The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Jared Taylor Archive
The 'White Supremacist Armed Insurrection' Lives On
Email This Page to Someone

 Remember My Information



=>

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • BShow CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

If enough people say something often enough, it becomes “true.” Big media and people at the highest levels of government now accept that the Capitol takeover of January 6 was an “armed insurrection” by “white supremacists.” A few eccentrics wonder how you can have an “insurrection” with no plan and no weapons, but virtually everyone has swallowed the story about “white supremacists.”

As for “insurrection,” even the Republican lawyer Michael van der Veen, who defended Donald Trump in his second impeachment trial, said something MSNBC called “obvious”: “The question before us is not whether there was a violent insurrection of the Capitol. On that point, everyone agrees.” Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin is one of a very small number of politicians who doesn’t. He pointed out that the mob wasn’t armed, and that a three-hour occupation is not an “insurrection.” Media ridiculed him, with an MSNBC contributor writing, “Let’s take a minute to unpack this, because while I tend not to expect much from Ron Johnson, this is extraordinary, even for him.”

An indignant CNN articled listed the “arms” the “insurrectionists” used: “a baseball bat, a fire extinguisher, a wooden club, a spear, crutches, a flagpole, bear spray, mace, chemical irritants, stolen police shields, a wooden beam, a hockey stick, a stun gun, and knives.” Not even comic-opera coup-plotters in Upper Volta or Rio Muni would try to overthrow a government with bear spray and pocket knives.

One of the few journalists who scoffs at the “armed insurrection” tale is Glenn Greenwald. He writes: We know that “no Trump supporter fired any weapon inside the Capitol and that the FBI seized a grand total of zero firearms from those it arrested that day . . . .” He adds that there were “no known cases of the rioters deliberately killing anyone,” and “no evidence anyone intended to assassinate Mike Pence, Mitt Romney or anyone else.”

(Credit Image: © Mark Finkenstaedt/ZUMA Wire)
(Credit Image: © Mark Finkenstaedt/ZUMA Wire)

Why the drumbeat about “armed insurrection”? Mr. Greenwald argues that “the more you can demonize your opponents as something monstrous, the more political power you can acquire,” and that Democrats warn about an attempted coup “because declaring an ‘armed insurrection’ empowers the state with virtually unlimited powers to act against the citizenry.” So far so good, but Mr. Greenwald is silent about who the rioters were and what they wanted.

Others had that figured out almost before the tear gas had cleared. Joe Biden pegged the rioters as “a bunch of thugs, white supremacists, domestic terrorists.” It would be tedious to list even just a few of the press articles that blamed the riot on white supremacy, but I will be tedious.

The FBI launched a massive manhunt for these white supremacists. There have been 275 arrests, and several outlets have written about who the rioters were, but no one has looked into them more carefully than staff at the Program on Extremism at George Washington University (GWU). Last week, it issued a report called “This is Our House!” which looks into 257 people who have been arrested and indicted.

The report sorts the 257 defendants into three groups: “militant networks,” “organized clusters,” or “inspired believers.”

Click here for a larger version.
Click here for a larger version.

The smallest number — 33 — are said to have been members of “militant networks,” or what the report also calls DVE (Domestic Violent Extremist) organizations. They are “alleged to have planned in advance to breach the Capitol and, in many cases, conduct violence inside the walls of the building.” These so-called DVEs are the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and the Three Percenters (aka “III%ers”). Five members of the Proud Boys have been charged with criminal conspiracy in connection with the riot, as have nine Oath Keepers.

What will eventually come of these cases is anyone’s guess, but an FBI spokesman explains that conspiracy charges are “an entry point to investigate white nationalist groups [emphasis added] long on law enforcement’s radar, allowing for a review of finances, communications and affiliations.” In other words, these are fishing expeditions that will poke into every detail of the organizations, reveal members and contributors, and probably put the groups out of business — even if the conspiracy cases later collapse in court.

None of these groups is “white nationalist” or has any racial orientation at all. The leader of the Proud Boys is Enrique Tarrio, a black Cuban who was in Latinos for Trump. As he says, “I’m pretty brown, I’m Cuban. There’s nothing white supremacist about me.” This does not stop the Wikipedia entry on the group from starting with: “The Proud Boys is a far-right, neo-fascist, and male-only white nationalist organization.”

Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio. (Credit Image: © Allison Dinner / ZUMA Wire)
Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio. (Credit Image: © Allison Dinner / ZUMA Wire)

As for the Oath Keepers, all members have had a job — mostly as peace officers or soldiers — in which they swore to “defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Not even the Southern Poverty Law Center can bring itself to call them “racists.” It’s leader, Elmer Rhodes, says he started the group when it occurred to him that if German soldiers and police had refused to follow orders, they could have stopped Hitler. The Three Percenters are similar to the Oath Keepers in opposing what they see as unconstitutional federal power, but with an even heavier emphasis on the Second Amendment. The group denounced the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, saying, “we will not align ourselves with any type of racist group.”

April 27, 2019 – Indianapolis, Indiana – A member of the III% militia does security during the Pro-Freedom rally at the Indiana Statehouse during the during the third day of the National Rifle Association convention being held nearby. (Credit Image: © Jeremy Hogan / SOPA Images via ZUMA Wire)
April 27, 2019 – Indianapolis, Indiana – A member of the III% militia does security during the Pro-Freedom rally at the Indiana Statehouse during the during the third day of the National Rifle Association convention being held nearby. (Credit Image: © Jeremy Hogan / SOPA Images via ZUMA Wire)

The GWU report warns about “white supremacist” and “neo-Nazi” groups without specifically naming any. In an article on arrests at the Capitol, NPR idiotically called all three groups — Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Three Percenters — “self-described Nazis and white supremacists.” This is American journalism: Call any conservative white man a Nazi.

The second category of rioters in the Georgetown report is “organized clusters,” which are simply people who travelled together to Washington DC to take part in the Stop the Steal demonstration. If two friends or a husband and wife were arrested, they were an “organized cluster.” “Inspired believers” — the expression makes them sound vaguely unhinged — are just individuals.

Even if the 33 members of “militant networks” really did want to break into the Capitol building, they carried no firearms and had no plan. By the report’s own count, they were only 12.8 percent of the people arrested, and “many of the individuals responsible for storming the Capitol were brazen opportunists who took advantage of the unrest to enter the building and achieve personal or political objectives, despite lacking a well-devised plan to do so.” No well-devised plan? They had no plan at all. They walked in once the doors were open.

As if one needed any more evidence that this was not an “insurrection,” the report says 47 percent of the 257 arrested and charged were tracked down because they posted about the fun they had on social media. They will surely be the most bumbling, witless rabble ever to go down in history as an “insurrection.”

What about white supremacy? Of the 257 people charged, the report can find circumstantial evidence of “hate” for only two. Kevin Seefried is the man who carried a Confederate flag, but the report says only that he is a Trump supporter who flew the flag on his Delaware property. I have been unable to find anything else about his politics. The other “hater” is Robert Packer of Newport News, Virginia, who wore a “Camp Auschwitz” T-shirt. What are his politics? No one seems to know.

With obvious regret, the report concludes that the main motive of the rioters was “a desire to prevent the certification of the electoral votes for the 2020 Presidential Election.” The report quotes defendant William Calhoun of Atlanta: “The crowd was of one mind. Everybody there had the same attitude. They felt they had been robbed of a fair election and the Congress wasn’t listening to them.” If the crowd had been howling for segregated schools or restrictive covenants, I suspect we would have heard about it.

So far as I know, not one media outlet that was in a panic about white supremacy has admitted it was wrong. And just last week, Sen. Judiciary Committee Chairman Richard Durbin explained that “the insurrectionists on January 6 are the latest incarnation of violent white supremacist movements that have terrorized fellow Americans on the basis of their race, religion and national origin for more than 150 years.” He also cited a department of Homeland Security finding that white supremacy is “the most persistent and lethal threat in the homeland.”

Dick Durbin (Credit Image: © Tom Williams – Pool Via Cnp/CNP via ZUMA Wire)
Dick Durbin (Credit Image: © Tom Williams – Pool Via Cnp/CNP via ZUMA Wire)

On the other hand, media have been quick to correct a different theory about the riots. They quickly slapped down the idea that antifa in MAGA hats might have started the violence:

NPR’s crack reporting job was called “Antifa Didn’t Storm the Capitol. Just Ask the Rioters.” How about asking the rioters if they were “white supremacists”?

It’s touching that the media are so quick to defend the good name of the one group in America that might really be what the GWU report calls “violent domestic extremists,” but it’s just another example of applying the rules of good journalism — and the law — selectively.

Countless BLM rioters have had charges dropped, and the good fortune of rioters in Portland, Oregon is just the most recent case. Local authorities had been so unwilling to bring charges that the feds made arrests. However, with the change in administration, local media report that: “The Department of Justice has dismissed more than one-third of riot cases stemming from last summer’s violent protests in downtown Portland, including felony assault of federal officers. Many more dismissals are expected.”

August 1, 2020, Portland, Oregon: A protestor starts a fire behind the Mark O. Hatfield Courthouse. (Credit Image: © Allison Dinner/ZUMA Wire)
August 1, 2020, Portland, Oregon: A protestor starts a fire behind the Mark O. Hatfield Courthouse. (Credit Image: © Allison Dinner/ZUMA Wire)

The DOJ is handling the Capitol riot a little differently. Michael Sherwin, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, says, “‘The scope and scale of this investigation and these cases are really unprecedented not only in FBI history, but probably DOJ history.” The FBI posted electronic “wanted” photos on the sides of bus shelters in Washington, DC and other cities, and in just two weeks got more than 200,000 tips. The bureau has taken hundreds of specialized agents off their usual jobs, now considered less important than catching trespassers: securities fraud, public corruption, drugs, and gangs. The FBI arrested a New York City man after an investigation “that involved the FBI, two city agencies, surveillance footage, a Telegram account, and license plate readers on toll roads in New Jersey and Maryland.” Have the authorities put even half that effort into catching BLM rioters who set fire to stores or assaulted police officers?

And why, in spite of the evidence, are so many people determined to blame the Capital riot on white supremacy? I suspect it’s for the same reason Glenn Greenwald gave for insisting on calling the riot an “armed insurrection”: Blaming this highly publicized event on white supremacy makes it much easier to justify repression against anyone who has ever been accused of white supremacy. As I noted above, the GWU report’s “domestic violent organizations” have no racial orientation at all, but are still “white supremacist.” The two that face conspiracy charges will probably be destroyed.

Blaming the Capitol takeover on “white supremacy” will no doubt be a justification for surveillance and harassment of any racially dissident organization or person. It could even lead to laws that ban “white supremacist” speech. Private companies are already actively suppressing speech with which they disagree. A climate is building in which our government could join them.

(Republished from American Renaissance by permission of author or representative)
 
Hide 158 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. “For my friends everything, for my enemies the law” — Óscar R. Benavides

    • Agree: follyofwar, Bull Gator
  2. “The greatest instrument of political authority is the ability to give names and enforce definitions.”
    – Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, 1651

    • Agree: Lurker
    • Replies: @animalogic
    , @Anon
  3. Is it fair to call Trump supporters white supremacists? Taylor apparently thinks it unjustified, but I can see arguments for either side. On the one hand, the obvious fact that most of them would vigorously deny being white supremacists speaks against, and on the other that they are, in the main, a movement made up almost completely of white people, apparently motivated by disquiet and loss of cultural dominance brought about by demographic change, speaks in favor. They say they want to make America great again, or in other words, how it used to be, when it was whiter. They want a return to old, white, cultural values because, presumably, they believe those values to be better than any others. How else to describe this than white supremacy, albeit a white supremacy so ashamed of itself that it dare not speak its name?

    Assuming that whites have racial interests that are distinctly their own, I wonder which does more harm to those interests: Is it the press and the gov’t, who by dubbing them white supremacists bring hatred upon them, or is it men like Jared Taylor, who by rejecting the label, agree that white supremacism is evil, a cause with which no “respectable” man should want to be associated?
    By agreeing that white supremacism is evil, it seems to me that he puts the interests of whites in jeopardy, for it guarantees that such a movement must be internally conflicted and fail. Would it not be better for them to own the term, and admit that what they have racial interests that are not being served?

  4. The Capitol protest was over in three hours, and work resumed on certifying Biden that night. The protestors peacefully departed for home, family and employment. Washington was back to normal the next morning.

    What needs to be known is: who called Michael Sherwin the next day, and gave him his Draconian marching orders? Who had a vested interest in exploiting January 6th?

    The origins of wars are the starting points of knowing history. This new war on American patriots began on January 7th, but it was prepared in advance, just like the Global War on Terror. Historians need to unravel the timeline, the players, and the actions they took. This war is starting out with jackboots kicking in doors and grabbing people for political detention. It is a state-sponsored terror campaign which followed a ‘Reichstag Fire’ false flag. The regime it serves is on the path of Orwellian totalitarianism.

    At this crossroads of history, where is our William L. Shirer, or John Toland?

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
    • Replies: @Wally
    , @geokat62
    , @Zoom-Copter
  5. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Just because Whites want to live in their own ethno state does not necessarily correlate with them being supremacists.

    Because Jews want to live in their own ethno state in Israel does that make them Yiddish supremacists?

    Asians, hispanics, and blacks on California campuses are demanding their own dormitories and graduation ceremonies. How long before they start demanding their own campuses?

    We can take it a step further. How long before those same ethnicities start demanding their own homelands within the continental US.

    Does that make them supremacists?

    Why is OK for everyone but White people to look out for their own interests without being labeled supremacists, nazis, or racists?

    When will it be OK to have our own National Association for the Advancement of White People?

    Will that happen after we’ve become just a fond memory like the dodo bird or the wolly mammoth?

  6. My SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle: “Because Jews want to live in their own ethno state in Israel does that make them Yiddish supremacists?”

    Many people would say so, but the Jews aren’t particularly disturbed by it.

    My SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle: “Why is OK for everyone but White people to look out for their own interests without being labeled supremacists, nazis, or racists?”

    My point is that’s the problem: whites are disturbed by the label. They run from it like a vampire fleeing the sun, and that makes any movement in favor of white interests non-viable as soon as someone labels it supremacist. Fraught with this internal contradiction, it never goes anywhere.

