The Unz Review • An Alternative Media Selection$
A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media
 Pierre Simon Archive
The Saddest Story Never Told
The Real Cause of WW2

Bookmark Toggle AllToCAdd to LibraryRemove from Library • B
Show CommentNext New CommentNext New ReplyRead More
ReplyAgree/Disagree/Etc. More... This Commenter This Thread Hide Thread Display All Comments
AgreeDisagreeThanksLOLTroll
These buttons register your public Agreement, Disagreement, Thanks, LOL, or Troll with the selected comment. They are ONLY available to recent, frequent commenters who have saved their Name+Email using the 'Remember My Information' checkbox, and may also ONLY be used three times during any eight hour period.
Ignore Commenter Follow Commenter
Search Text Case Sensitive  Exact Words  Include Comments
List of Bookmarks

Things come apart so easily when they have been held together with lies

Dorothy Allison, Bastard Out of Carolina

In his book The New Ecological Order, philosopher Luc Ferry, the former French Minister of Education (2002-2003), shocked animal protectors, whom we shall henceforth call “animalists,” the counterpart of “humanists” for humans.[1]Luc Ferry, Le Nouvel Ordre écologique : L’Arbre, l’Animal et l’Homme, Grasset, 1992, p. 147-168. An English version is available: The New Ecological Order – August 15, 1995 by Luc Ferry (Author), Carol Volk (Translator). In a chapter of his book entitled “Nazi ecology: the legislation of November 1933, July 1934, and June 1935,” Ferry had the misfortune not only to praise the legal provisions of the National Socialists relating to animal welfare, but also to make overlaps between the philosophical theses of the German legislation and those of the contemporary animalist movements.

This sulfurous amalgam between the National Socialists and today’s animal lovers caused a huge scandal, the echoes of which can still be heard today. Deeply wounded in their self-esteem, these ladies of the animalist movement refused to admit that the Germans loved animals and nature as well as, if not better than them. Unable to face this terrible conflation between fascism and their movement, they set out to prove it wrong.

Thus, if the Germans of the time had the most progressive animal protection laws in the world, they did not apply them, according to the animalist’s philosopher in chief, Mrs. Elisabeth Hardouin-Fugier, but used them only as a pretext “to adorn themselves with a supposed humanism.”[2]Élisabeth Hardouin-Fugier, “La protection de l’animal sous le nazisme,” Luc Ferry ou le Rétablissement de l’ordre, Éditions Tahin Party, 2002, p. 129-151.

Adolf Hitler’s notorious love of animals was ridiculed. It was claimed that he was photographed with animals only for demagogic reasons[3]Protection of nature and animals under the Third Reich. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. and that he wasn’t really a vegetarian. Even though, Margot Woelk, one of his regular tasters, is clear on this subject: “The Führer was indeed a vegetarian, eating neither meat nor fish, but mostly fresh products. He also forbade himself cigarettes and alcohol.”[4]Blandine Le cain, “La goûteuse d’Hitler raconte ses années de terreur,” Le Figaro, Feb. 24, 2014.

How can this determination to deny Hitler’s vegetarianism, which has been confirmed by historians,[5]Hal Herzog, “Was Hitler a Vegetarian? The Paradox of the Nazi Animal Protection Movement,” Psychology Today, 2011. be explained? The National Socialists’ extraordinary love of animals has been proven. As Luc Ferry confirms: “This legislation did not remain in words, but was embodied in deeds.”[6]Luc Ferry, work cited, p. 149.

Why do today’s animalists fear being lumped together with the National Socialists to the point of obscuring in the literature on ecology and animal welfare any reference to National Socialist legislation on animals and nature? “The presence of a genuine interest in ecology [and animals] within National Socialism is not, in itself, in my opinion,” says Luc Ferry, “a relevant objection in a critical examination of contemporary ecology. On this account, one could also denounce as fascist the construction of freeways, which was one of the priorities of the Hitler government.”[7]Ibid.
(Luc Ferry, work cited, p. 149.)

Someone needs to tell animalists that at the time when animal welfare and nature legislation were implemented, i.e., in the early 1930s, Germany, which was not yet at war, enjoyed a solid reputation of integrity and high ethical standards. Visitors came from all over the world to greet Chancellor Adolf Hitler and see the German economic and social miracle with their own eyes.

In seven years, from 1933 to 1939, Hitler, the most popular man in the world at the time, put seven million unemployed people back to work, ended class warfare, put work (production) instead of money at the centre of the economy, eliminated usury and finance capitalism, expelled the rogues of stateless finance, closed down the Masonic lodges, put the German Communists out of business and restored order to the utterly depraved society of the Weimar Republic that was briefly surveyed in Sex with Animals in a Weimar Democracy.[8]Friedrich Kurreck, “Life in the Third Reich and the World Political Situation Then and Now,” Der Schlesier, July-August 2002.

As a result of this public health work, within two years Germany had no more debt or inflation and its currency was solid and stable. After the ordeals of the Treaty of Versailles and the hunger blockade (which killed as many children, women and old people as the Iraqi blockade of Israel’s Washington foreign minister Madeleine Albright), the entire German people had regained their pride, dignity, and happiness. It is no exaggeration to say that the Good, the true, and the beautiful reigned supreme in the National Socialist kingdom of the pre-war period.[9]Richard Tedor, Hitler’s Revolution. Ideology, Social Programs, Foreign Affairs, Castle Hill Publishers, 2021.

Voted “Man of the Year” in 1938 by Time Magazine, which featured him on its cover in 1936, Hitler was adored by his people and admired by many, including Winston Churchill, who said of Hitler in 1935: “…One may think what one likes about these achievements, but they are undeniably among the most remarkable in the history of the world.”[10]Benton Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, Money Tree Publishing, 2nd edition, 2022, p. 148.

As for Canadian Prime Minister William Mackenzie King, he compared the Führer to Joan of Arc, no less:

My sizing up of the man as I sat and talked with him was that he is really one who truly loves his fellow men, and his country, and would make any sacrifice for their good. That he feels himself to be a deliverer of his people from tyranny… His face is much more prepossessing than his pictures would give the impression of. It is not that of a fiery, over-strained nature, but of a calm, passive man, deeply and thoughtfully in earnest. His skin was smooth; his face did not present lines of fatigue or wariness; his eyes impressed me most of all. There was a liquid quality about them which indicate keen perception and profound sympathy. He has a very nice, sweet and, one could see, how particularly humble folk would come to have a profound love for the man… As I talked to him, I could not but think of Joan of Arc.[11]Robert Fisk, “The Premier Who Thought Hitler Was a ‘Joan of Arc,’” The Independent, October 23 2011.

Even after the war, in 1945, there were still people who could speak well of Hitler. This is notably the case of the future president of the United States, John F. Kennedy, who wrote in his diary:

Within a few years, Hitler will emerge from the hatred that now surrounds him as one of the most significant figures that ever lived… he had a mystery about him in the way he lived and in the matter of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.[12]John F. Kennedy, Prelude to Leadership: The Post-War Diary of John F. Kennedy: Summer, 1945, Quoted in Benton Bradberry, work cited, p. 171.

As author Laurent Guyénot points out in his book The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, as a young man,

Kennedy never saw Hitler as an evil man, let alone as a man responsible for WW2… In 1946, in his book, Profiles in courage, John praised Senator Robert Taft, for having at tremendous personal cost, denounced in 1946, the hanging of eleven Nazi officials as motivated by the ‘spirit of vengeance’ and as ‘a blot on the American record that we shall long regret.’[13]Robert Taft, quoted by Laurent Guyénot in The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, 22021, p.99.

With such a track record and reputation, why did the world gang up on Hitler? Was it because he invaded Poland? Was it about money, usury, economics? Those are some of the usual suspects that most well-informed people are familiar with, but what are the other possible suspects? There is only one, really, although it is linked to all the others, race is basically the crux of the matter.

Hitler’s goal was a “Europe of Nations”[14]Léon Degrelle, Hitler pour mille ans, La Table Ronde, 1969. based on race and similar to the Roman Empire when it was all powerful and not yet eviscerated by Christianity and race mixing. According to Belgian politician Léon Degrelle, one of Hitler’s most brilliant soldiers,[15]Ibid.
(Léon Degrelle, Hitler pour mille ans, La Table Ronde, 1969.)
the Führer wanted a pan-European union with freedom of movement within it, but restricted to the people who are part of the European gene pool. To paraphrase evolutionary psychologist, Dr. Keven MacDonald, such a race realist point of view would have stressed the genetic interests of Europeans first. It would have constituted a group evolutionary strategy to the extent that it had the political will to keep other races out.[16]Kevin MacDonald, Individualism and Western Liberal Tradition. Evolutionary Origins, History and Prospects for the Future, Kindle Direct Publishing Edition, 2019, pp. 88-89. It would have turned Europe into a superpower as powerful if not more than any of its competitors. The problem, of course, comes from the fact that such a race-based policy was completely contrary to the interests of Hitler’s Jewish enemies, as is the case today, more than ever. So, of course, it had to be stopped. How Jews proceeded to do so is brilliantly summarized in the following quote from the great Hungarian journalist Louis Marschalko, a long forgotten but credible individual whose views should be taken seriously:

Hitlerism was not the only thing the World Jewry hated. They dreaded even more those [fascist] movements paving the way for a new understanding among the nations of Europe. Jewry’s main aim was to discredit these new [fascist] trends as well as to make them disliked by the rest of the world. While campaigning on one side for full cooperation, they tried to strangle on the other side all those who were collaborating with their enemies—the Germans.

“They unhesitatingly opposed even the slightest thought of making peace,” writes French writer Maurice Bardèche.

But today we have definite proof that the Germans tried most earnestly to establish cooperation and partnership among the European elite. They were not looking for “Quislings” but for those who were considered good patriots in their own country, people devoted to the cause of their own native land. An almost exaggerated idealism pervaded the elite of the National Socialist revolution. In their own country, they stated what they believed to be the truth. They recognized that the individual has social rights. They demonstrated that this is the only satisfactory solution if Bolshevism was to be avoided.

They believed with revolutionary fervour that if they could succeed in liberating the European masses from capitalist exploitation, then peace would be secured for a long time. They had seen how Jewish “Nazism” interposed itself to disrupt the unity of the German people by means of its money power and its control of the press in order to secure exclusive domination over the entire nation. Having successfully done away with all this by their National Socialist revolution, they had high hopes of securing peace and also the cooperation of neighbouring peoples, once the influence of the supranational Old Testament “Nazism” was eliminated in those countries too.

This was “New Europe” in the making. And this was the very thing World Jewry had to prevent at any cost, even if it entailed reducing the Christian culture of Europe to the dust. Because should this plan succeed, more and more states would be released from the grip of Jewish domination.

Therefore, the mere thought of European Unity or of any possible cooperation had to be discredited. And because more than 60% of the press of the Western World is in Jewish hands, and according to American statistics, 85% of the American press and 100% of American films, this campaign was conducted on a larger scale than any other propaganda operation in the history of the world.

By misinterpreting the racial concept, the Jews pretended that the Germans were claiming sole supremacy for the German nation over all other nations. Thus, they succeeded in estranging the other nations from Germany. They distorted the racial theory by insinuating that Germany wanted to conquer the world and the basis of this theory was claiming world supremacy. The Nineteenth Century magazine in its issue of September 1943, during the height of the war, admitted on the contrary that:

“The general belief that Germany started this war to achieve world power, in our view, is a mistake. Germany wanted to become a first-rate power, but to be a first-rate power and to achieve world domination are two different things. Great Britain is also a world power but also does not rule the world.”

The Jews also misinterpreted the theory of “Blut und Boden” (blood and soil), i.e., the theory that a man belongs to his native soil, the concept of unity between a country and its inhabitants was so twisted as to suggest that the Germans claimed all the territories in which any inhabitants of German origin happened to be living. By this means they aroused the jealousy of all independent European nations where German minorities were to be found. Poland, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovakia, Yugoslavia, Bohemia, Rumania, and other neighbouring countries began to regard with mistrust the German Reich.

They tried to explain Germany’s steadily growing export trade as a preparation for war and attempted to make the world forget that Goering’s slogan of “guns and butter” had a precedent in the boycott by American Jewry. They ridiculed the sincerely pro-British parts of Mein Kampf, at the same time working on the fears of both East and West by quoting certain passages of this book out of their context.

The poisoning of the mind was thus stimulated on a gigantic scale throughout the world. When the German administration tried to stop this trouble-making, it was promptly accused of dictatorial tyranny. As a background to all these forms of anti-German propaganda there was, of course, the undeniable fact that the abolition of the reign of gold together with the peaceful cooperation between capital and labour was a real shock for Jewry. World opinion was induced to believe that the German worker’s living standard was rising only because of rearmament. But, in fact, they knew very well that large workers’ settlements were everywhere under construction, and that the existence of workers and satisfied families was a living refutation of those things [communism] taught by Jewry for over a century.

“What can have happened?” They asked one another in fear, “Have these hated Nazis really wrecked the splendid theory of the Marxist class-struggle theory which was serving our ends so well? As Bettelheim expressed it, can great cities such as Berlin, Vienna, and Budapest get along without Jews? Can a nation really live without exploitation, without a Jewish national press, without the films, theatre, and the Jewish ’mercenary spirit? After all, we have kept the whole world under our influence for centuries by suggesting that without our cultural activities, our business sense, and our supercilious intellect all nations would perish and all “progress” would cease. And now Germany prospers without us—with a prosperity which is the living negation of our arrogant nationalism. Anyone looking at these steadily growing garden cities, at the satisfied and happy people, and the prospering intellectual and economic activities can see that our great nationalist writer, Bettelheim was wrong when he predicted that world civilization would perish without the Jews. So far, these Christians are becoming more and more satisfied, while we Jews are losing more and more ground. If the rest of the world learns about this on an international level, and if the foreign tourists and the world’s proletariat see that all this is possible without us, indeed, even against us, they will realize that we have lied to them. Our politicians, journalists, trade union leaders, capitalists, and labour leaders will all become liars! Therefore, we must destroy the proofs! Therefore, these beautiful homes with their gardens, together with the new factories, nurseries, hospitals, and youth camps, must be wiped off the face of the earth. For we have at our disposal our secret nationalist weapon—the same used with such effect at the siege of Jericho. Let us, therefore, sound the trumpets for our world propaganda.”[17]Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals, Britons Publishing Society, 1958, pp. 85-88.

After the war, the Master Race made sure that their alleged god given racial superiority would never again be challenged. With the charter of human rights, the UN, the Nuremberg trials, they poisoned the well of racial consciousness with anti-racism, individualism, liberalism, consumerism, democracy, and the particularly powerful Holocaust venom, which they injected in the minds of every White person on the Globe.

As admitted by Jewish supremacist Stephen Steinlight, the source of Jewish power in America [and in Europe, especially in Germany] is White guilt over the Holocaust, and that is mostly how Jews have been able to prevail.[18]Stephen Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography. Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy,” Center for Immigration Studies, October 1, 2001.

Why do you think Jews spend so much money and energy defending this weapon of White destruction? Why do you think Jewish Hollywood and Jewish directors such as Steven Spielberg (Schindler’s List), Alan J. Pakula (Sophie’s Choice), and more recently, Jonathan Glazer (The Zone of Interest), work overtime in an effort to destroy with guilt every vestige of racial consciousness and nationalism among White people? Because this is what allows them to hold on to the tail of the dog that they need to subdue in order to stay on top.

The “the light of humanity,” in other words, does not want to see the rebirth of a far superior political doctrine that would rain on their parade and foil their plan of world conquest. The famous catchphrase “Never Again” does not refer to the alleged gas chambers but to National Socialism (and fascism in general), one of the best antidotes to political Judaism that deadly poison which has been eating away at humanity for at least 2000 years.[19]Michael Collins Piper, The New Babylon. Those Who Reign Supreme. A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious, and Economic Origins of the New World Order, American Free Press, 2015.

“What Jews fear more than anything else,” writes author F. Britton in his book Behind Communism, “is a rebirth of race consciousness among the great White majority of the Christian world. They remember that at the very instant that the German people became race-conscious they turned with deadly fury against the Jews.”[20]Ibid.
(Michael Collins Piper, The New Babylon. Those Who Reign Supreme. A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious, and Economic Origins of the New World Order, American Free Press, 2015.)
“It is precisely for this reason,” concludes Curse, an anonymous commenter on one of the social medias, “that they have stigmatized racism in our minds, they know it’s the best survival strategy. Their position in our societies is a testament to that.”

Likewise, should Whites regain their racial consciousness, they would quickly turn against their Jewish overlords, and send the minorities they are weaponizing against them back running to where they came from as they do in race-conscious Israel.

In the end, Hitler and National Socialism will continue to be relentlessly demonized by the Jews. To achieve their Jewish utopia,[21]Michael Higger, Ph.D., The Jewish Utopia, The Lord Baltimore Press, 1932. Israel (as the Jewish race as a whole is also called) will systematically seek to destroy any individual, group, or country that stands in its way. Nationalism and race consciousness are particularly targeted because they know from their own experience that the unity, strength, and cohesion of a nation are rooted in its racial and ethnic homogeneity. They are well aware that racial and cultural diversity in the same country is not a strength, but a Trojan horse used to divide, fragment, and weaken those who succumb to its charms. They know, finally, that the ethno-state is the only model of society capable of ensuring the security and happiness of men.

To sum up, WW2 was basically a war between two racially conscious nations: Israel and Hitler’s Germany, the first one, voraciously ambitious, dishonest, intellectually inferior, and hateful of all non-Jews,[22]Lazar Berman, “5 of Ovadia Yosef’s Most Controversial Quotations,” The Times of Israel, October 9, 2013. and the second, convivial, nature and animal friendly, honest, intellectually superior by a long-shot, and willing to live in peace with the other nations and races.

On a larger scale, this war is much like the story of Antonio Salieri vs Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

It’s a sad story when you think about it, the saddest story never told, because, unfortunately for mankind, the inferior race won over the most promising one. How do we know it’s inferior? By its fruits. What we see today in Ukraine and Gaza, the present threat of nuclear war, and the chaos observed in all Western countries is the culmination of thousands of years of incompetence and “By way of deception thou shalt wage war.” The Jewish race, which has lived by lies all its existence is trapped by its hubris in a false reality which will eventually be its downfall.

That’s what happens when you build your house on lies. It catches up on you and destroys you.

Notes

[1] Luc Ferry, Le Nouvel Ordre écologique : L’Arbre, l’Animal et l’Homme, Grasset, 1992, p. 147-168. An English version is available: The New Ecological Order – August 15, 1995 by Luc Ferry (Author), Carol Volk (Translator).

[2] Élisabeth Hardouin-Fugier, “La protection de l’animal sous le nazisme,” Luc Ferry ou le Rétablissement de l’ordre, Éditions Tahin Party, 2002, p. 129-151.

