s (((worst enemies))).

    Dante’s ‘n-th’ was intended for this lot.

    • Agree: Irish Savant
  74. @Paul Greenwood

    France paid the reparations after 1871 in record time, and it made them stronger (which gave Keynes the idea in the first place). Germany was unable to pay (what would have lasted until at least 2016) so France occupied the Saar and the Ruhrgebiet (with Senegalese troops), further ruining their ability to pay. That they should turn to the Soviet Union for comfort (also cut off from international recognition, also invaded by Brits and Americans, also humiliated and starved) was only natural (German industrial goods – in exchange for grain – were shortly crowded out by American ones, and German military talent found employment elsewhere).

    As for the “rearmament”, it started before the National Uprising. It was the allies who were in breach of the Versailles treaty (just as they are now in breach of the Non-Proliferation Treaty) by refusing to disarm (case in point, Little Britain – in % of a much higher GDP – spent more on armament in 1936 than Germany did before freaking 1943). The Germans had far more pressing uses for their money – courtesy of the perfidious Albion 1.5 million children starved to death after WWI.

  75. @Emslander

    Our Lady of Fatima said RUSSIA, not communism, not the left wing : Russian orthodox theology is very opposite in many ways to Catholic theology. It is a theology of despair and of acceptance of corruption, it is slow-motion suicide presented as a way of spiritual perfection. Our Lady of Fatima stood tall (as is usual in the history of all Marian apparitions since Early Middle Ages : ALL Marian apparitions intervene first and foremost to confirm a point of dogma the catholic world has had a hard time to establish, like the Immaculate Conception at Lourdes ; a Marian apparition without a theological point of dogma to confirm, like Garabandal, or that goes most contrary against many well-established ones, like Medjugorje, shows the proof it is not authentic) for what is expressed as the Filioque clause in the Nicene creed : the spirit emanates from the Son as well as from the Father. The consequence is that in Catholic theology the believer in Christ is responsible for the action of the spirit in the universe around him, christian civilisation must bear fruits worthy of that name to be called such. That was not the case with the Russian form of Orthodox religion, especially in the wake of Peter the Great and Catherine the Great’s reigns (two “progressive-minded” Western-imitating Czars who learned to look down upon Russian peasantry like cattle with the use of arch-corrupt religion and vodka), where the piety of the elect few must go on a par with surrounding apocalyptical degradation and general corruption.

    Communism was rather hinted at (without being named as such) as a tribulation it would be subjected to as a divine chastisement in retribution for the errors it had been going on spreading for quite a long time in the realm of religion : the very real but negatively oriented religious instinct of the Slavic peoples would fit even more perfectly the new religion Stalin was to install for the adoration of his own personality, and most of the Russians would espouse it with greater fervour than ever, as a vivid proof that most orthodox believers had never been attached to the true God since long. When in another apparition the Virgin spoke of consecrating Russia to her heart immaculate, it means the acceptance by Russia of certain essential truths that had been then traditionally defended by Catholics (not since Vatican II) but rejected by Russian Orthodoxy.

    She in particular warned in advance against ecumenism as would be practised during the Vatican II Council which consisted in accommodating to many Calvinistic and even more Orthodox points of dogma : the Orthodox clergy was then 100% corrupt and submitted to Soviet power, as it had been when it submitted to the renegades Peter and Catherine (both characters were partisans of Western enlightenment philosophies which considered revealed religion as a mere tool of manipulation of the human cattle not cunning enough to see through and take advantage of it). Vatican II was the ultimate spiritual defeat of the catholic dogma of faith to an unholy mixture of Protestantism and of the errors spread by Russia. This is the reason why the demise of Soviet Union was but the continuation of the same corruption : communism was defeated but restored orthodoxy as of now has not yet converted from its own errors : it just goes together well with the power of (often Jewish) gangster oligarchs that have been ruling Russia since and consented to abandon communism only in exchange for their acquiring property and power within the US. Religion in the US, especially as it developed after VII under the form of Zionist Born Again cults, has renounced to all true justice.

  76. anon[358] • Disclaimer says:
    @Alison Weir

    I read somewhere that House was on the cusp of preventing a war between USA and Turkey. His telegrams were made sure not to reach the presdinet and his delegation was subverted by presence of Brandeis ‘s apointee with soecail mission to prevent any understanding, truce or modus operandi between the two. This could have prevented Britush victory over Turk in Middle East .

    Also around same time Turk persuaded Miandano sultan to accecpt USA’s misssion in Phillipine.

  77. Wilson is one of the biggest traitors in Americas history and two of the bills he signed off instilled zionist control over America, these being the FED and the IRS both zionist privately owned creations which have put America on the road to destruction which is now almost complete are zionist created wars and debt and mayhem and the latest zionist creation the covid-19 scam and psyop and genocide of the American people.

    World War I was a zionist engineered war to bring in a new world order via the League of Nations, however it took another zionist engineered war WW II to seal the deal with the zionist created and controlled UN and this and the covid`19 scam and psyop are about to seal the fate of America and bring in a zionist one world government that will make past genocides of Mao and Stalin and Hitler look like a Sunday school picnic in comparsion.

  78. @Rogue

    “ I’m near the end of Hitler’s War by David Irving (courtesy of this very site). His so-called “revisionism” makes plain that many Jews were transported from various places in Europe by the Nazis, and that unquestionably many were killed.”

    Dr. Robert Faurisson, the French/English history revisionist, hounded most of his life for daring to speak the truth, proved by relying on war records, that 90% of the casualties at concentration camps died in the last year of the war after Germany was bombed to smithereens thereby hindering the capacity of German authorities to feed and nurse the sick and the weak. It is also a known fact of WWII that the German authorities asked for the help of the Red Cross at addressing the catastrophically deteriorating situation in the concentration camps.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  79. @Gidoutahere

    There were no reparations under the November 11, 1918 Armistice. The reparations came from the Treaty of Versailles, to which Germany had no input.

    • Replies: @Gidoutahere
  80. Chris Moore says: • Website

    It is amazing how the brightest White race goes into fratricidal mode at the behest of Jewish manipulation… Now the same deadly game of which Germany was the victim in two World Wars is being played against the Russians with Western Europeans dutifully playing their part. If the attempt at subverting Christian Russia is not aborted first and foremost by the Germans, then anyone equating Europeans with tribal Arabs and Africans should be excused.

    The ((Jews)) want to “prove” that civilization outside of ((Jewish)) domination is a farce; and similarly, that no nation is more civilized than the ((Jews)), and every aspect of civilization flows from ((Jewish)) origins.

    This has been their schtick forever, and pre-programmed useful idiots believe it to their core. The ((Jews)) see themselves as having the “God” franchise, and they see themselves as entitled to it, and to everything on earth of value.

    Of course, they’re mentally ill, and the entire shtick is a racket and inside job, meaning it is a self-serving grift and self-reinforcing echo chamber that validates itself, and “expels” (kills, boycotts, deplatforms, marginalizes) any nation, people or individual who will not get on board the ((Jewish)) Big Lie and the genocidal ((Jewish)) agenda. But from their perspective, they’re “crazy” like a fox.

    From an objective perspective, they’re crazy as shithouse rats. And every day, they’re exposed more and more as the megalomaniacal psychopaths and sociopaths they are and have always been.

    This used to be common knowledge about ((Jews)). Yet the more “modern” humanity gets (built on mass corruption, mass murder, and the ((Jewish))/Fed Ponzi scheme that is now in the process of collapse) the dumber it has become.

    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
  81. anon[358] • Disclaimer says:
    @Paul Greenwood

    https://img.haarets.co.il/img/1.5664614/1018316866.jpg?precrop=1627,2200,x0,y0&height=1932&width=1429

    Balfour letter dated Nov 2nd,1917

    When Balfour was in opposition in 1906, he met with Weizmann for a chat. He was interested to learn why the Zionist leader had refused his generous offer to establish a future state to the Jews on fertile land in Africa under a British protectorate.—– https://www.jpost.com/opinion/the-balfour-declaration-some-stories-and-anecdotes-508676

    also from above jpost link —“The initial drafting of the Balfour Declaration was the work of a group of Jewish and Christian Manchester Zionists. Among them were Simon Marks and Israel Sieff, partners of the famous Marks and Spencer stores, and Harry Sacher. They were helped and encouraged by C.P. Snow and Herbert Sidebottom, the editor and correspondent of the Manchester Guardian “.

    Now Mufti ‘s role was limited to viisting Germany onetime and he might or might not have met Hitler.

    Meeting Hitler might be a crime to modern day Zionist or Isareli but so is meeting with Ben Guiron,Sharett, Begin,Sharon,Shamir,Barak,Netanyahu,and Bennet to Arab and to the world who believe the Arab.

  82. @Rogue

    “ The British intercepted the message and decoded it – and then passed it on to the US government”

    Wow! How brave of British intelligence to decode a German message which the German Ambassador to Mexico could have simply transmitted to Mexican authorities through verbal diplomatic communications after consultation with the foreign ministry in Berlin. Remember the Lusitania, a supposedly passenger ship that was loaded with ammunition along with civilian passengers whose instant destruction was also blamed on German U Boats when there was no definitive proof that this was the case?

    No wonder that just before the conflict erupted between Germany and the Soviet Union in WWII, upon British intelligence providing Stalin with credible evidence collected from a fallen German Luftwaffe plane where maps were collected that hinted at Operation Barbarossa, was dismissed by Stalin as an attempt to push Russia onto the side of Britain in the war. So much was the reputation of British intelligence for craftiness and treachery that it was dismissed out of hand by Stalin.