    So again, who is the bigger enemy of white interests? The Trumpian pearl clutchers who nearly faint when called white supremacists? Or their accusers? To me, it looks like they’re on the same team, working together to achieve the same end.

    I’ve seen it said that Jared Taylor is a CIA asset. Whether that’s true or not, I’ll let others decide. But if he were CIA, there’d be no better way to guarantee the failure of “white nationalism” than to help perpetuate this contradiction, as he does here.

  7. Chinaman says:

    Mr. Greenwald argues that “the more you can demonize your opponents as something monstrous, the more political power you can acquire,”

    This summarize 2000 years of political tradition in the West.There is always a bogeyman to scare the masses into giving away their freedom for the state’s protection.

    A faraway evil that lurks behind the shadows, one which is growing ever so powerful that it threatens to destroy everything they cherish. One so alien and inhuman that it rival Sauron of the Rings and Voldemort of Harry Potter. Its mindless Orcish minions do ritual organ harvesting, Uighur ( whatever that it) genocide, eat bats and dogs.

    It is the perfect script.

    What I can promise is that the Chinaman will play our role so well that it will no longer be make- belief. We will make this fantasy movie a reality. It will be Lord of the Rings set in the Matrix . China will become Mordor and the Chinaman the super AI that you cannot defeat.

    Take the red pill and let see how deep the rabbit hole goes.

  8. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Ethnic supremacism is the belief in the superiority of one’s own ethnic group plus the idea that it has therefore the right to rule over other ethnic groups.

    Ethnic nationalism is the belief in the values of one’s own ethnic group and the endeavor to protect them. There is no ambition to rule over other ethnic groups at all.

    White nationalists are simply ethnic nationalists for Whites. To call them “white supremacists” is not only a misnomer, it is deliberate false propaganda.

  9. This insurrection was the most bloody event in the last two centuries. Ashli Babbit, an unarmed white woman, was killed by a professional negro assassin wearing cuff links. At least that’s all we know at this time. The white supramacists, likely organized by Jared Taylor, nearly took control of our multicultural nation.

    Thankfully, this insurrection was thwarted by the Capitol police under the fearless leadership of the Black General Honore. Our history books should record that the nation was saved by this heroic Negro General defending our sacred citadel of freedom. The aftermath is best described by Kyle Dunnigan:

  10. Anonymous[324] • Disclaimer says:

    So the majority of the public believes whatever the mainstream media hand feeds them. Clearly that media has a Democrat agenda these days and the Democrats mostly have an organisational leadership thick with militant feminists, black racists, sexual deviants and knee-jerk leukophobics, all of whom paint the straight white male (including most of the “founding fathers” and traditionally great historical figures) as the cause of all evil in this world and a target for total cancelation. Those who would throw the likes of Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Darwin and Columbus (to name just a few all should have learned about in elementary school) under the bus by tearing down their statues and stripping their names from schools and monuments are the ones brewing up an “insurrection.” Maybe a bloodless one, but a rejection of our shared history and a disastrously transformative rebellion nevertheless. (Though I must say that last summer’s riots and looting by BLM was not exactly violence-free.)

    I hesitate to categorize any of the contradictory stances pushed by either party as “liberal” or “conservative,” and certainly not “left” or “right.” The divide seems to be more how bellicose and financially ruinous a foreign policy you choose to pursue and whether you want to start shooting at Russian or Chinese targets first. There’s also a matter of which particular wealthy oligarchs you take your monetary contributions from and which of their monetary/financial interests you choose to support over the needs of the oppressed middle class.

    It seems more important for both major parties to cater to every need and want of murderous apartheid Israel than to fund programs or repair infrastructure critical to the needs of its own citizens. Both sides are in near lockstep on this mindless and futile but very persistent effort to destroy the civilisations in places like Iran, Venezuela, Libya, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia and Ukraine as if crushing these peoples, and using them as preposterous excuses for committing war crimes around the globe, would somehow accrue advantage to the American populous. I suppose most Americans, propagandized by the media and satisfied wallowing in their willful ignorance, just don’t know any better, but these vicious murderous (and quite expensive!) acts gain you NOTHING as a participant in the American experience, whatever that is now supposed to be.

    The racial divide, as ballyhooed by opportunistic politicos and their media tools, is totally contrived. I don’t know any white people who obsess on causing damage of any sort to blacks, holding them back, keeping them down or just generally oppressing them. They mainly ignore blacks and focus on
    their own ever mounting hardships and travails of trying to cope in an economy that deliberately stripped them of their jobs, incomes, status and other necessities, such as affordable health care, quality early education and affordable higher education for their children and a fair and adequate retirement plan for their old age. Their plate is full trying to cope with all these woes imposed upon them by the upper classes who purposefully shipped their jobs off to foreign lands (including but not only China) and now want to blame those countries for the chaos and hardships they have caused to their “fellow” Americans. I use quotes because they feel no fellowship with the 99% and would sooner you die of starvation or some disease than look at you, they especially do not want to hear your complaints about the system they set in motion–whether you are white, black, green or polka-dot.

    The anti-white and anti-male movement afoot in America is not based in some deep social justice that whites owe to blacks and that men owe to women, it is just the blacks and other minorities forced to claw for as much of the exponentially shrinking pie as they can get. First they must demonize us to justify taking from us as much as they possibly can. It still won’t be enough. The only way to survive in what is now a global competition wherein all you have to offer is your labor or skills acquired through education is to up your game: to work harder, longer, smarter… for ever less money and benefits (you are now competing with Bangla Deshi wages, remember). White people, unlike some others (Oriental and East Indian Americans, having some smarts and a work ethic, are equally enlightened), are at least vaguely aware of this, which is why their kids are incurring college loan debts the size of home mortgages before they even start their first real job. But with the constant erosion of our social programs (such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security) and the burgeoning underclass population (especially when American presidents open the borders to all comers with no qualifications or resources and will be lifelong residents on the dole–BTW, is that even HIS call w/o an act of Congress?) siphoning off the diminishing tranche of funds, one can see nothing but doom and some sort of crash and actual revolution happening at some point in the nearing future.

    • Agree: acementhead, Zarathustra
    • Thanks: Emslander
    • Replies: @A.z
    , @JoaoAlfaiate
    , @Billy Kidd
  11. Wally says:
    @beavertales

    said: “It is a state-sponsored terror campaign which followed a ‘Reichstag Fire’ false flag.”

    Oh yawn, it’s more Amateur Hour from the indoctrinated.
    The Reichstag was as the Germans said at the tine, a communist action.
    see:
    Reichstag nonsense debunked: https://www.unz.com/?s=reichstag&Action=Search&ptype=all&commentsearch=only&commenter=Wally

    said: “At this crossroads of history, where is our William L. Shirer, or John Toland? ”

    Those shysters have been easily discredited.
    see CODOH at: http://www.codoh.com
    ex.:
    https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=shirer
    and: https://codoh.com/search/?sorting=relevance&q=toland
    see: The CODOH Forum at: https://forum.codoh.com/index.php
    ex.:
    https://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=shirer&fid%5B0%5D=2
    and: https://forum.codoh.com/search.php?keywords=toland&fid%5B0%5D=2

    • Replies: @beavertales
  12. thordaddy says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Dr. Robert Morgan…

    This all boils down to the enemy’s egalitarian conception of a subjective “supremacy” as literal degeneracy versus the absolute conception of objective Supremacy as Perfection.

    Thus, depending on one’s disposition, there is either the conception of “white supremacy” as “white degeneracy” OR a conception of white Supremacy as a white man’s desire for Perfection.

    So it goes that the bulk of deracinated “whites,” Christian and anti-Christian alike, embrace the enemy’s “lower-cased” conception of “white supremacy” and in turn reject Perfection ENSURING an inevitable de-generation.

  13. Tucker says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Peter Brimelow, founder of vdare.com – is also exhibiting behaviors that are very similar to the criticisms Dr. Morgan levels at Jared Taylor.

    Brimelow has an on-going civil lawsuit against some left wing news publisher wherein he is claiming libel because they have accused him and his website of being ‘White Nationalist’ .

    This is clearly an effort by Brimelow to help perpetuate the false idea that White Nationalism is somehow uniquely evil and to foster the left’s desire to paint the label as being the kiss of death for anyone who embraces it.

    To wit:

    Japanese nationalism is great.
    Korean nationalism is great.
    Israeli nationalism is super, duper great.
    Chinese nationalism is great.
    Mexican nationalism is great.
    Argentinian nationalism is great.
    Nigerian nationalism is great.

    European (i.e., White) nationalism from any nation is EVIL!

    How did this idea come about that only European nationalism is bad?

    Peter Brimelow should be proudly declaring his allegiance to White Nationalism, and pointing to Israeli Nationalism as the perfect role model. But, instead of doing that – he has an on-going civil lawsuit where he claims to be butt hurt over being labeled a White Nationalist?

  14. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Have you spent any significant amount of time among Trump supporters? There are huge numbers of Asians and Hispanics (particularly Cubans) and some black people as well. How about the Stop the Steal protests that bloomed in Japan and other places around the world? Trump’s appeal was transracial and transnational.

    • Replies: @A.z
  15. ebear says:

    White supremacists? Really? I thought they were anti-communists.

  16. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    That is a great quote — thanks for sharing it.

  17. Anonymous[306] • Disclaimer says:

    Racism has long disappeared in our country. White Supremacists perished after our civil war. We remain the most race neutral and color blind country in the world. Else, why do millions still dream of coming here? Just look at our integrated neighborhoods and you’ll see why. Save for a few aberrations abroad of murdering millions of innocents for resisting our model of democracy and human rights for their own good, racism in distant lands is a figment of the imagination of deluded morons. Troll me if you agree.

  18. Sulu says:
    @My SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle

    Why is OK for everyone but White people to look out for their own interests without being labeled supremacists, nazis, or racists?

    Simple. Jews fear the White race above all others because we are the race numerous enough and intelligent enough to eventually destroy them. So they in turn want us dead and actively implement policies that will ultimately lead to our destruction. They own the news so they always spin any White that wants to look out for White interests as a “White Supremist.” That immediately marginalizes them and their message. And it destroys any possibility of Whites being able to have any self determination. Personally I am proud to be of the same race as the likes of Shakespeare and Mozart.

    Trump gaining the Presidency terrified the Jews. First off it aptly demonstrated to them that despite holding the microphone and continually claiming Trump to be a clown people weren’t buying their bullshit. He still gained office. This meant that their huge multi billion dollar propaganda machine isn’t as effective as they thought. Secondly, when you looked at the Trump rallies, it was obvious almost all the people there were White. This had to make the Jews shit themselves. A political figure supported by the White race was the last thing the Jews wanted. It meant that Whites just might be waking up to their nefarious plan.

    The true irony of it all is the fact that by attempting to destroy the White race it does increase the odds that enough Whites will wake up to the fact and will then proceed to destroy the Jews. And given Whites superior numbers it would be relatively easy. So the Jews are playing the most dangerous game. Destroy Whites slowly and pray they never catch on. And thereby take the chance that Whites will wake up to the fact of their ongoing genocide and wipe out the Jews. Personally I hope it’s the latter as opposed to the former. Because it’s certain that one of us has got to go.

    Sulu

    • Agree: Zumbuddi, Juckett
    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
    , @Bookish1
    , @Polistra
  19. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Interestingly, I was just thinking how both “systemic racism” AND “white supremacy ” come off as a kind of metaphysics & then you post.
    “on the other that they are, in the main, a movement made up almost completely of white people, apparently motivated by disquiet and loss of cultural dominance brought about by demographic change, speaks in favor. They say they want to make America great again, or in other words, how it used to be, when it was whiter. They want a return to old, white, cultural values because, presumably, they believe those values to be better than any others.”
    How to deny this ? Is it falslafiable? If not its probably some kind of metaphysics or perhaps worse, a social science.
    I mean, I can point out that perhaps the people you refer to want a return to a LESS economically polarised US, coincidentally or not, associated with a US that had a larger white majority (say the 50’s, 60’s etc).
    But it’s easy to deny it. I can’t prove it.
    And, yes maybe they would like a “return” to less globalised values, more “traditional values” (b/c let’s face it, today’s world leaves a lot to be desired, & that just ain’t ALL about race — ) but is that a symptom of white supremacy?
    Elites have their convenient (sometimes defined as “white”) “enemies” all sown up it seems. I’m sure they appreciate any help you can offer.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
  20. @My SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle

    “When will it be OK to have our own National Association for the Advancement of White People?

    Will that happen after we’ve become just a fond memory like the dodo bird or the wolly mammoth?”
    I think the answer to your last Q is “yes”. ie, dodo bird.

    • Replies: @anon
  21. Anon[904] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    What page of Leviathan is this quote from?

    • Replies: @xyzxy
  22. mkr says:

    Theft one: We know from the so-called “Russian” hacks, which was true information, that the Democrats stole a primary election from Bernie Sanders in 2016. Theft two: We know for a fact that the FBI and the Democrats cooked up a false story in order to spy on Trumps 2016 campaign, probably to glean campaign strategy. Theft three: After Trump won in 2016 they used their knowingly false Russia narrative in order to attempt to steal the presidency through the Mueller investigation which they hoped would lead to impeachment and removal from office, an attempted coup. Theft four: Joe Biden is on video at the CFR saying that he compelled the Ukrainian prime minister through threatening to cut off US aid to fire a prosecutor. We know now that they prosecutor was investigating the company that Joe Bidens son worked for in Ukraine. No one would investigate the probable corruption so Trump went to investigate it, and then the Democrats impeached him for it, another impeachment, again trying to remove him from office, another coup attempt. Theft five: there is evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election, yet the Democrats refuse to investigate it, and same with the establisment Republicans, we must have an election audit/investigation to determine whether or not the fraud was enough to flip the election (election fraud), and we must secure our future elections so that they can be trusted, we cannot let the Democrats and the fake Republicans leave our elections untrustworthy, it is beneath us as a people.

    If you are white the Democrats want you to relinquish your race (critical race theory agenda), your gender (transexual agenda), your family (abolish the nuclear family agenda), your ancestors (your ancestors are racists and supremacists agenda) your religion (the lefts anti-Christian agenda), your nation (America is a white supermacist nation agenda) , and your human rights and property rights (the man-made global warming agenda and the great reset agenda).