[3] Protection of nature and animals under the Third Reich. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

[4] Blandine Le cain, “La goûteuse d’Hitler raconte ses années de terreur,” Le Figaro, Feb. 24, 2014.

[5] Hal Herzog, “Was Hitler a Vegetarian? The Paradox of the Nazi Animal Protection Movement,” Psychology Today, 2011.

[6] Luc Ferry, work cited, p. 149.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Friedrich Kurreck, “Life in the Third Reich and the World Political Situation Then and Now,” Der Schlesier, July-August 2002.

[9] Richard Tedor, Hitler’s Revolution. Ideology, Social Programs, Foreign Affairs, Castle Hill Publishers, 2021.

[10] Benton Bradberry, The Myth of German Villainy, Money Tree Publishing, 2nd edition, 2022, p. 148.

[11] Robert Fisk, “The Premier Who Thought Hitler Was a ‘Joan of Arc,’” The Independent, October 23 2011.

[12] John F. Kennedy, Prelude to Leadership: The Post-War Diary of John F. Kennedy: Summer, 1945, Quoted in Benton Bradberry, work cited, p. 171.

[13] Robert Taft, quoted by Laurent Guyénot in The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, 22021, p.99.

[14] Léon Degrelle, Hitler pour mille ans, La Table Ronde, 1969.

[15] Ibid.

[16] Kevin MacDonald, Individualism and Western Liberal Tradition. Evolutionary Origins, History and Prospects for the Future, Kindle Direct Publishing Edition, 2019, pp. 88-89.

[17] Louis Marschalko, The World Conquerors: The Real War Criminals, Britons Publishing Society, 1958, pp. 85-88.

[18] Stephen Steinlight, “The Jewish Stake in America’s Changing Demography. Reconsidering a Misguided Immigration Policy,” Center for Immigration Studies, October 1, 2001.

[19] Michael Collins Piper, The New Babylon. Those Who Reign Supreme. A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious, and Economic Origins of the New World Order, American Free Press, 2015.

[20] Ibid.

[21] Michael Higger, Ph.D., The Jewish Utopia, The Lord Baltimore Press, 1932.

[22] Lazar Berman, “5 of Ovadia Yosef’s Most Controversial Quotations,” The Times of Israel, October 9, 2013.

 
Hide 226 CommentsLeave a Comment
Commenters to Ignore...to FollowEndorsed Only
Trim Comments?
    []
  1. Wokechoke says:

    Israel and proto Likud Beitar was present in Warsaw a stones throw from Berlin. Germany naturally moved on them.

  2. Mitteleuropa was the idea that the Germans were uniquely suited, both culturally and geographically, to unite Europe. An Unz article by Guyénot makes this argument. Earlier attempts to unite Europe under German leadership failed, in part due to a rivalry with the Church of Rome. Later, the British sought to weaken Germany and prevent its rise as a European power. National Socialist Germany came the closest to realizing its role as mitteleuropa and uniting the continent on the basis of ethnic sovereignty.

    Europe is presently ruled as a single bloc, but it does not allow for national sovereignty or local decision-making, because power is centralized. It is an artificial unity that weakens each member, ensuring that no state is able to assert its self-interest or to challenge the plans of the ruling elite.

    The European Union is a sad story, when compared to the potential of a German mitteleuropa to revitalize the peoples of Europe

  3. To sum up, WW2 was basically a war between two racially conscious nations: Israel and Hitler’s Germany, the first one, voraciously ambitious, dishonest, intellectually inferior, and hateful of all non-Jews, and the second, convivial, nature and animal friendly, honest, intellectually superior by a long-shot, and willing to live in peace with the other nations and races.

    I dunno, man. This sounds about as intellectually honest as thousands upon thousands of texts explaining how the American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq were totally a fight against the terrorists who hated the Americans for their freedom and totally not wars of choice for the benefit of Israel at goyim’s expense, or as countless texts telling us how Israel is fighting a war for its survival against savage Hamas terrorists who just want to destroy Israel and kill all Jews, and totally not a genocide/ethnic cleansing operation to grab some Palestinian land carried out mostly against defenseless civilians.

    They tried to explain Germany’s steadily growing export trade as a preparation for war and attempted to make the world forget that Goering’s slogan of “guns and butter” had a precedent in the boycott by American Jewry.

    According to this paper, the slogan was “Guns, not butter.” The main focus of the Third Reich’s economy seems to have been rearmament, not building a consumerism utopia. They were so much “willing to live in peace” that they were preparing for war as their top priority.
    https://personal.lse.ac.uk/ritschl/pdf_files/ritschl_dec2000.pdf

    Foreign exchange allocations to imports of food and textiles were frozen and often reduced. “Guns, not butter” was the infamous slogan coined in 1935 by the propaganda ministry to explain to the public what the tradeoffs were and why recovery should not be followed by a corresponding increase in living standards

  4. Bookish1 says:
    @Anonymous534

    What choice did Germany have but to prepare for war. They would have been stupid not to. Comparing Afghanistan and Iraq wars with ww2 isn’t intellectually sound given 2 different time periods in 2 different worlds.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  5. @Bookish1

    I wasn’t comparing those wars.
    I was comparing the possibility to find and quote countless texts to support whatever narrative you want about any war. That doesn’t make all these narratives true.
    Germany had many options. They chose the one that ultimately led to their country being destroyed and permanently occupied. Maybe it was the right choice, who am I to judge?

    • Replies: @HdC
    , @Anonymous
    , @JC Smallhat
  6. Nazi hatred of Russians undid them.

    That is the saddest truth of all.

  7. @Suetonious

    The EU, like the UN, was designed to keep Germany down – small wonder
    the result is unnatural; the wildest thing the intelligentsiya dare think is
    “Karolingian” Europe.

  8. Wokechoke says:
    @Anonymous534

    Israel was in operation long before the UN partitioned Palestine. I’d hazard that 1920 or thereabouts was Year Zero.

    • Replies: @Marcali
  9. the source of Jewish power in America [and in Europe, especially in Germany] is White guilt over the Holocaust,

    I never feel guilt over something in which I had no part. In respect of the Holocaust™ how can one feel guilt over something that did not happen? The fact that legislation to impose a narrative, for which there is no forensic evidence, as history, should be proof that it did not happen. I have said, for decades, that The Hoax Of The Twentieth Century needs to be exploded in order for all of us to be liberated.

  10. @Priss Factor

    It was the (((Bolsheviks))) the “nazis” hated and feared not the Russians, ok.

    • Replies: @Dule
    , @Pythas
  11. Marcali says:
    @Wokechoke

    Of course it was:

    The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הסכם העברה Translated: “transfer agreement”) was signed on 25 August 1933 after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany. The agreement was designed to help facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine. While it helped Jews emigrate, it forced them to give up most of their possessions to Germany before departing. Those assets could later be obtained by transferring them to Palestine as German export goods.[1][2]

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  12. @Priss Factor

    Hatred of the Marxist/Communist was the impetus for the (eventually) failed invasion of Russia. A Czarist Russia might have been an ally, or at least a benevolent neutral like Spain. The ideology of Marxism made its eradication a priority for the National Socialist.

    • Replies: @HdC
    , @R.G. Camara
  13. Wokechoke says:
    @Marcali

    It blows apart the idea that Israel was founded de facto after ww2.

    • Replies: @skrik
  14. What we are seeing now is how evil those who won WW2 really are.

    Germany was supported to rebuild after WW1 for one purpose…and one purpose only…to complete the evil doers biggest wet dream…to break up Russia and steal their immense assets.

    The Zionist were working on the Russian takeover from the inside when Russians understood their game and ran them out, they gathered in host America as a base to eventually launch other attempts at bringing down the leviathan.

    One thing these evil Bastards cannot stand is one of their assets going rogue as Hitler did…and now Putin, they’ll move heaven and earth to revenge themselves on the wrongdoer like any organised crime outfit would.

    Now that the latest attempt at Russia, project Ukraine, has failed they move to the next effort, its the removal of Palistinians to take control of gas imports to Europe and to build up an army and technology to storm fortress Russia through the starvation of energy sales West.

    These evil Bastards will never stop in their greed and machinations unless permanently removed.

    What is their ultimate goal?

    To be omnipotent Gods of the world where they can indulge in any depravity they wish with no consequences.

    To create real AI golems so they can rid the world of most of its population.

    Covid was a dry run of the method they will use.

    The Western people are tame and mute to their dystopian future.

    If you don’t fight you not only lose…but become extinct!

    • Agree: Zumbuddi
    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
    , @Common Time
  15. Much as I love and admire Charlie Chaplin, making “The Great Dictator” did the world an enormous disservice. Because it scrambled the dishes for everyone’s trying to figure out what exactly was going on in the world, and why. Hitler’s big mistake was not understanding that what played well in Deutschland was completely misunderstood in the Anglosphere. Well. Whaddaya gonna do.

    What could be funnier than the world-spanning British Empire calling Hitler a madman for wanting to govern some small parts of Czechoslakia and Poland.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
    , @Lurker
  16. Notsofast says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    chaplin was angry that hitler stole his mustache.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Daniel Rich
  17. HdC says:
    @Anonymous534

    Hmmm, let’s see:

    German expatriates are murdered by the tens of thousands in Poland,
    France, Britain, & USA defacto declare war on Germany,
    Soviet Union is poised to invade Germany and western Europe.

    But Germany baaad because it had numerous choices???

    One f the first things AH did was to propose a weapons reduction program for Europe, but those wise and peace loving Brits and Frogs declined.

    Fact is WWII would have happened regardless of what German foreign policy was implemented, because Germany implemented Labour Capitalism which proved so equitable to the working class that both the world’s capitalists and communists made common cause to destroy the newcomer and his brilliant ideas.

    The results of that alliance are there for everyone to see and experience.

    • Agree: Malla, Thomasina, c matt
  18. HdC says:
    @American Citizen

    That is way too simplistic.

    The murderous antics of the Soviet communists was well known in Germany: Millions upon millions of Russians murdered.

    Further, the plan to invade Germany and western Europe, thus imposing that murderous regime on the rest of Europe, became known to the German government.

    So Germany is the bad guy because they kept the murderous communists from overrunning all of Germany and western Europe.

    What in holy hell is wrong with you people’s thinking???

    • Agree: Delberto Bey
    • Replies: @Sesto
  19. fnn says:
    @Anonymous534

    Of course, Germany was disarmed under the Versailles system–it makes sense they didn’t want to remain helpless.

    A.J.P Taylor in his famous book, The Origins of the Second World War :

    In 1938-39, the last peacetime year, Germany spent on armament about 15% of her gross national product. The British proportion was almost exactly the same. German expenditure on armaments was actually cut down after Munich and remained at this lower level, so that British production of aeroplanes, for example, was way ahead of German by 1940. When war broke out in 1939, Germany had 1,450 modern fighter planes and 800 bombers; Great Britain and France had 950 fighters and 1,300 bombers. The Germans had 3,500 tanks; Great Britain and France had 3,850. In each case Allied intelligence estimated German strength at more than twice the true figure. As usual, Hitler was thought to have planned and prepared for a great war. In fact, he had not.

    • Agree: OldWhiteMan
    • Thanks: Almost Missouri
    • Replies: @Wokechoke
  20. @Mr_Chow_Mein

    One thing these evil Bastards cannot stand is one of their assets going rogue as Hitler did…and now Putin, they’ll move heaven and earth to revenge themselves on the wrongdoer like any organised crime outfit would.

    Hitler was not a Jewish asset and neither is Putin, let me refer you to my previous article:

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/

    • Agree: Cloverleaf
  21. Wokechoke says:
    @HdC

    I’ve got a radically different take on the war.

    Poland had so many Jews that the British who also controlled Mandate Palestine were panicked into protecting the Yids. So as not to fill Palestine with proto Likudniks from Warsaw thus losing Arab and Persian favor in one swoop. And the oil.

    Just a thought. We must begin to see the precursors of Israel in Poland as a serious threat to Europe. Not just a footnote of Pole v German rivalry.

    An embryonic Israel in both Palestine and Poland as a serious player in the entire dynamic of Britain committing to war over Poland.

  22. Wokechoke says:
    @fnn

    AJP Taylor got fired for that didn’t he?

    Did he mention the Jews the British were protecting in Warsaw?

  23. Wokechoke says:
    @Notsofast

    He was buttering up Jews in Hollywood.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  24. @Priss Factor

    No apologist for Hitler, but he had no choice. Stalin was prepared to invade Germany. That’s why the Germans ran over them so readily, they were in an offensive, not a defensive position.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Replies: @Derer
  25. Anonymous[357] • Disclaimer says:

    This video always makes me get teary-eyed. So beautiful. So sad.

    Read the YT comments. Some of them say it all. “Civilization ended in 1945”… “We now live in a zoo”…

    • Replies: @Anonymous
  26. Anonymous[152] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre Simon

    Isnt putin part jewish? Didnt he have his eyes fixed to take the slant out of them.!!

    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
  27. Wokechoke says:

    Chilling first half hour.

    Beevor has always been a British propagandist but it’s very interesting to read the diplomatic flurry before the war between Germany and Russia. Good narrator too.

    Diplomats didn’t appear to know what was up.

    • Thanks: Agent76
  28. @American Citizen

    Hitler needed oil badly. That was the #1 impetus of the invasion of Russia.

    The timing was rushed from Hitler’s point of view because he realized Stalin was planning to invade Germany first, as the Red Army had begun placing invasion units at strategic locations near German territory. That was the #2 reason.

    Hitler always had planned on taking the East (read Mein Kampf) and needed the oil badly (Germany had none) but wasn’t foolhardy enough to want a two-front war until he realized if he didn’t strike right away Stalin was going to come through his back door while Hitler was busy with France.

    Once Hitler greenlit the Russian invasion, he was dismayed that his generals (more interested in historical glory than practicality) refused to rush south to secure the oil but instead made plans/ attempts to sweep north to Moscow and St. Petersberg. Had Hitler had more practical generals at the time he would have been swimming in oil by 1943 and possibly instigated a rebellion against the Soviets. That would have made the Red Army sue for peace. Thus the entire complexion of the war could have been changed.

    The National Socialist-Bolshevik rivalry was always going to cause friction and lead to some kind of conflict, but was a distant 3rd in the reasons for Operation Barbarossa.

    • Agree: Bro43rd
    • Replies: @profnasty
    , @profnasty
    , @Marcali
  29. @HdC

    It’s sad that we live in a time when we can’t talk about Nazi Germany’s effective economic recovery policies or animal rights protection policies without also having to proclaim again and again that invading Poland, Denmark, Norway, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and the USSR was purely defensive and that Germany had absolutely no other choice.

    Are we allowed to talk about how Hollywood used to make some good movies like The Lord of the Rings trilogy without having to proclaim that invading Afghanistan and Iraq around the same time when these movies came out was purely defensive and that the US had absolutely no other choice?

    Does every article about any positive aspect of the Third Reich have to stress that it was a country of Absolute Good in its every aspect, especially in its foreign policy, led by a leader who did not a single thing wrong, especially in his foreign policy?

    I find this comically silly.

    There are some communists out there today trying to convince everyone that the USSR in Stalin’s time was a country of Absolute Good in its every aspect led by a leader who did not a single thing wrong. Your position, when seen by a neutral observer, appears just as convincing and accurate as theirs.

    Ok, you convinced me, Germany not baaad. I concede.

    • Thanks: Rich
    • Troll: annacat
    • Replies: @HdC
    , @c matt
  30. Sesto says:
    @HdC

    Napoleon failed so why did Hitler think he could succeed? Oh, he was the leader of the “Master [compared to Slavs, who are a mid-level race] Master Race” and so could just steamroll based on that fact alone. What about Lebensraum? Wasn’t that the real reason for the invasion? Over confidence.

    If he really wanted to win, maybe Hitler should have sprung a trap for Stalin and used the Reich itself as bait.

    • Replies: @Wokechoke
    , @Rich
  31. Excellent article. Thank you, Mr. Simon.

  32. Opposing The War Machine Is Cool Again, And The Empire Is Getting Nervous by Ms Caitlin Johnstone!

    https://caitlinjohnstone.com.au/2024/05/08/opposing-the-war-machine-is-cool-again-and-the-empires-getting-nervous/

    American rapper Macklemore has released a single titled “Hind’s Hall”, the name given to Columbia University’s Hamilton Hall by anti-genocide protesters in honor of the six year-old Hind Rajab who was murdered in Gaza by Israeli forces. The artist says all proceeds from the track will go to UNRWA.

    The song with its accompanying video is such a scathing indictment of the United States-backed destruction of Gaza that Google-owned YouTube promptly age-restricted it.

    Macklemore attacks Biden, the brutal police crackdowns on protesters, the conflation of anti-Zionism with anti-semitism, United States politicians and the Israel lobby, with lines that will haunt you for days like “The Nakba never ended, the colonizer lied.”

    • Replies: @Simon D
  33. I barely got started on this wretched essay before having to duck out of it. Maybe a piece by Ilana Mercer a few years back was worse, but then again maybe it wasn’t.

    The Very Nice Nazis had other motives besides Love For Animals when they enacted their anti-cruelty laws:

    Laws passed by the Nazis on April 21, 1933, to regulate butchering were not only a measure for the protection of animals. They also constituted a barely concealed attack on the Jews, whose “ritualistic slaughter” was characterized as “torment of animals.”

    Hitler dearly loved his dog Blondi – even allowed the mutt to sleep in his own bed. But the Great and Loving Führer had no problem testing his cyanide pills on the beloved animal.

    Hitler was a cornflake with near-total power. Other Nazis found it convenient to copy the Great Man’s eating practices. If Hitler had managed to live into his Eighties or Nineties, some form of actual animal worship might have taken hold in Germany to replace all forms of “Christianity”.

    As a result of this public health work, within two years Germany had no more debt or inflation and its currency was solid and stable.

    This is at least as silly as a claim made here that Hitler was a “normal statesman”. Nazi Germany was notorious for not paying for the things it bought!
    You Can’t Do Business with Hitler: What a Nazi Victory Would Mean to Every American Naturally I can’t find my own copy, so I’m reduced to quoting somebody on Amazon:

    This is a very interesting book. I haven’t had a chance to read the entire thing, only having skimmed so far as I am very busy but it is a very concise look into the psychology and economics of the times, and the author also explains to the businessmen why they should be wary of doing business with Hitler as he was a true national socialist, in that he wouldn’t actually pay them or allow them to take their goods out of the country. I guess Hitler was buying a lot of stuff on credit as the entire world was in a depression and people were desparate to trade. He was not paying his bills and likely invaded some creditors.

    It’s really interesting to read intellectual arguments from the past. I found this book in my bookshelf as my great-grandfather had purchased it. The writing is phenomenal and very clear.

    Well, I DID read it, and the dishonesty of the Nazi regime was stunning. They ran an international version of what the fat orange p*ssy grabber does in the US – buying things and then stiffing the sellers/laborers/lawyers with undersized payments or none at all.

