The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Tobias Langdon Archive
The Wickedness of Whiteness
Leftist Minority-Worship Preaches the Innate Evil of Whites
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

What’s the connection between cakes and leftism? Until last week, I would have found it impossible to give a good answer to that question. Then I picked up a new book by the British mathematician Ian Stewart (born 1945) and read the following:

The classic example [of fair division], from which everything else flows, is that of two children arguing over a cake. The problem is to divide the cake between them using a good protocol — a set of rules specified in advance — that is provably fair. The classic solution is “I cut, you choose.” … When I mentioned this method in an article, one reader wrote in to say that he’d tried it on his children, and Alice (not her real name) had promptly complained that Bob (not his) had the bigger piece. When her father pointed out that this was her fault for cutting badly, the news didn’t go down terribly well — in her eyes it amounted to blaming the victim — so her father swapped the two pieces. Only to hear her wail: “Bob’s piece is still bigger than mine!” (Ian Stewart, What’s the Use? The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics, Profile Books, 2021, chapter 2)

That might seem a funny but trivial story. In fact, it’s more than that: it captures the way millions of adult leftists think about “social justice” and “equality.” In particular, it captures the way Blacks and other non-Whites think. Nothing Whites can do will ever be enough to satisfy their demands or appease their anti-White hatred, resentment and envy. Whites will always be racist and White nations will always be unjust to non-Whites. Here’s an example of that kind of thinking from the Guardian:

Amy Mae Baxter was still a publishing trainee in 2019 when she founded Bad Form, an online magazine for writers of colour. … This March was a “huge month” for Bad Form, thanks to a flurry of black-authored titles commissioned in response to the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests finally hitting the shelves. Her worry, however, is that they’re all now competing with each other, meaning some might not sell as well as they otherwise could have. (“The book that tore publishing apart: ‘Harm has been done, and now everyone’s afraid,’” The Guardian, 18th June 2022)

How do you satisfy a leftist like Amy Mae Baxter? You can’t: the only solution is to get people like that out of your society. Even better is not to let them into your society at all. In other words, prevention is better than cure. The Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orbán believes in prevention, not cure, and refuses to open the borders of his White Christian nation to Blacks and Muslims. That’s why he is demonized by leftists around the world for his “racism” and “xenophobia.”

The toxicity of truth

Orbán has the truth on his side, but that doesn’t fully explain why he is successful. As I’ve argued before, having the truth on your side can be enervating and unhelpful, in part because you can subconsciously fall into the trap of thinking that truth will do the work for you. And believing in obvious truths doesn’t require any emotional investment or activate any of the religious modules that seem to be built into the human brain. No religion has ever been based on the claim that water is wet or that the sun rises in the east. It doesn’t take any effort to believe those things. But the very successful religion of Christianity is based on the claim that a man rose from the dead. That claim defies common sense and demands effort to believe. Once you’ve made that effort, you have an emotional and cognitive investment. Naturally enough, you then want to defend your investment and protect your belief against its critics.

Leftism also makes claims that defy common sense and demand emotional investment: we’re all the same under the skin; Blacks fail only because of White racism; East Asians flourish despite White racism; and so on. In short, leftism is a quasi-religion that activates those very powerful and ancient religious modules in the brain. Old religious concepts like sin and blasphemy re-appear in the form of racism and hate-speech. Indeed, leftism is in part a Christian heresy or a perversion of Christianity, drawing on Christian ideas of spiritual equality but failing to accept the Christian idea that we’re all sinners. In fact, some Christians don’t accept that idea either. Calvinism has the concepts of an elect minority, bound from birth for Heaven, and a damned majority, bound from birth for Hell. In Calvinism, we’re all predestined to celestial bliss or infernal agony, and nothing we do will alter our fate.

Rhetoric as route to power

Leftism has re-created that Calvinist concept and founded what Gregory Hood at AmRen has called the Church of the Damned, where nothing Whites can do or say will ever cleanse them from their hereditary taint—their original sin—of racism. Leftism mandates both that Blacks and Whites are born equal and that only the innate evil of Whites explains why Blacks don’t have the same high achievements as Whites. In other words, leftism has two big lies that contradict each other: first, that we’re all born equal; second, that Whites are innately evil. The contradiction doesn’t weaken leftism but strengthens it, because it trains leftists in deceit and allows them to preach one thing while practicing another. They use the rhetoric of equality and justice as a Trojan horse to get themselves into power. Once they’re in power, they impose inequality and injustice on their enemies. A cult of minority-worship goes naturally with a cult of majority-demonization. An anonymous French writer long ago described how leftism operates:

« Quand je suis le plus faible, je vous demande la liberté, parce que tel est votre principe ; mais quand je suis le plus fort, je vous l’ôte, parce que tel est le mien. »

“When I am the weaker, I ask you for freedom, because that is your principle; but when I am the stronger, I take away your freedom, because that is my principle.”

Free speech in the U.S. is a classic example. In the 1950s when Jews had relatively little power compared to the present, Congressional committees were grilling Jewish communists and communist sympathizers on their ideologies and connections. It was the period of the notorious Hollywood blacklist. At that time, Jewish activist organizations were all for free speech. It’s a distant memory now that the left has power and the ADL is partnering with social media companies and payment processors like PayPal to get right-wing and even conservative messages off their platforms. And the Biden administration is actively pressuring social media companies in the same direction—a clear violation of the First Amendment. So now there is a very different kind of blacklist, one reserved for people who do not conform to leftist narratives.

Leftism is an ideology based on lies and run by liars. Look at the topic of slavery, where leftists work tirelessly to encourage White guilt and non-White grievance. But neither the guilt nor the grievance can be justified on the central leftist principle of human equality. If human beings are, as leftists insist from one side of their mouths, innately and absolutely equal, it follows that the roles of slave and master are determined entirely by accidents of history and geography. White Europeans enslaved Black Africans in our reality, but that was pure chance. If the historical and geographical dice had rolled differently, it would have been the other way around: Black Africans would have enslaved White Europeans.

The stench of White history

But there is no hint of any of that in the endless propaganda pumped out by the Left about White enslavement of Blacks (they ignore the Muslim enslavement of Blacks and much else). Kris Manjapra, a Black professor of history at Tufts University, has asked “When will Britain face up to its crimes against humanity?” in the Guardian. But he doesn’t preach the first big lie of leftism, namely the equality of all so-called races. He doesn’t talk about historical contingency and the decisive role of chance in determining who enslaved whom. Instead, he uses rhetoric about the “stench of British historical amnesia and of institutionalised racism” to promote the second big lie of leftism, namely, the innate moral superiority of non-Whites over Whites. The implication of his rhetoric is that the innately evil Whites of Europe enslaved the innately virtuous Blacks of Africa. But he also says something very interesting at the beginning of his anti-White polemic:

On 3 August 1835, somewhere in the City of London, two of Europe’s most famous bankers came to an agreement with the chancellor of the exchequer. Two years earlier, the British government had passed the Slavery Abolition Act, which outlawed slavery in most parts of the empire. Now it was taking out one of the largest loans in history, to finance the slave compensation package required by the 1833 act. Nathan Mayer Rothschild and his brother-in-law Moses Montefiore agreed to loan the British government £15m, with the government adding an additional £5m later. The total sum represented 40% of the government’s yearly income in those days, equivalent to some £300bn today. (When will Britain face up to its crimes against humanity?, The Guardian, 29th March 2018)

Manjapra then complains that all of this huge loan, which wasn’t paid off by ordinary White tax-payers until 2015, was used to compensate the White beneficiaries of slavery rather than its Black victims. He leaves two very interesting historical questions hanging in the air. First, how were Rothschild and Montefiore, members of the tiny and oppressed Jewish minority, in possession of such a vast sum of money? Second, in what other ways were Jewish plutocrats using their wealth and influence over gentile politicians? Manjapra couldn’t explore those questions, of course, or he would have been denounced as an anti-Semite. But a lot of that vastly disproportionate Jewish wealth came from slavery, which Jews have practiced and been enriched by for many centuries. As Andrew Joyce has described at the Occidental Observer, Jewish slave-dealers worked in Europe from Roman times before turning to the profits to be made in Africa. Among much else, they “bought and sold Christian slaves and kidnapped and castrated Christian youths for the Muslim markets in Spain.”

Listening, Learning, Lying

You wouldn’t guess any of that from anti-White propaganda-films like Amistad (1997), which was directed by the proudly Jewish Steven Spielberg and is about Blacks mutinying against cruel Whites as they are carried into slavery. In Hollywood, Jews are not simply over-represented but overwhelmingly dominant, and they have been promoting minority-worship and majority-demonization for decades. That propaganda will increasingly shift from denying history to outright reversing it. Leftism is abandoning the rhetoric of equality to insist on the wickedness of Whiteness. In August 2022, the White American historian James H. Sweet made a doomed attempt to criticize this trend:

The Elmina [Ghana] tour guide claimed that “Ghanaians” sent their “servants” into chattel slavery unknowingly. The guide made no reference to warfare or Indigenous slavery, histories that interrupt assumptions of ancestral connection between modern-day Ghanaians and visitors from the diaspora. Similarly, the forthcoming film The Woman King seems to suggest that Dahomey’s female warriors and King Ghezo fought the European slave trade.

In fact, they promoted it. Historically accurate rendering of Asante or Dahomean greed and enslavement apparently contradict modern-day political imperatives. (President of American Historical Association Dares Doubt the 1619 Project, Quickly Apologizes, Steve Sailer, 20th August 2022)

The video below is a classic summary of African culpability in the British slave trade that dumbfounded Don Lemon, a CNN anchor — Africans rounding up Africans and depositing them in cages on the beach, the costs to the British navy for policing their ban on the slave trade [2000 dead British sailors], and the uniqueness of the British anti-slavery policy at a time when slavery was essentially universal.