    “ Apparently, and understandably, this enraged American public opinion and made it a lot easier for the US Congress to declare war on Germany.”

    If you could just state how many times American Congress voted to reject an act of war, I would be much obliged.

    • Agree: John Q Duped
    • Replies: @Rogue
  83. Rurik says:
    @Trinity

    I suppose the idea of a Hell, where people burn alive for eternity, resonates with much of humanity because there do seem to be people who actually deserve such a fate.

    how many American citizens would John McCain betray to rape, torture, murder or worse, if by doing so he might advance his personal prospects? Perhaps, even be president?!

    Ten? A thousand? Millions? I think we all know the answer to that. As many as necessary.

    Ditto Dick Cheney and his spawn, and God knows how many others…

    If they choose to serve the Devil in life, (ZOG = those who want your people tormented and destroyed), then why shouldn’t they pay the Devil’s price in the after life?

    ZOG burns people alive for the fun of it. Dresden being perhaps the most egregious example, of many…

    Women and children.

    Who really would shed a tear if Cuckhill or Woody or Bliar or Dubya or God knows how many are willing to sell out their own citizens, (when they’re the ones trusted to protect those very same citizens), if there were some divine justice meted out in the afterlife.

    I’d like to think so.

    I’d like to imagine that every scintilla of agony, of loss and heartbreak and injustice and suffering, every single mother morning the gratuitous death of her child, every loved one whose husband or daughter or friend, who died or lost limbs or were otherwise brutalized because of John McCain’s serial betrayals, is what he feels every second for eternity. All heaped upon him in a constant, groaning agony.

    With the Devil turning the screws, and mocking John (Woody / Cuckhill, Fauci / et al) in flames, asking ‘was it worth it? HAHAHAAA HAHAHHAA!’

    And failing that, perhaps the next worst fate for these types, would be removed from positions of power.

    Next to burning alive, I suspect the worst thing that Liz Cheney can imagine, is losing her reelection.

    Heh, heh

    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
  84. lloyd says: • Website
    @Zachary Smith

    The common assumption is if there is a sexual accusation, there must be some truth about it. Time magazine could have on its cover, Bill Clinton is the first black president. Not true. Barack Obama is the first gay President. A resultant scandal. The letters may have just crossed the line from friendship to intimate. But enough to result in divorce and loss of Wilson’s moral reputation. The relationship between Wilson and Brandeis does echo the relationship between future presidents and Zionist leaders.

  85. Emslander says:
    @Francis Miville

    Vatican II was the ultimate spiritual defeat of the catholic dogma of faith to an unholy mixture of Protestantism and of the errors spread by Russia.

    Your comment deserves further discussion, but I hesitate to go so far off-topic. One must always beware of throwing pearls into the pigpen of the internet. Maybe Mr. Unz will one day find an appropriate essay to anchor these matters.

    I can’t see, however, how Russian Orthodoxy, with its apostolic priesthood and valid sacraments, would merit a special supernatural message in the context of the critical moment in history. She also warns of the second war, while the first has a year to go. Protestantism and materialism had been dominant for four hundred years by 1917.

    Like I say, I appreciate your message, but would prefer another vehicle.

  86. HdC says:
    @Joe Levantine

    The German population has no say in the matter.

    As you so aptly put: “… with the European natives relegated to voting for handpicked candidates whose only qualification is behaving obsequiously to Zionist interests…”

    Same in North America.

  87. barnabus says:
    @Alison Weir

    Germans were free to give Israeli lands back to the Jews for 2o years. There was a lot of persuasion directed at Kaiser Billy II, and he was well aware of the argument. He writes about it in his diary. In the end, he decided not to, because he thought more of the influence Germany would have with the Muslim world. So he lost WW1. The British were Johnny come lately, but hey, they were cleverer to make the deal.

  88. barnabus says:
    @Paul Greenwood

    Samuel was simply not interested in re-establishing Israel, so he created stumbling blocks. A lot of Zionism is Christian in origin, and many Jews were anti-Zionist. Moreover, being an old Indian hand, he was particular to Indian Muslim interests.

  89. @Chris Moore

    Thanks. Totally agree.

    Here I should mention a book written by Egyptian Dr. Ashraf Ezzat titled “ Egypt Knew no Pharaohs nor Israelites” in which he brightly exposes the original big lie that is the building stone of the Jewish legends upon which lies the excessive Jewish conceit and that is none other than The Old Testament. This book was rated five stars by most commenters except Israelis.

    “ Yet the more “modern” humanity gets (built on mass corruption, mass murder, and the ((Jewish))/Fed Ponzi scheme that is now in the process of collapse) the dumber it has become.”

    And I would add to what you mentioned what Dr. Robert Malone, father of the mNRA technology labelled as Mass Formation Psychosis. Just watching people accept the medical pass in France makes me believe that things have to go a lot worse before we could see the light at the end of the tunnel.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
    , @simple mind
  90. @Emslander

    As it was already mentioned, Germans are notoriously hard to assimilate, sharing with their ultimate enemy, Jews, clanishness and nomadism.

    I was once attending a lecture about German communities from Baden in the old 19h century Venezuela or Ecuador (anyway, tropical part of Spanish Latin America), and it was a story of isolationism, contempt for non-Germans neighbours, Pakistani/Kurdishlike fanatical endogamy as to the point of bride imports from a village of origin of an individual German (this custom actually created a record from which the investigation begun). The lecture was in Germany by a German academic who herself was a bit shocked with all that she was speaking about. There was some reminiscence of the story of Colonia Dignidad, just without religious overtones. BTW, the German goverment until today has not prosecuted Colonia escapees in Germany as required by the relevant UN Committee ruling (either one on Torture or one of Human Rights). The fact that Germans did make a movie about Colonia but did not prosecute perpetrators hiding in Germany is a testimony to the German hipocritical approach to the problem: a movie but not justice. The same was with German WWII crimes: public apologies, monuments, but not justice. Germany are actually rather good at resisting justice, whether of Versailles or any other, esepcially justice for non-Germans.

    Nevertheless, surprisingly just recently I learnt the only succesful example of German assimilation in the East , and that are so called Gluchoniemcy (Silent Germans), a progeny of German colonists in medieval Poland.

    https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Głuchoniemcy

    However, reading the list of their surnames I realised many of them are on the woke side in today Poland, starting with some Marta Lempart, the main leader of pro-abortion side in the current conflict around this problem in Poland. Many people noted that the symbol of women strike resembles the SS symbol too, which is a kind of trolling, I would like to say, German trolling, but not, not really.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All-Poland_Women%27s_Strike

    With all that, the German nomadism is quite surprising, really. There were actually two nomadic nations in East Europe, Jews AND Germans. Why the latter did it? Not enough love for Germany?
    Were Germans the Kurds of yesteryear, leaving at every sight of trouble? After all, there has never been such serious conditions in Germany as there were once in Ireland… Moreover, the political structure of Germany, fractioned for a long time, should make easy fighting for your own rights against your local lord. Yet the only romantic story about this, the gloomy Michael Kolhaas by Heinrich Kleist teaches you that you must pay with your own life for justice to be served: in other words, there is no justice.

    • Replies: @HdC
    , @Jews Rock!
  91. Fox says:
    @TGD

    How would you classify re-naming of streets and townships from German to non-German names? Is this a spontaneous action or are city councils not part of government? Removal of German literature from public libraries? What kind of action is that and what does that kind of official distancing convey to people on the street? Why was it done?
    And there was also the more laughable stuff such as propagating “Freedom Cabbage” for sauerkraut, just like the “Freedom Fries”, which was even discussed in Congress just quite recently.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  92. @Rurik

    “ With the Devil turning the screws, and mocking John (Woody / Cuckhill, Fauci / et al) in flames, asking ‘was it worth it? HAHAHAAA HAHAHHAA!“

    Thanks for putting this sly psychopathic rat Fauci, that mass murderer who is still looked up to by so many gullible and naive Americans, in the same league of the greatest enemies of God and mankind. Though I hope that he will keep in hell the company of his business buddy Bill Gates of Hell.

    What you wrote here resonates with every person of decency and integrity. The style and substance of your writing never fails to enchant and amaze. I always look forward to your posts.

    • Replies: @Rurik
  93. Rogue says:
    @HdC

    It might be a circular argument – in your opinion.

    But it’s certainly not fiction.

    I suggest you at least resort to a Wikipedia glance at the matter, or somewhere else if Wikipedia not your cup of tea, before posting an argument such as “if what you wrote is true.”

    It was true and, as stated, pissed of average Joe America.

    Whether it was reason to declare war is obviously subjective. In my opinion it was not a good enough reason to declare war, but since when have governments acted rationally when it comes to taking up the sword?

    As it is, it aided the declaration of war – and wasn’t a root cause of it.

  94. Rogue says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Shhhh!!

    Here at Unz not a word of reproach can be said against the Germans in either World War…

  95. @Francis Miville

    As a Catholic who sought pilgrimage at Mount Athos, I was surprised that our Orthodox brethren prevented me from taking the communion while stating that there is no unity of belief between Catholicism and Orthodoxy when I had always believed, and I still stick to the belief, that the differences were political only.

    Here, it is worthy to mention a Christian Syrian lady called Mirna whose hands seep olive oil that does not stain and who displayed this holy phenomenon in the company of people I knew well, and the secular Syrian government under Hafez Al Assad testified to the veracity of the fact, and the oil has had miraculous effects on many believers. Mirna stated that she got this holy capacity after she had an apparition of Mother Mary in which she told her to preach the unity of the Catholic and Orthodox Churches without any mention of other churches.