    Hitler and his buddies got a running start on WW2 by the means of forced labor and deficit spending. At the outbreak of the war matters were getting dicey – small wonder he wanted war as a way of evading the huge and growing German international debts.

    The Nazi Fiscal Cliff: Unsustainable Financial Practices before World War II
    https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1188&context=ghj

    Such devout worship of Hitler and his criminal enterprise in Germany is shocking. And I’ve already wasted too much of my time on this devotional.

    • Thanks: Anonymous534, Brás Cubas
    • Troll: Corrupt
  34. @Priss Factor

    Nazi hatred of Russians undid them.

    I doubt if “hatred” is quite the right word for the German feelings. Their arrogance and belief of the racial superiority of all their citizens was something to behold. But you’re surely right about the invasion being their undoing – if Hitler had sat on his hands in 1941 he’d have won WW2!

    The Russians were seen by Germans as dangerous subhumans in much the way God’s Favorites see Palestinians as vermin to be exterminated. In both instances these views grease the skids to steal the victim’s land and resources.

    I no longer wonder at today’s stout support by Germany for the shithole state and its Genocidal practices.

    So far as I know, Germany has never seen a Genocide it didn’t like.
    There were the pre-WW1 German mass murders in their Southwest African Colony, their attempt starve the great city of Leningrad (and to eventually slaughter most other Russians when they were no longer needed as slaves), and their current support for the Zionist mass murders in Gaza.

    There may be other instances, but in my view this is a “Three Strikes and You’re Out” situation.

  35. Odyssey says:

    It is very interesting that many people here (and elsewhere) discuss issues related to race and European culture and do not have the most basic knowledge about it. Moreover, they are very irritated when someone draws their attention to it.

    For example, this text talks about the intention of AH to create United Europe of the white race. I think almost no one here knows when and where the white race originated. Recently there was an article here that said that the white race arose from the collision of primitive nomads from the Russian steppes who came to Europe and natives who were at a higher level of culture (e.g., they knew about metals several thousand years before the arrival of the nomads). It is not said who gave whom the ‘whiteness’ (and language), the newcomers to the natives or vice versa.

    Also, few people know about the roots of the oldest European (and world) culture, which is nominally the guiding idea of ​​the aforementioned integration. It is symptomatic that in this example, the descendants of the nomads-immigrants who took over the culture of the natives declare themselves to be the pivots of the white race and culture and have been trying to exterminate the natives of Europe since their first arrival in Europe until now.

    Some are very irritated (especially the panzer bloc, followers of the above mentioned initiator of the United Europe) when the Serbian name is mentioned in this context, since that language has been present in Europe continuously since the Palaeolithic.

    They would probably be even more irritated if they knew that the word ‘race’ itself, which has been adopted by almost all languages, is of Serbian origin and has the same meaning as the word ‘Serb’ (=relative, member of the same race).

    Here, at least these few lines should be a modest contribution to the education of those who will one day begin to think about the roots of their own civilization and culture. Welcome.

  36. Derer says:
    @Redpill Boomer

    Stalin was prepared to invade Germany.

    Nonsense…he believed naively in non aggression agreement with Germany, unprepared.

    • Agree: Odyssey
    • Replies: @Marcali
    , @werpor
  37. Qwerty123 says:
    @Suetonious

    The European Union is a sad story, when compared to the potential of a German mitteleuropa to revitalize the peoples of Europe

    European Union was tool of American Empire to control the Europe. It was was created by CIA

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/04/27/the-european-union-always-was-a-cia-project-as-brexiteers-discov/

    • Agree: Anonymous534
  38. Derer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Nazi hatred of Russians undid them.

    This should be further qualified, it was a hate of Jewish Bolshevism in Russia.

    • Disagree: Anonymous534
  39. eah says:

    This sulfurous amalgam between the National Socialists and today’s animal lovers caused a huge scandal, the echoes of which can still be heard today.

    It’s not just animals — the same, i.e. a ‘huge’ (and dumb) scandal, would probably happen with favorable mention of anything about Hitler or the NSDAP — at least it did with Eva Herman, who years ago was a popular newsreader on German TV — in the context of very low birthrates and the rising age of first-time mothers, she spoke favorably of certain aspects of Third Reich Familienpolitik, which promoted motherhood and a positive image of mothers and families — afterward she was more or less hounded out of public life — she was fired from her TV job — she filed a lawsuit about her dismissal (and lost) — she appeared on a talk show, which quickly turned into a kind of inquisition where it was clearly expected by the host and guests that she would apologize for what she’d said — she refused to back down and was basically thrown out.

    The truth is that few politicians today genuinely act in the interest of the people they ostensibly serve (‘public servant’) — instead they spend their time trying to establish their moral fitness to lead to the satisfaction of the media — one of the ways they do that is by condemning everything about the Nazis.

    • Agree: BrooLidd
  40. j2 says:

    Economic recovery under Hitler from WWI and its consequences in Germany is not so exceptional. There have been many recoveries. Think about West Germany, Japan, Finland (the losers of WWII that did not end behind the Iron Curtain). They all recovered economically, and not by Hitler’s method. Think about the Easter European countries that joined EU after Communism crashed. They have recovered economically, not by Hitler’s methods. Think about China after Mao’s time. again: economic recovery, not by Hitler’s methods. Think even of the Soviet Union after the WWII, it recovered in many areas, put a man on the space. Hitler prepared for a war. The war was a disaster for Germany. People do not benefit from war. They benefit much more from peace.

    Hitler’s basic mistake was the racial doctrine. It is inspired by Darwinism and Darwinism is a false theory. It is not so that species fight for survival and the fittest survive and have the right to rule the world because they are the strongest. If cockroaches would conquer the world and exterminate all other life, it would be a disaster, not right by might, not that the fittest have the right to rule. Because insects do not have what mammals and birds have, self. But we have and all mammals and birds have. But we cannot create self in a robot, because it is not material and not a side-effect of anything material. There is a direction in evolution. It leads somewhere. Darwin was totally wrong and racism is based on a wrong theory.

    In human populations it is not races that compete. It is not even ethic groups (or national states) that compete. Wars have been between states and states, if large, have always been multi-ethnic. Even such a state like the Comancho nation, which once controlled a large area and raided other Indians, was genetically multi-ethnic because due to their warsome style of life, they died too often in wars and had to kidnap children from other tribes and turn them to their people, but genetically they were not the same people. These big states that compete with each others are only extensions of their leaders. Thus, it is big men competing with each others for power. It is not their peoples competing for living space. Hitler fits well to this image. It was not German people who needed living space, they do fine without it. It was Hitler’s ego that needed living space.

    Dogs have races because human breeders keep these races separate. Races do not naturally appear unless there is geographical separation that keeps these populations apart. A similar separation can be made by the culture, as is the case with certain human populations that do not interbreed with other populations. This is artificial and it creates hatred towards other groups. Jews have practiced this method. Hitler wanted Germans to do the same, but it is still artificial and it does not lead to good results. It leads to short term benefits because your group supports you, but it always fails at the end: it leads into a conflict with other groups and you will lose finally. Humans have races, the main races, maybe eight of them. They were caused by geographic separation and as these races usually are geographically separated, it did not lead to racial competition. It members of separate main races are brought together, it is best that they mix. Because races without a natural barrier are unnatural and only cause problems in the end. But it is still better to keep these people where they have historically been and help them develop their societies there.

    • Replies: @c matt
  41. As the late John Tyndall wrote, Jews seek to weaken other races, while strengthening their own.
    This is why they are the driving force behind immigration, homosexuality, abortion, miscenagenation and feminism throughout the Western world.
    Hitler understood the struggle between the Jews and the Goyim, which has defined modern history.
    They have won many battles, but not yet the war.

    • Agree: John Trout
    • Replies: @SomeDude
  42. paulo says:

    Another apologetic article for Adolf Hitler on Unz review.
    Adolf put an end to the class struggle: sure did, by murdering his old and revolutionary-minded SA comrades like Gegor Strasser and Ernst Röhm at the behest of the capitalist oligarchy. Then by decapitating the German trade unions and putting the unemployed to work in arms factories… a bit like what the Europeans are planning to do today…

    Hitler tried to save Europe from the Bolshevik threat by taking the lead in 1941: that such nonsense can still be asserted today shows that one hasn’t read Hitler’s own writings: Hitler invaded Russia for one simple reason: to grab its natural resources and free up the space of Slavic underlings for future Germanic colonists. It didn’t matter whether the regime was communist, capitalist, liberal or tsarist. For Hitler, control over Russia was the only way to build a Germanic space capable of self-sufficiency and strong enough to stand up to the Anglo-Saxon powers.
    12 million Russian civilians murdered, hanged, starved to death and massacred bear witness to Adolf’s determination to “liberate” the Russians from the Bolshevik yoke…

    • Agree: Odyssey
    • Disagree: Servenet
  43. Daniel Rich says: • Website
    @Notsofast

    “chaplin was angry that hitler stole his mustache.”

    side note: Hitler sported that moustache as a remembrance of his days at the The Great War front, where they had to cut their moustache that short so the gasmasks would fit and stay in place, the same way the samurai shaved the top of their heads, to keep helmets in place.

    Adolf saw the hell of wart upfront. How about Charlie [or was the man too busy doing things upskirt :o]?

    • Replies: @One Nobody
  44. Loup-Bouc says:

    Per Mr. Simon:

    …at the very instant that the German people became race-conscious they turned with deadly fury against the Jews.

    I had forgiven Mr.Simon’s clichés because of the affecting Third Reich history he was rendering, when I met his falsehood that I quoted above.

    At the beginning of his anti-Jew propaganda campaign, Joseph Goebbels complained that he felt grave concern for whether Germany’s masses could be turned against Germany’s Jews, of whom, he said, Germans were proud.

    Goebbels, himself, valued most his Jewish high school (gymnasium) teachers, and he was, at one time, engaged to marry a half-Jewish woman.

    Simon’s articles bear some useful information and an appealing emotional tone. But also they suffer from falsehoods, exaggerations,. and absolutisms — like all Jews are evil (my distillation, not a quote) — which hurt Simon’s cause (and, in some respects mine) by gifting Jews a premise of attacking that cause by associating it with falsehoods, exaggerations, and absolutisms like those of Simon’s articles.

    • Replies: @Caroline
  45. woods says:

    “The Jewish race, which has lived by lies all its existence is trapped by its hubris in a false reality which will eventually be its downfall.”

    Funny how well that rhymes with Nietzsche’s evolution of the Jews (Anti-Christ: 24.)

    • Agree: John Trout
  46. @Zachary Smith

    their attempt starve the great city of Leningrad

    To be fair to the Germans and all their allies who blockaded Leningrad, the Soviets were able to ship raw materials into Leningrad and industrial goods out of Leningrad (even locomotives, apparently) by lake. The fleet there had sufficient capacity to ship enough food to avoid starvation. Axis’ bombing campaign against ships seems to have had minimal effect on shipping (something like ~5% of shipping disrupted). The important party members in Leningrad weren’t starving at all, they got plenty of food supplies shipped/airdropped for them (unlike regular citizens who were starving to death by the thousand). It would appear that Stalin wasn’t prioritizing ending starvation in Leningrad, even though it seems to have been technically possible to do so.

    • Thanks: Brás Cubas
    • Replies: @Zachary Smith
  47. @Pierre Simon

    Hitler’s reanimation is fostered by the West in order to incite and destroy the Western remnants of the people against the Eastern remnants of the people of Europe.
    Hence: Do you ignore crucial aspects?
    Yours is only half the story. Half-truths are worse than lies. There is another half of Hitler, which I recommend to anyone phantasizing about “strong leaders”. Once again I would like to recommend to you the publications of General Ludendorff. He detested Hitler and warned in time that Hitler would steer Germany into another war and destroy the German people; and Hitler did.
    Hitler was and is, after all, the greatest Jewish asset. He was a puppet. E.g. Yevkraine’s abuse and embezzlement of Ukrainians by means of a motivational “patriotism” associated with Nazism, in conjunction with Ukrainian memory of liberation by the Wehrmacht. At the same time, Moscow uses Hitler to fuel “Anti-Fascism” to motivate fearful (and mostly poor) people Russians against the Ukrainian people with the image of Hitler’s Germany or, as it is called in today’s Tsargrad, The Dark Teutonic Horse (of evil). (It always takes two to tango…and the Jews in Kiev & Moscow play the tunes).
    Hitler was an uprooted, unmarried, childless, unashamed plagiarist; the fact that he was an artist to boot enabled him to put his stamp on the overall image and cast a spell over many.
    Hitler led us into an avoidable open war with the Poolish scum of Vatica, while he himself was at heels to Vatica. He did that in full knowledge of the British & French guarantees for the Poolish.
    To see Hitler as a recipe for better times is short lived and fatal at the end, as fatal as it has always been when the real sovereign, the citizen, leaves his responsibility to priests & politicians.
    Power corrupts and total power corrupts totally.
    The reanimation of Hitler serves “The West”, the hijacker of the European peoples, the Jew.

    • Replies: @profnasty
  48. shahnameh says:

    Treaty of Rapallo 1922, would and did give the Soviets just enough jump. The fact that Tadeusz Brzezinski was the Polish Amb to Germany and the Soviet Union b4 fleeing to British Genital Islands and Au Canada, should give pause 2 backing anything voiced by Pilsudski’s Khunts:)

  49. Qwerty123 says:
    @Pierre Simon

    After the war, the Master Race made sure that their alleged god given racial superiority would never again be challenged. With the charter of human rights, the UN, the Nuremberg trials, they poisoned the well of racial consciousness with anti-racism, individualism, liberalism, consumerism, democracy, and the particularly powerful Holocaust venom, which they injected in the minds of every White person on the Globe.

    “What Jews fear more than anything else,” writes author F. Britton in his book Behind Communism, “is a rebirth of race consciousness among the great White majority of the Christian world. They remember that at the very instant that the German people became race-conscious they turned with deadly fury against the Jews.”
    “It is precisely for this reason,” concludes Curse, an anonymous commenter on one of the social medias, “that they have stigmatized racism in our minds, they know it’s the best survival strategy. Their position in our societies is a testament to that.”

    Race consciousness is not something an evil idea but very natural and biological expression of individuality, it is found in every society. One can observe it over entire human history in different civilization irrespective of religion, region, culture and geography with its own specific way of manifestation and tone. It is problematic only when Race consciousness turns into Race Pride, which crosses the fence of self confidence and get onto self-obsession and group narcissism, which threatens not only its own well-being and engenders corruption in morals but becomes bereft itself of positive spirit of human productivity.
    The Race Pride also endangers other race groups because of inferiority and meanness that Pride race group associates with other groups, to which naturally, other race groups react in defense of the themselves with different degree of social and political measures.
    I am an Asian and live in Asia and I found Race consciousness everywhere in old poetry, culture and literature, music but do not consider it double standard, bad or threating or even negative. I found this phenomena even in those great personalities who are revered and considered as great moral and religious giants.
    Its modern western knowledge production , with its newer knowledge disciplines specifically social sciences, which completely turned the meaning of Race upside down.

    Q 1.The question then arises why it happened? Why the Race consciousness has been turned into an evil thing?

    Q 2.What causes this 180 degree shift in human perception towards race? What factors drive this shift and who supported this momentous transformation, or west was being turned astray to wrong direction?

    Q 3. 19th century was full of Race consciousness but was it positive or natural expression or crossing into unnatural limits of Race pride?. Read Malthus, Spencer, Darwin, Huxley, Francis Galton (all are British). This British idea of Race travelled to Germany ( Ernst Haeckel, Emil du Bois Reymond to Hitler),ensued hygiene movement ,environmentalism and fascinated many of them among others. From Britain it got across Atlantic towards USA ( Cold Harbor Spring Laboratory, Rockefellers, American Eugenic Society, Margaret Sanger, Population control measures, sterilization all of that.

    Q 4. Emancipation of Jews produced the most hateful narcissist Race pride ideology of Zionism in the very same period of 19th century. Is there any connection between Eugenics or Zionism or not?

    What was it? What exactly was happening in this period of time?
    clarity on above questions and issues are warranted.

    Sharing some references which poses more complexities:

    https://www.historynewsnetwork.org/article/the-horrifying-american-roots-of-nazi-eugenics

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/From_Darwin_to_Hitler

    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
  50. LeZ says: • Website

    The Political Economy of Genocide . . .

    Genocide & Economics – https://les7eb.substack.com/p/genocide-and-economics

    Free to subscribe.

  51. Anynomous says:

    Like always, american and british murdered the good guys, hundreds and hundreds of thousands of them and now evil is manifesting, threatening, controlling, blackmailing, corrupting and interfering with everybodys internal affairs, because american and british are not just imperialists, they are GLOBAL imperialists and always have been. Russian and chinese wouldnt never set up this kind of tyrannical and GLOBAL empire that american and british always do.

    • Agree: John Trout
    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
  52. Nonsense, undoubtedly the true cause of World War II was to confront the nascent Soviet Union and its social consequences and the Jewish origin of some of its leaders had nothing to do with it; It was the West that put together and financed the miracle of Nazi Germany for the defense of white racism and its world hegemony against the new ideas of socialism.
    That is to say, the war was for capital or money. The Holocaust against the Jews was a secondary issue, it must be remembered that at that time the entire Christian West was in a certain way anti-Semitic.

  53. “Nazi hatred of Russians did them in”- No, Nazis didn’t hate Russians- they hated the Bolshevik Jews that had taken over Russia! Hitler was a grassroots anti communist leader-like Franco in Spain and Mussolini in Italy. The Jews hated Hitler and the Germans, doing everything they could to undermine him and them when Hitler toppled the Jewish dominated Wiemar Republic Germany- possibly the most corrupt and degraded European government in history!. The Jews hated them first- , so of course Hitler and the Germans returned the favor. Failure to do so would have been foolish- like an ostrich sticking it’s head in the sand when it senses danger. After Hitler ran the Rothschild’s out of the Central Bank of Germany, World Jewry made Hitler’s defeat their primary purpose in life.

    • Agree: John Trout
  54. @Daniel Rich

    A veteran told me once, never accept any talk of war from a politician who has never seen combat, and for God’s sake, never trust a high rank who has never faced his enemy on the field. He will always try to prove his bravery through the sacrifice of his men.

    • Agree: BrooLidd
    • Replies: @Daniel Rich
  55. America First or Israel First? Ask Trump By Helena Glass

    https://helenaglass.net/2024/05/06/america-first-or-israel-first-ask-trump/

    The Unitary Executive Theory. US Constitution, Article 2. Executive Power shall be vested in the President. Vested with this authority, the President may execute any federal law by himself. As long as no part of the Constitution is breached. Trump would surround himself with a different breed than his first run. But who are they? Are they the punishers? Are the actions of Mike Johnson indicative of what Trump now stands for = pro-Ukraine, pro-Israel, pro-Taiwan? Will these stances push America into the abyss?