As Steve Sailer has noted, Prof. Sweet was quickly forced into a groveling apology. He announced that “I sincerely regret the way I have alienated some of my Black colleagues and friends” and promised that “I’m listening and learning.” One of the things he is “learning” is that traditional White standards of scholarship have no place in modern academia and must exercise no influence on portrayal of the past. Yes, it’s historically true that King Ghezo and his female warriors promoted the European slave-trade rather than fighting it. But so what? If it serves the purposes of leftist propaganda and the promotion of Black grievance to invert the truth, that is precisely what must be done. Virtue trumps veracity and it is virtuous to sanctify Blacks and demonize Whites.

History isn’t a science, as you can see from the inability of historians to make accurate and useful predictions of the future based on their study of the past. But I’m an amateur historian and I will confidently make this prediction: that the demonization of Whites will not lessen as ever more power and wealth are taken from Whites. On the contrary, it will intensify. George Orwell also described how leftism operates: “The more the Party is powerful, the less it will be tolerant: the weaker the opposition, the tighter the despotism.”

Not by words but by war

Black leftists like Kris Manjapra are not seeking justice and equality. No, they’re seeking revenge. And their anti-White rhetoric will increasingly translate into anti-White action. Manjapra and countless other non-Whites share the psychology of the Black criminal Eldridge Cleaver (1935–1998), who made this boast way back in 1968: “Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the white man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women — and this point, I believe was the most satisfying to me because I was very resentful over the historical fact of how the white man has used the black woman. I felt I was getting revenge.”

Revenge and resentment are what power leftism and motivate the Black and Brown foot soldiers of leftism. That’s why leftists were so eager to open the borders of formerly cohesive and conservative Western nations. Hungary can defend its native Whites and maintain its ancient traditions because anti-White barbarians are outside its gates. America, Britain and France can’t emulate Hungary because anti-White barbarians are inside the gates. And those barbarians are growing in numbers, aggression and arrogance by the day. Separation is the only solution and separation will not come by words but by war.

(Republished from The Occidental Observer by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 114 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. When are you going to stop using the obsolete terms “left” and “right”. These people wouldn`t know the real left if it bit them in the arse. They are the useful idiots of globalist finance.

    Leftism is an ideology based on lies and run by liars.

    Would this statement, known to every real “leftist”, be an example?
    – “Immigration is the reserve army of capital.”
    Goddam those North Koreans and their open borders.

  2. Phibbs says:

    The first order of business is for Caucasians to round up the Jews and deport them. After that, America’s Born-Again “Christians”/evangelicals should be deported, as they worship the enemy (Jews). Of course, America’s 50 million blacks and mulattos will be deported to multiculturalism and multiracialism loving Canada. Muslims will be deported to Muslim nations. White liberals should be summarily executed. South African whites will all be encouraged to move to the new and improved United States. Most of America’s problems will ease when all these steps are taken.

  3. “When I am the weaker, I ask you for freedom, because that is your principle; but when I am the stronger, I take away your freedom, because that is my principle.”

    The perfect description of jewing.

    • Agree: Z-man
    • Thanks: Trinity
    • Replies: @Realist
    , @anonymous
  4. anarchyst says:

    There’s more to the “slavery” business that remains unknown by most…
    The acclaimed “anti-slavery” movie “Amistad” ends with Cinque and his cohorts gaining their “freedom”.
    That’s where the “movie” story ends. Everyone lives happily ever after.
    Now, for the rest of the story…
    The real life Cinque became a successful “businessman” slave trader, procuring “human capital” (slaves).
    He made numerous trips to the African continent to procure “human capital” for sale in the USA and elsewhere.
    When Cinque and his cohorts gained their “freedom”, they should have been immediately shipped back to the African continent.

    • Agree: René Fries
  5. S says:

    If you want to see the background behind the 1960’s creation of a particularly hateful, though well known, series of movies designed to indoctrinate folks about the ‘wickedness of Whiteness’ read the comment below.

    Read to the end to find the name of the particular franchise.

    https://www.unz.com/akarlin/open-thread-197/#comment-5566638

    • Thanks: René Fries
  6. Excellent article. Much appreciated.

    Regarding the hypocrisy of the Calvinist left on slavery, I’d like to remind readers of great resources on the topic.

    The story of Wellesley Professor Tony Martin “The Jewish Onslaught” is an excellent primer on the subject.

    Then Ron Unz’s articles about the Nation of Islam’s 3 volume masterpiece “The Secret Relationship Between Blacks & Jews” provides all the receipts.

    (I wish Ron would get back to exposing the malfeasance of the Jews instead of buying into the “millions of Covid deaths” and how awesome the vaccines are, sigh)

  7. TKK says:

    I just finished a book that explains why blacks are so different than whites, and why they ruin everything they touch. It is a life changing book.

    The Mountain People, by Colin M. Turnbull

    For any of you that are on the fence with the old “not all blacks” failed arguments , or believe that there is any hope for blacks to live peacefully with sane whites, or hedge about any of the truths race realists state – read this book.

    Here is a small passage. The anthropologist (this was the 1970s, so he was not subject to woktardation, even though I discovered that he was gay and later died of AIDS) recorded what he saw and learned with no sentimentality while observing a group of blacks in Uganda.

    He is discussing how hard the “mothers” throw their infants down to the ground.

    Then she goes about her business, leaving the child there, almost hoping that some predator will come along and carry it off.This happened once when I was there — once that I know of, anyway– and the mother was delighted. She was rid of the child and no longer had to carry it and feed it, and still further this meant that a leopard was in the vicinity and would be sleeping the child off and thus be an easy kill.

    The men set off and found the leopard, which has consumed all of the child except part of his skull; they killed the leopard and cooked it and ate it, child and all.

    • Thanks: Kim
    • Troll: The Real World
  8. The desire to control the whole world is an embodiment of wickedness but that doesn’t mean wickedness is a specific White trait.

    When it comes to doing good things in the world and offering help in times of disaster and hardship Whites as part of the Judeo-Christian Civilization rank number one. There are literally White angels walking on earth. Rich Mohammedan countries are less willing to contribute financially to help people in need in the world.

  9. How To Destroy Critical Clueless Race Theory (CRT), Part 1.

  10. JR Foley says:

    Talking about being Rich and Entitled and Insensitive— Jews yesterday and again today in USA-the 1% have not changed or evolved over time –reptiles with no conscience,

    Luke 16:19
    There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores and longing to eat what fell from the rich man’s table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

    “The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham’s side. The rich man also died and was buried. In Hades, where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. So he called to him, ‘Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.’

    “But Abraham replied, ‘Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been set in place, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.’

    He answered, ‘Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my family, for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.’

    Abraham replied, ‘They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.’

    ‘No, father Abraham,’ he said, ‘but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.’

    “He said to him, ‘If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.’”
    ——————————-
    1% and trickle down economics at its best –just desserts will be in the cards.

  11. zard says:

    Hitler & the Nazis exposed this Judeo-Masonic-Communist-Christian nexus/conspiracy last century & its existential threat to the white race, but nobody listened much outside of Germany, except for a few intelligent individuals like Amery, Mosley, Pelley, Ramsay, Joyce, Beckett & Unity Mitford. So why would these morons listen now? Instead the prodigious majority of white gentile morons united to extirpate Nazism–so they could continue believing in Rabbi Jesus & Rabbi Marx on a planet governed by their Jewish Overlords..

    • Agree: Kim
    • Replies: @shadowy_figure
  12. Chriss says:

    “Rape was an insurrectionary act. It delighted me that I was defying and trampling upon the white man’s law, upon his system of values, and that I was defiling his women — and this point, I believe was the most satisfying to me because I was very resentful over the historical fact of how the white man has used the black woman. I felt I was getting revenge.”

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2017/10/18/harvey-weinstein-on-jews-and-the-shiksa/

    For example — and central to our purposes in this essay — protagonist Alexander Portnoy chronicles his sexual escapades with his shiksa sex object, whom he cruelly nicknames “The Monkey.” Throughout the novel, Roth describes how Portnoy humiliates this Christian girl with all manner of explicit sexual acts. Roth’s characterization of Portnoy’s vicious contempt for “The Monkey” represents perfectly the easily established hostility American Jews hold for the Christian majority.

  13. History isn’t a science, as you can see from the inability of historians to make accurate and useful predictions of the future based on their study of the past.

    The said “study of the past” being always and necessarily fragmentary, it follows that any prediction could be, at best, of the same alloy. Better then to make none, indeed.

    • Replies: @RedNordid1488
  14. P.T. says:

    What is striking is the lengths to which third-world people will go to get into largely white countries that they call racist. The hypocrisy is astonishing!

    • Agree: Bernie
    • Replies: @Flo
  15. Kat Grey says:

    Once WASPS were demonised beginning in the 1960s, it was the first stone laid to build the tomb of the White Race. We had the numbers to fight back but now it’s too late. Even the British chancellor is non-white.

  16. P.T. says:

    A look at countries around the world shows that multiculturalism is mostly a failed model. Different peoples want different things and that leads to conflict.

    • Replies: @HbutnotG
  17. ghali says:

    Black and White rant by a no-brainer.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  18. JM says:
    @Curmudgeon

    I agree with you in an objective sense. The trouble is that the Left, the far Left, the Centre Left and the Social Democratic parties, from the outset and almost to a man went over to Globalising Imperialism bringing with them all the form from their past sans their former essence. Of course some of them, not all, were very much nascent Globalists from the 60’s on: the USA Left being very much of that kind, probably due to the high century old polyglot migrations but mainly due to the Negro Question, not to mention the heavy Jewish bias in their de facto rulers.