    I will refrain from adding more on the subject for the same reasons mentioned by Emslander.

  96. @Emslander

    Since it was American Wall Street Financiers that bankrolled the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, I have always wondered why Our Lady of Fatima didn’t speak of the American “errors” forced on Christian Russia. Russia, today, is more Christian than America, which has become anti-Christian.

  97. Rogue says:
    @Joe Levantine

    Wow! How brave of British intelligence to decode a German message

    What an asinine comment!

    You don’t think every country on Earth will not resort to dirty tricks (though arguably in this case not particularly dirty) when it comes to intercepting and successfully decoding enemy messages?

    Intelligence gathering, and intelligence breaking of enemy codes has been an integral part of warfare since at least the beginning of the 20th century.

    All countries capable of doing it, do it. You think Germany in the 2 World Wars didn’t do it??

    • Replies: @Joe Levantine
  98. Far the most pointed and penetrating comment on the Treaty of Versailles (and prediction of its consequences) is not to be found in Keynes’ book but in Thorstein Veblen’s review of it, collected in his Essays In Our Changing Order, ed. Leon Ardzrooni (1934, rpr. 1964).

  99. @Rogue

    I have read many books about WWII including Irving’s ‘Hitler’s War’ and I know for a fact that breaking encoded messages is part and parcel of the game during and outside wars. My point is that I doubt Germany would risk sending coded messages about alliances directed against the US to the Mexican government considering the consequences of having such a code deciphered by the enemy. If America is the heir of the British Empire, then how much research one needs to do in order to reveal how much US history is ripe with false flags.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  100. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Joe Levantine

    Mass Formation Psychosis

    I can’t help but to believe that Malone was alluding to more than the conventional wisdom on “vaccine” dogma there. I think he was also alluding to how ZOG and its MSM have basically put the entire West (formerly Christendom) and much more of the world under their spell. Of course, they have the entire resources of the Federal Reserve at their disposal (ie unlimited funds).

    It’s similar to how ((Fink)) et al managed to entice most of the nation into embracing “Woke” dogma. By just placing relatively few ((Jews)) in key positions, they can basically take control of the levers of the world. That’s been their modus operandi forever, too.



    Video Link

    • Agree: Joe Levantine
  101. @Miro23

    “These were US Supreme Court Justices, the highest US authorities supposedly defending the US Constitution and the wellbeing of the American people.”

    Actually, they’re the U.S. Supreme Shysters, nine unelected, unaccountable, ethics-free megalomaniacs.

  102. @Emslander

    I’d be interested in learning more about the changes in OD you refer to.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  103. Rogue says:
    @Joe Levantine

    Apparently, the German sender of the message (Zimmerman), a high official in the German foreign office at the time, admitted to doing so when pressed.

    I’m not aware – at all – that the Germans have ever denied it was the case.

    • Replies: @Petermx
  104. @Emslander

    “I’d go a step further. If a child begins to take an interest in social justice, international affairs or elective politics, jail them for twenty years.”

    Sounds OK. Something’s got to be done to stem the flow of power-mad, live-on-the-taxpayers’-dime hacks! . . .

  105. Trinity says:

    Even Glenn Beck exposed what a complete scumbag Woody was years ago when Beck was riding high during his gig at
    Fox news. Good ole GB even exposed Jew boy Jorge Schwartz but he did not have the sack to utter the J word whether the subject was white traitor trash, Woody or kike supremacist Jorge Schwartz. Now I am sure that people like Glenn Beck and Tucker Carlson can not possibly be as clueless as they pretend to be or can they? Lol.

  106. Emslander says:
    @Irish Savant

    This isn’t a good forum for dragging out dirty Catholic linens. OD is a very complicated and spiritual development within the Church. My relationship with it and with its members and directors was very spiritual and complicated. I generally attribute my failure to persevere as a personal weakness. Beyond that, I won’t go.

    • Thanks: Irish Savant
  107. R2b says:
    @Alison Weir

    Thank you Alison Weir!
    The word Parushim, as you write about in your excellent book, was an important revelation for me. It gives continuity to history, in a very special way.
    Emslander wrote about Opus Dei. Thank you, that also brings about another facet, that one would like to hear moore.

  108. Petermx says:
    @Rogue

    It’s only American propaganda and self-righteousness that would suggest there is something wrong with that. Americans were the aggressors, taking sides in a war already raging thousands of miles from the American shore, first by sending aid to Great Britain, including military aid on the Luisitania and eventually attacking Germany and going to war against a country that had done nothing to them. What was said in American cables when they were talking about joining the “allies” and attacking Germany? If Americans can complain about the Zimmermann note, I’m certain Germans would have a lot more to complain about in American notes or even public statements while they were planning to go to war with a country that had done nothing to them. But those things aren’t discussed. It’s only the two oceans that let Americans take this self-righteous tone. They knew they were protected and could behave that way. The USA is fortunate to have those two oceans protecting them and allowing the USA to conspire against others and shoot off its big mouth without fear. In those days Germans could defend themselves and didn’t feel inferior to anyone, quite the opposite.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Disagree: Corvinus
  109. @littlewing

    Surprised that nobody has yet taken the liberty of dropping a dump on his crypt…and then doing a video on the whole stinking “accolade”. Unfortunately, there is as yet no way to convey the reeking ordure via one’s sense of small.

  110. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Emslander

    I use “internationalists” because I hesitate to put it all on the Hebrews. New Englanders came out to the Midwest in the 1860’s and established newspapers, colleges and other forms of cultural hegemony and most of them weren’t Jews.

    Why not? You press hard enough on the Devil and his Satanic minions emerge to defend him.

    The ((Jews)) are starting to turn against the [[Anglo-Saxons]] because they’re sick of taking the entire fall for what amounts to joint Satanism. That’s what this Samson Option Biden administration is all about. The ((Jewish)) rackets are revealing their partners in crime. The Devil is turning upon himself.

    All the chips are falling into place: “War on Terror”? Fail. War on Russia? Fail. War on China? Fail. Plandemic? Fail.

    It’s not all Jews, just ((Jews)). It’s not all Anglo-Saxons, just [[Anglo-Saxons]].

    The redeemable will abandon the ZOG ship and publicly repent, letting the chips fall where they may. The Satanists will cling to their dark master and his poisonous fruits to the bitter end. They are blind to the error of their ways by their magalomania, their vanity, their greed, and their conceit.

    They did it to themselves.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  111. @Rogue

    There are many historians who think that the “Zimmerman Note” was a “false flag” psyop concocted by British Intelligence.

    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  112. Rogue says:
    @Joe Levantine

    90% of the casualties at concentration camps died in the last year of the war after Germany was bombed to smithereens thereby hindering the capacity of German authorities to feed and nurse the sick and the weak.

    What you say might well be true. But the Germans incarcerated Jews from all over Europe into these squalid camps – not just from Germany.

    Therefore Nazi Germany was guilty of the crime of transporting Jews from all over occupied Europe into an uncertain fate.

    Seeing as many of these Jews died in the final months of the war due to Nazi German policies, it’s the latter that sits with the blame.

    And, clearly, loads of Jews were also murdered on the Eastern front.

    Now, the Jews are not my favorite people, to be sure. But a crime’s, a crime.

    Have the Jews overstated, garnished, exaggerated and embellished their suffering during WWII? In my opinion, yes. But they haven’t invented it out of whole cloth either.

  113. Al Ross says:

    One aspect of America’s entry into WW One was the effective abolition of patriotism as a rational concept , i.e., a nation’s dedication to its own preservation and interests .

    Woodrow Wilson and his backers not only knew that joining battle in Europe would be in diametric opposition to US interests , they announced the fact by bleating about “democracy” and “rights” of foreigners as reasons for the Holy War.

    Indeed , intelligent Americans who protested against this madness, regarding it as being inimical to the nation’s true Ethnic Genetic Interests , were , in a classic Semitic inversion of our language , labelled “unpatriotic”.

    • Agree: HdC
  114. @John Q Duped

    If it happened to be an expansionist, imperialist, militaristic program, Teddy was all for it. He prided himself on big-game hunting in Africa. As a young, pampered callow youth, Roosevelt decided to make a man outta himself by ranching in the far reaches of North Dakota.

    If recall is precise, he was Secretary of the Navy for a spell and probably was instrumental in America’s first False Flag attack, the sinking of the battleship Maine, which gave the Administration (and William Randolph Hearst) the excuse they were looking for in order to declare war on Spain and swipe their empire, including the Philippines.

    In that Spanish-American War his Roughriders assaulted San Juan Hill outside Santiago, Cuba and would have been decimated had it not been for an all-black infantry regiment which pulled his cavalry chestnuts out of the fire.

    It’s highly likely that someone with considerably more money than his not insignificant fortune, made him an offer he could not refuse in starting up the so-called Bullmoose Party which as J.Q.D. rightly points out, divided the Republican Party and cost William Howard Taft the 1912 election. Though his own ego could have induced T.R. to run, it’s doubtful whether his fortune would have sufficed to run a presidential campaign. But its not unlikely that that same overblown ego made him think he could win. Those \$hekels-\$hifters sure had that man pegged.