  56. Anonymous[661] • Disclaimer says:
    @Priss Factor

    Germany was well aware of the ongoing Jewish Bolshevik rampage in Russia which would eventually claim 66 million Russian lives, likewise the famine engineered and executed by Communist Jews in Ukraine in 1932 which killed 11 million Ukrainians.

    One year later the World Jewish Congress declared war on Germany and called for an economic boycott claiming they would “starve Germany into submission”.

    Given the context of contemporary events, the Germans would very unlikely consider these empty threats.

  57. @Anonymous

    No Putin is not Jewish.

    Is Vladimir Putin Jewish? Karl’s Substack. Everything about Jews and Judaism, Feb 02, 2024.

    See my previous article:

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/

    Thanks for your comment.

  58. @Anynomous

    They are mostly Jewish occupied countries. That’s why they are globalist imperialists. Jews are running the show.

    • Agree: werpor
  59. annamaria says:
    @Anonymous534

    Fascist mega corporations and zionist private banking cartel (the City/FedReserve) have been the worst cannibals of humanity: https://www.moonofalabama.org/2024/05/ukraine-sitrep-eating-the-seed-corn-intervention-threats-and-responses/comments/page/2/#comments

    “Hitler opened the eastern front for the same reason; he knew he couldn’t hold Europe without Russia’s oil to fuel his armies.” — That’s what they tell you in BBC documentaries.

    In reality Nazi Germany was supplied with all the oil they needed via Spain until 1944 by the Rockefeller owned Standard Oil. The collapse of France very conveniently allowed a land corridor to be formed with Spain to move oil from Spain to Germany. Look at a map of Vichy France and you can immediately see that the Germans invaded to open a route for oil and to take control of French industry so all of Germany could be mobilised for Barbarossa. There was no Second Front until 1944 because the extreme right in the USA, France and the UK wanted Germany to destroy the USSR.

  60. National Socialists and anti cruelty to animals was ironic . The modern day climate warriors could buy humanity some ‘extra protein time ‘ by eliminating all pet dogs and cats ( not in service to agriculture )… exterminate all food and resource competitors, disguised as cute , but consumers . After all , social media and modern daft phones can pant , pet , purr and more than adequately substitute for, any thumb sucking theory . Psst how many times was Hitler on the cover of Time CIA MAGAZINE , ….. How many Netanyahu on the COVER , A -FRONT Pages ? Bark. Meow . Pet- ocide ! HITLER had no children , the other has . His , legacy will be someone’s revenge ! How cruelty to ANIMALS disguised as Humans ‘yoke ‘ the chain of history . Meet your ‘shaper ‘ , for it is not , maker time yet .

  61. Simon D says:
    @cousin lucky

    Macklemore also rails against ‘white supremacy’, a phenomenon that is almost entirely a figment of projection by the Chosen People (aka the Master Race). I wonder how many of these kids in campus protests are motivated, primarily or not, by the indoctrination they have been subjected to about whites, with whom they now seem to conflate Zionist jews.

    • Replies: @cousin lucky
  62. Wokechoke says:
    @Sesto

    Not so much master race but this.

    Once you have a technologically sophisticated airforce you can in fact treat peers and near peers like Speachuckers v Gattling Guns.

    Might makes right.

  63. @Qwerty123

    With the advent in the early 20th century of the fraudulent Jewish-led Boasian anthropology, which defined race as a social construct, race realism, Darwinism, and eugenics lost their popularity, except, paradoxically, with the Jews themselves, the very ones who imposed on Whites the values of universalism and race denial for political reasons. In other words, as we shall see further on, Jews are basically using universalism and race denial as a Jewish group evolutionary strategy to dominate the White race and eventually all races, while they themselves remain separate and racially conscious. As evolutionary psychologist Dr. Kevin MacDonald says,

    Jewish ethics is universalist, while at the same time maintaining that Israel must remain separate in order to present a moral beacon to the rest of humanity—a beacon of universalism and ethnic dissolution of non-Jews. One cannot underestimate the importance of the fact that the central pose of post Enlightment Jewish intellectuals is a sense that Judaism represents a moral beacon to the rest of humanity. (1)

    Kevin MACDONALD, Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition: Evolutionary Origins, History, and Prospects for the Future, Kindle Direct Publication Edition, 2019, p. 284.

    • Thanks: Odd Rabbit
    • Replies: @tamberlint
    , @annacat
  64. @Pierre Simon

    Putin is universalist and embraces multiculturalism. Its still illegal to question the holohoax in Russia. He doesn’t have to embrace Hitler but he could stop shitting on White racialists.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  65. Nat X says:

    More Corporal Shicklegrubber dick riding from the cucked incel right.

  66. BrooLidd says:

    Thanks, Mr. Simon. Thanks for not pussy-footing around.

    Throughout my 82 years of life that’s been the only way Fascism, Hitler, the NSDAP, and Germany could be defended:

    By pussy-footing around. Admitting they were ultimate evil, then continuing, with “Yeah, but…” to claw back a little bit, a little sub-atomic bit of justification.

    I can already hear the squawks from some of our esteemed colleagues.

    “It’s not the jews! It’s the zionists!”

    Sickening.

    Crawl back under your rocks!

  67. Z-man says:
    @Curmudgeon

    The source of Jew power isn’t so much the Holohoax but the money they control and with which they can destroy individuals, groups, companies and nations that dare to challenge (((them))).

    • Replies: @Thinking Man
  68. BrooLidd says:
    @Curmudgeon

    You’re not wrong… about yourself.

    But you’re not everybody.

    ‘Guilt’ is probably the wrong word. It’s more complicated than that. Maybe the word ‘horror’ is a more accurate way to describe the effect holocaust propaganda has on most people.

    I remember well seeing the Anne Frank movie in the 50s. I was deeply stirred. I still remember the music. What I felt, empathetically, wasn’t guilt. Of course not. It was simply a generalized fear.

    One thing I did not feel and have never felt was antipathy toward the Germans. In all these years of immersion in the sea of holocaustianity and anti-germanism I never felt that.

    You’re a strong person. You reject, rightly, the whole idea of ‘guilt.’

    Tens of millions of people are not strong. Tens of millions of people are weak. They do feel, if not guilt, then something very like guilt.

    If that were not true the children of even the smallest villages in the U.S. would not continue being carted off to the nearest holocaust temple.

    • Replies: @Dule
    , @Curmudgeon
    , @Miville
  69. SomeDude says:

    …convivial, nature and animal friendly, honest, intellectually superior by a long-shot, and willing to live in peace with the other nations and races.

    con·viv·i·al
    [kənˈvivēəl]
    adjective
    (of an atmosphere or event) friendly, lively, and enjoyable: “a convivial cocktail party”

    Is this cocksucking retarded nazi cunt serious? convivial? honest?

    Anyone even vaguely familiar with 20th century European history knows the nazis achieved power by sheer brutality, propaganda and lies.

    I suppose the fucking brownshirts were ‘convivial’.

    What a ridiculous, dishonest and pathetic pile of bullshit.

    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
  70. Anonymous[250] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous

    This is sad. Berlin nowadays…

    • Thanks: BrooLidd
    • Replies: @tamberlint
  71. @Odyssey

    Hahahaha yes we are all Serbs of course. Typical Chetnik.

  72. profnasty says:
    @R.G. Camara

    A confederacy of Germany/Russia/China, Chigeru, could easily rule over this earth.
    We must never allow this to happen. We, USUK, took the Devil’s Bargain.

    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  73. Anonymous[303] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous534

    As a teenager, I had a coin collection, fueled by my activity as a paperboy. I remember having some “Notgeld – German money printed during the Weimar German Government reign in the 1920s – it was trashy money, printed on Monopoly Money paper in units of millions and billions of Marks. And then I got a 5 Mark coin with Hitler’s portrait on it, dated 1935 – it was silver coin about the size of a US half of a dollar.
    Even as a teenager. I marveled that a country could go from “trashy” money to silver based money in just a few years.
    People can bullshit all they want how evil Hitler was, but they will never tell the truth about how he healed German finances. Damned shame, we copy his “miracle”.

    • Thanks: Caroline
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  74. profnasty says:
    @R.G. Camara

    US needs oil badly, so we buy it.
    Why couldn’t Hitler do the same?
    WWII was about WWI, about a mistake.
    Versailles stole Germany’s land and cities.
    Her Hitler was man enough to take them back.
    And so it goes.
    But where it’s going
    No one knows.

    • Agree: Rich
    • Replies: @R.G. Camara
  75. SomeDude says:
    @OldWhiteMan

    Jews seek to weaken other races, while strengthening their own.

    Jews are not a race. Even by the standards of the jew-haters.

    Modern jews are Khazars, remember? Khazars supposedly converted to judaism.

    You can’t ‘convert’ to a race.

    Oh, and there are Chinese and African jews.

    Jews are basically a tribe, and you can join if you want to.

    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
    , @OldWhiteMan
  76. @Zachary Smith

    This 1941 book is totally shocking. The dastardly hun.

    YOU CAN’T DO BUSINESS WITH HITLER

    You Can’t Do Business With Hitler, a series of radio shows, written and produced by the radio section of the Office of War Information (OWI), was transcribed four times a month. Elwood Hoffman writes the scripts, and Frank Telford directs the production. This series is one of the many thousands of government propaganda plays that were broadcast to help the war effort during World War II. You Can’t Do Business with Hitler, based on the experiences of Douglas Miller, who was for 15 years commercial attaché to the American Embassy in Berlin. Douglas Miller reveals the NAZI technique of plundering and looting conquered lands. This transcribed program written by Elwood Hoffman and directed by Frank Telford was brought to you by the Radio Section of the Office for Emergency Management in Washington.

    https://archive.org/details/OTRR_Certified_YCDBWH

  77. @Pierre Simon

    Race, as we understand it now, is a social construct. So is gender.

  78. @We are all Dumb

    Let me tell you a secret. Nobody outside the American Empire gives a fuck about the Holohoax and Jews. These topics are irrelevant everywhere in the world outside of jew-run West.

    Putin doesn’t have to embrace Hitler but he could stop shitting on White racialists.

    Putin and Russia are in a fight with jew-led self-proclaimed master race of Ukrainian “White racialists” who keep calling Russians “subhuman Orcs” at every opportunity and keep shitting on everything Russian, with full moral, political, military and financial support of the rest of (nominally) White countries. Remember how everyone applauded that Nazi SS guy in the Canadian parliament? 80 years ago, another “White racialist” invaded Russia with his White allies with the same kind of “Russians are sub-humans” rhetoric.
    Do you see how it’s understandable that Putin will not be “embracing Hitler” and “White racialists” any time soon?
    I’m sorry you personally were shat on by Putin. You have my condolences. Now go wash yourself.

    • Replies: @We are all Dumb
    , @SteveK9
  79. A big problem Hitler created for himself is that he never created a body of political theory. Mussolini didn’t produce much beyond a pamphlet that was really written by Giovanni Gentile. Mein Kampf is mostly a rambling series of meditations and no really an outline of a solid political programme.

    So when we’re trying to sort out what Hitler hoped to achieve, we’re mostly left with things like “Table Talk” and the like. And the recollections of various people who, when they related the stories were looking at a firing squad or under the shadow of a scaffold.

    Did Hitler mean to enslave all the Russians and physically kill all Jews everywhere? You can find many different answers to these and other questions about that time. Writers with axis to grind can support Hitler as a misunderstood savior figure or a demon possessed avatar of pure evil and cite quips he made (or was supposed to have made) ^

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  80. @Anonymous

    What do the Russians care what happens to Berlin? Do they miss their bastards.

    • Replies: @OrangeSmoke
  81. “The nation that maintains its racial purity is destined to rule the world.”
    – Hitler

    Does anyone think they can convince China he was wrong? Or Israel for that matter.

  82. Caroline says:
    @Loup-Bouc

    David Irving, who has read the whole Goebbels diaries from the time he was at school to shortly before his death, gave a great speech summarizing how Goebbels gradually turned into an antisemite from his experiences wirh Jews.

    • Thanks: BrooLidd
  83. “Likewise, should Whites regain their racial consciousness, they would quickly turn against their Jewish overlords, and send the minorities they are weaponizing against them back running to where they came from…”

    So long as Christianity remains divided into different sects, the White race won’t be able to overcome its enemies within or without and the list of enemies is growing long and strong every passing day… time is of the essence!

  84. @HdC

    One f the first things AH did was to propose a weapons reduction program for Europe,

    You got that wrong, kid; the Great One insisted the Allies make good on the
    disarmament they themselves committed to in the Treaty of Versailles (!), yet two
    decades after WWI it was only Germany that was disarmed (Little Britain spent
    a higher percentage of GDP on armament in 1936 than Germany did until 1943 (!!!),
    and even “Poland” greatly outnumbered and outgunned the part of the reconstituted
    Wehrmacht that could be spared against them in 1939).
    True is that He went beyond that – even offering the Polacks a 25-year nonaggression
    treaty (“far extending beyond my own lifetime”) if only they would cease and desist
    from their aggression against East Germany
    (the history of the “Washington” Naval Treaties of the same time is instructive also).

  85. The real causes of World Wars 1 and 2 were White dullardism and cowardliness.

    How could Americans have tolerated (the Illuminati/Khazarian puppet) Woodrow Wilson’s breaking of the promise he made to the American electorate in 1916 to keep America out of WW1? Even whilst he made this promise his regime was already preparing to take America into this war.

    What a better world it would be today if America did the right thing in 1917 and stood back and let the European powers fight themselves into total bankruptcy.

    Americans then went on to tolerate the Illuminati/Khazarian puppet Roosevelt breaking his promise to keep America out of WW2. As he made this promise his regime was already making plans to go to war with Japan and enter the war in Europe.

    When Roosevelt demanded that Americans hand their gold over to the Illuminati and Khazarians, they meekly complied.

    By the way, do you know that the “American hero” John F. Kennedy signed a law in 1961 that makes it legal for the Federal Government to confiscate U.S. citizen’s guns? And that at the same time he also signed a law that makes it legal for the Federal Government to give complete control of the U.S. military to the United Nations at any time it chooses.

    When the Federal Government comes looking for your guns they will be coming with full legal authority. When the Federal Government sics foreign soldiers on White Americans they can legally do so as long as these soldiers attack under the auspices of the United Nations.

    American’s have no right to feel rueful about their country being destroyed because it’s a just punishment they brought on themselves. American greed, stupidity and indifference have inflicted more bloodshed and misery on the human race than any other Empire in history.

    America is solely and totally responsible for WW2. America is solely and totally responsible for the dire state of affairs in Mexico, Central America and South America. Muslim countries would also be much better places today if only America hadn’t been interfering and meddling with them over the last century. When Muslims refer to America as the “Great Satan” they are spot on.

    The bottom line is that since about the 1870s America has been taking orders from the Square Mile in London and bringing nothing but misery to the world and (now eventually) itself. The American military has been nothing more than a badly paid mercenary outfit. And still is nothing more than this.

    The American military never fought one war that benefited American citizens. Not ever.

    (Don’t get me wrong here, I’m not gloating, I’m just amazingly annoyed at how White European races could be gifted a continent overflowing with riches and resources and then go on to use it to bring nothing but bloodshed and misery to the world.)

  86. Marcali says:
    @R.G. Camara

    The first reason was this:

    The „defensive” Soviet forces versus the „offensive” German forces on June 22, 1941:

    Divisions: 303 against 135
    Personnel: 5,373,000 against 3,750,000
    Tanks and assault guns: 18,680 against 3,350
    Artillery pieces: 91,400 against 7,000
    Aircrafts: 15,599 against 2,000

    Source: Steven D. Mercatante: Why Germany nearly Won, Praeger, 2012, p64.

  87. Marcali says:
    @Zachary Smith

    But the main reason for the whole affair is this:

    „Whatever measures may be taken against Japan and Germany, they must in any case include the reduction of their industrial output, to prevent them competeing on the world markets against the English, French, Dutch, Belgians, and other exporters, and against us as well.” (FDR, US president, in November, 1944.)

    • Agree: Caroline
  88. Dule says:
    @Cloverleaf

    Then, why did they hate Serbs who were not communists/bolsheviks at that time? Not only that they hated Serbs, they also slaughtered them in thousands whenever they had a murder wish. To make matters worse, attempting to keep their hands clean they gave the permission to their Croatian Ustashe lapddogs to kill any Serb they wished, which resulted in one million dead Serbian men, womed and children. More than 700 thousand of these were killed in one place, the contrentration camp of Jasenovac, and either burried in mass graves or thrown in the Sava river to be carried downstream to Belgrade.

    • Replies: @Ustasha
  89. Marcali says:
    @Derer

    “McMeekin details the belligerent character of the Soviet regime, and especially Stalin’s aggressive policies of 1939-1941, and his ambitious plans for the future – all of which made a clash with the Germany and her European allies inevitable. By June 1941, the Soviet air force was not only the world’s largest, it was greater than the combined air forces of all other countries together. Similarly, the Soviet airborne assault force – which could be used only in offensive operations – was not only larger than Germany’s, it was larger than the combined paratroop forces of the rest of the world. The Soviet Red Army’s tank force was not only the world’s largest, it was larger than the tank forces of the rest of the world combined.

    Hitler’s decision to strike against the Red empire in 1941, the author shows, was made only after the mortal threat to Europe and Germany posed by the immense Soviet military buildup and Stalin’s hostile intentions, were manifestly clear.”

    From IHR review of Sean McMeekin: Stalin’s War, 2021.

    • Thanks: Caroline, HdC
  90. @Anonymous534

    So Putin is another jewish sock puppet like every Russian with White skin tells me. Just as I knew. The whole world system and every elite have been poisoned by jewish finance. What a joke putinboos are enjoy being Islamic.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  91. Servenet says:

    The rats always come out of the woodwork when the truth about Hitler and NS Germany is spoken.

  92. The quote of JFK replaces “manner” with “matter.”

    I hate this stuff.

  93. Agent76 says:

    The history rarely told, and few know.

    March 31, 2024 History: US Business Operations with Nazi Germany

    By 1933 the Nazis were receiving funds not merely through German business, but also from investments arriving across the Atlantic. The New York Herald Tribune reported on 31 July 1941 that the Wall Street firm, Union Banking Corporation, which the American banker Prescott Bush was managing, had in 1933 sent $3 million to the Nazi Party. This is indeed the same Prescott Bush who was the father of George H. W. Bush, and grandfather to George W. Bush, both of whom would later become presidents.

    https://www.globalresearch.ca/history-us-business-operations-with-nazi-germany/5737005

  94. @Anonymous

    What you describe was official currency – “Notgeld” was notes issued by
    some local administrations when inflation got so bad Marks were useless;
    they preempted a few ideas of Modern Monetary Theory, backed by the good name
    of the council, sometimes with expiry date etc.
    None of them survived reintroduction of money that could be hoarded
    (which seems to be a primal impulse) but they kept things (read: the local economy)
    running through the worst of it.