    We have to have justice for each of these thefts and for each of these inhuman lies. We must. The Democrats have some nerve to call the rioters on January 6th “insurrectionists”, they are projecting big time. The Democrats are liars and thieves, insurrectionists, seditionists, and traitors, what they are doing is treasonous. They spent 40 million dollars on a knowingly cooked up fairytale about Trump being a Russian agent. On any given day during the Mueller investigation we had no shortage of left wing puppet losers ready and willing to hang Trump for being a spy. These things can’t go unanswered.

    I’ve never seen such a mess of false ideology and contempt for the nation and its people pushed all at once upon the American people. Thankfully for us Americans the Bolsheviks this time don’t have the power to enforce their agenda with their deeds so all they have left are their filthy lying words.

    We are blessed as a people. The founders knew it. A government of, by, and for the people, the Russian Christians didn’t have this, we do, remember what we have, know and understand what we have, and protect it.

    • Agree: Peripatetic Itch
    • Disagree: Supply and Demand
    • Thanks: beavertales, Emslander
  23. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    On supremacy – any kind of racial Will must necessarily impose coercion on foreigners. Peaceful co-existence and Jewus-ordained, natural borders of neat and tidy ethnostates is an abominable Christian fantasy. Life is war. Those who do not kill will get murdered, and Nature will breathe happier.

    > “My point is that’s the problem: whites are disturbed by the label.”

    I blame Christianity. The closest to racism ideology of the White rabble in America is concerned exactly with running an efficient civilisation – they hate blacks not for their disgusting skin colour, but because of their criminal homicidal and raping habits. One cannot built a realm on such a fickle foundation. And yet Christians do not allow even as much – the Negro must be adored and worshipped, not merely curtailed and made to serve as Reason would see fit.

    This is why I agree with you in practical terms – only a premature failure of America can hope to save the Aryan race in the epicentre of the black hole (Conservative Swede’s Red Giant metaphor). That, or the Aryans on the periphery.

    > “I’ve seen it said that Jared Taylor is a CIA asset.”

    He once wrote an amusing book on Japan.

    “The parents are so different physically. After all, Japanese have a lower body temperature and a longer gestation period than Westerners.* It really is a wonder they can have such sweet children.”

    […] Since then I haven’t met a Japanese who thought his body temperature was different from mine. However, I have met a few who say they have elderly relatives who still think so.

  24. The leader of congress, mainstream media and big tech still pretend 70 million Trump-voters not exist. That is a worrisome signal , even Stalin know what meaning of carrot and stick. The simple suppression may cause more intensely disobedience in 2022.

  25. In a more just time, the rioters would be hanging from trees right now for bringing a foreign battle flag into the halls of Congress. Glad I got out of the sinking American ship when I did.

    • Troll: El Dato
  26. What Jared Taylor and many others fail to see is that we are a conquered people who now live under Jewish tyranny. The kill shot was the Jewish Immigration Act of 1965 sometimes referred to as the Hart-Cellar Act.

    • Agree: KenH, GMC
  27. gotmituns says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    I’m not a white supremacist. I’m a racial realist.

    • Replies: @Zumbuddi
  28. gotmituns says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    “Because Jews want to live in their own ethno state in Israel does that make them Yiddish supremacists?”
    —————————————————————————————————-
    No, what makes them jew supremacists is how they went about getting their state, Balfour Declaration and having the British keep the Arabs down while they brought in enough zionists to murder all the Arabs who resisted/resist having their land stolen.

    • Agree: GMC
  29. and the faster they are eradicated off the face of this earth the better. We live in a capitalist society- DEAL WITH IT!!! Money and profits should trump bullshit concepts such as religion or patriotism. The only future is corporatism- corporates should run the world. We are already well on our way thankfully. The little people can be eradicated.

  30. JessicaR says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Let me add, not so much a disagreement as an amendment to the idea that Trump supporters are closet white nationalists.

    Yes. Some are. No on can deny that. However, Mitt Romney got a lot of white nationalist support, too, because he was a Republican man who married a white woman and had five white children.

    Many other Trump supporters voted for him for reasons that have nothing to do with race.

    1. The NYT estimated there were 6.7 million Obama-Trump voters. Some political scientists place the figure at over 8 million. It is hard to argue that millions of Obama voters suddenly turned into hardcore racists in 2016.

    2. Twelve percent of Sanders voters in the primaries voted for Trump in 2016. Did voters for a Jewish socialist suddenly turn into KKK members?

    3. Two political scientists, Kriner and Shen, examined counties that flipped from Obama to Trump and found that these counties had above-average military casualty rates in the Iraq war.

    4. A 2016 poll commissioned by the Military Times found that only 14 percent supported Clinton. In contrast, in 2008, 23 percent supported Obama.

    5. It is a statistical fact that working class white males do a disproportionate amount of the dying in our foreign wars. While African Americans do enlist in large numbers and their sacrifices should not be underestimated, their casualty rate is lower –but not non-existent– because relatively few serve in combat units.

    There have been African American troops who were killed or severely wounded and I don’t want to take away from that. I am writing about statistical generalizations.

    6. Two major liberal news organizations, MSNBC and CNN have parent companies that are defense contractors. MSNBC is owned largely by General Electric while CNN is owned by AT&T, which has billions in defense contracts.

    7. If anti-racism were really the agenda for these organizations, they would cover Biden’s racial gaffs, most notably his claim that the African-American community is not diverse, that ridiculous Corn Pop story, and his claim that “If you don’t vote for me then you ain’t black.” Yet, the mainstream media covered these stories briefly, if at all, and then let them drop. Trump’s gaffs get never-ending airtime.

    8. I suspect that a large part of the media animus to Trump–so severe that even Ted Koppel condemned it–is due to his relatively dovish foreign policy views that interfere with the profits of media parent companies.

  31. Robjil says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    White nationalists are simply ethnic nationalists for Whites. To call them “white supremacists” is not only a misnomer, it is deliberate false propaganda.

    It is projection. A clue to what our real masters think. They think of themselves as Supremacists. Our Supremacists rule our “free” press MSM, our money and our mandatory enforced religion – the big H 6.

  32. anon[358] • Disclaimer says:
    @animalogic

    “Will that happen after we’ve become just a fond memory like the dodo bird or the wolly mammoth?”

    What will happen is that you will see many fewer of those television commercials featuring mixed race marriages.

  33. GMC says:

    This article would give the Democrats – a heart attack. Send this article to all those Democrat supporting websites like Salon and Veterans Today. lol Trump did it – Trump did it – Ya he sure did , he opened up a can of worms , and in the middle was the US Government, the States Governments and the Local ones too.

  34. @Wally

    This regime in Washington DC is more like the Argentine junta of 1976-83. Their war on the Argentine people became known as ‘the dirty war’.

    Everything the regime is doing now will come back to haunt them. Michael Sherwin and Christopher Wray are not unlike the Argentine officers who enthusiastically abandoned law and humanity in their prosecution of suspected dissidents.

    • Thanks: Emslander
  35. “Why is OK for everyone but White people to look out for their own interests without being labeled supremacists, nazis, or racists?”

    It’s very clear to everyone else…………….because of their intelligence combined with their spirit of adventure, conquest and inventiveness, Whites ruled the world……..even northern Asian with higher mean IQs didn’t have the combined traits of Whites and Jews didn’t have the numbers or traits either…..

    …..in the 18th through the 20th century Whites had the only 1st world countries and colonized most of the non-White world.

    We walked on the moon while the rest of the world wallowed in trying to find enough food and clean water……..

    Everyone else can become tribal because they can’t do what Whites do when they look after their own self interests…

    But when Whites look after their own self interests?

    Well the last time Whites did that was in country call Germany about 100 years ago and when they did…..

    …… they figured out the conjob the Anglo Zionist money changers were doing to their country and decided to put an end to that monetary destruction of their economy.

    …….that’s why the Jews to this day say “never again”

    The irony of it all is that White interests eventually benefitting for all non-Whites……….and they want to continue to enjoy those benefits but fear any recoil Whites may be capable of when they are pushed too far.

    When Blacks get angry they burn down parts of their own neighborhood…………….When Whites get angry they destroy countries and continents………

    That scares a lot of non-Whites and along with the pathological White liberals, both become the tools for the World revolution Zionist Jews to keep things at bay……

    And that’s why Whites cannot self identify without the world coming down on their cause.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  36. As if one needed any more evidence that this was not an “insurrection,” the report says 47 percent of the 257 arrested and charged were tracked down because they posted about the fun they had on social media. They will surely be the most bumbling, witless rabble ever to go down in history as an “insurrection.”

    The point made by their figurative judicial lynching will be aimed at the Deplorable Nation … pour encourager les autres.

  37. JKnecht says:

    With stupidity God himself fights in vain

  38. A.z says: • Website
    @Anonymous

    It’s “Bangladeshi”.

  39. A.z says:
    @Supply and Demand is a Fuckhead

    Cubans, the ones who were ejected by castro r pathetic white wannabe 🙄

  40. Binyamin says:

    Granted, there was no armed insurrection by white supremacists on 6th Jan, then what exactly did happen? A motley crew of misfits, losers, conspiracy nut jobs and ill educated morons invaded the building which is the iconic three dimensional symbol of the US constitution. Why? Because these inadequates believed every word of our former Toddler-in-Chief that the election was stolen even though not a shred of evidence was provided. The result was that for the first time in the nation’s history, a peaceful transfer of power nearly did not take place. To call the crowd ‘white thrash’ would be an insult to white thrashes everywhere -the later merely take drugs, beat their spouses, stay on welfare and commit petty crimes. What the world witnessed was the last episode of the Trump Show with minor celebrities such as the QAnon Shaman providing backup and making myriads of Americans choke on their hamburgers as the show unfolded on telly. The show having ended, ex Toddler-in-Chief now joins an infamous crowd of Third World and East European dictators by refusing to accept the verdict of the people.
    The author rightly points out that the thuggish and violent alt right group Proud Boys are multiracial. This is because many whites in the alt right movement realize that they need to reach out to beef up the numbers. Look, ‘whites’ constitute a mere 65% of the population and who exactly are these whites? Tens of millions of American ‘whites’ would not be classified as such if they went to, say Scandinavia. They include Arab Americans, millions of them, born in this country and having anglicized their name to fit into the white melting pot, are physically indistinguishable from say, Italian Americans. Increasing number of Hispanics and Eurasians are self identifying as ‘whites’ because of the advantages, real or imaginary. White Nationalism? The most recent effort to create a superstate based on shared European heritage was the EU. United Kingdom’s departure from the EU project due to the Brexit vote gave lie to the fantasy that one can create an entity due to shared European identity.
    Jared, why flog the dead horse of White Nationalism ? You would be better off writing another book on Japan, a country about which you are regarded as a bit of an expert.

  41. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    What could be more obvious than that the white race is supreme over all others?

  42. If enough people say something often enough, it becomes “true.” Big media and people at the highest levels of government now accept that the Capitol takeover of January 6 was an “armed insurrection” by “white supremacists.”

    Perhaps it does become “true”, at least in the minds of those for whom truth is variable (many females genetic and otherwise eg) and others of the manipulated underclass, tv-watchers, “newspaper”-readers, racist savages etc … whether it is true in the minds of those who manipulate these no-hopers, psychopaths etc is another question …

    This article seems to be yet another handwringing exercise in how awful it is what they are doing now … and what solution does it offer to this dire and worsening situation ?

    Apparently none at all.
    It appears to be a message saying that Resistance is Futile …
    Perhaps I am mistaken but that’s what it looks like to me …

    • Replies: @James Scott
  43. dimples says:
    @Chinaman

    Thanks but no thanks. I disappeared down the rabbit hole once and never came back. It’s the blue pill for me from now on.

  44. You’re still refusing to name the enemy of the White Christian Americans… it ain’t right!

    • Agree: Trinity
  45. MLK says:

    “Journalism is the first rough draft of history.”

    Okay, that ship sailed. A word to the wise, don’t read it.

    Nor should anyone who knows how to fog a mirror be playing ‘Charlie Brown’ to the FBI/DOJ ‘Lucy with the football.’ As Trump says, “If they can do it to the POTUS. . . .”

    I won’t reinvent the wheel, nobody listens anyway. Just accept that while they achieved their get rid of POTUS Trump by any means necessary. Yet in the event these institutions of government and mainstream media have collapsed. They’re compromised and captured.

    While definitely of the “Other than that Mrs. Lincoln . . .” variety, they’re wholly discredited.

    That’s the shortest predicate I can muster for my principal point here. Given the breadth and depth of the anti-Trump/MAGA do-over alignment, pretty much the entirety of the establishment, foreign and domestic, January 6th didn’t go according to plan.

    The white supremacist armed insurrection narrative is a fallback after they came a cropper on a frame-up of Trump/MAGA. It’s mostly defense, as opposed to offense, for Pelosi, McConnell (and other RINO filth) and more (e.g. big gay Mike Pence; the DC Mayor) at great risk for their malefactions surrounding the events of January 6th.

    McConnell is already planning just two months into his new term to get while the getting is good. Mark my words, that filthy old whore Pelosi will be retired, too, this year.

  46. Trinity says:
    @Chinaman

    You are a Jew troll. No one here believes you are a “Chinaman.” Stop with the racial slurs, dude. Not a good look for a Jew troll. Shalom, Shlomo. Cue: China Girl by David Bowie & Kung Fu Fighting by Carl Douglas.

  47. Zumbuddi says:
    @Sulu

    Any idea why Jared failed to mention the role that ADL played in organizing, inciting, instrumentalizing, then propagandizing this insurrection, just as was done Charlottesville, 9/11, Iraq war (s), WWII, WWI?

  48. Bookish1 says:
    @My SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle

    Why is it ok for non-whites to look out for their own interests and whites can’t do the same? Because whites let it happen. Simple as that.

  49. Zumbuddi says:
    @gotmituns

    I’m not a White anything.

    My ethnic origins are Mediterranean. My Mediterranean roots are 100 times older & deeper than Bibi’s fake Levant ring.

    My roots in USA are shallow, not a land of my “blood and soil” but the place my parents felt forced to flee to because White people from England, US, plus “International Jewry” were starving, then bombing my family & their villages.