    • Agree: JM
    • Replies: @Anon
  19. Franz says:
    @Curmudgeon

    When are you going to stop using the obsolete terms “left” and “right”.

    Seriously.

    The same left that wanted nuclear power in 1965 and thought a new Ice Age was coming in 1975?

    They change their eternal principles more often than the rest of us change underwear.

    Left — Port. Right — Starboard. That’s it.

    • Replies: @JM
  20. Karl1906 says:

    “Whiteness” always means “white people”. No matter what they may say. When they talk about “cancelling whiteness” and “ending whiteness” it’s only about WHITE PEOPLE.

    Their end goal – their “final solution” – is to split society along racial lines, to incite hatred against white people, white culture and (what they call) white society. And their next step will be to exterminate these people – the white people. No matter WHAT they may claim. That’s WHAT they ACTUALLY want.

    And it has already started.

  21. For me, the left is still labor and the right is still capital. The people referred to here as “leftists” are neither. They build nothing. They finance nothing. I find them repulsive. The worst are the self hating whites. The practitioners of Negolatry. They are like zombies. Ugly, stupid, aggressive. You don’t argue with zombies. You separate from them or destroy them. That is why I am a Separatist.

    If you are living in one of our shithole cities you must get yourself OUT. Come home to Red America. We don’t have to live with these hateful assholes. We can go our own way without them.

    • Agree: Dystopian
    • Replies: @animalogic
  22. geokat62 says:

    Virtue trumps veracity…

    Three words that encapsulate the malignant ideology of wokeness.

  23. Z-man says:

    Z-man’s culling principle:
    2 billion must be culled. At least 500 million blacks, 500 million South Asians, 500 million East Asians and 500 million others. In the ‘others camp’ that would be mostly Central and South Americans, the peoples of the Middle East and North Africa (Muslims) and then, unfortunately, even some absurd Caucasians. ‘Progressive’ politicians come to mind. Lastly, but definitely not least, 6,666,666 people who call themselves The Chosen Ones. We would start with the richest and biggest influence peddlers amongst them and work our way down. (Evil grin)
    Jesus, forgive me.

    PS. I have a special ending for the likes of Bill Maher. Take him on a boat ride to some shark infested waters and if he, by chance, swims his way back…shoot him. (LOL)

    • Thanks: TKK
    • LOL: Realist
    • Replies: @TKK
    , @Anon
    , @HammerJack
    , @Thrallman
  24. @WorkingClass

    “For me, the left is still labor and the right is still capital. The people referred to here as “leftists” are neither. They build nothing. They finance nothing. I find them repulsive. The worst are the self hating whites. ”
    Excellent comment.

  25. There is no more wickedness in Whites than any other race in history……

    …the difference is that the combination of intelligence with the risk to innovate with Whites has resulted in their splitting the atom, walking on the moon and creating the digital age when the rest of humanity was still trying to figure out how to feed themselves and find clean drinking water…….

    So its obvious that when any aggression is coupled with that combination of intelligence and innovation that the White race was far more efficient in dominating others……….smarter violent people are more “wicked” than dumb violent people………..simple as that.

    Pointing out and claiming the “wickedness” of the White race against other races over history is really pointing out just how more adaptable Whites are to creating and maintaining modern civilizations…………being critical of Whites by non-Whites is admitting defeat in the area of intelligence/innovation in human history otherwise no such domination or “wickedness” could be have happened and as a result be claimed in the first place.

    Of course what is left out is the White race being so far ahead of the curve in human progress that they are the first race to outlaw what aggressions against other are still being practiced by many non-Whites throughout the world.

    Non-Whites should kiss the ground they walk on in that the White race didn’t do what most dominate species do on Earth and that is extinct the less adaptable species simply due to their dominance over them…………

    • Agree: Bernie
  26. Realist says:
    @Phibbs

    Most of America’s problems will ease when all these steps are taken.

    That would definitely improve this country, but talk is cheap and your scenario will never happen.

    White liberals constitute about 50% of our population…especially when you include the the cuck Republicans.

  27. TKK says:
    @Z-man

    As brutal as it reads, it would solve many problems.

    All of sub Sahara Africa should be made into a game park. Let the animals revive and live after so many decades of murderous poachers- Like the ones that just took three baby chimpanzees hostage and are threatening to chop off their little heads if they are not paid ransoms. The white moron (female!) who owns the sanctuary finally admitted that it was workers who have done this.

    Most whites never learn.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  28. Realist says:
    @Robert Dolan

    “When I am the weaker, I ask you for freedom, because that is your principle; but when I am the stronger, I take away your freedom, because that is my principle.”

    The perfect description of jewing.

    It is a perfect description of some Jews…but it is a perfect description of ALL avaricious power-hungry assholes.

    • Agree: HbutnotG
  29. Realist says:

    The fact that most Whites still do not understand what is being done to them, after decades, is a testament to rampant stupidity.

    • Agree: Twin Ruler, Trinity
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  30. Rich says:

    “Nothing Whites do will ever satisfy them.” Every White person has to have this drilled into their head. Stop apologizing, stop caring about powerless words like “racist”. They aren’t going to ever like you, and if they ever get the chance, they will eat you.

  31. @Realist

    “The fact that most Whites still do not understand what is being done to them, after decades, is a testament to rampant stupidity.”

    So true.

    Rampant stupidity and toxic head in the sand cowardice.

    • Replies: @Realist
  32. This is mighty frustrating . . . the first westerns nation to abolish slavery was the independent nation

    Haiti.

    So much for the history lesson.

    The lesson that needs to be cleaned is that the west engaged in slavery by skin color and set a legacy that had generational implications. Further, the practices and policies regarding blacks set in place continued consequences. The professor is plying foot loose and fancy free about the cpntext — which is the central part of the issue.

    The world had slaves — uhhhh no kidding. Africans engaged in slavery no kidding, yada yada yada . . . what remains central are the policies when slavery ended and why blacks were uniquely targeted and used as slaves. Very simple and very practical . . . a person with black skin is biologically labeled.

    Good grief if someone as low IQ as myself can get it — surely a white woman, who no doubt was granted no special privilege’s toward earning her degree — gets it.

    I like being a conservative, and I like that liberals are shocked and mortified about who and why I vote. But c’mon. This is not hard to grasp. But I do get a kick out out Unz and TAC trotting out women and foreigners to, make their case and how dare anyone challenge them . . . I don’t have a case for reparations — but I can certainly spot an election dog whistle.

    I take it blacks and jews are responsible for the previous admin to build the wall and cement restrictions immigration policies. I notice she did not mention the millions of Africans who lost their lives defending Britain and who were subsequently denied the promised wages and honors for bravery in the face of battle — if we are going to open the world on the issue . . . let’s at least be relevant.

    Uhhhh excuse me . . . I am unclear where that British reparation money went to. It is like getting in huff about blacks and welfare — who were largely cut out of those programs until the 1960’s and when they v=became available they were not exclusive to blacks —

    whispers . . . whispers . . . affirmative action went primarily to white people. Shhhhhhh . . . can’t deal with reality unless we look at it.GI Bill administered by the states . . . it’s no secret who the states cut out or lowered benefits to . . .

    No it is not an excuse for crime, or drunkeness or out of wedlock relations, or kids . . . but it is onteresting the helps for whites of the same and the lack thereof for blacks.

    • Replies: @Bernie
  33. In Canada and Australia, reparations mania has taken root in aboriginal affairs.

    No amount of money or groveling is enough. First it was financial compensation to victims of convicted sex offenders in residential schools, then it became doctrine that all former attendees of residential schools were “survivors” and deserved cash settlements, and now its becoming accepted that all aboriginals and descendants are owed reparations for “loss of land and culture”. The train keeps rolling in one direction.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  34. Kim says:
    @Charles Martel France

    “Judeo-Christian” is an oxymoron.

    More than that, it is an insult to the intelligence of the collective Unz readership.

    • Agree: Twin Ruler, follyofwar
  35. @zard

    I partly agree, but I don’t consider the Masons to be particularly important. It’s interesting to me that certain luminaries of the past, who were ostensibly pro-White would nevertheless traduce Hitler and the Nazi’s and sing Jewish praises. The pious Catholic, J.R.R. Tolkien comes to mind. There he was, a “Professor of Anglo-Saxon”, writing books about racially-aware Anglo-Saxon heroes, but this is what he said about Hitler:

    “I have in this war a burning private grudge against that ruddy little ignoramus Adolf Hitler,” Tolkien wrote to his son Michael three years later, by which time the war had reached a new height. “Ruining, perverting, misapplying, and making for ever accursed, that noble northern spirit, a supreme contribution to Europe, which I have ever loved, and tried to present in its true light.”

    In his books, Dwarves are Jews in a fantasy setting. This is what Tolkien has to say about Dwarves:

    “There it is: Dwarves are not heros, but calculating folk with a great idea of the value of money; some are tricky and treacherous and pretty bad lots; some are not, but are decent enough people like Thorin and Company, if you don’t expect too much.”

    In the future that Tolkien helped to bring about, by heaping condemnation on the Nazis and giving the Jews a pass, even use of the term “Anglo-Saxon” is now verboten.

    From here:

    But the argument is about much more than a name. And it is by no means an issue confined to the US, though there it has gathered a particular intensity. American critics of ‘Anglo-Saxon studies’ feel the subject is by definition racist, that it has never escaped its roots in 18th and 19th-century colonialism when ‘Anglo-Saxonism’ in both the USA and Britain was used to endorse white supremacy. The slave-owning Thomas Jefferson, after all, founded the republic on imagined Anglo-Saxon roots, based on laws supposedly lost in 1066. This latter-day Anglo-Saxon commonwealth would come to be summed up in the acronym WASP – White, Anglo-Saxon and Protestant – a code for racial purity that white supremacists and neo-Nazis have embraced. And this situation, critics allege, is still implicitly underwritten by a white academic establishment that has failed to move with the times and embrace diversity, both in appointments and ideas.