    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
  95. skrik says:
    @Wokechoke

    It blows apart the idea that Israel was founded de facto after ww2

    Yes, but more [from my December 26, 2016 at 11:51 am GMT • 7.5 years ago:]

    According to my research, Zs *never* intended anything other than being outlaws.

    Proof from Herzl, 1897: “Both the process of expropriation and …”

    Even before Jabotinsky, ((they)) ‘wangled’ big-power muscle, proof, 1917: Balfour.

    Then Jabotinsky, 1923: Colonisation by force.

    They always knew what they were doing was wrong, proof from Ben-Gurion after the Arab Revolt of 1936-1939, cited in Benny Morris’s book, ‘1948’: “we are the attackers and the Arabs are those defending themselves. They are living in the country and own the land, …”

    There’s more at my link but IMHO there is no valid ‘excuse’ for the ((alien invaders, their heirs & successors)) to illegally squat on land never to be theirs [let alone mass-murder for it] and ‘no,’ some imaginary deity’s equally imaginary ‘promise’ does not count.

    Sooo; where’s an honest cop when the world oh, so sorely needs one? rgds

  96. annacat says:
    @Pierre Simon

    Thank you for an excellent article and well-needed comments, Mr Simon!

    As you probably know, Dr Kevin MacDonald was permanently banned on Twitter once the “free speech lover”, Elon Musk, became the platform’s owner. This, if anything, shows clearly that censorship is more about who than what is being said, as Dr MacDonald is a gentleman and a person of great knowledge, i.e. so very unlike the many personas that Twitter finds no reason to ban.

    • Agree: Pierre Simon
  97. @Zachary Smith

    Jacob Schiff, Kuhn and Loeb et al financed Japan’s 1905 Russia escapade. Around 1916 Britain owed same said banks 800 million whereas Germany owed 10 times less. Hence Wilson and what followed. To focus on Third Reich financial crimes as if it wasn’t part of previously and much larger ongoing financial crime seems a bit simplistic with the backdrop of a Hegeian Dialectic in play. Hdc #17 comes closest….labor capitalism was serious impediment to the communist vs capitalist global con. Now they all have Central Banks under the BIS. But the conversation always ends up about who is first in line for victimhood. There truly is no business like shoah business.

  98. We’re dealing with the children of the father of lies.
    DaSynagogue of Satan are those children.

    It’s not about ideology anymore. It’s not about politics. Even globalism versus nationalism is only the material form of the real conflict between Christians and virtuous pagans on one side and the satanic servants of the god of this world literally attempting to rebuild the Tower of Babel on the other. It is not an accident that both Putin and the official voice of the CPC have specifically condemned “the Empire of Lies” aka The Empire That Never Ended which Jesus Christ identified more than 2,000 years ago.

    “Why is my language not clear to you? Because you are unable to hear what I say. You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.”
    John 8:44

    Both Putin and Xi know, as far too many Americans, Europeans, and Christians do not, precisely who – and what – is seeking to rule over them and heal the world by establishing a global order that is not even remotely new, but rather, is the modern manifestation of an ancient and wicked evil.

    Think carefully about whom you are serving when you choose a side.

    http://crushlimbraw.blogspot.com/2022/03/the-satanic-world-order-vox-popoli.html

  99. Dule says:
    @BrooLidd

    Several Slavic nations, notably Serbs, Russians and Belarussians, can not feel a holocaust guilt. Not only that they did not commit a single act related to it, but they also suffered terribly under German and Nazi terror. The total number of Slavs murdered during WW2 is in tens of millions, exceeding more than five times the number of Jewish victims. In some areas, particularly in the present day Croatia, Bosnia and Hercegovina, and Belarus, close to 50% of the Slavic population was murdered by Germans and their servants, which matches the official death ratio of the European Jews. Interestingly, these three Slavic nations are now the most hated in the western world, possibly because their very existence denies the Jews their monopole on victimhood.

    • Replies: @HdC
    , @Ustasha
    , @BrooLidd
  100. @We are all Dumb

    Good to see such high IQ takes as “the whole world system and every elite is a jew” and “Putin is another jewish sock puppet” on this webzine.
    We need to also add some high IQ takes from the mainstream media that “Putin is literally Hitler” for balance.
    Astonishingly high levels of analysis and insight.

  101. @SomeDude

    I suggest you read my article on the Khazar myth:

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-ron-unz-doesnt-say-about-the-khazars/

    and also on Jewish racial consciousness:

    https://www.unz.com/article/we-love-you-ayelet-shaked/

    There are indeed Chinese and Ethiopian jews but they are not Semites but converts. Ethiopian jews in Israel are treated as second rate citizens.

    According to Jewish journalist Tina Hesman Saey:

    “Large-scale genetic studies have shown that today’s diverse Jewish communities have remarkable genetic cohesion. The Jews of Iran, Iraq, Yemen, North Africa, European Ashkenazi and other Semitic groups all originated in the Middle East. A common geographic origin can be observed for all major Jewish groups studied. This genetic research clearly disproved the story of the Khazars: a pre-10th century Turkish-Asian empire that converted en masse to Judaism. The researchers compared the DNA signatures of Ashkenazi Jews with those of people of Turkish descent and found no match. The DNA results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of the European, North African, and Middle Eastern Jewish communities originated from a common ancestral Middle Eastern population, and suggest that most Jewish communities remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the diaspora”

    Tina Hesman Saey, “Tracing Jewish Roots: Genome Study Helps Map Diaspora, Highlights How Heritages Blended,” Science News, June 3, 2010.

    Here are some other references you can look into:

    Mark Weber, “Jews: A Religious Community, a People, or a Race?” The Journal of Historical Review, March-April 2000, vol.-19, No 2, p. 63.

    Jim Goad, “The Ultimate JQ: Religion or Race?” Taki’s Magazine, June 17, 2019.

    Oscar Schwartz, “What Does It Mean to Be Genetically Jewish?” The Guardian, June 13, 2019.

    Eric Striker, “New Documentary Sheds Light on Israel’s Strict Prohibitions on Interracial Marriage,” National Justice, December 9, 2020.

    Susan Abulhawa, “Israel’s ‘Nation-State Law’ Parallels the Nazi Nuremberg Laws,” Al Jazeera, July 26, 2018.

    Thanks for your comment.

    • Replies: @Anonymous
    , @SomeDude
  102. @nokangaroos

    Not True, the only trustworthy source on the financing of Hitler’s Germany is this one:

    Henry Ashby Turner, German Big Business and the Rise of Hitler, Oxford University Press, 1985.

    On the financing as such see my article:

    https://www.unz.com/article/was-hitler-controlled-opposition/

    Some large companies did invest in Germany but before the war in the early thirties after Germany became a very successful country. But exterior investors had nothing to do with Hitler’s rise to power.

    • Agree: HdC
    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  103. @Gott ist mit Unz

    Hitler had no intention of ruling the world and neither does Putin or China.

  104. @Gott ist mit Unz

    The Chinese consider their country multi-ethnic. Look at the 5 different languages/scripts on their banknotes. Sorry, u got to find another bogeyman.

  105. Dule says:
    @Odyssey

    Never crossed my mind, but it is so simple and you are right. The early medieval kingdom of Serbia was called Rascia (“Rashka” in Serbian), which obviously comes from “rasa” that is the Serbian word for “race”.

  106. HdC says:
    @Anonymous534

    “…Does every article about any positive aspect of the Third Reich have to stress that it was a country of Absolute Good in its every aspect, especially in its foreign policy, led by a leader who did not a single thing wrong, especially in his foreign policy?

    I find this comically silly…”

    Suppose you list half a dozen instances, with verifiable proof, where NSDAP Germany did wrong.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  107. @Pierre Simon

    I merely corrected a small technical error – the hyperinflation happened long
    before the National Uprising took power 😉
    (On your point I recommend Görlitz, Walter: Geldgeber der Macht (1976);
    a bit anecdotal, but the direct comparison with Lenin, Mao, Stalin, Mussolini and
    Tito is interesting)

  108. @Rick deGreat

    Nothing but misery? Misery is needing surgery for a kidney stone. I had a great place to go with great people to help, along with some fentanyl, the greatest drug ever invented. I think your analysis is pretty spot on, but your conclusion is wanting. Yes, the conundrums of Pandora and Cassandra are still with us, but it’s not all bad. At least not in my little corner, with me trying to make it all a little better by making myself better each day. We become what we think about. Peace

  109. Rishi says:
    @Gott ist mit Unz

    The West died, so China could rise. I’ve been studying China and have many Chinese friends in correspondence-China studied the mistakes of the West- but China also admires the good qualities of the West. You should see their cities- many are made in European style-an ode to Classical European architecture. The CEO of Huawei has actually modeled his Huawei office after some Hungarian cathedrals, and the company’s latest phone’s official ad was shot there. Check it out on YouTube.

    The CCP wants rationality above all. No sentiments, no morality-for morality is anti-nature. Nature is amoral-indifferent. The white man is obsessed with morality, goodwill, and doing charity. All of these require a high trust-one race people-the opposite of multiculturalism. The Chinese think of blacks as low IQ, and a strain on the American system-they state this openly. They respect the Jews, give honest opinion on Palestine issues, and know well that the West is in decline. Everyone does today thanks to social media and the internet. China will rule for a thousand years, as Hitler had envisioned for his Reich. Can the CCP fuck things up? Who knows. But does not seem likely. They have created the perfect state. Humans need order to exist and thrive. Leadership. These qualities are totally lacking in wimpy western leaders.

    You should try the Maglev levitating train in Shanghai airport- its science fiction come alive!

    • Replies: @SteveK9
  110. HdC says:
    @Dule

    We got it we got it! Communists goood, Germans baaad.

    Well boyo, then don’t threaten to invade Germany and western Europe, or side with the communists.

    Very simple really. If however you choose to become Germany’s enemy or aid and abet her enemies, then don’t complain when you get a few lumps in the cross fire.

  111. Ustasha says:
    @Dule

    That claims about Jasenovac were debunked long ago. Stop spreading lies.

    • Replies: @Dule
  112. @HdC

    Even half a thousand instances, with verifiable proof, where NSDAP Germany did wrong, will not change your mind.

    • Replies: @bike-anarkist
  113. Nat X says:

    In the 80s you could buy you a pretty german whore for about $15 dollars, thank you Corporal Shicklegrubber!

    • Replies: @Trinity
  114. Levtraro says:

    Counter Executive Summary of Mr. Simon’s essay

    Fascism is the bolshevism of the conservative camp, a pollution of conservative thinking with leftist collectivist ideas, culture, and parafernalia. And Hitler was a charlatan, a lowly Austrian corporal, a fanatic and a fool. He led Germany into the raping of all German women by Russians and others and turned Germany into what it is today, a nation of vassals. von Hindenburg should have killed the whole leadership of the NSDAP, the mediocre painter, the mediocre poet, the raging homosexual, the fat aviator, the whole lot, instead of appointing one of them as Chancellor in 1933. Germany would be an independent, strong nation today, had von Hindemburg not yielded to pressure by corporate rascals.

  115. Ustasha says:
    @Dule

    Yes, that is why serbian leader Nedic proclaimed in 1941 that serbia is “first judenfrei state in Europe”. Stop spreadig lies.

  116. Sarita says:

    Unlike Germans Americans are egotistical uneducated lazy cowards.
    They let their country for descend into a degenerative society.
    So long as they can indulge into their junk food and wave their little flags it makes them happy.
    I don’t care if they say Germans are racists.

  117. In seven years, from 1933 to 1939, Hitler, the most popular man in the world at the time, put seven million unemployed people back to work, ended class warfare, put work (production) instead of money at the centre of the economy, eliminated usury and finance capitalism, expelled the rogues of stateless finance, closed down the Masonic lodges, put the German Communists out of business and restored order to the utterly depraved society of the Weimar Republic that was briefly surveyed in Sex with Animals in a Weimar Democracy.[8]

    Thank you for this precis of the unprecedented success story of National Socialism/Adolf Hitler. Hoping those who promote Beavis and Butthead/The Simpsons as western high art, sodomy, pornography, feminism, pederasty as western lifestyles, killing women/children en masse to build beachfront properties and their purchased “politicians” are reading this.
    The boneheads who fight for them.
    The telly-watching stupids, debaters of trivia, open fools and rogues.

    You have no idea of the depth of contempt in which most of the world holds you. You are now in a vice of conflict and your “principles” do not allow you to repent and escape. You are being drawn inexorably into it and you will be destroyed completely.
    The disaster that you have been led into by the Jew and his depraved servants daily becomes more apparent. Yet even with in-your-face failings and inevitable ongoing collapse, most westerners refuse to face the truth.

    • Agree: Voltaria Voltaire
  118. @tamberlint

    Yes, why should Russia care about Germany the strongest financial and industrial power in Europe? If not for interference of the British and Americans, it would be in Germany’s best long term interests to develop an alliance with Russia by joining Brics.

    The first Secretary General of NATO, Ismay, said the purpose of NATO was “to keep the Soviet Union out, the Americans in, and the Germans down. The Jew dominated British have spent the last century trying to destroy Germany.

  119. Levtraro says:
    @littlereddot

    littlereddot, please also explain what those four stars around the large star in the Chinese flag mean (also shown in the top-left corner of the front side of the 100 banknote). That is interesting information.

    • Replies: @tamberlint
    , @littlereddot
  120. Kumbaresu says:

    WW2 was basically a war between two racially conscious nations: Israel and Hitler’s Germany, the first one, voraciously ambitious, dishonest, intellectually inferior, and hateful of all non-Jews, and the second, convivial, nature and animal friendly, honest, intellectually superior by a long-shot, and willing to live in peace with the other nations and races.

    I have some bad news for my fellow Gentiles:
    I understand your feelings towards Jews, I get it. And, yet, at the same time you trust the Jewish media and Jewish doctors so much, that most of you happily injected yourself with a Jewish poison known as COVID 19 vaccine. To be fair, many Jews did the same thing, which is even more perplexing. Given this particular example, one might conclude that most Jews and Gentiles have more in common than any of you want to admit. We are stupid, ignorant and cowardly. Although I did not take the vax, I put myself in the same category, for various other valid reasons. BTW, the vax intake was very high in Germany – the land of animal friendly, honest and intellectually superior people. Having said that, I am not trying to torment anybody, but I am asking you people to wake up and smell the roses.

  121. Treg says:

    ‘They turned with deadly fury’ ….. no, not really.

    How about targeted assassinations of high placed key individuals in Germany and around the world? Nope. Even after confiscating the Rothchild bank, they were free to walk around in the City of London and make their plans of revenge.

    How about just picking off Stalin and other Bolseveks with some Spanish sharp shooters? The thought simply did not occur.

    Even today with a mere 300 top globalist, at the cusp of worldwide control thru CBDCS and a global carbon tax (which will surely be more than enough to raise the biggest army the world has ever seen) …the thought of a low cost highly target war with a “deadly fury” seems to be unimaginable to the white gentile race.

    However if the shoe was on the other foot, that is exactly where you could expect attacks.

  122. I had an opportunity to spend time with the Japanese Self-Defense Forces in Okinawa, I had a number of interesting exchanges with a very articulate Japanese officer.

    He said that, without question, the Japanese would have used the atomic bomb against the Americans in WWII if they had it. They would not have hesitated.

    • Agree: tamberlint
    • Replies: @Malla
    , @littlereddot
  123. If you ever watch the notorious “The Eternal Jew,” the last and thus closing argument made against the Jews is the cruelty of kosher butchery. Seriously.

  124. Malla says:
    @Anonymous534

    They were so much “willing to live in peace” that they were preparing for war as their top priority.
    https://personal.lse.ac.uk/ritschl/pdf_files/ritschl_dec2000.pdf

    Yeah right, we are stupid enough to accept some garbage written in some Commie British University. Hitler is the most lied about person, the most demonized person in the West and the Western elites want to keep the up the myth.

    This sounds about as intellectually honest as thousands upon thousands of texts explaining how the American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq

    No connection. Stop being a retard.

    They chose the one that ultimately led to their country being destroyed and permanently occupied. Maybe it was the right choice, who am I to judge?

    Germany was not given any options by the slutty whores of the Globalist elites, the USA, the UK and the USSR. They all ganged up to destroy it.

    • Agree: Joe Levantine
  125. BrooLidd says:
    @Dule

    I appreciate your reply, Dule. But must withhold judgement on its accuracy.

    All my life Germany has been accused of having killed hundreds of thousands, multiple millions of innocent civilians during WW2.

    The movie Open City was filmed in Rome days after the withdrawal of the German army in 1945. In one scene Gestapo agents knock on the door of an apartment, seeking to arrest an Italian man. (I forget why.) A woman answers the door. “He isn’t here,” she says. The Gestapo agents go away.

    What?!

    Not too many years ago the authorities at Auschwitz, with zero fanfare, reduced the Auschwitz death toll from 4 million to a little more than one million.

    Somehow the 6 million figure of Jewish camp deaths remained (and remains) unchanged.

    Magic arithmetic!

    A major U.S. newspaper in a city adjacent to the one in which I live published in 1980 a three page feature story about the silver wedding anniversary of a jewish couple who had met and married at Auschwitz during the war. The husband had been allowed to leave the men’s camp regularly and walk to the women’s camp to visit his bride-to-be. There was never a murmur of disbelief among the readership!

    Golden silence!

    Then came the breakup of Yugoslavia and claims of tens of thousands of deaths as a result of interethnic fighting. Milosevic was posthumously convicted, but then

    In February 2007, the International Court of Justice cleared Serbia under Milošević’s rule of direct responsibility for occurrences of crime committed during the Bosnian War. [Wiki]

    It has since been claimed that the number of deaths resulting from the strife was grossly exaggerated.

    Innumerable articles have appeared on this site and elsewhere about German actions in Ukraine during WW2. They have nearly always depicted ethnic cleansing carried out by local groups, not by the Germans.

    What am I to conclude from all this?

    Here is one conclusion I draw. I drew it long time ago.

    Every ethnic group should inhabit its own geographic space exclusively.

    • Thanks: Curmudgeon
  126. @Anonymous534

    Please post just one or two.

    Don’t kill the dialogue.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  127. Malla says:
    @Zachary Smith

    Their arrogance and belief of the racial superiority of all their citizens was something to behold.

    Nope. Most humans are WAAAY more arrogant and believe in their own racial/ ethnic superiority than the German National Socialists. Any third World society would put Hitler’s Germany to shame in these traits.

    The Russians were seen by Germans as dangerous subhumans in much the way God’s Favorites see Palestinians as vermin to be exterminated.

    False. Propaganda.

    There were the pre-WW1 German mass murders in their Southwest African Colony,

    Debunked. Check out Bruce Gilley on the German Empire.

    current support for the Zionist mass murders in Gaza.