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  115. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Rogue

    Germans incarcerated Jews.. squalid camps… Nazi German blame… loads of Jews murdered… a crime’s a crime…

    There you go again with the “persecuted Jew” shtick. Do the ((Jews)) not operate as a nation? Do they not have leaders choregraphing their Bolshevism, their bankster Ponzi schemes, their Zionism? Did the Zionists not collaborate with the Nazis? Did the Bolsheviks not previously murder millions in the Soviet sphere in collaboration with the Zionists? Did the “Cousinhood” bankster Ponzi schemers not oversee the whole operation from Britain?

    Top ((Jews)) think you can go about maneuvering, manipulating, pitting group A against group B against group C, walking between the raindrops, engaging in all manner of anti-goyim treason and treachery and mass murder, and then when the their rank and file gets hassled and pressed and vilified and bitch-slapped (which top ((Jews)) always knew would happen — wanted to happen so they could play the Persecuted card) then they act surprised and innocent, as if they’re a nation without agency and without vast financial resources and without expertise in manipulating and brainwashing and buying and guilting at their disposal.

    You really are a disgusting, cowardly, parasitic, passive-aggressive lot. That’s why you have the reputation as Satan’s minions. And who’s to say you’re not, given your track record? Indeed, I think you welcome the reputation and the “anti-Semitism” to keep your perpetual Evil motion machine operating.

    The question raises itself: What would a world without ((Jews)) look like? Not a world that exterminated the ((Jews)) but a world where truly free speech exposed them and their devilish goy minions for what they are again and again and again until the machine broke down and the evil wizards were nothing but senile old grifters drooling and muttering to themselves?

    It would certainly look a damn sight better than the one that “tolerance” for ((Jews)) has resulted in.

    • Agree: RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @Rogue
    , @HdC
  116. Trinity says:

    I have learned over the years to believe the exact opposite of what we are told. Scum like Woody, Cuckhill, Rosenfelt aka Roosevelt, all lionized by (((historians))) were all total cripples not only in some cases physically, but morally as well. The so called elite are in fact inferior rejects with titles. Chuckhill for example appears to be nothing more than a bloated alcoholic bum.

    • Agree: HdC
  117. Colinsky says:

    If I ever get my time machine working, I’m going back to October 14, 1912, in Milwaukee, to pluck the 50-page speech (folded in half) from Theodore Roosevelt’s inside jacket pocket just before John Schrank shot him in the heart.

    Without the thick manuscript blocking the bullet, Roosevelt would have been killed. Without Roosevelt in the race, the Republican vote would not have been split in November and President Taft would have been re-elected.

    No Woodrow Wilson. No income tax. No Fed. No election of Senators. No Prohibition. No World War One, so probably no World War Two.

    • Replies: @Orville H. Larson
  118. @TGD

    The blackmailed and complaisant Thomas Woodrow Wilson established a regime of State Terrorism as his ma\$ters “suggested”. Roving squads of specially designated thugs invaded German-American neighborhoods, social-clubs, churches and even picnics, “beating up the Huns.”

    Semantic warfare was also practiced under the terror regime of the Puppet Regime in the Di\$trict of Corruption. Dachshunds were to be called “liberty dogs” and sauerkraut became “liberty cabbage”. Note how they rubbed it in our faces by using the word “liberty” in that context.

    Even before Wilson’s selection, the forces which made him, largely centered around the Rottenchild Crime Clan’s minion J.P. Morgan, spent a tiddle of their considerable fortunes to buy up the 25 most important newspapers which, unlike the Chew Pork Slymes, were not already grasped in their greedy mitts. They appointed new editors for those now under fully under their control house-organs and gave them their marching orders. The mission was to demonize Germany by all possible means and British Intelligence, controlled by the same City of London Bank\$ters, were most happy to oblige with such tales as Pikelhuber-helmeted Huns happily bayonetting Belgian babies.

    TGD may go on and on about how the Germans treated the Belgians—and some of it may well be true–mind you SOME of it.

    The most gruesome treatment of civilians was how the British and their Imperial allies, enjoyed the honor of establishing the world’s very first concentration camps to hold women, children and elders as ransom against the Boer farmers at the onset of the world’s bloodiest century. Many thousands of those innocents died under British concentration camp conditions.

    Why did Britain attack a bunch of Dutch farmers in the Transvaal and Orange Free State? Simple: It was through their agent Cecil Rhodes, and also for their co-religionists, the Oppenheimers, that the Rottenchild Crime Clan wanted total control over the largest diamond and gold deposits in the world.

    • Agree: Joe Levantine
  119. anarchyst says:
    @Fox

    Here is an excerpt from jewish author Theodore N. Kaufman’s book “Germany Must Perish”: This vile tome advocated the complete destruction of German culture, music, society, architecture, and everything German. In other words, total genocide of Germany and the German people.

    Germany has lost its war. She sues for peace. The imperative demands of the victor people that Germany must perish forever makes it obligatory for the leaders to select mass sterilization of the Germans as the best means of wiping them out permanently. They proceed to:

    1. Immediately and completely disarm the German army and have all armaments removed from German territory.

    2. Place all German utility and heavy industrial plants under heavy guard, and replace German workers by those of Allied nationality.

    3. Segregate the German army into groups, concentrate them in severely restricted areas, and summarily sterilize them.

    4. Organize the civilian population, both male and female, within territorial sectors, and effect their sterilization.

    5. Divide the German army (after its sterilization has been completed) into labor battalions, and allocate their services toward the rebuilding of those cities which they ruined.

    6. Partition Germany and apportion its lands. The accompanying map gives some idea of possible land adjustments which might be made in connection with Germany’s extinction.

    7. Restrict all German civilian travel beyond established borders until all sterilization has been completed.

    8. Compel the German population of the apportioned territories to learn the language of its area, and within one year to cease the publication of all books, newspapers and notices in the German language, as well as to restrict German-language broadcasts and discontinue the maintenance of German-language schools.

    9. Make one exception to an otherwise severely strict enforcement of total sterilization, by exempting from such treatment only those Germans whose relatives, being citizens of various victor nations, assume financial responsibility for their emigration and maintenance and moral responsibility for their actions.
    Thus, into an oblivion which she would have visited upon the world, exits Germany.

    Now if you were a German living at that time, what would you think about jews?

    • Agree: Towey
    • LOL: nokangaroos
    • Replies: @Fox
  120. Al Ross says:
    @emerging majority

    It was very stupid of the US to eschew the annexation and occupation of Cuba in 1898 , almost as stupid as the country’s burdening itself with the Philippine islands.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  121. @Peter Rabbit

    Any doubts as to the authenticity of the telegram were removed by Zimmermann himself. At a press conference on March 3, 1917, he told an American journalist, “I cannot deny it. It is true.” Then, on March 29, 1917, Zimmermann gave a speech in the Reichstag in which he admitted that the telegram was genuine.[27] Zimmermann hoped that Americans would understand that the idea was that Germany would not fund Mexico’s war with the United States unless the Americans joined World War I.

    • Replies: @Peter Rabbit
  122. @Curmudgeon

    “Germany” lived up to the Armistice because they had no other choice, obviously. The German Army had collapsed and revolution with mutiny spread across the ranks, much as in other armies across Europe. Germany lost the 1st world war, hands down.

  123. @Emslander

    They were randomly “sent off to kill and die” but couldn’t manage to stay put like everyone else who stayed put. Anybody who wanted to stay out stayed out. THEN it will shift to “the Jews”, who didn’t fight enough for some European madness called “trench warfare”, but your people were helplessly lifted into the maelstrom by the same Jews who wouldn’t join your wars for the various Kings.

    It’s always somebody else’s fault, never yours. The Eternal Dindoo

  124. @John Q Duped

    They also stole the weather and the elections, and “made everyone” drink alcohol

    What ISN’T the fault of the Jews? It’s never your fault at all

    • Replies: @Robjil
  125. @Emslander

    One of the young men in the Watergate coup …

    May I suggest that there was no more a Watergate coup than there was a January 6 insurrection. The only true coup associated with the Watergate was the one that ousted Nixon. Cf. Silent Coup: The Removal of a President (1991), by Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin.

    Nixon was far from being a heroic figure. He was simply a better man than his utterly contemptible enemies.
    ____________

    Addendum: Does anyone know where this article was originally published? Is its publication here at Unz a first? The piece is very well researched and argued, but it badly needs close proofreading.

    • Replies: @emerging majority
  126. @Orville H. Larson

    absofrickinlutely.

    I likes a man ‘oo says wot ‘ee finks. IMO, Wilson is #2 on the list of ‘If you could go back in time and kill just 1 famous American before he/she does that thing that damaged the country.’

    PS – #3 = LBJ
    – #1 = John Marshall. I was a mere half-bright 7th grader when they taught us about Marbury v. Madison, and I saw *instantly* how that decision upended the Constitution, shat all over ‘checks & balances’, and made a bunch of unelected fuckin JUDGES our Supreme Rulers For Life. As long as I live, I’ll never understand why Jefferson – who would have understood its real meaning and impact much better than I ever did – why Jefferson didn’t march Marshall to the White House lawn at gunpoint and hang him right there right then for sedition.

  127. @Al Ross

    Had the U.\$. annexed Cuba as well as Puerto Rico, then “West Side Story” may have needed to have been re-written, with the gang warfare being between Cubans and Puerto Ricans. Colonialism is most often an evil enterprise. Let people run their own affairs. The White Man’s Burden has resulted in some very sore shoulders and battered backs.

    In the Philippines, the burden fell mostly on the Filipinos themselves. The U.\$. occupation there was bloody-minded and horrendous in the early 1900’s. Thousands upon thousands of Filipino freedom fighters were butchered with superior weaponry and more advanced military operations and tactics. Years later, under more enlightened policies, the American government made an about-face and first established that land as a Commonwealth and then using that as a step towards independence, which they achieved in 1946.