    I was born in USA as were my children, but even tho I have never set foot in my parent’s homeland; and even tho that place is desperately poor and corrupt, that is where my soul longs to be.

    Whoever wants this benighted USA, land of bombs & hypocrisy, you can have my spot– I’ve husbanded it well, improved it & made it productive.

    Just let me return to the land of MY roots and dwell there, die there in peace, without your meddling.

    • Agree: Emslander
  50. Bookish1 says:
    @Sulu

    the rise of the internet has been a great help to the whites cause.

  51. There are no “white supreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemists.”

    I have never seen one.

    None of our leaders are supremacists. Not Taylor, not Duke, not Enoch, not Johnson, not KMAC.

    In fact, because of Christian values, even far right leaders would be reluctant to claim that whites are superior or supreme.

    HOWEVER….there are loads of jewish supremacists. Organized jewry is steeped in supremacism as jews still believe they are the chosen (when in fact God divorced them 2000 years ago)
    The Talmud is actually a blueprint for supremacism, a how to book for world rule. The jews have their own set of rules and pay no attention to gentile legislation.

    So….you have team white that is trying to play ball while wearing a straight jacket and ankle cuffs….while team jew runs wild with AK’s spewing hot lead on every gentile in sight.

    To summarize Jared’s well crafted essay…..ANY hint or sign of organized white people makes the jews shit their pants…..so it has to be demonized and shut down.

    Now little old ladies who voted for Trump wind up on no fly lists, while mobs of BLM negroes that stomped people to death remain free to do some more stomping.

    This is what you get with jew rule.

    I do not think this is sustainable.

  52. Mike Tre says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Because supremacism is not the correct word. Nationalist or separatist would be more accurate.

    If you were an honest sort, you’d admit the difference.

  53. If you can hijack 4 commercial jets, knock down three steel framed skyscrapers and score a direct hit on the Pentagon armed only with boxcutters, then just think how easy it could be to storm the Capitol and overthrow Government with a fire extinguisher and some pepper spray.

    • Replies: @Emslander
  54. Robjil says:
    @PghPanther

    WWI was for the Balfour Declaration and WWII was for Israel. The present wars in the Middle East are for Eretz Israel, greater Israel. Why was this so? Jewish advisors were in Britain and the US in the both World Wars promoting these wars. The same thing is happening today.

    The only Supremacy for destruction of nations in the past hundred or so years was motivated by Top Jewish "White" Supremacy interests and not the any other "White" interests.

    https://prepareforchange.net/2019/08/18/why-is-america-fighting-wars-for-israel/

    Yes, wars are in their interest and that “could” affect executives’ opinions on whether to support a war, but the key part of the sentence is “Wars in the Middle East against Israel’s enemies”. That means the wars are due to Jewish influence, pushed by Jewish lobbies like “AIPAC”. And to the degree the “US military/security complex” has any power, it isn’t over who will be our targets. We don’t attack enemies of Switzerland, South Africa or any other country in the world. All our wars are fought against Israel’s enemies.

    And that means Israel’s lobbyists direct our wars, not the “US military/security complex”.

  55. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Is it fair to call Trump supporters white supremacists?

    Is it fair to call Biden supporters brainiacs, Hillary a super model, and Leftists tolerant? Sure, if your thing is lying.

    they are, in the main, a movement made up almost completely of white people

    Like, you know, Abolitionists. And members of the human race that broke the 4-minute mile, harnessed electricity, invented the computer, pasteurized(!) milk, first summited Mt. Everest, built Notre Dame cathedral, and created the modern world.

    motivated by disquiet and loss of cultural dominance brought about by demographic change

    Whites were minorities on plantations. They still ran ’em. Whites don’t fear loss of dominance. They fear the consequences of anti-white racism inflicted by illegal aliens and enstupidated people.

    They say they want to make America great again, or in other words, how it used to be, when it was whiter.

    When it was safer, better educated, and more prosperous.

    Name one majority-minority city/nation/continent that “trumps” 1950s America?

    They want a return to old, white, cultural values because, presumably, they believe those values to be better than any others.

    Prove them wrong! Black “culture” today produces literal bastards…some 78% of black kids living in fatherless families. Said culture leads to welfare, which results in no inheritance money to give “legs-up” to succeeding generations. Instead, it leads to “failing” generations of feral thugs going to prison instead of college, skanky thots pumping out “chirrenz” for “weffare” bling.

    How else to describe this than white supremacy

    It’s “black inferioracy”: jealousy of the accomplishments of white folks.

    so ashamed of itself that it dare not speak its name

    To wit: toxic black culture that counts on spineless whites to give top jobs to 4th-tier niggerwords at Harvard, Brown, etc. where they get big bucks in make-work jobs a la “gubmint” positions and the DMV.

    Assuming that whites have racial interests that are distinctly their own

    Like preserving themselves? Do reds, yellows, browns, and blacks have interests “distinctly their own”? Why do colleges have black student unions, the government a black caucus?

    the press and the gov’t…by dubbing them white supremacists bring hatred upon them

    Yup.

    white supremacism is evil, a cause with which no “respectable” man should want to be associated

    “White supremacy” is simple to conquer: just have non-white populations perform better.

    Why aren’t whites flocking to Africa, China, or Mexico? Why do blacks, yellows, and browns flock to the USA, founded by whites using white cultures, laws, customs, etc.?

    the interests of whites in jeopardy

    By grifters and kapos like Robin DiAngelo.

    Should Caucasians accept depictions that the Japanese reject: https://tinyurl.com/472pmhym

    such a movement must be internally conflicted and fail

    Like feminism, which believes women are more equal than men?

    Like MSM, which believes it alone knows The Truth?

    Like the FBI, which think antifa violence is kinder, gentler, and “mostly peaceful”?

    Like the USA, which thinks it can now malign half itself?

    they have racial interests that are not being served

    Indeed, they do. Because they are being singled out by race and aren’t suicidal.

    Again, point to any black culture…anywhere on Earth!…that stresses hard work, intact families, comity, community, saving money, pooling resources, education, peace, gratitude, delayed-gratification, responsibility, self-sufficiency, self-improvement, etc.

    We’ll wait.

    In the meantime, sane whites will continue to note that just 1.5% of America (criminal black males aged 14-34) commit 54% of all violent crimes while you split hairs on your pate-inserted fundament.

  56. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    No White should accept the term “white supremacists” for the simple reason that it’s inaccurate. We are not supremacists but anti-supremacists; we oppose non-White, especially Jewish, supremacy over us. Nor do we want to be supreme over non-Whites. What we want is to be free from them, to sever all relationship with them. The terms should be “White freedom” for the movement and “freedom fighter” for an individual. To be made to live with aliens is to be under occupation. To be ruled by aliens, as Americans will soon be ruled by the unelected prostitute Kamala Harris, is to live under tyranny. To be made to hand over one’s wages for “reparations” or “welfare” for aliens means Whites don’t own our own labor, which is the definition of slavery. “Diversity” is slavery.

  57. Agent76 says:

    Feb 4, 2021 Surprise! Far-Right “Proud Boys” Leader an FBI Informant

    Surprise! Far-Right “Proud Boys” Leader an FBI Informant

    January 8th, 2021 YOU’RE BEING LIED TO! PROOF THE CAPITAL BUILDING “INSURRECTION” WAS A SET UP!!!

    The storming of the capital building was not a “failure of security” as multiple camera angles and videos show police letting protesters beyond the barricades and in some cases they march them right up to the front.


  58. ruralguy says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    Very true. We live in a backwards country, where our ruling media, companies, and the government use the words “racist” and “white supremist” as a weapon to destroy people’s lives. The population acquiesces by recoiling with deathly fear at being called these names. I guess most people never overcome the stigmatism they faced in going against popular kids in junior highs, middle schools, and high schools. Our government is nothing more than immature middle schoolers that are gleeful that they are the “in” group and able to destroy other peoples’ lives. This talk about insurrection is the talk of popular kids outraged that people would stand against them. Look at news clips of our Senators and House Reps. They are not adults. They are psychological children in adult bodies.

  59. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    No successful political movement that I’m aware of has accepted the particular labels conferred on them by their enemies. It’s strange that you seem fixated on getting Whites who want nothing more than freedom to accept the inaccurate and loaded term “white supremacist”. Very few Whites are “white supremacists” as very few of us want to live surrounded by non-Whites calling us “massa”. Any who do are pathological and ultimately on the side of the enemy. We don’t want to live with non-Whites, period. You sound to me like a disruptor and very likely a CIA asset.

  60. @Binyamin

    You people are the worst thing that the world has ever spawned. You have been run off from everywhere that ever accepted you for this. This time you scum ripped off the whole world and there will be no USA coming to your rescue when we finally turn on you. It is coming and I am positive you jews all had the same hubris your post screams of in Germany in 1930. By 1933 not so much. History is not over and you are not an American.

  61. HT says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    The obvious problem is people are called white supremacists merely because they reject the disgusting dysfunctional culture of blacks and want to live in a civilized country which generally means a more white country if you embrace the truth. Probably 5% of blacks want the same thing. Are they white supremacists too?

  62. @Arthur MacBride

    Taylor will never have a solution because he refuses to see where the problem comes from. Jared is getting jew money for sure.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
    • Replies: @Irish Savant
  63. KenH says:

    an indignant CNN articled listed the “arms” the “insurrectionists” used: “a baseball bat, a fire extinguisher, a wooden club, a spear, crutches, a flagpole, bear spray, mace, chemical irritants, stolen police shields, a wooden beam, a hockey stick, a stun gun, and knives.”

    And most of these were being carried for self defense purposes against antifa and BLM types who might show up and cause trouble.

    No true insurrectionists would waste time milling around like tourists and taking funny selfies. Real insurrectionists would be on a mission, would have been much more organized and wouldn’t have wasted even a minute. And they would be well armed and prepared to use them.

    Like the article says many of the people who entered the Capitol thought they could make an impression on the Congressman not to certify the election.

    New Jewish AG Merrick Garland said that attacking a federal building at night is not domestic terrorism so I guess our side should occupy federal buildings at night then they should be ok although I think that only works for left wing groups.

  64. if 1/6/21 was indeed a white supremacist insurrection, why is everyone afraid of white supremacists?

    • LOL: Emslander
  65. HT says:

    If white supremacists believe white Western civilization is superior to other cultures and multiculturalism in general and want to live in a white Western culture instead of a black or multicultural one, then sign me up. The greatest accomplishment of those who destroyed America was getting the once white majority to accept that their culture was not superior to others, opening the way for the diversity sewer we have now.

  66. Anonymous[401] • Disclaimer says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    My point is that’s the problem: whites are disturbed by the label. They run from it like a vampire fleeing the sun

    Agreed. Whites either unite-and-fight or remain fear-filled cowards who are ever-more marginalized, silenced, jailed, fired, etc.

    My suspicion: BLM is filled with millions of blacks who were raised in single-momster hovels. They never got enough affirmation. They now want whites to tell them they “matter” since their own parents didn’t. There were no fathers to instill self-confidence in them by showing them how to succeed in life.

    Ironically, and bitterly so, those same blacks now act-out their histories on whites. They inflict the same shite they experienced in their dysfunctional families. That is, they act like their abusive/neglectful parents…treating whites as kids to be beaten at-will and with impunity.

    The wonder is that whites put up with it!

    I blame whites’ reactions on (1) years of propaganda, allowed by men, that taught boys masculinity was toxic; (2) men themselves doing jacksquat for 55+ years as feminists kicked testicles; and (3) cucked Christianity…which believes Jesus was a turn-the-other-cheek pussy instead of a strong carpenter who tossed moneychangers from the Temple.

    Whites are letting white race-traitors destroy them. Why?

    Lefties bailed out thugs who got arrested for attacking people and property. Democratic leaders supported BLM violence. To wit: liberals took action…and no prisoners.

    On the other hand, the Right is filled with all-talk, no-action castrati like Gowdy, Cruz, Graham, McConnell, Romney, and others. Those bozos knew the election could be rigged via mail-in ballots…and did nothing. They saw the Proud Boys (their only fighters!) get maligned and jailed…and did nothing. They held hearings on Big Tech, listening to Zuckerborg, Jackoff Dorky, and others lie…and did nothing. They saw votes manipulated…did nothing…yet expect saps to believe CPAC crap and vote again in 2022 and 2024 while KNOWING Dominion will determine winners.

    The Left (gays, trannies, feminists, Democrats) learned too well how easy it is to win against the cowardly, disorganized, passive, hot-air bloviating, never-changing Right.

  67. xyzxy says:
    @Anon

    This likely refers to the Leviathan Part 1, Chapter IV, ‘Of Speech’–the Use of Speech, Abuses of Speech, etc.

    An earlier point of reference for this concept, and one often cited by Ezra Pound (compare Cantos LXXVII, written when he was jailed after WWII for sedition) is the notion of ‘sincerity’ in speech as found in Confucius’ doctrine of the ‘Rectification of Names’, as it relates to government.

    • Replies: @Zoom-Copter
  68. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    anyone who lambasts white supremacy has never been a habitue’ of a non-white society. nor has anyone who lambasts white supremacy been in dire need of emergency medical attention.

    accouterments do not a society make.

    despite the taking of white, european, breeders throughout medieval times, the intellectual prowess of the dark continent remains significantly below the upper bound of mental retardation.

    to propose, as the progressive have, incessantly, handing over the reigns of government to simians possessing an intellect lower than that of a highlands gorilla is obscene and suicidal.

    it is inconceivable that an infallible god would unleash upon his perfect creation such a loathsome, detestable, and useless a creature as the congoloid, but such is the case; it behooves the rulers of civilized societies to ensure the eradication, within their borders, of these tiresome, indolent, and violent beasts of the field.

    • Replies: @Bull Gator
  69. Adûnâi says: • Website
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    > “Ethnic nationalism is the belief in the values of one’s own ethnic group and the endeavor to protect them. There is no ambition to rule over other ethnic groups at all.”

    1. It is true than an ethnic nationalist will not rule over foreigners – any contact plants the seed of miscegenation.

    2. What you are lying by omission about is that an ethnic nationalist will strive to genocide all foreigners on planet Earth. As long as any remains, a threat to his race persists. Thus, none shall remain.