  36. Anon[296] • Disclaimer says:

    The Wickedness of Whiteness
    Leftist Minority-Worship Preaches the Innate Evil of Whites

    As a White, I dont think too much about this. I frankly dont wake in the morning and go looking for a black man to make miserable. I would say all my friends, family and the people I know casually are much too busy to worry about blacks. Marriages, spouses, kids, employers, house maintenance, shitty neighbours, chores and errands, the state of the USA. Who the hell has time to think about Dindoos, East Indians, other Asians, Hispanics and other breeds, let alone contemplate and carry out wicked deeds.

    The mystery is that if Whites are so wicked, why move to and live in a White Country ? Head back to Africa,Pakistan or Latin America or what ever shithole you were hatched in and be with your own !

    The fact is every cannibal in the Congo, the slum dwellers of the West Indies, every dog catcher in China and every curry and rice eater in India and Pakistan is headed for Tijuana. They WANT to be with the wicked white man LMAO. Why ? Because they see a better life under Whitey. Ndudo Mathane, Chang, Abdul and Singh dont have anything to get from their shit poor countries. No free perks there ! Their own people are too backward and so they head to Whitelandia.

    Whites put up with this shit and that is why it not only continues but gets worse. Think about going to Zimbabwe or Pakistan and denigrating the Melanin Government. You would get a club right in your head. No other country puts up with this nonsense in reverse as we do.

    The day must come where we tell these people to piss off and drive them out of our space. Given the existing trend of catering to these miserable wretches that moment will arrive unexpectedly and from the most insignificant of events. There is a lot of resentment present and the resulting fallout will be very unpleasant.

    • Agree: Bernie, Pastit
    • Replies: @Robert Dolan
  37. @Anon

    The ultimate reason for all of the misery is organized jewry…..the fact that organized jewry currently has control over the western world and is able to buy off, shame, intimidate, scare, and kill whites who do not cooperate with the goals of organized jewry.

    Whites are not allowed to organized, have any sort of unity, have any interests whatsoever.

    It is a surreal situation…..absolutely insane…..and many people have not figured it out yet. And the people who have figured it out don’t know what to do about it.

  38. saywhat says:

    White here – do not believe I am ‘supreme’, rather, a very solid US citizen:

    – Pay my taxes
    – Contribute to my church
    – Never use government services other than licensing, etc.
    – Support my neighbors
    – Mind my business….and for all this, I am suddenly:

    – A traitor
    – Racists
    – Anarachist
    – Deplorable

    The only thing that changed is this all started with Hussein Obammy…..I am prepared to defend my home and name to the death if required…..

    • Replies: @Roger the Lodger
  39. Anon[296] • Disclaimer says:
    @Z-man

    Z Man

    You have to remember that most Latin American countries are governed by, controlled by and run by Whites.

    When we talk about Hispanics or Latin Americans we generally think about 100% Indigenous, Black or Half Breeds ! The chaff, the dross and the filth of the gutters !

    BUT, from Mexico to Argentina, whites RULE. They consider themselves European, whether from Spain, Portugal or Italy. There are places in South America where Blacks, Towel heads and Asians are hardly seen. In places where Blacks are predominant, they are kept firmly in control. In the rare event of riots and misbehaviour, the Security Forces take off the gloves.

    Unlike the USA, these places have no intention of being the first to elect Mulattoes to be President or Vice President. They look at all the shenanigans of the “West” as sheer idiocy ! So when you start your culling, you need to elicit the support of these Whites. Believe me they are also anxious to help with the clean up.

    • Agree: TKK
    • Replies: @TKK
    , @Z-man
  40. @Z-man

    Harsh? Sure, but if you want to make an omelet…

    The planet is currently headed for nine and then ten billion, and it would be vastly more livable with two or three. MAX!

    I’m not advocating mass murder. Just mass sterilization. Maybe put something in the water?

    I need to read more of Mr Langdon’s work. The Toxicity of Truth has a great ring to it. Pithy way to put our current predicament.

    • Replies: @Sollipsist
  41. aandrews says:

    • Replies: @Automatic Slim
  42. It’s a proven fact that men and women are different when it comes to mathematics. If you compare the bell curves for the groups, you find that the women’s curve is the same as men’s but skewed to the left. This explains why there are so few female geniuses in this field. (The geniuses are on the right side of the curve.)

    My point is that if men and women are inherently different in math ability, why is it hard for anyone — even the dumbest leftist — to believe that different races are different in math abilty — and in educational performance in general?

    • Replies: @anonymous
  43. Flo says:
    @P.T.

    Exactly. The true “white supremacists” are the hoards of nonwhites flinging themselves in their millions across the border into every majority-white First World nation.

  44. @Robert Dolan

    100% accurate, as usual from you. Most of the denial you mention is simply the result of decades of brainwashing, largely via the mass media.

    And ownership & control of the media is one of many fields where not only is “proportional representation” not required, you’re not even allowed to mention it.

    • Agree: Inverness
  45. TKK says:
    @Anon

    I was speaking with a German man who had a wonderful pug dog that was eating with him in a restaurant in Rothenburg ob der Tauber.

    (You know if you try to bring your dog in a restaurant in America they would act like you had a bomb.)

    Anyway, he makes your point concretely. We were talking about Obama he said and I quote:

    “We never dreamed you Yanks would go and do it! Put a black in as your president!!!”

  46. beau says:

    whites, less than 13% of global population, have done ALL that is seen globally. to deny, or destroy, this group is a manifestation of mental illness, or pathologic envy.

    either way, such a desire is not compatible with a well functioning mind, but, then, what are ‘lefties’ but mentally ill emotional midgets?

  47. Z-man says:
    @Anon

    Yes, I’ve been to Argentina, twice, but that was a long time ago. They’ve gotten considerably browner in the last thirty years. Mexico then again was and is a lot browner than Argentina but I’ve met and dealt with some good Tex-Mex’s.
    Again, under my culling plan it would be ‘selective’ and proportional. (Grin)

  48. How To Destroy Critical Clueless Race Theory (CRT), Part 2.

  49. Realist says:
    @Robert Dolan

    Out of buttons, but I agree, and thank you.

  50. Americans are actually fleeing the country. They have been, for decades. It is not much talked about, but it is happening now.

  51. Richard B says:
    @Curmudgeon

    When are you going to stop using the obsolete terms “left” and “right”.

    You were so anxious to lecture that you forgot the question mark.
    But that you did forget it is telling, since it wasn’t a real question in the first place.
    It was a rhetorical quesiton. The preferred question-form of the self-righteous.

    These people wouldn`t know the real left if it bit them in the arse.

    What’s the real left (or the real right for that matter)?

    The attempt to stabilize categories and determine their meanings once and for all is a waste of time, in as much as it’s an impossibility. Though it’s always been the desire of the weak-minded. Which is why they’re so dangerous whenever they get into positions of power.

    Why human beings insist on doing that is an interesting question that can be answered. But just because a word can’t be categorically fixed doesn’t mean they aren’t valid and instrumentally useful.

    The fact is, the Left and Right, like all words or terms without exception – including common names – are dysjunctive categories, not conjuntive (where all parts fit and everyone responds to them in exactly the same way). So instead of circular arguments about meaning, it’d be far more productive to talk about the character of words and how they are being used in particular situations or at particular times in history.

    In terms of this article, TL’s use of the word Left was categorically valid and instrumentally useful. Whether or not he satisfied your expectations.

    • Agree: shadowy_figure
    • Replies: @Richard B
    , @Curmudgeon
  52. Z-man says:
    @TKK

    There were some sub species of Tiger that have become extinct over the centuries that had Africa as a habitat, I believe. It would be nice to reintroduce some form of Tiger to that continent and have them fight with Lions. It would be glorious.

  53. Richard B says:
    @Richard B

    The real takeaway from my response to Crumudgeon’s comment is that the only way to get rid of an opinion you don’t like is to kill everyone who holds it. A strategy that’s been used not infrequently throughout history. But no one has used it more in the last 100+ years than Jewish Supremacy Inc. In fact, in terms of mass murder, they have no rival.

    Or as Tobias Langdon wrote:

    their anti-White rhetoric will increasingly translate into anti-White action.

    • Replies: @Richard B
  54. @Robert Dolan

    Organized jewry? How about some proof? Let’s see an organizational chart.

    • Troll: Polistra
  55. @saywhat

    King Obama was as divisive as any president.

  56. @HammerJack

    Something in the water… or maybe something in the vaccines?

  57. @aandrews

    Odds are 99% she isn’t going anywhere, and on the off-chance she does go through with it, she will be back within months. At most. Lured back by indoor plumbing, plentiful food, lack of disease and war, getting paid to write drivel, and the many other advantages to living as a black in America vs. Africa.

    • Agree: Bernie
  58. TheMoon says:
    @Phibbs

    As long as we’re dreaming, I’d like a pony.

  59. Richard B says:
    @Richard B

    But the very successful religion of Christianity is based on the claim that a man rose from the dead. That claim defies common sense and demands effort to believe.

    Not if it’s seen as a spiritual metaphor. I’m willing to believe in a metaphor if it teaches me something about life and inspires me to live. But I’m not going to die for one. That’s why I’m not a Christian. But you don’t have to be Christian to admire Jesus Christ.

    In fact, if one were to divest the story of Christ of its metaphorial content and look at it simply as a story of how one man stood up to a group of crazy tyrants – what’s not to admire and inspire?