    You have proven that you are a certified retard, whose head should be stuffed in your diseased ass to save humanity. Germany is occupied by ZOG and after WW2, they were subjected to enormous guilt for daring to challenge Jew World order.

    • Thanks: Rich
  128. Malla says:
    @Noviop Co-Prosperity Sphere

    He said that, without question, the Japanese would have used the atomic bomb against the Americans in WWII if they had it. They would not have hesitated.

    Of course, we will believe this er….story…from a Japan hater.

  129. @SomeDude

    Unfortunately, there is always bloodshed in almost every ideological revolution, but the number of casualties in Germany never went above two or three number digits, compared to the millions that were killed by the Jewish Bolsheviks in Russia, it’s insignificant. Things in Germany settled down once Hitler came to power. But not in Russia where the Jewish Bolsheviks killed roughly 30 million people. Jews have shown, now in Gaza and then during the Bolshevik revolution, that when it comes to revenge, torture, assassinations, mass murder, and genocide, they have nothing to envy anyone. One of the greatest murderers in history is the Jew Genrikh Yagoda, deputy chief of the Bolshevik police, the infamous Cheka police. Yagoda was responsible for the deaths of about ten million people. It was he and his Jewish henchmen who set up the gulag system in the USSR.
    Steve PLOCKER, “Stalin’s Jews,” Yediot Aharonot, December 26, 2006.
    Jacques COURTOIS et al, Le livre noir du communisme. Crimes, terreur, répression, Robert Laffont, 1997.

  130. Rich says:
    @Sesto

    Hitler’s reference wasn’t Napoleon, but Germany’s defeat of Russia in WW1 and its ability to eliminate a second front. Hitler had a real fear that the Soviets were going to attack Germany and wanted to preempt them. At least according to a large minority of historians. If not for allowing his 6th Army to be destroyed at Stalingrad, the Germans might have had a chance at fighting the Reds to a standstill.

    • Thanks: littlereddot
  131. @BrooLidd

    I remember well seeing the Anne Frank movie in the 50s.

    Perhaps it is genetic, or more likely my upbringing. I, too, remember seeing the Anne Frank movie in the 50s. The eye rolling and harrumphing from my old man was pretty much non stop. I think he even chuckled once.

  132. They were kicked out of 109 countries / or 109 times, I’m not sure. But I’m sure, but this will the last time.
    We are dealing with master shape-shifters and illusionists. I think the jews are all hard wired to our destruction and enslavement. The most powerful country just changed it’s laws to make it impossible for it’s citizens to challenge it’s enslavers.
    The world has changed in an unexpected way. The net has broken the monopoly of jewish propaganda and this is the first time they are truly exposed globally. Hallelujah. Praise the lord.

    • Replies: @DaveE
  133. Anonymous[140] • Disclaimer says:
    @Pierre Simon

    I suggest you read my article on the Khazar myth:

    https://www.unz.com/article/what-ron-unz-doesnt-say-about-the-khazars/

    …Still there is no reference to scientific confirmation in your article. Is there is solid scientific evidence to back up the Khazar hypothesis. Here’s an Israeli geneticist and bioinformatician, Eran Elhaik, with a Ph.D. in molecular evolution who believes science proves the Khazar theory is correct:

    Eran Elhaik, a geneticist at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health… in a recently published study in Genome Biology Evolution (Elhaik 2012), is calling for a rewrite of commonly held assumptions about Jewish ancestry. Instead of being primarily the descendants of the 12 tribes of Israel, present-day Jewish populations are, finds Elhaik, primarily the children of a Turkish people who lived in what is now Russia, north of Georgia, east of Ukraine. This civilization, the Khazars, converted from tribal religions to Judaism between the 7th and 9th centuries.

    The controversy cut into by Elhaik’s work runs deep, far past the lab bench. Among some circles, his conclusions are bound to be unpopular. “This is the first scientific paper to prove the Khazarian Hypothesis and reject the Rhineland Hypothesis,” he says, “and with it about 40 years of research.” Although his findings will not be welcome in all circles, Elhaik’s interest is more medical than political.

    “All I want is to help my colleagues who are studying genetic disorders,” he says. “I hope this work will open up a new era in genetic studies where population stratification will be used more correctly.”

    Jewish populations are used in many disease studies because of their presumed genetic homogeny. Some conditions, such as Tay–Sachs disease, are more common among select Jewish populations than other populations. However, Elhaik says, the acceptance of a flawed origin narrative is hampering the best science…

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3595031/

    • Replies: @Abhuman
    , @Pierre Simon
  134. @Z-man

    The source of Jew power is the money they control and with which they can destroy individuals, groups, companies and nations, but the Holohoax serves to victimize themselves.The money they control is the whip and the Holohoax is their cry of pain while they flog you.

  135. Miville says:
    @BrooLidd

    How can for instance a country like Holland feel guilt when being entertained about Anne Frank as the ancestors of most people there, no matter they were Jewish or not, suffered about the same thing at the hands of the occupiers (she died of malnutrition and typhus like most of her co-citizens, in an internment facility of exactly the same kind former Dutch soldiers were kept as war prisoners) as Anne Frank? My feeling is that the guilt of being white was sold much later to white audiences and rather consisted in reversing against themselves the moderate marxist discourse they had conquered with some advantages in the west. The guilt-feeling rather took colonialism and former European white imperialism as practiced by the liberal West as a pretext.

  136. scorpion says: • Website

    I would like to thank the author for this excellent, important essay. The level of deception layered throughout western society is a true tragedy, ever-unfolding. It is a profound mistake to blame it all on the Jews, however unless and until the West can find the wherewithal to reject their machinations only bad things will happen and further degradation unfold.

  137. @Priss Factor

    Hatred always outdoes people and brings about their downfall eventually. But they can take out a lot of people on the way down. But if it truly was all about race, why were so many supposedly “genetically superior” intellectuals who were non Jewish also exterminated? Resistance. Those who are wired wrong, wired to destroy, will use any excuse to kill, be it race, religion, ideology or WHATEVER. They will also find or invent excuses to kill or destroy those offering resistance to their destruction. There were Jews behind the killing of Jews AND Slavs, etc. during that Holocaust. They were hiding behind the religion. The biggest saddest secret. There are Jews now hiding behind “religion” who don’t give a damn about the hostages. Why do you think they shut down Al-Jazeera in Tel Aviv? They were exposing the documented facts of Hamas accepting the release deal. Someone who is wired to destroy is not defined by their religion, race, political ideology, economic standing, genetics, intelligence, gender or even age. Look at history. Humans need to learn some things about humans. The majority, who favor peace, and well being for all, need to stop giving destroyers reign. They need to hold the International Law breakers to account for their crimes. Until that happens, it won’t change and we will always have war and want.

    • Thanks: Zumbuddi
  138. Abhuman says:
    @Anonymous

    But why should we care? Judaism allows for conversion, when the rabbis approve. Maybe the rabbis did approve of a mass conversion, but they would only have done so if the prospective converts were already phenotypically Jewish. From a Gentile perspective, it makes no difference.

    Supposing that the Khazar theory is true, will telling Jews that they’re “really Khazars” make a difference to them? No. Of course not. OTO, knowing them, it might give them some really bad ideas, like the idea that they have some kind of historic right to large area of land in the area of the Caucasus. So I advise that we simply stop bringing this idea up. Only anthropologists and geneticists have any reason to take an interest.

  139. I never felt any guilt myself about the Holocaust. I have read many books about the events of WW II as a child at the end of the 50’s and early 60’s including Anne Frank and Exodus and I empathized with the Jews then. A lot of people have suffered from that war and Jews are a part of them.

    I now feel as much empathy for the fate of the ordinary Ukrainians who are rounded up by the TCC and sent to the frontlibe against their will. And I feel that the fate of the Gazaans reaches a step further in horror surpassing by a large matgin what the Zionists themselves claim their parents suffered during WW II. Those are my own perceptions. I was not there to see by myself. However no one can miss what is happening now in Gaza; this is not a Holywood movie.

    The Holocaust card is basically a political tool to control the politicians, the businesnen and the institutions everywhere including universities. It does not mean the people themselves feel any guilt when they are told the story.

  140. @Kumbaresu

    Kumbaresu, okay! I’m AWAKE!!!!! Good morning. But we can change. Humans have been stupid on many ocaissions for many reasons. But we don’t have to stay that way. But we do need to wake up others. United and awake, we will all be better off. Screw this racial shite.

  141. @bike-anarkist

    All has been discussed a million times before on this webzine. Check out WWII section and read the comments too. If you’re actually interested.

  142. @Anonymous534

    You obviously do not know the diplomatic histories of the inter-war period. If you did, you would have not come up with such nonsensical statements.

    Germany re-armed because it couldn’t get the other signatories to the Versailles Treaty to abide by their own commitments to maintain a median level of re-armament, all of which was specifically constructed in the treaty.

    In addition, when people talk of Germany’s rearmament they always discuss the small arms and aircraft procurement for the German Armed Forces.

    However, the big technology of the day was sea-power and this was where all the other nations were sinking their military funding. Germany on the other hand was still abiding by the Tirpitz Doctrine of WWI (even if this was unintentional), whereby the Kriegsmarine was designed to maintain the safety of German sea-based commerce. The result was that the Kriegsmarine was rather small in comparison to the other navies.

    And finally, Adolf Hitler had no beef with Britain and had no interest in going to war with her. He saw the British people as kin folk that should share in the fruits of powerful commerce. In turn, France had no real interest in going to war against Germany for a second time as documentation of Frances Foreign Minister at the time demonstrate.

    Unfortunately, it would be England that would turn France’s Prime Minister into a partner against Germany, a partner that Britain would throw under the bus at Dunkirk…

  143. @Anonymous

    Very controversial view from one scientist doesn’t mean it’s true, many scientists have debunked his work, so let’s wait and see what happens in the future.

    https://forward.com/israel/175912/jews-a-race-genetic-theory-comes-under-fierce-atta/

    It’s one of the consequences of the ongoing conflict between Israel and its neighbors that the origins of the “Jewish people” periodically surfaces as an issue of great controversy. It’s particularly troublesome when a scientist—in this case, an Israeli molecular geneticist whose motivations appear more personal and ideological than scientific—stokes the contretemps.

    https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/05/13/jewish-researcher-attacks-dna-evidence-linking-jews-to-israel/

  144. Derer says:

    Kennedy never saw Hitler as an evil man, let alone as a man responsible for WW2… In 1946, in his book, Profiles in courage, John praised Senator Robert Taft, for having at tremendous personal cost, denounced in 1946, the hanging of eleven Nazi officials as motivated by the ‘spirit of vengeance’ and as ‘a blot on the American record that we shall long regret.’

    Any positive views, even lukewarm, of Hitler were suppressed by Jewish hate and deceiving victimhood. Hitler made Germany world superpower from the ashes of WWI destruction within 7 short years.

  145. @littlereddot

    So what is the ethnic composition of the CCP? Both the party leadership and the rank and file are pretty much 100% Han Chinese aren’t they? And who is that guy on their banknote? Isn’t that Mao? Since when did communism give up its aspirations to being international in scope?

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m in favor of people wanting to maintain their ethnic purity. The “bogey man” is multiculturalism as far as I’m concerned. That is the main thing giving China the edge over the west now, like the other poster said in reply to my post. That and not spending trillions on forever wars.

    • Replies: @littlereddot
  146. @Pierre Simon

    Before you can claim that Putin isn’t Jewish, you have to define precisely what the meaning of “Jewish” is.

    • Replies: @Pierre Simon
  147. @Simon D

    All human beings go through a childhood. Some children live in very strict households and at the other end of the spectrum some children are despised and never taught anything except to stay out of the way.

    Like it or not humans are molded while they are still children. They may encounter all kinds of terrible things as adults because life is not a bowl of cherries.

    Any realist that looks at United States society today can only get depressed because this country and our society is falling apart.

    Schoolteachers and police officers should be paid millions every year because our society is extremely sick and dysfunctional.

    We do not have a society anymore; we have an open air asylum where nutcases are everywhere.

    It is only going to get worse for all of us, except the super-wealthy!

    • Agree: werpor
  148. “It members of separate main races are brought together, it is best that they mix. ”
    ———————————————————-

    That does not apply to blacks and whites because blacks are so mentally inferior. Dumbing down the white race it a terrible idea.

  149. SteveK9 says:
    @Anonymous534

    I think you are mistaken, if you believe Jewish power doesn’t exist in Russia. Just read a story on John Helmer’s website, where he discusses Israel’s assistance to Ukraine in electronic warfare aimed at Russian drones. Will Putin do anything … no.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  150. “I wonder how many of these kids in campus protests are motivated, primarily or not, by the indoctrination they have been subjected to about whites, with whom they now seem to conflate Zionist jews.”
    —————————————————-

    Yup. Jooz don’t think of themselves as white, but whites do.

  151. SteveK9 says:
    @Rishi

    So, you believe the Chinese are purely rational with no nationalistic instincts, morality, or customs that bind them into a people? And you say you know some Chinese? I find that incredible.

    • Agree: TKK
  152. Dule says:
    @Ustasha

    “Croats are the bravest people in the world. Not because they are not afraid of anyone, but because they are not ashamed of anything!” (Jovan Dučić, poet and diplomat)

  153. @Kumbaresu

    As many people understand, the problem is not with all Jews, hwr, we are in an existential battle with organized transnational Jewry. The problem is that the average Jew has been conditioned, much like the boomer generation, to believe the Holohoax™ narrative and reflexively support Israel/Jews when they are criticized or inconvenient truths are revealed. It is no accident that the decay of the West is structurally/economically/culturally similar in most of the major European countries and the U.S. Until the majority of Jews rebel against the “neo-Bolshevik” Jewry blaming “Jews” is appropriate.

  154. @Levtraro

    Those are the four traditional castes of Chinese society.

    • Replies: @Levtraro
    , @Levtraro
  155. Had Germany won the war, we wouldn’t be surrounded by mass migration replacement, Zionist monopolies or magic negroism. Instead we would be living in a world filled with the greatest inventions the world have ever known.

    • Agree: Bookish1
    • Replies: @Bookish1
    , @littlereddot
  156. Che Guava says:
    @Anonymous534

    All rubbish. I can’t find any proof on an Internet search, but am quite sure that I read, in print, that Otto von Bismarck had said or written ‘guns [or more likely iron in the original?] before butter’. I may be incorrect on that, but recall having read it, the quote may well have been wrong.

    Trying to find a reference to that, the first recorded use that I find on the English-language Internet is by a member of Wilson’s cabinet in the U.S.A.

    Neither of the alleged German National-Socialist originators (Goering and Goebbels), who used the two words in a single sentence only once each, ever expressed ‘guns not butter’ or ‘guns before butter’ in that precise sense.

    This is a little like the constant big lie about the theory of the ‘big lie’ having been formulated by Hitler or Goebbels, often repeated by people who should be well-read enough to know that both Hitler and Goebbels used it only in reference to something they despised.

    It was used by their enemies, they never recommended it as a tactic to use.

    Those who claim otherwise, if well-read, simply show themselves to be proponents of a ‘big lie’.

    Goebbels makes a point in his writing on progaganda that expressing the truth is always most effective and should always be the goal. Never once did he promote use of the ‘big lie’ tactic.

    Bernays, on the other hand, a second-rate rival of Goebbels as great propaganda theorist of early last century, is a keen proponent of using big lies.

    • Thanks: Zumbuddi, Thomasina
    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  157. TKK says:

    No one makes any White politician take Jewish money.

    The problem lies with the people you elect to office- not the Jews.

    There will always be temptations. The Jew places them at your feet. He tells seductive stories that make the soft minded of you believe the Jew is “chosen” and that some Supreme Being has them in his favor. It is absurd.

    Walk away from these temptations, and your country would still be flourishing.

    • Agree: Thor Walhovd
  158. c matt says:
    @Curmudgeon

    Of course it’s fake, that’s beside the point – they use it to push legislation and will destroy anyone who effectively counters it. They don’t care about some internet yahoo yelling into the cybervoid. But start getting traction on TikTok, and look what happens – next thing you know the ZOG government is forcing you to sell out to the enemy or be banned.

    You don’t personally have to feel guilty – just shut up and fall in line.

  159. c matt says:
    @Anonymous534

    “The Führer was indeed a vegetarian, eating neither meat nor fish, but mostly fresh products. He also forbade himself cigarettes and alcohol.”

    See, the article did say something bad about Hitler.

  160. @SteveK9

    Yes, it’s the mighty jewish power that prevents Putin from acting against Israel when they supply Ukraine some EW tech.
    However, the same mighty jewish does not prevent Putin from being allies with Iran and Syria against Israel, including helping them militarily.
    How does this mighty magic jew power in Russia work exactly?

    • Replies: @Anon
  161. My father’s cousin was drafted into the German army, made it into Russia and back, and spent the rest of the war as a prisoner of war in France.

  162. DaveE says:
    @Rev. Spooner

    ……and this is the first time they are truly exposed globally.

    And remember, we still have the genius of The Founding Fathers and The Second Amendment to scare the crap out of (((them))).

    It’s working.

    Praise the Lord.

    • Replies: @SomeDude
  163. SomeDude says:
    @Pierre Simon

    There doesn’t seem to be consensus on the Khazar issue, but it doesn’t matter because that entire argument misses the point.

    The only question that matters is this:

    Can a non-jew convert to judaism?

    Or, put another way, is Ivanka Trump jewish?

    If you can convert, it’s not a race.

    I cannot ‘convert’ to being Chinese.

  164. @Obergefreiter

    The Jewish race has a typical DNA profile that can easily be identified by genetic tests. That’s how rabbis in Israel can prove that someone with doubtful origins is Jewish before they allow the person top marry a real Jew. According to Jewish journalist Tina Hesman Saey:

    Large-scale genetic studies have shown that today’s diverse Jewish communities have remarkable genetic cohesion. The Jews of Iran, Iraq, Yemen, North Africa, European Ashkenazi and other Semitic groups all originated in the Middle East. A common geographic origin can be observed for all major Jewish groups studied. […] The DNA results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of the European, North African, and Middle Eastern Jewish communities originated from a common ancestral Middle Eastern population, and suggest that most Jewish communities remained relatively isolated from neighbouring non-Jewish communities during and after the diaspora

    Here are some references you can look into:

    Mark Weber, “Jews: A Religious Community, a People, or a Race?” The Journal of Historical Review, March-April 2000, vol.-19, No 2, p. 63.

    Jim Goad, “The Ultimate JQ: Religion or Race?” Taki’s Magazine, June 17, 2019.

    Oscar Schwartz, “What Does It Mean to Be Genetically Jewish?” The Guardian, June 13, 2019.

    Eric Striker, “New Documentary Sheds Light on Israel’s Strict Prohibitions on Interracial Marriage,” National Justice, December 9, 2020.