    • Replies: @El Dato
    , @Mike Tre
  70. @James Scott

    Definitely. And no matter how much he grovels to them he still gets deplatformed and vilified like the rest of us.

    • Agree: Arthur MacBride
  71. Each time I read Mr. Taylor, I am reminded of the quote from a certain German: ” He who refuses to name the Jew as the architect of our present misery can never in this world help the truth to victory.”

    It’s like telling someone with melanoma to “just put neosporoiin on it.” I wonder if Mr. Taylor is entitled to Japanese citizenship, he speaks the language, so maybe doesn’t have the same investment in this land others of us do. ..

  72. @xyzxy

    Pound was put in a mental ward for almost a decade. He only escaped being shot due to the influence of TS Eliot and other major literary figures who at that time still had recourse to publishers not completely owned by the jews.

  73. bayviking says:

    The Republican Senators and Republican members of the US House of Representatives are fighting Biden exactly like they fought Obama: opposing his initiatives and planning to turn their Supreme Court and the hundreds of federal judges they put in office during the Trump era against him.
    Religious preaching comes out of books written by desert people about two millennia ago. It has little if any relevant lessons for people educated in the humanities and the sciences of the modern world. Religious messages concern only the faithful following a particular dogma. The other people are labeled infidels.
    A corporate agenda has been guiding both Republicans and Democrats for decades. But sometimes, as in the years starting with the Obama administration in 2009, the white Congressional Democrats have been embracing non-white minorities rapidly becoming a majority. The aspiration of non-white Americans is for some kind of a better deal from the government.
    This close alliance between white Democratic politicians and non-white Americans is alarming the overwhelmingly white Republicans. Trump was a plutocrat, previously unknown within politics, who harvested this palpable anger among white Americans.

    The 1.9 trillion bill passed “over unanimous Republican opposition.” Kentucky, home of Mitch McConnell, Senate minority leader, is overwhelmingly poor. Now why would the Republicans oppose this largely antipoverty plan?

  74. One wonders if ‘democracy’ was concocted to protect the people from tyranny or to protect the elites from the Man of the People? It’s much easier for elites to prop up puppets(whose candidacy depends on donor money) if the leaders must be changed every so often.

    • Replies: @Rocha
  75. El Dato says:
    @Adûnâi

    Are underage persons allowed to post at the Unz Review?

  76. Until Jared Taylor acknowledges the pivotal role played by the Zionist Supremacist Rothschild Reich’s takeover of the Wests finances and thereby funding all white against white wars and revolutions for over two centuries with the goal of a Jewish supremacist world order, he will never
    provide a solution to their financial and psychological dominance over western man. I recommend reading Michael Collins Piper’s THE NEW BABYLON.

    • Agree: Zoom-Copter
  77. geokat62 says:
    @beavertales

    What needs to be known is: who called Michael Sherwin the next day, and gave him his Draconian marching orders? Who had a vested interest in exploiting January 6th?

    I’ll pick the ADL/SPLC for $200, Alex.

    • Replies: @iffen
  78. Trinity says:
    @Anonymous

    Good lawd. One of the best posts that I have read on this site. CAN NOT AGREE ENUFF.

  79. Jared Taylor is a giant, a powerhouse advocate for white people.

    He does not have to talk about the JQ all day long.

    I have seen interviews where he DOES address the issue of jewish influence…..it’s just not something that he focuses on.

    I believe that he figures that others can focus on the JQ….
    that normies shit their pants when jews are mentioned……
    and maybe he hopes to get some small hats to come to our side.

    In any case, the man is a BIG brain, his books are excellent, and his website is great.

    Consider that Taylor went to Yale. I doubt that anyone can begin to imagine the kind of shit this man has taken over the years….the social ostracism for being labeled a “racist”……the problems with obtaining employment…..family members stigmatized…..he’s demonized all over the jew media….deplatformed….etc.

    Taylor went PUBLIC as a white advocate. This takes HUGE balls. Balls the size of grapefruits.

    Give the man some credit.

    • Replies: @Zoom-Copter
  80. @Dr. Robert Morgan

    If you really are a Dr., I wonder what type. As a 72 year old white American male bred in a large city, I can testify to having never met a White supremist. I can also testify to what I see as; the intentional destruction of White Christian culture, and without said white culture, you would remain ignorant of: logos, still shitting in the weeds, living in burrows and pre-cardboard shacks, drinking contaminated water, riding mules, wearing loin cloths, and practicing slavery. And that’s the short list.

    • Agree: Bull Gator
  81. mkr says:
    @Supply and Demand

    I’m glad you read my comment. I see you disagreed with the truth.

    The halls of Congress are littered with treasonous scum, you read my comment so you know what I’m talking about, they steal election after election, sometimes succeeding, usually failing, they say that unarmed rioters are somehow insurrectionists, everything they say is ridiculous hyperbole that only stupid people fall for. January 6th was a protest and riot, not an insurrection, watch the videos. The ones that initially breached the building should be charged for trespass and any destruction of property or assault if they assaulted anyone, that’s the bottom line.

    Your contempt for someone waving the Confederate flag on American soil is telling, it is an American flag whether you like it or not. People’s relatives who fought in the Civil War on both sides should be understood and not de-humanized.

  82. Emslander says:
    @Niebelheim

    armed only with boxcutters

    They were “armed” with commercial jets. They obtained their “arms” with boxcutters at the throats of young women. No demonstrator on January 6 threatened anyone’s life. It was an hysterical planned overreaction to a planned entry. It has all the characteristics of a Pelosi plot.

  83. iffen says:
    @geokat62

    Stop using my formats, you @##$$%%%^^^& anti-Semite.

    • Replies: @geokat62
  84. Rocha says:
    @Priss Factor

    It was invented on the same day they established the Bank of England so that the citizens could not renege on the debts contracted by a “representative government “ with private bankers who conjured money out of nothing under the fractional reserve system and received interest for it. On the day they established the Bank of England, citizens became mere collateral for debt.
    They also instituted income tax the same day so that the government always had the money to pay back the debts WITH INTEREST.
    You vote for your own slavery and that of your children to the bankers.
    Under the cynical guise of promoting democracy, every single war and revolution since then has been to impose this nefarious system on the rest of the world. Usury is a sin for Catholics and Muslims and it is no coincidence that after 9/11 the only two countries left in the Middle East without a Rothschilds controlled central bank are Iran and Syria.
    Thus the money lenders got rid of all their problems in one go: the debtor’s refusal to pay: the death of the debtor and the bankruptcy of the debtor.

  85. Ray Caruso: “No successful political movement that I’m aware of has accepted the particular labels conferred on them by their enemies.”

    On the contrary, there are plenty of examples: niggers calling each other niggers as a sign of black solidarity, women proudly becoming “liberated” by adopting slutty lifestyles as an affirmation of their own sexuality and a conscious rejection of the “slut-shaming” patriarchy, race traitors and anti-racists proudly calling themselves that, etc. In fact, it might be fair to say that Noel Ignatiev is the godfather of today’s antifa:

    https://libcom.org/library/race-traitor-1

    That’s the side that seems to be winning, in case you haven’t noticed. I’m saying so long as whites refuse to admit what they’re about, their movement will remain hamstrung and impotent.

    Ray Caruso: “We don’t want to live with non-Whites, period.”

    Yet America is a multi-racial country. If Trump supporters want it run according to white cultural standards (i.e., America made great again), then that is de facto white supremacy.

    Ray Caruso: “You sound to me like a disruptor and very likely a CIA asset. ”

    LOL. In that case, I just have one question. Where’s my motherfuckin’ check?!

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  86. Mike Tre says:
    @Adûnâi

    Middle Earth called, they want their weird named orc back.

  87. @Anonymous

    Excellent. Spot on.

    Our bipartisan and apparently unlimited support for the Zionist enterprise is leading us directly into another Middle East war-this time against Iran. Things turned out so well in Iraq let’s attack a country three times larger and much more unified and powerful.

  88. @My SIMPLE Pseudonymic Handle

    Jews don’t just want to live in their own ethno state. In 1967, they conquered all of Palestine. As only half of Palestinians have been ethnically cleansed, there are now the same number of Palestinians in Israel/Palestine as Jews. Of those allowed to live in their own country, about one third are allowed to vote in elections for the Knesset, the body that rules them.

    Jewish Americans dominate the media that lies about White Supremacists in the USA but Israel/Palestine is real Apartheid, real Jim Crow and real Jewish White Supremacy.

    The USA is a country that supports wars of aggression and empire but that support covers all races in the US and has the fervent support of both Democrats and Republicans. How can anybody forget that Hillary Clinton promised an open war of aggression against Syria and Biden has always been an empire lover who hasn’t seen a single US war of aggression he didn’t support?

    I’ve always thought the USA was right to force Japan into war but I’ve also been aware that one of the US demands was the return of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos to French rule. The US fought for that too and it happened. In fact, no European empire was diminished in Asia by the “victory of freedom”. Not the French, not the British, not the Dutch, not even the US rule of the Philippines. [email protected]

  89. DrWatson says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Ethnic supremacism is the belief in the superiority of one’s own ethnic group plus the idea that it has therefore the right to rule over other ethnic groups.

    Ethnic nationalism is the belief in the values of one’s own ethnic group and the endeavor to protect them. There is no ambition to rule over other ethnic groups at all.

    White nationalists are simply ethnic nationalists for Whites. To call them “white supremacists” is not only a misnomer, it is deliberate false propaganda.

    I completely agree with you. I therefore suggest we call ourselves white superiorists. Hardly anyone can disagree with this assessment, considering White accomplishments over the centuries.

  90. @Chinaman

    The idea of white supremacy is the same as the idea behind BLM. It’s all designed to divide society. Early 20th century Europeans migrated to Eastern cities in the USA where neighborhoods sprang up. They were mostly catholic and were defined by nationality: Polish, German, Italian, even Jewish. When southern Blacks were migrated north to fill vacant (WW2) factory jobs, etc., they were inserted into selected areas. Of course these alien neighborhoods soon grew in political power, electing their own, and had to be stopped. Under the guise of Urban Renewal the ethnic enclaves were demolished. No matter what color a person is 99% prefer to be around their own kind, and studies conducted mid-century proved it so. Blacks preferred to live with other blacks too. Of course that wasn’t made public. Instead of respecting this various social groups, controlled by Quakers and Jews, were created. These groups forced integration, and when resisted they screamed racism. They intentionally bought houses in targeted communities and when one could be found mortgages were arranged for selected black families. The results were riots in Philly, Newark, Chicago, Detroit and other cities. It was a well planned social engineering scheme. One now dwarfed by Covid19.

  91. geokat62 says:
    @Anonymous

    Should Caucasians accept depictions that the Japanese reject:

  92. Boris II says:

    Not even comic-opera coup-plotters in Upper Volta or Rio Muni would try to overthrow a government with bear spray and pocket knives.

    Well, they’re smarter than white supremacists and Trump supporters then.

    They will surely be the most bumbling, witless rabble ever to go down in history as an “insurrection.”

    Yeah, we know. They were white nationalists and Qanon followers.

  93. @besarionis jugashvili

    I wish I wrote what you wrote. Cool

  94. Franklin Ryckaert: “Ethnic supremacism is the belief in the superiority of one’s own ethnic group plus the idea that it has therefore the right to rule over other ethnic groups.”

    By desiring to return a multi-racial America to traditional white cultural standards, white Trump supporters are essentially affirming their own ways are superior, and claiming a right to rule over minorities according to those standards. Yet when this is pointed out to them, they shrink back in horror. I’m saying they might be better off if they just admitted what they want and why they want it. I’m also saying that this internal contradiction is why they fail. The accusation of “white supremacy” is only effective because of its paralyzing effect. A more successful alternative might be to just accept it and move on.

  95. thordaddy says:

    First Law of (P)erfection: no redundancy…

    First Law of “liberation”: (S)upremacy is degeneracy…

    White man is either a) jew/wed to the first law of “liberation” or b) in harmonious union with objective (S)upremacy.

    If (a) then the “white” self-annihilator attests to the absolute degeneracy of “white (s)upremacy.”

    If (b) then the white (S)upremacist attests to his desire for (P)erfection.

    A “jewish supremacist” is REDUNDANT.

    A “jewish” (S)upremacist CANNOT BE anti-white (S)upremacy. In fact, he is a convert to white (S)upremacy. In other words, said “jew” has embraced the white man’s conception of (P)erfection*.

    High IQ “white” males are, on the whole, the most damnable in this inverted state of affairs. They simply provide NO VIABLE CONCEPTION of (P)erfection after burying all of white man’s God(s).

    *Perfection is objective Supremacy. Both fact and act. The West dies BECAUSE she is jew/wed. Married to the “jewish” conception of “perfection” which is a “liberation” from “white supremacy.”

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  96. geokat62 says:
    @iffen

    Stop using my formats, you @##$$%%%^^^& anti-Semite.

    Apologies, PEAbrain. I didn’t realise you had a copyright on that format. I assumed the only formats you had copyrights for were “rubber boot wearer” and “pellet dropper.”

    Give my regard to your peeps.

    Speaking of your peeps, have you seen this video by Adam Green of Know More News?

    HIGHLIGHTS FROM CHRISTIAN ZIONISM DOCUMENTARY ‘TIL KINGDOM COME”


    It shows the Sunday school instructor admonishing the students that they needed to accept the fact that the Jewish people were simply better than them. It also shows a woman who travelled all the way from Israel to collect a $25k cheque. The Israeli woman heads an organization her father founded. Before accepting the cheque, there is a scene where she’s in a car driving through an impoverished neighborhood of a town where half the kids live below the poverty line. As they’re driving by a row of dilapidated houses, she asks her tour guide, “That’s where they live? That looks like a house that’s been abandoned. Not where people live.”

    You’ll get an even bigger kick out of this video

    Dirty/UncIean (Not Kosher) Christian Zionists redeem themselves serving Zionist Israeli winemaker

    • Replies: @iffen
  97. Clip Carson says: • Website

    “White Riot,” New York Times, January 13, 2021

    White riot …? Since when does the New York Times tell the truth? That headline basically implies that most riots are “black” … which is true. I’m certain this was a mistake on the Times’ part, and will be corrected in the future, to make certain no is offended by truth.