    Of course, the American government had given the Filipinos a bargain they could not turn down, because there was a hook along with the bait: Military bases. It took a couple of generations for that nation to kick us out. Some of those sailors, airmen and soldiers really missed the chances to get their “ashes hauled” at low going rates. But as a rather polyglot people, the Filipinos do not seem to mind that some of their children grew up with blue eyes or with kinky hair.

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  128. @4 Dog Night

    Jefferson was probably too liberal-minded to have that done. Interestingly, in his very last hours in office, President #2, John Adams, a convinced Federalist, made that fateful appointment of Marshall as Chief Justice. Perhaps, hours later, when Jefferson assumed the role, he could have come up with some type of political means to remove the man from office.

    Curiously, during the Constitutional Convention, when the bank and land-speculator connected Federalists drew up the document; the connivers had previously had Jefferson appointed as Minister (ambassador) to France—at that time a fairly important assignment, as that nation was still much in the throes of the afterbirth of their bloody revolution. That’s probably the reason he allowed himself to be suckered in. Bad mistake. T.J. wrote a number of letters to his friends, the anti-Federalists. In those letters he warned that the way the court system was being set up was to introduce a monarchical element in what should be a republican form of governance.

    You said it 4-Dog: The court system injected into the Constitution “made a bunch of unelected fuckin JUDGES our Supreme Rulers for life”. Oh, did you hear about the latest U.\$. District Court RULING in the 7th District? Yeah, that’s what we’re faced with now.

    Since when should an unelected lawyer-politician—obviously tight with either the Republicrats or the Democans and probably a member of the Bar, as under control of Temple Court in City of London and quite possibly as well a high-degree Mason; a member of Opus Dei; or perhaps of the B’nai Brith—all secret societies with elitist agendas— those BlackRobes ,lord it over
    “We the People”. Why, oh why. Only the smirking Bank\$ters know for sure and they’re certainly not telling.

  129. Robjil says:
    @simple mind

    Top Jews have had control of the Media in the west for over a 100 years. These days it is at its highest level, western governments follow what ever Media spouts. Since our votes don’t count for much in our “governments” in the Zion ruled west, we should go with the flow. The flow is the Media, it is our government in the west. All Media heads should be voted in by the people of the west. That is where “votes” really count these days. Sites like Unz are freedom sites. It gives the information and allows free debate that people would vote for if people were allowed to vote who would be their Media controllers.

    https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/04/media-control-was-key.html

    The Conquest of the World by the Jews (1873), by Major Osman Bey (also known as Frederick Millingen)
    reveals that Masonic Jews controlled Western media more than 150 years ago. This is how they initiated wars to decimate the goyim. More recently, why Syria is bombed after a bogus nerve gas attack that brought the world to the edge of war. But does the media hold our leaders accountable for this? No. Meanwhile, Israel kills over 40 unarmed Palestinian protesters and there are crickets in the media.
    How did the “Jews” gain this control? As bankers, it was easy to finance their agents
    (like Pulitzer, Ochs, Newhouse and Rupert Murdoch) to purchase the newspapers. Because of this control, the goyim have remained their mental prisoners to this day. The majority of Jews were not consulted and want to assimilate. Their security and that of humanity, in general, is jeopardized by the secret megalomaniacal agenda of Jewish “leaders” and their Freemason flunkees.

    • Replies: @simple mind
  130. @Pierre de Craon

    The article certainly needs close proofreading. It could also have used for a highly informed copy-editor. The writer stated that Wilson appeared before a Joint Session “just four months after he was inaugurated”. Not true at all.

    In 1917, the “man who kept us out of the war”, according to his re-election propaganda, was inaugurated in March of that month, not in January as is the current practice under a constitutional amendment. He called for a Declaration of War in the early part of April, a mere matter of a few weeks since his Inauguration.

    So we can take from that that the deal was in. No question whatsoforever that the man was blackmailed and was acting under orders emanating from the covert rulers of Britain, the Rottenchild Crime Clan and their American agents, Brandeis, Frankfurter and Baruch. The latter’s father, incidentally, was operating as a major financier on behalf of the Rottenchilds for the Confederacy and working out of Charlestown, South Carolina. Baruch Pere was also instrumental in establishment of the KKK after the War and was closely connected with the Masonic gentleman who wrote “Morals and Dogma” for the Scottish Rite Masons, who were very powerful in the South.

    Underlying the entire Zionist operation (a multigenerational agenda) are the ruling judges of Babylonian Talmudism, the “wise elders” known as the ruling Sanhedrin. The Honey-trap scheme which is employed with the strategy and tactics of bribery and blackmail, was different back in 1909 or thereabouts when the agent walked into Wilson’s office as the Chancellor of Princeton University. His image was that of a suave, Southern gentleman and a Presbyterian preacher to boot. What a perfect image of respectability.

    It is my surmise that that agent confronted a blushing Wilson with that letter, he also said that “we have ALL of them, BUT do we have a deal for you. You will be nominated for governor of New Jersey next year by the Democrats and you WILL win.” Did Wilson even have a choice in the matter? With a strong-minded and judgementalist wife at home and public opinion still of a Victorian attitude, the letter would have ruined him.

    Fast forward to Epstein, his girlfriend Maxwell and her director, Wexner and his Mossad controllers and HOW many members of Congress, the Senate, major administrative figures, judges, generals and admirals were in THEIR little black books. That old honey-trap, along with bribery and blackmail are still working like they always have.

    • Thanks: Pierre de Craon
  131. Al Ross says:
    @emerging majority

    Colonialism , in the White Settler sense , did not figure in the Philippine scenario.

    What the Filipinos got was the Imperial Presence of a ruling, Colonialism – derived, America with no experience in managing indigenous peoples, albeit with prodigious and deserved domestic success in conquering them.

    A Philippines – based launch of American Imperial expansion would have been against both the US’s interests and its principles , if that’s quite the right word.

    Puerto Rico’s annexation was a second prize sop to those who unsuccessfully argued for US occupation of Cuba.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  132. karel says:
    @Emslander

    Ten million Germans died when they were driven from Czechoslovakia, their actual homeland, after the Allies gave the Slavs a free hand after WWII.

    Can you count till ten?

    • Replies: @Fox
  133. E_Perez says:
    @Rogue

    What you say might well be true. But the Germans incarcerated Jews from all over Europe into these squalid camps – not just from Germany.

    Therefore Nazi Germany was guilty of the crime of transporting Jews from all over occupied Europe into an uncertain fate.

    Seeing as many of these Jews died in the final months of the war due to Nazi German policies, it’s the latter that sits with the blame.

    Not so fast, please.

    Jews were (self-declared) enemies of Germany and all beligerents in both wars – including the US – put their enemies in camps. The Jews make us believe that these were extermination camps, while the Germans – understandibly – put them to work.

    And, clearly, loads of Jews were also murdered on the Eastern front.

    This is a completely different issue and has to do with partisan warfare prohibited by international rules, but not accepted by Stalin.

    Same, by the way, in France, where to this very day they are mourning their perfidious ‘resistance fighters’ murdering cowardly German soldiers in ambushes after the French capitulation.

    • Replies: @Rogue
  134. @Colinsky

    In his book “American Assassins: The Darker Side of Politics” (1982), James W. Clarke discusses this case. John F. Schrank shot Roosevelt with a .38 caliber revolver. The bullet didn’t penetrate the folded manuscript and/or an eyeglass case.

    If you get your time machine going, and still want to go back there, I’ll lend you my Colt Python .357 magnum six-incher. Find Schrank, and give it to him. It ought to be enough firepower to get the job done. (Just one thing: Grab the gun back from Schrank, run to your time machine, and get back here. It’s a nice heater, and I’d like it back.)

  135. @Robjil

    uh oh! The MEDIA are holding many goyim mental prisoners

    Dindoo Nuffin amirite vote for magical Media Heads, children

    Thank Gawd for the Freedom Flag and Vote Vote Vote

    • Replies: @Al Ross
    , @irvingdavid
  136. @Joe Levantine

    a book written by Egyptian Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

    IOW another lying Arab propagandist with an axe to grind

  137. Al Ross says:
    @simple mind

    The Media’s output is heavily leavened with the customary Semitic sludge that is mandatory in all offerings intended for consumption by misinformed Americans.

  138. Fox says:
    @anarchyst

    Thanks.
    I know this vile screed by Kaufman, even have a copy of it. Just could never get myself to read it.

    Arthur Topham of Canada published a few years ago a slightly altered version of ‘Germany must Perish’, titled ‘Israel must Perish’. He merely altered the word ‘German’ to ‘Jewish’ or ‘Israel’, thus making the mirror image of Kaufman’s book.
    The light-hearted defense of Kaufman, as for example in the Wikipedia article about him, gave way to swift judicial persecution and ended in Topham’s imprisonment.

  139. NY Viking says: • Website

    Author,

    I prefer to call the banksters cartel of the world “Canaanites.” It more accurately depicts them. No Zionists that allows them to decry racism or anti-semite.

  140. Orwell said something like, he who controls the historical account determines the future; in that humans react to narrative in predictable ways. If a great injustice was done in the past we must make amends…but what if the defendant is not guilty? And debate is not allowed, not tolerated, like it’s a matter of national security. If we can’t discuss the past how can we discuss the present?

  141. @simple mind

    Are you masquerading as Amelek?