    Susan Abulhawa, “Israel’s ‘Nation-State Law’ Parallels the Nazi Nuremberg Laws,” Al Jazeera, July 26, 2018.

    Thanks for your comment.

    • Thanks: TKK
  165. Bookish1 says:
    @CelestiaQuesta

    Germany would have had colonies on Mars by now.
    But the problem is the leftists and liberals would claim if the communists would have won we would be living in a paradise where all men are equal and everyone would be getting along in brotherly love. And people wouldn’t know how much bullshit all that talk would be. Hitler had lose for us to know how right he was.

    • Replies: @Notsofast
  166. The whites Hitler was so eager to serve, and to which this author refers, clearly do not include the Slavic peoples of Eastern Europe and Russia. Over 25 million dead Russians would agree, and will be remembered as Martyrs tomorrow on May 9th, Victory Day.

    And just like the Russians held back the Nazis in WWII, they are wiping the table with them again right now in occupied Ukraine.

    • Agree: Anonymous534, Notsofast
    • Replies: @Alexandros
    , @Lurker
  167. Notsofast says:
    @Wokechoke

    you germans have no sense of humor, it’s a good thing i didn’t post my original comment that the first image, proved that hitler, physically intimidated his german shepherds, (perhaps he thought they were german sephardics), why that poor dog may have been jojo in another life, explaining his rabid hatred of the “aryan race”.

    do i need to place a sarc/ on this?

  168. Levtraro says:
    @tamberlint

    Those are the four traditional castes of Chinese society.

    Namely, the proletariat, peasants, petite bourgeoisie, and bourgeoisie, same as in the Western world. And the large star is the CCP. I find it interesting that they include the bourgeoisie and the petite bourgeoisie.

    • Disagree: tamberlint
    • Replies: @littlereddot
  169. c matt says:
    @j2

    Hitler’s basic mistake was the racial doctrine.

    You completely misunderstand his “doctrine.”

    His “doctrine” was that races exist, are real, and exhibit real differences. This is irrefutable fact – otherwise, Somalia would look no different than Switzerland.

    His doctrine was to keep Switzerland Swiss, Somalia Somali, etc. regardless of whether you consider Switzerland or Somalia superior (although I notice migration goes overwhelmingly one way).

    • Agree: Thomasina, Lurker
    • Replies: @j2
    , @Dule
  170. SomeDude says:
    @DaveE

    And remember, we still have the genius of The Founding Fathers and The Second Amendment to scare the crap out of (((them))).

    Guns cost money.

    Jews have money.

    Therefore, Jews have guns.

    Every jew I know, and admittedly it’s only secular jews, is armed to the teeth.

    Praise the Lord.

    Your ‘lord’ was a jew. A con-artist lying fraud of a jew, but a jew nonetheless.

  171. Notsofast says:
    @Bookish1

    would the mars colonies, be before or after the moon crashed into the earth? and why the fuck do we have to “colonize” mars? i asked 3lon that just the other day and he said “south africa and stuff”.

    i say give elon, his brainslug kippah and all zionists mars, provided they get there at their own expense. hell, i’ll throw in saturn as a deal sweetener as well.

  172. On a larger scale, this war is much like the story of Antonio Salieri vs Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

    I’m a big fan of the Movie Amadeus directed by Milos Forman and I had never thought of it as an analogy for WWII — very perceptive, thanks! What is funny is that I asked ChatGPT to make this analogy and it put Germany in Salieri’s place and the Allies as Mozart — which is the exact opposite of what you intended, of course. Then I tried to force the chatbot to make Hitler out as Mozart and Salieri as the Jews, and it just warned me of “hatred fueled by false narratives and misunderstandings, deeply misrepresenting the real historical roles and contributions of the Jewish people.”

    I should have expected that reply since the Jews also dominate AI. As you say in your article, the Jews have operated the largest “propaganda operation in the history of the world”. I agree. Now, add AI to the mix. Taking a cue from a William Engdahl book, what the Jews have achieved could be called “Full Spectrum Propaganda Dominance”. There are very few exceptions, relegated to the outer fringes of the internet (like TUR). This would be a whole other topic to discuss.

    But getting back to the movie Amadeus, what is also interesting to me is the high probability that both Mozart and Hitler were Aspies (Asperger Syndrome or “Autism Spectrum Disorder”). I’ve argued in favor of Michael Fitzgerald’s Hitler-as-Aspie theory in a recent comment on your previous articles (and I know you don’t agree with this theory, since you supported another commenter with a counterargument). In one of my comments, I point out how people on the spectrum feel very close to animals, quoting Asperger’s expert Tony Attwood: “[Aspies] are sometimes more able to perceive and have compassion for the perspective of animals than humans”. In your article, you write that “Hitler’s notorious love of animals was ridiculed”. That’s doubly Aspie: loving animals and being ridiculed or bullied. Fits perfectly with Fitzpatrick’s theory.

    In another comment, I also mentioned the movie Amadeus. Although I wasn’t making the same analogy as you do, maybe unconsciously I felt that there was a link between Mozart and Hitler due to their common neurological condition. Here is what the NIH published on their site, which might be described as the Mozart-as-Aspie theory:

    “Did Mozart suffer from Asperger syndrome?” by Michele Raja
    The most reliable biographies of Mozart highlight elements that are compatible with current diagnostic criteria for Asperger syndrome including qualitative impairment in social interaction and stereotyped and repetitive motor mannerisms. …difficulty in communicating his emotional state and in inferring the mental state of his interlocutors, motor clumsiness, specific skills and genius, left-handedness, special sense of humour, physical developmental abnormalities, bizarre thinking, overvalued ideas and delusions.

    So maybe both Mozart and Hitler were misunderstood Aspie geniuses.

  173. anon[152] • Disclaimer says:

    Hmm, I see a pattern here. Lincoln printed money, he was killed. Hitler printed money, he was killed. Kennedy printed money, he was killed. I guess sovereignty isn’t tolerated. Imagine a world without usury. We can dream can’t we?

  174. @Che Guava

    When up to 80% of annual government expenditures are on the military during peace time, you don’t even need to say anything about guns and butter, all is evident as is.

  175. Daniel Rich says: • Website
    @One Nobody

    “He will always try to prove his bravery through the sacrifice of his men.”

    Z’s taking in more $$$ playing a poor sob on the world’s stage pretending to care about a country that needs more of whatever, while Ukrainian men are dying by the hundreds every day.

    Still his bravery of playing the piano with his d*ck, is unmatched.

    Now, where’s that brick…?!

  176. @SomeDude

    That’s not what the Babylonian Talmud says.

  177. Interesting but improbable, the only thing they have in common is their genius. Hitler did not all behave like Mozart, he was a well-rounded person, poised and thoughtful, nothing exuberant like Mozart. The comparaison I made is between the two races, not Hitler as such. Thanks for the comment, I like out of the box theories.

    • Thanks: Fin of a cobra
  178. Sarah says:

    Nationalism and race consciousness are particularly targeted because they know from their own experience that the unity, strength, and cohesion of a nation are rooted in its racial and ethnic homogeneity.

    They are well aware that racial and cultural diversity in the same country is not a strength, but a Trojan horse used to divide, fragment, and weaken those who succumb to its charms.

    They know, finally, that the ethno-state is the only model of society capable of ensuring the security and happiness of men.

    What you’re describing is the current dramatic situation of nations of European origin, which have been the main target for at least a century. But now non-European nations are also increasingly under threat.

  179. Pythas says:
    @Priss Factor

    It was but the Germans where trying to get all the bolshevik jews and punish them for their evil and wicked deeds and actions.

  180. Pythas says:
    @Cloverleaf

    The Germans didn’t fear these low-lifes anymore then I fear them. The Germans hated their filthy disgusting guts and wanted to deal with them appropriately and ruthlessly like these criminal scumbags did in Russia and Ukraine to the people there in the 1920’s and 1930’s. Like I’ve said I’m originally from New York and I’ve been around alot of these jews and if I wanted to I could have clobbered these scumbags with no problem.

  181. @Anonymous534

    “thousands upon thousands of texts explaining how the American invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq were totally a fight against the terrorists who hated the Americans for their freedom”
    Bush as you know, had a screw loose, and frankly I think, so do you!
    If you believed al those texts, either in the US or British Press, you would have been completely hoodwinked, sorry… like the media now tells us that everyone in the world was being lied to within those texts, sorry, most were not paying attention.
    Consider 80-90% of everything you read as Zio American propaganda here in good ol’ USA; or else possibly connected to the NATO/UN con, a.k.a. known as World Psychobabble. Sites like this are so more more honest.
    But keep your fingers crossed. The Weltanschauung will eventually flip, and then the “they” will no longer be so translucent.

  182. @Zachary Smith

    There’s nothing significant or noteworthy about German actions toward it’s colonies, toward Leningrad in WW2, or it’s attitude toward Russians in WW2. The US, Great Britain, France, Portugal, Spain, Belgium, Holland and every other nation that has had colonies, have done extreme things and have had similar ideas of racial superiority to the people they’ve come up against. This doesn’t justify it but please don’t repeat the same old tired lines about Germany when everyone has engaged in the same actions.

    The US killed over a million innocent people in Iraq 20 odd years ago, Britain starved untold millions of Indians when they diverted wheat shipments in WW2 and then the atrocities by the Belgians at the turn of the 19th century shocked the world even then.

    • Replies: @Olivier1973
  183. c matt says:
    @Rick deGreat

    When the Federal Government comes looking for your guns they will be coming with full legal authority.

    Well, yes and no. Technically, it would still violate the constitution (may it R.I.P.) even if passed by Congress and signed by the pres., but not that such trivialities matter any more. Would still take years for the SCOTUS to get around to striking it, assuming they would, and even then the other branches could just ignore it anyway.

    Long way of saying 2nd Amd doesn’t matter.

  184. @Thor Walhovd

    Martyrs for what? Communism?

    Slavs were ruled by Jews, doing their bidding. Bleeding in the millions for Jewish masters. Sacrificing themselves on machine gun nests to preserve their slavery.

    If Russia was a white nation, it would have allied with Hitler (which he offered them). Instead they chose to serve Jews, like the Brits and the Americans.

    When you serve Jews you do not have the right to call yourself white. At best you’re just a good goy. Traitors get the bullet first, that is right.

    • Agree: Lurker
    • Replies: @Odyssey
  185. Dr. Rock says:

    Great article, by the way!

    We sure do need our Hitler now!

    • Agree: Lurker
  186. PrgB says:

    Judging by what appears on this site, all my years of education, except learning to read,write and do basic math, was based on politics of some sort.. And that includes Sunday school.
    Thank you!

  187. @Pierre Simon

    I did not know that a nazi could have a free column on Ron website.

    What a disgrace!

    There is not such things as a jewish gene or set of genes. Complete ideological crap and lies.

    • Replies: @anarchyst
  188. @Joe Paluka

    There’s nothing significant or noteworthy about German actions toward it’s colonies, toward Leningrad in WW2, or it’s attitude toward Russians in WW2.

    Sure for nazis, there is nothing significant killing more than 13 millions civilians of Soviet Union.

  189. Odyssey says:
    @Alexandros

    Is Greko-schizo-panzer trying to outdo HdC in moronism or is he just saying things that even a dog with butter wouldn’t swallow, that is the question?

    • Agree: Anonymous534
  190. @Anonymous534

    To be fair to the Germans and all their allies who blockaded Leningrad, the Soviets were able to ship raw materials into Leningrad and industrial goods out of Leningrad (even locomotives, apparently) by lake. The fleet there had sufficient capacity to ship enough food to avoid starvation. Axis’ bombing campaign against ships seems to have had minimal effect on shipping (something like ~5% of shipping disrupted).

    Wow! That Leningrad was an important manufacturing center during the German seige is something none of my WW2 history books bothered to mention. Could you kindly provide some references/sources for the statements you’ve made? I have a small library, access to Archive.org & Google Books, and if necessary can purchase some individual texts.

    It’s the “practicalities” about this which bother me. Making things in the modern world requires a constant source of starting materials, and more importantly than that, a reliable source of electricity.

    The situation in late January and early February, when perhaps as many as 10,000 died on individual days, was surely exceedingly grim; however, once defense plants had to shut down due to lack of electrical power by mid-December 1941, state and party officials gave top priority to assisting the civilian population with what few resources remained, and the militsiia and NKVD maintained a firm grip on all city districts, although bread shops were occasionally looted.

    Lifting the Blockade on the Blockade
    New Research on the Seige of Leningrad
    DOI: 10.1353/kri.0.0089

    The above article also speaks of Soviet propaganda films which showed “scenes portraying enthusiastic workers, successful production, and tanks rolling straight from the factory.14” The Soviet Union could tell Official Lies as well as anybody else!

    Such incoming blockade-breaking efforts as the Soviets could manage HAD to have as priority #1 weapons for the soldiers manning the defenses of Leningrad, and also food for those soldiers.

    Please don’t forget to provide the sources for the claims you made in your post.

    • Replies: @Anonymous534
  191. Anon[786] • Disclaimer says:
    @Anonymous534

    There is no magic jew power, and no magic power of any other tribe. But Putin is not an ally of Syria. Israel has been attacking Syria regularly for a dozen years. Russia does nothing to protect Syria against these attacks. Does Putin believe in some magic? I don’t know. But it is odd to let a bully hound a person under your protection. Whose side is Putin on?

    • Agree: Sarita
    • Replies: @OrangeSmoke
  192. Odyssey says:

    It is obvious that a number of readers here have major psychological problems. On the one hand, we have a great animal lover and protector who at the same time starves a million people in Leningrad. We have a great promoter of the white race and a fighter against Zionism who kills millions of whites in that name and in one day flattens Stalingrad with bombs and kills 70K whites.

    Was it a fight against Zionism? What did he even do in the fight against the Zionists? How to justify and explain all that? Ah, yes, the pre-emptive aggression against the Soviet Union that claimed 27 million Russian and 8 million German white lives that has nothing to do with lebensraum, which in fact does not exist.

    • Agree: Anonymous534
  193. anon[374] • Disclaimer says:

    so what was “the real cause of ww ii”?

    didn’t see it in the first paragraph so i concluded CORRECTLY that you are a LIAR. burying the lead = FRAUD = JEW.

    sad.

    heil hitler! for real motherfucker!

    why would any say heil hitler just before his hanging?

    what did he mean by heil hitler?

    the inner truth and greatness of national socialism is still 100% ABSENT from (((unz))).

    sad.

  194. anarchyst says:
    @Olivier1973

    If there is “no such thing” as a jewish gene, why is the USA attempting to pass a law making criticism of jews a crime? Antisemitism (whatever that is) is about to become a criminal offense.

    • Replies: @Dule
  195. Odyssey says:

    Territories within the Soviet Union were crucial to Nazi plans to acquire Lebensraum, or prime “living space” for “Aryan” Germans. With continental western Europe firmly under German control, Hitler was ready for war with the Soviets in the summer of 1941. For Hitler, according to historian Wendy Lower, “the ultimate aim of this Vernichtungskrieg (war of destruction) against the Soviet Union was to make a ‘Garden of Eden’ out of the newly won territories in the East.” Germany planned to colonize western parts of the Soviet Union, especially the resource-rich lands of the Ukraine, as it had colonized the Warthegau in Poland. This would involve expelling the supposedly inferior “races” of Slavs and Jews who lived there and settling ethnic Germans in their place.

    Hitler ordered the invasion of the Soviet Union, which was code-named Operation Barbarossa, on June 22, 1941, deliberately breaking the nonaggression pact that the two countries had signed two years before. The invasion was the largest German military operation of World War II. Battle victories came quickly throughout the rest of 1941, as Germany conquered Soviet-controlled Poland, the Baltic states, and Ukraine. A month after the invasion began, Hitler described his vision for the lands Germany would conquer from the Soviet Union:

    The German colonist ought to live on handsome, spacious farms. The German services will be lodged in marvelous buildings, the governors in palaces. . . . What India was for England, the territories of Russia will be for us. If only I could make the German people understand what this space means for our future! Colonies are a precarious possession, but this ground is safely ours. Europe is not a geographic entity, it’s a racial entity.

    From the Nazis’ point of view, in order to establish Europe as a “racial entity,” Operation Barbarossa would need to be fought as a “racial war” against the Jewish and Slavic “races.” Therefore, according to historian Richard Evans, German military officers believed they “were not just officers but also leaders in a racial struggle against ‘Jewish Bolshevism [Communism].’” In May 1941, German General Erich Hoepner issued the following orders to his soldiers:

    The war against Russia is a fundamental part of the German people’s struggle for existence. It is the old struggle of the Germans against the Slavs, the defence of European culture against the Muscovite, Asiatic deluge, the defence against Jewish Bolshevism. This struggle must aim to smash the Russia of today into rubble, and as a consequence it must be carried out with unprecedented harshness.

    As a result of those orders and similar ones issued by other German generals, many Soviet prisoners of war (POWs) were shot and killed immediately after being captured, in violation of long-standing international agreements.

    • Replies: @nokangaroos
  196. Righteous Negress spills the beans.

    • Replies: @Lurker
  197. Trinity says:
    @Nat X

    Were they male or female, Fleece?

  198. This article would have been much more persuasive if it included mire photos of nazis with dogs or of german airmen with baby fox puppies they just rescued from the russian wastelands. Flying fox nazi puppies are super persuasive.

  199. @Anon

    Russia has an air base near the Syria’s international airport and a naval base in the sea port of Tartus. Russia also has over 1 million Russian citizens in Israel, so their intervention in Syria is a complicated issue. However, Israel’s genocide and aggressive moves against Iran is pushing Russia toward a closer alliance with Iran which I believe is more important than the temporary Israeli state.

  200. Lurker says:
    @The Germ Theory of Disease

    Hitler’s big mistake was not understanding that what played well in Deutschland was completely misunderstood in the Anglosphere

    And certainly nothing to do with who was mediating his message in the Anglosphere.

  201. @profnasty

    We don’t need to buy oil, we could supply our own. Our politics restricts our oil drilling.

    Hitler had lots of trouble buying things when he had the British (and then America) blocking his sea trade. When he discovered the Soviets were about to invade Hitler knew he could never resupply oil being pinched between the Soviets on the land and the U.S./Brits to the West. Deliveries simply wouldn’t get through. Hence why he launched Barbarossa when he did. It was a desperate gamble that he was forced into and almost paid off.

  202. @Odyssey

    The (Jew-engineered) Yugoslav coup d´etat cost the Wehrmacht six weeks
    (not helped by Mussolini´s idiocy), which would have meant Moscow before
    the winter; that Serbian Winkelried Complex was also on display during WWI.
    This not to say the Germans weren´t clumsy – they should have let Nedić form a
    concentration government and do his stuff (as Löhr and Rendulić demanded) but
    the Great One was too enamored of the Poglavnik.
    – As for the POWs, the USSR was deliberately a nonsignatory of the Geneva and
    Hague Conventions; they treated German POWs as criminals and their own as traitors
    but demanded combatant status and Geneva protections for their own (((kommissars)))
    and (((partisans))) (= actual war criminals) i.e. they invented the rules-based order.