    From this perspective Jewish hatred of Jesus, which continues to this day, is perfectly understandable, since his story makes it clear that he had to do what he did because life with them was impossible. He literally would rather have died than live another day among them. Their intolerance made them intolerable and still does. One could object to his solution, but not his perception.

    In short, ole JC exposed them. And if there’s one thing psychopaths both fear and hate more than anything it’s exposure. That’s why if they are exposed they won’t rest until they kill those who expose them. Something else about them that continues to this day. How progressive(more like, How regressive).

    Also, an argument could be made that Christianity was a very succesful religion because it corresponds to the texture of human experience of which it is a perfect symbolization. It even recognizes and almost fully explains the disparity between belief and reality. Not bad as far as religions go. In fact, the best. For proof of this just look at the people who hate it so much. Also, look at how poorly they stand up to criticism of any kind in comparison to what Christians have not only had to endure, but actually encouraged.

    Unfortunately, however, just a touch of scepticism and its instability becomes immediately apparent. If God knew in advance – as he must have, since he was God and thus knew what he was doing – that he was creating a man who would plunge himself from a Paradise into a world of sin and suffering, why did he do it? Why send your son to earth and an early death because men are imperfect? Forgive them God for they know not what they do. Fair enough. But God did.

    It’s all very well to say, “I can’t answer that question, but since it is a question that appears in the fallen world, it’s obviously another of those temptations which serve to make one’s fatith stronger. Credo quia imossibile est. I believe because it’s impossible.”

    But if one says, If I an receive a comprehensible answer to the above question, I will believe in God and the whole system, obviously the whole orientation shatters. That’s why the simplest and most obvious interpretation of the Bible has never been given by a believer – especially theologians – and why intense intellectual efforts were, and are, devoted to avoiding such an interpretation.

    But out of Christiantiy came a culture and social system that made the transcendence of Christiantiy possible. It (the West, the land of whiteness) also made the only attempt in world history to invert the four sanctions found in all cultures of
    Economic Deprivation – Imprisonment – Torture – and Death, to
    Economic Ease – The Privileges of Freedom – Respect for the Individual – and The Value of Life.

    And that is why it’s the greatest religion in the history of the world, and why so many hate it so much. Because it paved the way toward a freedom the human race had never experienced before. And one of the ways it did this was by exposing the tyranny of itself which it could then apply with greater accuracy to the tyranny of others.

    This is the beating heart of Jewish Supremacy Inc.’s undying hatred of Christianity and everything that a tiny group of European and American men – White men – have created since in their attempt to live in reality and move toward a larger freedom.

    Freedom and Reality. Two things that Jewish Supreamcy Inc. hates above all else. With reason. Because with that freedom one can expose Jewish Supremacy Inc. for what it is – the birth place of tyrannical race and religious hatred. By exposing that tyrannical hatred one is in a better position to escape from it and move into a larger freedom.

    It’s been done before. Time to do it again.

    • Thanks: anarchyst
  60. @ghali

    But… Can you point me to anything he said – ANYTHING at all – which is not actually true ?

    Thought not.

  61. Iva says:

    I am curious when Jews will start paying reparations to Slavic nations. The first slavery was done by Jews rounding up slavic women and young man/boys and selling them as sex slave to Arab countries. The young men were then castrated. The narrative against whites is usually done by Jews . I always wonder why they do not consider themselves white? Most of Jews are very white . Why would they come up with a narrative against themselves? Do Jews think that they are only humans and races are for sub humans black, white , brown and yellow?

  62. anonymous[146] • Disclaimer says:

    This would all stop if a certain tribe was run out of America. Always knew about the heavy jew involvement in the slave trade, as one of my old professors studied the creditors and money lenders of the Atlantic trade but never published his findings for reasons that should be obvious. Jews don’t earn honest money; they steal money. They are clever scoundrels and thieves. They’re smear merchants, too. The gullibility and stupidity of whites is going to get a lot of them murdered or enslaved. Truth is an enemy of these people. They generated enormous wealth through the rapine and exploitation of others, and then have the chutzpah to lecture humanity on its need to be more humane because of “The Holocaust” (TM). This site is a goldmine, by the way: you are taught nothing in our tertiary education “institutions”, but here at least you are given the information needed to go out and find the truth yourself. Jews fear truth, so make sure you make it your polestar.

  63. anonymous[418] • Disclaimer says:
    @Robert Dolan

    jewishness to a T. Talmudic values. I am your friend until I am powerful, then I attack you and destroy you. Think of all the goy businessmen who went into business with a jew and ended up robbed of everything, and then found out that jew judges and law firms protect their own tribe ahead of protecting justice. And the American media accuses the Chinese of being deceitful.

  64. KenH says:

    Leftism is an ideology based on lies and run by liars.

    It’s also led by Jews which explains the pathological lying and rank hypocrisy. Jews are the great masters of the lie and resort to pathological lying to create the revolutionary conditions that they seek in the diaspora.

    In Jews we are dealing with a race that is completely amoral in its dealings with non-Jews and follow no rules and aren’t restrained by any norms in their ongoing war against us.

  65. Cowboy says:

    Infogalatic? Wow! You did some serious research there! Are you twelve years old?

  66. Bernie says:
    @EliteCommInc.

    “what remains central are the policies when slavery ended and why blacks were uniquely targeted and used as slaves.”

    Blacks were “targeted” because slavery was rampant in Africa and that is where you could go to easily procure slaves.

    The policy in the US when slavery ended was to offer blacks the option of staying in the US or going back to Africa (Liberia).

    “It is like getting in huff about blacks and welfare — who were largely cut out of those programs until the 1960’s”

    Those programs mostly didnt exist until the 60s and blacks still take the lion’s share of these handouts.

  67. Anon[227] • Disclaimer says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Left is centralization/collectivism/globalism/top-down etc.

    Right is decentralization/individualism/bottom-up etc.

    Immigration is the reserve army of capital

    What about equality, i.e. the rich/privilged workers of the West need to compete for the resources? I.e. must put an end to global inequality?

    • Replies: @JM
  68. Anon[227] • Disclaimer says:
    @JM

    The left does not want centralized/top-down global equality?

  69. Treg says:

    Private donations — $50,000 money grants” — to young married families wanting to buy a house and start or grow a family will go a long long way.

    And third child bonuses –$35,000 — can easily tip the all important scales in the important direction of remaining a predominately white country.

    Most of all, there is nothing stopping any of us from setting this system up. Nothing.

    We cannot wait and must take this action because millions of “LatinX’s” are pouring in from the South and our various Sec 8 programs are paying for more and more “MalcomX’s” to be leftist-filled with resentment.

    Meanwhile, never fail to mention that both Britain and President Roosevelt in America BOUGHT two African Countries in the 1900s. These countries are still more than willing to take in “ancestors of slavery”. These two countries are Sierra Leone and Liberia and their arms are as white open to American blacks. Same with Ghana.

    So, for all Black Churches who make one-way pilgrimages FREE & AVAILABLE to ANY of their anti-white congregation — Yes, they should receive our donations as well. (It might even be a charitable write off on your taxes – ask your CPA)

  70. “Blacks were “targeted” because slavery was rampant in Africa and that is where you could go to easily procure slaves.

    The policy in the US when slavery ended was to offer blacks the option of staying in the US or going back to Africa (Liberia).

    “It is like getting in huff about blacks and welfare — who were largely cut out of those programs until the 1960’s”

    Those programs mostly didnt exist until the 60s and blacks still take the lion’s share of these handouts.”

    I worked in inner city populations and among liberal youth in rural communities . . . .

    drug use was mine for the taking. Their offer did not excuse my violating the law or my moral code. The argument that the africans traded in slaves is not an excuse – when applying the codes of faith and practice and the philosophy of humane conduct held by Europeans.

    Furthermore, the way in which african civilizations practiced slavery varied and was far different, because it was not impossible for that slave to be incorporated into the slavers society – even in full. And while there were undoubtedly civilizations that engaged in brutal treatment — and even marked their slaves. What Europeans did in all of their sophistications violated their own norms.

    The drug pushers code is one thing and then there is the code that I hold. It is the hypocrisy that trips us up and is hardest to master.

    ———

    I don’t see your point about Liberia. The US was their home. Here Longer than thousands of whites, slave or free. The black slave freed is the most dramatic teller of the history of the country. His or her identity is the US. It is any African country. That history, ancestry is far removed and of a kind he knows little if anything about. Unlike Europeans who generally can trace their roots to to other ethnicities — slaves – to a one none.

    Here at the Kings and parliament’s pleasure – then so free to reap its trials and benefits.

    ——–

    On welfare, I made the required references and no african americans are not getting the lion’s share —

    and you need to some homework on US welfare assistance.

  71. How To Destroy Critical Clueless Race Theory (CRT), Part 3.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  72. “We cannot wait and must take this action because millions of “LatinX’s” are pouring in from the South and our various Sec 8 programs are paying for more and more “MalcomX’s” to be leftist-filled with resentment.”

    Well,

    probably a bad idea to fail to educate and assimilate the 1 million or so freed slaves.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/welfare-policy-created-white-wealth-largely-leaving-black-americans-behind-2020-8

    even someone as low IQ’d and nonwoke as myself comprehends this

  73. Jews Organized Globally(JOG) is an evil gang of nation-wrecking rats and they are using mass immigration as a demographic weapon to attack and destroy White European Christian nations such as the USA, Germany, Italy, Sweden, Canada, Australia, France…etc.

    Jews Organized Globally(JOG) is using mass immigration as a demographic weapon to bring on WHITE GENOCIDE in European Christian nations.

    The JEW QUESTION explained:

    Jews form a nation within a nation everywhere they reside. Can Jews ever be considered to be part of the larger nation in which they reside when they are genetically and culturally predisposed to put the interests of the Jew Nation over and above the interests of the larger nations in which they reside?