  142. Rogue says:
    @E_Perez

    Hitler’s War, by David Irving, which I’m near the end of, makes clear that substantial numbers of Jews, including women and children, were systematically murdered by the Nazi regime.

    Specifically, on Himmler’s orders. Irving, of course, gets a lot of flack for not linking these orders to Hitler. Whether Irving is right about that or not I simply don’t know. But it doesn’t alter the fact that his “revisionist” work doesn’t pull punches at mass liquidations of Jews – and not just because of partisan activity.

    Furthermore, Jews were transported out of all Nazi occupied countries for permanent relocation elsewhere (again according to Irving), not just for temporary purposes of whilst the war lasted.

    • Replies: @HdC
  143. Rogue says:
    @Chris Moore

    You really are a disgusting, cowardly, parasitic, passive-aggressive lot.

    Oi vey, slow down my friend. Are you meshuganah? I is not Jewish! Methinks your goyishe kop is malfunctioning.

    I mean, just cos my real name is Shlomo Shekelstein, and I reside down here in Barmitzvah Gardens, doesn’t make me Jewish! Plus I still have my foreskin – oh no, wait, hang on, I don’t.

    Whatever, as it is, I’m on speed-dial to the ADL right now…

    • LOL: Ned kelly
  144. I don’t mean to discount the importance of the Jewish role in the WWI tragedy nor deny their responsibility for their actions with this comment. But there comes a time when a people or peoples must address the board in their own eye.

    What is being documented in this article is the key role of Jewish money and influence peddling upon the many gentile actors involved in WWI. At the end of the day, however, hardly any, if even one, of the 17 million dead were killed by a weapon wielded by a Jew. Nor were the “over the top” infantry charges ordered by Jewish corporals or generals. The most that can be said, it seems, is that gentiles killed their owned after succumbing to Jewish bribery, blackmail and propaganda.

    I’ve come across several zio-commenters here at UR taunt the commentariat with lines such as “if you are so much better than us how can we control you so easily?” Their failure to own their own people’s crimes does not exonerate us of our own.

    At the end of the day, ladies and gentilemen, we must make our own choices and correctly weigh the costs and benefits. If someone offers you trillions to commit murder and you say yes, the primary guilt is on you, not the briber. In short, the Jews conquered us by exploiting our weaknesses and divisions. “We” were our own willing executioners. The devil can offer you the crown of Caesar but you are guilty for accepting it.

    Again, you might respond that my blame is misplaced, but there is a hopeful silver lining to this approach. Perhaps it is not necessary to defeat Jewish power by arms or in the halls of power, for their power derives from our own complicity. We win once we are strong enough to withdrawal that complicity.

    • Replies: @Chris Moore
  145. @Al Ross

    I agree with you 100 percent vis-à-vis the Philippines, both as regards your original comment and the cogent analytic follow-up to which this comment is a reply. I think, too, that your image of PR as, in effect, a consolation prize for Cuba is on the money.

    I remain unpersuaded, however, that annexation of Cuba would have benefited actual Americans—i.e., white folks—in the short term or the long. My guess is that within twenty years it would have become a plantation island with Jewish overlords, mestizo field bosses, and black serfs as workers. Just thinking about the immorality of such a setup leaves a stench in my nostrils. And would it even have brought a five-cent-a-pound drop in sugar or rum prices?

    While we are talking about island grabs, I wish to heaven that Hawaii too had remained untouched. That grab was the original CIA color revolution avant la lettre. Also, if someone were to offer me a petition titled “Independence for Alaska,” I’d sign it.

    Somewhat off topic, did you ever see Sam Francis’s pointed characterization of the War between the States? “A war in which 600,000 whites died so that 400,000 blacks could move from slavery to serfdom.”

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  146. @Rurik

    Thanks for that PDF, brilliant stuff.

  147. @simple mind

    Read the book and judge for yourself. If you are able to refute the major themes of the book, I would be very much interested in your thoughts.

    • Replies: @simple mind
  148. Druid55 says:

    The “pogroms” in Russia have been debunked. As in poland. It’s all zionist trickery and propaganda

    • Replies: @Bukowski
  149. @Rogue

    The late scholar Eustace Mullins, one of America’s most dedicated researchers, had a different theory about what Hitler’s intentions when he started gathering Jews from outside Germany into the concentration camps. Mullins argued that in 1942 Hitler realised that he was about to lose the war and started gathering the Jews to use them as a bargaining chip with the Allies. However, the Allies were not interested in any peace proposal by mid war as their chances of victory increased anymore than they were at the beginning of the war when all of Hitler’s peace overtures were ignored by Churchill. Since the Jewish press in New York posted ‘ Judea Declares War on Germany’ only a few weeks after Hitler became Chancellor, and the high and mighty among the Jews did not spare an effort to get Britain and the U.S. at war with Germany by the acknowledgment of many prominent Americans including Joseph Kennedy, I judge Hitler’s illegal incarceration of Jews as an act of self defence. Should Germany pay reparations for Hitler’s act? I believe so, provided the Allies pay in a similar way for the senseless destruction of German cities for no military objective other than to terrorise the German population with the pinnacle of this reckless policy displayed by the shameful, criminal and barbaric destruction of the baroque style Dresden when it was obvious that Germany was weeks away from total surrender. Alas, the former Allies are doing history revisionism to hide their criminal behaviour by claiming that twenty five thousand civilians died when the real figure was between three hundred to four hundred thousands while at the same time making sure that future German generations would bear the burden of guilt for the Holocaust without allowing facts revealed by many revisionists to be part of the verdict.

  150. Emslander says:
    @Chris Moore

    The Devil is turning upon himself.

    He/she/it always goes too far. It’s the pride, you see.

  151. Chris Moore says: • Website
    @Mario Partisan

    Perhaps it is not necessary to defeat Jewish power by arms or in the halls of power, for their power derives from our own complicity. We win once we are strong enough to withdrawal that complicity.

    Your mistake is that you consider “White” ((Jew)) stooges to be fellow Whites and/or Christians when in fact they’re often hybrids, or secret confederates of ((Jews)) who have become “Jewish” due to their greed and low ethics. So you’re basically appealing to ((Jews)) not to be ((Jewish)).

    This is why I say a religious war is necessary. Jesus Christ learned the hard way never to count on the kindness of ((Jews)).

    The ((Jews)) are already engaged in a religious war anyway, even though their multiplicity of ((confederates)) continue to act as if they’re playing by the good will rules of Christendom/Western Civilization.

    Why would anyone assume ((Jews)) and their stooges, secret or otherwise, would ever play by such rules? White willingness to do so as the ((Jews)) and their stooges engage in the worst kind of treachery marks them as suckers, fools, and ultimately doomed.

    This White “Christian” project of offering the fruits of Jesus Christ to the world (Globalism) in exchange for thirty pieces of silver today amounts to a quick buck sell-out.

    But given American “Christian” willingness to engage with ((Jews)) in predictable quick buck disasters like the Transatlantic slave trade, one has to question whether there ever was a Christian bone in the national DNA.

    Maybe we always were a Judas nation, and now we’re paying the price.

    As I said, it’s now a religious war or continuation of the long, painful, ignoble Judas decline into nothingness as the ((Jews)) and their stooges carve up what’s left of the nation.

  152. HdC says:
    @Another Polish Perspective

    I’ll keep this short: Would bunch of Polish emigrants to some country in Africa assimilate into that local culture? I’m certain that you can think of a number of valid reasons as to why not.

    Ditto why German emigrants are resistant to assimilation into Eastern European or South American culture.

    Notice that German emigrants have had very little difficulty in assimilating into North American culture. Mind you, this may change in the future.

    • Agree: Emslander
    • Replies: @Emslander
  153. HdC says:
    @Chris Moore

    With international headlines screaming “Judea Declares War on Germany” in 1933, Germany would have been fully justified in imprisoning every Jew they could lay their hands on.

    Why was there no opposing outcry by Jews deploring this declaration of war???

    • Agree: anarchyst
  154. HdC says:
    @Rogue

    During wars many civilians are murdered.
    What makes the Jews, the self declared enemies of Germany, so special?

    How many Jews were killed by German action, other than those by the Einsatz Gruppen whose actions were legitimate under the Geneva Agreement?

    • Replies: @mulga mumblebrain
    , @Dube
  155. @4 Dog Night

    Well, if I could “go back in time and kill just 1 famous American before he/she does that thing that damaged the country,” I think I’d ice one A. Lincoln of Springfield, Illinois. Without him, the southern states would have peacefully bailed out, and formed their own country. (What the hell’s wrong with that?) No 600,000 dead, no devastation. . . .

    The glorification of Lincoln, the Lincoln Cult, is, and always has been despicable. However, thanks to revisionist–and politically incorrect!–historians, there’s more objectivity and less bullshit regarding that scumbag.

    In “Lincoln Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe” by Thomas DiLorenzo, Lincoln is revealed for what he was–a statist, a defiler of the Constitution, a railroad lobbyist, a devotee of corporate welfare. Just the opposite of the bullshit that schoolchildren are force-fed from day one.

    Your comment “a bunch of unelected fuckin JUDGES our Supreme Rulers For Life” is well taken. The U.S. Supreme Shysters are nine unelected, unaccountable, ethics-free megalomaniacs.

  156. Al Ross says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Thank you . My view on Cuba’s value to the US was based on strategic concerns , doubtless prompted by perfect hindsight.

    I have , unfortunately , neglected the work of Dr. Francis , having read only a fraction of his output, so I do appreciate the nudge.