    The Jewish obfuscations are coming thicker – so this is what you mean by Primal Race.

  203. @profnasty

    Stalin was too untrustworthy, as both Hitler and Mao learned.

    It’s not the US’s job to police the Eurasian landmass. We are not Team America: World Police.

  204. Lurker says:
    @Thor Walhovd

    Ah yes, those ‘nazis’ in Ukraine. They ones who die for a jewish president & clique, a jewish State Dept, a jewish Black Rock. Who have no control over any aspect of Ukrainian policy or military strategy.

    Hollywood ‘nazis’.

  205. @Levtraro

    Let me see. Google says they represent the different classes “farmers, workers, petty bourgeoisie and national bourgeoisie” working with and led by the CPC.

    I wouldn’t put too much thought into the flag. It captured symbolism important at the time it was created.

    In the same way that the US flag is a descended from the
    1. British East India Company, that was in turn based on the
    2. Pirate flags of the East Indies, that were in turn based on the flag of the
    3. Majapahit Empire.

  206. Zane says:

    ” Anti-semitism ” is a perfectly rational response to Jewish supremacism.

  207. Skeptikal says:
    @Anonymous534

    Agree.

    In the center of this author’s paradise for the German people:
    the T4 Program.

    Plenty of distortions of the WW2 narrative must be deconstructed, but this fellow is not the one to do so with any credibility.

  208. Pierre,

    What is your real name. Surely not Pierre. LM tell you it is really really great to know that Hitler and the third Reich were animal lovers. Just terrific info. How come we never heard this enlightened info before? Changes everything doesn’t it? My question is this: If the Holocaust is a lie, made up by the Jews. Why do you need to show Hitler cuddling up to animals, like a teddy bear?
    Why? We know already he did nothing wrong.

    And just my opinion. I think Hitler was a psychopath and remarkably ignorant, stupid and ill educated especially in warfare. The guy was solely responsible for the defeat of Germany, and forcing the Germans in Berlin to eat worms and defend the Fuhrer in his bunker.

    A total lunatic.

    Pierre really what is your real name?

  209. @Noviop Co-Prosperity Sphere

    Japanese Self-Defense Forces in Okinawa

    These few words are dripping with irony.

    1. Okinawa/Ryukyu/Loochoo was an independent kingdom that traded with China for thousands of years.
    2. 1850s, after participating in ravaging China during the Opium Wars, US gunboats arrive off Japanese cities.
    3. 1860s, a panicked Japan rushes to militarise and industrialise to catch up with the West
    4. 1870s, Japan learns from Western colonisers and annexes Okinawa, then later Korea.
    5. 1930s Japan invades China
    6. 1940s Japan fights USA and are defeated.
    7. 2024 Japan has “Self Defence” Forces in US + Japan occupied Okinawa in order to defend against a “Bad China”????

    WTF. you could not make up a more ironical situation if you tried.

  210. @Gott ist mit Unz

    Both the party leadership and the rank and file are pretty much 100% Han Chinese aren’t they?

    No. Ethnic minorities make up 10% of the Central Committee of the CPC. It is proportional to the population make up.

    Isn’t that Mao?

    Yes, a founding father of the modern Chinese nation. Just like Ben Franklin is on your notes. Why do you take exception at that?

    Since when did communism give up its aspirations to being international in scope?

    Your misunderstand in 2 ways:

    1. This is no longer 1950 when the fires of communist ideology was raging across the world. These days it is much more muted. Even the ever decreasing number of committed Communists themselves see weaknesses in their systems and would be the first to admit that theirs is a work in progress.

    Some people from PRC will undoubtly protest, but I will say that present day China has practically moved on from Communism. Sure, they still keep up appearances so as not to shock the system. Sure, they still hold on to socialistic ideals. But at the same time, China is now receiving back its 2000 year old Confucian ideals with open arms.

    Fortunately for the Chinese, Confucian ideals fit quite nicely with socialist ideals too…there are few contradictions. This is why the Chinese people were able to receive the communists so readily.

    It will take a few decades more before China will be comfortable enough to dispense with its “communist” facade. But eventually they will, and the CPC will become just another ruling dynasty in a long line of dynasties.

    2. The Chinese are inherently inward looking. They do not have the same Abrahamic ideal of spreading their ideology/beliefs to other peoples. I come from a place that is in between China and the West. My region has been trading with China for 2 millenia, and I can tell you that the West, and particularly the USA is FAR FAR FAR more pushy and preachy about their belief systems than are the Chinese.

    I’m in favor of people wanting to maintain their ethnic purity.

    If one scratches below the surface of Han Chinese ethnicity, they would find something very interesting. I explain:

    The Han take their name from the Han dynasty that existed roughly 200BC to 200AD. It was considered one of the golden ages of the Chinese, and immediately followed the tumultuous time of China’s formation as a unified polity around 250BC.

    The Han dynasty ruled over a country that was made up of many disparate peoples who spoke different languages and had different customs. Even today, the different Han languages such as Taiwanese and Cantonese and Mandarin can be as different as English from German from Swedish……yet they all consider themselves Han.

    The key to understanding Han “ethnicity” is to see that the Han dynasty existed at the same time as the Roman Republic and Empire….and was roughly the same size. Whereas the Roman Empire eventually fell apart, the Chinese polity continued in essentially the same form till today.

    So imagine that the Roman Empire never fell apart and exists today. Then people would not be calling themselves English or French or Italian or Spanish or Egyptian or Syrian…..They would all be calling themselves simply “Roman”.

    Now that is what it is to be be Han.

    When different cultures are held together long enough, they eventually meld. It might take 2000 years tho…LOL

  211. @Levtraro

    What can I say? The Chinese are a practical people.

  212. @CelestiaQuesta

    we wouldn’t be surrounded by mass migration replacement, Zionist monopolies or magic negroism.

    That would certainly be true.

    But the problem is, that the same ideology if kept pure, would have insisted that only Amerindians remain on the Americas.

    Then what? We would have to dumb down or corrupt the ideology in order to justify the presence of the non-Amerindians?

    England would be pretty densely populated if its population increased to 300 million from those returning from the Americas and Australia, S Africa etc.

  213. j2 says:
    @c matt

    ” Hitler’s basic mistake was the racial doctrine.

    You completely misunderstand his “doctrine.” His “doctrine” was that races exist, are real, and exhibit real differences. This is irrefutable fact – otherwise, Somalia would look no different than Switzerland. His doctrine was to keep Switzerland Swiss, Somalia Somali, etc. regardless of whether you consider Switzerland or Somalia superior (although I notice migration goes overwhelmingly one way).”

    You are correct that there are human races and they exhibit real differences. These main races have been created by separation over a long time because of geographic distance. You are also correct that Hitler thought that each race should live at the place where it originated, but you do not see what this idea means. According to this idea Middle Eastern should live in the Middle East and not in Europe. And because of this Hitler wanted to move Jews from Europe to the Middle East, Palestine exactly, because Hitler thought that Jews originate in Palestine and should live there. As Jews did not want to move to Palestine, they had to be pushed there. That is what Hitler did and this was exactly what Zionists wanted and the result that Zionists and Hitler wanted is that Jews move to Palestine and create Israel. Today there is Israel and there is an endless conflict between Jews and Palestinians, who actually originally lived in Palestine. Do you now see the error in Hitler’s idea?

    When some population from some area has already moved to another area and lived there for hundreds of years, it cannot any more return to the original area without creating a conflict there. Populations in any given area should assimilate. There would be much less problems with e.g. Muslims if they would assimilate and adopt the European culture if they live in an European country. Only culture (like religion, ideology etc.) set barriers to mixing of the populations. With all animals races do not compete when they live in the same area because races, unlike species, can mix genetically. Individuals compete for the best mates. In social animals, like chimps, a small group at times competes against another small group, but there small groups have about 5-10 males only. There are no racial wars.

    Races in animal populations are in separate areas. They do not have racial competition because they do not meet. If several racial groups for some temporary reason are in the same area, they mix genes. If some close by species are in the same area, they cannot effectively mix genetically, they compete and only one of the species prevails. But this is not the case with races. Races can remain separate in the same area only by artificially separating them by human made barriers. For humans these barriers are cultural and religious.

    The wrong idea that racial mixing lowers genetic fitness is not correct, because individuals do compete for mates. Only the best of another racial group will manage to find a mate from the other racial group because individuals from different races do not fit to the image the perfect mate of a given group. Fot a long time two races living in the same area will stay separate because the individuals from both populations will typically prefer members of their own population as mates: they fit to the beauty image that this population has. But given some hundred years the populations mix and the mixture comes only from those individuals who passed as good mates. This is why admixture does not lower the gene pool of either population.

    What Jews should have done in Europe is to admix with the local population and forget their own culture and religion. But Jews did not do that. What Hitler should have understood is that transporting Jews as it was done would not solve the Jewish problem. It would create a bigger problem. Transporting Jews as pro-Zionists, with great hardships and many deaths, would create the myth of the Holocaust to be used against Europeans. Moving Jews to Palestine would create a very long time Israel-Palestine conflict. Finally, Hitler using Germany to push Jews to Palestine would cause German defeat and destruction because Germany was not strong enough to make a war against Western Europe, Soviet Union and the USA. If Hitler so thought, he was a fool. But I doubt he thought so: he transported Jews to East and if it caused Germany to be destroyed, so what. The fittest survive.

    This all comes from the racial idea that each race should live in the place where it originated and if more races happen to live in the same area because of some historical reason, they should not mix: only one race should be left to this area and the other reces should be transported to the areas where they came from. This is wrong. This is a receipt for a catastrophe. This was the receipt for the WWII and the destruction of the loses of that war. This is a very stupid idea. Hitler thought in this way.

    Different races in the same area should be left to be. They will admix in a very long time. Only, one should see that no races try to dominate the other ones. But there is no good reason to import other races to any area.

  214. @Mr_Chow_Mein

    ..YOU sound like a paid, Russian Troll…!

  215. werpor says:
    @Derer

    All of the belligerents were preparing for war — including the Soviet Union — throughout the 1930s.

    Stalin moved almost all the Soviet Union’s industries east of the Urals in the 1930s — Stalin, only in the sense Stalin was leader. The Politbureau as early as 1921 was driving for industrialization. Read Eisenhower’s biography. The U.S. was preparing for war in the 1930s. Read Churchill’s Biography. England was preparing for War in the 1930s. Likewise France, certainly focusing on defense. Japan anticipating War, built up their forces in the 1930s. And of course Germany too was preparing. Mussolini in Italy was preparing.

    The inter-war interregnum was a preparation for war. Germany was no different. The money interests were priming the potential antagonists encouraging the massive expenditures and the borrowings.

    Hitler had the right idea about the Jews. The Jews wanted war. If that sounds provocative to some ears it is only because they do not know their history. The world in the 1920s and 1930s was primed for war. Few wanted war but all well understood the dictum that the best defense was/is thought to be as a rule, offence. Every leader of every eventual belligerent was in the 1930s preparing for war. Not only Adolph Hitler.

    One of the best books I ever read “The Arms of Krupp” should be on every pundits reading list. The historical background quickly sidelines the casual interpreter of the good guy-bad guy narrative. Aside from the main narrative he references hundreds of sources. The photograph of Krupps works in Essen almost stagger the mind. Krupp thought the German military would prefer his steel cannon to their bronze cannons. Of Krupp owed huge sums to his bankers. He resorted to selling steel cannons to countries all around the world. Krupp armaments were used by the North in the Civil War.

    There is no topic like Hitler to bring out the half baked theories about his rise and fall. Start with The Arms of Krupp. Was Manchester unbiased? He published the book in 1968. I have read more than a thousand biographies and autobiographies and histories. None of them are unbiased. It is a plain simple fact that it impossible to be unbiased. Perhaps today his book would be less severe.

    Conducting a nations business is done in the dark. Unless an author has written what he thinks before he acts, it is a mugs game attributing his subjects decisions to what his biographer concluded his subject might have thought. Whatever drove Hitler once he rose to power we have his own words to fall back on. One certain thing he was provocative. He threatened the banking hegemony. He threatened Churchill’s idea of Empire and Churchills mistaken view of English power. We have Churchill’s own letters written before the war.

    Aside: We have Abrahams Lincoln’s letters, and speeches he gave before the Civil War.

    We have the speeches leaders gave before the wars they engaged. I would say Hitler had every justification for preparing Germany for war. Here’s a guess: All of encounter life more or less unprepared for the roles we play. We have no idea how treacherous others can be. Ordinary pettiness is amplified a thousand fold under duress. Hitler wanted to right the wrongs of Versailles. He blamed the money lenders for the outcome of the Armistice. …Which some might agree with Hitler was intolerable.

    He rode the momentum of his times and galvanized a depressed nations latent energies. His successes put the fear of God into those who became his adversaries. Was Hitler naïve? Was Churchill naïve?

    President Wilson was certainly a naïve dupe. He was suckered. He was way out of his depth. He was managed by the usual suspects which led to the U.S. fighting Germans in WW I.

    Another interesting book is Benjamin Anderson’s Economics and the Public Welfare: A Financial and Economic History of the United States 1914 — 1946. His argument against Keynes in a chapter devoted to it — alone is well worth the price.

  216. Levtraro says:
    @tamberlint

    Me:

    The four little stars in the Chinese flag represent the proletariat, the peasants, the petite bourgeoisie, and the bourgeoisie (same groups as in the Western world), and the large star is the CCP.

    tamberlint:

    I disagree

    Lol! Who should I believe, a random guy on the internets or the Chinese officials that explained exactly that to me when I was on business in Shanghai last month?

    What is really interesting is that from the very beginning of the conquest of the State by the CCP in 1949, they thought of themselves as coordinating not just the proletariat and the peasants, but also the petite bourgeoisie and the bourgeoisie. This means Chinese communists always had the project of ruling over a capitalist economy. That project was delayed by fanatics (Cultural Revolution) and then after Mao died, Deng corrected the course.

  217. @Pierre Simon

    I consider it being lazy to base your argument on a potpourri of articles from the internet that you did not even bother to provide links to.

    https://www.takimag.com/article/the-ultimate-jq-religion-or-race/

    https://ihr.org/journal/v19n2p63_weber.html

    https://www.takimag.com/article/the-ultimate-jq-religion-or-race/

    https://www.unz.com/estriker/new-documentary-sheds-light-on-israels-strict-prohibitions-on-interracial-marriage/

    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2018/7/26/israels-nation-state-law-parallels-the-nazi-nuremberg-laws/

    I did not read these articles, I only scanned them. Even if I had, whatever I thought I had read I could not really debate because you could just later say that isn’t what you meant.

    In any case, I think obsessing about some genetic strings is far to narrow a definition of what “Jewish” means, and besides, far too many Jews are obsessed about this and are busy obfuscating the topic to make it worth my time.

    I instead focus on other defining Jewish characteristics, such as who considers themselves to be Jewish. Ivanka Trump is a good case here. Let us assume that Trump is not “Jewish” (a point I won’t concede), then by Jewish law all her children could never be Jews. But Ivanka Trump is clearly a Yenta bimbo of the first order.

    Or take, say Nathanael Ratner, who likely shows as 100% Jewish genetically. I would not consider him to be a “Jew”.

    So if I use this yard stick to measure Putin’s “Jewishness”, I have some data points to triangulate from:

    – His mother was very likely at least partly Jewish and almost certainly has some “Jewish” DNA
    – He has LOTS of close Jewish associates, including Chabbad Lubowitzers
    – He passed “holocaust” restricted speech legislation, but never discusses the Gulag
    – He worked for the KGB
    – He is constantly spread lies about “Nazis”
    – He covers up the crimes of the Red Army and their Komissars
    – He minimizes the Jewishness of the Bolshevics and the Russian Revolution
    – He never really criticizes Israel, nor does he do anything about their ongoing war crimes or crimes against humanity

    I could go on, but I am sure you get point.

    So yes, I think Putin is more “Jewish” than many “Jews” living in occupied Palestine.

  218. Dule says:
    @Pierre Simon

    The key point of the scientific findings that you cite is: “According to Jewish journalist”.

  219. Dule says:
    @anarchyst

    Does this criminal offence refers to all descendants of the biblical Set or only some of them?

  220. Pheasant says:

    ‘Adolf Hitler’s notorious love of animals was ridiculed’

    Editor.

  221. Pheasant says:

    ‘Hitler’s goal was a “Europe of Nations”[14] based on race and similar to the Roman Empire when it was all powerful and not yet eviscerated by Christianity and race mixing. According to Belgian politician Léon Degrelle, one of Hitler’s most brilliant soldiers,[15]
    the Führer wanted a pan-European union with freedom of movement within it, but restricted to the people who are part of the European gene pool. ‘

    There is perhaps some evidence for this but there is more evidence for Hitler being a German(ic) chauvanist. National Socialist Germany began asking non-Germans to leave Germany in 1934 and whilst this could be put down to economic strains Hitler’s comments about lebensraum in the east and his punishment of German women who slept with French and Polish laborours during the war point to Hitler favouring German exceptionalism not European integration.

  222. Dule says:
    @c matt

    “His doctrine was to keep Switzerland Swiss, Somalia Somali, etc.”
    Possibly, but with a few ‘minor’ exceptions. He was planning to turn Russia, Ukraine and Belarus into a German land, witj just a fraction of the indigenous population remaining to serve the superhuman German settlers. The rest of the Slavs would be either killed or expelled to Siberia. Likewise, the Croatian Ustashe of the ‘Independent state of Croatia’ officially proclaimed that their plan was to kill 1/3 of the Serbs who lived there, expell another 1/3, and convert to the catholic fate the remaining 1/3 (recall, for a millenium Serbs have been ortodox Christians). The first part of the plan was accomplished in the period 1941-45 and the second in 1992-95, albeit only in the present day Croatia as in Bosnia&Herzegovina Serbs resisted and managed to survive in the Republic of Sroska. The last part was to a large extend accomplished by the Yugoslavian communists of J. B. Tito who did their best to destroy the Serbian ortodox church. To their dismay, when they thought that the work had been done, there came the Serbian national revival of the late 1980’s and early 90’s.

Current Commenter
says:

Leave a Reply -


 Remember My InformationWhy?
 Email Replies to my Comment
$
Submitted comments have been licensed to The Unz Review and may be republished elsewhere at the sole discretion of the latter
Commenting Disabled While in Translation Mode
Subscribe to This Comment Thread via RSS Subscribe to All Pierre Simon Comments via RSS
PastClassics
Analyzing the History of a Controversial Movement
The Surprising Elements of Talmudic Judaism
The evidence is clear — but often ignored
The JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks?
The Shaping Event of Our Modern World