    It is clear that Jews have a disproportionate control of the mass media and the advertising agencies and academia and other power centers of thought control and the rancid Republican Party cowards won’t talk honestly about breaking up the mass media to prevent Jews from controlling the political and cultural discourse in the USA.

    The cowards in the rancid Republican Party will not talk about the JEW QUESTION and that is because Jew billionaires have bought and paid for the duplicitous treasonous scum in the GOP. I have been convinced that the evangelical vote is important as a reason for GOP politician pandering on Israel but I still think the Jew loot from Jew plutocrats is more important of a factor to explain the GOP’s insistence on putting the interests of Israel over and above the interests of the USA.

    The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire pushes mass legal immigration, mass illegal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire is a clear and present threat to the safety, security and sovereignty of the United States of America.

    The JEW/WASP Ruling Class of the American Empire must be politically decapitated and removed from power and then they must be financially liquidated and forcibly exiled to concentration campgrounds in sub-Saharan Africa. All this should be done legally with a nice celebratory supper of roast beef, potato salad, beans and plenty of cold delicious ale.

    IT’S MORE THAN OK TO BE WHITE

    WHITEY IS WAKING UP WORLDWIDE

    WHITE CORE AMERICA RISING

  74. US Senator Charles Schumer is anti-White.

    US Senator Charles Schumer is Anti-Christian.

    US Senator Charles Schumer is a Jew Nationalist.

    US Senator Charles Schumer is a member of the evil, duplicitous Jews Organized Globally(JOG).

    US Senator Charles Schumer and Jews Organized Globally(JOG) are using mass immigration to replace the European Christian ancestral core of many European Christian nations.

    The WASP portion of the WASP/JEW Ruling Class of the American Empire — as represented by the scum in the Bush Organized Crime Syndicate — and the JEW portion — as represented by rancid Baby Boomer Charles Schumer — are a clear and present threat to the national security interests of the United States of America.

    I hereby accuse Charles Schumer of being a JEW NATIONALIST who puts the interests of Israel ahead of the interests of the United States.

    Charles Schumer is a Baby Boomer JEW who wants to erase the border between the United States and Mexico.

    Charles Schumer pushes mass legal immigration and amnesty for illegal alien invaders.

    Charles Schumer wants to continue to use the US military as muscle to fight wars on behalf of Israel.

    US Senator Charles Schumer is a JEW NATIONALIST and a JEW SUPREMACIST.

    Sam Francis wrote about nations within nations.

    Baby Boomer Jew Charles Schumer says:

    “In Israel and America, the Jewish nation lives — now and forever”

  75. @Roger the Lodger

    Hmm… You must be new around here. Welcome, friend… Perhaps.

    What part, exactly – and I DO mean exactly – of the current world disaster under Jewish control and ruthless Satan-worshipping evil are you not familiar with ? Is it, for example, Jewish ownership of the mass-media which brainwashes and lies to it’s consumers 24 hours a day ? Or did you mean Jewish social and moral national sabotage – via their gross moral corruption in producing, distributing and promoting family-wrecking pornography across every available media for over 60 years ? Perhaps you’re thinking of their part in the undermining and destruction of the cultural and religious practices of Whites – and White Christians – by condemning their historical traditions ? Or were you mindful of their illegal and unconstitutional 24/7 lobbying control of American foreign policy which results in the periodic and repeated bombing and slaughter of whole swathes of the Islamic world, from Lebanon to Iraq to Syria, for the sole benefit of apartheid Israel ? Perhaps you are more concerned about the traditional and utterly unchanged (and deranged) Jewish hatred of minority Christians and all they stand for across the middle east as well as in the West ? How about Jewish manipulation and utilisation of hundreds of millions of low-IQ anti-White third-world savages to flood the White western homelands via decades of un-debated, un-voted and wholly unwanted mass-immigration? Or perhaps you meant simply the Jew tendency to general, universal and incorrigible high-level financial corruption and fraud on a scale which bankrupts corporations, makes hard-working White people by the million unemployed, drains strong White economies, weakens well-meaning political will – and turns once-comfortable, stable, secure and forward-looking White western nations into third-world ghetto cesspits of almost exclusively BLACK violent crime, MOSLEM paedophile racist (WHITE victims only) rape-trafficking sex-crime – and of course, above it all, JEW high-level business and low-level street (money-lending) swindling of ANY kind which results in the transfer of White industrial and commercial wealth into Jewish pockets – and ultimately bank vaults in Tel Aviv ?

    If you’re really interested – from your attitude I have my doubts – you could start here:

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2012/07/11/manny-friedman-jews-own-a-whole-freaking-country-and-yes-that-includes-the-media/

  76. JM says:
    @Anon

    So you concede his point about (Globalist) immigration (being) the Reserve Army of Capital?

    Where on Earth could you go from there! The First International was based on opposition to that.

    • Replies: @Anon
  77. JM says:
    @Franz

    The same left that wanted nuclear power in 1965 and thought a new Ice Age was coming in 1975?

    Nearly ALL the left opposed nuclear power then and did up till the last decade or so, though most still do. The great majority of the Left in that period NEVER saw anything of significance in ‘a new Ice Age. Where do people get this shit! Lol!

    The PRIMARY position of Marx was that Capitalism, having moved production forward from the previous economic system, had become a barrier to development. To this end he devoted his magnum opus, Capital, in which the Laws of Development of Capitalism and its Contradictions were outlined. The historic role of the proletariat was to clear the way for the new system.

    ‘Equality’ was a secondary consideration. As a primary consideration, it has its inspiration from brands of Christianity (‘Christian charity’) or shyster carpet salesmen using it to push hidden ethnic agendas.

    • Replies: @Franz
  78. HbutnotG says:
    @P.T.

    Well stated.

    I’ve always said that homogenous (uniethnic/unicultural) states persist the longest. Not always in a state of nirvana, btw, but trouble is 100% due to outsiders trying to get in or otherwise disrupt/divide..

  79. Absolute recommend

    Created Equal Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas

  80. @Phibbs

    The first order of business is for Caucasians to round up the Jews and deport them. After that, America’s Born-Again “Christians”/evangelicals should be deported, as they worship the enemy (Jews). Of course, America’s 50 million blacks and mulattos will be deported to multiculturalism and multiracialism loving Canada. Muslims will be deported to Muslim nations. White liberals should be summarily executed. South African whites will all be encouraged to move to the new and improved United States. Most of America’s problems will ease when all these steps are taken.

    Got it….BUT what we gonna do with them Native people called Indigenous Americans? Should we try and again kill off their primary food supply and feed them carbohydrates? Should we sterilize them some more (maybe get them to take another vax booster) so their population goes to zero? What’s the plan here?

    • Replies: @Phibbs
  81. @René Fries

    Once the white man isn’t afraid of naming the Jew and start putting God and Logos in history back again then History can be called a science, like it did in the past.

    • Replies: @René Fries
    , @René Fries
  82. Pastit says:

    Without White societies the world would be a very poor place. The jewish led destruction of White societies is absolute genocide, the goal being to have an amorphus identy-less glob of humanity the jew overloads can then reign over and control. The tide must turn.

  83. @Charles Martel France

    “When it comes to doing good things in the world and offering help in times of disaster and hardship Whites as part of the Judeo-Christian Civilization rank number one.”

    As Larry the Cable Guy says, “I don’t care who y’are, that’s funny stuff right there!”

    I won’t get into the yawning chasm between Jewish and Christian values, so let me just remind Mr. France of “The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews,” whose commercials air in endless rotation especially on late-night television. The entire premise of this multi-million dollar “charity” is to take money from Christians and spend it on Jews.

    They’ve recently focused on impoverished Ukranian Jews, which begs the question: if they find 200 people huddling in a hovel outside Kiev, do they tell the Christians to remain seated while the buses pull up for the Goldsteins?

    Jews wouldn’t piss on a goy on fire.

    • Thanks: Thrallman
  84. Richard B says:

    Always great to read Tobias Langdon. He never misses. In terms of articles he’s hands down TOO’s best. For the longer essays their most talented writer has to be Andrew Joyce. So I was glad to hear TL mention him in this article. Cause I’ve been wondering where he’s been lately. Been a while since I’ve seen anything from him here or over at TOO.

    No religion has ever been based on the claim that water is wet or that the sun rises in the east. It doesn’t take any effort to believe those things.

    It might not take a lot of effort to believe in a truth. But it takes a lot of effort to get to one. A handful of whites took that effort and built a civilization out of it and another group of whites took it upon themselves to extend the advantages of that civilization to as many as possible and their beneficiaries will never forgive them for it.

    Leftism also makes claims that defy common sense and demand emotional investment: we’re all the same under the skin; Blacks fail only because of White racism; East Asians flourish despite White racism; and so on.

    True. But the same could be said of the man we might as well call, for the sake of argument (and to simplify a complex matter), the father of the modern Left, Marx. Pretty much everything about the Left today leads back to him. Just as everything deserving of what’s called modernism or to put it bluntly, the cutting edge of human thought, leads back to Nietzsche.

    Like most on the Left, there are some on the Right who go into conniptions whenever they come across anyone using a word or phrase in a way they don’t approve of. Nowhere is this truer than with the term Judeo-Christian. That’s unfortunate. Because it’s a valid category no matter what they say. So we can leave them writhing on the floor in a fit of ideologically-induced hysteria with their brothers and sisters on the Left and get on with it. Namely, get on with directin attention to the connection, or similarity, between the Judeo-Christian tradition and Marx.

    The myth of the fall from Paradise in Genesis was and is a symbolization of the human drive to live acording to a perfectly gratifying belief-system or orientation that corresponds in every way, no data excluded, to a real world. It states in no equivocal terms that it’s an historical fact that heaven was once on this earth, and since man was excluded from it it is in the realm of possibility that he may return to it. And in the human mind a desired possibility is automatically translated into a absolute certainty.