  98. Easy Pete says:

    Racially conscious or not, the riot hints at the real possibility of an insurgency. I don’t think the elite are being foolish when raising the alarm.

  99. Anastasia says:

    It’s too bad for the people arrested, but I don’t think there is one Republican person and not half the Democrats who believes the government or the media about January 6.

  100. Fox says:
    @Franklin Ryckaert

    Well put. A good definition is extremely important and the one you give encapsulates the idea in a concise, precise and memorable manner.

  101. He who controls the media, controls the narrative. It’s obvious who’s pushing “white Supremacist/domestic terrorists” propaganda. The question is why now and why the urgency?
    I don’t care what color you are, if you don’t have respect for history of my culture or race, you don’t deserve mine.
    If we can settle this like adults and admit our unreconcilable differences and separate peacefully, I’m ready to attend that historic event. Buy if you want to burn loot murder, rape my kids with Global Homo pornography and silence me on technopoly platforms, you become a target that threatens my existence and I will fight until my last dying breath.
    God made me white for a reason. I intend to fulfill his honor and blessings. Just don’t deny me my right to worship, praise, and celebrate my whiteness, my white culture. To do so will cause me to retaliate with cruel and unusual punishment.

  102. @Anonymous

    @ Anonymous[401] – You took the words right out my mouth. Excellent stand your ground rebuttal. Bows in respect.

  103. thordaddy says:

    When a white man calls a “black” male a “nigger,” it is a racial slur which provokes society-wide approval for violent retaliation.

    When a nigger calls a white man a “white supremacist,” it is a racial slur which either evokes passive indifference, knee-jerk rejection or paralyzing fear… But NEVER a violent reaction.

    Niggers exist… And so do “white supremacists.” In the first instance, “we” can’t name the nigger. “We” have to pretend he doesn’t exist. Nigger kills “us” with an immunizing invisibility. In the second instance, every white man is now named “white supremacist” and everyone is scrambling to deny that he exists because “white supremacy” is ready to kill niggers with impunity.

    Game Over.

    It is Self-Annihilation down the line.

    Everyone is in on this paranoid delusion.

    • Replies: @Robjil
  104. Robjil says:
    @thordaddy

    white man a “white supremacist,

    There is only one type of “white supremacy” in the western world. It is Jewish “white” supremacy. Barbara Spectre is a example of this. She is an American Jew who thinks she can tell Swedes how to live their lives. Who is she? A Jewish “white” supremacist, that is the only possible answer to that question. This “white” supremacy thing is a projection of Jewish “white” supremacy.

    https://www.whyileftsweden.com/barbara-spectre-swedish-zionist/

    Barbara Lerner Spectre (born ca. 1942) is a US-born Jewess who is most noted for waging a racial campaign against Swedish people in particular and European people in general through the promotion of Cultural Marxism and demographic genocide. She is a hardline Zionist and supports Jewish-racial chauvinism in occupied-Palestine, and is head of Paideia – The European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden, an organisation funded by the Swedish government and the Wallenberg Foundation to promote Jewish ideology. Through an organisation called One Sweden, which she heads, she promotes multiculturalism (cultural Marxism) against Europeans in their own homeland.

    “Diversity” is the strength of Jewish “white” supremacy. Zion MSM promotes divisions between the little people. This “diversity” game is to create divisions of hate between little people with Top Jews ruling supremely at the top of societies.

    “Unity” is the strength of all the people on this planet against Jewish “white” supremacy. All the little people of the world have to unite. Say no to the dividing tactics by Top Jews like Barbara Spectre.

    • Troll: Corvinus
    • Replies: @thordaddy
  105. iffen says:
    @geokat62

    Give my regard to your peeps.

    ditto

    Given the subject of the article (which I think is pretty good), I find it interesting that he didn’t mention the ADL or the SPLC given their intricate involvement in constructing the background on individuals and groups named by MSM in constructing narratives of events such as these.

    • Agree: geokat62
  106. @Robert Dolan

    A serious question, Mr Dolan– what has Taylor ever accomplished in real terms with his fluent jap, French verbs, and Yale degree by not naming the jew? Is he made more “kosher” at his PTA meetings for his daughter?

    Also, who would you say has accomplished more– Taylor, or myself and about 100 other shit posters fairly skilled at editing who drove the Jews up a wall with assorted merchant memes and ultimately forced them to employ such censorship that it has finally woken up joe Sixpack and Sally soccer mom?

    If you think I exaggerate, see if you can find old screenshots of joe rogan YT episodes when he’d have on whining jewesses like Bari Weiss abd count the number of comments mentioning uss liberty, Lavon Affair, Johnathon Pollard, etc… with so many positive votes they eventually had to just turn off comments.

    Now who do you think reached more people? Taylor with his same old FBI crime stats bullshit everyone knows already or a gang of 20 year old merry shit posters?

    If Taylor isn’t a jew-controlled gate keeper, he sure acts like one.

  107. thordaddy says:
    @Dr. Robert Morgan

    And so…

    Are you a white (S)upremacist?

    Your commentary at César Tort’s blog would suggest that you are not?

    Is this not a failure on your part?

  108. thordaddy says:
    @Robjil

    I don’t necessarily disagree with what you are stating…

    But…

    This isn’t really about {{{them}}}.

    It is about our highest IQ “leaders.”

    So, until high IQ “whites” can discern a radical difference between a subjective (s)upremacy which translates into a common “degeneracy” from an absolute (S)upremacy which translates into (P)erfection, said high IQ “whites” will continue to submit to the enemy’s conception of “white (s)upremacy” versus CONCEPTUALIZING the white man’s vision of (S)upremacy, ie., (P)erfection.

    Remember… Because (C)apitalism…

    If (s)upremacy?

    CAUSE: (S)upremacy.

    Ergo, if “white (s)upremacy?”

    CAUSE: white (S)upremacy.

    The issue is not whether Mr. Taylor is crypto? Rather, the question is whether he is anti-white (S)upremacy?

    This is the question to be put at the feet of all white race-realists.

  109. thordaddy says:

    In a sane world, the desire for objective (S)upremacy is a desire for (P)erfection. True omnipotence is willing ALL Right.

    In an insane “woke” world, desiring a subjective (s)upremacy is “degeneracy.”

    This is the most basic frame and high IQ “white” male finally chooses one or the other “reality.”

    So, “we” are in an insane world where the highest IQ “whites” are ABSOLUTELY BEHOLDEN to the latter conception so much so that they, LITERALLY, cannot EVEN COMPREHEND the former understanding. This radical egalitarianism — the inability to distinguish (S)upremacy from (s)upremacy — is its own phenomenological singularity.

    More commonly understood as a total brainwashing.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  110. animalogic: “I mean, I can point out that perhaps the people you refer to want a return to a LESS economically polarised US, coincidentally or not, associated with a US that had a larger white majority (say the 50’s, 60’s etc).
    But it’s easy to deny it. I can’t prove it.”

    I’m assuming here that there’s a connection between race and culture, or as we would say if we were talking about non-human animals, between genetics and behavior, something it’s pretty common on the racial right to assume, and something is easy to demonstrate in the latter case. In principle it’s falsifiable, although the sort of experiments that would need to be done to scientifically prove it in humans aren’t practical.

    The delusion that America would be (or could be) just the same if composed entirely of negroes, or entirely of Chinamen, is one that derives from America’s Christian past, but still persists today, especially on the religious right. The biblical creation story makes man a special creature, apart from the rest of nature, uniquely endowed with a “soul” and a magical “free will”, so to this religious way of thinking, there’s no reason why race should matter in the slightest. Such is the depth of the idiocy their religion induces in them, the Christian is obliged to believe that negroes can start acting like white people any time they want to.

  111. @beavertales

    While Toland’s book isn’t bad, you are I guess not aware that William L. Shirer was absolute vermin, scum of the earth who should have been lined up against a wall abd shot?

    In his REAL diary, he praises Hitler and the third Reich to the skies and writes favorably about just about every member of the party he met.

    Once he left and saw which way the wind was blowing, he completely rewrote his “diary” to claim he was against those “nazi scoundrels” the entire time. I knew this just reading the book without any background info; what sane man living in Germany with an Austrian wife sits in Berlin “cheering on” the Brit bombing raids as they happen, knowing that they might well kill him and his wife in the horrible death of being burned alive?

    Complete fraud Shirer, and also ugly as sin and with the physiognamy of someone who would be living in a “shettel” in the pale in early 19th century Russian empire.

    • Replies: @RJ Macready
  112. @Zoom-Copter

    He was an excellent writer though- you gotta give him that. I am currently reading two books- his Rise and Fall of the 3rd Reich and H Trevor Roper’s Last Days of Hitler, and boy do I miss the erudite, analysis-laden texts of past historians. What flair!

    • Replies: @Zoom-Copter
  113. @Franklin Ryckaert

    The U.S. left, is all about “systemic racism against “whites”…..

  114. Corvinus says:

    “If enough people say something often enough, it becomes “true.” Big media and people at the highest levels of government now accept that the Capitol takeover of January 6 was an “armed insurrection” by “white supremacists.” A few eccentrics wonder how you can have an “insurrection” with no plan and no weapons, but virtually everyone has swallowed the story about “white supremacists.””

    There was a plan.
    There were weapons.
    It was an armed insurrection.
    There were in the crowd white supremacists.

    It’s as if Jared Taylor enjoys whitewashing a seminal event in our nation’s history.

    https://sethabramson.substack.com/p/here-is-the-twelve-point-plan-donald?r=ex3rw&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=twitter

  115. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “In a sane world, the desire for objective (S)upremacy is a desire for (P)erfection. True omnipotence is willing ALL Right.”

    No True Scottsman fallacy.

    “In an insane “woke” world, desiring a subjective (s)upremacy is “degeneracy.”

    False conclusion.

    “This is the most basic frame and high IQ “white” male finally chooses one or the other “reality.””

    False dilemma fallacy.

    So, “we” are in an insane world where the highest IQ “whites” are ABSOLUTELY BEHOLDEN to the latter conception so much so that they, LITERALLY, cannot EVEN COMPREHEND the former understanding. This radical egalitarianism — the inability to distinguish (S)upremacy from (s)upremacy — is its own phenomenological singularity.

    “More commonly understood as a total brainwashing.”

    So only (W)hites in your “reality” must subscribe to your unilateral perspective to be in your version of “wokeness” lest they be considered (w)hites and thus enemies of True Whitism.

    One day, God will perfectly gather to himself a people from every tribe, tongue, and nation (Rev. 7:9-10) . In the end, ethnic differences will no longer divide God’s people, but will rather enhance our grasp of the wisdom and glory of God in creating and redeeming multitudes of wondrously different people.

    However, since we live on the near side of that great day, we should expect that ethnic differences will not be fully transcended in this life, which provides an opportunity for sensitivity and love among God’s people. Despite our best efforts, ethnic differences will continue in some measure to separate and divide people from one another, even the people of God. Therefore, the people of God have the opportunity to show deliberate care across ethnic lines, recognizing it as an opportunity show honor to the parts of the body that have lacked it (1 Cor. 12:24-26).

    • Replies: @Zoom-Copter
  116. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “First Law of (P)erfection: no redundancy…

    First Law of “liberation”: (S)upremacy is degeneracy…”

    Whose laws are you exactly referring to?

    “White man is either a) jew/wed to the first law of “liberation” or b) in harmonious union with objective (S)upremacy.”

    False Dilemma Fallacy.

    “A “jewish supremacist” is REDUNDANT.”

    NONEXISTENT is the word you were looking for.

    “A “jewish” (S)upremacist CANNOT BE anti-white (S)upremacy. In fact, he is a convert to white (S)upremacy.”

    You going to have cite sources here, both historical and contemporary.

    *Perfection is objective Supremacy.

    Except we are other than perfect. Only God is perfect. So you are affronting His Word, Humility, and Grace with your blasphemy.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
    , @thordaddy
  117. @RJ Macready

    Agree with you on Hugh Trevor-Roper since he worked for brit intelligence during war, knew much of the info firsthand and at least was a straight-shooter.

    But Shirer? How can you trust anything (no matter how “erudite”) written by an acknowledged, outright fraud who was a massive fan of AH and his “housecleaning” abd what he was doing fir Germany and wrote as much in his REAL diary. Then to go back abd change it, pretend you are thrilled at the Brit’s massive air raids on civilian neighborhoods in Berlin that might easily kill his Austrian wife and his child? Only had to read that part and knew was a fraud. Like telling someone you’ll trust their check after they have bounced 10 to you bc they have beautiful handwriting.

    And then in his later years, to sit smoking a pipe like Tolkien as if he were some moral authority and to have the balls to write a treatise “What I Believe” as if he were Tolstoy?

    I could have sumned up all his beliefs in 2 words– amorality & opportunism.

  118. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    Until you pull your mind out of the “universal equality” AND put your mind on (S)upremacy, you will not only not understand what I am writing, but you will also erroneously suggest some fallacious disharmony with Christ.

    Remember…

    Perfection is universal.

    Desire for Perfection is racial.

    There is NO SCHISM between Christ and white (S)upremacy,

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  119. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    You, consciously or subconsciously, SUBMIT to this fundamental equation:

    (S)upremacy = (s)upremacy

    You realize this “equality” in REJECTING (C)apitalism.

    So, in conceptualizing “white (s)upremacy” and acknowledging the anti-(C)apitalist prejudice, one instantly recognizes a “lower-casing” emblematic of a submissive standing and fealty to “universal equality.”

    In other words, “white (s)upremacy” is the rabid and stank conceptual ideation of the phrase in the mind of the anti-white (S)upremacist.

    So, illegitimate and invalid triggering the obvious inquiry?

    What is white (S)upremacy?

    Hint: it doesn’t involve jews or blacks

  120. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “Until you pull your mind out of the “universal equality” AND put your mind on (S)upremacy, you will not only not understand what I am writing, but you will also erroneously suggest some fallacious disharmony with Christ.”

    In typical fashion, you are bastardizing the faith. Supremacy is God’s Word. The Bible does not start off with the creation of a special or privileged race of people. In Genesis 1:26 God says, “Let Us make man (adam) in Our image, according to Our likeness.” Then 1:27 describes his creative action: “So God created man (adam) in His own image; He created him in the image of God; He created them male and female.