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  157. Ned kelly says:

    Debt of the dead. So has Britain payed off its WW1 debt?
    Back in 2015 Chancellor George Osborne anounced the UK was going to finally (after a hundred years!) Pay off its war debt… Turns out he was only grandstanding (lying) the truth was that they just refinanced it… So does anyone know the truth?

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  158. @simple mind

    That’s easy, the Bible is 100% true and everyone knew that for thousands of years. Only since about the 19th century did the “higher criticism” emerge, the first dumbing down of classical history and ancient wisdom in modern times. And here we are today

    • Troll: Ned kelly
  159. @Joe Levantine

    That’s easy, the Bible is 100% true and everyone knew that for thousands of years. Only since about the 19th century did the “higher criticism” emerge, the first dumbing down of classical history and ancient wisdom in modern times. And here we are today

  160. Towey says:
    @Francis Miville

    St John of the Cross very wisely advised us to ignore all personal revelations both good and bad BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT NECESSARY FOR SALVATION.
    Some of the reasons he gives are; revelation ceased with the Apostles; revelations are perceived with the senses which are fallible and revelations may be diabolically inspired.
    I am a pre-Vatican II Catholic and when I attended the SSPX for a while to attend the Latin Mass I was surprised by the emphasis given in the sermons to the apparitions at Salette and Fatima. This surprised me as I don’t remember ever hearing a sermon on these apparitions in the pre Vatican II Church. I had never heard of the apparitions at Salette.
    My own take on the Fatima Apparitions is that they have been very useful to deflect responsibility for communism from the true malefactors to the Russians.
    The Apocalyptic messages and the emphasis on sins of the flesh are characteristics of gnostic Puritanism and not Catholicism and totally in keeping with the puritanical, pharisaical animus of the so-called traditional sects. And the obsession with revelation seems to be a relatively recent phenomenon, perhaps in compensation for the denial of the Faith that occurred at Vatican II. The so-called traditional sects deny the same dogmas regarding salvation and additionally, are heretical in their denial of the dogma that God created a good world.

    • Thanks: Joe Levantine
  161. Al Ross says:
    @Ned kelly

    The descendants of the Jews whose loans George Osborne mentioned ?

  162. Ned kelly says:
    @Rogue

    I agree with some of that… But the deliberate extermination of Jews did infact happen. That became Hitler’s main obsession… But WW2 was the Holocaust. 85 million people died… Or 3% of the world’s population!

    • Replies: @Al Ross
    , @Rogue
    , @Bukowski
  163. @Zachary Smith

    The idea is that the Zimmerman note was the idea of British Intelligence foisted onto Zimmerman. The British knew the content even before it was sent having concocted the idea. They had it presented to Zimmerman by a suborned member of the German diplomatic establishment as a “good idea.” The British knew the exact wording and presented this to the Americans before the cable was decrypted. There is a book about the discrepancy in time when the Zimmerman note was presented, and the time the cable was decrypted and the exact wording. The contents of the Zimmerman note were specifically designed to influence the western United States which were most isolationist and opposed to the idea of a European war.

  164. Fox says:
    @karel

    I am reading currently Bertram de Colonna’s Czecho-Slovakia Within. It is a book written at a time when it was not yet too late for the powers responsible for dictating their peace at Versailles to change course. The Czechs could have thrown out Benes, and they could have sought cooperation with the Germans inside and outside of their ill-gotten country. It is quite possible that the majority of Czechs would rather have lived peacefully, and profitably, next to their neighbors of 1200 years rather than menacing, denigrating and robbing them, but as we know, a regime, once installed is not easy to dislodge. Benes was the head of the chauvinistic Czech power monopolizers and under his regime’s direction, confrontation was preferred and no thought wasted of the future.

    When Germany was overrun by its enemies, the Czechs lost no time in committing their heinous crime against the Germans living on their land and in their country; the Sudeten area had been by peaceful accord and secured by international treaty made part of Germany.
    The about 4 million Germans living there were driven away from their country at gunpoint by the Czechs under the direction of Benes who, upon returning on the Allies’ coat tails, seems to have self-appointed himself as the new president and immediately put in practice what his policies up to September of 1938 were aiming at. This action of eliminating all Germans, not only in the Czech province, but also from the German Sudetenland, cost about 300000 (threehundred thousand) Germans their life. Counting the Germans who perished when the Poles drove all Germans (about 12 millions) from Eastern Germany (the provinces that are currently misnamed”East Germany” are Central Germany, Eastern Germany is occupied by Poland, Russia and Lithuania) and were driven from Southeast Europe, particularly Yugoslavia, a number of about 2 million is arrived at.

    • Thanks: Emslander, RedpilledAF
    • Replies: @Al Ross
    , @karel
  165. Al Ross says:
    @Ned kelly

    Hitler was a very bad man . He insisted upon Germans being in control of Germany.

    He made a Transfer Agreement with incipient Israel . Contemporaneously , the Israelis were working on site clearance.

    Disappointment ensued when the putative welcoming Israeli kibbutzim realized that persecuted Jews , in situ in Europe , preferred to relocate to another European ( 90% ) country , viz., USA.

  166. Rogue says:
    @Ned kelly

    Sure.

    My issue is not to fixate only on the Jews and their death and suffering during WWII – as professor Norman Finkelstein says, the whole Holocaust thing has turned into a gigantic Jewish racket.

    However, too many in the “alternative” media are just plain full of shit when it comes to facing up to certain facts about WWII, and history in general, if it doesn’t square with their own preferred world-view.

    Vast numbers of people died during WWII. They should all be remembered, including the Germans. Definitely, 100%. But it’s plain wrong to simply ignore or mock Jewish death and suffering as well.

    • Agree: mulga mumblebrain
    • Replies: @Ned kelly
  167. Al Ross says:
    @Fox

    Yes .

    Dr. Austin J. App wrote an absorbing academic article on this subject.

    Dr. App stressed the long historical presence of Germanic people in the land that UK’s Neville Chamberlain ( never been on an aeroplane prior to the Munich plea for foreigners , whom we all know Brits of that generation revered and knew little about , especially Germanic peoples} wished to “liberate”.

    • Replies: @karel
  168. Woodrow Wilson was the worst thing to ever happen to America. Elected on a platform of peace he chose a needless war to fulfill his own ego and arrogance. A pompous ass indeed.

  169. Ned kelly says:
    @Rogue

    I absolutely concur. Finkelstein is one of the righteous among the (pseudo) nation

  170. @Rogue

    Why shouldn’t Germany seek out an ally against America IN THE EVENT that America declared war against Germany? The German offer was only IF America declared war, If America remained peaceful there was no alliance.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Replies: @Rogue
  171. @Matt Lazarus

    And no Bolshevik takeover of Russia either.

  172. @simple mind

    I wish I could agree with you about the Bible. Unfortunately my time of believing in fairy tales is long past. It is interesting how many of those who assert the story of the promised land, by God to Abraham, are self declared atheists. Dr. Ezzat’s book is challenging for those who have difficulty challenging their memetic upbringing.

  173. Rogue says:
    @anonymouseperson

    I’ve already stated that I don’t think the Zimmerman telegram was a good enough reason for the USA to have declared war against Germany in WW1.

    However, when a country is seeking a cassus belli, in this case Wilson-led USA against Germany, don’t go give them even more reason to do so.

    Actually, my main issue is that these events are excluded from revisionist history – such as in this article.

    If you’re gonna tell an alternative tale, then let’s hear it warts and all.

    I’m not opposed to revisionism. If I was, I wouldn’t have been at the UR for the last several years.

  174. Emslander says:
    @HdC

    Mind you, this may change in the future.

    I can assure you that the German culture cannot bear to assimilate into the modern North American sewer of depravity. That’s what Wilsonian democracy unleashed. I don’t see how any rational human being can continue to bear up for much longer.

    Donald Trump wasn’t much of an authoritarian, but he held out enough hope to keep us going for a little longer.

  175. Anon[494] • Disclaimer says:
    @whodat

    Using devil – a metaphor for dirty soul- has been the signature MO of the Church from antiquity.

  176. @SolontoCroesus

    In 1916 or 1917 Wilson sent him [former Ambassador to Turkey Henry Morgenthau] on a “secret mission” to negotiate peace with Turkey.

    This was the summer of 1917, according to BA Murphy in his book the Brandeis/Frankfurter connection (pp.57-58*). That they would willingly prolong World War 1 another year or so for Palestine should appall but not amaze when Zionists had already arranged to tip the war in return for that same prize.

    *Just noticed this on page 58 “To the horror of the Zionists when this weaker document [draft of the Balfour Declaration] was sent to Washington for President Wilson’s support, he stated on September 11, 1917, that the time was ‘not opportune’ to commit himself to it.”

    Makes me wonder if such an historical stall was why the mass murders were scheduled on September 11, 2001. Though I still favor the theory it was in memory of Charles Lindberg’s famous speech in Des Moines. Good luck finding the entire audio. Here Youtube clips out the part of the 2nd group of war agitators. Ha.

    And, FYI, the text of his speech just prior to that segment:

    The second major group I mentioned is the Jewish.

    It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race.

    No person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone the persecution of the Jewish race in Germany. But no person of honesty and vision can look on their pro-war policy here today without seeing the dangers involved in such a policy both for us and for them. Instead of agitating for war, the Jewish groups in this country should be opposing it in every possible way for they will be among the first to feel its consequences.

    Tolerance is a virtue that depends upon peace and strength. History shows that it cannot survive war and devastations. A few far-sighted Jewish people realize this and stand opposed to intervention. But the majority still do not.

    Their greatest danger to this country lies in their large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government.