    From this point of view, it’s obvious that Christianity inevitably had to emerge from Hebraism, just as we can’t sleep until we hear the other shoe hit the floor. It’s the drive toward completion, toward fulfilling the logical and emotional potentials of a pattern. Even chimpanzees suffer from this drive; given an uncompleted circle and a piece of chalk, they will finish the circle. Christianity completed the Hebraic circle (of course, it then received a powerful reinforcement from Greece, from Plato, but that’s another story).

    So the basic template of the Judeo-Christian tradition is:
    God created Man who sinned.
    As a necessary consequence of that sin, given the nature of God,
    He will send his son down to redeem mankind from sin.

    And now we’re back to Marx. Here’s his template:
    History created Man who sinned in creating Capitalism.
    As a necessary consequence, given the nature of History,
    It will produce the proletariate to redeem mankind from Capitalism.

    The terms have been changed but the structure remains unaltered. And what is the structure?

    The structure of any explanatory system that claims to be perfect and final. In short, it’s the structure of redemptive theologies and ideologies. Under the skin, theology and ideology are brothers from the same mother. The mother of absolutes. Absolutes that whenever acted on lead to tyranny and destruction. One claims to solve all of our “spiritual” problems, the other our social and economic problems. Today the new terms that have been added are of course Race, Gender and Sexual Orientation. Aside from that the pattern is identical.

    So, because Identity Politics (the dominant explanatory system of the West today) is basically a Marxist derivative that has merely shifted the focus from Class to Race and added a few terms, we can simply speak of Christianity and Marx. From this perspective Christianity was the first full scale attempt to break free from the tyrannical drive behind Jewish Supremacy. Marx was the first full scale attempt to return to it.

    In any event, the identification of the two patterns is made more probable by pointing out that both promised an ideal world after redemption – the one in heaven, the other on earth – the State or Satan (the instrument of man’s sin) or Capitalism having withered away. In the sect of Universalism, even Satan is to be redeemed. In the same way, Marxist rhetoric is not merely an “analytic” rhetoric – whether of history or economics – but a rhetoric which asribes evil, even intentional evil, to its object (capitalists, or today, whites).

    But, it has to be said, that the reaction of some on the Right fades into nothing when compared to how the old school Marxists and their modern-day mini-me’s of Identity Politics react whenever it’s pointed out to them that the structure of their belief-system is virtually idential to that of their historical enemy and present day designated scapegoat (or anyone who looks like them whatever their personal beliefs might be).

    The only solution for those interested in preserving their sanity while living in reality is to engage in a deliberate, self-conscious act of cultural transcendence and put the intellectually, socially and morally bankrupt ideologies of the Right and Left behind them. It can be done. It’s about time.

    • Agree: René Fries
  85. Jews are at the bottom of all this.

    • Replies: @Dave Bowman
  86. “In fact, if one were to divest the story of Christ of its metaphorial content and look at it simply as a story of how one man stood up to a group of crazy tyrants – what’s not to admire and inspire?”

    Well, you are playing a tad careless with Christ’s expectations and agenda. The exposure was the by product of something which is literal — a spiritual salvation. Exposing the legalease straining of gnats was but a by product of that agenda. Eventually one has to grapple with what Christ says,

    “I am the way the truth and the life. No man comes to the father, but by me.”

    “Eat of my flesh”

    may very well be metaphor, but what it calls one to do is . . . to eat of Christ’s teachings, his word . . . his sacrifice.

    “How about the this revelation

    “You are the Christ the Son of the living God” and Christ acknowledges as much. Trying excise Christ from his purpose is a slight of hand

  87. Thrallman says:
    @Z-man

    Comments about “culling” make you look like a genocidal demon. Please stop doing this. These words will be used against everybody associated with Unz.

    The entire internet is under surveillance. At your trial, you will not be given a chance to speak in your own defense. Choose your words carefully now while you can.

    • Replies: @Z-man
  88. There is nothing wrong with Dr. Fordham’s response on its face, save that is a might shrift on the issues and the reason.

  89. Phibbs says:
    @dogbumbreath

    Dog, I have a soft spot for Native Americans — even though many of them look more African than Native. After the Patriot revolution, Natives should be given ten times more land than they have now and pursue living the way they want and free from anybody not Native. In other words, “Indian nation will return,” as Paul Revere and the Raiders sing. P.S. Most Mexicans look more Native than Spanish. Perhaps their growing numbers are, in some way, a return of Native America?

    • Replies: @dogbumbreath
  90. @RedNordid1488

    like it did in the past

    “Le bon historien n’est d’aucun temps ni d’aucun pays / The good historian isn’t of any time nor of any country” (Fénelon, Lettre à l’Académie, Classiques Larousse, Paris 1934, p. 59). But he also says that there are but a few historians without great “défauts”, at any rate until the 17th century in France. And, most important, that “toute sa critique se borne à donner comme douteux ce qui l’est, et en laisser la décision au lecteur, après lui avoir donné ce que l’histoire lui fournit / his entire critic limits itself to giving as doubtful what is so, and to let the reader decide thereon, after having given him (all) that history has provided to him” (ibid.).

    To single out any particular (white or green) men and pinpoint them against others (black or blue) is no longer history but partisan writing.

  91. Alrenous says: • Website

    How do you satisfy a leftist like Amy Mae Baxter? You can’t

    More importantly, you shouldn’t even try.

    Is Amy your Amy? Are you responsible for her, do you own her? Equivalently, has she hired you? If not, then her problems are none of your business, and you ought rightly ignore them.

    It is not your job to mother the world. If it needs saving, let it save itself. They’re allegedly adults. You don’t care how strangers are feeling and, speaking of being based on lies, it’s well past time to stop pretending that you do.

    And believing in obvious truths doesn’t require any emotional investment or activate any of the religious modules that seem to be built into the human brain.

    Misdirection. Do the obvious thing and believe in non-obvious truths instead. Such as acknowledging the social status obsession and the fact it doesn’t work at all outside the savannah.

    Leftism mandates both that Blacks and Whites are born equal and that only the innate evil of Whites explains why Blacks don’t have the same high achievements as Whites.

    Note this is actually humblebragging. Leftist are just lying, they don’t genuinely believe whites are evil. What they believe is that blacks can never win against whites, and they’re crowing about it. This [evil] is apparently insurmountable, they sneer. “Haha I’m “”evil”” and you can’t do anything about it.”

    Conveniently this also helps them persecute rival whites via the invocation of kto kogo principles. If you e.g. send the human traffick to Martha’s Vinyard, you will find they’re perfectly capable of ackowledging obvious facts about the world. And that they own the national guard, and you don’t.

    Also note [white] and [black] are categories invented for the daily and political convenience of American bureaucrats, not actual races.

    rhetoric of equality and justice

    Note that justice is nearly as opposite of equality as you can get. The more just a society is, the more it discriminates between good and bad.

    Indeed, leftism is in part a Christian heresy or a perversion of Christianity

    Actually the opposite, Christianity is a perversion of leftism.

    Background: everything man can make, man can unmake. Some institutions must be perverted to do good, others perverted to do evil. The smart thing to do is to have institutions that must be perverted to do evil (as in, not-democracy). Christianity must be perverted to do good.

    Christianity is a lie. Christianity is egalitarian and pro-crime. The parts that leftism removes by “perverting” it are clearly inconsistent with core doctrines. And just as clearly necessary to, you know, not starve to death. There is an obviously selection filter which made non-hypocritical Christian sects die out, leaving only the adulterated ideologies.

    Chauvin judged, and was judged in turn.
    Zimmerman should have turned the other cheek. If anyone should crack your skull on the pavement, turn and let them crack your nose also.
    To really heap coals upon his head, Zimmerman should have just let Martin steal whatever he wanted.

    Fun fact: egalitarianism is always Envy worship. Christianity is based on something Christianity correctly identifies as a sin.

    Leftism, seeing we became rich, removed the adulterations. “Every mountain and hill will be made low.” You are here.

    failing to accept the Christian idea that we’re all sinners.

    No? We’re all racist. Or sexist. Or transphobic or whatever. Bit-for-bit identical across all points of profound identity.

  92. Alrenous says: • Website
    @loner feral cat

    When you try to refute it, you must assume it is worthy of being refuted, and not equivalent to duck quacking or pigeon cooing.

    This is giving it more credit than it has earned, or indeed will ever earn.

    Has it replicated? Of course not, nobody has even tried to replicate it. Epistemologically speaking there is nothing there to refute. You can go ahead and assume it’s false until it replicates.

    • Replies: @loner feral cat
  93. Z-man says:
    @Thrallman

    LOL!!!
    Are you going to tell? Or are you going to be the prosecutor?

  94. @Alrenous

    A virus is a submicroscopic infectious agent that replicates only inside the living cells of an organism. Viruses infect all life forms, from animals and plants to microorganisms, including bacteria and archaea.

    Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virus

    Woke Virus, found replicating inside U.S. public libraries.

    Source: https://sfpl.org/kids

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  95. @anonymouseperson

    Jews – in their monstrous Satanic worship of money, and the terrible power over the world which it brings – are at the bottom of all the evil on earth.

    • Replies: @Alrenous
  96. Anon[101] • Disclaimer says:
    @JM

    Yes, if it’s collectivist/governmental/centralized controll of capital (the economy/means of production etc), not if he’s implying that we live in a capitalist society with private property rights/free trade/freedom of association etc.

    Where on Earth could you go from there!

    Go where?

    The First International was based on opposition to that.

    Opposition to what?