    Both the dignity and the equality of human beings are traced in Scripture to our creation. To presuppose one’s own race or ethnicity is superior is an **absolute denial** of the fact that all people are created in the image of God.

    “Perfection is universal. Desire for Perfection is racial.”

    No, perfection is God. We seek to be perfect in all aspects of our lives, but fall woefully short due to our sinful nature. Desire for Perfection is relative and personal; God shows us the way to be our best selves in His image.

    “There is NO SCHISM between Christ and white (S)upremacy…”

    Dorothy, you can tap your ruby shoes three times, but your statement remains patently false. You are employing in part channeling the arguments made infamous by James Henley Thornwell long ago, as his public public pronouncements his fellow white Southern Christians ought not feel guilty about enslaving other human beings. Except, sir, you are the slave to your wickedness.

    His brand of evangelical Christianity, anchored in the South by cultural scaffolding, has been a foundational part of Southern culture–NOT Christian culture–which is one reason some otherwise devout “Dixie Christians” had and have failed to challenge it. And due to their (and your own) innate stubbornness, pointing out clear passages in the Good Book that squarely contradicts their philosophy only leads them (and you) to intellectually flounder through bombastic language that, in the end, fails spectacularly to eviscerate “the pure, peaceable, and impartial Christianity of Christ”.

    The message of Jesus is a unifying message. “According to Ephesians 2, he tears down ‘every dividing wall of hostility’ through his death on the cross.

    “You, consciously or subconsciously, SUBMIT to this fundamental equation”

    I submit to the Lord.

    “You realize this “equality” in REJECTING (C)apitalism.”

    YOU are foisting your alternative reality onto me, and I utterly reject YOUR disillusionment.

    “So, in conceptualizing “white (s)upremacy” and acknowledging the anti-(C)apitalist prejudice, one instantly recognizes a “lower-casing” emblematic of a submissive standing and fealty to “universal equality.”

    Yet another false conclusion you have drawn. Alas, only the Lord can change your heart. Seek His counsel, and I will pray for your soul. At the heart of your theological rebalancing is the reality of accepting God as mystery, a mystery portrayed in the profoundly relational narratives of the Gospels. For John, the heart of that narrative is relational intimacy. For Mark, it is healing. For Matthew, it is to take up our cross and follow Him…and not your own huckster brand.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  121. @Corvinus

    Dude, any chance I could ask you nicely to quit clogging up threads with totally non-related and frankly irrelevant Bible stuff?

    I know, it’s not my site and Ron Unz almost never “censors,” but there are a million other sites where you could write and discuss such things and it’s just plain boring abd off-topic.

    Am I alone in this belief?

    • Agree: Robjil
    • Replies: @Corvinus
  122. Corvinus says:
    @Zoom-Copter

    Actually, it’s quite relevant. Perhaps you ought to seriously ponder what was said rather than be a nag.

  123. @Anonymous

    You have summed it up well, kudos

  124. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    So, you are a believer in objective (S)upremacy, yet, vehemently opposed to white (S)upremacy believing wholeheartedly that these beliefs align you with Christ?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  125. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “So, you are a believer in objective (S)upremacy, yet, vehemently opposed to white (S)upremacy believing wholeheartedly that these beliefs align you with Christ?”

    No, I am a believer in Christ. Seek His counsel, rather than create from whole cloth an ideology that worships idolatry.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  126. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    White (S)upremacy is not an ideology. Rather, “it” is the foundation for any and all conceptions of “white (s)upremacy.”

    Plus, Christ is no “anti-racist.” How could He be unless He has a hatred for Himself? Does Christ hate Himself? Does Christ hate His Father?

    “Anti-racists” hate themselves because they hate their father(s). Does this describe you?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  127. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “White (S)upremacy is not an ideology. Rather, “it” is the foundation for any and all conceptions of “white (s)upremacy.””

    Because you have constructed this foundation based on your beliefs. as well as confirmation bias. Hence, “White (S)upremacy” is an ideology. No amount of virtue signaling on your part will change that immutable fact.

    “Plus, Christ is no “anti-racist.” How could He be unless He has a hatred for Himself? Does Christ hate Himself? Does Christ hate His Father?”

    Now you are simply floundering. Christ loves His people. And since He is perfect, he has no hatred for Himself.

    ““Anti-racists” hate themselves because they hate their father(s).”

    False conclusion. You are simply a pseudo-intellectual posing as a believer of Christ. Matthew 7:15 is appropriate here to describe your idolatry–Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  128. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    I’m not posing as a believer in Christ. Rather, I am a believer in an objective (S)upremacy which the Christians claim to be revealed by the person of Christ.

    You are clearly too young to remember when the most politically potent “white (s)upremacists” were “white male heterosexual CHRISTIANS.” Of course, this was before the Great Cucking. Now, “Christians” are radical egalitarians pushing a “Christianity” that asserts a “universal equality” and Christ as an “anti-racist” ideologue.

    There is NO SCHISM between Christ’s teaching/message/Gift and white (S)upremacy. None whatsoever.

    And that’s all that really needs to be written on the subject.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  129. thordaddy says:

    If you study the anti-Christian then you recognize that his essential objection to Christianity and Christ is not her crimes or his “fictitious literary existence,” respectively, rather, it is the “sinlessness” of this “God-man” which triggers their utter disbelief (even where one cannot assert, explicitly, where Christ has wronged him). It is the idea of a single man being PERFECT in absolute relation to all other men now and forever which spawns this terrible hierarchy of spirited value at complete odds to a radically egalitarian mindset. For, it is just plain common sense that a race of men more faithful to The Perfect Man than all other races could be reasonably understood as the “master race.” And so, Christianity is, ultimately, attacked by anti-Christians exactly because Christianity is a Doctrine of Supremacy asserting the Reality of Perfection in the person of Christ.

  130. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “I’m not posing as a believer in Christ. Rather, I am a believer in an objective (S)upremacy which the Christians claim to be revealed by the person of Christ.”

    No, you are touting a philosophy by which you believe Christ embodies.

    “You are clearly too young to remember when the most politically potent “white (s)upremacists” were “white male heterosexual CHRISTIANS”.

    White male heterosexual Christians personify their love and duty to Christ, not your false belief system.

    “There is NO SCHISM between Christ’s teaching/message/Gift and white (S)upremacy. None whatsoever.”

    Dorothy, tapping your ruby shoes three times does not change the fact you are patently lying here.

    “It is the idea of a single man being PERFECT in absolute relation to all other men now and forever”

    that completely contradicts the Word of the Lord.

    “For, it is just plain common sense that a race of men more faithful to The Perfect Man than all other races could be reasonably understood as the “master race”.

    That race of men are faithful to God, who is perfect and who embraces all under His command. Christian men seek to be His version of perfect, acknowledging they will fail, but nonetheless seek His guidance and support in their quest for humility and piety.

    “And so, Christianity is, ultimately, attacked by anti-Christians exactly because Christianity is a Doctrine of Supremacy asserting the Reality of Perfection in the person of Christ.”

    Christianity is a Doctrine by which its faithful acknowledge their imperfection through their belief in Christ, who is perfect.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  131. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    Again…

    You are THOROUGHLY BEHOLDEN to the anti-Christian’s conception of “white (s)upremacy.”

    This goes to the heart of the whole debate.

    It DOES NOT MATTER whether one identifies as a “Christian,” an anti-Christian or just a plain non-Christian, ALL have SHAMELESSLY SUBMITTED to the “woke” conception of “white (s)upremacy.”

    In other words, you, as a self-identified “Christian,” are AGAINST white men who desire objective (S)upremacy, ie., (P)erfection. And you display this vitriolic mindset with your incessant demand that “white (s)upremacy” meme exactly what the anti-white (S)upremacist demands it memes. So, you call yourself a “Christian,” yet, readily accede AND COMMIT to the anti-(white) Christian’s core belief.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  132. thordaddy says:

    So…

    “We” have this situation where a well-known anti-Christian (and not necessarily anti-Christ) in the person of Dr. Robert Morgan is ALSO anti-white (S)upremacy, although, in this thread he is NOT knee-jerkingly anti-“white (s)upremacy.” And why is this so? Well, because modern cucked “Christians” are anti-“white (s)upremacy,” too. And so, on the subject of “white (s)upremacy,” “Christian” and anti-Christian are ON THE SAME SIDE. This has to create a cog-diss in the minds of BOTH identities. And here, “we” have Dr. Robert Morgan cracking and “Christian” Cornivus cucking.

    • Disagree: Corvinus
  133. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    You can virtue signal all you desire, but this absolute truth remains–you are committing blasphemy with your own preferred version of Christianity. Your own arguments have been rendered impotent. Rather than be self-reflective, you maliciously lash out.

    I am a Christian, not a “self-identified Christian”. You are part of a small cult who has created an ideology rooted in “objective (S)upremacy”, which is a direct assault to God, by erecting false premises, creating strawmen, and generating false conclusion. You may get a free pass with your serpent tongue at PA World And Times, but not here.

    You shall not make idols for yourselves or erect an image or pillar, and you shall not set up a figured stone in your land to bow down to it, for I am the Lord your God.–Leviticus 26:1

    But, if you seek His Forgiveness and steer clear of Wickedness, you shall be Saved.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  134. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    I’m not sure how “virtue signaling” fits into this but it “sounds” fake.

    The reality is that you are anti-“white (s)upremacy” and Christians are (S)upremacists, ie., believers in (P)erfection. This isn’t “blasphemy” or “ideology” or whatever you rant about. It is a straightforward assertion of Reality.

    What this memes is that white Christians are white (S)upremacists are “white (s)upremacists” because “universal equality.”

    You, as a so-called “Christian” can’t solve this “problem” by referencing Scripture, rather, you must dispense with any and all ideas of “universal equality” to which Scripture is an incredible “piece of evidence” of a universal INEQUALITY.

    So, you are really an egalitarian in spirit and therefore, a collapsed (c)atholic possessed of a roaming faith.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  135. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    The reality is that you created, and are promoting, an ideology that perverts God and Scripture.

    That is straightforward fact.

    There is observably no such thing as white (S)upremacy. And how convenient for you to dispense with Scripture when directly confronted with your heretical views. You are idolatry in spirit, and, therefore, a man devoid of morality.

    But if you repent and renounce the serpent, you can be saved.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  136. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    I didn’t create the reality of “white supremacy” nor have I embraced a conception of “white supremacy” most firmly held onto by the “woke” race-hustlers and cucked “Christians.”

    The question is whether “white supremacy” and Christ are at odds, fundamentally?

    And the answer depends ENTIRELY on how one conceives of “white supremacy” and Christ, obviously.

    Your CHOICE is to put them at odds by contriving rival natures.

    Your choice is to pretend as though Christ and “supremacy” are at odds with each other. How else to explain your insistence without any substance that Christ is at odds with “white supremacy?” Certainly, Christ is not at odds with just plain “whites,” is he?

    What is the actual schism between Christ and “white supremacy?”

    Some Christian and/or anti-Christian should be able to answer better than you, cornivus?

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  137. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “I didn’t create the reality of “white supremacy””

    There is no reality of white supremacy in God’s World. You perpetuate this falsehood Earth.

    “nor have I embraced a conception of “white supremacy”

    You have created AND promoted a philosophy of white (S)upremacy and white (s)supremacy that are false predicated on Christian tenets.

    “The question is whether “white supremacy” and Christ are at odds, fundamentally?”

    They are clearly at odds, as I pointed out via Scripture.

    “And the answer depends ENTIRELY on how one conceives of “white supremacy” and Christ, obviously.”

    Right, your own conception that is squarely opposed to the Will Of God.

    “Your CHOICE is to put them at odds by contriving rival natures.”

    Not my choice, it is just is self-evident you have contrived a false ideology.

    “Your choice is to pretend as though Christ and “supremacy” are at odds with each other.”

    No pretending, just reality that Christ does not recognize (W)hite supremacy nor (w)hite supremacy. Your purpose here is DECEIT.

    How else to explain your insistence without any substance that Christ is at odds with “white supremacy?” Certainly, Christ is not at odds with just plain “whites,” is he?

    Non sequitur, strawman, and red herring all wrapped in a neat little bow, Dorothy.

    “What is the actual schism between Christ and “white supremacy?””

    I have already provided a substantive response on the matter, one that you repeatedly ignore at your soul’s own peril.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  138. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    In order for my soul to be imperiled would require a desire for self-annihilation, ie., self-damnation.

    For a white man who desires objective (S)upremacy, ie., (P)erfection, this desire for self-annihilation CAN itself be nearly “annihilated,” leaving a soul AND self intact for a glance at eternal life.

    So. there is no ideology or philosophy or rival religion here.

    There is the racially-incarnated individual who must come face-to-face with the Reality of (P)erfection while simultaneously discarding all otherworldly conceptions of “equality” made mundane by a false “Christianity.”

    Christians worship The God of (P)erfection.

    Christians are (S)upremacists.

    Ergo, white Christians are white (S)upremacists.

    Deal with it. cornivus.

    I’ve provided you with the opportunity to get to the heart of the cog-diss and you are just lashing out, ranting and raving and all BECAUSE you cannot and will not conceive of white (S)upremacy in ABSOLUTE TERMS. And instead, you STAY LOYAL to the “woke,” anti-racist and “equality,” dogmatic conception of “white (s)upremacy” (have you not learn the absolute importance in lower-casing and upper-casing) and proclaim these “positions” as somehow related to Christ’s teaching and/or his promise of resurrected eternal life.

    So, it’s crazy how you fake “Christians” are all aggressive and pompous when asserting your superior understanding of God OVER another believer in Christ, yet, lack this same dominant mindset when confronting any of the other religions?

    If you aren’t a (S)upremacist, you are NOT a Christian. That’s a fact, corvinus.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  139. thordaddy says:

    What’s crazy is that in this world it is anti-“white supremacy” which is the TIE THAT BINDS. And it is the bulk of fake “Christians” who strengthen this bind BY SUBVERTING THEIR religion to “woke” ideology. This is the essence of CUCKING. Your fake “Christian” “god” is the bottom. “Progressive” ideology is on top of this turd pile.