    I am not attacking either the Jewish or the British people. Both races, I admire. But I am saying that the leaders of both the British and the Jewish races, for reasons which are as understandable from their viewpoint as they are inadvisable from ours, for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war.

    We cannot blame them for looking out for what they believe to be their own interests, but we also must look out for ours. We cannot allow the natural passions and prejudices of other peoples to lead our country to destruction.

  177. @Al Ross

    Since life is short and no one has the time or endurance to read everything, permit me to qualify the “nudge” somewhat.

    In his later years, Sam Francis’s best stuff (i.e., of most enduring interest) was to be found in his articles written for Chronicles during its heyday under Thomas Fleming. The syndicated columns were largely throwaway journalism, in part because Sam, in common with all too many others, was addicted to coining nonce words and initialisms for movements and situations he didn’t like. (“Anarcho-tyranny” was a brilliant and extremely apposite coinage, but most of the others were instantly forgettable.) Fleming was a tough-minded editor, and I believe that his refusal to tolerate rambling spurred Sam to produce work of real consequence.

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  178. Al Ross says:
    @Pierre de Craon

    Many thanks for the further and better particulars re Dr. Francis.

    I remember proofreading a manuscript by an Indian for intended publication by the ‘Oxford in Asia’ sub – imprint of OUP .

    The author was responsible for my subsequent extensive collection of mixed metaphors , two examples of which still make me smile , viz., ” I smelled a rat so I nipped it in the bud” and ” The hand that rocked the cradle kicked the bucket.”

    • Replies: @Pierre de Craon
  179. @thotmonger

    Dear me! How despicably ‘antisemitic’! Words fail to express my disgust. A veritable Corbyn-need one say more?

  180. @simple mind

    ‘Simple’ really does not do your cretinous pig ignorance justice. The Bible is 100% true-the most stupid thing I’ve seen in print for some time.

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  181. @HdC

    The Einsatzgruppen were legitimate under the Geneva Agreement??!! THE MOST stupidly wicked thing that I’ve seen for some time.

    • Replies: @HdC
  182. Al Ross says:
    @mulga mumblebrain

    Perhaps simple mind meant 100% Jew.

  183. karel says:
    @Fox

    Yes Foxhunter, I have read similar fables of yours before. I do not know what you mean by:

    It is quite possible that the majority of Czechs would rather have lived peacefully, and profitably, next to their neighbors of 1200 years rather than menacing, denigrating and robbing them,

    From what I know, for most of the time, it was the other way around. The so-called settlers have descended over centuries from the hills, hence the Czech name skopčáci to steal cattle and land. That was probably an expression of their inborn instinct, called Drang nach Osten to emulate their return to the swamps of the Dnieper from which the Germans emerged in ancient times. It is an irony of history that although Germans, being more numerous, industrious, and racially superior, the western border has remained more or less the same from the days of Charlemagne, whose armies, somewhat unsuccessfully invaded Bohemia in 805 AD to plunder the land.

    Bellow is another, but the very slight inaccuracy of yours

    This action of eliminating all Germans, not only in the Czech province, but also from the German Sudetenland, cost about 300000 (threehundred thousand) Germans their life.

    Why not six million, may I ask? A large part of this 300 k missing Germans perished during the less then victorious Feldzug to the Soviet Union and their bones can be found almost everywhere in the East if one looked for them. Others, the war criminals fearing for their lives, disappeared with the help of the Vatican in South and North America, to culturally enrich the more primitive natives. Some, very nice Germans, members of the Gestapo, SS, and the Third Reich administration were simply killed during the Prague uprising in May 1945. I am uncertain, whether anyone bothered to count them.

    So little Foxie, straighten up a bring up more tales in 2022.

  184. karel says:
    @Al Ross

    Your sentence

    Neville Chamberlain ( never been on an aeroplane prior to the Munich plea for foreigners , whom we all know Brits of that generation revered and knew little about , especially Germanic peoples} wished to “liberate”.

    makes, even if you try to inject some irony into the statement, no sense. I would appreciate it if you could reveal what ”Munich plea for foreigners” actually meant.

    • Replies: @Al Ross
  185. Al Ross says:
    @karel

    1 . Neville Chamberlain had never been in an aeroplane before his trip to meet Herr Hitler in Munich.

    2. NC’s plea for Czechoslovakia to cede territory to Germany was in the interests of foreigners, that is to say people not of Chamberlain’s nationality.

    3. Brits of that period still greatly admired much of mainland Europe and had done so since the days when a ‘Grand Tour’ was a sine qua non of almost every upper class gentleman’s education.

    4. My phrase “knew kittle about” refers to a quotation , well – known to educated people who comment on WW Two , viz., Chamberlain’s view on the Sudetenland dispute – ” A quarrel in a far away country , between people of whom we know nothing.”

    • Replies: @karel
  186. karel says:
    @Al Ross

    Hmm,
    1. Who cares about Chamberlain’s travel arrangements. Pointless information.
    2. Who are the foreigners? Chamberlain is also a foreigner to me.
    3. What does your twaddle about the ‘Grand Tour’ and the upper classes actually mean?
    4. What makes you think that I have never heard of that stupid man’s comments? What did he expect to negotiate in Munich while being, in his own words, totally ignorant about the matter?

    • Replies: @Al Ross
    , @Al Ross
  187. the same mechanics that carved out a viable state for the khazars WAS to have been implemented for the Armenians who truly experienced a holocaust at the hand of the Young turk donmeh movement. Hertzl not only offered cash for Palestine but also suppression of the Genocide awareness via their media outlets. Still a mandate for the Republic of Armenia was proclaimed by Wilson and an arbitration of land was passed. Sadly the Armenians didn’t have the flattery/banking and sexual blackmail skills so perfected by the zionists to make their dream a reality and instead the khazar cousins of the Christ killers came out on top. They must of had some real good dirt on Wilson. The Armenians meanwhile have languished while the NATO member genocidalist Turkey prospers, multiplies and becomes a world power all on Armenian soil.

  188. Al Ross says:
    @karel

    There isn’t anything that makes me think that you know very much at all.

  189. Al Ross says:
    @karel

    By commenting on a website so fruitfully endowed by a wealth of knowledgeable people , you may have picked up and , of course , misspent some intellectual small change while devaluing the currency.

  190. karel says:

    Do not work overtime, Ross. Instead, take a Grand Tour to emulate the upper-class toffs.

  191. Rurik says:
    @Joe Levantine

    sly psychopathic rat Fauci, that mass murderer who is still looked up to by so many gullible and naive Americans, in the same league of the greatest enemies of God and mankind.

    could not agree more, Joe

    and thanks again for your encouragement

    and likewise

  192. @Another Polish Perspective

    With all due respect, fuck off with your jew lies, kike.

  193. @Al Ross

    A three-hour examination of online resources leaves me with the sinking feeling that a distaste for mixed metaphors has not yet been declared implicitly racist or white supremacist. Perhaps tomorrow will bring better news on that front, Al.

    Speaking more generally, the fact that a life spent in the publishing racket exposes one to encounters with interesting people of every conceivable sort may justly be regarded as one of the best reasons for working as a greeter at Walmart instead. Or should I speak only for myself?

  194. HdC says:
    @thotmonger

    “…It is not difficult to understand why Jewish people desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany. The persecution they suffered in Germany would be sufficient to make bitter enemies of any race. ..”

    Well, God’s chosen people chose to declare war on Germany in 1933!

    International newspaper headlines screamed “Judea Declares War on Germany”.

    With these self-declared enemies everywhere, trying to undermine the security of the German state at every opportunity, I submit that Germany was well within its rights imprison every Jew it could lay its hands on. It is truly commendable that they didn’t, but did their best to weed out the wheat from the chaff (enemies).

  195. Dube says:
    @HdC

    How many Jews were killed by German action, other than those by the Einsatz Gruppen whose actions were legitimate under the Geneva Agreement?

    Or, by reduction:

    How many Jews were killed … by the Einsatz Gruppen whose actions were legitimate under the Geneva Agreement?

    Would you please set out that rationale for legitimacy?

    • Replies: @HdC
  196. HdC says:
    @Dube

    The Einsatz Gruppen were troops that protected the German army from partisan attacks from the rear.
    These partisans were not uniformed troops, but civilians who took up arms against the occupying or traversing regular troops.
    According to the Geneva agreement this partisan activity was illegal, and usually punished by immediate execution when caught in the act.
    From what I read, many of these partisans were Jewish.

  197. Bukowski says:
    @Druid55

    No doubt there was anti Jewish sentiment and in cases this led to violence but the whole scenario has been greatly exaggerated.
    There is a 3 part article by Andrew Joyce here.
    http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/05/08/revisiting-the-19th-century-russian-pogroms-part-1-russias-jewish-question/

  198. Bukowski says:
    @Ned kelly

    But how were the Jews “exterminated” ? For 80 years now we have been told that they were killed en masse in gas chambers. There have been 3 forensic reports on buildings that were allegedly used to gas Jews and others.
    1. The Leuchter Report.
    https://codoh.com/library/document/the-leuchter-report-1/en/
    https://codoh.com/library/document/leuchter-report-2021/en/

    2. The Luftl Report.
    https://codoh.com/library/document/the-luftl-report/en/

    3. The Rudolf Report.
    https://codoh.com/library/book/the-rudolf-report-2011-edition/en/

    The results of all 3 came up negative for gassings as described in holocaust literature and films.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Kacey Gunther Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Becker update V1.3.2
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
How America was neoconned into World War IV