  97. Alrenous says: • Website
    @loner feral cat

    Not really, no. This is what it looks like when the State forces a meme. There is nothing organic about the process. The libraries aren’t being “convinced” they’re being hit with a big stick. You can demonstrate the most elaborate counter-proof imaginable, but they will still be getting hit with a big stick, which you didn’t address.

    Indeed by likening it to a virus you, again, reinforce the legitimacy of the stick-wielding State. “The State must have a compelling argument! I must argue back, if I can manage it!” Further: “I was told to ignore the elephant in the room, so I did. Do it like I do: pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.”

  98. Alrenous says: • Website
    @Dave Bowman

    Communism.
    Wealth bad => don’t have wealth => starve to death.

    I like the “terrible power” of money thing…which can do nothing but trade.
    Trade bad => cooperation bad => defect instead => crime, also starve to death.

    “Bottom of all evil” => vaingloriously claiming to be perfect and without sin, and yet not perfect enough to resist evil…

    “But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.” Matt 5:39
    Got that [resist not evil] thing down pat, I suppose. Very virtuous or something.

    Can I sign up to the be [bottom of all evil] too? I think resisting evil is pretty cool actually. Also having stuff (especially beautiful things) and not starving to death. Pretty weird to call it evil, but if you really have to, then you have to, I guess.

  99. AceDeuce says:

    Posted this elsewhere a couple of days ago. Thought it be more relevant here.

    Over the weekend, I, without looking for overt anti-White propaganda, came across the following:

    1. Looking up an article in a 2019 New Yorker, I came across another article in the issue-a review of Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time . . . in Hollywood”, in which the bad guys are the Manson Family. The review’s title was:

    “Quentin Tarantino’s Obscenely Regressive Vision of the Sixties.” In it, the reviewer snarks:

    ”Tarantino delivers a ridiculously white movie, complete with a nasty dose of white resentment.”

    Not just White. “Ridiculously” White.

    2. September, 2022 is the 60th anniversary of the cartoon TV show The Jetsons (fun fact, in the show, George Jetson was said to have been born in 2022). Slate has a current article about the evident atrocity that is The Jetsons, entitled “The Jetsons, Now 60 Years Old, Is Iconic. That’s a Problem.”

    What would be the problem with an innocuous cartoon from the early 60s?

    “The Jetsons was a rather tame, pedestrian sitcom about a family that reinforced traditional gender and family roles, knew little of the social issues of the time (it was, for example, unbearably white), and effectively glorified the consumerist, suburban lifestyle.”

    Not just White. “Unbearably” White.

    3. I saw a TV commercial trumpeting a line of trendy sneakers rolled out for “hispanic heritage month” The shoes have “The Future is Latina” , in Spanish, printed on the side.

    4. Also on Sunday, PBS was showing a recent BBC adaptation of Jules Verne’s Around the World in 80 Days. The protagonist, Phileas Fogg, a White man in the book and here, has been turned into a weak, snivelling cuck. His assistant Passepartout (Who was White in the book) is now a supernegro who is superior to Fogg (Hell, he’s now superior to James Bond.) The White detective in the book who was Fogg’s adversary has been turned into an attractive White female journalist who now tags along with Fogg and Passepartout–she smugly lectures Cucked Fogg on gender stuff and everything else, and is falling into a romantic relationship with the supernegro.

    5. Last but not least, I was looking at a cocktail website and came across a 2017 review of a vintage 1960s cocktail book, written by Johnny Carson sidekick Ed McMahon.

    Who was more genial and less offensive than Ed McMahon? Well, this millennial reviewer, while acknowledging that, while the book hat it is a very good book in many ways, it is seriously flawed and “reflects a sorry past”. So what’s wrong with it? Here’s Mr. Millennial’s money quote from the review:

    “As much as I love this book I must acknowledge its major flaw. It was written in 1969 and only speaks to (White) men. Ed writes as if he’s in a bar full of guys and he’s talking to a bartender named Bill. Seriously, in this book Ed conversates with his fictional pal Al and bartender Bill like Elwood Dowd spoke to Harvey. The book mirrors what bar culture was back then – bartenders wore aprons up to their armpits, patrons smoked cigarettes inside the bar, women were there for entertainment, wives were punchlines and People of Color were invisible. It’s a history lesson in a glass with no chaser and no excuses.”

    Up against the wall, Comrade Ed! You, too Al and Bill!

    • Replies: @Lancelot_Link
  100. @beavertales

    Your observation, beavertales, buttresses Langston’s thesis. His final sentence: “Separation is the only solution, and separation will not come by words but by war.”

    But today’s prelude to WW3 is not what he has in mind. Whites are killing Whites in great numbers in Ukraine, to the delight of Jewish bankers. A repeat of the first two World Wars. Mr. Putin did his best to stop what was coming since Jewess Nuland’s Maidan Coup. But the Globalist lust for power was too determined.

    The Globalists are happy to see Russians fight to the last Ukrainian. They commit ecological holocaust to get their way by blowing up life-saving pipelines. Whites have learned nothing after killing millions of their brothers since the Great War. They don’t understand who the real enemy is.

    Langston’s argument is right on! The hope, if there is any, lies with Orthodox Russia. America is too far gone.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  101. Franz says:
    @JM

    Nearly ALL the left opposed nuclear power then and did up till the last decade or so, though most still do. The great majority of the Left in that period NEVER saw anything of significance in ‘a new Ice Age. Where do people get this shit! Lol!

    The Port Huron Statement of 1965 insisted on “small, nuclear plants” owned by communities for their own use. Signed on by the SDS and other radical left groups that year.

    The CIA’s paper on the coming Ice Age got the ball rolling for communards, the dropping of nuclear power in favor of ecology-friendly energy, and so on.

    One of conservative’s favorite insults on the old New Left is how often the flip-flopped on major statements and positions.

    • Replies: @JM
  102. @AceDeuce

    Richard Pryor said (Bicentennial Nigger album” something to the effect of whites weren’t planning on having black people around too long as there were none on “The Jetsons”.

  103. anarchyst says:
    @follyofwar

    Actually Ukraine is being “cleansed” of ethnic Russians (genocide) to make room for “the new israel”. You see, demographic changes within the present rogue state of israel will make jews a minority there in the next 30 years or so, especially since jews will be “outbred” by ethnic Palestinians.
    Just like rats fleeing a sinking ship (an apt description for jews), once the present-day israel is abandoned, a ready place for (((them))) will be the Ukraine.

    • Replies: @follyofwar
  104. sammuddin says:
    @Phibbs

    How about first a criminal mind like you is burnt at the stake, or better yet apply the islamic law for criminals like you…..off with head by a dull sword

  105. sammuddin says:

    the whites are primarily inclined towards evil, its a DNA defect

  106. @anarchyst

    I’ve heard that one before. Might be something to it. It’s too hot for pale skins in Israel, anyway.

  107. @Phibbs

    It is easy to resort to illogical assertions such as wholesale deportation, and murder of human beings. Do you think any of your suggestions will be carried out by at least rational-thinking human beings? As an alternative, I propose helping human beings increase their consciousness (awareness of the totality of one’s feelings).

  108. @Richard B

    Where to begin? – Note that I used a question mark. I apologize for my lapse in my previous comment.
    Langdon, although British, is writing in the context of accepted the American belief that Marxism is socialism. It isn’t. The “real Left” were the early socialists who wanted the state, the church, and the banks out of the economy. The purest form of socialism is anarchy. Even libertarians understand this.
    Socialism is looking after the well being of your own “nation”, not top down state control. The Russians and Czechs I met at university 50 years ago believed that they were transitioning to less state control, if you can believe that. At the same time, immigration to “socialist/left” Norway and Sweden was almost impossible, because they had people unemployed, and even where special skills were needed they were “guest workers” who may never have been allowed citizenship.
    Marxism/communism and capitalism are the two sides of the same shekel. They are both about a small group of people controlling the masses and the economy. Both are anti-democratic and global in nature. Both are oppressive and soul crushing.
    There is no perfect political philosophy other than pragmatism.

  109. JM says:
    @Franz

    The New Left and their spawn weren’t/aren’t Marxist. They’re Jewish. Even the “internationally disciplined” CPUSA was also heavily influenced by Jewish Nationalist ideology and that’s (unintentionally) documented in W.Z. Foster’s History (of it). The cultural (vs Marxist) emphasis of the Left in the USA is old. I’d say it arises from its heavy Jewish influence, the Negro Question, the polyglot European migrations and (less so) the porous Mexican border. Truly a fu***d society waiting, with legs splayed wide open, to be f***ed over when Imperialism (of which it was the centre) had acquired the accumulated “contradictions” of its Post War phase as well as the technical wherewithal to go Global. And it dragged the whole of the West with it.

  110. anonymous[154] • Disclaimer says:
    @Ted Shmundi

    Special ed teacher here married to another special ed teacher and no slurs, please. Actually, yeah, the curves are different, but not in that way. The female curve is higher and doesn’t stretch out as much meaning there are fewer exceptions in both directions — fewer geniuses and fewer mentally retarded among females, more among males for both groups.

  111. @Phibbs

    Dog, I have a soft spot for Native Americans — even though many of them look more African than Native. After the Patriot revolution, Natives should be given ten times more land than they have now and pursue living the way they want and free from anybody not Native. In other words, “Indian nation will return,” as Paul Revere and the Raiders sing. P.S. Most Mexicans look more Native than Spanish. Perhaps their growing numbers are, in some way, a return of Native America?

    If you’re genuine, may I suggest you use the correct vocabulary. You said, “… Natives should be given ten times more land than they have now…”.

    Perhaps you should say, ” Natives should be returned ten times more land than they have now”…………….seeing that the entire country was settled by them prior to the 1500’s. You ain’t giving, you are returning.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Tobias Langdon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
Shouldn't they recuse themselves when dealing with the Middle East?