  140. Robjil says:

    The only true Supremacy in our times is Jewish Supremacy. All talk of supremacy by other groups is childish. Top people control societies. Top Jews control all levels of power in the west. Thus Jewish Supremacy is the only real supremacy today.

    Here is a good overview of the sad reality of today’s world. Jewish Supremacy is and has been for over hundred year literally destroying the human mindset and the world.

    http://www.judeofascism.com/2011/03/voltaire-on-jews.html

    And true, in retrospect, certain facets of the Enlightenment have indeed been poorly implemented. But is this the fault of the Enlightenment thinkers and their Christian intellectual forbears, or is it because anti-Christian, hard core Jewish supremacist, racist and greedy elements of Jewry (Zionists) and their political, material, intellectual and spiritual collaborators have refused to get with the Western Civilization program, and indeed sought to sabotage it at every turn?

    Might we be far closer to world harmony, peace and prosperity by now, (in the West via Christendom and the consequential Christian-modeled Enlightenment, in the East perhaps via Buddhism) but for these opportunistic, neoliberal money-worshippers, and pathologically aggressive Zionist saboteurs?

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  141. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “In order for my soul to be imperiled would require a desire for self-annihilation, ie., self-damnation.”

    The self-righteous need not be aware in his/her path to self-annihilation. It’s their hubris and outright refusal, or abject ignorance, that results in it.

    “For a white man who desires objective (S)upremacy, ie., (P)erfection, this desire for self-annihilation CAN itself be nearly “annihilated,” leaving a soul AND self intact for a glance at eternal life.”

    You mean YOUR version of a Christian white man.

    “So. there is no ideology or philosophy or rival religion here.”

    You are touting a belief system predicated on morality. In this process, you philosophize its tenets. So, there is ideology, philosophy, and a rival religion all wrapped in your neat little package.

    “There is the racially-incarnated individual who must come face-to-face with the Reality of (P)erfection while simultaneously discarding all otherworldly conceptions of “equality” made mundane by a false “Christianity.”

    A false premise.

    “Christians worship The God of (P)erfection.”

    Christians worship God, who is perfect.

    “Christians are (S)upremacists.”

    Cite specific Scriptures.

    “Ergo, white Christians are white (S)upremacists.”

    False conclusion.

    “I’ve provided you with the opportunity to get to the heart of the cog-diss and you are just lashing out, ranting and raving and all BECAUSE you cannot and will not conceive of white (S)upremacy in ABSOLUTE TERMS.”

    Classic projection on your part, which is a gamma tell.

    Genesis 3:1 says “Now the serpent was more crafty than any other wild animal that the Lord had made”, and after The Fall, God punishes the serpent in Gen 3: 14, “The Lord God said to the serpent, because you have done this cursed are you among all the animals and among all wild creatures, upon your belly you shall go.”

    “So, it’s crazy how you fake “Christians” are all aggressive and pompous when asserting your superior understanding of God OVER another believer in Christ…”

    More projection on your part, Dorothy.

    “If you aren’t a (S)upremacist, you are NOT a Christian. That’s a fact, corvinus.”

    You are dressing your philosophy in theological garb. Repent. Seek forgiveness.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  142. thordaddy says:
    @Robjil

    Where have “jews” EVER BEEN ACCUSED of desiring (P)erfection?

    “Jewish (S)upremacy” is an oxymoron.

    A “Jewish (S)upremacist” is a CONVERT to base Christianity.

    A “jewish (s)upremacist” is certainly REAL, yet, one amongst many “(s)upremacist”-type.

    The egalitarian infection renders one unable to differentiate (S)upremacy from (s)upremacy and so unable to distinguish white (S)upremacy from “white (s)upremacy.”

    It should be evident that the enemy’s conception is the latter understanding and the absolute conception is the former iteration which YOU must put your mind into and fill it out TRUTHFULLY.

    Just watch and see how you respond.

    It will be telling one way or the other?

    • Replies: @Robjil
  143. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    Come on, corvinus…

    Does The Church proclaim “no such thing as white (s)upremacy?”

    She would be skewered in the global media if she dare.

    Instead, she STAYS QUIET.

    Are you, corvinus, speaking for The Church?

    I am not writing on behalf of your fake “Christianity.”

    I am writing of the mundane human condition “under” the Reality of (P)erfection and the political duress of “universal equality.”

    Do you acknowledge such objective (S)upremacy and the RACIAL connection to “it?”

    Dude…

    You are no preacher of a desire for (P)erfection, yet, somehow, maintain that you’re a pious Christian?

    Stinks like “radical autonomy,” to me.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  144. Robjil says:
    @thordaddy

    Supreme means “situated above”. The only group that is at the Top place in all the important places in the west is Jewish culture. Biden’s has many Jews in Top positions in his administration. The Media is held by Top Jews. The fiat money making is held by Top Jews. Thus the only culture that truly is in the Supreme position in the west is Jewish Culture.

    Others culture may “think” that they are in the Supreme position but that is only “thinking”.

    https://www.etymonline.com/word/supreme

    supreme (adj.)

    1520s, from French suprême (15c.) and directly from Latin supremus “highest,” superlative of superus “situated above,” from super “above” (from PIE root *uper “over”). Supreme Being “God” first attested 1690s; Supreme Court is from 1689.

    Interesting that the beginning of our big 6 age ( that is the big H 6 religion) started on 6.6. at 6 am in 1944. The term Operation Overlord was used. Overlord and Supreme are similar words in terms of the concept that they are conveying.

    https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/wars-conflicts-and-operations/world-war-ii/1944/overlord.html

    Operation Overlord: Invasion of Normandy

    6 June 1944

    At dawn on 6 June, nearly 7,000 U.S. and British ships and craft carrying close to 160,000 troops lay off the Normandy beaches, surprising German commanders, who had overestimated the adverse weather’s impact and were also expecting landings to the northeast, in the Pas-de-Calais area

    Biden has a “diverse cross -section” of American Jewry in his government. “Diversity” within one ethnic group that is 2 percent of the US population. That is some “diversty”, a Supreme “diversity”.

    https://www.timesofisrael.com/all-the-jews-biden-has-tapped-for-top-roles-in-his-new-administration/

    From secretary of state to attorney general, a diverse cross-section of American Jewry is set to fill seats at the incoming president’s Cabinet table and elsewhere in government

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  145. thordaddy says:
    @Robjil

    I am not necessarily disagreeing with the essence of your view…

    But…

    The issue here is two-fold:

    Why do “whites,” almost to a man, mentally buckle when being accused of “white (s)upremacy?”

    And, do Christians believe in objective (S)upremacy, ie., (P)erfection?

    The “jew” qua “jew” DOES NOT BELIEVE in (P)erfection, although, he may seek a subjective (s)upremacy amongst rival races in the mundane sphere.

    So, there is no debate over the realness of rival “supremacies” be they “white,” “jewish,” “asian,” “female,” homosexual,” “trans,” etc.

    The debate is over whether “unwoke” white Christians who desire (P)erfection are white (S)upremacists?

    Jewish (S)upremacists, by absolute conception, are ethnic Jewish CONVERTS to Christianity.

    No one is really debating the RELATIVE “(s)upremacy” of “jews” in Western society. It is the hard denial of this “jewish” DESIRE for (s)upremacy WHILE slimultaneously rejecting an absolute (S)upremacy which triggers all the major chaos.

    In other words, when one seeks to be a (g)od BY REJECTING (G)od, all hell breaks loose.

  146. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    I speak for myself.

    There is no such thing as (W)hite supremacy and (w)hite supremacy.

    You are writing and promoting YOUR philosophy.

    There is no such thing as objective (S)upremacy and the racial connection to it in the context of God, the Bible, and the Christian faith.

    There is no such thing as “unwoke” white Christians who desire (P)erfection are white (S)upremacists.

    Indeed, all hell breaks loose as you seek to be a (g)od BY REJECTING (G)od.

    You are a charlatan.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  147. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    You just don’t seem to understand the nature of your Cucking?

    You kneel before “woke” ideology and, as such, you stand hand-and-hand with the anti-Christians in a committed offense against “white supremacy.”

    You are a very BAD, roaming catholic.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  148. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    You just don’t seem to grasp your outright bastardization of God and His Word. And when you resort to using such meaningless phrases as “cucking”, it only demonstrates the absolute hollowness of your argument.

    There is no such thing as objective (S)upremacy and the racial connection to it in the context of God, the Bible, and the Christian faith.

    You are a Charlatan. Own it.

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  149. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    You are going straight to the heart of the “matter.”

    You are claiming to be a “Christian” AND DENYING that (P)erfection is REAL.

    In other words, you are stating, unequivocally (even though egalitarian), that Christ is not objective (S)upremacy, ie., (P)erfection all about.

    And consequently, this is EXACTLY what the anti-Christian will violently claim.

    But…

    The issue isn’t really about believing in Christ, rather, it is about believing in The Perfect Man (who you “know” as the person in Christ).

    You do believe in He who wills ALL Right?

    You do recognize the basic “game theory” axiom?

    He who makes all the RIGHT moves, WINS.

    That’s “total spectrum superiority.”

    That’s “perfection.”

    Believe it or not?

    PS Calling a conception of God as (P)erfection an “outright bastardization” of God’s “Word” just doesn’t even make sense in the context of the argument. Yet, God’s Word is (P)erfection.

    PSS “Cucking” relates to the muddied relativism that the fake “Christian” purposely rolls in IN ORDER TO deny objective (S)upremacy (by politically perverting “white (s)upremacy” out of short-termist self-interest) and real eyes “universal equality.” It is an “equity” through humiliating submission mentality coupled with a racial self-annihilation for “salvation” theology.

  150. Corvinus says:

    “You are claiming to be a “Christian” AND DENYING that (P)erfection is REAL.”

    All you are doing here is providing strawmen and speciou reasoning. I am a Christian (no quotes). Perfection is God. He made us in His image, but due to our sinful nature, we can only strive to be perfect.

    “that Christ is not objective (S)upremacy, ie., (P)erfection all about.”

    There is observably no such thing as “objective (S)upremacy”.

    “The issue isn’t really about believing in Christ…”

    To the contrary, is IS about believing in Christ. How convenient for you to state otherwise.

    “You do believe in He who wills ALL Right? You do recognize the basic “game theory” axiom? He who makes all the RIGHT moves, WINS.”

    The RIGHT moves through God’s Will and Grace. You willfully ignore this critical component.

    “That’s “total spectrum superiority.””

    You continue to make up things as you go along.

    “PS Calling a conception of God as (P)erfection an “outright bastardization””

    No, I said that YOUR philosophy of God as (P)erfection is outright bastardization of the faith.

    “”PSS “Cucking” relates to…”

    Punching at waterfalls.

    “It is an “equity” through humiliating submission mentality coupled with a racial self-annihilation for “salvation” theology.”

    Bascially, that is YOUR ideology which has absolute no basis in Christian doctrine. Again, you are a charlatan. Own it!

    • Replies: @thordaddy
  151. thordaddy says:
    @Corvinus

    Again…

    You are arguing X and I’m arguing “why.”

    Why is Fake “Christianity” at odds with “white (s)upremacy” JUST LIKE an atheistic anti-Christian is?

    Answer: “woke” ideology.

    Why is real Christianity NOT AT ODDS with white (S)upremacy?

    Answer: Be-cause racially-incarnated desire for (P)erfection is real.

    What you haven’t yet told “us” yet, cornivus, is how you came to desire (G)od in the first place? That this desire was not inspired by your racial incarnation does then invalidate said “mechanism” of inspiration.

    You are truly beholden to “woke” ideology and readily subordinate your faith in a Christ to a “faith” in anti-(S)upremacy.

    You are a “radical autonomist” cloaked within a pseudo-“Christian” skin suit.

    • Replies: @Corvinus
  152. >”White Supremacist”
    >A demonstrator clearly waving a flag of the Republic of Vietnam
    Pick one, mass media!

    America is nowhere near “White Supremacist” enough for my liking! “White Supremacist” really means “I love my race, and will fight to defend it!”

  153. Polistra says:
    @Sulu

    Jews fear the White race above all others because we are the race numerous enough and intelligent enough to eventually destroy them. So they in turn want us dead and actively implement policies that will ultimately lead to our destruction.

    Our ability to destroy them is actually not the issue. If we’d wanted to do that, we had many, many opportunities to do so. No, it’s our ability to see what they’re up to, and to provide a check upon their worst excesses. No other race is able or willing to do this.

    One irony being, of course, that such a check is exactly what they need, though they don’t perceive this. Because without it they inevitably overreach and provoke a backlash. This time, though, they’re sure it’s different. I don’t know if that’s true.

  154. Corvinus says:
    @thordaddy

    “You are arguing X and I’m arguing “why.””

    In typical fashion, you are employing rhetorical tricks. I have been discussing the how AND why– using Scripture as the cudgel–your ideology is a perversion of the faith.

    “Why is Fake “Christianity” at odds with “white (s)upremacy” JUST LIKE an atheistic anti-Christian is?? Answer: “woke” ideology.”

    There is no such thing as “Fake Christianity”, “white (s)supremacy”, “woke ideology”. Your theology is a racial interpretation of Christianity not rooted in the actual teachings of the Bible.

    “Why is real Christianity NOT AT ODDS with white (S)upremacy?”

    Now you are employing the No True Scotsman Fallacy. That’s all you have!

    “Answer: Because racially-incarnated desire for (P)erfection is real.”

    Not according to God and Scripture.

    “God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears him and does what is right” (Acts 10:34-35).

    About the age to come, we see a heavenly picture: “a great multitude that no one could number, from every nation, from all tribes and peoples and languages, standing before the throne and before the Lamb” (Revelation 7:9-10).

    “What you haven’t yet told “us” yet, cornivus, is how you came to desire (G)od in the first place?”

    He provides Truth, and He empowers me not to remain supine in the face of your wickedness.

    “You are a “radical autonomist” cloaked within a pseudo-“Christian” skin suit.”

    LOL. More punching at waterfalls on your part. Once again, YOUR ideology which has absolutely no basis in Christian doctrine. You are a charlatan. Own it!

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply - Comments on articles more than two weeks old will be judged much more strictly on quality and tone


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Jared Taylor Comments via RSS